[00:00:00] Speaker 1
‸ All right, then we'll call the meeting to order. Good. We'll do a roll call, please.
[00:00:05] No voice detected
Yes.
[00:00:08] Speaker 2
I would like
[00:00:09] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:09–00:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:17] Speaker 2
here.
[00:00:18] Speaker 3
So,
[00:00:19] Speaker 2
welcome. And I mentioned earlier we'll have nameplates for you and Mr. Bashan, too, for the next meeting.
[00:00:26] Speaker 3
Okay.
[00:00:29] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:29–00:00:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:30] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:00:31] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:00:32] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:00:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:00:34] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:00:35] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:00:36] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20]
[00:00:56] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Here. Thank you.
[00:00:57] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:00:57–00:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:57] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:00:57] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:01:02] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:03] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:01:08] Speaker 1
All right. Thank you, ma'am. Does everyone please stand? Face the flag.
[00:01:16] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Pleasure
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:16–00:01:17 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:01:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:17–00:01:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:17] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
to
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:17–00:01:24 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:01:18] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
the flag of
[00:01:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
the United States of America and to the republic
[00:01:22] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
for
[00:01:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
which it stands,
[00:01:23] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
one nation,
[00:01:25] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:25–00:01:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:25] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:25–00:01:29 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:01:35] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:35–00:01:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:36] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
move on to item two, approval of
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:36–00:01:37 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:01:37] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:37–00:01:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:41] Speaker 1
the minutes? Yes. Yes. All right. Would anybody like to make a motion to approve one or
[00:01:48] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
both I'll make a motion to approve both
[00:01:51] Speaker 4
well
[00:01:52] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:52–00:01:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:57] Speaker 4
here at the last meeting ‸ I
[00:01:58] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
was
[00:02:01] Speaker 4
not present at the last meeting
[00:02:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:08–00:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:10] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yeah I
[00:02:13] Speaker 2
will make that correct in the minutes
[00:02:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:14–00:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:17] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:02:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:02:21] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it had me
[00:02:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
as absent but I was here ‸ November it had me absent on the November 6th meeting the last one but I was here.
[00:02:30] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 00:02:30–00:02:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:31] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:02:35] Speaker 1
catch. Great catch. so we'll just do the agenda first how about the agenda
[00:02:39] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:39–00:02:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
the motion for the agenda.
[00:02:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. Can ‸ get a second on the agenda approving the agenda second second for mr. Anderson any discussion? All in favor? Aye. All right. Any opposed? Motion passes. Now we'll go on to the minutes just to make sure. So we make the motion that the minutes are approved with the changes to the roll call any other amendments yes ma'am
[00:03:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I
[00:03:08] Speaker 6
was present
[00:03:09] Speaker 5
as well Okay.
[00:03:10] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Would you like to go through it? Like who all was present ‸ not? A little slower? For
[00:03:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:19–00:03:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:20] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:03:30] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:03:40] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:42] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:42] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:03:45] Speaker 1
people should be marked off
[00:03:47] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:47–00:04:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:48] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:03:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:54] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:03:57] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:58] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:04:00] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:04:00] Speaker 2
thank you
[00:04:05] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:05–00:04:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:06] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:04:11] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:04:16] Speaker 3
might want to remove Greenwood and Burgess
[00:04:18] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:18–00:04:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:23] Speaker 3
it looks like maybe this was
[00:04:25] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:25–00:04:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:27] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:04:32] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:04:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
excellent. That's fine. Yeah.
[00:04:37] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
doing an emotion then to postpone the approval of the minutes ‸ okay now I'll make that motion for the postponement you get a second
[00:04:45] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:45–00:04:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:04:48] Speaker 1
yeah all in
[00:04:50] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:50–00:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:51] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:04:52] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:04:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:53–00:04:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:58] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:04:59] Speaker 4
‸ all
[00:05:00] Speaker 1
right That brings us to item three, delegations. We have nothing.
[00:05:10] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:10–00:05:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:13] Speaker 1
old business. And then five, old business has nothing but new business under five. We have
[00:05:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:18–00:05:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:23] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:05:25] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm Jennifer Webster City of
[00:05:27] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:27–00:05:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:31] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
reading of
[00:05:51] Speaker 1
If it's any help, we also don't have the image ‸ our screens, even this image, just so you know. okay
[00:05:59] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
sure. And they were just saying they don't have the image on their screens
[00:06:02] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:02–00:06:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:07] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:06:09] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:06:10] Speaker 1
have it. It's not even coming on. It looks like it's trying, and it is.
[00:06:13] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It is.
[00:06:13] Speaker 1
Except for mrs. Finley yes family this is
[00:06:17] Speaker 3
supposed to be absent
[00:06:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yeah her screen is broken just
[00:06:21] Speaker 3
‸ Okay. Not worried about it.
[00:06:22] Speaker 1
Okay.
[00:06:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Okay.
[00:06:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:23–00:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:23] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:06:24] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:06:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:06:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
back to your old seat? ‸ share with a friend? Okay.
[00:06:39] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:39–00:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:41] Speaker 2
a photocopy
[00:06:42] Speaker 1
no
[00:06:42] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
‸ I'm good okay great thank you all for your patience okay so yes so I'm Jennifer Webster as a planner with the city of Cocoa and this is a reading of the ordinance um a
[00:06:55] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:55–00:06:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:57] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
commercial zoning map amendment okay and then so this request is for consideration of
[00:07:05] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:05–00:07:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:07:05] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
city initiated ordinance amending the the official zoning map designation of 16 parcels as shown of real property totaling 8.36 acres more or less from
[00:07:17] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:17–00:07:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:30] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to the city of Cocoa general commercial zoning district is the subject parcels are generally located adjacent to West King Street or
[00:07:40] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:40–00:07:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:41] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of Cocoa village near the intersections with Virginia Avenue Ruth Street and Aurora
[00:07:46] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:46–00:07:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:50] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
close proximity to the west boundary line between the city and Brevard County so 15 of these properties were annexed into the city in 2004 from Brevard County one parcel
[00:08:05] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:05–00:08:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:11] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the north and on the east as shown and a single family residential neighborhood on the south and Brevard County directly to the west so they were assigned a future land use of commercial but a zoning category was not assigned at the time of the annexations this makes future development challenging with the absence of a city zoning designation ‸ the adjacent future land uses are generally commercial to the north and east and low density residential to the south and Brevard County again to the west the
[00:08:46] Attribution uncertain
west now
[00:08:46] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the difference between
[00:08:47] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:47–00:08:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:51] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
as explained
[00:08:52] Attribution uncertain
by Florida's growth policy
[00:08:52] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
act future land use policies direct the growth and development of a community and zoning ‸ standards are guidelines for that growth without a city zoning category development is impossible with the assignment of that zoning category there'll be guidelines to follow and creating opportunity for redevelopment and improvement So part of the staff analysis in a reason request is the potential creation of non-conforming lots. Per Article
[00:09:22] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:22–00:09:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:22] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of the City's Cocoa Zoning Code, non-conforming lots are legal ‸ uses, but do not conform with the zoning regulations such as lot size, setback minimums of the district that they're located in. as shown as
[00:09:40] Attribution uncertain
shown
[00:09:40] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
there are a mix of uses auto sales and storage furniture and thrift sales shutter manufacturing and sales welding mixed retail parking auto repair personal services and vacant and unused property so quite quite a mix of generally commercial uses and the next slide is a breakdown of the Brevard County zoning classifications of the subject parcels before they were
[00:10:06] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
annexed. So going back one or two, one more. Yeah, thank you. So there's one parcel in the subject area with the former county classification of RU1-9, which is their single family residential. And
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:06–00:10:24 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:10:24] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:10:24–00:10:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:25] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
currently vacant. Keeping in mind these parcels have a current commercial future land use, this partial will be considered conforming commercial property in the proposed City of
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:25–00:10:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:10:36] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:10:36–00:10:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:37] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
zoning district. Okay, so there is one business in the subject parcel area with the former classification BU1, which is their general commercial, which is the Brevard Sharing Center thrift store. This county zoning classification encompasses land devoted to general retail shopping offices and personal services to serve the needs of the community,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:37–00:11:01 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:11:01] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:01–00:11:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:05] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And this is an allowed, excuse me, this is an allowed as a primary use
[00:11:11] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:11–00:11:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:15] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
be considered conforming. So the remaining 14 parcels in the subject parcel area
[00:11:22] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:22–00:11:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:28] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and are a variety of retail, personal services, light industrial, manufacturing, and are vacant or unused like we saw before. So two of these businesses, which are of a light industrial or manufacturing nature,
[00:11:43] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:43–00:11:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:48] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
but with imposed conditions. However,
[00:11:52] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:52–00:12:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:00] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
as
[00:12:01] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:01–00:12:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:05] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
section 4. As legally nonconforming, they will be allowed to continue as they have been, as long as they remain compliant with city code requirements and standards for screening, parking, safety, etc.
[00:12:16] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:16–00:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:23] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:23–00:12:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:27] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
conformance with the development regulations of general commercial if they have not already done so.
[00:12:35] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:35–00:12:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:41] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
city CG zoning district.
[00:12:43] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:43–00:12:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:46] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
requirements and standards for screening, parking, safety, as mentioned before. And all of the businesses will be required to maintain current business tax receipts with the city, as per the city of Cocoa code chapter 12 on local business taxes. ‸ So upon analysis, it was determined as discussed that the most compatible zoning district to assign to
[00:13:10] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:10–00:13:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:13] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
per appendix A, article 11, schedule of district regulation, section 12, which outlines the allowed uses and development regulations for general commercial. ‸ This assignment is also an extension of the existing district to the existing city boundary as shown.
[00:13:34] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:34–00:13:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:38] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to appendix A of the city of Cocoa,
[00:13:40] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:40–00:13:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:44] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
land use patterns, school districts,
[00:13:46] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:13:46–00:13:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:47] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:13:47] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:13:50] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and other utilities and public services, and has determined that the zoning change will not negatively or adversely impact the neighborhood or surrounding areas, nor is it expected to adversely affect property values. So staff has also determined consistency with the comprehensive plan future land use policy 1.1.2.9, describing a commercial future land use, and that CG is an applicable zoning district in the commercial future land use,
[00:14:25] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:25–00:14:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:29] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
comp plan.
[00:14:32] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:32–00:14:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:40] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
a city-initiated ordinance amending the official zoning map designation of 16 parcels of real property, totaling 8.36 acres more or less,
[00:14:50] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:50–00:14:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:54] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:54–00:14:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:56] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Cocoa, Florida, from Brevard County Single Family Residential RU 1-9, General Retail Commercial BU-1,
[00:15:04] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:04–00:15:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:09] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to City of Cocoa General Commercial CG.
[00:15:16] Speaker 1
All right.
[00:15:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:17–00:15:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:18] Speaker 1
Anybody on the board have any questions for the staff? Yes, sir. Mr. Greenwood.
[00:15:22] Speaker 8
Thank you very much. It says here, City-initiated ordinance.
[00:15:27] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:27–00:15:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:32] Speaker 8
Because it's obvious on ‸ the coloring diagram, your commercial all across the street, and this isn't.
[00:15:40] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:40–00:15:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:45] Speaker 8
that wants to utilize all that property at one time? Or is this something that you felt it would be best, the city, I meant to say, to balance out what's happening across the street?
[00:15:56] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Well, yes. So to answer your question, there is not a specific project that someone is bringing forward to the planning department or to the city. But we did have a property owner representation for a few of the property owners from the formerly ‸ residential property that are not able to market it as commercial because it didn't have a commercial zoning.
[00:16:20] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:20–00:16:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:26] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
similar inquiries of that nature,
[00:16:28] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ we
[00:16:29] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
decided to go ahead as a city, as a body to initiate and just take care of the rest of the properties that had been without zoning for since 2004.
[00:16:41] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:41–00:16:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:46] Speaker 8
anybody? Or how do you feel?
[00:16:49] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
We received two to three inquiries.
[00:16:53] Attribution uncertain
We
[00:16:53] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
did, of course, send out mailers, notification letters to surrounding property owners. And we did get a few inquiries, a few phone calls that just, you know, had questions. And yeah. Yep.
[00:17:05] Speaker 8
All right. Thank you very much.
[00:17:06] Attribution uncertain
Of
[00:17:06] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
course. Thank you, sir.
[00:17:07] Speaker 1
All right. Thank you. Mr. Anderson.
[00:17:10] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. If I recall about two months ago, we went over a similar situation where the FLU is not matching up with our zoning. We dealt with this up on, and I know at the time, I think city staff had mentioned that they were looking at all areas of the, uh, the city to, uh, to make sure that everything was in compliance. So these
[00:17:34] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
kind
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:34–00:17:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:17:34] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
of things are going to come up. These are kind of loopholes that have existed for 20 years.
[00:17:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:39–00:17:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:40] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:17:49] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:49–00:17:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:51] Speaker 4
which is on Ruth street?
[00:17:52] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:52–00:17:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:53] Speaker 4
only one that was designated.
[00:17:55] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:55–00:17:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:59] Speaker 4
Have you all had conversation with the owners of that property?
[00:18:02] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
We have, and that's actually the, uh, the party that I was referencing when, uh, under Mr. Greenwood's question. Okay.
[00:18:08] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:08–00:18:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:11] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:11–00:18:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:11] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:18:16] Speaker 4
for instance, you said that lot was empty, right?
[00:18:20] Speaker 3
Yes.
[00:18:21] Speaker 4
If in fact, the property owner wanted to build residential under the new zoning, would that be allowed?
[00:18:27] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No, uh, single family, single family residential is not permitted. In the commercial zoning district. I
[00:18:34] Attribution uncertain
thought
[00:18:34] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
there was an exception on page 16.
[00:18:36] Attribution uncertain
You
[00:18:36] Speaker 4
mentioned something. It said something briefly. Um, I don't have the page here,
[00:18:40] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:40–00:18:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:45] Speaker 4
in that.
[00:18:46] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:46–00:18:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:52] Speaker 4
an issue.
[00:18:53] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
He did not. In fact, he, he, he, he very much wanted to market it as a commercial property.
[00:19:01] Speaker 4
All
[00:19:01] Attribution uncertain
right.
[00:19:01] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That was the only, that was the only glitch I saw in your, in your, um, presentation. Okay.
[00:19:10] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
All
[00:19:11] Speaker 5
right.
[00:19:11] Speaker 6
Anybody else have any questions? So basically for the last 20 years, they've, it's been in limbo or just,
[00:19:21] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that's correct. And the, the businesses that are there have, have been continuing existing without any, um, difficulty. Uh, but, but it just, we feel that because we're getting interest on the properties that have potential for develop to be developed, but cannot be developed because of the conflict, uh, such as the, the vacant, you know, the vacant properties or the abandoned properties, um, that we needed to take care of this so that they would be able to develop their properties. Yeah.
[00:19:53] Speaker 6
Okay. And if they're in violation of anything, anything now, ‸ it's going to be up to date. Basically.
[00:20:04] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Well, uh,
[00:20:05] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:05–00:20:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:11] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
zoning ‸ code defines as conforming, uh, to the zoning district that we're proposing, which is general commercial. So most of them will be conforming properties so that there were the two, there were the two businesses with regard to the use. That aren't in the list of allowable uses in general commercial, but they are fine. They will be, they are fine to continue their businesses as they have been all this time. But if there were to be any, uh, any abandonment or, or expansion, then we, um, we would have to look at that again.
[00:20:46] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:46–00:20:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:52] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
No, no, no, that's correct. Yes.
[00:20:54] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:54–00:20:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:58] Speaker 4
uh, you have annexations,
[00:21:00] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:00–00:21:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:05] Speaker 4
you know, uh, depending on if it's a farm or, you know, vacant lands or if it's a commercial properties. So that's pretty standard procedure to grandfather them in under, you know, what they had been previously under annexations. What happens with the city of Cocoa, we did a
[00:21:20] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:20–00:21:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:22] Speaker 4
and, and, and even in the, in the 2010s. And, um, so the city staff, it looks, it appears to me that it's really catching up. And, and admirably, they are catching up with a lot of these annexation areas, uh, over the last 20 years.
[00:21:39] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:39–00:21:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:41] Speaker 4
Okay.
[00:21:42] No voice detected
That's cool.
[00:21:44] Speaker 5
Good job.
[00:21:44] No voice detected
Of course. Can,
[00:21:46] Speaker 8
can I add something to ‸ both the board members had brought up in reference to tweaking and correcting the ordinances? This is something that I think you all remember on the previous meeting that I was directed by the, uh, city attorney to get approval to, from the city manager to look about potentially do, including, uh, the ordinances of what was recently, um, presented, uh, because there was an appeal made on it. And, uh, I know that you mentioned in reference to, uh, approving this, this, uh, what's before us now, uh, that the, uh, neighborhood in the area there, once this zoning changes, won't affect the value of the properties. And I agree with your folks that came up with that.
[00:22:37] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:37–00:22:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:39] Speaker 8
in contrast to that, um, and, and I guess I can give you a simple scenario. If you have a house you want to buy and there's an airport right next door,
[00:22:48] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:48–00:22:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:53] Speaker 8
not near an airport. It's going to be worth more money. You have no noise like you would at the house next to the airport, that kind of thing. So this appeal that happened, um, did exactly that.
[00:23:06] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:06–00:23:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:12] Speaker 8
value, property values would be reduced significantly. Uh, and one example,
[00:23:19] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:19–00:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:22] Speaker 8
but,
[00:23:23] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:23–00:23:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:31] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:31] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:32] Speaker 8
could call it in the ordinance, uh, uh, uh, ‸ it was a possibility that a bar could be located based on the approval requirements. ‸ And, uh, it's like an, uh,
[00:23:45] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:45–00:23:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:45] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:23:48] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:23:51] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. Thank
[00:23:51] Speaker 8
you. Um, so what happened is that everybody got very upset about it because right next to the property was another vacant lot that was owned by,
[00:24:03] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:03–00:24:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:09] Speaker 8
uh, is still the owner and only recently retired. But anyway, the land is big enough to develop either two or maybe even three, uh, luxurious homes on this property.
[00:24:21] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:21–00:24:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:27] Speaker 8
So because of that, who would want to pay more than half a million dollars for a house where the backyard has lights, music, you know, uh, activity, people talking loud and all that. Well, it,
[00:24:42] Attribution uncertain
it
[00:24:42] Speaker 8
was upsetting enough that an appeal was done saying, no,
[00:24:45] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:45–00:24:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:46] Speaker 8
not next to our property because we're going to lose too much value.
[00:24:49] Speaker 1
Uh, we need to stay on this topic. I want to, like, I know this is a good topic. This is more of a, a post topic. ‸ But what I wanted
[00:24:57] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
to say is this is an example of the changes that the city is doing with this particular property, uh, which is something that we're going to hopefully, uh, add in the future for the rest of the ordinances. That was just an example.
[00:25:10] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:25:10] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
wanted to make sure Todd wasn't here then.
[00:25:12] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:12–00:25:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:13] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:13] Speaker 1
Thank you. Mr. Greenwood. Anyone else? Last call. Okay. We'll close it to the board. I'll open it to the public.
[00:25:19] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:25:19] Speaker 1
don't have any cards, but, uh, ‸ anybody ‸ like to speak on this item. Fair enough.
[00:25:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:26–00:25:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:25:29] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:29–00:25:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:31] Speaker 1
Move to approve.
[00:25:32] Speaker 3
I'll second it.
[00:25:33] Speaker 1
Move to approve. Mr. Greenwood. Seconded. All right. Any further discussion?
[00:25:38] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:38–00:25:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:41] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:42] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:42] Speaker 1
Yes. Sorry about that. All right. Any further discussion?
[00:25:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:46–00:25:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:48] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:49] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:25:52] Speaker 4
All right. Thank you.
[00:25:53] Speaker 1
No. Thank you all. And I'm sorry to cut you off. Mr.
[00:25:57] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:25:57–00:25:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:58] Speaker 1
I wanted to hear it.
[00:25:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:58–00:26:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:58] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:58] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:26:00] Speaker 1
Well,
[00:26:00] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I respect why you did it. I respect why you're talking about it. But I was there at the end anyway. I was trying. I was rushing it too much, but I didn't want it not to make any sense.
[00:26:08] Attribution uncertain
Well,
[00:26:08] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it's a thorough
[00:26:08] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
story. No, that's all. That's all. It
[00:26:09] Attribution uncertain
was
[00:26:09] Speaker 1
a thorough story.
[00:26:11] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:11–00:26:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:26:12] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:13] Speaker 1
Uh, so we'll move on to the tree board. I don't see anything under here, but do we have anybody who'd like to speak on the tree board?
[00:26:18] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:18–00:26:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:19] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:20] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:26:21] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
had, uh, mentioned at the meeting. Before the last, we're talking about what? Two months ago. Yeah. Two months. ‸ and he wanted to see if there was a chance that the staff could liquid into the oak tree that was removed, uh, in front of the Cocoa High School.
[00:26:37] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:37–00:26:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:39] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
Is that the name of it? Uh, not Rosalie. Is it?
[00:26:42] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It's actually Range Road. Range.
[00:26:44] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
Range. Yeah. Corner.
[00:26:45] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:45–00:26:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:47] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well,
[00:26:47] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:47–00:26:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:47] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:48] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Um, with, uh, Michigan.
[00:26:54] Speaker 8
I see. Well, I was curious if the staff had time to look into why the tree was removed because I was very proud of this board, this tree board, the way they handled the previous meeting about some trees that came up. And I was just curious where did you have time or get any additional information on that tree with for it to be removed?
[00:27:15] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
No, I apologize. We don't have any further information on that, but I'm going to continue to pursue for an answer.
[00:27:21] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
but
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:21–00:27:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:27:22] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
I will, I can comment on that.
[00:27:24] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:24–00:27:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:28] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
I don't, it was two months ago, almost six weeks ago. Uh, I did receive that was, uh, uh, carbon copied from the, uh, city manager that he had reached out as he said he would.
[00:27:42] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:42–00:27:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:47] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
And, and that seemed to be satisfactory to, uh, to the city manager. Um, I responded that. I'm pretty sure the right of way ‸ is not Brevard County school board property.
[00:28:04] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:04–00:28:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:08] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
Now
[00:28:09] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:09–00:28:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:16] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
I sent back. Um, I could look into my records, but, um,
[00:28:20] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:20–00:28:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:29] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
by us. And the school board can't just
[00:28:31] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:31–00:28:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:34] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
like they can. I mean, not on our property. So it really was in the right of way is the city property and it wasn't the school board. So regardless, the tree is gone. Uh, I just think that, uh, hopefully in the future,
[00:28:49] No voice detected
um,
[00:28:50] Speaker 4
people don't just cut down aged oak trees in the right of way. So,
[00:28:54] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
so,
[00:28:56] Speaker 4
‸ yeah. So if you still could follow up, um, I don't know who sent me the email. I apologize for that, but it was someone on your staff. And I know that, uh, the city manager was a carpet copied on it.
[00:29:10] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:10–00:29:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:14] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:29:23] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:29:23] Speaker 8
wanted to get that out
[00:29:24] Attribution uncertain
of
[00:29:24] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
the way. And that is something I'll be working on and keeping the board, uh,
[00:29:28] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:29:28–00:29:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:28] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
on this. And, um, I must admit, I'm, I'm very, um, proud. Uh, ‸ the, well, let me back up a little bit.
[00:29:40] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:40–00:29:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:44] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
the, uh,
[00:29:45] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:45–00:29:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:49] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And that, well, it just
[00:29:51] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
wasn't
[00:29:51] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
reinstituted,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:51–00:29:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:29:53] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
right? They just allowed it to
[00:29:55] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:29:55–00:29:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:55] Speaker 8
Uh,
[00:29:56] Attribution uncertain
bring
[00:29:56] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it up to the board and the board said, yes, don't take it away from us. We were, uh, we were, uh, designated to overlook the tree board, uh, designation for the city. So it was activated again. The point is, is that it's sort of new. And, uh, uh, ‸ requirements that this board created before an oak tree is just completely removed because what happened was they were.
[00:30:21] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:30]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:21–00:30:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:51] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
That is supporting and protecting our city. So when you all voted last month about the palm trees, and
[00:31:03] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:03–00:31:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:12] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
is ‸ all on an equal level with that subject. That's just great. I just wanted to compliment everyone. And that is it.
[00:31:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:22] Speaker 8
don't want to take any more time.
[00:31:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:23–00:31:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:24] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:31:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:25] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:25] Speaker 1
Anybody else have anything you'd
[00:31:27] Attribution uncertain
like
[00:31:27] Speaker 1
to discuss as we move on to other business? Mr. Manfredi?
[00:31:34] Speaker 5
I prepared some remarks I'd like to share with you, if you don't mind. As you know,
[00:31:41] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:41–00:31:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:44] Speaker 5
At meetings, I've been quiet and observing. During my career as a market researcher and consultant, I worked with a large number of companies who hired me to help them analyze their markets and competition. I'd like to make the following observations, comments, and requests about my experience with this Board so far. The City staff does a fabulous job, especially in unraveling zoning rules, which I'm trying to learn as quickly as possible. Also, I admire the older members of this Board, and I'm learning from them at every meeting. In my view, the Board appears to be responsible for administering and making judgments about zoning issues. I voted in favor of those changes and have no disagreement with how I voted. It would not change my opinion if I were to vote on them again today. Going forward, I hope the Board will address planning issues. Specifically,
[00:32:50] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:50–00:32:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:54] Speaker 5
us to consider. That is, how many people live here, age groups, education, economic status, etc. In addition to current stats, I believe it is critical for the Board to consider population growth projections. We certainly need those to inform our votes. Projections are particularly important so that we can consider the impact of zoning on schools, recreation, roads, sewer, housing requirements, population, shifts, etc. I also suggest the Board survey residents and ask them their opinions about what
[00:33:33] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
they'd
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:33–00:33:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:33:33] Speaker 5
like to see us plan for in the village in the future.
[00:33:38] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:38–00:33:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:45] Speaker 5
facilities, more cafes, fast food restaurants, parks, day slips for boats, fishing piers, etc.? You name it. If we all sat here and brainstormed, we could come up with many more topics. Then the Board can prioritize them. The surveys can be, and I've done hundreds of surveys in my career, the surveys can be somewhat informal. We don't have to hire research consultants to do these. I used to conduct a lot of what I call mother-in-law surveys. ‸ To do that, I suggest we recruit volunteers to ask their neighbors and friends, perhaps stand outside grocery stores or at city-organized events, and ask questions about residents and their opinion about various topics for which we need input. We all should also study what other similar-sized communities have done that is successful.
[00:34:43] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:43–00:34:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:48] Speaker 5
Vieira and, of course, the Disney communities. I suggest we make planning a collaborative effort and have Board members research and champion topics, rather than sit here and wait for problems to be brought to us. Then the staff can tell us if we're on track or we're crazy. In speaking with the city staff, I discovered there's a National Association of Planners,
[00:35:13] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:13–00:35:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:15] Speaker 5
group here in Florida that publishes a monthly magazine. I suggest that a Board member join the association and report to the Board anything that may be of interest to us during our meetings. Finally, I've had several of my neighbors ask about the comprehensive plan. They don't understand it. They're confused about what it is and why it is and who prepares it. I suggest that the city staff sponsor a meeting for COCO residents to inform them about what that plan covers and the long-term implications, legal implications of the plan. Those are my current thoughts. I appreciate your indulgence tonight, and I hope I have not offended anyone, especially the staff. I look forward to taking an active role as a Board member. Thank you.
[00:36:09] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:09–00:36:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:11] Speaker 5
Mr.
[00:36:12] Speaker 8
Greenwood? Thank you. I just want to respond to some of the points that was just brought up, and I'm glad Mr. Manfredi made it obvious that he's brand new to the Board and all that. But every concern that he's got is already addressed whenever there's a project being presented to our Board.
[00:36:31] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:31–00:36:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:36] Speaker 8
process, and people that have projects don't have that kind of time to wait to get all this input. There's a radius put out there when somebody wants to do a development of piece of property. It goes to every single person that lives around that property that somebody wants to develop. And what is that,
[00:36:57] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:57–00:36:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:59] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
500 feet.
[00:37:00] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:00–00:37:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:01] Speaker 8
Okay. So ‸ that explains when the neighbors are given the information of what needs to be done there. We are required, the city, to hire experienced and licensed people that are very familiar with the codes, and that's what we have right now. And we've had that for years, but I've seen them more polished since our new city manager took it over. Now, this also sounds familiar because there is one member on the council, and there is one other that I'm looking into, that a lot of this is an example of added delays of what we've been doing successfully for years to get to the position we're at now. We're all over the news about this is the place to come. And I really don't feel it's a good idea to alter the things of what has worked for the,
[00:38:08] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:08–00:38:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:13] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:38:13] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
mean.
[00:38:13] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:13–00:38:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:14] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:38:14] Speaker 8
35. For 35 years. So when people come up here, ‸ that includes the city attorney that we got,
[00:38:22] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:22–00:38:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:30] Speaker 8
There isn't anything that this city would be allowed to do in any way where it's not up front, access to it, public access, transparency. All these things are there. But you don't sit at home and wait for the city to call you. You come and talk and meet with the planning and zoning department, as well as the city manager.
[00:38:53] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:53–00:38:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:58] Speaker 8
city council stands up here and tries to attack the city like it's doing an
[00:39:05] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:05–00:39:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:08] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:08–00:39:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:14] Speaker 8
And I just wanted it to be put on the record that we are not doing anything that is incorrect or wrong.
[00:39:22] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:22–00:39:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:23] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:39:24] Speaker 5
anything was being done wrong at all.
[00:39:27] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:27–00:39:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:34] Speaker 5
what's been done.
[00:39:35] Speaker 1
I think both of you spoke what you've had. It's all ‸ good. That's what we're here for.
[00:39:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:40–00:39:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:42] Speaker 1
Anybody else have anything ‸ to discuss tonight?
[00:39:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:46–00:39:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:49] Speaker 1
find. Yeah,
[00:39:49] Attribution uncertain
that's
[00:39:50] Speaker 1
good. And an issue with. Better to bring it up than to push it down. All right.
[00:39:54] Speaker 4
Motion to adjourn.
[00:39:55] Speaker 1
Yeah, let me just let you know that ‸ the next meeting is February 5th, unless otherwise told.
[00:40:00] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:00–00:40:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:08] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Okay. That's what it was. Rescheduled then. Okay. January 8th, 6 p.m.
[00:40:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:11–00:40:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:13] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:13–00:40:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Sounds good. Thank you, Mr. Chebeau.
[00:40:27] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:27–00:40:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:27] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:40:27] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:40:28] Speaker 1
Sounds good. Thank you.
[00:40:30] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:40:30] Speaker 1
Anything else? All right. Then we have the motion to adjourn from Mr.
[00:40:35] Attribution uncertain
Mr.
[00:40:35] Speaker 1
Anderson. Second?
[00:40:36] No voice detected
Second.
[00:40:36] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:36–00:40:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:37] Speaker 1
Miss Finley.
[00:40:38] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:38–00:40:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:39] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:39–00:40:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:40–00:40:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:40–00:40:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:40] Speaker 1
Welcome aboard, Mr. Jones.
[00:40:42] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:40:43] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Jennifer Webster” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:43–00:41:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:18] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]