Sorry about that.
I will need all of you to speak into your microphones today because with the attorney on the phone, she won't be able to hear unless you're on the microphone talking.
Hello. Oh.
‸ Just
testing it
out. Yep, we can hear you. All right.
We'll call this meeting to order. Code
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:54–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Start with our pledge of allegiance.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:06–00:01:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:06–00:01:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
nation,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:13–00:01:19 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:18–00:01:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Lord, thank you for allowing us to be here today. Lord, just continue to guide us and bless us and give us the strength to do what's best in the best will of the city of Cocoa.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:29–00:01:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:41–00:01:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Here. Mr. Mueller? Here. miss Weatherspoon? Here. miss Hatcher? Here. And Mr. Zimmerman?
‸ Here.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:56–00:02:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
whole truth, and nothing about the truth, so help God. ‸ I
do.
All right. So we'll have the approval of the meeting for tonight. There are some changes.
welcome
Are we good? Yeah,
we're good.
All right. All right. For item number one, it has been tabled.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:37–00:02:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Item number four is tabled. Item number six has complied item number seven has complied item number eight has complied
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:10–00:03:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all right
by my account we have six i'm sorry four remaining
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:32–00:03:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
with
that being said i'll take a motion to approve
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:38–00:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
a motion on the floor with the second all in favor say aye
aye aye
though the polls motion passed unanimously right as far as our last meeting from October 16th,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:58–00:04:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
‸ motion on ‸ floor with the second. All in favor say aye.
Aye. Those
opposed? Motion passed unanimously. Right. We'll have the submittal of our document packet.
Mr. Chair, I would like to submit the PowerPoint presentation and package of documents for each case into the record.
Thank you, sir. So noted. All right. And before we start, is there some kind of ordinance that we have to have all this?
what is that's the backup for each of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:43–00:04:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:48–00:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so what is the process to
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:57–00:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
and streamlining it to all to y'all, we could do that. Instead of printing it up and dropping it off to y'all, yes.
Yes, ‸ because I think, just think this is the overkill.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:15–00:05:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
I don't have an email. so
maybe you can just print one. We could. if We could drop it off to Mr. Brown,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:05:39–00:05:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the practice the packet, and the rest of the board members, we could accommodate
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:05:43–00:05:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
send it to an email.
Okay. so So, that would eliminate us having this, correct? Correct. Okay. Please and thank
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 00:05:56–00:06:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
you'll get the all the documents and everything, what you get tonight. okay
so
with that being said,
I don't mind
printing it at home, but do you not, during the submittal of the packet, is all of this information not what you guys put on the screen for us to see each meeting for each case? Yes,
it's in the power, it's in their
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:30–00:06:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, all the documents, the notice of
violations
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:32–00:06:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
division of corporations, and the deed. It is in the PowerPoints. Yes.
Okay, perfect. Thank you. That's all I
have
I would like mine emailed, please.
Okay. you can do that
Yes.
oh I gotta say it out loud. Yes. yes
okay Okay, I'm sorry. I just wanted to make sure we address that because...
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:57–00:07:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
the, um little eight-year-old kid when he ‸ was driving the car. He had this in his seat to see over the steering wheel. All right. I'm sorry. A little off topic. All right. Back on topic. So, on our agenda, our first item is
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:23–00:07:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Respondents,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:38–00:07:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll be presenting. Property owner did allow for the following violations. Appendix A ‸ zoning. Article 11 schedule of district resolution regulations. Essentially boils down to prohibited use. Any use not in keeping with the commercial character of the district.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:07–00:08:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This picture was taken
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:21–00:08:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It shows the back of the property in a parking lot that gives you a view of the uh bus that's in the back. uh Business equipment, uh portable heaters, chairs.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:40–00:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:44–00:08:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ shows a closer photo of the outdoor heaters, chairs, part of the bus. This photo was also mis-labeled It's November 17th. It shows the front of the bus where there's a trailer and a semi behind it. On the left is the printout from the property appraisers. I apologize for the screen being a little off. And on the right is the deed for the property. On the left is the tax rolls. They are paid up to date up until it looks like 2024.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:28–00:09:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
30 of this year with a compliance date of October 30th. On the left was the affidavit of posting for the notice that was mailed and also posted in City Hall.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:47–00:09:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
signed for. Here is the notice of hearing. On the left is the photo October 28th when I posted the property for the notice of hearing. On the right is the affidavit of posting which was also posted in City Hall here. That is a copy of the receipt for the notice of hearing that was mailed out. Case summary. I opened the case on September 22nd. After an adjacent property owner complained about the outside storage in the rear of the property. Property did have a does have a history of code enforcement. properties owned by a trust in his commercial zone. October 22nd. I spoke with owners of the property and explained the violation as well as who the complainant was at their request. The storage in the backyard was addressed as well as the vehicle's trailer.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:50–00:10:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
posted to the hall.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:56–00:11:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
name. About the notice of hearing.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:11:05–00:11:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
vehicle
and Informed him no due to the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:10–00:11:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the central business district theme. And he was also reminded about all the property in the back that needed to be removed. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:23–00:11:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
violation.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:11:29–00:11:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the right. The chairs. There's the semi. The trailer that was there appears to have been moved. Staff recommendation Staff recommends the code enforcement board find the property in violation. Issue an order requiring the
violations
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:56–00:11:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be corrected. And assess the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:59–00:12:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Per violation be imposed if the property is not
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:05–00:12:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at 4 pm We're available for questions.
Are any of the vehicles registered? I
believe
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:18–00:12:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bus was or is, but to my knowledge it doesn't run. And the semi was being, when I recall, stored for a friend. Is there a reason? Sorry. You're
not sure if they run or not? I
know the bus I was told is not. Semi, I can't say.
Okay, okay so that would
void
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:44–00:12:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that being ‸ registered if they don't run.
Well, they could be registered, but not running. Right. yeah
But, I mean, not running is a violation also.
Any vehicle, even if it's registered, can't be left on the property for 72 hours. If it's just going to be stored there.
Question, is there someone here for the property? Yes. Okay. all right You need to be sworn in.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); words the first reading may have missed · 00:13:11–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
is
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:18–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
oh my home address or a business
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:20–00:13:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
All right. So go right ahead.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:29–00:13:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
technically Sirocco's violation, but that's our bus. And I wanted to let you guys know that we've moved. um The trailer's been moved. The uh heater lamps and the tables and chairs have been moved. uh The last thing, the bus was supposed to be moved today. It runs great. It's just been sitting for a while, so we couldn't get the start. The guys,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:52–00:13:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And Mike said something about the semi. Once
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:58–00:14:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So everything should
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:02–00:14:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
trying to get everything done by tomorrow. oh and the registered. The bus is registered. Up-to-date registered and insured, both.
Okay. um And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:17–00:14:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Okay, ‸ well, um they've given you
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:32–00:14:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they've recommended um January. ‸ so yeah, well
before tomorrow. We can
get it all taken.
‸ Well, this is the thing. You have that time, but the goal is to ensure that it's taken care of definitely in a timely manner. But when you get it taken care of, get a hold of these gentlemen so they can come and officially hey say, okay, it's taken care of. Everything was cleared. Sure,
no
problem. It's
no
problem.
So, and again,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:02–00:15:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
please make sure you get the information from those gentlemen. Yep,
I sure will.
All right, I'll take a motion. I
got a question before the motion.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:11–00:15:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
January 14th, quite so long to move vehicles?
That would be the next date prior, the day before our next code board.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:24–00:15:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
like to make a motion, please. Go ready All right. On KCE 25-680, based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I
move
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:15:40–00:15:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to find a respondent, in this case, in violation of the city codes as charged,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:50–00:15:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which is city code appendix A, zoning article 11, and that the
respondents
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:01–00:16:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
shall correct the violation no later than...
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:06–00:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because you said you can move it starting tomorrow, so I would say the 4th of December.
oh yeah, easily. ‸ So
just giving you two weeks. If
you
can do it
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:24–00:16:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um ‸ December 4th, no later than 4 pm In the event the respondent does not comply to this date, after consider
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:39–00:16:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will be imposed for each day. The violation continues past the
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:52–00:16:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order. thank you
I'd be interested in a second if we get the fine down.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:20–00:17:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
All in favor, say aye.
Aye. aye aye aye
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:25–00:17:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
i have a vote of six to one. Motion passes. So, again. Thank
you.
No, thank you for being here.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:17:39–00:17:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:47–00:17:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Respondents, Richard D. Lemon, LLC. Address 520 Brevard Avenue. I'll be presenting. Property owner did allow for the following violations. Appendix A, Zoning, Article 13, Supplemental District Regulation, Section 5, under visual
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:13–00:18:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Requirements. And I'm going to show a table on the following slide. It was 16 pages, so I had to isolate what I was uh citing. Under the table, it shows the category, specific requirement, residential zoning district, commercial zoning district, and industrial on the top of the table. Just for reference. So, when you go to the next slide, you see the materials and designed by material. And this is regarding fencing. It says barbed wire.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:51–00:18:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, there's no exceptions. The only zone where it's allowed is industrial though
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:00–00:19:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This was a photo taken October 21st. It shows the razor wire, concertina wire that's behind the property. This is another photo of the same day. It shows the concertina wire ‸ goes down the back of the property. On the left is the printout from the property appraiser. On the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:35–00:19:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the deed for the property. On the left is the tax
roll,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:42–00:19:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
which paid up to 2025. On the right is the notice ‸ violation that was mailed on
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:48–00:19:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this year with a compliance date of November 8th. On the left is the affidavit of posting, where I posted ‸ in City Hall ‸ same day
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:00–00:20:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for. I believe it says
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:07–00:20:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on it. Here's the notice of hearing, which was mailed out November 6th. And same day, November 6th, is when I posted in front of the property and also posted here at City Hall. On the right is the affidavit of posting. On the left is the receipt for the notice of hearing, and the right is the notice of hearing receipt that it was signed for.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:37–00:20:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
violations. November 4th, Mr. Lemon contacted me and left ‸ voicemail, which I returned to ultimately spoke to him regarding the property and the code case. He expressed his willingness to speak to the code board regarding the concertina. wire I wanted to explain why he had the wire at the property. He emailed me stating as such, which I forwarded to the code manager and community services director.
per
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:08–00:21:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
his request, November 5th, I added the case to the code board agenda and generated the documents to
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:14–00:21:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as of today, November 20th, I inspected the property and found it to be in violation. Here's a photo from today at 12 25 PM. You can see the concertina wire behind the property. And there's another photo of it. That's to the right of the previous photo Staff recommendation. Staff recommends that the code enforcement board find the property in violation issue in order requiring the violations be corrected and assess a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:49–00:21:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For ‸ violation be imposed if the property is not brought into compliance by January 14, 2026 at 4 PM.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:00–00:22:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
yes ma'am
yes
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:21–00:22:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
David lemon. uh
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:24–00:22:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:31–00:22:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
yeah
Regarding that wire is, um it was actually ‸ extremely hot day. When I put that up, I had to spend about 200 to get it. So it really wasn't something I wanted to do. um but we've had a homeless and crime taking place
out on
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:47–00:22:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the pub next door and they broke
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:49–00:22:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um we had, a the bus out there. Somebody went back and threw a brick through one of the windows. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:59–00:23:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that was damaged by vandals. And um then we're concerned that the window back there, if anybody jumps out test breaks, that window goes inside, they'll have access to our real estate company, our mortgage company, our title company, and everything else that's in there's that What's that? ‸ And the restaurant. um uh So, and on top of that, the the timer I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:27–00:23:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
water the plants, it was actually ripped off and broken. I put it on twice, they stole it twice. um So I figured I had no alternative but to somehow protect my my property and my um ‸ investment. So uh that's why I put that up there. So I was asking if, or I mean to ask if there's any alternatives you guys might be able to give me. um Other than that that thing just being kind of an eyesore in the back with nobody being able to see it, why I would have to take it down if it's worked like a champ since the day I put it up. I've had no problems. The only way anybody's going to get hurt is if they try to do something they're not supposed to. So I'm asking that I'm asking if I could, if I could keep it up
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:10–00:24:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's been up there for probably about a year now and I've had no issues. Nobody's gotten hurt. Nobody's tried, lost nothing. um It seems to be a very effective way to keep people out. So um my request is that I, I'm able to keep the wire up.
Well,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:28–00:24:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you give him a
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:34–00:24:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
and his current zoning is not industrial. So it would have to be removed.
What option, what um additional options you might be able ‸ because it seems to be that the crime in the homeless situation hasn't really gotten a whole lot better.
Notify the police if you have problems. We've
been down that road. So what's what's something else I might be able to do?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:02–00:25:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
I can just tell you that you can't have the barbed wire fence according to the current code
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:08–00:25:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
a question just, um pertaining which I talked about
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:21–00:25:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
No, ma'am. There's no exemptions per the code. There's no going to B and Z or anything like that. That's pretty cut and dry. It's only for industrial areas
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:35–00:25:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So there's no way I could get an exception on that, huh?
No, sir.
Is there anybody, uh any way we could maybe escalate this and find out who might be able to help me out here? I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:48–00:25:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be broken into again.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:51–00:25:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I put it up. I hate to, it it's almost like an open invitation if I take that down. So,
like
I said, sir,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:04–00:26:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I can't tell you how to run your business. Unfortunately, unless the code changes at this time, that's the way it is.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:11–00:26:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
any higher.
Or
is this it? I
mean, I'm, as a director of the department, um there is no other options according to the code. All right, I appreciate it guys.
Thanks.
I have a question on this, please. the Bob Wire. What's the, what's the code say where it's going to be? Does it have to be on top of a fence? Is that what makes it illegal?
It's a good question. That's a really good question because I could just put it on the ground it'd be fine.
No, unfortunately you cannot. Is that what it says that barbed wire cannot be used anywhere? It has to be used only in an industrial area, sir. An industrial zoning. The current zoning ‸ that property is not industrial.
‸ well i know that. But I'm just saying that if he puts it on the ground and it's not on a fence like they usually want barbed wire at the top of a fence. No, sir.
What about, what about an electric fence? Could we do something like that?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:35–00:27:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
to research and check the code for you.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:39–00:27:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have ‸ electrical fence either.
Well,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:46–00:27:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm able to do that, that'd be great. I can give back
with you right now. But at the time at the moment, Mr. Chair, I'd like to bring it back. The issue is the barbed wire on top of the fence. staffs presented its case.
Well, I understand that you have a business to run and you're
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:28:12–00:28:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
business to be broken into.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:15–00:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this point because there was no movement when they first came out. um So, do you would you need more time? um I know the holidays are coming up.
Yeah. Well, I'd really like to not deal with this. If I could keep the January 14th date, I'd appreciate it because then the holidays would be over and I won't have to deal with it if we take it down.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:45–00:28:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
gonna ‸ have to deal with before the holidays and I'd rather not do that.
Yes, sir. And again, I was just asking, um is that enough time for you?
Yes.
Okay.
Yes. But, but you do understand that there will be a per day fine. Begin all the way. ‸ Okay.
Yeah, I do.
Okay. I was just making sure you understand. You're clear.
So again, I ask. Is that enough time?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:16–00:29:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
time. I appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you.
Any more discussion? If not, I'll take a motion.
‸ No, this motion is just on the fence? It
is. The barbed wire. Barbed wire.
Well, I understand that. The barbed wire and fence and all. The fence don't have to come down. The barbed wire has to come down, correct?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:01–00:30:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
‸ Seeing I'm having a problem reading. This fine gentleman will read for me, please. Can you read for me? Sure. Okay. ‸ I'd like to make a motion on this. ‸ And
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:16–00:30:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh by, ‸ let's give them the, what was it, January 4th
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:29–00:30:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
14th. um our fine of 25 a day will be imposed. And if I need to be corrected and filled in,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:44–00:30:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because I can't read too well.
Okay. For
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:51–00:30:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order. He moves to find a respondent in this case in violation of
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:08–00:31:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as charged. And that the respondent shall correct the violation no later than January 14th, 2026.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:19–00:31:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
respondent does not comply with this date after considering the factors in sections 162.09 florida statues a fine in the amount of 25 per day will be imposed for each day. The violation continues past
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:36–00:31:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The respondents
Respondent is ordered to contact the code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:31:42–00:31:57 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Point of order before we vote, I have a question. Are we get to reduce it?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:57–00:31:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:58–00:32:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
I've tried to talk to the board about is when they
mention
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:06–00:32:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the fine here That's maximum. We don't ‸ have to use maximum We can go, you know, we have problems sometimes with swimming pools
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:18–00:32:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
something like that, but something like this Give them a break. Let them get it done. Even if you go $25 a day, that's like
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:31–00:32:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that get it done, you know, so it gets it ‸ done And thank you for reading that in for me sir,
okay
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:48–00:32:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:56–00:32:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. ‸ Those opposed
Nay
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:04–00:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
That motion is killed Have another motion
You guys made me read for nothing
I'm
kidding.
I'm kidding
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:35–00:33:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
try Okay
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:40–00:33:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
date?
It's the amount. It's the amount.
Okay
should we discuss
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:47–00:33:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
can we discuss it What are you guys recommending?
‸ Just to to go with the recommendation of the board of the code enforcement.
Okay. So the 250 Yeah,
they're not
recommending
that
they are
they are
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:04–00:34:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
myself Is that being recommended by ‸ the city that that's what they want is 250? They don't want us to make a decision on it.
No, we leave it up to the board of up to 250 Thank you the board's discretion to
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:20–00:34:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
So we just had a hearing
we made a motion This is really states
records Yes
Yeah, it says up to 250 ‸ It
states they recommend up to 250. I'm good with going what they recommend which is 250
Okay
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:46–00:34:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:49–00:34:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Oh
Well, no, we
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:35:00–00:35:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:35:09–00:35:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the respondent shall correct the violations no later than 4 o'clock p.m. on the 14th of January, 2026. In the event the respondent does not comply by this date after considering the factors in section 162.09, Florida statutes, a fine in the amount of $250 per day will be imposed for each day. The violation continues past the aforementioned
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:17–00:35:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:39–00:35:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The respondents is our order to contact the code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order. I'll second.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:40–00:35:49 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Have a motion on
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:49–00:35:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:49–00:35:50 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:50–00:35:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor say aye.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:50–00:35:52 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Aye.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:53–00:35:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Those opposed? Nay. That motion passes 7 to 1. All right, good sir. You have two things to get taken care
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:53–00:36:02 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:36:02–00:36:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Thank you for being here.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:36:05–00:36:06 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; the machine readings disagree here · 00:36:06–00:36:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
power.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:36:17–00:36:23 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
I did not do that.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:36:23–00:36:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the record. I picked it,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:36:24–00:36:27 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:36:27–00:36:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You got the record.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:36:28–00:36:29 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; part of a long flagged stretch · 00:36:29–00:37:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:17 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
The property owner did allow for the following violations.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:37:11–00:37:15 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:15–00:37:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
15 administration and enforcement building permits and applications section 2a. On a no person firm or corporation shall commence or cause to be commenced the erection construction or alteration of any building structure sign or canopy within the city of Cocoa until
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:37:16–00:37:40 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:40–00:37:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for a permit. Therefore has been previously filed with the city of Cocoa as provided here in and in the other ordinance of the city and until the permit. Therefore has first been issued by the city and the
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:37:40–00:37:59 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:59–00:38:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
says itself. This is a satellite view aerial view of the address 1236 Jackson Street.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:38:02–00:38:10 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 00:38:13–00:38:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:17–00:38:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ and as far as you for permitted work and
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:26–00:38:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a permit. This is still the same deal same day. September 18th from inspector Joe and Marco Pictures of the inside of the residence. As you can see, certain things, the cabinets and the
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:55–00:39:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
19th I went out and posted a stop work order. and just some pictures of the electric and as you can see the the roof which had a permit, but you see the big debris bend right there. This is more they came back on they really revisited excuse me the roof they were inspecting the roof and notice that work was was still done. This is October 21st and this is some of their pictures. You see the point and you can see, you know, drywall and the open area. This is the property appraiser on the left and the warranty deed on the right which is a golden investments LLC they are the they are the property owner by Brevard County property appraisers. This is
an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:08–00:40:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
affidavit ‸ I posted on October 31st. This was the notice of violation on the on the 31st but to go back previously my my first notice of violations was sent out on September the 24th.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:31–00:40:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the same day I sent out the the notice of hearing ‸ the affidavit it was it was posted downstairs and on the property and
mailed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:42–00:40:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to the to the owner who is there. These are just the permits that were needed to be pulled for the basically the renovation of the of the home. And this the return receipts and the ‸ green card were returned.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:03–00:41:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the of the of the property as you can see is it's pretty clear the bend is gone. I believe the roof is done but it's still in violation for for not having the proper permits that are there. So on September 18th Inspector Joe sent an email of the president's stop work order for for the said 1236 Jackson for construction without a permit. The photos were attached and included electrical framing plumbing windows drywall etc. On the 19th I expect the property and observe one or more violations. The property has a history with code enforcement.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:50–00:41:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:54–00:41:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the photos were taken.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:00–00:42:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
name of Joey
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:04–00:42:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and he stated they were there was only
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:42:11–00:42:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the other jurisdictions didn't require permits for the work being done. And as the pictures were taken and the property was was being fully renovated. It was just photos updated on the October 22nd and on October the 24th there was a notice of
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:37–00:42:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
owner to the new owner. So just to have that noted in there on October 21st is it's out of it's out of order but
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:56–00:43:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for an open roof permit under review and they noticed the contractor was still working outside the scope of the permit that was under review. On the very first notice of hearing was mailed and the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:15–00:43:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
email that would be Mr. Eric Henson who is here tonight in the status of the permits for the property. Mr. Henson stated that the only permit that he was having issues with was the plumbing permit and the permits are on hold by the manager of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:43:38–00:43:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mrs. Jennifer Justiano. Staff recommends the code enforcement board find the property in violation issue ‸ order requiring the violations be corrected and assessed as a data fine of up to $250 per day. Uh, per violation be imposed
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:56–00:44:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm available for questions.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:08–00:44:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is the owner of the property. Um, and you need to be sworn in.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:44:22–00:44:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:26–00:44:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you.
All right.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:34–00:44:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Good sir.
Uh, just that the, the only permit I'm waiting on is the plumbing permit. Um, the plumber that was doing the work, he was, he applied for the permit, but wasn't able to obtain one.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:48–00:44:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that he couldn't get the permit, something about tax, his business taxes.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:57–00:45:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I have a new plumber and he said he applied for the permit today.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:06–00:45:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
only permit that's that he's, he needs? Because from what I saw was ‸ there was more than that. Correct.
I am going to defer to the director, but there is a list that, uh, Mrs.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:27–00:45:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
completed because the, there are certain permits that are on hold until, uh, the list is completed.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:39–00:45:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
To, I mean, to building to, to the permit, but I can refer, uh, to the director if she could answer that.
So I, I, I'm looking at the permits. There was, there was not a plumbing permit that was applied for. There's an alteration and renovation permit, which included plumbing. And we were waiting for the information for the plumbing to be added as a sub contracted portion of that project. Um, I, I'm just going to read under here what, why it is on hold. Uh, scope of work must be the scope of work and the construction value must be updated to match the actual work that's being conducted. Currently the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:22–00:46:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:24–00:46:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
done. And based on the analysis by our inspectors, it's probably five or six times more than that.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:38–00:46:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, there was, there needs to be documentation that the contract is authorized, ‸ authorized to sign on behalf of the LLC and who owns the property. And there needs to be full product approvals, including installation instructions for all windows and doors to be installed. Buck affidavit must be completed and uploaded. Asbestos notification statement is on the Brevard County form and needs to
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:04–00:47:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A notice of commencement is required prior to the permit issuance
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:09–00:47:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:12–00:47:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A plumbing subcontractor must be added to the permit along with a copy of their license and subcontractor authorization form.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:22–00:47:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
comp COI or exemption documents. The electrical permit is, uh, already issued and HVAC permit is already issued.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:38–00:47:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in the, uh, home to be added to this project before we can issue the permit. Uh, once the valuation is, uh, updated to the correct amount based on the work that was done, ‸ then the permit can be issued once all documents are received.
The only permit that I don't have turned in is the plumbing permit.
No, the only, there is a permit for alteration and renovation, which includes all of the work
that's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:22–00:48:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
inside of the, the interior of the home and the subcontractors, you have the Ed Ryan as the building contractor. And then there needs to be a plumbing subcontractor added on that.
Okay.
And
there's not a plumbing subcontractor added on that because the plumbing sub subcontractor needs to be added on this permit. Okay. Because typically when we do a permit for an interior renovation, all of it is under one permit with subcontractors under that general contractor.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:01–00:49:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then that's what triggered everything. Because when we went in for the HVAC and then the roof and saw all of the other work, that's what triggered the stop work order. That's what triggered this case because there was much more work that is Florida building code requires any interior renovations that are including windows, doors, any type of walls, structures, all of that has to be permitted. And that was already done without a permit. Okay.
Well, I understand.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:38–00:49:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and had pulled permits, but they did not. And the only one that I'm aware of that is still outstanding is the plumbing permit, as you stated. And I will tell him to add his, I guess he should know what to do as a plumber.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:59–00:50:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Ed Ryan and just have him add under his. That is correct. Okay. The only question I have then is just the value. I can put a higher value if, if you require it, but I, I know that they're not charging me five times. ‸ I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:19–00:50:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
the scope of work is. So our building official will do an analysis. If you don't provide us with an analysis of a, a, a
charge
for the contracted work, our building official will go in and will determine what the value is. And
will
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:38–00:50:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
charge the permit based on that value. Okay. Because they're in the Florida building code. There are construction costs based on the job that is being done. That is an average set price. And that price will be valued by the building official. Okay. And if that's how you want it valued, we'll value it that way.
Well, I don't want it valued that way. I want it valued the way I'm actually paying for it. Would I just give you the, the invoices?
We need the, we need the invoices. We need the contract. We need to know exactly what you paid for everything, including installation labor and the cost for the materials.
Okay.
I have a question, Ms. Neuterman.
Yes.
So
do you think that January 14th is enough time for him to get all that squared away?
To get the permit issued? Yes.
That's plenty of time.
That's plenty of time to get the information to us and get the permit issued.
I,
once we have all of the information, it has been fully reviewed with the exception of the plumbing, ‸ the riser diagram and the plumbing information for the contract or the subcontractor. Everything else is ready to go. So once we have that with the cost, we will be able to issue the permit within a week.
but
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:54–00:51:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
we have to get that information first, but I believe January 14th is a sufficient amount of time for them to upload all of that information to the portal and for us to complete the review.
Okay. Thank you. With that said, I'd like to set a motion. Uh, everybody deal with no more discussion. All right.
Yes, sir. Okay.
Uh, ‸ my motion on, on CE, excuse me. My motion on
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:24–00:52:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order. I move to find responding in this
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:33–00:52:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:38–00:52:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a zoning
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:40–00:52:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:52:47–00:52:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:00–00:53:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The violation continues past the first date. The respondent is ordered to contact the code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order. Okay.
Understood.
Thank you.
I second.
I have a motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye.
Aye.
Those opposed? Nay. Aye.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:42–00:53:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right, sir. You have that time. Please be diligent.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:53:48–00:53:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Oh, with that being said, we have no new business. Uh, no non-compliance. Looks like we are done. Anyone has anything? All right. Well, with that being said, silence is golden.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:13–00:54:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Greatest motion ever. Motion to not have a meeting in December.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:26–00:54:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor say aye.
Aye.
Aye. Those opposed? All right. Motion passes. So, with that being said, next code enforcement meeting, January 15th, 2026.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:42–00:54:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:47–00:54:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:54:49–00:54:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:54:58–00:54:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording