Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines.)
Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Anthony A. Garganese (City Attorney), Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Monica Arsenault (City Clerk), Abigail Morgan (Public Works Director), Rebecca Bowman (Finance Director), Charlene Neuterman (Community Services Director), Jonathan Lamm (Fire Chief), Evander Collier IV (Police Chief), Jack Walsh (Utilities Director), Samantha Senger (Communications and Economic Development Director), Lorne Stinnett (HR Director), Tom Wilkinson (Code Enforcement Manager), Dalyn Sims (Helpdesk Support Tech)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (19)
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of July 22, 2025. (2025-570) — to approve the agenda for the Regular City Council meeting of July 22, 2025 with an amendment to move Consent item V.4 to Council Business VII.5 (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 2
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 13, 2025. (2025-571) — to approve the minutes for the May 13, 2025 Regular City Council meeting as written (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve the Consent agenda (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 4
1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification — to approve Resolution No. 2025-045, establishing the Rolled-Back Rate at 6.7367 (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 5
1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification — to approve the Proposed Millage rate at 6.9532 (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 3-2; ayes: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn; nays: Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss — the City's minutes, p. 5; the vote on p. 6
1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification — to schedule the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2026 Budget on September 3, 2025 at 6pm at Cocoa City Hall (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 6
2. Conduct the Final public hearing on the proposed FY2025/2026 Action Plan; approve the Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan for subm — to approve the Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan for submission to HUD; and authorize the Mayor to sign all subsequent certifications and agreements (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 6
to approve the proposed Development Agreement with the City of Cocoa for the development of a Large-Scale Commercial/Mixed-Use Buildings on certain properties within the Cocoa Waterfront Overlay District (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 7
Second Reading of Ordinance 04-2025 Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Amendment. (2025-639) — to approve Ordinance 04-2025 on Second and Final Reading, for discussion (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Alex Goins); PASSED 3-2 (the minutes record this as the vote on the original motion, taken after the motion below); ayes: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn; nays: Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss — the City's minutes, p. 9; the vote on p. 10
5. Pass on First Reading of Ordinance 07-2025 to adopt the updated Redevelopment Plan for the Cocoa Community Redevelopment Agency. (2025-69 — to approve Ordinance 07-2025 on First Reading (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lavander Hearn); PASSED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 10
6. Pass on First Reading of Ordinance 08-2025 to adopt the updated Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Square Community Redevelopment Agency. — to approve Ordinance 08-2025 on First Reading with an amendment to add the Leon and Jewel Collins Museum under the Community Identity category under the CRAs Goals and Strategies (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Mike Blake); PASSED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 11
to reduce the lien to the amount of $2,773.32, which is the City's cost to prosecute this case (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 12 The City's minutes list agenda item 1 as: 'The property owner (Tim Levensaler) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $24,010.00, on the property located at 213 Factory St. reference Code case # CE22-475, be reduced …' (2025-07-22 City minutes). CocoaCivic could not confirm that this motion belongs to that item.
to reduce the lien to the amount of $2,121.36, which is the City's cost to prosecute this case (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 12; the vote on p. 13 The City's minutes list agenda item 2 as: 'The property owner (Fair Price Properties) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $39,620.00, on the property located at 309 Georgia Ave. reference Code case # CE23-0064 …' (2025-07-22 City minutes). CocoaCivic could not confirm that this motion belongs to that item.
3. Provide Direction for a Task Order to Design and Permit a Trailhead with parking to Cocoa Conservation Area off of Cox Road with Myra Pla — to take a ten- minute recess (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 13
3. Provide Direction for a Task Order to Design and Permit a Trailhead with parking to Cocoa Conservation Area off of Cox Road with Myra Pla — to return from recess (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 13
3. Provide Direction for a Task Order to Design and Permit a Trailhead with parking to Cocoa Conservation Area off of Cox Road with Myra Pla — to direct staff to work with FDOT to explore all options of establishing a trailhead off of SR524 (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 4-1; ayes: Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: Mike Blake — the City's minutes, p. 14
to authorize city staff to apply for the National Fitness Challenge (NFC) Grant (the minutes print this motion after the heading “5. Travel Authorization for Planning Officials Training Workshop for Councilwoman Koss. (2025-700)”; the motion's own words do not name that item) (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 15
to extend the meeting by fifteen minutes (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 16
to adjourn the Regular meeting of July 22, 2025 (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 17–18
Motions not adopted (2)
1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification — to approve a Proposed Millage Rate of 6.85, for discussion (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); FAILED 2-3; ayes: Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss; nays: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn — the City's minutes, p. 5
Second Reading of Ordinance 04-2025 Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Amendment. (2025-639) — to amend the original motion to remove the verbiage from the ordinance regarding the three-hundred-foot buffer that’s applicable to package stores (an amendment to motion 10) (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); FAILED; ayes: Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss; nays: Mike Blake, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn — the City's minutes, p. 9 Corrected to match the minutes, page 9; the minutes print the figures (3-2).
Motions whose printed result and vote count contradict each other — unresolved (1)
4. Utilities Advisory Board Discussion. (2025-712) — to table this item until Councilwoman Koss has had a chance to speak with the City Manager (moved by Lorraine Koss, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: Alex Goins — the City's minutes, p. 14; the vote on p. 15 Unresolved: the minutes print a result and names that do not agree: AYES: Blake, Weeks, Hearn, Koss / NAYES: Goins / THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0).Corrected to match the minutes, page 15.
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$2,773.32 — Council: decided in an adopted motion. “reduce the lien to the amount of $2,773.32, which is the City's cost to prosecute this case” The figure printed in the motion's own words. Separately, the City's minutes list agenda item 1 as: 'The property owner (Tim Levensaler) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $24,010.00, on the property located at 213 Factory St. reference Code case # CE22-475, be reduced …'; CocoaCivic could not confirm that this motion or its amount belongs to that item. (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf, p. 12); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,121.36 — Council: decided in an adopted motion. “reduce the lien to the amount of $2,121.36, which is the City's cost to prosecute this case” The figure printed in the motion's own words. Separately, the City's minutes list agenda item 2 as: 'The property owner (Fair Price Properties) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $39,620.00, on the property located at 309 Georgia Ave. reference Code case # CE23-0064 …'; CocoaCivic could not confirm that this motion or its amount belongs to that item. (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf, p. 12; the vote on p. 13); fiscal period not recorded)
$624,009.18 — Council: Consent agenda item 1, approved with the Consent agenda. “Approval of Task Order 2025-14 with Carollo Engineers, Inc. Orlando, Florida, in the amount of $624,009.18 for the SCADA Migration Project at the Jerry Sellers Water Reclamation Facility.” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf, p. 4); fiscal period not recorded)
$296,345.94 — Council: Consent agenda item 2, approved with the Consent agenda. “To Approve Task Order 2025-13 to Continuing Professional Services Agreement Q- 23-13-COC with Carollo Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $296,345.94 for Design, Permitting, and Bidding Services for the Jerry Sellers Aeration Blowers Replacement Project (WS25AB).” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf, p. 4); fiscal period not recorded)
$24,010.00 — Council: printed with an agenda item; the motion's link to it is not confirmed. The figure the City printed with agenda item 1 ('The property owner (Tim Levensaler) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $24,010.00, on the property located at 213 Factory St. reference Code case # CE22-475, be reduced …'); CocoaCivic could not confirm that this motion belongs to that item. (not adopted as listed: the adopted motion states a different amount or scope; the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf, p. 12); fiscal period not recorded)
$39,620.00 — Council: printed with an agenda item; the motion's link to it is not confirmed. The figure the City printed with agenda item 2 ('The property owner (Fair Price Properties) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $39,620.00, on the property located at 309 Georgia Ave. reference Code case # CE23-0064 …'); CocoaCivic could not confirm that this motion belongs to that item. (not adopted as listed: the adopted motion states a different amount or scope; the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf, p. 12; the vote on p. 13); fiscal period not recorded)
$1,000 — Council: printed with an agenda item; the motion's link to it is not confirmed. The figure the City printed with agenda item 2 ('The property owner (Fair Price Properties) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $39,620.00, on the property located at 309 Georgia Ave. reference Code case # CE23-0064 …'); CocoaCivic could not confirm that this motion belongs to that item. (not adopted as listed: the adopted motion states a different amount or scope; the City's minutes (2238_07_22_2025.pdf, p. 12; the vote on p. 13); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.
An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.
I. Opening Matters
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Roll Call
II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of July 22, 2025.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 13, 2025.
III. Awards and Presentations
1. Presentation of the City of Cocoa’s 2025 “Cocoa Works” Summer Youth Employment Program.
2. Presentation by EXP US Services on the Vulnerability Assessment Grant. Presentation is required as part of the public presentation for the grant deliverables and to finalize the document which will be presented to Council in August.
IV. Delegations
V. Consent Agenda
1. Approval of Task Order 2025-14 with Carollo Engineers, Inc. Orlando, Florida, in the amount of $624,009.18 for the SCADA Migration Project at the Jerry Sellers Water Reclamation Facility.
2. To Approve Task Order 2025-13 to Continuing Professional Services Agreement Q-23-13-COC with Carollo Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $296,345.94 for Design, Permitting, and Bidding Services for the Jerry Sellers Aeration Blowers Replacement Project (WS25AB).
3. Announcement of Mayor Blake, Deputy Mayor Weeks, Councilmember Koss, Councilmember Hearn, and Councilmember Goins to Attend the Florida League of Cities Annual Conference from August 13 - August 16, 2025.
4. Travel Authorization for Planning Officials Training Workshop for Councilwoman Koss.
5. Correction to the affordable housing real property inventory list and approve a Resolution identifying certain real property within the City to which the City holds fee simple title that is appropriate for permanent affordable housing.
VI. Public Hearings
1. Approve Resolution No. 2025-045, Establishing the Rolled-Back Rate, and Approve a Proposed Millage Rate for the Purposes of Notification to the Taxpayers by the Brevard County Property Appraiser and set the date, time, and place for the first Public Hearing to consider the FY2026 Budget. It is also recommended that the City Manager be instructed to complete the Florida Department of Revenue’s Certifications of Taxable Value, Forms DR-420. — 00:21:01
2. Conduct the Final public hearing on the proposed FY2025/2026 Action Plan; approve the Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan for submission to HUD; and authorize the Mayor to sign all subsequent certifications and agreements. — 01:00:16
3. PZ 23-02800005: 430 Brevard Mixed Use Development Agreement and Concept Plan.
4. Second Reading of Ordinance 04-2025 Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Amendment.
5. Pass on First Reading of Ordinance 07-2025 to adopt the updated Redevelopment Plan for the Cocoa Community Redevelopment Agency.
6. Pass on First Reading of Ordinance 08-2025 to adopt the updated Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Square Community Redevelopment Agency.
VII. Council Business
1. The property owner (Tim Levensaler) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $24,010.00, on the property located at 213 Factory St. reference Code case # CE22-475, be reduced to the amount of the City's cost.
2. The property owner (Fair Price Properties) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $39,620.00, on the property located at 309 Georgia Ave. reference Code case # CE23-0064, be reduced to the amount of $1,000.
3. Provide Direction for a Task Order to Design and Permit a Trailhead with parking to Cocoa Conservation Area off of Cox Road with Myra Planning and Design LLC. No budgetary action is needed at this point. If approved, provide a funding source and authorize the City Manager to execute the Task Order Agreement and the budget transfer. — 03:18:04
4. Utilities Advisory Board Discussion
VIII. City Business
1. Authorize City Staff to Apply for the National Fitness Challenge (NFC) Grant. — 03:58:49
IX. Informational Agenda
1. In accordance with City Code, Section 2-74, at the beginning of each month during the fiscal year, the City Manager shall submit to City Council data showing the relation between the estimated and actual income and expenses to date.
2. In accordance with the Financial Operations Manual (FOM) the City Manager shall submit to City Council in the form of an agenda item any approved change orders to construction contracts that the City Council has authorized the City Manager, by resolution, to approve in excess of the City Manager’s spending authority.
3. FY 2025 June Budget Adjustment Report
4. Informational Only - The City of Cocoa's Open Board Vacancies.
5. Bi-Weekly Report for July 3, 2025 - July 17, 2025.
X. Reports
XI. Adjournment
XII. Notice to the Public
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.
929 suspect passage(s) marked in place; 1 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 31 voices separated from the audio.
81 short machine repair(s) (93 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.2% of 37,700 content words.
Dotted words (964 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
929 passages (23% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Voice detected, no words recognized (1 stretch). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
02:49:00 (6 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Risk to different types of assets. Most of the extreme risk that we're seeing is right along the intercoastal there. And as such, it's mainly around ‸ transportation infrastructure, roads, bridges, some of your marinas, so on and so forth. Also, we took a ‸ community-wide look and assigned percentages of risk ‸ under those categories of extreme, high, medium, low, and none for that extreme scenario with
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:35–00:00:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
cat 5 coming in. And in that scenario, I'm modeling the ‸ flood risk ‸ associated with it. About 34% of critical assets within the city under that extreme scenario will be at extreme risk. Again, most of those are coastal infrastructure, natural infrastructure such as your shorelines, the transportation infrastructure, roads, bridges, marinas, and the like. So next steps and recommendations again, once where this is a interim report, I know there's a,
and that's going to be brought back to you, I believe in August. Where this leads, it allows the city to make a bunch of choices. The next step, typically from a vulnerability assessment, is to get into some level of adaptation planning. So that is taking what we have assessed in terms of vulnerability and starting to develop and ultimately design and implement projects to assess that vulnerability with the input of the community as well. And that can take the form of a plan or that can look at individual projects. And then ultimately, we're trying to get those, or the city will be trying to get those projects to be implemented. Either with further state funding under the Resilient Florida program or other funding. Some of the broad kind of high level recommendations. And again, once we look into developing specific projects, this becomes more granular and specific. is, you know, in areas of high risk, invested in drainage upgrades, strengthening coastal and tidal differences. Again, shorelines in particular were pretty vulnerable under certain ‸ scenarios. Really starting to dive into connecting this issue to different parts of the community. Because not everyone is affected the same way or understands the risks the same way. Or risk may mean something different from one community to another.
with funding. And so ‸ we can get them implemented. All right, so I hope that was short enough. And I'm here for any questions. Again, there's a lot of detail behind this, a lot of data. This was just really intended as a kind of high level summary to update you guys.
In reference of analyzing flooding vulnerabilities, critical infrastructure, critical elevation, and also public workshops. I think it's imperative for you to make a well-informed decision. You must have knowledge because knowledge is power. And you've indicated that. So I look forward to seeing you in the month of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:11–00:04:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:30–00:04:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Dixon Boulevard runs east and west, but once it crosses over US-1, she's talking about the low-lying area there, sir, that has a vulnerability of being flooded. Okay. I'm assuming that's what she's talking about.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:56–00:04:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so there- do you give us any sort of timeline as to the progression for sea level rise? Because there are also several considerations for development in this area. Yeah. And those are historic. There are a couple of historical homes.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:47–00:05:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from 2040 to 2080. So we'll have those graphs, um, and that will give you guys the power with, um, what we've assessed in ‸ terms of risk for assets to make decisions based on that timeline.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:08–00:06:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:14–00:06:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I'm just being honest because we, you know, in planning we have to look at these kind of more macro planning horizons. Um, so it- it looks at projections from now through 2040 and
advancements in data collection and technology comes online based as you know, we redo these- these maps and these projections, um, on a few year basis. Um, so everything hopefully should be updated. Um, and that would allow you guys to update any type of planning based on those projections. But honestly, probably not as granular as you would like, but enough information that you should be able to make some-
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:21–00:07:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:34–00:07:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:54–00:07:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:33–00:08:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:39–00:08:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:47–00:08:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:22–00:09:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:28–00:09:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
how they say work my way back to you mom. She was trying to get back to Florida to be with her mother. Um, but the sidestep took her to Texas and from to Texas, it took her to, um, Atlanta or to Georgia. And so ‸ what I'm proud to actually say to you all that she's finally made her way back home here.
ma'am, you got the ringside seat, ma'am. Come on down on the front row, ma'am. Thank you. We, we just percolating. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Give us one moment, ma'am. You, you, you just slide over here to your right. There you go. A little bit more. A little bit more.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:32–00:10:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There you go. You know, we have, we do it like we do on Sunday school. Okay. Mr. Randy Cole Sims, sir. Would you come forward, please? And then after Mr. Sims, then we'll be, uh, Dr. Bryant, sir.
your light so shine before men that they might see your good works and glorify your father which is in heaven. Um, not intending to be prophetic, but every now and again, I have a tendency to share with members of the body things that I believe would encourage one and the other. Just a little while ago, I sent to sis a piece, uh, that suggests that she was being watched.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:52–00:11:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
membership, I want to congratulate her. I've had, we've had the privilege to watch her. Um, and one of the things I've teased her about, uh, consistently is her favor with God. And so he took her where he did, brought her back home, and we appreciate him for the same.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:11–00:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:34–00:12:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:51–00:12:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be fitting, uh, to come and honor and support and encourage, uh, Mary, uh, who has found favor, not only in the eyesight of the Lord, but in the eyesight of Brevard
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:01–00:13:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, we just want to say congratulations to you, Mary. Uh, we love you. Uh, and we've been praying for her to come back to Florida. Uh, I wanted her to come, uh, to Fort Pierce. Uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:15–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:27–00:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, so let's give the pastors a round of applause. Now, the lady of the hour, would you come to the podium, please, ma'am? Um, what members of your family, do you have any of you? I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:41–00:13:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:00–00:14:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
well, not my co-workers, my, well, they are my co-workers. My employees that thought enough of me to come out tonight. My church family and everybody that's here. ‸ Thank you all. And I'm looking forward to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:36–00:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:46–00:14:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:57–00:15:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:15–00:15:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the beautiful thing about it, we come from different tribes, but we belong to one race, that's the human race, because we're all God's children. Amen? So we're extremely proud of you, ma'am. You're setting a positive precedent, because proper preparation produces positive productivity. Now, you're looking sharp. Let's give her a round of applause again.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:05–00:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:17–00:16:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:23–00:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:45–00:16:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:50–00:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:53–00:17:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:13–00:17:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:15–00:17:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Man, if you don't want me to tear up your refrigerator, bring yourself on down. Who else? Come on. Who else? God bless you. God bless you, ma'am. Anyone else?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:45–00:17:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:13–00:18:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:18:16–00:18:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:52–00:19:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:04–00:19:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:06–00:19:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:08–00:20:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:37–00:20:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:41–00:20:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:49–00:20:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:00–00:21:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:06–00:21:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:19–00:21:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:31–00:21:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:47–00:21:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
four now I know you're next, mrs bowman ma'am but I just want to get a little quick comment from either my city manager or my city attorney. Anything you all want to say before I turn the floor over to the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:31–00:22:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
millage, which is required for by florida statute So, at this meeting, we've got a few things that City Council is going to need to decide on. um There's a resolution establishing the rollback rate where we are essentially stating and affirming in a resolution what the rollback rate is, which is a calculation. um We're going to request that you adopt a proposed millage rate um further in the presentation so that we can also comply with trim requirements. um And according to trim, we have to establish a proposed millage rate by august 4th Again, within 35 days of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:13–00:23:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
um That vote needs to be a minimum of three out of the five votes. And then, um at the end, we're also going to set the first public hearing to be held on September 3rd at 6 p.m here at city hall in the Council Chambers at 65 Stone ‸ Street. That is required so that the trim notice can be mailed out or ‸ notice of proposed property taxes um to set to uh property owners, which will be mailed by the property appraiser um in august ‸ So, um as part of this normal presentation that we're required to do every single year, we look at the um horse historical review and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:08–00:24:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:12–00:24:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:24–00:24:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then, this is a graphical presentation for you. um ‸ you'll notice, going back to 2015 and after the Great Recession, as you know, property values fell considerably. And it wasn't until about 2014 that uh
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:43–00:24:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
started going up. and so now we're uh at about 1.9 billion which was shown ‸ on the previous slide. So this slide shows you the review of the millage rates and what the revenue was that's been generated uh over the last several years. um If you will notice, the revenue variance from the previous year based on gross taxable revenue,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:12–00:25:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:19–00:25:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:26–00:25:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:30–00:25:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
proposed tax rate of 6.9532 which is the same as last year's millage rate So looking at the uh the millage rate options that uh council has available, uh
collected in fiscal year 2025. And then council can go uh with what the proposed tentative millage rate is, which is what the budget was developed. And uh
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:23–00:26:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:34–00:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:41–00:26:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:56–00:26:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:57–00:26:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
taxes based on what the property valuation is in each one of those CRAs at the millage rate that the city council adopts. And then also is being budgeted at the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:18–00:27:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:41–00:27:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:54–00:27:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we always like to see what other cities are doing in the county. So this slide shows you what the current millage rates are in the different cities in Brevard ‸ County and then what their rollback rates are
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:37–00:28:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and they're going even further. They're dropping their millage rate even further. But if you will notice, they also have strong property values that they have, even with the dropping their millage rate even more, they have 14 million dollars in avalor in revenue whereas city of coco has about 13.5 million dollars So um the proposed um millage rate and the first public hearing, as I said, um the budget's been developed with 6.9532 mills gross tax revenue would be an increase of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:20–00:29:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we usually like to show is what's that impact um for the property taxes that homeowner homeowners would be paying um with keeping the millage rate the same as it was in the previous year. um This isn't exact. It isn't precise. This is an example. um Everyone has different uh tax exemptions on their properties for varying reasons. So this is just a representation of what someone could expect at uh different uh property valuations on their homes. uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:05–00:30:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:08–00:30:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:22–00:30:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:29–00:30:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:35–00:30:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:41–00:30:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:41–00:30:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:56–00:31:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:12–00:31:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:13–00:31:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:21–00:31:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:36–00:31:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um If you'll notice at the top of the slide there, the majority of the revenue is being generated for what's called non-revenue, which is interfund transfers, the water and sewer fund return on investment and payment in lieu of franchise fees, and
I'll remind council as we discussed at the budget workshop last week, the budget was produced without taking any money out of reserves this year. All the capital was funded with ‸ recurring revenue. So there is no use of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:16–00:32:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:20–00:32:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:33–00:32:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:41–00:32:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:45–00:32:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:57–00:33:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
routes to school, um a stump cutter and public works, and a vehicle. uh ‸ police department is getting seven vehicles replaced. They also are in need of some air conditioners, so that's about
the fire station one needs a diesel generator for the station, and then bay for bay floor coating at the station, and a vehicle, and then some CPR equipment. ‸ So looking at the water and sewer fund, 85 of their revenue is generated by their charges for services or their utility rates, in other words. And then they have some use of their non-revenues um from fund balance reserves for
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:52–00:34:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:12–00:34:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:28–00:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Again, we kind of went over this at the budget workshop. uh The biggest increase is the water and sewer fund, and um that increase is primarily due to an increase in capital, as you'll see in that water sewer renewal and replacement uh fund. That's a transfer that goes into that fund. So from the water and sewer fund to the renewal and replacement fund that's an 8.5 million dollar increase out of the 12.7 million dollar increase in water andwater and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:10–00:35:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:15–00:35:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So um I'll go over the requested action, but I'll remind council at this point in time this is a public hearing. So the next slide I will go and um hand it back over to the mayor and he can um get the public input. And then I'll go back and uh ask city council to take action. um The actions that you will take will be to approve the resolution establishing a rollback rate of
at city hall here in the chambers. Reminder to city council that once we establish this trim rate, you can go down or up uh in subsequent trim hearings. However, if it is increased and in the future meetings, uh we would have to re um put those trim notices out again and hold hearings again. um And then also the
voting requirements would apply. So at this time, I'll hand it over to you, Mr. Mayor, and take public input, and then I'll kind of go back to the previous slide to remind council of what they're going to be voting on.
Okay. If you would like to expound on this, make sure you complete a card, submit it. um You will come to the podium. You have 180 seconds to expound this particular item on the rollback rate and your concerns. comments Do we have any other questions for Mrs. newton Sorry, Mrs. Bowman. I'm sorry. That's what I get for looking at you, Mrs. ‸ newton
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:20–00:37:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
open to the public. Please come forward and state your name for me, please. Anyone in the audience? Going once. Going twice. Chair likely close this portion to the public and return to the council. Okay. Would you digress? One slide, please, Mrs. Bowman. Yes, ‸ Thank you. uh We'll proceed in this order. Councilwoman calls and then Deputy Mayor Weeks.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:58–00:38:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:15–00:38:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, and and last year um when we had, you know, our final, um when we put together the final numbers for the budget, we actually spent less than we ‸ budgeted by some 12 million, wasn't it?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:45–00:38:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
an assumption that everything is going to be spent and all the revenue is going to be earned because we don't know exactly what's going to happen. um So the city manager balances the budget. The budget, again, by statute has to be balanced, the revenue against the expenses. ‸ And so he looks at the requests of the different departments slash needs and tries to balance the revenue against that. And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:31–00:39:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
revenue exceeds expenditures then that money goes back into fund balance. If they didn't spend their expenses, some of that gets rolled over, which is uh an agenda item that comes back to city council to approve each
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 00:39:54–00:39:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:56–00:39:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
or budgeted capital that is not on a purchase order at that point in time, all that gets rolled over and re-established in the next year. So while you may end up with 12 million
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:08–00:40:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:11–00:40:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:12–00:40:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:12–00:40:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I know from last week's budget meeting, I know um um we were told that we more or less this was, we needed to accept this. um We needed to tell at that meeting whether we were going to accept this. But, you know, there's something about getting this much information
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:45–00:40:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
comparison to this total budget. And how easy it would be to find that money so that we didn't have to raise taxes. The last time we raised the millage rate, just a few months later, we raised the millage rate a half a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:09–00:41:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:10–00:41:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to us that had been in a fund that needed to go back into the general fund. So, i I know that um the numbers look ‸ relatively small um in terms of, you know, 20, 40. I think um for most of us, as far as I can tell, it's going to be about a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:44–00:41:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:52–00:41:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, really reluctant to raise taxes when we've had such a good year, and particularly in light of the fact that we had so much left over at the end of the year, last year, based on our budgeting. um It tells me there probably is a little leeway there. And I'll just leave it at that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:03–00:44:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:10–00:44:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. And then the other thing that I'm concerned about would be, it only takes, and God forbid, just think about what took place in Texas. A flood take place and it can decimate your whole budget. Put it in havoc. And I would rather have reserves there and not need them than to need them and not have them, because we're trying to keep quality personnel here in our city and provide that service for
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:03–00:45:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Lots of reserves. It's just like a medical event can decimate. Okay. ‸ So that's why we're good stewards of the taxpayer dollars. And again, we have to keep quality personnel here. There has been a reduction in crime in our city. People are moving here. We are finally getting around the curve.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:01–00:46:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:05–00:46:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. ‸ In looking at this, and of course, in my particular district, we're up to our eyeballs in new construction. We're going to be adding so much more to our
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:22–00:46:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
this year. With all the projects down 524 and the new subdivision at the end of Friday Road. Me personally, ‸ I would love to see us either do the rollback rate or go halfway between, do something in between like 6.85. At least give the homeowners a little ‸ bit of a break.
family homes, which are going to pay taxes because they are all new homes and the value of them is much higher. And only those who transport their homestead from another property would have advantage of that. Otherwise, they're all going to be paying new home prices or new home taxes on it. And as we saw this year, because there was a lot of new ‸ properties
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:14–00:47:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of our increase came from new construction. It's going to be more than that this year. I mean, look at all that stuff. ‸ I've got pictures of all of it in my presentation. But anyway, I would like to see us give the homeowners a break.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:31–00:47:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:33–00:47:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:44–00:47:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is doing great. You're right. And I don't want to see it slide backwards, but I don't believe giving a little break on their property taxes is going to cause
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:11–00:48:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:24–00:48:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In between. 6.85. Rollback is... You talking about the proposed millage rate? Yeah. Proposed millage rate between... I'm going halfway between the rollback rate and the proposed...
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:04–00:49:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:13–00:49:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:17–00:49:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:27–00:49:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:33–00:49:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:49:39–00:49:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, I... So my only... My only concern is once that number comes... ‸ So it's two things. Well, multiple things. Services is the issue. Quality of life issue. Employee retainage. And our CRAs are taking a hit. Especially Diamond Square CRA.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:25–00:50:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
taking a hit for Diamond Square CRA could cause some major issues, especially on their paint and landscape programs, for example. We depend on that ‸ dollar amount for the entire year for those homes.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:42–00:50:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:58–00:50:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah. I picked the middle of the road kind of for that, ‸ reason. ‸ And I know they'll figure out the difference. but it wouldn't be the 13,000 hit that they were talking about because of the...
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:31–00:51:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:36–00:51:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:50–00:51:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:10–00:52:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:52:25–00:52:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
However, just for clarity and for those that may be listening, I think it's real, It's important of us that we make sure we use the correct language. Even if we was to go at the proposed millage rate, we're not raising taxes technically, even though there is an increase in property values. So I think using the correct language is very important for those that may be listening and don't quite. Understand what we're doing up here. And that's just all I wanted to say that. That's it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:00–00:53:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, Mr. Mayor, just a couple of points of clarification. And so, and she'll give you the number, regardless of what the number is. I think that the $400,000, you can't, you can't,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:12–00:53:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:21–00:53:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:36–00:53:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:40–00:53:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:45–00:53:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:48–00:53:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:51–00:53:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:52–00:53:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ it affects the general fund. ‸ Everything that's on the tax roll for the upcoming fiscal year has to be on the tax roll prior to January 1st of this calendar year. So ‸ the new construction that's occurring right now is not on the tax roll.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:27–00:54:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
rate is technically a tax increase. So if you're not going to roll back any rate, doesn't matter the decimal point, any rate above the rollback is a tax increase, technically. So just wanted to, to, to clarify those ‸ couple of things there. Again, if we had to look for 400,
if we have to look for 200, it's not against the 194, it's against the 54. Any rate above rollback is technically a, a tax increase. And again, those, that valuation that is not on the tax roll
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:55:11–00:55:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:49–00:55:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:55–00:55:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:57–00:55:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will just, ‸ I'll thank the city manager for pointing out that technically anything above the rollback rate is advertised to the public as a tax increase. So that is the way the public sees it. And then I wanted to do, what is, I believe, the 400,000 of 54 million. What percentage is that?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:30–00:56:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:43–00:56:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:04–00:57:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:52–00:57:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:56–00:57:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:22–00:58:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:34–00:58:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:46–00:58:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:51–00:58:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have ‸ unanimously. Now we're going to the proposed millage rate of six point nine five three two. Chair like to make a motion to approve the proposed, excuse me, proposed millage rate of six point nine five three two. And I'm looking for a second.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:08–00:59:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:10–00:59:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:26–00:59:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:27–00:59:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:32–00:59:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
date and time September the 3rd, 2025 at 6 p.m. at the great city of Coco City Hall, 65th Stone Street. Move to approve. We have a motion on the floor by Deputy Mayor Weeks.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:58–01:00:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:11–01:00:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:22–01:00:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:11–01:01:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and to approve the action plan and citizen participation plan for submission to HUD. ‸ For fiscal year 2025-26, based on last year's allocation, the city anticipates
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:24–01:01:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
community development block grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as direct entitlement. The city also anticipates receiving
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:34–01:01:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
home investment partnership program funds from HUD as a part of ‸ the Brevard County Home Consortium, which is comprised of the cities of Cocoa, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Titusville, and Brevard County. As we've noted in the past, the CDBG funds must meet the following requirements. One of the three requirements, national objectives are for low- and moderate-income persons to eliminate or prevent slums of blight or to meet urgent needs.
public service agency and a maximum of 20% to the grant to be allocated for staff administration. The city also plans on expending the remaining balance of our
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:34–01:02:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to support the residents of the city. A portion of the funding would assist and be used ‸ for housing activities by providing food, meals, rental and mortgage assistance, benefiting low- and moderate-income persons that are vulnerable and at risk of homelessness.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:04–01:03:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:03:08–01:03:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In addition, the home funds will also decrease based on last year's numbers. And so we have four public service agencies that we brought to you at the first public hearing to have them present to you what their programs are and how they are going to present to their activities to the city. As a part of the changes in the allocation, we did have to reduce the amount recommended for each of the partner agencies, just a slight amount. So the new dollar amount recommended for Central Brevard Sharing Center will be $3,940.76.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:07–01:04:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will receive $3,940.77, and the Salvation Army Domestic Violence Shelter will receive $3,940.76. A large portion of our CDBG funding is going to repay the Section 108 loan that we have that we used to build the Dr. Jolie Smith Community Center.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:38–01:04:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:54–01:04:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And those funds will be allocated and split between the four public service agencies. And then staff will also have administration costs for that. And so we are looking to get the approval today. We did advertise the proposed public hearing for a 30-day public comment period.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:18–01:05:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:20–01:05:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Central Brevard Library here at City Hall for comments. And no comments were received during that comment period. Staff recommends approving the action plan and citizen participation plans for submission to HUD and authorized the mayor to sign all subsequent certifications and agreements. And as this is a public hearing, you can open it up for comments at this time before making a vote.
[01:06:12]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you. Good evening, distinguished mayor and council and staff. My name is Dave Brubaker. I am the president, CEO of the Central Brevard Sharing Center located at 113 Aurora Street. Our mission is to provide emergency assistance and guidance to those in our community who struggle to obtain life's most basic needs. And I often break that down in my discussions as the food on your table,
[01:06:39]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:39–01:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:41]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
your head. That's what we do. And we've proudly done that for 47 years, 36 years at the 113 Aurora Street location. Recently, ‸ well, actually, we're here to say thank you. It's always a pleasure to work with the city as a community partner of ours, but also in regards to the need. We've seen a great increase in regards to hunger in our community. Just the cost of food alone is driving people to us at record numbers. This grant will help us buy food for our community kitchen. Our community kitchen about a month ago became the only
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:17–01:07:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:18]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[01:07:19]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in all of Brevard County where you can go every day to receive a nutritious meal. I emphasize that because we are starting to see some folks start migrating from down south that had been utilizing some
[01:07:33]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:33–01:07:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:35]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
But since they closed their doors, we're starting to see an increase. And again, I can't imagine this community without a sharing center in it. We are woven organically into the fabric of this community. And we really depend on a number of segments and community partners for us to be able to meet the need of our mission. And so today, the funds that are being recommended, and I hope that you approve, again, 100% of it will go to be used for purchasing food for our community kitchen program.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:10–01:08:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:16]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
And I agree that when you're out there to help ‸ your fellow person, you know, it makes a big difference. Providing that nutritious meal makes a big difference in their lives. So thank you for your
[01:08:29]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
consideration
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:29–01:08:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:08:30]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:39–01:08:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was just going to say, you work so hard. I wish there were more because this just, you know, it's just a drop in the bucket.
[01:08:52]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Yeah, well, I'm not going to complain about the amount because I understand the situation. We've suffered with a lot of grants that have either been put on pause or that have gone away. And
[01:09:04]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:16–01:09:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:19]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So you can see in the 22 years we've grown exponentially, but our programs have as well.
[01:09:25]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:43–01:09:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:45]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
We were predicting 36. So that's 2,000 above ‸ what we thought we'd serve. So more than that. But really, it's the food pantry that's taken off. Sometime in October, we started distributing over 100,000 pounds in a month.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:23–01:10:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:32–01:10:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at one point in time in my life. So I definitely appreciate the work that's being done. My question to you in regards to the influx of people outside of Cocoa starting to utilize
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:45–01:10:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ If you're not already doing so, is there any kind of way to track that information so that ‸ we could probably provide or be provided that information when we're having these conversations with our partners, even with the Space Coast League of Cities, you know, when we're coming to the table trying to find solutions for this funding. If you could provide that to us at a later date, I would appreciate it.
[01:11:11]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:14–01:11:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:15]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
many people come from outside the city
[01:11:17]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:17–01:11:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:18]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
do receive funding from Brevard County in circumstances And we do keep the same records in regards to that. So we don't count
[01:11:26]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:26–01:11:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:28]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
towards the count that we provide to them ‸ each quarter, I should say. So I would be glad to provide those numbers to you. I'll ‸ email them to you.
[01:11:36]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
I'm not sure how the rules exactly work, but if, for instance, if these citizens are coming from the city of Melbourne and if they have funding that they're no longer utilizing because I know a lot of the centers down that way have closed down, Maybe there can be a way to collaborate and bring some of that funding this way here. So
[01:11:58]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the sad thing, councilman, is that they're ‸ coming in, they're staying. ‸ They're not going back.
Understandable. So as you stated, that's going to create some hard conversations that we have to have with our representatives. So always when having those conversations, having that evidence at hand to show what we're talking about is definitely vital. So thank you again for what you do.
[01:12:30]▶ PlaySpeaker 4 (introduced as “Dave Brubaker” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Thank you. And I extend an open invitation to each and every one of you to come and take a tour, see what's going on and get down with us.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:12:46–01:12:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:08–01:13:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
by Deputy Mayor Weeks and a second by Councilwoman Calls. She's going to call the question all in favor of saying aye. Aye. Aye. Aye's have it unanimously. Proceeding on to item
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:23–01:13:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:33–01:13:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:55–01:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:18–01:14:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Tonight, we are here for an application for consideration of a development agreement approving a conceptual plan for the construction of a vertically integrated mixed-use development. The site is commonly known as the Bank of America site. It consists of three parcels, totaling approximately 1.95 acres, and it is located at the northeast corner of Brevard Avenue and Church Street. The current future land use is mixed-use, and the zoning is Central Business District within the Cocoa Village overlay. And within the Waterfront overlay district, the subject property is designated as commercial mixed-use large building type. Over the course of several years, multiple policies have been approved that allow for unique and dense redevelopment opportunities within the city's CRA,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:05–01:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
where the subject property is located. In 2022, the comp plan was updated to allow for density of up to 25 dwelling units per acre for vertically integrated mixed-use projects. In 2023, the Land Development Code was updated to allow for large-scale mixed-use buildings with the maximum building height of eight stories. And last year, a
for a vertically mixed-use building with no fewer than 220 upscale apartments, approximately 2,800 square feet of commercial retail uses on the ground floor, with the maximum building height proposed of eight stories and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:51–01:16:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:57–01:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:10–01:17:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the CRA, architectural design of development, impacts of public facilities, consistency with the CRA plan, proven experience by the developer, a proposed development schedule and compliance with all applicable comp plan policies and land development regulations. I'll only touch briefly on a few of the factors listed for economic and social benefits in the economic impact and TIF projection study provided by the applicant team.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:44–01:17:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
proposed enhancements include a clubhouse amenities proposed on the ground floor. Gym and spa will be accessible to the public through a paid membership program. And outdoor resident areas include private pool and community terrace.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:18:46–01:18:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:01–01:19:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:06–01:19:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the subject site has been identified as a catalyst mixed-use redevelopment site and as a medium priority project in the CRA. As part of negotiations, since the planning ‸ zoning board meeting, an updated development schedule is proposed and has been recently added to the agreement.
Within 18 months of the development agreement approval, final site plan applications must be submitted with final approval required to be secured within 24 months. And construction is required to start within
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:43–01:19:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
years of development agreement approval. In addition to the mixed-use policy and the comprehensive plan, Appendix A, Article 11, Section 22 of the Land Development Code require five factors to consider when ‸ approving in development agreement. And I show many of which are similar to the factors that are listed in the Comprehensive Policy 1.1.2.6 that we reviewed. Additionally, waiver requests are included in the DA and are allowed per Section 15-21 of the LDC. The waivers listed propose differing development standards than what is found in code, and specifically deal with parking space sizes, signage, and lot standards. Staff has determined that the request ‸ for the development agreement complies with all relevant sections of the City's Code of Ordinances and comprehensive plan, and we recommend approval of the requested development agreement between the applicant and the city of Ococo. We are available for any questions and so is the applicant.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:55–01:20:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, I hope my question isn't out of line, and I don't know the legalities behind if this is even feasible or not, but I'm a strong believer in closed mouths don't get fed. I'm certainly in favor of this project. Can anyone tell me what's the probable time that construction would begin on this project?
can defer to the applicant but for purposes of the development agreement, a schedule has been included with the DA and construction is required to commence within three years of the development agreement being approved.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:58–01:21:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
park there. So my question ‸ was, would the developer be willing to, either allow those spaces until construction began to be free parking ‸ or donate any proceeds from that parking space to our street improvements or parking improvements throughout the village? It's just an ask. I don't know the legalities behind it, but like I said, closed mouths don't get fed.
Yeah, understood. I don't have the authority to say yes to any of that tonight, but we can certainly talk offline about what you're trying to accomplish. Perfect. Open to it. Thank you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:37–01:22:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:43–01:22:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
evening, council. and ‸ staff. First and foremost, the historic Cocoa Village Main Street Board of Directors and over 100 merchants and businesses in this village are so excited over the fact
actually going to happen in my lifetime, and I know you've all heard that, and so I will have to say that Nick came a couple weeks ago. He made a special trip And presented ‸ to the merchants and answered all their questions, and for therefore, I have a letter that I'm not going to read, but I will just take, I don't want to take any more time and just turn it into council, But basically it tells you that we are 100% behind this. We look forward to it.
so we can all go swimming, so they're extremely excited. We cannot wait for this to come to the village. That's 400 more people living in this village that will be here as permanent residents for at least 15 to 24 months with the rent, shopping, eating, playing, So that's more revenue for our police department, our fire department, and the city, so thank you very much. My shovel will not rest on this one.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:42–01:24:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:24:50–01:24:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:21–01:25:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:34–01:25:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:51–01:25:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of any lawyer, I will be brief, and then Nick will go over some of the detailed points of the presentation. As we said, at Planning and Zoning, we're really excited about this project being at this point. While this project team has been involved in just over three years of this, which we can go over, the, I think, city vision of this started a decade ago when you adopted that mixed-use land use. And when we look at sites like this and the potential for development, I am excited to represent clients like Framework Group who take the time to analyze the history of Cocoa, kind of the development opportunities, the building style. They know that the first public Christmas tree in Cocoa was at St. Michael's that was then renamed to St. Mark's or vice versa. And so they really take the time to learn the area to see what is needed and bring that forward into the development program, which Nick will kind of tell you about. As it relates to the development agreement, like it was noted between the planning and zoning and now there are changes just to assignability and timing.
questions. And we will be coming back, I think, before this board and before the CRA with some discussions on what this partnership looks like moving forward. Nick will touch on that, but I think from day one, we've wanted to make this a fruitful partnership for the city and the project. So with that, I will introduce Nick Caring, Vice President of Framework Group.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:21–01:27:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:26–01:27:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:30–01:27:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. So I will run through this. I know we've talked at length about it already and heard from the public, so you have my commitment to move quickly. This is the agenda about Framework Group.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:51–01:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:11–01:29:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:29:16–01:29:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We've been around since 2010. The framework group. All we do is multifamily and mixed use. We look for special urban infill opportunities. We never build the same thing twice. We like to take a big idea approach.
where we get to know the area, what we love about it, and we create a brand, something that's rooted in authenticity and localism. ‸ It's an exciting way to develop. ‸ Again, it makes everything we do unique. You get a snapshot of our pipeline from this slide. We own about 3,500 apartments. ‸ We've got 1,600 in future development, 325 under construction. A representative development I want to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:30–01:30:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:37–01:30:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and ticking up and up every day. So we're happy for that. Hopefully, you'll see this is like no other apartment community. The big idea was mid-century modern architecture, ‸ something that you really associate with the Space Coast meets futurism. So you see the glass and the metal that we've incorporated there to hit on that. And I chose these two images because what you're looking at on the left-hand side is a photo today. And on the right-hand side is a rendering that I showed City Council Planning and Zoning many years ago. So the point here is we are the sort of people who do what we say we're going to do.
Brevard. A quick location map. You're looking inland, kind of hovering over the Indian River Lagoon. So right in the heart of Cocoa Village, two acres. The site plan is shown on the left-hand side. We've got some key stats listed. This is going to be between 220 and 241 apartments. That's a little bit in flux because we still need to finalize the design of this building, lay out the interior walls, and so on. It's got 2,800 square feet of retail.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:07–01:32:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be seven stories tall. The parking calculation will go something like what's shown here. This assumes 234 apartments, but you can see the rationale is that we are earmarking a certain number of parking spacers for every different type of apartment. So a studio gets one and a half, for example. A three-bedroom gets two and a half, and we add it up from there.
So really, that's 35 spaces that function as available to the public as a part of this community as well. A key plan is shown here, so to take a little trip around that ground floor. Item number one
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:52–01:32:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Item number two, that large kind of tan-colored box, is our leasing office, our clubhouse, gym spa, those amenities that you associate with a lot of modern apartments. That whole area will also be available by membership to the public.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:17–01:33:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:21–01:33:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Now, that is private for the residents, but that's where we're going to have our pool and sun deck and things like that. Item five is our vehicular access. So we want to be good neighbors. We believe in the walkability of this area.
thing I want to point out about this is that it's almost completely enveloped by the building. ‸ You'll especially see that on the next slide where we go up a story, and it's completely wrapped in apartments.
yellow color. Here we are on an upper floor. So, again, you see the apartments wrapped the garage. It's almost completely invisible from the street. And ‸ one new thing to note on this slide is that we've got item number one.
That's on the second story looking down ‸ for residents to interact and feel a part of the village. And it also gives the benefit of pulling the building back from the street, kind of giving some relief, hiding the building, massing a little bit. As for apartment and community features, this will be a high-end in quality and upscale community. Every inspiration image you see on this screen is from a framework property. So we've got some amenities on the left, and we've got units on the right, apartment residences, I should say. Those interior apartment photos are actually from Cirrus. So that's in actuality what you're getting there. We're going to have a wide array of amenities.
have on-site property management. The apartments, we're going to have tall ceilings, generous ‸ windows, private outdoor spaces like balconies, walk-in closets. It's going to be a really upscale and nice property. The architecture we proposed, we call it mercantile-inspired, but we've pulled it forward, and we've made it a little more residential. We've counteracted the scale of this building with the jogs. I mentioned a little bit of that already, but you kind of see the effect of that ground-floor plaza going up the building. It's really pulled away from the street.
get sunshine down on the street. So that seven-story building starts to feel a lot smaller when we do things like this. And we have features that emulate the character of the village.
That includes the incorporation of brick and interesting masonry and different patterns and things like that. Arched openings at our courtyard there, and you see some windows top left that incorporate those arched openings. The use of columns, you see that around the village. We've got a pronounced cornice with decorative corbels. Awnings, urban stoops. These are things you see around the village. So it's something that we worked hard on with staff to ‸ really make sure that this is going to be contextually appropriate. And there's another view. This is looking from the corner of Church and Brevard.
people living full time in the village. Spending their discretionary income here. Going out to eat. Shopping in the village. Being advocates for the neighborhood. So we have been welcomed warmly. And I think that's for good reason.
This is what we're going to come back and discuss at a future date. I'll say plainly, this is an incentive package that we're going to be discussing. In our application, we have explained that what we're going to be looking for is a TIF rebate over 10 years. Probably a combination of city and county incentives. Nine and a half million dollars is what we're seeking. Also, a credit of water and sewer impact fees. ‸ Now, that is not up for approval tonight. That's only to restate what is in our application. And to be forthcoming. You know, being good partners.
This is what we need in order to deliver. We want to provide 25 structured parking spaces. Again, public spaces and asset indefinitely for the village ‸ as contribution. Some justification for that. And again, we're going to talk in more detail in the future. But just to taste. The current tax revenue is about $21,000. So, even with some incentives, that is going to increase, I believe, ‸ substantially to benefit the current tax rolls.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:45–01:38:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this is the sort of thing that we need to overcome. The hesitation among the lending community, the investment community, when we're doing something that is pioneering. Of course, we've had increases in commodities, material and construction costs increases, tariffs, all sorts of things that are headwinds in our industry. So, again, things that we need to overcome.
And again, you know, this is not something that's entirely new. In the 2008 Cocoa Waterfront Master ‸ Plan in the 2018 update to the CRA, ‸ you see it repeated. You know, specifically for this site that's been known as a catalyst mixed-use site, private ‸ development incentives are encouraged.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:59–01:40:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:07–01:40:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're kind of laying the groundwork, negotiating, you know, what's going to work for both parties. But this is the partnership that Jessica alluded to. And one last time, we're going to talk about it in more detail at a future date. I just want to set that expectation. But tonight, we're talking about the development agreement, the site plan, the architecture, everything that you've seen here. That is what we're requesting approval of. This will be transformative. This is deserving of this key address and location in the heart of Cocoa Village. I hope you agree with me there. And it's long awaited.
You know, sometime around the start of Cirrus, we put this under contract. And it's been a challenging road. But you all have been fantastic partners in that. So, I'm thrilled to be here tonight to take this key step and hopefully win your approval. I'm here to answer your questions.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:23–01:41:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Well, I really appreciate the framework group, your approach to, you know, redevelopment. You know, you don't do, you don't clear land and you go into places that need reviving.
Ah, okay. And so the parking garage is all concrete. Because I did listen to the planning and zoning meeting the other day. And I know that you got a question about the wood frame. So, you go the first level and the second level are concrete. And then the parking garage will be concrete. And the rest of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:49–01:42:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:58–01:42:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I would say the ‸ storefront glass, ‸ the use of masonry, that kind of rich, high-quality texture there at the ground level. Okay. The urban stoops that I mentioned, the awnings. You know, these are the things that are kind of immediately perceivable as you're walking by the property, especially ‸ close to it.
We've gotten over, you've heard me before, we've gotten over the height issue. I mean, it's a done issue. But I still look at the diagrams and the streets look so much larger than what our streets actually are.
streets. I mean, I guess you've, you know, looked at engineering traffic in and out and because I know you can only get so many cars parked on the side and
cars going in the same, in different directions. Of course, they're one ways. So, last question. Have you spoken, you mentioned St. Mark's. They have a school enterprise.
I know they're very concerned about the school enterprise being able to opt. And this is that basically it supports the church as the foundation of the church is their enterprise. And they're concerned about how it will be impacted during ‸ construction. Have you had any talks with them or thought about reaching out?
intend to be good neighbors here. So we want to work that out both for construction and the permanent building. We need to, I mean, and we're used to doing this in an urban setting. So we're going to have that conversation.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:45:44–01:45:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:56–01:46:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:09–01:46:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:40–01:46:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:45–01:46:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:05–01:47:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:21–01:47:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:25–01:47:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:48–01:47:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
stated they did not want a liquor store In the neighborhood Period point blank. I don't care how you look at it frontwards or backwards. They don't want it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:09–01:48:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:48:14–01:48:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
between locations for on-premises consumption of alcohol in public parks and playgrounds, updating the zoning ordinance. to be consistent with state law regarding separation requirements between schools and locations for on-premises consumption of alcohol,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:56–01:49:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and special exception uses in the general commercial district, cg relating to the alcoholic beverages providing for the repeal prior and consistent ordinances resolutions incorporation into the coast of co-severability and an effective
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:49:14–01:49:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:20–01:49:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this is the second final reading of ordinance 04 2025 and a bit of history on the ordinance is that in december of 2024 council gave staff notice to proceed to to make a few changes to the alcoholic ‸ beverage ordinance
between bars and schools to be consistent with the florida statute being the 500 foot distance as opposed to the 300 foot distance which it is currently and also to impose a minimum 300 foot separation distance between liquor stores and package stores so we're adding liquor stores and package stores as a as a category requiring distance measuring and also to add parks and playgrounds to the categories that require a distancing and also to amend the method of measurement between separation distances
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:50:59–01:51:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:08–01:51:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
alcoholic beverages. And specifically, it resulted in changes to three of the articles in the zoning code, one of which is the Article 5 definitions, of
also Article 11 with regard to uh general commercial, and also Article article 13 uh supplementary district regulations. with For alcoholic beverages in general.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:54–01:51:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:08–01:52:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So that uh where ‸ convenience stores do not require any distancing. Also, liquor store uh was revised just to say C package store as the two terms are synonymous in the code and
just wanted to just remind everyone that the bar, um the, what it, what it, the way it reads right now in the code prior to this change is that a retail establishment selling alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises or an establishment commonly known as a bottle club. In the business of furnishing premises where alcoholic beverages may be consumed. So that's what it says simply now.
So what we did is we revised in the definition of the bar so that the bottle club, again, which is currently in the definition of a bar, that that definition reflects the Florida statutes and saying that a bottle club is a commercial establishment operated for a profit, whether or not a profit is actually made wherein patrons consume alcoholic beverages which are brought onto the premises and not sold or supplied ‸ to the patrons by the establishment where the patrons bring in and maintain custody of their own alcoholic beverages or surrender custody to the establishment for dispensing on the premises and also which is located in a building or other enclosed permanent structure.
would would not be able not be eligible for a bottle club license. And again, just the the term bottle club has been in the city's definition of a bar and it's always been subject to the same special exception and distancing requirements where applicable in the code.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 01:55:03–01:55:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
However, it must provide an affidavit to say that alcohol is not their primary business and that no revenue is derived from the sale directly. However, an,
will not be permitted to convert to a bar or bottle club without first complying with any, any distancing or special exception requirements as stated in the zoning ordinance. And in addition, they must also, meet all, department of business and professional regulations, regulations and licensing. So another note on the new definition of establishments with alcohol as an accessory use is that ‸ is not synonymous with open container. Neither is bar or bottle club synonymous with open container. We are, we, we are not suggesting or, ‸ or allowing um businesses to to become open container. We already have uh language in our code for that, for
And our code says, it shall be unlawful for ‸ any person to drink or consume alcoholic beverages or possess an open container of alcoholic beverages, including but not limited to beer and wine, on or upon any street, sidewalk, or parking area open to the public in the ordinary course of business. Soso again, in the creation of the establishments with alcohol as an accessory use, and in the revision of the definition of bar and bottle club, it is not synonymous with open container, and we are not allowing that. And then just a quick quick edit in Article 11, which is the general commercial district. uh We just needed to clarify a discrepancy between the uh the uses here. So um where we had cocktail lounges and bars are synonymous, and then liquor stores and package stores are also synonymous, and there was a bit of a conflict there. So we uh we corrected that. And then also, we um we made a few changes regarding restaurants, where
And uh just as a note that uh special exceptions are not required for restaurants uh meeting that criteria. And then going on to the separation distancing, is our current
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:17–01:58:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
between bars and schools, churches, and residential zones. So what we're proposing is to add parks and playgrounds to the to these categories, and to also add package stores to these types of establishments that require distancing from these groups of properties. And then specifically with regard to separation between bars and schools, we are making sure that we are making
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:58:51–01:58:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
uh for clarification, um we have added a a chart here, uh ‸ distance measuring a distance‸ chart, uh which explains um how certain premises are measured from other premises. And so we hope this will will clarify and and make it easier to interpret. And also just to note that in general, the the measurements are still taken from property line to the building. So in general, it still results in uh greater distancing in the community. And so staff was tasked to do the analysis uh with the taking the distancing requirements into consideration for the new categories that we've added, looking at the buffers for parks and playgrounds. We wanted to determine if we were creating any any new non-conforming uses uh with our the buffers, with the buffer requirements. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:09–02:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there were no new non-conforming uses created by adding parks and playgrounds. And then looking at the 500 foot uh distance requirement from schools to bars, um it we only discovered one non-conforming use was created, which is a bar located at 238 peach tree Street. And that was due to them being less than 500 feet from a school. And
And that has always been in the code. That bars would be a separation distance of 300 feet from residential zones. And so we're adding package stores to that. And in doing this analysis, we discovered there was one new non-conforming use, which is a package store located at 1105 Clear Lake Road due to its less than 300 foot proximity to a residential zone. And so we there was some concern that our buffer requirements, and I know this map looks it looks busy and it looks like it takes up all the whole city, but but there was some concern for the the buffers and the distancing that it would be too limiting and too restrictive. And so we created a map that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:42–02:01:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:02:03–02:02:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:14–02:02:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the yellow, those are shopping centers that are greater than 20 000 square feet where package stores and bars uh are not required any distancing. And also
package stores in in the city are the red stars. And we've included uh also Walmart and Sam's there, um which are in the shopping centers greater than 20 000 square feet. So just as an illustration that um the kind of distribution of existing stores. So the determination determination we made in our analysis is that um most of the bars and only one package store are in the central business district where there are no distancing requirements. um And that a non-conforming use may continue if it complies with the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:03:43–02:03:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
distancing. The city is taking steps necessary to address public health and safety concerns associated with the potential of over concentration of liquor stores and other alcoholic beverage establishments within the city. And then we also did an analysis with regard to um uh some some some some historical research that's been done with regard to health and safety concerns, increased rates of childhood accidents, assaults, and child abuse injuries, weakened social controls uh with the president with the presence of um of Package Stores, Elevated Levels of Crime and Nuisance. And um in in summary of that determination is regulating the location of liquor and package stores is in the best interest of the community. And it is necessary to protect vulnerable populations, particularly youth and families. The proposed amendment also updates key definitions and establishes more precise methodology for measuring separation, and
with regard to future land use goals, neighborhood protection, redevelopment and community revitalization, and that it promotes public safety and welfare through planning and regulation. And so staff finally requests the city approve on second reading ordinance 04 2025
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:32–02:05:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
relating to the regulation of alcoholic beverages, by ‸ imposing separation requirements for liquor stores and package stores from certain other uses, imposing separation requirements between locations for on-premises consumption of alcohol and public parks and playgrounds, ‸ updating the zoning ordinance to be consistent with state law regarding separation requirements between schools and locations for on-premises consumption of alcohol, amending the method of measuring separation for purposes of alcoholic beverage regulations, amending certain definitions to clarify the application of the alcoholic beverage regulations, modifying the regulations pertaining to alcohol beverage sales as an accessory use, and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:06:37–02:06:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:38–02:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:06:47–02:06:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:55–02:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you again, uh council staff, a great job and explaining, uh the, uh my answers to all my questions. uh I now understand it and I can support it. So thank you.
Thank you very much. Let me do it officially, please. Let me close this portion to council and over to the public. And I know you were first. You're fine. That was me, ma'am, not you. Next will be um the attorney. Come on up, brother. from sorry No, no. You're fine. You're fine.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:54–02:07:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:01–02:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:09–02:08:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:21–02:08:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
located immediately to the west and across Fisk from the existing Wawa. Although we understand the city's desire to adopt regulations that promote the health, safety and welfare of the community and our clients support reasonable restrictions on the sale of liquor and distance and buffer requirements for on-site consumption. Our client's position is that the proposed 300 foot buffer distance from the packaged liquor stores isn't really correlated to the specific harms that are outlined in the fact-finding sections of the whereas clauses of the draft ordinance. Our client asserts that there's not really a specific relationship or connection to that 300 foot buffer and the harms that the city's trying to cure or mitigate. In our particular case, it makes even less sense to exempt convenience stores from the ordinance where citizens are able to purchase alcohol products at hours that are even greater than what a packaged liquor store would be directly across from our client's property at the Wawa. And those those
is overly burdensome, excessive and unduly oppressive on a legal ‸ commercial use with just those packaged liquor stores. The rest of the ordinance, our clients do not have an objection to. It's just the 300 foot buffer from the packaged liquor stores. We believe that the council should respectfully balance the uh economic interests of your business owners and your commercial property owners versus the harms that you're trying to avoid. And we think the rest of the ordinance accomplishes that goal without the 300 foot buffer applied to the packaged liquor stores. We think staff did a great job of writing the ordinance and the rest of the ordinance is fine. It's just that one 300 foot buffer applied to the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:45–02:10:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:55–02:11:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:11:06–02:11:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:12–02:11:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:11:35–02:11:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was beautiful, beautiful. That corner was beautiful. Now that story is going to switch to a nightmare. So uh as an adult, I expanded and went to the big city, Orange County, Orlando. And I was exploring and getting used to the area. And I discovered the the downtown area. I found that to be exciting, good. It's beautiful. I said, no wonder they call this the city beautiful. ‸ And so I wanted to continue my exploring. And I did. I was expecting to see that beautiful city continue. So I decided to cross the railroad track and make a turn that I had never made before. um it was a very traumatic uh It was a very traumatic experience because I didn't expect to see what I saw. um i turned down on um
I had to call a family member to help me because I thought like iit felt so alien. So un like I felt like I was in a different country. I felt extremely unsafe. I saw terrible things and the terrible things that I saw. I saw for the first time in
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:13:33–02:13:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We don't need that. It was a beautiful city before. We can be a beautiful city again. We have all these wonderful opportunities coming. I don't want the new people that are coming off those train stations to come down Clear Lake and go exploring and see
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:13:59–02:14:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:21–02:14:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
wrestled with this. i I said it before. I don't drink alcohol. I hate it. My brother was killed by a drunk driver. um However, I think that the ordinance is too restrictive, especially when it comes to package stores, which I will tell you I've never even been in one. But uh they don't drink on the premises. They sell and people take it home um and and consume it there. To put package stores in the same category as bar as bars. And it when you look at the map, my area,
growth down 524, when they showed it earlier, other than where the public's is and the little dollar general, those are the only places, the rest of the area. And so, um again, I don't see why we would put package stores in the same category as bars.
uh as well with the development that's going to go in down at the other end by the train station. um I don't want a bar with close to church or school. I get that. And I have no problem with those. But to exempt the the shopping centers and somebody wants to come along um and, you know, build a standalone. uh I just think we're going to have a lot of we're going to be restricting ourselves a lot on this. But right now I'm going to pick my battle, which is I hate to see the folks who bought that property and were told that it was okay for that to go there at the corner of uh fisk and 520. um
i Again, a package store right across from Wawa where you can buy it all the time. um I don't think that that's going to hurt that corner. And I would like to see us take package store out. um So that is my. um I also
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:08–02:17:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:16–02:17:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:32–02:17:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, that's some of the questions that some of the business owners, especially that particular business, owner asked me the same thing where you have. A
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:53–02:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
500, 300, whatever that may be. And then, you know, a mile and a half up the road. And it's kind of confusing the same thing. Conversation we had about food trucks recently.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:18:10–02:18:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:18:13–02:18:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
conversation with staff regarding those convenience stores um who sell alcohol with percentages greater than, um just say, I've seen liquor inside of convenience
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:18:35–02:18:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and Mad Dog 2020, right? So those are the questions that I asked about the convenience stores. if they was Was it a conversation about the percentages? Maybe if, I'm just trying to figure out, like, what's the difference? Of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:19:13–02:19:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
stores may sell at retail alcoholic beverages provided that the sale of alcoholic beverages is incidental to the sale of other items as does not constitute the primary business of the store.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:19:25–02:19:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
footage uh maximum. It does say, ‸ at the beginning of the definition, it shall primarily sell items such as candy, ice cream, soft drinks, lottery tickets, newspapers, magazines, along with a selection of processed food, grocery,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:19:48–02:19:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
which is strictly, you know, a liquor, beer and wine, of course, which is the primary, you know, more than 51 of their sales. So, we revised the definition of a convenience store to differentiate it more, and to say that a convenience store, such as Wawa, you know, which should the sale of alcohol isn't their primary use, that they would not require a special exception.
course. And if I may uh just address another um another comment that in that, um it was the previous comment made. um I'm sorry. I'll come back to it. I just lost my train of thought.
be referring to the cut the statement that was made about they were told that it was approved for thefor the business to be there. That's what you was...
there are two different cities or there's a character for downtown and there's a character for the rest of the city. However, um specifically in the central business district for a bar package store, that is required by special exception across the board in
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:21:21–02:21:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Village. So there is a measure of control that an applicant would need to come before uh planning and zoning to get approval for that. However, in other parts of the city, the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:21:48–02:21:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reason? Everybody knows where you can go. Now, to find, just like pawn shops or in a designated area. But let me be perfectly clear about this because I want to be fair and equitable across the board. I live on [address] and 520. Across the street from me was, uh uh 520, the club and so forth there. They sold beer and packages, liquor out of the store. and
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:06–02:23:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:12–02:23:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:13–02:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
None of y'all will be as close as I am. So you will not deal with the outcome outcome and outcry and the problems that are being dealt with this. So that's the reason I'm asking you to, it's not a morality versus spirituality and we're limiting ourselves.
life at my grandparents house and I saw the 20 grand. I've seen the clubs and their attraction centers that come there. And then just down the street heading further um ‸ east is little child daycare center just east
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:54–02:23:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:14–02:24:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:23–02:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:37–02:24:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:49–02:24:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's the point that I'm saying. We're trying to develop our community. We're trying to do away with that old stereotype. Put it in a certain designated area and it'll be okay. I don't,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:25:11–02:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:25:26–02:25:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a liquor store. i I mean, I actually grew up not too far from a liquor store and the church was down the street from there as was a school. And it wasn't an issue. um it On Clear Lake Road, there are no, I've never seen any prostitutes by the liquor store on Clear Lake Road. um It seems i
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:44–02:26:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:26:51–02:26:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
um I don't know. Right now we've got nothing going on there. And it doesn't seem to be attracting much either. So is having it vacant better than having the liquor store there?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:27:23–02:27:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:27:43–02:27:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:27:58–02:28:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:28:02–02:28:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
when you live there and when you walk the walk and talk to talk and experience it, then you will understand. Right. But until then, you really don't understand. Exactly. Because you don't have to live it every day. Exactly.
You absolutely right. both for 60 some odd years of my life, and I'm 65 all my life. It's been there all my life. And it's a difference between everybody and that great grandmother know ‸ if you want to find certain things, you don't have to go far. Right.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:47–02:28:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:49–02:28:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:01–02:29:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:29:16–02:29:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:29:27–02:29:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh I can appreciate your passion and what you have what you have gone through. um I really can. And again, I don't like alcohol. I would just I mean, but. But but I am in I just feel that the regulation in this particular instance is not only going to hurt us and I appreciate your explanation. about the difference between that they need a special exception in the central business district, but regardless, they are all. um ‸ there's a whole lot there in a very short small place and. uh
um ‸ a package store, which, you know, if you go out beachside, you see the ABC package stores and all that stuff. And you don't see people hanging around there drinking or doing any of that stuff. They're going in, buying it and taking it home. And this is along that same line would be like an ABC package store. and they also sell. uh because I know my husband's gone ‸ and bought and sodas in there. So I know they sell not just alcohol. They sell ‸ other things, but, um but nobody's consuming it there. and i would love to see uh at least a waiver for this gentleman to be able to do his business there uh because i know he had the letter stating that, ‸ before he got started, it just took him longer and he, this came up before he could finish what he was doing. and
uh there's a lot of a lot of variables in this and um and i i just don't want to see us down the road that this has hurt us bringing in new business into the area regardless um because i think it will i mean so again i've
With respect to the ordinance, um there's a motion and a second on the floor. So the main motion is to prove as presented to the extent that you want to propose an edit, to the ordinance. Then it would be by a motion to amend the main motion.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:32:51–02:32:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:33:34–02:33:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:33:41–02:33:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is, a an emotion to amend the main motion. So, you know um Mr. mayor's chair, you would entertain discussion regarding the amendment, um to the main motion. And that would be subject to a separate vote. If it fails, then you can call the question on the main motion.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:05–02:34:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just because I got the money doesn't make it always right. Because you know what we go through in the Diamond Square area. And we're making that change
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:35–02:34:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, it does. Because that's what you're trying to do. So what we get ready to do is call the question. And I'm gonna ‸ let you go. But what i'm what I'm saying to you,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:51–02:34:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if we vote no on her amended motion to change the verbiage, it will die. Then we will come back and vote on my motion that was made. Is that correct, Mr. City? That's correct, man. Okay, that's all I want to know. Now, I will hear from you, Councilman
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:09–02:35:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Real quick, as this conversation carries on, it just uh as the mayor stated, the historical context is just triggering to me. um Being here from the city of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:26–02:35:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:29–02:35:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the elements that were hanging around that area. um Just a block away, um it was always a running joke about, just go to peach tree Street and you can find a prostitute walking
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:55–02:35:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
work of our police department has cleared up a lot of those elements in that area. We just talked tonight about raising uh the millage rate because many of our properties aren't valued over a certain amount. How do you raise property values when you bring these type of elements back into an area where ‸ majority of those properties don't pay property taxes because the amount that is valued at? um I think we have to take a bigger look at what we're trying to accomplish here.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:26–02:36:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:38–02:36:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:37:01–02:37:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:37:11–02:37:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ All in favor by saying aye. Aye. nay Nay. Nay. It dies. So now I'm getting ready to go back to my original motion and a second by Councilman Hearns to approve staff recommendation on the second and final reading. And chairs gonna ‸ call the question. All in favor by saying aye. Aye. Aye. nay's Nay. That the record reflect three, two, no package store
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:38:21–02:38:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
That's not going to happen. Thank you very much. Council. Thank you for saving the integrity of the community of the Diamond Square that we're making powerful economic gains through the leadership of the city attorney,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:39:01–02:39:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:39:14–02:39:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:27–02:39:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:31–02:39:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:39:40–02:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the Staff has sent out the notices to taxing authorities. So um it's up for council's consideration. And the LPA also made a recommendation of approval. Mayor.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:21–02:40:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:28–02:40:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:34–02:40:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:40–02:40:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:40:45–02:40:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Community Redevelopment Agency. And as the ‸ attorney noted that it has been advertised and properly noticed to the taxing authorities and it was recommended by the uh local planning agency at the July 9th meeting. And now I'm going to turn it over to Laura Martinez with Inspire Placemaking Collective and she's going to provide you a short presentation. uh This will start in the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:09–02:41:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:30–02:41:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:41:39–02:41:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:07–02:42:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:11–02:42:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:42:17–02:42:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:42–02:42:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
analysis. This started off with a CRA staff guided site tour we pulled our own u.s census bureau reports on socioeconomic housing and economic statistics And then we also looked at the current regulatory context as well as the existing public services and facilities. we then moved into our uh public involvement segment. We had a public or a project website for each CRA. They were both active for four months. Each website had project information and updates on the public hearings, as well as a survey and an interactive map comment board where people can interact and and leave their comments and concerns for the CRA.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:44:21–02:44:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:44:27–02:44:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
also had a series of boards that prompted input across these several topics. And uh we had stakeholder interviews with CRA board members, local business owners, long-time residents, and council members. So just to get into COCO CRA specifically, this was some of the public input that came from our public engagement segment. um So in the short term, we saw comments regarding enhanced public realm, increased lighting, some safety, uh walkability, um a lot of uh ‸ emphasis on improving the waterfront. um Same thing for midterm. A lot of it had to do with the public realm, the ability for a community to come out and sort of engage with things like dog park. That was um
homelessness in that area, affordable housing, micro transit especially with the bright line hopefully coming in, and then Harbor Patrol and Marina improvements. um Our data analysis also looked at these five segments, uh these five topics that came out from public input as well as what we had seen in the previous plans. So place making connectivity, housing, economic development, and environmental resiliency,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:46:03–02:46:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
CRA as it is on the waterfront. And then we looked at um all of the information that we looked at from the previous plans, the existing conditions analysis
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:46:13–02:46:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
input. And we came up with these updated CRA goals and their strategies, which are both broad enough to allow for ‸ the CRA to kind of, you know, just be guided, but also focused enough toto really know where to hone in their efforts on. um For
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:46:36–02:46:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:46:37–02:46:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
projections. And with that, we offered some proposed projects and programming, as well as what sub districts would be most benefited from these programs and projects. And uh potential funding sources and estimated costs that were associated both with the prioritization of public input, but also with estimated costs of these projects
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:47:09–02:47:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:47:16–02:47:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
CRA. So you can take a look at that. That's in the report. And then the master plan, as well. This is Harrison Street as a Festival Street. And then the Gateway Plaza. So that's all I have for
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:47:31–02:47:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you very much, Mrs. Martinez, ma'am. all right Do we have any question for Mrs. Martinez? Great job, ma'am. Great presentation. I know you want to give us uh Diamond Square next. So let me close this portion to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:47:51–02:47:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:47:53–02:47:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like to close this portion to the public and return to the council. What are the wishes of council Move to approve. we got a motion on the floor by Deputy Mayor Weeks.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:48:09–02:48:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:48:19–02:48:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:48:30–02:48:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:48:33–02:48:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:48:50–02:48:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:49:15–02:49:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We'll just wait for the presentation to be popped up again. All right, moving right into Diamond Square. I'm going to pick up on the public input. uh For Diamond Square, we had a little bit of a shorter operational time frame, and so what we heard from public input is really it's all uh more on the shorter term. um But the three focus areas were public spaces, housing options, and infill development. So we heard things like increased public transit, safer pedestrian infrastructure, um and just overall improved public realm, as well as some intergenerational public spaces and programming, uh which we've seen Diamond Square have a lot of success in in the past. um Housing options included um missing middle housing as well as live work options, affordable housings specifically with amenities uh public to the community, um and then programs that helped increase home ownership and owner occupancy. um For infill development, this included um improved storefront facades, local business support, and really attracting uh restaurants, grocery stores, and medical facilities. um Throughout the whole public engagement process, there was a lot of really fond um fond remembering of what Stone Street uh really used to be a very vibrant place.
previous plan. So we took um community living, community places, community connections, community identity, and community opportunities as the five frameworks. And then again, we looked at previous
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:51:20–02:51:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:51:31–02:51:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:51:38–02:51:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we also took a little bit of a different approach on the proposed capital projects and programs, uh really highlighting um what our proposed items were and what partnerships and could be made and what departments could really champion these.
And so we have an overview of Diamond Square. We have the master plan there where you can see where the focus areas of Diamond Square are. And then some renderings of what Diamond Square could look like with some really focused intention and investment here. So this is an example of what a residential area in Diamond Square could look like with some of that improved landscaping, focus on pedestrian
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:51:57–02:52:26 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
intention and investment backed up. So again, mixed-use development, pedestrian improvements, and the‸ improved landscaping, as well. And then that public realm and ‸ parks on aspect to it.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:53:02–02:53:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
become effective immediately. So with these proposed initiatives and possible projects, how would we measure measure through like a timeline on some of these projects I would it be like
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:53:31–02:53:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like some of these initiatives I see you know of course there's a cost with everything but I see some of them don't have a cost like I saw one of the pointers said something about a neighborhood watch program. That's something that could be supported by our V cop program or something
I mean obviously, a neighborhood watch program would not necessarily have an expensive cost to it, but some of the other initiatives would. So that would be on a budgetary basis.
we do have a very short time frame where the diamond square CRA as far as 2038 is concerned and so we do need to act as quickly and effectively as we can to to do some of these initiatives that we are able to and you know with the financial backing that we have I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:54:35–02:54:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yeah yeah so we don't have that much time with the diamond square and I know the last conversation that we had dealing with the museum we know the museum was not inside of our current diamond square plan is that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:55:54–02:55:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:56:07–02:56:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:56:24–02:56:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I would say if it has to do with cultural events or cultural activities maybe under community identity I think that would be you know there's strategies under there that could support that of course being within the frameworks of what the Florida state statute allow okay
yeah so I'm all for approving this along with that amendment and make sure that we add the museum into if the community identity is if that's what it is then that's fine with me I and
form of a motion yes sir okay I'll second your motion even though I know I have to listen to the public I know I know I know but make sure uh uh madam clerk do you have his motion down
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:31–02:57:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:57:35–02:57:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:43–02:57:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:57:59–02:58:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:58:02–02:58:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:58:40–02:58:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
your light is on. oh ‸ okay. No worries. No worries. All right, this concludes this portion of public hearing. We will proceed to item number seven, Council Business. The property owner of Tim Levin
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:58:54–02:58:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:58:59–02:59:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:09–02:59:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:28–02:59:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:07–03:00:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on April 20th of 2023, at which time the property owner was found in violation for City Code Appendix A, Article 13, Section 19b supplementary ‸ district regulations referring requirements to site plan approvals ‸ the zoning city zoning regulations.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:44–03:00:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:01:01–03:01:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:01:12–03:01:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:01:24–03:01:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the since he's here he might be able to explain that uh he's next on the list okay uh he owned the apartment building and he bought the lot next door for parking for the apartment building and uh from what i understand um
but anyway he put that down surface not knowing that he needed to get a permit is that correct sir yeah and once he found out it took him a long time to get all of the millings out of there because they're so small and um and um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:02:25–03:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the number of 20 inspections, I'm gonna ‸ just be honest with you. um What kind of collaboration did you have a report did you have with Mr. levin sailor I had a good rapport.
He let me know as soon as things were done. I followed up, let him know we always kept in contact and had a few things to take care of. And he went ‸ and knocked him out, took care of him. Good report back and forth between the property owner and staff. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:03:12–03:03:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But from the time that I came on on the staff, I've dealt with the property owner. He's been nothing but cooperative and even followed up a time or two.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:03:47–03:03:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:03:59–03:04:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:04:32–03:04:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
purchased 699 Hewlett Avenue, which is a 22 unit building, which is totally boarded up and and empty. I renovated it over a year's time. It's now 22 uh family units fully booked, I mean fully occupied. uh The parking, I only had 22 spaces, so I purchased the... It was an AT&T storage uh storage area So I purchased that and started parking cars there and put the millings down.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:05:13–03:05:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The reason it took so long was because I had to go through the whole permitting process get theget the site plan permitted, and then the construction of it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:05:39–03:05:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:05:58–03:05:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:21–03:06:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:06:29–03:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:35–03:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:43–03:06:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:51–03:06:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:58–03:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:07:11–03:07:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:07:31–03:07:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:07:35–03:07:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cents. um I ‸ definitely want to always cover our administrative cost I'm gonna ‸ be honest with you. um I'm hoping this young man does not sell this piece of property no time soon. uh Mr. Wilkinson, let me hear from you. And then um Deputy Mayor uh Weeks and then
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:07:58–03:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:08:12–03:08:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:08:25–03:08:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:08:38–03:08:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:09:03–03:09:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:09:14–03:09:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:09:20–03:09:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:09:31–03:09:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:00–03:10:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:08–03:10:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:16–03:10:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:10:27–03:10:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:11:30–03:11:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:11:48–03:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:03–03:12:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:13–03:12:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in favor ‸ saying aye. Aye. any nays. eyes have it unanimously. Okay. Thank you very much, sir. Yes, sir. Thank you, Mr.‸ Yes, sir. Proceeding on to item number
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:27–03:12:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:35–03:12:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:41–03:12:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:13:04–03:13:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:13:16–03:13:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you um present us with this presentation? Now, you know, um let me say a few things. I think the state requires 20 pedestrians per hour to be accessible to this for certain stipulations. Also, the um the trailhead and parking
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:13:42–03:13:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at the April 22nd council meeting, council directed staff to determine the cost and other necessary actions to construct the trailhead and parking off Cox
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:14:41–03:18:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
task order is for the survey design and permitting of a trailhead off Cox Road at a cost of one hundred and thirty one thousand eight hundred and seven dollars and fifty cents. Uh, the trailhead design will include a picnic pavilion, uh, children's play area and a sand volleyball court. Uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:19–03:19:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:19:42–03:19:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so she has this, but, but what you guys directed staff to do was design and permitting on Cox there. And so, so she has that as supplemental if the other issue comes up.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:20:04–03:20:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:20:37–03:20:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:20:45–03:20:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There are homes here today. We have a homeowner right in here today, right now, Mr. Billy long, and I will give him the opportunity to speak as well. But I'm looking at the entrance,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:21:02–03:21:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:21:19–03:21:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:21:31–03:21:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:21:46–03:22:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:22:25–03:22:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is what is the foot patrol or number of people that visit that area as well, because I know the state, um, has a criteria of, is it 25? Um, Mrs. Mrs. Morgan.
Uh, so I had discussions with the FDOT permitting staff and they were saying that, uh, for there to be a trailhead access off of their state road 524, it would require a mid block crossing to address safety concerns.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 03:23:07–03:23:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
demonstrating pedestrian demand, which is typically at least 20 pedestrians per hour. Not to mention the mid-block crossing cost. There's one being installed on A1A with current costs, and it's just north of $500,000.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 03:23:24–03:23:48 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:23:58–03:24:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:24:03–03:24:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
measure across from a park in a very residential area that's becoming more and more residential. In other words, there will be people who you would hope ‸ walking from one side to the other, likely, particularly
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:24:23–03:24:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Across and across from a park. And yeah, we would like to think we could put a trail there. But even if we did, this is a public park. It's going to be surrounded by residents who have sidewalks and access to that park, right? I mean, they're going to be, other than this trail, there are going to be reasons to have a crosswalk there. That's why I'm so shocked that FDOT, who is promoting, you know, vision zero and additional safety measures everywhere
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:25:33–03:25:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't know that they're resisting it. They just simply said that if you, if you, you gotta, you gotta justify it, you justify it by doing a study. Study doesn't cost you that much.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:26:17–03:26:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that's a cost that's known that that is happening at one of the crosswalks there. So she's just presenting the discussions again. Hey, if we, if we were to come and ask you for a mid block crossing, what are the things that we need to do? You need to do the study. The study needs to prove out that there's a demand of 20 people needing to cross the road per hour, and she's giving you the real cost of that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:26:53–03:26:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
nice if there was a focal point where people could cross safely where they had that option, particularly as much traffic as we're going to be putting on that road.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:27:13–03:27:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:27:20–03:27:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:27:26–03:27:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:27:33–03:27:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cox and 524, none at Friday road and 524. And so again, this, this is the process where if you're gonna, if you're gonna ask for a mid block crossing, then the study occurs. Um, studies, the, the, the need is justified. And then there's the cost of, of, uh, installing the, the walkers. I think that, I think now this is actually their standard with the flashing beacons.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:28:49–03:28:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:29:01–03:29:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:29:05–03:29:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:29:14–03:29:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:29:23–03:29:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:29:36–03:29:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
traffic that goes through there going back there. Um, so we wanted an area, another entrance. And when I asked for this initially, because we have that easement off of 524, that's what I thought was the best thing to do. And then, uh,
I know we're going to run into issues there and I've been out there. So I've seen how close the neighbors or the homes are to that. Um, so that is not ideal either. And that's why I went, um, and, uh, I had help getting the price of the footbridge to go over the conservation, over the waterway. Even with the widening of 524, you can still put a, a bridge, a footbridge over there. Um, to, the, uh, to get
to, uh, dig out mud lake and make that bigger, it's going to help make that more attractive for people to go into the conservation area. And, um, so to do this, first off, how are you going to do a study when there's nothing to go to at this point to know how many people are going to go across on the north side of 524, there is a, uh, sidewalk all the way down. So even people coming from the apartments and everything on that side of the road, they'll ride their bikes and they'll want to cross the road to go over to the conservation area. And, um, and I think it makes the most sense
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:31:16–03:31:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
uh, it showed when they do mud lake, they're also going to stop that water that's flowing out and have it flow back in. So that's going to help keep the water contained, which is going to help the whole conservation area. So I, I would like to see us pursue the 524 entrance and see what we can do on the other side of the footbridge, whether it's, uh, you know, uh, picnic area, um, you know,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:32:18–03:32:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
pavilion, uh, something where people can, can go over there and then go off into the trails and have a, have a beautiful thing that, uh, people, you know, all along there,
to park and, and go across the road. I'd love parking on the, on the conservation side, but that does not look feasible at this point. Although I wonder with all the clearing, uh,
that's going in next to the public shopping center. Why can't we use some of that and then have an access back to the conservation area? And that's uplands area of the conservation area. Just throwing that one out there too, cause I like to mess things up.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 03:33:09–03:33:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
staff, but I mean, those are the, the F dot rules, you know? And so, and so the timing is off because if you say, well, prove that you have 20 people per hour, you're not going to be able to prove that in the short term. And so at some point you may be able to prove that. Um, but again, their, their process simply is, yeah, if you, if you want a mid block crossing, if you want that crossing, you gotta, you gotta prove that there's a demand there. Um, and ‸ they probably will still ask the locals to fund it. Um, um, and then on the, on the clearing next to the shopping center, that's just private property. So,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:34:02–03:34:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
private property to the, to the, to the conservation area. And I think ‸ number of some of it may be owned by the county. Some of it may be private down there to additional private properties there. And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:34:27–03:34:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:34:52–03:34:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I thought you guys were having meetings with F dot, but there, that's sort of their graphics on the whole design of the widening of 524. And so you can see what their thought process is. If you don't have that out, I'll, I'll make copies and, and distribute that to the council there.
to the ponds. And you can see how we just simply say, why are you making these smaller ponds when the, when the management plan actually, the primary objective of the management plan, one of them is to, to, uh, to reestablish a mud lake and to increase the size of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:35:34–03:35:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:35:40–03:35:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:35:50–03:35:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:35:53–03:35:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
nobody knows it's there. Um, but on the other hand, I can see where with what they're going to do, it will make it more prohibitive for us to, to do something with it. So, um, I'm just kind of, um, at this point, I'm, uh, I would like to see perhaps if the staff, I mean, they did great work on the 520 off of Cox road. I appreciate all the work that went into that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:36:35–03:36:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:36:49–03:36:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
plans with what F dot plans to do to the ‸ conservation area. What could be developed here? Including a potential crosswalk there. Uh, what we could do there to, uh, create a trailhead at that point.
Or just, uh, open it up to looking at all the alternatives there. Yeah. Like if we approach the dollar general store, I mean, are, is there an opportunity to have a partnership with them? Create some sort of, you
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:37:31–03:37:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. And, and approach the, the dollar general and see if we could do a partnership with them because then we could put parking there and that would solve our problem right there. Uh, but I would like a trailhead off of 524 and however we can work on that. That would be wonderful because this is going to really change the whole conservation area with the mud lake and, um, make it much more user friendly. So that's, I would like that please.
I would like to see us. I would like to have staff look at doing a trailhead off of 524 in whatever form that is from approaching. If there's a way to do a, a trailhead off 524. Yeah.
the, uh, that's a, that's a, what we have is a, the access easement would be underwater. So we have a drainage easement there, but, but I get it to work with, with F dot with the dollar general is not owned by dollar general LLC.
That's a motion, but I'm gonna ‸ hear from the people. And then I'm gonna ‸ just say it this way. We already have an established entrance already there. Why reinvent the wheel? Period point blank. Do you want to say something
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:40:15–03:40:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:40:45–03:40:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, the phone calls I've gotten, they just, their kids are out playing, they've got cars going through and they don't like it. They, they hate that that trailhead is at the end of their street and, uh, and they get all that through traffic.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:41:09–03:41:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:41:23–03:41:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:41:58–03:42:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:42:08–03:42:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 03:42:14–03:42:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:42:21–03:42:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, we struggle with it just because we're going to lose our privacy. Um, the, uh, piece that needs, you know, that you guys will be accessing needs at least two to three foot of fill. Um, when you do that, my neighbor's home, uh, that was built in 1965.
property is shaped. Um, you'll just be filling him in completely. Um, you know, just the foot traffic, the homeless, and all of that stuff. Um, you know, in my backyard, uh,
our home and see that in our backyard. And I don't think any of us want to see that. Um, so those are our really big concerns that we have. Um, so I appreciate it. I love the way the conversation is going, which is away from this area.
But, uh, you know, again, that area is, it was designed for a residential home. Um, I think when the city bought the conservation area, they bought that piece of property.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:43:52–03:44:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:45:06–03:45:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:45:23–03:45:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:45:40–03:45:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 03:45:51–03:45:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will now continue with my prepared statement. As many of you know, I've spent many hours volunteering in the CCA that has included locking and unlocking the gates, trail development, cleaning restrooms, and guiding hikes. Most recently, another volunteer who was locking and unlocking the gates, doesn't do so now due to authorization and security issues. So, we're waiting on that gentleman to get a blessing from the
In reviewing the map in attachment ‸ page 5, I had several comments. The hiking trails shown are incorrect. Some of the trails shown are underwater at least part of the year.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:47:06–03:47:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about. All you've got to do is look at Travis Park when the volleyball teams meet. The picnic area adjacent to the Arbor's Landing is not a convenient destination from the 524 trailhead access to lug coolers, etc. Just compare that to taking
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:47:27–03:47:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:48:43–03:48:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:48:46–03:48:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:49:06–03:49:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But just to address, I thought ‸ the chief had actually, the police department had actually cleared that one volunteer that was previously volunteering. So, so we can take that ‸ up in the morning. Yeah. And then on page five,
So it's interesting to hear Mr. Stoll say it doesn't really, doesn't really work as they actually wrote it down there. So again, this thing is not, not a static sort of document or static environment. But if, if the motion is to simply explore, through all available means, the ‸ possibility, opportunity of a trailhead on 524, then ‸ Mr.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:50:30–03:50:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:50:34–03:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:50:39–03:50:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:50:47–03:50:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:51:09–03:51:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
discuss the utility advisory board. Now, a couple of things. Across every resolution, the mandate remains consistent to the UAB show, analyze, make findings of facts, and make recommendations on the matters involving cities, water, sewer, garbage, telephone, cable, television, electrical utilities. It is strictly advisory only. So a lot of our agreements that we have now is done through franchise. And it was also wanted to know that in raising this committee,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:52:13–03:52:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:52:44–03:52:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And, you know, I can discuss it with the city manager, either have my ideas presented or not, but the hour is just too late. This is a policy decision. It does need to thank you for bringing it in front of us. But this is not, you know, ‸ these four items, they're only the latest issues. That's not why I was calling for an advisory board.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:53:51–03:53:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:54:02–03:54:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Nay. I didn't hear you, Councilman. Aye. You voted for this? Okay. ‸ Right. ‸ Just kicking the can down the road. That's all. Thank you. Proceeding on to the next item, item number four, a reference of travel ‸ authority.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:54:26–03:54:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:54:49–03:54:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:55:00–03:55:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In fact, I'd love to have any one of you come with me. The most important thing that we do here is planning and for us to understand it, for us to, anyone on here to have a deeper understanding is a good thing, not a bad thing, in service of the citizens of Coco. But this is beneath us addressing at this hour on the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:55:50–03:55:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I've been asking for ‸ for the last year, but what was written up does not reflect my ideas or what I was requesting. I need an opportunity to talk to the city manager if we can come back with something, that's fine. If staff is so resistant forget it. I'm not going to waste my time with that. You know, wait until we have you know, people that are that really want to see, you know, the public interface. I'm as far as this item goes, this is 45 bucks. I'm not going to discuss it with you. I can pay it out of my own pocket. It was suggested to me by people at the TPO and several other council members that are going. So it's a good thing. It's good for the citizens And the only reason it was taken out of consent was to make an issue. How many things have you gone to that nobody else has here?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:57:23–03:57:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:57:38–03:57:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:58:08–03:58:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:58:18–03:58:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:58:25–03:58:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:58:44–03:58:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Item number 8-1. To ‸ the city staff to apply for the National Fitness Challenge. I make a motion that we apply for the National Fitness Campaign Challenge.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:59:20–03:59:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:00:06–04:00:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Sorry, Mitch. Thank you. Um... On your space, you have a little workbook. It looks like a... Yes. So, uh... Jamie in our... In my office, uh... She's our public information officer, came up with the idea. We host a lot of kids here at City Hall. We give them tours of the facility.
Um... And typically, we were using just a generic Florida League of Cities workbook about, um... You know, if I was mayor for the day, what would I do? So, um... She came up with this idea, um... To talk... To
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:00:56–04:00:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:01:05–04:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:01:15–04:01:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And show you what we have. And we'll use that when we have tours here at City Hall. Um... Or if we go out, like, we'll give them out at our backpack supply, uh... Drive as well. Um... And just wanted to give you guys an advanced copy there. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:01:42–04:01:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Great volunteers. We had volunteers from, uh... The Walmart Distribution Center. Um... And our great police department and fire department. We so appreciate their support. Um... And we collected a lot of supplies. And we ‸ have been collecting supplies for the entire month of July. We will collect until the end of July. So it is still going on. You can drop off supplies at any city building. Um... And then we will, uh... Pack all those supplies into backpacks and, uh... Give them out. We are handing out supplies this year on Friday, August 1st at 5 p.m. And we're gonna do that at the Dr.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:02:21–04:02:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Smith Center. Um... So people can come up and pick up their supplies and get a brand new Cocoa workbook as well. Awesome. And I can answer any questions. It's
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 04:02:40–04:02:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 04:02:52–04:02:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 04:02:55–04:02:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 04:03:02–04:03:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:03:28–04:03:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:03:40–04:03:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:03:45–04:03:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:03:46–04:03:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:03:50–04:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:04:17–04:04:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:04:24–04:04:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:04:53–04:04:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and and did a 30-minute sit down um which I know, I do understand that we have a First Amendment right. We can say anything we want, um but at the same time, I i feel, in my just in my opinion, um we still have to
make sure that we respect one another, especially in the public eye. we cannot we don't have to agree with each other all the time but me personally would never go out publicly and try to um harm any any one of you at all ever i wouldn't
so the biggest thing that I i took from what you said was definitely for me, which I know I i sit down with Stockton I call the city managers. as well as you do and
to me um is Is ridiculous to me because it it shows disrespect towards me and my time that I put in that I know that I do my best job that I possibly can in the
the the experience that I have, which may be less than you. but But on certain things, I make sure I talk to directors if I don't have all the information or if I go to my city manager and talk to him about opinions. But to just, to me, we all supposed to be a team. And sometimes a team, you know, that doesn't mean you are going to be holding hands all the time. But at the same time, at the end of the day, we got a damn game to play. And regardless of what the situation is, we are together. And that's how it should be. We may argue with each other. We may not agree with each other. But when it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:06:37–04:06:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
down to being in front of the public eye, we cannot attack one another. That's how I personally feel. I would never do you that way. And I respectfully ask for the same thing from any one of you. I would not do ‸ I don't care how a person is trying to lead me in questions that come off negative. I wouldn't care what they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:06:58–04:06:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
me about. They asked me, how do I feel about Mayor Blake in the discussion the other day? You know what I'm gonna ‸ say? Hey, we had a spirited argument. and and And that time, the mayor got me. Or I may come back and say, hey, look, I'm gonna ‸ try it again ‸ the next meeting. I lost this one. But all I'm saying is, when we in front of the public eye, we got to make sure that we we protect one another as well.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:07:29–04:07:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:07:35–04:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but what I guess my point is, in order to have open dialogue so this stuff will not happen again, we have to be open and honest with each other. We're not arguing at all. I don't feel no type of hate towards Councilwoman Costs at all. I'm not.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:07:56–04:07:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I still never disrespected you. While we was on the dais, because, and the reason why you did it is because it was you were losing an argument or losing losing a point. And so instead of accepting that and or fighting for that, what ended up happening is you accused me of a sunshine law violation. But I still never ever disrespected you or treated you differently. Never.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:08:37–04:08:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not, in that interview, I do believe there are times where we rubber stamp things, where we're not as thoughtful as we need to be. So ‸ I was pretty clear in that interview that it's not across the board, but yes, we do rubber stamp things. I've seen many things rubber stamped here. And secondly, as far as the uh accusing you, trying to remember the specific instance, but but things that were being said would lead one to believe that there was something going on there. So, I mean, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, but, um i you know, the thing is, it goes both ways. It really goes both ways. And I am aware of several times when you've gone around my back, campaigned against me in remarks to other people. And maybe campaign is not the right word, because there's actually, you know, the mayor did actually campaign against me,
But, bad mouthing someone um to other people that you know will bring it back is one way to uh stab somebody on the back without directly going up to them and stabbing them in the back. So, um you know, I mean, you
Well, I don't know what you said. For the most part, you lost me. But, but I i i will i will say this. Anything I can say about you or anybody else I can say to you. and Anytime someone come ask me about anything or come tell me any kind of rumor about what somebody else said about me, you know what I'm gonna ‸ do? I'm gonna ‸ come to them directly as a grown person.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:11:07–04:11:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Well, okay. My point is, I'm asking. These people that sit on these podcasts and do all these different things things are there not for positive purposes. They ask certain questions to lead us in a direction. That's why a lot of times i I listen to Samantha in the back of my brain when Channel
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:11:40–04:11:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:11:47–04:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because that they lead you to a spot and now you're sitting ‸ in front of a camera and now you end up spilling all of your personal emotions come out in an interview that you can't take back. That's why we have to be careful and that's why I appreciate Samantha for scolding me the way that she does because I'm on my open book to a fault. And I shouldn't be at times. And that's so I appreciate her for that. If I ‸ tell you that publicly, even though I don't like it sometimes. But but I just, i I wanted to say that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:12:36–04:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:12:56–04:12:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because I am a direct person. I don't play games like that. And so I'm just, I'm just telling you, we all have to be careful because these people are out for a division. They're not trying to bring our city together. They're trying to tear out behind a part because so they can have click bait It's all about numbers. It's all about views. It's all about all that crap. All they want is views and money to come in their pocket. ‸ Some of the things may be true, some things they may bring out, but they're not there to try to bring us together. so That's my only point. They're not there for that.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:13:38–04:13:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:13:39–04:13:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:13:48–04:13:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm not gonna ‸ go home and feel no type of way, and I hope you don't either. So that just that was that was my point. I respect all of y'all. That's all. That's it. Yes, sir.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:14:34–04:14:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:14:50–04:14:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:15:05–04:15:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:15:12–04:15:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Then this is on the, um further up on the west side of 524. And this is a number of, you can see the buildings all coming out and again, apartments. I hope we're done with apartments
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:16:02–04:16:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ones are often the first two months free because they are not filling up. rental prices are coming down and they are not filling up. So we are definitely full of apartments. uh next one. um those are the, those are the live local act ones on the north side of 524. ‸ next one and this is where the old gas station was
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:16:29–04:16:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the next picture, um they have not cleared the trees and they haven't done the retention pond. And I got the question from the lost lakes folks wanting to know when they're going to put up the little black, uh stuff. ‸ That's it. The silk fence. they're concerned about that. I said probably after the trees come down, but anyway, so and then the next picture. oh I went to the TPO's open house and uh the only pictures I have are of the back side of me. But anyway, the next picture and
it's just so dangerous and ‸ with all our homes there are people you know kids riding bikes, motorcycles, all kinds of stuff that electric bikes going to and from work and you've got all those trucks going to and from the dump so something's got to be done. But they had a good turnout at the TPO and I think that was my last slide. Yep, that's all I have.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:18:07–04:18:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:18:13–04:18:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:18:19–04:18:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
give a kudos to Chief for taking on that initiative and uh continue uh continuing our safety for our pedestrians and citizens. So um other than that, that's all I had. um In regards to what
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:18:42–04:18:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:18:49–04:18:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the consensus was, it was kind of indicative of saying there was a Sunshine Law violation. At least that's, that's what the uh perception was. um on the same note,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:19:10–04:19:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, um that's what I took from it, or, or at least what the citizens that sent me the video, uh that's what they took from it. um Sunshine Law is, is, ‸ we take it very serious. At least I do. um Councilman
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:19:38–04:19:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and my son, they both play on the same football team. So we're around each other a lot and there's times when citizens will come up to us talking city business and we'll tell them right there immediately. uh uh ‸ Yeah. So, uh we take it very serious. um and, uh other than that, um keep up the good work city of Coco. I'm loving it.
right? ‸ Or collaboration. And you didn't confirm or deny. To citizens when you don't. It automatically shows uh optics of you, you may think. And then that's still not good either. Because you, you're saying that you don't,
when you when you kind of like, I don't know. when you it It brings that perception to kind of what he's saying. It ‸ just brings that, you know, even, you know, even though you didn't say yes, they did it. It just makes them feel that way. i'm Just telling you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:21:24–04:21:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
taken my knocks on this dais. Of course. And there has certainly been what I feel like is a ganging up on me voting against things that you wouldn't even be against, except that you see it as a way to get at me.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:21:45–04:21:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we're well aware of the campaigning that took place against me, as well as, well, there's a long list. I have a long list of grievances like everybody else.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:22:14–04:22:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:22:22–04:22:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
confusion and frustration from him to me. So, I'm going to address you shortly after you finish your comments. Okay. Because I could talk about Jack Walsh when you call him a lie and you denied and you got caught. So, leave me alone. Stop right there while you're ahead
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:22:40–04:22:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:22:46–04:22:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I'm entitled to that. Well... God bless you, ma'am. That's all I'm gonna ‸ tell you. God bless you. Just like you have people to make foul complaints against the city manager, your friends.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:23:23–04:23:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
little group out of district number four. You got a little group and i'm don't make me go there. Just be quiet and say what you got to say, ma'am. Please, ma'am. I said Okay, well,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:23:43–04:23:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
take on. Fine. But I really, ‸ don't like when people are literally laughed at or dismissed or disrespected from this dais. It's just not appropriate. I don't like it as a representative. I don't like it because I was sitting in that audience before ‸ became a representative and I'll be sitting in it afterwards. So, yeah. So leave the, uh leave my constituents alone. please
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:24:47–04:24:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:24:56–04:25:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
point blank fact. Now, um I'm not going to get caught up in your trap or gas lighting as you like to use that term, ma'am, because there's several things I can cite you on. on multiplication uh multiple occasions in reference of staffing and your comments And
and that man has a degree, a PE degree, ‸ professional engineering degree. So, so that is, I mean, and you denied it and you got caught and you still denied it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:03–04:26:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:10–04:26:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:13–04:26:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:16–04:26:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:26:25–04:26:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:44–04:26:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
say thank you to all the council members that acknowledge me uh for the accomplishment for being one of the few individuals with the Hometown ‸ Hero Award from the great city of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:57–04:26:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that you all were invited to and some of you all attended. um This was at the mayoral at Tampa Bay. We toured a cigar factory there in Tampa Bay. We were there. um You all remember for FRA. We went there to some of y'all took that tour. um
elevator. I'm not going to address that. That is, uh as you can see, a stogie right there. um It's a unique history about Tampa Bay. As you all know, um the diversity of Tampa Bay is one of the few remaining cities in the United States that produce cigars. um This is held um with the president of the National uh League of Cities where we're at um Columbus, Ohio. This is one of the elected officials, also a member from the National League
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:28:00–04:28:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:28:18–04:28:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Central, Brother Johnson, Jeff Branch, also Casey Cook. This is at the cigar factory as well. um This is the mayor of Tampa, um Mayor Castor, myself, and first vice president, um Holly Smith, who will be president um come um ‸ August 14th through the 17th. We have the celebration of mish la shonda's birthday, of 50th birthday. um lewis jackson um we celebrated her event um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:29:33–04:29:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And this is uh Steve Patterson, the president of the National League of Cities. This is where I was at this past week. um These are the members at a Historical Black Church. there at Athens. It intertwines within the city itself. um This is a repeat.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:30:01–04:30:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:30:06–04:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um The criteria has come on legislative day. Do like we've done before. Talk with our legislatures Bring them in front of us. As you all know, the state legislatures will be starting early this year in January.
Yes, ma'am. Yes, ma'am. You're right. um This is my nephew Gary on the 4th of July. And this is us back there. Hey, man, a great day at the Orlando Health. oh how sweet it is. um You know, here it is. uh Councilman
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:30:52–04:30:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right. People and other council members as well um talk about we got to get this Provost Park right the first time. So kudos to it because a lot of people think it's not going to happen. But we threw under the leadership of the city manager, ‸ city attorney, chief of police, and the fire department, ‸ all 400 plus employees
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:31:12–04:31:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this image in the diamond square. And as you all know, action speaks louder than words. And there are haters out there saying that we cannot change it. But through leadership, it will happen. Either lead, follow, or get the hell out ‸ the way. That's how I feel about it. That's my presentation. I thank you. um
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 04:31:50–04:31:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording