Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Board Meeting

Date: 2025-06-19
Status: Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source: CivicClerk event #74

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 📋 Agenda (PDF, 187 KB) 📋 Agenda Packet (PDF, 41.3 MB) 🎬 Recording ↗

Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (1954_8_21_25_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 9–18). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

The roll call could not be read reliably from the minutes' text (an entry could not be read as a name), so it is not stated here; the first page of the minutes is the record.

Adopted actions (12)

to approve to the agenda of June 19, 2025 (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to approve to the minutes of May 15, 2025 (moved by Otero, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to amend the Staff’s recommendation and a fine of seventy-five dollars per day per violation and give the property owner until August 20, 2025, and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the property owner to have been in violation and a Finding of Fact filed with no fine is imposed (moved by Scott, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero dollars ($0) (moved by Scott, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to approve the staff’s recommendation to City Council that the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand one hundred twenty-one dollars and thirty-six cents ($2,121.36) (moved by Otero, seconded by Muller); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction to be in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) (moved by Scott, seconded by Otero); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to approve staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand seven hundred seventy-three dollars and thirty-two cents ($2,773.32) (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero ($0) (moved by Roberts, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–18

Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)

$0 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero dollars ($0)” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-08-21 agenda packet (1954_8_21_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21))
$2,121.36 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve the staff’s recommendation to City Council that the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand one hundred twenty-one dollars and thirty-six cents ($2,121.36)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-08-21 agenda packet (1954_8_21_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21))
$10,000.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction to be in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-08-21 agenda packet (1954_8_21_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21))
$5,000.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-08-21 agenda packet (1954_8_21_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21))
$2,773.32 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand seven hundred seventy-three dollars and thirty-two cents ($2,773.32)” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-08-21 agenda packet (1954_8_21_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21))
$0 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero ($0)” (motion result: CARRIED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-08-21 agenda packet (1954_8_21_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21))

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-08-21, pp. 9–18; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2025-08-21).

Source: 1954_8_21_25_Agenda_Packet.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2025-08-21 meeting, packet pp. 9–18; lines 270–855 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes

Meeting Minutes
June 19, 2025

A meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Cocoa was held on Thursday, June 19, 2025, in
the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed.

OPENING MATTERS:

Chairman Roberts called the meeting to order at 6:01 P.M. The Board Secretary called the roll.

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Lloyd Roberts Chairman
Josue Otero Vice Chairman
Sharri Scott Board Member
Dik Muller Board Member
Jody Hatcher 2 nd Alternate

MEMBERS ABSENT:

George Brown Jr. Board Member
Gloria Weatherspoon 1rst Alternate
Michael Simpson Board Member - excused
Melissa Acosta Board Member

OTHERS PRESENT:

Tom Wilkinson Code Enforcement Manager
Micheal Mack Code Enforcement Officer
Justin Simpson Code Enforcement Officer
Jason Brimm Code Enforcement Officer
Kristin Eick Board Attorney
Darla Crowl Recording Secretary
Mark Baaden Police Lieutenant
Charlene Neuterman Community Services Director

The Board Secretary swore in all Staff members giving testimony.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES:
1. Approval of Agenda: June 19, 2025
Chairman Roberts noted changes to the agenda (Items complied, tabled and withdrawn)
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve to the agenda of June 19, 2025. Vote on
the motion carried unanimously.

2. Approval of Meeting Minutes: May 15, 2025.

Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Mr. Muller, to approve to the minutes of May 15, 2025. Vote on
the motion carried unanimously.

3. Submit to the record of all documents & notices for all cases on the Agenda.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 2

CASES:
1. CE-24-790 – 2526 Stanford Dr.
Code Enforcement Officer Justin Simpson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Officer Simpson testified that the Property Owner was in violation of City
of Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Junk, Trash, Debris,:Ch. 6 Art. III, Div. 3 Sec. 6-
900 (b)(1) Accu, of Trash and City of Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 4, Sec. 6-1001 (d) weeds
overgrowth of the City Code.

Officer Simpson requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be given until August
20, 2025 (60 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of up to two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00)
City of Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Junk, Trash, Debris up to two hundred fifty
dollars ($250.00) City of Cocoa Code 6 Art. III, Div. 3 Sec. 6-900 (b)(1) Accu, of Trash and up to two
hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) City of Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 4, Sec. 6-1001 (d) weeds
overgrowth per day until found in compliance.

Chairman Roberts asked if the residence was occupied? Officer Simpson stated he has been to the
property several times and not seen anyone at the residence. Since this is his area, he actively patrols it.
He noticed a ring camera on the property. Question if there was an active water account. Officer
Simpson responded there is an active water account. The question was asked about the violations if
there were 2 or 3. Attorney Eick confirmed the notice of violation had all 3 violations which she believed
Code Enforcement was asking to find all three in violation. More discussion amongst the Board members
and staff.

Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to amend the Staff’s recommendation and a fine of
seventy-five dollars per day per violation and give the property owner until August 20, 2025, and find the
Property Owner in violation. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.

2. CE-25-82 – 516 W King St

Code Enforcement Officer Jason Brimm provided an overview of the Case history and presented exhibits
for the Board’s review. Officer Brimm testified that the Property Owner was in violation of City of Cocoa
Code Ch. 12 Sec. 12-1 (a)(b) Business Tax Receipt of the City Code.

Officer Brimm requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be given until April 17,
2025, to come into compliance or impose a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) City of Cocoa
Code Ch. 12 Sec. 12-1 (a)(b) Business Tax Receipt. To have been in violation and a Finding of Fact
notice to be on the record.

Attorney Paul Bross representing the business, contacted Officer Brimm stating his client had not
received a copy of the notice of violation but did receive the notice of hearing. On June 9, 2025, the
owner’s son came to City Hall and paid the three years delinquent amount for the business tax receipt for
the business. Chairman Roberts had questions about the Finding of Fact. Officer Brimm stated that they
came in compliance after the date given of April 17, 2025, so he wanted a Finding of Fact on record.
Attorney Eick explained that it would be a no fine case. More discussion amongst the Board members
and staff.

Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Mr. Muller, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the property
owner to have been in violation and a Finding of Fact filed with no fine is imposed. Any violation of the
same code by the same respondent within five years from this date of this order be treated as a repeat
violation for which a fine of up to five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day may be imposed. Vote on the
motion carried unanimously.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 3

NON-COMPLIANCE:
1. CE-25-37 – 1112 Ohio St
Code Enforcement Officer Justin Simpson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Officer Simpson testified that the Property Owner is in violation of Ch. 6,
Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Storing Junk and City of Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-902
(b)(2) Abandoned Vehicles of the City of Cocoa Code. Officer Simpson stated a Notice of Hearing was
sent on June 2, 2025, sent certified and posted on the property and property owner remains in
violation.

Property owner was sworn in: Mark Yates, 1112 Ohio St, Cocoa
Thomas Studstill, 200 Linda Ave, Merritt Island was also sworn in.

Officer Simpson contacted the Cocoa Police Department to see if Mr. Yates had the registration for the
vehicle in the picture. At this time, he did not have a registration for the vehicle since 2020 per Cocoa
Police Department. Mr. Yates was unclear what the violations were after the power point presentation.
Mr. Yates gave more testimony about all the items on his property and explained that the items on his
property were items for future projects. Officer Simpson went through the pictures to show Mr. Yates the
items that were considered junk, trash and debris. Chairman Roberts asked Mr. Yates at the last meeting
you were going to take some of the items to a different property? Chairman Roberts explained that
having insurance on a vehicle is not what the violation was for it was the registration of the vehicle. Ms.
Hatcher asked about the barrel in the yard. Mr. Studstill gave his testimony about what was going on with
the property. Vice Chair, Otero said all of this was discussed at the last meeting. Vice Chair Otero asked
Officer Simpson to show him pictures of the front of the house. Mr. Muller asked if they had pulled any
permits for work that was being done on the property. Mr. Yates said no permits were needed. Mr.
Muller explained that any work done on the property needs plans or permits (ramp and building a wall).
Mr. Yates said he was putting up a fence and got a permit. Community Services Director Neuterman
stated there were no permits in the system for a fence. Manager Wilkinson asked the Chairman if the
Board could get back on the topic for the noncompliance items. Ms. Scott asked Officer Simpson if the
items on the front porch were included in the accumulation of junk and trash. Officer Simpson responded
that the items on the front porch were moved around so it was not included in the violation. More
discussion amongst the Board members, property owner and staff.

Motion by Vice Chair Otero seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the
Owner in Non-Compliance. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.

2. CE-24-13 – 1304 S Lakemont Dr.

Code Enforcement Officer Jason Brimm provided an overview of the Case history and presented exhibits
for the Board’s review. Officer Brimm testified that the Property Owner is in violation of Chapter 6
Buildings, Construction, Sec.6-902, Discarding Junk, inoperable or abandoned Vehicles (b)(1) and
Chapter 6 Buildings, Construction, Sec. 6-900 Generally Nuisances(B1) of the City of Cocoa Code.
Officer Brimm stated a Notice of Hearing was sent on June 2, 2025, sent certified and posted on the
property and property owner remains in violation.

Motion by Vice Chair Otero seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the
Owner in Non-Compliance. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.

LIEN REDUCTIONS

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 4

1. CE-18-651 – 1001 N Indian River Dr.
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on May 16, 2019, at which time the Board found the
owner, Patrica Ahneman in violation of the following:

• City Code, XXII. Permit Required App. A Article XV Sec. 2(a)
• City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-1002 (a) Pools and spas
• City Code, XXIII. Permit Required (Fences) App Art. XIII sec 5 (c)

The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners with sufficient time of June 16, 2019, to correct said
violation(s). Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing
was held on September 19, 2019.

The lien ran at $75.00 per day from June 16, 2019, until compliance was achieved on December 6,
2024. Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $149,945.00. The property owner
(Patrica Ahneman) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of Zero.

Staff utilized the following factors in making their recommendations to reduce the lien:

• Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes

• Applicant resides at the property: yes

• The number of violations related to the subject lien; Three

• Number of Inspections performed: 10

• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024

• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens

• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, June 19, 2025, and was
in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to
the Council Meeting

• $1,819.99 is the city cost of staff to prosecute this case.

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $750,030 according to the
Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.

The staff’s recommendation is that the lien be reduced to the amount of zero, per the applicant’s request.

Property owner was sworn in: Patricia M. Ahneman, Jr, 1001 N Indian River Dr.

Ms. Ahneman asked the board to change the reduction from zero to staff cost for processing. Ms.
Ahneman gave testimony about talking to the city about putting up a temporary fence because of the
pool. She was first notified not for violations, that there were no permits. The pool company, according to
her, had pulled the permits. It took 6 months to get the permits because the building department could not
locate. Ms. Ahneman travels and stated her neighbor picks up her mail. She was unaware of any
violations. Chairman Roberts asked when she realized she was in violation because it ran for 66 months.
She stated she had no idea because she signed the paper and thought she was good. Chairman
Roberts stated that the city cost on the power point was different than the staff report. Manager Wilkinson
stated he had just noticed the error. Manager Wilkinson stated the cost sheet that was given to board

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 5

members was the correct amount. Ms. Scott asked Manager Wilkinson if he had checked to see if any
permits had been pulled and completed. Director Neuterman went through each permit for the board
members. The fence permit was withdrawn and never completed. In 2019 a screen enclosure was
pulled and never closed out. Director Neuterman continued to look through the system and found notes
that the permit was given a final on September 11, 2019. Attorney Eick had questions about the fence
permit not being in compliance. Attorney Eick also stated that she would not be eligible for a lien
reduction since the fence was not completed. Chairman Roberts asked shouldn’t of all this information
about the permits been caught when doing the lien reduction packet. More discussion amongst the
Board members, property owner and staff.

Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the
lien reduction be in the amount of zero dollars ($0). Vote on the motion carried unanimously

2. CE-23-64 – 309 N Georgia Ave.

The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on October 19,2023, at which time the Board found
the owner, Fair Price Properties LLC. in violation of the following:

• City Code Appendix A, Article XV Sec. 2(a) Permit required
• City Code Chapter 6, Sec. 6-1003 (g) Roofs & Drainage
• City Code Chapter 6, Sec. 6-1003 (c) Premises Identification

The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners with sufficient time of November 18, 2023, to correct
said violation(s). Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance
Hearing was held on January 18, 2024.

The lien ran at $75.00 per day from November 18, 2023 until compliance was achieved on April 29,
2025. Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $39,620.00.

The property owner (Fair Price Properties LLC.) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of
$1,000.00.

Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:

• Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes
• Applicant resides at the property: No
• The number of violations related to the subject lien; Three
• Number of Inspections performed: 15
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens

Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, June 19, 2025, and was in-
compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to the Council
Meeting

The current market value of the subject property is listed at $117,710.00, according to the Brevard County
Property Appraiser the use is listed as Single-Family Residence.

The staff’s recommendation is that the fine / lien be reduced to $2,121.36 which is the cost of staff to
prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the
property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.

Property owner was sworn in: Johnny Diamantas, 10552 Plantation Bay Dr, Tampa

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 6

Mr. Diamantas said he was not aware of the staff’s cost and would like to change his request to the staff’s
cost. The company listed on this property is being closed. Chairman Roberts asked if the property was a
rental property. It was stated that it is a property that was being flipped. Manager Wilkinson stated all the
permits were pulled and closed. More discussion amongst the Board members, property owner and staff.

Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Mr. Muller, to approve the staff’s recommendation to City
Council that the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand one hundred twenty-one dollars and
thirty-six cents ($2,121.36). Vote: Yay (3) Nay (2) (Chairman Roberts, Ms. Scott) Motion Passed

3. CE-22-828 – 1050 W King St.

The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on May 18, 2023, at which time the Board found the
owner, Floor Suppliers Inc. in violation of the following:

• City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-900 (b) Accumulation of Trash & Litter
• City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-1003 (a) Exterior General Condition
• City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-900 (b5) Boarded Up Buildings
• City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-1003 (g) Roofs & Drainage

The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of July 17, 2023, to correct said
violation(s). Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing
was held on August 17, 2023.

The lien ran at $100.00 per day from July 17, 2023, until compliance was achieved on March 13, 2025.
Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $60,520.00. The property owner (Floor
Suppliers Inc.) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of $10,000.00

Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:

• Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes

• Applicant resides at the property: No

• The number of violations related to the subject lien; Four

• Number of Inspections performed: 20

• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024

• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens

• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, June 19, 2025, and was
in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to
the Council Meeting

• City Cost to prosecute the case was $2,433.54

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $1,138,600.00 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Retail Store.
The staff’s recommendation is that the lien be reduced to $10,000.00 per the applicant’s request.

Property owner was sworn in: Shiua Roopnarine, 10902 Belle Maisons Dr, Orlando

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 7

Mr. Roopnarine said they had a hard time finding a contractor to do the roof work. More discussion
amongst the Board members and staff.

Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the
lien reduction to be in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Vote on the motion carried
unanimously.

4. CE-17-29 – 1723 Dixon Blvd

The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on March 16, 2017, at which time the Board found
the owner, Allen Condominium Association Inc. in violation of the following:

• City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-1003 (b) Protective Treatment
(peeling and flaking paint)
• City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-900 (b4) Maintenance of structure & Grounds

The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of April 16, 2017, to correct said
violation(s). Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing
was held on April 20, 2017.

The lien ran at $250.00 per day from April 16, 2017, until compliance was achieved on December 1,
2020. Code records show the case was closed, leaving a fine of $331,270.00. The property owner (Allen
Condominium Association Inc.) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of the city cost.

Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:

• Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes

• Applicant resides at the property: No

• The number of violations related to the subject lien; Two

• Number of Inspections performed: 24

• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024

• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens

• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, June 19, 2025, and was
in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to
the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property is not available at this time due to the property being
divided up into separate units, according to the Brevard County Property Appraiser the use is listed as
Condominiums.

The staff’s recommendation is that the fine / lien be reduced to $3,381.43 which is the cost of staff to
prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the
property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.

Property owner was sworn in: Chris Linardo, 2805 Nicholas Rd, Titusville

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 8

Ms. Linardo said she has been working for the management company since 2017. As of May 2020, had
taken care of all the exterior building, painting and soffit work. Once corrected an inspection was
requested from the Code Enforcement department. Due to previous management failure to secure
building 17 & 19 the lien could not be stopped. The management company is trying to get a bank loan to
fix the roofs on the building but cannot with the lien on the property. Chairman Roberts asked if there was
a current violation on the property. Manager Wilkinson gave the answer does it need a new roof.
Manager Wilkinson stated he would put a new roof on it. There have been some repairs to the roof, but it
is out of his scope to say that they need to replace the roof on the buildings. Chairman Roberts stated he
did not answer the question which Manager Wilkinson stated there are not any current violations. More
discussion amongst the Board members and staff.

Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the
lien reduction be in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). Vote: Yay (4) Nay (1) (Chairman
Roberts) Motion Passed

5. CE-22-475 – 213 Factory St.

The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on April 20, 2023, at which time the Board found the
owner, Edgar Levensaler in violation of the following:

• City Code Appendix A, Article XIII, Sec. 1, 9(b)

The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of October 20, 2023, to correct said
violation(s). Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing
was held on November 16, 2023.

The lien ran at $75.00 per day from October 20, 2023, until compliance was achieved on August 29,
2024. Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $24,010.00.

The property owner (Tim Levensaler) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of the city
cost.

Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:

• Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes

• Applicant resides at the property: No

• The number of violations related to the subject lien; One

• Number of Inspections performed: 20

• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024

• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens

• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, June 19, 2025, and was
in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to
the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property is listed at $972,440, according to the Brevard County
Property Appraiser the use is listed as Low-Rise Apartments.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 9

The staff’s recommendation is that the fine / lien be reduced to $2,773.32 which is the cost of staff to
prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the
property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.

Property owner was sworn in: Tim Levensaler, 2260 Sykes Creek Dr., Merritt Island

Chairman Roberts asked if this was new construction. Mr. Levensaler gave an overview of the property
and what was done. The property was a vacant storage lot that AT & T owned. Mr. Levensaler went to
the city and asked what the use code for the property. Mr. Levensaler assumed that he could park cars
on the property and put milling down, which was not allowed. He was also required to get a site plan for
the property which turned into new construction. He had to merge the property on 213 Factory St and
699 Hughlett together to make it one property which is the 699 Hughlett address. Mr. Levensaler
renovated the property into a 22-unit apartment building and the other added property was for overflow
parking. More discussion amongst the Board members, property owner and staff.

Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve staff’s recommendation to City Council
the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand seven hundred seventy-three dollars and thirty-two
cents ($2,773.32). Vote on the motion carried unanimously

6. CE-22-695 – 49 Parkway St.

The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on May 18, 2023, at which time the Board found the
owner, Deborah Raskett in violation of the following:

• City Code Appendix A, Article XV Sec. 2(a) Permit required

The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners with sufficient time of June 17, 2023, to correct said
violation(s). Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing
was held on July 20, 2023.

The lien ran at $25.00 per day from June 17, 2023, until compliance was achieved on January 19, 2024.
Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $5,400.00.

The property owner (Deborah Raskett) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of Zero.

Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:

• Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes
• Applicant resides at the property: No
• The number of violations related to the subject lien; One
• Number of Inspections performed: 8
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens.

City’s cost of staff to prosecute this case is $1,864.48

Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, June 19, 2025, and was in-
compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to the Council
Meeting

The current market value of the subject property is listed at $63,090.00 according to the Brevard County
Property Appraiser the use is listed as Single-Family Residence.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
June 19, 2025
Page 10

The Code Enforcements Board and staff’s recommendation is that the lien be reduced to the amount of
zero.

Property owner was sworn in: Deborah Raskett, 2565 Washington St, Melbourne & Renee Wiebelt, The
Closing Place Inc. (closing agent) 461 Ibis Ln, Satellite Beach

Ms. Raskett told the board that she never received any notices about the hearings. Ms. Raskett found
out about the lien when she went to sell another property. She stated the previous owner did the work at
the property and she thought the lien was closed. Ms. Wiebelt said she did the closing on the property 3
years ago when she bought the property. Emails back in forth between herself and Manager Bunt at the
time. Ms. Wiebelt stated that Manager Wilkinson had a copy of the emails. Vice Chair, Otero asked what
the plans were for the house. Ms. Raskett said renovate it and then rent it. Ms. Scott and other board
members asked when the property was purchased. Her response was October of 2022. Manager
Wilkinson said the email that he has in front of him does state from Manager Bunt the case was closed.
Chairman Roberts asked Manager Wilkinson if this was incorrect and should not be a lien. Manager
Wilkinson answered there should not have been a lien. More discussion amongst the Board members,
property owner and staff.

Motion by Chairman Roberts, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to amend staff’s recommendation to City
Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero ($0). Vote on the motion carried unanimously

NEW BUSINESS:

None

OTHER BUSINESS:

None

ABATEMENT APPEALS:

None

Manager Announcements:

None

NEXT MEETING:

The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on August 21, 2025.

ADJOURNMENT:

There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:57 PM.

Approved on this ______ day of ___________________, 2025.

______________________________
Lloyd Roberts, Chairman

______________________________
Darla Crowl, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Roll Call

II. Swearing in of Code Officers

III. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of June 19, 2025.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 15, 2025.
3. Submittal of Document Packet

IV. Cases

1. CE24-790 / Christina Cobb property owner of 2526 Stanford Drive, Cocoa, FL, in violation of the following City Codes: Ch. 6, Art. III, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Junk, Trash, Debris, Ch. 6, Art. III, Div. 4, Sec. 6-1001 (d) Weeds Overgrowth — 00:03:15
2. CE25-82 / Stone Funeral Home / Richard Stone & Daisy Stone, property owner of 516 W. King St., Cocoa, FL, in violation of City Code, Ch. 12 Sec. 12-1 (a)(b) Business Tax Receipt. — 00:14:30

V. Non-Compliance

1. CE25-37 / Mark Yates The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on May 15, 2025, at which time the Board found the owner (Mark Yates) of 1112 Ohio St. Cocoa, FL. in violation. The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner (Mark Yates) sufficient time of June 18, 2025, to correct the following violation(s). Ch. 6, Art. III, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Junk, Trash, Debris Ch. 6, Art. III, Div. 3, Sec. 6-902 (b)(2) Abandoned Vehicles — 00:27:25
2. CE-24-13 / Burton Baum The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on March 20, 2025, at which time the Board found the owner (Burton Baum) in violation. The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners of 1304 S. Lakemont Dr. Cocoa FL. sufficient time of April 16, 2025, to correct the following violation(s). Chapter 6 Buildings, Construction, Sec.6-902, Discarding Junk, inoperable or Abandoned Vehicles (b)(1). Chapter 6 Buildings, Construction, Sec. 6-900 Generally Nuisances(B1). — 00:51:52

VI. Lien Reductions

1. The applicant (Patricia Ahneman) is requesting a reduction of the Code Enforcement lien of $149,945.00 at the property located at 1001 N. Indian River Dr. be reduced to the amount of zero.
2. The applicant, Fair Price Properties LLC. (William Diamantas), is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $39,620.00 at the property of 309 N Georgia Ave. be reduced to the amount of $1000.00.
3. The applicant, Floor Suppliers Inc. (Shiua Roopnarine), is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement Lien of $60,520.00 at the property of 1050 W. King Street, be reduced to the amount of $10,000.
4. The applicant, Allen Condominium, (Lissette Mendoza), is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $304,000.00 at the property located at 1723 Dixon Blvd. be reduced to City's cost.
5. The applicant (Tim Levensaler) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $24,010.00 at the property located at 213 Factory St., be reduced to the amount of the City's cost.
6. The applicant, Deborah Raskett, is requesting a reduction of the Code Enforcement lien of $5,400.00 at the property located at 49 Parkway St. be reduced to the amount of zero. — 01:47:15

VII. New Business

VIII. Other Business

IX. Abatement Appeals

X. Manager Announcements

XI. Next Meeting Date: The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on August 21, 2025 .

XII. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 20 voices separated from the audio. 42 short machine repair(s) (51 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.5% of 15,531 content words. Dotted words (525 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 358 passages (22% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:14] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:14–00:00:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:17] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:00:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Anybody here? Father, we thank you for allowing us to see another day.

[00:00:38] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:38–00:00:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:41] ▶ Play Speaker 1

that we can do for seated Cocoa. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. Amen. Alright.

[00:00:46] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:46–00:00:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:51] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:51–00:01:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:54] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

[00:01:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1

And we'll have our roll call.

[00:01:13] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Mr. Roberts.

[00:01:15] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Here.

[00:01:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Mr. Otero.

[00:01:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Present.

[00:01:18] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Mr. Brown. I talked to him today. He's still not doing good.

[00:01:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay.

[00:01:25] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Ms. Scott.

[00:01:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Here.

[00:01:27] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Mr. Simpson.

[00:01:29] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Excused.

[00:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Yeah, he won't be here. Ms. Acosta. Mr. Mueller.

[00:01:38] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Here.

[00:01:39] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Ms. Weatherspoon. And Ms. Hatcher.

[00:01:43] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Here.

[00:01:46] ▶ Play Speaker 1

‸ All right. We'll have our swearing in of our code enforcement officers.

[00:01:54] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:54–00:01:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2

help you God.

[00:02:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1

I will have our agenda approval for tonight. Are there any changes? All right. Take a motion to approve. Motion to approve.

[00:02:13] ▶ Play No voice detected

Go ahead.

[00:02:14] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Motion to approve.

[00:02:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3

I'll

[00:02:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

second.

[00:02:16] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:16–00:02:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1

All in favor say aye. Aye. ‸ Opposed? Motion passed unanimously.

[00:02:22] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Can I just remind everybody to speak in their microphones?

[00:02:26] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Hello. Hello. Hello. Oh, my bad. Just checking. Is that better?

[00:02:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:31–00:02:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:31] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:02:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:33] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:37] ▶ Play Speaker 1

All right. And our meeting from May 15th. Are there any recommendations on changes? There are no recommendations on changes. I'll take a ‸ motion to approve.

[00:02:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Motion to approve. Second.

[00:02:53] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:53–00:02:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Second. Motion to approve.

[00:02:59] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Motion to approve on the floor with

[00:03:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

the

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:01–00:03:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:03:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1

second. All in favor say aye.

[00:03:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Aye.

[00:03:05] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Anybody? Oh, no nays. Motion passed unanimously. All right. We'll have our submittal

[00:03:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8

of our documents. Mr. Chair,

[00:03:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:03:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8

would like to submit the PowerPoint presentations and the packet of documents for each case into the record. Yes, sir. So noted.

[00:03:20] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Thank you very

[00:03:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

much.

[00:03:23] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:23–00:03:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:35] ▶ Play Speaker 9

All right. Good evening. First case is going to be 24-790. President myself.

[00:03:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:41–00:03:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Property owner did allow for the following violations.

[00:03:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:51–00:03:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9

trash, storing junk, and weeds. This is the house. It's located on Stanford Drive, as you can see. It's to the north end,

[00:04:02] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:02–00:04:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:05] ▶ Play Speaker 9

The image here is provided by Brevard County Property Appraiser.

[00:04:11] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:11–00:04:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9

If you just want to take a minute, it just basically says that any accumulation of trash debris refuse, basically says that it's become a nuisance. It's not allowed to exceed seven calendar days for any

[00:04:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

reason

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:32–00:04:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:04:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9

location and visibility from adjacent properties. As you can see here, it's clearly been left at the street. This picture was taken May 29th of 2025.

[00:04:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:48–00:04:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:55] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:55–00:04:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:59] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Also, any abandoned vehicles also could fall into this as possible, or other waste materials constitutes a nuisance. Here we see under the carport on the property, storage of miscellaneous junk.

[00:05:16] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

You

[00:05:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9

have bicycles, outdoor refrigerators, coolers, this kind of thing. Normally, if this were an enclosed garage, you would not have this issue. But it being outside in the open, ‸ it becomes a nuisance because ‸ it becomes a blight to your fellow neighbors. This picture was also taken on May 29th.

[00:05:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:40–00:05:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9

All premises and exterior properties shall be maintained free from weeds and plant growth in excess of 12 inches. Weeds shall be prohibited, defined all grasses, annual plants, and vegetation other than trees and shrubs. And, of course, it's not to include certain types of flowers or garden beds and that type of thing. As you can see here, the entire front yard has an accumulation of grass and sawgrass and that type of thing of weeds above the 12 inch. Taken again, May 29th of 2025. The case was started on August 27th, 2024. Code enforcement arrived at the reference property. During an active patrol of the neighborhood, code enforcement observed outdoor storage junk, trash debris, tall grass.

[00:06:39] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:39–00:06:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9

UBSPS certified mail. January 31st, 2025. I conducted a re-inspection of reference property. Found it still be in violation. No contact from property owner. April 25th, 2025.

[00:06:54] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:54–00:06:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Conducted an inspection of the reference property based on a citizen complaint. ‸ Property was still found in violation. No contact from property owner.

[00:07:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:03–00:07:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:05] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I conducted a re-inspection at the reference property. Still in violation. No contact from property owner.

[00:07:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:13–00:07:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:15] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Notice of hearing sent to the property owner. USPS certified mail. Restricted delivery with hard copy return receipt. Notice ‸ hearing was posted at the reference property and at City Hall. You'll find this in Exhibit 4.

[00:07:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:27–00:07:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I conducted a re-inspection at the reference property and

[00:07:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

observe

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:32–00:07:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:07:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9

the property to remain in violation. You'll find this in Exhibits 5 through 7. Here you can see on the left, this is the picture of the posting of the property. And on the right, this is the posting of the affidavit, my signed, notarized ‸ copy.

[00:07:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:49–00:08:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:52] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:07:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:24 ▶]

[00:08:16] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:08:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:08:16] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:08:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:08:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9

The grass and weeds have still not been cut.

[00:08:22] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:22–00:08:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Issue an order requiring the violations be corrected. Property brought into compliance immediately. and consider an imposition of a daily fine of up to $250 per fine per day until compliance is met. Staff available for any questions. Is the residence occupied? I've been by several times. This is my zone, so I actively patrol it. I have not seen anybody at the residence. There is a ring camera there.

[00:09:03] ▶ Play No voice detected

‸ The

[00:09:04] ▶ Play Speaker 9

property, I don't believe ‸ it's

[00:09:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:09:07–00:09:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:08] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:09:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9

believe, but I have not seen anybody there at all.

[00:09:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:12–00:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Water is active, yes.

[00:09:22] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Because ‸ the trash that's out by the road, is that where the trash is picked up, or would you know? Because I'm just wondering, because if it's out by the road, why wasn't it picked up? Is there anyone here for the property first?

[00:09:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:40–00:09:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9

wouldn't know if there was anybody here for the property. I have seen trash cans put at the road, and they've been removed from the road. So I can't say for certain that somebody is living there or is not living there. But from the assumption of trash cans being placed at the road and being removed from the road, my assumption would be that somebody either stays there or is at least using the property to some effect.

[00:10:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay. Also, just to clarify, here on our document packet, it shows two violations, but there were three on the PowerPoint. Now, are

[00:10:27] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:27–00:10:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Just want to make sure we're clear.

[00:10:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:34–00:10:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:47] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Yes, sir. There are three violations.

[00:10:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:53–00:10:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes, sir. I do.

[00:11:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay. And you see two violations on here?

[00:11:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Mm-hmm.

[00:11:04] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay. So I just want to be accurate to ensure that we are being as fair as possible.

[00:11:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

And

[00:11:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1

are there, so we have two listed here, three ‸ on the presentation. I just, I don't know if it makes a difference. Calvary.

[00:11:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Can we go over them again?

[00:11:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:31–00:11:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:11:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Okay. So that's the one we're missing. Yes. Yeah.

[00:11:43] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Yes. The violation for 6-900B1 is not listed on the agenda item itself. However, it is listed on the notice of violation. So I believe code enforcement is asking the board to find all violations of all three. Is that correct?

[00:12:02] ▶ Play Speaker 9

That is correct. Okay.

[00:12:08] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So we have no one here. And from what I see, um, they are clear violations with the evidence in the pictures.

[00:12:19] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:19–00:12:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1

And this is a regular, this is the first time. So I'm looking for 25 per violation a day. Any?

[00:12:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Yeah.

[00:12:43] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:12:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3

would prefer to go up.

[00:12:45] ▶ Play Speaker 11

No communication with the

[00:12:46] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

homeowner.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:46–00:12:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:12:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Maybe not 250, but definitely more than 25 per violation per day.

[00:12:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay. How about 25 50? I'm joking. Well, I'll take a motion.

[00:13:02] ▶ Play Speaker 2

How ‸ are we doing for each one?

[00:13:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Well, ‸ I'll make

[00:13:07] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

a motion.

[00:13:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3

I'll make a motion. Based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I may define the respondents in this case in violation of the city codes as charged.

[00:13:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:19–00:13:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3

on, um, what is our next meeting date? August.

[00:13:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9

August 21st.

[00:13:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3

On August 21st. In the event, respondent does not comply by this date after considering the factors in section 162.09 Florida statute, a fine in the amount of $75 per day per fine. Um, will be imposed for each day.

[00:13:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:50–00:13:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3

enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order.

[00:14:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:02–00:14:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:14:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:14:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:14:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6

And what's the amount?

[00:14:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:12–00:14:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:14:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

I second.

[00:14:19] ▶ Play Speaker 1

I have a motion on the floor with

[00:14:20] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

the

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:20–00:14:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:14:21] ▶ Play Speaker 1

second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed. Motion passing unanimously. Item number two. CE 25-82.

[00:14:38] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:38–00:14:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:43] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Respondent is a Richard and Daisy Stone.

[00:14:46] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Addresses

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:46–00:14:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:14:47] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

516 West King Street.

[00:14:49] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:49–00:14:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:51] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

Will be represented by myself. Code Enforcement Officer Brim. The property owner did allow for the following violations.

[00:15:00] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:00–00:15:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:05] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

This is

[00:15:06] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:06–00:15:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:06] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

aerial overshot view of the business. I'm sure you're familiar with it. It's right over the railroad tracks. ‸ Business tax receipt under chapter 12 section 12-1. No person shall engage in or manage any business, occupation, or profession for which there is a local business tax receipt required by this chapter or any other ordinance in the city unless such person shall first procure a local business tax receipt to conduct the same form. Same from the building official. ‸ On this slide, the highlighted portion shows valid through. The date

[00:15:42] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:42–00:15:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:45] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

This was taken on June 6th of this year, 2025. And they were

[00:15:51] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:51–00:15:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:59] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:59–00:16:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:05] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

business didn't have

[00:16:05] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:05–00:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

March 17th, I mailed out a notice violation to the address according to the property appraiser, which was 516 West King Street via certified mail. The USPS showed that it was delivered March 20th. April 8th, I went into the business physically and spoke to the owner's son. He stated that his mother had passed away

[00:16:28] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:28–00:16:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:29] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

He wasn't aware of the business ‸ tax receipt. I gave him the permit technician's number at City Hall and informed him how to go about getting the BTR. May 28th, I checked the BTR website at work for the status. The business still showed that it was still behind going back to the same

[00:16:49] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

day

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:49–00:16:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:16:49] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

2022. June 2nd, I posted the notice of hearing at the property next to the office door. I tried to give it to someone in person.

[00:16:59] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:59–00:17:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:01] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:01–00:17:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:05] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

June 6th, I received a call from Attorney Paul Bross. He was representing the business in regards to this case.

[00:17:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

stated

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:13–00:17:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:17:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

his client didn't receive the notice violation, but had received the notice of hearing, informed the attorney that a copy could be emailed to him, and it was. And as you can see, on June 9th, the owner's son came to City Hall, paid the delinquent amount regarding the BTR for the business. The notice of violation, as I mentioned previously, that was mailed, gave the business until April 17th, 2025 to come into compliance. And again, the business was behind three years in business tax receipts. On the left, you can see the notice of hearing that I ‸ mailed out that went out certified mail. And on the right is my affidavit of posting and showing that it was posted down here in City Hall. On the left, you can see the USPS tracking that it shows, as I stated on the other slide, that it was mailed, or I'm sorry, delivered March 20th.

[00:18:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:08–00:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

that was sent out June 3rd. On the left is a copy of deed. The right is the tax rules, which shows they're up to date.

[00:18:23] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:18:23] ▶ Play Speaker 12

just had these for reference in case there's questions that come up. Staff recommendation, staff requests the code enforcement board find to respond to owner in noncompliance, as the business tax receipt was not renewed and active in the time frame given. In the notice of violation, in addition, was three years delinquent. Staff is requesting a finding of fact in this case. I'm available for questions.

[00:18:50] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So what

[00:18:51] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

you are

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:51–00:18:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:18:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1

asking is for the board to find them in noncompliance and going back three years, correct?

[00:19:01] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Staff is, well, I'm requesting the code boards to request their code enforcement's requesting a finding

[00:19:06] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:06–00:19:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:06] ▶ Play Speaker 12

fact based on they were given a deadline of time. They did not meet it. They did become current on the BTR, but it wasn't until

[00:19:15] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:15–00:19:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:18] ▶ Play Speaker 12

up. And that was well past the April 17th date that they were given.

[00:19:26] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So they came into compliance

[00:19:28] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

June 9th. Yeah, June 9th, I believe it was. I can go back.

[00:19:33] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:33–00:19:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:37] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:19:40] ▶ Play Speaker 12

I'm sorry, September of 2022.

[00:19:42] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:42–00:19:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:50] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So, ‸ you gave them April 17th of this year. They didn't come into... They didn't take care of it until June 9th, correct?

[00:20:02] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Yes, sir.

[00:20:03] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay.

[00:20:05] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:05–00:20:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1

page and get a better understanding. So, what we're looking for is for them...

[00:20:19] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:19–00:20:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:20:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:24–00:20:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1

which the violation was...

[00:20:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:30–00:20:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1

month, in which you gave them to April, exactly.

[00:20:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:39–00:20:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:43] ▶ Play Speaker 1

here.

[00:20:44] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

A finding of fact that they were in violation, ‸ even though it is, as of today, taken care of. Okay. That way, if there's any future violations, it would be regarded as a repeat.

[00:20:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Okay.

[00:20:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:54–00:20:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:55] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:20:56] ▶ Play Speaker 10

So, for the board, it would be a no-fine case.

[00:20:59] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. That's what I just want to ensure. Okay.

[00:21:03] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:03–00:21:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:05] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

everybody on the board, to be clear, because I was a little cloudy.

[00:21:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12

No, that's fine, sir. Okay.

[00:21:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:21:10] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

understand.

[00:21:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So, everyone here good?

[00:21:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Do we have anybody from the corner

[00:21:19] ▶ Play No voice detected

that

[00:21:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

wants to speak?

[00:21:21] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

I don't believe so.

[00:21:22] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:22–00:21:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:23] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

from the owners or the attorney. Okay. So in

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:21:23–00:21:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:21:29] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

our recommendation, it'll be either find them compliant or non-compliant with no fine. So then now next

[00:21:38] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:38–00:21:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:40] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[00:21:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:21:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:21:53] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:21:53] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:21:53] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:21:53] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

um All right. I'm moving to find the respondent was in

[00:21:59] ▶ Play Speaker 2

violation of city code as charged

[00:22:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3

and failed to correct the violation by the time specified for correction by

[00:22:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:08–00:22:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3

imposed. Any violation of the same code by the same respondent within five years from this date of this order may be treated as a repeat violation for which

[00:22:23] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:23–00:22:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Second. I

[00:22:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor say aye. Aye.

[00:22:35] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Those

[00:22:36] ▶ Play Speaker 1

opposed. Motion passes unanimously, ma'am. All right. We are to our non-compliance section.

[00:22:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:52–00:22:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:03–00:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:14] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I will be presenting this case for you. Code officer Simpson. Property owner failed to comply with the board's

[00:23:22] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:22–00:23:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:31] ▶ Play Speaker 9

bravo

[00:23:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:32–00:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:33–00:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Abandoned vehicles, chapter

[00:23:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:36–00:23:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

article

[00:23:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:36–00:23:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

division

[00:23:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:37–00:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9

section

[00:23:38] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:38–00:23:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9

bravo

[00:23:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:40–00:23:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:42] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Storing junk, chapter

[00:23:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:44–00:23:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:24 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:44–00:24:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9

the current year and or the absence of a current motor vehicle registration shall be prima facie evidence that such vehicle is inoperable and or abandoned,

[00:24:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

jumped

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:17–00:24:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:24:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9

or discarded. Presence of a current license plate or registration shall not in and of the assent and of themselves ‸ exempt any motor vehicle from becoming in ‸ violation of this section. of

[00:24:32] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

the uh this

[00:24:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9

is a copy of the uh board's order from last month. The highlighted sections are the violations and the possible fines.

[00:24:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

May 15th of this year, Code Board

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:48–00:24:50 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:24:50] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:50–00:24:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

owners in violation of section 6-9, Bravo 11 and 6-9, 902, Bravo 2. For the property owner to come in compliance as of 18 June, 29 May, I conducted an inspection of reference property,

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:51–00:25:09 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:25:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:08–00:25:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

owner still in violation.

[00:25:10] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:25:10–00:25:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:11] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

notice of hearing is

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:25:10–00:25:12 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:25:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:12–00:25:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9

USPS certified mail, restricted delivery with hard copy return receipt requested. Notice of hearing is posted to reference property and City Hall. This will be presented in Exhibit

[00:25:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:23–00:25:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

as you can see, this is, there's still

[00:25:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:30–00:25:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9

You can see on the left hand side that the abandoned van, the abandoned vehicle, the van is still there from May's code board. And the uh abandoned vehicle, the Porsche is still there from May's code board as well.

[00:25:50] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Here's the posting on

[00:25:51] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

the

[00:25:51] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

left hand side.

[00:25:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9

On the left hand side, you can see the posting in front of the house. On the right hand side, you can see my posting affidavit. June 12, 2025, property owner contacted me via cell phone. The property owner stated that he was removing the burndown trailer. He also stated that there were new vehicles on the property, but that he was removing them soon.

[00:26:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:18–00:26:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

and observed the property remained in violation. These will be shown in Exhibits

[00:26:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:28–00:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9

through

[00:26:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:29–00:26:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:31] ▶ Play Speaker 9

As you can see on the left and the right, these are pictures of today. and as you can see on the license plate it still says 1219. i did contact pd today to verify to see if Mr. Yates possibly just had not put the registration on the license plate. According to

[00:27:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:08–00:27:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9

PD, the license plate has not the van has not had current registration since 2020.

[00:27:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:17–00:27:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9

code enforcement board's previous order

[00:27:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:24–00:27:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9

and a fine be imposed until broadened compliance. the

[00:27:31] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

staff

[00:27:31] ▶ Play Speaker 9

is available for questions and uh

[00:27:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:33–00:27:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:27:37] ▶ Play Speaker 1

be sworn in?

[00:27:37] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

Are you both going to talk

[00:27:39] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:27:39–00:27:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:40] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:27:42] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:27:45] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes. Okay. First one, state your name ‸ Mark

[00:27:49] ▶ Play Speaker 14

Yates and

[00:27:50] ▶ Play Speaker 2

your address.

[00:27:51] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:51–00:27:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:57] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:57–00:28:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:28:06] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

you.

[00:28:09] ▶ Play Speaker 14

All right, Mr. Yates.

[00:28:10] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:28:10–00:28:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:12] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:12–00:28:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:34] ▶ Play Speaker 14

it's not scrap metal first of all The lumber is being used. um waste paper products. There's none on my property right now. The uh discarded building materials. It's not discarded building materials that's being used for the pole barn. And the abandoned motor vehicles. There's no motor vehicle on my property abandoned. Every one of my vehicles work. They're up and running. And they're sitting there.

[00:29:04] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:04–00:29:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:07] ▶ Play Speaker 14

the time. I found them recently and put them on the vehicle. And abandoned parts. What abandoned parts ‸ you talking about? I mean, how do you abandon a part?

[00:29:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice

Okay. Everything in the picture here is junk, trash, or debris. Junk,

[00:29:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

trash.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:34–00:29:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:29:34] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Everything in there is junk, trash, or debris?

[00:29:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Yes, sir.

[00:29:37] ▶ Play Speaker 14

What what what in there is junk? Besides them wood pellets okay Everything that is being stored there. it's None of that's junk. That's being used for what I do. I keep it, if you look, it's it's in order, it's not laying all over the yard. I've been working non-stop to try to keep you guys happy and get you off my back, and nothing nothing matters. I asked you to come out last week to give me a heads up, tell me what else I need to do to make sure when I came here today, that we wouldn't have this problem. You never showed up the next day.

[00:30:17] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:17–00:30:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

Yes, sir,

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:19–00:30:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:30:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9

you did call me,

[00:30:22] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

and

[00:30:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:23–00:30:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:23] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:30:25] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

I got pictures of all the construction work I'm doing on this house. I can show you right now. I'd like to show you guys. I tried to print it out, but I couldn't get my printer to work, which

[00:30:36] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:36–00:30:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

work right. When

[00:30:40] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

you were here last,

[00:30:40] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:40–00:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

another property? I think

[00:30:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14

in Titusville or something like that? I took a lot of it and took it to the dump and took a lot of it to Titusville. But the camper, it's gone. That was one of the main things, burn up camper.

[00:31:00] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:00–00:31:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:03] ▶ Play Speaker 14

sitting and where it was burned up at, it was hard to move. But I finally got it out of there with the back problem that I had from the accident I had right before this.

[00:31:13] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:13–00:31:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:19–00:31:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:31:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:31:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14

don't have to, but he said he would come out. So he could tell me, you know, yeah, you need to keep doing this or you do need to remove that. He never showed up. I mean, it's. I was just hoping he would come out and show me so I ‸ make sure I got it right so it wouldn't come to this. But none of that there is junk. There's nothing in there junk. Everything's stored nice and neatly. And I'm still using it. The house is under construction

[00:31:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So the stuff right there to the right of the pallets, that's not junk.

[00:31:58] ▶ Play Speaker 14

Where i now?

[00:32:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

The scrap stuff that the pallets are leaning on and the stuff to the right of it.

[00:32:07] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:07–00:32:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

to the left?

[00:32:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

Lower right. Yes, sir. uh The pallets are going out. I had stuff on them. I was going to store them, use them to take the tides so i could store stuff so it wouldn't get wet. But I'm gonna ‸ go ahead and take those and take them to the dump. I just

[00:32:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:26–00:32:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:31] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

perfectly good plywood that we're using. um Some of them for a dog house and if you were to come on the property, I'd love for one of y'all to come on the property. I could walk you around because

[00:32:44] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:44–00:32:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

‸ it just shows the whole thing and

[00:32:49] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:49–00:32:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:52] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Well, the thing is, way better than it was this is residential, correct? No, it's commercial and residential. So,

[00:33:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1

this is commercial and residential?

[00:33:02] ▶ Play Speaker 9

No, sir, it's not. It's it's uh it's actually zoned commercial. um He has a residential house. it is a, uh

[00:33:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:17–00:33:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um when the uh future land use was done. um Him and his neighbor to the west because of where they're located, the future land use um for previous years did a blanket future land use and they were in captured in the commercial ‸ area. um they are currently in a non-conforming zone, but because they were already residential properties before that, they are residential properties zoned for commercial. So, they're not a mixed use, they are strictly commercial.

[00:33:59] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So, what's your, what's your business?

[00:34:01] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:01–00:34:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:05] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

‸ brand new welders and I've been spending everything I've got for that and the products and material I need for the house. I'm doing a whole new rock facade on the front of the house, which is happening about quarter ways done right now, which all this stuff costs a lot of money. I'm putting a lot of money into this house. So,

[00:34:27] ▶ Play Speaker 1

now we talked before, what progress have you done besides the camper from last? Because

[00:34:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:34–00:34:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1

keys or something like that, correct? Okay, so we talked about that, talked about pulling out the camper, talked about getting the property straight because you

[00:34:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

have

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:47–00:34:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:34:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1

been a nuisance to your neighbors pretty much. So, and then you said, I'm starting a welding business. um

[00:34:55] ▶ Play Speaker 14

It's going to be a portable welding business. I'm not going to be really working from home, but I will be bringing stuff back there once I get the business license and the insurance. So,

[00:35:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

but the thing is, we talked about it and talked about getting this. So, I'd like to know what type of progress have been made besides

[00:35:16] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:16–00:35:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

was a big nuisance. I

[00:35:20] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

got the license plate for the Porsche. I got the license plate for the van. So

[00:35:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1

why they're not on there?

[00:35:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14

They are on there. I got pictures right here ‸ shows it.

[00:35:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So the picture was today.

[00:35:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Yes, sir. The license plate is on the is on

[00:35:39] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:39–00:35:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:43] ▶ Play Speaker 9

current registration or current tax. And

[00:35:45] ▶ Play Speaker 14

i I asked DMV if I could turn in my plates and they said, yes, you're allowed to turn them in. But apparently

[00:35:52] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:52–00:35:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:53] ▶ Play Speaker 14

has a different set of rules where you have to have it plated. They said, well, have them call up DMV. Well, I can't really practically have them have you guys do that. But that is, they said you can do that. But apparently

[00:36:06] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:06–00:36:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:07] ▶ Play Speaker 14

you're not allowed to do that. I understand the conflict there. I have to go about what

[00:36:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:11–00:36:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14

says. So I had plates on there.

[00:36:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

But ‸ has to be current registration because then it's considered junk. Well, I

[00:36:22] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

have insurance on that van right now. I just got full coverage. Not full coverage, but I got insurance on the van. And I had an appointment to go down and get new stickers for the van. And with everything that's been going on, I just haven't made it down

[00:36:38] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:38–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:43] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

It's just I haven't had time to get down there and do that. I've been non-stop working on this property. So they will be happy with it. And I can go on about my business and they can do what

[00:36:58] ▶ Play Speaker 1

they gotta do. Well, but the problem is that you didn't come into compliance on the date when you're supposed to. And then you said you have insurance, but the registration is something. Because

[00:37:10] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:10–00:37:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1

But again, they weren't looking for the insurance. They're looking for a current registration. And it doesn't show you say you have this or have that. But the important thing is it needs to be on it.

[00:37:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14

Yeah, but you gotta understand. I got insurance on it.

[00:37:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:26–00:37:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:30] ▶ Play Speaker 14

anything. So

[00:37:31] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:31–00:37:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14

the insurance, get the tag. Which I got the tag is just get the up-to-date sticker. So I ain't, why would I get insurance on it if I don't plan on using it? That's going to be one of ‸ my company or my

[00:37:44] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Machine re-recognized

van

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:44–00:37:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:37:45] ▶ Play Speaker 14

I use for doing portable welding.

[00:37:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So I'm gonna ‸ use your terms, but it's still not done. And that's the thing. Because we have to, when these things are going on, we have to make sure we have these things in priority of how we need to take care of these things in order. So now we do this, we get this step taken care of, we're getting them out there, check it out, so on ‸ forth and so on. So they were there today at some point. You were not there when they were there? I was there

[00:38:16] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

today. I was there all day today.

[00:38:18] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:18–00:38:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:22] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

the day he told me he was going to show up to go over the property with me and make sure everything was up to par, which we had an agreement he would come out. He said he said he would try his best to come out. I will say that. He said

[00:38:35] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

he'd try

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:35–00:38:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:38:36] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

his best to come out and we'd go over ‸ make sure everything was right because I didn't want it to come to this today. And he didn't show up. It don't mean it's all his fault or nothing, but I was trying my best to make sure this wasn't going to come to this today. I'm doing the best I can do. I mean, I did get insurance on the van so I could drive it. I'm not going to drive it without the sticker. I just haven't went down there and got it yet. I mean, I'm doing everything I can do. And i the main thing was the camper and the abandoned built vehicles, which they're not abandoned. That Porsche I've had in family for a long time. The van I've had for

[00:39:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:19–00:39:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:22] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

needs the key, which I

[00:39:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:24–00:39:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:29] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

the tag on it. All the junk's been cleared out. All that material,

[00:39:35] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:35–00:39:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:38] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

That's all building material for the pole barn

[00:39:41] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:41–00:39:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

there was brand new. I just got it. ‸ the thing is,

[00:39:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1

nowhere in the country you could you couldn't convince someone else that there's not junk, trash, debris out there. So even if, say, we say that wasn't there, still have the abandoned vehicle,

[00:40:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

what

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:09–00:40:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:40:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1

you say they're not abandoned, but by

[00:40:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:11–00:40:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:14] ▶ Play Speaker 1

statue, they're abandoned vehicles because they don't have current registration, whether you have insurance on it or not. So again, that's what we're dealing with.

[00:40:23] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:23–00:40:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

it wouldn't be considered

[00:40:27] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:40:27–00:40:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:27] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

building or a abandoned car. It's not in the city of

[00:40:30] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:30–00:40:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:31] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

nothing to do with us at that point. We got a whole new set of rules over here, apparently. well bmv said all I had to do

[00:40:36] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

was

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:36–00:40:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:40:36] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

turn in my tag and everything would be fine. That way,

[00:40:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

you know

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:39–00:40:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:40:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

like if somebody was to steal the vehicle and they crash into somebody, I guess you're not held reliable and all that. But I told myself well,

[00:40:48] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:48–00:40:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:48] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

they told me I gotta have the tags on it. And the lady at DMV specifically told me, well, tell them to have them call me.

[00:40:56] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:40:56–00:41:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:58] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:40:58] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:40:58] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:41:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

one street because there's a school zone then it changes back. You enter the city of

[00:41:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:06–00:41:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

there are certain rules, city of

[00:41:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:09–00:41:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

So, I mean, you have to, when you have this property, you have to ensure that

[00:41:14] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

you're

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:14–00:41:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:41:14] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

buying by that. And we've had this conversation.

[00:41:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:17–00:41:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:18] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:41:19] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:41:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:41:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

So the main, only thing right ‸ now is the thing's not up to date on the sticker, right?

[00:41:24] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No.

[00:41:25] ▶ Play Speaker 14

So what else is wrong with the jump Yes. I don't know what to consider jump except the pallets being there. The rest of that wood is being used.

[00:41:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

What about ‸ I'm working

[00:41:37] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

every day on that house. I'm sorry.

[00:41:39] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:39–00:41:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:41] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

are two barrels there. There's a wooden barrel and then a

[00:41:44] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:44–00:41:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:45] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:41:48] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

but it's it's a Jack Daniels whiskey barrel. And you

[00:41:52] ▶ Play Speaker 7

leave it outside? It's

[00:41:54] ▶ Play Speaker 14

going to be cut in half and used as a flower pot. They sell

[00:41:58] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:58–00:42:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:02] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:42:08] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Yates to help him come into compliance. the code force we could clean up some of this stuff. Okay. I've been working seven days a week around the clock. Hauling stuff. Moving stuff. getting stuff right. Okay. He's right. The vans, I have nothing to say about that.

[00:42:24] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:24–00:42:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:25] ▶ Play Speaker 15

But the wood behind those pallets, okay, I'm currently using as a, we're going to build a platform. Okay. A walkway raised up deck, so to speak. Okay. From the house. The, uh ‸ the, ‸ blue barrel, the blue barrel itself. I use, I use to put water in for cleanup after I'm done because I use a lot of

[00:42:48] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:42:48–00:42:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:48] ▶ Play Speaker 15

a lot of stuff that's detrimental to my hands and stuff. So, yes, ma'am. That's there. And it's full of water. Okay. Now, the Jack Daniels, the Jack Daniels down Mr. Yates has already told me by risk of my

[00:43:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6

neck

[00:43:02] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice

that if I damage that barrel, right, it's going to be an issue because he's got plans for his So,

[00:43:10] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:10–00:43:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:14] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice

It, ‸ looks, but it's, it's organized. It's, i'm I'm, I'm in the point now of. Doing five things at one time on that property. Even today, when they came by today and took those pictures, I didn't see

[00:43:30] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

them

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:30–00:43:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:43:31] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice

by the other day. I'm not saying that he didn't come by. I'm saying it's

[00:43:34] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

evident

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:34–00:43:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:43:34] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that he came by. But I didn't see him. The only thing that I'm asking is that, or ‸ Mr. Yates is asking, is that somebody help us by being, by communicating, by telling us, listen, we don't know the rules. I don't know those rules. You can say nine days, ‸ hundred thousand if you want to. I don't know what that means. But I do know that ‸ the city code said that

[00:43:55] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:55–00:43:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:58] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:58–00:44:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:01] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:01–00:44:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:05] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice

We would have did that.

[00:44:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:07–00:44:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:08] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

saying

[00:44:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:44:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:44:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

here. Excuse

[00:44:11] ▶ Play Speaker 15

me?

[00:44:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

Last time you guys were here, we discussed that. Yeah, and I discussed that

[00:44:15] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:44:15–00:44:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:17] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:44:17] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:44:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:44:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

the codes, let's say you put the code numbers away. You guys were here, we talked about it.

[00:44:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ Yeah, and I asked him last week to come out, if he could come out and show me if there's anything else I need to do.

[00:44:32] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:32–00:44:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:44:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

show, do you have any pictures of the front of the house?

[00:44:45] ▶ Play Speaker 9

This is from

[00:44:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

And

[00:44:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:46–00:44:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

This is from June

[00:44:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:49–00:44:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:44:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

And you guys are doing construction to

[00:44:52] ▶ Play Speaker 14

this? Yeah, that the concrete part up under the porch, that's all getting ready have the rock facade put on. I just went yesterday, bought the rest of the cement for that at Home Depot.

[00:45:03] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:03–00:45:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:08] ▶ Play Speaker 14

that you can't see, because there's a banana tree in front of it, and the mailbox is kind of blocking it. It's already got the rock facade on there. And I'm gonna ‸ take it all the way across the bottom of the house, from the bottom to the window seal.

[00:45:21] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:21–00:45:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:45:21] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:45:23] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

The walkway has been done as of two days ago, we completed it. I got pictures of it, too. flagstone. So

[00:45:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:45:30] ▶ Play Speaker 14

your walkway is done,

[00:45:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

why do you still have wood back there?

[00:45:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:33–00:45:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:45:36] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the back, from the gate? All

[00:45:38] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:45:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

and then And then the other question is, do you guys have permits for ‸ this construction you've been doing?

[00:45:43] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

You don't need permits for what I'm doing right now. Except for the privacy. Do you have plans? I'm sorry. Do

[00:45:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4

you have plans for these modifications? Do

[00:45:54] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I have plans? Yes,

[00:45:55] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

plans. Did you submit plans to the city?

[00:45:58] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

um all I did was put in a sidewalk that was already there. I've redone it, basically. That's not what I'm asking. You're talking you're

[00:46:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

talking about... He

[00:46:09] ▶ Play Speaker 15

says construction, and it's actually improvement

[00:46:12] ▶ Play Speaker 14

‸ I'm not doing any new construction. It's just improving the old stuff.

[00:46:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Improvement or any changes you're making to your building requires that you contact the city, you make a plan, and you get a permit.

[00:46:30] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So if I paint the house, I gotta add... I

[00:46:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4

didn't say that. I'm talking about modifying anything I'm building.

[00:46:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:39–00:46:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:42] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:42–00:46:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:46:45] ▶ Play Speaker 14

No, I was talking about putting a rock facade on the already existing wall. It's just a cover face. It's not tearing the wall down. It's just a cover face that goes over the wall. They told me

[00:46:59] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:59–00:47:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:00] ▶ Play Speaker 14

I don't need a permit for

[00:47:02] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Machine re-recognized

paying

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:02–00:47:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:47:02] ▶ Play Speaker 14

it. I do need a permit for privacy fence, which I went down there and got.

[00:47:07] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

There are no permits in the system for this No, sir. I'm looking at the permit you're right

[00:47:12] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ When I went down there, I talked to the um lady at the uh it was at this building. I talked to her,

[00:47:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:19–00:47:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:23] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:47:23] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Second

[00:47:23] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

floor. And I talked to the lady and she got me through

[00:47:27] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:27–00:47:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:47:28] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

some other guy ‸ had long hair. We went over it. He goes, yeah, you can put a eight to ten foot privacy fence or a fence around your property. Not the front part, but you know the back part. I said, well, I don't need nothing that big. It's just going six feet up. And he was supposed to... He got my number and everything and looked it up. And he was supposed to call me back the next day. And, well, that was a Friday, I think it was. He was supposed to

[00:47:54] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:54–00:48:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:48:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

I mean, we're here for a compliance hearing. I mean, he's in violation of the board's order. I would like to ask that we go ahead and just, if we could, circle back and move on.

[00:48:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Definitely. Mr. Chair, I'd like to set a motion,

[00:48:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 00:48:10–00:48:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:48:14] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Simpson, the stuff that's on the front porch, is all of this included in the accumulation of trash and things of that nature? Junk and trash? Because

[00:48:23] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:23–00:48:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3

nature.

[00:48:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice

uh No, ma'am, it's not because

[00:48:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:29–00:48:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

go by, there's just the ‸ stuff on the stuff on the front porch uh constantly gets moved. So, with it being constantly moved around and looked as if it was being used, I did not include it.

[00:48:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Okay. Okay. okay That makes sense. Thank you.

[00:48:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Mr. Chair, I'd like to set a motion. Yes, sir. um Mr. Mark and Thomas, just I want you guys to know that we are here for uh

[00:48:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:59–00:49:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

um We let you guys speak so we can get a better story of what's going on. But unfortunately, the information that they gave us today, it shows that you guys are not compliant. So my motion is that I move to find that respondents in this case failed to correct the violation within the time specified in the Code Enforcement Board's prior order in this case and that the fine will be imposed as set forth in that order.

[00:49:31] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so what do I got to do to get this done? Just get the tag up to date? Give

[00:49:39] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:49:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

one

[00:49:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6

second here.

[00:49:43] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:49:43–00:49:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1

thank you I have a motion.

[00:50:18] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:18–00:50:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:19] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:50:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:24–00:50:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:29] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:29–00:50:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:38] ▶ Play Speaker 1

the thing is you have time to work on it. And then once it's done and they say, hey, all right, now you're compliant, then you can have a lien reduction. You can fill out for a lien reduction. But again, when you come back for a lien reduction, we're going to listen to you again and see how ‸ your progress was because, again, it's a matter of trying to come in compliant with every citizen, with every property that they find in non-compliant So now it's the burden of truth is on you to get these things taken care of,

[00:51:20] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:20–00:51:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1

this is what needs to be done. This is what needs to be done. So you guys got to continue to work together to get this taken care of.

[00:51:32] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

yes

[00:51:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1

they're gonna ‸ get the paperwork and you should get everything you need. All right. Thank you for coming. All right. Next case, ce 24-13

[00:52:00] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

This is case 24-13, as you said. I'll be presenting it.

[00:52:05] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:05–00:52:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:09] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

I believe I'm pronouncing it correctly. Address 1304 South Lakemont Drive. The property owner failed to comply with

[00:52:18] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:18–00:52:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:22] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

reference discarding junk, and

[00:52:24] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:24–00:52:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:27] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

and

[00:52:28] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:28–00:52:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

And then I go on to in depth of what the violations are. Would the board like me to read that? No. Okay. Thank you. I appreciate it. Case summary. The notes pick up from after the date that the property was supposed to come into compliance. So I'll only start the notes from there after April 18th, I took updated photos of the property. Property showed no improvements and had acquired more garbage and abandoned vehicles. I emailed the tenant of the property and attached photos with instructions on bringing it into compliance. The

[00:53:10] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:10–00:53:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:14] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

He wanted to work and try to get things uh into compliance. May 2nd, Steve contacted me after I reached out regarding the status of the property and the response. I was informed in no uncertain terms to leave him alone. I reiterated I was still giving him the extra 30 days to attempt to come into compliance before the next code board hearing. May 19th, I conducted inspection of properties. Some progress ‸ improvements had been made. Photos were taken ‸ uploaded. No further contact with the owner. Should be tenant. Owner ‸ tenant there. May 19th, going by the date I had given the tenant to come into compliance, I inspected the property again.

[00:53:53] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:53:53–00:53:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:54] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

Property remained in violation. June 2nd, I posted notice of hearing on the property next to the mailbox. the

[00:54:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

photo

[00:54:00] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

was taken ‸ uploaded. Notice of hearing was also mailed and posted at City Hall. I did see the tenant that day come out and pick up the post. uh Didn't speak to me.

[00:54:10] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:10–00:54:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:14] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:14–00:54:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:21] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

the board. uh The right is just the second page of it. And on there, I believe it says April 16th,

[00:54:29] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:29–00:54:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:32] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

these photos are from today like 9 49 a.m On the left, you can see, I call it a cherry picker. I'm not sure what the appropriate verbiage is for it, but it's been ‸ there for years. um The junk and debris you can see that's throughout the property. The boat, that's, I don't know when it's seen water. It's been years. There's also an RV behind it. There's the truck. That was a new addition that hadn't been there. And this all this has been there for an extended period of time. On the left, you can see a closer photo of the RV in the back that's covered up with tarps.

[00:55:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:55:13–00:55:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:55:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

trailer in the front. Not sure what's on top of it. That's also new. And the truck that's there that previously wasn't there before. This is the front of the house. Left and the right, I believe on the left, that's a dunk tank. On the far left, I'm not entirely sure what that is. On the right, they always have cars parked in the ‸ grass. And then you can see the other side of that construction vehicle. I'll just call it that. Staff recommends

[00:55:48] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:48–00:55:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:52] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

with the code enforcement board's previous order. That was dated April 16, 2025.

[00:55:56] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:56–00:56:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:00] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

And just ‸ side note, He was given the time to come into compliance and

[00:56:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:08–00:56:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:11] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

emails because he wouldn't speak to me in person for whatever reason.

[00:56:15] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:15–00:56:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:19] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

that. So that's why we're here a little bit later than normal. But tried to work with him.

[00:56:27] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:27–00:56:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1

now? I

[00:56:30] ▶ Play Speaker 12

don't see him in the galley.

[00:56:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:56:37–00:56:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

in this case failed to correct the violations within the time specified in the code enforcement board's prior order in this case and that

[00:56:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:54–00:57:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:00] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:57:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor say aye. Aye. aye aye opposed. Motion passes unanimously. All right, we are on to our lean reductions.

[00:57:18] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Mr. Chair, this is a lean reduction CE 18 651 at 1001 North Indian River Drive. the

[00:57:28] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

code

[00:57:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Enforcement Board held

[00:57:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:29–00:57:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8

public hearing on May 16th of 2019. Which found the property owner in the violation of the following codes listed above. The code board provided the owners enough time with the compliance of June 16th of 2019 to correct the said violations.

[00:57:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:46–00:57:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8

They were found in violation. the Applicant resides at the property. Practically taxes is paid through till the year. Records show no other outstanding liens on the property. No water liens.

[00:58:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:03–00:58:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8

The applicants requesting the early amount reduced to be amount to zero.

[00:58:18] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:18–00:58:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1

so this property was in violation for 66 months.

[00:58:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8

According to the records we have, yes, sir.

[00:58:40] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:40–00:58:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1

for them Yes.

[00:58:43] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I'm here. right

[00:58:44] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Would you like to step up, ma'am?

[00:58:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:58:54–00:58:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1

to be sworn in.

[00:58:56] ▶ Play Speaker 2

You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and

[00:58:59] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:59–00:59:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:00] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Yes, ma'am. Please state your name and address for the record. Into

[00:59:03] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:03–00:59:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:04] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:59:11] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:59:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:59:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1

ma'am. What would you like to tell us today?

[00:59:15] ▶ Play Speaker 11

um I'd like to to ask permission to change the amount from zero to costs, court costs, or processing course costs. That's the first thing. And then

[00:59:30] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:30–00:59:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:59:39] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:59:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:59:39] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:59:39] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:59:48] ▶ Play Speaker 11

temporary fence to take care of the pool so no one could access the backyard. And then we got notified about the the property, but it was the first notification had nothing to do with violations except for no permits, which we, all the per the pool company, everybody had permits. And

[01:00:12] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:12–01:00:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:16] ▶ Play Speaker 11

took six months ‸ to approve her permit. The building department lost it

[01:00:22] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:22–01:00:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:26] ▶ Play Speaker 11

permit. But the pool was clean in January and I took pictures of it and we did everything in a timely manner. But

[01:00:34] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:34–01:00:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:38] ▶ Play Speaker 11

the permits. It was about something else we'd never heard of. And then one of the

[01:00:45] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

code

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:00:45–01:00:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:00:45] ▶ Play Speaker 11

officers stopped by when I was in the front yard. And we walked around the property. He looked at the fence. He went in the backyard. He saw the screen and the pool. And we went inside the house and he made me sign a paper and said, okay you're great. I'll send you a copy. And

[01:01:03] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:03–01:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:08] ▶ Play Speaker 11

because we're we're we both travel 20 to 25 days a month. So when we have people that collect our mail, I never was notified that we were in in violation after that.

[01:01:22] ▶ Play Speaker 1

so when did you realize you were in violation because this this ran for 66 months? i I had no idea.

[01:01:34] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I did. I did. I thought it was resolved once I signed the paper and he said everything was good.

[01:01:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Do you recall what the violations were?

[01:01:49] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Well, the first one was for not having permits, not pulling permits. And then I never received a second thing. uh

[01:02:00] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:00–01:02:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:04] ▶ Play Speaker 11

our attorney showed up, they said, well, this isn't about pulling permits.

[01:02:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1

shows permit required uh ‸ Pools and spas. I'm sorry. Right here ‸ shows permits required. Appendix. Appendix. Appendix.

[01:02:28] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:02:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1

article 15. uh then pools

[01:02:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:34–01:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1

and permit required with ‸ specification

[01:02:43] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:02:43–01:02:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:46] ▶ Play Speaker 1

uh Article 13, section 5C. So there are three violations. But

[01:02:54] ▶ Play Speaker 11

we have permits.

[01:02:55] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:55–01:02:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:58] ▶ Play Speaker 11

and got the final inspection,

[01:03:00] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:00–01:03:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:06] ▶ Play Speaker 11

and

[01:03:07] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:07–01:03:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:07] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:03:08] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:03:08] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

you

[01:03:08] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:03:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Because all we have is what we have to go on here.

[01:03:15] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Yeah, I can do i can do that. Well,

[01:03:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

I'm

[01:03:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:18–01:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:21] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

definitely bring everything you needed as far as um what occurred, and this was the time to bring your evidence to help us to help

[01:03:31] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

us get

[01:03:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1

a clear view of, a better view of what was going on.

[01:03:35] ▶ Play Speaker 11

uh-huh Yes, sir. i I'm sorry. I just drove in from New York because I was on location in New York, and I apologize. I didn't bring it.

[01:03:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1

um My next question is for the staff. um

[01:03:51] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:51–01:03:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I just noticed that in the PowerPoint. Okay. Yeah. The cost that you have in front of you, Mr. Chair, is right.

[01:04:03] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay.

[01:04:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I apologize for the slide.

[01:04:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:09–01:04:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:04:15] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

or some change.

[01:04:16] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:16–01:04:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:04:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:04:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:04:24] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:24–01:04:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:04:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:04:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:04:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:04:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:04:27] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

when I... i

[01:04:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8

i'm As

[01:04:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:28–01:04:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8

saw

[01:04:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:30–01:04:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:04:33] ▶ Play Speaker 1

to try and get a understanding when you don't give us anything to go on. um Because, you know, this ran for 66 months. um I mean, in that time, I know we've had turnovers with our officers, but within this time, of 66 months being on the road, um ‸ just a difficult one.

[01:04:59] ▶ Play Speaker 11

No, I understand that. I just... we We didn't know it was in violation until, I guess it was about six months ago. That's when we found out. Because when the code officer came by and he went through the house and looked at the fence in the pool and I signed the paper, I thought it was over. And

[01:05:22] ▶ Play Speaker 1

how long ago was that?

[01:05:23] ▶ Play Speaker 11

‸ 2019 or or they're about the end of the year.

[01:05:29] ▶ Play Speaker 1

And you you say you travel? and you And you just go about signing things and don't know what you're signing?

[01:05:35] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:35–01:05:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:39] ▶ Play Speaker 11

because

[01:05:39] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:39–01:05:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:40] ▶ Play Speaker 11

around the house, inside the house. You know.

[01:05:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:50–01:05:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:51] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:05:52] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Sorry.

[01:05:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3

officer um did you pull to did you pull it up to see if any of her permits had been pulled and approved? all Any of that stuff had been done before we came today?

[01:06:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Just look today ‸ Sorry.

[01:06:08] ▶ Play Speaker 16

uh i can I can tell you what we have here in the system. There was a fence application uh applied for in January of 2019. It with with it was withdrawn and never completed.

[01:06:22] ▶ Play Speaker 1

it does show who withdrew it?

[01:06:24] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Shows the applicant, which at the time... uh ‸ This is our old system. It was... uh

[01:06:37] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:37–01:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:41] ▶ Play Speaker 16

They put the application in but withdrew the permit before it was issued.

[01:06:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay. And that was for the

[01:06:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8

fence.

[01:06:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

and

[01:06:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8

the condition And the pool,

[01:06:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:51–01:06:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:59] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So what about the permit, the other permit?

[01:07:07] ▶ Play Speaker 16

In July of 2019, there was a screen enclosure permit that was pulled and it never got closed out. Never... The contractor never called for a final inspection and is still listed as an open

[01:07:22] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

permit. So that was in 2019? Yes.

[01:07:27] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Houseman told me that they did have an inspection, a final inspection.

[01:07:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So now if that was in 2019...

[01:07:36] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Was

[01:07:37] ▶ Play Speaker 1

that for the same permit that's showing here, the first one?

[01:07:40] ▶ Play Speaker 11

The screen one. The screen.

[01:07:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So again, if that permit...

[01:07:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:47–01:07:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:50] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:07:51] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay. So that permit was issued. Why do we have permit required here? I'm just... When was it issued?

[01:08:00] ▶ Play Speaker 16

July of 2019. And we don't have an answer as to why I went to a non-compliance hearing in September of 2019.

[01:08:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3

So even if it sits open, then um it would not go to a non-compliance as long as it's sitting open. It just needs to be inspected by the city.

[01:08:22] ▶ Play Speaker 8

inspected and finalized. Okay. ‸ you don't call for a final, then it doesn't get closed out.

[01:08:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3

So it just sits open, but it shouldn't go in front of non-compliance because of an open permit?

[01:08:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

If I was at staff on staff then, I would not recommend that Code Enforcement officers take it to Code Board for non-compliance Okay. But I wasn't here at the time.

[01:08:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:48–01:08:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:08:50] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

but they're currently in the file. And the board's order that was done in 2019.

[01:08:59] ▶ Play Speaker 16

So,

[01:08:59] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:59–01:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:03] ▶ Play Speaker 16

and And like I said, this is 2019. So I'm trying to get all of the details. uh There was a final inspection. It was never finalized in the system, but the notes show that they did a final. And the final was conducted

[01:09:18] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:18–01:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:21] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:09:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1

July. And

[01:09:27] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:27–01:09:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:31] ▶ Play Speaker 16

based on the notes that I see. But the building official at the time did not close the permit.

[01:09:41] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:41–01:09:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[01:09:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1

[01:09:57] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:09:57–01:10:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:04] ▶ Play Speaker 10

ask fences, um violation that there was no permit

[01:10:10] ▶ Play Speaker 16

ever. It was withdrawn ‸ before the ep before the permit was issued. From what I'm looking at from the initial screens here.

[01:10:19] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Okay. How then can that violation be in compliance

[01:10:28] ▶ Play No voice detected

Because

[01:10:29] ▶ Play Speaker 10

you're only eligible for a, um

[01:10:31] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:10:31–01:10:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:10:32] ▶ Play Speaker 10

reduction if that one is in, well, we might separate them. but that one, you know, would also have to be in compliance for a reduction on that particular violation. That's correct.

[01:10:42] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'm gonna ‸ go into ‸ the background notes on the fence, uh to ensure that that was, there was nothing that was in the notes that is not on this main screen based on what I found on the ‸ other uh permit just to ensure that there weren't any items missed. So give me just a second ‸ And

[01:11:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

i have a I have another question, if you will. um You said that the

[01:11:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

screening closure

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:11–01:11:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:11:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

was finalized on September 11th,

[01:11:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:16–01:11:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

So I'm curious as to... There was a one week time frame here, eight days, that the

[01:11:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

screening closure

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:33–01:11:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:11:35] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

was taken care of. So i

[01:11:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:38–01:11:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

but i I'm just curious as to why we're here on that one. It shouldn't have even been charged.

[01:11:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:47–01:11:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:51–01:11:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8

on the

[01:11:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

property.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:56–01:11:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:11:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8

there was

[01:11:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:57–01:12:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:04] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:12:08] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So let me ask a question. I mean, maybe... I'm not sure if this was the same thing that you were touching on. But can how could we have a lien reduction packet submitted and approved if we still have an open permit?

[01:12:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8

It's not an open. It was withdrawn. And from the notes I was just about to say before I asked the second question, the notes regarding the fence, from what I see in the comments from the officer, it was only a couple sections. And it would not require a permit if they're just maintaining it. If they're going to replace the whole thing and put it up, that's one thing. That's what all I got from the notes from the officer. But as far as the case, the permits were done on June... I'm sorry.

[01:12:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

the

[01:13:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8

permits were pulled on June 18th or 19th. The board, according to the orders...

[01:13:13] ▶ Play No voice detected

wow

[01:13:21] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ According to

[01:13:21] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:21–01:13:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8

16th, 2019.

[01:13:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:27–01:13:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8

current permits, it was only, like you said, eight days, seven, eight days. I can't answer any questions on why staff brought this to a non-compliance hearing because I was not there. All I'm doing is trying to help out the applicant to do a reduction or vacate this lien that's on her property, and I have to bring ‸ in front of you to move forward. So I put it on the board to make a motion. The staff has no

[01:13:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:58–01:13:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

problem going

[01:13:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:13:59–01:13:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:13:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8

moving forward. If you want to table it, we can table

[01:14:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:01–01:14:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[01:14:08] ▶ Play Speaker 1

or Am I wrong?

[01:14:10] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:10–01:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:14:16] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:14:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

[01:14:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

close it in ‸ system.

[01:14:26] ▶ Play Speaker 1

But

[01:14:28] ▶ Play Speaker 16

the fence permit was never issued. Okay.

[01:14:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So even if he didn't close it in the system,

[01:14:37] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:37–01:14:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:40] ▶ Play Speaker 1

when we went with the, with the new reduction packet?

[01:14:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:47–01:14:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:53] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:14:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:14:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1

making sense?

[01:14:54] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:14:54–01:14:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3

trying to either move forward with the lien reduction or dismiss it because the back-end documentation is showing that it should not have even had a lien placed. I

[01:15:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1

just want to make sure that legally we're doing things on the right side, whichever way we go. That's all.

[01:15:23] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Well, I i think that what, I think I would agree with the statement. I think what staff is is saying is that I believe there may have been some mistakes, essentially, that were made and that they question why violations were found for sections, uh for the permits required, both for the fences and then also under 2A for the screen room.

[01:15:50] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:50–01:15:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1

[01:15:57] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:57–01:16:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1

this to actually get an accurate number of, ‸ for instance, what would be owed as far as the time frame to where it was, was found non-compliant to the time it became in compliance because this can't be correct by what we're talking about here.

[01:16:27] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:27–01:16:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:29] ▶ Play Speaker 1

That's correct, Mr. Chair. Okay, so let's let's take care of this. Let's not let it

[01:16:36] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:16:36–01:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:16:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:16:45] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:16:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:16:53] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Okay, so

[01:17:01] ▶ Play No voice detected

‸ Okay,

[01:17:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3

I move that the board recommend to the city council that the lien be reduced, in this case, from 149 945

[01:17:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:12–01:17:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:17:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:17:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[01:17:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3

it should have never been found in non-compliance

[01:17:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Second.

[01:17:26] ▶ Play Speaker 1

I have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor say aye.

[01:17:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Aye.

[01:17:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Those opposed? Motion passing unanimously. Thank

[01:17:33] ▶ Play Speaker 8

you.

[01:17:33] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

All right, ma'am. So this will go before the city council. And don't sign things that you don't know. Thank you. Have a good day, ma'am. Thank

[01:17:46] ▶ Play No voice detected

you very much.

[01:17:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:48–01:17:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on October 19th, at which time the board found the property owner in violation. ‸ The following codes. Code Enforcement Board provided the owner's submission of time from November 18th, 2023 to correct the violations, therefore consistent with the code board order.

[01:18:18] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:18–01:18:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Reminder, we

[01:18:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:26–01:18:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8

have ‸ code board in December, so that's why you had the compliance area in January. Just want to remind the board of that. Applicant does not write it to reside at the property. Property taxes paid through.

[01:18:39] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:39–01:18:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8

lien ran at 75 a day from November 18th, to 2023 until

[01:18:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:45–01:18:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:51–01:18:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

is requesting that

[01:18:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:59–01:19:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:05] ▶ Play Speaker 8

And it is the same property owner that was in the in the original case. Ownership has not changed.

[01:19:19] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:19–01:19:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:19:20] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:19:21] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:19:21] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:19:21] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:19:21] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:19:25] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:19:29] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:19:29] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:19:29–01:19:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:32] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:19:34] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:34–01:19:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1

All right, sir. What would you like to talk to us about?

[01:19:45] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

uh Yes, sir. uh I was unaware of the city cost so I'd like to change my request to match that amount, ‸ please. And then, so, um long story short, this is my previous company. It's going out of business. My business partner was in charge of the, you know, renovation side. I'm not here to, like, you know, pass blame. I accept, you know, responsibility as well. um I believe these issues were brought into compliance within maybe six to 12 months or something like that. And so, um

[01:20:21] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:21–01:20:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:20:24] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice

As I mentioned, the company is, you know, going out of business. I just want to do the right thing and just get it closed and just, you know, move on.

[01:20:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So, this is a rental property?

[01:20:36] ▶ Play Speaker 13

uh It was a flip, actually. um We specialized in doing uh affordable housing, uh mostly um under 300 000 more or less.

[01:20:46] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:46–01:20:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:20:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13

And then, so, you know, this one came across that came across my desk. And um I know that, uh you ‸ that's kind of like a, um you know, lower end area. So, I wanted to see if I could, you know, make some improvements around there. So, uh I gave it a go in this house, but um it didn't work out. And uh in the end, I took a 32 000 loss on the sale

[01:21:14] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:14–01:21:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:21:20] ▶ Play Speaker 13

a toilet were stolen. And then it was broken into again and the appliances were stolen. And then it has waters So, so, you know, renovating this house and then, you know, selling the house has been a long challenge.

[01:21:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1

So,

[01:21:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:42–01:21:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:21:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1

17 months.

[01:21:48] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Sure. So

[01:21:54] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:21:55] ▶ Play Speaker 13

believe the renovations, and again, I'm just going uh off of my partner's notes here, but I believe that the renovations probably started around um maybe early 2023. And then I'm not sure exactly when we became informed of the violations, the

[01:22:18] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

violations

[01:22:18] ▶ Play Speaker 13

but we went through basically two different GCs. Both of those either stole our money or just basically you know gave up on the case. And then finally, one of my local um one of my local realtors who works really closely with a GC. And so he basically took it over and he got everything done and passed and that was um ‸ around may 6 2024.

[01:22:44] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

is there a new roof put on yes

[01:22:51] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:22:51–01:23:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:22:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:22:57] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:23:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1

And you still currently own the house?

[01:23:02] ▶ Play Speaker 13

uh It was, it was actually sold about three days ago.

[01:23:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Mr. Chair. Yes, sir.

[01:23:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:13–01:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:23:22] ▶ Play Speaker 8

February, and march

[01:23:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:25–01:23:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:23:42] ▶ Play No voice detected

any

[01:23:43] ▶ Play Speaker 1

questions

[01:23:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I'd like to set a motion if there's no questions. What answer? Anybody? You have any questions?

[01:23:55] ▶ Play No voice detected

Okay.

[01:23:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I move that the board recommend to the city council that

[01:23:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:59–01:24:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

financial hardship. the that's my

[01:24:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

reason

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:24:25–01:24:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:24:30] ▶ Play Speaker 12

i second

[01:24:33] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor say aye. Aye. aye aye those opposed ‸ I'm also a nay. So the motion passes by the vote of

[01:24:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:45–01:24:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

[01:24:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:45–01:24:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

So this will go before city council. And then we have a final say so. All right. Sounds good. Thank you. Yes, sir.

[01:24:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:56–01:24:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

case number CE 22-8 28 10 50 West King Street. Code Enforcement Bill held a public hearing on May 18th of 2023, at which time the property was found in violate listed violations. Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing and gave them the July 17th of 2023 to come

[01:25:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:25:23–01:25:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:25:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8

correct the violations.

[01:25:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:25–01:25:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:25:35] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ applicant does not write it a property because it's commercial. Property taxes are paid through. the Records show

[01:25:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:42–01:25:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:25:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8

of 2023 until compliance was achieved of March 13th of this year. of this year Property owners ‸ requesting that the lien

[01:25:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:58–01:26:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8

have city's costs listed ‸ available for any questions.

[01:26:07] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Is there anyone here for the property?

[01:26:09] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Yes. Good evening.

[01:26:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Good evening. You need me sworn in.

[01:26:15] ▶ Play Speaker 2

You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing that was true so happy God?

[01:26:18] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes. Please

[01:26:20] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:20–01:26:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:20] ▶ Play Speaker 2

your name and address for the record.

[01:26:21] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:21–01:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:28] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:26:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1

All right, sir. What would you like to tell us?

[01:26:32] ▶ Play Speaker 5

um Well, the biggest part of the the lien was, sorry,

[01:26:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:38–01:26:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:45] ▶ Play Speaker 5

of violation, we started to work on the property.

[01:26:49] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:49–01:26:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:56] ▶ Play Speaker 5

building up to the standard, which we didn't have at the time. But we did start to do, the like, the soffit area before we actually started to get fined. So,

[01:27:08] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:08–01:27:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5

another issue with finding the proper contractor to do the roofing job which we

[01:27:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:18 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:19–01:27:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:36] ▶ Play Speaker 5

worked on the repairs.

[01:27:41] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Well, I would definitely give you credit. It looks a lot better than it used to. Thanks. That's right that's around the corner. Yeah,

[01:27:49] ▶ Play Speaker 5

we did we did more work than we supposed to.

[01:27:51] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:51–01:27:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

It looks like you don't have people, almost sleeping out there anymore. Yeah, we have

[01:27:59] ▶ Play Speaker 5

my trusted guy, Joe, here. He uh he takes

[01:28:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 01:28:03–01:28:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5

building every day on ‸ daily basis to make sure

[01:28:05] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:28:05–01:28:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:06] ▶ Play Speaker 5

maintained. So we went through a little process and trying to see how we can resolve it.

[01:28:11] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:11–01:28:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5

It told us what to do to get people off the property. So we went through the steps and

[01:28:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:19–01:28:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6

If no questions ‸ like to set a motion, please. Okay. I move that the board recommend to the city council that the lien be reduced to this and excuse me,

[01:28:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:43–01:28:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6

owner is

[01:28:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:51–01:28:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6

requesting

[01:28:54] ▶ Play Speaker 17

Yes.

[01:29:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3

I'll second. i

[01:29:02] ▶ Play Speaker 1

have a motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye

[01:29:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

aye. Aye.

[01:29:05] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Those opposed? Motion passed unanimously. So again, it'll go before the city council and they will have a final say so.

[01:29:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Okay. Great.

[01:29:14] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Yes, sir. You have a good evening.

[01:29:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Thank

[01:29:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1

you for being here.

[01:29:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ Next lead introduction will be

[01:29:24] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:24–01:29:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:29:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Dixon Boulevard. Code board held

[01:29:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:37–01:29:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:29:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8

property owner was found in violation for the list of violations above. Code board provided the

[01:29:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

owner a submission

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:46–01:29:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:29:47] ▶ Play Speaker 8

out of time of April 16th, 2017 to correct the said violations. The non-compliance hearing was held on April 20th, of 2017. The board found ‸ in violation. the

[01:30:04] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

property

[01:30:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8

taxes are paid through. No outstanding liens on a property.

[01:30:07] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:16 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:07–01:30:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8

ownership is requesting that the lien be reduced the city's cost. all

[01:30:26] ▶ Play Speaker 1

right ma'am, you need to be sworn in.

[01:30:39] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:30:39–01:30:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:39] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing about the truth, so help you God?

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:30:39–01:30:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:30:42] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:30:42–01:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:42] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:30:43] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:30:44] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:44–01:30:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:45] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[01:30:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:30:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1

What would

[01:30:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:30:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1

like to tell us?

[01:30:55] ▶ Play Speaker 18

um so, the reason why we're here is, uh we would, we're looking forward to, or it's, um a lien reduction

[01:31:04] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:04–01:31:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:31:08] ▶ Play Speaker 18

management. We began managing the property in July 1st of 2017. um the liens were already in place. um so, by May 2020, we had completed all required exterior repairs, including

[01:31:25] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:25–01:31:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:31:31] ▶ Play Speaker 18

and all exterior violations were deemed compliant. However, we were informed, um the city extended the original code violation to include build building 1719 due to a prior management failure to properly secure the building and mitigate liability risk. Permits for building 1719 were obtained on September 18th, 2020. At which point the daily fines ceased. unfortunately, the lien remains in place, which currently prevents us from securing a bank loan for roof replacement across 15 buildings. The lender requires either the final lien amount or a lien waiver from the city in order to proceed. We respectfully request consideration for a lien reduction or waiver.

[01:32:21] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:21–01:32:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:32:26] ▶ Play Speaker 18

‸ Under the guidance of new management and newly appointed board, we remain committed to maintaining the property in full compliance. ‸ at this time, the only remaining obstacle is resolving the roof violation, which the loan would directly address. approval of a lien reduction or waiver would enable us to complete this critical improvement and ensure the continued safety and upkeep of the property. and it's just what we need.

[01:32:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Is the current violation on this property?

[01:33:05] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Does it need a new roof? I would put a new roof on it. But as far as, you know, there has been some repairs to the roof, but it's out of my scope to say that they need to completely replace the roof for all the buildings.

[01:33:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:18–01:33:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:33:22] ▶ Play Speaker 8

violation on it? No, sir. Okay. The violations you heard ‸ for were protective treatment for peeling paint and

[01:33:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:28–01:33:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8

and for ground maintenance and maintenance of the grounds. No,

[01:33:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1

I asked because she stated that there is a violation for the roof, so that's why.

[01:33:42] ▶ Play Speaker 18

It's just the roof, they're really old. And due to previous property management managing the property, mismanaging it, um we encountered the lien. And we inherited, we took in the property with the lien, but

[01:33:57] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:57–01:34:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:03] ▶ Play Speaker 18

to be reduced or removed in order for us to obtain a loan. So we can get all the 15 buildings that need to be removed

[01:34:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:10–01:34:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

that there are multiple property owners on this. I've had a couple, uh council, legal counsel reach out to me and ask for a vacation of a partial lien release. And I told

[01:34:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

him

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:34:23–01:34:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:34:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

we could not do that, we had to move forward. We don't do partial releases so we went and reviewed it and looked at it. That's why we're moving forward with it today. uh ‸ rewind, you said a vacation ‸ They wanted to, they wanted to do a partial release. We had multiple different property owners reach out to staff regarding doing a partial release so they can move forward ‸ their closing. When we don't do a partial release of any liens. This is all under one? It's all under one. Because when this case was taken, this property had ended, uh was all under one parcel. Now, if you look it up today, each individual parcels

[01:35:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1

each

[01:35:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

individual but

[01:35:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1

you're representing the property as a whole?

[01:35:14] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Yes. Okay.

[01:35:21] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:21–01:35:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:26] ▶ Play Speaker 1

building?

[01:35:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

those are two different buildings yes the

[01:35:34] ▶ Play Speaker 18

first one i'm sorry was 1713 this one is 1715.

[01:35:38] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:38–01:35:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:35:40] ▶ Play Speaker 8

The grounds are kept clean. The buildings are all painted. Pools clean.

[01:35:51] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So in other words, our reason for being here, they have complied. So yes

[01:35:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:57–01:36:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:36:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

Yes,

[01:36:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6

ma'am.

[01:36:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Okay, I'd like to make a motion.

[01:36:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

well

[01:36:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Are there any questions? I'm sorry.

[01:36:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Are you guys planning to sell this? is that