Also searched: millage, mill rate, property tax rate (same meaning as “tax rate”).
Motions and votes (13)
From the City's minutes: what was moved, who voted, and the result.
-
7 2. (a) Review of the FY 2017 Millage options and Approve Resolution No. 2016-92, tentatively adopting a proposed millage rate of 5.9790 miMotion at the City Council meeting of 2016-09-06 (vote 3): approve Resolution No. 2016-92, tentatively adopting a proposed millage rate of 5.9790 mills, for the City of Cocoa Fiscal Year, commencing October 1, 2016 and ending on September 30, 2017 Agenda item: 7 2. (a) Review of the FY 2017 Millage options and Approve Resolution No. 2016-92, tentatively adopting a proposed millage rate of 5.9790 mills, for the City of Cocoa Fiscal Year, commencing October 1, 2016 and : _ & ending on September 30, 2017. (16-378) Result: CARRIED 4-0 Moved by Brenda Warner; seconded by Mike Blake. Voted yes: Henry Parrish III, Don Boisvert, Mike Blake, Brenda Warner Recorded as unanimous.
-
Conduct a Public Hearing on the Tentative Millage Rate and Tentative FY24 Budget and Adopt Resolution No. 2023-093 adopting a tentative millMotion at the City Council meeting of 2023-09-12 (vote 5): Adopt Resolution No. 2023-093 adopting a tentative millage rate of 6.9532 mills, for the City of Cocoa, commencing on October 1, 2023 and ending on September 30, 2024 Agenda item: Conduct a Public Hearing on the Tentative Millage Rate and Tentative FY24 Budget and Adopt Resolution No. 2023-093 adopting a tentative millage rate of 6.9532 mills, for the City of Cocoa, commencing on October 1, 2023 and ending on September 30, 2024; Adopt Resolution No. 2023-094 adopting the FY2024 tentative budget and CIP for the City of Cocoa Fiscal Year, commencing on October 1, 2023 and end Result: CARRIED 4-1 Moved by Mike Blake; seconded by Alex Goins. Voted yes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Herbert "Rip" Dyal, Alex Goins Voted no: Lorraine Koss
-
1. Conduct a Public Hearing on the Tentative Millage Rate and the Tentative FY2026 Budget and Adopt Resolution No. 2025-62, adopting a tentaMotion at the City Council meeting of 2025-09-16 (vote 2): adopt Resolution No. 2025-62 adopting a tentative millage rate of 6.9532 mills for the City of Cocoa, commencing on October 1, 2025, and ending September 20, 2026, for discussion Agenda item: 1. Conduct a Public Hearing on the Tentative Millage Rate and the Tentative FY2026 Budget and Adopt Resolution No. 2025-62, adopting a tentative millage rate of 6.9532 mills for the City of Cocoa, commencing on October 1, 2025, and ending September 20, 2026; and Adopt Resolution No. 2025 -63, adopting the FY2026 tentative budget and CIP for the City of Cocoa Fiscal Year, commencing on October 1, 2 Result: CARRIED 3-2 Moved by Mike Blake; seconded by Alex Goins. Voted yes: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn Voted no: Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks
-
Vi. Public Hearings: a Conduct a Public Hearing on the Final Millage Rate and Adopting the FY24 Budget and: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-101 adMotion at the City Council meeting of 2023-09-26 (vote 3): Adopt Resolution No. 2023-101 adopting the final millage rate of 6.9532 mills, for the City of Cocoa, commencing on October 1, 2023 and ending on September 30, 2024, which is 19.3% over the rolled-back rate of 5.8285, for discussion Agenda item: Vi. Public Hearings: a Conduct a Public Hearing on the Final Millage Rate and Adopting the FY24 Budget and: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-101 adopting a final millage rate of 6.9532 mills, for the City of Cocoa, commencing on October 1, 2023 and ending on September 30, 2024; and Adopt Resolution No. 2023-102 adopting the FY2024 Budget and CIP for the City of Cocoa Fiscal Year, commencing on October 1, Result: CARRIED 4-1 Moved by Mike Blake; seconded by Herbert "Rip" Dyal. Voted yes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Herbert "Rip" Dyal, Alex Goins Voted no: Lorraine Koss
-
1. Approve Resolution No. 2019-063, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, Adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate and set the date, time, and pMotion at the City Council meeting of 2019-07-24 (vote 7): _ to adopt a millage rate at 5.9790 for Fiscal Year 2020, setting the First Public Hearing for September 11, 2019 and adopting the rolled back rate Agenda item: 1. Approve Resolution No. 2019-063, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, Adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2020 Budget. (19-328) Result: CARRIED 5-0 Moved by Don Boisvert; seconded by Alex Goins. Voted yes: Jake Williams Jr., Brenda Warner, Don Boisvert, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss Recorded as unanimous.
Show 8 more
-
approve the proposed millage rate at 6.9532 millsMotion at the City Council meeting of 2023-07-25 (vote 12): approve the proposed millage rate at 6.9532 mills Result: CARRIED 4-1 Moved by Mike Blake; seconded by Lavander Hearn. Voted yes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Herbert "Rip" Dyal, Alex Goins Voted no: Lorraine Koss
-
1. Approve Resolution No. 2018-048 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a Tentative Proposed Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and pMotion at the City Council meeting of 2018-07-10 (vote 5): ! / approve Resolution No. 2018-048 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and place for the : first Public Hearing to consider the FY2019 Budget Agenda item: 1. Approve Resolution No. 2018-048 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a Tentative Proposed Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2019 Budget. (18-281) Result: CARRIED 5-0 Moved by Clarence Whipple Jr.; seconded by Don Boisvert. Voted yes: Henry Parrish III, Jeri Blanco, Don Boisvert, Brenda Warner, Clarence Whipple Jr. Recorded as unanimous.
-
4. Approve Resolution No. 2018-051 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and pMotion at the City Council meeting of 2018-07-24 (vote 7): approve Resolution No. 2018-051 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2019 Budget Agenda item: 4. Approve Resolution No. 2018-051 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2019 Budget. (18-304) Result: CARRIED 5-0 Moved by Jeri Blanco; seconded by Clarence Whipple Jr.. Voted yes: Henry Parrish III, Jeri Blanco, Don Boisvert, Brenda Warner, Clarence Whipple Jr. Recorded as unanimous.
-
F a 4. Approve Resolution No. 2017-64 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a 7 4 Proposed Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and placMotion at the City Council meeting of 2017-07-11 (vote 8): approve Resolution No. 2017-64 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a Proposed Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2018 Budget Agenda item: F a 4. Approve Resolution No. 2017-64 establishing the Rolled-back Rate, adopt a 7 4 Proposed Millage Rate, and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2018 Budget. (17-299) Result: CARRIED 5-0 Moved by Don Boisvert; seconded by Brenda Warner. Voted yes: Henry Parrish III, Don Boisvert, Jeri Blanco, Brenda Warner, Clarence Whipple Jr. Recorded as unanimous.
-
1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of NotificationMotion at the City Council meeting of 2025-07-22 (vote 6): approve the Proposed Millage rate at 6.9532 Agenda item: 1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification to the Taxpayers by the Brevard County Property Appraiser and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2026 Budget. It is also recommended that the City Manager be instructed to complete the Florida Department of Revenue’s C Result: CARRIED 3-2 Moved by Mike Blake; seconded by Lavander Hearn. Voted yes: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn Voted no: Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss
-
5. Approve Resolution No. 2026-053, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification to tMotion at the City Council meeting of 2026-07-28 (vote 10): approve a Proposed Millage Rate of 6.9532 Agenda item: 5. Approve Resolution No. 2026-053, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification to the Taxpayers by the Brevard County Property Appraiser and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2027 Budget. It is also recommended for the City Manager to be instructed to complete the Florida Department of Revenue’s Cer Result: CARRIED 3-2 Moved by Mike Blake; seconded by Alex Goins. Voted yes: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn Voted no: Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks
-
1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of NotificationMotion at the City Council meeting of 2025-07-22 (vote 4): approve a Proposed Millage Rate of 6.85, for discussion Agenda item: 1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification to the Taxpayers by the Brevard County Property Appraiser and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2026 Budget. It is also recommended that the City Manager be instructed to complete the Florida Department of Revenue’s C Result: FAILED 2-3 Moved by Patricia Weeks; seconded by Lorraine Koss. Voted yes: Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss Voted no: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn
-
2. Approve Resolution No. 2020-175, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate and set the date, time, and pMotion at the City Council meeting of 2020-07-22 (vote 4): approve Resolution No. 2020-175, establishing the Rolled-Back Rate of 5.8247 mils, to adopt the proposed tentative Millage Rate of 5.979 mils and to set the first public hearing date for September 9, 2020 at 6pm in Council Chambers, 65 Stone St., Cocoa, FL 32922 Agenda item: 2. Approve Resolution No. 2020-175, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, adopt a Proposed Tentative Millage Rate and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2021 Budget. (20-400) Result: CARRIED 5-0 Moved by Alex Goins; seconded by Lorraine Koss. Voted yes: Jake Williams Jr., Alex Goins, Don Boisvert, Lorraine Koss, Brenda Warner Recorded as unanimous.
What was said at meetings (12)
Machine transcription of the recordings: provisional and mostly not checked against the audio. It can show that something was said; it cannot establish a vote, an amount or an outcome.
-
[…] Speaker 7: “And so I'd ask you to read that at your, at your leisure. Uh,” Attribution uncertain: “the,” Speaker 7: “the presentation really just takes what's in the budget message and presents it to you in a PowerPoint and graphic form. Uh,” […] Attribution uncertain: “uh,” […] Speaker 7: “the budget on tax rates. And so hopefully in an effort to clear up a lot of the misconception, uh, that is out there with regards to what the tax rate is. And we'll get to that later in the meeting. And so we're just going to take you through, uh, the budget presentation. Um, you guys set the tentative millage back in August. Uh,” […] “And September 24, 26 is the, uh,” Attribution uncertain: “uh,” Speaker 7: “final hearing on the budget there.” Attribution uncertain: “And” Speaker 7: “so Mrs. Bowman is going to start off and I'll jump in, uh, like I normally do.” […]
-
[…] “We also gave you a listing of projects that you could spend the fund balances on.” […] “Mrs. Dolphin in her correction of the editorial, the fund balances are the current fiscal year and really have nothing to do with the tax rate increase that's proposed. The tax rate increase that's proposed is specifically so that you can give pay raises to staff and most particularly to those union members as we negotiated them. And so” […] “does fund salary increases for the proposed fiscal year. The fact that the number that is the fund balance for capital is comparable is just merely coincidental or really has nothing to do with it. We are funding capital.” […] “your capital with fund balances and we are funding capital with fund balances. So, and then there, the other issue of a $24 million discrepancy.” […]
-
[…] Speaker 14: “instance of the, uh, Walmart distribution center there, there's a tax abatement associated with that.” […] “to the, uh, Walmart distribution center. Everybody in Florida, um, um, that's a part of a city,” Attribution uncertain: “a” Speaker 14: “part of a county, they pay, uh, the same tax rate. And so there's no difference in the tax rate, uh, that a city or a county can apply to all properties.” […] “Um, and you saw that in the examples that I sent to you guys the other day, you can live right next door to someone and your house is built in the exact same year and you can have totally different exemptions based on your personal circumstances. Generally in Florida, uh, uh, the, the two base exemptions are, I'll call them are the homestead exemptions, the first 25 and then the second 25.” […]
-
[…] Speaker 7: “So this is a public hearing. And at this point in time, I would like to announce” […] “is the taxing authority. The rollback rate is 5.9866 mills.” […] “of the rollback rate. And if you recall, rollback rate is the tax rate taking out new construction that would get us to the same revenue that we collected last year. The millage rate at this hearing is 6.4532 mills to be levied, which is, as the mayor noted, same as the current year tax rate.” […] “adopting the tentative millage rate of 6.4532 mills” […] “commencing on October 1st, 2022, and ending on September 30th, 2023. So at this time, public comment, and then council will need to take a motion.” Speaker 1: “Okay.” Attribution uncertain: “Do” Speaker 1: “you have any questions from Mrs. Bowman, first and foremost? I mean, we've been at workshops, et cetera, et cetera.” […]
-
[…] “So that was a welcome increase.” […] “with the other cities. Um, so what we do when we develop the budget and we start discussing millage rates is we see what other cities are doing. And this slide shows you, um, the comparison of the city of Coco compared to the other cities in Brevard County. And we're kind of in the middle at 6.4532 mills that is ranked based on the proposed millage rates. Um, of no Titusville. Is increasing their property tax rate. Um, Coco beach. And Melbourne are both increasing their property tax rate above what they had the previous year. Um, Cape Canaveral, um, is actually going with a rollback rate. Uh, which is kind of a surprise and Rockledge is going down. Um, so what this slide demonstrates to you is that each city is unique with their challenges that they have with where they want to go.” […]
Show 7 more
-
[…] Speaker 2: “And so again, if, if they're not telling us about it, if you're not telling us about it, then most of the time we're not made aware of that until it is on social media or until you make an appearance here. Um, they provide the routine day to day maintenance and the, and there's a, there's a, there's a,” Attribution uncertain: “an” Speaker 2: “exhibit that has a level of service or standards that they're supposed to meet. Um, and, and again, they,” […] “They fund the maintenance and staffing for the, uh, for the district. They're responsible for the tax rate. So the, the tax rate that's associated with the district is approved by the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners. They schedule, they reserve, uh, the facilities, they collect the fees, they retain whatever fees, um, they, uh, contract and pay the maintenance for 5,000 or less.” […]
-
[…] “on their house bill 7063 where they want you to expend or spend down your excess reserve funds” […] “restricted accounts or special revenue accounts or funds and I don't think this you know those who wrote or authored the bill understand that our special revenue funds are not like the state's trust funds, where you can just spend that money you know in lieu of you know raising taxes or maintaining your tax rate house bill 753 senate bill 1018 contaminate site cleanup talks about you know advancing some costs for the purposes of remediation advanced cleanup of sites but more so as it relates to our city as you know we've used the brownfields program fairly effectively using the brownfields program on the current or the future fire station” […]
-
[…] “And so just to recap what the rollback rate is, this is a technical explanation that says allows government's growth in revenue by excluding new construction from the calculation and keeps the taxpayers paying the same taxes as they did in the previous year.” […] “a term that applies to the property tax rate as it changes year over year in relation to the property values. So essentially a rollback rate, excluding new construction, will get you back to collecting the same amount of taxes that you collected in a prior year, even though maybe you have inflationary issues or salary union negotiations going on and cost of everything's going up. So that is an option that council has. So at this point in time, I would like for council to approve” […]
-
[…] “And hopefully, as our housing improves, that will be a more desirable thing to do, because I think that we'll have a stronger workforce that way. And then I'll throw one out for Alec. Last week, I went to the Titusville Tree Workshop, and I would love to see us have one of those. In fact, what they're doing is rewriting their tree ordinance so that they, you know, really begin to appreciate and keep their heritage trees so that they do an inventory of their canopy so that they can effectively use it for stormwater management.” […] “so that we're actually looking towards storm preparedness. And so I'm glad we, you know, voted on the tax rate tonight, and hopefully that will go through so we can accomplish some things.” […]
-
[…] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice: “assessment program in each year. We can also add potential expenses or potential revenues and create a number of different scenarios for you all. So at this point, I'll turn it back to the city, and I can entertain any questions or requests.” No voice detected: “Thank you. Thank you.” Speaker 3: “Yes. So at this time, it's opened up to city council. This is as Pete had mentioned, this is an interactive model. So if you have an interest and want to see that impact projected over a 10-year timeframe, we can go ahead and do that at this time.” Speaker 2: “Yeah, so I was just wondering the tax rate and value increase that goes of course, we have that we did last year, this year, and then” […] Attribution uncertain: “What” Speaker 2: “is that based on the last 10 years, or” […]
-
[…] “So, you look, if it's at $50,000 less than $25,000 exemption, you might be looking at about $1, $52 or so actual increase in their property taxes for next year. Keep in mind, we are only able,” […] “Obviously, the CPI is” […] “that” […] “and I think a lot of citizens want to know, well, where do we compare to other municipalities in terms of our ad alarm taxes or our property taxes? We rank number seventh.” […] “And you can see here, and this is based on these rankings are based on the proposed rates for all of our respective or sister jurisdictions. And you can see there is one community that is actually proposing a pretty sizable tax increase over its current tax rate, let alone the rollback rate.” […] “Number eight.” […]
-
[…] “And so our budget is not going to be as robust, as a, as the county that has, I forget how many budget analysts,” […] “county, because this is the lawful process that's prescribed by Florida statutes and” […] “This process can be no different. If you were to talk about the tax rate and the budget together, you would we you would receive a non-compliance notification from the trim office there. And that's never fun. That may cause you to have to redo the process all over again. And so so it's a matter of state law that the process is the way that it is. Again, in terms of the budget, property insurance increase, parks increase,” […] “the pay raises as health insurance There is uh other insurance that increases in this budget there.” […]
Documents (10)
Minutes, agendas and agenda packets, section by section, with the page.
-
Planning & Zoning 5-6-26PROPERTY TAX COMPARABLES PER ROOM Source: Brevard County Assessor Number Amounts Per Room of Rooms REAL PROPERTY PERSONAL TOTAL Tax rates are based on the city and county budgets, which change annually. The following table shows changes in the tax rate during the last several years. REAL PROPERTY PERSONAL PROPERTY YEAR MILLAGE RATE MILLAGE RATE 2021 13.2060 13.2060 2022 12.2524 12.2524 2023 12.6500 12.6500 2024 12.3260 12.3260 PROPERTY TAX RATE Source: Brevard County Assessor Based on comparable assessments and the tax rate information, the proposed subject property's projected property tax expense levels are calculated as follows. PROJECTION OF INCOME & EXPENSE (CONTINUED)
-
CC_Reg_Packet_07_13_2021Table of Contents Income tax expense Income tax expense was $142.8 million in 2014 , com pared to $62.7 million in 2013 . The effective income tax rate, expressed by calculating income tax expense or benefit as a percentage of income before income taxes, was 36.8% and 32.1% for 2014 and 2013 , respectively. For 2014 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, including current year state income tax credits. For 2013 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, including current year state income tax credits and an adjustment to deferred state income taxes due to changes in […]
-
CC_Reg_Packet_11_09_2021Table of Contents Income tax expense Income tax expense was $142.8 million in 2014 , com pared to $62.7 million in 2013 . The effective income tax rate, expressed by calculating income tax expense or benefit as a percentage of income before income taxes, was 36.8% and 32.1% for 2014 and 2013 , respectively. For 2014 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, including current year state income tax credits. For 2013 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, including current year state income tax credits and an adjustment to deferred state income taxes due to changes in […]
-
CC_Reg_Packet_07_13_2021[…] consiste d of the following: The reconciliation between the statutory tax rate expressed as a percentage of income before income ta xes and the effective tax rate is as follows: The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to the net deferred income tax liability is presented below: (in millions) Years Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 Current: Federal $ 206.8 $ 96.7 $ 110.3 State 19.3 10.1 8.0 Foreign 5.8 4.6 5.1 Total current 231.9 111.4 123.4 Deferred: Domestic (89.0 ) (48.6 ) (56.2 ) Foreign (0.1 ) (0.1 ) (0.1 ) Total deferred (89.1 ) (48.7 ) (56.3 ) Income tax expense $ 142.8 $ 62.7 $ 67.1 (dollars in millions) Years Ended December 31, 2014 2013 […]
-
CC_Reg_Packet_11_09_2021[…] consiste d of the following: The reconciliation between the statutory tax rate expressed as a percentage of income before income ta xes and the effective tax rate is as follows: The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to the net deferred income tax liability is presented below: (in millions) Years Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 Current: Federal $ 206.8 $ 96.7 $ 110.3 State 19.3 10.1 8.0 Foreign 5.8 4.6 5.1 Total current 231.9 111.4 123.4 Deferred: Domestic (89.0 ) (48.6 ) (56.2 ) Foreign (0.1 ) (0.1 ) (0.1 ) Total deferred (89.1 ) (48.7 ) (56.3 ) Income tax expense $ 142.8 $ 62.7 $ 67.1 (dollars in millions) Years Ended December 31, 2014 2013 […]
Show 5 more
-
CC_Reg_Packet_07_13_2021[…] unamortized deferred financing costs related to the previous facility. Income tax expense Income tax expense was $67.1 million in 2012, compared to $11.2 million in 2011. The effective income tax rate was 36.0% and 39.7% for 2012 and 2011, respectively. Table of Contents For 2012, the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to favorable adjustments to state tax credits which are partially offset by the unfavorable impact of adjustments to deferred taxes due to changes in state tax laws and permanent differences. For 2011, the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the unfavorable impact of permanent differences offset by a benefit for state income taxes. The lower […]
-
CC_Reg_Packet_11_09_2021[…] unamortized deferred financing costs related to the previous facility. Income tax expense Income tax expense was $67.1 million in 2012, compared to $11.2 million in 2011. The effective income tax rate was 36.0% and 39.7% for 2012 and 2011, respectively. Table of Contents For 2012, the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to favorable adjustments to state tax credits which are partially offset by the unfavorable impact of adjustments to deferred taxes due to changes in state tax laws and permanent differences. For 2011, the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the unfavorable impact of permanent differences offset by a benefit for state income taxes. The lower […]
-
CC_Reg_Packet_07_13_2021[…] debt, adjusted for the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs. Income tax expense Income tax expense was $62.7 million in 2013 , comp ared to $67.1 million in 2012 . The effective income tax rate was 32.1% and 36.0% for 2013 and 2012 , respectively. For 2013 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, including current year state income tax credits and an adjustment to deferred state income taxes due to changes in apportionment factors. For 2012 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to favorable adjustments to state tax credits which were partially offset by the unfavorable impact of adjustments to deferred […]
-
CC_Reg_Packet_11_09_2021[…] debt, adjusted for the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs. Income tax expense Income tax expense was $62.7 million in 2013 , comp ared to $67.1 million in 2012 . The effective income tax rate was 32.1% and 36.0% for 2013 and 2012 , respectively. For 2013 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, including current year state income tax credits and an adjustment to deferred state income taxes due to changes in apportionment factors. For 2012 , the effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to favorable adjustments to state tax credits which were partially offset by the unfavorable impact of adjustments to deferred […]
-
CC_Reg_Packet_11_12_2024[…] following 12-month period beginning January 1, by adjusting 1401 the tax rate of 4.6 9.2 cents per gallon by the percentage 1402 change in the average of the Consumer Price Index issued by the 1403 United States Department of Labor for the most recent 12-month 1404 period ending September 30, compared to the base year average, 1405 which is the average for the 12-month period ending September 1406 30, 2013. 1407 b. Before January 1, 2027, and each year thereafter, the 1408 department shall determine the tax rate applicable to the sale 1409 of natural gas fuel, rounded to the nearest tenth of a cent, for 1410 the following 12-month period beginning January 1, by adjusting 1411 the tax rate […]
City facts, calendar and news (5)
The City's published budget, rates, election facts, calendar, news and the roster of seats.
-
Two parks and a tax rate[…] Rios Martinez Park, repairs at Stradley Park and the FY2027 tax rate, from a 3–2 split in July to a final rate the chair announced as unanimous. Updated with the August minutes. This article covers City of Cocoa records from 26 April 2021 to 13 October 2026. Council minutes, signed or in draft, run through the meeting of 25 August 2026. [ Draft minutes, 11 Aug 2026 (packet of 13 Oct 2026, p. 11) ; Draft minutes, 25 Aug 2026 (packet of 13 Oct 2026, p. 37) ] For 8, 9, 22 and 23 September and 13 October the archive holds agendas or packets and recordings, but no minutes. [ Meeting page, 8 Sep 2026 ; Meeting page, 9 Sep […]
-
Two parks and a tax rate[…] ; Minutes, 19 May 2026, p. 7 ] July: the tax rate At a budget workshop on 7 July the City’s consultant, Stantec, recommended no millage rate increase, a 3%
-
Two parks and a tax rate[…] then “stated that if Council goes back to the rolled-back rate then the cuts should come from Districts 3 and 4.” [ Draft minutes, 28 Jul 2026 (packet of 22 Sep 2026, p. 21) ] Whitten said it “would not be fair or ethical for him to decide which Districts are going to receive cuts,” and Weeks said that “to imply that Council doesn’t care about the employees is not true.” [ Draft minutes, 28 Jul 2026 (packet of 22 Sep 2026, p. 21) ] Goins said “Council is the boss” of the City Manager and should direct him. [ Draft minutes, 28 Jul 2026 (packet of 22 Sep 2026, p. 21) ] Hearn did not want services to “decrease […]
-
City budget document, fiscal year 2027: FY 2027 Adopted BudgetCity budget document, fiscal year 2027: FY 2027 Adopted Budget fiscal year: 2027 section: Adopted Budget Resources label as published: FY 2027 Adopted Budget Status in the City's title: Adopted. source / agency: City of Cocoa source / page title: FY 2027 Adopted Budget pages: 362 In the document's own text: "Adopted" 286 times, "Proposed" 0 times, "Tentative" 0 times. final millage statements / quote: FINAL BUDGET HEARING 9-23-26 ...COUNCIL ADOPTED A FINAL MILLAGE OF 6.9090 final millage statements / millage: 6.9090 final millage statements / pages / 5 final millage statements / pages / 74 final millage statements / pages / 211 final millage statements / pages / 222 final millage statements / hearing date: 2026-09-23
-
City budget, fiscal year 2027[…] sections / entries / label: July 28, 2026, 6pm: Tentative Millage Status in the City's title: Tentative. sections / entries / label: August 11, 2026, 6pm: Preliminary Fire and Stormwater Assessment Status in the City's title: Preliminary. sections / entries / label: August 25, 2026, 6pm: Final Fire and Stormwater Assessment Status in the City's title: Final. sections / entries / label: September 9, 2026, 5:05pm: Tentative Millage and Budget Hearing and CIP Ordinance Status in the City's title: Tentative. sections / entries / label: September 23, 2026, 5:05pm: Final Millage and Budget Hearing and CIP Ordinance Status in the City's title: Final. sections / entries / label: All meetings are held in Council Chambers at Cocoa City Hall (65 […]
The 40 best matches across the City's minutes, meeting recordings, documents and published facts, ranked by how well their words match what you typed (and the spellings and same-meaning words listed above). No AI wrote or chose anything here. Recordings are machine transcription.