Councilman Whipple.
Here.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:01–00:00:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:12–00:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay.
Okay, make a motion that we approve the agenda for the regular meeting of July 10, 2018, and
the minutes of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:28–00:00:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:29–00:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Oh, is somebody doing it for me or am I doing it?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:02–00:01:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Big brother is looking through the window.
I
know. I
know.
I
just think you should need help.
All right.
Okay. Thank you.
All
right.
We're going to go forward.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Teresa. Thank you.
Thank you. A special little presentation tonight. I'm not going to speak. We have invited one of our next generation representatives, Mr. Jordan Miles, who has just completed one year of service in Israel, to come and give you some highlights and tell you what he did during this last year as a representative of the Sister City program. So I'd like to introduce all of you to Jordan Miles.
Jordan? I'm Jordan. All
right.
Welcome. Welcome. Hi. Good evening, everyone.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:03–00:02:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So for the past year, I've
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:06–00:02:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but I've also been your ambassador, hands on the ground, with the Sister City program. So in this photo I have right here, this is me with Mayor Blake
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:17–00:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So from an early age, I've just been brought up in this, and it's just nothing else I'd rather do. This is the group of 10 of us that I've been working with in Israel. The next generation of people are going to continue this effort and this relationship that we've built. Here are some of the different things I've been able to do in this past year. I've been able to go to these Holocaust survivors and hear their stories and just build friendships and relationships with so many people in Israel, and it's all thanks to you guys. So this is one woman
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:49–00:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and she would just tell me all of her stories.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:53–00:02:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This woman was so hospitable, even though she had nothing. And we were there to
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:00–00:03:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
juice. And you don't say no to a Holocaust survivor. Just wonderful people. This is Rosa, and we were there for her 99th birthday. It was just an amazing experience to be able to be part of these people's lives.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:15–00:03:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just love on them, even though she spoke old Russian that even my Google Translate couldn't translate. Wow. So another activity we got to do is we went to the north and rebuilt bomb shelters. And we were asked by a municipality up north after the escalation with Syria to take over 100 bomb shelters and clean them up and make them available if any time in need that they have to go and use them. So this is just two that we got to work on. I also had the opportunity to talk to two Knesset members, which is like members of parliament in Israel. And it was just an amazing experience to be able to interact with them.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:52–00:03:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was getting to do there. This is
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:57–00:04:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
while I was working there. And I was able to go and give them the Bet Shemesh. And it was just an incredible event to see how this has just blossomed into a wonderful relationship and how you guys have supported me even while I was there. I also had the opportunity to go and run in the Jerusalem Marathon.
And I ran
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:17–00:04:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:19–00:04:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I ran all over it. Okay,
42.2 kilometers is a long way. And I got to see every back road of that city. It was an amazing event, though. And everyone came out to support those affected by terror.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:38–00:04:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And people were traumatized. People
have
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:43–00:04:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
been injured. And homes
have
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:44–00:04:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
been destroyed by terrorist actions. So this is my entire family in Bet Shemesh.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:51–00:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't know if you can spot me in there. I'm in the right corner. They call me the American son because I am over there. They don't talk to me in English anymore. Only Hebrew. So I learn how to speak with them. I go there once a month.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:06–00:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I do their yard work. And I love it. They treat me like family. So this is
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:12–00:05:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
broken homes. The children go to this school. And they perform this huge production. And those are just some of the kids. There's about eight of them. And I'm like the big brother now. And so just about in the early May, this is my mother,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:30–00:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and you, Mr. Parrish, presenting the artwork that I had the honor of bringing to the U.S.
Embassy
in Jerusalem. So this is pre-flight. And this is me with it in front of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:43–00:05:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which so happened to be my birthday.
And
so this is where it is now. It is the American Center, which is part of the U.S.
Embassy.
And the center strives to initiate and strengthen bonds between Israelis and the United States and to promote understanding of U.S. policies, society, values, and culture.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:05–00:06:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
One of my good friends now. I used to go to his house. I helped him build a website. This man was amazing, Walter Bingham. He's a 94-year-old, the world's oldest radio show host. He's still out there.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:18–00:06:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He's incredible. But he came out to support me and to put me on his show. So this is my Bet Shemesh family. They also came to support me, even though they don't even speak English too well. This is me in the newspaper recently with Lisa Wilschman. And she was the woman who runs the American Center of the U.S. Embassy. And it was just an incredible event and very humbling. It was a privilege to do this on behalf of Space Coast.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:46–00:06:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the international affairs coordinator. And he just recently retired. But he had to be there. More than me, he had to be there.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:58–00:07:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and what I got
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:00–00:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
had for so many years. And, you
know,
I just want to say thank you. This is just a photo of me on one of the many hikes I got to do. And I want to say
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:11–00:07:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Space Coast, and Florida. And thank you guys so much. It would never happen without any of you. And it's been a blessing to be your boots on the ground in Israel. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank
you.
Very good. Very good.
‸ Your medal.
Hey, how many years ago was that when you first ‸ picked a young picture?
There you go. Great job.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:49–00:08:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay.
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:39–00:08:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm talking
about getting the same hairdo as the chief and John has. I'm
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:52–00:08:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
start.
Okay. Okay.
Stand by just a minute.
No, you're good, sir. I'll be good.
I'll be
good. Delegation. Okay.
We're good. Delegation. Okay. Jessica
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:26–00:09:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Good. All right.
Oh, this is my first time doing this. I'm a little nervous.
Don't be nervous. It's okay. ‸ I
wanted to talk
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:45–00:09:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Officer
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:54–00:09:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
male because he claimed to smell marijuana coming from him. Now, when he approached this male, he approached him aggressively. From within seconds, ‸ his forearm was to his throat. He was on the hood of the car. This
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:11–00:10:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was no reason for that aggression. This young man did not attempt to run. He didn't attempt to do anything. The officer attempted to search him. Officer ‸ Hernandez attempted to search him, and he said no. If he would have told him no, because you smell like marijuana, I want to search you. Or
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:34–00:10:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the law, maybe the situation wouldn't have happened how it went down. But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:41–00:10:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
than I am. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:46–00:10:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
people that I am a 29-year-old vet who has deployed twice. And I didn't deploy twice to see that, that ‸ your own people, your own police officers are separating your community because you guys do not know how to talk to people. You ‸ all are ‸ too aggressive, and it's not fair. A
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:08–00:11:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They see a police officer, and they're so nervous. He was so nervous from that. ‸ I have little brothers. I have nephews. I have uncles, and I have family that I have to live for. I could have easily been mistaken. For a young male, all cops are not bad cops, and that's not what I'm saying. But the bad cops are putting a horrible name on your police department. I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:33–00:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I know I have a time limit, but I just ‸ really want to let you all know that people are looking and they're seeing. And maybe if I would have spoken up that night and let him know who I was, the situation wouldn't have happened. But I sat and I watched. I can't sit back and watch anymore. There are people who are dying because of ‸ assumption. I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:56–00:11:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He told me no. Which I get.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:12:02–00:12:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
when he gets ‸ charged with resisting a police officer without violence, just because he said no, and then you have a forearm to your throat? To me, that's wrong. These kids, they watch the news. I get he's an adult, 19. To me, that's still a child. I'm
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:22–00:12:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
These kids are scared. They're so scared. That's really just all I have to say, honestly.
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:36–00:12:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
George Brown, Jr.
Junior?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:46–00:12:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yes.
Junior.
George,
can I use this one?
Sure. Oh, okay. Because this is the one I'm used to. All these years, I don't know if I could operate over there. My name is George L. Brown, Jr.,
and
I'm going to surprise you folks. No complaints. No complaints from the old man. All right. It's amazing. I would like to comment on the fireworks, which were great. Beautiful, beautiful show. As good as anybody else's show, great, and I hope they can do it again. ‸ Now, I know we had a little rain. The good Lord wanted to cool things down a little bit. And I was lucky enough to sit in my carport and look out to the east and see a beautiful show. So I wanted to say, very, very good show. I don't know how it affected the attendance down there with a little bit of rain.
It
was good. It was still good, yeah. So it was just beautiful. And I ‸ know I usually come here with some things that I'd like to see
change,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:56–00:13:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
But that I don't want to see
change.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:58–00:13:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
That was very good. So thank you very much. Thank you, sir. Thank you, Mr. Brown.
Are you going to reach out to Jessica? Jessica's
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:14:06–00:14:12 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
still
here?
Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:14–00:14:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Make sure your number is on there.
Is
this
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:14:20–00:14:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:14:21–00:14:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
thank you. Okay,
thank you.
Ken Parks.
Good
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:29–00:14:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mark's Episcopal Community. And on June 2nd, our 140th birthday just down the street at the riverfront, we launched a thing called the St. Mark's Community Action Network. And Deputy Mayor Blanco, Mayor Parrish were there for the ceremony. We
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:51–00:14:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I've reached out recently to Samantha Singer about our next program, which will be the Space Coast Inspiration Awards. It'll be at the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:00–00:15:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You each have a flyer. I'll leave a couple more here for anyone who didn't receive one in some of the lobby for people who might be interested. We would love to see you at the event, but most were interested in receiving nominations for Inspiration Awards. ‸ Again, I'm working with Samantha on that, and I think she'll be able to channel any thoughts you might have. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:21–00:15:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of St. Mark's and encourage you to pay attention to that program and help us out in any way you can.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:30–00:15:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:30–00:16:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I'll
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:04–00:16:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
640
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:06–00:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have no complaints either. I have positive stuff to say. I think that the fireworks, again, were great. I really would love to know if our attendance, even though we had the rain, was either equal to last year or a little higher. I'm waiting to hear that. I'm
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:23–00:16:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was
great.
It was? It was higher than last year?
I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:27–00:16:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
With the rain and it was still equal? Wow.
It
was people parked. It was almost like 10 years ago, I thought we had a fire.
Yeah,
they
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:37–00:16:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Almost
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:39–00:16:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Wonderful. But I'm here for food for thought. I'm one of the old guys now. And I'm going over the people that have been involved with the city for many, many years. And I just wanted to make a statement about a particular individual that while I was on the council, I highly supported. This person also told me no several times before he even took me seriously about looking into an opening that was created.
And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:23–00:17:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's been a while since
I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:26–00:17:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
seen him, and he's doing well. But I highly recommend that some attention is considered to possibly naming the city hall after this person. And we're talking about Rick Holt. He not only was the financial director for many, many years, when there was an opening ‸ for city manager position. He fought me. And I kept embarrassing him during council meetings to consider. And
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:57–00:18:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at that time was interested. And then that involved quite a few more years as well. But that was the only thing that I wanted to bring up today, is just something that you might want to consider. I
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:17–00:18:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
hall to anyone, because I was part of council and we even considered this building as well as the police department. So just thought I'd bring that up. Thank
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:32–00:18:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay. Brad Whitmore. Coco's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:44–00:18:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Positive news.
Yes. Yes. Yes. I got some great news tonight. Anyway, good evening, city council. Staff. Brad Whitmore.
here
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:57–00:18:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
representing the Historic Cocoa Village Association. And the great news is I'm here more to listen than to talk tonight. So I know that's great news for everybody.
Don't
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:07–00:19:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Three minutes. Time flies. Thank you. Time flies.
Anyway, I
am
frequently out of town on Tuesdays now, so I don't get a chance to come to as many meetings as I normally would be. So I miss out on a lot of the good stuff. So basically what I was ‸ going to do is just ask if it would be possible to get a very brief recap on how progress with the modification to the Master Waterfront plan is coming. And in particular, I know Matt looked into the feasibility of maybe doing something for a temporary facility until we really get the real one going. And I was curious about that. And I have a specific reason for it that we'll get to. If I get a chance to hear what's going on out there. John,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:44–00:19:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
call?
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:45–00:19:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Can
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:47–00:19:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. Yeah, that
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:49–00:19:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fine. The
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:51–00:19:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with is coming up in December, which will be here in a blink, we will be having the fourth arrival of the Sail to the Sun rally. And last year, in conjunction with that, we did our first cruiser seminar, a pay-to-attend seminar that was hosted at the convention center. So we're going to be working, getting closer to having to make a decision on that again this year, whether we run it or not. And part of that decision will be facilities that are available to bring people in and whether it's just too much or what, and whether we want to skip a year or keep it rolling like this year and keep it going. So that's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:22–00:20:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that's all I've got. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:26–00:20:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going to listen more than talk, I obviously didn't quite succeed at that. But that's what I've got. Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:32–00:20:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
can you pass down this
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:20:35–00:20:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you,
sir. Okay. That was it. All right. So we've got consent.
Motion to approve the consent agenda.
Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Very good. Thank you. All right. Super
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:03–00:21:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:04–00:21:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:24 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:32–00:21:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As I mentioned, this is second reading and final reading. There have been no changes since first reading of this ordinance. It's also a public hearing item, and we'd be happy to answer any questions if you have any at this juncture.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:59–00:22:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm going to shut this down to the council, open it up to the public. Anybody like to speak on this ordinance? Special events, parades. Sam,
you
want
to
say anything? I'm joking. Okay, we'll close it to the public, bring it back to council.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:18–00:22:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
All in favor?
Aye. Any opposed? Good. Great start. All right. Laura, is this the
train, John?
No, John.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:21–00:23:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number 2018-048, establishing the rollback rate, adopt
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:23:37–00:23:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:39–00:23:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to consider the FY, or fiscal year 2019 budget.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:46–00:23:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
providing how municipalities shall adopt
post military
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:59–00:24:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So, you'll be approving the resolution
resolution establishing
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:03–00:24:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the rollback rate,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:05–00:24:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:12–00:24:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
five votes, and you'll set the first public hearing for September 5th at 5.30 PM. Just as a reminder, the proposed rate you vote for tonight can be reduced when voting for the adopted millage rate, which cannot be increased. So, just to provide some context here in terms of valuation, history, ‸ historical review, we normally have 10 years, but we added, we put 2008 in there, just to kind of show you where we are, where we were at the height of the market before ‸ the market crashed.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:47–00:24:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And in this most recent year, we had $25 million of new construction. This table is also historical, both valuation, millage rates, the ad valorem revenue raised as a result of the millage, and the variance from the year over year, and the percent of change.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:15–00:25:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:25–00:25:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:34–00:25:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:42–00:25:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:44–00:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:49–00:25:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:52–00:25:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
consistent with the fiscal sustainability analysis, the financial analysis, uh, to keep us on a fiscally, uh, sustainable path.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:06–00:26:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:12–00:26:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which would result in a revenue variance, or increase of $450,120 to the general fund.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:25–00:26:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
an additional $147,021.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:40–00:26:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but just simple majority, you, uh, adopt a rate of 9.2317, uh, which would yield $8,487,075, or an additional $3,440,467. Uh, based on the analysis performed, and based on the budget that we, the budget workshop,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:27:07–00:27:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:16–00:27:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:27:22–00:27:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That
really kind of speaks to the partnership and to what extent the city supports the redevelopment agencies. And you see in the second column from the left, yes, from the left, that last year the CRAs received a total of 836,592. If you maintain the current proposed
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:44–00:27:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
$164,391 more. If you went to the rollback rate, you know, right
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:55–00:27:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you would see that they would receive $945,786. And to put it in context, because many people are, you know, curious
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:08–00:28:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
where the CRAs and, you
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:09–00:28:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
funding for the redevelopment agency. The county participates in terms of its share of the general fund, its general fund millage,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:20–00:28:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we believe
it'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:24–00:28:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
go down based on their charter
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:26–00:28:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:29–00:28:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
revenue that the city would, you know, raise. So, and then
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:42–00:28:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
family, looking at our single family property owners and what the increase would be. They're familiar with this slide. You know, in FY18, house valued at $100,000 less the homestead. Would, they pay $299 to the city for property taxes. With the increase,
it
would go to 312 or a $13 increase. Obviously, we're not looking at the max. But, and then for, just go down to
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:15–00:29:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And $300,000, you're
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:21–00:29:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Obviously, what's out there on the horizon, we've discussed, is Amendment 1. All indicators are, suggest that it's going to pass, which would, not for this upcoming fiscal year, but the one after, would increase the value of the homestead exemption. And for the adoption hearing, I
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:46–00:29:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but if you recall, a large percentage of our homes are below the 150 mark. Right. I want to say close to two-thirds, if not higher. So, as we always try to provide comparison. comparison.
[unclear audio — 0:30 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:08–00:30:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:30 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:38–00:31:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:07–00:31:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:31:23–00:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:30 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:37–00:32:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:32 ▶]
any questions that you may have and you're being asked, the requested action is to approve resolution 2018-048 establishing
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:48–00:32:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
set the date, time, in place for the first public hearing to consider the fiscal year 2019 budget. Any questions?
Any
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:02–00:33:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I'll make a motion that we stay the course and adopt the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:11–00:33:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
All in
favor? Aye.
Aye.
Any opposed? Okay. Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:24–00:33:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the Finance Department for their assistance as we go through this budget process.
John,
I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:31–00:33:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, and I know there's some challenges coming up for a lot of cities, and I think you're
doing
the right thing. I mean, it's being responsible.
I think the department heads and all those have participated in the budget meetings. ‸ I know we've discussed this at the budget workshop or the fiscal sustainability workshop, but
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:53–00:33:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
we can...
This is my sixth budget presenting to you, and this has been one of the more difficult ones in terms of, you know, looking at, you know, every fund, you know, feeling the stressors, you know, because obviously we have certain impacts to each fund that drive those budgets.
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:13–00:34:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:25–00:34:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:26–00:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:30–00:34:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. I've sat in with a lot of...
I've seen a
number of public officials recently. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:42–00:34:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Everybody's kind of going through the same thing, having to cut pretty hard. We've
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:54–00:34:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I know that's part of this. Good job. Thank you, sir. Thank you.
All right.
Thank
you.
Hey,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:35:19–00:35:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, City Council, as you know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:30–00:35:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the State of Florida used to operate under a principle called Dillon's Rule, you know, which essentially, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:46–00:35:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to them, you know, from the state legislature. All the power resided with the state legislature and the state. And in 1968,
the
voters, Florida, voted an amendment
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:03–00:36:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that, you
know,
or stated that municipalities, specifically actually in Article 8, Section 2B of the Florida Constitution, it does state municipalities
shall
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:16–00:36:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have the governmental, corporate, and proprietary powers to enable them to conduct municipal government, perform, to perform, municipal functions, ‸ render municipal services, and may exercise power for municipal purposes, except as otherwise provided by law. Home rule powers are extremely critical to our city, and to cities across Florida, and to other counties.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:39–00:37:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:21 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Uh, or, you know, what works in Miami
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:06–00:37:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, generally speaking, and home rule is the center of that, and it's very important. And I know, in the last two years, in legislative sessions, uh, sessions, we have seen an outright attack on home rule, where the legislature's trying to claw back the powers and restrain, restrict, provide underfunded and unfunded mandates to the cities, which puts a, uh, a burden on, on the cities and local governments to deliver municipal services. Uh, our employees in, in the cities, uh, they're in the trenches. We're the ones that actually, local government, that deliver daily the municipal services that residents, you know, expect and, you know, uh, to be provided at the level that they choose that they be provided. And so, ‸ today, you have a resolution before you, uh, to honor 50 years of home rule. Um, so, the requested action is to approve a resolution celebrating 50 years of home rule in the state of Florida.
That's good. As I've learned, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:22–00:38:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
twice a year, no matter what. And, you know, of course,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:32–00:38:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or once a week. But, it's, uh, there's a disconnect. And I hope the audience knows this or sees it. And, uh.
Yeah, we need to celebrate while we still can. Yes.
Because
if it's up to the legislature that we currently have, this will be the last year we get to celebrate home rule.
Yeah.
And I'll just say it out there, because I know we're on TV. That includes our representative, Mr. Fine. He would like to see you not be able to sit here in this room and help us make decisions.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:01–00:39:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
50 years of home rule. You deserve the right to vote for people who sit in your city and make the rules that govern your community. Not somebody who sits in Tallahassee.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:19–00:39:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
And I'd say elect somebody. It could be, you know, I'll say it, even Mike Blake. Elect him. Um, because if you, if we don't elect people from the local governments to serve with experience, you gotta have experience in the, uh, on the state side, I don't know what to say.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:45–00:39:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And, uh, you know, it's a, it's a simple, you know, the house is a simple $29,000 a year job, but I've never seen more people with money, millions, throwing at a campaign that, I mean, that have money to throw at a campaign to own a vote that's gonna do harm to the citizens of our state. I mean,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:15–00:40:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
on one side or the other, but we've enjoyed a lot of things in my lifetime because of home rule.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:26–00:40:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
I did this the first time in 1999, and I've never in all those years seen a legislature that was so determined to pull power away from the people and away from the local level.
Yeah.
We've been under attack for the last two years. It's not gonna ‸ be any better this year.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:44–00:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Republican. I mean, I'm gonna ‸ say it straight to you. This is his concern.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:53–00:40:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yeah, you'll know.
I mean.
Well, that's a good point, though, Henry. That shows it's not a party issue.
It's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:00–00:41:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
not a party issue. It's a community issue. There's a, there's a
serious movement. Yeah. To knock all of us out. And, and people with money or attorneys or whoever
that
run for that legislature, they're gussy enough to tell me that, oh, you're not qualified.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:15–00:41:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All you are is a tool in my toolbox to get the job done, because they don't want people like me, Brenda, or anybody up here, or Mr. Blake, who's watching, hopefully, up there, because we'll make change. You know what
I
mean? And I, I'm, I'm over, I'm over what we're experiencing.
You
know, and John, thank you for that. So, the,
there is a resolution for, and then after that, we have, uh, like to ask all council, staff, and anybody, any members of the audience that support, you know,
uh,
and would like to honor 50 years of home rule and join us in front of the dais. And we're going to take a picture. We have some, our cocoa and let cities work. Let cities work.
So, we need a motion. I'll make that motion to approve the resolution. I'll second it. I got it. Okay.
Okay. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Good. So, if you could join us in front of the dais.
Come on, you guys. We need your help.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:19–00:43:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
I got a spot
right for you up
front.
That's how I roll right in front. Okay.
Scrooge
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:04–00:44:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
been a selfie. She's on her way. We wouldn't need a selfie. We
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:45:04–00:45:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's
wonderful.
Yep.
Yep, room rule.
Absolutely. Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:45:24–00:45:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:26–00:45:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Chemical Conversion, and Reliability Improvements Project, Final Design, Permitting, Bidding, and Procurement Assistance.
Motion to approve. Second.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Very good.
Okay. Okay.
All right. So we're going to... Who's going to do this one?
That's me. Hello. Okay. Okay.
So
18-270, approve as recommended by the Employee Insurance Task Force Committee and State Administration, the proposed fiscal year 2019 benefit renewal for medical, which eliminates the BioPremier plan, dental, flexible spending, and life
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:45–00:46:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a final determination on the vision carrier, Humana or IMED, subject to a revised quote, and authorize the city manager to sign related agreements. We have, as you know, the city has moved to a self-funded plan in 2016, and we had some changes with regards to that. We
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:13–00:47:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with them. We
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:19–00:47:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you all to go over the details of what the recommendation is for the new fiscal year benefit renewal. Sean?
Sean?
All right. Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Council. Good to see you all again. So as Gina said, we're going to jump right in here and talk about upcoming renewal and benefits for the upcoming fiscal year. A couple months ago, we did a little bit of a lengthy presentation reviewing some of the clinic data, which I think many of you remember. And we also gave a couple pieces of information that we're a little bit of looking into some of the stuff that we're going to look at tonight. So we're going to try and keep it pretty brief. Just go over real high-level background, medical plan utilization, talk about catastrophic claims. We spent some time on that earlier in the year, but need to hit on that again and then talk about some of the options that we looked at and ultimately the decisions that we're putting in front of you today. So Gina hit on some of this, and you've seen this slide before, so I don't want to spend too much time on it. But in 2016, the city was facing a pretty significant increase of 15%. In that year, the city elected to transition to self-funding. There was an initial savings in that year of close to half a million dollars by avoiding some fees that are associated with fully insured plans. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:53–00:48:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
able to capitalize and get our immediate return on investment for the money that we put into the health center when people use that. That redirects costs out of the plan at a lower cost than through the medical plan. So taking a look at medical claims averages, if you look at this chart, you'll see a pretty significant spike this year, which I'm going to talk about a little bit with the catastrophic claims. It's
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:20–00:49:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The other thing we are seeing, and this is industry-wide, it's affecting every city and every employer around, is we have a lot higher pharmacy costs due to new high-cost medications. And I know we talked a lot about that with the clinic information. And the other thing is that we'll talk about a little bit more is the city has three plans. And if we look at those three plans individually and look at that claims experience, it's not equal across those three plans. We
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:53–00:49:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and that's where we're going to talk about some of the recommendations that we're coming to today. So catastrophic claims, we gave you a little bit of an update on this, but in the last 12 months, so we always look at our prior 12 months in insurance, we've
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:13–00:50:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which is a pretty high threshold. We have seven additional claims that went over $100,000. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:25–00:50:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And our largest claim was actually about $870,000 and represented 15% of spend on the plan for the whole year last year. So that one claim, it was an anomaly, but those things happen. We have reinsurance that covers that. But when you look at that last graph I showed you a couple slides ago where this year looks pretty bad, if you take that one claim out, it's really right back in line with the averages from the years before. So those things happen on plans. They happen every couple years where you have an outlier like that. We just happen to have an outlier this year as we're going through that. ‸ So what we did here is I took the plans and we took the claims costs on a monthly basis. So this is an annual. This is the total amount of claims on the plan divided by the number of employees enrolled. And you'll see if you look at the base plan, last year that average was $533 in claims per employee per month. This year, at the same snapshot, same point in time, it's about $608. So
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:36–00:51:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The buy-up plan, which is our middle plan, has a
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:42–00:51:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So it's up higher than industry averages that we would see there. But then the premier plan, if you take a look at that, you see one, those averages are significantly higher than the other two plans as a starting off point, even last year. And then look at where we've gone this year. We're up at an average of almost $3,500 in claims per employee per month. So multiply that by 12. That's the average claims on that plan for the individuals on that plan. That
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:16–00:52:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So people may be drawn to that plan if they know they're going to have higher expenses. But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:25–00:52:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And six times, basically, is what it, you know, six times the cost of the base plan for the individuals on that plan. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:38–00:52:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
approached it. I know we've talked about it in some of the prior renewals and the city managers talked about it. But what we did was we, when we look at projecting insurance costs going forward, we're looking at medical inflation, utilization, all those things. We broke out that projection by each plan individually. And overall, it came out to a 10.6% projected increase for the city. That, the way we got to that, it's not equal enrollment, as you'll see in the parentheses, is the core plan would actually need a 16% reduction. So the premiums in that plan more than cover the expenses in that plan. The buy-up plan, which has 96 employees, would need a 37% increase. And the premier plan, which only has 22 individuals enrolled in that plan, or 22 employees enrolled, would need a 260%
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:40–00:53:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
When you start looking at that, when an actuary starts looking at that information, it'd be great to say, we're just going to follow these numbers. And everybody on the core plan gets a reduction. Everybody in the buy-up gets a 37% increase and 260%. What would happen in reality, though, is everybody would drop off those top two plans and they would take the 16% reduction. They're still going to have claims, even though they've moved plans. You know, $1,000 or $1,500 more deductible doesn't offset $150,000 of claims at a very significant level. So we took a look at that. We
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:26–00:54:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We looked at going to one plan at a 7.5% increase because some people would have a lower schedule of benefits by doing that. That's what the overall increase needed would be to just have one plan. As
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:44–00:54:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cities, and candidly, some of the employees in that core plan, to pay any more than they would have to pay ‸ just because other individuals are buying up. So we established 7.5% in a scenario where we went to two plans. We
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:06–00:55:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
way to look at that and determine that the buy-up, by moving those schedule of benefits, would need a 17.5% increase. So ultimately,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:21–00:55:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the insurance task force. The insurance task force voted for scenario B, which puts the overall increase, as it does with both of them, to the city at 7.5%, which is about $313,000 to the city. I know there's a lot of numbers on that page, so please feel free to ask any questions. The next couple slides are vision, so I didn't know, Mr. Mayor, if you want me to stop there or keep going and save the questions until the end.
No, save questions until
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:55:58–00:56:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
So the last item, we had a number of lines of coverage that I'll show you at the end that don't have any rate increase or proposed changes. So the only other item was the vision renewal. We had no increase proposed from Humana, who is the current vendor, along with no change to the schedule of benefits. ‸ There's been a number of administrative issues with Humana on the billing and eligibility side. So we did get quotes from other vendors. We had two very competitive quotes, one from IMED and one from VSP. They were both reductions with enhanced benefits. ‸ As we looked at the networks, both of the carriers have very good networks, but what we did find is that IMED had a significantly higher number of what we call retail providers. So that's going to be your Sears, Target, JC Penney, all of those. So there was a difference between IMED and VSP with that. And IMED was a 5.4% reduction in premium with some enhanced benefits. The insurance task force did recommend renewing with Humana. Staff in Gehring Group really believed that selecting IMED due to the cost savings and the enhanced benefit would benefit ‸ the largest percentage of population. So we did have a little variance there in the recommendation. And then up here, this is just kind of a high-level summary. A number of other coverages that most people don't think about until they use them.
So the cost
of
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:57:40–00:57:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then we have the vision there in the end. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:49–00:57:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
happy to answer any questions that you all have.
In
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:55–00:58:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you
pretty much, I mean, we're kind of peaking up on the catastrophic claims. Does it normally go down, or is this?
Yeah,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:09–00:58:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
average, you know, an 18 to 24 month kind of one thing spikes. So if you think about the type of conditions that typically drive these kind of costs, a lot of times it's cancers, could be heart related. But even that these days, you know, the cancer costs are really exceeding that. And if you think about somebody with cancer getting treatment, you know, you typically, hopefully they're getting better and coming back. You typically have about a 12 to 16 month kind of period where they're having a lot of tests. So you see that spike, and then you see it kind of drop back down. And
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:47–00:58:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you're not paying all that. premium to the insurance company because they raised your rate because you had a bad year. Right.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:58:58–00:59:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Yeah, hold on a second.
I got some charts at one.
Okay.
Thank
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:26–00:59:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay, so what I did is I kind of broke a chart down for y'all to see the numbers. In the chart that I prepared for you,
you
can see that the employee is considered to be part of the poverty group according to the U.S. federal government, dependent on the gross income, net income, and measures of income. I hate to really come to you tonight to ask anything to speak about this, but the astronomical cost of these medical, you know, health going up. It's brought a lot of attention to everybody ‸ because it's raising blood pressure, it's getting people excited, and we're here to ask you to help us, the employee. It seems like the administrative branch, you know, they're there to make money, ‸ you know, they're making millions right now. So, if the insurance is being paid for the administrative branch at 100%, they don't care. You know, I've done a study, I've asked people that do have insurance, they don't care anymore.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:41–01:00:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the cost of living going up annually, and especially with the single parents, there's no way for them to sustain. This particular person will be forced to use approximately 25% of their gross annual income. And I was, had to drop my son last year, he was disabled, so I could no longer afford the insurance. And that's heartbreaking to have to do something like that. And what, some of the things that I'm asking here, you know, to look at, if
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:13–01:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
don't have anything. We haven't had anything ‸ for years. I'm asking to please take a look at a cost of living with the negotiated LIUNA race, as we used to have long ago, many years ago. And,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:29–01:01:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
use ‸ this clinic that we have that was supposed to be so great for everybody. If they can't no longer afford the clinic, you know, the insurance, let them use the clinic for free, at a minimal cost, something they can't afford, because you know what they're making. And you can see that this person cannot afford to add another member there. And there's a lot of employees that work for the city right now that have their children on Medicaid because ‸ they can't afford the city's insurance anymore. More and more individuals are having to do their own research. They're given just 800
number
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:02:08–01:02:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
distributed through HR and told to, you know, they're responsible for calling doctors, hanging on the phone for hours, waiting for referrals, finding out why Cigna's not either, you know, denying a claim or, you know, refusing to pay for services. Since,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:25–01:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to use and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:29–01:02:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the big complaint now is it takes weeks to get into the clinic. There's been circumstances where people have been very, very sick and had to drive to Satellite Beach to be told to go to the emergency room. And I don't think that's what the clinic was actually, you know, supposed to do for us.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:51–01:02:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
quick and easy to get into. Since the city,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:00–01:03:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I work in the purchasing department. It kind of baffles me why the city declines to go out for bid for these services. We haven't been out to bid since June of 2012. And,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:17–01:03:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They got a great deal here, but it doesn't make sense to me to have a, you know, hire a service that's actually working on commission from the insurance companies that we are using. Why would you do that? I mean, you would hire an independent to come in and do a study of your bids, and then you would have, you know, a service to come in and do all your other service.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:43–01:03:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You wouldn't have one shop stop because they're going to be working on commission. So when they do look through this, they're going to look at benefits for themselves, the commission.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:58–01:04:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That was just another thing that I thought was kind of crazy. And, you know, I just wish for one moment that, you know, the executive branch that gets everything paid at 100%, you know, would be forced to be in our shoes for one moment and, you know, ask themselves, every year, is this the year I'm going to have to drop a child or I'm going to have to drop a spouse for my insurance? You know, pretty much our wages are staying dormant. Three percent is not even offsetting anything, as you can see in the numbers there. They don't lie.
I
mean, it's real. These people are having to live like this.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:37–01:04:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and everybody ‸ uses this word so freely, but why can't the employees vote for this stuff on ‸ their own?
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:46–01:04:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Why can't we do some of this stuff? If the city is going to continue with the, if they have the premier plans available for the executive branch, there's a lot of retirees and other people that do want to keep that plan if it is going to be available for them.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:07–01:05:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So that was another thing they wanted to know.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:16–01:05:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
their employees again. You know, for the morale and this type of stuff that you're seeing in black and white, it's really down. People, the turnover is bad right now. People don't want to stay. And there needs to be some type of recognition for tenure, whether it's that, or peer-to-peer across the board.
You
know, just some more spot recognition. Just more, you know, getting with your people. And, you know, your employees work hard for, you know, your management and the city. Why not recognize them for what they do when you work, you know, hard in the workforce and you did a job well done, whether it's achievement, you know, critical projects that, you know, have done in timely manner. You know, reinforce positive behavior. Do something for the poor good. You know, the bottom line is for the citizens and the city, happy workers,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:06:12–01:06:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, help everyone. It's a good ‸ work environment. So, you know, and the thing that bothers me now is, you know, we need to stop the good old boy organization. So, I thank you for the ‸ opportunity to get to speak tonight.
Tammy, thank you. Thank you.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:06:27–01:06:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:06:38–01:06:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Could I address, Mr. Mayor, the bid statement?
and if
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:44–01:06:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
there was a lot in there and, you
know,
I'm happy to answer any questions. But when we transition to self-funded and we've spent candidly a lot of time reviewing this as much as possible. I understand it's a ‸ hard concept sometimes when you're not dealing with it. But when we transition to self-funded,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:02–01:07:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
pays an administrative fee to a third-party administrator, Cigna in this case. That fee, I don't have it offhand. Gina might have it memorized.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:17–01:07:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's a pretty negligible fee in the grand scheme of things. That is the only premium or money that's paid to that third-party administrator. There's reinsurance that's purchased.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:34–01:07:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the other expenses are those claims. Right? ‸ So those make up 85% of the program expenditures
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:46–01:07:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on the plan.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:50–01:07:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to the doctor, going to the hospital, all those things. So what you look at more with self-funding and going out to bid, I think there's a misconception that we're just going to go out to bid and somebody's going to give us a lower rate,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:04–01:08:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
When you're self-funded, what happens is you're paying those claims as they occur. So what you're really looking at is who has the best discount on those services in the area. If you take a look around at a lot of the municipal entities around here, you'll see that they're insured with Cigna for their self-funded plan. The reason is that gets them the biggest discount on the claim. So when we're looking at that each year, it's not a fully insured environment where
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:32–01:08:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and give us the lowest rate. And I understand that concept is appealing to people. The one thing I would say is,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:42–01:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's gone on that and think about an insurance company's perspective and whether or not, candidly, the city's really attractive in a fully insured arrangement right now. I mean, you know, what kind of underwriters and actuaries want to, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:58–01:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a large percentage of the claim. So when we're looking at whether or not the bid,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:06–01:09:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
who has the best discounts that's ultimately going to keep the program
cost as well
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:12–01:09:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
as possible. So I just wanted to kind of address that because I think sometimes that gets, you know, misinterpreted with we're buying two equal products and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:22–01:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's really not that way when we're looking at self-funded ‸ medical
program
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:28–01:09:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So
I just wanted to address that part.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:30–01:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:09:33–01:09:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
It
could be. So we actually, I don't know if Gina can sit any late. We actually stepped out of the room while they did their vote.
Yeah. The, it is not covered, the diabetic eye care with IMED. However, this has always been covered with Cigna. A lot of employees don't realize that and that has been provided to them in the educations we have given them. And we also plan to include that education as well in the open enrollment meetings. We have a presentation before the actual enrollment sessions.
Do
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:27–01:10:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Humana covers the diet? Because I'm, I mean, I'm looking and that's, that's the only real difference that I see.
Since I'm a non-voting member, I, I stepped out as well with management. Okay.
It was one of the discussion points. Okay. That was an express concern, you know, we believe it was addressed, but.
Yeah, and it's,
it's
kind of a general rule if it helps just understanding. Typically anything that an ophthalmologist would do is covered under the medical plan. It's largely your optometry that's going to fall under the vision.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:07–01:11:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
cataracts or glaucoma?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:13–01:11:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay. All
right. That was it for me.
That's it. Yes.
I
had some of the same concerns
about the non-coverage of the diabetics. And it seems as though that's what's happening within our communities. We have a lot of diabetic people that needs the coverage that this plan is saying that they're not going to cover. And you say it's falling under the medical.
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:43–01:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
vision coverage because that is a covered medical benefit. It's just, and they have it now, right now under full. You know, if you made this transition, it would solely be under the Cigna medical plan, which
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:02–01:12:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as a whole. There's some benefits to it actually being performed under the medical plan because that data is transmitted back and it helps the carriers identify what they call gaps in care. So like if a diabetic doesn't have their eye exam, they actually do an outreach and let them know, hey, you need to have an eye exam. You actually
get a notice in the mail.
Yes.
So, I mean, with the cost of insurance going up across the board, whether you're self-insured or not, is there anything that the city can do to lower the cost for the employer or employee?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:45–01:12:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. Yeah, I mean, ‸ we've talked about a number of ideas. We've looked at different wellness incentives. We obviously have the health center. ‸ You know, the health center data, we showed you all some of the utilization. ‸ I understand that, you know, on the last minute, it may be frustrating to go to Satellite Beach. ‸ Still a better option than,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:08–01:13:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So trying to continue to promote that. We've looked and talked about different wellness incentive programs. I think there's been some pushback. I think, candidly, going to a single plan would be a good step towards really controlling those costs. That was really where that initial recommendation was this year, was put everything ‸ on kind of that same line.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:34–01:13:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the option of kind of the two plans. I think if you look as a whole where care is going and where insurance is going, whether individuals like it or not,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:51–01:13:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And there's more onus on the individual for their own care. And I think we have to continue to keep taking the steps that way. We have to continue to get people to be better consumers to make sure they're selecting the right location for care. Now, if you want to do that solely via plan design, the way to do that is do what most private employers have done, which is go to a high deductible plan. Where everything's subject to the deductible. We haven't taken that step yet because I need the police escort out then. But, you know, looking at some of those things is really where things are going. So we're trying to get there in an approach that, you know, we're taking baby steps more than just, you know, ripping the Band-Aid off. But I think if you make a drastic step and do some of those things, you know, you'll start to see more of those results quicker. Unfortunately, there's some pain in that transition as people get used to a different program.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:51–01:14:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:55–01:14:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:56–01:15:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
apparently. It's other employees as well. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:04–01:15:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that was said by her tonight. So that there can be some type of solution to taking care of some of those concerns about us being self-insured. And their prices are going up as an employee. I think her concerns are a lot deeper than ‸ the city being self-insured. There are other entities that she's mentioned that I think we need to address. So peace and understanding will come about. We may be doing the right thing as far as finances are concerned for the city. But if it has a negative impact on the staff, I think we need to address it. And I'm going to ask that the city manager address those concerns specifically with the individual that came before us tonight. I know that it says during delegations that the employee can come forward to discuss issues in regards to their employment.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:16–01:16:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
what problems they may be having as a staff member. So I think what was said was a lot deeper than transitioning into
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:16:36–01:16:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the city. So I'm going to ask the city manager if he can address that offline and report back to council in regards to whether he does it by interoffice communications or doing a council meeting. We need to find a solution to those concerns, period. That's it, Mr. Mayor.
Yeah, absolutely. I want to add to that. Tammy, thank you. Any other employees? Thank you. You're the heart of the city. Happy employees. You know, move the city forward. Not happy employees don't. And I think from our vantage point, the only excuse I can give you is ‸ we're at 5,000 feet up or 10,000 feet up, setting policy ‸ as we improve things through the years. You know, like the example would be the fire departments. You know, we opened the new fire departments, reposition them. It's great. And your policy is set, you know, comes in play.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:41–01:17:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
keep looking at everything.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:47–01:17:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
elected, you know, some raises.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:53–01:17:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know, it, you know, we're, that's a strong message by everybody coming tonight.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:01–01:18:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the employee needs. Because employee needs, guess what, take care of the citizens. The citizens are the bosses. But I'm sure we have to look at everything that you, that you're being subjected to. And hopefully we can see it. Or maybe you can talk to us individually or whatever you like to do. But, but
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:26–01:18:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this to go any farther.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:34–01:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
done over the years.
are
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:18:38–01:18:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you know, that policy change, you know, self-insured and the clinics, ‸ it's a great thing. But I'm, I'm with you guys.
I
like to look at, always re-look at everything. ‸ You know, I want to be better than the other cities, the other counties. ‸ But I hear you loud and clear. We all do. And I think maybe we need, ‸ maybe even get a task force to look at this and see, and kind of refocus on,
you know,
money employees.
Why don't we just keep with the insurance task force that was already there and.
Well, I'm not talking about the insurance.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:10–01:19:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Well, I heard more than insurance too.
But a lot of it comes from insurance and raises. I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:17–01:19:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right. But remember, you
know,
we set policy and policy does get stale and old and bad if you don't maintain it or, you know, look at it. And I think even though we don't set policy on employees, it affects some of our policies. But we need to make sure that we keep morale up. Morale is, always bothers me, you know. And I mean, we need to improve things. So,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:47–01:19:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
No, I just, I just had a question. So, I mean, the employees are looking at a 7.5% increase. And the council or the city budget is looking at a 300,000 plus increase. Is that what we're saying here? That's fine. Yeah. Okay. Okay. That's my last question.
Anybody else?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:12–01:20:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll be glad to provide you an overview of both, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:19–01:20:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know
what
I
mean?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:25–01:20:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I just would like to say I know that the city administration works hard with
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:39–01:20:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:42–01:20:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
structure a level of benefits at the city.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:20:47–01:20:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
balance between the city employees and city taxpayers.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:52–01:20:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
options in addition to what was presented tonight to try to offset some of the ‸ impacts in terms of health reimbursement accounts, health savings accounts,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:07–01:21:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
some of them ‸ would cost the employees more. So, I mean, we're trying to provide a regional level of benefits. And so I'll be more than glad to provide you all an overview, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:24–01:21:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because I'm not sure this chart represents everything,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:29–01:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
absorbed the entire increase itself.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:39–01:21:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't think
we can, can we?
Well, we need to, yeah. The agenda, we need to be, at the end of the day,
we
need to, our open enrollment for insurance is coming up. I mean, so, we do need a decision with regard to the insurance. I mean, as Sean indicated,
I
mean, the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:01–01:22:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to two plans, and then we had two that were recommending one plan. And so, you know, while the administration certainly does believe, and I think it was discussed, that the, going to a single court plan would be more beneficial. But we said we would try the, this as an interim to see if there is a, you know, see how this works out. Also, ‸ you know,
I
think some things that Sean talked about, it also, education. And we have, you know, the wellness fairs, we have the open enrollment, and where all the benefits are explained. And we actually have Cigna coming out, I think they come out three, four times a year.
Yeah. To meet with
any, you know, so,
and
it goes out to the employees. So, if anybody has, they
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:55–01:22:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, everybody's aware of the benefits that they have, where they can ask questions to, you know, so you don't have to get on that phone. I've been on that phone call before, too.
So have I.
And, you know, and the one thing I will say, just in general, if you recall, you know, because I think it's, you know, at the core of this, back when the city made
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:15–01:23:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:26–01:23:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
budget as well. And that's when we made the decision to do what we did. I mean, I think it was last year, there was a community in Brevard County whose employees faced a 30-percent increase,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:42–01:23:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, I mean, insurance costs, you know, even more so in the aftermath of the Affordable Care Act, you know, have, we've seen some of those costs increased.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:58–01:24:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's one of our strategic issues in terms of, you know, investing in our employees and providing those, you know, reasonable level benefits. We also be, you know, also trying to be mindful that there's only so much money the taxpayers are willing to provide and trying to make the best decisions ‸ in the interest of both parties.
Well, that being said, Mr. City Manager, I would like to make a motion that we approve what is it being recommended by the employee task force that's on our agenda tonight using iMed as the vision carrier, with the understanding that our employees who are diabetic still have the availability of vision services through their regular medical care, which is how I've always done mine, not ‸ through my vision, but through my medical. And I want my motion to include that from this day forward, we will reach out to our employees and if nothing else, at least ask for suggestions on how they think we may be able to improve the health services that we offer at a more reasonable cost and see if maybe somebody out there has a better idea than what we have as a council. That's a great
idea.
And also let the motion include asking the city manager to maybe consider forming a employee group to look at insurance coverage, not just for the city of Cocoa, but, you know, what is happening to insurance nationwide so that we can use that information to educate our employees before we go through this process next year?
I'll second that. Well, so, yeah. Well, so. Yes.
We got a second. Okay. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Motion carries. 5-0. Thank you.
Thanks, Sean. Thank you, Sean.
Thank you.
That's painful.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:26:20–01:26:24 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Yeah, it is.
Yeah, it is.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:24–01:26:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:24–01:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know what it is? It's the unknown that's bigger than what we can. Yeah, but
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:26:26–01:26:48 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
it's a lot deeper than just a lot deeper.
I think you summed it up earlier, Mr. Mayor. You know, we're not the only city, when you talk to other mayors, that are grappling with these issues in terms of maintaining
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:48–01:26:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
level of benefits and balancing the needs of the employees
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:26:48–01:26:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:51–01:26:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ability of taxpayers.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:26:52–01:26:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:55–01:26:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the same agenda tonight. You know, not increasing
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:26:56–01:26:59 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:59–01:26:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to the taxpayers, but still providing a level of service that keeps employees here. Because,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:26:59–01:27:09 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:05–01:27:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I mean, with the unemployment rate, what it is,
Everybody is fighting for employees, and ‸ everybody knows municipal government doesn't have the best salaries. The benefits to our employees are the best things that we can offer. So ‸ we just have to hope that our citizens at some point understand that there's only so much cutting we can do, and we can't keep good employees if we don't compete.
‸ And we can't ignore their concerns. That's the main
thing. ‸ Not ignore their concerns.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:40–01:27:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I mean, when you look at the lion's share of the budget is personnel, salaries and wages and benefits. And
that's the way it goes in the private sector, too. I mean, any business will tell you employees and benefits for employees are a huge portion of their budget, and most of them have started cutting employee benefits because that's the only way they can. The deductibles go much higher. Most of my friends who are in the private sector, their deductibles are 75. My brother's deductible on his last surgery was $10,000, and he's the boss. He buys the insurance. Yeah. Right.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:19–01:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's your option sometimes.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:23–01:28:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay. So, super attorney, we got it.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:30–01:28:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
change the meeting dates.
at
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:28:39–01:28:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the April 24th city council meeting.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:43–01:28:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the ‸ city council can change the meeting date from a Tuesday to a Wednesday. You asked that we look at the legal authority to change the meeting dates. We, pursuant to the city charter, the council has the right to change the meeting dates if it's your desire. ‸ Procedurally,
the
city council would have to adopt an ordinance to do that. So, this is just being brought to close the loop for your consideration on whether or not you even want to entertain changing the meeting date ‸ from Tuesdays to Wednesdays. And if so, there is an ordinance that we put in the agenda package in case that's the direction the council wants to go.
I have a question. I like to see.
I just have a question ‸ of the city administration.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:32–01:29:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if we changed our... There was two, I believe.
It would be the planning and zoning and the board of adjustment.
Right.
The one thing that...
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:29:46–01:29:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:50–01:29:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:29:54–01:29:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:56–01:29:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Does it be a way?
If
anybody got a
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:30:00–01:30:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I did. I did.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:03–01:30:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, well,
may I speak about it?
I think...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:08–01:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I can see a reason for moving them, mainly having to do with the school board.
I was going to say that's one of the issues that we've had residents... I can't attend the school board or the county commission meetings because we meet on the same days. I know we always...
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:33–01:30:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
budget being presented. The
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:39–01:30:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:41–01:30:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
‸ It would require us moving around.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:46–01:30:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:49–01:30:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
always a church night.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:55–01:30:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
evenings these days than we used to have. But I feel
that having a council meeting on Wednesdays would be advantageous for the staff as well as the community. We have the school board. My main reason for bringing it up is that we have attendance to the school board more so than council meetings because they're on the same night.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:27–01:31:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
So they're going to go to that meeting before they
would
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:31:35–01:31:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
come here. We've had empty seats on Tuesday nights here when if we give people the opportunity the next night to come here, to voice their concerns, and get involved in city government, local government, more so than being in another place to where they won't be able to have the input they would if they
are
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:00–01:32:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
coming here on that Wednesday.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:03–01:32:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's in the middle of the week.
it'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:12–01:32:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
give them an extra day in order to prepare. I'm sure,
I'm
quite sure, sometimes on a Friday or Thursday, he's preparing the agenda for our meetings.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:24–01:32:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
meet that Tuesday, it will give them an extra day in order to prepare for us that Wednesday.
Well, the biggest benefit I see is definitely that we have been sitting here having a meeting on nights when we all should have been in a school board meeting. Yes, many times. Many times.
Many
times. And knowing how important, especially these days when we've lost our middle school, that schools are to our city. You know, I don't want to be sitting here when the school board is making decisions about our schools. I would ‸ like to at least be able to know that one or two of us could go sit at a school board meeting. Yes. I have no objection to changing it.
It
doesn't affect me personally either way other than how it may affect our boards.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:19–01:33:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the boards that would have to change their meeting. ‸ I would like that information before I make a decision.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:29–01:33:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
maybe the city clerk's office, poll the members of the board that would have to move their meeting night and see if they have any objections.
I can give them a call.
Yeah,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:41–01:33:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Because
it's hard enough to get members to serve on board. It's true. It is. Yes.
And we do need to take that into consideration as well.
Yeah,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:48–01:33:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I'll
make
a
motion that we table it until the next meeting and we get more information on the other committees,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:55–01:33:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to serve on the other committees.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:00–01:34:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Somewhat. Okay.
Well,
you know, it's not a decision that requires a lot of thought other than, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:14–01:34:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
citizens. It's going to be advantageous for us to be able to meet in the middle of the week instead of one day after Monday.
I just want to make sure we're not going to lose our chairman of our planning and zoning board and some other planning. ‸ Okay. We'll get
a five over here. So, you know, we've got our city staff. ‸ Well,
we can table it until more information. We can bring it back to
next meeting.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:39–01:34:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But I really do feel that we need to entertain that.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:34:45–01:34:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Do
you have
a second? Second. Second over here.
All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Good.
We'll find out and bring it back. Mm-hmm. That'll work. Okay. Good.
Laura?
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:02–01:35:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the requested action is to approve vendor selection for award of RFP 18-17-COC, Professional Auditing Services, authorize the city manager to negotiate and execute a multi-year contract with Moore-Stevens-Lovelace PA in a contract form acceptable to the city attorney
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:27–01:35:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I would like to mention one of the attachments that was, it was called the comparison that was attached to the agenda item. That was prepared by a non-voting member of the committee that made the selection. And there was a typo between two lines. But I just wanted to let you know that that comparison was not used in the scoring and the ranking at all. ‸ It was given to the committee, like, shortly before we met. And we had already, you know, scored our sheets and everything. So the typo didn't affect the scoring aspect at all. But I wanted to bring it to your attention.
Thank you.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:26–01:36:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:33–01:36:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as a multi-year agreement to be renewed automatically for successive one-year terms until either party terminates agreement retroactive to the effective date of the maintenance agreement and amendment.
motion
to approve
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:59–01:37:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:01–01:37:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:10–01:37:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to execute a multi-year agreement addendum I'm sorry a multi-year contract addendum between
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:17–01:37:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
second
all in favor aye any opposed okay okay good Anybody in the audience from ‸ advisory board or committee like to speak?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:41–01:37:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right behind you.
I think you need a sale, Cap.
yeah
cap mid Nice to be here in front of you. The
reason I come up here, I want to publicly thank the mayor. I don't know if you people, whether he explained it or not, but they have a program which they call Honor
flight
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:38:15–01:38:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:28 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:38:16–01:38:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
And he pushed me all around Washington
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:38:44–01:38:46 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
in the wheelchair. And very, very good. Even took time for me to go to the bathroom and all that he was really did a good ‸ job and I want to publicly thank him for it right here. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:39:06–01:39:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just let everybody know since we went to that level the trip we take
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:11–01:39:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right? Just make make that ‸ very clear. And DC has some great bathrooms to be laid out and so we did it but it yeah it was a great yes it's a great adventure and we met we
yeah
we ‸ met
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:35–01:39:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:39–01:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you do go down and get the picture first with all of us and don't go there to Bob Dole so captain and I are see a congressman Posey shows up at the bus we're getting pictures with him and everybody's getting a little mad and I see Bob Dole he's looking at Captain
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:59–01:39:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going, come
here.
So we went over there got pictures. and so we were in trouble most of the day captain and I we had a we had a great trip. It was a it was a great trip. so good all right. oh yeah. He's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:17–01:40:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Looking good. Okay. We'll go see the ‸ administration. No, no.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:26–01:40:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you want to talk? what about
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:40:27–01:40:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:40:38–01:40:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
yeah I mean it used to be on
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:49–01:40:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we
‸ move it to Wednesday
we'll
have it Saturday after church
good point
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:01–01:41:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:04–01:41:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Ed anything happen Ed anything going on
Just one brief item. ‸ with the deep regret that one of our employees
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:18–01:41:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Public Works passed away this weekend I want to let you know I'm
going to let you know
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:23–01:41:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
worked for the city 12 years total, starting out in sewer field operations. right we'll miss him and yeah
sorry to hear that definitely
a surprise
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:39–01:41:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Chief Caleb no reports ‸ Chief Prince
no
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:03–01:42:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Karen
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:42:04–01:42:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
okay no
reports
you want to say anything Monica
no reports either
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:15–01:42:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
okay answer me
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:17–01:42:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
wow we're going to
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:21–01:42:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
kind
of shared my report
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:28–01:42:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and daughters Emily and Crystal Please keep in your thoughts and prayers. yes yeah yeah
okay okay
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:43–01:42:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you going to match up ‸ everybody
um
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 01:42:54–01:42:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
roll tonight Keep it up, right? ‸ Just a couple things. um I just wanted to say great League of Cities dinner last night Mr. Whipple and I attended and I wanted to say thank you to the city of Rockledge for letting us um sit and enjoy the meal with them. it was nice to see our friends in Rockledge and get to talk about what's going on in their city and we were both of us were without our city manager, so we could we could have nice conversation without feeling like the teacher was looking over her soul. so
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:43:28–01:43:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I also wanted to mention to the city manager that um there has been a lot of and I'm sure I know Samantha who's already gone
as
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:38–01:43:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
well aware of it because she and ‸ I've had a conversation there's a lot of um
um
negative talk online uh in the port st john community about our water system and specifically about our meter readers and their employees and that's our employees and that's very upsetting to me because I know our employees are are doing their jobs um so I have suggested to people that they reach out to our city manager and deal with him uh
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:07–01:44:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
has suggested that every everybody from port st john come to our next council meeting so I just wanted to give our cocoa citizens a heads up if you get here and have no place to park it's your neighbors in Port St. John that are here. uh in the meantime
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:23–01:44:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city manager and I am confident that he will address their concerns They would like for somebody from our water department to host a meeting in Port St. John to talk about um what they feel is problems specific to Port St. ‸ John and
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:42–01:44:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So just a heads up.
uh
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:52–01:44:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
phone calls. this has been
going on yesterday and today so I'm sure you'll i'm sure you'll hear from somebody
I mean, if they are customers, and we should we should reach out to them, and we should hear everything and and see what
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:11–01:45:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
i
I know Samantha's been following along, so I know she's familiar with it.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:18–01:45:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
readers and said I know are not true. you know yeah
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:28–01:45:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
since you mentioned the League of Cities, that uh Brenda has agreed to
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:36–01:45:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
annual uh meeting ‸ of the uh the uh
league
of Cities. It was requested in our board meeting that we have a representative from the City of Coco designated as their our representative, and she did.
I'm really looking forward to going to
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:00–01:46:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm sure they're waiting. yes that's good all right edit that's it
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:10–01:46:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
I just want to say uh 524, the traffic lights are all up and working.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:18–01:46:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The traffic lights operational as of yesterday, and the new north and north northbound traffic light at 95 is operating. So now both entrances to the highway have traffic lights and they're working. They usually only had one before. you mean
walmart
no no
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:46:41–01:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
I meant Sam's Club. On 524, that traffic light is working now. Walmart distribution center.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:54–01:46:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
yeah
that
traffic light's working and then the new traffic light's working at 95. So both sides of the highway have it and it seems to be working good.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:05–01:47:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and Yeah,
we were
there. and got two dozen golf carts racing around the property, so they're doing good. and it's
big
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:14–01:47:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
i
think so yeah ‸ so.
We're really coming to town. Keep it up. Thank you all for attending. ‸ you too
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:25–01:47:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
jerry
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:29–01:47:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:31–01:47:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
On the uh 4th of
July, uh 160 foot flagpole, and they raised the flag, and that was a very nice ceremony. He had a good turnout. So um that was a nice event that
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:47–01:47:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we had the 4th of July in the park that evening as well. yes but
there was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:57–01:47:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
one thing i do want to mention that we had on july 1st in the park which was the u.s army jazz band And for those of you who did not get to attend that event, you missed a great concert. They were great. I mean, the audience. i Right, Brenda?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:12–01:48:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so And I mean, that's it's really an honor for the the of the band of their caliber to uh come to Coco and perform like that. So I hope to see them again in the future. And uh I think that's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:30–01:48:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the two fire stations.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:33–01:48:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:36–01:48:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Wonderful turnout at both stations. I think the community really appreciated the fact that we did that. Thank you, Chief Prince. You and your team did a great job. Yes. ‸ thank you very much. um That's it, Mr. Mayor. Thank
you. And just to add on to that, the fire station opening, set was great. It was two beautiful buildings. Of
course
I looked at the quality, ‸ high quality installs and everything. And,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:02–01:49:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
love it. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:10–01:49:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
lot of years of work. And um I really appreciate ‸ everything done, everybody's done for it. um Number two would be the uh urban. There's
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:25–01:49:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
flagpole and they start cranking up, this this flag that's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:32–01:49:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
probably. You know? um It was a great
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:39–01:49:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
then the uh evening
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:47–01:50:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:28 ▶]
of folks. But it was great night. ‸ It
was a great day.
Yeah,
they were very good.
Also, uh hold on. Also, I was going to talk about um home rule, but we kind of added,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:27–01:50:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
home rule stuff. You know, everything's not home rule.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:30–01:50:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I think, you know, by, I think earlier when we were talking about it, I think by, you know, having a group come in and try to, you know, circumvent what the local governments have done is not right. And history will show that today doesn't,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:51–01:50:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, the board here, we can't talk
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:00–01:51:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
before we shut it down? Because I always like to talk.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:07–01:51:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
employees show up.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:12–01:51:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know, we need to take care of morale. Morale is going to be something we need to look at you know coming years. Yes, sir?
I just put out one thing. ‸ I want
to
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:22–01:51:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:25–01:51:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just really, it's really proud to say that it's the long city. It's clean. You know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:36–01:51:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we took it over. And I want to
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:42–01:51:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 01:51:46–01:51:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's
good
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:51:58–01:52:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:52:01–01:52:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:10–01:52:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as, uh you know, the stuff we're seeing down in uh Patrick and the water system down here all kinds of accusations going around. um Be mindful of, you know, you know our city. I'm very proud of our water system how it's, you know, all the work that has been done to it over the years and all the vendors that work on it and people that work in utilities. and uh you know very proud of the city. any Anything
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:40–01:52:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
The speaker at League of Cities last night, John, was Ian Golden from the county's housing department. Karen, Ian was talking about some of the uh federal money that they're expecting um to come as a result of the last hurricane that they're still kind of waiting on. Yeah. um
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:04–01:53:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Brevard County is eligible, one of the, I guess, one of four areas that's eligible for some of this money. According to Ian, some of this money that's coming to us is specifically designated for infrastructure. so That's
good.
He suggested, and our lobbyist was at the table with us last night, and he also suggested that we jump on it early.
Because we all know that,
yeah you know, the county doesn't, they want to spend as much of it as they can on county areas and not necessarily with cities.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:45–01:53:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that Ian talked for about 20 minutes, and the majority of it was about the money that's coming down sooner or later because
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:56–01:54:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
‸ Yeah,
which is you know, I know we're going to shut ‸ down in just a second. This is important that we kind of reconnect because we can't talk, you know, and,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:08–01:54:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's got a huge water pipe going across it.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:13–01:54:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, sir. They've made their repairs to stabilize the bridge, and I don't think they've,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:20–01:54:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think the intent of the county, to my knowledge, is that they're going to keep it closed.
Okay. I was at a
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:30–01:54:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
asking the same questions. And, uh so, I guess the county is the county
has a the
county has to put it out publicly, as well So, okay um all right, so we'll shut her
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:45–01:54:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]