Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Board Meeting

Date: 2025-03-20
Status: Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source: CivicClerk event #71

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 📋 Agenda Packet (PDF, 943 KB) 🎬 Recording ↗

Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-05-15, pp. 9–12; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-05-15, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended. The City has not posted the approved minutes. The approving motion, “to approve to the minutes of March 20, 2025”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-06-19 agenda packet (1867_6_19_25_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 10–16).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (1822_05_15_2025_Code_Board_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 9–12). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

Listed present when the roll was taken: Lloyd Roberts, Josue Otero, Sharri Scott, Michael Simpson, Dik Muller
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Absences: no absence line could be read from the minutes' text, so none is stated here; the first page of the minutes is the record.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Tom Wilkinson (Code Enforcement Manager), Micheal Mack (Code Enforcement Officer), Justin Simpson (Code Enforcement Officer), Jason Brimm (Code Enforcement Officer), Amelia Ulmer (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary), Mark Baaden (Lieutenant), Evander Collier IV (Police Chief), Charlene Neuterman (Community Services Director)

Adopted actions (6)

to approve to the agenda of March 20, 2025 (moved by Muller, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–12
to approve to the minutes of February 20 2025 (moved by Otero, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–12
to approve to the workshop minutes of February 13, 2025 (moved by Muller, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–12
to amend Staff’s recommendation and give the property owner until April 16, 2025, and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Otero, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–12
to amend Staff’s recommendation and table until September 18, 2025 (6 months) with (30 day updates) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–12
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 9–12

Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)

$5,000.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-05-15 agenda packet (1822_05_15_2025_Co; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-05-15, pp. 9–12; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-05-15, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended)

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Source: 1822_05_15_2025_Code_Board_Packet.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2025-05-15 meeting, packet pp. 9–12; lines 201–353 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes

Meeting Minutes
March 20, 2025
A meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Cocoa was held on Thursday, March 20, 2025 in
the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed.
OPENING MATTERS:
Chairman Roberts called the meeting to order at 6:01 P.M. The Board Secretary called the roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Lloyd Roberts Chairman
Josue Otero Vice Chairman
Sharri Scott Board Member
Michael Simpson Board Member
Dik Muller Board Member
MEMBERS ABSENT:
George Brown Jr. Board Member - unexcused
Melissa Acosta Board Member - unexcused
Gloria Weatherspoon 1rst Alternate - unexcused
OTHERS PRESENT:
Tom Wilkinson Code Enforcement Manager
Micheal Mack Code Enforcement Officer
Justin Simpson Code Enforcement Officer
Jason Brimm Code Enforcement Officer
Amelia Ulmer Board Attorney
Darla Crowl Recording Secretary
Mark Baaden Lieutenant
Evander Collier IV Police Chief
Charlene Neuterman Community Services Director
The Board Secretary swore in all Staff members giving testimony.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES:
1.Approval of Agenda: March 20, 2025
Chairman Roberts noted changes to the agenda (Items complied, tabled and withdrawn)
Motion by Mr. Muller, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to approve to the agenda of March 20, 2025. Vote
on the motion carried unanimously.
2.Approval of Meeting Minutes: February 20, 2025.
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Mr. Muller, to approve to the minutes of February 20 2025.
Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
3.Approval of Workshop Meeting Minutes: February 13, 2025.
Motion by Mr. Muller, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to approve to the workshop minutes of February 13,
2025. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
March 20, 2025
Page 2
4. Submit to the record of all documents & notices for all cases on the Agenda.
CASES:
1. CE-24-13 – 1304 Lakemont
Code Enforcement Manager Tom Wilkinson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Manager Tom Wilkinson testified that the Property Owner was in violation
of City of Cocoa Code Chapter 6 Buildings, Construction, Sec.6-902, Discarding Junk, inoperable or
abandoned Vehicles (b)(1) and City of Cocoa Code Chapter 6 Buildings, Construction, Sec. 6-900
Generally Nuisances(B1) of the City Code.
Manager Wilkinson requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be given until June
18, 2025 (90 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) City
of Cocoa Code Chapter 6 Buildings, Construction, Sec.6-902, Discarding Junk, inoperable or
abandoned Vehicles (b)(1) and two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) City of Cocoa Code Chapter 6
Buildings, Construction, Sec. 6-900 Generally Nuisances(B1) per day until found in compliance.
Chairman Roberts had questions about the length of time given to the property owner to work on the
property. Manager Wilkinson requested that the compliance date be changed to the day before the next
Code Board meeting. More discussion amongst the Board members, staff and City attorney.
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Mr. Simpson, to amend Staff’s recommendation and give the
property owner until April 16, 2025, and find the Property Owner in violation. Vote on the motion carried
unanimously.
2. CE-24-526 – 705 Howard St.
Code Enforcement Manager Tom Wilkinson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Manager Wilkinson testified that the Property Owner was in violation of
City of Cocoa Code Chapter 6 Buildings, Art. III, Div. 4, Sec. 6-1003 Exterior Structure (a), of the City
Code.
Manager Wilkinson requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be given until June
18, 2025 (90 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) City
of Cocoa Code Chapter 6 Buildings, Art. III, Div. 4, Sec. 6-1003 Exterior Structure (a) per day until found
in compliance.
Property owner was sworn in: Almitra McGriff, 106 Rich Berry Dr, Dothan, AL
Ms. McGriff explained what had been going on with her dad’s property. Chairman Roberts had questions
for Ms. McGriff about the notices posted on the property. Manager Wilkinson stated that he had no
problem with giving Ms. McGriff more time. More discussion amongst the Board members and staff and
the property owner.
Motion by Chairman Roberts, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to amend Staff’s recommendation and table
until September 18, 2025 (6 months) with (30 day updates) and find the Property Owner in violation. Vote
on the motion carried unanimously.
3. CE-24-750 – 1009 Westview
Complied.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
March 20, 2025
Page 3
NON-COMPLIANCE:
None
LIEN REDUCTIONS
1. CE-09-102 – 1112 Myrtle Ln
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on June 18, 2009, at which time the Board found the
owner, Patrick Badgett in violation of the following: Sec. 6-105 (a) permit required.
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner sufficient time April 3,2009 to correct said violation.
Therefore, consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing was held on
January 25, 2010.
The lien ran at $50.00 per day from April 4, 2009 until compliance was achieved on September 6, 2024.
Code records show the case was closed leaving a fine of $281,720.00. The current owner (Richard
Carey), is requesting that the lien be reduced to $5,000.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; No
•Applicant resides at the property: No
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; One
•Number of Inspections performed: 24
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, March 20, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior
to the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $179.000.00 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
Staff submitted their cost sheet and the in total amount of $3,074.43

Staff’s recommendation is that the fine/lien be reduced to $3,074.43 which is the cost of staff to prosecute
this case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the property to
come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Property representative was sworn in: Elizabeth Felipe, 1090 Bianca Dr, Palm Bay
The property representative answered questions from the Code Board Members. They asked about the
cars in the driveway and was it a rental property. Vice Chair Otero said there was a car parked in the
yard which is a violation. The representative stated there is a renter living at the property. Ms. Scott
asked why the property owner asked the lien be reduced to $5,000.00. More discussion amongst the
Board members, property owner and staff.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
March 20, 2025
Page 4
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the
lien reduction be in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). Vote: Yay (3) Nay (2) (Chairman
Roberts, Mr. Muller) Motion Passed.

2. CE-21-875 – 1040 Myrtle Ln
Tabled.
NEW BUSINESS:
None
OTHER BUSINESS:
None
ABATEMENT APPEALS:
None
Manager Announcements:
None
NEXT MEETING:
The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on April 17, 2025.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:03 PM.
Approved on this ______ day of ___________________, 2025.
______________________________
Lloyd Roberts, Chairman
______________________________
Darla Crowl, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

No time links are shown for this meeting.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Swearing in Officers

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of March 20, 2025.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of February 20, 2025.
3. Minutes: Workshop Meeting February 13, 2025
4. Submittal of Document Packet

III. Cases

IV. Non-Compliance

V. Lien Reductions

VI. New Business

VII. Other Business

VIII. Abatement Appeals

IX. Manager Announcements

X. Next Meeting Date: The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on April 17, 2025.

XI. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 11 voices separated from the audio. 10 short machine repair(s) (12 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.6% of 7,726 content words. Dotted words (244 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 185 passages (25% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] ▶ Play No voice detected

Thank

[00:00:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

you.

[00:00:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:00:08–00:00:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:27] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:30] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:35] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Good evening. We'll call this meeting to order code enforcement board March 20th, 2025. Stand up for the pledge of allegiance, please.

[00:00:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Pleasure.

[00:00:48] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:00:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:48–00:00:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:50] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:51] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:52] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:00:54] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:00:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3

with liberty and justice for all.

[00:01:01] ▶ Play No voice detected

Thank you.

[00:01:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Thank

[00:01:05] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

you. I

[00:01:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2

have a roll call.

[00:01:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Mr. Roberts.

[00:01:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Here.

[00:01:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Mr.

[00:01:09] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Brown.

[00:01:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:11–00:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:01:14] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:01:16] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Mr. Simpson. Here. Miss Acosta. Dick Mueller.

[00:01:21] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Here.

[00:01:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:24–00:01:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 2

And I'm the swearing in of our officers.

[00:01:36] ▶ Play Speaker 1

You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God. Yes,

[00:01:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I do.

[00:01:41] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Yes, I do.

[00:01:43] ▶ Play Speaker 2

All right. Now we'll have the approval of our agenda for tonight. We have some amendments. Case number two and CE 24-526 item number two and item number three have complied. Item number three, case number 24-750 has complied. Under lien reductions, item number two CE 21-875 has been tabled.

[00:02:22] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:22–00:02:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:22] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:02:22] ▶ Play Speaker 2

there are no other amendments, I'll take a motion to approve.

[00:02:28] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; words the first reading may have missed · 00:02:28–00:03:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:29] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:30] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:02:38] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:02:38] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]

[00:02:51] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:53] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:03:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:03:00] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

[00:03:12] ▶ Play Speaker 2

motion to approve

[00:03:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Second. Have

[00:03:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2

a motion on

[00:03:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

the

[00:03:20] ▶ Play Speaker 2

floor with the second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed.

[00:03:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:23–00:03:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:26] ▶ Play Speaker 2

to submit our document packets.

[00:03:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Mr. Chairman, I would like to submit the PowerPoint presentation and a packet of documents for each case into the record.

[00:03:33] ▶ Play Speaker 2

So noted. All right. On to number case number one, CE number 24-13.

[00:03:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:45–00:03:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and testimony presented at this hearing,

[00:03:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:54–00:04:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6

following violations of number one, City

[00:04:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:04–00:04:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Section

[00:04:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:09–00:04:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Discarded Junk, Inoperable and Abandoned Vehicles, Section 6902 b1 Unregistered Inoperable

[00:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:19–00:04:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6

It's in City Council District 2. ‸ Photo depicts site inspection of March 18th, of 2025.

[00:04:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:49–00:04:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:54–00:04:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Discarded Junk,

[00:04:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:04:57–00:04:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

‸ Abandoned Vehicles. state storing of leaving abandoned property,

[00:05:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

and operable

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:03–00:05:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:05:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6

motor vehicles on private ‸ properties prohibited. As you see in the photographs, it depicts ‸ inspection of the vehicles in question, of the boat and the RV

[00:05:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

parked

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:14–00:05:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:05:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6

on the side of the property. Photo depicts site inspection

[00:05:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:23–00:05:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:05:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6

February 3rd, of 2025 and March 18th, of 2025. Property owner did allow for violation of the following code.

[00:05:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:32–00:05:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6

There's no current registration on the boat. Also on the side, and second photo to you far right is this uh aerial a picture of the boat and RV in the back and side of the property. ‸ photo depicts the site inspection of March 18th of 2024 for the second violation on the agenda. The property owner did allow for the following violation of City of coco code chapter six buildings construction section 6.90 generally which states accumulation of trash, debris, filth, waste on the property. Note the pile of, uh with arrow is, pile of debris in front of the property.

[00:06:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:19–00:06:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of site inspection for the day, March 20th, 2025.

[00:06:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:29–00:06:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and the RV in the back of the side of the building and the trash in the front. This is inspection of the timeline on January 4th, 2024. Officer Folger conducting a

[00:06:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

side

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:44–00:06:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:06:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6

inspection at the property. Found one or more violations. On January 6th, a notice of violation was sent to the property owner.

[00:06:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:53–00:06:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and found the property still in violation. No contact from the property owner.

[00:07:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:02–00:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of the property. Also spoke to the brother of the property, who apparently resided there. There had been no improvements or corrections since the last inspection conducted by former Officer Folger. On January 14th, of 2025, an amended notice of violation was sent to the property owner. On February 3rd, 2025, Officer Brim conducted a follow-up inspection. The property ‸ no improvements were

[00:07:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:32–00:07:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of hearing for today's hearing

[00:07:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:42–00:07:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6

violation. And today, on March 20th, staff inspected the property and found it still remained in violation of the

[00:07:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:53–00:07:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

board to find the property in violation of the city codes as charged and impose a fine per day per violation, if not brought in compliance by

[00:08:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:04–00:08:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6

questions concerns the board may have

[00:08:21] ▶ Play Speaker 2

[00:08:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and

[00:08:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:22–00:08:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:26] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:08:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:08:26] ▶ Play Speaker 2

‸ just want to be clear. So, we've been working on this for just over a year. So, this person has had a year to work on getting it together and we've had minimal contact. Yes, sir. um Do you know what's under the tarp? Is that a vehicle under the tarp?

[00:08:48] ▶ Play Speaker 6

i believe it is a vehicle in a tarp. I'm trying to go back. ‸ hit left I believe when uh staff made the site inspections, it is a vehicle. They have not been able to ascertain if it's tagged or operable. But it has been there since 2024.

[00:09:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:14–00:09:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:09:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:09:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6

it's a handyman. A man just likes to tinker. Because uh there was an email sent to uh Officer Brim about some of the equipment he has on the property.

[00:09:38] ▶ Play No voice detected

Okay.

[00:09:38] ▶ Play Speaker 2

And again, we've had no direct contact with the actual owner, just the brother.

[00:09:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6

That's correct, sir.

[00:09:51] ▶ Play Speaker 2

uh any discussion take a motion

[00:10:01] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:10:01–00:10:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:07] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Mr. Chair, I'd like to set a motion, please. Yes, sir. On case number 24-13-1304, South Lakemont. Based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find respondent, in this case, in violation of the city codes, as charged. And that the respondent shall correct the violation no later than 4 pm 30 days from now, from today. ‸ In the event respond respondent does not comply

[00:10:48] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:48–00:10:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:49] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:10:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[00:10:56] ▶ Play Speaker 4

a fine in the amount of Did we

[00:11:04] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:04–00:11:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:11] ▶ Play Speaker 4

is it

[00:11:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:11:27–00:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:36] ▶ Play Speaker 4

um Will be imposed for each day the violation continues past the after stated date.

[00:11:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:42–00:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4

with this order.

[00:11:51] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:51–00:11:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2

um Now, they were asking for a compliance day of June 18th. Now, are you you want to change that? Because if I'm not mistaken, how many is that? So, do you want to go less?

[00:12:17] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:17–00:12:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:17] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:12:17] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:12:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2

want to make sure

[00:12:20] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

90 days to after

[00:12:23] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:23–00:12:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:25] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]

[00:12:38] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:12:42] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:12:43] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

[00:12:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2

going 30 days opposed to the 90.

[00:13:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:09–00:13:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:13:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:13:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and trying to be consistent? Can we ask to amend that ‸ order to be the day before our next hearing? Or would you rather give him the full 30 days? Because I'm just trying to plan ahead for our next hearing. I

[00:13:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2

have to go on the advice of my co-chair.

[00:13:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6

And I'm asking to be more specific as the date of compliance for their order to have it as far as like April 17th the day before our next hearing.

[00:13:46] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So April

[00:13:47] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

16th?

[00:13:48] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:13:48] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

April 17th, I'm sorry. 16th? Yes, sir.

[00:13:51] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Stand by one moment, counselor. Now, your advice, seeing as we have passed that motion to do anything else to it, do we have to reopen?

[00:14:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:05–00:14:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:08] ▶ Play Speaker 7

‸ a new amended motion. But

[00:14:11] ▶ Play Speaker 2

I have to make sure make sure that's fine with my co-chair. Yeah, we can reopen it and go with April 16th.

[00:14:20] ▶ Play No voice detected

Okay, so.

[00:14:21] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Mr. Chairman.

[00:14:22] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:14:22–00:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:22] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:14:25] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:25–00:14:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:28] ▶ Play Speaker 7

uh You can give them

[00:14:30] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:30–00:14:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:34] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Any amount of time. Okay, perfect. Yeah,

[00:14:36] ▶ Play Speaker 3

yeah just, Mr. Chairman, just so so that for

[00:14:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:39–00:14:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3

if you can actually maybe outline some ‸ the dates like what he was asking for,

[00:14:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:46–00:14:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3

can have you a good product of what your expectations are. So I know you said 30 days, but we ‸ just be specific about what that date is to to the board. Right.

[00:15:04] ▶ Play No voice detected

Okay.

[00:15:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3

So that we can have accurate uh notes.

[00:15:11] ▶ Play Speaker 4

All right. So we amend the, uh what do we reopen?

[00:15:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:16–00:15:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:21] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

what the manager is asking as far as the date. Yes? Okay. No, i'm just want to make sure. Yeah,

[00:15:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

no, that's

[00:15:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2

correct. Yeah. Okay. So you want to make sure our process is reopening.

[00:15:35] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:35–00:15:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:40] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:15:43] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

and just restate it, um from the beginning new compliance date, April 17th and a fine, as you stated previously, 250 per day for violation. Okay.

[00:15:54] ▶ Play Speaker 2

So, all right, so at this time we're going to reopen case number

[00:16:01] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:01–00:16:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:03] ▶ Play Speaker 2

and ‸ just going to go with an amendment. And that date was April 16th, April 16th. And everything else will stay the same.

[00:16:20] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:20–00:16:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:20] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:16:22] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:16:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

Yes. I just want to make sure.

[00:16:24] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

it's

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:24–00:16:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:16:25] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

Okay. So with all that, I still need motion. Well, I just need a motion and a second.

[00:16:36] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Okay. uh

[00:16:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:37–00:16:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:39] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:16:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:16:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4

amend amending for case number 24 to 13, uh ‸ amending the date of 30 days to April 16th, 2025 to reflect the record.

[00:16:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:52–00:17:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:54] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:16:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:16:55] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:16:56] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:17:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:17:07] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

set the fines from starting today through april 16th

[00:17:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:13–00:17:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:17:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Mr. Chair,

[00:17:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:21–00:17:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3

want to make sure that's clear. Right.

[00:17:28] ▶ Play Speaker 2

okay

[00:17:29] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:17:29] ▶ Play Speaker 2

you said today. off the start today. My bad.

[00:17:32] ▶ Play Speaker 4

‸ Sorry. Let me correct that. uh case 24-13, uh it's found in violation and we are going to give them until April 16th, 2025 to correct those violations.

[00:17:52] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:52–00:17:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:18:04] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:04–00:18:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:18:07] ▶ Play Speaker 2

floor with a

[00:18:07] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:07–00:18:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Those opposed. Motion passed unanimously. Thank

[00:18:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6

you, Mr. Chair.

[00:18:14] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Thank you. thank

[00:18:16] ▶ Play No voice detected

you

[00:18:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Brings us to

[00:18:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:22–00:18:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:29–00:18:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the property of 705 Howard Street in violation of the following. City of Code,

[00:18:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:39–00:18:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Chapter 6, Article 3, Division 4, Section 6,

[00:18:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:44–00:18:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:53–00:18:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:02–00:19:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6

which states exterior structure of

[00:19:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

this

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:15–00:19:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:19:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6

shall be maintained in good repair, structurally sound, and sanitary, not to pose a threat to public health and safety.

[00:19:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:23–00:19:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of 2025. Note the busted of the arrow in the photograph from March 7th, the busted out

[00:19:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:37–00:19:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Inspections of timeline. On June

[00:19:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:55–00:19:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6

2024, Code Enforcement Officer

[00:19:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:58–00:20:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6

found the property being ‸ violation, issued a notice of violation, gave him 30 days to comply.

[00:20:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:07–00:20:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6

found the property still in non-compliance On September 5th, 2024,

[00:20:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:17–00:20:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Folger observed the property still in violation, sent a final notice of violation. On 13th of January, 2025, Officer Simpson was assigned the case and found the property still in non-compliance and issued an amended notice of violation. On February 11th of 2025, Officer Simpson inspected the property found in ‸ still violation. On March 7th, staff observed the property still in violation, posted it for a notice of hearing for today's hearing. March 20th, staff inspected the property and found it and remains in violation of the aforementioned county code or city code.

[00:20:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:54–00:20:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the city code as charged and pone oppose a fine per day for violation if not brought into compliance by 4 p.m and i would like to

[00:21:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:09–00:21:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and then we do have a representative from the property owner address any questions or concerns from the board. all

[00:21:26] ▶ Play No voice detected

right.

[00:21:28] ▶ Play Speaker 2

And we had contact with...

[00:21:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes, we have.

[00:21:34] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Okay. uh Hello, ma'am. How are you doing?

[00:21:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I am appalled and i'm confused, but... Can

[00:21:41] ▶ Play No voice detected

I swear you

[00:21:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ Yes, yes, yes.

[00:21:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:43–00:21:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:44] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:21:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

truth ‸ the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you God? I do. Please state your name and address for the

[00:21:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:49–00:21:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:21:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:21:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2

you for being here. and What can you tell us, ma'am?

[00:22:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So, um like I was telling Thomas earlier, I'm appalled um with this whole process right here. My father um was George Edward Vanderhall, and his property is 705 Howard Street. um So, he passed January 21st, 2024, um and there were two females by

[00:22:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

the name of Amanda

[00:22:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

Lee Grant and Courtney

[00:22:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:27–00:22:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the property and refused to leave. They did not have a lease. They are not family. They had no rights to ‸ property. I had to go through court through the um process of getting a writ of possession. I received the writ of possession on it came to me in the mail to to my address at [address] ‸ it's post dated january the 6th

[00:23:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

2025.

[00:23:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:02–00:23:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8

of possession, as you all know or not know, um the process was not easy just like getting them out. They had to we had to go through a process of getting the sheriff to go and get them out. That process started on January. the um

[00:23:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:28–00:23:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Due to scheduling issues and some type of training that the sheriffs had going on, they were not able in the back they said they were backed up on doing evictions. So,

[00:23:50] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:50–00:23:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:57–00:23:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

2025, okay? So, that's the official date that the squatters were kicked out of my father's home. Mind you, they have completely demolished and destroyed my father's home. um The disgust and the filth that was allowed to go on and they were still there and then not be arrested for squatting or anything like that or any type of accountability on their parts is appalling. But they had no accountability. They just left. And so,

[00:24:33] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:33–00:24:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

okay? So, the um pictures that you see on what was that? March the um 7th? Those pictures right there are are me paying people, uh contractors to clean the the filth that they had all around my father's home. ‸ mind you, my dad passed on

[00:25:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:02–00:25:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:05] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I was not allowed to get in there to get any of his possessions or get anything. Their filth had contaminated all his stuff. So the the stuff that you see on March the 7th, that is their filth and everything that my dad possessed had to be trashed. Okay, so I came down on March the 8th. That was the day after they had put a sign in my in my yard, ‸ in my dad's yard, which is now mine, in the yard, and um to see how the progress of the house being cleaned was. ‸ Okay. um Mind you, I live six hours away from here in Alabama. Okay. So I came down on that weekend to see how the progress was to see the letter in the yard from the code enforcement. Okay. With the notice of this hearing today. That was on March the 8th. This is March the 20th in the middle of the week where I had to take off work to come down for something I just got in the mail. So officially in the mail, I got a certified letter right here that

[00:26:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:26–00:26:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

certified on March the 12th. I was able to pick up the actual paper because as you see right here back home, if you you miss a certified letter, they put one of these in your post office box to tell you that you've missed a certified letter. Okay. So ‸ on the 13th at 8 a.m i went to the post office and that's when i got this letter that is notifying me of this particular hearing right here. um and so that was on March the 13th. That's last Thursday for me to get here for ‸ hearing. So all that said is I'm a little confused because from what

[00:27:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:25–00:27:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8

who was on the site on the 7th,

[00:27:33] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:33–00:27:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8

they just got it back in March that it was undelivered. But I have things from the the court, the um

[00:27:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:51–00:27:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8

from

[00:27:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:59–00:28:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8

those paperwork so where they were able to mail me things, and magically, on on this this letter right here from

[00:28:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:12–00:28:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:17] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Code Enforcement Division, that is notifying me of this particular a hearing tonight. It is dated

[00:28:24] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:24–00:28:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8

on the the timing of um needing to get everything back into code when I'm just now being made aware of anything um other than we finally got the sheriffs to get the squatters out of my my father's home. And i was just, I'm just able to be able to get it cleaned up. So the timeline is not, is not um fair or suitable. um I was, I was, ‸ listening to the prior

[00:29:11] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:11–00:29:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:17] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I'm just now on January 31st, even acquiring this property. So I need more time to be able to get everything um up to code. That is my father's property. That is my inheritance. I'm fully aware of his condition. I'm hurt deeply because of its condition. um It is not going to stay like that. But the time period needs to be extended.

[00:29:48] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Okay. Well, again, thank you for coming. um We want to get this taken care of. We're not looking to try and make money off you by no means. um did you when you came to the property did you find a notice posted on the property

[00:30:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8

[00:30:05] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:05–00:30:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:07] ▶ Play Speaker 8

i found the it's uh um it's like a little yard sign plastic um yes i i received that march the

[00:30:16] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:16–00:30:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8

he put it in there March the 7th. of He is Mr. Justin Simpson, put it in the yard on

[00:30:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:25–00:30:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I came here. I flew down to check on the process,

[00:30:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:32–00:30:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

And that's when

[00:30:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:37–00:30:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I actually picked this this paper of the hearing up from my post office, signed for it, which you all can check and see with the certified the certified mail and everything on march the 13th 2025.

[00:30:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2

okay let me ask you a question now going back I know you're saying uh ‸ picked it up in March, so there should have been something posted before then uh previous time when you were here.

[00:31:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8

No, i the previous time when when?

[00:31:14] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

When you say that you had the squatters there. So shortly after that, it was found in in violation. Excuse me? am i Am I right or wrong? At some point in time. um I just want to find out when did all this transpire uh after Yeah,

[00:31:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:31–00:31:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:31:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8

the very first notice of um this meeting and a violation and stuff that I am aware of is um when I came down on March the 8th, 2025, and

[00:31:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:45–00:31:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8

um And other than that, I am not aware of anything. um

[00:31:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:53–00:31:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

that I didn't even have to come to this hearing. And I was like, no, if this when I got this in the mail and it's a whole legal process, I must represent myself. So the very first time was March 28th, 2025 is when

[00:32:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:12–00:32:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:15] ▶ Play Speaker 8

little little sign out of the yard that's march 8th 2025.

[00:32:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:32:23–00:32:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

Yeah,

[00:32:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:31–00:32:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that's not acceptable. Okay.

[00:32:39] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'm sorry. No, they're asking for April. No,

[00:32:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8

he amended that.

[00:32:44] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:44–00:32:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:47] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:32:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8

A year sounds good to me to get his property up.

[00:32:52] ▶ Play Speaker 2

That's a long

[00:32:53] ▶ Play No voice detected

time.

[00:32:54] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Well, that's what I that's what i was quoting, like, with the the previous case. They had a year to get their property

[00:33:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

up. um Mr. Wilkinson.

[00:33:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes, sir.

[00:33:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2

um The,

[00:33:13] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:13–00:33:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:14] ▶ Play Speaker 2

number one, exterior structure. Is that for the windows? That

[00:33:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

is for the windows. It is secured. Knowing the situation that the young lady has gone through in the passing of her father, I would leave it at ‸ discretion of the board. I mean, the tax rolls currently have the address for the mailing at, you know,

[00:33:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:34–00:33:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:33:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. That's, that's the correct address. I have mail. If you all want to see the mail, um that is stamped from, from the um from rachel m sandoff clerk of the city court and um comptroller from january to 6 2025.

[00:34:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:03–00:34:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

which was needed to be able to get Amanda Lee Grant and Courtney Dwayne Brown out of the house and their occupants, whoever they had in there with them. And mind you, they busted out every window in my father's house. Like, it's despicable.

[00:34:29] ▶ Play Speaker 2

mr wilkinson

[00:34:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes, sir. I'm sorry. do you have a question.

[00:34:39] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

You were, um I

[00:34:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6

would, you

[00:34:42] ▶ Play No voice detected

know,

[00:34:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

code enforcement's goal is voluntary compliance. If she's asking for additional time farther than, uh June, then I would leave it at the discretion of the board. I mean, we have an open line of communication with the property owner now. I gave the young lady my business card. She's got my number and officer, uh Simpson's number. The property is secured. If you notice the picture from today,

[00:35:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:07–00:35:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6

from all the debris, the fence in the yard, the trash that was on the side of yard and the rear of the yard. We did have two previous violations. They did comply with that before today's hearing. So, with that being said, I would just leave it at ‸ discretion of the

[00:35:25] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

board

[00:35:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6

as far as the time frame what they feel comfortable with and

[00:35:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:29–00:35:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6

a contractor to have the windows replaced and get a permit for that. That may take some time for her to find a contractor that's able to go ahead and put the install the windows and get the property cleaned up the way she'd see fit.

[00:35:57] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:35:57–00:36:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:36:02] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:36:04] ▶ Play Speaker 10

see.

[00:36:05] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:05–00:36:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:09] ▶ Play Speaker 10

windows. Yes,

[00:36:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6

sir.

[00:36:10] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Now, what is and I'm sorry, just ‸ second. um So but you said you're saying it's leaving it up to the board. But as long as it's covered the way it is, is that it would that be fine? What would.

[00:36:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No, because it's exterior structure. And as the code says, I mean, yes, it is secured for where they won't have many squatters. Right. In the in the building anymore. But the

[00:36:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:36–00:36:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6

not to pose a health and public safety. I would say no.

[00:36:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:45–00:36:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6

it could, you know, invite other folks in there like she just had evicted. So I would ask the board to hold her some kind of time frame to. and But, you know, at the same time, understand the situation that she's in and give her some time to hire a contractor and place the windows in. there

[00:37:04] ▶ Play Speaker 10

What about the roof, the roof and

[00:37:07] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:07–00:37:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:37:07] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Because

[00:37:07] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:07–00:37:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:16] ▶ Play Speaker 10

paint starts chipping or something in that effect. And then I wouldn't want it to be a repeat offense so that, you know, you understand so that everything is covered now and she get it taken care of. Or instead of like in the six months she gets the windows done and then y'all come back and say, oh yeah, by the way, the roof needs to be done.

[00:37:35] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:35–00:37:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6

According to the inspector that is expected to cite the roofs in fair condition. The only question is the windows, for the exterior structure at this time. okay And as a code enforcement manager and working with the property owner, I wouldn't let that happen to come back

[00:37:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:56–00:37:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:58] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:37:58] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Are you working with someone now?

[00:38:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8

No, I just had the um property clint because it was it was disgusting. Can

[00:38:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I ask a question? um ‸ Ma'am, you said you need a year to fix this?

[00:38:15] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Based on what the previous case had, it said that you all have been working with them for a year.

[00:38:21] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that Yeah, let's let's not worry about that case. Let's worry about ‸ Yeah, my my

[00:38:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

concern, my concern is, number one, I'm not from here, okay? Number two, I will have to hire someone. So I do not know the time frame of your contractors nor building material and stuff here. So

[00:38:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:41–00:38:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

foot in my mouth and have to come back before the board and say, oh yeah, no problem, I can get it done within two months. And you all, your contractors and stuff are backed up three, four months. You see what I'm saying?

[00:38:55] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:55–00:39:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

It needs to be something better where it can be done. Number one, nobody in this room wants this property looking better than I do. This is my father's home.

[00:39:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so So can you tell me why do you need a year? I

[00:39:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8

need money. I need money. I need people to be able to do it. i If I could write somebody a big check to just come and do it, I would. I do not.

[00:39:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:30–00:39:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8

care of this business. You see what I'm

[00:39:38] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:39:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yeah. So, yeah. um

[00:39:42] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Just. Can we do a follow-up? Well, that's what I was going to suggest. I would incline to suggest that we go 180 days with updates every 30 days. Because essentially, as from the outside looking in, what this property needs, it needs the TLC. But the most important thing is being secured and the board taking down in windows. um Whether windows, the whole window need to be replaced or get a glass company to come in and replace the actual glass. Which is something that's possible because just replacing the glass um wouldn't need a permit, correct? I believe that all the windows have been

[00:40:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

ripped out with the frames. The boards are covered up. So, they have to replace the whole window in the framing.

[00:40:41] ▶ Play Speaker 2

So, again, um just on a rough estimate, what does what does it look like for someone applying to replace windows as far as the permit? I

[00:40:53] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

think I can answer that

[00:40:54] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:54–00:40:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:58] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

[00:40:58] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:58–00:41:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:04] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

to do that. Because, as she had noted, um the time frame of backlog, uh we're finding that it's taking uh individuals who have with issues with their windows or doors.

[00:41:16] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:16–00:41:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:19] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

a contract with a contractor,

[00:41:21] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:21–00:41:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:22] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

have to pull the permit after that just just to find the contractor. So

[00:41:27] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:27–00:41:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:30] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

I mean it there's a lot of construction going on and there's a lot of uh windows and doors that are being replaced um throughout the city and throughout the county. So

[00:41:42] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:42–00:41:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:48] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

‸ acquire a contractor and get a permit issued in that time frame.

[00:41:58] ▶ Play Speaker 2

So I would like to see some type of plan to where we get some type of updates to ensure that she's her due process is being done but we're also um being ‸ realistic to ensure that number one this task can be done in some suitable time

[00:42:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:19–00:42:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:26] ▶ Play Speaker 2

she continues to work diligently. Because again the goal is not to just

[00:42:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

find

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:31–00:42:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:42:32] ▶ Play Speaker 2

you. The goal is to allow you to get this especially with uh with mitigating the circumstances and you don't even live here. So that is understandable and uh we sympathize with you. um question now you had something chief? I'm just letting y'all finish. I was waiting on the motion. Okay. um I'm looking at just seeing if we could table this because opposed to just going ahead and ruling on it. I would prefer to to table it for 30 to 60 days but still with updates to find out where we are with it. Because again she's done some work already. She's done more. She's gotten two things complied and there were three things on ‸ there. So with that being said she's diligent trying to make progress. um that's

[00:43:41] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:41–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:50] ▶ Play Speaker 2

to 90 days before we even talk about it again. Because again she's making

[00:43:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

progress. Right.

[00:43:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2

[00:44:00] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:44:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yeah Go ahead,

[00:44:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:02–00:44:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

Yeah, you know, I can't

[00:44:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:04–00:44:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:08–00:44:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

six months to even get a permit, um i I think that may be somewhat of consideration from the board to maybe table it, if that's what you're going to do, six months to see what they could bring back and

[00:44:27] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:27–00:44:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:28] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

could bring back if she's even attempted to do that. That might be, because every 30 days you might not get a whole lot because everything is backed up. So she, just like

[00:44:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:38–00:44:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

So I i think you know that's that's a reasonable potential time frame that you might want to consider.

[00:44:48] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:44:48–00:44:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:49] ▶ Play Speaker 2

that's the reason why I'm i'm i'll just saying three to six months to table it

[00:44:53] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:53–00:44:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2

to where we forget about it, but we still may have something to talk about it to see where it is to say, hey, we'll table it again because she's trying. So it's not like other things that she's not trying. So she's made progress. okay

[00:45:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Mr. Chair,

[00:45:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:45:15–00:45:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

suggestion. Instead of tabling, ‸ can we just get an order to, you know, have the property

[00:45:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:45:21–00:45:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

have a contract or something, showing improvement within eight months and bring it back to the board? That way and then we we don't, we're not holding,

[00:45:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:30–00:45:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

a stash report. We have it on the record. We have a board order on the record. Instead of table it and pushing this and kicking can a can down the road, we go ahead and hold the one, the property owner responsible, and at the same time we're working with the property owner to get voluntary compliance. So we're asking for, I mean, staff, my recommendation to the board would be

[00:45:52] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:52–00:45:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

have them come back and show us a contract, show us that they're working, that they have it lined up to go ahead and have the windows installed, or at least a couple quotes, something to show us that they're moving forward with an eight month time frame.

[00:46:10] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:10–00:46:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:17] ▶ Play Speaker 7

specific actions by any specific date, ‸ getting a contractor, that sort of thing. I think maybe, you know, the best that we can do is table it or give a very long time for compliance. um Because really, you know, what we're doing here in this hearing is just finding if she is in violation or, um uh yeah and you know, what fine might be appropriate to impose. um But certainly we can table it and you know check in, that sort of thing. But as far as specifically ordering her to do XYZ, getting a contract, I'm not sure that's a something we should do.

[00:46:54] ▶ Play Speaker 2

All right, so check this out. How about this? I'll make a motion. uh I'll make a motion to table this six months. Second. Motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed? Motion passes unanimously. How about that, ma'am?

[00:47:11] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right, thank you.

[00:47:12] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

All right, well, again, um just make sure you touch base with him so you guys can have an open line of communication so we can find out where we're going.

[00:47:23] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay.

[00:47:24] ▶ Play Speaker 2

‸ All

[00:47:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right, thank you. Thank

[00:47:26] ▶ Play Speaker 2

‸ you again, mr mcgrift for being here.

[00:47:27] ▶ Play Speaker 1

‸ Mr. Chair, who was the second?

[00:47:38] ▶ Play Speaker 2

We're on to lean reduction. We have one more lean reduction. We have CE09-102.

[00:47:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes, board. This is lean of drugs to CE09-102

[00:47:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:53–00:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Enforcement Board held a public hearing on June 18, 2009, at which time the board found the property owner, Patrick Badgett, in violation of ‸ following code, section 6 105 a permit required.

[00:48:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:16 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:11–00:48:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6

2010.

[00:48:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:27–00:48:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

not reside at the property. Taxes are paid through the year. Records show no other outstanding liens on the property. Case was

[00:48:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:49–00:48:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6

new applicant, the new owner, Richard Carey, is requesting that

[00:48:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:57–00:48:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

city's cost is enclosed. staffs available for any questions.

[00:49:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:09–00:49:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:49:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I took today. I apologize I could not have any pictures prior to from the hearing because

[00:49:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:17–00:49:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6

But

[00:49:21] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:21–00:49:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:23] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:49:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6

took that picture this afternoon. Yes, sir.

[00:49:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:32–00:49:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6

from the property owner. I'm sorry.

[00:49:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:49:39–00:49:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:49:45] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

name is Elizabeth Felipe.

[00:49:48] ▶ Play Speaker 1

And your address?

[00:49:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9

[address], Northeast, Palm Bay, Florida, 32905.

[00:49:56] ▶ Play Speaker 2

All right, ma'am. Thank you for being here.

[00:49:58] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Thank you.

[00:49:59] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Is this a rental property?

[00:50:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um This was a vacant property. uh We don't have it rented at this time.

[00:50:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2

That's the purpose of it?

[00:50:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9

The purpose is probably going to just sell it. We're not looking to keep any more rental properties at this time.

[00:50:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4

So it's it's empty? Is that what you're saying?

[00:50:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I believe

[00:50:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:19–00:50:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:21] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:50:22] ▶ Play Speaker 4

those cars? I

[00:50:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

believe that that's Jesus, the guy that was working on the property to bring it into compliance.

[00:50:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:31–00:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:50:35] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um Can I look in my system and I'll tell you?

[00:50:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Please. Hold

[00:50:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9

on one second. I don't want to speak out of place just in case.

[00:51:06] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:51:06–00:51:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:21–00:51:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:51:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:51:31] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I don't speak out of place

[00:51:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6

mr. chair on the application for the reduction they'd also said ‸ states that it is is vacant and it appeared to be vacant there was nobody at the house but

[00:51:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:43–00:51:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6

party we

[00:51:48] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:48–00:51:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:51] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:51:57] ▶ Play Speaker 4

cars

[00:51:57] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:57–00:52:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:52:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6

corner lot which it's not but

[00:52:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:05–00:52:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:09] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:52:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:52:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:52:40] ▶ Play Speaker 1

mr. Wilkinson

[00:52:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

yes ma'am

[00:52:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1

do you know why he requested the lien to be reduced to 5,000 why that number I

[00:52:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6

don't know that's what the application on the he filled out

[00:52:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9

we purchased the property after the probate was processed.

[00:52:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:56–00:53:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:02] ▶ Play Speaker 9

found out after taking possession of the property, that's when we started doing what we had to do to the

[00:53:09] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:09–00:53:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:53:11] ▶ Play Speaker 2

liens on it when you purchased it

[00:53:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um they that I couldn't tell you but

[00:53:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:16–00:53:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9

before um so

[00:53:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:21–00:53:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:25] ▶ Play Speaker 9

while we were doing the probate, property

[00:53:28] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

then

[00:53:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9

that's when they found out about these I might be able to tell you a little more in just a moment

[00:53:38] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I guess I must have missed she's not the owner are you not the owner I

[00:53:43] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I work for the company I was not actually the person that was

[00:53:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:46–00:53:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice

so I since I live here in Palm Bay and I am a

[00:53:55] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:55–00:53:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:58] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice

property but if I'm now into the software and I should be able to answer you

[00:54:04] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:04–00:54:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:54:10] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:54:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:54:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6

yes sir also on the application it says that they did not at the time of purchasing the property, they did not notice the liens were placed on the property, which prevented him from addressing them in a timely manner upon discovering the situation I took action and recently of the issues and have since complied with all necessary requirements and

[00:54:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:54:47–00:54:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the matter.

[00:54:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9

To answer your question, there is a tenant in the property

[00:54:53] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:53–00:54:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:59] ▶ Play Speaker 9

out for you

[00:55:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

He answered what Richard said there, but I might be able to see it here as well.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:55:03–00:55:20 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:55:20] ▶ Play No voice detected · Machine re-recognized

When

[00:55:20] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:20–00:55:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2

like yours, is that like the normal protocol to find out if there are any liens, properties

[00:55:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

especially

[00:55:30] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

when you're buying it in that situation?

[00:55:34] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:34–00:55:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:55:38] ▶ Play Speaker 9

so we usually buy the properties as hardship properties directly through members of the family, like in this particular case where it went through the probate. um they do run a title search on the property um because this was in probate I'm going to assume um and I say assume because I'm not Richard who knows the full story that they couldn't do anything with the property till it finished going through the probate, and then they immediately started working on the property.

[00:56:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:13–00:56:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:15] ▶ Play Speaker 9

so I could tell you when they started working on the property if that helps

[00:56:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:19–00:56:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:22] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um the day that we had today was after July but um I'm sorry

[00:56:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:29–00:56:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:47] ▶ Play Speaker 2

[00:56:48] ▶ Play Speaker 5

did you

[00:56:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

or your firm or Richard yes

[00:56:52] ▶ Play Speaker 5

did that did you receive a clear title

[00:56:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9

we didn't purchase it through the title company we went directly with a family member so it was not your traditional closing where you get to the title insurance

[00:57:12] ▶ Play Speaker 5

That's interesting.

[00:57:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:13–00:57:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:57:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:57:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:57:29] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

It's not that expensive.

[00:57:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Right. They, they run a title usually on the property as they're working with the sellers to see if there's any value in the property. And if we've purchased a property like this particular one that had a code matter or something, we know that we're going to be fixing the properties because we don't leave our properties um in disrepair. We, to be quite honest with you, we, we bring the properties to great condition. If

[00:58:04] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:04–00:58:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:06] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

property

[00:58:06] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:58:07] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:58:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:19 ▶]

[00:58:26] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

Well,

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:26–00:58:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:58:26] ▶ Play Speaker 5

I guess my question is if you have no qualms about investing in the property why wasn't a title search done

[00:58:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

It would have been a very simple title search. That

[00:58:39] ▶ Play Speaker 5

is correct. I mean that's a big number sitting out there

[00:58:45] ▶ Play Speaker 9

yes it is sir

[00:58:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Mr. Chair ‸ answer your question the probate case according to the tax rolls was uh November 3rd of 2023 ownership changed of March 14th 2024

[00:59:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:07–00:59:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um I can give you a little bit of a timeline on um

[00:59:37] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

when

[00:59:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9

we started cleaning up the property. Will that help with

[00:59:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:40–00:59:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:44] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:59:45] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:59:46] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:59:47] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[00:59:59] ▶ Play Speaker 9

we've been working on the property since March of last year

[01:00:04] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:04–01:00:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:00:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4

like I said motion please yes sir um

[01:00:34] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:00:35] ▶ Play Speaker 4

said motion for uh case ce09-102

[01:00:45] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:45–01:00:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I move that the board recommend to the city council that the lien be reduced in this case from

[01:01:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:02–01:01:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:05] ▶ Play Speaker 4

[01:01:06] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:06–01:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:09–01:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4

the house looks good. um they're working on it

[01:01:28] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:01:39] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:39–01:01:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:42] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:01:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4

and that's all I got

[01:01:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1

I'll second

[01:01:50] ▶ Play Speaker 2

‸ Have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor say aye. aye aye

[01:01:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:57–01:01:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:58] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:02:01] ▶ Play Speaker 10

[01:02:01] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

no this is miss

[01:02:03] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Scott

[01:02:04] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:02:04] ▶ Play Speaker 10

oh you second

[01:02:07] ▶ Play Speaker 2

So motion passes three to two.

[01:02:15] ▶ Play No voice detected

all

[01:02:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2

right ma'am that will go before city council and they will get you an information of the date.

[01:02:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

okay and then I come back and that's when they

[01:02:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:27–01:02:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Well, you'll go to city council and they'll have the final say so.

[01:02:35] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:35–01:02:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:36] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:02:36] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

thank you

[01:02:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9

so much and I just want to say I'm grateful for allowing me to get into my software um ‸ while I was here

[01:02:46] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Thank you for being here, ma'am.

[01:02:47] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Thank you.

[01:02:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:48–01:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:02:52] ▶ Play Speaker 2

All right. We have no other business. Before we close question. Those people that are not here. Did you receive any notice? From any of them?

[01:03:03] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:03–01:03:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:03:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2

[01:03:11] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:11–01:03:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:03:21] ▶ Play Speaker 2

all right As it goes for this meeting,

[01:03:24] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:24–01:03:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:37] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:03:48] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:48–01:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T13:15:31 · 5,871 ordinary words, 2,028 in suspect passages, 28 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.