civic record · cocoa, florida
Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Regular Meeting

Date
2022-08-18
Status
City minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #567
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Built only from the City's minutes (680_CE_Reg_Minutes_08_18_2022.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Edward Green, George Brown, David Lightholder, Lloyd Roberts, Sharri Scott, Michael Simpson, Verna Hughes
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Augusto Gonzalez-Ruiz (Code Enforcement Officer), Vince Buonocore (Code Enforcement Officer), Jennifer Nix (Board Attorney), Susan Lambert (Recording Secretary)

Adopted actions (12)

  • to nominate Mr. Roberts as Chair (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to approve the agenda of August 18, 2022 with case number three, six and seven complied and noncompliance case number one complied (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to approve the Minutes of the May 19, 2022 meeting as written (moved by Green, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to approve the Minutes of the July 21, 2022 meeting as written (moved by Green, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
  • to accept Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
  • to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
  • to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner one hundred and twenty (120 days) with thirty (30 day) updates and find the Property Owner in Violation (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
  • to amend Staff’ s recommendation and give the property owner ninety (90 days) with thirty (30 day) updates and a fine of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
  • to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner a hundred and twenty days (120 days) with thirty (30 day) updates and a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
  • to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
  • to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7

Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)

  • $100.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staff’ s recommendation and give the property owner ninety (90 days) with thirty (30 day) updates and a fine of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (680_CE_Reg_Minutes_08_18_2022.pdf, p. 5); fiscal period not recorded)
  • $50.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner a hundred and twenty days (120 days) with thirty (30 day) updates and a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (680_CE_Reg_Minutes_08_18_2022.pdf, p. 5); fiscal period not recorded)

Agenda (the City's wording)

The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_08_18_2022), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:00–00:00:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:02] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:00:06] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:06–00:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:00:12] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
[00:00:27] Speaker 1
Thank you.
[00:00:28] Attribution uncertain
Thank
[00:00:28] Speaker 1
you. For those who have not yet secured their cell phones, please secure your ringer.
[00:00:34] Speaker 2
I'm silent.
[00:00:39] Speaker 1
‸ Madam Secretary, would you call the roll?
[00:00:42] Speaker 4
Chairperson Green?
[00:00:44] Speaker 1
Here.
[00:00:46] Speaker 4
Board Member Brown?
[00:00:48] Speaker 5
Present.
[00:00:49] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:49–00:00:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:51] Speaker 5
Present.
[00:00:52] Speaker 4
Board Member Roberts?
[00:00:54] Speaker 5
Here.
[00:00:55] Speaker 4
Board Member Scott?
[00:00:56] Speaker 1
Here.
[00:00:57] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:57–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:59] Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
or
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:59–00:01:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:01:00] Speaker 4
Member Hughes?
[00:01:01] Speaker 1
Here. Okay. And swearing in of officers, officers, would you please rise to be
[00:01:10] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:10–00:01:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:12] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, to help you guys? Yes, ma'am.
[00:01:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:18–00:01:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:24] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:01:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:01:35] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:01:37] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:37–00:01:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:44] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:01:45] Speaker 7
I will support,
[00:01:46] Attribution uncertain
protect, and defend.
[00:01:47] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:47–00:01:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:48] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:01:50] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:50] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:01:50] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:50–00:01:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:53] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:01:54] Speaker 7
And of the State of Florida.
[00:01:55] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:55–00:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:59] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:02:02] Speaker 7
United States.
[00:02:02] Speaker 6
And that I will well and faithfully perform.
[00:02:05] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:05–00:02:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:08] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:02:09] Speaker 7
The duties of City Board Member.
[00:02:11] Speaker 6
Of the City of Cocoa, Florida.
[00:02:13] Speaker 7
Of the City of Cocoa, Florida.
[00:02:14] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
On which I am now about to enter.
[00:02:18] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
On which I am now about to enter. So help me God. So help me God.
[00:02:22] Speaker 6
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
[00:02:27] Speaker 1
And the next item on the agenda is the election of chairperson. But before we do that, as a point of privilege,
[00:02:34] Speaker 2
I'm glad to see that Mr. Chairperson is in the house tonight. ‸ I'd just like to say a few words.
[00:02:39] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:39–00:02:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:02:43] Speaker 2
And unfortunately, because of our recently voted rules,
[00:02:48] Speaker 1
we have term limits. And we have reached the end of his term limits. But that
[00:02:52] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:52–00:02:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:54] Speaker 1
that he has given us. As I said, decades of service. He has set a standard for this board that made this, to my mind,
[00:03:01] Attribution uncertain
and
[00:03:01] Speaker 1
a lot of many others,
[00:03:02] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:02–00:03:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:05–00:03:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:07] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:03:09] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:10] Speaker 2
Thank you.
[00:03:15] Speaker 1
Thank you.
[00:03:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:17–00:03:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:19] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:19–00:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:19] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:20] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:22] Speaker 1
And on to election of chairperson. I'm here acting as
[00:03:25] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the vice chair. And to replace Mr. Chairperson in his position as chairperson,
[00:03:31] Speaker 5
I'll take a
[00:03:32] Speaker 1
nomination.
[00:03:33] Speaker 5
I'll nominate Lloyd Robert.
[00:03:37] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:37–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:39] No voice detected
Second.
[00:03:40] Speaker 1
Okay, so we have a nomination and a second. Are there any other nominations?
[00:03:44] Speaker 8
Who
[00:03:44] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
seconded it?
[00:03:45] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:45–00:03:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:45] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:47] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:49] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:03:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I will decline that nomination. Thank you. I appreciate it. But as you
[00:03:56] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
know, I will be stepping down to this board every next few months.
[00:04:00] Attribution uncertain
So
[00:04:00] Speaker 1
for the sake of continuity, I'll be fine. Thank you so much. Is there any discussion? Hearing none. All in favor? Aye. And any opposed? It is unanimous.
[00:04:20] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:04:20–00:04:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:23] Speaker 2
Thank you.
[00:04:24] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:24–00:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:06] No voice detected
Okay,
[00:05:07] Speaker 9
as we're going down the agenda, the next item on the agenda is the approval of the meeting for, um, I'm sorry, approval of the agenda for tonight's meeting. I'll take a motion.
[00:05:21] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:21–00:05:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:24] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair? Yes. Can we approve that with the changes of the complied cases on the agenda,
[00:05:32] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:05:32–00:05:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:33] Speaker 3
into the record? Yes, sir. I apologize. No problem.
[00:05:36] Speaker 9
All right. On the agenda, the change, number three has complied.
[00:05:45] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:45–00:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:53] Speaker 9
And on the noncompliance side, number one has complied.
[00:06:05] Speaker 1
Second.
[00:06:08] Speaker 9
Motion to accept by Mr. Lightholder and second by Mr. Green. All in favor say aye.
[00:06:14] No voice detected
Aye.
[00:06:15] Speaker 9
Those opposed. It's
[00:06:20] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
passed.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:20–00:06:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:06:21] Speaker 9
All right. Now we are on to approval of
[00:06:24] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:24–00:06:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:33] Speaker 9
Taking a motion to accept.
[00:06:36] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:36–00:06:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:40] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No,
[00:06:40] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
we had no meeting in June.
[00:06:42] Speaker 6
Oh, okay. It says, sorry,
[00:06:44] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:44–00:06:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:48] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Oh, that's a script news
[00:06:49] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:49–00:06:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:49] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It should be July. Mine says July.
[00:06:51] No voice detected
Yeah,
[00:06:52] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
but it should be July. There
[00:06:53] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:53–00:06:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:54] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Yes.
[00:06:57] Speaker 1
Move to approve.
[00:07:01] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:01–00:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:04] Attribution uncertain
The
[00:07:04] Speaker 9
second. Motion on the floor to approve with a second. All in favor ‸ say aye.
[00:07:16] No voice detected
Aye.
[00:07:16] Speaker 9
Those opposed. And it passes.
[00:07:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Mr. Chairman. Yes, sir.
[00:07:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:22–00:07:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:22] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:07:25] Speaker 3
of evidence and notices into the record at this time. Yes, sir.
[00:07:40] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:07:40–00:07:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:41] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:07:44] Speaker 9
All right. So we're on to case number one.
[00:07:55] Speaker 10
The
[00:07:56] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:56–00:07:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:59] Speaker 1
We have no screens.
[00:08:21] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:21–00:08:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:08:22] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
There it is.
[00:08:29] Speaker 10
We're good to go.
[00:08:31] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:31–00:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:32] Speaker 10
Case number is 210587. Address is a tax ID number 2425074, which is a vacant lot west of 718 Bernard Street. For the record, I'm Augusto Gonzalez, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately
[00:08:52] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:52–00:08:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:56] Speaker 10
and show findings of accumulation of trash and litter, section 6-900.
[00:09:01] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:01–00:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:03] Speaker 10
Weeds, section 6-1001D. Permit required. Appendix A, article 15, section 2A. In total, we visited the site nine times. During the first inspection, Officer Murdoch found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. During my re-inspections, I also found the same to be true. We have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection this morning on
[00:09:30] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:30–00:09:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:34] Speaker 10
We have been working on this case since September 29, 2021, and I've made attempts to contact the property owner. I brought this case before the code enforcement board as
[00:09:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:44–00:09:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:46] Speaker 10
and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on July 28, 2022, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in case 21-0587 that the owner is in violation and recommend 30 days be given to come into compliance
[00:10:05] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:05–00:10:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:07] Speaker 10
The violations remain until compliance is achieved.
[00:10:11] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:11–00:10:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:14] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair, if I can just elaborate a little bit. This is a vacant lot, so there's no primary structure on it, but they put up a fence, and they put up that fence without a permit. There's chronic trash and litter scattered throughout the property, and even though they cut the
[00:10:30] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
right away
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:30–00:10:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:10:30] Speaker 3
at times, the inside of the lot is actually overgrown as well.
[00:10:39] Speaker 9
Now, how long has this fence been up that you can recall or that you have on record?
[00:10:47] Speaker 3
It goes back. ‸ The original complaint we got was from October, and in the very first picture, which I can go back to, you can see that it was relatively new. Probably only a few months old. You can see by the color of the wood.
[00:11:05] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:05–00:11:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:10] Speaker 3
We started our case on September 29th of 2021.
[00:11:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:17–00:11:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:17] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:11:18] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:18–00:11:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:20] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:11:22] Speaker 3
No, it wouldn't be because of the way it's
[00:11:24] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:11:24–00:11:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:25] Speaker 3
the property in the front.
[00:11:27] No voice detected
Right.
[00:11:33] Speaker 9
Take a motion.
[00:11:36] Speaker 2
Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion.
[00:11:40] Speaker 9
Be my guest.
[00:12:03] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:12:03–00:12:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:11–00:12:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:14] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:12:19] Speaker 9
All in favor, say aye.
[00:12:21] Speaker 1
Aye.
[00:12:22] Speaker 9
Those opposed, motion passes.
[00:12:31] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:31–00:12:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:39] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:12:42] Speaker 10
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during Officer Murdoch and my visits and show findings of parking in the yard, section 6-900B9, stolen junkerados, section 6-902B1 and 2, accumulation of trash and litter, section 6-900B1A3D.
[00:13:08] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:08–00:13:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:10] Speaker 10
During the first inspection, Officer Murdoch found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. During my re-inspections, I also found the same to be true. We have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection this morning on August 18, 2022, the property remains in violation. We have been working on this case since November 2, 2021, and have made attempts to contact the property owner. I brought this case before the code enforcement board as
[00:13:38] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:38–00:13:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:40] Speaker 10
The violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on July 28, 2022, and it was sent, certified, and posted on the property in violation.
[00:13:49] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:49–00:13:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:55] Speaker 10
days be given to come into compliance.
[00:13:56] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
or
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:56–00:13:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:57] Speaker 10
a fine of $75 be imposed for each day that violations remain until compliance is achieved. The property owner is not present.
[00:14:05] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair,
[00:14:06] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:14:06] Speaker 3
would just like to mention also, you can see the number of vehicles throughout the many months, and they don't change. There's chronically tires and other auto parts scattered on that property. It's a vacant piece of property with no primary structure or driveway.
[00:14:23] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:14:23–00:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:23] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:14:24] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:14:25] Speaker 3
No, it's a separate owner.
[00:14:28] Speaker 9
The people that are parking on there, they are from the house next door, ‸ I take it?
[00:14:34] Speaker 3
We've asked that question, and it's been denied by the people next door that it's theirs. So we're not quite sure. So we had to cite the property owner, the owner of this property.
[00:14:47] Speaker 1
Are any other vehicles registered?
[00:14:49] Speaker 3
Yes.
[00:14:50] Speaker 1
So does the registration information be ‸ the best of the owners?
[00:14:56] Speaker 3
I would have to walk on the property and get the plate, which I cannot do. I can't see the tags from the right-of-way. At one time, the white pickup truck was parked facing out, and you could see that it was a current tag, but nobody ran the tag.
[00:15:13] Speaker 9
How about the boat? Because the registration number is on the side.
[00:15:17] Speaker 3
I would refer to Officer Gonzalez for that.
[00:15:22] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:22–00:15:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:24] Speaker 10
To be honest, a lot of the vehicles and the items on the property change.
[00:15:30] Speaker 9
Okay.
[00:15:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:33–00:15:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:34] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:15:35] Speaker 9
I'll take a motion.
[00:15:36] Speaker 1
Mr. Chair, I'll make a motion.
[00:15:38] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:38–00:15:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:43] Speaker 1
recommendations based on officer's testimony, accepted photographs,
[00:15:49] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:49–00:15:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:54] Speaker 2
storing
[00:15:54] Speaker 1
junk
[00:15:55] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:55–00:15:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:59] Speaker 2
30 days to
[00:16:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
come into compliance,
[00:16:02] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:02–00:16:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:05] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
until compliance is achieved.
[00:16:13] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:13–00:16:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:18] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:16:18] Speaker 9
opposed? Motion is passed.
[00:16:23] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair, could I have
[00:16:25] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:25–00:16:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:25] Speaker 3
Scott pull her microphone down so that it can be picked up on the recording?
[00:16:29] Speaker 9
Yes, sir. Thank you.
[00:16:37] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
All right. On to number 4CE21-0874.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:37–00:17:00 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:16:46] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
The
[00:16:46] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
property address is
[00:16:47] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
1049 Park Drive. I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of permit required, Appendix A,
[00:17:00] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:00–00:17:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:00] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
All right.
[00:17:00] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:00–00:17:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:01] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:17:01] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:17:04] Speaker 10
I visited the site seven times. During my first inspection, I found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection this morning, on August 18, 2022,
[00:17:17] No voice detected
the
[00:17:18] Speaker 10
property remains in violation.
[00:17:20] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:20–00:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:23] Speaker 10
made attempts to contact the property owner. I brought this case before the code enforcement board as
[00:17:28] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:28–00:17:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:30] Speaker 10
and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on July 28, 2022, and it was sent and certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in case 21-0874 that the
[00:17:44] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
owners of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:44–00:17:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:17:44] Speaker 10
violation and recommend 30 days be given to come into compliance
[00:17:47] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:47–00:17:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:50] Speaker 10
the violation remains until compliance is achieved. The property owner is not present.
[00:17:55] Speaker 9
‸ Are they making repairs, or is they...?
[00:17:58] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:58–00:18:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:03] Speaker 10
without a permit. I educated them, and the property owner actually owns the roofing company. So I provided extensions during a set period of time to allow for them to get the permit. It was never pulled. I double-checked it this morning, and no updates have been given from the property owner.
[00:18:21] Speaker 3
And, Mr. Chair, this was a complete re-roof. They finished the roof over the ‸ main portion of the house, and then on that addition is where they stopped. But they've had ample time to pull a re-roof permit.
[00:18:34] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:34–00:18:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:40] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:40–00:18:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:46] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:46–00:18:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:47] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:47] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:47–00:18:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:47] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:18:51] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:51–00:18:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:51] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:18:51] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:18:57] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:18:57–00:19:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:08] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:19:09] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:19:15] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:15–00:19:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:17] Speaker 9
All in favor say aye. Aye.
[00:19:19] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:19–00:19:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:21] Speaker 9
Motion passed.
[00:19:23] No voice detected
All
[00:19:24] Speaker 9
right. Number 5.
[00:19:30] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:30–00:19:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:38] Speaker 10
Property address is 409 Churchill Drive. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. They show my findings of accessory structure, section 6-1001G, exterior general condition, section 6-1003A.
[00:19:57] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:57–00:19:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:59] Speaker 10
During my first inspection, I found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. But as of my last inspection this morning on August 18, 2022, the property remains in violation. I have
[00:20:16] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:16–00:20:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:19] Speaker 10
And I've made ‸ attempts to contact the property owner. I brought this case before the code ‸ enforcement board.
[00:20:24] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:24–00:20:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:26] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:26–00:20:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:29] Speaker 10
I sent the notice of hearing on July 28, 2022. And
[00:20:32] Attribution uncertain
it
[00:20:32] Speaker 10
was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:20:36] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:36–00:20:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:40] Speaker 10
violation. And recommend 30 days be given to come into compliance.
[00:20:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:44–00:20:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:48] Speaker 10
The compliance is achieved. The amended amount is due to the property owner and property manager removing the violation for accessory structures. Which I observed this morning.
[00:20:59] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:59–00:21:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:03] Speaker 10
And the property representative is here. They've also submitted a letter which is included in your agendas.
[00:21:22] Speaker 9
The property owner would like to step up.
[00:21:30] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:30–00:21:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:31] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:31–00:21:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:31] Speaker 9
Ma'am you're going to have to be sworn in.
[00:21:33] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:33–00:21:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:35] Speaker 11
I'm a property manager representing you.
[00:21:37] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:37–00:21:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:38] Attribution uncertain
Yes
[00:21:38] Speaker 9
ma'am.
[00:21:38] Speaker 8
Can you state your name for the record please?
[00:21:40] Speaker 11
Vicki Yates.
[00:21:42] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:42–00:21:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:48] Speaker 8
Can you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about you? I do.
[00:21:57] Speaker 9
Okay, ma'am, what can you tell us about this?
[00:22:00] Speaker 11
So I was obtained, my services, I received a phone call from the owner. His residence is California, but he's out of the country ‸ majority of the time for work and asked if I could assist him in his problems. At that time, he had a problem tenant, which was responsible for the trash and stuff around the property and the condition of the house on the inside. So once he's secured by services, I proceeded to evict the tenant and clean up the property, removing the debris inside and out. And the flat roof has been an issue trying to find companies that are willing to do that type of roof. Typically, we always try to provide two or three estimates, and to find two or three companies that are willing to do that type of roof has been an issue for us.
[00:22:57] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:57–00:23:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:04] Speaker 11
stuff that has to be addressed. So the issue will be that ‸ I now have two estimates on a roof, and as soon as I hear back from him, he's in Italy right now, so time frames are always a little convoluted.
[00:23:20] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:20–00:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:22] Speaker 11
not going to order work to be completed until I have his funds in hand to be able to pay the vendor once they're done. So I have asked for a six-month extension to be able to get the roof done, get the painting done, and then we'll start on the inside.
[00:23:42] Speaker 9
Have you applied for any permits or anything? You have, you said you've gotten estimates, correct?
[00:23:49] Speaker 11
Yes, I would expect the vendors to apply for their own permitting. I have asked the one company. I have asked the inspector if he had any kind of issues with the first guy that gave me an estimate, and I just got the second estimate yesterday. So actually, it came in late last night, and I saw it today.
[00:24:13] No voice detected
So...
[00:24:15] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:15–00:24:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:22] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:24:27] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:24:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:24:38] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:24:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:24:43] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:24:46] Speaker 1
I would just ask the two
[00:24:48] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
bits
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:48–00:24:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:24:48] Speaker 1
that you got from the vendors, do they give you any idea of timeline?
[00:24:52] Speaker 11
No, sir, because, again, I'm not going to do anything until I have funds in place. We are maintaining the yard and keeping, you know, as far as things being picked up.
[00:25:04] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:04–00:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:19] Speaker 7
I'll
[00:25:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
make
[00:25:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:20–00:25:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:27] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:25:30] Speaker 1
No. 22-021. 409,
[00:25:36] No voice detected
Churchill.
[00:25:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:36–00:25:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:39] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:42] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:42–00:25:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:48] No voice detected
to
[00:25:48] Speaker 5
give the property management
[00:25:51] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:51–00:26:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:02] Speaker 5
So that the city knows
[00:26:03] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
what's going on. I'll second it with discussion.
[00:26:08] Speaker 9
Okay. Discussion.
[00:26:13] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:13–00:26:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:19] Speaker 2
far as all the flame. Yes,
[00:26:24] Speaker 11
sir.
[00:26:25] Speaker 2
All the trash.
[00:26:27] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:27–00:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:28] Speaker 11
The officer can attest to the fact that we have removed all the exterior debris.
[00:26:34] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:34–00:26:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:37] Speaker 11
swimming pool. We've removed that per their inspection and request. So I'm not a slumlord, so I don't intend to continue having that property in my inventory and it looking like it does. Oh,
[00:26:55] Speaker 5
man. There's no pool, right?
[00:26:56] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No. We removed that.
[00:26:58] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:58–00:26:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:58] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:26:59] Speaker 11
That's correct.
[00:27:00] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:27:00] Speaker 5
It is removed?
[00:27:01] Speaker 11
Correct.
[00:27:02] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:27:03] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Are you... Just a curious question. Are you trying to rent
[00:27:06] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it out while you're getting all of the repairs?
[00:27:09] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ No. It's vacant and actually gutted. There was a rat problem. And ‸ the interior is going to also require removing ceilings to get everything cleaned out. It'll have to have new duct work.
[00:27:28] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:28–00:27:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:29] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:29] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:30] Speaker 11
It's going to be a full reno from the roof to the floor. The cabinets, the bathrooms, ‸ everything's... Other than the drywall on the walls currently has been removed. But we're going to have to go further and take the ceilings out in order to be able to clean up what's in the attic.
[00:27:54] Speaker 12
Gotcha. Understood.
[00:27:57] No voice detected
Understood.
[00:28:00] Speaker 9
Okay.
[00:28:00] Attribution uncertain
We
[00:28:00] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
good on that, Mr. Brown?
[00:28:02] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah.
[00:28:02] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:02–00:28:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:03] Speaker 9
Okay. Motion on the floor with the second. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Aye. Those opposed? All right, ma'am. I hope you can... You have some resolution. And please, if you can see them, get a business card to ensure you do... Because that's part of the agreement that you give 30-day updates. So if you can do that so we can stay on top of it.
[00:28:30] Speaker 11
We...
[00:28:30] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Either one of those gentlemen. We got
[00:28:33] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it. We're communicating already.
[00:28:36] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay.
[00:28:36] Speaker 11
Thank you.
[00:28:37] Speaker 9
Yes, ma'am. Thank you very much. All right.
[00:28:51] Attribution uncertain
Item
[00:28:51] Speaker 9
number eight on the agenda.
[00:28:53] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:53–00:29:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:01] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:29:05] Speaker 10
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show the findings of accumulation of trash and litter.
[00:29:14] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:14–00:29:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:21] Speaker 10
Section 6-1003A. Storing outdoors. Section 6-900B11. Roofs and drainage. Section 6-1003G. I visited the site five times. During my first inspection, I found the property
[00:29:38] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:38–00:29:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:43] Speaker 10
I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last
[00:29:46] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:46–00:29:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:50] Speaker 10
violation.
[00:29:51] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:51–00:29:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:55] Speaker 10
to contact the property owner.
[00:29:57] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:57–00:30:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:00] Speaker 10
this case for 107 days. The violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the
[00:30:05] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:05–00:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:09] Speaker 10
and posted on the property in violation. Staff fines in case 22-0180. That the owner is in violation and recommended that these be given to come into compliance or a fine of $100 be imposed for each day that violations remain until compliance is achieved. Leave it. Mrs. Morales is there. The property owner is present.
[00:30:34] Speaker 9
Would you like to step up?
[00:30:36] No voice detected
Sure.
[00:30:39] Speaker 9
You have to be sworn in. See that young lady over there? Mm-hmm.
[00:30:44] Speaker 8
Can you state your name for the record?
[00:30:45] Speaker 13
Walter Morales.
[00:30:48] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:48–00:30:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:51] Speaker 13
I do.
[00:30:57] Speaker 9
What can you tell us, good sir, about what's going on here?
[00:31:03] Speaker 13
Hello, everybody. This tenant is a, how can I say, a troublemaker.
[00:31:09] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:31:09–00:31:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:10] Speaker 13
there, he clean up and everything. He put everything away.
[00:31:12] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:12–00:31:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:14] Speaker 13
Turn around next month, he's back into the same thing. So, right now, he got a check in the back that I told him that he cannot have
[00:31:22] Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:22–00:31:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:31:22] Speaker 13
there. It's not authorized. I'm working and thinking about pulling a permit on that.
[00:31:27] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:27–00:31:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:29] Speaker 13
to have the tenant evicted. I think it'd be my easiest way to do it. So, if you guys give me about 30 days, I think I will solve the problem.
[00:31:43] Speaker 9
So, this is a rental property?
[00:31:46] Speaker 13
Yeah, this is a rental property.
[00:31:48] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. All right. So, you have, your tenant is not cooperating. Well, he
[00:31:55] Speaker 13
cooperates. He's going there, he clean up everything, he has everything perfect, he
[00:31:58] Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized
follow
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:58–00:31:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:31:58] Speaker 13
the rules and everything. Next thing he knows, he's doing it again.
[00:32:04] Speaker 9
Okay.
[00:32:05] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's
[00:32:05] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:05–00:32:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:09] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:09–00:32:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:10] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
I mean,
[00:32:11] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:11–00:32:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:15] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
You cannot have all the cars like that. You cannot have all that junk in there.
[00:32:18] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:18–00:32:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:21] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
And he
[00:32:21] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
move
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:21–00:32:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:32:22] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
everything and you do it again. So, right now, I'm done with him.
[00:32:27] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:27–00:32:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:30] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:30–00:32:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:32] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
clean. So, I just need 30 days from you guys. Hopefully, on those 30 days, we solve the problem.
[00:32:40] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:40–00:32:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:41] Speaker 9
Just, well, trying to get that problem fixed, even trying to evict him, if that's the route you go, may take a little bit longer than that. Yeah, if he refuse, yes. It will take more than 30 days.
[00:32:56] Speaker 12
I'm sorry. ‸ Officer Gonzalez, what about the
[00:32:58] Speaker 12 · Machine re-recognized
roots
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:58–00:32:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:32:59] Speaker 12
and drainage?
[00:33:00] Speaker 10
That's going to take more than 30 days. The permits
[00:33:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:03–00:33:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:06] Speaker 10
get estimates. But the
[00:33:07] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
roots
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:07–00:33:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:33:07] Speaker 10
and drainage is a concern with the property as well.
[00:33:10] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:10–00:33:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:12] Speaker 10
Around the roof, there's ‸ dark spots, as well as the exterior general condition of the property. This is the first time I've talked to the property owner in regards to this case.
[00:33:27] Speaker 12
So, the property owner has not reached out to you to discuss
[00:33:31] Attribution uncertain
it?
[00:33:31] Speaker 10
No, ma'am.
[00:33:31] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:31–00:33:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:33:38] Speaker 9
Any thoughts?
[00:33:41] Speaker 2
What should we do on the time?
[00:33:44] No voice detected
I think it's going to be more.
[00:33:45] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair, yeah,
[00:33:47] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:33:47] Speaker 3
would recommend, especially if he decides to go through an eviction process, I would recommend probably a 90-day change, at least, if, of course, it's up to the board. But if he decides to do an eviction, it's probably going to take a couple months.
[00:34:06] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:06–00:34:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:10] Speaker 3
this carport where the roof is beginning to sag, and there's some rot in that beam that's up there. He would have to do that. So, I would recommend a minimum of 90 days.
[00:34:23] Speaker 2
What if it's 90 days and there are some
[00:34:27] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:27–00:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:30] Speaker 3
That's surely your prerogative? If you want to give him 90 days for this and
[00:34:35] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:35–00:34:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:36] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:34:36] Speaker 3
mean, that's up to you guys on your motion.
[00:34:39] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:39–00:34:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:42] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:42] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:34:46] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:46] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:47] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:48] Speaker 3
That's correct. And if you wanted to make a motion, giving him 30 days to clean up the accumulation and the outdoor storage, but I'll refer to the board's attorney for recommendation on that.
[00:35:04] No voice detected
I don't know if you
[00:35:05] Speaker 5
could request that.
[00:35:07] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:07–00:35:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:07] Speaker 5
he has a lease on
[00:35:08] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:08–00:35:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:35:15] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:35:15] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:15] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:35:18] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:18] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:35:21] Speaker 6
While it's a civil issue between the landlord and the tenant,
[00:35:25] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:25–00:35:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:29] Speaker 6
the property owner because there is case law and attorney general opinions that do provide that they are the ones that are able to, depending ‸ on the way the codes are written and such, get the property to come back into compliance. And on the matter of two separate dates, if you all were looking to kind of bifurcate and split the due dates, if you will,
[00:35:52] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:35:52] Speaker 6
compliance dates, I'm able to do that, of course. It just gets a little more complicated in making the motion and ensuring compliance by both of those type of dates, but it's certainly up to the board.
[00:36:06] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:06–00:36:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:12] Speaker 9
to next month to now, first we give time to get the small things cleared up, and then he has some type of direction by that time of how he wants to proceed with his tenant, keep them there or put them out? I mean, what do you think?
[00:36:30] Speaker 1
I like that. My feeling on that is that Mr.
[00:36:35] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Burroughs
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:35–00:36:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:36:35] Speaker 1
has testified that he's been successful in getting the trash and some of these violations cleared, and then they reoccur, and the cause for the reoccurrence is that the tenant is there. I don't understand how short of
[00:36:50] Speaker 2
removing the
[00:36:51] Speaker 1
tenant he can
[00:36:51] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
reasonably be expected
[00:36:54] Speaker 1
to ‸ clear and clear those violations and have them remain clear. So the root cause is having the tenant, and he has expressed the desire and willingness to take care of that through eviction. I think he's just underestimated how long that would take. So
[00:37:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:11–00:37:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:13] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:37:17] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:17] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
to do an eviction and then clear the violations.
[00:37:20] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:20–00:37:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:21] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:37:25] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice
I would be opposed to tabling it. I would rather go with giving him the 90 days to get the eviction and do what he needed to do because
[00:37:34] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:34–00:37:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:40] Speaker 2
reach out to
[00:37:41] Speaker 12
code enforcement
[00:37:43] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:43–00:37:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:45] Speaker 12
need to do, number one, with the roof, and number two, with my tenants.
[00:37:51] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:51–00:37:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:56] Speaker 12
reach out to him to get this resolved, that him as the owner has taken responsibility. He's dealt with the tenants, but he has avoided code enforcement until tonight. So I think 90 days is appropriate for him to
[00:38:10] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:38:10–00:38:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:21] Speaker 1
I agree with that.
[00:38:22] Speaker 2
I have a question. Is this a condition of the roof? The whole roof has to be replaced? ‸ Are you talking about this?
[00:38:35] Speaker 3
Well,
[00:38:35] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:35–00:38:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:38] Speaker 3
Our concern right now is the sway and the rotted wood that's up over the carport. If you look at the pictures of the rear of the property, you will see that there's also some issues in the back with some sways. ‸ But our main concern is what's over the carport. It would probably behoove him to redo the whole roof, but I'm not his property manager. So our main concern is this area right
[00:39:06] Attribution uncertain
here.
[00:39:06] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:06–00:39:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:07] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:39:07] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:39:13] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Like Mr. Lightholder said, he may not be able to only because of supply issues, but at least he would be able to start the process.
[00:39:21] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
We should be able,
[00:39:22] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:22–00:39:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:25] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
I already went in there and looked at it.
[00:39:27] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:27–00:39:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:31] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
It's a very simple step. That will push the swell that is in the middle of the, above the carport.
[00:39:37] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:37–00:39:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:39] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And then the bin on the front, I already talked to my engineer, and the only thing they need is just ‸ an additional board in the front to just reinforce that right there, and that will take care of that. So it's a simple process. Once I get the guy out of there,
[00:39:57] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:57–00:40:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:02] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
paint the whole property, clean up everything, and I will have a different
[00:40:05] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:40:05–00:40:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:06] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
in there.
[00:40:06] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:06–00:40:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:08] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:08–00:40:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:12] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:12–00:40:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:15] Speaker 13
I mean, the last thing he did was bring a check in there without asking nobody.
[00:40:24] No voice detected
So
[00:40:24] Speaker 13
I had enough of him.
[00:40:26] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:26–00:40:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:29] Speaker 13
So I just get rid of him, paint the house, clean ‸ up everything,
[00:40:32] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:32–00:40:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:36] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:36–00:40:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:39] Speaker 3
Yes.
[00:40:41] Speaker 1
I'd like to make a motion.
[00:40:45] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:45–00:40:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:40:50] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
and from the code enforcement
[00:40:53] Speaker 1
officer and the property owner,
[00:40:55] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:55–00:41:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:55] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:40:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:40:59] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:41:04] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:41:04–00:41:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:06] Speaker 1
90 days to come
[00:41:07] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:07–00:41:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:41:07] Speaker 1
compliance,
[00:41:08] Speaker 2
with
[00:41:08] Speaker 1
30-day updates to code enforcement officer,
[00:41:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:11–00:41:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:18] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:18–00:41:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:20] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion is passed. Yes. Mr. Morales, you have 90 days. You need to ensure that you, try and ensure that you get in touch with code enforcement to give them updates, so we are square with what we need to do and where we need to go from there. Okay. Okay. Okay. Thank you very much.
[00:41:45] Speaker 2
Thank you for
[00:41:46] Speaker 9
your help.
[00:41:47] No voice detected
Good luck.
[00:41:50] Speaker 9
All right. Item 9 on the agenda.
[00:41:54] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:54–00:41:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:00] Speaker 10
This property has no address yet.
[00:42:02] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:02–00:42:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:02] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:42:06] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:06–00:42:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:11] Speaker 10
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of permit required, Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A, Site Plan Approval Required, Appendix A, Article 13, Section 1B.
[00:42:29] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:29–00:42:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:31] Speaker 10
During my first inspection, I found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. I attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case as my last inspection on August 18, 2022. The property remains in violation. I have been working on this case since
[00:42:47] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:47–00:42:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:49] Speaker 10
I have made attempts to contact the property owner. I brought this case before code enforcement board as I have been working ‸ this case for 85 days and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on July 28, 2022, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. ‸ Staff finds in case 22-0238 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance
[00:43:12] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:12–00:43:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:17] Speaker 10
compliance is achieved. The property owner is present.
[00:43:24] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair, for the record, I would like to mention that the property owner has been in and consulted with the planning and zoning department, and he has sent several emails, so he has been in contact with staff.
[00:43:36] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:43:37] Speaker 9
Great, great. Sir, you'll need to be sworn in. Can
[00:43:42] No voice detected
you
[00:43:43] Speaker 8
state your name for me, please?
[00:43:44] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:44–00:43:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:46] Speaker 8
Can you spell that for me, please?
[00:43:47] Speaker 14
A-U-B-U-C-H-O-N.
[00:43:53] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:43:53–00:44:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:56] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:44:00] Speaker 14
evening, Chairman. Good evening. Ladies and gentlemen of the board. This case has been a tough one because I've been trying to follow all the rules and regulations. I am an excavating contractor, and I submitted the proper paperwork to achieve a permit, and I received a topographic survey from my engineer and went to the building department, and as far as they were concerned, everything was fine. I didn't need a permit from them. So they waited for ‸ planning and zoning to come out, and they never came out, and they said, okay, go to Public Works to see if ‸ there's anything from them that you need. So I did. I
[00:45:01] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:01–00:45:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:06] Speaker 14
to, spoke to a woman named Joanna, a lovely woman, and she presented the topographic maps to her supervisor, and he came out and he said, this is private property, you're all set. There's nothing you need from us.
[00:45:29] No voice detected
Now,
[00:45:30] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:30–00:45:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:35] Speaker 14
small shed. In the beginning when I bought, purchased that property, it was to store heavy equipment, you know, backhoes, excavators, dump trucks, that sort of thing. And it's approved for that. And, um, so, so that's what I continued to do, but I needed more space because I started leasing to a, uh, nationwide trucking company that has brought a lot of
[00:46:11] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:11–00:46:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:14] Speaker 14
And
[00:46:14] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:14–00:46:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:17] Speaker 14
for this nationwide company. So I started what was considered just a slight depression.
[00:46:28] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:28–00:46:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:33] Speaker 14
There was no retention pond required, according to my engineer, because there was no buildings on the property. It's all an impervious surface, so there was good drainage. And I have been out there several times during the heaviest of rainstorms. And there is no water that collects in this depressed area.
[00:46:59] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:46:59–00:46:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:59] Speaker 14
they went back to 1994. It's been a trucking business since then, and I haven't changed the business.
[00:47:09] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:09–00:47:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:15] Speaker 14
room for the trucks. And I was going to continue and put a swale along the backside and run down the side. It's what I do for a living. People call me for drainage problems. So, on top of that, the area I started filling in, there's an easement from, on the deed, from FPL that requires me to maintain access 10 feet from the fence to the utility pole. So, I took that as, you know, I'm required to maintain a road or maintain access so they can work on the utility pole or the transformers. So, that's what I did.
[00:48:08] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:08–00:48:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:15] Speaker 14
neighbor next door complained. And she said I was flooding her up. Now, I have people that have been there 20 years and they have never seen any water in this location. So, I guess the problem continued. And I went to, like I said, the building department, public works. They all agreed I didn't need a permit because I was just filling in a slight depression.
[00:48:50] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:50–00:48:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:57] Speaker 14
filling in a slight depression you need a permit for. Route breaking, clearing of land, that sort of thing, yes, you do need a permit. But there's many times when houses have, because of previous contracts contractors back in the day, they were very stumps.
[00:49:21] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:21–00:49:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:24] Speaker 14
there'd be a three or four foot depression in their backyard. And I would just fill it in. And I didn't need a permit.
[00:49:34] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:34–00:49:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:41] No voice detected
And
[00:49:41] Speaker 14
even after visiting building department and public works and they said I didn't need a permit because of this complaint, all work had to stop. So I haven't been able to do anything with the ‸ property or with the fill. and ‸ it's remained as is, but I've been in contact with my engineers and they are working on the problem. But there's been a ‸ shortage of staff in planning and zoning. And as much as the individual is trying to accommodate, it's a difficult situation for her. And each time I take one step, there's another problem added or another request. And now the request for a permit from St. John's Water Management, additional requests that just keep making it more and more difficult. I'm a 100% service-connected disabled veteran with limited resources and I'm just trying to secure a retirement for my wife. I'm 69 years old and I can't work like I used to.
[00:51:11] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair, if I can maybe sum this up a little bit, first of all, we're dealing with zoning. This is not a residential piece of property. It's not a private piece of property. The business that was there before was much smaller. He actually expanded his whole parking area. Under the guidelines of the city, to expand that, he needs a site plan. And he needs a site plan because all parking areas require paving, landscape, and drainage. The problems that he's running into now would have been curbed had he not put the cart before the horse and came in and did a site plan, filled everything out, and had to do. The other problem is the surface that he's using is not approved for an expansion of the parking lot. So, all this would have been answered had he come in and got a site plan in the beginning. So, yes, he's running into problems ‸ now because we're kind of doing things after the fact. He does have to get with St. John's. There was clearly some issues there of where he's put the dirt.
[00:52:17] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:17–00:52:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:18] Speaker 3
but now we have to fix that from this point forward.
[00:52:21] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:21–00:52:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:23] Speaker 3
He needs to answer all of zoning's codes. The fact that he spoke to the business tax receipt technician in the building department and did not speak to the building official or anybody in planning and zoning, sometimes you get answers to the questions that you're asked and I don't know what was asked of her.
[00:52:41] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:41–00:52:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:44] Speaker 3
so it doesn't concern public works And that is true except for the fact that during the site plan approval process, stormwater engineer Abby would have looked in and said your stormwater needs to go here. He doesn't even know where he needs to drain off because there's no site plan to tell him any of that. So basically he just dumped a lot of dirt and created a much larger parking lot. So what we need to do is get a site plan so that he can do things properly and then he will know exactly where the water needs to flow, where it has to go. ‸ and then there may be some issues in the fact that he's expanded the usage and he may have to come up to current codes and not what this property was originally grandfathered in, but that's for planning and zoning to review in a site plan.
[00:53:36] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:36–00:53:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:37] Speaker 3
He just started without going through the process
[00:53:40] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:40–00:53:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:53:40] Speaker 3
now he's playing catch-up, getting engineers and doing what we should have done in the beginning.
[00:53:45] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:45–00:53:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:47] Speaker 3
But at the end of the day he needs a site plan. He needs to meet the stormwater, the flow, make sure that the surface he put down is approved. and that will take some time because he's got to draw up plans and stuff for that. But that's kind of where we are. It's not a residential property.
[00:54:05] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:05–00:54:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:07] Speaker 3
There's things that you can't encroach on. That's what all this would do for getting a site plan.
[00:54:14] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:14–00:54:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:16] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:16–00:54:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:16] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:54:16] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:54:17] Speaker 14
planning and zoning and I did speak to the building department. I spoke with Tori.
[00:54:22] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:22–00:54:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:23] Speaker 14
I talked to and they looked at the plans, and then they waited for planning and zoning to come up like they normally do.
[00:54:32] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:32–00:54:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:35] Speaker 14
with the topographic maps ‸ showing the existing grades and the proposed grades and the swale where the water would go. So everything was outlined.
[00:54:49] Speaker 3
‸ Nothing was approved. No site plans were approved. My emails to you from the very beginning never strayed regardless of who you talk to there.
[00:54:58] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:58–00:55:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:01] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:01–00:55:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:03] Speaker 3
she told you the same thing, and I have the emails back and forth. All I'm saying in front of this board because we want compliance, is you put the cart before the horse, you did all this work, it does need to be approved. Public works does have a concern based on the stormwater. So you can have all the maps ‸ you have but that all has to be put together and then approved and stamped approved then you continue. So we just need to play catch up. I'm not debating that you spoke to Tori and Terry who sit at the front counter in the permitting department, but they're not certified planners, They're not working for zoning and they're not building. and my correspondence with you from day one has always been the same. Get a site plan, do this, do this. Same with Joanne.
[00:55:49] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:49–00:55:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:53] Speaker 3
You really needed to speak to the stormwater engineer who I put into our emails because she's going to tell you exactly how she wants that water to flow and drain. So we need to go from here and you just need to get your site plan and whatever permits they're going to require from you. And you know this because
[00:56:11] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:11–00:56:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:13] Speaker 3
So really what we're talking about is time.
[00:56:16] Speaker 14
And it's put a great hardship on me because I, frankly, I don't have the abilities I used to have. I've been in the hospital for the last three years and it's been tough.
[00:56:27] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:56:27] Speaker 3
‸ understand But my point was that you actually did this. Had you went through this process first
[00:56:32] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:32–00:56:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:35] Speaker 3
through
[00:56:35] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:56:35–00:56:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:56:35] Speaker 3
the site plan. They would have told you what you needed and where you had to go and you would have designed it from there.
[00:56:40] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:40–00:56:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:44] Speaker 3
but that needs to be done. There is a drainage issue with what you've done and that needs to be corrected. And
[00:56:51] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:51–00:56:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:55] Speaker 3
email
[00:56:56] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 00:56:56–00:56:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:56] Speaker 3
a visit with Officer Gonzalez to the property. So she has a lot of concerns with the stormwater.
[00:57:02] Speaker 14
Mr. Lyota? I agree. I'm asked if it was
[00:57:07] No voice detected
Who was the engineer you admired?
[00:57:10] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:10–00:57:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:11] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:57:12] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice
was Kirk Mitchell. he works with he owns advanced mapping and he did the topographic survey showing the existing grades and the water flow. and then I hired a civil engineer and he's
[00:57:36] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:36–00:57:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:39] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
John Herbert. John Herbert.
[00:57:42] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:42–00:57:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:46] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice
May I just say one thing? That on two separate occasions I requested the comments that I was to address from the first review. and both times they had sent out the wrong address for the different departments to go visit and review and I made this known but ‸ that wasted almost 60 days.
[00:58:17] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:17–00:58:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:21] Speaker 14
Thank you, sir.
[00:58:29] No voice detected
Good job.
[00:58:33] Speaker 9
So you need to be sworn in.
[00:58:36] Speaker 8
Can you state your name for the record, please?
[00:58:38] Speaker 9
John Herbert.
[00:58:41] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:41–00:58:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:42] Speaker 8
‸ truth, to help you God?
[00:58:44] Speaker 15
Yes.
[00:58:51] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right, John.
[00:58:53] Speaker 15
Let me tell you the big problem. Go ahead.
[00:58:56] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:58:56–00:59:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:03] Speaker 5
process is at this point you need to do drawings. You need to apply put an application in the city. You may or may not need St. John's depending on wetlands or whatever. You've got to have a drainage plan and approved service to park on. That simple.
[00:59:23] Speaker 15
And what is that surface? Dust free?
[00:59:29] Speaker 5
Yeah, they can answer that for you.
[00:59:30] Attribution uncertain
The
[00:59:30] Speaker 5
city
[00:59:31] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:59:31–00:59:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:35] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:59:35–00:59:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:35] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
[00:59:50] Speaker 15
That's what I have right here.
[00:59:51] No voice detected
You
[00:59:52] Speaker 5
got comments back?
[00:59:53] Speaker 15
Yes. I'm pretty sure ‸ we did, but I can't really tell you if we did or did not. But we submitted plans and we got comments.
[01:00:04] No voice detected
And
[01:00:04] Attribution uncertain
we
[01:00:04] No voice detected
got comments.
[01:00:07] Speaker 3
And just to answer your question, approved surfaces are, of course, concrete and asphalt.
[01:00:13] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:13–01:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:17] Speaker 3
surfaces and it's going to be based on the percolation of what it is. And it actually says in the code that the community services director and the city engineer will consider other types of materials.
[01:00:33] Attribution uncertain
So
[01:00:33] Speaker 3
part of the site plan approval would be to submit the materials you intend to use and then they would approve it. So, of course, ‸ concrete and asphalt, no-brainer, thumbs up, ready to go. Anything else, you have to ask their permission. It's going to deal with percolation. Is it going to push water into the storm area? Because, you know, you've got coquina, you've got dirt, you've got millings, you've got all kinds of substances. Those would have to be approved. So when you do this, that's what you would tell them you used and then they could make a determination
[01:01:06] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
then
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:06–01:01:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:01:07] Speaker 15
All right.
[01:01:10] Speaker 6
Is the, are the comments being submitted as evidence? Because if so, they need to be accepted into evidence and the board all needs to see it and we need to have a copy that the city can keep.
[01:01:24] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:24–01:01:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:28] Speaker 6
Okay. Well, if it's going to be accepted as evidence, everybody needs to see it.
[01:01:32] Speaker 5
It basically tells me that he has an application and with the city.
[01:01:37] Speaker 6
Okay.
[01:01:38] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:38–01:01:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:40] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:40–01:01:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:44] Speaker 5
He has a, a amount of time he can answer these comments.
[01:01:49] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:49–01:01:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:56] Speaker 5
at the, at the board. That's what I do
[01:01:58] No voice detected
for a living.
[01:01:59] Speaker 3
Well, it actually started much earlier where we put a stop work order and asked
[01:02:05] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
him
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:02:05–01:02:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:02:05] Speaker 3
to stop. We didn't start.
[01:02:06] Speaker 5
This is dated less than
[01:02:07] No voice detected
40 days.
[01:02:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:08–01:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:10] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
of December
[01:02:11] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
would
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:02:11–01:02:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:02:11] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
stop work orders, but it kept going and going. And then we had to go ahead and start an actual code case.
[01:02:18] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:18–01:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:20] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:20–01:02:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:22] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:22–01:02:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:25] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
given back to the attorney, the engineer, And then we have a copy that we can put into the record for the, for this case, since it was already looked at.
[01:02:38] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:38–01:02:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:43] Speaker 6
respondent?
[01:02:44] Speaker 9
That will be. Yes, ma'am.
[01:02:46] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you. That's
[01:02:47] Speaker 9
all.
[01:02:49] Speaker 15
So can I have it back for just the next 10 minutes?
[01:03:02] Speaker 9
Now, with that being said,
[01:03:05] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:03:05–01:03:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:16] Speaker 3
So we're looking at time.
[01:03:19] No voice detected
30 days is not.
[01:03:20] Speaker 3
‸ Is not enough.
[01:03:21] Speaker 9
Okay.
[01:03:22] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:03:22] Speaker 9
would say,
[01:03:24] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:03:24–01:03:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:37] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:37–01:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:38] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:03:40] Speaker 3
Because staff is at least satisfied that they've started the process because we were actually not aware that they've actually turned that in. But I would agree with board member Lightholder that it's definitely going
[01:03:50] Attribution uncertain
to
[01:03:50] Speaker 3
be more than 30 days for them to answer these comments, resubmit them. Hopefully, everything will be good. But if there's some more things that need to be worked out, so you're looking at easily 90 to 120 days.
[01:04:03] Speaker 9
I'll take a motion.
[01:04:04] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:04–01:04:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:04:10] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[01:04:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:04:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20]
[01:04:39] Speaker 12
I'll second that.
[01:04:44] Speaker 9
Motion on the floor with a second. All in favor, say aye. Aye.
[01:04:47] Speaker 1
Aye.
[01:04:47] Speaker 9
Those opposed, motion passes.
[01:04:52] Speaker 15
Thank you very much. I just have a question about the grandfathering of the fill. The filling. So you go to Google Earth and you look down and ‸ go back to 1985.
[01:05:05] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:05–01:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:09] Speaker 15
2002 was when the fill ‸ was first placed in that property. All right. And it was... It's been there for 22 years. The client has added more to it. But if we go back to zero, which would be before any fill was on that property, that property cannot be filled at all because it's not 100% or 90% in a FEMA flood map.
[01:05:38] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:38–01:05:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:45] Speaker 15
fill. We can work off of that.
[01:05:47] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:47–01:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:49] Speaker 15
there was dinosaurs and Indians, then we can't fill anything on that property.
[01:05:55] Speaker 3
Okay. And just for the record to answer your question, the grandfathering was what it was. ‸ Had you kept it in that same area, it's a grandfathering, but now you've expanded, changed, and elevated. So that's a question
[01:06:14] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:14–01:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:17] Speaker 3
the planning and zoning board because the ‸ grandfathering is only what was preexisting. You can't expound and go greater than, and then still claim the grandfathering. This is why I think we should have done all this first and got that straight. But I would make mention to that to planning and zoning, and then see if you need to go to the Board of adjustments or planning and zoning, to look at that. Because there has been quite a bit of fill added ‸ to the existing. So I would take that up with them.
[01:06:50] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:50–01:06:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:53] Speaker 3
does not encompass what he's added.
[01:06:56] Speaker 15
Okay. So I think there's like two things going at the same time. One is ‸ code enforcement and the other is a minor site plan. So I'm just wondering, I've been doing this for a long time, and I'm wondering, I'm in
[01:07:11] Attribution uncertain
front
[01:07:11] Speaker 15 + overlapping voice
of a code enforcement hearing but yet we're talking about a site plan.
[01:07:16] Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:16–01:07:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:18] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:07:20] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
city. So we enforce zoning codes, stormwater ‸ regulations. We are the enforcement officers. Now if planning and zoning tells you that you're fine, then code no longer has a case because you've satisfied them. Or if public works tells you you're fine, then we no longer have a case. But we are the enforcement arm for all of those divisions. That's how that works.
[01:07:44] Speaker 15
So if we were to remove the fill that was recently placed, remove it, would we be okay then with code enforcement?
[01:07:56] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
If you restored it back to the way it was before you did it, yes. Our case would close at that time. Then you could start the other process and do whatever you needed to do.
[01:08:04] Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:04–01:08:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:07] Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
if we take off the fill that's recently been placed, take that off, and then keep the property as it was grandfathered in, and let it be as ‸ is. A truck, a truck storage area. Is that, is that, is that a possibility? If you pull it back to where it was?
[01:08:34] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, if you restore it back to like what it was, this is a photo from 2021 before he put it in and I'll submit that into evidence and let the board look at it.
[01:08:47] Speaker 15
So the option is, we could do what I just said or we could improve the property. The client wants to improve it, but if it's going to be impossible because of being in a floodplain, then we want to go back to leaving what it is.
[01:09:03] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That would take care of your code issue. I would definitely go talk to planning and zoning and let them go.
[01:09:09] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:09–01:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:10] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:09:14] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Are we able to accept that even though we've already taken a motion? Oh, that's right.
[01:09:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:19–01:09:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:20] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:09:20] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:09:23] Speaker 9
that. Am I correct?
[01:09:25] Speaker 6
I mean, there's a ‸ motion in a second and this is discussion. There needs to be a vote. I don't know that taking...
[01:09:34] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:34–01:09:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:37] Speaker 15
on this.
[01:09:38] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:09:38–01:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:39] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:09:40] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:09:41] Speaker 3
Didn't they, did they already vote?
[01:09:43] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:43–01:09:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:44] No voice detected
No.
[01:09:44] Speaker 3
Oh.
[01:09:46] Speaker 6
Okay.
[01:09:46] Speaker 3
That's why I got confused.
[01:09:48] Speaker 6
Okay.
[01:09:50] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:50–01:09:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:53] Speaker 9
I thought... Ma'am, you have us as voting, correct? Yes.
[01:09:58] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's what I thought. Yes. So that was my bad.
[01:10:00] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I should not have submitted something after the motion.
[01:10:02] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And, I mean, if the vote's been made, the hearing is closed. So, at this point, some of the conversation that, um, that is being had, you know, you may want to just step outside and have the conversation.
[01:10:18] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:18–01:10:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:18] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:10:18] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:10:21] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:10:25] Speaker 9
because at this point, I don't think that really has anything to do with the board, correct?
[01:10:29] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That is correct. And I didn't realize you voted and she is absolutely correct. We need to have this in my office or via phone or we can have these discussions then. Yes, sir. And
[01:10:41] Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Abigail is the person I need to talk to about stormwater.
[01:10:45] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:45–01:10:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:47] Speaker 3
Okay.
[01:10:49] Speaker 9
All right. So, with that being said, moving forward, we're now down to our noncompliance cases. And we are number two, which is actually number one, will be CE21-0249.
[01:11:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
The property
[01:11:16] Speaker 9
address is 711
[01:11:17] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:17–01:11:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:20] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:11:20] Speaker 10
record ‸ Augusta Gonzalez, code enforcement officer.
[01:11:23] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:23–01:11:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:27] Speaker 10
They accurately depict the property during my visits. This case is brought to the Code Board on September 16, 2021 and is found in violation of protective treatment section 6-1003B and storing outdoors section 6-900B11. The compliance date given was November 16, 2021.
[01:11:49] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:49–01:11:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:53] Speaker 10
was sent, certified and posted to the property. At this time, the property remains in violation and
[01:11:59] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:59–01:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:05] No voice detected · Machine re-recognized
I'd
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:12:05–01:12:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:12:05] No voice detected
like
[01:12:06] Attribution uncertain
to
[01:12:06] No voice detected
make a motion.
[01:12:15] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:15–01:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:16] Speaker 9
Motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye.
[01:12:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[01:12:20] Speaker 9
Those opposed, motion passes. Our next item,
[01:12:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:27–01:12:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:33] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:12:34] Speaker 9
is CE21-0875.
[01:12:39] Speaker 10
The property address is 1040 Myrtle Lane. I am submitting photos that I took during my re-inspection to the property. ‸ They accurately depict the property during my visits. This case is brought to the Code Board on March 17, 2022 and was found in violation of exterior structure section 6-1003A, interior structure section 6-1004A and C, extermination section 6-1007A, B, and E, electrical facilities
[01:13:11] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:11–01:13:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:13:14] Speaker 10
I'm sorry, 6-1303A, B, and C, roofs and drainage section 6-1003G, protected treatment section 6-1003B, and Fire Protection System, section 6-1403B. The compliance date was May 16, 2022. I sent them notice of hearing for noncompliance on July 28, 2022 and
[01:13:40] Attribution uncertain
it
[01:13:40] Speaker 10
was sent certified and posted to the property. At this time, the property remains in violation and the property owner is here.
[01:13:50] Speaker 9
Property owner is welcome to step up. Thank you for being here, sir. You need to be sworn in.
[01:14:13] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:13–01:14:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:15] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:15–01:14:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:17] Speaker 8
Can you raise your right hand? You swear,
[01:14:20] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:20–01:14:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:20] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:20–01:14:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:21] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:21–01:14:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:22] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:22–01:14:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:23] Speaker 2
Yeah.
[01:14:24] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:14:24–01:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:29] Speaker 9
All right, good, sir. What can you tell us here?
[01:14:37] No voice detected
Well,
[01:14:37] Speaker 16
the house has been repainted. The electrical contractors have finished their work. This interior, as far as I know, I haven't looked at the house, but I've been paying to have it done. They sent in the final bill. So, as far as I know, the work is progressing as it's supposed to be.
[01:15:11] No voice detected
And,
[01:15:11] Speaker 16
let's see. There were some other things that came up That we need a ‸ permit to do additional work. And we have a contractor that's going to apply for the permit. Had something to do with the interior structure needing
[01:15:40] Speaker 16 · Machine re-recognized
an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:15:40–01:15:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:15:40] Speaker 16
engineering. an engineer to come out there and look and see what needs to be done. And we have a floor plan where We have an engineer lined up to go in there and inspect the property to make recommendations as far as the additional engineering that needs to be done. And the tenant is supposed to be vacating at the end of the month. She said she has another place to go to. So, we should have free reign to do the work that needs to be done. In addition to the things that were ‸ listed there that I think have been completed. And one thing that we haven't done is the plumbing Because we can't do the plumbing until the tenant vacates. The plumbers have to go in there and dig up the floor. And they refuse to do it with the tenant in occupancy. So, we'll get that done as soon as she moves out. So, I'd like an additional six months to bring the property into compliance.
[01:17:00] Attribution uncertain
We
[01:17:00] Speaker 16
have a contractor that's doing the work. We have an engineer that's going to be doing the recommendations for the engineering that's required to be done.
[01:17:13] No voice detected
and
[01:17:13] Speaker 16
all we need is time.
[01:17:15] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Mr. Chair.
[01:17:16] Speaker 9
I'm
[01:17:17] Speaker 3
sorry, go ahead. I was just going to mention this is a noncompliance hearing. Correct. He already came to one hearing and was given time. So, I always make this little speech when they ask for more time. Staff would recommend that they be found in noncompliance. Then he has no clock to deal with And when he comes into full compliance, he does have an option to come back for a lien reduction and explain to the board
[01:17:39] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:39–01:17:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:40] Speaker 3
to get it done. And then the reduction can be given at that time. But typically on a noncompliance hearing,
[01:17:45] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:45–01:17:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:49] Speaker 3
into compliance.
[01:17:50] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:50–01:17:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:51] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Now, did you understand everything that he just explained? Now, he's trying to give you... I
[01:17:56] Attribution uncertain
think it's unfair.
[01:17:57] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
He's trying... I
[01:17:57] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
understood what he said but I think it's unfair because I... My understanding is is that most of the things
[01:18:04] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:04–01:18:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:05] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice
that were in the photographs and complained about have been completed.
[01:18:11] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well, sir...
[01:18:12] Attribution uncertain
I paid
[01:18:12] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the electrician. I paid the painter who has painted the exterior of the structure. I paid the fellow that did all the soffit work and the roof work.
[01:18:22] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well,
[01:18:23] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:18:23–01:18:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:23] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:18:23] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:18:24] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I don't want
[01:18:24] Attribution uncertain
to
[01:18:24] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
really interrupt you but what he's telling you is this is either a compliance or noncompliance issue. It's not about time at this moment. So, what they're saying is you are either in compliance or you're not compliant.
[01:18:40] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:40–01:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:44] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
to help you with the process after we leave here today.
[01:18:49] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I think I'm in compliance with the complaints that we made. You know, I haven't been able to look at the inside because the tenant is in occupancy but I have paid the contractor for the work that was supposed to have been done. So, as far as I'm concerned I think we are in compliance.
[01:19:15] Attribution uncertain
Mr.
[01:19:15] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Chair? Yes,
[01:19:16] Attribution uncertain
sir.
[01:19:16] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
With respect to the complaints that were made. Now, he had additional work that ‸ he has said that we need to do and we're in the process of trying to do that.
[01:19:29] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:29–01:19:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:32] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice
there and do the engineering work that needs to be done. But as far as the complaint that was made
[01:19:41] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:41–01:19:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:44] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice
recently
[01:19:47] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:47–01:19:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:52] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice
but I talked to the ‸ contractor and he said that they've done everything on the inside that needs to be done. and I can notice on the outside that everything on the outside
[01:20:06] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
but it's been
[01:20:07] Attribution uncertain
done.
[01:20:07] Speaker 16
It's been repainted the soffit and everything has been fixed the roof has been fixed.
[01:20:13] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:13–01:20:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:16] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
if he wants an inspection tomorrow we can be out there tomorrow and then we're dealing
[01:20:20] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:20–01:20:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:23–01:20:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:25] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:20:26] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:26–01:20:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:20:26] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:20:27] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[01:20:35] Speaker 5
those
[01:20:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:36–01:20:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:48] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:20:49] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:20:49] Speaker 16
in town.
[01:20:50] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:50–01:20:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:56] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:20:59] Speaker 16
Well you want to be unfair? That's fine. I think you are.
[01:21:04] Speaker 5
I'd like to make a motion on 21-0-87-5
[01:21:09] No voice detected
and we find it on the block.
[01:21:10] Speaker 16
Second.
[01:21:11] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:21:11–01:21:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:12] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm just going to pass down for the board the fine, it's a fact, the order that was originally which the board's aware of.
[01:21:20] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:20–01:21:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:21:20] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:21:23] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:21:24] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Motion
[01:21:25] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
on the floor
[01:21:25] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:25–01:21:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:27] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All in favor say aye.
[01:21:28] Attribution uncertain
The
[01:21:28] Speaker 9
attorney's talking.
[01:21:29] Speaker 16
Aye. Aye.
[01:21:29] Speaker 9
Those opposed? Motion passes.
[01:21:36] Speaker 16
So you want to persecute landlords? Fine. Goodbye.
[01:21:42] Speaker 9
All right.
[01:21:43] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:43–01:21:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:48] Speaker 9
Our next meeting is September 15th and I hope to see everyone there. If there's nothing else
[01:21:59] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:21:59–01:22:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:22:14] Speaker 1
Thank
[01:22:14] Attribution uncertain
you.

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T10:50:51 · 8,535 ordinary words, 2,500 in suspect passages, 66 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.