Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (554_CE_Reg_Minutes_09_16_2021.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Jim Gifford, Edward Green, George Brown, Kimberly Curtis, Sharri Scott, David Lightholder, Lloyd Roberts
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: none (the minutes record no absences)
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Anthony Marchica (Police Lieutenant), Steve Murdick (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Roberts (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (11)
to approve to the agenda of September 16, 2021 (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve to the minutes of August 19, 2021 (moved by Green, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until December 16, 2021 (90 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staffs recommendation and give the property owner until November 16, 2021 (60 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until November 16, 2021 (60 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until December 16, 2021 (90 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to approve staff's recommendation to City Council and no lien reduction to be given and the amount be in the amount of Thirty-seven thousand and thirty dollars ($37,030.00) (moved by Green, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED 6-1; ayes: not read from the minutes' text; nays: Roberts — the City's minutes, p. 7
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$37,030.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve staff's recommendation to City Council and no lien reduction to be given and the amount be in the amount of Thirty-seven thousand and thirty dollars ($37,030.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (554_CE_Reg_Minutes_09_16_2021.pdf, p. 7); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_09_16_2021), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
206 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 14 voices separated from the audio.
32 short machine repair(s) (36 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 94.0% of 8,575 content words.
Dotted words (168 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
206 passages (20% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:57–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:01–00:01:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:06–00:01:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
got every single board member here tonight. I know. Thank you. Okay. We have an agenda. Everyone should have an agenda in front of them. And I need ‸ to have a changes mentioned or approval of that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:44–00:01:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:52–00:01:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? The agenda is approved. And the minutes of our August 19 meeting, there were some changes that I noted for Darla, and those have all been made and corrected. So unless you found some additional things, I'll take a motion to accept the minutes.
‸ Thank you. And that brings us to our first case. 21-0060.
[00:03:10]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:10–00:03:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:13]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of permit required, storing outdoors, and accessory structure. Storing outdoors has since complied. I visited the site 10 times and found some progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on September 16th, the property remains in violation.
[00:03:51]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:51–00:03:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:55]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case before the code enforcement board,
[00:03:57]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:57–00:04:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:03]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
on September 3rd, and it was sent certified and posted at the property. Staff recommends in case 21-0060 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or ‸ fine of $50 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's not anybody here tonight for the property.
[00:04:34]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
had also on the other side had some chain link that was damaged. That's been taken care of. What's really left is the permit and the staining on the fencing.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:53–00:04:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we accept staff recommendation to find the property owner in violation and that the property owner be given 30 days or a fine of $50 per day be imposed until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:06–00:05:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:09–00:05:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:27]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I spoke to her
[00:05:28]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:28–00:05:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:33]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:42–00:05:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:50]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Property address is 114 Cocoa Place. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case.
[00:05:58]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:58–00:06:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:01]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of parking in the yard, which has since complied. Storing junk or autos, which has since complied. Storing outdoors. Permit required. And protective treatment.
[00:06:16]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:16–00:06:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:20]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection, September 16, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working
[00:06:29]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:29–00:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:33]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
before the Code Board. Code Enforcement Board,
[00:06:36]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:36–00:06:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:42]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
It was sent certified and posted at the property. Staff recommends in case 21-189 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or a fine of $75 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's nobody here ‸ tonight for the property.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:09–00:07:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:07:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
caps or the west end and the east end of the house are where the majority of the issue lies. The tenant that was in there has painted a portion of the front of the house, but the end caps have not been addressed. The gabled ends.
[00:07:34]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes, sir. There's some staining. Some of it may be able to be cleaned, but there's a large portion
[00:07:38]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
of these
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:38–00:07:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:07:38]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And the stack of wood there, is that what the permit is needed for?
[00:07:46]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
There was a beam that was removed from the front porch overhang. The wood that's there, he said, was just wood that he uses to build crosses. But the corner of the house there at the edge of the driveway is where a beam was removed for the roof. And they had done some work to try to shore it up to make it stiffer, but it was all without benefit of permit.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:10–00:08:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:13–00:08:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:14]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:08:15]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I'd
[00:08:15]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:15–00:08:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:17]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:17–00:08:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:26–00:08:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:34–00:08:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:55–00:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:59]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:09:04]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The
[00:09:07]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:09:07–00:09:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
depict the property during my visits.
[00:09:09]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:09–00:09:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in violation of protective treatment and storing outdoors. I've visited the site five times and found some progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. But as of my last inspection, September 16th, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working on this case since June 9th, 2021. And I've brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully corrected. I sent a notice of hearing on September 3rd and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 21-243 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or find a $50 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's a representative for the property here tonight. If you'd like to speak, sir.
[00:10:02]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Well, it's sad how I got the side ditched closed in.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:06–00:10:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:11–00:10:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Please state your name and address for the record and the microphone.
[00:10:20]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
My name is Samuel Wiggins
[00:10:21]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:21–00:10:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:24]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:24–00:10:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:29]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. The side ditch on the side trenches, everything else has been closed in. I closed that in three days ago and we moved all the scrap out of the backyard along the left side of the fence where he was taken. Only thing left I have to do is pressure wash the front of the house and paint it. Okay. And you have a
[00:10:49]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
will start
[00:10:50]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
on
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:50–00:10:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:10:50]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:24–00:11:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:30–00:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:11:45–00:11:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:45]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Samuel Wiggins” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[00:11:58]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Property address is 707 South Kentucky Avenue. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of protective treatment, storing outdoors, temporary storage, and parking in the yard, which has since complied.
[00:12:22]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:22–00:12:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:22]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
visited the site five times and found some progress made on the property.
[00:12:25]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I have
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:25–00:12:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:26]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection, September 16, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working on this case since June 9, 2021, and have brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a
[00:12:45]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:45–00:12:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:48]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:12:52]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:52–00:12:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:56]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance, or a fine amended to $75 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And the property representative is here tonight.
in that, uh, from Indiana that we had to switch out. Furniture. And instead of putting all that on the street, which would definitely put a lot more than what that was there, we put it on my patio to store it.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:15:06–00:15:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
myself I'm totally disabled. And your paperwork, you said something about the house being painted and pressure washed. With me having the only one in my family who lives with me is my brother who has Parkinson's. I have nobody who can do that. I have nobody that I know other than friends that I can get. Who other than having full time jobs. It's hard to get them to come and do the work. So I've been patient and patient.
And to paint it. I have pictures of the paint. That's at my front door right now. Being ready to use to paint the house with. But again. Where do I find somebody to paint it? Especially with these times. With
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:05–00:16:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:18–00:16:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:48–00:16:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
friend. That's. Had a hard time. Getting evicted from his place. Um. He's also a gentleman's been helping with my. Cutting my grass. Helping me around the house. Fixing things around the house. And he's the one that helps me do all that right now.
So he lost his son and his son's wife. So I didn't want to push it saying. I know your son. And his wife just passed away, but. I'm getting hit by the city for this stuff to be done. So again, I'm being patient saying, okay, there's a right time and place. To approach this man to do the things he's always done.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:36–00:17:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's just patience on my part because. I was pretty angry when I got it. The notice. In my yard. Because I'm an upstanding citizen. I don't break no laws.
Okay, our goal, sir, is just to. Just to make Coco look as good as it can look. And your place is not terrible, but it does need some some attention. As I said, officer can help you find someone to do painting.
And Mr. Chair. He could actually go to planning and zoning, which he has not done. And he could fill out their application for the temporary storage box, which would give him a certain length of time in order to keep it. He hasn't done it yet, even though he's had it for a while, but he could do that and then he could get 30 days with that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:54–00:18:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:58–00:18:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
our habitat and those groups that we have and see if we can't get somebody out there. He may not even need painting. A lot of his is a mold and mildew.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:08–00:19:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:57–00:20:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:19–00:20:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Aye. Any opposed? There are none. So the motion passes. Uh, Mr. Ellis. So you understand what we've done here is give you 90 days. To, uh, to get these issues taken care of officer. Murdoch is going to call her with
Um. Thanks to the gentleman here. Which impresses me that he's here because he just got out of the hospital yesterday. Mr. Sam here. And it press me that he's here sitting right here now.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:31–00:21:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:02–00:22:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:06]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:22:09]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of storing outdoors and protective treatment. I have visited the site five times and found some progress made on the property.
[00:22:26]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:26–00:22:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:29]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
inspection,
[00:22:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:31–00:22:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:34]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation.
[00:22:35]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:35–00:22:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:39]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case before the code enforcement board. As the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on September 3rd, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted at the property. Staff recommends in case 21-249 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. The gentleman here to speak for the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:09–00:23:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:15–00:23:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm Ernest Robinson's grandson, which Ernest passed January 15th. Okay. The white truck that's in the yard is actually that truck has actually been towed before. And it's not registered to anyone. And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:39–00:23:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Now the two cars are mine, the gold one in the back. I am getting registered. The one in the front is registered and I am driving. Okay. The house is ongoing with a, you know, in a court case with the roofing company that actually did our roofing. They never finished up with the soffits or anything on the roofing. So right now we're in a battle with them with all of that. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:12–00:24:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:36–00:24:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I can, just to kind of recap in general, the comments regarding the vehicles, we don't, that's not, we don't have a case against them. So the vehicles are fine. He's good with those. It's the items that are just stored out in front.
just around the front there, you can see, but if that's all pertaining, if he gives us that case number, like we've done in the past, we've worked with people that have ongoing court cases to see about them getting it resolved. So we can probably get away with that. It's down to really just cleaning up the whole front of the house and keeping it there.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:48–00:25:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:09–00:26:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:21–00:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then we can review the roofing issue and see what's included in that and work with that. That would give him 60 days to take down the swing. All those cushions, all the other debris that runs around the side of the house. He could just take care of that. If that would work for him.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:46–00:26:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, move that we find the, uh, property owner in violation of the above mentioned violations and that. He'd be given 60 days to come into compliance or a $50 fine per day be imposed until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:17–00:27:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:21]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Thank you. Appreciate it.
[00:27:23]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:23–00:27:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:27]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm sending a packet of documents and photos associated with this case.
[00:27:30]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:30–00:27:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:32]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of accessory structures, storing outdoors and weeds. I visited the site five times and found some progress made on the property.
[00:27:47]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:47–00:27:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:50]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
but as of my last inspection, September 16th, 2021, the property remains in violation.
[00:27:56]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:56–00:27:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:59]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and
[00:27:59]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
have
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:59–00:28:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:27:59]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
brought the case before
[00:28:00]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:00–00:28:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:02]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on September 3rd, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:28:13]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:13–00:28:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:17]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or a fine of $75 be imposed for each day of the violations remain until compliance is achieved and
[00:28:27]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:27–00:28:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:28:27]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:27–00:28:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I do apologize. I'm coming into this late. Um, I'm basically an adopted child to the homeowners. The wife that is living there full time is in almost late stages of MS and pretty much wheelchair bound. Um, her husband is in Abu Dhabi. Subcontracting for the,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:22–00:29:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
plants that they're working on. Um, I come down from Virginia. A couple of times a year. To try and help where I can. Um, she really doesn't have much help until he comes home when he retires in December.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:43–00:29:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:35–00:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:49–00:30:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:53–00:30:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Okay. If you have any question about what needs to be done again, talk with the officer. Uh, they can, they could come over there even if they need to.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:31–00:31:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I spoke with a gentleman this evening. To get a clear view of what was going on. Um, as I said, I'm coming in late. I just found out about this this morning.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:03–00:32:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
It's really just clean up mowing. And once they cut the weeds back off the fence, it's just resetting that fence bar and making that fence. Back the way it should be instead of collapsing. But we can give him 60 days based on those circumstances.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:39–00:32:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:47–00:32:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:00–00:33:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:19–00:33:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:24]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:24–00:33:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:30]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of parking in the yard and storing outdoors. I visited the site 5 times and found some progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance, uh, in this case, but as of my last inspection,
[00:33:52]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:52–00:33:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:56]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation.
[00:33:57]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:57–00:34:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:01]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case before the code enforcement board
[00:34:03]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
as the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:03–00:34:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:34:03]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on September 3rd, 2021. ‸ It was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:34:13]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:13–00:34:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:18]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or find a ‸ $50 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there is not anybody here tonight for the property.
[00:34:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I talked to her, uh, at the very first time I cited it.
[00:34:35]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:35–00:34:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:38]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The time was extended.
[00:34:40]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:40–00:34:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:43]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
yard since. Um, they did clean up, uh, some of the debris that was out in front. Uh,
[00:34:50]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:50–00:34:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:52]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
or, uh, the cars come and go as far as being parked in the grass as well. So,
and Mr. Chair, we've, we've actually had several code cases on the property and they actually did appear before the code board. Um, it was a little over 5 years ago, so it's not a repeat.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:09–00:35:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:02–00:36:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:05]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:05–00:36:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:07]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
King street. Submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case.
[00:36:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:12–00:36:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:15]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
After my first inspection, I found the property in violations of permits required. I visited the site 6 times and then found no progress made on the property and attempt to gain compliance on this case. Uh, but my last inspection on September 16th, 2021, the property remained in violation. Been working on this case since July 15th and have brought this case before the code enforcement board.
[00:36:41]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:41–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:44]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I sent a notice of hearing on September 3rd, 2021. It was sent certified and posted at the property in violation. Staff recommends the case. 21 dash 3 5 0 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance. Or find a $25 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved.
[00:37:04]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:04–00:37:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay, so they did the repair. They just didn't get the permit.
[00:37:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, they did. They did the repair, um, without obtaining the permit. And there was actually a, uh, the, the building official came out for this one in specific and, uh, filled out a check sheet explaining what they need to do, including pulling the permits and it was still repaired without permit.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:43–00:37:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
would be at least amendable to 60 days mainly because we're dealing with a contracted building official. We don't have an actual building official right now. We're in the process of looking. So the permitting process may take. A little bit longer. I'd like to see 60, but it's the board's pleasure. As long as we get a permit on that.
to pull the permit. But because the work's already done, they're going to have to get an engineer to certify that the work that they did do was up to code and meets all the requirements. Um, so that's the way that would work.
reason I have knowledge is because I built stuffies. And the tenant has called me while the hole was in the building and they told them that they needed permits.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:09–00:39:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I would like to see a 90 days because they, uh, that's, that's a vast improvement. Although what was there before. It helps the city quite a bit. We got to work with these people.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:29–00:39:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:35]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is. The property address is
[00:40:43]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:43–00:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:47]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:47–00:40:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:50]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:50–00:40:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:55]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
at which time the board found the property owner in violation of appendix a
[00:41:01]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:01–00:41:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:13]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
intent.
[00:41:15]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
Chapter 6, Article 4, Section 6-1600C, Mobile Home, Parks,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:41:15–00:41:23 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:41:23]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:41:23–00:41:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:25]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
Appendix A, Article 13, Section 6, Accessory Structures.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:41:23–00:41:29 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:41:30]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:30–00:41:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:32]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the owner sufficient time to correct the said violation. Therefore, consistent with the code enforcement board's order, a lien was recorded
[00:41:39]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:39–00:41:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:42]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The lien ran at $100 per day from 7, 7 2018 until compliance was achieved on 7 11 2019. Code records show on site inspections were conducted by officer Murdoch. The current owner is requesting that the lien be reduced to $1,000 due to the fact that he spent money to correct the violations and improve the property and illegal fees to his attorney.
[00:42:08]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:08–00:42:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:12]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
[00:42:13]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Staff utilizes the following factors
[00:42:15]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:15–00:42:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:42:16]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
making a recommendation to reduce the lien. Whether the current owner owned the property at the time of the violations occurred. He was the owner at the time. Applicant resides on the property. Now the property is a rental. The number of violations related
[00:42:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:31–00:42:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:33]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The number of inspections performed was 38. The length of time the property was in violation was 369 days. Property taxes. There's no outstanding property tax bills. Other liens. Records show no other outstanding liens on the property and no water liens. Property inspection on 8 19, 2020. The property was in compliance before the code board hearing. The inspection on the property will occur prior to the council meeting. The current market value of the subject property.
[00:43:09]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:09–00:43:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:14]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
According to the Brevard County property appraisers page. Staff submits their
[00:43:19]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:19–00:43:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:21]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
for this case. Uh, court and appeals
[00:43:25]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:25–00:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:31]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Therefore, the staff recommends that no reduction in the fine be given as
[00:43:35]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:35–00:43:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:43:35]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
city costs costs are greater than the fine of $37,030. Based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took for the property to come in compliance and the total amount of staff and attorney time.
[00:43:45]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:45–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:50]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
If council reduces the amount owed
[00:43:52]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:52–00:43:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:54]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
required within 30 days of the council's decision or the
[00:43:58]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
lien
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:58–00:43:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:43:58]Speaker 7 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
amount reverts back to the original amount owed. And a subsequent lien reduction request cannot be made for a one year period of time. And the property owners here this evening.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:10–00:44:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:19–00:44:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:25–00:44:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:29–00:44:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
make a motion to do something. And that motion is a recommendation to see council. They have the final word. So, uh, you of course could go before council if you wish.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:51–00:44:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city, I came to the city. None of this had to even happen. ‸ I came to the city and I said, whatever the violation is, tell me what I'm doing wrong. I will correct it. I'll do right. They said, okay, well, can we come out and check out the property in good faith? I said, yes, I'm trying to resolve the issue, even though you didn't have to come out. So when they came out, uh, that's when they. They hit me for every violation that they could find while they were on property when I was trying to resolve the issue.
well, I, I consulted attorneys and they told me that they felt that they believe that I was right. And that I was in the right. There was three different attorneys that told me that.
the back. Um, that was a rental before I even moved in there. And the realtor told me that I could rent that out separately. So I thought that it was okay. I didn't.
That lasted three hours or so. We heard testimony, testimony from experts. The board made their ruling. Um, the decision was challenged. They came back to stay the fine. That was challenged. It that's all been heard and went ‸ through. Um. I mean, that's where we are. The tiny house was a violation. The, you know, we already handled everything as far as the existing rental in the back. That's all been heard. It's also been held up in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:32–00:47:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And he needs a reduction. However, the city's ‸ cost exceeds. His fine by 40,000. Plus dollars. So that's why staff is recommending. We should be entitled to receive our costs. And his fine doesn't even meet that. So we're just stating that he should not receive a reduction at this time.
I also want to say that when I applied for the permit. ‸ For the structure to be there, um, I told her exactly what was going on that structure or on the ‸ concrete slab that was poured and she told me that was okay.
Um, it was my recollection that they were fighting everything that the city, um, was stating was a violation. And when the, after the board made its decision, they appealed, which they certainly have a right to appeal. And then the, the, they lost on the appeal and then they appealed from that appeal. So, um, there's quite a bit of out of pocket expenses that the city has incurred, not just with the code enforcement staff, but with our office as well. Um, our bill is submitted. Our bill doesn't even include the time for the, the, the time involved with our office preceding the appeal. ‸ It doesn't even include the code enforcement board time on here. So the 70 something thousand dollars is staff time and the time of our office just on the appeal part of it.
It's pricey. Um, ‸ all the issues that he is raising now, they were resolved. Um, they were resolved by the code board. They were resolved by the appellate court. So those are done. Those are done issues.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:12–00:50:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:21–00:50:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:32–00:50:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I recall you're being here. I was chairman of the board at that time and the board members comments are accurate. Uh, because at that original. Code board meeting, uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:27–00:51:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. You'll have to take that up with them. I mean, maybe you have to go and, uh, sue your attorneys. I, I don't know, but, but the city has, has a tremendous expenditure involved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:44–00:51:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Like I told them whatever I'm doing wrong, I'll fix it. And they said, well, can we come out and take a look at the property? I said, sure, come out and that's when they took the opportunity to hit me with every violation. So that's why I fought it.
Yeah, question. I'm just trying to get some clarification. How many violations were there before you even came? Because for you to come, there had to be some violations served to you. So, because here it says, um, there are four violations. But how many violations were there before you came?
was that I, my rental in the back, like, um, that's what made me decide, okay, well, I, you know, like, that helps me. Pay for my parents health insurance. It helps me pay for the home.
Um, so I don't see, and they were also reported and never stopped. And I don't understand that either or why. Um, when we sat down in one of the meetings, I gave a list of every other home in the neighborhood. That was doing the exact same thing because I spoke to them.
I have a license from the city of Coco and. Well, during our meetings, information was never divulged of how I come into compliance in order to rent my property and do it the right way. I found out the very hard way, which was to take. Take you guys to court.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:07–00:54:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:27–00:54:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:33–00:54:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:36–00:54:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:44–00:54:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:53–00:54:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:11–00:55:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If he would have moved the RV, maybe nobody would have ever known it was a bed and breakfast or a rental in the back. But unfortunately, because we had to go out there, that's what happened. But again, that's kind of a moot point. That was what the violation
I'd like to make a motion, but before I do, I'd just like to say that this has been litigated, litigated again and decided by the courts. And it's not the place of this board
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:56:00–00:56:09 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:09–00:56:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that of the courts. So based on that and based on the idea that you've shown us on no indication or evidence that you've done anything that you can do to mitigate the money that you've spent with regard to this, I move that in this lead reduction request for 2607 Indian River Drive, case 17907, that the board recommend to city council to deny the reduction.
One opposed? Yes. Okay. So noted. Motion is passed. That recommendation will go to city council and the secretary can tell you, can notify you when that council meeting will be. So if you wish to appear before them,
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:33–00:57:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:20–00:58:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording