civic record · cocoa, florida
Planning & Zoning

Planning & Zoning Regular Meeting

Date
2024-08-07
Status
City minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #610
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Built only from the City's minutes (751_PZ_Reg_Minutes_08_07_2024.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Wesley Park, Todd Anderson, Ron Chabot, Aleck Greenwood, Tamisha Findlay, Frank Manfredi, Katherine Stewart
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Abbey Bass (Assistant City Clerk), Luci Ribeiro (City Planner), Jennifer Webster (City Planner), Stockton Whitten (City Manager)
  • Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: ANDERSON, CHABOT, FINDLAY, GREENWOOD, MANFREDI, PARK, STEWART (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)

Adopted actions (7)

  • to APPROVE THE AUGUST 7, 2024 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA AS WRITTEN (moved by STEWART, seconded by CHABOT); PASSED 7-0; ayes: PARK, ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, STEWART, FINDLAY, MANFREDI; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to APPROVE THE JUNE 12, 2024 SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES AS WRITTEN (moved by CHABOT, seconded by STEWART); PASSED 7-0; ayes: PARK, ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, STEWART, FINDLAY, MANFREDI; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CONSISTENT WITH APPENDIX A, ZONING, ARTICLE XI, SECTION 17, FOR THREE PARCELS TOTALING +/- 57.23 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF N. RANGE RD. WITH PARCEL ID NUMBERS 24-36-19-00-501, 24-36-30-00-252, AND … (moved by GREENWOOD, seconded by STEWART); PASSED 7-0; ayes: PARK, ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, STEWART, FINDLAY, MANFREDI; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 3
  • to POSTPONE TO SEPTEMBER 4, 2024 @ 6PM AT COCOA CITY HALL (moved by PARK, seconded by STEWART); PASSED 7-0; ayes: PARK, ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, STEWART, FINDLAY, MANFREDI; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 3; the vote on p. 4
  • to RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY 2 Exhibit B ORD 11-2024 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT COUNCIL REGARDING THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX A, ARTICLE XI, SECTIONS 4A AND 22 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COCOA TO ALLOW FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, AND PUBLIC … (moved by BOARD MEMEBER CHABOT, seconded by GREENWOOD); PASSED 7-0; ayes: PARK, ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, STEWART, FINDLAY, MANFREDI; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 4; the vote on p. 5
  • to APPROVE OF ORDINANCE 12-2024 WITH CHANGES DISCUSSED (moved by BOARDMEMBER GREENWOOD, seconded by STEWART); PASSED 7-0; ayes: PARK, ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, STEWART, FINDLAY, MANFREDI; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 6
  • to ADJOURN THE MEETING (moved by BOARDMEMBER MANFREDI, seconded by GREENWOOD); PASSED 7-0; ayes: PARK, ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, STEWART, FINDLAY, MANFREDI; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 6

Agenda (the City's wording)

The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (PZ_Reg_Agenda_08_07_2024), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:01] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:01–00:00:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:40] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:40–00:00:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:58] Speaker 1
Moving on to item two, approval of agenda minutes. Can I have approval or changes to the agenda?
[00:01:09] Speaker 2
I'll make a motion to approve the agenda.
[00:01:11] Speaker 1
Okay, a motion by Ms. Stewart for approval and second by Mr. Chabot. Any discussion? All in favor?
[00:01:21] Speaker 3
Aye.
[00:01:22] Speaker 4
All
[00:01:22] Speaker 1
right. For the meeting minutes, does anybody, has everyone had time to review the minutes?
[00:01:33] Speaker 4
Satisfactorily.
[00:01:37] Speaker 2
I'll
[00:01:37] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:37–00:01:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:39] Speaker 1
All right. Any discussion? All in favor?
[00:01:43] Speaker 2
Aye. Aye.
[00:01:45] Speaker 1
Motion passes. We have no old business listed. So we'll move on to section four for new business. Item A, 24-426.
[00:02:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:30–00:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:34] Speaker 1
I
[00:02:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:34–00:02:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:35] Speaker 1
Okay. Not
[00:02:38] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:37–00:02:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:38] Attribution uncertain
How
[00:02:38] Speaker 1
can
[00:02:38] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:38–00:02:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:55] Speaker 5
Yes.
[00:02:56] No voice detected
None
[00:02:57] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:56–00:03:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:03] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:04] Speaker 6
like any of them are.
[00:03:10] No voice detected
I think.
[00:03:12] Speaker 7
Oh, there we go. There we go.
[00:03:14] No voice detected
I
[00:03:14] Speaker 7
mean, I
[00:03:15] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
listen
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:15–00:03:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:03:15] Speaker 7
to Metallica growing up, so I could always go that direction if needed.
[00:03:19] Speaker 5
I'm sorry.
[00:03:23] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
So this is a preliminary PUD request, there we go, for property located on North Range Road. On the overhead right now is a location map. It's a property that's just over 57 acres, located on the east side of North Range Road, north of Kathy Kim Street, and adjacent to Hooper Road to the west. Subject property is currently vacant, and approximately 28.73 acres of the subject property
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:03:23–00:03:47 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:03:47] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:47–00:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:48] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
The proposed development will occur on the upland area, which consists of just about 28.50 acres. The future land use of the subject property is LDR, low-density residential, which allows up to seven dwelling units per acre. As you can see on the overhead, we have a snapshot of the city's future land use map. You can see a majority of the surrounding properties are LDR, less the
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:03:47–00:04:11 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:04:11] Speaker 7
subdivision
[00:04:11] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:11–00:04:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:13] Speaker 7
a future land use designation of VLDR, which is very low density residential. The subject property is a mixture of uh three
[00:04:21] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:20–00:04:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:22] Speaker 7
ru 17 ru 215 and then the smaller parcel to the southeast does not have a zoning category applied to it. And as you see on the zoning map, the surrounding zoning districts are
[00:04:33] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:33–00:04:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:37] Speaker 7
RR1 to the west. The applicant is proposing a 61 lot, single family detached subdivision with multiple open space tracks and associated infrastructure. The project is proposing two different lot types, 40 feet wide and 50 feet wide. Of the 61 lots, 31 or 40 feet wide and 30 or 50 foot wide. And as I mentioned before, the developable area of the property is roughly 28
[00:05:01] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:00–00:05:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:03] Speaker 7
um Now, ‸ just want to speak about process really quickly. This is just the preliminary PUD submittal. This is not the final PUD. There's not a plat associated just yet or a site plan. So in essence, you're reviewing a concept plan tonight. uh The
[00:05:18] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:18–00:05:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:21] Speaker 7
regarding the width of the lots. um Since they're a bit narrower than typical, we uh advise that the applicant along with staff, we advise the applicant, why don't you just do the preliminary PUD for starters, gather input and feedback from planning and zoning city council, and then then spend ‸ your time and money on further engineer that level of feedback. So based on the actions of PNZ and city council, no entitlements would change. So no rezoning would occur
[00:05:52] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
until the final PUD is submitted and reviewed. On the overhead is the 61 lot subdivision. The, if you're looking up, that is west. So right is north. And what I'll do is I'll walk you through the next few slides and point out some of the features of the subdivision. There'll be two access points from North Range Road. The southern access point lines up with Hooper. And as you move to the east, it
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:05:52–00:06:22 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:06:22] Speaker 7
Terminates
[00:06:22] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:22–00:06:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:23] Speaker 7
So there is no continuing access proposed to Ivy drive to the east. And then the secondary access point is just to
[00:06:31] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:30–00:06:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:34] Speaker 7
As I mentioned, the proposed plan is a mix of 40 foot wide and 50 foot wide lots. All of the lots would be detached single family homes. There are no townhomes associated with this project. What I tried to do with this slide is the show in
[00:06:48] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:47–00:06:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:52] Speaker 7
But those are the two different lot sizes and it's a mixture throughout the
[00:06:56] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:56–00:07:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:04] Speaker 7
The proposed setbacks typical setbacks are 20 feet in the front five on the side 20 in the rear. That's slightly different than the code requirement ‸ was 25 in the front eight on the side and then the side corner and rear is 15 feet. One thing that I'll point out on this is that there are a few lots that have some backup to that are corner that kind of back up to some other lots. You can kind of see some areas here. Those
[00:07:35] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:35–00:07:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:40] Speaker 7
There's actually some open space tracks that were placed that I'll ‸ point out later where the lots 56 and 13 and 44 and 43 instead of budding right up to the street. You'll
[00:07:51] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:51–00:07:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:55] Speaker 7
the street. You'll
[00:07:58] Attribution uncertain
have a little bit of open space.
[00:07:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:57–00:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:58] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:07:58] Speaker 7
mentioned, almost half of the property is wetlands. Those wetlands will remain. None of them will be touched as part of this project and they'll be put into a conservation easement. And I'll point out a nice design feature of this project is that none of the lots of but the wetland area either. You can see that on the north side, there's the pond that separates the majority of the lots from the wetlands. And then on the south side, you have lots that terminate at the cul-de-sac and then you have the other pond that abuts the wetlands. The
[00:08:32] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:31–00:08:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:38] Speaker 7
In this case,
[00:08:39] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:38–00:08:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:42] Speaker 7
I'll walk you through the number of tracks that will be amenitized as common or open space. The first is track B, which is the pond on the south side. There'll be a sidewalk path around the perimeter of the pond. There'll be benches throughout and the pond will be stocked with fish in accordance with FWS recommendations. Tracks E,
[00:09:01] Attribution uncertain
F,
[00:09:02] Speaker 7
O and P. Those are those open space tracks I was just mentioning a moment ago. Those will be general open ‸ space areas with benches and trees. Tracks
[00:09:12] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:11–00:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:14] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:09:14–00:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:14] Speaker 7
sidewalks running ‸ along the bank of the ponds and those will be interconnected to the sidewalks that will be provided on the perimeter of the streets within the community. And
[00:09:25] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:25–00:09:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:29] Speaker 7
open space, and then there will also be a tot lot adjacent to lot 32. The PDP or the preliminary PUD process does not require a landscape plan, but one will be provided at the final development plan. And
[00:09:43] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:42–00:09:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:45] Speaker 7
required to meet all the requirements of section 17. A very important talking point with this project was architectural renderings and architectural features of the buildings. As I mentioned at the start, the lot sizes are a bit
[00:09:59] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:59–00:10:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:01] Speaker 7
So building architecture and ‸ lot and development amenities are very important. And so we asked the applicant provide us with renderings, not only to look at, but to run concurrent through the application and the review process. And what I mean by that is these renderings and all the features that are on the buildings will be part of the plans that will run concurrent into the final development plan. And if approved run with the land. So if someone were to come in other than the applicant and build this project, the homes would need to look like that and that will be built into the approval process. And so you can see there's on this slide, there's three different
[00:10:37] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:37–00:10:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:41] Speaker 7
then
[00:10:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:10:41] Speaker 7
have the three different levels. Of course ‸ you have the standard medium and then the high, and you can see the elevation and enhancements change as you go further up. And then these are the two remaining types of floor plans. And
[00:10:54] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:53–00:10:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:57] Speaker 7
they continue to enhance as you go down. So,
[00:11:03] Attribution uncertain
this is a very important question.
[00:11:03] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:22]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:02–00:11:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:25] Speaker 7
this is an analysis of the neighborhood in the general area. Um, and as I've mentioned a few times, there's a 50, 50, 50, 50 mix of the 40 foot and 50 foot wide lots. However,
[00:11:36] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:35–00:11:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:39] Speaker 7
‸ developed. If it was to be maximized and the wetlands be impacted at the seven units per acre, they could hypothetically develop almost 400 homes. However, since they're only developing half of the site and leaving the wetlands as is their density calculation is doing. 2.14 units per acre, which is actually more in line with the V LDR future land use category. So taking that into account, it does become more consistent and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The lot sizes are a little different, but from a density perspective, they're still hitting the mark. And the
[00:12:12] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:12–00:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:16] Speaker 7
within the plan, your development, the relationship is
[00:12:18] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:12:18–00:12:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:18] Speaker 7
neighborhoods. Many of the same talking points. One thing I would add into this in talking about the minimum lot sizes is the applicant is not skimping on
[00:12:28] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:28–00:12:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:28] Speaker 7
minimum square footage of the homes code minimum is 1200 square feet. However,
[00:12:32] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:12:32] Speaker 7
floor plans that you saw range in size from ‸ just under 1600 square feet to over 3000 square feet. And as I mentioned, those renderings and floor plans and minimum lot sizes would run through into the final PUD and be a part of that final approval that reaches that point. Provision
[00:12:49] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:48–00:12:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:55] Speaker 7
control and soil conservation is so shown in the preliminary development plan. And as
[00:12:59] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:59–00:13:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:03] Speaker 7
the city. There's
[00:13:04] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:03–00:13:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:07] Speaker 7
lift station on the east side of North range road. Both of those would be utilized for utilities in this case service,
[00:13:13] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
drainage,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:13–00:13:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:14] Speaker 7
flood control and
[00:13:14] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
soil
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:14–00:13:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:15] Speaker 7
conservation will be addressed with the proposed stormwater ponds that are designed to comply with state local regulations. As
[00:13:22] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:22–00:13:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:23] Attribution uncertain
there
[00:13:23] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:13:25] Speaker 7
access point, which is street a aligns with Hooper to the west and about 700 feet to the north is the second access point to street C. There are no improvements proposed on North range road. They did do a traffic impact analysis and have found that the roads operated sufficiently and that no additional improvements were required. The project will generate just under 600 average daily trips per day. The nature intent and compatibility of common space, including the proposed method for maintenance and conservation of the open space, all the open space will
[00:13:54] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:54–00:13:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:58] Speaker 7
They
[00:13:58] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:58–00:14:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:02] Speaker 7
The wetlands, as I mentioned, will be dedicated into a conservation easement. The availability and adequacy of primary streets and thoroughfares to support traffic to be generated within the proposed PUD. As I mentioned, a traffic impact analysis was done and that analysis found that no other improvements were required of North range road or on North range road rather. And I'll mention just really quickly, the project previously proposed 71 units and they ran the calculations on that as well.
[00:14:31] Attribution uncertain
And
[00:14:31] Speaker 7
the same thing was found.
[00:14:32] Attribution uncertain
So
[00:14:32] Speaker 7
they, um, through negotiation and, and review of the project with, uh, RBI and city staff, um, and trying to determine a good mix of 40 foot and 50 foot wide
[00:14:43] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
lots.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:43–00:14:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:14:43] Speaker 7
It went from that 71 max to 61. Now,
[00:14:46] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[00:14:47] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
the availability and adequacy of water and sewer service support the project. As
[00:14:50] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:50–00:14:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:53] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
water line. No
[00:14:54] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:54–00:14:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:55] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
North range and then into an existing lift station located on the east side of North range road. I'm
[00:15:03] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:03–00:15:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:06] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, sir. Uh, the project is also consistent with the comprehensive plan policies and, and objectives. It
[00:15:13] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:12–00:15:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:17] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
flu one and flu policy.
[00:15:18] Attribution uncertain
One,
[00:15:19] Speaker 7
one, two, three. Staff is recommending, uh, that the planning zoning board recommend approval to the city council of the proposed planning and development consistent with appendix a. Article 11 section to 16 for the 3 parcels totaling 57.23 acres located on the east side of North range road with the parcel ID number shown on the overhead. I'll
[00:15:41] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:40–00:15:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:41] Speaker 7
take any questions you may have and the applicant, um, and the, uh, the applicant's engineer rather is here this evening for any technical questions you may have. Thanks.
[00:15:51] Speaker 1
All right. Thank you. So do you want to go ahead and have the speaker come up? Mr. Crawford.
[00:16:01] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:23]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:01–00:16:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:24] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:24–00:16:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:25] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:26] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:32] Speaker 3
So
[00:16:33] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:32–00:16:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:34] Attribution uncertain
to say,
[00:16:34] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:35] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:35] Speaker 3
wanted to work on the lot. ‸ So originally we did come in
[00:16:38] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:38–00:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:40] Attribution uncertain
So
[00:16:40] Speaker 3
that's where the 71 lot project came in before, and
[00:16:44] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:44–00:16:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:46] Speaker 3
And as I mentioned, as we negotiated with the city,
[00:16:48] Attribution uncertain
we
[00:16:48] Speaker 3
did
[00:16:48] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:48–00:16:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:49] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:16:56] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
And
[00:16:57] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:56–00:16:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:59] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:59–00:17:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:07] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:17:06–00:17:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:10] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:10–00:17:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:16] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
So
[00:17:16] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:17:16–00:17:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:22] No voice detected
All
[00:17:22] Speaker 1
right. Thank you. Do I need to ask for any other public comments? There are no other cards submitted.
[00:17:29] No voice detected
I mean, if any of the board
[00:17:31] Speaker 8
members have questions for Mr. Crawford, you could do that first.
[00:17:35] Attribution uncertain
Sounds
[00:17:35] Speaker 8
good.
[00:17:36] Speaker 1
Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Kristen. All right. Any questions from the board?
[00:17:39] Speaker 9
Yes. Thank you. I have three items that I'd like to ask you, sir. The price, landscaping, and the construction. The construction of the units, are they going to be concrete, wood, and what kind of roofs?
[00:17:57] Speaker 3
That
[00:17:58] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:57–00:18:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:13] Speaker 9
Okay. And the price of the units?
[00:18:18] Speaker 3
We've
[00:18:18] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:18–00:18:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:19] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:19] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:18:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:22] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:18:31] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Mr. Crawford, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they don't have a builder at the ‸ moment. This is just a preliminary plan, so they don't have a builder yet.
[00:18:41] Attribution uncertain
That's
[00:18:41] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
correct.
[00:18:42] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:41–00:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:42] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:18:44] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes.
[00:18:45] Speaker 9
But you're saying you're not sure whether it's going to be wood or concrete block?
[00:18:51] Speaker 3
Well,
[00:18:52] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:51–00:19:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:03] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:03] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:03] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:19:04] Speaker 3
Right.
[00:19:05] Attribution uncertain
Right
[00:19:05] Speaker 3
now,
[00:19:06] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:05–00:19:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:06] Attribution uncertain
If
[00:19:06] No voice detected
you're trying to get the
[00:19:08] Attribution uncertain
actual
[00:19:08] No voice detected
lot layout set up like
[00:19:12] Speaker 9
Have
[00:19:12] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:12–00:19:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:17] Speaker 3
Well, I
[00:19:19] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:18–00:19:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:25] Speaker 9
Okay. And the price you're telling me is going to be around 300,000 at 1,600 square feet and possibly up from there. Is that correct?
[00:19:34] Speaker 11
Yes,
[00:19:34] Attribution uncertain
that's correct.
[00:19:34] Speaker 11
Okay. And, um,
[00:19:37] Speaker 9
let's see, 61 units. Um, that, that covers all my questions. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yeah. Great. Go ahead.
[00:19:45] Speaker 2
Uh, sir. Just for clarification again, you said that you decided to go with
[00:19:49] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:49–00:19:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:50] Speaker 2
off. It's off. You got it. Can
[00:19:52] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:52–00:19:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:53] Speaker 2
You decided to go with the mixture of the 40 and 50 foot lots and because of that now you have 61 planned. Can
[00:19:59] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:59–00:20:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:02] Speaker 2
going with just, I guess, 40 foot lots and 71 or 72, whatever the original. Of
[00:20:08] Attribution uncertain
course,
[00:20:08] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:08–00:20:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:09] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:20:12] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:20:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:20:18] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:20:25] Speaker 2
Okay. Thank you.
[00:20:27] Speaker 1
All right. ‸ Any other questions?
[00:20:31] Speaker 4
Thank you.
[00:20:32] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:20:32] Speaker 4
had one question, uh, maybe for staff. This subdivision kind of looks to me like Coventry. Um, up off of 524 where the houses are. Basically long and skinny, um, because of this lot size, um, or is anybody familiar with the lot size in Coventry? Those
[00:20:52] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:51–00:20:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:57] Speaker 10
You
[00:20:57] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:57–00:21:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:21:03] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:21:05] Speaker 4
just, the other question I think you guys answered. Looks like we're going to be typical three, two houses, four, two houses, about 15, 16 hundred square feet.
[00:21:22] Speaker 3
16
[00:21:23] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:22–00:21:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:26] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And up from there. Okay. And if you don't have a builder yet, but if somebody wanted to build on two lots, is that permissible?
[00:21:45] Speaker 7
Yeah,
[00:21:49] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:45–00:21:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:50] Speaker 7
be a ‸ master builder subdivision type of situation. But that's, I think, as we continue on through the process, we can clarify. How they could flush out.
[00:22:05] Speaker 5
‸ I just want to say, I like the project. I grew up in that neighborhood. I
[00:22:11] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:10–00:22:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:17] Speaker 5
good, a good project. I feel so that's my two cents. Okay. Go ahead, sir.
[00:22:25] Attribution uncertain
Thank
[00:22:25] No voice detected
you.
[00:22:25] Speaker 11
Thank you. It looks like a good project to me too. I'm new to this committee or council. So, um, my questions are pretty basic. Have
[00:22:38] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:38–00:22:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:45] Speaker 3
Well,
[00:22:46] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:45–00:22:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:47] Attribution uncertain
to
[00:22:47] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:22:48] Attribution uncertain
start
[00:22:48] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:22:49] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:22:53] Speaker 7
Okay. Thank you. Go ahead. Mr.
[00:22:57] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:57–00:23:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:57] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[00:22:57] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:23:01] Speaker 7
yes, that's a mixture of, um, I would say 40 to 44 foot wide lots.
[00:23:08] Speaker 4
Yeah. That's a nice.
[00:23:11] Speaker 7
‸ All
[00:23:11] Speaker 1
right. Are
[00:23:12] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:12–00:23:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:19] Speaker 1
All right. Any further discussion?
[00:23:21] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
get a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:21–00:23:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:23:22] Speaker 1
Motion in the affirmative or what
[00:23:24] Speaker 8
public comment?
[00:23:25] Speaker 1
Oh yes. Public comment. Anybody from the public like to speak on this item? All right.
[00:23:33] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
i'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:33–00:23:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:23:33] Speaker 1
take it back and bring it back to the board.
[00:23:36] Speaker 9
I move to approve a staff recommendation on this project. I think it's going to be a very good addition to the city of cocoa. I just hope that it's not a situation where we approve something like this and then it gets to another builder. I remember Steve mentioning if that was the case and it's a different ownership situation that they still follow with some of the things that we approve of today. Is that correct?
[00:24:01] Speaker 7
Yes. The intent is that all of the development standards, including the architecture would run with the
[00:24:06] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
rezoning.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:06–00:24:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:24:06] Speaker 9
move to approve as a staff recommendation. I second it.
[00:24:10] Speaker 1
Okay. We've got a first and a second on that. Any discussion on the item? All right. All in favor.
[00:24:16] Speaker 4
Aye.
[00:24:17] Speaker 1
Any opposed? ‸ Motion passes unanimous. Congratulations, Mr. Crawford. See you soon.
[00:24:25] Speaker 4
Um, hopefully.
[00:24:27] Speaker 1
Moving
[00:24:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:27–00:24:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:31] Speaker 1
is the moat,
[00:24:31] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:24:32] Speaker 1
request to postpone. An item.
[00:24:38] Speaker 7
Yes. The applicant, um, was sent some comments from staff in
[00:24:43] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:42–00:24:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:46] Speaker 7
comments. Okay.
[00:24:50] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Um, ‸ the motion to postpone should include, um, the date, time and place. So
[00:24:57] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:56–00:25:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:17] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
Uh, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, what is the
[00:25:22] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
meaning
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:22–00:25:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:25:22] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
of, um, major recreational equipment that threw me the word major? I mean, recreational equipment. I'm trying to see what level we're talking about. We're talking about carnivals. Are we talking about the major
[00:25:42] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Ferris
[00:25:43] Speaker 9
wheels?
[00:25:44] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
Thank
[00:25:44] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:44–00:25:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:48] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
Major. Major. It's one of the code definitions.
[00:25:50] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:50–00:25:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:25:51] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
just closed my computer.
[00:25:53] Attribution uncertain
Get
[00:25:53] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
your books out. Yeah. They
[00:25:55] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:55–00:25:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:57] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ Thank you.
[00:25:58] Speaker 8
Yeah.
[00:25:58] Attribution uncertain
Um,
[00:25:59] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the definition is,
[00:26:00] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[00:26:01] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
boats, excluding kayaks and canoes. Um, and including boat trailers, travel trailers, pickup campers or coaches designed to be mounted on automotive vehicles, motorized dwellings, tent trailers, golf carts, and the like, in
[00:26:18] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:17–00:26:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:23] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
not. So that's the, the definition. So
[00:26:26] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:25–00:26:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:33] Speaker 9
or the campers. They
[00:26:35] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:34–00:26:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:37] Speaker 9
goes.
[00:26:38] Speaker 8
They would be included within the definition.
[00:26:41] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. Well, the answer is yes.
[00:26:43] Speaker 8
Yes. It doesn't. The definition is not limited to a certain size.
[00:26:46] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, ma'am. I understand. No more other questions. Mr. Chairman. Thank you. Thank you. Anybody else like
[00:26:51] Speaker 1
discuss this topic? All
[00:26:56] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:55–00:26:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:57] Speaker 1
Uh, I'll propose the
[00:26:59] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:59–00:27:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:00] Speaker 1
to postpone the consideration for item. For
[00:27:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:05–00:27:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:06] Speaker 1
Consideration of land development code text amendment appendix a article 11 section 12 of the code of
[00:27:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:11–00:27:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:14] Speaker 1
Equipment to September 4th
[00:27:16] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:15–00:27:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:18] Speaker 2
Seconded.
[00:27:22] Speaker 1
Second.
[00:27:22] Attribution uncertain
My,
[00:27:22] Speaker 1
Mr. Any further discussion? All in favor.
[00:27:27] Speaker 2
All right.
[00:27:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. Motion passes. Is that acceptable? Postponement. ‸ Excellent. Moving
[00:27:36] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:36–00:27:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:42] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:43] Speaker 10
Chair.
[00:27:44] Attribution uncertain
Uh,
[00:27:44] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
first of you are gonna ‸ switch. We ‸ actually gonna, um, ‸ I'm gonna ‸ present item 24, 4 30. That's item number D first. Okay.
[00:28:02] Speaker 1
‸ Can we get the board to agree to a change in the agenda?
[00:28:08] Speaker 9
We're still gonna be discussing.
[00:28:10] Speaker 1
It's correct. It's just a change in order. So
[00:28:13] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:12–00:28:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:14] Speaker 10
Yes, sir.
[00:28:15] Speaker 1
Okay.
[00:28:16] Speaker 10
Thank you. My is a short presentation. So we decided to be best to discuss that one first census. Good evening, everyone. I'm Lucy.
[00:28:29] Attribution uncertain
He
[00:28:29] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Bato. I'm the city planner with the city of Coco. I welcome to the new board members that are here with us tonight. Um, so we're gonna ‸ discuss the ordinance 12, 2024. For
[00:28:43] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:42–00:28:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:47] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
within the diamond square community through the revision of technical amendments that relax. Are
[00:28:52] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:52–00:28:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:00] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
City staff is requesting the Planning Zoning Board consider amending Appendix A, Zoning Article 11, Section 3 of the City of
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:29:00–00:29:09 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:29:09] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:29:09–00:29:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:10] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
of Ordinance to create new minimum yard requirements applicable to
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:29:10–00:29:14 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:29:14] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Are
[00:29:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:14–00:29:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:18] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
the diamond square community where those every development area?
[00:29:21] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
The Diamond Square area is characterized by a mix of residential homes, commercial business, and lighting industrial uses. Recognizing the Diamond Square
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:29:21–00:29:31 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:29:31] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:29:31–00:29:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:32] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
resources, the City of
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:29:32–00:29:34 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:29:34] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:29:34–00:29:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:34] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
invested millions to enhance streets, drainage, purchase lands for affordable housing, and inclusive build a new community center for the area. As you can see in this map, we have highlighted all
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:29:34–00:29:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:29:51] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
the
[00:29:51] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:51–00:29:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
located on the south portion of the diamond square CRA So that the the city code has the yard requirements as 25 feet for the front. The interior setbacks are eight
[00:30:23] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:23–00:30:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:27] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
for rear, that is your backyard, is 15 feet. So what we're proposing is to change and reduce the front setback to 20 feet. The interior lots are back to five
[00:30:38] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:38–00:30:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:39] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
The law to the side corner lots setbacks to 10 feet. And the backyard rear setback to reduce to 10 feet. And here you can see,
[00:30:50] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:49–00:30:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:53] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
new yard requirements for for development for a single-family residential.
[00:30:59] Attribution uncertain
so
[00:31:06] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
many existing subdivisions within
[00:31:08] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:07–00:31:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:13] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:12–00:31:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:16] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
not meet standards locked with dimensions
[00:31:19] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:18–00:31:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:23] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:22–00:31:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:26] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
efforts for local property owners and developers. Based on staff analysis, the proposed ordinance 12, 2024 is recommended to the Planning ‸ Zoning Board for approval. If adopted, this ordinance will benefit single-family residential properties by ‸ facilitating development, boosting property values, increasing tax revenue without negative affecting existing neighborhoods. I will not address all the policies of objectives but with focus on those the me most important by staff and that will be goal
[00:32:05] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:05–00:32:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:10] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
go 1.1 emphasizing ‸ the development, manage different types of land use that the city grow while ensuring public health, safety, appearance protected to careful planning of land and public public facilities we also like
[00:32:27] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:26–00:32:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:32] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
areas
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:32–00:32:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:32:32] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
showing
[00:32:33] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:32–00:32:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:35] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
using redevelopment programs and maintaining rules that promote redevelopment where ‸ is needed. uh objective 1.110 the city should maintain amend and develop land development regulations that guide future growth and development discourage the proliferation of urban sprouts and implement the goals objectives
[00:32:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:56–00:32:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:32:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
policies of its comprehensive
[00:32:58] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:57–00:33:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:03] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
is community revitalization that the city should continue to support the retabilization
[00:33:08] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:08–00:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:09] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Florida enterprise zone its designated Florida brownfield area the diamond square
[00:33:14] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:14–00:33:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
in the Heart of Cocoa area, concentrating on issues such as crime, economic development, and affordable housing. so staff recommends that the planning zoning board recommend approval of this ordinance 12.2044 as presented today
[00:33:33] Speaker 1
all
[00:33:33] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:33:33–00:33:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:33:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:38] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:38] Speaker 1
we have any questions for staff?
[00:33:39] Speaker 9
I do, sir. um Is
[00:33:42] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:41–00:33:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:46] Speaker 9
Diamond Square area? Are the
[00:33:48] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:48–00:33:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:51] Speaker 9
don't even know.
[00:33:54] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Are you saying the, well, the, the,
[00:33:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
there are lots, there are non-conforming lots. Right. In within per code, you are allowed to develop those lots. You know, there's no restriction against development. But just to facilitate and to assist
[00:34:10] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:10–00:34:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:14] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
reduce the yard setbacks for those. So for the area.
[00:34:18] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ this must be,
[00:34:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:19–00:34:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:23] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:22–00:34:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:26] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:34:38] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
which
[00:34:38] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:38–00:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:42] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:34:42] Attribution uncertain
uh
[00:34:42] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:34:51] Speaker 9
that correct
[00:34:51] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. ‸ Because now. And then there's five
[00:34:53] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:53–00:34:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:34:58] Speaker 9
the rear setback uh is 15 uh is it 10 or 15
[00:35:02] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
10 10.
[00:35:03] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
so
[00:35:04] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:03–00:35:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:08] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
lots that have already been developed? Are they less requirements
[00:35:12] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:11–00:35:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:13] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:35:15] Speaker 10
I don't know if any, um waiver or something that
[00:35:18] Speaker 9
was
[00:35:18] Speaker 10
required. If there's any agreement between the city for those developments, I'll have to check to see if they meet the yard
[00:35:24] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:24–00:35:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:24] Speaker 10
uh but every development should follow those requirements. But we do have provisions in our code that it could reflects
[00:35:32] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:32–00:35:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:33] Speaker 10
could flex a little bit. Those yard requirements. I
[00:35:38] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:37–00:35:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:39] Attribution uncertain
know if
[00:35:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:39] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:35:41] Speaker 9
you may be more confused. If you don't mind me trying to clarify. um I'm under the opinion that I think that the lots were that developed already. um is that me? I'm under the opinion that the the lots that have already been developed are slightly larger than the ones that we're proposing on what's before us.
[00:36:03] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So you're saying the setbacks are more or less? I'm sorry. More.
[00:36:07] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
They're able to build larger homes. let
[00:36:09] No voice detected
me
[00:36:10] Speaker 9
ask ‸ So is this
[00:36:11] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
different? Mr. Greenwood, when you say that have been developed, you're talking about ‸ existing homes. The ones that we just built. The ones that were just
[00:36:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:20–00:36:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:23] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
so those were all, I believe, conforming lots. The ones, the five homes that we just
[00:36:29] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:29–00:36:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:31] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:36:33] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:33] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:33] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:36:37] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
variances. Those were those
[00:36:39] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:38–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:44] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
uh that the setbacks that are in place.
[00:36:47] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
The lots that were developed are already a little large uh That's what I was trying to get at. But, and i I feel that this is good. It should be conducive with what was already built there. And,
[00:36:58] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Because
[00:36:59] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:58–00:37:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:03] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
just the setbacks as well. ‸ Because you have the impervious area. You know, there's a limit for impervious ‸ area. We do have requirements for minimum sizes. You know, minimum
[00:37:12] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:12–00:37:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:17] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
there's
[00:37:17] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:17–00:37:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:23] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:23] Speaker 10
there are a
[00:37:23] Speaker 6
lot of lots in the, uh Diamond Square community that are a lot smaller than what we built on.
[00:37:30] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ averaging about 50,
[00:37:32] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:32–00:37:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:34] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
don't know the number. I don't know what they averaged there, but, they're old but this allows more flexibility in terms of building on those non-conforming ‸ i think this is a good idea
[00:37:45] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I just want to know in comparison to what was already built. That was the reason for my questions.
[00:37:51] Speaker 10
I have to say, like a lot of these lots are part of old subdivisions, existing subdivisions that follow uh prior requirements. And, um so that's why we have so many non-conforming lots. But there is,
[00:38:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:03–00:38:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:11] Speaker 10
are below 50, but they're staying that range
[00:38:14] Speaker 9
that'll fit because of what's presented to us. It'll tend to blend. So, and, uh is this gonna ‸ allow them to be a little more affordable housing as well?
[00:38:28] Speaker 10
The
[00:38:28] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:28–00:38:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:30] Attribution uncertain
that
[00:38:30] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:38:32] Speaker 10
have affordable development. And I think, uh the intention that develop that you just mentioned, it was to be a development project. So it's always the main goal to promote and try to assist developers
[00:38:47] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
that are
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:47–00:38:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:38:47] Speaker 10
interested. Okay, thank you. No more questions, sir. all
[00:38:51] Speaker 5
right Anybody else
[00:38:52] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:52–00:38:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:57] Speaker 5
possibly state or federal assistance for some of this development there?
[00:39:03] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
For the Diamond Square, I have to say, i'm I apologize, I'm not familiar. I don't know if the maybe our city manager can assist in that question because I'm not familiar with that. Yeah,
[00:39:14] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
through
[00:39:15] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:14–00:39:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:18] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
are down payment ‸ assistance programs through uh our generally funded programs. There are the first time home buyers, the down payment assistance. Again, all of those are are are income based and so those same programs would be would be available to whomever uh met their criteria. Awesome. Awesome. Thank
[00:39:40] No voice detected
you.
[00:39:40] Speaker 2
Do you have an approximate of affordable
[00:39:43] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:43–00:39:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:50] Speaker 2
Yes,
[00:39:51] Speaker 6
the
[00:39:52] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:51–00:39:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:59] Speaker 6
I think that gets the, yeah, for single family, thank you. I think that gets adjusted uh annually, but it's
[00:40:05] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:04–00:40:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:08] Speaker 6
price. And then there are there are income requirements, which are a comparison or an average against the uh the uh the uh median income county-wide Thank
[00:40:20] Speaker 2
you. All right.
[00:40:21] Speaker 1
Any further questions before we move out to public? All right. Let's open ‸ up to the public. Anybody like to speak on this ordinance, 12-2024? Seeing no one. before uh Before I open it up for a motion, I do have some items. I kind of did this on purpose so we can talk about the motion right after this. um Whether
[00:40:44] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:43–00:40:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:47] Speaker 1
you all have a copy of this or something that, or should I just provide it to you? Yeah,
[00:40:52] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:51–00:40:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:52] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:40:55] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you'd like to make ‸ Yes, ma'am.
[00:40:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
About six.
[00:41:05] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:41:05] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. Thank you.
[00:41:06] Attribution uncertain
i
[00:41:06] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
can tell you that I
[00:41:07] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:07–00:41:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:12] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
a one. Correct. that I can tell you that was not on the original, but we will somehow in the copying process or uploading process, something happened, so we can correct those.
[00:41:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, I'll just show you. Second and third whereas, as you saw on the front page, right?
[00:41:26] Speaker 8
Yeah.
[00:41:26] Speaker 1
Second and third whereas have have a missing R. um On the second page, section two
[00:41:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:34–00:41:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:36] Speaker 1
text amendment, it says, uh and it's in the second sentence, uh by the asterisks and set fourth in this, but it's
[00:41:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:46–00:41:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:50] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:41:55] Speaker 1
And then on page three
[00:41:56] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:56–00:41:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:58] Speaker 1
section three
[00:41:59] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:58–00:41:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:59] Speaker 1
into the code. Actually, I would like to know what that that word is supposed to be. It's going to be um grammatically, actually the G and grammatically is, oh that's right, it's beginning of the sentence. Grammatically, typographically, and like errors may be, and I don't know what that word might be.
[00:42:19] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I think it's corrected. Corrected. again, you just
[00:42:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
got some, yeah yeah. The R was goofy. I got you. I just want to make sure I'm clear on that.
[00:42:26] Speaker 8
I
[00:42:26] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:26–00:42:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:29] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:42:31] Speaker 1
perfect. Thank you. And
[00:42:32] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:31–00:42:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:42:36–00:42:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:37] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:42:41] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:42:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:42:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
got you. And then the last item is um on adopted on the final page. It'll be city
[00:42:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:47–00:42:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:49] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:42:52] Speaker 1
Right. So whomever makes the motion, if you don't mind, uh requesting the addition of the changes ‸ discussed, that'd be great. So open for a motion.
[00:43:02] Speaker 9
Move to approve with the, uh changes that was requested by the chairman, uh for this project.
[00:43:08] Speaker 1
All right. Do we have.
[00:43:09] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you.
[00:43:14] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:10–00:43:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:14] Speaker 1
get either? Yes. Yes. All right. Any further
[00:43:20] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:20–00:43:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:22] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:43:24] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:43:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:27–00:43:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:27] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:43:35] Speaker 5
for catching those.
[00:43:44] Speaker 1
that's it all right we'll move uh on to the item 4c 24-4 29.
[00:43:52] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
yes thank you yes good evening and thank you um I'd like, I'm Jen Webster, uh city planner
[00:43:58] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:58–00:44:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:01] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the new new board members this evening. And before I get started on, um on this or presence, a presentation for this ordinance, I'd like to draw your attention to uh some documents that we provided to you uh at the start of the meeting, which are an update to the um the documents that were provided on the agenda, on
[00:44:25] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:24–00:44:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:30] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
um but the the main the main difference is, just to point it out, so to to prevent any confusion, is on page four
[00:44:39] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:38–00:44:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:39] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the sections regarding bulk regulations and yard requirements. So,
[00:44:45] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:43–00:44:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:51] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of Ordinance 11, in those sections for A, where it talks about bulk regulations and
[00:45:04] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ The underline
[00:45:06] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
is added, correct. And then the strikeouts are being deleted. That's correct.
[00:45:13] Speaker 9
strike
[00:45:13] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:13–00:45:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:14] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:45:16] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
okay
[00:45:17] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Sorry, the strikeouts are being deleted and the underlined text is being added. So those are the the the the primary uh changes uh from the ones that were posted for you earlier. And
[00:45:31] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:30–00:45:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:38] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
that we will refer to in
[00:45:41] Speaker 4
the presentation.
[00:45:45] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
So this this presentation is uh is a request. It's a request for a zoning text amendment in
[00:45:54] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:54–00:45:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:59] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
By authorizing neighborhood commercial uses on designated lots within the consent decree area, heart of cocoa, and by
[00:46:07] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:06–00:46:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:12] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and affordable housing on existing lots within the consent decree area. The consent decree area as as most of us, if not all of us know is generally bounded by several major roadways, Florida Avenue on the East King Street or 520 on the North
[00:46:32] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:32–00:46:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:37] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Jones on the South. The consent decree area is zoned
[00:46:43] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:43–00:46:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:45] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and multi-family with a future land use designation of low density residential, which is seven dwelling units per acre. The consent decree area also known as Heart of Cocoa is also a sub district of the Cocoa Waterfront Overlay District and the Cocoa Redevelopment Area. So this request is for a land development code amendment to Appendix A, Article 11, Sections 4A and 22 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Cocoa to allow for optional commercial development, neighborhood commercial development, and public parking on certain very limited properties within the consent decree area and
[00:47:30] Attribution uncertain
the consent decree area
[00:47:30] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to support those commercial ‸ uses. to amend the list of permitted and special exception uses and to add specified commercial building types for the designated properties authorized for neighborhood commercial and to amend the lot regulations for residential development. and
[00:47:55] Attribution uncertain
to add to the zoning code
[00:47:55] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:47:54–00:47:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:55] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:47:55] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
neighborhood commercial lots shall be designated in Appendix A in the Zoning Code Article 11, Section 22 in the Waterfront Overlay District Regulating Plan which you have a copy of in your attachments. The
[00:48:09] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:08–00:48:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:16] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
residential use. ‸ commercial uses shall be permitted either in a single story commercial building or on the ground floor in a mixed use building in which residential is the primary use. so
[00:48:33] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:32–00:48:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:38] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
you might recognize. uh And
[00:48:41] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:40–00:48:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:45] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
accommodate a multi-story in our case a maximum of three stories. A
[00:48:50] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:50–00:48:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:56] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
designed for small lot lot sizes. And the
[00:49:01] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:01–00:49:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:03] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
one that's designed for the average lot size. And these are examples of a mixed use building in which residential is the primary use for example. A commercial business shop on the on the ground floor with a residential unit above. And the third option
[00:49:26] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:25–00:49:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:29] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
commercial building designed to ‸ be one story and to accommodate only a single use office and or retail. So the technical amendments that are being made, these will streamline the research process when trying to design for residential development. Sections
[00:49:48] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:48–00:49:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:54] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
on your left, on the left side, is showing lot development regulations. ‸ This is being actually actually deleted and language is being added to now refer
[00:50:06] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:05–00:50:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:09] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Section 22 of the zoning code. These regulations may vary on street location and building type. So
[00:50:18] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:17–00:50:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:23] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
22 of the zoning code. And it's the plan that regulates the front building setback and building types
[00:50:29] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:29–00:50:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:33] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:32–00:50:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:37] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
here blown up on the table,
[00:50:40] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:39–00:50:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:46] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
So here you have the building types. You have estate, house, cottage, townhouse, and then the newly added building types for the ‸ commercial, neighborhood commercial option, which is ‸ commercial mixed use small and commercial mixed use medium. And there's also a single story commercial building type. yes
[00:51:11] Speaker 10
Because
[00:51:11] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:11–00:51:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:13] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:51:14] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
then the the
[00:51:20] Attribution uncertain
oh
[00:51:20] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Let me go back a few slides because I'd like to tell you about the actual back on back on the slide for showing the optional neighborhood commercial lots that have been designated. These are the uses that have been added to the zoning code section 4a
[00:51:39] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:38–00:51:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:40] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
allowable uses for this district, which is a professional services and office gym and facilities. uh As
[00:51:47] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:46–00:51:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:54] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
medical and dental clinics and animal clinics and electronic communication transmission facilities is
[00:52:01] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:00–00:52:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:04] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And
[00:52:05] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:04–00:52:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:06] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
look up to the north of the consent decree area, you'll see uh lots that have been designated for parking. These are city-owned lots that have been designated for parking to
[00:52:15] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:15–00:52:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:25] No voice detected
And
[00:52:25] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 00:52:25–00:52:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:32] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:52:33] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:52:38] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
care is also on that on that on that list. So, um so going ‸ back to the building types, the residential building types uh that's described in the regulating plan and also in the table of allowable building types. uh Below is an example here of of what's also described in Section 22 in the Waterfront Overlay District regulations of the the type. This is just an example of a type of house and
[00:53:12] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:11–00:53:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:16] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that you can see um on item E, it says refer to the regulating plan for the setback, which is the previous slide that we were we were looking at. And then this proposed ordinance is consistent with the objectives of the city of coco's
[00:53:38] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:38–00:53:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:38] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
plan with regard to future land use categories, redevelopment, neighborhood protection, sustainability and energy efficiency, smart growth principles and
[00:53:49] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:48–00:53:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:53] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the analysis of this criteria according to Appendix A, the city of
[00:53:57] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:57–00:54:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:00] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
regard to impact to land use patterns, school districts, consistency with a comprehensive plan as mentioned, as
[00:54:07] Attribution uncertain
mentioned
[00:54:07] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
traffic, storm water and other utilities and public services that has determined that the zoning change will not negatively or adversely impact the neighborhood or surrounding areas. So staff recommends the planning and zoning board recommend approval to city council regarding the proposed land development code amendment to Appendix A, Article 11, Sections 4A and 22 of the zoning ordinance
[00:54:35] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:35–00:54:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:36] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
allow for neighborhood commercial mixed use development and public parking on certain very limited properties within the consent decree area, also known
[00:54:44] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:44–00:54:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:49] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and amending the list of permitted and special exception uses and the building types permitted for those certain properties authorized for neighborhood commercial and mixed use development and
[00:54:58] Attribution uncertain
the development
[00:54:58] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:58–00:55:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:06] No voice detected
Thank
[00:55:07] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:55:06–00:55:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:07] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:55:09] Speaker 1
if
[00:55:10] Attribution uncertain
you
[00:55:10] Speaker 1
have any questions for staff?
[00:55:13] No voice detected
i
[00:55:14] Speaker 9
do Thank you. um
[00:55:18] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:17–00:55:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:23] Speaker 9
this page.
[00:55:29] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that's
[00:55:29] Attribution uncertain
the page
[00:55:29] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:29–00:55:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:29] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:55:30] Speaker 9
Okay. I just wanted clarification. um The yellow, correct me from wrong, uh in reference to what's presented to us, what is in
[00:55:40] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:40–00:55:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:44] Speaker 9
is for the this page that I presented?
[00:55:48] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, the the mixed use, uh the mixed use idea is going to be within the heart of
[00:55:54] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:54–00:55:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:55] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
is all in yellow. Which
[00:55:57] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is all in yellow, that's correct.
[00:55:58] Speaker 9
Okay.
[00:55:59] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And these are options for development, not replacements for the underlying use is always residential low, low density. So,
[00:56:08] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:08–00:56:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:15] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
uh ‸ an additional option for those properties designated mostly on the perimeter. You'll notice of the consent decree area. ‸ I
[00:56:24] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
apologize. uh Mr. Greenwood in the ordinance package that was sent. If you can open exhibit a. because we replaced the package like
[00:56:34] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:33–00:56:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:37] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
the regulating map.
[00:56:39] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 00:56:37–00:57:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:42] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:14]
[00:56:56] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:56:57] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:57:00] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:57:01] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:57:04] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
hold back on my questions and then let everybody else and then we'll come
[00:57:08] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:08–00:57:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:11] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
questions?
[00:57:11] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And then, just to, um also highlight the
[00:57:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
zoning
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:15–00:57:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:57:16] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:15–00:57:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:17] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
the consent decree area. It's not a single family. Are you one seven?
[00:57:23] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Right. But in
[00:57:25] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:24–00:57:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:31] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
part of
[00:57:32] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
its
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:32–00:57:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:57:32] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
residential. The other part is for business, right? right
[00:57:35] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
there There, there, there is, um there are two building ‸ types, um that are described for a mixed use. Which would be the option to have, uh the business on the bottom floor with, a with a residence above where, of course, the residential being the primary use. So um there
[00:57:55] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:55–00:58:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:02] Speaker 8
areas
[00:58:02] Attribution uncertain
as
[00:58:02] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:02–00:58:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:04] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:58:11] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:58:14] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:58:14–00:58:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:17] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:58:20] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
pointed out is just the general zoning, our zoning map and the regulating plan, which is contained in Section 22 of the zoning code is a little bit more is more detailed. It reflects, it reflects the, uh, sub districts of the waterfront overlay district. And also, um, within that it might be hard to see because it's, um, about the size of the print, but it does indicate, uh, there's numbers that indicate setback, uh, thresholds along the lot lines as ‸ well as the label for the building, ‸ commercial building type that's permitted on those commercial lots.
[00:59:05] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
Yeah. And if I can just also reiterate the, the lots that are eligible for this mixed use or single story commercial are only those
[00:59:16] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:16–00:59:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:22] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ Yes. Limited to those only.
[00:59:25] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. Well, that, that clarifies it. Uh, thank you very much. Thank you. It's similar, but I can see where the additions were in this.
[00:59:33] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes. Thank you for your question.
[00:59:35] Speaker 9
Thank you.
[00:59:36] Speaker 1
Are ‸ any further questions? Okay. Then
[00:59:41] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:41–00:59:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:42] Speaker 1
Would anybody from the public like to talk
[00:59:44] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:44–00:59:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:47] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:59:49] Speaker 1
Are
[00:59:49] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:49–00:59:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:51] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. Fair enough.
[00:59:53] Speaker 1
Seeing no one approaching. We'll close it to the public and bring it back to the board. ‸ Anybody have any motions on this item?
[01:00:04] Speaker 5
I'll make the motion. Good. Accept.
[01:00:07] Speaker 1
To approve the ordinance as written. And
[01:00:09] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:09–01:00:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:11] Speaker 1
by Mr. Greenwood. Any further discussion? All in favor.
[01:00:17] Speaker 3
Aye.
[01:00:18] Speaker 1
Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. All right. Get back to the agenda here.
[01:00:28] Speaker 4
That is all of our
[01:00:29] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
new business. So we'll move on to our tree board. There's nothing written there, but if there's any items ‸ like to discuss for the tree board.
[01:00:40] Speaker 9
Is
[01:00:41] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:40–01:00:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:43] Speaker 9
uh, uh, uh, trees
[01:00:44] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:44–01:00:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:50] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Not
[01:00:51] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:50–01:00:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:52] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Even
[01:00:52] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
though they were living for a hundred years, we can tear them down in about half an hour. Any new proposals?
[01:01:00] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
No,
[01:01:00] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:00–01:01:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:05] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
want to mention that, um, the agenda for today ‸ was over 300 pages. Yeah. So
[01:01:11] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:11–01:01:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
trees. We're not printing a thousand, 2000 copies. So if you do require a paper copy, you put your outcome to ask Abby. So here on, we always just going to print the, most important attachments with the staff report. But
[01:01:29] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:29–01:01:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:34] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
happy to provide you.
[01:01:35] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
I understand. And
[01:01:37] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:37–01:01:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:37] Attribution uncertain
handled.
[01:01:37] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:37] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:38] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
to highlight that. That's the way it's been handled. And
[01:01:40] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:40–01:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:44] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
thing that there was a, if there was a request to have, uh, oak trees removed and that was a simple question that I had. If there's none, then that's, that's all I need to hear.
[01:01:54] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:01:54] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
don't
[01:01:54] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:54–01:01:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:55] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:01:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:56] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:57] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:57] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:58] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:01:58] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
in the meantime, the, um, the approval I got from the city manager to join forces with the people in Rockledge that have a coalition going on about the, uh, uh, removal of oak trees that they went through. Uh, there's other people that I'm working with, including the attorney that they hired. Uh, uh, I also found out some information that there's very big advantages, uh, for the, uh, change over to the sewer septic tank situation. And there's, uh, uh, sewage, um, companies that have advanced sewage systems that actually can, uh, be available. That ‸ reduces, uh, the discharge of what we're experiencing with these old septic tanks. That's why they call it an advanced one. And
[01:02:45] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:45–01:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:52] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
removing oak trees. I just wanted to share with the board here that there is a possibility that, that could be, uh, something that we can consider to prevent it being a very big expense for people, because, uh, that way this advanced septic tank system is re is, uh, addressing the issues, the negative issues that we're experiencing now with our existing, septic tanks and this advanced, uh, system is by
[01:03:18] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:18–01:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:21] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
I
[01:03:21] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:21–01:03:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:26] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
that, which I was very glad to find that out. And, uh, that could be something that could save a lot of money for citizens as well as the city, as well as, uh, not being too, um, uh, drastic when it comes to, uh, trees and things like that. That's
[01:03:44] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:44–01:03:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:49] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
The other thing is that we're dealing with a lot of older homes. So I'm talking about a hundred year old homes that are on the river. And sometimes these septic tanks are not in the front of the house.
[01:04:00] Speaker 4
And
[01:04:00] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:00–01:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:04:02] Speaker 4
Really?
[01:04:02] Attribution uncertain
It's
[01:04:02] Speaker 4
the drain field.
[01:04:03] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's that too. It's part
[01:04:05] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
systems eliminate. It's a
[01:04:07] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
lot
[01:04:07] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
of that. Right.
[01:04:08] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And that's part of it. Thank you, Todd. And so, uh, this is a very, um, I don't want to simplify it too much, but I got excited with it because it solves a lot of, issues that are coming up that the citizens are concerned about. Uh, because the trimming that they did on the trees and Rockledge, I went through there, I could see where it needed to be done because they needed a height clearance. And that's what it was. But, um, people were very upset about it. But I think now that it's been done, um, I can see it wasn't that severe. It was, yeah. And, um, that's one thing I learned by trying to become involved. And, uh, when I drove through there, I, I could see that it was justifiable. A lot of people said, Oh, if the waste management trucks, come through or fire trucks and all that, they can just drive on the opposite lane to get here. They don't need those trees trimmed, but for emergency purposes, I can see why it needed to be cleared for the 14 foot height clearance. Um, and, uh, with
[01:05:15] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:15–01:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:18] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
it wasn't as severe as they were concerned about, but we, uh, I
[01:05:22] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:22–01:05:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:25] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
has the same issue. Uh, and of course that's a safety thing, but it's a big difference between major construction for septic tanks. I just thought I'd share that with everybody.
[01:05:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
All right. Yeah. I
[01:05:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:05:41–01:05:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Okay. that's a tree board. I
[01:05:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:45–01:05:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Are
[01:05:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:47–01:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:50] Speaker 5
We are the tree board. But sir, I just like to compliment staff.
[01:05:53] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:05:53] Speaker 5
have, and, um, elected and unelected officials for all the work they do.
[01:06:00] Speaker 1
Yeah.
[01:06:01] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:00–01:06:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:06] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
on whether it be Facebook, um, wherever, um, you guys do a hell of a job, uh, elected and unelected people. And I just want to compliment you.
[01:06:20] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Thank
[01:06:20] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:20–01:06:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:06:21] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:06:22] Speaker 12 (introduced as “Jen Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:06:24] Speaker 1
All right. Any other business? Excellent. Our next meeting is going to be September 4th, Wednesday, September 4th at 6 PM right here at city hall and get a motion to adjourn. All right. Second. Excellent. All
[01:06:38] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:38–01:06:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:40] Speaker 1
All right. Let's get out of here.
[01:06:42] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 01:06:42–01:06:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:46] No voice detected
Thank you.

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T12:41:16 · 6,739 ordinary words, 2,451 in suspect passages, 319 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.