Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Board Meeting

Date: 2025-05-15
Status: Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source: CivicClerk event #73

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 📋 Agenda Packet (PDF, 24.0 MB) 🎬 Recording ↗

Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-06-19, pp. 10–16; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-06-19 (that draft's own approval is not found in the records on file); the motion does not say whether they were amended. The City has not posted the approved minutes. The approving motion, “to approve to the minutes of May 15, 2025”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-08-21 agenda packet (1954_8_21_25_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 9–18).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (1867_6_19_25_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 10–16). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

The roll call could not be read reliably from the minutes' text (an entry could not be read as a name), so it is not stated here; the first page of the minutes is the record.

Adopted actions (8)

to approve to the agenda of May 15, 2025 (moved by Otero, seconded by Acosta); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16
to approve to the minutes of March 20, 2025 (moved by Muller, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16
to approve Staff’s recommendation and give the property owner until June 18, 2025, and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Otero, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16
to approve staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand six hundred twenty-seven dollars and sixty-six cents ($1,627.66) (moved by Scott, seconded by Roberts); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16
to approve staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand three hundred eighty-four dollars and fourteen cents ($2,384.14) (moved by Acosta, seconded by Muller); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of thirteen thousand eight hundred twenty dollars ($13,820.00) (moved by Otero, seconded by Roberts); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of twenty-nine thousand three hundred thirty dollars ($29,330.00) (moved by Acosta, seconded by Roberts); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 10–16

Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)

$1,627.66 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand six hundred twenty-seven dollars and sixty-six cents ($1,627.66)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-06-19 agenda packet (1867_6_19_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-06-19, pp. 10–16; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-06-19 (that draft's own approval is not found in the records on file); the motion does not say whether they were amended)
$2,384.14 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand three hundred eighty-four dollars and fourteen cents ($2,384.14)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-06-19 agenda packet (1867_6_19_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-06-19, pp. 10–16; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-06-19 (that draft's own approval is not found in the records on file); the motion does not say whether they were amended)
$13,820.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of thirteen thousand eight hundred twenty dollars ($13,820.00)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-06-19 agenda packet (1867_6_19_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-06-19, pp. 10–16; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-06-19 (that draft's own approval is not found in the records on file); the motion does not say whether they were amended)
$29,330.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of twenty-nine thousand three hundred thirty dollars ($29,330.00)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-06-19 agenda packet (1867_6_19_25_Agend; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-06-19, pp. 10–16; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-06-19 (that draft's own approval is not found in the records on file); the motion does not say whether they were amended)

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Source: 1867_6_19_25_Agenda_Packet.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2025-06-19 meeting, packet pp. 10–16; lines 243–515 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes

Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2025
A meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Cocoa was held on Thursday, May 15, 2025, in
the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed.
OPENING MATTERS:
Chairman Roberts called the meeting to order at 6:05 P.M. The Board Secretary called the roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Lloyd Roberts Chairman
Josue Otero Vice Chairman
Sharri Scott Board Member
Melissa Acosta Board Member
Dik Muller Board Member
Jody Hatcher 2 nd Alternate
MEMBERS ABSENT:
George Brown Jr. Board Member - excused
Gloria Weatherspoon 1rst Alternate - excused
Michael Simpson Board Member - excused
OTHERS PRESENT:
Tom Wilkinson Code Enforcement Manager
Micheal Mack Code Enforcement Officer
Justin Simpson Code Enforcement Officer
Jason Brimm Code Enforcement Officer
Kristin Eick Board Attorney
Darla Crowl Recording Secretary
Mark Baaden Lieutenant
Charlene Neuterman Community Services Director
Ms. Weeks City Councilwoman – Liaison
The Board Secretary swore in all Staff members giving testimony.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES:
1.Approval of Agenda: May 15, 2025
Chairman Roberts noted changes to the agenda (Items complied, tabled and withdrawn)
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Acosta, to approve to the agenda of May 15, 2025. Vote
on the motion carried unanimously.
2.Approval of Meeting Minutes: March 20, 2025.
Motion by Mr. Muller, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to approve to the minutes of March 20, 2025. Vote
on the motion carried unanimously.
3. Submit to the record of all documents & notices for all cases on the Agenda.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
May 15, 2025
Page 2
CASES:
1. CE-25-37 – 1112 Ohio Street
Code Enforcement Officer Justin Simpson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Officer Simpson testified that the Property Owner was in violation of City
of Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Junk, Trash, Debris and City of Cocoa Code Ch.
6, Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-902 (b)(2) Abandoned Vehicles of the City Code.
Officer Simpson requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be given until June 18,
2025 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) City of
Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Junk, Trash, Debris and two hundred fifty dollars
($250.00) City of Cocoa Code Ch. 6, Art. 111, Div. 3, Sec. 6-902 (b)(2) Abandoned Vehicles per day until
found in compliance.
Property owner was sworn in: Mark A. Yates, 1112 Ohio St, Cocoa
Attorney Eick asked if the previous case that came before the Code Board had been closed. Officer
Simpson started yes; a new case had been started once the property owner stopped communication in
January. He told Mr. Yates if he kept in contact he would work with him. There was a fire at the property
and the State Fire Marshal asked Code Enforcement to come out to the property and do a site visit. This
is when Code Enforcement was able to walk the entire property and get pictures. Attorney Eick reminded
the Code Board members that this was a new case. Mr. Yates gave an overview of his property and why
it is still not in compliance. Chairman Roberts asked several questions about why he did not stay in
contact with the Code Officer and what his plan going forward was for the property? More discussion
amongst the Board members and staff.
Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to approve Staff’s recommendation and give the
property owner until June 18, 2025, and find the Property Owner in violation. Vote on the motion carried
unanimously.
NON-COMPLIANCE:
1. CE-24-860 – 900 Friday Road
Code Enforcement Officer Justin Simpson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Officer Simpson testified that the Property Owner is in violation of App. A,
Article. XV, Sec. 2 (a) Permit Required of the City of Cocoa Code. Officer Simpson stated a Notice of
Hearing was sent on May 1, 2025, sent certified and posted on the property and property owner
remains in violation.
Benjamin Weismann: attorney for the property owner.
The property owner’s attorney spoke about permits that were applied for. Attorney Weismann asked for
more time to complete the work rather than the date of March 20, 2025, that was given at the last
meeting. Chairman Roberts explained to the attorney that there was no more time to be given as this
was a non-compliance hearing. Attorney Weismann said the property owner was not given proper notice
of the start date of the fine. Attorney Eick responded that a notice was sent with the information of the
violation and the fine start date if not brought into compliance. Discussion amongst the Board members
and staff.
Motion by Vice Chair Otero seconded by Mr. Muller, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the
Owner in Non-Compliance. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
May 15, 2025
Page 3
LIEN REDUCTIONS
1. CE-19-00193 – 1501 Harvard Dr.
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on January 16, 2020, at which time the Board
found the owner, Karen Scott, in violation of the following:
•City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-1003 (b) Protective Treatment.
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of February 16, 2020, to correct
said violation. Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance
Hearing was held on August 20, 2020.
The lien ran at $25.00 per day from February 16, 2020 until compliance was achieved on August
21, 2020. Code records show the case was closed, leaving a fine of $4,675.00. The property owner
(Karen Scott) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of zero.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes
•Applicant resides at the property: Yes
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; One
•Number of Inspections performed: 10
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, May 15, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur
prior to the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $171,900 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
The staff’s recommendation is that the fine / lien be reduced to $1,627.66 which is the cost of staff to
prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took
the property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Property owner was sworn in: Karen Scott, 1501 Harvard Dr, Cocoa
Ms. Scott said the only thing that was told to her is that there was a spot on her house that was dirty.
Chairman Roberts asked if she was aware of what the violations were. Chairman Roberts asked
Manager Wilkinson what the violation was for. Manager Wilkinson said the violation was for protective
treatment. Ms. Scott had questions about the date of the non-compliance hearing and the compliance
date. Discussion amongst the Board members, property owner and staff.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
May 15, 2025
Page 4
Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Chairman Roberts, to approve staff’s recommendation to City Council
the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand six hundred twenty-seven dollars and sixty-six cents
($1,627.66). Vote: Yay (4) Nay (2) (Vice Chair Otero, Ms. Acosta) Motion Passed

2. CE-23-0156 – 1106 Mitchell St.
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on January 18, 2024, at which time the Board
found the owner, One Stop Construction, in violation of the following:
•City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-1003 (g) Roofs and Drainage.
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of March 3 rd, 2024, to correct said
violation. Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance
Hearing was held on March 21, 2024.
The lien ran at $50.00 per day from March 3, 2024 until compliance was achieved on November 14,
2024. Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $12,820.00. The property owner
One Stop Construction (Jesus Velazquez) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of
City’s Cost.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes
•Applicant resides at the property: No
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; One
•Number of Inspections performed: 20
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, May 15, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur
prior to the Council Meeting
The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $121,130 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
The staff’s recommendation is that the fine / lien be reduced to $2,384.14 which is the cost of staff
to prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it
took the property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Property owner was sworn in: Jesus D Velazquez, 4214 SW 2 Terrace, Miami, FL 33134
Mr. Velazquez stated he took care of all the violations except for the roof. Mr. Velazquez stated he is a
general contractor. He worked on getting a roofing permit. There are no longer any violations on the
property of Mr. Velazquez. Chairman Roberts asked Mr. Velazquez where the disconnect was. More
discussion amongst the Board members, property owner and staff.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
May 15, 2025
Page 5
Motion by Ms. Acosta, seconded by Mr. Muller, to approve staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien
reduction be in the amount of two thousand three hundred eighty-four dollars and fourteen cents
($2,384.14). Vote: Yay (4) Nay (2) (Chairman Roberts, Ms. Scott) Motion Passed
3. CE-22-0583 – 128 Aurora St.
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on July 20,2023, at which time the Board found
the owner, Stoa Acquisitions LLC, in violation of the following:
•XXII, Permit Required App (A) Article XV sec 2(a)
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of August 19, 2023, to correct
said violation. Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance
Hearing was held on September 21, 2023.
The lien ran at $25.00 per day from August 19, 2023 until compliance was achieved on February
21, 2025. Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $13,820.00. The New property
owner (Faraway SG LLC) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount of $4,685.00.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; No
•Applicant resides at the property: No
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; One
•Number of Inspections performed: 25
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, May 15, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur
prior to the Council Meeting.
•The cost of staff to prosecute this case is $2,384.14

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $381,390 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
Staff’s recommendation is that the fine / lien be reduced per the applicants’ request to the amount of
$4,685.00 ,which will cover the cost of staff to prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the
gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the property to come into compliance, and the total
amount of the City’s Cost.
Chairman Roberts asked if anyone was present for the hearing. Manager Wilkinson stated the property
owner was notified of the hearing. Discussion amongst the Board members and staff.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
May 15, 2025
Page 6
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Chairman Roberts, to amend staff’s recommendation to City
Council the lien reduction be in the amount of thirteen thousand eight hundred twenty dollars
($13,820.00). Vote: Yay (6) Motion Passed
4. CE-23-0649 – 535 S Kentucky Ave.

The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on January 18, 2024, at which time the Board
found the owner, 535 S Kentucky Land Trust, in violation of the following:
•City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-900(b)(1) Accumulation of trash and litter
•City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-900(b)(11) XXII, Storing Outdoors
•App. A, Article. XV, Sec. 2 (a) Permit Required
•City Code, Chapter 6, Sec 6-1003 (a-p) IX. Exterior General Condition
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of February 17, 2024, to correct
said violation. Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance
Hearing was held on March 21, 2024.
The lien ran at $25.00 per day from February 17, 2024 until compliance was achieved on
December 6,2024. Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $ 29,330.00. The
property owner (535 S Kentucky Land Trust) is requesting that the lien be reduced to the amount
of City cost.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes
•Applicant resides at the property: No
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; Four
•Number of Inspections performed: 12
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, May 15, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur
prior to the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $75,840.00 according
to the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
The staff’s recommendation is that the fine / lien be reduced to $1,893.30, which is the cost of staff
to prosecute this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it
took the property to come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Ms. Acosta read off the application as to why they applied for the reduction. The property owner was
made aware of the lien and never brought it into compliance when the applicants reclaimed the property.
No one for the property was present. More discussion amongst the Board members and staff.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
May 15, 2025
Page 7

Motion by Ms. Acosta, seconded by Chairman Roberts, to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council
the lien reduction be in the amount of twenty-nine thousand three hundred thirty dollars ($29,330.00).
Vote: Yay (5) Nay (1) (Vice Chair Otero) Motion Passed
NEW BUSINESS:
None
OTHER BUSINESS:
None
ABATEMENT APPEALS:
None
Manager Announcements:
None
NEXT MEETING:
The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on June 19, 2025.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:03 PM.
Approved on this ______ day of ___________________, 2025.
______________________________
Lloyd Roberts, Chairman
______________________________
Darla Crowl, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of May 15, 2025.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of March 20, 2025.

III. Cases

1. CE25-37 / 1112 Ohio Street, Cocoa, FL / Mark Yates property owner of 1112 Ohio Street, Cocoa, FL, in violation of the following City Codes. Ch. 6, Art. III, Div. 3, Sec. 6-900 (b)(11) Junk, Trash, Debris Ch. 6, Art. III, Div. 3, Sec. 6-902 (b)(2) Abandoned Vehicles Ch. 12, Sec. 12-11 Doing Business Without BTR App. A, Art. XI, Sec. 15 (A)(15)(f)(8) District and Intent – Wholesale Commercial

IV. Non-Compliance

1. CE-24-860 / 900 Friday Rd. Cocoa FL / Cocoa Loft LLC. The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on February 20, 2025, at which time the Board found the owner, Cocoa Loft LLC , in violation of city code(s). The Code Enforcement Board provided the owners sufficient time of March 20, 2025 , to correct the following violation(s). App. A, Article. XV, Sec. 2 (a) Permit Required. — 00:29:18

V. Lien Reductions

1. CE19-00193 / 1501 Harvard Dr. / The property owner, Karen Scott, is requesting the Code Enforcement lien be reduced from $4,675.00 to the amount of Zero. — 00:41:16
2. CE23-0156 / 1106 Mitchell St. / The property owner (One Stop Construction) is requesting the Code Enforcement lien of $12,820.00 be reduced to the amount of citys cost. — 00:57:00
3. CE22-0583 / 128 Aurora St. / The property owner (Faraway SG LLC.) is requesting the Code Enforcement lien of $13,820.00 be reduced to the amount of $4,685.00. — 01:17:52
4. CE23-0649 / 535 S Kentucky Ave. / The property owner (535 S Kentucky Land Trust) is requesting the Code Enforcement Lien of $29,330.00 be reduced to the amount of the city's cost. — 01:28:01

VI. New Business

VII. Other Business

VIII. Abatement Appeals

IX. Manager Announcements

X. Next Meeting Date: The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on June 19, 2025.

XI. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 16 voices separated from the audio. 34 short machine repair(s) (42 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 91.8% of 11,748 content words. Dotted words (337 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 301 passages (24% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:13] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:00:13–00:00:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:00:28] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:28] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:01:14] ▶ Play Speaker 4

And by our heads, Lord, we thank you for allowing us to be here today. Lord, just continue to guide us and bless us in the best way of the city. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. Amen. I have a pledge of allegiance.

[00:01:29] ▶ Play No voice detected

I pledge

[00:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5

allegiance to the flag of the United States of

[00:01:33] ▶ Play No voice detected

America, and to the

[00:01:35] ▶ Play Speaker 5

republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

[00:01:47] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:47–00:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:51] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:01:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:01:53] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:01:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:01:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:01:57] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:01:59] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:02:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:02:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:02:09] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:10–00:02:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:13] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:02:15] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:16] ▶ Play Speaker 1

And

[00:02:18] ▶ Play Speaker 2

our new member, Jody Hatcher.

[00:02:23] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. I have the approval of agenda and

[00:02:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:26–00:02:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6

If you it's okay, I'd like to go ahead and ask staff, I'd

[00:02:35] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:02:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6

to go ‸ amend the agenda for item number one. ‸ like to ask the board to make a motion to amend the agenda to remove uh

[00:02:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:43–00:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:47] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:02:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

[00:02:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:50–00:02:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:02:59] ▶ Play Speaker 4

right That will be the third and fourth bullet

[00:03:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:02–00:03:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:03:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4

item number one in the cases. take a motion to approve. Motion to approve.

[00:03:13] ▶ Play Speaker 7

A second.

[00:03:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4

‸ Have a motion on ‸ floor with

[00:03:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:16–00:03:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:03:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4

second. All in favor say aye.

[00:03:17] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Aye. Those

[00:03:19] ▶ Play Speaker 4

‸ opposed? Motion passes. ‸ all right. um For the minutes

[00:03:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:26–00:03:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Okay. With that, I'll take a motion to approve.

[00:03:41] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ motion to approve. Second. ‸ Have

[00:03:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4

a motion on the floor with the second.

[00:03:44] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:44–00:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:03:46] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:03:51] ▶ Play No voice detected

Okay.

[00:03:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. So we're on to case number one.

[00:03:55] ▶ Play No voice detected

okay i

[00:03:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

swear

[00:04:03] ▶ Play Speaker 2

in our officers. I

[00:04:05] ▶ Play Speaker 4

know, but it's not on here. Just saying.

[00:04:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8

yeah I think it was the

[00:04:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

evocation

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:12–00:04:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:04:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8

should have been.

[00:04:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

okay

[00:04:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:16–00:04:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ all

[00:04:20] ▶ Play Speaker 4

right you gotta change stuff up on me.

[00:04:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Darla, do we also, we usually typically accept the packet, um

[00:04:35] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:35–00:04:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:38] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I'm sorry, you're gonna ‸ do that.

[00:04:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Mr. Chairman, I would like to submit the PowerPoint presentation and the packets with documents for each case into the record.

[00:04:47] ▶ Play Speaker 4

uh So, accepted. So, if possible,

[00:04:53] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:53–00:04:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4

those things

[00:04:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:54–00:04:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:58] ▶ Play Speaker 4

please? And thank you. okay Yeah, we're not seeing that up there.

[00:05:14] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Should pop up now.

[00:05:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1

yep voila

[00:05:22] ▶ Play No voice detected

‸ Welcome.

[00:05:22] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. Item

[00:05:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:24–00:05:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:37] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:05:43] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Currently, right now, we have the following violations. Number one, chapter six, article three, division three,

[00:05:49] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:49–00:05:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5

junk, trash, debris.

[00:05:56] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:56–00:06:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:08] ▶ Play Speaker 5

This is an aerial view of where the property

[00:06:10] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:10–00:06:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:12] ▶ Play Speaker 5

is a google map image. as you can see it's um located just behind south bar avenue lake drive just off of 520. this

[00:06:26] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

is a breakdown

[00:06:26] ▶ Play Speaker 5

of violation number one chapter six junk trash and debris shall constitute a nuisance for

[00:06:32] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:26 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:06:32–00:06:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:58] ▶ Play Speaker 5

violation number two

[00:06:59] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:59–00:07:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:01] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:01–00:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5

absence of a current motor vehicle registration shall be prima facie of evidence that such vehicle is inoperable and or abandoned

[00:07:11] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

chunked

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:11–00:07:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:07:11] ▶ Play Speaker 5

or discarded January 3rd, Officer Simpson arrived at ‸ reference property to conduct an inspection based on a citizen complaint for multiple violations. I observed excessive junk, trash debris and abandoned vehicles. January 16th, I contacted, we had contact with Mr. Yates and

[00:07:43] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:43–00:07:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:44] ▶ Play Speaker 5

and the corrective actions that were needed to take place.

[00:07:48] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:48–00:07:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:50] ▶ Play Speaker 5

to correct the issues and would stay in touch.

[00:07:52] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:52–00:07:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:57] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Notice a violation was sent via UPS as certified mail. February 24th, certified notice ‸ violation was refused and sent back. I conducted a re-inspection of the reference property and observed that the property remained in violation. On February 28th, a fire occurred at the reference property due to an individual attempting to cook inside one of the RVs in the property.

[00:08:21] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:21–00:08:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:24] ▶ Play Speaker 5

was able to contain the fire to the RV and

[00:08:27] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:27–00:08:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:28] ▶ Play Speaker 5

to the neighboring homes and businesses. the

[00:08:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

state

[00:08:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Fire Marshal was called to investigate the fire and requested code enforcement to investigate alongside. This will be evidenced in

[00:08:37] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:37–00:08:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5

[00:08:39] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:39–00:08:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:41] ▶ Play Speaker 5

an amended notice of violation was sent to the property via USPS certified mail.

[00:09:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:09:03–00:09:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:09:27] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:27–00:09:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:28] ▶ Play Speaker 5

via USPS certified mail restricted delivery with a hard copy of return receipt requested. ‸ Notice

[00:09:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

of hearing

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:34–00:09:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:09:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5

was posted to the reference property and at City Hall 65 Stone Street Cocoa Florida 32922 May 15th today I conducted a re-inspection of the reference property and observed the property remaining in ‸ violation. Staff recommendation. We recommend the Code Enforcement Board by the property in violation, issue an order requiring the violations be corrected and the property brought into compliance immediately and consider an imposition of a daily fine of up to $250 per ‸ fine per day and took lines is met. And it seems that

[00:10:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:19–00:10:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:21] ▶ Play Speaker 5

what

[00:10:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4

was the amendment?

[00:10:28] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:28–00:10:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:29] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:10:34] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]

[00:10:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:10:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9

may I add on to that question please I I believe looking at the notice of violation, the amended notice of violation, this is a new case number, correct? So is this essentially this is a new case starting over because my recollection is I believe the board

[00:11:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

tabled a

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:08–00:11:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:11:09] ▶ Play Speaker 9

matter for this property address previously. Can you speak to that?

[00:11:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5

They table the matter previously from an old case and that case was closed so there was a new notice that was sent out that was started by me in January and then based on my communication with mr. yates in January once he ceased the communication with me that's when I sent the new notice of violation and then with the fire happening on February 28th that's when the amended note of violation happened because that's when I was able to do an inspection of the entire property based on the state fire marshal asking us to be present during her investigation we were able to gain access

[00:12:01] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

to the

[00:12:01] ▶ Play Speaker 5

the entire property and that's when the amendment of violation was sent out.

[00:12:09] ▶ Play No voice detected

okay

[00:12:10] ▶ Play Speaker 9

and but I apologize but

[00:12:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:12–00:12:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9

correct

[00:12:17] ▶ Play Speaker 5

yes it is

[00:12:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9

oh it is in the packet

[00:12:22] ▶ Play Speaker 5

I'm sorry

[00:12:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I'm

[00:12:29] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

sorry

[00:12:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so mr. chair my question is what was added to the

[00:12:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6

two items ‸ that we withdrew were on the the amended notice of violation after the fire

[00:12:41] ▶ Play Speaker 4

so they were added that

[00:12:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6

was the amended notice of violation if I'm not correct

[00:12:47] ▶ Play Speaker 4

okay okay

[00:12:49] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

all

[00:12:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

right all

[00:12:50] ▶ Play No voice detected

right

[00:12:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6

And those are the two we withdrew. okay okay

[00:13:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9

So for the board, this is a new case and not what was tabled

[00:13:05] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:05–00:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:05] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:13:06] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:13:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4

property owner would ‸ like to step up and speak. okay

[00:13:16] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

yeah

[00:13:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

I was

[00:13:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:17–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

in. okay

[00:13:20] ▶ Play Speaker 2

you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth still have to God yes

[00:13:23] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

ma'am

[00:13:24] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Please state your name and address for the record.

[00:13:25] ▶ Play Speaker 11

mark a yates

[00:13:28] ▶ Play Speaker 2

and your address

[00:13:30] ▶ Play Speaker 11

1112 ohio street

[00:13:32] ▶ Play Speaker 2

thank you

[00:13:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4

all right mr. yates um first of all thank you for being here what can you tell us here

[00:13:37] ▶ Play Speaker 11

first of all I was gonna ‸ let you see

[00:13:39] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:39–00:13:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:44] ▶ Play Speaker 11

late today it was pretty severe and it's luckily I'm even here but I made sure I made it ‸ here

[00:13:53] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:13:54] ▶ Play Speaker 11

start off I have a rental I have a property in ticeville that's

[00:14:01] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:01–00:14:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:05] ▶ Play Speaker 11

so I keep a lot of my building supplies and stuff at this house over here because it's commercial residential

[00:14:12] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:12–00:14:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:14] ▶ Play Speaker 11

it a little bit messier than they want it to be. But ‸ to start off, the people that keep calling on me, there's a business next door. I've been very respectful to them every time I deal with them It's always yes, sir, no, sir, all that. and um

[00:14:33] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:33–00:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:38] ▶ Play Speaker 11

turned it down That was early on. and ever since then, it seems like they've had it in for me. Every day

[00:14:45] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:45–00:14:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:48] ▶ Play Speaker 11

calling on me Every day

[00:14:50] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:50–00:14:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:54] ▶ Play Speaker 11

indeed the trash pickup

[00:14:57] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:57–00:14:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:58] ▶ Play Speaker 11

get my trash because it's blocking the trash cans. I got many pictures showing this too

[00:15:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4

That has nothing to do with

[00:15:05] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yours.

[00:15:06] ▶ Play Speaker 4

now

[00:15:07] ▶ Play Speaker 11

my property is I'm working on it I take care of a disabled girl and I'm working on my property at the same time and take care of a rental property I'm doing it ‸ might not be doing it as quick as they want me to do it, but I'm doing the best I can I got pictures here that shows the improvement on my houses on my house there that the complaints being made of. and they said

[00:15:33] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:33–00:15:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:36] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I don't know where they get that information from ‸ that is completely false. There was nobody cooking ‸ it. There was

[00:15:42] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

nobody

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:15:42–00:15:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:15:42] ▶ Play Speaker 11

living in it or nothing so what happened? It was electrical or something like that

[00:15:50] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:50–00:15:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11

There was electric cord going to it, but there wasn't no power even going to ‸ There wasn't nothing inside of it being used at all. so I don't understand it's kind of strange on why that thing caught fire. because nobody There was nothing hooked up to it.

[00:16:05] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:05–00:16:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4

alright ‸ so let's talk about the issue of the you were you responded initially and then you did not respond. And then we're here now. So tell us how we get here. Because one of the biggest things that we always

[00:16:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

want

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:29–00:16:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:16:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4

to avoid coming here and working with the code enforcement officers and showing them some kind of progress or having communication, open dialogue with them would avoid us being here. But the way it looks,

[00:16:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:43–00:16:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:47] ▶ Play Speaker 4

But let's talk about why

[00:16:50] ▶ Play Speaker 11

nothing's

[00:16:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

happened

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:51–00:16:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:16:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Well, there has been things happening. There's a lot of change there right now. I took pictures today that showed a lot of change that's taking place, and

[00:16:59] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:59–00:17:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:02] ▶ Play Speaker 11

a lot of progress. I got pictures if you ‸ want to see it

[00:17:08] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:08–00:17:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:09] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:17:13] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

oh yeah, that's another thing. There are no

[00:17:15] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:17:15–00:17:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:16] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

vehicles.

[00:17:16] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:16–00:17:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:18] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

I turned in the tags on my Porsche The only reason, it's got a broken windshield. It happened from the hurricane, and I lost the key to it

[00:17:27] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:27–00:17:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:28] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

it so I sold the key to it off my backpack It was about a year ago, and I haven't been able to drive it since because the keys like ‸ $700

[00:17:37] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:37–00:17:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:17:37] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

get made, and you got to order it and everything else But the vehicle is not abandoned. it's my vehicle It's registered to me. It runs perfectly fine once I get the key

[00:17:47] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:47–00:17:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:50] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it's not abandoned I use it The trucks registered to me, and I use it and there's a motorcycle there that I use so I don't know what vehicle they're talking about that's abandoned So

[00:18:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4

they don't have tags. do they all have tags?

[00:18:06] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:06–00:18:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:10] ▶ Play Speaker 11

and they're not being used, because the Porsche I haven't drove it and I take that back on when the key was lost

[00:18:17] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:17–00:18:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:20] ▶ Play Speaker 11

around two years, probably. I had to get it towed there because I didn't have a key to start it but it runs perfect. and I'm in the process of getting that restored but

[00:18:30] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:30–00:18:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:32] ▶ Play Speaker 11

keep code enforcement happy try to

[00:18:36] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:36–00:18:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:38] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so far. I know

[00:18:39] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I just got a lot of stuff going on and I'm trying my best to get it done ‸ so let's Talk

[00:18:44] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

about some kind of plan going forward. what can we do going forward?

[00:18:50] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:50–00:18:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:18:55] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So let's talk about what we can do to for you to do to not

[00:19:00] ▶ Play Speaker 11

be here again. ‸ well one thing is I

[00:19:05] ▶ Play No voice detected

guess

[00:19:05] ▶ Play Speaker 11

the people next door keep calling on me. I know

[00:19:07] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

this

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:07–00:19:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:19:07] ▶ Play Speaker 11

who's calling because they told me it was

[00:19:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yes sir and I understand that there's your neighbors So you have a responsibility to your neighbors also. Yeah, they have a responsibility. We can't talk about them calling. We got to talk about a plan of what

[00:19:20] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

you're going

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:20–00:19:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:19:20] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

to do or how much time you need to work on getting this cleaned up.

[00:19:25] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

okay

[00:19:25] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:25–00:19:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:19:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

like I don't want you to feel like ‸ I'm coming off like a jerk but we got to be able to stay on topic of

[00:19:32] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

what we need to get done. I respect that I'm working on the front yard right now I almost got it done I'm doing a rock facade on the front of the house I'm right in the middle of that I'm going to start working on the backyard getting it all cleaned up, taking some of it to my other property. I just need a little bit of time ‸ you know

[00:19:52] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:52–00:19:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:56] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

can keep code enforcement from having to come out all the time or you know having to bring us here. again.

[00:20:04] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Question for you Officer Simpson have you seen any progress? or shall I say have you seen any acceptable progress?

[00:20:18] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:18–00:20:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:24] ▶ Play Speaker 5

are still there.

[00:20:28] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:28–00:20:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:32] ▶ Play Speaker 5

I haven't seen any acceptable progress I mean

[00:20:34] ▶ Play Speaker 11

there's He hasn't been out there lately then. and those I don't know

[00:20:40] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:40–00:20:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:43] ▶ Play Speaker 11

my property? that's what I don't understand

[00:20:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ Mr. Chairman may I ask a question? please can you just Mr. Simpson state for the record which vehicles are you saying are the abandoned vehicles? I saw a van with no license plate and then there was

[00:21:06] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:06–00:21:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:12] ▶ Play Speaker 5

‸ the RVs in the back also don't have current registration but as of right now just from original the original accusations was the van and the Porsche yes okay

[00:21:22] ▶ Play Speaker 11

They are both registered and have place they're just not up to date because

[00:21:29] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:29–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:33] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I'm in the process of getting it fixed back up so I can get it

[00:21:36] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

back and

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:36–00:21:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:21:37] ▶ Play Speaker 11

get it sold because I'm trying to sell it but I got to get it back up and fixed.

[00:21:46] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So plates are not up to date or you turned it in?

[00:21:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11

The plate on the van was stolen,

[00:21:52] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:52–00:21:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:58] ▶ Play Speaker 11

is in the RV

[00:22:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

‸ Alright ‸ so let's talk about how much time you feel like you need. because

[00:22:07] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:07–00:22:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

what would be our most alarming or concerning things with this property that needs to be done as far as the priority list? what would be on the top of the priority list?

[00:22:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5

To be honest the ‸ junk and trash because

[00:22:41] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:22:42] ▶ Play Speaker 5

mean he stated that the one RV wasn't hooked up to anything and then he just said that it was an electrical fire

[00:22:52] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:52–00:22:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:22:53] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:22:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

to pop up well If it wasn't ‸ electrical fire then how was it not hooked up to anything? and when I went out today the RV in the back was hooked up to electricity. it was running an AC unit

[00:23:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:13–00:23:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:23:13] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:23:15] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:23:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:23:16] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:23:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:23:20] ▶ Play Speaker 5

so there's power out there in the backyard to these RVs That's because that's an office.

[00:23:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8

well yeah I

[00:23:32] ▶ Play Speaker 11

use it I use it as an office

[00:23:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

just Just to remind the board, we're only speaking about the junk trash and debris and the abandoned vehicles. so I'm not sure what the RVs are how it's relevant

[00:23:50] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:50–00:23:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:23:55] ▶ Play Speaker 9

still have power I suppose that

[00:23:57] ▶ Play Speaker 11

that burnt pop up the picture

[00:24:00] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:00–00:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:00] ▶ Play Speaker 11

a minute ago, it doesn't look nothing like that. That was

[00:24:03] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:03–00:24:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:24:03] ▶ Play Speaker 11

day of burn up. of course it's going to look a little burnt up but it's completely covered with a tarp and ready to be hauled out there.

[00:24:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1

is there going to be hauled out?

[00:24:13] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:13–00:24:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:18] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I just I got some injuries but I can make it happen all right let's get back to. Or

[00:24:25] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:25–00:24:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:24:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4

much time would you feel like you need to get some significant progress because this has lingered for a while and you have that fire and now it's more of a hazard. because you have initially the fire department when they put it out, because they were concerned about structures to both sides so again how much time do you feel like you need?

[00:24:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11

If you could give me two to three months, I can get it done I mean that would be what I'm I'm asking for if it's available

[00:25:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4

[00:25:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:00–00:25:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4

want to sound insensitive but what are

[00:25:06] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

you

[00:25:06] ▶ Play Speaker 4

going to do in two or three months that you haven't done any three months oh I'm sorry this is May so we've been we've been at this since January so

[00:25:15] ▶ Play Speaker 11

well I've gotten a lot done He's not telling you all the stuff that's gotten done. if he's once you go back there now, he would see that there's a lot more done than what he's saying there is. And at the same time, I'm working on my house up front

[00:25:28] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:28–00:25:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:32] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I got pictures I can show you what I'm doing no so again

[00:25:36] ▶ Play Speaker 4

you say two or three months.

[00:25:38] ▶ Play Speaker 11

yeah I'll just stop focusing on working on the house and just focus on cleaning the back up I guess I don't know what he means about trash There's really no trash. There's not trash laying around ‸ the floor. I mean there might be a Coke cup or something laying somewhere every once in

[00:25:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:25:56] ▶ Play Speaker 11

while, but I don't

[00:25:57] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:25:57–00:25:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:58] ▶ Play Speaker 11

sit there It's not like it's a junkyard and

[00:26:01] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:01–00:26:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:04] ▶ Play Speaker 11

for everyday use

[00:26:06] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:06–00:26:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:06] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:26:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:26:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 00:26:15–00:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:26:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:26:30] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

For Chapter 6, Article 3, Junk, Trash, Debris, and Chapter 6, Article 3, Abandoned

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:26:30–00:26:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:26:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:39–00:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

And that the respondent shall correct the violations no later than 4 p.m.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:26:41–00:26:46 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:26:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 00:26:46–00:27:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:48] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:26:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:26:53] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:26:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:27:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

not comply by this date after considering the factors in Section 162.09, Florida Statute,

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:01–00:27:09 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:27:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:09–00:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

in the amount of $250 per day per violation will be imposed each day the violation continues past the

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:09–00:27:18 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:27:18] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:18–00:27:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

date. The respondent is our order to contact the code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:18–00:27:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:27:28] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

Second. We have a motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed? Motion passes unanimously. So, Mr. Yates,

[00:27:38] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:38–00:27:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

to get to work. So you need to ensure that you are in contact with the code enforcement officers so we can try and get to some resolution and show progress that we're working toward it.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:39–00:27:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:27:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:51–00:27:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:52] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

So basically, by June

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:52–00:27:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:27:54] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:54–00:27:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:54] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

I need to have

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:54–00:27:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:27:55] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:55–00:27:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:56] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

vehicles with registered and all that and trash of

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:56–00:28:00 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:28:00] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:28:00–00:28:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:02] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

up and put away or thrown out and the camper hauled off. Is that basically...

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:28:01–00:28:28 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:28:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

I will do. Thank you. Thank you for being here, sir.

[00:28:20] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

Mr. Chair.

[00:28:21] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

Yes, ma'am.

[00:28:22] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

Can you make sure everybody talks in their microphone?

[00:28:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

Uh, we need to make sure we pull

[00:28:28] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:28:28–00:28:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:28] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

down so we can be heard. I'm loud, so...

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:28:28–00:28:31 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:28:31] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; part of a long flagged stretch · 00:28:31–00:28:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:28:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:28:44] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:28:45] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:28:47] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:28:53] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:28:56] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:28:58] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:58–00:29:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:58] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:28:59] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:29:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4

looking at this, right?

[00:29:10] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:10–00:29:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:11] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:29:12] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:29:12] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:12–00:29:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:22] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Yes, sir.

[00:29:23] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:29:23–00:29:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:24] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:29:26] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Non-compliance of 900 Friday Road, Cocoa Loft.

[00:29:31] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:31–00:29:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Property owner failed to comply with the following violations.

[00:29:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:38–00:29:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:41] ▶ Play Speaker 5

So paragraph a permit required. Breakdown of the code violation. No person, firm or corporation saw commence or cause to be commenced the erection, construction or alteration of any building structure, sign or canopy within the city of Cocoa until an application for a permit therefore has been previously filed with the city of Cocoa as provided herein

[00:30:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:03–00:30:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:08] ▶ Play Speaker 5

first been issued by the city.

[00:30:11] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:11–00:30:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:15] ▶ Play Speaker 5

owners in violation of permits required for work being done at reference property, gave property owners

[00:30:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:19–00:30:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:23] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:23–00:30:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:27] ▶ Play Speaker 5

makes contact the email saying a permit ‸ notice ‸ commitment had been issued for the reference property.

[00:30:33] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:33–00:30:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:35] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:30:35] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:30:37] ▶ Play Speaker 5

I contact legal representation for the property owners

[00:30:40] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

inform

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:40–00:30:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:30:41] ▶ Play Speaker 5

them due to incorrect permits being applied for violations still applied.

[00:30:44] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:44–00:30:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:51] ▶ Play Speaker 5

This is the permit

[00:30:53] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:53–00:30:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:57] ▶ Play Speaker 5

It was for interior paint and flooring. This was the scope of work that was sent in.

[00:31:09] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:09–00:31:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5

flooring with new vinyl plank.

[00:31:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:16–00:31:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:22] ▶ Play Speaker 5

This was the comment from the community services manager. That was applied to the building. Applied to the building permit. The

[00:31:34] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

permit that

[00:31:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5

they applied for. Obviously, it was denied because the permit was not required for painting and flooring. However, there was a comment in there. Any structural work to include drywall or ceilings, plumbing work, mechanical work or electrical work will need to be permitted. And that was stated on April 7th, 2025. April 30th, 2025. Property owners general contractor contacted me in reference to the building permits. Contractor stated he applied for the permit for the work that the property owners said had been done. He admitted he apologized that he did not actually research the property. I stated that electrical, drywall and plumbing work had been done to the property previously. May 1st notice of hearing was sent to the property owners via USPS certified mail restricted delivery for with hardcopy return receipt requested.

[00:32:33] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:33–00:32:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:37] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Street, Cocoa, Florida, May 15th. Today, I conducted a re-inspection of the reference property and observed that the property remained in violation. This is a screenshot currently of our citizen serve software that shows that the permits for electrical, plumbing and

[00:33:02] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

their

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:02–00:33:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:33:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5

current one for a drywall patch repairs. The only one that they have right now is the drywall patch repairs is under review.

[00:33:12] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:12–00:33:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5

There are no permits for plumbing work. This is the comment for their drywall as of right now. This is the reason it is currently under review.

[00:33:52] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

Staff recommends Code Enforcement Board

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:33:52–00:33:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:33:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:54–00:33:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

property

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:33:54–00:33:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:33:54] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:54–00:33:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:55] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

an issue of fine of $250 per day beginning March 20th, 2025, and continuing until compliance is met. And the property owner's attorney is present.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:33:54–00:34:15 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:34:11] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized

Yes, sir. Thank you for allowing me to speak to all today.

[00:34:16] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:16–00:34:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:18] ▶ Play Speaker 13

that he said, but there is more additional progress that's being done currently.

[00:34:24] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:24–00:34:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:28] ▶ Play Speaker 13

an electrical permit

[00:34:29] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized

that is

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:29–00:34:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:34:29] ▶ Play Speaker 13

currently being considered

[00:34:30] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:30–00:34:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:33] ▶ Play Speaker 13

And for plumbing,

[00:34:35] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:35–00:34:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:37] ▶ Play Speaker 13

has applied as well. Unfortunately, he tendered his application to the county of Brevard instead. And

[00:34:43] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:43–00:34:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13

You have

[00:34:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:49–00:34:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:54] ▶ Play Speaker 13

So he's in the process of that. So then ‸ the second that approval happens, that permit will be submitted. So currently, all of the issues that have been raised in the past are being addressed. And there is progress and there is compliance. It's just taken a little bit longer because unfortunately, I'm sure everyone who's worked with contractors before knows, they don't always respond or do things as quickly as you would like. And especially in this sort of circumstance where work was unfortunately done in ‸ the past without permits to go and get that work permitted. It takes you really it takes time to find a contractor willing to do that because the contractor is legally liable for the previous work when they attach their own permit to it. So it takes a little bit of time to allow that to happen. Now,

[00:35:39] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:35:39] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:39–00:35:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:45] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Cocoa permitting laws when they started this process.

[00:35:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:49–00:35:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:54] ▶ Play Speaker 13

is trying that. So the only thing we would ask is if we were given to the next board meeting to get all this permitting done and to the approval of Officer Simpson instead of just the 20th and starting the violations there.

[00:36:06] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So are you aware of the section in which this falls into? This is not a section in which that you previously heard where it's a straight a kind of start from scratch. This is not a start from scratch. This is a compliant or non-compliant.

[00:36:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:27–00:36:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4

compliance or you're not.

[00:36:32] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

They're in the process of applying and applying for the permits.

[00:36:35] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

That's my

[00:36:35] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

question. There is no additional permits currently beyond those that have been described. ‸ All right. And the board has already found that certain permitting was

[00:36:47] ▶ Play Speaker 4

required. All right. ‸ So, technically, we're not in court and I'm not an attorney. So, I'm plain and simple. Compliance or not?

[00:36:58] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

The only thing we would ask you is if there's just a slight amount more time than just five days.

[00:37:03] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:03–00:37:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:03] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:37:07] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice

I understand that. But they did diligently pursue attempting to get the permitting done.

[00:37:14] ▶ Play Speaker 4

They went about it the wrong way and started something. Because, again, ‸ when you have a business, especially something of that nature, you have to understand the ins and outs. And you have to have a permit. If you have a question, you pick up the phone. It's that easy. So, at this point, you haven't given me an answer. So, I'll take that as a no. I understand that, sir. Yeah.

[00:37:40] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:40–00:37:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:44] ▶ Play Speaker 4

and dry. There's no gray area. It's just kind of like the law. You either comply with it or you broke it. I understand that, sir. But

[00:37:53] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:53–00:37:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:58] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:58–00:37:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:01] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I understand that, sir. But you now will announce what you're going to do. And you have a choice that you can issue a fine now on the 20th. Or you could provide additional time for the permitting that's been applied to go through. Okay.

[00:38:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So, what I'm trying to say to you, there's

[00:38:20] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:20–00:38:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4

There is no time. There's nothing we could... We can't give you more time because the time has already expired.

[00:38:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:30–00:38:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:35] ▶ Play Speaker 13

I understand that, sir. But the board is in power to... If you chose, I could tell that you probably are not interested in that. But you do have the authority to grant additional time for the fines. Okay. Hold on. Just one second.

[00:38:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I'll take a motion. Yes, sir. I'd like to set a motion, please. Yes, sir.

[00:38:55] ▶ Play Speaker 14

Okay.

[00:38:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:56–00:39:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I move to find that the respondent in this case failed to correct the violation.

[00:39:09] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

App A, Article XV, Section 2, Permit required within the time specified in the Code Enforcement Board's prior order in this case, and that the fine will be imposed

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:39:09–00:39:25 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:39:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:39:25–00:39:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

forth in that order.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:39:25–00:39:27 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:39:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:39:31–00:39:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:31–00:39:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:31] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:39:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:39:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:39:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4

the floor with the second. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Those opposed? Motion passes. So, now you have time to work on it. And I'm sure they'll get with you again to possibly have a lien reduction. That's an option.

[00:39:52] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Well, thank you for that. ‸ The only question I just... Just to be sure that I understand, is the board then

[00:39:58] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:58–00:40:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:02] ▶ Play Speaker 13

fine? Oh, no. The 20th of March. Two months ago. Of March. Okay. Is there not an issue there with ex post facto in terms of your issuing a fine? You're issuing... I don't know

[00:40:14] ▶ Play Speaker 4

about ex post facto.

[00:40:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:15–00:40:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:18] ▶ Play Speaker 13

You do have an attorney that could advise you on issuing a fine for an action

[00:40:22] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:40:22–00:40:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:24] ▶ Play Speaker 13

like that, and whether there was proper notice

[00:40:25] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:25–00:40:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:40:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Proper notice was given, and you guys... They didn't meet it. So, that's why we're here now. So, proper notice was given. They didn't meet that date. So, by Florida statute, that's where it rolls.

[00:40:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I would just add that the order included the... Basically, what would happen if you didn't meet the March 20th deadline, which was imposition of a fine.

[00:40:57] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:57–00:40:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:59] ▶ Play Speaker 9

So, it was included in the order.

[00:41:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Thank you for your time. Yes, sir. Thank you for being here. Of course. Thank you.

[00:41:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:13–00:41:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. So, first lean reduction item number one. Lean

[00:41:24] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

reduction CE

[00:41:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4

19-00193.

[00:41:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Okay.

[00:41:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:33–00:41:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:41–00:41:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6

at which time the code enforcement board found the owner, Karen Scott, in violation of the city code.

[00:41:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:50–00:41:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The code enforcement board provided the

[00:41:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:41:57–00:41:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

time to February 16th, 2020, to correct said violation. Therefore, consistent with the code enforcement board order, a noncompliance hearing was held on August 20th of 2020. The

[00:42:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:10–00:42:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:42:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6

ran from at $25 a day from February 16th of 2020 to August 21st of 2020. The applicant does reside at the property. Property taxes is paid through. There are no current outstanding liens on the property. No water liens. The case was closed.

[00:42:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:33–00:42:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:34–00:42:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6

An applicant, Karen Scott, is requesting that the

[00:42:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:40–00:42:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:42:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6

be reduced to zero.

[00:42:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:42–00:42:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:48] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I'm available for any questions. And I believe

[00:42:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:42:54–00:42:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Scott is in the audience.

[00:42:57] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:42:57–00:43:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:06] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:43:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? I do. Please state your name and address for the record. Karen

[00:43:15] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Scott.

[00:43:21] ▶ Play No voice detected · Machine re-recognized

Karen

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:21–00:43:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:43:21] ▶ Play No voice detected

Scott.

[00:43:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:23–00:43:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:43:27] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:43:28] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Thank you.

[00:43:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right, Ms. Scott, what would you like to tell us here?

[00:43:35] ▶ Play No voice detected

Thank you.

[00:43:38] ▶ Play Speaker 12

When I first was aware of this, the problem, I called the Cocoa City Department. I have no idea who I spoke with. This was back when it first started. I told them I wouldn't be able to be at the council meeting on the date it was being held because I would be working. And whoever, whomever I spoke with told me there was no problem, that it was okay. So I just, I didn't realize, I mean, I didn't know it was a serious problem. I had no idea. I didn't, I didn't come then, but the only thing I've ever heard was there was a spot on, if you're facing my house, there was a spot on the right side of the house that was dirty. That was all I was told.

[00:44:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

How long have you owned this home?

[00:44:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:39–00:44:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:40] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:44:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So you've been the owner all this time, and you said they only, you were only aware of some spot?

[00:44:51] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

Yes. That was what, that was the, what I was told was wrong with the house.

[00:44:58] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:58–00:45:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:08–00:45:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

2 o'clock, 3 o'clock in the morning, and I was having to go to work. So I would call the police on them. One morning I woke up at 3 o'clock in the morning, there was three gentlemen right by my bedroom window, and I called the police that night. And they knew, someone told them that it was me, and I, you know, that's why they called code enforcement ‸ about my house.

[00:45:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Okay, can you, do you recall what your violations were? Are you saying a spot?

[00:45:46] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

It was, that's what I was told, a spot on the right side of my house. If you're facing my house, there was a spot on the right side on the wall.

[00:46:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Can you guys tell me what the violation, that she had, violation or violations?

[00:46:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Mr. Chairman, from what the case record shows, it was for protective treatment for faded paint on the property.

[00:46:19] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:46:19–00:46:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:21] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:46:21] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:46:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I'm

[00:46:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

going

[00:46:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

to talk about just pretty much faded paint. You need to get up there and be the fresh wash and then maybe paint. ‸ And we've got from February to August that we couldn't get that done. And you're asking for a lien reduction to zero.

[00:46:49] ▶ Play Speaker 12

February to August of what year?

[00:46:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4

2020.

[00:46:56] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:56–00:47:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:01] ▶ Play Speaker 12

When I called the city of Coco and told them, because I was going to, I wanted to come to the meeting, but I couldn't because I was working. ‸ The whole house almost has been painted, pressure washed and painted, everything on that house. Mr. Gonzalez came out. I knew nothing about any of this until last ‸ year when Mr. Gonzalez came out. I thought it had been resolved.

[00:47:31] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:31–00:47:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:40] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:47:40] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:47:43] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

The whole, the front, the back, the sides, everything has been taken care of. It's been pressure washed.

[00:47:48] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:48–00:47:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:50] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:47:53] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:53–00:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:58] ▶ Play Speaker 12

I found out was when I went to code enforcement where Darla was working.

[00:48:08] ▶ Play No voice detected

And

[00:48:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12

she told me. Okay.

[00:48:11] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Mr. Chair. Notice, notice was, I'm sorry, go ahead.

[00:48:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:14–00:48:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6

If y'all look up there on the screens, I don't know if you can see the screens in front of you.

[00:48:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:20–00:48:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:24] ▶ Play Speaker 6

February 16th to comply. Your noncompliance hearing was held on August 20th of 2020. The property was placed in compliance the day after the Code Board ‸ noncompliance hearing.

[00:48:37] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:48:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6

just wanted to point that out to the board.

[00:48:43] ▶ Play No voice detected

And

[00:48:44] ▶ Play Speaker 4

when did it come into compliance?

[00:48:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6

August, the day after the compliance hearing. You had your compliance and your noncompliance here on August 20th to 2020.

[00:48:53] ▶ Play No voice detected

And

[00:48:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6

staff put it in compliance on August 21st, 2020.

[00:49:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:06–00:49:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the records say. They show. And I just wanted to point it out to the board.

[00:49:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:49:10–00:49:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:11] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:49:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:49:12] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:49:13] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:49:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:49:13] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:49:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:49:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yeah, you had the original hearing on, on January 16th.

[00:49:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:21–00:49:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The board gave the property owner until February 16th to come to compliance. The noncompliance hearing was held on August 20th.

[00:49:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:33–00:49:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:37–00:49:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6

an affidavit of compliance

[00:49:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:44–00:49:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:46] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:49:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6

just want to point that out to the board before y'all make a decision.

[00:49:49] ▶ Play Speaker 7

But there were notices that were provided around January, correct? That there was these violations. So it's not like she just found out that she was in noncompliance on August 20th. There was previous correspondence, correct?

[00:50:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes.

[00:50:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:05–00:50:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

original hearing for January 16th. She had the notice for the hearing for them for noncompliance hearing 10 days prior to the February 16th hearing. Staff reported it in violation in August that it was in violation. Then they placed it in compliance the following day.

[00:50:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:31–00:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

No, sir.

[00:50:39] ▶ Play Speaker 12

That's why I called and they told me because I got a letter to state and I needed to be here.

[00:50:46] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:46–00:50:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:50] ▶ Play Speaker 12

out.

[00:50:53] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:53–00:50:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:58] ▶ Play No voice detected

I'm

[00:50:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3

sorry.

[00:50:59] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:59–00:51:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:01] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:51:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

[00:51:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:51:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

[00:51:23] ▶ Play Speaker 3

I'm a little bit perplexed by that. I mean I did the whole six month thing,

[00:51:27] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:27–00:51:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3

But I'm saying on the day of the non-compliance end, code went out there and said it was not

[00:51:37] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:51:37–00:51:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Then we go the very next day and say that it is

[00:51:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

compliant

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:41–00:51:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:51:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3

I'm a little bit boggled by

[00:51:44] ▶ Play No voice detected

that.

[00:51:44] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

But I believe the fines began February 16th.

[00:51:47] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:47–00:51:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:51:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:48–00:51:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3

You can't answer this, but...

[00:51:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No, ma'am, I can just go by the records that are in there from the previous officer and there is an email. There is an email from the officer who took the case to our coordinator notifying us that the case ‸ in compliance and asked to stop the fine the same in that very next day.

[00:52:10] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:10–00:52:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:52:13] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:52:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:52:14] ▶ Play Speaker 3

that I have called to the carpet ‸ multiple times. And this sounds like another one of those that if I sit here much longer and still want it, I'm going to call it out again. So you can make a motion for six months if you want to.

[00:52:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4

If no one else has any questions, I'm satisfied and I'll take a motion.

[00:52:51] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:52:51–00:52:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:51] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:52:51–00:52:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:57] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:52:57–00:52:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:57] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:52:57] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Um, I move that the board recommend to the city council that the lien be reduced on this case from... You guys have it at the 1627 66?

[00:53:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes, ma'am.

[00:53:13] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Okay. Um,

[00:53:14] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:14–00:53:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Oh, I'm sorry.

[00:53:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:53:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

misunderstood your question. The actual lien is $4,675. Okay. The 1676 is actually cost

[00:53:26] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

staff. Okay. Perfect. So the lien I move in this case that from $4,675

[00:53:35] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:35–00:53:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:47] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:47–00:53:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:47] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:53:48] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[00:53:56] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Um, there's my motion.

[00:54:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I understand what... I understand and in no way am I trying to sway anything, but ‸ still for something to go

[00:54:14] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:54:14–00:54:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:15] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

just

[00:54:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

need to go slap some paint on pretty much.

[00:54:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:17–00:54:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:20] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

But

[00:54:21] ▶ Play Speaker 15

did... Can we prove that she really knew about it?

[00:54:26] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Sir, I did wash the... I washed it. It wasn't repainted at the time. I did wash it. I didn't repaint it, but it was ‸ washed. That's why I didn't know all this was... I mean, I had no idea it was all this was going on. I did wash the wall.

[00:54:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4

The thing for me is, okay, you say you washed the wall, but still if we have... We know there's some type of problem when we go out and wash it, we need to ensure that we call somebody because it's not just like going washing dishes.

[00:55:05] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:05–00:55:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4

we approve,

[00:55:10] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:55:10] ▶ Play Speaker 4

could. Now it's a higher authority involved.

[00:55:14] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Sir, the officer came out and took... ‸ Actually, I have no trespassing signs ‸ on my property. The officer came out and went all the way around my property and he saw that it was ‸ clean. Mr. Gonzalez.

[00:55:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4

‸ I'll second. We have a motion on ‸ the floor with a second. All in favor say aye.

[00:55:48] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Aye.

[00:55:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

‸ Opposed?

[00:55:50] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Nay. Nay.

[00:55:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So I have... Oh, you got a vote. Oh, okay. So one, two, three, four ayes and two nays.

[00:56:01] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:56:01–00:56:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:56:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4

second.

[00:56:08] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:56:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

have two... Four ayes and two nays.

[00:56:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:15–00:56:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

So the next process is going before the city council and you may want to be there.

[00:56:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:26–00:56:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Oh, I'll be

[00:56:28] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

there.

[00:56:28] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes, ma'am. So they have the final say. So we're just making a recommendation. So what

[00:56:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

is your recommendation?

[00:56:36] ▶ Play Speaker 4

The $1,627.66.

[00:56:40] ▶ Play Speaker 12

I'll be there.

[00:56:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. And they'll let you know when it's going to go on the city council's agenda.

[00:56:48] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Okay.

[00:56:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right.

[00:56:50] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Thank you.

[00:56:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. Thank you for being here. Item number two.

[00:57:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:01–00:57:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes, Mr. Chair. This is lean

[00:57:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:08–00:57:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The code enforcement board held

[00:57:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:17–00:57:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The code enforcement board provided the property owner

[00:57:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:36–00:57:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

violation. Therefore, consistent with the code enforcement boards order, noncompliance hearing was held on March 21st, ‸ 2024. The lien ran at $50 per day from March 3rd, 2024

[00:57:52] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:52–00:57:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The applicant does reside at the property. It doesn't reside at the property. I'm sorry.

[00:58:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:02–00:58:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No other current liens are on the property. The case was closed leveling a fine amount of $12,820.

[00:58:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:11–00:58:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of lien to reduce the city's cost. The city's cost is $2,384.14. And I believe somebody's here for representing the property ‸ or it is the property owner.

[00:58:31] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:58:32] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God. I do. Please state your name and address for the record.

[00:58:37] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:37–00:58:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:44] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Southwest 2nd Terrace, Miami, Florida. ‸ 33134.

[00:58:48] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Thank you. All right, sir. What would you like to tell us?

[00:58:52] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

Yes. So the essence of it is originally we got this. I'm an absentee owner as stated, so it's pretty challenging, but that doesn't exonerate me from any responsibility. But I got the original ‸ communication of the violations and took care of all of them immediately, except the situation with the roof.

[00:59:13] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:13–00:59:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:16] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

state-certified general contractor.

[00:59:18] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:18–00:59:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:25] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

that the violation was based on dark spots on the roof. There was no leaks. So I questioned the validity of having to replace the roof. So that went on back and forth until they referenced a couple of codes and whatnot. So, you know, I exceeded it, went, pulled the permit. But I will mention, actually, we came here for one of these hearings. And they gave me a certain timeframe to do the hearing. And then after that, there was some storms. And I ‸ did the due diligence of getting some estimates and whatnot.

[00:59:59] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:59–01:00:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:04] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

compliance.

[01:00:05] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:05–01:00:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:08] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

were price gouging because I know fair market value.

[01:00:11] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:11–01:00:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:15] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the least, but I pulled the permit and we finally got it done and taken care of. So that's it. And there's no violations, no nothing. That's the gist of it.

[01:00:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So now you felt like they were, because there were dark spots, there were, there were no leaks inside. Um, I mean, again, I know you're a general contractor, but like, if you are working with them, they usually, we don't even end up with to get to being a violation.

[01:00:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:52–01:00:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

Where do we go in that process being a general contractor? And then they're trying to tell you what they see is wrong and you guys going back and forth. So my, my thought process, general contractor, you, they tell you, this is the deal. Then you guys get together and see what the deal is.

[01:01:14] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:14–01:01:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

So tell me where was the disconnect? That's a good question.

[01:01:19] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Um, but. ‸ Initially,

[01:01:22] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:01:22] ▶ Play Speaker 16

dealt with, uh, Augusto.

[01:01:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay.

[01:01:25] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Then, uh, Inspector Mack. And then most recently, I think Wilkinson.

[01:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay.

[01:01:31] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Is that, is he here? Yeah, right here.

[01:01:33] ▶ Play Speaker 1

That's

[01:01:33] ▶ Play No voice detected

me.

[01:01:33] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Oh, so we spoke this afternoon? Yes, sir. Oh, okay. So, uh, and, uh, from my perspective, I've been very communicative and, and cooperative the whole way through. So I, you know, I, I don't know how to answer that. I, the whole time when they've requested something, I've complied. Sometimes it's taken some time, but we've addressed any issues or concerns, except that whole roof thing, which, like I said, it was a debate because I didn't feel it

[01:02:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

was,

[01:02:00] ▶ Play Speaker 16

it was fair to, uh, determine that the roof had to be replaced based on dark spots.

[01:02:06] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Machine re-recognized

which

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:02:06–01:02:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:02:07] ▶ Play Speaker 16

could be as a result of, you

[01:02:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6

know,

[01:02:09] ▶ Play Speaker 16

a tree, or it could be a lot of reasons, and there was no leak. So,

[01:02:13] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:13–01:02:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:16] ▶ Play Speaker 16

we ran into that situation that I just described.

[01:02:18] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:18–01:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:20–01:02:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:02:26] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:02:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:02:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4

my head wrapped around like the disconnect still, because this is my outlook on it. Okay.

[01:02:34] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:34–01:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4

don't even get found in violation. They tell you, okay, this is what they see wrong.

[01:02:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:43–01:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

long as they're

[01:02:50] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:02:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4

that you're doing something that you're not going to be in violation. So again, I'm still, my disconnect is you ended up coming here for being in violation. And I'm just still trying to understand how we get here. You

[01:03:08] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

understand me? That's a good question. ‸ I don't, quite frankly,

[01:03:11] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:03:11] ▶ Play Speaker 16

don't remember.

[01:03:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Uh,

[01:03:13] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:13–01:03:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:16] ▶ Play Speaker 16

those lines or what happened? Was I a non-cooperative in any way or something? I think I was pretty regular communication with you.

[01:03:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14

I can speak on this. Um, Mr. Velasquez, Jay, kept, uh, in contact with me. It was either, it was either him or his, uh, designated, uh, ‸ person.

[01:03:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:39–01:03:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:45] ▶ Play Speaker 14

But, uh, by the time it came before the board and then the non-compliance that were, uh, him mentioning a couple of hiccups of, as he mentioned,

[01:03:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

uh,

[01:03:57] ▶ Play Speaker 14

you know, guys on reasonable prices or, you know, this is basically, you know, right after, right after the storm.

[01:04:04] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Um,

[01:04:04] ▶ Play Speaker 14

so he was having problems getting contractors, but he kept in contact, but it was, you know, he had ‸ came in front of the board and, uh, you know, then reached a non-compliance date, but he kept in contact even during, you know, during, during the non-compliance hearing.

[01:04:20] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:20–01:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:23] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:04:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:04:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14

the roof

[01:04:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Machine re-recognized

down

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:04:24–01:04:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:04:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14

and I, I went out and checked it and it was done, but he kept in contact. So,

[01:04:28] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so do you have any idea where, where the ball dropped? Because it ‸ had to be a disconnect. They cut in the chain for a general contractor to be standing here in front of us over a roof issue.

[01:04:44] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:44–01:04:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

you guys work with them. And then even when you come in here, we understand how difficult it is to get a roof done. ‸ And we give people a lot of grace because of the roof issue.

[01:05:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:02–01:05:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

contractor get, become standing here in front of us for this?

[01:05:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:17–01:05:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:20] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I think I'm understanding. I think somewhere in listening to you, my thought process is maybe he wasn't given enough time, given the fact of the contractor issue, that maybe he wasn't given enough time to correct the issue. And maybe that's why it went into default the way it did is what I'm thinking. So like, for example, ‸ hurricane, we know we had it bad last year. You know, let's just say, for example, he was only given 30 days.

[01:05:50] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Well,

[01:05:50] ▶ Play Speaker 7

30 days is not really realistic, given that contractors were price gouging and not available and giving them ridiculous prices. And maybe he wasn't given enough time because given the testimony, he was in constant contact. He, you know, I ‸ think maybe given your, your question, maybe he wasn't given enough time to fix it.

[01:06:22] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:22–01:06:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:06:27] ▶ Play Speaker 14

So check this out. I'm ‸ be quiet.

[01:06:29] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

As far as my recollection, I was given, I believe, I, I don't have the information in front of it, but most likely ‸ could have been 90 days. But within those 90 days, we had storms,

[01:06:38] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:38–01:06:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:06:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:06:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

I'm sorry, go ahead.

[01:06:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:44–01:06:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:45] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Mr.

[01:06:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Wilkins, tell us the, uh, the timeframe on how long was the violation from

[01:06:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:49–01:06:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:55] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:55–01:06:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:06:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Thank

[01:06:59] ▶ Play No voice detected

you.

[01:07:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Your noncompliance hearing or the board gave them until

[01:07:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:03–01:07:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The noncompliance hearing was on March 21st, 2024.

[01:07:11] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:11–01:07:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:07:17] ▶ Play Speaker 8

June 1st.

[01:07:18] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Well, there could, there could be storms that happen between then though. It's not necessarily hurricane season. There's times we get storms that'll.

[01:07:27] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:27–01:07:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:34] ▶ Play Speaker 15

So can I just ask a quick question? And then you can go back. So if, if he's staying in constant communication with the officers that are handling the case, do you, even though we find them. So we give them the

[01:07:52] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:07:52–01:07:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:52] ▶ Play Speaker 15

you know, we give them, they come in front of the board. March 21st. And we say, okay, you have. The 60 days.

[01:08:00] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:00–01:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:08:03] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Do you guys have the ability to wait one more month to bring it in front of us again to say that he's noncompliant? Or are you required to bring it to us at that 60 day mark and say, he's noncompliant at this point? However, there's a storm. There's extenuating circumstances. And we would like to extend his timeframe. Do you have that ability?

[01:08:29] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:29–01:08:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:08:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:08:33] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Okay.

[01:08:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6

If you give them a compliance state, they have to comply by this time. And even if the, if the, you know, the court board attorney can confirm this, even if we don't have, you told them to comply by, you know, January. And we didn't have a code board hearing because of January, we would probably report it back to you in February that they didn't meet the compliance

[01:08:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

date

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:55–01:08:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:08:56] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. But say, but say he didn't meet the compliance date because of an extenuating circumstance. Would you ‸ come and say it, he was very communicative, communicative, however, there was a storm or whatever, whatever the situation may be that kept him from complying. And code felt like it was reasonable, a reasonable ask to say, give this person 30 more days. I'm just trying to understand where your level of. Yes, ma'am. The code

[01:09:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6

enforcement staff does have the discretion to do that.

[01:09:30] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Okay.

[01:09:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6

‸ Especially if they are in compliance, the property owner, I'm looking at the permit here.

[01:09:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:35–01:09:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:38–01:09:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:45–01:09:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:54] ▶ Play Speaker 15

That was the permit close.

[01:09:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The permit was

[01:09:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:57–01:10:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of the citizens serve. They made application on March 13th of 2024. Then April 1st, it was approved on 2024. And issued on April 4th on 2024.

[01:10:18] ▶ Play Speaker 15

So who made ‸ application? Was it, was it the owner or was it an actual roofer?

[01:10:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6

We have Diaz Russell construction company. Who actually pulled the permit for a re roof.

[01:10:40] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Is that a

[01:10:41] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:41–01:10:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:43] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:43–01:10:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:49] ▶ Play Speaker 16

And like I said, whoever was charging a reasonable or fair market price on, on the re roof,

[01:10:56] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:56–01:10:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:58] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:58–01:11:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:00] ▶ Play Speaker 16

look at it, ‸ look back at it and it was a bad business decision because, you know, say I end up, if the console next month or based on your recommendation, I end up in the fine or the administrative fees. I should, I should have just paid one of those contracts.

[01:11:17] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:11:17] ▶ Play Speaker 16

just didn't want to give in to price gouging. I've, you know, I didn't feel it was right. But at the end of the day, if I would have paid that, I would have been, you know,

[01:11:25] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:25–01:11:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:28] ▶ Play Speaker 13

back to

[01:11:28] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

where I am

[01:11:29] ▶ Play Speaker 13

right now.

[01:11:29] ▶ Play Speaker 16

So anyway,

[01:11:33] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Mr. Wilkinson, was there any initial violations besides just a roof?

[01:11:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6

According to what I have on the, on the order. There was storage, ‸ junk and debris, autos and storage for outdoors. But the only violation left when the order was recorded was the roofs and drainage for

[01:12:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:00–01:12:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:03–01:12:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:04] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:12:05] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Yeah, we took care of everything else ‸ diligently.

[01:12:07] ▶ Play Speaker 8

And Mr. Velasquez, uh, was there somebody living there ‸ this whole time? That's right. Sorry,

[01:12:15] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:12:16] ▶ Play Speaker 8

mean, it was it being rented this whole time. That is correct. And I have a

[01:12:20] ▶ Play Speaker 16

business license and

[01:12:22] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:12:22–01:12:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:23] ▶ Play Speaker 16

in order. Yeah. And just for the record, in no way, shape or form, am I even insinuating that, uh, you know, that the code enforcement was negligent or whatever. ‸ I take responsibility for, for what I did or didn't do. So we're just, this is the facts of what transpired over that timeline.

[01:13:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:02–01:13:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So it sounds like we gave him an extension because he was compliant with the trash. ‸ Sounds like ‸ I'm not saying that's what it was. And the roof was going to take longer.

[01:13:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:13:36–01:13:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Does that sound about right? What do you guys think?

[01:13:43] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:43–01:13:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:43] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:13:47] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Sorry. The, uh, you said the total cost of the fine or no,

[01:13:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

no. I'm just saying that I'm trying to do the timeframe.

[01:13:56] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Sorry.

[01:13:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Um, that the, you know, he had other violations that were corrected.

[01:14:02] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Yeah.

[01:14:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

It looks like he, the trash accumulation was corrected prior because it was probably easiest. And then the roof was

[01:14:10] ▶ Play Speaker 7

the most difficult one to do. Yeah. Um,

[01:14:16] ▶ Play Speaker 16

I'm just asking you to look at the whole picture. So I get a violation. We address every other concern immediately. Then there's extenuating circumstances ‸ that, you know, caused me to delay on the roof situation. But every other instance, there's been good communication. There's been, uh, consequential action after the communication to address any issues. So the only issue here is the roof that was delayed. Like I said, for reasons outside of my control.

[01:14:44] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I would like to file a motion. Was it file a motion? File a motion. Yeah. Make a motion. That's what it was. Sorry. Okay. Um, be patient. First time I've done this in a while. Um, I move that the board recommend to the city council that the lien be reduced in this case.

[01:15:03] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:03–01:15:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:17] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Um, the reason for this reduction are, um, mitigating circumstances. Um, he did comply with other stuff and, um, as you know, given the testimony, it was not easy finding a contractor for the roof. The end.

[01:15:43] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:43–01:15:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:44] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Um,

[01:15:48] ▶ Play Speaker 4

we have emotional flow with the second all in favor. Say aye. Aye.

[01:15:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:52–01:15:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:52] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:15:52] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:15:53] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

Nay. Can I state

[01:15:56] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

something

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:15:56–01:15:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:15:56] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice

for the record? I didn't want to say it before. ‸ I didn't want to think you, I was trying to sweet talk you guys into, you know,

[01:16:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

into mitigating.

[01:16:04] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:04–01:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:05] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:16:09] ▶ Play Speaker 16

So this is, you know, public service and I just want to take the time

[01:16:12] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:12–01:16:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:20] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:16:21] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Thomas Wilkinson. I could have seen him today.

[01:16:24] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:24–01:16:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:24] ▶ Play Speaker 16

I didn't know who he was, but just today

[01:16:26] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:26–01:16:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:31] ▶ Play Speaker 16

to have to postpone or reschedule because you're not in the closet.

[01:16:34] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:34–01:16:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:35] ▶ Play Speaker 16

So it was some weed growing in the fence or whatever. And obviously the picture wasn't going to be favorable. And I expressed to him, listen, I got a hotel.

[01:16:43] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:43–01:16:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:47] ▶ Play Speaker 16

to the board.

[01:16:47] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:16:47] ▶ Play Speaker 16

brought my family with me. Uh, is there any way around the situation? I'll have somebody there immediately.

[01:16:53] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:53–01:16:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:57] ▶ Play Speaker 16

He got a weed whacker and took care of it within minutes, but he went above and beyond because he said,

[01:17:03] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:17:03] ▶ Play Speaker 16

stood there in the car and waited for this to happen.

[01:17:07] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:17:07] ▶ Play Speaker 16

said, give me 15 minutes. He waited in the car, took another picture, which is what you're seeing now. And that's why I'm able to stand here before you and I have to drive back home and, and, uh, incurring more, uh, fees. So, you know, for the record, I, I respect and appreciate that. And I know I wanted to acknowledge it publicly. Both him and Mac have been,

[01:17:26] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

uh,

[01:17:27] ▶ Play Speaker 16

you know, nothing but phenomenal through this whole process. So not that that's going to change

[01:17:31] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:17:31–01:17:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:17:32] ▶ Play Speaker 16

That's why I wanted to say it afterwards. So,

[01:17:35] ▶ Play Speaker 4

well, thank you for coming. Um,

[01:17:37] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

um,

[01:17:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4

yeah, thank you for coming. We appreciate you and

[01:17:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized

you

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:42–01:17:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:17:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4

be safe. You got it. So

[01:17:44] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[01:17:44] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

reschedule another schedule. I'll be notified about city council next month. And that's the final decision. I'm not sure what month though, ‸ but they'll let you know. Okay. You got it. Have a great evening. Thank you.

[01:17:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:17:54–01:17:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:17:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:17:56] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:17:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:17:56] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:17:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:17:56] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:17:58] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:17:59] ▶ Play Speaker 4

reduction.

[01:18:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:00–01:18:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:04] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:18:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[01:18:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:10–01:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6

on July 20th, 23, at which time the board found the property owner in violation of the city code. Permit required.

[01:18:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:21–01:18:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6

2023 to correct the violation. Therefore, consistent with the code enforcement board's order, the non-compliant training was held on September 21st, 2023.

[01:18:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:37–01:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6

was on February 21st of 2025. Oh, I'm sorry. $25 a day. I got 50 in my brain. I'm sorry. Applicant

[01:19:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

that

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:19:04–01:19:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:19:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6

does not reside at the property property taxes is paid through. No current outstanding liens. The case was closed leveling the fine of amount of $13,820.

[01:19:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:15–01:19:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6

be reduced to $4,685. City's cost is $2,384.14.

[01:19:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Does anyone here for the property?

[01:19:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6

They were notified about today's hearing.

[01:19:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:41–01:19:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

speak to them and

[01:19:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:42–01:19:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So the initial fines were exactly what?

[01:19:53] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:53–01:19:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:55] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:19:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:19:55] ▶ Play Speaker 4

What were the, I'm sorry, the violations. I apologize.

[01:19:58] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:19:58–01:20:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:20:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

give me one second mr. chairman

[01:20:35] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I'm just trying to get a basis here what defines what the violations were and how long it took them to cure them.

[01:20:44] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

according

[01:20:55] ▶ Play Speaker 13

to the agenda, this is permit required.

[01:20:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

according to your order, at that time it was permit required as well

[01:21:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:06–01:21:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:21:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:21:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:21:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6

new roof

[01:21:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

put

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:13–01:21:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:21:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6

on ‸ it was because that's ‸ one thing first ‸ I noticed when I went and took a look at it they had

[01:21:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:20–01:21:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:21:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6

[01:21:28] ▶ Play Speaker 7

have a super quick question ‸ I haven't been here in like a little bit. Have we ever tabled these when the property owner or property management is not here oh no okay okay I just want to make sure sorry I haven't been here for a little bit

[01:21:48] ▶ Play Speaker 4

because this this is something in which you I would think you want to be off to ensure you want to come and defend your property. Right. So, because it's been through this process that you put this, for these people this paperwork

[01:22:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:03–01:22:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:22:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[01:22:09] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

from Virginia

[01:22:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

And they are a new owner.

[01:22:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:21–01:22:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:22:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

that was brought before you for the violations.

[01:22:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:29–01:22:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:22:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[01:22:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[01:22:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4

And you would tell us, hey, they were the owner or they are new owners. though That's missing in this. If you look at my

[01:22:53] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:53–01:23:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:22:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[01:23:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6

but I can tell you when the date was but I can make it more stand out more next time

[01:23:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

Is this, so, permit required was the original for the roof.

[01:23:23] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:23–01:23:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:23:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:23:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Mr. Chairman was

[01:23:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:28–01:23:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:23:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

and

[01:23:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4

those violations were on there and that you said November 2023 the

[01:23:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

violation started in July

[01:23:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:42–01:23:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:23:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and they came into compliance in February of

[01:23:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1

this

[01:23:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

year

[01:23:58] ▶ Play Speaker 4

[01:23:59] ▶ Play Speaker 1

when

[01:24:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it first came in July then they sold it So the owners didn't take the time to find out that they were leans so there

[01:24:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1

was a thought on the title

[01:24:14] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

all right so I'm sorry but they don't

[01:24:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:17–01:24:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:22] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

I'll take a motion

[01:24:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8

okay I'll make a motion

[01:24:25] ▶ Play Speaker 4

oh yes ma'am

[01:24:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Just out of curiosity, do you have any clue as to why

[01:24:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:31–01:24:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:36] ▶ Play Speaker 3

it doesn't

[01:24:41] ▶ Play No voice detected

interact

[01:24:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6

since I've

[01:24:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:50–01:24:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of you all I've had a couple applicants when they do their applications and they see they have a high number of fine and they they they asked me what cost is and I said I can't tell you at that time we can tell you once we go through the process when they fill out the application they usually put anywhere from three to five thousand dollars on there and it is notarized and that's what's in your packet and when you I make the ‸ the presentation to the city council,

[01:25:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:20–01:25:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:25:22] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:19 ▶]

[01:25:40] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

kicks. Like, thank you.

[01:25:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4

What's the property value?

[01:25:51] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:25:51] ▶ Play Speaker 4

we have a property value?

[01:25:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:52–01:25:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:25:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:25:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

on this one

[01:25:59] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:59–01:26:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:26:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:26:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:26:07] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:26:11] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

but

[01:26:12] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:12–01:26:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:26:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:26:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4

drunk okay thank you

[01:26:18] ▶ Play Speaker 8

okay Mr. Chair I'd like to make a motion

[01:26:24] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:24–01:26:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8

recommend to the city council that the lien stays

[01:26:33] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:33–01:26:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:38–01:26:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:40] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[01:26:47] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:26:48] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:26:48] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:26:50] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:27:05] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right.

[01:27:06] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:06–01:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6

This is lean reduction.

[01:27:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:12–01:27:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:20–01:27:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6

board

[01:27:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:27–01:27:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of city code protective treatment.

[01:27:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:34–01:27:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6

time to come in compliance ‸ February

[01:27:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:39–01:27:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:42–01:27:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:46–01:27:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The lien ran at

[01:27:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:50–01:27:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

on December

[01:27:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:57–01:27:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The applicant does not reside at the property

[01:28:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:04–01:28:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No other liens. Case was closed.

[01:28:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:09–01:28:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The property owner applicant 535 Kentucky land trust is requesting the lien to be reduced

[01:28:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

the city's cost

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:28:19–01:28:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:28:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:20–01:28:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:26] ▶ Play No voice detected

This

[01:28:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6

is the same property owner that was that did, that was heard before you at the time brought the code board and they were notified to be here today.

[01:28:38] ▶ Play No voice detected

And

[01:28:38] ▶ Play Speaker 4

property value?

[01:28:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Property value?

[01:28:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:42–01:28:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

What were the violations?

[01:28:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Protective treatment for the outside conditions of the ‸ property. Chapter 6, Section 6, 1003, Subsection

[01:29:03] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:29:34] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:34–01:29:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:29:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

mailing

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:50–01:29:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:29:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6

address is [address], Longwood, Florida.

[01:29:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay. So this is a rental?

[01:30:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6

It's currently vacant right now.

[01:30:07] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So they probably don't want to

[01:30:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

sell?

[01:30:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No, ma'am.

[01:30:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Was there, do you know if there was a tenant when this initially started?

[01:30:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

That I.

[01:30:20] ▶ Play Speaker 7

It says, if I may, I'm looking at the application. It

[01:30:27] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

says

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:30:27–01:30:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:30:27] ▶ Play Speaker 7

the reason that they're asking for the reduction is the owner was made aware of the lien and never brought into compliance when our company reclaimed the property. We began to work on the lien issues. We need the company

[01:30:42] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:30:42–01:30:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:42] ▶ Play Speaker 7

the property question.

[01:30:43] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:30:43] ▶ Play Speaker 7

have a management agreement. A prior owner to take care of the property. They let the property fall into disrepair along with the rent.

[01:30:51] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:51–01:30:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:51] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[01:30:57] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

So I'm assuming it was being rented and they had an agreement and then everybody thought that they didn't. I don't know.

[01:31:06] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:06–01:31:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:31:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

Well,

[01:31:09] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:31:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4

sounds like what that is telling me is they were making money on it until some point.

[01:31:14] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Well, the very paragraph prior to that, it says the property owner was made aware of this lien and never brought into compliance when our company reclaimed the property in August. We began to work fixing lien issues. What does that mean,

[01:31:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

reclaiming

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:31:31–01:31:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:31:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3

the property?

[01:31:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4

That's a really good question.

[01:31:35] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:35–01:31:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:31:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:31:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

through foreclosure or it might have been a lease to rent.

[01:31:46] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

To buy the home. Yeah. To rent the home.

[01:31:55] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Do we have anything on an eviction?

[01:32:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Bear with us a minute.

[01:32:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:32:18–01:32:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:32:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:32:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:32:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:32:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:32:36] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:17 ▶]

[01:32:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:52–01:32:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

‸ I said these people applied for this lean reduction and do they realize that Longwood is a lot shorter than Virginia? So, uh, I don't mean to sound cutthroat or anything. Anybody ready to make a motion?

[01:33:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Gas is

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:31–01:33:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:33:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

$3.19. ‸ Get you from Longwood to here somebody. Okay. So I'll take a motion. Everything else at this point is inconsequential to me.

[01:33:48] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I would like to make a motion.

[01:33:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Yes,

[01:33:50] ▶ Play Speaker 7

ma'am.

[01:33:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Okay.

[01:33:51] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Let me read my thing.

[01:33:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Just before you make a motion, can I say, just remember the property costs $75,000? That's the current property value. Correct? $75,000. $75,000. And the finance $29,000.

[01:34:07] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I'd like to say,

[01:34:10] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:34:10–01:34:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:10] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:34:11] ▶ Play Speaker 4

a bid. It's rocks up under the cover, but hey, they didn't even come to even soften the, soften the blow to break up the rocks.

[01:34:19] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:19–01:34:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:20] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:34:20] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:34:26] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:34:26] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I hope I'm doing this correctly.

[01:34:30] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:30–01:34:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7

of CE 23-649, the lien remained the same at $29,330. And I have to give a reason, right?

[01:34:47] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:47–01:34:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:48] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Okay. That's it. Thank you.

[01:35:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I'll second. Motion on the floor with a second.

[01:35:04] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:04–01:35:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:35:07] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Those opposed? Nay.

[01:35:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:09–01:35:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:12] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. Motion passes five to one. Go to city council. And we have no abatements.

[01:35:21] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:21–01:35:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:23] ▶ Play Speaker 4

long time. And we have no news. Next meeting will be June 19th. Does anyone have anything? Nothing.

[01:35:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:39–01:35:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:40] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:35:40] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:35:42] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:35:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:35:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Forget ‸ it. I mean adjourned.

[01:35:46] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:46–01:35:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:46] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:35:46] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

[01:35:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:35:56] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T13:15:52 · 9,050 ordinary words, 2,993 in suspect passages, 329 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.