Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (972_CE_Reg_Minutes_06_17_2021.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Jim Gifford, Edward Green, George Brown, Kimberly Curtis, David Lightholder, Lloyd Roberts, Sharri Scott
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Eric Myny (Police Officer), Steve Murdick (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Adopted actions (13)
to approve to the agenda of June 17, 2021 (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve to the minutes of May 20, 2021 (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to amend Staffs recommendation and impose a fine of two hundred dollars ($200.00) a day and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to reopen (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Green, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$200.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staffs recommendation and impose a fine of two hundred dollars ($200.00) a day and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (972_CE_Reg_Minutes_06_17_2021.pdf, p. 3); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_06_17_2021), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
193 suspect passage(s) marked in place; low recognized word rate (38.9 words per minute): source worth verifying; not evidence of silence; 1 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 15 voices separated from the audio.
18 short machine repair(s) (21 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 82.4% of 7,378 content words.
Dotted words (192 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
193 passages (28% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Voice detected, no words recognized (1 stretch). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:00:00 (1369 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on June 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation and the property owner is here this evening.
by myself on all this stuff. I entered those two storage units out front and got them into the house, got them going, and I thought that's all I needed to do.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:23:46–00:23:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:00–00:24:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Hopefully that will give me a little income because all I'm getting right now is Social Security. I'm not working. I'm ready to do it all and get it right.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:20–00:24:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:24:41–00:24:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:43–00:25:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So he's already been found in violation and he was given an extended amount of time to clean up at this time. Staff would recommend that he be found in non compliance. Come into compliance as
Mr. Chair, that was also covered during the initial hearing and it was not that he needed a permit. It said he needed a zoning application to keep them there for 30 days. The pods actually were there for a lot longer than 30 days. We
but both of these violations were cited and voted on by the board. So even though he's focused on the storage units, the other outdoor storage was still also cited as well.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:19–00:26:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you understand under under non compliance. We're. We operate under Florida statute and we don't really have a lot of wiggle room here. We can either find you in compliance or not in ‸ compliance. If we find you not in compliance. Then as. Officer
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:39–00:26:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:48–00:26:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, if you get it all clean, you know, if it were all cleaned up tomorrow morning, you'd want to call the code and let them know that so they can come and take a look. But as soon as it is cleaned up, then you let them know and that stops whatever fine has been established. And at that point, you still. ‸ You still have the opportunity to come back and ask for forgiveness of the fine or some portion of it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:46–00:27:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:57–00:28:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:28:17–00:28:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the motion passes. And as I said a moment ago, clean it up as quickly as you can. If, you know, if it doesn't rain tomorrow, get out there and get that stuff gone. Give them a call and that'll clean it up. Thank you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:58–00:29:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:04–00:29:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:09–00:29:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the code enforcement board by officer Carver on February 18th, 2021. And was found in violations of permits required. Compliance date was given as of May 21st, 2021. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:35–00:29:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for non compliance on June 1st. It was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation. And the property representative is here this evening.
No, what happened was she posted just the front window and it got torn down and she posted it again. So the third time she went out, she posted every visible window because they kept peeling this. Somebody kept peeling the stickers off.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:27–00:30:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:39–00:31:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:02–00:31:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:16–00:31:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:20–00:31:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And Mr. Chair, this is easily rectified. If he would go back into the building department, they could pull the original application and they could make the changes and a permit could be issued.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:38–00:32:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:47–00:32:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:51–00:32:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:06–00:33:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:09–00:33:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:11–00:33:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:20–00:33:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. All right. Well, as I said earlier, under non-compliance, we have very little wiggle room. Actually, no wiggle room. It either is compliant or is not. I see. If indeed the facts bear out what you've just explained, and as our board member just pointed out, if your contractor would go into the ‸ city hall and go into where he applied, they
and then you can give a code a call and let them know that it's been taken care of. But the fine will still, if ‸ the board votes to give you a fine, then
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:16–00:34:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:30–00:34:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
visits. This case was brought before the code enforcement board on April 15th and was found in violations of a violation of Article 2 sign regulations, prohibited signs and features. Compliance date was given as May 15th, 2021. I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on June 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:58–00:36:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:05–00:36:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:13–00:36:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:39–00:36:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:41–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:48–00:36:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
18th, 2021. I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on June 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation.
Well, I would just like to mention we had a long discussion regarding putting up a new fence since there's no structure on that and that it's a vacant piece of land. And
because this is behind the police department and I would go over ‸ ways to correct the violation. He chose to come and start to build a new fence without a permit. And
The cars are still there. The weeds are still there. And he's actually never contacted our office. He just started building that until we put a stop work order on it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:32–00:38:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:37–00:38:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:40–00:38:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:43–00:38:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the code enforcement board by officer Carver on January 21st, 2021. And was found in violation of storing outdoors. Roofs and drainage. Protective treatment. Weeds. Accessory structure. Boarded up buildings. Accumulation of trash and litter. Landscaping requirements. ‸ Exterior general condition. Parking in the yard. Permit required. Maintenance of structure ‸ grounds. And site plan required. Compliance
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:27–00:39:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:34–00:39:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation related to roofs and drainage and the maintenance of the structure for structure or grounds related to parking lot damage. So, we find it still in violation of the property owner or property managers here this evening to represent the property.
Yes. Majority of them have clear, they are working on getting the roofs taken care of the. They've contracted contracted a roofer in order to take care of that.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:15–00:40:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
getting all their permits submitted. The parking lot they were working on doing some patchwork, but in their intent was to eventually get the whole parking lot done.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:27–00:40:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:53–00:40:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're glad to see that some things have been accomplished, but as I said earlier, under non-compliance, we have no latitude to do anything. Is the owner still on board with getting the rest of the items finished?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:19–00:41:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:08–00:42:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:13–00:42:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:34–00:42:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:43–00:42:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
She can give you that. It was discussed every motion that they make is always for the time period. But she can give, ‸ she can give that to you. And then as soon as you come into compliance, you need to call Steve so we can stop it. And then you'll be given options that you have at that point in time.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:09–00:43:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:17–00:43:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:24–00:43:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the code board on April 15th, 2021. It was found in violation of accessory structure. Storing outdoors. Storing junk or autos. Accumulation of trash and litter. And district intent for
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:11–00:44:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
has been cleared. The accumulation of trash has been, uh, mostly cleared. Storing outdoors still exists and, uh, the accessory structures, uh, there's still in damage. Still
Okay. And I think you probably already heard me say that under non compliance, we don't have a latitude to excuse anything. It's either in compliance or not. Um, but what you want to ‸ do is make sure you get. You need to be sworn in before you can speak.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:59–00:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:05–00:45:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:17–00:45:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:24–00:45:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
seen this picture here? There's still some storage outside by the corner of the fence. But the fence also has, has never been permitted. Um, and there was some damage and if you look at the other picture on the other side. Where
And then, uh, as far as the cars got the cars out of the yard, that was great. Uh, but then even though you're operating the business or repairing the cars in the road. You have stopped that now?
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:46:04–00:46:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
primary complaints were coming at the initial case, uh, when it was found in violation, uh, was coming from the issue of, of a high quantity of traffic for, for business, for automobile repair.
right there. And you couldn't even turn down that street and go because it was filled with cars. I understand, but it's still a public street. You can't. ‸ I understand, but you still cannot. Go down that street and there is a property on the other side of you, even though it's vacant, even though it's vacant. They still have a right. All I'm saying is you could not access that public street. It is a public street for cocoa taxpayers. Nobody
So, but that's all been corrected now. So I don't want to harp on that. But since we're discussing it, I just wanted to say can't block that street. That's a public street. It's for access. So we need to keep the cars where they are. If you've stopped repairing great. We can take care of that. But now we just need to get rid of the junk and trash.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:29–00:47:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ needs to be permitted or removed. So on the other side, when you're looking at the north side, you got fencing running all along the side of there too. So it's a matter of either permitting it or removing it.
that would be something, that would be something more for the property owner to address. And he'd actually have to address it because he would be the one that would be pulling the permits and whatnot for the fencing.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:09–00:48:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then I was going to say, ‸ I couldn't find it on the building permit, but that would also be something where it's damaged then also has to be repaired. Regardless if, if it was there for 20 years or not, it has to be maintained.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:35–00:48:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:42–00:48:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
What you need to do, what you would need to do is get with the building department and find out what they would constitute as a repair. And what they would require a permit for. I can't give you that information because I'm not the building official. So
Steve, he'll meet you there and explain it to him. And then if it's repairable, then it might not need a permit. If you need a permit, then you'd have to replace it, but then you still have the option to take it down. But I would deal with them. I don't want to give any information that they may change on you. And who's the other person who is it?
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:31–00:49:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:49:46–00:49:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:00–00:50:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:11–00:50:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:14–00:50:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:16–00:50:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:39–00:50:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chair. First, I just want to point out he was not cited to get a permit. He was cited to fix the accessory structure and to clean up the outdoor storage that has not been fully complied today for the non compliance hearing. As
So again, the permit can be taken care of after this hearing. And Steve would be more than happy to meet with them and find out exactly why and what they needed. But right before us today is the junk and the condition of the accessory structure. So I don't want to get in the weeds on a permit or what happened during permitting because they were not cited for permits.
the actual property owner. So there's gotta be a reason they were denied. And we're not going to find that reason here today. We'd have to go upstairs upstairs and talk to building.
And I did speak to the property owner as well. And my understanding was ‸ with him was what they were telling him about that he had to, he had to get defense permit, but he couldn't. He couldn't put the fence up himself because he's renting the property. You know, he's not, uh, he's, he's a, he's a landlord. He's not the property. He's not the property resident. So because of the fact that it's a rental, he'll have to have a ‸ contractor to do that.
Yeah. Now that changes everything because under chapter 49, if it's a rental property, a licensed contractor has to do all the work on the property. So
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:48–00:53:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Correct. And he can have Steve meet him there and Steve can explain it to the building department as well as a liaison, but he just stated he took up the post. So yeah, they're probably not going to let call that a repair if he took up the actual post. So.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:01–00:54:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:07–00:54:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:15–00:54:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:35–00:54:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:47–00:54:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second. Okay. Motion on the floor with a second. All there say aye. Aye. ‸ Any opposed? There are none. ‸ Motion passes. And what we would suggest you do is get that outdoor storage cleaned up first. And then within the next as quickly as you can. And you
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:12–00:55:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
organized to talk with the building department and get that resolved. Whether you can repair it, whether you have to get a permit to replace it, whatever.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:46–00:55:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
into compliance, you can come back before this board and ask for a lean forgiveness. And then all that you went through will come into play at that time of why it took so long to come into compliance. Well, no, it's as soon as you get fixed and then fill out the paperwork with Ms. Crow. She can take care of that for you.
As a matter of fact, if you're the representative of the property, that's probably going to be a better. You'll get more traction with them upstairs probably as as your family member of the property owner. ‸ Okay, I was gonna say that, you know, might be something that you got a direct conduit to your
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:56:50–00:56:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:56–00:56:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:58–00:57:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:07–00:57:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:17–00:57:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:57:48–00:57:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:03–00:58:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:58:09–00:58:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, but you know, we always have due process as our first priority. And if, if he's got something significant to say, um, but if, if it's not something significant as to why he didn't bring it into compliance, if he doesn't have evidence why it wasn't in compliance by the date set forth in your order, then this
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:08–00:59:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:12–00:59:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:14–00:59:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:38–00:59:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:54–00:59:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:00:11–01:00:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:22–01:00:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bar. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After the first inspection, I found the property in violation of permit required parking in yard. Accumulation of trash and litter. And storing junk or autos. I visited the site seven times and have not found progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on June 17th, the property remains in violation. I've
before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on June 1st, 2021. ‸ It was sent certified and posted at the property. Staff
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:17–01:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
violation and given. 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $100 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance achieved. And Mr Collins is here to speak.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:36–01:01:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:49–01:01:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:02:07–01:02:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the ‸ city. It's on this side of the sidewalk. That's the blue truck again. 11. I'm not here to fight with you guys. I'm here to come and comply. I have a problem with PTSD. Within the last month I have police called out of my house because I've been aggressive toward people. And because of the stress of these meetings that I have come to. I talk to the police officers. They say I'm a veteran. They're going to try to get me a privacy defense put up on their behalf. Because I deal with the police. I deal with the public. I'm very well spoken. I'm
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:09–01:03:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
come out there. People taking pictures of me. ‸ That makes me paranoid. And like right now I'm shady because I have PTSD. ‸ I told you all this before.
told the police. ‸ The police will come by and they're my friend. They even give me junior police badges and shields because I'm a prominent member of that community. I'm
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:36–01:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I asked the policemen about illegally parked. They say no as long as I'm facing the way of traffic and I'm on the city easement side of it. And this guy came out and said I'll bulldoze all of this because I'm in trouble. And
This one right here. I'm here to cause you trouble. I'm a veteran of the United States. I gave you the right to talk to me like that. He said you would bulldoze all of my stuff down.
And Mr. Chairman, that context of that conversation is not as it's perceived. That was for an abatement ordered by the chief of police to abate his property of all the nuisance. And I told him he had 10 days or we were going to come in and remove all the items. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:04:25–01:04:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:04:37–01:04:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Mr. Chair, none of that is before this board today was before the board is the condition of the property as these pictures depict. And staff is asking that you find them in violation as you did before. We have sent multiple code officers out to walk his property and tell him what he needs to do. And all he wants to do is debate it.
property is really bringing down the property values. It's actually becoming a public nuisance. And staff submits that along with the pictures in our testimony as this case.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:20–01:05:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:24–01:05:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:28–01:05:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:58–01:06:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:15–01:06:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
You can't have the tent, the grill, the kitchen sink. We can go, we can go, we can go. I thank you for your service. I think you need to find some social programs to help you,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:10–01:07:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:12–01:07:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:14–01:07:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
told me that they were doing a program with veterans and they were going to come out and put up a privacy fence. So all that you see now would be behind the fence. I'm
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:27–01:07:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:36–01:07:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:56–01:08:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:18–01:08:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So you have 30 days to get that stuff all cleared up. If you need any help from the officers, let them know. They'll come out and tell you which things. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:29–01:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:35–01:08:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:57–01:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:09:03–01:09:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:37–01:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:06–01:10:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording