Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (249_CE_Reg_Minutes_11_18_2021.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Jim Gifford, Edward Green, George Brown, David Lightholder, Kimberly Curtis, Sharri Scott
Arrived after the roll: Lloyd Roberts (the minutes note: “arrived at 6:15”)
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: Demetrius Thomas, Jocelyn Scott
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Jeff Taylor (Police Corporal), Steve Murdick (Code Enforcement Officer), Augusto Gonzalez-Ruiz (Code Enforcement Officer), Gerald Pettengill (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Adopted actions (13)
to approve to the agenda of November 18, 2021 (moved by Green, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve to the minutes of October 21, 2021 (moved by Curtis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staffs recommendation and table this case and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to amend Staff's recommendation and table this case and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Roberts, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to approve staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand two hundred twenty- seven dollars and thirty-nine cents ($2,227.39) (moved by Brown, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
Motions for which no result was read from the minutes' text (1)
to not have a meeting in December. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business (moved by Roberts, seconded by Curtis); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the City's minutes, p. 9
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$2,227.39 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand two hundred twenty- seven dollars and thirty-nine cents ($2,227.39)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (249_CE_Reg_Minutes_11_18_2021.pdf, p. 8); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_11_18_2021), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
187 suspect passage(s) marked in place.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 14 voices separated from the audio.
14 short machine repair(s) (19 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.8% of 7,065 content words.
Dotted words (148 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
187 passages (25% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:57–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:13–00:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:25–00:01:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:33–00:01:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:49–00:01:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:50]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:09–00:02:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:17–00:02:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:43–00:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:35–00:03:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:52–00:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
OK, and the next change would be item number seven, which is complied. And number eight has complied. Number nine has complied. And number 10 has complied. Number 12 also complied. Number 13 complied. Number 15 complied.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:00–00:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:27–00:05:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:32–00:05:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:53–00:05:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:03–00:06:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:08–00:06:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:26–00:06:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the agenda is ‸ approved. And you have before you the minutes of our October 21st meeting. Are there any changes or amendments to be made there? Hearing none, I will take a motion to approve.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:56–00:06:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:14–00:07:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:18–00:07:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The property address is 215 Riverside Drive. The code enforcement board held a public hearing on April 18th, 2019, at which time the board found the owner Parkside properties LLC in violation of the following. Permits required. Handrails and guardrails and protective treatment. The code enforcement board provided the owner time to correct the said violations. Therefore, consistent with code enforcement boards order. A lien was started against the property effective ‸ May 19th, 2019 and the lien ran at $75 per day from May 19th, 2019 until compliance was achieved on September 2nd, 2021.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:38–00:08:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:45–00:08:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be reduced to staff's costs. Staff utilizes the following factors and making recommendations to reduce the lien. Whether the current applicant owned the property at the time of the violation occurred. Yes. Number of violations related to the subject
was 3. The number of inspections on the property performed was 26. We also consider the length of time the property was in violation before correction. And there was no previous code violations. Property taxes for 2020 are paid the tax bills for 2021
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:19–00:09:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:45–00:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:51–00:09:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 00:09:58–00:10:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:10:08–00:10:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:57–00:11:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
little difficult to try to find staff here, people here to get everything in compliance. He's done as best as he can. I've been working with Mr. Bunt to make sure as soon as I got involved, we
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:12–00:11:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to get everything in compliance as fast as possible. So we're requesting the $2,227.39. We want to make sure the city's made whole with the cost, obviously, but the $62,000 obviously is a substantial amount of money.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:26–00:11:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He wants to come from Maine and buy more property in Brevard and improve it and, you know, bring more business to Brevard County. So we're hoping that the city will work with us in reducing this linked cost.
Well, the only thing I didn't mention yet that I want you to be aware of for sure is that what ‸ the board recommends, what the staff recommends, the board votes on, but ‸ ours is a recommendation to city council. So this will be heard one more time ‸ at a city council meeting. You're welcome to attend that meeting if you wish. But that's entirely up to you. And the secretary will notify you when that meeting is going to occur.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:28–00:12:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:44–00:13:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:56–00:13:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:39–00:14:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:46–00:14:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:15:05–00:15:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:32–00:15:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That the board accepts stack staff recommendations that the property owner be found in violation of the three violations noted and a fine of $75 per day be imposed until the compliance is achieved.
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. At my first inspection, I found the property in violation of protective treatment and storing junker autos. I visited the site eight times and found some progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:55–00:16:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:02–00:17:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on November 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 21-236 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's a representative of the property here tonight. If you'd like to speak, ma'am.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:38–00:17:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
You can stay right there. That's fine. ‸ You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God. Please state your name and address for the record into the microphone, please.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:58–00:18:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We have got an argument about this car. My uncle has talked to her about this car ‸ today. She refuses to move it. I don't know what to do. I've done the roof. I fixed the windows.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:36–00:18:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:45–00:18:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:48–00:18:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. And then pressure wash on the west side. Kind of under the steps or some staining there. And if the staining doesn't come, then it might be a little paint.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:07–00:19:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Well, staff is recommending that you have 30 days to get things taken care of. So if that's what the board votes on, my suggestion would be to tell the owner of the car that if it's not gone in 30 days, you're going to have it towed. Okay. I'll take anything else you'd like to tell us.
the car we will. And if you, if you have any questions, you can get my information's on the bottom. Just call me. Okay. And I can meet you there if you'd like.
If she gave us permission to go on the property and ‸ go, we could put a red tag. There is a process for that, but we would need permission because it is inside a fenced in the ordinary. It's in the back. So we would need the help of the owner.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:25–00:20:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:34–00:20:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:20:47–00:20:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:56–00:20:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? There are none. So the motion passes. And, um, just work with the officer and for sure when you get all these, when you get everything accomplished, you want to let him know so that he can, uh, sign off on it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:46–00:21:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of protective treatment. Storing junk or autos, which has since complied and storing outdoors. I have visited the site six times and found some progress made on the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. But as of my last inspection on November 18th, 2021,
and have brought this case before the code enforcement board. As the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on November 1st, 2021. It was sent certified and posted on the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:42–00:22:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
family member of the property. The resident ‸ was living there has passed. And they are working on trying to clean it up. They did get the car removed. Um, but yeah, there's still quite a bit of cleanup to do on the outside as well as some standing on the paint.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:26–00:23:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:38–00:23:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:53–00:23:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:09–00:24:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:19–00:24:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:24–00:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:28–00:24:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of protective treatment. Storing junk or autos. Accumulation of trash and litter. And weeds. I've visited the site six times and found no progress made on the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:59–00:25:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:08–00:25:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:25–00:25:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or a fine of $100 be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. There's nobody here for the property this evening.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:44–00:25:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Chair, I'll move case 21 432 to accept staff recommendation to find the ‸ property in violation and that the owner be given 30 days to correct or be fined $100 per day until compliance is achieved. Second.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:18–00:26:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Property address is 504 South Kentucky Avenue. Submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. Photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of parking in the yard, trailers in the yard and weeds. I visited ‸ site five times and found no progress made on the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:59–00:27:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They did have an issue there. I've been monitoring it to see if there's been any activity. I haven't seen any individuals there, but it does appear that way. And they did have an issue just a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:24–00:28:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll make a motion in case number 21-433 that the board accept staff recommendations that the property owner be found in violation of the mentioned violations and $75 a day to be imposed until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:28:45–00:28:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:51–00:28:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The property address is 2610 North Cocoa Boulevard. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my ‸ visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of accessory structures. Failure to secure. Protective treatment. Roofs and drainage. Weeds, which was complied as of today. Exterior property areas for graffiti, which has been complied. An accumulation of trash and litter, which has been complied as of today.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:40–00:29:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:44–00:29:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:53–00:29:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:02–00:30:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 21-540 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:19–00:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You have seen the property before as the old owner. Mr. Kerman had the property and he sold it to the new owner, which is C cubes LLC. I have talked to the property owner on multiple occasions.
That's actually for the accessory structure, but the failure to secure is once they're inside, the doors are kicked open. As you can see in this particular photo here, multiple of the doors have been opened up and they haven't been re-secured since.
like they recommend we accept staff recommendation, give the property owner 30 days to come to compliance to be fined $100 per day until compliance is achieved.
[00:32:33]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:33–00:32:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:35]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, my name is Gerald Pettengill, Code Enforcement Officer, and I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of the business tax receipt.
had no business tax receipt. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but
[00:32:59]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:59–00:33:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
remains in violation. I've been working on this case since 9 17 of 2021 and brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on 11 4 2021 and was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.
[00:33:20]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:20–00:33:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:00–00:34:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This lady that owns the Jazzy style is a tenant of mine. And when the first notice came out, I did receive that first notice, but the second notice I have not received ‸ personally, other than I did get a letter in the mail and it doesn't say what it was. I've been trying to contact code enforcement on several occasions.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:42–00:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:59–00:35:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then the lady there gave me a card to call. I called that number twice, left a message and I haven't got a response as of today. I did talk to the lady that has Jazzy Styles because she came by my house last night and dropped off the rent check. And I told her I had to come over for this, but I didn't know what it was.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:42–00:35:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Pardon? She claimed to have paid that. ‸ She told me last night she dropped the check off yesterday or the 17th, which was yesterday. Yeah. ‸ So now I'm not
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:58–00:36:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So my thing to you is I'm here tonight to take care of a violation, but it's not really mine, but I will get back to her tomorrow morning. She told me last night she take it. She took care of that.
Yeah, ‸ he wants to provide a receipt. We did check it in the system and call community services to the BTR office and they did not have one for this particular business. He has one for a residential rental, but there is none for this hairstyle.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:05–00:37:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:37–00:37:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:46–00:37:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:05–00:38:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Address on this one is 465 Forest Avenue, Suite 126. Let's see what the business is. ‸ I believe this is the fitness. ‸ It used to be called Maxi Vibe.
[00:39:11]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:11–00:39:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Submitting a package of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, ‸ I found the property in violation of business tax receipt.
[00:39:29]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:29–00:39:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
11-18-21, the property remains in violation. I've been working on this case since September 17, 2021 and brought this case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been resolved.
[00:39:47]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:47–00:39:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 21-0558 the owner be found in non-compliance and that the city of Cocoa shall impose a one-time fine in the amount of $250 in addition to the cost of the rental or business tax receipt. And I don't believe there's anybody here for that business tonight.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:39–00:40:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:28–00:41:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:50–00:41:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:10–00:42:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:23]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:23–00:42:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:31]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, my name is Gerald Pettengill. I'm the code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a package of documents and photos associated with this case.
[00:42:39]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:39–00:42:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:42]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of business tax receipt. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance with this case, but as my last inspection of 1118 of 2021, the property remains in violation.
[00:42:58]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:58–00:43:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:01]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and brought this case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on 11, four of 2021.
[00:43:11]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:11–00:43:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:15]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:15–00:43:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:24]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The owner be found in noncompliance and that the city of Coco shall impose a one
[00:43:28]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:28–00:43:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:32]Speaker 6 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of the rental or business tax receipt. And there is a lady here that would like to speak.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:41–00:43:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:47–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is my business. I have been a business owner in the city since 2013. Three years ago I took on a business partner who, it really doesn't matter. This summer, so we joined forces and then this summer we split up and shame on me for having my head in the sand and not checking in everything.
and, uh, got all of my paper for the city, got all that done, submitted it, emailed it to them, copied him on that. Um, that's where I am with that. And it said that, uh, when you pick up your business tax receipt that your, in
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:37–00:45:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:09–00:46:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:17–00:46:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:24–00:46:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:46–00:46:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's Avenue. ‸ Yale Lane. I'm sorry for the record. I'm Gerald Pettengill code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately ‸ picked the property during my visits. This case was brought to the code board on August 19 2021 and was found in violation of business tax receipt rental business tax and storing junk and autos.
[00:47:32]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:32–00:47:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:34]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:34–00:47:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:39]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:39–00:47:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:44]Speaker 6 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:44–00:47:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:56–00:47:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and brings another batch full. And it's, it's a steady routine in the neighborhood. He usually has anywhere ‸ from eight to 10 cars on the property at any given time.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:48–00:48:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
he could have a, a home business and do phone and mail only, and even bring his transport cars. He's got two cars with transporter ‸ tags. They can come there, but he can't load and unload and, um, utilize the property different than what the zoning for the property is.
this has been going on for quite some time and both Officer Carver, who's no longer with us, and Officer Pettengill have been out to the property. Officer Carver has spoken to the gentleman several times, um, but he's not ceased the business.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:53–00:49:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:02–00:50:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Motion ‸ forward to the second. All pairs say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? There are none. That concludes that section of the agenda and brings us down to lean reductions. Um, you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:20–00:50:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:05–00:51:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have none for tonight other than I want to remind the board that our December meeting will would fall on December 16th. In the past, the board has always made a motion to not have a meeting in December as it's close to the holidays. Um, so if the board's inclined to do that,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:55–00:51:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:52:21–00:52:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording