civic record · cocoa, florida
Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Board Meeting

Date
2025-10-16
Status
Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #78
Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-11-20, pp. 10–12; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-11-20).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (2057_11_20_2025_Code_Board_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 10–12). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Lloyd Roberts, Josue Otero, Sharri Scott, Dik Muller, George Brown, Thomas Zimmerman
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Listed absent: Gloria Weatherspoon, Jody Hatcher
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Micheal Mack (Code Enforcement Officer), Jason Brimm (Code Enforcement Officer), Nathan Propst (Code Enforcement Officer), Kristen Eick (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary), Thomas Wilkinson (Code Enforcement Manager)

Adopted actions (4)

  • to approve to the agenda of October 16, 2025 (moved by Brown, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–12
  • to approve to the minutes of September 18, 2025 (moved by Otero, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–12
  • to approve Staff’s recommendations and find the Property Owner in violation and a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) per day (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–12
  • to approve Staff’s recommendations and find the Property Owner in violation a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) per day (moved by Scott, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–12

Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)

  • $250.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): decided in an adopted motion. “approve Staff’s recommendations and find the Property Owner in violation and a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) per day” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-11-20 agenda packet (2057_11_20_2025_Co; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-11-20, pp. 10–12; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-11-20))
  • $250.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): decided in an adopted motion. “approve Staff’s recommendations and find the Property Owner in violation a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) per day” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-11-20 agenda packet (2057_11_20_2025_Co; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-11-20, pp. 10–12; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-11-20))

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-11-20, pp. 10–12; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-11-20).

Source: 2057_11_20_2025_Code_Board_Agenda_Packet.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2025-11-20 meeting, packet pp. 10–12; lines 296–459 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes 
Meeting Minutes 
October 16, 2025 
 
 
A meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Cocoa was held on Thursday, October 16, 2025, 
in the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed. 
 
OPENING MATTERS: 
 
Chairman Roberts called the meeting to order at 5:59 P.M. The Board Secretary called the roll. 
 
MEMBERS PRESENT: 
 
Lloyd Roberts                                 Chairman  
Josue Otero Vice Chairman 
Sharri Scott Board Member  
Dik Muller Board Member 
George Brown Jr. Board Member 
Thomas Zimmerman 2nd Alternate  
 
   
MEMBERS ABSENT: 
 
Gloria Weatherspoon Board Member - excused 
Jody Hatcher 1rst Alternate - excused 
  
OTHERS PRESENT: 
 
Micheal Mack Code Enforcement Officer 
Jason Brimm Code Enforcement Officer 
Nathan Propst Code Enforcement Officer 
Kristen Eick Board Attorney  
Darla Crowl Recording Secretary  
Thomas Wilkinson Code Enforcement Manager 
 Officer Alan Fuller Police Officer    
    
The Board Secretary swore in all Staff members giving testimony. 
 
 
 
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES: 
1. Approval of Agenda: October 16, 2025 
Chairman Roberts noted changes to the agenda (Items complied, tabled and withdrawn) 
Motion by Mr. Brown, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to approve to the agenda of October 16, 2025.  Vote 
on the motion carried unanimously.  
 
2. Approval of Meeting Minutes: September 18, 2025. 
 
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Mr. Brown, to approve to the minutes of September 18, 2025.  
Vote on the motion carried unanimously.  
 
3.   Submit to the record of all documents & notices for all cases on the Agenda.  
 
 


Code Enforcement Board 
Agenda 
October 16, 2025  
Page 2 
 
 
CASES: 
1.  CE-25-350 – 718 Thomas Ave      
Tabled.  
 
2.  CE-25-529 – Tax # 2461918 
 
Code Enforcement Officer Jason Brimm provided an overview of the Case history and presented exhibits 
for the Board’s review. Code Enforcement Officer Brimm testified that the Property Owner was in violation 
of City Code Appendix A, Zoning, Art. XI, Schedule of District Regulations. Sec. 12, District and 
intent, CG, General Commercial District. (D) Prohibited Uses and Structures (2) of the City Code.   
 
Code Enforcement Officer Brimm requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be 
given until November 19, 2025 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of up to two hundred 
and fifty dollars ($250.00) City Code Appendix A, Zoning, Art. XI, Schedule of District Regulations. 
Sec. 12, District and intent, CG, General Commercial District. (D) Prohibited Uses and Structures 
(2) per day until found in compliance.   
 
Chairman Roberts asked Officer Brimm if the vehicle seemed operable?  Officer Brimm stated that he did 
not believe it was.  The property owner told Officer Brimm that the vehicle would be removed by tonight or 
Friday. Attorney Eick wanted to add for the record that the citation subsection General Commercial 
District.(D) Prohibited Uses, she just wanted to add that for the Board and for the record that Section 12 
(a), describes the principal uses that are aloud in CG General Commercial states that all the principal 
uses and structures aloud in professional service district and the neighborhood commercial district aloud 
except residential uses and child care centers, day nurseries or kindergarten. The section itself does 
indicate that residential uses are not permitted in the CG zoning district just wanted to add for the record.  
Chairman Roberts had questions of how this would be different from the case last month in downtown 
Cocoa Village which he had an RV.  Manager Wilkinson explained that downtown Cocoa Village area has 
the same zoning class but more stringent codes that follow up with the zoning classification in the CG 
zoning and the Cocoa Village area.  So, it may be the same violation, but downtown Cocoa Village area 
has more stringent code than this case does.  More discussion amongst the Board members, attorney 
Eick and staff. 
 
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve Staff’s recommendations and find the 
Property Owner in violation and a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) per day. Vote on the 
motion carried (5) Aye (1) Nay Mr. Brown.  Mr. Brown wanted to amend the motion to fifty dollars ($50.00) 
but there was not a second.  
 
3.  CE-25-604– 1201 Japonica Ln 
 
Code Enforcement Officer Jason Brimm provided an overview of the Case history and presented exhibits 
for the Board’s review. Code Enforcement Officer Brimm testified that the Property Owner was in violation 
of City Code Appendix A-Zoning, Art. XIIl-Supplemental District Regulations. Sec. 30-Temporary 
Storage Units. (a)-Residential Zoning District. (3) of the City Code.   
 
Code Enforcement Officer Brimm requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be 
given until November 19, 2025 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of up to two hundred 
and fifty dollars ($250.00) City Code Appendix A-Zoning, Art. XIIl-Supplemental District 
Regulations. Sec. 30-Temporary Storage Units. (a)-Residential Zoning District. (3) - The maximum 
time a temporary storage unit is permitted to remain on the lot is thirty (30) consecutive days with 
a maximum of two (2) placements permitted per year; per day until found in compliance.   


Code Enforcement Board 
Agenda 
October 16, 2025  
Page 3 
 
 
Discussion amongst the Board members and staff. 
 
Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Chairman Roberts, to approve Staff’s recommendations and find the 
Property Owner in violation a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) per day.  Vote on the motion 
carried (5) Aye (1) Nay Mr. Brown 
 
4.  CE-25-617 – 1205 Vassar Ln.  
 
Complied.  
 
5.  CE-25-641 – 937 Dixon Blvd.  
 
Complied.  
 
NON-COMPLIANCE: 
None 
 
OTHER BUSINESS: 
 
None 
 
ABATEMENT APPEALS:   
 
None 
 
Manager Announcements:  
 
None 
 
NEXT MEETING: 
 
The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on November 20, 2025. 
 
ADJOURNMENT: 
 
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 6:27 PM. 
 
Approved on this ______ day of ___________________, 2025. 
 
______________________________ 
Lloyd Roberts, Chairman 
 
______________________________ 
Darla Crowl, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

  • 1. Call to Order
  • 2. Invocation
  • 3. Pledge of Allegiance
  • 4. Roll Call
  • 5. Swearing in Officers

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

  • 1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of October 16, 2025.
  • 2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of September 18, 2025.
  • 3. Submittal of Document Packet

III. Cases

  • 1. CE25-350 / 718 Thomas Ave., Cocoa, FL 32922 / Coshed LLC property owner of 718 Thomas Ave., Cocoa, FL 32922, in violation of the following City Codes. Chapter 12 – Local Business Taxes, Sec. 12-15 Penalty for doing business without a local business tax receipt. Chapter 6 – Buildings, Construction and Property Regulations, Sec. 6-901 - Accumulation (1)
  • 2. CE25-529 / Tax # 2461918 / Keith Roberson property owner of Tax # 2461918, in violation of the following City Code. Appendix A, Zoning, Art. XI, Schedule of District Regulations. Sec. 12, District and intent, CG, General Commercial District. (D) Prohibited Uses and Structures (2) All uses not specifically or provisionally permitted herein, any use not in keeping with the commercial character of the district.
  • 3. CE25-604 / 1201 Japonica Ln. Cocoa, FL 32922 / Richard Willoughby property owner of 1201 Japonica Ln., in violation of the following City Code. Appendix A – Zoning, Art. XIII – Supplemental District Regulations. Sec. 30 – Temporary Storage Units. (a) – Residential Zoning District. (3) - The maximum time a temporary storage unit is permitted to remain on the lot is thirty (30) consecutive days with a maximum of two (2) placements permitted per year; — 00:16:01
  • 4. CE25-617 / 1205 Vassar Ln. Cocoa, FL 32922 / MG Prime Investment LLC property owner of 1205 Vassar Ln., in violation of the following City Code. Chapter 6, Building, Construction and Property Regulations., Art. III, Property Maintenance Standards., Sec. 6-902 Discarding junk, abandoned or inoperable motor vehicles. (2) The absence of a license plate for the current year and/or the absence of a current motor vehicle registration shall be prima facie evidence that such vehicle is inoperable and/or abandoned, junked or discarded. The presence of a current license plate or registration shall not in and of themselves exempt any motor vehicle from becoming in violation of this section.
  • 5. CE25-641 / 937 Dixon Blvd. Cocoa, FL 32922 / BUCAMIR LEGACY HOLDING COMPANY LLC property owner of 937 Dixon Blvd., in violation of the following City Code. Chapter 6, Building, Construction and Property Regulations., Art III, Property Maintenance Standards, Sec. 6-901 Accumulation. All owners, agents, custodians, lessees and occupants of real property within the city shall, in accordance with the notice set forth in this article, cut and keep cut to a height of not exceeding twelve (12) inches all weeds, grass or underbrush on any property owned, controlled or occupied by them within the city and shall remove any trash, debris, refuses, filth, junked appliances or other noxious matter …

IV. Non-Compliance

V. Other Business

VI. Abatement Appeals

VII. Manager Announcements

VIII. Next Meeting Date: The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on November 20, 2025.

IX. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:04] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:04–00:01:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:00:35] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:00:36] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[00:00:46] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:01:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:02] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:02] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:01:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3
All right. Positive this time. We're good. Usually when I hit this thing again, we're leaving.
[00:01:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:11–00:01:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:14] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]
[00:01:39] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:01:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:40] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:40] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
I pledge
[00:01:40] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible,
[00:01:50] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:50–00:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:01:59] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:02:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:03] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:04] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:05] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:06] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:06] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[00:02:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:12] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:14] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:17] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:19] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
So
[00:02:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3
we have our swearing in of our
[00:02:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:21–00:02:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:28–00:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:29] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:02:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:31–00:02:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:02:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[00:02:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
before we approve that, I have a couple of amendments.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:47–00:02:50 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:02:51] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:51–00:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:51] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
one has been tabled. Item number four has been complied.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:51–00:02:58 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:02:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:58–00:02:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:59] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
five has complied.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:59–00:03:00 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:03:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:03–00:03:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3
motion to approve.
[00:03:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2
a motion we approve the agenda, please. Second.
[00:03:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor, say aye aye. Aye. Those opposed, motion passed unanimously. All right.
[00:03:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:17–00:03:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Anyone have any amendments? Okay.
[00:03:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:31–00:03:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
I'll
[00:03:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:32–00:03:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:32] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:03:35] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:03:36] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Motion on the floor with the second. All in favor, say aye.
[00:03:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5
Aye. aye
[00:03:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Those opposed, motion passed unanimously. ‸ right. On to our cases. oh
[00:03:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:50–00:03:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
uh Docket
[00:03:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:56–00:04:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
noted. I was such an arrest. ‸ like, that
[00:04:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:06–00:04:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:19] ▶ Play No voice detected
uh
[00:04:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
all
[00:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 7
right. Good evening. As you stated, this is
[00:04:25] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:25–00:04:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:32] ▶ Play Speaker 7
There is no address specifically for it. uh Owned by Keith Robertson. uh
[00:04:40] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
‸ property
[00:04:40] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
owner did allow for the following violations under Appendix A zoning. Article 11, Scheduled District regulation Regulations, Section 12, highlighted it for the specific violation. Any use not keeping with the commercial character of the district. Here's the
[00:05:00] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
aerial
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:00–00:05:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:05:00] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
view of the parcel. You can see it's on the US one as you're
[00:05:06] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
driving towards
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:06–00:05:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:05:06] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:06–00:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
John on
[00:05:07] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:05:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7
left. Pretty small. On the left is the printout from the Brevard property appraiser. On the right is the tax deed. Left is the tax accounts, which is up to date pending. Appears to be one payment, but it's otherwise up to date. On the right was the amended notice ‸ violation that I sent
[00:05:31] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:31–00:05:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7
is the affidavit of posting. Middle is the return receipt when it was received back to me and
[00:05:46] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:46–00:05:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:53] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Far left is the photo of the property being posted, the RV in the back, which is the issue for the violation. It's been parked there for quite some time. Middle is the affidavit of posting for the notice of hearing from 10-3-2025. And far right is the certified mail receipt when it was mailed out.
[00:06:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:16–00:06:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:19] ▶ Play Speaker 7
after ‸ citizen called in a complaint regarding the RV. The lot did not have a code history. I went to the lot, observed the RV parked there, spoke with the two individuals that was living there and still living there. Spoke with them at length. They were staying there and are staying there. The property owner was trying to help them out because they're at the moment without a home. I let them know about resources from 211 and other resources that uh were in the area, housing for homeless and other options that they might have had. Pretty much have extended this to about where we're at now, 90 days. I've spoken with the property owner at length regarding it. He's understanding that he's tried to help out them, but he's on the same page as he's understanding that they have to move the RV. And as of this evening,
[00:07:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:16–00:07:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:17] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Smith, who's one of the individuals living in ‸ RV, she said it would be gone this evening. And if not tomorrow, based on the property owner coming out to give them gas and jump the RV to get it off the property. This is just the notes continued. I have it on there from today when I went out and
[00:07:37] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
inspected
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:37–00:07:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:07:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7
it, which was the
[00:07:39] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:39–00:07:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:43] ▶ Play Speaker 7
short time later today and let me know that it would be gone this evening, if not tomorrow morning. That's the photo from today when I went out.
[00:07:55] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:55–00:08:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:00] ▶ Play Speaker 7
recommends the Code Board find the property in violation issue in order requiring the violations to be corrected and assist daily
[00:08:06] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:06–00:08:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:14] ▶ Play Speaker 7
2025 at 4 pm
[00:08:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:16–00:08:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[00:08:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3
have gas. Did they run out of gas driving there, or um does it seem operable?
[00:08:30] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:30–00:08:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7
it is. It's just a matter of the battery and gas. And the property owner assured me if that didn't work that it would still be removed from the property.
[00:08:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Okay. Any questions? Hey, with that, I'll take a motion.
[00:08:54] ▶ Play Speaker 8
Mr. Chair.
[00:08:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, ma'am.
[00:08:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
i Apologize. um I just wanted to add for the record, um the citation here is um for the
[00:09:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:04–00:09:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
which is prohibited uses. I just wanted to add for the board and for the record that section 12A, which describes the principal uses that are allowed in c in
[00:09:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:20–00:09:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
that um all the principal uses and structures allowed in professional service district and the neighborhood commercial district are allowed, except residential uses and child care centers, day nurseries, or kindergarten. So ‸ the section itself does indicate that residential uses are not prohibited permitted in um the CG zoning district. And I just wanted to add that for the record. um
[00:09:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Just for my clarification, um you say CG zoning different district. um Would that be, how would that be different? and i I get what you're saying, but I'm just trying to wrap my hand head around. How's that different from the case we had last month that was in downtown where he had the RV? and I'm just trying to just get a familiarity to what the difference would be. I know we they had the same thing because he had a trailer there before and then we had the other uh situation for the polls. but But again, um would that be the same? I know the area is a little different, but is that the same because both of them are commercial?
[00:10:40] ▶ Play Speaker 8
Yeah. um oh Maybe Mr. Wilkinson can answer.
[00:10:45] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Mr. Chair, to answer your question, the one from last month, previous case, it's got more, the Cocoa Village area, it's got the same zoning class, but it's also got more stringent codes that follow up with the zoning classification
[00:11:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:00–00:11:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:11:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So it may be the same violation, it's just that
[00:11:06] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:06–00:11:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
has
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:08–00:11:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
got a more stringent code than
[00:11:10] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:10–00:11:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:11:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
to
[00:11:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:11:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
because it sounded like the way it's in violation, it sounded a bit different than that one in which it's kind of the same. And ‸ that's the only reason I
[00:11:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
asked. It's the kind of same kind of violation, yes, sir, but it's more the code for Cocoa Village area is a more stringent code than the one for the regular commercial general zoning. Do
[00:11:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8
you recall if it was general commercial though last month?
[00:11:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
uh No, I do not ‸ I don't see,
[00:11:39] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I i suspect that it ‸ right, I believe it is a different zoning district from last month. This one is in the general commercial zoning district. And again, I was just trying to provide for the record that there is a section that describes ‸ residential uses are not uh permitted in that uh
[00:11:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3
‸ general
[00:11:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
commercial. Thank
[00:12:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you very much. And I appreciate it. um No more questions. uh Take a motion.
[00:12:08] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:08–00:12:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:12:11] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
[00:12:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5
and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find respondent in this case in violation of the city code as charged. And that's the appendix A zoning article 11 schedule of district regulation section 12. General commercial district uh general
[00:12:49] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
commercial district
[00:12:49] ▶ Play Speaker 5
prohibited uses and structures. And that respondents shall correct the violation no later than. 4 pm I'm looking for November 19th, 2025. In the event the respondent does not comply with this date, after considering the factor in section 162.09 florida statutes a
[00:13:20] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:20–00:13:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5
per violation will be imposed for each day. The violation continues past the aforetested date.
[00:13:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:34–00:13:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5
to verify compliance with this
[00:13:40] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:13:40–00:13:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:43] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
[00:13:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3
I'm sorry, but I absolutely object to that because it should be. It's a camper that's operable.
[00:14:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:00–00:14:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:14:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3
So I'm just going to say, I don't think we should entertain that because we get ‸ through this and
[00:14:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:07–00:14:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:14:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3
should roll off tomorrow.
[00:14:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:09–00:14:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:11–00:14:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3
you know, within a day.
[00:14:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2
So
[00:14:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:19–00:14:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8
Right.
[00:14:28] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So this is a second with an amendment. And it's up to this
[00:14:34] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:34–00:14:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8
So that would not be an appropriate motion. So I think what we would need to do, so there's a motion on the floor. And if there's no second, then that one would die. Okay, so that's seconded. And then Mr. Brown, if you would like to make a motion now to ‸ amend, you may do that.
[00:15:00] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Amend the amount of money? Yes. I would like to see the amount of money at $50 a day, which is plenty of fine for somebody to get the whole thing going. It's not always easy for some people.
[00:15:18] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:18–00:15:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
money. $50 a day adds up quick. But that's my motion, please. Is it up to the person making the motion?
[00:15:36] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:36–00:15:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:15:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8
Now someone would need to second your motion to amend.
[00:15:44] ▶ Play Speaker 2
Okay, we'll forget that.
[00:15:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3
All right. We'll go back to the original motion.
[00:15:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:50–00:15:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:52–00:15:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:53] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:53–00:16:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:15:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:16:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Motion passes by majority. All right.
[00:16:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:09–00:16:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:14] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:16:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Property owner is a Richard Willoughby. ‸ Address 1201 Japonica Lane. Property owner did allow for the following violation. Appendix A, zoning. Article 13, supplemental district regulations. Violation relates to the maximum time a temporary storage unit is permitted to remain on the lot is 30 consecutive days with a maximum of two placements permitted per year. Here's the aerial view of the property. August 14th, this is the
[00:16:52] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:52–00:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:53] ▶ Play Speaker 7
question at the property off to the right of it.
[00:16:58] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:58–00:17:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:03] ▶ Play Speaker 7
On the left,
[00:17:03] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:03–00:17:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:09] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Left is the tax rolls, which I believe he is behind, if my vision serves me. On the right is the amended notice violation that gave a compliance date of October 2nd that needed to be done. Far left is the affidavit of posting, which was mailed, same date, September 25th.
[00:17:34] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:34–00:17:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7
certified mail.
[00:17:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:38–00:17:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:45] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Upper left will be the posting for the
[00:17:48] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:48–00:17:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:51] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Middle is the affidavit of posting for the same, 10-3-2025. And far right is the certified mail receipt for the notice of hearing that was mailed out. I opened this case on August 14th after noticing an ongoing issue with temporary storage containers. The property had a history with code enforcement. The notice violation was sent out November 16th.
[00:18:17] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:17–00:18:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
The container
[00:18:19] ▶ Play Speaker 7
was still there. September 25th, I generated a mailed and amended notice to make a more specific code for the subsection to be more ‸ in line with where the violation was.
[00:18:34] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:34–00:18:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:37] ▶ Play Speaker 7
and it was mailed via certified mail. October 15th, I was forwarded an email from the property owner's niece, who said the storage
[00:18:46] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
project
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:46–00:18:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:18:46] ▶ Play Speaker 7
was scheduled to be picked up Saturday, October 19th. Deborah, the niece, also inquired as to what the code case was in regards to. I replied and let her know. And today I inspected the property and it was still found to be in violation. Photo was taken and uploaded. The property owner did show up and
[00:19:03] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:03–00:19:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7
him. I let him know that I was aware of the pod being picked up on the 16th after his niece had let me know. I told him he's more than welcome to stay and encouraged to stay for the meeting, but it was not a requirement. I let him know that I will follow up with him with whatever the findings are. This is the property today. The pod is still there on the storage containers. And there's no running fine or any fixed liens that I recall.
[00:19:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So it wouldn't be a repeat on the address? ‸ It would just have to be a repeat on the same violation? Yes, sir. Okay. All right. Just one
[00:19:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:47–00:19:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Okay. And they said when ‸ it's supposed to be picked up?
[00:19:53] ▶ Play Speaker 7
The property owner, he told me Saturday morning sometime. He's ‸ the owner of the property and his niece apparently rented the pod. So she emailed our case coordinator or called and then I was notified and she let me know via the email that it would be picked up Saturday.
[00:20:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Okay.
[00:20:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:13–00:20:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Yes, sir.
[00:20:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Okay. Any questions?
[00:20:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2
I have a question. On these fines, as stated by the code officer, the fine is up to, up to, the city suggests maybe, I don't know what they suggest, but the fine is up to, depending on how much of a critical problem it is.
[00:20:47] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:47–00:20:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:53] ▶ Play Speaker 2
down. But every case, like this thing here is not a big problem. It's unsightly. It's unsightly.
[00:21:03] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
It's
[00:21:03] ▶ Play Speaker 2
going to draw stuff underneath it where it's sitting. But put a fine on it.
[00:21:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:08–00:21:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:08] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:21:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:21:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2
It's
[00:21:11] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
not
[00:21:11] ▶ Play Speaker 2
$250.
[00:21:12] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:12–00:21:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:21:13] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:21:15] ▶ Play Speaker 2
When they get that notice, $250.
[00:21:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:19–00:21:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:21:21] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized
give it to them within reason. Even at $50, it's $200 a week. If it's so much a day, $50 a day, that adds up. I wouldn't want to have to contend with that. I'd get it paid off. But that's just my old way of thinking.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:21:21–00:21:44 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:21:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
Thank you.
[00:21:45] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:45–00:21:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Now take a motion.
[00:21:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here; part of a long flagged stretch · 00:21:52–00:23:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:55] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
[00:22:07] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[00:22:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:44 ▶]
[00:22:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17 ▶]
[00:23:13] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:13–00:23:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:17] ▶ Play Speaker 2
don't I'm lost all right
[00:23:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
there's no other new business you didn't ask a question mr. Brown you made a statement
[00:23:32] ▶ Play Speaker 2
please what
[00:23:34] ▶ Play Speaker 3
‸ okay
[00:23:36] ▶ Play Speaker 2
do I can I do that
[00:23:38] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:38–00:23:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:39] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:23:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[00:23:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
question I got you so what I just said was if you feel like we they
[00:23:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:23:50–00:23:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:51] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it in at the max up to, so when you want to make, if you say you don't feel like it should be you make the first motion to say that's what I said
[00:24:02] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
yeah
[00:24:03] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:03–00:24:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yes
[00:24:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3
sir and that's what I'm saying
[00:24:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:07–00:24:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3
to us having to try and go back to do something else you understand what I'm saying
[00:24:15] ▶ Play Speaker 2
in other words don't try and change the motion
[00:24:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3
it's a lot easier if you went ahead and set the motion
[00:24:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2
if I say the motion
[00:24:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3
yes sir
[00:24:25] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
I'll tell you one thing right now
[00:24:28] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:28–00:24:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
‸ and I'd have to have this gentleman read you know the actual motion
[00:24:37] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:37–00:24:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:38] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
because I can't read that well so
[00:24:41] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:41–00:24:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:42] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
I'm not doing because I can't do it properly
[00:24:46] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:46–00:24:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:24:49] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:24:50] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:50–00:24:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes sir. so But
[00:24:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2
it's hard for me to make a motion without this gentleman
[00:25:01] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized
helping
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:01–00:25:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:25:02] ▶ Play Speaker 2
me which he said he would
[00:25:03] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:03–00:25:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3
yes sir
[00:25:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:08–00:25:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T13:49:57 · 2,209 ordinary words, 986 in suspect passages, 80 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.