The almost 100,000 folks that lost their lives to this COVID-19, so we can just have a few minutes of silence if you don't mind. Okay, if I can have you all please stand.
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:32–00:00:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:00:57–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:12–00:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, ‸ for which
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:28–00:01:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and not a nation,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Thank you, ma'am. Roll call, please.
Mayor Williams. Here. Deputy Mayor Goins. Here. Councilmember
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:48–00:01:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. Councilmember
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:50–00:01:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Councilmember Warner.
Here.
Assistant City
Attorney Ike.
Here.
And Interim City Manager Fuhrer.
Here. Okay.
Okay. We can move on to the approval of our agenda in minutes. Item number one,
the
agenda for the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:13–00:02:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ There's one item that we're going to have pulled on here as item number one on the consent. It's just going to be pulled.
So
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:36–00:02:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No,
it's
been
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:39–00:02:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
pulled. Oh,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:39–00:02:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:40–00:02:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh,
okay.
Yeah,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:42–00:02:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
being pulled off.
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
one under consent.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay. Okay.
Okay. We
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:02–00:03:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:04–00:03:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor, signify by saying aye.
Aye.
Opposed? It passes unanimously. Okay. And we have no minutes. No awards and presentation. We can move on to delegations.
And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:21–00:03:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm not for sure.
But
Dr. Anastasia Hawkins, can you come up and say your name and address?
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:36–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Smith, 2130 Michigan Avenue, Coco
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:40–00:03:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the historic Cocoa Village Playhouse. We are so happy to see you in person and not on the computer screen. And with me is
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:57–00:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
grant writer. And just bringing you up to date. And thank you so much for allowing us at every meeting to keep you up to date with what's happening and for your support. And a special thank you to the city manager for being right there, always answering the questions and giving the answers when we need them. As you know, we aren't able to open this weekend. And to date, right now, this marks about $20,000 in refunds that we've had to give. We just added another $2,000 because we couldn't open this weekend. However, what we've done is choose another date even farther out, June
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:45–00:04:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we've written to the governor, DeSantis, asking for him to look at our procedures set in place, our seating chart, and hoping that he'll consider allowing us to reopen by June 18th. Now, he may do that anyway, but we thought it would be really great to make ourselves known and issue our support, give our support to him, but also let him know about our historic theater right here in Cocoa Village. So that's where we are. One other thing, Chris Beavers is in the process of writing our state grant request, which is due June 1st, and it's an operational grant. So hopefully we'll be approved for that. Last year he literally scored first in our category. So we're hoping that this happens and comes through for us. So we're still holding on, and we thank you for your support and hope that June 18th will be the day. With the summer camps announced as far as being open, we are hoping that that will cause us to be able to open our children's Stars of Tomorrow programming, but we're watching those guidelines carefully before we make any kind of announcement as far as that. So do you all have any questions? I do.
Yes. So have you been able to access any CARES
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:22–00:06:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you been able to access any CARES Act dollars, any federal dollars to pay salaries? We have
just been approved. Actually, we were approved several weeks ago for the PPP loan, which is fantastic for us, and that will take us up to probably July, okay, which is assisting with our payroll. So yes is the answer to that. Okay, that's good news.
And the $20,000, so did people actually ask for refunds? Yes,
yes. But most people took gift certificates for a future show, showing their faith in us that we'll be back, and we will. It's just a matter of time and when. So thank you. Thank you. Thank you, ma'am.
Thank you. Next up we have
‸ I have another delegation that was given by me that I want to read after everybody.
Okay.
Next up we have Dave Lightholder.
Thank you. Thank you.
Dave Lightholder, 219,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:40–00:07:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I need your help. I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:46–00:07:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:50–00:07:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city. Their
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:58–00:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Their septic tank still works.
And
they went to the city and the city supposedly Jack told them they had to hook up to the sewer. Well, after researching it,
it's
$100,000 plus to hook up to the sewer. The sewer's in the middle of the state road. Clear
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:21–00:08:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There's no lateral to the property. ‸ Replace the drain fields, $13,000. If they have to apply for permits and get engineering and have the lateral put in for the city, it's $100,000 plus. They're paying $2,300 a month for temporary bathrooms since October. They're up to $25,000. They've
got
to make another payment tomorrow. I talked to John
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:50–00:08:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He said he could write a letter to the county. All the county's requesting, the state is requesting, is a letter from the city saying that sewer is not available because there's no lateral there, and they'll let them replace the drain field. John
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:09:07–00:09:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, then John's not here. So ‸ I talked to Matt about it. Matt said, write a letter. Address it to Jack because he researched it and said Jack really needs to write the letter. He said he's talked to Jack. I've
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:22–00:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
You have said you've talked to Jack about it. I just asked Jack. I've called him three times today. No return phone call. He says he's never talked to anybody about it. I need help. These people are dying. I mean, they're in the booze business and
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:09:39–00:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
even really doing much business right now. Their business is down 75%. I haven't heard stress in their voices until today. They're like, do we close? Do we try to annex out ‸ the city into the county? What do we do? It's a simple letter saying that the city does not have a lateral to that property. Matt told me today that Jack may not write the letter that he may want to bring it to council next month for a council to do it. We had that conversation four months ago. So, I mean, these people are, you know, they're going to be, another
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:18–00:10:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that could have been put in months ago.
I know Matt and I had some discussions about this.
It's
been
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:28–00:10:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I didn't know where we were. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:32–00:10:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But I know that Matt and I have had some discussions about it. And ‸ I had some concerns with reference. Because I think there's an ordinance that says that they would have to hook up to sewer. But then ‸ we were looking at the cost versus the fact that they had just, I guess they had just purchased a building, if I remember correctly.
And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:58–00:11:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we had talked about, you know, maybe authorizing a one-time deal with this septic deal. But
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:11–00:11:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But that's where we were with that discussion. And I thought it had resolved itself some kind of way. But definitely
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:11:19–00:11:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:20–00:11:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I just wanted to ask, so is the effluent just the bathrooms?
Just the bathrooms.
And how many employees are there?
About 20 employees. I mean, we have other people in the city that sewers available and they're not hooked up in the river circle. We just had a business on Dixon Boulevard, our commercial business, just ignored the laws and put a new septic tank in. And they're up and running.
Well, it's certainly not something we'll want to encourage. But we also have to recognize special circumstances.
Well, I mean,
they're willing to hook up the sewers as long as the city puts in the lateral to the property. It's not available. I mean, who's?
And the lateral is going to cost $100 plus?
It's $10,000 just in engineering fee. Yes, it's a state road. I was going to put a lateral here on 520, and it's in for permitting right now, and we're moving it down the road because it was $55,000 to monitor traffic for two days while they dug up the road. That's the cost. We moved this lateral 30 feet, and the bill went from $55,000 down to $22,000. But there's no choice out there. It's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:42–00:12:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We can't do anything about it. So that cavity
feeds were there? Is that gravity? Forced me.
Councilman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:53–00:12:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
First
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:56–00:13:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
There's no reason why a business like that should have to spend that kind of money. And it's a state road. Even the permitting process, we all know what the permitting process is like.
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:15–00:13:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have to deal with that. We're talking another six months probably before it even happens. In the meantime, they're still paying for portable bathrooms for 20 employees. They're
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:24–00:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're going to be sorry they ever annexed. It's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:31–00:13:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
into the city. It's absolutely freaking
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:13:36–00:13:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that this has even taken place. If there's no state law that says that they have to hook up to that lateral in the middle of the state road that we have not supplied, then why are we even having this discussion? Give them the damn letter and let them put their septic tank in. It's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:55–00:13:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not like it's on top of the
friggin'
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:57–00:13:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Indian River. 20
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:01–00:14:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Let them put it in. Let them put the frame field in.
So ‸ if I may touch on a little bit of the city's code related to this, and ‸ Jack can provide any information in addition to what I provide. But ‸ the requirement is that they connect to our sewer system if it's available, and it's considered available if it's in front of the property. Now, in this particular case, I believe they're seeking a financial hardship due to the expenses because there's a current lateral available to the property. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:40–00:14:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for review, and then ‸ based on his review of either accepting it and approving it or denying it, they can appeal it then to city council. So there is a procedure outlined within the city code for this. And I think the first step's taken with a letter sent to the utilities director.
Which he's received. So how much longer are we talking?
Well,
I
mean, Jack would have to review the letter as well as the site. I didn't
have the opportunity to meet the city manager. We
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:19–00:15:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ But obviously, Dave's here to try to get things moving. And
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:28–00:15:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But there is also an exception in there for other reasons, hardships and other. So I've been here 11 years.
We
haven't granted any exceptions to our policy. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:46–00:15:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That actually ended up kind of circumventing the building process because the people on staff weren't alerted to the fact that they were doing a substantial change to the building, not just a minor renovation. And in doing so, the ‸ building permit or the septic permit was applied to the county and we didn't have any knowledge on this side. So we've tried to close that gap. We provided the Brevard County Health Department copies of our ‸ sewer system so that they know if people come in, they can look it up themselves. They can also contact us, of course. But just trying to ‸ get more information out there so that we can avoid that kind of stuff
that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:23–00:16:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
happening. But
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:23–00:16:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
two or three days ago, maybe Friday. Or maybe hit my desk Monday or Tuesday when I came in. But, ‸ yeah, absolutely, ‸ the request has been made. My next step was really to really talk in detail with Matt because we haven't really given exceptions, I would say, you know, for ‸ this particular site. And to ‸ sort of understand what we're talking about, we have a substantial cost, no doubt there. And it is far enough away from the Indian River where it doesn't really pose an environmental hazard. So those would be the if council, you know, certainly feels, you know, that the section should be granted, that's absolutely I have no objections to that whatsoever.
Let me say one more thing. I know in the future, and we know how VLT works, it could be three to five years. But there
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:14–00:17:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:18–00:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
beneficial to
have
a deal with the city and whoever's doing the work. They're
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:28–00:17:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and maybe the cost won't be as much at that point because they're
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:34–00:17:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to
[unclear audio ▶]
road tore up and blocked off and so forth. And they're willing to sign a letter to say when there's a lateral available or a sufficient cost decrease, they would hook up to it. But at this
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:44–00:17:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But,
I mean, they bought the business off the original owner and everything, so it's just a financial thing. And on top of it, the fire department has requested several hundred thousand dollars in repairs to over the next two or three years also. So they have a new building and an old building. The old building's not under a fire system. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:07–00:18:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They said they'd give them three to five years to do it, but that's another expense that's coming down the road for them. So, okay.
Yeah, Joseph, I just wanted to ask because isn't the state requirement is that if you have a gravity sewer, they have to
It's not specific.
It's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:27–00:18:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, I looked it up. It just simply says if the sewer is available ‸ within 100 feet of the property, it doesn't say whether it's gravity or whether it's force main.
Okay.
And I don't want to, you know
We typically don't we don't certainly force residential. If there's a force main near a residential, that doesn't apply because it's not realistic to make a residence, you know, put a lift station in to serve their house. That
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:55–00:18:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ But typically on commercial, if there's a force main nearby, then the expectation is that they would connect to that and install a private lift station to serve their property.
And I don't want to step on anybody's toes. So, my thing is I want to give Jack the opportunity to sit down with Matt. They're
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:12–00:19:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:13–00:19:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we can just do a census over the phone if it's okay with the council.
Unless we have to have a formal vote, I don't see any reason why we have ‸ to wait
till
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:25–00:19:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the next council meeting. You guys can get this done.
I
mean
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:28–00:19:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
come up with some guidelines because I think that would be helpful for myself as well as any of the other future people. Because
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:37–00:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
however that takes. Because
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:43–00:19:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
now, what is the criteria that allows this particular property that it makes sense? And what's the monetary value? What's the distance from the river or distance from a water body? These are things, unfortunately, that we probably have to consider because those are the kinds of things that can be faced with on the next site plan, which is at a different location and has different criteria.
Jack, would it be possible maybe ‸ to write this up as a temporary thing based on the fact that the state already has plans to reject? Do
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:15–00:20:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the redoing of Clear Lake Road since they're already ‸ willing to do it at the time the road is done? So, if we're doing this as a temporary fix, then maybe we don't circumvent some of those issues that you're worried about. ‸ Yeah, I think you're right. Is
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:36–00:20:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If Dave's client's willing to allow that and sign that off, then it's essentially temporary. ‸ It could be a couple of years, could be whatever, but when DOT comes along and they're willing to connect to it, then we can abandon it at the right time.
There's no
problem
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:49–00:20:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. You
realize a septic tank to redo this drain fill is like $13,000. You're probably three months of temporary bathrooms. Right. Three
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:58–00:21:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:00–00:21:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
making some modifications from 520 to Michigan.
So,
it's not a complete redo deal. But I get it. But, yeah. Okay.
So, you guys are going to talk and we're going to work this out. Okay. Thank you.
Okay. Thanks a lot. Okay. And then, Tammy, you have...
Yeah.
Okay.
Yes, sir. This
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:30–00:21:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
our delegation at tonight's city council meeting from Candace Rogers. It was emailed to Samantha earlier this afternoon and Samantha's not at the meeting tonight. So, I'll read it on her behalf. So, good evening, Mayor, city council, and city manager.
Nothing angers people more than to ask them to participate, to give their time and effort to develop a plan at a cost of $40,000, then ignore what they
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:21:50–00:21:59 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:21:59–00:22:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and push another structure, even if it costs considerably more. The direction from the residents' input was more transparent, connected relationship between the promenade, boardwalk, and water's edge. The workshop determined that a stainless steel cable railing system would be favored, preserving the water view while still providing safety and air flow. It would provide transparency, resiliency, low maintenance, and achieve the views at the water's edge as requested. This was the majority of the residents' desire based on the workshop and
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:22:00–00:22:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:22:35–00:22:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the 2018 updated waterfront master plan. It was the collective plan of the majority in attendance based on input. It seems simple enough to understand desired direction, but here we are
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:22:35–00:22:49 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
with
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:49–00:22:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
public three feet away from the water. You can no longer lean against the rail and look into the water to watch fish, turtles, and other interesting creatures. The Brevard Zoo suggested oyster mats along the length of the seawall edge to encourage a juvenile fish nursery. This would have delighted children and adults alike for free and encourage a relationship with the water. The oyster mats would have also been a natural water filter for the Indian River Lagoon. And help disperse and reduce the water energy when pushed by strong winds against the seawall. It is not a matter of the wall being pretty or a failure of communication by the people. It
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:31–00:23:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it occurred. ‸ Yes, ISS gave a rather sterile and unimaginative presentation of the promenade concept. A council person gave a slideshow of what they desired. An 18-inch knee wall. No presentation was given of various cable and rail designs as used commonly in port cities. It would have only taken a quick Google search to find them. Ms. Warner advised the council to state what the structure would be to meet the FEMA deadline and then work out the design later. This option was rejected. ISS was directed to come back and with concepts showing landscaping, planters, and an 18-inch seawall. Because this selection was now in conflict with the ‸ waterfront plan, sorry, and it
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:23–00:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ public comment. The ISS plans were by no means the best we could do. Asking the city to leverage citizen participation to formulate a plan that would support the spirit of the waterfront master plan would have brought forward the best ideas and maintain the process of community input. This did not happen. Shutting down or changing the process comes at what price? Perhaps
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:49–00:24:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
structure more resilient could have been used for needed competitive city salaries, security cameras,
for
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:02–00:25:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
numerous other community needs. Perhaps the monies could have been used to offset the $191,000 cost to repair the severed seawall ties discovered after construction began. But the greatest cost of all was the loss of faith of the residents and their local government to carry out the desires of the waterfront plan based on community input. When the process of community input is ignored or changed, so goes to results, community faith and good governance. In short, after the city asked the residents to work with the consultant for a year on their own time for free to develop a plan, the
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:37–00:25:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
plan, along comes a council member who does not like it and makes changes so it is what they want, even if it's going to add $150,000 to the cost, a cost that is paid by the residents' tax dollars. As a resident, how would you feel? Sincerely, Candace Rogers, Cocoa Village Neighborhood Coalition.
Thank you, ma'am. And I just want to add to that is that, you know, there are two beautiful and pretty good-sized observation walls that
I mean
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:11–00:26:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
platforms there. So you will be able to go out and actually look out over the waterway. You
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:17–00:26:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And as well, they're going to have the stainless steel chains and poles up there. Can
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:23–00:26:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The one where we decided where those options were presented to us was probably, there were probably half the people in attendance of other meetings.
It
was held in December. It was close to Christmas. The
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:42–00:26:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cables is what they wanted versus other people that wanted other things. I'm just, I
don't
know.
I
think it's going to be lovely. And we're not going to have to look through steel cables. And that wasn't just my choice. There are other people out there that, you know, ‸ I'm sorry there's, you know, that her group did not like that. But as far as the oysters go, we're going to have to have rip-rap, something to attach those to. The zoo is looking at that. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:24–00:27:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Where
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:26–00:27:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from? I
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:29–00:27:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know.
That's just, I don't, that doesn't even make sense.
But anyway, we can move on. And we're going to get them moving here. We're going to ‸ move on our reports. Any
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:27:42–00:27:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
boards here?
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
on our reports. Any advisory boards here? Okay. I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:27:58–00:28:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Finance department. Ms. Rebecca?
Yes, I would like to remind council that during the time that the governor had the safer at home, all
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:12–00:28:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ We have allowed a month after, so starting on June 2nd, customer service will begin interrupting service for unpaid accounts. Staff has worked very diligently during this time period, trying to contact customers and get them to sign up for a payment
plans.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:36–00:28:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
However, currently, the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:38–00:28:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I just want to let you know, it's been very slow since we've opened up in this last week, in the last year, but you'll probably start seeing a lot of people coming in in the next week or so.
Okay. Thank
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:57–00:29:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It'll be ‸ long walk.
We have NTP
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:13–00:29:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
scheduled for early to mid-June. Regarding our annual paving, we started the milling of Washington Avenue, and the paving is scheduled for later this week, pending weather.
Thank you, ma'am.
Thank you,
ma'am.
Thank
you,
Chief Lamb.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:29:41–00:29:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
I did like baseball and I went ahead and got on deck, so I knew I was up
sir. I'll just give you a brief update on where we are state-wise and then break it down locally with the current COVID-19. Currently in the state of Florida, we have a total of 52,255 positive cases within the state. 2,259 of those have resulted in death. In Brevard County, we're at 399 positive cases. And in Cocoa,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:18–00:30:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
also includes our unincorporated areas, we are now up to 68 confirmed positive COVID-19 cases. Currently, the state is continuing to run the test sites as they've been scheduled. They're
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:41–00:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
far as the number of positive cases we're seeing across the state in general. Just an update for us here locally, Friday was our first drive-through test site that we opened here in conjunction with Brevard Health Alliance. Great, phenomenal turnout. In
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:04–00:31:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
first hour, they did 65 tests within that first hour, so it was a little more than a car a minute they were pushing through there. So it worked out really well thanks
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:15–00:31:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was very streamlined with Brevard Health Alliance and getting them through. We hardly ever had a backup except for the first thing in the morning when we first got ready to open. So with that being said, they did a total of 270 tests at that test site between 10 and 3 o'clock. Between
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:39–00:31:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So they were very positive about the relationship between the city and the health alliance and doing that, so much so that we're going to do it again this Friday. So I've reached out to them. I've already coordinated with
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:58–00:32:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Same exact setup as we had this Friday. They're hoping to have 250 tests available. So that'll start at 10 o'clock and it'll end at 3. The caveat to that is it may end earlier depending on the number of tests they have available. So
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:21–00:32:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they'll close. That's all they've got. So it's just been a great turnout. The response from the community was very much well needed. You can see it by the participation that we had in our local community and people that came out. So they definitely saw a lot of value in that. And certainly they saw the value between the city and Brevard Health Alliance and getting that site up and running so quickly and just the flow of traffic and how things went. So
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:56–00:33:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm very encouraged by that. More importantly, I'm encouraged by the downward trend that we're continuing to see in positive cases across the state as a whole. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:13–00:33:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:17–00:33:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that coming up here in the next couple of weeks. So we'll actually be ramping all that up, meeting with ‸ EOC staff and all on the 26th to make sure that we're ready for both transitioning to work COVID and in the event we have a hurricane. Knock them wood, I'm praying that we don't. We can definitely handle those in the community as a whole.
Thank you, sir. Oh,
I wanted to ask, I looked at the hot map.
Yes, ma'am.
So
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:53–00:33:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is that, how accurate is that? Because if that's accurate, it's right. Sure.
Diamond
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:05–00:34:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Remember the heat maps are going by physical addresses in the most part, and that's what they're going by. So you really have to, I hate to say, nail down further and really zoom in on that map to see where those areas are at. It's no different than, I'm sure, the chief can talk about heat maps just as much as the fire department can. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:28–00:34:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's not until you actually zoom into that more and you start to see that disbursement of that heat map to where you see where your actual hot spots are. And they may not be in that one concentrated area. It
wasn't spread out.
Yeah,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:47–00:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
where
that's at. Okay,
so we just don't have
the resolution on what they're sending out?
It had to do with the size of that and the way they did that because if you
delve
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:59–00:35:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a little bit farther into it, you'll find out that a lot of those are actually, we have the unincorporated Cocoa area that you're seeing a lot of there.
You know, when I expanded it, it was, you know, a lot of it was in Cocoa.
If you refine that down to even smaller those, just like the mayor said, you may wind up seeing that some of that will be in your unincorporated areas. But
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:23–00:35:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city.
We shop
at
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:28–00:35:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:30–00:35:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
everybody
should be aware of it.
You had some high numbers out in West Cocoa that
shows up in
Cocoa. Yeah,
and it's what we've been continuing to tell the public, just like what the CDC's recommendations are. Continue to follow those CDC guidelines and recommendations. Hand washing, social distancing, staying away from large gatherings. Now, all those things that help prevent the spread of this virus is what's going to help us heal as a community and really as a nation as a whole. So, you know, we just got to continue to enforce those CDC guidelines and get stronger as a community.
I
have a question, Mr. ‸ Jonathan, those tests that are
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:11–00:36:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of those tests or do they just get rolled into the county numbers? They
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:16–00:36:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Brevard County and go straight to their EOC. And then they plot it to where the resident's address is, basically.
And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:28–00:36:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Sorry?
They want to find a person. Oh, yeah, absolutely.
Absolutely. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:34–00:36:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So you don't
even get out of those 270 if
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:40–00:36:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
No, ma'am. Yes,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:45–00:36:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
No
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:51–00:36:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank
you, sir. Ms.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:55–00:37:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Mr. Walsh.
No report, ‸ sir. Thank you, sir.
Minister
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:07–00:37:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
I just wanted to give you an update. I received a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:13–00:37:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
received 23 resumes for applicants from all over the U.S. She hasn't gone through them all to source them, to make sure they're qualified or, you know, to narrow them down. But just to let you know, she's got 23. The position is open until June 12th right now. And if you'd like to, we can give you an update at the next meeting.
I
think the 10th, yeah, I'm trying to remember the calendar. So the 10th and then y'all
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:47–00:37:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or close it with the initial schedule date of the 12th. Thank you.
Thank you, ma'am. Ms.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:59–00:37:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No
reports.
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:04–00:38:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Thank you,
ma'am. Mr. City Manager.
Just a quick report, a little bit of follow-up. I know Rebecca had mentioned that the City Hall lobby was opened on Tuesday the 19th. We also opened the other City facility lobby entrances and then the rest of the facilities by appointment only. We've
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:28–00:38:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And even here at City Hall,
we're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:33–00:38:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
actually kind of surprised at the numbers that we were seeing coming in. Although we do expect those to increase this next week specifically related to customer service. We would like to, this next Monday, we're anticipating opening up the office up there, the entry vestibule community services. Or we could allow a limited number up into that area at one time and it could be controlled from the City Hall lobby. So we could start that process Monday to allow those folks to continue to get their permits, answer any questions they may have. That
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:10–00:39:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of interactions. That's all I have for you tonight. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Councilman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:27–00:39:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm
sorry. I'm going
to
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:39:29–00:39:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Regarding this letter from Mr. Green, are you going to talk about that today? Yeah. I think I just really feel the need to be addressed.
Yeah. Just for information for the public, we did receive, actually I received an inquiry from Ed Green, a resident at [address] yesterday.
I
responded to him. It was related to the decision to bring code enforcement lien reductions directly to City Council and forego the code enforcement board review and recommendation. And his concern was, you know, essentially there's a policy or procedure outlined within the city code related to code enforcement lien reduction process. And, you know, due to the question came up at City Council meeting April 22nd under the reports. And at that time, Anthony Garganese, the city attorney, provided an opinion that, you know, the lien reductions could come straight to City Council as the code enforcement board provides a recommendation. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:52–00:40:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:58–00:41:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not including the code enforcement board even in the time of the pandemic. And I believe the intent was that without the code enforcement board meeting for potentially months, you have a few cases out there that would preclude sales, transfer of properties. And so, you know, ‸ the decision was made to bring those to the City Council. We had one at the last meeting and then one tonight for City Council consideration.
But
in just,
I
mean, Anthony did reply to ‸ Ed Green to myself. Ed Green hasn't received it yet. But essentially, it just states that the code board's role is providing an advisory recommendation on the lien reduction request. It's a, that's a local city requirement, not a state requirement. And so, you know, he believes it's his opinion that the ‸ power is vested ultimately with the City Council. And so, it is, it is okay to essentially do, consider those applications straight to the City Council.
Thank you, sir. Thank you. Councilman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:25–00:42:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. Thank you.
I
have a couple of questions, one mainly for the Chief. On that special detail on Prospect and Pine
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:36–00:42:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is that the request of the store owner to be out there? Is it our, is it our doing ‸ to just go out there and do it, number one? And are we trespassing people from that area?
It was not at a request from the owners. Basically, we were doing the proactive
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:56–00:42:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ we've been doing a lot of stuff in that area based on the calls for service to that location and the activity that was occurring in that location. It seems to be getting much better. I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:11–00:43:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
response from the store that we would like to see. You know, they do, we've had a blanket trespass on file for a while. But the majority of the time when we do try to trespass people from there, most of the time, or even when we try to, more or less, when we try to make an arrest on it, we don't get much cooperation on the prosecution
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:31–00:43:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's pretty much what we're doing now. And actually, we've been working between that location and 1080
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:38–00:43:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which just seems to be another hot spot right now. But I think the prospect in Peachtree
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:47–00:43:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
starting to become better. We're actually working on a plan to be a more holistic plan for that area to hopefully be able to go in there with not only the police department, but with public works, with code enforcement, with community development, and try to work with the residents in that neighborhood, you know, and build relations with those residents, which I think we have a good relationship in there. And, you know, ‸ I'm actually working on the PowerPoint now to put together to present to the deputy mayor, because it is in District 1, and at that same time, bring in community development in some other areas to try to do some things in that neighborhood to make a difference. I talked to Matt
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:33–00:44:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ I was looking in there a week or so ago, there's actually three
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:39–00:44:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there. There's one on Fern, there's one on Grove, and there's one right at the ‸ entrance to the park that actually points towards Fern. And we were talking, if we could get those changed out, that would just alone, I mean, I know we talked before about trying to add some additional ones and stuff, and that definitely adding would always help, but if we could just get those changed out at this, you know, as soon as possible, and then I know we talked about working with public works also to try to go in there. If you've been down Fern, especially Fern,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:12–00:45:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's horrible. It's so overgrown in that area, and it creates such a dark area that I think if we could go through and clean that up, not only will it ‸ open it up to lighting, and if we can get the LED lighting in there, it'll open it up to that, but I think by cutting those trees back, it'll also open the area up and make it more easier for people to see in there. It'll make the neighbors be able to see more because looking at it, there's, you know, I mean, a lot of things that happen, happen at that store, don't even deal with people that live in that neighborhood. It's not the residents in that neighborhood. Now, there are a handful of houses in there that we've dealt with, but for the majority, it's people coming to that store to commit crimes. So we're working on that and actually working on some other stuff I was going to talk to, maybe the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:57–00:45:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about trying a little idea I have. ‸ But that's kind of it right now. It's a hot spot. Hopefully, like I said, I went back and looked. I mean, ‸ we did five years analysis. I
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:09–00:46:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
especially at
the
one location are, yeah, I mean, that's a light way to put it. I mean, they really are. ‸ It's encompassing a lot of our time. And hopefully, we can work, like I said, holistically through that whole process and make some changes in there, add the lighting, make the changes, hopefully get some things going and ‸ help the neighborhood. I mean, bring that, I mean, like I said, the majority of that neighborhood, I even had code enforcement go through and do a sweep. And I can tell you out of, I think it was 139 houses that they went through and looked at individually and listed out whether or not they had code violations or not. If there were current ones, I think out of that, I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:59–00:47:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they actually had code violations. The other ones had no violations at all. So, I mean, the neighborhood is really,
I
mean, for those of those who have been here for
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:47:10–00:47:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:13–00:47:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, it's come a long ways. There's a lot of good people in that neighborhood that have worked very, very hard to make changes. So, I think if we can do a couple of small things in there, we can go at it from a different approach instead of, because obviously we've been enforcing in there for 30 years. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:31–00:47:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, like I've said before, we're
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:36–00:47:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We need to come up with a better plan. So, that's kind of where we are now. Just kind of ‸ trying to get it stabilized. I think we're getting stabilized. And if we can go in there and make these changes, I think we'll come out the other side. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:48–00:47:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:52–00:47:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
move it to those areas. All right. So, that's kind of it.
Thank you.
Hey, while
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:47:59–00:47:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
up here, can I add one more address to you? So, what's happening at Ball Head Store ‸ when we do our either ride-throughs or park at the store, so now what's
happened,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:13–00:48:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
they're going to Dolphin Apartments. Yes. That's
also in the we're actually working on that. Okay. All right. So,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:20–00:48:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:25–00:48:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the store actually made a comment to some of
the
guys around
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:48:31–00:48:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
last week that we're putting them out of business.
Yeah.
Because
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:48:35–00:48:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We want them to go.
So,
we said, you know, either you get on board and cooperate and help us out, or unfortunately we'll do what we need to do to make a difference and make a change.
I appreciate you. Thank you. You're welcome.
Thank you, sir. All
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:48–00:48:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay. Well, three things. First of all, a week from Saturday, 9 to 12, is
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:00–00:49:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Provost Sibley from Eastern Florida State College, hopefully Dr. Fenton, Principal Wilson, Ben
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:15–00:49:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Shuri,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:22–00:49:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
remember her last name, Executive Director for the YMCA.
will
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:49:26–00:49:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
all be joining us. And we'll be looking at we'll
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:31–00:49:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is a budget season. I don't expect that a lot will happen this year. But just looking at the potential of that area and noting that some of the best prospects recently this was brought on by a Moody Analytics article I read, an analysis, looking at the cities ‸ most likely to come out of this COVID crisis or any economic crisis. And one
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:02–00:50:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the drivers. Just one. You know, we know we have the village. We have some manufacturing. But we also have a large campus area there that is, you know, I think what characterizes it best is that the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:24–00:50:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:28–00:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
collaboration and look in the long term. So I'm really excited about that. And I've had conversations with all those people. And I think they are too.
So
that will be a week from Saturday.
I
hope everybody's got that on their calendar. Okay. Okay. And I also wanted to ask that I know we successfully completed our audit a couple weeks ago. But I was hoping and I know that we looked at and was included in that some of our future liabilities. But I
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:13–00:51:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
analysis or some sort of report to
council
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:20–00:51:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that would include any future liabilities, any post-employment liabilities that might impact us or might impact our children. Because I've become, you know, aware during this crisis and all of the federal dollars that are being spent now that that really is money in our future that will impact them. So I'd just like to know I'd like the
council
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:48–00:51:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to have a better idea of what those liabilities are. And then the third thing is I was going to ask for yesterday we pulled up the temporary sign ordinance. I know that this is, of course, the political season. We want all our citizens to be engaged. And we have been we have an ordinance, a temporary sign ordinance. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:14–00:52:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that we
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:19–00:52:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that is picking up a package. But when I went over that, there seemed to be some discrepancies in the modifications versus the ordinance. And I don't want to have staff in the position of interpreting our ordinance or implementing it or getting involved in the politics. We know that that would not be good for us. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:47–00:52:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ahead and act on that, Matt make sure that we have that on our agenda soon. And that's
it.
Thank you, ma'am. Councilwoman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:03–00:53:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Was
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:09–00:53:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
Did it go it's on the calendar now? Oh, we're getting yeah. So we should send the invitations tomorrow. Yeah. Okay. All right. 9
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:53:23–00:53:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, and then we'll have a picnic lunch at the conservation park under the pavilion.
The
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:32–00:53:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cocoa Conservation. Have you been
out there and looked at the pavilion lately?
Oh yeah. Okay. Yeah.
I've
been out there several times. I've
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:42–00:53:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The last time I was out there, I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:44–00:53:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be eating. Oh, ‸ it looked great. Oh yeah. ‸ It looks great. That's
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:50–00:53:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just one thing. I received a phone call the other day from somebody who was looking to buy a home in the city of Cocoa and they were looking at a home that was completely renovated. New roof, new windows and everything. And they had done some checking and found that all of that work was done without any permits, that the city had no permits pulled on that residence at all. So I started looking at some of the other homes that are listed in the MLS that are totally renovated with new roofs. And I found three homes in my district that have been renovated to the tune of new roofs, new doors, new windows, new plumbing, and new electric with no permits pulled on any of them. I realized that our code enforcement officers are very busy and that it's not possible to spot that. So
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:45–00:54:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
either RV cops, some of the other volunteers, or maybe encourage some of our board members that are out amongst the community to, when they notice work going on, on these homes, to mention it to somebody at city hall. Because I can't expect my code enforcement officers, when there's three of them, to catch everything that happens in the city. But if I'm out buying a home that's been completely renovated, I don't know that I want to buy a house that hasn't been inspected and has had new electric and new plumbing put in it. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:23–00:55:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city of Cocoa, is to buy property that's been renovated without a permit or an inspection on the electric and the plumbing and the roof. So
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:32–00:55:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
pull a permit and you can get away with it. And that needs to stop right now. It's not even about the loss of revenue. It's about people buying homes that are not safe to live in. So I'm expecting staff to come up with a way that we can address this, some way that we can at least start to spot it. Even if we have to meet with the realtor community and encourage them to stop listing these homes until they check and make sure permits are pulled. That's it for me. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Thank you, ma'am. Mr.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:10–00:56:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
good
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
First of
all,
I'd like
to
thank ‸ police and fire for assisting a lot of our community events that have been going on. I know sometimes y'all get them at the last minute and sometimes you might want to say no, but y'all are doing an awesome job with doing the best that you can to please everybody. Definitely with a fire, fire did a baby shower. What was that last week? Last weekend, I think. I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:44–00:56:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ But just those simple things, it makes the community come together. Things that we think maybe are significant,
insignificant,
it bridges that gap. So I'd like to appreciate, you know, show my appreciation for police and fire for doing that. Thank you. I did a tour yesterday at the promenade. And despite
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:12–00:57:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think last year, it looks absolutely beautiful. ‸ I'm encouraged by it. I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:26–00:57:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But when we make decisions, when we make votes that are difficult, when that vote happens for us, hopefully, it's over. It's done. I
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:40–00:57:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
any type of way because I believe that they made whatever choice they made on their own merit, on their own research. So, but it was a very good meeting. I appreciate our project managers, Gary Palmer, for
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:01–00:58:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
successful. With
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:08–00:58:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We know that. So
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:14–00:58:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I think everyone in the city and everyone in the county or the state that visits the city of Cocoa is going to be happy with it. I have one thing with the, so we have an issue with apartment owners, house homeowners who rent properties. When they move the residents out, especially in District One, they have a tendency to dump all of their materials out on the side of the road. And it stays there at times for weeks and or
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:50–00:58:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
couches, TVs, dressers, desks all day long. ‸ And I don't think anybody who lives in a neighborhood should be looking at that kind of stuff for months at a time. So ‸ I talked to Matt about maybe thinking we can add something in our ordinance is about requiring dumpsters, at least the small dumpsters for when it's time to kick somebody out of your apartments or your home that we require them to get a dumpster so they can get the material out faster. I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:28–00:59:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but I know, I think it's something we need ‸ to definitely talk about because this had maybe it don't happen in your neighborhood. But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:36–00:59:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to see it, if I don't live across the street from it, well, I don't have a problem. But when I see it every single day, it becomes a problem. Okay.
you know
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:59:48–00:59:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So if we can have that conversation, I know we talked about you looking into it, maybe we see what other cities may do around the state. But I really, really would like to look at that because what they're doing a lot, especially ‸ one particular person, he's going,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:05–01:00:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bringing the trash from the other three to the one property. So that's ‸ because he knows that they're going to pick ‸ up at the, maybe at a house and not so much at a commercial property. So he's playing the game. So we need to do the best job we can. Code enforcement is on it. I think we have some code violations on this one particular person. But we need to let them know they can't do that in our city. Because ‸ it's nasty and ‸ our citizens don't deserve to see that all the time. ‸ So whatever we can do in it, maybe on the next meeting, next couple meetings, I don't know, but so
we can have that conversation.
One question for Public Works. I know Mr. Smith is not here, but maybe you could bring it later. Did we approve a reclaimed water line on Park Drive in the last six, seven years or so, five years? That you were, maybe that's just
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:05–01:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
like to have that answer. ‸ Park Drive.
Is there reclaimed water in that neighborhood?
No. I
don't think
there's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:18–01:01:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
reclaimed in that neighborhood.
Okay. Well, I had a resident text me today and said that they believe that it was approved a while back. And they, a few residents in that area wanted reclaimed water and they thought it was already approved already.
I'm
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:01:39–01:01:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right there because that's right in line with Carl Anderson Park. Right, right. And there isn't reclaimed there. I believe it's just, it ends on Fisk, just north, maybe a block or two from there. I
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:55–01:01:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
house in Cypress. I
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:57–01:01:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
How many, how many blocks are you north of Carl Anderson? I'm,
I'm
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:03–01:02:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
it's only, I think it's only a couple blocks from Carl Anderson. Yeah,
I think it goes up maybe to Highland.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah,
but there's, there's no reclaimed in Broadmoor at all.
No, yeah, you're right. You're right.
Okay. Well, that's all I had. I appreciate everybody coming. I'm
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:24–01:02:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I love, I love my staff. I like to see some other people sometimes too. So I appreciate you for coming, you know, because we're going through a difficult time.
I
think we all know that, but things are starting to, you know, look a little better. So I appreciate everybody for coming.
Thank you, sir. Is that it? Yes, sir. Okay. I'm
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:45–01:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this Friday, but I do ‸ want to give a big thank
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:53–01:02:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
County
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:57–01:03:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ and just all the volunteers. They did a phenomenal job out there because I was talking to the executive director and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:10–01:03:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they were so impressed with how you guys came together and how you put it together and how well it was coordinated. And,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:19–01:03:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Hungry Howie's delivering all the pieces, bringing all the pieces over for them. So it was a great event. A lot of the folks came together and that's what it's all about. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:34–01:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
man,
it
was just, you guys did just an excellent, brilliant job. And then also, once again, I want to thank Pebbles Catering Celebration, Tabernacle Church, the Real Church, and all the volunteers. They're still continuing to, continuing to feed our residents that are in need. Once again today, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, this week as well, they're from four to six, or until they run out of food. Pebbles Catering Company is actually doing all the cooking and then they ‸ have actually had some fresh produce as well there. So no questions asked, drive up or walk up and you can get hot meals. And they've been, and last time I talked to them, I think yesterday, and
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:25–01:04:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
meals, I believe. Wow. Which is crazy.
Mm-hmm.
And I don't know if those terms are right or not, but that's what I was told. So,
but
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:04:40–01:04:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
they've been serving some meals there. I mean, there's been a ton of them and a lot of folks coming out volunteering. So, I'm so grateful for what they're doing and how folks have stepped up ‸ and all the other organizations that have stepped up as well. And
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:53–01:05:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a former City Manager, Rick Hope, showed up. Also, Melissa Martin and a whole bunch of other folks showed up and
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:09–01:05:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
actually putting flags on grave sites. And we were so grateful because I guess maybe the Boy Scouts or someone that beat us to some of the sites. And so, it ‸ really worked out well. But it was ‸ just an honor to be able to do that and to go to the different cemeteries that we have in the city and do that. And ‸ then while I'm talking about that, we have the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:39–01:05:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the headstones have been pushed over. We've managed to prop some up, but some of those things are pretty heavy and we just couldn't do it. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:49–01:05:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, if we can maybe figure out how we can get in there and do some of that. And I know what's happening there with these folks going in there and pushing those over. But if we can somehow, ‸ maybe we can get some volunteers that we ‸ can come in there and help us with that and ‸ get that done. So, but the interim postmaster for, post
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:18–01:06:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're trying to get that up and going right now because they were shut down by their, I guess their ‸ main office. Because they weren't doing enough community events. And they're looking to revamp that ‸ facility now ‸ and how they do things. So, they're looking for a lot of community activities to kind of continue and ‸ keep that
pulse
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:43–01:06:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
up and running. And,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:44–01:06:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Monday.
And
also, if we can, there's a house on the east end of Stone Street there ‸ just west of US 1. And it's a historical house. It's been deemed a historical house. And we can't do anything with that house. And it's actually a nice home. And maybe we ought to, at the city, if we can maybe look into maybe partnering with someone. Because I know there's some state funding that we can get for that home. But to just see it, you know, maybe we can look at possibly even getting that from the owner. I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:07:31–01:07:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:33–01:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
It used to be a boarding house years
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:36–01:07:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
It's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:47–01:07:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes.
Okay.
There's a.
Yeah, talk about the two stories.
The
two stories, yes. And a detached garage.
Okay,
isn't
that
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:56–01:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, no, no. Not that building. It's farther down before you get to the little data in there.
I
was just down there the other day. I didn't notice it. I'll
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:08:06–01:08:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's a beautiful home and it's a historical site. We can't do anything code-wise. But the owners are down, I guess, down south of Miami somewhere. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:18–01:08:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with that. Or maybe getting with some organizations, see if they're interested in maybe doing something or
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:08:28–01:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
So. But also, you know, I know I've talked to Matt about the property, ‸ the trash on Bronson. And he let me know that they, I guess they don't have accounts there. But ‸ I know that some of the homeless that they've been feeding there are serving meals to there. They get them to go out and pile all those pond prines
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:08:54–01:08:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that's where those piles are from. And they've been there for over a month now. And if we have to, you know, go in there and maybe, and then get that stuff up and maybe talk to the property owners there, like the
hotel
there and the others. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:12–01:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But it's just, ‸ it's drying up and it's getting pretty nasty. And they keep taking it and putting it back in the piles. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:22–01:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. Public Works actually went out and identified probably more than 20 areas where this is occurring. And they're working with code enforcement. So the property owners at least understand the situation. Yeah. And it's likely that Public Works is going to pick this up because there's no commercial account for green waste. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:46–01:09:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it was the quarantine, folks had time on their hands. Yeah. But there's a lot of green waste throughout the city sitting around. So.
Yeah. Okay. And I mean, the waste management have been doing business with the city for a lot of years. And you would think that, you know, if you see that, you know, it's just, it wouldn't take that ‸ much to just do something like that.
I mean
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:10:11–01:10:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I wouldn't expect them to do it all over the city, but certain locations, I would expect them to do something like that. But anyway, and one last thing is I want to talk about was the, the, the property on Roselle Jones on the, I've had a number of developers approach me about that property. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:33–01:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:39–01:10:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I know we've had a couple of meetings
our
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:10:48–01:10:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
staff had a couple of meetings with the developer, but that was something that happened prior to some of us getting on the council. And I think that before we start entertaining, discussing anything with that property anymore, it should come back to the council or ‸ should come back to ‸ council because there was never a sound agreement. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:11–01:11:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's the way things are done. I mean, it just, we just don't start negotiating with someone on a piece of property that they've never signed an agreement with and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:27–01:11:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And, uh, it just needs to come back to the council so we can decide whether we want to continue negotiating with them because
there
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:38–01:11:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
hadn't been any negotiating. Or if we want to put it back out for RFP or whatever the case might be. That's a decision that should be made by the council. And I was a little disturbed by that because we've had situations like that before and that's the way it's handled. ‸ And, uh, I mean, it's, I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:01–01:12:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
mean, three years now and, uh, ‸ we just need to find out what's going on and what's happening. You
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:08–01:12:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I don't, I don't know if it's on, it's on the
corner.
‸ Yeah. The old mobile home park on the east side, on
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:18–01:12:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Right.
And it's just something that, uh, something that needs to happen. Okay. Okay. There's a lot of folks in the city. There's a lot of developers out there that's looking to do stuff. And I mean, and they're looking at our city because there's a lot of stuff happening in the city right now. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:37–01:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
got a piece of property sitting out there, no development agreement. And, and it's just sitting there, you know, and we're still having to maintain it. Keep the grass cut. Kind of like the hotel. Yeah. And for us to negotiate, they
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:53–01:12:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And they say, it's crazy.
Kind
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:12:59–01:13:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
That's coming back with the CRA at our next CRA meeting, but it's just something that needs to happen. We need to, that needs to come back and that needs to come back to us so we can have that discussion. Because
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:17–01:13:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, winning RFPs, and then just sitting on projects for years. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:26–01:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then we have other developers that are wanting to move on these properties. They got the money, they're ready to go. And,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:34–01:13:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
what's going to happen with this property? And I'm going to tell you, I've had, I've had three developers approach me about that property. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:44–01:13:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ I don't know what's happening with that property. You know, and they did a little research themselves and they say, well, there's an agreement, but my understanding is it's not signed. And I said, that's my understanding too, as well. And I said, then, you know, but that needs to come back so we can figure out what's happening. Why, why is it taking so long or what's going on?
If
there's some issues, we need to know what's going on and not just sit there and let it sit there like that. So,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:11–01:14:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, I just have a question.
What is, I do understand that council cannot be a part of every single situation that comes through city hall. But what is the process when we have a property such as that one, when, when negotiation or attempted negotiation, is there a process that we can be notified of that prior to? Is that, is that possible? Well, well,
what
should, what should happen is that once there's a development agreement and you've got a timeframe and that doesn't happen. Yeah. And then that doesn't happen in that timeframe, then it comes back to the council and we make a decision on what we want to do. Do we want to extend that? Do we want to redo the agreement or however, but it just don't, you just don't at the last hour say, okay, let's start negotiating. Yeah. When you had three years to do that and there was nothing and it just doesn't make any sense to me.
It's
my personal opinion.
But
anyway. Oh.
Well,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:15:17–01:15:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
get
[unclear audio ▶]
So yeah, related to that particular project, I would recommend that you allow staff to bring back all the information. City
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:15:25–01:15:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Man,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:34–01:15:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
CRA for review during the RFP process because it was a redevelopment activity taking place in the redevelopment area.
So does this need to come back to council or back to RDA?
The agreement, I believe, and Kristen's on the line, but I believe it's with the city of Cocoa.
Yeah,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:01–01:16:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It seemed like the CRA was involved in the original.
No, they were from my
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:11–01:16:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But, you know, I understand it's in the CRA within that area, but I just don't get it.
Yeah, I thought it was a CRA thing, so maybe, well, when you bring back the information, you'll include that and have the process happen? Like
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:29–01:16:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
And
that's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:33–01:16:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:38–01:16:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
consent agenda. What is the wishes of the council?
Second.
We got
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:47–01:16:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. We're
going
to move on to public hearing, and we have none. And so we're going to move on to council business. Item number eight is approve the current code enforcement lien for the residents located at 1803 North Indian River Drive to be reduced. Chief
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:16–01:17:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Yes, Mayor. I'm
asking
to approve the current code enforcement lien for the residents located at 1803 North Indian River Drive to be reduced to $2,000. There was a code inspection conducted. Everything is up to par. There are no current code violations. All the liens were checked on the property. There's no outstanding liens. ‸ And actually ‸ the request was for that amount, and that amount does cover the cost of investigation. So our recommendation to council is to reduce it to $2,000. Thank you, sir.
We're
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:53–01:17:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Question about it. Does
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:59–01:18:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
value was $880,000? ‸ I mean, and wasn't it? Because, you know, I know the woman. And I believe it was one of those deals where you sell back your mortgage.
Yeah, I think it had something to do with a reverse mortgage. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:25–01:18:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
if I remember correctly, it's actually the. Not a good deal.
No, no,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:33–01:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then that's the appraised, current appraised value. Yeah, so that's something
to be entered into cautiously.
Absolutely.
That was a lesson.
Absolutely. We
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:45–01:18:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yeah.
Right there off of this.
Well, you know, when the property owner passes away and ‸ the bank gets the property back on the reverse mortgage, and then it tends to sit there and nothing happens for months on end, which is basically what happened. ‸ The grass didn't get mowed and it became an eyesore right there.
That's probably one of the most beautiful properties.
It's one of
the most historic properties.
There
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:15–01:19:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:19–01:19:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think we had to fill that one in and the east and the road collapsed. And there's already a motion on, so I'll second the motion.
Okay, we got
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:31–01:19:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Okay, we're going to move on to item number one on the city business.
Thank you, Mayor. Yes, ma'am. The staff is requesting that you approve the city attorney to negotiate the terms and conditions of the purchase agreement for the property located at 915 School Street and proceed with the closing. As I brought to you last Council meeting, the surplus properties that were available, city-owned. This is the one property that ‸ actually has a unit on it. The other ones were all vacant, as you remember. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:12–01:20:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
started code enforcement action. It is in a six-plex along with 909 School Street and 915. We started code enforcement action on it. And then eventually in 2017, we foreclosed on the property. In the meantime, we've been working with Tim and Arlette Levenseller since 2016. They own two of the units in the six-plex. And it has been a constant issue for
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:43–01:20:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:52–01:21:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
has had a tenant in it ever since. The 915 School, once the city foreclosed on it, at the last minute, Fannie Mae filed a motion to vacate the city's final judgment. And so although the city received a certificate of sale, we spent the next two years trying to clear the title. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:22–01:21:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so now the city is looking to get this property fixed up and get the vagrants out and illegal activity, the rodent infestation. As you've seen in the agenda item, there's the pictures. All
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:43–01:21:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:21:46–01:21:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
It is a real mess. So staff wanted to bring you a couple of options. The
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:54–01:21:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Their
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:57–01:22:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They would have an agreement with the city requiring a certain time frame for them to be issued permits and to repair the property. And then ‸ we would proceed forward with the closing. They will provide a cash closing as well. Another developer, PPS Holdings LLC, has proposed $17,000
for
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:22:23–01:22:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
purchase price and has agreed to rehab
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:25–01:22:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And they need approximately 90 days to repair the property. They
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:32–01:22:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They typically purchase properties, rehab them, and then flip them. So a third alternative for the city would be to do a request for proposals and seek out other developers who may be interested in repairing the property. The issue with that is the property has been open and has that rodent
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:22:53–01:22:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and illegal activity. And with ‸ it being owned by the city, staff is requesting that we try to do something a little bit quicker than the RFP process. So we are requesting that council ask the city attorney to negotiate the terms and conditions of the purchase agreement with Tim and Arlette Levenseller for the property located at 915 School, the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:15–01:23:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have a longstanding history of owning rental properties with approximately almost 70 within Brevard County. They would enter into ‸ a co-enforcement lien reduction agreement similar to what the city had with them previously on 909 School. And then we would proceed with the closing. So the city has also, in community services, we've already paid off the existing mortgage that was on it. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:45–01:23:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So
thank you, ma'am. And of course, we're not in the, we ‸ don't want to be in the real estate business ourselves. But I got a
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:57–01:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if you'd like to come up and make a couple of comments. Well,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:06–01:24:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
didn't know how I was going to pronounce his last name and you've said it twice.
Let him say it. ‸ Yeah. ‸ If you could state your name and address, please, sir. We
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:18–01:24:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:20–01:24:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're
2260
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:22–01:24:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:24–01:24:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
both in the city area and the unincorporated area. We enjoy the business. We
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:35–01:24:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We do not flip properties. We live here and we
work here.
And
we
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:24:40–01:24:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Just to expand a little bit, all the facts Nancy already had down there. But we actually now own and manage 909, excuse me, 917 and 919, three of the six units. We'd love to acquire this unit and do the same. I think the 909 project went very well. We could easily do it in 60 days. I think that's about what we did on the 909. The problem is, I'll just expand a little bit, though. The
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:12–01:25:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's really affecting my other tenants. And we've lost several tenants because of that. Because of the rodents mostly. They get throughout the entire building. ‸ You can't contain them. So what I did on my own incentive, we treated them. We had a professional company come and treat all three of our properties, trying to stop it. And then we also treated the entire building to try to prevent the egress of the rodents coming in and out.
So
it was at our own expense. We were trying to protect our tenants, really.
It
was our main objective. So, and then the homeless and drug activity in the place. It's scary to our tenants. I've actually secured the door several times myself. And it just gets kicked in. ‸ They're in there. And we get calls. Our leg gets calls from the tenants. So
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:03–01:26:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
afraid. And the police, you
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:06–01:26:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They always respond and come out and check it out. So we really appreciate that. So,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:16–01:26:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
council and work on a purchase agreement. And on a side note, my small company was able to get
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:27–01:26:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
them employed. And we would immediately put our three full-time employees on that job as well as my contractors, you know, getting the permits and stuff required for the electrical plumbing,
et cetera.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:26:42–01:26:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
The place is stripped. It's a terrible mess.
It
is stripped. ‸ Thank you, sir. One little side note, if I can address what the deputy
mayor
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:26:54–01:26:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
brought up with the dumpster. ‸ Being a big property owner in the area, we love that idea. We are one that we do that. Literally every time we have a move out, we hire a small dumpster, load everything in
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:06–01:27:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
It's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:10–01:27:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Thank you, sir.
I
appreciate that.
Motion to approve.
Now
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:17–01:27:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Which option?
Recommendation.
Okay. We got a motion from Councilwoman Warner. And who made a
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:27:27–01:27:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:28–01:27:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously.
Thank you,
sir.
Ma'am?
Thank you.
I
appreciate that.
I got one question for Nancy. Why were the apartments sold separately? Is that just over time?
They
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:49–01:27:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yeah.
They
were townhomes at one time.
So
somebody came in and did just like what he did where they purchased one at a time? Or how did that
work? Yeah.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:00–01:28:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Yeah, they were individually owned, yeah.
Yeah,
it
started out as, I think, what, an apartment, then it turned into condos. And actually it was renovated in late 90s, early, late 90s, I believe. Both buildings were renovated and sold as condos.
I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:18–01:28:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Because the only thing, the problem with it, you have a really good landlord ‸ and then you have
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:26–01:28:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, yeah. That's when the problem comes in.
That's exactly what he's been dealing with since. Yeah. Have
you ever contacted
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:34–01:28:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah.
And
it's probably the one on the end. Because I think,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:28:44–01:28:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Okay,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:54–01:28:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I got you. Yeah. All right, appreciate you.
Thank you, sir. We
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:28:59–01:28:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that. And we can move on to item number two. Approval
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:03–01:29:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Rebecca.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:07–01:29:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The interim city manager requested that staff go back and review their budgets. As a result of COVID-19, we have seen some reduction in revenue and are forecasting further reduction in revenue for the remainder of this fiscal year. So
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:27–01:29:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in revenue. As late as this afternoon.
We
got estimates from the state that we should expect a 50% reduction in sales tax revenue and state revenue sharing. So staff went through. All directors looked at their budgets for their travel. And then in addition, some positions had not been filled yet. So they're noted in this agenda item. The
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:02–01:30:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the fiscal year. It's very important that he takes these kind of actions immediately when the city sees that there is something like this pandemic going on and reacts quickly to hopefully save jobs in the future. So
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:30:28–01:30:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
approval to recognize those costs
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 01:30:33–01:30:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reduction in revenue through budget amendment form number 20-065-A, T1 and T2, which reduced the budgets for different departments to achieve the cost savings and reduce the budget.
Thank
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:53–01:30:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
We get
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:57–01:30:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
Second
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:00–01:31:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye.
Aye.
Opposed? It passes unanimously. Okay,
item
number three, council approval to apply for a special category historic preservation grant through the Florida Department of State for $150,000 with a one-to-one match from the city for $150,000 for the historical replacement of ‸ exterior windows and doors
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:25–01:31:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, I'm sorry.
Thank you. Got
carried away. What are the wishes of the council?
Motion to approve.
You got a motion from Councilwoman Warner?
Second. I'd like to ask a question. We got a second from
Councilwoman Cox with ‸ discussion.
So $150,000, so this will be all of the openings. So
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:56–01:32:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is big in terms of,
so you've
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:04–01:32:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
already had the roof done, right? So then this would be about as storm safe as you can get a historical building.
Right. It's the exterior windows and doors. I'd have to get back to you on whether or not they're hurricane-proof.
Yeah.
Well, I would think for that amount, they probably are.
They probably
are. Yeah,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:28–01:32:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yeah,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:33–01:32:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I think we
know. Yeah, you have
to. Right.
Yeah, you can't do that. Okay. It changes the.
Okay.
Yeah. Yeah.
The price may reflect the fact that they're a special design because they are historic and not that they're resilient. Yeah.
Yeah. So what's kind of happened over the years is those windows were replaced from the original windows, and some of the design, you know, like these have the cross members changed locations. The doors have been changed. This grant would reinstall what it was back in the day. The roof was previously done, and then one of the big items, you know, to make the building more resilient was the actual ‸ floor. The joist space was open to the ground underneath. They actually sealed that off permanently, so you don't have that moisture intrusion into that wood floor and everything that you had before. So this would complete the building, essentially.
Thank you, sir. Is that it? Yeah. We have a first and a second. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? The
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:36–01:33:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, Mel. And then
we
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:39–01:33:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
got item number four.
Provide approval for the
city.
Yeah, provide
approval for
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:46–01:33:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Program funds for the Fisk and Broadmoor Acres Drainage and Roadway Improvement Project, the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:56–01:34:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
River Drive Slope Stabilization Project,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:04–01:34:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, ma'am.
Okay.
We've got
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:11–01:34:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
And I'll second that, but I have questions.
We've got
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:16–01:34:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:18–01:34:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
property on Indian River Drive that, you know, I had asked Brian, he was going to look into, was there any ‸ insurance on the property? Because,
I
mean, that's an expensive property, I'm sure, and it's their slope that we're stabilizing. It would seem like their insurance would kick in. Yeah,
so I know.
On Indian River Drive, it's right there. Indian
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:53–01:34:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
with that
particular project just for city council's information during, it was really Hurricane Matthew kind of what started it, but it's kind of at the high point of Indian River Drive there. It's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:09–01:35:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a very steep slope. You can see where the guardrail bends out, where the slope has been slowly being eaten away by the Indian River. And we had met with FEMA when that damage had occurred. The problem is at the back of the curb line, it becomes private property. The property owner that's on the other side of the street owns that property, so the city couldn't apply ‸ for any sort of FEMA reimbursement for any work that would be done there. And
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:40–01:35:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
then for them to seek it through FEMA, there was no impact for them at the time, so they didn't proceed to seek for those damages.
And,
okay. And see, Anthony had looked at that, and he had actually mentioned that it's more so the road. I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:36:03–01:36:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
a million dollars. Well, it's either that or lose the road the next time it happens. Yeah. Well,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:11–01:36:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know, the water lines, all that would go with
it.
Well, their
house is on the other side of the road, so I really don't know that they particularly care about, I mean. Well,
they won't be able to get in and out of their property. That would be the problem.
So they won't be the only ones either, though. So
it's just a million dollars to one of the ‸ most expensive properties in the city.
I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:37–01:36:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
saying. ‸ Yeah. It just seems like
‸ they should have some insurance that would kick in toward it, a part of it. Okay.
So,
can you second it?
Yeah, we got
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:53–01:36:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You second it. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Okay. We can move on to item number five.
Aye.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:06–01:37:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
our Indian River Lagoon Project cost share interlocal agreement between Brevard County, Florida and the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:19–01:37:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
sorrel
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:21–01:37:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
modified by the city attorney. Aye.
Thank you, ma'am. Those are wishes of the council.
Motion to approve. Second.
We
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:38–01:37:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously.
Thank
you, ma'am. Thank
you.
I didn't ever see six. Community
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:52–01:37:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. Council authorization to apply for a small matching historic preservation grant with the Florida Department of State Division of Historic Resources for culture engagement and educational resources for the historic Cocoa Junior High School Leon
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:05–01:38:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a resolution dedicating the total match for the project if the grant is awarded. So this ‸ is in line with the grant request that Public Works was asking for for the exterior of
the
building. This is more for the kiosks and videos. Having a consultant that would be able to provide the educational materials, walking brochures, things like that. So it's a $25,000 with the $25,000 match.
Thank you, ma'am. As
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:38:41–01:38:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Motion to approve.
Motion
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:43–01:38:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Second.
Second from Deputy Mayor Goins. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Item
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:53–01:38:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Approval
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:59–01:39:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cocoa, Florida for a multi-year line abatement service effective June 1st, 2020 for a period of three years with two optional year renewals. It's a long time coming. We
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:18–01:39:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
from
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:30–01:39:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify ‸ by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Thank you, sir.
It
passes unanimously. Thank you, sir.
Okay.
Item number eight.
You
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:47–01:39:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:50–01:39:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
by reason of single source vendor for five-year, multi-year term contract between the City of Cocoa and Tyler Technologies, Inc., providing a service agreement supporting the Brazo software subscription with PDA and printer for six users, along with software and hardware maintenance, approve
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:11–01:40:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
form, and authorize the City Manager to approve and sign the agreement. This
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:20–01:40:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
well as the associated software, and tie-in to the City's computer-aided dispatch software.
Thank you, sir. What is the wishes of the Council?
Motion
to approve.
We got
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:39–01:40:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Second
from Councilwoman Warner ‸ with ‸ discussion.
Yeah. So now we're, this is the one where we need to pay this annually?
That's correct. It's an annual subscription, yes.
So is it a lot more?
I
mean, are we locked into one vendor here, or?
This
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:00–01:41:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think it's been two years, maybe, since they first, this came about, and ‸ they've been working to implement that.
Right. We're basically locked in because this connects us with the county and ‸ other police departments, too, right?
That's, I think you're referring to the computer-aided dispatch and the records management system. That was on the consent portion. Oh, okay. But, yes. This ticket
writer
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:34–01:41:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
system ties into that software.
The current one we have
doesn't work real well with the software, with the records management software we have. So we end up doing a lot of extra data entry and stuff by going to Tyler Process, and they're all in one so it all interconnects. And then we don't have to pay extra to ‸ get the connection to the system. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:56–01:41:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you can actually interchange. So the six, one person can use them. You put a code in, another person can use them. So
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:42:06–01:42:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But it will be a lot more functional than what we have now.
Okay. And they're using them in a lot of places in the county. Yes. Yeah.
Yes. Yeah, we actually tested them out, and they worked phenomenal. We just took us a while to get the agreement put together.
Thank you, sir. We got a motion and a second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:31–01:42:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I want to go back. I know ‸ we approved in one of the block grants for the $50,000 for the parking lot for Provost Park. If we're going to spend ‸ money in the park, can we
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:49–01:42:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We need cameras. If we're going to try to build that park up and or any other
part you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:59–01:43:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
need to make sure that it's secure. I think we've been asking for cameras in these parks for now, almost going on two years. I
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:09–01:43:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but the Provost Park, I think we know, and Chief definitely is behind it about getting cameras. So we really, really need cameras in that park before we start upgrading the park. That's just my opinion.
Just to give you an update, we actually demoed two different camera software providers. The reason why ‸ you can't just go and buy, you could go and buy a residential type system, but you really need to look at ‸ more of an enterprise grade system because if you want to integrate other
parts,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:52–01:43:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
maybe other areas within the city or the housing authority, you need to make sure that all the software will tie in, use similar storage capacity. And so we've met with two different vendors. We're getting the cost right now. ‸ Okay. Appreciate it.
Thank
you, sir.
Yeah, I just wanted to draw light to the informational item about Walmart and ask you because I didn't find in there, I understand that, you know, there have been these big capital investments made there and money coming in. I'm trying to figure out how much of that is actually staying in Cocoa. How many employees did they actually hire in Cocoa, from Cocoa?
For me.
For Walmart.
For
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:44–01:44:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
part of the agreement ‸ when they first came to the city was that they would offer positions to Cocoa residents first. And
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:57–01:45:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city residents.
They
had job fairs within the city. I
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:08–01:45:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
after opening was ‸ around 10 from the actual city limits. Okay. Of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:19–01:45:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
But they didn't have any numbers to back it up. I
mean,
they didn't. I would really like to see that. And it's not a part of the report. This
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:34–01:45:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
abatement. But that's not a part of the report?
No. Okay.
I don't know. How do we keep money in Cocoa? I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:45:45–01:45:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
still hiring. They're trying to expand their employment. ‸ I went on a tour there, and
I'm telling you, it was amazing that there was a lot of residents of Cocoa that they had hired. And because of some of the temperatures in there, even though they have the jackets and stuff, they decided,
oh,
I just don't want to do this. And, yeah, I had a long discussion with them about that. If you're
born and raised in Cocoa, it's kind of difficult to put in there, yeah.
And then another deal was that, and then once again, it was the drug test.
They
had a stack of applications there, but they're still hiring. I mean, they're still hiring.
They're still hiring
and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:46:27–01:46:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
time I talked to them,
[unclear audio ▶]
had over 80 openings. Yeah. They just can't fill. I'm
avoiding them. I mean, a motion to adjourn.
Okay. We
had
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:46:35–01:46:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:35–01:46:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Don't we still
have agenda items? Second.
Second
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:41–01:46:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. That's it.
Thank you.