Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (627_CC_Reg_Minutes_09_03_2024.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss, NOT PRESENT Alex Goins
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines.)
Absences: no absence line could be read from the minutes' text, so none is stated here; the first page of the minutes is the record.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Kristin Eick (Asst. City Attorney), Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Lori Chabot (Recording Secretary), Abigail Morgan (Public Works Director), Rebecca Bowman (Finance Director), Anthony Marchica (Police Lieutenant), Jack Walsh (Utilities Director), Tammy Gemmati (Administrative Services Director), Samantha Senger (Communications & Economic Development Director), Corbin Gilbert (Help Desk Support Tech)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (3)
to dopt Resolution No. 2024-083 adopting a tentative millage rate of 6.9532 mills, for the City of Cocoa, commencing on October 1, 2024, and ending on September 30, 2025 (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 4-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 3
to adopt Resolution No. 2024 -084 adopting the FY2025 tentative budget and CIP for the City of Cocoa Fiscal Year, commencing on October 1, 2024 and ending on September 30, 2025 (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 4-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 4
to adjourn the 1st Budget Hearing of September 3, 2024 (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 4-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 4
Agenda (the City's wording)
No agenda for this meeting was found in the City records this site holds. That does not mean the City published none.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube, in a new tab.
148 suspect passage(s) marked in place.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 14 voices separated from the audio.
11 short machine repair(s) (13 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 93.8% of 5,762 content words.
Dotted words (115 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
148 passages (23% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:05–00:00:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Invocation will be performed by Deputy Mayor Hearn, and then we will do roll call, and then I will turn it over to the city manager, and we will proceed in that order. Would everyone please stand for all glory.
If you all will join me in prayer. Dear Heavenly Father, I'd like to give thanks for allowing us to arrive here safely at the beautiful City Hall this evening. I ask that you continue to watch over our city, watch over our neighbors as well, as we endeavor the rest of this year.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:14–00:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:27–00:01:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:38–00:01:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We will proceed in this order. We will ‸ have this discussion about the budget hearing. I have one card as it states right now. I would like to turn it over to the City Manager, but we will have a public hearing with two items, two adoptions for a resolution, and we'll proceed in that order. Okay. Everyone should have their itinerary in front of them.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:13–00:02:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:34–00:02:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:50–00:02:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
millage cannot exceed the millage rate adopted by City Council ‸ on July 23rd. That can happen, but we would have to redo all of our trim steps all over again if Council wanted to do that. Note that the fiscal year 2025 budget was developed with an assumption
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:15–00:03:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
state requires for us to do to support our ongoing capital needs and operational needs. And then the second step in this process, I'll run you through the budget numbers, and then I'll request for Council to adopt the tentative budget for fiscal year 2025.
tentative budget, we will set a second public hearing. It is, again, not on a regularly scheduled Council meeting date because the school board, would be meeting on the same date as the city council meeting.
so the state statute says we cannot meet on the same date as the school board. So that's why we're doing a little bit differently this year. And according to state statute, we have to have a balanced budget by October 21st, 2024. And the notice of proposed taxes, property taxes, went out to homeowners already via the trim notice. So comparing other cities' rates, we did not get information from everyone about what their current versus their rollback and proposed rates are. There are, the rollback rate is there on that slide for comparison. And if you look at it, doesn't look like anyone is going back to rollback rate. However, they are making some slight reductions in their millage rates.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:01–00:05:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:08–00:05:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:19–00:05:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:23–00:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:33–00:05:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:40–00:05:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:50–00:05:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And keeping the millage rate the same as in previous years was helped to fund salaries and benefits, mandatory and critical capital equipment, maintaining ‸ essential services, and absorbing inflationary costs. So at this point in time, Mr. Mayor, I would like for you to open this up to public hearing and take any comments from the public.
I just want to ask in the future if we could, when we do the comparative city rates, we could ‸ also include population size. I mean, I kind of know what these are, but it gives us, I think, a better perspective. You know, for example, we're probably double the population of Satellite Beach, but we're half the population of Titusville. So, you know, just if we're going to compare, that would be a helpful data point. Thank you.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:05–00:07:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't know if now is the appropriate time to ask, but ‸ when ‸ going through the budget, there's a number of items that are in red under shortfall. How do we handle that?
It's just a suggestion. Sorry. It's just a suggestion as well. Maybe looking at next year's budget. If we can do a scenario-based presentation as well. Maybe showing the council what we can do
Okay. Do we have any other comments from council pertaining to tonight's budget? Saying none, ‸ sure letting you close this portion. Open to the public. Please come forward and state your name. And you have three minutes to elaborate on this particular item. Resolution number, the tentative millage rate, tentative fiscal year 25 budget. Going ‸ once.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:55–00:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You want to see the numbers? Okay. We're going to, we will come back again. Yes, ma'am. I'll make sure you get the opportunity when we meet the second time so that you can see the actual numbers there too as well. That
Charlotte, it closes portion to the public and return it to council. Next slide, please. Because I know we got to make a motion, but I just want to see the next slide.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:01–00:10:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:11–00:10:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:19–00:10:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so just to recap what the rollback rate is, this is a technical explanation that says allows government's growth in revenue by excluding new construction from the calculation and keeps the taxpayers paying the ‸ same taxes as they did in the previous year.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:50–00:10:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a term that applies to the property tax rate as it changes year over year in relation to the property values. So essentially a rollback rate, excluding new construction, will get you back to collecting the same amount of taxes that you collected in a prior year, even though maybe you have inflationary issues or salary union negotiations going on and cost of everything's going up. So that is an option that council has. So at this point in time, I would like for council to approve
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:45–00:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:55–00:11:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:13–00:12:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:20–00:12:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:33–00:12:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:39–00:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:43–00:12:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:54–00:12:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:59–00:13:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:04–00:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:10–00:13:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:14–00:13:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we'll start with General Fund. And as a reminder, these are the different categories that we have to report in the financial statements. So General Fund revenue sources is made up of taxes, other permits and fees, intergovernmental revenue, which is shared revenue, and sales tax and things like that. And then charges for services is the water billing services and garbage collection and other various charges for services that we have. We have fines and forfeits, miscellaneous, and then something that's called non-revenue, because it's not something that we generate that revenue ourself, which ‸ includes interfund transfers, the water and sewer return on investment, and payment in lieu of franchise fees. We did have debt proceeds this year.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:10–00:14:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then anything that we pulled from unassigned fund balance or reserves. So looking at General Fund budget, the highest revenue source there is the interfund transfers from water, sewer, stormwater funds, followed by taxes. That line for
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:37–00:14:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:47–00:14:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:57–00:15:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:14–00:15:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:19–00:15:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:34–00:15:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:36–00:15:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:46–00:15:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Community services, $214,000. City council, $179,000. And then emergency operations, $173,000. And so this slide is the slide where you see the red, and that is showing a reduction in the cost from fiscal year 24 to fiscal year 25.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:08–00:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and fire had large increases. Those increases were due to capital spending, different pieces of equipment for public works, and then fire truck ‸ was the major thing for the fire department for the next fiscal year. And I would like to note overall that there was an
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:31–00:16:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Their largest revenue generator is charges for services, which is all the utility fees. And then they have revenues from unrestricted net position to fund
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:02–00:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So their total budget is $85.6 million. And then looking at them by division, again, you see some things in red there, like for engineering, this is all the different departments that are in utility fund. That's just due to a change in capital projects from one year to the next. And then the administration, which includes the costs for the ROI, the pile off and the overhead and debt service transfers decreased slightly at $126,000. And then water field operations and inventory also had slight decreases.
due to capital again. Fiscal year 2025 stormwater budget. If you'll recall, stormwater is collected through a special assessment, similar to the fire assessment. So that's not under charges for services. It gets reported as a special assessment. And we break out the collection of that money by trying to keep track of delinquent or tax certifications, but the total budget for stormwater revenue is $2.3 million.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:34–00:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:12–00:19:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:28–00:19:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
four or six years ago now, I guess five years ago to know which projects are going forward. If we've replaced any, you know, what our progress is. ‸ So,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:45–00:19:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:49–00:19:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:15–00:20:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Any other questions? I do have a card in the audience. All right. Let me close this portion to council and open to the public. I have you, Mr. Murphy. Please come forward. State your name.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:58–00:20:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have a month after the end of the fiscal year to be able to record all the costs back to the previous fiscal year. Right. Before I can start working on financial statements.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:04–00:22:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I know you're going to find this hard to believe, but I kind of disagree with that. Uh, for a couple of reasons. The first one is, um, and looking at the FAMS report
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:16–00:22:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
projected borrowing. And so there was a large amount of, uh, projected grants that are to come in and the 27, 28 year, um, versus what was projected previously to that. And, um, um, so
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:55–00:23:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:08–00:23:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So it was probably for a large project where we're hoping that we would get a grant or it would be dependent on execution to get some dollars to offset it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:20–00:23:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
engineering, uh, department that did that analysis for you. And they're projecting 379 parcels, uh, that are west of the Indian river drive that are not going to be converted to sewer. So
but those 379 other parcels don't get converted, ‸ which now puts the onus upon those owners of those parcels to do a conversion to an enhanced septic system, which the report projecting there is $30,000 each. Now I understand that within the county that there are available grants out there today of about 18,000 to offset that, but it's still 12,000 and that grant money could dry up from the, uh,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:39–00:24:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:40–00:24:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:53–00:24:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:54–00:26:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:19]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:06–00:26:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:07]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is a lot of money for somebody who's struggling. So, um, I would just like to get a breakdown and figure out why I feel like, I feel like it, we might be paying for it twice.
[00:26:19]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:19–00:26:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:21]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
your property tax? That's just that. No, that's just the, what the city of Cocoa gets out of my property taxes. I pay roughly $4,000.
[00:26:30]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Yeah. Your $1,500 goes into a big pot that funds the police department, the fire department, uh, public works, uh, all the support agencies, um, city council. So it is a, it is a cumulative collection of all the property
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:25–00:27:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:25]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
for services, it says that the waste management is, you know,
[00:27:29]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
that a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:29–00:27:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:27:29]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
garbage collection is a part of that. And I'm just, I mean, I paid $20 a month on my water bill basically for, for that. I'm just, I'm trying, I'm coming, I'm coming here to get educated. Yeah. There's a
[00:27:57]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
understand that. But what I'm saying is like, there's roughly $20 a month on the water bill. So I'm just curious as to why on that, uh, charge for services line item garbage is mentioned, but
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:13–00:28:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that's a, that's a bill that goes out every month. Um, waste management garbage is, uh, expense monthly. And so, so to, so that you don't get two bills, you're actually ‸ just receiving your waste management bill. That's a part of your water bill.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:51–00:28:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:00]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
there's an itemization on the charge for services, it's like that, if that line item, if there's a, uh, itemized, um, list of what, what's on there. Yeah.
right. Thank you. I don't, I don't know if that's what you're referring to, but are you, are you just trying to figure out an itemization of your garbage charge? Well, that's just one of the, that's, that's one of the, uh, okay. So you just want, you want an itemization of what's called charges for service on your monthly water bill?
[00:29:36]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Not on the monthly water bill on the actual, on this, on this, uh, this tax bill,
[00:29:40]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:40–00:29:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:47]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:18–00:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:21–00:30:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:24]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:43–00:30:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:50]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Like, so if I, if, if I were, if that's where I was going to be paying, what percentage is going to this? ‸ What percentage is going to that? Because I mean, if it's going into a big pot, then obviously that pot's got a percentage of the, it pays a percentage to this percentage
[00:31:03]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:03–00:31:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:31:03]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that. So what about an itemized percentage? Um,
[00:31:06]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:06–00:31:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's going to be, be accurate, but, but again, ‸ the city collects, including your 1484, the city collects, uh, 12 point, whatever million she had on the, on the previous chart there. So again, they're about 7,000 residential properties. If I remember correctly, that all have a, a taxable, um, revenue amount that go into making, uh, ‸ the,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:39–00:31:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:01–00:32:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:04–00:32:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the police department, doesn't cover the full cost of public, works. You can see what fire is. You can see general operations, finance, information, technology. And so you're the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:49–00:32:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:57–00:33:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:01]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Yeah, no, it's, it's traditional IT services that supports, uh, all of those services that you see there, including, um, uh, ‸ stormwater, including utilities.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:39–00:33:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So, so again, you can see why it would be difficult to, because again, your, your 1400 is a part of the, the 12.03 million, which again is a part of this 54 million. So it pays for again, whatever percentage 12 million is of 54. ‸ pays a, uh, a small percentage of, uh, the cost to run government.
[00:34:21]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Jeffrey Brown” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
because I'm on commercial residential and then there's others that do not pay any taxes at all. But that's a different conversation on a different date. Okay. Do we have any other ‸ additional individuals in the audience? Saying none, I'd like to close this portion of the public and return to the council.
a comment. We are not voting on the water sewer percentage. We've already done that, right? We're voting on the budget tonight. That's right. Yeah. Just for Mr. Murphy's information and in regard to the, uh, septic conversions and, and that report, I think I've requested that we have an opportunity to, um, see that as a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:27–00:35:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:41–00:35:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:04–00:36:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you city council. So, um, at this point I would like to, um, reiterate that the next public hearing will be the final public hearing on the final millage rate and the final budget, uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:39–00:36:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you very much, ma'am. Job well done. Mr. City manager and staff directors, all 400 plus employees because teamwork is the dream work. Mr. City manager,
last week on Amazon opening. Um, so Amazon has announced or will be announcing, um, the fulfillment center on Grissom that will be opening, uh, hopefully very soon.
Um, and we should have a release by next week on hiring. So we'll have a hiring announcement next week. And we're looking at possibly hundreds of positions available right there in our community. So that's, we're excited about that. We'll get the word out about that announcement. Um, once we have more information, but we hope to have that next week.
was going, um, can you explain, because I know there are different types of plants. So this one is not the last mile plant. Correct. It, how do you, how do you describe,
a fulfillment center. Fulfillment center. Okay. That's the, that's the term that they use for that. That facility is a fulfillment center. Originally, the facility was going to be a last mile, which would have had vans, but this is a fulfillment center. And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:16–00:39:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
last mile is last mile. Those are the facilities that the items that are going on the gray truck that come to your home, uh, go to. So that's the last mile. The fulfillment center is items that will go to other Amazon centers. They may be, uh, they may be last mile centers there, but it's the, it is those items that are not going directly to your home, but going to other Amazon centers. And
there's a difference as well to that with jobs, because those vans that pick up on a last mile facility are all contract employees and aren't technically employees of Amazon.
Yeah, that was one of, that was one of the benefits of benefits of the change was that these are, these are more direct Amazon jobs there. And, and again,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:33–00:40:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, no, I mean, Amazon did a lot of work to retrofit that building to ensure its safety and all, which added some more space for them, but we're actually doing their final fire inspection of the fire pump and the foam system that, um, had to be added to that on September 10th. So they've done a tremendous amount of work out there.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:20–00:41:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:31–00:41:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
One and said, thank you all very much. Job well done. You've been a good servant for the city of Cocoa and the citizens. I thank you. Mr. City manager, city attorney and council staff, staff,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:04–00:42:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:11–00:42:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:16–00:42:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T12:41:33 · 4,523 ordinary words, 1,391 in suspect passages, 13 machine re-recognized.
Ask about this meeting
Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular,
or compare it across other meetings in the archive.