Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (370_CE_Reg_Minutes_10_21_2021.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Jim Gifford, Edward Green, George Brown, David Lightholder, Lloyd Roberts, Demetrius Thomas
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: Kimberly Curtis, Sharri Scott
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Anthony Marchica (Police Lieutenant), Steve Murdick (Code Enforcement Officer), Augusto Gonzalez-Ruiz (Code Enforcement Officer), Gerald Pettengill (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Adopted actions (15)
to approve to the agenda of October 21, 2021 (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve to the minutes of September 16, 2021 (moved by Green, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to amend Staff's recommendation and table and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner (60 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to amend Staff's recommendation and table this case and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to amend Staff's recommendation and table this case and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Roberts, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_10_21_2021), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
240 suspect passage(s) marked in place.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 17 voices separated from the audio.
22 short machine repair(s) (35 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 88.8% of 9,189 content words.
Dotted words (264 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
240 passages (30% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:57–00:00:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:12–00:01:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:21–00:01:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:29–00:01:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Okay. Everyone should have an agenda for tonight's meeting. And I have some changes to note for the record. Item number one has complied. Item number two has complied.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:00–00:02:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:19–00:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:53–00:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:08–00:03:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the agenda is approved. And the minutes of our September 16 meeting, hopefully they've all been reviewed. Any changes to be noted there or updates? Hearing none, I'll take
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:31–00:03:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:01–00:04:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For the record, my name is Augusto Gonzalez, Code Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:18–00:04:30 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:30–00:04:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
file. During my follow-ups and re-inspections, I found the property in violation of roofs and drainage and parking in the yard. I visited the site five times and found no progress made on this property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on today, 10 21 2021 the property remains in violation. The case has been open since May 10th to 2021 and brought this case before Code Enforcement Board as violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on October 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case number
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:14–00:05:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:19–00:05:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:23–00:05:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:04–00:06:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:36–00:06:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:44–00:06:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:08–00:07:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After the first inspection conducted by Officer
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:21–00:07:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I assumed the inspection duties and case file. During my follow-ups and re-inspections, I found the property in violation of accumulation of trash and litter, parking in the yard, and storing outdoors. I visited the site seven times and found some progress made on the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:46–00:07:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
before, Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on October 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in this case, number 210174, if the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:07–00:08:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:39–00:08:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:58–00:09:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:11–00:09:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:36–00:09:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:54–00:09:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. It was uh one of the initial issues and then there was tags that were, uh when Officer Murdoch was working it I believe the older vehicle, the Cadillac, didn't have current tags. That got fixed, but then they got moved to the other side of the yard.
officer will have to come and inspect uh in order to clear the case. That'sthat's the way this works. uh we Not that we don't believe you when you say you've done it, but uh we have to we have to verify
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:38–00:10:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
see what's in the notices with storing ‸ junk and autos, accumulation of trash and storing outdoors. Those are the three violations I see in the paperwork. The
current violations were that the biggest concern, especially was the accumulation of trash and outside storage. uh The parking in the yard, I explained to the homeowner ‸ attempted to, uh or I'm sorry,
that was left because of their parking family size, it would be okay there. So that I may have taken it off the final notice because of that. I'd have to double check it. I might haveaadministrative error on my side. But the biggest issue was the trash that was there and initially was the car parts. That was moved.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:11:42–00:11:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:50–00:11:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:08–00:12:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like I explained on the phone though, the biggest issue was the trash and debris that was in the outside storage. There can't be any outside storage. And then there was also junk and trash there.
staff will table this case until next month and allow Officer Gonzalez to meet with Mr. Morales and they can look at the property and go over what the violations are.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:13:00–00:13:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:08–00:13:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:19–00:13:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Aye. aye Any opposed? Motion passed. This item's tabled. we'll uh If everything's cleared, you won't even need to come back next month, but if it's not cleared, then you'll be seeing us again. Thank you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:45–00:13:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the record i'm steve murdoch code enforcement officer i'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case photos accurately depict the property during my visits After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of boarded up windows and protective treatment. The vehicle has since ‸ been abated. I visited the site seven times and found some progress made on the property.
inspection, October 21st, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working on this case since August 10th, 2021, and have brought this case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on October 1st, 2021, and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:53–00:14:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh which she had boarded up because he was leaving. uh But then the uh uh you know about the hurricane situation, I explained the 30-day requirement. uh They started to take the boards off the one side of the house,
And there's also some mold and mildew staining, like you can see behind that wood around throughout the house. Probably could be pressure cleaned. Yes.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:57–00:16:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:12–00:16:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:22–00:16:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
549, uh duplex on peach tree Street. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of accessory structures, accumulation of trash and litter, storing outdoors, and then appendix, appendix A, article 11 related to business in a residential district. i visited ‸ site seven times and found no progress made on the property.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:51–00:17:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:05–00:18:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:07–00:18:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:15–00:18:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:38–00:18:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:42–00:18:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:03–00:19:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of storing outdoors and accumulation of trash and litter. I visited the site seven times and found no progress on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:32–00:19:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:37–00:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:51–00:19:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:05–00:20:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:23–00:20:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:20:28–00:20:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:36–00:20:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:44–00:20:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:53–00:21:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:01–00:21:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:18–00:21:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:24–00:21:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
took during my inspections of the property. They accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of Section 6-205, Standard Fire Prevention and Life Safety Codes.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:42–00:21:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
visited the site five times. I have found some progress made on the property. I have spoken to both owners regarding the violations on the property and the ways to correct them. I have granted an extension on the property in an attempt to resolve the case. After actively working the case, I find the property is still in non-compliance and I'm bringing this board to the case this case to the board to resolve. I sent the notice of hearing on October 6th, 2021. It was posted to the property and sent via certified mail.
uh Yeah, that'd be a good idea. Let's Would you, would you, we're not really familiar with how, ‸ the fire department works and what you're looking at.what
Absolutely. So the, uh section 6205 references the Florida Fire Prevention Code. through the Florida Fire Prevention Code, it's split up into, multiple chapters. The, uh primary violation on this property is, uh electrical. um the picture here right now is a live electrical conduit missing covers and secured via rope to the wall, which is in violation of the National Electric Code. Additionally, there are several exits blocked throughout the building and insufficient emergency lighting was found such in that picture. The exit signage that's supposed to be illuminated with a battery backup is not functional.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:48–00:24:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:55–00:24:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:00–00:26:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:26:08–00:26:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; words the first reading may have missed · 00:26:45–00:26:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:59–00:27:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
um There is one item that we are waiting for another electrician to come in and into a school one of these um exit signs. The other ones, we got them working. They were working. They're old. They do need to be, should they be placed but they do work. I am not familiar with that one. I will tell you I'm not sure which part of the shop
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:24–00:27:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:27:46–00:27:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:50–00:28:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:15–00:28:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:36–00:28:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:57–00:28:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:11–00:29:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:27–00:29:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:32–00:29:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Before 30 days pass, you want‸ when you're fairly sure everything is done, then contact the fire inspector to come back and re-inspect. and he can sign off that everything's done and you'll be ‸ cleared up. all
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:20–00:30:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
took during my inspections of the property. They accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of section 6-205, standard fire prevention and life safety codes. I've visited this site six times and I have found some progress on the property. I've spoken to the tenant regarding the violations on the property and ways to correct them.
in an attempt to resolve the case. After actively working the case, I find that this property is still in non-compliance and bringing this case to the board to resolve. ‸ sent the notice of hearing on October 6, 2021. It was sent through certified mail and posted to the property. when working on this case
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:05–00:31:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
after the violations have not been resolved. Staff recommends in case FD 2021-002 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of 150 per day be imposed until while the violations remain until compliance is achieved
we we still need more information on what the violations are and thethe photos aren't dated. So, i we don't know what like what was the before and what's the after. We don't know if anything's been changed. Are these dated today? These
because it had gone past three re-inspections, I informed the tenant here it had to go to Code Board. If he was going to get everything corrected before the Code Board hearing, he did have ample opportunity to call me before it came to the hearing.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:34–00:32:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:44–00:33:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:43–00:33:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:49–00:34:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:36–00:34:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
um for both of those larger breaker boxes that I had to make. uh Since a lot of stuff is so old, ‸ we're trying to uh figure out a way to make it work.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:35:12–00:35:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:24–00:35:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:30–00:35:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Chair, I'd just like to say that uh I think it's important that the fire inspector has the opportunity to go in and re-inspect so that we have uh ‸ current testimony as to what the status of the uh property is. So can we ensure that the fire inspector gets an opportunity to lay eyes on it so that we can get accurate testimony?
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:36:11–00:36:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:39–00:36:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:55–00:37:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:37:06–00:37:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:34–00:37:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:41–00:38:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
took during my inspections of the property. They accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of Section 6-205, Standard Fire Prevention and Life Safety Codes. I've visited this site five times, and I have found some progress made on the property. I've spoken to the representative regarding the violations on the property
in an attempt to resolve the case. After actively working this case, I find that the property is still in non-compliance and I'm bringing this case to the board to resolve. I sent the notice of hearing on October 6, 2021. It was sent through certified mail to the property owner and posted to the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:44–00:38:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:00–00:39:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:16–00:39:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
fire alarm control panel that monitors the sprinkler system and the smoke detectors throughout the property that currently has no power to it. As of this day, a permit has not been pulled by a licensed fire alarm contractor to replace the panel. With a panel like that not having power and
panel showing a trouble in the supervisory, which is indicating an electrical issue. When a panel shows multiple error codes like that, one is not able to verify the integrity of the panel that it's transmitting the emergency signals as it ‸ should. The other pictures are of fire sprinkler and fire extinguisher tags. The fire extinguisher tags should be certified annually. The one pictured was not certified since early 2019.
Red tag on a fire sprinkler system indicates a critical uh deficiency that the system is impaired to the point where it may not work in the event of an emergency. And a yellow tag indicates that there is an ‸ issue with the system that needs to be resolved immediately that may lead to a red tag.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:12–00:41:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:22–00:41:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the initial issue is when I walked in in October of last year. Nobody had notified me of that, and there was no manager previously for several months. um When I got onto the property, um since then, the management company has changed three times, so it delayed it. Right now, the only thing pending is the panel. And when we received it and they went to install it,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:35–00:42:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:40–00:42:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:02–00:43:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:43:10–00:43:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:23–00:43:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:26–00:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:50–00:43:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
report from FLSA stating that they've come out and changed all the red tags back to green. They were red tagged due to painted fire sprinkler heads. There were 21 different sprinkler heads that needed to be changed. I replaced all 21 of them plus three siren horns and a,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:09–00:44:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:44:15–00:44:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that does require a building permit that has to be applied for and approved and released before the work is done i did notify uh y'all in writing when i originally wrote that the panel had lost power that it does require a permit to be replaced okay
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:51–00:44:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:58–00:44:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:00–00:45:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:28–00:45:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay, Mr. Chair, just for the record, I'd like to ask the fire inspector to provide the dates that he took these photographs, so we can document that for the record and for the minutes.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:11–00:46:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:34–00:46:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:37–00:46:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in August, it's not like we have a bad relationship. We have a wonderful relationship. Unfortunately, the management before WRH was just horrible. I mean,
Okay. Well, it sounds like you're moving forward and your people that are installing ‸ the equipment are responsible for pulling the permit. The only reason we want to extend that time of it is to give uh time for the permit to actually get pulled. um ‸ I need a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:46–00:47:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this This case number will not have any photos. This case is in violation of Section 6-208, Fire Prevention Fees. um I originally visited the site for a fire inspection, which resulted in a fee on
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:41–00:48:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:46–00:48:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:07–00:49:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:18–00:49:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Chair, just so you guys um kind of have an idea, they they're doing this like we do our business tax receipts. It's a required fee that they have to pay. And if they don't, it's not established. So what he's asking is like when we bring our business tax receipts that people do not renew,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:42–00:49:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:55–00:49:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:12–00:50:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:21–00:50:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:44–00:50:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:53–00:50:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which it establishes a fee schedule for fire inspections based on the amount of inspections and if the violations are corrected or not during the inspections.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:09–00:51:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:26–00:51:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:32–00:51:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, the code does not establish a penalty for non-payment So that's why I brought it to in front of the board to recommend that a fee be added to this non-payment
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:05–00:52:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
no. I'm not saying ‸ I'm saying. um I believe they were looking at it like we do our business tax. But today he can ask his board to find that they pay a re-inspection fee of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:36–00:52:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:52:44–00:52:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:09–00:53:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:22–00:53:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:38–00:53:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:54–00:53:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:09–00:54:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:21–00:54:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:54–00:54:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the Code
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:02–00:55:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
1st, 2021. And it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation. And there's no representative here tonight for the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:37–00:55:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:52–00:55:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
storing outdoors, and permit required. Compliance date was set for September 19th, 2021. I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on October 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation, and there's nobody here tonight.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:52–00:56:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:00–00:57:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ the front, the I believe the business that was doing the tires has now left. They've taken down their signage. uh but the property is still in the violation of the other items. ‸ The, uh the time outdoor storage and the permit for their, uh uh equipment and all they put in back.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:03–00:58:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:10–00:58:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:28–00:58:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Property address is 1011 Montclair Road. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was brought before the Code Enforcement Board on August
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:48–00:58:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2021. and was found in violation of accessory structures, protective treatment, and weeds. Compliance date was set for September 19th. I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on October 1st, 2018.
it'sIt's supposed to be vacant. There's no water service uh vehicle did uh show up at the property. uh Nobody's coming out of the house, however. um The grass was actually abated by our contractor um because it had gotten so bad. uh Although they're still it's already getting high again in the back. uh But no sir, nobody's supposed to be living there.
I originally didn't, but I would just like to inform the board. um Having the fire inspector bring cases. ‸ We did that once before with Mr. Nick Gary. It's always a trying thing because
want to discuss that with him in his code. It does say you can cite the business owner, but in chapter 162, it says you also have to cite the property owner that they're ultimately responsible. So it may ‸ be a case of noticing the business and sending a copy to the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:19–01:01:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:01:26–01:01:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:35–01:01:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:46–01:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:50–01:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:56–01:03:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
already made a motion. uh Gave 30 days to correct the problems. And at the end of 30 days... Before the end of 30 days, You need to speak with the officer anyway to indicate that everything is taken care
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 01:03:59–01:04:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:04:45–01:04:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording