Thank you.
Yes, in spirit.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:05–00:00:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:06–00:00:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I'm thinking about it.
Thank
you.
This is a...
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:12–00:00:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:14–00:00:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:16–00:00:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:18–00:00:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:25–00:00:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
I'll rise. Hi, Jerry. Say yes, sir. Sorry, little brother. Yeah, I guess we can go home. Yeah, man, remember this is for you. That's right. Jerry's here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:43–00:00:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Hey, Jerry.
Yeah,
we can go campaign for Mike. Yep, and him. Amen.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:53–00:00:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Smooth.
It's smooth.
Silver tongue. I'm happy for you.
I still think she's better looking...
I
still think she's better looking than him.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:21–00:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Sure. Okay.
Just kidding.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:29–00:01:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:31–00:01:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:35–00:01:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:38–00:01:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay.
Yeah, everybody ready?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:46–00:01:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Good. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:48–00:01:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:54–00:01:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
$25...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:56–00:01:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:58–00:02:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:00–00:02:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:01–00:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:02–00:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Welcome, everybody. Thank you for coming this evening to our special city council meeting. Big crowd. We're going
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:02:18–00:02:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ask Mr. Blake if he could do the invocation.
Absolutely, sir. Would everyone stand in security? Heavenly Father, once again, ‸ say we come to you as humble servants, ready to serve and protect the people. We ask that your blessings be upon this facility, the structure of this meeting, but most of all, all citizens of this great nation that you have blessed us with. We ask all these blessings in your sweet son named Jesus. Everyone say amen. Amen. Amen. Amen.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:47–00:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
To the
flag
of the United States of America. And to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God.
Indivisible. With
liberty and justice for all.
Here.
Mayor Parrish? Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:09–00:03:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. Councilman Blake?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:11–00:03:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Councilwoman Warner? Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:20–00:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Anthony?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:24–00:03:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
How
you
doing?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:25–00:03:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. We're calling wrong.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:27–00:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:30–00:03:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:31–00:03:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Telethonically. I'm on
my way.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:34–00:03:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. Assistant City Manager Fuhrer?
Here.
Okay.
I make a motion that we approve the agenda for the special meeting of September 6, 2016.
Second.
All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Mr. City Manager? Mr.
Mayor,
council,
members
of the public, we're here this evening at a special city council meeting for the FY 2017 budget. This is the first public hearing.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:15–00:04:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, in the individual meetings as well as the budget workshops we've had thus far. Again, I want to thank all the directors and the managers that worked very hard to put together a budget that exercised fiscal responsibility and ensuring that the citizens' needs are being met and services will be provided in the upcoming fiscal year. So, you've seen a lot of this, although we have taken out a lot of the department level because we're at a higher level now, but for the purposes and the benefit of the public that are watching this evening, as well as those in attendance, I'll go through and provide some details that I know many of you have asked either personally or collectively in meetings. I will tell you that we do have our great consultant here this evening, Mike Burton, and Eric, and Malcolm. Yeah.
I'm sorry. Yeah? Yeah? Okay.
And I know we received an email regarding the fire assessment, and at a point prior to the public comment, when it comes to the fire assessment, I would ask that, you know, Mr. Burton get up and make comments, you know, so council is assured based on the questions that were raised in the email and some of the statements that you have a level of assurance, you know, moving forward.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:41–00:05:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the fire protection final assessment resolution for FY 2017, adopt a tentative military for fiscal year 2017, adopt a tentative budget for fiscal year 2017, and set the second public hearing, and you'll see this date several times throughout there, which is September 14th, eight days from today. Questions have already been asked. Can we do it on the 12th or the 13th, our meeting, or on the 27th? The county and the school board are having their budget hearings on those days, and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:17–00:06:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on those same days. So, eight days from today will be the second public hearing. Keep in mind, by state law,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:27–00:06:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:33–00:06:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there's
two steps. First, we will adopt the you will adopt the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:40–00:06:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
millage rate. Please note that the tentative millage rate, which you previously established as the maximum, cannot exceed the rate of 5.9790.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:54–00:06:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
rate that you establish as the proposed at the maximum. You can go below, but you can't go higher. That was approved on July 12th, 2016. Then the second part of this evening is adopting the 2017 City of Cocoa tentative budget. So, just again, just to review this, so the members of the public have the benefit of knowing where the city's going ‸ in an effort to continually try to be transparent and accountable with the citizens' tax dollars. One, our focus in this upcoming fiscal year ‸ is community improvements in infrastructure. The two prior years, we spent a lot of focus in assets and resources on public safety. With utilities, we continue to work.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:39–00:07:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the assets and undertake a fairly massive and continuing renewal and replacement program. While we're mentioning utilities ‸ when we get there, I just want to let everybody know, today we did sign an MOU with LIUNA. You'll receive an informational agenda item addressing the disparities and the inequities as it
relates
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:05–00:08:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to those critical, hard-to-fill positions.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:08–00:08:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in signing the MOU with LIUNA for those, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:17–00:08:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, just that's kind of a sidebar note. And I want to thank Tammy and finance ‸ for all their work and Jack and Ed as we worked with, especially the members of LIUNA, Andy Newsome, the chief steward, and his fellow union stewards. So, then, obviously,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:42–00:08:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
current levels of services that we provide to our businesses' citizens. We want to make sure we maintain control expenditures. And this year, we actually implemented zero-based budgeting for two departments, and we'll rotate that through. So, ‸ they basically start their budget from scratch. They don't look at last year. ‸ They build their budget from scratch, you know. So, it's one way to kind of get around to true up and make sure things aren't just sitting in a line item that carry forward every year, you know.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:13–00:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This year,
it
was community services and the police department.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:20–00:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
volunteer, I'm sure, after that.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:28–00:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as well as maintaining employee benefits at reasonable levels. We did experience, you know, higher than anticipated claims this year in our health insurance. But, you know, you'll see later, actually, the numbers are still we're in a better position. If you recall, this fiscal year, we went fully self-funded. And the rate that we're going to ‸ be paying is still less than had we renewed with Cigna last year. So, ‸ I think it was a pretty wise decision on council's part, and I think it will only continue to ‸ grow. We also want to make sure that we fulfill our commitment to our collective bargaining units, the fire union, the LIUNA, and the police ‸ union, PBA.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:18–00:10:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
our strategic plan, which was brought forward, was to put the city on a fiscally ‸ sustainable path. So, we're going to go over some of that, too. A little bit of a background as it relates to that. In 2015, we retained Burton & Associates, worked collaboratively with, you know, with staff and their staff to develop a fiscal sustainability model. It's a proprietary interactive model that Burton & Associates developed, and that was for the general fund. We used Burton & Associates for our utilities. They were for our rate study and also for fire assessment. And when you look at the integration and how that affects the general fund, it made a lot of sense.
It
enabled us to model our expenditures and revenues over a 10-year period and make decisions today, understanding what decisions we make today, how it's going to impact us, you know, down the road.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:08–00:11:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
prior assumptions, evaluate the current fiscal conditions, and also look at the, you know, where we were in terms of the assumptions and the projections as it relates to the FY17 millage and fire assessment ‸ rates. This is the full screenshot.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:27–00:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
their model. Again, the top bar, they originally, this goes back to 2015 when we first started this. And ‸ I'll even just go really right down to the two bottom bars, or the boxes, rather. The green and blue bars, those were our reserves. And as you can see, we were using our reserves to fund, you know, the fund ‸ deficit.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:52–00:11:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to have a reserve target of four months of O&M expenses.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:58–00:12:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a deficit out of complete reserves. So we needed a plan for that, as well as go over to the right. You see the red and blue bar, or the graph. The red bar line represents cash out. Those are our expenses. And the blue line represented cash in. You see the variance between the two. So we had a serious structural or financial challenge to overcome. So that was the basis. Now, moving into 17, it's been updated. It does demonstrate, as you recall, at one of the workshops that we held, that the military should remain unchanged over the projection period. It was updated to include the Walmart and the port property phased in 2019 for the Walmart distribution center.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:50–00:12:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
excuse me, developing. It shows that, you know, continuing to use our reserves for catalytic type projects, economic development or, you know, community catalytic type projects and one time non-recurring capital expenses. The projection, and this was done back in May, if I recall correctly, was $5.4 million.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:17–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
mark in this budget today. It did demonstrate the 3% increase to the fire assessment annually. If you recall, last year it was recommended at 5% looking at our expenses and
then
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:32–00:13:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
running their projections.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:33–00:13:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
supposed to be 5% to 3%. And it does provide for the debt ‸ service for the fire stations. You see on the right the cash in, the cash flow model, cash in, cash out. Those red and blue lines are a lot closer.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:54–00:14:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If you look at the light brown line, that is our O&M costs without capital. So you can see if we had to make some changes due to maybe a recession or, you know, or some other, you know, catastrophic event that, you know, would impact us financially, we would be able to, like we did previously, but maybe in a better position to, you know, be sustainable and not place
ourselves
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:25–00:14:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
in jeopardy.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:26–00:14:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're spent down strategically over time for a level 10-year period and on catalytic projects that will, ‸ you know, induce capital investment and growth in the city to, one, enhance our tax base. So at the end of the day, we're moving in the right direction, the model showing that. And again, this is the interactive proprietary model that Burton Associates prepared working with staff.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:58–00:15:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we thank them for their efforts for that. Just a history in the ad valorem tax base. As you know, FY fiscal year 2008 was our high ‸ mark, our $1.178 billion.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:14–00:15:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
effect. And you can see to the right the drastic reduction in the tax base. Even nine years later, we are still not, you know, we're not even close. You know, we're getting there.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:26–00:15:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
taxable, you know, ‸ valuation, rather, valuation for
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:35–00:15:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city, it's been ‸ very good.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:41–00:15:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
after the value adjustment board.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:45–00:15:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I mean, we were talking
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:50–00:15:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's pretty significant for our city. This is tying it together, valuation, millage, revenue, ad valorem revenue. You can see the change over time. In the current fiscal year that we're in, $817 million of valuation, maintaining the millage rate of 5.9790, which is we've maintained for the last two years.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:17–00:16:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:23–00:16:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:33–00:16:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:44–00:16:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
maximum,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:51–00:16:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
valuation. That would yield, and keep in mind, we have to budget by state law at 95% of that. So that would yield $4.8 million, roughly $221,000 more this year. Staff believes it's critical to maintain course, you know, as we put the city on a fiscally sustainable path. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:20–00:17:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You do see
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:26–00:17:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:34–00:17:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
somewhere, it's not even open for discussion because you
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:38–00:17:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So,
obviously, the question we get a lot, and I know
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:46–00:17:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
owner? Take the single-family
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:51–00:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For that person, in the current fiscal year, for city taxes, for city taxes, and the reason why I say city taxes is because when you say city taxes, think of the city services that
you
receive. Because we
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:11–00:18:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, currently, it's $299, and then we go up to $303.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:19–00:18:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:25–00:18:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's an
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:30–00:18:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city, the city.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:36–00:18:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know more than a majority, close to probably, probably over about two-thirds of our homes are less than $50,000. So, you look, if it's at $50,000 less than $25,000 exemption, you might be looking at about $1, $52 or so actual increase in their property taxes for next year. Keep in mind, we are only able,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:06–00:19:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:12–00:19:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Obviously, the CPI is
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:17–00:19:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:18–00:19:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:24–00:19:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:29–00:19:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and I think a lot of citizens want to know, well, where do we compare to other municipalities in terms of our ad alarm taxes or our property taxes? We rank number seventh.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:40–00:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:41–00:19:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
And you can see here, and this is based on these rankings are based on the proposed rates for all of our respective or sister jurisdictions. And you can see there is one community that is actually proposing a ‸ pretty sizable tax increase over its current tax rate, let alone the rollback rate.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:02–00:20:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Number eight.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:06–00:20:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
another year or two, maybe we'll be number eight and we'll be number seven.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:10–00:20:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yeah, that's their current proposed rate. They're all going through the same process right now. But as you can see, pretty much every community is going above their rollback rate or maintaining their current rate. So it just I mean, ‸ Melbourne, again, much larger city, much larger tax base. But you can see, you know, even Rockledge ‸ dropping a little bit ‸ but going above the rollback rate. So, ‸ again, as I
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:40–00:20:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:49–00:20:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the fiscal year 2017 budget. Reminder, once again, this is the first public hearing. The second public hearing is on September 14th, next week, 6 o'clock, right here at City Hall.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:08–00:21:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the way.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:12–00:21:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:14–00:21:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:18–00:21:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The millage rate to be
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:22–00:21:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:25–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
over the current rollback rate. While you're keeping the
military
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:36–00:21:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
rate the same, it does represent a tax increase. I think I emphasized that before.
That's because of the property value on it.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:45–00:21:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's
correct. So, at this point, it's what I'd like to do before we move to the public comment is I'd like to prior to, you know, engaging or asking city council questions and comments, is to invite Mike Burton to come up because the next order of business would be to approve the final assessment resolution, the non-advalorem assessment rule for the fire protection.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:09–00:22:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have one presentation that covers all three. I thought you might like that instead of having three separate presentations.
Yes,
go ahead. So, with that, I'll invite Mike up and
you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:22–00:22:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
can address, you know, the email in terms of the propriety and the validity of the fire assessment.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:30–00:22:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank you, John.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:38–00:22:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:42–00:22:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:43–00:22:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:45–00:22:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
So, it's a pleasure to be here. We had an email that was forwarded by the city manager from a citizen who expressed some concerns. One was about the notices. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:03–00:23:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And ‸ the gentleman who did raise the issue for the fire assessment, he ‸ was ‸ not required to be noticed. Is that correct?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:14–00:23:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
‸ There are a couple cases that determine when a notice is required to be sent for fire assessments. One is when you go above your currently adopted maximum rate. And your currently adopted maximum rate is well beyond what you're adopting here tonight. The other is if you had a change in methodology or if the property is new annexed into the city. You had a last mail out the prior year, last year, when you adopted an update to your methodology for the entire assessment.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:44–00:23:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is based upon that study. All the property owners received that notice, including the property owner in question here that had the email. He was not required to be noticed this year because the rates aren't going above his maximum notice assessment. He also was noticed on the water and sewer bill for the rate adoption hearing for that as well. And I believe that was part of the concern.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:11–00:24:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you notice in the water and sewer bill not a first-class mail notice like the fire assessment is. So that was done. We validated that with your staff. So those two issues are taken care of. He also questioned the special benefit finding for a fire assessment.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:34–00:24:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number of years.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:38–00:24:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
methodology change, we referenced two cases. One is fire district number one of Polk County versus Jenkins.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:49–00:24:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Boynton Beach. And in both of those cases, the Florida Supreme Court or the Florida courts, ‸ some of those may have been appellate courts,
they've
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:01–00:25:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
validated that ‸ fire service provides a special benefit to real property. So that's been well settled in the courts. And that special benefit is the availability of fire service. It's the ability to get insurance. And it's a number of things that we delineated in the report that he questioned. And all of those for many years have been accepted as special benefits that the fire assessment does receive. It isn't just what we decided here. It's been decided in numerous cases before ‸ us. And I believe that was all that was brought up. So if you have any questions,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:40–00:25:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I think part of his confusion came from the fact that he did get a notice one year and didn't get a notice the next year. ‸ And he just assumed it was something that should come out every year. So ‸ I think that was ‸ in a city of 18,000 people, if only one person noticed that they didn't get a notice this year.
To his credit, you had gone through numerous methodology changes in the past few years. So he's probably used to seeing these notices and seeing this, oh, no, a new fire assessment hearing is coming up. So it's just the fact that this year you're finally kind of kicking down the road on ‸ the steady state plan. You didn't have to do the notices. Actually, you
had a notice the year before, too, because ‸ that's when you adopted the availability method the first time.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:25–00:26:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
multiplier last year, so you had to notice again. I think
he's probably only been a resident for about three years, so he's probably had a notice every year he's been here.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:37–00:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, also, the fire assessment hearing is advertised in the newspaper regardless.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:47–00:26:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
mail notices only go out under certain circumstances, but the publication in the newspaper is published annually. And it's a sizable display ad, too. Yeah,
that we spend a lot of money for, yes.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:07–00:27:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:09–00:27:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
for their
‸ accounting and for their planning. ‸ Kind of explain to us and for the audience out there that your model that you use.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:30–00:27:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
policymakers here that don't look at this every day, I mean, it's a great guide. It's almost live for me. Well, it
is. We've adopted a number of years ago an interactive modeling process, ‸ recognizing that it's very difficult for you to assimilate all the data that's coming at you, and particularly in tabular form and spreadsheets. We deal with this every day, and I think if you give either one of us a spreadsheet, our eyes will tend to glaze over, too, a series of schedules. So we developed this interactive technology where we can change things on the fly, and you can see graphically the results as their city manager shows you. Right. And you can
run trials like, hey, keep your billage rate at this. Yeah. You
can
see the telemetry.
And
‸ it's not preprogrammed. It's all in there. Right.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:21–00:28:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
audience could say, well, what if growth was different? Or what if we had a different escalation rate on payroll? ‸ And we can change it, and you can see it right then. So the good thing about it is. For us, it's a huge advantage. It's a huge tool. Yeah. Well, thank you very much. I think it's a big advantage because in the better part of a morning or an afternoon sitting with staff or with you, we can work you towards a solution.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:46–00:28:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you next week. We don't ever say that. Right.
You
know, so that's really been and it started off with ‸ utilities and water and sewer.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:58–00:29:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
then we started integrating that with the water and sewer and then with the fire assessment model, too, because we have it in all of those.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:09–00:29:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of that full integration. And everywhere we've done it, it's been an incredibly powerful tool for the decision makers to feel confident that they're really seeing what the answers are going to be. And how you need
to handle it.
‸ Well, it not only makes the decision-making easier because we can see how all of our decisions are going to affect not only this year's budget, but what's going to happen 10 years down the road. But for me, that's the biggest thing is that my first
go-round
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:40–00:29:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
on council, I felt like we were planning for this year and next year ‸ and not a lot further down the road because we never knew what was going to happen, and we didn't have any way of quickly going, okay, well, if this happens What will happen? This is what
the
result is going to be. This has made the whole process just so much easier. It's unbelievable. Well,
that's great. We really appreciate ‸ your perspective on it.
You
know, Peter Drucker, the management scholar, has a quote that says, long-range planning is not concerned about future decisions, but rather the future of current decisions. And that's just what you described. Yeah,
exactly.
Yeah, because it was almost impossible to know, you know, 10 years ago, what the decisions we made today, what effect they were going to have this year on the city.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:24–00:30:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You can see it.
And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:26–00:30:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
out 10 years? Well, ‸ we don't really. I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:32–00:30:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The next five years is really a projection. But what we're looking that far out for is to see, is there anything that's going to be a major issue you're going to have to deal with in that time period, like
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:46–00:30:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if you were going to have to fund a couple of stations out in that time period, that would be a big deal.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:54–00:30:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:55–00:31:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bar in the out years was still slightly above the blue bar, and it was capital. But that's a long ways out, and a lot of things can happen differently. Valuations could get better. You don't need to plan for a total solution 10 years out, but it's good to see that you're within the framework of having one.
Yeah, yeah. I
mean, a real simple way to look at it is from day one when
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:22–00:31:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was ‸ growing the city ‸ to the point where we're getting a lot more industry and business and
residents
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:32–00:31:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:32–00:31:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I want to remind people out there, ‸ a few years ago we didn't raise water rates because you didn't see the need because of ‸ Mike's model that you look at.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:43–00:31:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
knowing that things are going the right way. But ‸ again, ‸ people ask me questions the other way around. You know, like, why ‸ would you consider ‸ raising water rates? Well, we know exactly where we're at and how we're having to ‸ correct problems.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:03–00:32:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:10–00:32:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah.
And we ‸ are ‸ hell-bent on having the best water and the best utility system in the nation. Right. Yeah. So we're going to keep, you know, from our angle, we're not going to shortchange. We're going to make sure that everybody's taken care of and our water's safe, you know, as an example.
One last comment.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:30–00:32:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's true.
It really is.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:35–00:32:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city staff and ‸ your city manager particularly. On the general fund model, ‸ we showed those reserves, and your city manager said, well, that gives us the ability to fund these catalytic projects that can enhance our property values. And I fully believe that's what's going to happen in us out years is you're going to have increases in property value that will take care of those things.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:00–00:33:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
vision that you could afford to fund those catalytic projects. And so that was the good thing.
And the other thing is that tool makes us proactive in making our decisions. ‸ We are accurate. Yep.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:14–00:33:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And my thing is proper preparation promotes positive productivity. Yes, ma'am, yes, sir. We couldn't help what happened last week at SpaceX with the pad. But I'm sure
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:30–00:33:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
got a tool similar to what we have that's comparable to prepare for such events like that.
Yep.
So I do support this, and I thank you for your collaboration and communication. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:43–00:33:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
And to your point, one of the other good things you've done is you've done this two or three years in a row, and then you can see ‸ just what you're saying. You won't be necessarily perfectly accurate every year, but you can make adjustments and course corrections so that you stay on course. And that's really another big benefit of how you've used
it. That's a huge advantage.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:06–00:34:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Your
model is. Good
stewards of the tax dollars.
There you go.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:11–00:34:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:14–00:34:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and by we telling them up front because they wanted the trucks, they wanted the improvement,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:24–00:34:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we laid this scenario out, and by God, here we are now.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:30–00:34:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank you. Appreciate you being here,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:34–00:34:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Mike.
Thank
you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:38–00:34:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:39–00:34:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in the floor today on the notice of the hearing to adopt the non-advalorem fire protection assessment rates, and it was advertised on the utility bills, the water bill. So the first part, the requested action, and ‸ I'll turn it over to Council for questions and then open it to public comment, is to, again, approve the final assessment resolution and the non-advalorem assessment roll for the fire protection assessment for FY 2017,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:17–00:35:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
would be corresponding with your agenda. Public hearing item number one.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:32–00:35:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:34–00:35:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:35–00:35:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Now, if we decide to do the 5.970, we can, at the next meeting, reduce it even to the rollback rate of whatever, 5.8, whatever it is. If we decide to do it that way. But I, can you go back one more screen, sir? I know what you're
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:40–00:36:02 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:02–00:36:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:04–00:36:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But if we wanted to do the rollback rate, and the only reason why it is a tax increase because the property values
went up.
We kept that same millage rate, and you gave us the breakdown, ‸ a house under
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:23–00:36:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bring that screen up again just for the public I just want to make sure you
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:32–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:43–00:36:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
would have anything to complain about I
mean it's transparent accountability
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:58–00:36:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not trying to be insensitive to the taxpayers concern that local government
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:05–00:37:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
how much you know collectively a person spends in a year for a cell phone, for cable. And look at all the
sort of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:20–00:37:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the essential services, municipal services that the city provides to our citizens and our businesses. It's
true. Johnny, are you done? Yes. we're gonna we're gonna move on I'm gonna close this to the council go to the public on a public hearing number three, you know number one. Anybody in the audience want to speak on this issue
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:46–00:37:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the fire assessment? Fire department?
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:52–00:37:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
council. How ‸ you want to handle this? yeah
We're doing each uh item is a separate motion, right? Yes. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:06–00:38:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
it back up on the screen, the requested action.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:15–00:38:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
2016-96, uh councilman. uh
councilman was
inserted.
2016-96 is the resolution number? Yes. Okay.
And the agenda package
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:34–00:38:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
not on the slide that you're looking at.
hold on
okay 2016-96, ‸ Yes, sir. Okay. So we need a motion then right? i make a motion that we approve resolution number 2016-96 for the fire assessment.
Second.
All in favor?
Aye. Any opposed? Okay. ‸ Mr. Mayor, ‸ council the second item, which is a
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:13–00:39:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
adopting the proposed military.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:22–00:39:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:23 ▶]
‸ Okay. I'm going to close it to the council, bring this to the public. And would anybody like to speak on the millage rate, make any comments? Okay. ‸ close it to the public, bring
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:11–00:40:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make a motion that we approve resolution 2016-92 tentatively adopting the proposed millage rate of
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:22–00:40:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
all
in favor aye any opposed
okay very good john Go ahead.
Okay the final part of this evening is to review the fiscal 2017 tentative budget and the CAP or the capital budget.
Thank you ‸ Thank you. Which
is public hearing number item number 2B. Again we've been through this through two workshops. The last workshop we presented in more
detail
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:04–00:41:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
by department. This is going to be just by fund and category. So uh we'll start off with the revenues and provide some historical analysis for those trends so you can see what the trend line is looking like. uh
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:16–00:41:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
and you can see it peaked in 2014 and then in the ‸ current budget for 2016 is uh is there and then you can see kind of tapering down a little bit and the same for the utility system, which is the blue. uh And it kind of has that arc. So it's starting to come down a little bit in terms of revenues. And then as you see for the light green is the stormwater fund. It's really small. And it is really small.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:44–00:41:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In terms of the general fund revenue by funding source, uh everybody wants to know, well, what what percent of our property taxes or what percent of taxes kind of come ‸ you know make up our or at least
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:02–00:42:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh are come from budget come from taxes. And which probably, let me say it's about, I
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:20–00:42:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh ‸ the other larger categories charges
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:31–00:42:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's our water billing, garbage collection, cultural recreation fees. And then you have other non-revenue. included in that 11.3 million dollars is eight million dollars of debt proceeds for our fire stations So you know absent that
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:50–00:42:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
million,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:50–00:42:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you'd
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:51–00:42:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So there's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:54–00:42:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then there's also revenues that that we're using from the reserves or the unassigned fund balance for those catalytic projects.
So
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:05–00:43:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, correct. Okay. ‸ So
uh the revenue trends is by the individual uh revenue sources, you know, taxes being blue, or uh the gray being other permits and fees. And you'll notice uh intergovernmental orange and then charges for services. charges for services was a little ‸ bit higher in 11 through about 14. And then with the change in a with the the way we record the fire assessment in terms of the state chart of accounts, it changed and it's now that's why you see the gray bar where it says other permits and fees, the fire assessment revenues are actually recorded there. But you see a corresponding, you know, there's a increase, but then you see the this the dip in ‸ the charges for services. So that just kind of gives you those actuals are all based on audited numbers with the exception of 2016, which is the budget. uh For the water sewer fund, uh charges for services uh for water, sewer,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:10–00:44:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
reserves, as well as ‸ the anticipation of this year for several years due to, I think, you know, good project management and uh fiscal responsibility. And Jack
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:30–00:44:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
market, but this may be the year that we have to go out to the market and able to, in order to, you know, uh we were projected to go to the market a couple times, but again, we have we've not had to do that, but this may be the year that we have to. And in the budget, you'll notice there's, I believe it's 20
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:49–00:44:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
for debt potentially for
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:59–00:45:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:06–00:45:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about 2.8 million
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:16–00:45:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then the reserves that they have for projects. There's also uh some grant income that we're getting this year from St. John's River Water Management District for some projects. uh So now expenses, you know, the expense side of the equation. Again, just we'll be think larger by the budget in terms of not getting into the details of each individual department. uh The
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:44–00:45:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
year.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:52–00:45:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that will go down after those expenses are incurred. uh Literally no change in the debt service funds for either general fund or water service uh debt service fund. uh You're seeing the special services fund, the increase. That is it represents the expenses related to the cra's uh CDBG, home, uh SHIP, uh police confiscation. It's all those special revenue funds. uh And then you see the self-insurance. I mean, despite us having a, you know, a higher than anticipated uh year in
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:31–00:46:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
over ‸ but
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:37–00:46:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:44–00:46:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
decrease from the amended 2016 budget to
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:55–00:47:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh it's that that's the general fund from council to public works uh this current year 40.2 to the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:09–00:47:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then these are by category. uh I usually try to focus on the graphs here because they help uh
uh
they're they're more illustrate. You want me to go back?
Yeah, I'm just gonna ‸ you know make the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:23–00:47:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
at managing their ‸ budget.
That's all I want to know.
Yeah, very interesting. Who controls our budget? So
the general fund, as you know, we talk about this every year,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:41–00:47:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of uh the wages and benefits uh versus the ‸ the water sewer and the stormwater fund that are
capital-oriented
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:52–00:47:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and operating. uh ‸ So you
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:56–00:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is uh is from wages
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:59–00:48:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:03–00:48:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
general fund expenditure trends
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:48:11–00:48:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:48:19–00:48:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:25–00:48:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they held us up this time, but I think when you see the 2016 actuals, I think it's going to be closer are in line to where we were in 2014. So you'll see a dip. That's based on our budget, but I think due to the monitoring of spending. What's the reason for
that?
Well, I think, one, the capital, we were hoping, to be honest, to go to the market in September for the fire assessment bonds. We're going in October. So we were planning on starting that. You've got to have that money before you can issue a purchase order. You have to have the revenue to back it up. So therefore, we had projected in the expenses for this current fiscal year, the $40 million, was $8 million for the fire ‸ stations. Now,
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:16–00:49:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
engineering, surveys, site assessments, and things of that nature in support of the fire stations. ‸ So...
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:33–00:49:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Well, yeah, because we purchased two pieces of land, correct, and then we had ‸ the site assessment. Yes, sir?
Yeah, ‸ the one on
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:42–00:49:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Correct. The one over here we own.
Well, actually, ‸ the COCO CRA owns it, and the city will be essentially acquiring that property from the COCO CRA, but with that, the city will be forgiven the note that the ‸ city borrowed, or excuse me, the COCO CRA had a deferred note on that in terms of they have not yet started making ‸ debt service payments on that.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:11–00:50:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as a result of that transaction, but I don't think it'll... We don't think it'll affect us, ‸ you know, substantially. The Water Sewer Fund, it's an enterprise fund, so it's by the eight divisions you have here.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:29–00:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, when the customers say, well, what are you doing to improve our service?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:39–00:50:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to, you know, to make sure we continue on that proactive, you know, approach to, you know, exercising valves, backflow prevention, and just proactively out there,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:55–00:50:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
assets. There's been a lot of work that Jack and Chris Collier and ‸ their team have done in terms of assessing the infrastructure and identifying and prioritizing where repairs and maintenance are
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:10–00:51:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to
[unclear audio ▶]
the catastrophic event, but the event that kind of could really interrupt service or require more
cost
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:20–00:51:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
than necessary if we can be more proactive about it and do preventative maintenance. So you see, again,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:27–00:51:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There was one change. If you recall, we worked with working with the finance director, also with utilities, the director, and the city attorney. We're changing the way we do some of our contracts because, as I mentioned before, like we did this year, we booked the entire expense for the fire station. We know with some of the utilities large capital projects, they are multi-year, but you have to book the entire expense in year one. So now we're entering in like you did with the fire station contract. It's now a multi-year contract and we identify what the projected expenses are in year one. In that case, it is,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:13–00:52:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But in some of these capital projects that, you know, Jack's department works on, they are multi-year by nature. And to book that expense all at the one time, you know, kind of, I don't want to say it inflates the budget, but just because it's going to take three years or two years maybe to get those projects done. So now we've structured them so we can ‸ true up what the needs are for ‸ the actual utility. Again, water, sewer, you can see capital and operating, they dominate their budget because in operating, it's tools, it's equipment, it's chemicals, it's the electricity.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:53–00:52:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's up there pretty ‸ high, as well as sellers and...
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:00–00:53:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Maybe an opportunity to explore, sir. Yes. But salaries and benefits compared to the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:07–00:53:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number of our employees that work in water and sewer. The
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:16–00:53:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:21–00:53:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is just
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:33–00:53:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
general overview of the capital program. I won't go over every item, I'll probably just pick out a couple. Like, you see the $2.5 million ‸ bottom line public works infrastructure, that's the investment in our roadways. You know, the fixed boulevard, ‸ the additional funding for pavement management and maintenance, sidewalks, things of that nature that were, you know, ‸ have been deferred, but we have been, I think, have made some judicious decisions in the last couple years to try to increase that funding. If you recall, we had a workshop with the engineers that did the analysis of our pavement conditions, and so we're trying to put some additional funds in there so we can, for, you know, and there is a, that kind of that maintenance and depreciation curve, so we can try to get ahead of it. We're not going to completely get ahead of it, but at least we'll be in a better position. Yes, sir.
On the police, the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:25–00:54:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, what's that?
What are we buying for? $493,000.
I'm going
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:54:37–00:54:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
budget specifically.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:39–00:54:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Well, no, but,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:43–00:54:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so I can… ‸ I'm
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:52–00:54:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:55–00:54:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:57–00:54:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:58–00:54:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:58–00:54:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:59–00:54:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:59–00:55:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
…in your budget…
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:55:02–00:55:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We actually,
we are, for this year we actually are replacing, you know, one vehicle.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:55:13–00:55:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:55:15–00:55:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's the digital upgrade to our 800 megahertz system. If you recall, FEMA and I think it was the Department of Homeland Security required that by January 1st that we put a new radio system in ‸ so we can communicate and have interoperability. So right now within the county we can communicate amongst agencies. But in the event of a natural or man-made disaster, there's the ‸ need to communicate beyond just our borders. If
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:50–00:55:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
their commercial policing.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:55:57–00:56:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:11–00:56:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:13–00:56:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:56:15–00:56:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:56:18–00:56:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:56:20–00:56:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
machinery, equipment, software. I mean,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:56:44–00:56:46 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:56:46–00:56:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you all have been out at the
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:56:47–00:56:48 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:56:48–00:56:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
center and
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:56:50–00:56:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:56:51–00:56:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and all the it's a technology-driven, you know, system these days. It's not the way a lot of you know, go out to the pump, turn it. You know, now what they're doing with SCADA is amazing in terms of being
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:56:51–00:57:05 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:05–00:57:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
behind a console, being able to, you know, adjust and accommodate the needs of the system. And so the total capital budget is $22.5
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:57:06–00:57:16 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:16–00:57:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
capital projects, you see
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:57:19–00:57:22 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:22–00:57:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:57:22–00:57:25 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:25–00:57:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
put that in there. 6.660. That is actual capital related to the fire stations. There's about another $1.3
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:57:26–00:57:33 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:33–00:57:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in the capital for the operating component in terms of engineering and other stuff that doesn't fall under
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:57:34–00:57:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:39–00:57:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the building. It's the
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:57:40–00:57:41 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:42–00:57:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
furniture, fixture equipment, things of that nature.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:57:42–00:57:44 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 00:57:44–00:58:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
to be upgraded to it, like the police department, identical?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:00–00:58:08 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
It's in their budget. Matter of fact, you know, I skipped it. But you see the $87,000 there?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:08–00:58:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's for that's for them. Well, and there's actually a vehicle in there as well, but they have been upgrading as well, all their mobile and their handheld units.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:09–00:58:19 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:19–00:58:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
everybody's on the same schedule, so we did over four years, so we don't have to
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:20–00:58:23 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:23–00:58:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we waited, they have to replace
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:24–00:58:25 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:25–00:58:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And say they all hit a service life.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:26–00:58:27 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:28–00:58:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And you don't want to replace them all at the same time, so we did over a four-year period. And so they are doing the same thing.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:28–00:58:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:37–00:58:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So this then you see
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:38–00:58:41 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:41–00:58:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fund
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:41–00:58:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:43–00:58:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
related to capital And then these are the items that we discussed in at the last uh budget workshop in terms of they've been added to the budget or refined in the budget. uh you know The public bus shelter you know, looking at 15, ‸ about 15 000 And then I have these are the strategic issues, as you know. uh As somebody once said, it's going to stick with that plan. uh in those crime, public safety, image, community development, economic development, fiscal sustainability. So the community project fund, those are that's the five project, the 500 projects that Peter Kajiyama encouraged us to do. You know, have five of them budgeted and try to get one and get the community engaged. uh The dog park traffic signal electric art box our art project, uh wrapping those traffic signals with something other than the graffiti that exists on them.
site
prep and master planning for the the
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:48–00:59:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the building of a parking garage uh the endeavor elementary community school partnership uh and then
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:03–01:00:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
software, uh doing that study to find out what best serves the needs of the city. And then the changes to the stormwater drain education campaign. If you recall, that miss cost came before council and asked if we could do something along those lines. So this is responding, and it
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:25–01:00:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because we're managing those resources, those capital resources, and encouraging people to be responsible with their stormwater. So with that, I will return to council for any comments and questions. uh And at this point of the hearing, again, it's for public hearing item number 2B. You know, it's uh the first public ‸ hearing for the 2017 tentative budget and
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:51–01:00:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
tentatively adopting a budget and a
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:59–01:01:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
commencing on october 1st 2016 and ending on september 30th 2017.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:08–01:01:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I know you didn't show it all, uh just looking at
the
budget. But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:14–01:01:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as you're uh
Yes, actually, we do have funds budgeted in there, and we are going to be doing if you recall the request from Diamond Square Redevelopment Agency, uh you know, that's their project came out of their plan, and we'll enter into ‸ municipal services agreement for them to do the design, the engineering, as well as uh uh it was that, as well as the uh the four Habitat for Humanity homes. Those funds are budgeted. uh On the city side, there's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:45–01:01:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then we will, out of the assigned of the fund balance, i will we will assign the monies related to ‸ Stone Street streetscape. That will be when the audit comes around, we'll assign those funds when we have to report
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:02:00–01:02:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
uh
One, we'll probably look to the who helped us
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:09–01:02:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
better position. But uh look at the demand, look at, you know, the what are the opportunities for public private partnerships. uh it's it's a It's a tool a lot of communities are using to get some infrastructure projects. It's not a one-size-fit-all tool. Doesn't mean that it's going to be the best fit for the city of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:31–01:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But we owe it to see if there if there's a potential private partner out there on a project of that nature. Because you're talking about
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:38–01:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
million.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:39–01:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As you know, last year we had
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:41–01:02:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
million
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:42–01:02:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh appropriated in the legislature. a year before 2.5 million and both years
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:48–01:02:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the all the tourism and the numbers that we provided
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:57–01:03:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and for the region. So we we need to look at if we're not going to get any assistance. You know,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:07–01:03:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
delegation uh in the upcoming year. I would i would recommend that we continue to pursue that and give it another shot. uh But we need to look at other opportunities. And it might be through a public private partnership in terms of maybe we provide the land and they build. And
it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:25–01:03:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
just we have to we have to kind of think outside the box because that's a that's that is a big ‸ to crack,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:31–01:03:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
million,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:32–01:03:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if not more,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:33–01:03:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
maybe five and a half, yeah six.
yeah Also, the uh the connector, like the Lee Winter Park stuff, the connector and the uh that That is
in the CRA budget, the Lee Winter Park connector. And they are also uh unable to get the engineering completed this year for the day slips. So they're budgeting we are budgeting uh the CRA has approved a budget that includes both the engineering and the ‸ construction for the day slips in this budget. okay to be completed next year.
I'm glad you got this off the top That's good. uh
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:05–01:04:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Well,
we're doing part of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:09–01:04:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right now, as you know. And in the upcoming year, uh there are funds to do in this budget to do from peach tree Street to 520 to enhance that pedestrian connector connectivity uh and ‸ the safety, and then also to do the study, the designing engineering from Highland down to peach tree because remember, that's the area that doesn't have the sidewalks, doesn't have the drainage. Right. And uh there's also funds in here to upgrade lighting on peach tree
Good. That's good. our
fit I'm
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:40–01:04:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
peach tree's good,
‸ yeah. Okay, and then um uh North End, just again, off the cuff, the FDOT on the port uh the port project out there, they're going to come in and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:55–01:04:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, uh I don't know if they're going to foreline it. ‸ require
money from us
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:00–01:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Okay, we don't know. what
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:10–01:05:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to determine what the needs are based on the traffic impact. Right. And that being said, I mean, in your budget, we have,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:21–01:05:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:23–01:05:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
million
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:23–01:05:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
projected for this year to go towards that and economic incentive project. If you recall, we're breaking it down into the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:31–01:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
million
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:32–01:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cash
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:33–01:05:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
complete site work, and then we believe that'll happen in the next fiscal year. And then in the following fiscal year, you'll be getting the vertical construction, and then you'll be getting your ship date, or, you know, they'll get the CO, and then they'll go you get their ship date where they're actually moving product, and that goes on the tax rolls. So uh but they are actively we've been in communication with them recently. I mean, just last week, there was an exchange on emails uh between staff and uh the Walmart representatives and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:07–01:06:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in terms of now looking at the development order and what needs to happen in terms of amending that. So that project is still moving forward.
That's good. Okay. And uh I just get a lot of questions about traffic. People
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:06:22–01:06:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
524. So, okay. that's That's good.
And I know you know I'll share this. I know this ‸ the TPO currently has uh they're doing a a study. Yes.
so
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:35–01:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
board or study right now, 524. We just went through the project priorities. um The uh ‸ State Road 524 is a regionally significant project, and it's on the on the TPO's list. It's behind St. John's Heritage Parkway and a few others, but it is on the list. Right. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:04–01:07:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So well things
took
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:11–01:07:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a
while
with FDOT, but it is on the list. uh
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:16–01:07:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so it is designed now. So they're moving.
They're moving. And that's going to change dramatically out there. Yeah. Okay. And
‸ I just probably need to add one more thing, Mr. Mayor. Yeah. I know 240 plus pages of a budget here. And there are a couple things that you'll notice as you review this budget compared to your proposed budget that was originally presented.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:48–01:07:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
already presented some, but there is also a couple things where where instances we found based on, you know, maybe putting certain expenses in different account items. We, like, booked it in ‸ one account number. And then we moved it here. And we're like, I'll take uh the PD. we You know, we booked for their investigative funds. We booked it in two accounts. So we backed out. We'll be backing it out of one. uh And there's probably about four or five instances where we had the double booking. And through uh so
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:20–01:08:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just letting you know that. So you'll see. If you go in there ‸ like, well, why is this here twice? You won't find it in here because now because we've made those
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:29–01:08:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
All right. Again, we'll close this to council. Go to the public. Jerry. um Anybody like to speak on this? John, you're ready, right? If there's any
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:54–01:08:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
the audience, bring it back
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:00–01:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
2016, and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:17–01:09:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
within budget this year?
I'm sorry?
Is anyone within budget this year? Yes.
I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:35–01:09:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and we've had to have some we've had some as Mike indicated, you know, we've had some unanticipated expenses, whether it be related to operations or ‸ equipment failure. But generally speaking, I think all the directors do
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:52–01:09:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
very.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:54–01:09:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
as you review this, if you have any changes, and you know you're looking forward to review all 242 pages again. If you have any changes, uh
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:08–01:10:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which is, again, second public hearing, final hearing, September 14th,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:16–01:10:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
o'clock here,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:17–01:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
65 Stone Street,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:20–01:10:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Florida. And at that hearing next week, we'll be
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:23–01:10:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
adopting the final FY 2017 budget. So on behalf of staff, I want to thank, you ‸ council for your collaborative environment in which we work and the leadership that you provide to staff. And uh it's certainly appreciated. Thank
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:43–01:10:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
as far as understanding and planning. This was probably the easiest. I mean, I'm using Mr. Burton's model and then, you know, with what the staff put together, this was a really, I mean, to me, this was a really easy budget year. so You know, as far as the planning and everything went. ‸ so
Okay. Anybody want to say anything before we shut it down?
um um
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:17–01:11:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we will try to have it out tomorrow afternoon, but it may be Thursday. Okay. Okay.
i
have some items out there, so you know. Johnny,
wants anybody want to
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:26–01:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Remind
everybody that uh Thursday is the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:36–01:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Community Summit. ‸ I'm engaging the community, creating a safer community.
Six
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:42–01:11:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Center.
uh Let's share ideas. and um
I
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:48–01:11:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:53–01:11:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
somebody