[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:00–00:00:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
great city as well, and all who are in attendance here today. These and all of the blessings we ask in your name. Amen. Amen.
Take the flag clean. I pledge
allegiance to the flag of
the
United
States
of America
and
to the
republic
for
which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:00:37–00:00:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mayor Parrish?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:40–00:00:46 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Here.
Deputy Mayor Blanco?
Here. Councilman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:00:46–00:00:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. Councilman Warner? Here. Councilman Whipple? Here. City Attorney Garganese? Here. City Manager Takanich? Here. And Assistant City Manager,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:46–00:00:53 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:00:53–00:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. Thank you.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:54–00:00:56 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Peter.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 00:00:56–00:00:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's good. Okay.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:57–00:00:59 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:00–00:01:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:00–00:01:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have any
change
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:02–00:01:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to the agenda, gentlemen? No.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:05–00:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
accept the agenda for the regular meeting of March 27, 2018.
Second.
All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Before we get going on the presentations, I want to apologize to the council for last meeting, all the talking that was going on. I didn't run the meeting very tight. I'm sorry. Okay. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:41–00:01:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:44–00:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. We're in it.
John.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:48–00:01:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:49–00:01:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:50–00:01:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
You want to hold this?
All right.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:59–00:02:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. So, yeah. Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:05–00:02:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:08–00:02:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
do a brief presentation to city council and everyone on updating the city's return on investment with our city's employee health center.
That's operated by
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:25–00:02:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
care.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:53–00:02:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:55–00:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But we wanted to do kind of annual review here on the health center and talk a little bit about the medical plan as well. A couple things. We'll talk a little bit just about the claims experience on the medical plan, usage of the clinic, and then also the clinic partnership that we implemented last year. So, it's just kind of real high level what we're going to go over today. I'll try and keep it short, but please stop me with any questions. I know you all have already started your meetings today.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:25–00:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Everybody always likes to know what's going on. And what we really like to look at is cost of care. So, PricewaterhouseCoopers, every year they do an annual survey basically on projected medical inflation and estimate what they think.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:43–00:03:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
although we've been down, we didn't really start at a good point. We're at
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:49–00:03:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's trickled down, starting to trickle back up a
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:55–00:03:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, what that means is the cost of a hospital stay or a doctor's visit today, 12 months from now, they
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:05–00:04:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, we're always working to combat these increasing costs in the marketplace, even if we just use the plan the same amount. And then what I always point out is Florida's trend, their averages here, we tend to be a little bit higher because of our retiree population. Certain areas of the market, especially, that are very crowded, there's lack of access to care. So, that drives costs up even higher. Just a little bit more if you dive into some of those things of what's really driving things. We do see a little bit higher wages. So, people have more money to spend on health care. Demographics is a big one. We obviously have a big baby boomer population. ‸ As an example, 56% of
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:49–00:04:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
When we hit 40, on top of the cheaters and the reading glasses, other things start going wrong as well. And also,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:00–00:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Being a male, I can pick on the males. We tend to be worse about getting care. We put things off. We tend to wait. And what happens when we wait is the cost actually becomes more because we took too long to get to things. Lifestyle as a whole, you know, we have an obesity and a weight epidemic in the country. That drives a lot of costs. Diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol. Technology has kind of good and bad in it. There's a lot of new products that are being launched. Some of those help reduce the cost of care. But some of them are also adding to the cost. And then the last one I think is really important to note because I ‸ think you're going to hear a lot about this in the next five years.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:44–00:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Berkshire Hathaway was part of that with Chase. What they're really looking at is is there a way to change the delivery model and the way providers are paid. So right now
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:01–00:06:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
get charged for every service. You know, $200 for Tylenol and the ER, all those things. And what everybody's really looking at is how do we get to where we reimburse providers for delivering quality care and not just checking off that they did something. I think that's really important because we've actually been doing that in the clinic all along. And that was one of the main concepts. So a little bit of background real quick because I know a lot of you know this.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:31–00:06:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In 2016, we transitioned to self-funded because we were looking at about a 15% increase on a fully insured basis. When we did that, we saved about $380,000 plus another $110,000 in taxes that came with the Affordable Care Act.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:55–00:07:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
health center. So as we look at, before we look at the clinic, Cigna gives us a deep dive really into the claims every year and what's driving up costs.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:09–00:07:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
year was actually down about 3.7%. Outpatient went up. That's actually a good thing. We like that because we'd rather see people going outpatient where it's half or a third of the cost of going to the inpatient hospital. ‸ Professional, which is office visits, the overall cost impact was pretty neutral. Pharmacy, about a 4% increase, which is actually pretty good for pharmacy right now. And then catastrophic. So that's individuals that had claims over $50,000, a 16.6% jump. And we'll dive into that a little bit more. So what we do is we take the total claims on the plan each year and we divide it by the number of employees on the plan. And if you take a look here, going back to 2010 and 11, our average, before we were really taking some proactive steps to try and control costs, was about $10,000. We drove that down, down to about in 2012 and 13. We've gone up a little bit because of catastrophics. But overall, if you look at that trend
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:19–00:08:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
half of what the Florida market is. So we talked about catastrophic. So we define somebody as a catastrophic with somebody that's had $50,000 in claims. We haven't adjusted that number in the last couple of years.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:39–00:08:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
five years ago. But even looking at that, what you'll see if you look at this, so the bar is the average cost of a catastrophic claim.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:54–00:08:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But we also had six, we went from 16 to 21 people in that category. What's really impressive is despite all of that, our plan
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:10–00:09:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So even though we're fighting a little bit of a tough battle with these large claims, we still had positive results and our spend per member decreased. So that's very, very positive news. Looking at those claims a little bit further, people often ask, you know, what's driving that? The biggest item that was driving that was cancer. We had seven individuals last year with cancer, and those seven people their spend was $865,000. In 2015, we had none that hit $50,000. In 2016, we only had three. So we're definitely seeing an increase in cancer. It's important to note, though, obviously, because, you know, we're looking at the health center and what the health center does. And we know that the health center is not there to treat cancer. It's there for other items. The other one that, you know, was a pretty big issue, and I think this has to do with age a lot, is we had five musculoskeletal claims that totaled about $726,000.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:17–00:10:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then about 71% of those claims, so three out of every four, were for employees on the plan.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:28–00:10:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So taking that kind of into consideration, how are our results looking and how are things going in the health center? Before I dive into that, does anybody have any questions on the medical data?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:10:45–00:10:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
good? Okay. So what we have here is this is the number of office visits that have gone through the employee health center going back to the year we started.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:55–00:10:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But you'll see that our utilization of the health center continues to increase. So people are still using the health center at a very good rate.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:10–00:11:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
dipping and also using the medical plan. And as you'll see here, this is the number of office visits on the Cigna plan. So you'll see that we're close to almost 900 less appointments through Cigna than that year when we opened the clinic.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:31–00:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
medical plan at a higher cost to the clinic at a lower cost. And actually what I think most employees would argue is actually better care. So we want to look at pharmacy as well. You'll see similar statistics on pharmacy. Pharmacy will really start to level out. Our hope is that even the health center pharmacy will go down as people get their conditions a little bit more under control. But we're still seeing diminished usage of the pharmacy through the medical plan.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:09–00:12:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from 2014 to looking at 2017 where we are. So we try and quantify that as a return on investment. And what I will say is this return on investment is solely what we would consider hard dollars. So it's really shifting one visit from one location to another. We don't even try and get into the soft dollar cost, you know, opportunity, less time away from work, better health, all those things. But looking at the costs on the Cigna plan of those office visits and medications before the health center opened, overall we've avoided about close to $2.8 million in costs.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:59–00:13:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:04–00:13:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
On top of that, the employees have saved about $357,000 in co-pays in that time period.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:17–00:13:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
saving money as well. So I think as everybody knows, we ‸ started a partnership last year with Satellite Beach, Rockledge, and Cocoa Beach.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:33–00:13:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of that was adding another location, adding more hours, with really no added cost to the city and some cost savings.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:43–00:13:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the plan. And then we adjust that based on how people actually use the plan.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:56–00:13:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of two metrics. Our percentages fell off on the left there. I apologize. But overall, when we look at
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:05–00:14:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we're ‸ right about 10% under where we want to be, which we'd like to be at about 70%, so we still have time where people can get in for the same day, short notice, all those things.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:23–00:14:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The usage is being adequately met, and there's still a little bit of capacity in there. The Satellite Beach location is the yellow line down below, so Satellite Beach is actually being used a little bit less.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:40–00:14:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bit more. So sometimes it may be a little bit harder to get in here. We're actually working with Care ATC and their team to make sure when somebody calls in for an appointment, they remind them that they may only have to wait a couple hours to get into the satellite location instead of a day
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:01–00:15:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So this somewhat busy graph, but I would point you to the numbers down below, this is the split of the four cities and how much they're using. So overall, now the first month you guys were the only ones there, but we looked at March. So overall, Cocoa is using about 57% of the appointments that are being used than the other cities. And then what happens each year is that the cities are billed accordingly if one uses more
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:37–00:15:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:40–00:15:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You see some spikes that is based on when different cities do their annual health assessments and things like that.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:50–00:15:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to be there. So with that, I know I went fast because I know you all have had a long night already. But overall, again, we see very positive results. We obviously have the concern, you know, the cost of the cancers and some of those other high-cost conditions are really what are driving plan costs. But everything else that we see that we can control with the clinic, you know, we are controlling and we're seeing less utilization. So overall, pretty positive. And the only thing I would say on that is, you know, those cancer and musculoskeletals, those are not unique to the city of Cocoa. ‸ It's pretty much everybody we work with. You may have a good year or a bad year here or there, but overall those are really the driving trends.
Okay.
Thank you.
Sean,
nothing the industry can do to detect earlier, you know, things like that. What are you guys thinking as far as it?
In terms of cancer or just in general?
Yeah. Well, I think
on the cancer, so we do look at reporting of how many people are getting their preventative screenings. And overall, it's pretty good. You haven't had a lot of what we would call late-stage detection. Right. You know, we're seeing people catch it pretty early in most of the cases when we looked at all those claims from last year. What's really happened with cancer care is the medications have gotten more expensive. You know, so they're using these chemo drugs that you can take at home. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:29–00:17:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So it's pretty easy. But I think obviously the detection on certain things, you know, mammography, colorectal screenings, and some of those pap smears, we definitely want to keep doing that and promoting that. The musculoskeletal, I think a lot of it, it comes back to weight. You know, there's an impact that weight has on joints and a lot of those things. You're not going to prevent all of them, but as a whole, you know, the more that we can get people to do in that regard, ‸ it reduces that risk of injury, that risk of replacements and things like that. So we're actually working with, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:09–00:18:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on some ideas for the upcoming renewal and plan year to really kind of try and address some of those things specifically and how we kind of incentivize the package going forward. And
in regards to ‸ smoking, like, ‸ do you offer incentives for, you know, individuals to quit smoking? I mean,
as far as the premiums on the monthly plans or?
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:36–00:18:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:41–00:18:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
White does the coaching to the employees and offers
[unclear audio ▶]
I know a lot of major companies, they do offer a better rate on their medical plans for the non-smokers versus the smokers. And that might be something that the company wants to look into for a cost-saving factor.
I will tell you that it's something that we actually bring up and look at every year. And as you can imagine, it's a sensitive subject. But it's definitely something that's always on our agenda.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:12–00:19:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, it's a personal choice
whether
you smoke or you don't smoke.
‸ This might crash the industry. I'm talking about the tobacco industry. But, you
know, a lot of them— I'm
not saying everybody lies.
yeah,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:24–00:19:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I'm saying I've seen it in my workplace.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:27–00:19:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:19:29–00:19:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
whether or not you have a surcharge is kind of ‸ the simple part of the equation. The harder part is, you know, are you going to test? Are you going to do an affidavit? What's your enforcement going to be if you catch somebody? Those are a lot of the things that come up with more questions really candidly than—
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:51–00:19:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are in agreement that there's a benefit to doing it. It's really a question of how do we want to implement what's—
And for the non-smoker, it's a cost-saving factor as well because they get the lower premium. They're offered a premium, you know, a lower amount than the smoker who's at a higher risk of having higher costs down the road as a result of their smoking.
Yes, ma'am, definitely.
So, just something to think about.
We're thinking about it all the time.
I
promise you that. I'm sure you are.
Quick question. Yes, ma'am. Are the other cities seeing a similar savings of what we're seeing, or have you done any figures for them yet?
So, very initial, but if you go back—
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:38–00:20:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:42–00:20:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
then Satellite Beach came on in March. So, we actually haven't—we don't have a true year of data for them yet, but it is definitely on the agenda to discuss with all of them, actually. They just started a little bit later. You guys are kind of mature in that you've been doing it for a number of years. So, we're able to do your data a little bit earlier.
And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:07–00:21:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if they smoke or not?
There is a test. Oh, yes, there is. Okay. There are pass-fail tests, and there are level tests, for lack of a—I'm sorry, not a medical—you know, there are tests that say, yes, they are, no, they aren't. And then there's tests that actually report a value back, you know, and if it was zero to 100, if somebody scores 100 and they said, oh, I happen to be in the truck and it was secondhand smoke, you can say, no, you wouldn't have scored 100 if—
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:42–00:21:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
you hadn't smoked with them in
[unclear audio ▶]
last two hours or something. I mean,
to me, it just bothers me because it's the integrity of the test.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:49–00:21:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
you want accuracy to be able to have accurate rates.
Yeah, and one thing ‸ we've talked about in general is if you do it when most of our ‸ cities do something like that, they typically give a year warning period.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:06–00:22:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:09–00:22:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
open enrollment this year, you know, be prepared. We're
prepared
that in 2019 we're going to implement this. There's
companies that offer incentives, too, to quit smoking so that, you know, there's that aspect of it as well.
Yep. And those are all kind of things we're looking at.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:24–00:22:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think that'll be on our topic list for sure. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
That's it.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:37–00:22:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
hours.
Two hours. Tammy said she has an extra set of ears for you. Okay. I probably should
get a picture with her, you know, up there
at the
podium. Good idea. Yeah. Very good idea. That's
a
great idea.
Yeah. Pass that around work.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:56–00:22:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
by the time she got over here. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Very good.
I'd like to introduce real quickly while we're talking benefits. The city, our HR department has a new benefits coordinator, and she's here in the audience tonight along with our HR manager. Our HR manager is Gina Maxwell, and I know you all know
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:16–00:23:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and we are very lucky and fortunate to have her start with the city a couple months ago, and she
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:27–00:23:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Prior to working here, she worked for the University of Delaware
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:23:33–00:23:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
So she brings a
lot of experience to our HR team.
‸ Welcome, Abby.
Welcome. Thank you. Thank you.
All right. Great. And, you know, again, since we added
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:49–00:23:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, we get a lot of positive feedback. I'm constantly talking to the other HR departments at those cities because we meet on a regular basis to ‸ kind of work together.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:08–00:24:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to help initiate ‸ if we have any things, you know, going on or whatever issues to talk about.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:20–00:24:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Very good.
Well, I've gotten positive feedback from employees from some of the other cities about ‸ the health center, too.
‸ It's still a great decision. Oh, yeah. That we made.
Yeah, I've actually had a couple of
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:35–00:24:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
sooner.
‸ Good. Very good. Thank you. Thanks, Sean. Okay. We're going to move on. Jack.
Yes, sir. Yeah, I have a proclamation. Whereas water is a basic and essential need for every living creature, and whereas the state of Florida, water management districts,
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:58–00:24:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the city of Cocoa are working together to increase awareness about the importance of water conservation,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:02–00:25:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
typically a dry month when water demands are most acute,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:11–00:25:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
water resources, and whereas the city of Cocoa has always encouraged and supported water conservation through various educational programs and special events, and whereas every business, industry, school, and citizen can make a difference when it comes to conserving water, and whereas every business, industry, school, and citizen can help by saving water and thus promote a healthy economy and community,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:39–00:25:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city council of the city of Cocoa, Florida, hereby deem it fitting and proper to proclaim the month of April 2018 as Water Conservation Month, in the city of Cocoa, Florida, and am ‸ calling upon each citizen and business to help protect our precious resource by practicing water conservation measures, and becoming more aware of the need to save water,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:05–00:26:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city of Cocoa to be affixed this 27th day of March 2018,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:13–00:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
right? Yes, sir. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:27–00:26:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank
you.
Okay. Matt, do you want to start?
‸ Yeah. The next presentation, I believe Mike Arnold
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:36–00:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This was ‸ the third year of the event, I think, proving the most successful, and I think Mike's here to tell you about that. And as you may recall, city council last year, about a year ago this time, directed staff to work with Cocoa Rotary to develop an agreement that would establish fixed costs. Those are the costs that the taxpayers bear for the event. And
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:07–00:27:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the Boys and Girls Club and maximize that benefit for those children. And so I believe we've followed through with what you've asked.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:25–00:27:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was approved by city council in November. They held a successful event, and Mike is here to share those results with you.
Thank you, Matt. Welcome. Mayor, council, thank you. It's a pleasure to work with
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:45–00:27:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We think we're getting some legs on this event. This is our fourth event, counting the one we did at the Cocoa Village Playhouse.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:55–00:27:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
us.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:58–00:28:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:01–00:28:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Club, and they're very happy about that.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:08–00:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And, Jerry, you were in attendance. It was a pretty good event, and I hope the police chief and the fire department had a good evening, and there weren't too many hassles. The country music brings a little different ‸ group out, you know. Our beer sales were very strong that evening, and we made good revenue off that. I think Jamie Johnson did a fabulous job. Jamie Johnson is an eight-year Marine veteran, so I had the wild idea to bring Mr. Melvin Morris down and provide him with an honorary Rotarian. And I went back behind the Porsche house and asked.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:47–00:28:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
recluse individual, but he brought his dad on tour with him. So
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:53–00:28:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a gentleman here. Jamie might be interested in meeting our Medal of Honor recipient, Mr. Melvin Morris. And his father went on the tour bus and came back out rather promptly and said, yes, Jamie would like to meet Mr. Morris. And
I
think, truly, it was Jamie's honor to meet Mr. Morris. Mr.
Morris
did not know who Jamie Johnson was. And when they met, you could tell two brothers in arms came together.
It
was rather touching to me. Mr. Morris, and maybe some of you who have received it, has a Medal of Honor medallion that he'll pass to you in a handshake in a rather casual fashion. And he passed that to Jamie Johnson.
And
then about halfway through the show, you
can
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:36–00:29:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
see Jamie Johnson reach in his pocket and pull out the medallion and say, I had the pleasure of meeting Melvin Morris this evening. And what an ‸ honor it was to meet him.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:45–00:29:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And it was, This Land is Your
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:49–00:29:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And it was beautiful. It really was. The whole night, the weather, everything was great. We've reserved a date for next year,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:57–00:29:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we think we're going to stick with the country theme.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:03–00:30:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
She's looking to find us a date. We'd like to do two a year, a little smaller, more intimate event back at the Playhouse with somebody. You know, ‸ we had Robert Cray there a few years ago, and that was an excellent choice. Multi-Grammy winner.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:21–00:30:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Which kind of tells you about how exceptional of a guitarist he is. So my dream, and I have these silly dreams, and I know people think I'm crazy, is somebody like Tracy Chapman or some folk artist that would be most appropriate for the Playhouse. We don't want a big band. ‸ It's not the right environment. But, you know, the Boys and Girls Club continues to thrive. I think to date we've raised almost $400,000 for that program. ‸ Very proud of that. It's given our club something to sink our teeth into. Our membership has grown. I think because of the event, the community is starting to come around. And I'm willing to stick it out another 10 years if y'all are willing to have me. Oh, yeah. It's a very enjoyable event.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:10–00:31:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:31:13–00:31:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
we were impressed. We had 2,100 people in attendance, which is a ‸ good turnout for us. I think Doobie Brothers, we had 1,900. The costs were less for Jamie Johnson than the Doobie Brothers. But we're starting to sharpen it up and figure out what we do need, what we don't need, and get rid of the rest.
Chief,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:38–00:31:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you might be happy.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:39–00:31:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
I think ‸ in hindsight particularly, that was a good choice. I think there's a big difference between a beer buzz and a liquor buzz and the aggressiveness of it and such.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:55–00:31:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Well,
he's the guy who has to deal with the bad buzz or the liquor buzz. But we didn't have too much trouble, I
hope, and I didn't see any. I want
to thank Ed over at Public Works for helping us out with the people dividers. That's a tough thing for old people like me to move around, and having them help us was a great benefit.
It
really
was.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:21–00:32:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
events. ‸ We've done the beer and ‸ the alcohol. You'll see that some of these events ‸ kind of slide that way a little bit, but we don't pride ourselves on it. Everything that's been successful for us has been a family-oriented event. I
agree.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:42–00:32:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
call. I would say continue that.
Thank you, sir.
The country music, and Jamie Johnson in particular, was a really good fit for this area. It was.
I think we're going to stick with that theme. ‸ We're not blind. We see Runaway Country moved over to Osceola County and how much success they had in Melbourne, and we're happy to kind of fill that little void. Obviously, there's people that like that.
Very successful. Yeah. Runaway Country. ‸ I think the country fans in general are more family-oriented anyway. I mean, you see a lot of children at events like Runaway Country ‸ that you wouldn't see at some other type of concert venue. ‸ Yeah.
I think that's a good choice.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:25–00:33:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
take my 12-year-old to see Alice Cooper. Even at 70 years of age,
he
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:32–00:33:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
was still Alice Cooper. It was still edgy kind of death.
Big
difference.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:37–00:33:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
brought to the park. Absolutely.
It
really was. I
don't
say this very often.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:43–00:33:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Oh,
uh-huh. Okay. And my aunt, we both
share
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:50–00:33:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the same aunt. I see. Uh-huh. And she would, she'd always said that she would come to a fundraising type event if it was a good enough cause. Uh-huh. So, who knows, maybe. Well, you
give me her phone number, I'll call you. Why is it going? I ain't scared. But, I mean, she's been here. She's been around. She knows she's seen the park. Uh-huh. I think we would bust at the seams if we got some of that. Yeah, yeah. That's, that's.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:17–00:34:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:20–00:34:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:24–00:34:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
I think it's a natural. Uh-huh.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:29–00:34:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And my goal is to have, if we continue the country music, of course, the idea is to use Cocoa Merchants.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:38–00:34:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that cost $90,000. I thought she could put a salesman down there and sell three or four of them at the event. But she didn't want to go there this year. But I'll pursue that again.
How
about this? You talked to, talked to Laura.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:57–00:34:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Uh-huh. She's married to my second cousin. Okay. And they'll set that, you know, they'll set something up.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:04–00:35:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
It's probably. It might be
much
of this. We're married twice, in and out, everything else. I mean, it's funny.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:35:14–00:35:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Well,
the venue is beautiful. The city's help is greatly appreciated. And I think we can continue to support the Boys and Girls Club with this event.
I think it's great. It's great.
Yeah. Marine Max is a great organization to do something with. That's a good idea. Yeah. And these big corporate people around here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:37–00:35:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
get forward over there.
I'd love to. I really would. I think that our target market is their target market.
I mean, the next step shouldn't be more
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:45–00:35:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
pilot. I mean, he does this stuff all the time. Yeah. He's got it pretty well down to a science. But I mean, now you can probably focus on doing the same thing, but adding that corporate component. Yes.
We need some more sponsors. And I think our reputation is starting to garner that. ‸ And I've had a little help recently. Kim Rodriguez.
I
don't know if you know Kim and Pedro. But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:09–00:36:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I think she's going to help me bring some additional sponsors,
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:15–00:36:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Again, my appreciation to the city staff and everybody that's been so helpful and supportive. And, you know, I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:24–00:36:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I wouldn't say I'm totally experienced now, but I've learned a lot. And, you know, ‸ you guys have taught me a lot, too. So, well,
great job on the VIP party, too. Oh, yeah. I was going to say the barbecue was fabulous. Yeah. Everybody seemed
to really enjoy that.
They
worked so hard. Yeah, that
did work well.
Chad and Amy, they put forth a great job. ‸ And people raved about the food.
Yeah.
So.
That's a great idea.
Yeah. I agree with
that.
You know, again, I want to patronize the merchants of Coco. Support the Coco Boys and Girls Club. Coco Rotary. Coco Riverfront Park. Keep that nucleus. And I think we can continue to succeed. It's fantastic.
Please keep doing what you're doing because you're promoting the city to the point of service.
My pleasure. My pleasure. Got to give back. Yep. Got to give back. All right. Anything else? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you,
Mike.
Thank
you.
All right. Very good. Okay. We're going to move delegations. I have one card.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:34–00:37:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Lorraine, how
you
doing?
Good. Good. Good evening. Hi. Good evening.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:49–00:37:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2115 North Indian River Drive.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:37:52–00:37:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:00–00:38:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:02–00:38:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The beauty of that is creating a bigger market.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:08–00:38:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't want to get ahead of myself here. PACE are, they're kind of banks that find, they're a special financing mechanism. They finance wind mitigation, energy efficiency, or solar panels, anything that falls under those. And it creates a special assessment on the mortgage, which makes it a little easier for some folks, probably folks that can't finance those kind of enhancements on their own.
And
by having Brevard come on, Satellite Beach is already on, a couple other municipalities. Considering it creates a bigger market,
tracks
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:49–00:38:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
more PACE finance
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:51–00:38:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and lowers the rates.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:54–00:38:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I'm just here to ask that we ask for a presentation from those folks. And consider a resolution.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:05–00:39:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
one of the Space Coast Public Manager Association meetings where they had, the county had gauged interest in whether or not cities would
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:17–00:39:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:18–00:39:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of it
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:22–00:39:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
market. So ‸ with the county adopting one, when we, when we
were
reporting, we talked about it the other day, today, early today, about whether or not we have to opt in or are we already in? Because it's not clear. So we are following up with the county. Okay, great. To figure out whether or not.
Okay, thank you. Again, energy efficiency, conservation, that's a cornerstone of sustainability. And I'm glad we're going to be meeting for the first time in early May.
Okay. Thank you. Great. Okay.
So
we're going to do consent.
Make a motion that we accept the consent agenda as written.
Second.
Second over here. All in favor? Aye. Aye.
Any
opposed? Very good. Council business.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:22–00:40:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thanks, Mayor. Asking Council to approve a code enforcement lien reduction request in the amount of $5,000 for the property located at 2009 North Cocoa Boulevard. This case was originally brought in front of Council. A lien reduction case was heard by Council on February 13, 2018. We're bringing it back because it was tabled. It was tabled to give the property owner time to produce documents of why he couldn't come in compliance in the time allotted. Or, again, as of this time, we haven't got anything from the property owner in reference to that. So at this time, again, we're recommending, staff recommending to approve a code enforcement lien reduction request in the amount of $5,000 for the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:13–00:41:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Okay. Okay.
Anybody
here for this?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:26–00:41:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Motion to approve. I second. Okay.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Thank you. Super attorney?
Okay. A few meetings ago, the City Council requested that we provide information and an update regarding the two federal consent decrees that the city is subject to. A couple of meetings ago, we went through the first one, which was voting rights. The second and
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:41:47–00:42:05 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:06–00:42:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have to deal with here is ‸ one involving
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:10–00:42:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in 1990 It actually only applies within a certain geographical area of the city. A
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:25–00:42:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
subject to the consent decree is in in the agenda package. This consent decree resulted from a lawsuit that was filed against not only the city but the downtown Cocoa Redevelopment Agency
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:44–00:42:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a redevelopment plan that called, frankly, for the wholesale removal over over time of the residential
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:03–00:43:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:05–00:43:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
set forth in this agenda item has a long historical significant roots in
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:16–00:43:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
neighborhood which started started to populate as the city began to populate in
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:33–00:43:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of a lot of significance to the black community. and over the years at least statistically as far as as far as I can I could gather you know at
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:47–00:43:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There were also, you know, several named businesses, neighborhood type businesses that
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:02–00:44:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
were very significant to servicing the black community that resided there as you know several historical historical black churches have also been constructed that still
exists
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:21–00:44:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
today within the neighborhood. So when the city embarked on the implementation of this plan, the city had to move forward with the adoption of several zoning related ordinances. And during that that process, you know, the issue became very contentious regarding a certain segment of the redevelopment plan and the ordinances that were going to implement the redevelopment plan. And and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:55–00:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
area of the city was ‸ designated Project 12 under the redevelopment plan. And Project 12 is the is the plan that called for the elimination of the homes over time to a very very detailed relocation policy ‸ that would include a compensating residents
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:29–00:45:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
which would turn you know the the Heart of Cocoa neighborhood into more of a high density residential talks and talk about hotels and and more you know
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:51–00:45:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, on the other on the flip side of the of the coin, they were also existing high intensity
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:00–00:46:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
likewise slated for removal and you had business owners that were also very concerned regarding the proposed plans of the city and the redevelopment agency at the time.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:18–00:46:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know it was very very ambitious, and this was just one aspect ‸ project 12 then ‸ matter went into well actually I should ‸ I should know that there's a old newspaper article that I was aware that I'm aware of which was published by the Orlando Sentinel regarding this this contentious dispute so I
add
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:56–00:46:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
some of the quotes that were in that article into this agenda item so you can kind of get a flavor for the sentiment of the public at the time I won't you know reiterate what's already in the agenda item but
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:10–00:47:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
says it all in terms of the positioning of the various you know factions for lack of a better term ‸ at the time so the neighborhood retained
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:27–00:47:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which then sought the assistance of
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:35–00:47:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
New York City law firm
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:36–00:47:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to implement the redevelopment plan
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:45–00:47:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
another petitioned petition challenging the comp plan amendments with with the Department of Community Affairs at
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:59–00:48:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and federal court with respect to the federal court action which of course is the most significant
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:48:07–00:48:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
were the past practices of the city and the in the redevelopment plan that was being implemented constituted race based discrimination under the federal law there was some string of legal events that occurred early on bottom line was the city motion to dismiss was denied by the federal court
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:36–00:48:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of being lost because of the this plan and shortly after the 1989 city council elections the City Council elections,
the city council at
that time felt that it was in the city's best interest to move forward with negotiating a consent decree to settle settle the matter. And ultimately the consent decree was approved by the council. Now that consent decree that
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:11–00:49:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, and it resulted in the city and the redevelopment agency the
city
having to expend six hundred seventy five thousand dollars over five years to build
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:28–00:49:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
permanent injunction against the city from involuntarily
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:38–00:49:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and housing programs that the city was required to adopt attached to the the basic agreement were some voluminous ordinances that the city had to adopt involving its comprehensive plan as well as its zoning code. So once once once once the consent decree was approved by the federal court, the city adopted the ordinance. The city went forward and and began implementing its obligations under the consent decree and we have itemized
very generally some of those obligations that the city had to commit to completing. And that went on for quite a while, and then Central
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:50:18–00:50:34 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:34–00:50:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
because of some federal enactment, could no longer represent the class and somewhere around like 2000, a new new law law firm or legal services agency came to the city
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:54–00:51:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that was originally approved. And after that,
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:04–00:51:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to try to find the city not in compliance with the consent decree. And they also
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:23–00:51:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which, technically they, are permitted to do. And, as a result of that, we began working on, negotiating, a new consent decree, which became known as the substitute consent decree, a copy of which is in your agenda package. Now, um if you, being involved, you know, with various members of staff, including
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:51:54–00:51:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
original consent decree from the city's perspective, it became very cumbersome, and very difficult to try to apply. So, the substitute consent decree narrowed
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:08–00:52:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the original consent decree down to six and a half pages. So, it could be more easily reviewed and, and, ‸ implemented. And that, that substitute consent decree, the essence of it is, ‸ laid out in the agenda item ‸ in, and the consent, to substitute consent decree.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:30–00:52:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city, to maintain the low
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:35–00:52:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know to encourage the voluntary replacement of the existing wholesale commercial uses with low density residential uses or low intensive neighborhood commercial uses. The city and the CRA will continue to have support and have policies regarding uh you know redevelopment for affordable housing, etc., etc., which the city you know currently maintains on the books. um you know It also requires um that you know the city uh recognize and preserve uh
the
um historical
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:18–00:53:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um continues to agree uh not to initiate any
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:27–00:53:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:31–00:53:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which has the purpose or effect of uh involuntarily displacing current or future members of the
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:39–00:53:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We also in a good way were able to negotiate that any legal services organization representing the place in plaintiff's class could no longer um seek attorney fees monitoring the consent decree. um But, of course, with any federal consent decree, if the city were ever challenged with respect to compliance and the plaintiff's class was successful in in claiming that the city didn't comply with the consent decree, the city could be subject to ‸ reimbursement of prevailing party attorney fees and costs. But from a monitoring standpoint, we were able to cut that off. um So, you know, the original demand, John, you may remember, too, was rather
significance
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:30–00:54:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
with several hundreds of thousands of dollars, which we were able to negotiate down to a much lower figure. But it was a rather significant number, to say the least, on the monitoring um monitoring fees. um A couple other things that I think, you know, and noteworthy um is that, you know, the city has done various uh actions consistent with the substitute consent decree.
we
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:56–00:54:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
kind of laid those out um in the agenda item, thanks to all the efforts of staff. And, um you know, noteworthy is one that is implementation, i put implementation in quotes, but the community meeting room, which is um under paragraph
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:16–00:55:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on page
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:17–00:55:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:17–00:55:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and that there
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:55:20–00:55:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
was part of the original consent decree to try to pursue this uh ‸ this community meeting room within the heart of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:27–00:55:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
neighborhood.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:28–00:55:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the time because the city did not obtain um you know the federal grant funds um that were referenced in the in
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:39–00:55:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um So that community meeting room has kind of been lingering around, I would say, for you know a couple of decades. But you know this this city council has taken some significant action. um The city acquired property at 217 Factory Street uh to build a community meeting room. The city went out for construction bids um regarding regarding the project, and uh the council approved um bids
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:09–00:56:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is being prepared for construction and building. And staff indicates that it should be completed and sometime in
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:22–00:56:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um So that is something in the consent the original consent decree. I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:29–00:56:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
a need
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:32–00:56:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
um um You know, again,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:47–00:56:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
has a tremendous um and uh significant historical um boot
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:56–00:56:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
community.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:59–00:57:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um that require the city to maintain that to the best of its ability, obviously, um as a low density residential neighborhood. um One other thing I forgot to mention, this
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:15–00:57:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a big one too,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:16–00:57:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:20–00:57:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
based on you know historical documents that are out there. um We added into the substitute consent decree uh the possibility of enacting you know future regulations to try to um you know build those neighborhood uh neighborhood businesses back into the neighborhood
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:44–00:57:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to do that. You see some of it now around the outer perimeter of the Heart of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:55–00:57:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but now there's an opportunity, which the original consent decree did not provide, um to build some of the neighborhood commercial, I mean neighborhood, not any intense businesses, business use, but neighborhood commercial within the
within
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:12–00:58:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um in the future. I'd be happy to answer ‸ any specific questions you have, but
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:58:22–00:58:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
When you say the neighborhood commercial aspect, there were some neighborhood and family-owned businesses in that neighborhood that, I guess, when the um the business license expired or a family member passed away and that business wasn't doing business. And I'm thinking, and Mr. Whipple may remember, in particular, of the Brothers Family's
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:51–00:58:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Barbecue.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:52–00:58:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
years later, a family member came along and wanted to reestablish that business and they couldn't. Are you saying that now, under the new consent decree, the substitute consent decree, that would be a possibility where it wasn't a few years ago?
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:08–00:59:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when they, there was some attempt to kind of open it, under the original consent decree, all of those commercial businesses,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:25–00:59:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
um
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:41–00:59:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
re-established They can be even converted to some other, and more intense commercial uses based on, that was a compromise back in the 1990s when the consent decree was was adopted. But the city does have the ability now to regulate and allow those neighborhood friendly type uses. We'd have to go through a whole notice process under the consent decree as well as, ‸ the statutory notice requirements the zoning ordinances and so forth. ‸ theoretically,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:00:21–01:00:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
attention to the consent decree and what it actually means. It's educational for our council, for those that are aware of the consent decree and where it came from and why it evolved. It's just educational for us going forward. There are a lot of businesses out there, developers out there that's taking a look at the consent decree area and their rules and there are things that we must do according to federal mandate in order to keep it a certain way. And that's important going forward with what we have, decisions that we have to make for businesses applying to do business in the consent decree area. I'm happy that
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:29–01:01:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because that's something that was federally mandated
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:38–01:01:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
consent decree
yes and they ended this the ‸ the city and CRA or go they built where the child service center actually
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:54–01:02:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was seeking to move forward and
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:03–01:02:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
services center and then CRA on its own absent underneath the consent decree built the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:16–01:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
is the what is the employee health center. And that's where we came in with the community meeting room. meeting
room
There was a little jockeying and harsh trading because of the circumstances ‸ didn't pan out the way yes that was originally intended. So other options were were implemented?
by
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:02:40–01:02:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:02:42–01:02:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Well, I'm just happy that
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:02:43–01:02:45 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:02:45–01:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think it's a good thing and it's actually smart that we are addressing this issue now So thank you for your input. Thank you for the information.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:04–01:03:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:08–01:03:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
point out and thank Karen Hamilton, our community services director, for her work working with Anthony on the agenda item.
Thank
you.
‸ She had to pull together a lot of information on implementation. It was in a binder.
History classes by Anthony. Okay.
Since she's new, it
just
brought her up far.
I think she has a pretty good appreciation now for the geographical boundaries. Well,
it's also, for those of us who live here and live through it, but it's also a, ‸ I'm sure from a legal aspect, it's also an interesting case study, probably from a legal aspect. Absolutely.
Probably
from a redevelopment standpoint, it's also a very interesting case.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:04:08–01:04:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
maybe something that should be, or may even be being taught in courses, because it's definitely a different kind of thing that went on. I mean, I remember at the time, because I lived here, because it was in the newspaper, and it was constant news and stuff, and because I had some contact with some of the families who owned business properties in that area,
I
mean, I was a regular visitor to Miles Barbecue every Saturday. So, you know, if you were in the neighborhood, and you heard the discussion and what was going on, and you were in the downtown area, and part of the people who sat on that redevelopment agency at the time, I mean, it was a big deal. It was, ‸ it created a lot of, a lot of tension.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:57–01:04:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yeah,
it did.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:59–01:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:02–01:05:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But I was here when, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:08–01:05:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
every year.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:13–01:05:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:14–01:05:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
I remember.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:17–01:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. I met her personally. Thank you. She was a member of my church. I
met her personally, too.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:23–01:05:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's good.
Yeah, I remember. ‸ Yes. You know, like Clarence said, about developers coming in, you know, babies were small.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:34–01:05:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
how many people want to come in and just kind of, like they want to ignore the incentive page. Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:05:43–01:05:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, we're going to change it. Probably not going to change it. Not
going to happen. Not
going to happen. Every year. I told a kid recently,
he's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:05:53–01:05:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
pretty young, and I said, son, it's never going to happen.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:59–01:06:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right. It's going to be what it's going to be. Yes. I want
to thank Mr. Ripple for bringing that to my attention as well. Yes. You know, this was an educational, you know, for me as well, because I had no knowledge of it whatsoever, no previous knowledge. So thank you, Anthony, ‸ for the research, and Karen, and thank you for bringing it forward to our
attention.
Yes,
ma'am. I appreciate that.
Okay.
It makes a lot of things fall into place now
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:06:30–01:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that was the purpose.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:34–01:06:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Am I wrong? It was
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:06:38–01:06:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:06:45–01:06:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:06:49–01:06:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:51–01:06:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
It
was
surprising to see some of the comments in that article. Yes.
That was shocking.
Yeah. Yes.
And it was
basically an expansion of the village is what it was. Yes. That's what it was.
Exactly. But
if you go back and you look at, like, I had the opportunity to do when my daughter was in high school and we spent a lot of evenings at the public library
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:17–01:07:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all of the newspapers from 1911 forward trying
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:25–01:07:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:27–01:07:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of that neighborhood and how that neighborhood was vital to the downtown area as a residential. And you see there's just a lot of information in that history and in the newspaper about that neighborhood. So you get to see the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:48–01:07:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
And
so you understand why people got upset when they wanted to expand and display what had been an original neighborhood.
Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:01–01:08:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of it, my mother
collected.
And every once in
a
while you'll have ‸ Coco PD,
they'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:10–01:08:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be looking for a burglar, and, you
know,
you think I'm rough from up here, you know, to the, no. I mean, the things they wrote about were very direct, and they
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:08:19–01:08:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
these people what they
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:08:20–01:08:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But it was, you
know,
somebody downtown or somebody who,
you
know, break in houses on the river road. Yeah. You can go back 100 years, you know, and it
was
a,
it's a
struggle that never ends, right? Yeah. Reading
the history of the city through the old newspaper articles was definitely very, very interesting. Very
interesting.
And, you know, as the homes were built and the cost of the homes and the things they put in the paper in those days, I mean, if you had a visitor come from out of town, they made the newspaper. So,
there was a
lot of history there.
Yeah, I lived all of that, you know. I worked at the A&P food store one block north of here. It was a big A&P food store on the hill right by
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:03–01:09:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
that was a part of my growing up in this community and realizing what was actually going on. And right down Stone Street, there was a
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:13–01:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know you remember it. The Georgia store across from the restaurant that you frequent.
Mm-hmm.
Uh-huh. And several other
business
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:22–01:09:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
areas. So, that's where that strong feeling,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:25–01:09:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about community and all of the entities within that immediate community that they didn't want to see go away.
It'd be nice to see those businesses come back, too.
Well, I don't think that'll happen. Of
some type. Some type. Some type, yeah.
Yes, but where Miles Restaurant is now, I believe, that the church owns that now.
Yeah,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:46–01:09:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They
tore
the building down.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:49–01:09:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Thank you. Appreciate it. It goes a long ways. You're welcome. Thank you.
Okay, we're going to move on to the next one.
Okay. Mark, sir. The next item requires you to approve changes to the dates and times of a previously approved
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:08–01:10:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This originally came to you back in January. It was a blanket agenda item of all the street closures for the year for special events. As previously submitted, the date was April 21st. That's now been corrected to April 14th. And that event is from 10 to 5. Motion to
approve.
Okay.
Second.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
Ms. Ears.
Yes, sir. This is to consider the appointment of Ms. Deva Thomas as a regular member of US-1 CRA through June 2018. And she's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:58–01:11:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Motion to approve. Aye.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:04–01:11:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Let Jerry have it.
Let Jerry have it and still second it. Yeah, second. Yeah, I'll second. Okay. All in
favor?
Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Very good. All
right. Public work plan here. Ed, you got anything to say?
I'm just joking. Matt, he gets the shovel tonight. That's
right.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:31–01:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the next item under city business. The requested action is for city council to reject all prior bids associated with the stone street project. Authorize the city manager to allow the bidders to rebid based on the reduced scope of work for the stone street project. Authorize the city manager to negotiate and execute a contract with
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:11:55–01:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
in the amount not to
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:02–01:12:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:06–01:12:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
allow for project contingency in the amount not to exceed $50,000. This item, as you may recall, went out to bid October 5th. When those numbers came back in, the city had, between the utilities, stormwater, general fund, and diamond square budgeted or approximately $1.4 million.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:35–01:12:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:43–01:12:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
costs were allocated to the various funds. And the ‸ utilities fund had budgeted $659,000, and their amount came in at $1.1 million. And stormwater had $120,000. Their amount came in at $315,000. And then the general fund, $580,000.
And
that amount came in at $723,000. So substantially more. In fact, the unit costs were 30% higher than the Florida Avenue project. And so staff, working with the continuing services engineer that was working on the project, reworked the project to retain all of the items that were desired in the ‸ updated diamond square plan, with the streetscaping, the trees, the curbing, gutter, sidewalks, street treatments, the diamond in the square at
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:58–01:14:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and also the terminus there at the FEC right-of-way. And the result of that, and likely the reason why it came in at a much higher cost, was just due to the sheer length of the roadway. It's much longer than Florida Avenue, as well as the former Peachtree Street project.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:24–01:14:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The utility portion of the project made sense for utilities, not necessarily on their typical ranking schedule, but if the city were to do a full reconstruction of the roadway, they would also go in and replace the pipe at that time.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:50–01:14:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
pieces of the pipe network and drainage inlets that would lead to the new Diamond Square Pond that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:06–01:15:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And those ‸ items were re-evaluated. The utilities system staff looked at the pipe itself. It doesn't necessarily meet their scoring criteria for a project this year or in the immediate future.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:29–01:15:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that front 520 redevelop, for them to, along with their cost share for that redevelopment, the stormwater pond would buy into that and complete those improvements at that time.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:51–01:15:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:56–01:16:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the surface and then repave at a lower cost and complete the project along with all the streetscaping. amenities and all the visual impact that you would ‸ have had in the original project.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:14–01:16:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:19–01:16:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is desirous of happening in the immediate time frame. And so we are asking for your authorization to put this back out to bid to those who have submitted for a rebid on a reduced scope for approximately two weeks' time. And then once those bids are submitted, the lowest and most qualified bidder will be selected. And we are seeking your authorization to negotiate with and develop a construction agreement and then execute that agreement within two weeks of the receipt of the purchase order.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:04–01:17:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to have a construction contract underway. And so we are looking to expedite this. Again, those costs, how we're able to make this happen with the elevated cost is, you may notice that it is also utilizing the annual repaving, citywide repaving. There's $300,000 there, ‸ as well as a portion of the annual sidewalk reconstruction. Now, what we can do and what the Public Works staff is working to accommodate ‸ in staying with the repaving plan is to budget for this next upcoming fiscal year, the $300,000 and proceeding immediately after the fiscal year with the repaving portion. And so if you have any questions,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:18:05–01:18:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Mr.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:18:06–01:18:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I do. Yes. Thank you, Matt, for the information. I'd like to find out about the repaving number one.
You
mentioned that earlier part of the year.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:18:17–01:18:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
talking about next year for the repaving?
Yes. This project would be completed right away. And annually, we budget $300,000 this year for the annual repaving citywide. I believe Councilman Blake may have been on council
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:18:34–01:18:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
we completed a citywide roadway and sidewalk analysis. Okay. And
my question is, once we start the project, we're not going underground to replace any pipes or anything like that. And that's going to cut the cost of the overall project.
But
you mentioned that you're going to be doing sidewalks and curb stones, et cetera.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:03–01:19:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No. The road is going to be milled, removed, and then repaved.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:10–01:19:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. That's what I wanted to make sure of that.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:15–01:19:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it needs to look like it. I want, you know, it's finished. So I will make a motion if nobody else have any questions. I've got a question. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:29–01:19:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
remove the
pipes beneath
the road?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:35–01:19:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's their normal circumstances based on the service life of the pipes and in the ‸ location where they are. And in the, ‸ what is that?
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:48–01:19:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Like 20 plus years? Unless something, if not longer. Huh? Yeah. So I mean, yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:00–01:20:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I mean, so then that was the issue is with ‸ the cost jumping from utilities, but budget 659 based on a preliminary order of magnitude cost to 1.1.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:12–01:20:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
you could not allocate that cost fairly, you know, because the city's generating this project with a CRA. So this provides, it's a project done in a more efficient manner, less expensive, but also improve the corridor.
Yes. Well, you know, we need to keep it moving for sure because this is something that's been on the books for quite some time. And if we can get it done, especially before I come out of office,
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:43–01:20:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
$950,000 be approved, approve the resolution to amend the FY218 budget and approve the resolution to allow the project contingency change order in the amount not to exceed $50,000. ‸ Make that as a motion.
Second.
Okay.
All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:21:13–01:21:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay. Very good. Okay. Chief Prince.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:21:25–01:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:16 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:34–01:21:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:21:51–01:21:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:21:53–01:22:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Motion to approve. Second.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Thank you. Okay. Jack?
Yes, this is item number three on the multi-year contracts. To approve the first amendment to purchase agreement with Anderson Diving Incorporated and Ferraria Construction Southern Division under RFQ 14-19 COC subaqueous pipeline assessment effective March 5, 2018 through March 4, 2020. ‸ For Anderson Diving Incorporated and May 26, 2018 through May 25, 2020 for Ferraria Construction Southern Division. So this is the, there's no money involved on this particular agenda item. This is just extending the contract so that we have them available for task orders when we need them or for emergency services in the case of real or recent history.
Okay.
‸ Motion to approve.
Second.
All
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:22:59–01:22:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
in favor?
Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hey, Jack. Yes, sir. How old were those pipes on the river road you replaced
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:00–01:23:12 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:12–01:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:14–01:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
years old?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:14–01:23:18 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Which ones?
Some of the water pipes on Indian River Drive.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:18–01:23:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
River Drive, yeah. Oh,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:18–01:23:20 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:20–01:23:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they were.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:20–01:23:22 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
In the 90s, right?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:22–01:23:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
we don't really have the records. I feel good about 25 years
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:25–01:23:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
left on these other pipes. I feel good about that. Yeah.
And that material, I think, was the unlined cast iron, if I remember right. And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:35–01:23:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the cast iron, see, it continues to shrink because the tuberculation makes the cavity smaller and smaller and smaller. So even though Indian River, right next to the elevated tank, we only had 40 PSI, 45 PSI, and that was because we had a smaller diameter pipe. Right. As soon as we took that away, we had 60 PSI all throughout there.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:35–01:23:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:55–01:23:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's exactly what's in the tank. Yeah.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:56–01:24:09 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Right next
to it. That's
good. So that was one
of the driving factors. And there were a history of red water complaints, because that's that tuberculation
letting go when velocities change.
If you don't run it for a
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:24:09–01:24:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. So, you know, we try to factor in all those things. It's not a perfect system. But we try to look for the indicators. So in the case of that particular roadway we were just talking about, we didn't have a lot of other factors. The age of the pipe isn't too old. We haven't had any breaks. We have hardly any water complaints. So it's not high on our radar. Whereas we have other things that
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:24:09–01:24:30 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
So
we score those higher and we try to push the money towards those projects as a need.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:24:31–01:24:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Right. Do we ever, I know you're going, do we ever put a warning out in our, like our water
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:24:42–01:24:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, if you feel like your pipes, you know, if it tastes like iron or whatever, you know, whatever it is. Do we ever, as a utility, mention that, hey, you know, maybe your home plumbing should be, you know.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:24:42–01:24:58 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:58–01:25:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We generally don't
[unclear audio ▶]
‸ in the water bills, but we do have the frequently asked questions we have on the website.
It
has stuff like that.
If
my water smells funny or if my water has different colors, it gives them ideas. ‸ It gives them the contact information for our water conservation officer as well as for the laboratory.
Right. I mean, everybody always points to the utility, but a lot of times it's their ‸ own.
It can, and when we do get complaints, a lot of times we'll disconnect the meter, take a sample ahead of the meter, ‸ and then if there's no problem or
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:27–01:25:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
water coming out is okay, but the water on the other side is a problem, and so then they can recognize that there could be a service line problem. It could be the hot water heater and a number of other things that contribute to it.
Okay.
Well, thank you.
Yes, sir.
All right. Anybody in the audience from the advisory board or committee? It's left. ‸ Wants to speak? Okay.
All
right. And we already tried Ed. Ed didn't show up tonight. All right. Laura, what do
you
got?
I have no report. Okay.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:05–01:26:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No report, sir. I just want to remind you that we're at
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:11–01:26:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in a reduction in crime the last five years? Yes, sir. Okay. Great job. Thank you. You
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:26:21–01:26:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chief
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:22–01:26:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are
[unclear audio ▶]
I'm good. I'm good.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:25–01:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It
looks like we'll be getting those substantially complete by mid-April, around the 15th, and we'll be looking to establish dates to move in there around the 1st of May. So a little bit after that we'll look at doing the grand opening in those areas. Right.
So
‸ moving right along. Thank you.
That's great news. Thank you.
Thank
you. Karen?
No report.
Jack, anything?
Just one item, sir. We're trying to meet and finalize our agreement ‸ with our folks
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:03–01:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So that'll give us a third pipe going over towards the beaches. So I am meeting with those folks tomorrow. I've been working with the city attorney on a joint agreement, basically
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:19–01:27:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for a major construction project.
That's huge news.
It's a big deal. Yeah, it's just really great because they kind of already had it underway, so they were a
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:28–01:27:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:29–01:27:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But after we heard about it, we've been contacting them and working with them for the last three or four months as they work into the 30% designs. But I think we're pretty close. I'm going to meet with the public works director tomorrow.
kind of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:27:44–01:27:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
go over their final comments on the agreement. It's all been pretty minor comments so far, so that's really good. I think we're going to pretty much button it up tomorrow. We'll give our attorneys one last look at it. I'm hoping possibly by the next meeting, the very latest, the second meeting after tonight, that we would bring that agreement before you for approval. And then the first thing that we would
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:03–01:28:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they would have an increase in scope, and then we would split that scope down the middle because there's obviously some benefit because they've already done geotech and survey and some other things that they had to bear themselves. Right. So we would split that
cost.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:28:21–01:28:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
We think there's a couple million dollar savings in the end by teaming up and saving. I think that's a
great idea. Yeah.
The
city manager briefed us after the hurricane hit us. I didn't know how interested, because I think everybody was interested, how interested they were. I didn't realize this was moving forward. That's good. ‸ Yeah. And they gave us three redundant pipes. Yeah. And three
pipes,
you
know, three ways to slice it and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:48–01:28:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. I think we're also looking at potentially trying to look at some funding. I know John is looking to ‸ legislature possibly for some kind of resiliency and joint project support. No
problem.
We're not sure, but we're
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:02–01:29:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's probably about
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:06–01:29:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. There's, you know, we're going to be basically boring underneath the rivers, landing
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:13–01:29:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then reconnecting the pipes and going back under water. So there's a fairly complex design. About 16 months. A little
different what we have now.
‸ It would be similar to the end product, but it's just, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:28–01:29:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ So it's complicated how you land and bring the pipes above, back up to surface or close to the surface so you can connect them to the other pipes. Because we, one of the things we will do is connect it to the South Merritt Island on the way over to the beaches. Yes. So that ‸ for us personally would be an immediate increase in pressure, even ‸ improvement potentially in water quality to the south end and also fire protection for those that are challenged down at the south end of Merritt Island. So lots of upside now. That's a big improvement.
Eventually when we land on the other side,
we kind of stop short of where we want to go. And our next phase, what I would call phase two of it, would be to negotiate with the Patrick Air Force Base and see if we can work with their property and come all the way around and then connect all the way back onto A1A,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:15–01:30:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then that would complete a continuous loop.
Wow. I'll ask you that later. As far as like whose water is going to be in there, is it just an on off situation where you can turn on Melbourne if we need it?
Or
is it?
Yeah, we would have, we would have, it would be our water. Okay. And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:35–01:30:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They'd
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:30:36–01:30:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We'd have our pipe with our water in it. And once we landed on Merritt Island, I think we'll have a valve interconnect where we can open valves and close valves. So if they had an emergency, I could push water over from Merritt Island onto, you know, either going to the beaches or going back to the mainland depending on their need and vice versa. If
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:30:55–01:30:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:57–01:30:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right. So,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:31:00–01:31:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And eventually we'd probably do an interconnect, you know, out
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:04–01:31:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
once we get to that point.
That's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:07–01:31:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
to know that, I mean, that's, that's, we're doing something, you know, to improve the situation. What
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:18–01:31:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:19–01:31:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The city manager and I met with the port just a week or so ago to talk about, they had some expansion requests and some other things going on, some technical stuff. So we actually met with the port CEO and one of the, the senior engineers over there. And we did drift into some resiliency discussions. ‸ So we are going to continue to keep the door open.
I'd definitely keep that open because, you
know, if
you take a step back and if we have another
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:53–01:31:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
hopefully, you know, we're engaging them,
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:02–01:32:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be on them. Yeah,
I think they understand that they have some acute need. Yeah. And with the responsibility of fuel, water, anything else that could be delivered there, there's an extra responsibility there. And we did talk, you know, we had many ideas on the table. Yeah. Just preliminarily just, you know, talking about their need and what we could provide or what we can't provide. And so I think that was a good, a good start.
Yeah, thank you. Wow. That's, that's expensive, but great news.
And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:32–01:32:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I just wanted to give you all an update on the summer youth program. We're in the planning stages of that. So I think by the next council meeting, we'll be able to announce the application process for 11, the city
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:57–01:33:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be brought on. And so right now we're in the planning process with CareerSource. And so just a heads up out there to Coco High School students that might be interested that we will be announcing it shortly.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:33:14–01:33:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
That's good.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:23–01:33:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I have no report.
Tom Brady playing this year?
Probably.
Okay. Yeah,
he will.
John,
anything?
All right. ‸ I knew he had to say
something.
Yeah,
he's always going to say something. All right. That's why I get the shovel award.
Oh,
sorry.
I don't know. I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:48–01:33:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Somebody might want to hand it down there. There
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:52–01:33:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
what
[unclear audio ▶]
you got?
Yeah, a lot of discussion prior to the meeting regarding Provost Park and the potential relocation
at
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:34:03–01:34:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Jolie Smith Center. I just wanted to provide an update now that the park is officially closed at the east side. The city staff has been working with the county to address the concerns as they come up in the park with regard to the maintenance. The police department has been working with those individuals in the park and to large measure it's ‸ been going very well. I've not received a single call regarding the center.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:33–01:34:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
And you can see some of ‸ the activities taking place already. That's it.
All right. I know that some of the participants in the park are
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:54–01:34:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:34:56–01:34:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
hopefully the chief, you realize that, right?
Some of the players are going over there. Maybe we can push them back wherever they're from.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:14–01:35:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's great. Mr. City Manager, what
do
you got?
Yes, Mr. Mayor, members of council. Just really one item. I just want to, I know you received an email. The April 9th FY19 budget kickoff workshop has been pushed back two weeks to provide us
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:38–01:35:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to get a closeout for the, at
[unclear audio ▶]
for the full midyear, and make sure we're prepared for that budget workshop for you all.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:51–01:35:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
And I have not heard back from CPSM. I'm still checking emails, but
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:01–01:36:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So,
okay. Mr. Wibble? Yes.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. A couple of items. First, I'd like
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:18–01:36:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cocoa with the fire trucks this past weekend. That was a church function that, um, the wellness for the community information for them, free high cuts for the children, and, um, book bags,
etc
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:44–01:36:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And there's also fire truck there.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:48–01:36:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:51–01:36:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
being there this past weekend. Thank
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:58–01:37:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
attorney, Aramis Ayala, this past
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:07–01:37:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
She spoke to one of the local groups, or several of the local groups in the community, um, last Saturday morning at the church up there on,
um,
Roselle Jones. And,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:29–01:37:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
to go through there without having the traffic that we had before on a daily basis.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:48–01:37:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
And hopefully, once it's complete, it will be more comfortable for the residents in that area who frequents the Bar Avenue. So, I want to thank Matt for that. And I'll just stay on it, Matt. Also, in regards to the meeting that we had this afternoon, or, uh, with the Diamond Square Board, I want to thank all the Diamond Square Board members for being here. And thank everyone for their comments. Um, I want to remind people that this is a proposal. There's nothing set in stone at this point. But, going forward, I know that there are individuals out there that are spreading hate, lies, and discontent amongst the residents. So, I'll
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:42–01:38:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
sound of my voice, if you have any questions, we have a main number for City Hall. Give them a call.
Um,
information that you need is in the City Clerk's Office. Request the information. Copyrights
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:38:59–01:38:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be made at your expense. If you have any concerns about what's going on in City Government, I would urge you to come to Council meetings, to come to board meetings, etc. And, I suggest that you don't listen to people out there that may have malice in their heart, in regards to going forward for the citizens of this community. We have elected officials, elected officials, that were chosen by the majority of the people of the district that they represent. You have telephone numbers. You have ways and means to contact these individuals, from the mayor on down to the city manager. If you need information in regards to what's going on in our community, I suggest that you get accurate information, and not listen to people out there that may have hidden agendas.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:00–01:40:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
people that may have had negativity, you'll always know the tree by the fruit that it bears. If you want the truth, come to the source. Thank you.
Thank you. Mr. Clarence, I thought it was a great start today. Yes.
It was a great start, but there's more to be done. Oh, yeah. Yes. Yes. Okay.
Brenda, what
do you
got?
Just two things, Mr. Mayor. First of all, the chief, who of course we all know doesn't really promote himself, is having a breakfast on April the 12th,
or an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:46–01:40:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
annual breakfast with the chief, which is a fundraiser for Cocoa Community First, and the programs that the police department does
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:40:52–01:40:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
children. Tickets are available to the breakfast for $25 apiece. There's sponsorship opportunities available, and there's also raffle tickets with some really awesome raffle prizes. The
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:03–01:41:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I will be happy to sell you raffle tickets or a ticket to the breakfast or take some money so you can sponsor a table. So, April 12th, 7.30 in the morning, breakfast
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:16–01:41:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the chief.
That's good. Yeah,
just one other thing. I'd like to say happy birthday to my daughter who
turns
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:22–01:41:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
39 today and my mother who
turns
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:24–01:41:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
78 today.
‸ Happy
birthday.
Yeah. Kind of tells you that my mother was 39 the day my daughter was born.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:41:28–01:41:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Good job, Brenda. Yeah. That's pretty
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:41:38–01:41:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
She's only a year older than me.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:41:39–01:41:44 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
I know. I know. She's right in there with you.
That's good,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:41:44–01:41:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
My turn. Yes, sir. Okay, I just want to say that we had a neighborhood watch meeting that the deputy mayor and myself attended. It was a good turnout. Fire department was there. The chief was there.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:41:46–01:41:58 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:41:58–01:41:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
had a great time. And another thing, too, I'd like to find out how come we schedule a special RDA meeting at 530, a half hour before the council meeting. I don't know who's in charge of that, but they shouldn't schedule that meeting, especially
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:41:59–01:42:15 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:15–01:42:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
something as major as that Julie Center a half hour before the city council, that meeting should have been scheduled either for five o'clock or 4 30 in the afternoon.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:26–01:42:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
o'clock coming to the council meeting constituents that were a little upset. A lot of them left before the meeting even started because we were still in the middle of negotiations with the negotiating discussions with the
uh
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:43–01:42:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
inappropriate
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:46–01:42:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
scheduled earlier. You don't schedule a meeting like that at 5 30 and didn't expect to have a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:54–01:42:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
council in the position where we're looking bad because it's like we're not managing
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:01–01:43:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
advertised time is for the council ‸ meeting. That's when we should start. Not 6 30 not quarter ‸ seven, six o'clock. So if you're going to have special RDA meetings, we start them at 4 30 or 5 o'clock so we can get
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:18–01:43:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it for another night and have it at six o'clock then. But they don't schedule it on the same night as the council meeting and have it like that. And that's all I have to say. Thank you.
jerry You're up. I think I'm afraid to say anything. he might get mad at me.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:47–01:43:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
hit somebody with it.
just Just a couple of quick things because I know it's getting late. Everybody's, you know, thinking, okay, we've been here a long time tonight. um I had a um uh the privilege of uh touring the YMCA um last week. uh I want to thank uh Brandon Ballard for that. um and He gave me a great tour and I appreciate the facility even more now than I did before and what
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:16–01:44:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
think that's
an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:44:21–01:44:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
important aspect of that community that we need to support and make sure that that facility stays in uh the area for our citizens and the and a lot of the students too. A
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:31–01:44:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
school. So it's a great place for them to go uh interact with other students, exercise, get some tutoring if necessary, you know. So I'd just like to shout out to Brandon and to the Y and what a great job they do. And as Don mentioned, we had a community watch meeting at High Point on the 22nd, which we had a really good turnout for. I want to thank the Chief, Chris Hadaway, Officer had away
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:59–01:45:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They were in their attendance as well. So I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:07–01:45:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
next. but And then uh I think i I might have scared Ed off because he gave me a great tour of Public Works last Friday. So Ed, I hope you're okay. I spent like four hours with him. so uh But he gave me a really good tour of uh Public Works, uh the facilities, the grounds, and just gave me a real good overview with his staff of uh the department and uh all of that. uh You know, they really do. I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:43–01:45:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
small amount of employees that they have. So ‸ kudos to all those guys because they really do work hard for the city to keep it beautiful and keep things running. And um I just want to say thanks to Ed and I hope he's feeling okay. So that's all I have to say, Mr. Mayor. Thank you.
Good. Thank you. Again, you know, the neighborhood watch meetings and all the things that the departments do ‸ the employees do, uh the citizens of
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:12–01:46:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you. It's very important that we keep this going and keep the tone the way it is. That's right. And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:21–01:46:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And it's it's it's a great way for networking with folks and for the citizens to understand that the city, uh you know, you know comes out and demonstrates what they do. you know And they will at least answer questions. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:38–01:46:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to get back to the basics we did. And it's working. we
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:44–01:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
crime statistics.
Absolutely. So we
know it's working.
Everybody has a hand on on winning, and that's what we're going to do.
Right.
um
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:52–01:46:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
i this is um since the hurricane hit us six months ago, you know, one of the big thorns. in our sides, you know, was just making sure uh we got water service back and and trash picked up. and But another thing on my end was this bridge on Merritt Island that has our water, uh our 36 inch water main going across it. uh A few days after the Sykes Creek uh Relief Bridge was hit, you know, the hurricane, it had been deemed uh unsafe. And so, you know all heck broke loose from the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:34–01:47:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a county bridge. Well, the county, um I believe, got FEMA money. uh The
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:43–01:47:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
did a survey on it, but I went out and did an interview at lunch time today. um ‸ There's a construction group, they're very competent, that's shoring up the the bridge pilings. And um I called the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:01–01:48:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
before I went to the interview and ‸ said, Matt, I said, what, uh anything change ‸ the bridge or anything, you know? And
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:48:08–01:48:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I was actually quite surprised uh because I had anticipated that that bridge upon uh the construction and shoring up activities would be reopened for traffic. uh Apparently that it's not the case. They are shoring up the the pilings and then protecting those for the purposes of uh maintaining the utility infrastructure on the bridge. And uh the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:43–01:48:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reestablish the traffic on that bridge.
right It's going to be interesting how they handle it from this point forward. I know a lot of people use it and uh it's kind of a, it's popular, you know, for a ride home. But, um so for us, you know, the water, the very important water pipe, you know, which never
moved
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:49:08–01:49:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you know,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:09–01:49:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
intact, is uh safe. So that's that's a big thing. And then it's just interesting how this the county is going to handle that, you know. So, okay, um do
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:20–01:49:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
scheduled
with him. Is it a late meeting or is it ‸ early You know I mean? Let me see uh He's uh he's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:49:38–01:49:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh done
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
lot of work in other cities. He's got a, he's putting on a um a, uh I guess, some kind of class in Palm Bay.
Yeah, it's uh April 4th at 3 pm
April 4th? What day is it?
Wednesday.
That's possible. It's possible I can make that. I'll write that down. um Okay, great. That's great. It's a great start. And, yeah, hear him out. And hopefully you'll come to council's short time after that address us. And then we'll move forward. Okay. And then closing, um I haven't talked to the chief chief of police about this. Don't sleep. I'm joking. But we got, um on
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:23–01:50:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay? And normally when you're a public official, you know, elected official, you um never listen to, there might be a bit of truth in unsigned letters, but you really don't acknowledge them. So, we had a person send two or three unsigned letters, and they were, uh they were way to sign them, but he was signing them ‸ the phantom. Okay? So the phantom was, he'd read these things, you know, ‸ they were a little hard to read. Okay? um Interesting, ‸ say the least. But it wasn't anything, he wasn't saying anything that was, you know, outlandish. It was just, uh I guess it was the way he was saying it. ‸ so, ‸ I kind of took it as, you know, it's not a bad guy, and and, uh you know, I don't know him. But he he sent a fourth letter, and he decided, ah ‸ what the heck, I'm gonna ‸ sign it. Okay? I'm not gonna ‸ say his name, but I'll say this.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:19–01:51:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
he gave me an earful. and But you know what? He made sense. And
I've got to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:51:30–01:51:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
say,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:31–01:51:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but he's, uh
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:34–01:51:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
he cares about the city.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:36–01:51:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but he just wants to see the city improved. And I, I, that was refreshing talking to him. So I won't say his name on the air, but I want to thank the phantom for writing those letters. And I asked him to keep giving us some input, and let's, you know, help, help that, his neighborhood out. So everything from speeding cars to, you know, some building uh maintenance. That's it. So that's it for me tonight. Yes, sir.
Sir, I just had one update. I had received this from the county on Friday, uh that they are installing the final top layer of the number three rock rubble uh
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:18–01:52:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that they are on schedule to complete their work on April 6th, which is a week from this Sunday. um And that the bridge piles at this time are stable, no movement and no damage, but the bridge's closure
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:52:32–01:52:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
said each rock that was on this barge they had there, and they
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:44–01:52:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
something to say Okay, thank you very much. Mr.
Mayor
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:52–01:52:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if you could all uh convene at the center so we can get a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:56–01:52:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:03–01:53:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
last
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:10–01:53:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yeah, she won. Yeah, I think
the chief
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:53:19–01:53:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
had something to do with that, of police.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:53:43–01:53:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:53:47–01:54:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]