The City's agenda only — no minutes record on file — no AI-written text
The City's record
What the City's record shows
The City's minutes for this meeting are not on file in this archive. This briefing states only what the City's agenda lists. Nothing here is taken from the machine transcription.
The City's agenda: CE_Reg_Agenda_05_16_2024 (its items are not yet read into this briefing).
The recording's machine transcription is below. It is unverified: words and names may be misheard, and it cannot establish who acted or how anyone voted.
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_05_16_2024), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
410 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 2 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 18 voices separated from the audio.
50 short machine repair(s) (58 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 89.0% of 16,302 content words.
Dotted words (445 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
410 passages (25% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (2 stretches). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:46:29 (7 s) — neither reading has words
01:26:11 (8 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:00–00:00:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:35–00:00:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; part of a long flagged stretch · 00:00:42–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:07–00:01:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:16–00:01:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:21–00:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:29]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:07–00:02:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
ma'am. We're going to have the approval of our agenda for tonight, but I have some modifications. Item number two has been tabled. Item number four has been tabled. Item number five has been tabled.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:02–00:03:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:35–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:44–00:03:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
by Mr. Brown, second by Mr. Simpson. All in favor say aye. Aye. Ayes have it. All right. We have the submittal of our document packets by our officers.
All right. Now with that, we'll have our first case. ‸ Item number one, CE 23-952.
[00:04:15]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Case number 23-952. 1401 Donna Avenue for the record. My name is Michael Folger code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. These photos accurate accurately depict the property during staff visits and show our findings of exterior general condition.
[00:04:37]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:37–00:04:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:42]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the exterior walls of the home and fences not being maintained in good condition.
[00:04:48]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:48–00:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:53]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
parked within the front or side corner of the yard area.
[00:04:58]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:58–00:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:03]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For not having approved address numbers placed in a position to be plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. And parking in
[00:05:12]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:12–00:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:18]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
anywhere within the front or corner side yard area.
[00:05:23]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:23–00:05:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:23]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:05:25]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
During the first inspection, the property was found in violation of the above sections of the city code. Staff has attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. But
[00:05:36]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:36–00:05:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:41]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation. Staff has been working this case since.
[00:05:45]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:45–00:05:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:48]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And we have not had contact with the property owner until May 15th, 2024, which was yesterday. I brought this case before the code board as I've been working this case for 286 days and the violations have not been fully resolved.
[00:06:03]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:03–00:06:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:08]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and posted on the property in violation.
[00:06:11]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:11–00:06:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:18]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation of and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or find a $25 for exterior condition. $25 for trailers in the yard, $25 for premises ID, and $25 for parking in the yard be imposed for each day the violation remains until compliance is achieved and the owner is here.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:53–00:06:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right. First, I'd like to say I had been in contact with Officer Bonacore since last year about all this. So I don't know how you've been working it this whole time, and
I parked in the yard, and you drove by. I was there for 30 minutes. But besides that, because like I had called yesterday and today, and I was trying to figure out what the violations were left. I know
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:31–00:07:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:33–00:07:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
yard. Everything's gone. I just pretty much need to know what I need to do now after you drove by today. I understand the parking in the yard. You got me on that one. But other than that,
I did the fascia board all the way around the house. Everything. I mean, I do need to paint the one side of the house still. As far as the parking in the yard,
‸ My gray, Crown Vic, had got backed into by the neighbor across the street. He took full responsibility. My truck that's on the road has been backed into three times now, and the neighbors won't take responsibility for it. So, I mean, I don't have full coverage on anything. And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:23–00:08:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
side yard. I mean, ‸ I don't know what else to do here. I had talked to Officer Bonacore. He said something about I could maybe possibly lay some pavers down or something just to where the tires are on. I checked on pavers and it's unbelievable the price of them things now. I never knew that it was that much. But regardless, I'm just trying to figure out what ‸ we can do to just get this over with. I mean, I understand that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:59–00:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that for almost a week now. And I had everything cleaned up a few weeks ago, but I did have a trailer in my front yard because we were cleaning out the back room.
I worked nights. My grandma, my grandma just got out of the hospital after five weeks. She was in there and the ventilator and everything. So I've had a rough last month or two. And I'm just trying to figure out what exactly the violations are that ‸ we're here for today, basically. That's what I'm getting at.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:12–00:10:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:13]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:10:16]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:16–00:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:19]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
side of the house there, you can see that that's ‸ damaged. Um, and we do continue to have parking in the yard and I still don't see any type of number placards on the property as well.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:47–00:10:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:51–00:10:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:01–00:11:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:16–00:11:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, uh, I'm just, I want to just ensure you have enough time. And that's, that's my concern. Um, as far as what you say you've done, um, they're still saying that there's more, um, and from the looks of it right there, where the arrow is, but there may be some damage to where something you may have to do a little extra besides just a little paint.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:15–00:12:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:46–00:12:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
It's just, again, we're back again for the parking in the yard. I don't know what we're going to be able to do. Like I said, I talked to officer Bonacore about it. But he said that maybe I could put like some pavers or something where the tires are on the ground. I don't know.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:03–00:13:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:25–00:13:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
he removed the RV. The RV wasn't originally cited as I was reviewing the case because of the length of the case. It's the length of time has been open. There are some other violations that were observed that are new. So again, if he moved that RV, he may have some space to put those vehicles back there and park them in accordance
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:57–00:13:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I mean, I really needed another driveway is what I really need. ‸ I mean, ‸ I have two cars. My lady, she has two cars. I mean, ‸ you have two trucks and two cars. You see what I'm saying? You can only drive
one at a time. Or he can get a driveway extension, ‸ permitted, of course, and that may give him some extra driving or some parking space in the front yard adjacent to
Yes, ma'am. Okay. I just want to clarify on the exterior general condition. You cited 6-1003B. Yes, ma'am. Is it, I just want to clarify, is the violation still that where the arrow is pointing and the fence?
[00:14:55]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that lot, I guess. And I talked to them maybe a month ago, a few weeks ago, and I guess they're planning on building a house there, I guess. Which is crazy to me. It's right next to River Tracks, but each their own. I don't know. But ‸ kind of wanting to wait on that fence to see what they want to do.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:03–00:16:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:13–00:16:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you want to confirm with the building department. I'm not the say all for the permits. There are certain permits that they will, certain work that they will allow for polls. Uh, last I checked, anything with polls is concreted requires a permit.
[00:16:30]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:37–00:16:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
there is, there are times where they will allow certain work to be done without a permit, especially on owner builder situation. So that's going to be up to the building department.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:15–00:17:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Okay. Now the only, the only thing is now trying to give you 90 days, which we want you to come into compliance beyond shadow of a doubt. But this has been open for 286 days, whatever violations were the case. The problem is it's ‸ been open 286 days. So the goal is to get it cured. You know what I mean? Um, without fail and deciding what are you going to do? That's what I'm looking at as far as, um, dealing with the building department as far as trying to get permits. So that's why I'm, I'm going in that route. Right.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:10–00:18:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:21–00:18:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:31–00:18:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:40–00:18:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, officer Folger, did you, or did you not say that ‸ the trailers in the yard that has been resolved? However, you just have concerns about it returning, but it has been resolved
[00:19:13]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:46–00:19:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:59–00:19:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
in your notice of violation to, uh, remove the trailer or come into compliance? Yes. So it was, you gave them a time, him a time to comply and the trailer was still there after that.
[00:20:31]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The trailer's been removed
[00:20:33]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:33–00:20:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Then you could find a violation, but no fine. So essentially, so this is, this is one of the cases where, as if the, uh, violation was not, uh, corrected by the time the officers gave them to correct, but came into compliance before the hearing today, you could find that a violation existed, but can, we cannot impose a fine. However, in the future, if he, if there is another violation that reoccurs, it would be considered a repeat. So, um, that would be my suggestion would be to, uh, amend the motion to have no fine on this particular, uh, item. The trailers in the yard,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:31–00:21:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So now your goal is to ensure you work with these gentlemen to ensure that we are working consistently to get this taken care of, um, whatever it needs.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:14–00:22:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:25–00:22:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you want to still park those many vehicles there, ask for a driveway extension, get, you know, figure out what you want to do and work with them as far as that goes.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:56–00:22:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:11–00:23:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:33–00:23:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:45–00:23:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:57–00:24:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:03–00:24:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:15–00:24:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:26–00:24:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
required appendix a article 15 section 2 a for the unpermitted alterations to the structure, including room additions which include windows doors electrical and altered
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:38–00:24:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
life health property. And safety of the general public as an attractive nuisance. I visited the site 14 times during my first inspection. I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I have
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:32–00:25:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:43–00:25:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:52–00:25:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
condition, $25 for the interior structure, $25 for permit required, and $25 for unsafe buildings be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:17–00:26:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:29–00:26:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You're welcome. Okay, we're still going through probate with this home, and that first picture that you've seen on the inside, ‸ that is, yeah, that ‸ was my mom's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:50–00:26:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Well, okay, my mom passed May 2019. Um, and her husband was living in the home. So, anywho, I was living elsewhere. So, I just got into that home. Well, we didn't even go on that side of the house.
dog at, like, they left the dog there. Um, so I was able to basically fix up the living room, the kitchen area, and the rooms area on this side. My mom built a room area on that side, but the house is still in my grandma's name. She passed 30 years ago.
ago. So, we're still doing probate with this case. So, we can't even pull any permits or anything at this time. So, I don't know. Um, we have been working with Gonzalez. He's been helpful, but we barely can do anything because we can't pull permits. So, if I, uh, we keep dealing with, um, the of our clerk of courts, um, I don't know.
We're just going to actually just go hire a lawyer because we're passing back and forth paperwork. Like every month, it feels like, and we're not in compliance with probate, to be honest. So, we can't get into compliance with the housing.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:17–00:28:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
came and seeing the back of the home wasn't stable. And then they seen that part of the house that we do not go to. Well, we wasn't going to, um, my mom's room. It was a garage area. And then I guess when they broke off that wall, it had a leak in my stepdad never fixed. He just let it rain and rain for years. Um, probably like two years. So, that rotted out. So, my kids and I, we didn't go to that part. Um, but, yeah. So, long story short, we are still in compliance with probate. Um, I don't know. Can we have a couple more?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:02–00:29:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:27–00:29:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:36–00:29:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:44–00:29:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:57–00:29:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:05–00:30:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and afford a lawyer to be honest, but oh yeah, February 8th, me and my kids, we had to exit, like leave all of our stuff, everything been homeless basically. Since then. So we are working, but at this point I'm over just going back and forth, back and forth. So that's why I'm just going to break down and just get a lawyer. I'm over it.
I'm not if, especially if they can secure the door, the front door, that's the last remaining egress on the property that's not secured. And even during my recent follow up, people have been going in there and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:59–00:30:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:10–00:31:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:24–00:31:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. And that's my whole thing. When they told me that I was like, all right, we get them, you know, ‸ work early and I'm just going to get down there.
is my mom's house. And now that she passed, like, oh, well, she did pay the taxes even when she was in England for 20 years. She did do that. So girls, you guys can have it. And now they're all concerned because they see the sign in the yard.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:12–00:32:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:26–00:32:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. So you understand his concern as far as getting that secured due to being a public nuisance. And that's one of the biggest things. And that's why he had police action. If it's not secured, you'll have more police action.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:54–00:32:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:03–00:33:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this environment is not for you. So, okay. But yeah, he hasn't even been here, but my uncle was going in and out the house and I'm like, Oh really? Okay.
Cause again, when I heard that I'm like, Oh really? Okay. So let me go ahead and just take off the time for work and just go ahead and do this. So yeah, listen, they can't stand when I come through.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:42–00:33:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:54–00:34:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:06–00:34:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
go back. Oh, well, actually go back again. So here's part of it here with the roofing system, the structural members in here, some of the roof leaking, um, and the imposing weight that's left on there because of the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:35–00:34:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:47–00:34:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:56–00:34:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
me it was other things than doing what he's supposed to do just to upkeep the front yard and things like that. That's when I did a blanket trespassing. So, oh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:09–00:35:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:28–00:35:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:31–00:35:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:40–00:35:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
shall be, uh, corrected in violations no later than 180 days. Is that what we agree upon? Yes, sir. Uh, and, and, uh, the supplement and a subsequent hearing may be held to determine compliance with the order and daily fines may be imposed for each violation as follows. Uh, one of coded, uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:05–00:36:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:36–00:36:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:46–00:36:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:32–00:37:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:01]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:01–00:38:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:39:20–00:39:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:33]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
right.
[00:39:34]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:34–00:39:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:41]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:41–00:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:44]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
[00:39:47]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
a code enforcement officer. Submitting a package of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property ‸ during my visits and show my findings of exterior general condition, section 6-1003B and F. for the disrepair of the windows, facial walls and doors.
[00:40:09]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:09–00:40:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:15]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to the property, which has exceeded 30 days. Premises identification, section 6-1003C for the missing address numbers on the property. Weed section 6-1003D for the accumulation of tall weeds, grass, overgrowth, exceeding 12 inches in height, which has been cured. And finally,
[00:40:44]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:44–00:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:47]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
for an unpermitted ‸ drain pipe adjacent to the garage. Staff has visited the site 17 times. During our first inspection, staff found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of
[00:41:07]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:07–00:41:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:11]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation. Staff has been working
[00:41:14]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:14–00:41:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:20]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the property owner. I brought this case before the code enforcement board as I have been working this case. Staff has been working this case for 442 days, and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the
[00:41:34]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:34–00:41:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:39]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:41:42]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:42–00:41:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:46]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case number 23-222 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or
[00:41:56]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:56–00:42:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:28–00:42:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:30]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:42:32]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Anyone? This property was tabled, and the owner who's in Orlando called and said he had corrected all the violations, but the only thing that he had corrected was cutting the grass.
[00:42:52]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:52–00:42:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:00]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
So those are the only two. You know, I took over this case, but those are the only two conversations that I've had with the actual property owner. It was concerning, you know, he had cured the violations, and it was the grass, and he had fixed
[00:43:14]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:14–00:43:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:17]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
He just cut it, ‸ but it's still open to the drain, and he'd admit it to. So it was like a washroom or something or a washer, discharge or something to that nature.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:30–00:43:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:43–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:50]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I've checked for Azeem Properties, LLC, and they have a registration agent, which is Brass Tax Incorporated, which I also
[00:44:05]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:44:05–00:44:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:10]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
[00:44:34]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
He's been aware. This case well precedes me, and it was other officers that started the case, but for the 442 days, only to my knowledge from what I've seen in my inspections, only the grass has been cut.
‸ I only ask that for the record because when someone only comes to do one thing, it's like they're getting information through secondhand or thirdhand, and so they feel like that's the only violation they have, so that's what they go do.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:19–00:45:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:24–00:45:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when the property was originally cited. So he was renoticed. He had proper time, and we went through those channels and all those documents are with the exhibit packets. But we chose to still table the case to allow him time to correct, or at least start making progress with the case. Officer Mack explained to him the violations. He did cure the weeds because that was the only violation he said he felt he had
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:52–00:45:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:59–00:46:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that he just seems to disagree or appeal our findings of boarded windows, elicit discharge, and all ‸ the described violations. So if that helps with the background.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:08–00:47:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
before we second, can we ask the question, going back to the same case we had earlier about the ‸ weeds being a violation? Can we say weeds are still in violation, but no charges
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:21–00:47:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah, the question would be whether or not they corrected the weeds after the time ‸ that was stated in the notice of violation to correct it, ‸ or before that?
[00:47:41]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
So after the initial violation, the weeds were not corrected until they received the certified mail.
[00:47:53]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:53–00:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:58]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
He did correct them, but it took the final notice that he had to appear here. And he felt that that was all that needed to be corrected and compared, made the reference. I would say, make the reference of, you know, well, that's not how they do it in Orange County. So I'm like, it's not Orange County,
[00:48:22]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Cocoa, Florida. And people have different ordinances. So you still have to correct. You know, I went through the, through telling him he still had to correct the other violations,
[00:48:32]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:32–00:48:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:35]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the discharge.
[00:48:36]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:36–00:48:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:39]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
was basically thinking that just cutting the PVC pipe,
[00:48:45]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:45–00:48:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:51]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:22–00:49:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:37–00:49:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:58–00:50:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:06]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:50:12]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during staff's visit and show our findings of
[00:50:21]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:21–00:50:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:29]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in the front or side yard. Protective treatment.
[00:50:36]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:36–00:50:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:48]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
outdoor storage of lawn mowers, tools, tires, car ramps, and miscellaneous items, which has been cured.
[00:50:59]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:59–00:51:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:05]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
in the front or side yard. Staff has visited the site 11 times. During the first inspection, they found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. Staff has attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of
[00:51:25]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:25–00:51:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:29]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
violation. Staff has been working
[00:51:32]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:32–00:51:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:36]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
And I have not had contact with the property owner after several attempts. I just had contact with the tenant. I brought this case before the code board to the code enforcement board, as I've been working this case, or staff has been working this case for 323 days. And the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on May 3rd, 2024. And it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:52:08]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:08–00:52:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:18]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
violation and recommends 30 days to be given to come into compliance or a
[00:52:23]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:52:23–00:52:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:23]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
of
[00:52:23]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:23–00:52:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:31]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And $25 for trailers in the yard be imposed for each day. The violation remains until compliance is achieved. And I believe the owner is here. Sir,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:55–00:53:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:11–00:53:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
What he's showing you now is what I saw. I went by the house once I got the letter. I didn't get it until a couple of days ago. But I couldn't get anyone to answer the door. But I told him to put the... You guys got rules that you go by that I wasn't aware of. I told him to put the trailer on the side of the house because the initial complaint was that they were in the front yard.
and put his cars in the driveway. I think they got four of them. They're not supposed to be parked in front of the house facing the house. I thought there was an easement in front of the house where they could park the car along the front and not go into the driveway.
That brown patch right there where the sidewalk stops, I thought that was a parking space. But if it's not, I will tell them that they have to comply with the city ordinances and stuff. Plus, I'm going to have to put barriers in there because I talked to him a long time about parking his cars in there.
So I'll put barriers up there so they can't go up to the front of the house to where they were parked a few slides ago. ‸ But other than that, if you're telling me
they're not here. So I would have to tell them and then they would have to get on. Now I'm going to go by there and tell him about his cars. But as far as the structural stuff goes, they're going to have to find somebody to do ‸ work and stuff. Um,
So with that fascia there, that's damaged as I, and I spoke with your tenant this morning and so did officer Mack. And we explained everything he said, he said, he said 30 days will be enough time for him to correct his violations. He understood what the violations were regarding the trailers in the yard and the parking in the yard. He asked if he had to fix the fascia and he was educated and informed that no, he does not. The property owner does. Okay. So it's
Did you say that one of the violations was corrected?
[00:56:45]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes, sir.
[00:56:46]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:46–00:56:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:49]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Before there was, so they were working on, on cars. They were working on a car. It was a PT cruiser and all the, um, the toolboxes, the tools, the, you know, lawnmowers, um, other miscellaneous items were, uh, were outdoors. I mean,
[00:57:10]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:10–00:57:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:13]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
as we go by and take our pictures. But, uh, when I, when I made contact with the, with the tenant and I told him about it, he,
[00:57:22]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:22–00:57:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:26]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to, I don't know, but I know he had cured the violation of what we had cited or what was cited, you know, and I was taken over for.
[00:57:37]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:37–00:57:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
first, the slides are different. Um, I didn't get a copy of what the violations were this time, but, uh, the slides were different. Uh, by several months. I don't know if it's years or not, but there's a lot of time between when both of the cars were in front of the house to where he has, uh, ‸ he has a, he done built up some type of right here. That wasn't there. So that's the way it is today. Now, if he, if you don't want that there, I'll have to tell him to move it. But, uh, he's been working at it. Like I said, as far as I can tell, besides the face of the cars, we have to know what to do with them. If
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:26–00:58:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:34–00:58:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:38–00:58:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:41–00:58:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:59:05–00:59:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:12–00:59:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:39–01:00:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, the thing is, um, overall, um, as you understood before, it's your overall responsibility. If he's doing it, you're going to let him do it. That's fine. It has nothing to do with us. But again, they're not citing the tenant.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:29–01:00:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:42–01:00:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:51]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:51–01:00:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we need any further discussion. Um, now going forward, uh, for us here, we need to work on going by what our guidelines are. So we ensure we get everything we need as far as how he went down the list.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:23–01:01:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:24–01:01:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Uh, I'd just like to say, uh, I got a notice to appear here, but I didn't get a notice of the violations. So if I could have a list of the violations, that would help us out.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:52–01:01:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:02–01:02:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:02:31–01:02:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:40–01:02:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:51–01:02:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:02–01:03:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order. I move to find the respondent in this case in violation of the city codes as ‸ charged. And that respondents shall correct the violation no later than 60 days. Uh, violations are parking and yard $25.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:03:42–01:03:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:58–01:03:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a motion on the floor by Mr. Otero. Second by Mr. Simpson. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed? Motion passes unanimously. ‸ Mr. Ford, please, um, ensure you get whatever you need from code enforcement officers and please work closely with them.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:28–01:04:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:59–01:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:00]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:05:09]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:09–01:05:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:16]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The photos actually depict the property during a staff visit and show our findings of accessory structure.
[01:05:23]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:23–01:05:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:27]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the disrepair of the fence. Storing outdoors.
[01:05:31]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:31–01:05:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:36]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the outdoor storage of ladders, buckets, pallets, and miscellaneous outdoor storage items.
[01:05:44]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:44–01:05:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:51]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
weeds, grass, and or overgrowth in excess of 12 inches throughout the property. And verified via.
[01:05:57]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:05:57–01:05:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:05:58]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
aerial attained from the Brevard County property appraiser. Staff
[01:06:04]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
has visited
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:04–01:06:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:06:05]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
[01:06:10]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property was found in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. Staff has attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of
[01:06:19]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:19–01:06:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:24]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation. Staff has been working
[01:06:26]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:26–01:06:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:30]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And staff has had contact with the property owner.
[01:06:34]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:34–01:06:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:39]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the officer of record duties. I brought this case before the code code enforcement board, as I have been working this case. Staff has been working this case for 323 days. And the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent
[01:06:55]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:55–01:06:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:06:55]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
notice of hearing on May 3rd, 2024. And it was since certified and posted on the property in violation due to the longevity of the case. And no progress made
[01:07:07]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:07–01:07:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:12]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
That the property
[01:07:13]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
owner
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:13–01:07:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:07:13]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or a find of $25 for accessory structures. $25 for storing outdoors, $25 for weeds. Be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And the owners are here. How are you guys doing today?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:46–01:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:38–01:08:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
few months ago that you told me you were going to continue working on. So there was some minor progress made, but it's still in disrepair and needs to be corrected. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:38–01:09:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
miscellaneous outdoor storage. There's ladders next to the fence. Um, this morning there was a lattice and I believe a ladder as well. So the outdoor storage is miscellaneous items that are just range. Um, go to the other one. There's a, there was a lawnmower next to the fence on the east side, on that side there. Let's go back to ‸ that
So that, that was the overall miscellaneous outdoor storage items, ma'am. It's always, it's usually going to be right, right there that we're constantly, uh, taking pictures of. It's usually on their tables.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:26–01:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, you can have it piled here. And when you get back 30 minutes later, it's on the other side of the yard and the other, but that, that will be taken care of.
that ladder's gone. The lattice was put up for decoration there because there's another one to the left side of the porch there too. And I put up for decoration there.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:53–01:11:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:12:03–01:12:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
them a call so they can come out and take a look and you got to walk the property and, uh, make sure everything's taken care of. So then we don't even have to get to those 30 days.
And that's the overgrowth. Uh, it, uh, it does apply to the entire property, of course, but what we are specifically talking about is the overgrowth on the side of the house that you saw there towards the fence. Can you go back one? And in that photo there, you can also see some of the overgrowth in the backyard that was presented in the prior aerial, uh, which harbors rodents and it is unsanitary, um, to the surrounding properties as well. So it does need to be addressed. Thank you. You're welcome, man.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:08–01:13:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as charged and that respondents shall correct the violation no later than. 30 days. From the date of this order. A sub subsequent hearing may be held to determine compliance with this order and daily fines may be imposed for each violation as follows. Storing outdoors. $25. Weeds. $25. And I believe the accessory storage. You said structures is correct or not yet.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:01–01:14:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:03–01:14:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:15–01:14:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So Jeff, just make sure you get with them to ensure you're doing everything you need to do and not overdoing it until you want to do something different.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:34–01:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:44–01:14:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:45–01:14:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:15:02–01:15:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:09]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:09–01:15:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:15]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:15–01:15:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:19]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was brought to the code board on January 18th, 2024 and was found in violation.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:26–01:15:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:33–01:15:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:15:57–01:15:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:57]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:16:00]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
This case was brought to the code board on January 18th, 2024 and was found in violation of exterior general condition. Chapter six section six dash one Oh three.
[01:16:10]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
for the overall general condition of the property. Um, the board order compliance date was April 18th, 2024. I sent notification of hearing for noncompliance on 429, 2024 and it was sent certified and posted on the property. At this time, the property remains in violation and ‸ the owner is here.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:53–01:16:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:56–01:17:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, as you all know the reason I'm here ‸ because I was taking care of the paperwork. I'm not very good at it, but the person that was doing that, she got real sick.
she probably got operated today. Anyway, and then I waited, waited, waited. Sometimes I went over a house and she was asleep. Talked to her husband. So days go by, go by.
So that's what it is. So I'm going to put a new building in there. That's all. We already, I don't know if you know, the papers are in all the documentation.
[01:20:08]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
The, the, the process that he was going through, uh, as of the last hearing, um, his intention was to repair the property. Um, it ended up being a little bit more than he wanted to take care of at that point. So he decided that he was just going to demolish that one and build a new structure there. Um, in the process of all that happening, um,
[01:20:30]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:30–01:20:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:33]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
getting sick. Um, he's gotten other people to help him now with it. Uh, unfortunately we're just running up against the wall as far as the time that was given. Um, once they got somebody that could come in there and tear the property down for them, uh,
[01:20:49]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:49–01:20:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:54]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
down. Once that inspection is done, it has to be 10 business days before you can actually start the process.
[01:21:13]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Um, and I have explained to Mr. Silva that this is a non-compliance hearing. It's either in compliance or it's not. As of this point, we still aren't, um, you know, what, what we could suggest would be once everything is done, come back for a
[01:21:28]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
lien
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:28–01:21:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:21:29]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
reduction hearing as we do with other, uh, people with the same situation.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:40–01:21:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:43–01:21:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:15–01:22:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:42–01:22:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:46–01:22:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the time and it's actually knocked down. And then at that point you can come back for a forgiveness at that time. But at this time, fines will still start running. You understand that?
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:24:28–01:24:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:56–01:24:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:09–01:25:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:25:41]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
fines will start as of April 18th, because that was your compliance date. Once you get the building knocked down, the fines will stop and you have the option at that point to apply for a lien reduction. And we'll come back again and hear your lien reduction at that point.
[01:26:19]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:19–01:26:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:29–01:26:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:31–01:26:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I move to find that responding in this case did not comply with the code board's previous order by the compliance date and that the fine will be imposed as this as set forth in that order. Uh, exterior general condition.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:04–01:27:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:16–01:27:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:32–01:27:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:09–01:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:11–01:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:18]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:28:21]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is 1041 West Hillcrest. Submitting the photos that I took during my rear inspections of the property to operate the picture of property during staff visits. The case was brought to the code
[01:28:31]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:31–01:28:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:35]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:28:37]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of roofs
[01:28:38]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:38–01:28:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:45]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
condition of the roof, including missing grit, damage or worn sink shingles, water retention areas, swelling and decayed
[01:28:52]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:52–01:28:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:58]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The exterior of the structure shall be maintained in good repair structurally sound and sanitary.
[01:29:04]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:04–01:29:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:12]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of unserviceable and or unregistered vehicles.
[01:29:18]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:18–01:29:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:24]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
junk trash and miscellaneous outdoor storage items, ‸ couch cushions, box, wood, et cetera. Trails in
[01:29:32]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:32–01:29:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:41]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and unregistered. The board order compliance date was set for February 17th, 2024. Oh, oh.
[01:29:51]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:51–01:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:22–01:30:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:23]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:30:24]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No, we were a couple of days. I was, uh, it was 20, April 20th. I was off on it. The correction, Mr. Chairman, the board compliance date was April 20th, 2024.
[01:30:38]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:38–01:30:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:40]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
on May 3rd, 2024, and it was since certified and posted at this time, the property remains in violation.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:21–01:31:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:31:31–01:31:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:31:34–01:31:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:31:57–01:31:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:31:58–01:32:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is deceased. There is a history of this property. There is a tenant there. Um, just some civil issues going on, but the property owner is deceased, sir. Is
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:43–01:32:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number one exterior general conditions, $50. Uh, number two roofs of drainage is $25. Number three storage junk or autos is $25. Storing outdoors is $25 and trailers in the yard is $25. Just want to be correct.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:02–01:34:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, a compliance, non-compliance. I move to find that the respondent in this case did not comply with the code board's previous order by the compliance date and that the fine will be imposed as set forth in that order. Uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:28–01:34:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:35:16–01:35:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:00–01:36:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:07–01:36:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:19–01:36:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:50–01:36:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:54–01:36:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was held on March 16th, 2023. The lien ran at $200 per day from February 18th, 2023 until compliance was achieved on June 7th, 2023. Code records show on-site inspections were conducted by Officer Bonacore and myself. The case was closed, leaving a fine of $21,810.00.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:25–01:37:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:30–01:37:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien. Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violations occurred? Yes. If the applicant resided at the property? No. This is a rental property. The number of violations related to the subject lien? There were eight. Number of inspections performed? 21. Property taxes? The property taxes are current. Other liens? Records show there are no outstanding liens on the property and no water liens. And then the property inspection. The property
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:09–01:38:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
before the code ‸ enforcement board hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to the City Council meeting. The current market value of the subject property. The current market value
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:24–01:38:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
single family residence. ‸ Staff submits their cost sheet and the total amount of $3,078.65. Staff's recommendation that the fine lien be reduced to $3,078.65, which is the cost of staff to prosecute this case. And this reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took for the property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the city's costs. And the property representative is present.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:12–01:39:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:18–01:39:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:29–01:39:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
My client is well aware that there were significant violations of the property, some of which they couldn't ultimately control. There was a tenant that was in possession of the premises prior to my client purchasing the property. So multiple of the violations, we had to work diligently with the tenant. ‸ to get them to remove the unregistered
trash and litter fromfrom the front of the driveway. And then ultimately, my client stepped in and hired outside vendors to clean the brush on the side of the fence line. They also fixed the fence in several areas, replaced some of the roofing that had issues, cleaned up the debris, and the yard was cleared. And I also met with the code enforcement officer on one separate occasion. We went over everything that was deficient at the property. And thereafter, we rectified all
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:34–01:40:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and We're asking at this time that under the totality of the circumstances, and mainly being that we had an uncooperative tenant in possession of the premises, that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:47–01:40:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:10–01:41:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
compliance was 300 days. So that's, and that I'm referring to when the we sent to find the first notice of violation leading up to compliance. In terms of um fine days, the property was in fine, or I'm sorry, in violation in terms of being fined for a total of 109 days. So essentially, after the non-compliance hearing was held, whoever it was within the property management of the owner started moving fairly quickly. So,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:51–01:41:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
can't recall if it was um officer initiated or complaint based um but I do recall some information some discrepancies with the premises identification, which I believe was steamrolled everything. So i whether it was officer
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:04–01:42:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know that the property appraiser was involved because there were some issues with the site address. And then we also received calls throughout the life of the case. um As she explained, uh that there were some tenants there because there was no water on the property at one point. They were going forward with their civil process to get them out, but there was no water, so we received multiple complaints throughout the life of the case um for somebody defecating around the property. And the smell of sewage. So once they were finally able to get the tenant out, they did cure the violations. That was what was really holding them up. That and it appears some internal communication amongst her clients or the property owner, which she seems to have resolved since the non-compliance hearing.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:02–01:43:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:52–01:43:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:54–01:43:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:44:00–01:44:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the background information on this property the resicap LLC has I think about 11 or 12 titles attached to this property within the county so they have quite a few properties here.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:18–01:44:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Not any longer. We did have previous issues, and that was what the issue with the unregistered vehicle that was in the driveway, as well as some trash and litter that was collected on the front of the driveway that belonged to the tenant. So it did take quite a few months for us to get the the tenant to be cooperative with threats of, obviously, ultimately eviction, and then they came into compliance we have not had any issues with them
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:48–01:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:17–01:45:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:27–01:46:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:34–01:46:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:46–01:46:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:13–01:47:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
after the non-compliance hearing was held, there was brief contact prior to that, but nothing that showed compliance was being met. ‸ After the non-compliance hearing, it seems that whoever it is that's over resicap property management decision making hired
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:32–01:47:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Hardy, and she got to work on correcting, and essentially is now representing the client. And we haven't had issues with communication or compliance since then. So it seems like he had to, the based off of the notes, he's had to reshape his own internal property management to start addressing these properties, which he has done since the non-compliance hearing. so And
I did drive over here to meet him for an inspection. We walked the property. I took, you know, diligent notes as to all the issues that were at the property, went back to my client, and they immediately started correcting every um issue that he found on the property. And to the right side of the property, they even cleaned out to the sidewalk, which was more than what we were asked or required to do. And
Absolutely. I mean, we have a process set up. um Obviously, now we have a contact. um Code Enforcement can contact me directly if they find any issues withwith the property. As soon as I know, I will do a seven-day notice to cure to the tenant. um Ultimately, if they do not correct within those seven days, then we'll move forward with with eviction for that tenant if they stay non-compliant And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:06–01:49:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:11–01:49:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:46–01:49:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:05–01:50:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:22–01:50:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh My motion is that. uh oh I'm sorry. So my motion is dead. oh sorry. No, no, go ahead. No, I just want to put it out for nobody second. So my motion is dead. So
Mr. Chair, I'd like to set a motion. Yes, sir. Okay. My motion is that we, um I move that the board recommends to the city council that that lean be reduced. And in this case. From 21 825
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:02–01:51:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
people that live in the property with the company. The attorneys here, they did fix the issue um and they acted according to the officer that they acted quickly.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:51–01:51:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:44–01:52:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh she, um is no longer with our firm. um So, um I will be taking over, uh advising the board. um and luckily I helped her the other day, right. With, ‸ with, with training for you all. So you got to know me a little bit better. um so in the future, if you have any questions, um you know, feel free to reach out to me or reach out to
if you need anything. and, um hopefully, uh things will go smoothly as we transition. I know it might be a little bit different having a different attorney here, but, um I'm happy to answer any questions that you
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:48–01:53:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:59–01:54:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:16–01:54:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:54:34–01:54:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that we're using um our template that uh we're giving um because it helps us in the legal terms. So it helps us in the long run. So let's try and ensure that we're using that to, um get through our, using the correct verbiage
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:53–01:54:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:04–01:55:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:19–01:55:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording