Money flow

⬇ Download CSV

Specific projects, the dollar amounts allocated to them at public meetings, and the dollar amounts that have been spent since. Numbers are sums of cited amounts — arithmetic from the public record, not estimates.

Scope: only project-specific allocations are listed here. Fund-level totals (Water/Sewer Fund balance, FY budget totals, General Fund revenue) and comparison figures (other cities, the county) are deliberately excluded — adding multiple meeting mentions of a fund's running balance doesn't produce a meaningful project allocation, so those rows are out of scope until a separate Funds view is built. Amounts in motions the minutes record as adopted whose wording does not say what they pay for are listed on the project's page, with the amount, and are in no allocation or spending total; a project with no other amount is listed as Requires review. Signed revenue adjustments or pension-liability changes are listed under their own status and are in no allocation or spending total either.

Proposed · 10 Allocated · 54 Adopted, purpose not classified · 8 Encumbered · 27 Spent · 7 Partly spent · 1

Showing 7 of 7 projects, status “spent”, most recently active first.

Project	Allocated	Spent †	Range
Manhole Rehabilitation Spent As stated 2019-06-26: Approve Participation in a Cooperative Purchase Agreement with VacVision \| Environmental LLC (A Vortex Company) for Manhole Rehabilitation…	$305,524 + $399,028 — From draft minutes approved with amendments; not included above The allocated figure covers the 1 citation listed on the project page. Does not cover: 4 adopted amounts not classified; 1 amount in draft minutes not approved as written. 4 amounts in motions the minutes record as adopted; what they pay for is not classified; listed on the project page, in no figure above 8 citations are Consent agenda items, approved with the Consent agenda in one motion	$329,042 The spent figure covers the 2 citations classed as payments, listed under Expenditures. It does not cover citations classed as committed or allocated.	2019-06 → 2025-12
Jerry Sellers Water Reclamation Facility Spent As stated 2025-02-25: To Approve a Sole Source Purchase of a Vapex™ Radical Odor Control System for the Jerry Sellers Water Reclamation Facility from Vapex…	— No figure is shown for this project; it covers no citation. 1 citation is a Consent agenda item, approved with the Consent agenda in one motion	$155,000 The spent figure covers the 1 citation classed as payments, listed under Expenditures. It does not cover citations classed as committed or allocated.	2025-02 → 2025-02
Systematic Replacement Spent As stated 2022-07-12: Approve Participation in a Multi-Year Cooperative Purchase Agreement with Hydra Service, Inc., Debary, Florida for the Systematic Replacement of…	— No figure is shown for this project; it covers no citation. 1 citation is a Consent agenda item, approved with the Consent agenda in one motion	$66,897 The spent figure covers the 1 citation classed as payments, listed under Expenditures. It does not cover citations classed as committed or allocated.	2022-07 → 2022-07
Utilities Water Field Spent As stated 2019-05-22: Approve a Resolution waiving the competitive bidding process for the purpose of making an emergency single source purchase of a Trane 30 ton…	— No figure is shown for this project; it covers no citation.	$76,688 The spent figure covers the 1 citation classed as payments, listed under Expenditures. It does not cover citations classed as committed or allocated.	2019-05 → 2019-05
East Peachtree Street Water Main Improvement Spent As stated 2017-04-11: Authorize a Purchase Order to be issued to Maxwell Contracting Inc. in the amount of $80,945.00 for the construction of a sidewalk, ADA compliant…	— No figure is shown for this project; it covers no citation.	$80,945 The spent figure covers the 1 citation classed as payments, listed under Expenditures. It does not cover citations classed as committed or allocated.	2017-04 → 2017-04
Sanitary Sewer Manhole and Lift Station Spent As stated 2016-07-26: Approve Participation in a Cooperative Purchase Agreement with Danus Utilities, Inc., Utilizing the City of Clermont Contract No. 2011-40…	1 amount in motions the minutes record as adopted; what it pays for is not classified No figure is shown: the 1 amount in adopted motions whose purpose is not classified is counted and listed on the project page, not summed. 2 citations are Consent agenda items, approved with the Consent agenda in one motion	$10,000 The spent figure covers the 1 citation classed as payments, listed under Expenditures. It does not cover citations classed as committed or allocated.	2016-07 → 2016-07
Pipe Rehabilitation Spent As stated 2015-12-08: Approve Participation in a Cooperative Purchase Agreement with Insituform Technologies, LLC for Cured in Place (CIPP) Pipe Rehabilitation Se…	1 amount in motions the minutes record as adopted; what it pays for is not classified counts $20,000 from 1 amount read in draft minutes approved as written No figure is shown: the 1 amount in adopted motions whose purpose is not classified is counted and listed on the project page, not summed. 2 citations are Consent agenda items, approved with the Consent agenda in one motion	$20,000 The spent figure covers the 1 citation classed as payments, listed under Expenditures. It does not cover citations classed as committed or allocated.	2015-12 → 2015-12

What the figures cover. A project's figure is the sum of the citations listed on its page (the line beside it says how many). It does not cover the adopted amounts listed apart as not classified, requests and applications, amounts in draft minutes not approved as written, amounts whose record names no project, or minutes the City has not posted. It is not the cost of the project and not a fiscal-year total.

How this is built. A row is an amount named in a motion that the City's minutes record as adopted, cited to the minutes' page. Amounts only listed on an agenda item (proposals), named in a motion that was not adopted or was refused, or whose result the minutes do not state are not counted here; the meeting's page lists them with their status. Rows are classified as allocation or expenditure by keyword match on the minutes' wording and grouped by normalized project label. Totals are arithmetic sums of cited amounts — they do not reconcile against the city's actual general ledger. Use them as a navigation aid into the underlying meetings, not as the official budget record.

About the “Spent” column (†). A figure appears only when a later meeting explicitly reports a dollar amount as spent on that project. Most projects don’t get a separate spending report in the minutes, so they show “—”. That means no expenditure has been separately reported yet — not that the project cost nothing. Spend tracking is necessarily partial.