Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2026-02-02, pp. 6–13; approved as written by the Cocoa Community Redevelopment Agency according to the draft minutes of 2026-02-02, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes. The City has not posted the approved minutes as a separate file.The approving motion, “to approve the Minutes for the Regular Meeting of December 1, 2025, as written”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2026-04-06 agenda packet (2181_Cocoa_CRA_Agenda_04_06_26.pdf, packet pp. 6–8; minutes p. 2).
Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (2130_Cocoa_CRA_Full_Agenda_02_02_26.pdf, packet pp. 6–13). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
The minutes' roll could not be read for this meeting.
Adopted actions (7)
to approve the A genda for the Regular meeting of December 01, 2025 as written (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); PASSED 7-0; ayes: Mike Blake, ETZ, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, ROGERS, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 2, packet pp. 6–13
to approve the Minutes for the Special Meeting of October 28, 2025, with an amendment on Page 3 Paragraph 4 (moved by Lorraine Koss, seconded by Patricia Weeks); PASSED 7-0; ayes: Mike Blake, ETZ, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, ROGERS, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 2, packet pp. 6–13
to approve the proposed Cocoa CRA Meeting Schedule for 2026 (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); PASSED 7-0; ayes: Mike Blake, ETZ, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, ROGERS, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 4, packet pp. 6–13
to Approve two quotes by Empire Consulting that will include the installation of cameras at various locations in the Cocoa CRA (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Patricia Weeks); PASSED 7-0; ayes: Mike Blake, ETZ, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, ROGERS, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 5, packet pp. 6–13
to Approve an Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between the Cocoa CRA and the City of Cocoa for Community Policing Program and to Authorize the City Mayor to sign the Agreement (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); PASSED 7-0; ayes: Mike Blake, ETZ, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, ROGERS, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 7, packet pp. 6–13
to Approve the 2024- 2025 Accomplishments based on the Goals and Objectives set forth in the Cocoa CRA Plan Update of 2022 and required by Florida Statute 189.0694 (moved by Lorraine Koss, seconded by Patricia Weeks); PASSED 7-0; ayes: Mike Blake, ETZ, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, ROGERS, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 7, packet pp. 6–13
to adjourn the Regular meeting of December 01, 2025 (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Mike Blake); PASSED 7-0; ayes: Mike Blake, ETZ, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, ROGERS, Patricia Weeks; nays: none — the draft minutes p. 8, packet pp. 6–13
Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet
Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2026-02-02, pp. 6–13; approved as written by the Cocoa Community Redevelopment Agency according to the draft minutes of 2026-02-02, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes. The City has not posted the approved minutes as a separate file.
MINUTES
COCOA CRA
December 01, 2025
T
he Regular Meeting of the Cocoa Community Redevelopment Agency was held
on Monday, December 01, 2025, in Cocoa City Hall, in City Council Chambers,
located at 65 Stone Street, in Cocoa, Florida, 32922, as publicly noticed.
I. CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Blake called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
IN
VOCATION: Vice Chairperson Weeks led the assembly in Invocation.
P
LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE : Agency Member Koss led the assembly in the
Pledge of Allegiance.
PR
ESENT: Michael C. Blake Chairperson
Patricia Weeks Vice Chairperson
Alex Goins Agency Member
Lavander Hearn Agency Member
Lorraine Koss Agency Member
Janne Etz Agency Member
Candace Rogers Agency Member
Anthony Garganese Agency Attorney (Via Phone)
Peyton Fink Recording Secretary
ABS
ENT: Agency Attorney Garganese was absent during Roll Call, but he did call
in during delegations.
O
THER STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
C
ity Manager Whitten, Community Services Director Neuterman , Community
Services Manager Justiniano.
II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes:
Agenda: Regular Meeting held on December 01, 2025, either as written or with
amendments.
Special City Council Meeting 12-01-2025
Page | 2
* MOTION by Vice Chairperson WEEKS Seconded by Agency Member KOSS
to approve the A genda for the Regular meeting of December 01, 2025 as
written.
T
HE VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS:
A
YES: BLAKE, ETZ, GOINS, HEARN, KOSS, ROGERS, WEEKS.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0)
Minutes: Special Meeting held on October 28, 2025, either as written or with
amendments.
* MOTION by Agency Member KOSS Seconded by Vice Chairperson WEEKS
to approve the Minutes for the Special Meeting of October 28, 2025, with an
amendment on Page 3 Paragraph 4.
AY
ES: BLAKE, ETZ, GOINS, HEARN, KOSS, ROGERS, WEEKS.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0)
II. DELEGATIONS:
• Nichole Minot discussed security and noise in Cocoa. She shared her
concerns on how crime will continue to grow as Cocoa does. She offered
numerous suggestions on how to combat it. Agency Member Goins and
the City Manager both responded to her by discussing policing in the
village. Agency Member Goins pointed out that a lot of noise is coming
from the parking lots of these establishments rather than inside them and
the areas get busier during the holidays. The City Manager stated that he
would talk to the Chief of Police about being more active about people
loitering and Code Enforcement Officers will now be trained to use noise
readers.
• Agency Member Rogers added to the discussion by stating that she wants
more transparency and suggested a Dashboard so all calls to the police
can be seen. She then discussed policing in the village and suggested
using drones to help. She hopes this is all brought up at the Nightlife
Meeting.
• Agency Member Goins then further discussed the policing in the village
and stated that it is difficult to control the cars. Security may need to be
increased, which would increase the budget.
(A
brief pause was made for the Agency Attorney to call into the meeting).
Special City Council Meeting 12-01-2025
Page | 3
• Agency Member Koss asked when the nightlife workshop would be to
which the City Manager answered that we are working on getting it ready
for January.
• Aleck Greenwood agrees with what Nichole Minot had previously said. He
then talked about his concerns regarding police not enforcing citations and
the noise level in the village.
• Agency Member Goins then stated that we are not in the officers’ shoes
and we need a plan. He explained how it is difficult for officers to cover
everything that we want them to cover, so it is something for the CRA to
think about.
• There was then a discussion between Agency Member Hearn and Aleck
Greenwood regarding Mr. Greenwood’s ideas for citations towards people
who violate ordinances.
• Agency Member Rogers said that there are elements being introduced
into the area that will affect it. She stated that too much noise does not go
well with what we want Cocoa to be, which is a safe place that people
want to visit. She further stated that we do not want to decrease the value
of the area.
III. PRESENTATIONS: Mirah (transportation engineer) gave a presentation
regarding parking at Oleander.
Mirah presented a slideshow to the Agency Members which detailed various
aspects of the new parking structure at Oleander. After the presentation, Mirah
opened the floor up to any questions.
Chairperson Blake asked if an emergency station is being implemented. To
which Mirah responded by saying that it is not in the plan right now but if that is
something the board is interested in then she can work with staff on it.
Vice Chairperson Weeks and Mirah discussed how many parking spaces would
be included in the area. Mirah stated that at the moment she cannot give a
definite answer but feels safe to say at least 80 including on-street parking. They
also discussed the pond in the parking lot with Mirah explaining that the pond is
stormwater and they want to minimize as much as possible.
Agency Member Etz wondered about the surface of the area with Mirah giving
her various options that are being considered, it will certainly not be dirt though.
Agency Member Etz then asked about the pavement of the area as she believed
that covering all of it in asphalt was bad. Mirah responded by stating that asphalt
is not bad in all cases as you lay it and leave it but there are other options.
Special City Council Meeting 12-01-2025
Page | 4
Agency member Koss asked if we were getting funding for the EV stations, Mirah
responded that a provider has not yet been discussed as they only know the
locations of the stations so far.
Mirah also mentioned that they are looking at getting security lighting in the area.
When asked about the timeline, Mirah answered that they will work to get it done
as soon as possible.
The City Manager informed the agency members that Mirah will be doing further
work with the city and he congratulated her on recently obtaining her PHD.
V. ACTION ITEMS:
1. Request Agency approval of the Cocoa CRA Meeting Schedule for 2026.
T
he Chairperson read off the description of this action item, and a motion was
made by the Vice Chairperson. It was then seconded by Agency Member Koss,
and it passed unanimously.
* M
OTION by Vice Chairperson WEEKS; Seconded by Agency Member KOSS
to approve the proposed Cocoa CRA Meeting Schedule for 2026.
AYES: BLAKE, ETZ, GOINS, HEARN, KOSS, ROGERS, WEEKS.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0)
2. Request Agency approval of two quotes provided by Empire Computing and
Consulting for the installation of security cameras at various locations within
the Cocoa CRA (as recommended by the Police Department), utilizing contract
P-20-20-COC (Empire Contract Amendment #1). The first quote, not to exceed
$11,320.90, includes two cameras along with associated licenses and
equipment to be installed at Myrt Tharpe Square/Mason Building. The second
quote, not to exceed $24,308.70, includes five cameras and associat ed
licenses and equipment to be installed at Lee Wenner Park. The combined not-
to-exceed amount for both quotes is $35,629.60. Approve Resolution
Amending the FY26 Budget BAF #26- 025A, to transfer funds for the camera
installations to the appropriate capital account. Authorize the City Manager to
finalize and execute the quotes, and to execute all related Task Orders,
Purchase Orders, and the Budget Amendment.
Confidential Per Chapter 119.0713.
T
he Chairperson read off the action item. Director Neuterman then briefly
discussed the steps that will be tak en to proceed with the installation of these
Special City Council Meeting 12-01-2025
Page | 5
cameras. A motion to approve was made by Agency Member Goins and it was
seconded by Vice Chairperson Weeks.
* MOTION by Agency Member GOINS; Seconded by Vice Chairperson WEEKS
to Approve two quotes by Empire Consulting that will include the installation
of cameras at various locations in the Cocoa CRA.
AY
ES: BLAKE, ETZ, GOINS, HEARN, KOSS, ROGERS, WEEKS.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0)
3. Request Agency Approval of an Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement
between the Cocoa CRA and the City of Cocoa for Community Policing
Program approved by Agency Members at their October 18, 2022, Cocoa CRA
Meeting, and to authorize the City Mayor to sign the Agreement. This
agreement is effective in Fiscal Year 2026. Request Agency Approval of
Resolution Amending the FY26 Budget, BAF# 26- 025-IFT1-CCRA-Police
Overtime (12-1-25) for $88,000.
T
he Chairperson read the description of this item; he then spoke about the idea
of having security in the village and gave his thoughts on it . After doing so he
gave Director Neuterman the opportunity to speak on the item.
D
irector Neuterman began by clarifying that this item is different from a
previous one that was presented to the agency members a few months ago for
security in the village. This item is instead intended to renew the amended and
reinstated interlocal agreement, the security in the village item will be further
discussed at the nightlife meeting. This item is being brought forth to be
reinstated for this fiscal year so we can move forward until a decision is made
by the agency towards security and community policing efforts. This item also
includes an interfund transfer that will be brought back to the December 9
th City
Council Meeting.
D
irector Neuterman then discussed the aspects of the security guard proposal
that was presented a few months ago which was 92 hours a week totaling
$147,000 a year for an armed security guard to patrol all day long. The
agreement currently being presented is for an amount up to $88,000 from
Thursday to Saturday from 10:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. so the coverage is different.
T
he City Manager then weighed in by stating that the reason we are presenting
this item to the agency members is because a decision was not made on
whether or not we were going to continue using the police department or private
security services. We need to do this so the CRA can pay officers for the
specified times previously mentioned. It was then confirmed by the Agency
Attorney that even if this agreement is approved, we can still go with having a
security guard in the village. As the agreement allows you to go with either or
both.
Special City Council Meeting 12-01-2025
Page | 6
A
gency Member Hearn had questions for the staff regarding security. He
wondered what the support from the PD would look like if we went with security.
To which Director Neuterman responded that it would need to be established
by the Agency. The City Manager added to her statement by saying that it
would not be a special detail and this is an operational tactical question that
probably should not be answered in a public setting. Agency Member Hearn
also noted that he would like to make sure the response time is adequate for
officers since they would need to be called by security if a situation were to
arise. The City Manager responded to this by stating that it would depend on
the calls coming in and what you really need is Code Officers on nightshift
working with the noise meters but there will be more on that at the n ightlife
workshop. Agency Member Hearn’s final question was in regard to the length
of the agreement. It is a one- year agreement with renewals. He then made a
request that we receive biannual reports from either entity to see what they are
experiencing.
A
gency Member Weeks wanted clarification on what they were voting on, which
is an interlocal agreement to pay the police
A
gency Member Etz likes how detailed this agreement is. The Agency Attorney
spoke about the agreement by saying that it is different from the one that had
been presented to the agency members in 2022. This agreement has several
provisions added to it, one of which allows the agency to request that the private
security report on their services. Agency Member Etz then referenced a part of
the agreement which states that the police department will turn in reports to be
calculated by finance, and she asked if they were available to be seen. The
City Manager answered that they can be seen but him and Director Neuterman
are unsure of how finance is tracking the expenditures as there are many
variables involved. She then addressed her concerns over this being a CRA
expenditure and wants to keep track of it. She is looking forward to the nightlife
meeting as it will bring in many people from the community and address the
issues that are happening in Cocoa.
A
gency Member Rogers agreed with Agency Member Etz and stated that there
are a lot of break ins on the outer brims of the community. She does not know
how we cover the whole village, she believes we may need some additional
support. Which is why she likes the idea of having dashboards which would
improve communication and help keep citizens informed.
P
am Shea had a delegation and stated that on October 5 th she was attacked
by individuals in the Village. Since then , she has started carrying a gun. She
believes we need more lights , police presence, and cameras to make this
village and community move forward. She will never support private security.
Special City Council Meeting 12-01-2025
Page | 7
A motion was made by Chairperson Blake to approve, and it was seconded by
Agency Member Hearn. The motion passed unanimously.
* M
OTION by Chairperson BLAKE; Seconded by Agency Member HEARN to
Approve an Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between the Cocoa
CRA and the City of Cocoa for Community Policing Program and to
Authorize the City Mayor to sign the Agreement.
A
YES: BLAKE, ETZ, GOINS, HEARN, KOSS, ROGERS, WEEKS.
The Motion Passed Unanimously (7-0)
After the motion passed, Agency Member Goins suggested bringing in the call
sheets from 2025 to the Nightlife Meeting next month. He stated that we need
those numbers to know what the facts are.
4. A
gency review of the 2024- 2025 established Goals and Objectives and
performance accomplishments as required by Florida Statute 189.0694.
Agency review and approval of the 2025- 2026 Goals and Objectives as
established in the Cocoa CRA Plan Update 2025.
A
fter the Chairperson read off the description of this item, Director Neuterman
gave a brief overview of it. This is a new requirement, and the annual report
must be published on the CRA website by December 1 st. She then went over
the numerous goals that had been accomplished by the CRA. Some of these
goals included completing the parking at Lee Wenner Park, initiating the design
for Oleander West Parking, numerous façade grants, and more. She stated that
a goal for Heart of Cocoa was affordable housing, which is why 203 Orange
Street was purchased. The agency is to approve the accomplishments based
on the budget. She then went over the 2025 goals and objectives with the
agency members and stated that through the budgetary impacts of what we
have in the FY26 budget one of the biggest projects is the waterfront with the
FIND Grant. This project along with the façade grants and other improvements
will help make the Cocoa CRA more vibrant and resilient.
A
gency Member Koss asked if the information could be in a book format to
which Director Neuterman said yes. The booklet will be provided to the agency
members after March 31 st. Agency Member Koss t hen made a motion to
approve, which was seconded by Vice Chairperson Weeks and it p assed
unanimously.
* M
OTION by Agency Member KOSS; Seconded by Vice Chairperson WEEKS
to Approve the 2024- 2025 Accomplishments based on the Goals and
Objectives set forth in the Cocoa CRA Plan Update of 2022 and required by
Florida Statute 189.0694.
A
YES: BLAKE, ETZ, GOINS, HEARN, KOSS, ROGERS, WEEKS.
Special City Council Meeting 12-01-2025
Page | 8
The Motion Passed Unanimously (7-0)
VI. ATTORNEY REPORT: None
VII. UPDATES AND STAFF REPORTS:
• During Updates and Staff Reports, Agency Member Hearn asked for an update on
the 5 acres off of Rosa L Jones . The Chairperson said that they are back to the
drawing board for an RFP . He then went over the numerous requirements
associated with the property and said that the last appraisal was for over seven
million, but we will hopefully put something out in 2026.
• Director Neuterman wished everyone a happy holiday and new year.
VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE:
Monday, January 5, 2026, at 6:00 pm in the Council Chambers located in Cocoa
City Hall, 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, Florida.
IX. ADJ
OURNMENT:
* M
OTION by Vice Chairperson WEEKS; Seconded by Chairperson BLAKE to
adjourn the Regular meeting of December 01, 2025.
AYES: BLAKE, ETZ, GOINS, HEARN, KOSS, ROGERS, WEEKS.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0)
The meeting adjourned at 7:31 p.m.
________________________________
Michael C. Blake, Chairperson
Respectfully Submitted by:
___ ___________________________
Peyton Fink, Recording Secretary
Agenda (the City's wording)
Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.
An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Invocation
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of December 1, 2025.
2. Minutes: Special Meeting of October 28, 2025.
III. DELEGATIONS
IV. PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation by Myra Planning and Design showcasing the Oleander West Parking Lot Design progress. — 00:38:07
V. ACTION ITEMS
1. Request Agency approval of the Cocoa CRA Meeting Schedule for 2026.
2. Request Agency approval of two quotes provided by Empire Computing and Consulting for the installation of security cameras at various locations within the Cocoa CRA (as recommended by the Police Department), utilizing contract P-20-20-COC (Empire Contract Amendment #1). The first quote, not to exceed $11,320.90, includes two cameras along with associated licenses and equipment to be installed at Myrt Tharpe Square/Mason Building. The second quote, not to exceed $24,308.70, includes five cameras and associated licenses and equipment to be installed at Lee Wenner Park. The combined not-to-exceed amount for both quotes is $35,629.60. Approve Resolution Amending the FY26 Budget BAF #26-025A, to … — 00:54:33
3. Request Agency Approval of an Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between the Cocoa CRA and the City of Cocoa for Community Policing Program approved by Agency Members at their October 18, 2022, Cocoa CRA Meeting, and to authorize the City Mayor to sign the Agreement. This agreement is effective in Fiscal Year 2026. Request Agency Approval of Resolution Amending the FY26 Budget, BAF# 26-025-IFT1-CCRA-Police Overtime (12-1-25) for $88,000. — 00:57:42
4. Agency review of the 2024-2025 established Goals and Objectives and performance accomplishments as required by Florida Statute 189.0694. Agency review and approval of the 2025-2026 Goals and Objectives as established in the Cocoa CRA Plan Update 2025. — 01:25:52
VI. ATTORNEY’S REPORT
VII. UPDATES AND STAFF REPORTS
VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE - January 5, 2026 at 6:00 PM
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.
326 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 2 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 17 voices separated from the audio.
23 short machine repair(s) (25 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 90.8% of 13,143 content words.
Dotted words (343 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
326 passages (26% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (2 stretches). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:38:58 (7 s) — neither reading has words
00:57:08 (6 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:20–00:00:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, it wasn't fun. It was definitely not fun. We actually, some friends of ours had, they had tickets. They called us Friday and said, do you want to go?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:56–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:28–00:01:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:35–00:01:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:53–00:01:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:04–00:02:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:20–00:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:27–00:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:34–00:02:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:42–00:02:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:48–00:02:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:06–00:03:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:48–00:03:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:55–00:03:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:57–00:04:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:06–00:04:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:30–00:04:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:40–00:04:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:04:54–00:05:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
post-Thanksgiving. If you're anything like myself, Thanksgiving was great with the family and friends, but we gained weight. I don't know about you all, but I did.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:58–00:05:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
December 1st, first day in the month of December, 24 more days until Christmas. Yes. Okay, council would like to start this meeting. May we have an invocation by Deputy...
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:16–00:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:17–00:06:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:19–00:06:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:27–00:06:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
May we pray. Our dear Heavenly Father, we just thank you so much for this wonderful Thanksgiving season. We do each have so much to be thankful for. Lord, we thank you for our country, for this
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:46–00:06:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Amen. Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:48–00:07:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:58–00:08:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:15–00:08:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:27–00:08:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Any nays? Ayes have it unanimously. Proceeding on to item number 2-2, minute, special meeting of October the 28th, 20, 25. What are the wishes of the agency?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:58–00:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I went back and listened to it. What I said was, there's no question we want the post office here. So could we amend that, please? And I'll just say to Peyton that I know how ‸ difficult writing minutes are.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:32–00:09:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Why not? Miss Nicole, you want to speak on that item number three, right? ‸ Okay, what I'm asking you is do you want to speak on the delegations? Because it just says self. Or do you want to speak on a particular agenda item number? Okay, well then,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:26–00:10:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:30]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:42–00:10:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:46]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
and professionalism in addressing some ongoing noise disturbances that are tied to the nightlife
[00:10:53]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:53–00:10:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:55]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
However, despite the outdoor music ending
[00:10:59]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:59–00:11:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:02]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
and West continue to be awakened well after 2 a.m. By those patrons of the Aqua Lounge who gather in the street and surrounding parking areas, blasting amplified music from their vehicles. These violations
[00:11:17]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:17–00:11:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:22]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
statute 316.3045.
[00:11:25]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:25–00:11:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:32]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
by loud noise in front of the Aqua Lounge and the
[00:11:36]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:11:36–00:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:36]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
directly across the street. Although the police response was commendably swift, and the underlying issue
[00:11:46]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
remains
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:46–00:11:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:46]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
without meaningful amendments to the city's ordinances providing for consistent enforcement, citations, fines, and consequences for repeat offenders, there is absolutely no deterrent, and these disruptions will continue unchecked.
[00:12:04]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:04–00:12:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:11]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:12:11–00:12:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:12]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
Referencing the proposed hotel and the expanded nightlife vision. Multiple council members have expressed their pride in bringing additional late night establishments into
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:12:12–00:12:23 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:12:23]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:39–00:12:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:41]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
commit to infrastructure and safeguards necessary to protect its residents, particularly those who live within close proximity to these establishments. Cocoa Village is a mixed-youth community. Businesses have been granted the privilege to operate late into the night, but residents have the absolute right to expect that the existing laws will be upheld. It should not fall on us to constantly have to report these violations late into the night. The burden rests with the city to ensure enforcement is possible,
[00:13:19]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:13:19–00:13:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:21]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the council to take a decisive ‸ action. Increase funding and staffing for overnight police in Cocoa Village. Amend our city ordinances to establish clear enforcement mechanisms, including fines and escalating penalties, and adopt proven strategies by other
[00:13:44]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:44–00:13:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:48]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
such as providing officers with decibel meters and structured
[00:13:51]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
violation protocols.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:51–00:13:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:53]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Thank you for your time, your service, your commitment to ensuring that our city of Cocoa remains a place where businesses can
[00:14:01]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
succeed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:01–00:14:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:14:02]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
and residents can
[00:14:03]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
safely
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:03–00:14:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:14:04]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
and peacefully call it
[00:14:06]▶ PlaySpeaker 8 (introduced as “Nicole Minot” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
home.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:06–00:14:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:08–00:14:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The issue that we're having is on these holiday time where you have the last time, I believe it was 4th of July, was a big issue. And then this past weekend was Thanksgiving. And so the crowds are a lot bigger. Some patrons might not even go into those establishments and spend money. A lot of times they just want to hang out in the parking lot, turn their music up as loud as possible. And that's something that I know
And I believe the conversation that you had with him was around that 1.30, 1.15 a.m. is probably that time that we should deploy those officers in the front of the parking lot next to
which gives the officers an ability to actually move people out of the parking lots there. And so that should be happening. We even got the owner of ‸ Bug Nutty to actually let us sign his lot. And he actually his lot is actually closed at 2 a.m. also. So so we shouldn't have that problem. But I'll talk to the chief again about becoming more active if people are loitering in the in the parking lots. It's always difficult with the noise coming from vehicles, ‸ you know, ‸ that's just difficult statewide there. But the officers, I know our new code enforcement officers, as well as the old code enforcement officers, are going to be trained with the noise meters. I think we had that same conversation with the chief about the officers being trained with the noise meters there. So just give me some time to talk with the chief about where we are in terms of them being trained on the noise meters there. But the parking lots should be under control now.
Yes, sir. This is this is this lot is closed. You can't be here. You have to leave. If you don't leave, we'll trespass you or take some other punitive measures. OK. All right. Thank you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:10–00:17:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think on the parking lot, this ‸ tends to be people loitering after hours and then residents are calling in. And these are non-emergency events. And I know that we have not always gotten everything that we wanted
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:35–00:17:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a difference. So I think we should try to bring some transparency to this by having a dashboard where all the calls are listed so that we know where we need to put our people. And what times and what kind of issues that are occurring.
It's a problem when you involve alcohol. So I think we need to have more transparency and know exactly what it is that we need to request so that we can get the reports. ‸ We are expecting to have been logged and filed and then retrieved. There should be a protocol.
won't be on the list. I think everything should be on the list because that gives us an idea of what is actually happening. As far as the parking lots, you have some that are private parking lots. So I think maybe when we have the ‸ late entertainment workshop, we should address that. There's plenty of examples throughout Florida where they have certain requirements regarding the private and the public parking lots to make it safer for all individuals. Otherwise, I just think ‸ I don't think we need less security. I think we need more. I think I can't say where they should be. I don't know where they should be. And then when we have big events, we don't maybe have enough people to do the calls that are important. Maybe ‸ when we're down at ‸ having a big event in the park, we use drones so that we can have better coverage.
don't have a sparse group of police. And we can still do things beyond the park at that time. But, yes, I think it's needed to have the late night entertainment workshop as soon as possible. And I think accountability and transparency also would be a good idea so we all know what's going on.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:24–00:20:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:42–00:20:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:53–00:20:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They know, but to city manager's point, it is very, very difficult to control the cars. It is because sometimes we have, just say, for example, I don't know the exact numbers and I don't know police strategy because I'm not an officer.
But you have 500, 600 people in that one area. So it's difficult to go to each car to have them turn down their music. I think, to your point, it's increasing. And when we increase it, that means we have to increase our budget on that as well. So that's another conversation we might need to have. But the police officers, they know where to be, to be honest with you. But it's 30 cars with loud music.
The difficulty, because there's so many cars, you got people walking across the street and not using the right intersections to cross. You have 30 cars in the parking lot. You got this fight finna start over here with the girlfriend mad with her boyfriend. You have another guy over here. He's drunk and about to pass out. ‸ Then you got to call a domestic violence on 524.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:25–00:22:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Welcome to my teleconferencing. Please enter a participant code, then press pound. Sorry, that participant code is invalid. Please try again. Please enter a participant code.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:23:47–00:23:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:15–00:24:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:38–00:24:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:44–00:24:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:24:47–00:24:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:54–00:25:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about car radios and ‸ the police having trouble with the car radios and all that. I'll just give you an example. And it's called enforcing the ordinance, which means issues of patients. We're the only city that does not do
So there is habitual repeat violators that could be eliminating this issue if we enforce the ordinance. And a lot of the police do not know the noise ordinance. I have to explain to them. That's why the commercial property group wants me to call, because the dispatchers also don't know.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:15–00:26:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:26:16–00:26:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it back up again. That's disrespectful. So it's going to continue like this, like it has for four years, because there's, I'll give you an example where it does work.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:33–00:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:06–00:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:11–00:27:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
one, two, three. Six different officers, three different times, to tell them to turn the volume down, and they kept cranking it up. I mean, you know, there's no skin in the game. They don't care. They're above the law. And that's been going on for four years. We have 120 signatures with the problem.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:43–00:27:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:56–00:27:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cannot even have a conversation with each other at the business that's violating. ‸ You cannot talk. That shows that it's in the 70s and 80s decilometer readings that we have received over the four-year period. We on Derby Street, when we hear it, we already know they're in the 70s and high.
So it's really about enforcement. And this is something that needs to be done when we get ready to set up the security system and also the policing. They need to work together. Very important. ‸ Otherwise, we're going to continue this problem. Thank you.
made. My question to you, ‸ it seems like the concerns are the people that are patronizing these establishments after hours and resulting back to the parking lots. That's where the noise is occurring. So ‸ my question would be, ‸ how do you control that with levying down ordinances?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:29:35–00:29:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:55–00:29:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:19–00:30:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
brings attention ‸ to the person that's doing the loud music. And when they're going in the cars with the loud music, it's even louder than what we're talking about in the bars. I mean, ‸ it's gotten to be that bad. But I hope that answers your question.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:41–00:30:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:57–00:31:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So this is... I said something about this ‸ maybe two years ago. In order for us to really know what a problem is, we all must be there at 2 o'clock in the morning. And I don't think we're all going to commit to that. And so a lot of times when we come in these meetings, we're having a discussion other than the resident, having a discussion about what we think something is. or what we assume that an officer should do. But yet we're not in those officer's shoes when, again, 300 people coming out of Aqua. 250 people coming out of Rec. 225. 200 people coming out of Georgian...
Right? And so you get that crowd that leaves that place at 155. You got 30 cars. You got three officers. What we think they should do in that moment, it's not enough. And so I wanted to say that because it was just on my head when I'm thinking about it. I just... We got to come up with a plan for what that is. Right? And so it's... We're not talking about the car riding by. We're talking about the young guy with the high truck, four doors wide open, parked on the other side where the condo is. And I've talked to this young man before too. But now those two officers who are in the parking lot, they don't see this guy over here. They're so busy dealing with, like I said before, maybe a simple discussion or argument about something, leaving the club. And ‸ all those patrons are coming out at the same time. Right?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:06–00:33:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:13–00:33:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the budget for more officer. We may not have the officers... Hold on. Hold on one second. I know you like to finish me up. But what... Hold on a second. We may not have the officers, from what Chief is saying as well, to cover what we want them to cover in those Friday, Saturday, Sunday, holiday weekends. So we may have to consider something else. Which could be BCSO. I'm not sure. I know our officers don't like hearing that. But we may not have those officers who wants to come in to work overtime. And so I think we have to kind of figure that out. And that's something the city manager will think about doing. But that's something also we as a CRA may have to think about as well, as far as the dollars.
not there at 2 o'clock. We don't see that. The ‸ residents hear it. But I'm telling you, it's a much difficult situation. And ‸ it's not every weekend. ‸ But it happens frequently.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:34:27–00:34:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:34:58–00:35:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:10–00:35:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:11–00:35:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:20–00:35:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:54–00:35:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so we can let the police department continue the good work they're doing with keeping crime down in the city. I'm sorry, but crime like that, that to me is more important than noise ordinance or radios loud. You know, that's more important. But we can't
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:29–00:36:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think we ought to realize that we are ‸ introducing elements into the neighborhood that will have a definite impact on the valuation. And on the, ‸ we're supposed to be developing the village into something where people can come and work, play, visit, have a good time, but be safe. And this doesn't necessarily bode well because I know Melbourne had a problem with it and too many bars and so on and so forth.
It's not petty because the city does depend a lot in the village for the taxes. And we don't want to devalue our properties because location, location, location, same, same building, one by a dump, one by an airport, and one by a canal. You're going to get three different valuations. Yes, ma'am. So that's all. Thank you so much for letting me speak.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:38:00–00:38:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:20–00:38:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 00:38:53–00:39:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:09–00:39:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:31–00:39:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:39:40–00:39:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
folks at home ‸ to be able to hear me, even if they can't see me. So my name is Myra. I like to say I'm your favorite transportation engineer and planner for those that have worked with me before. For those that haven't, I would like to earn that title with you. And we'll start with this project that we're presenting today, which is the Oleander parking lot. Right? So this is a very important project for the CRA, which is why it's coming before you. uh If you're not familiar with it already, the site is just west of Hewlett. It's south of King Street, 520. And most importantly, it's about a quarter mile or a five minute walk from the Playhouse. So the idea here is that you're providing several things at once. Right? So one, you're providing um improved connectivity, which is, I know, one of the CRA's goals.
And then three, using it as an opportunity to kind of showcase low impact development and and some of the things that we can do with that. Right now, the lot is vacant, but the good news is it's not going to stay that way for long. We're in the process of designing a new public ‸ parking lot. It's going to extend the village streetscape westward. As you can see in this image, there's new on street parking. the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:38–00:41:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
village style. Also, on the actual lot, you're going to see, if you look in the top left hand corner, I've highlighted some EV charging stations. There will be fencing.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:01–00:42:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
being functional, uh we want to look good doing it, right? And even all this talk about like parking and I was just, the the engineer in me loves parking and I was like, oh the how many cars are leaving? I go, should we not be using the
but I digress. But, you know, I think it's one of those things that everyone um can look forward to this project being, you know, a piece of maybe kind of the bigger vision that the CRA is trying to implement. So, again, this is a rendering that we did to kind of give you an idea of about the number of parking spaces and where that would be. And then I'll go to the next slide.
This is, again, it's it's not as uh visual, but this is kind of the engineering phase that we're in right now. And it was based on we now have survey information so
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:35–00:43:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for two reasons. One is safety. Another one is there's a big existing drainage inlet right where we would have put the widened driveway. So we want to avoid impacting that drainage structure. The other thing that
consolidated the landscaped islands so that they're more contiguous. And also it's to ‸ protect the root ball of that tree that's going to remain. And, you know, as we obviously further go further through the design, we'll refine it once we can kind of meet the requirements of the stormwater. So the next step is the less glamorous stuff. But I am here to answer any questions, transportation
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:28–00:44:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. um I have a few lights here that are illuminated, but let me ask one quick question, please, miss Myra. You know, sometimes they have an emergency station there when people are at a parking lot and it's night time even though it's illuminated. You know what I'm saying?
with the lighting, we're going to have to run conduit and electricity. So if that is something that um the board members would like to have, we can certainly
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:45:41–00:45:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um Okay. I want to, thethe road to the north, is that 520? Correct. Okay. And how I didn't see anywhere. Exactly how many parking spots are we going to get out of this?
So I want to say we have a goal. We have a goal of about 80 parking spots. We have on street parking that we're showing right now that's new. And then we have, again, on street off street parking in the center. So once we get through permitting with the Water Management District, I'll be able to give you a more finite number. You know, I want to say that,
So the water will naturally flow that way, as well as kind of some of the things that we want to do with the landscape medians. We want to minimize as much, but we're not at the phase where I can tell you that. Exactly. um and But we'llwe'll get there soon enough. Okay,
So even under the parking lot back here, there are huge vaults that I could actually walk through the pipe. um And so I ‸ don't, but that made sense in the urban environment of the village. Over here, I, you know, I would like to say there are other ways we can ‸ use low impact development to try and reduce the amount that we need. But again, that's determined by the water management district.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:21–00:48:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the, well, I can tell you it's not going to be dirt dirt. Okay. uh so I want to say that the actual, pavement material hasn't been determined yet. um but there are different options. You know, there's
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:36–00:48:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
where you have grass going within like a concrete block. um and those are the types of things that we're hoping that if we use will help ‸ reduce the pond size, because what you're trying to do is filter the water first and then convey it versus when you put it straight into a pipe. That's the fastest way to go.
And, and it's likely not going to be completely paved either. becauseI, I, my understanding when we first started talking about this was that was bad to cover that much with solid
asphalt. Yeah. you know their Asphalt isn't bad in all cases. you know The one thing about asphalt is you lay it and leave it. um If if you do something else, it just takes a little bit more time in order and money to obviously maintain it. But there are options. Okay. Thank you.
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:16–00:50:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
any funding for those? ‸ I know that, um I mean, I think like there, or at least there were some some deals out there from providers that wanted to, you know, they would charge for the electricity, but just give more options.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:41–00:50:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as we get further in the design process, I think we'll be able to know exactly who the provider is. um but at this point in time, we're just kind of locating where they're going to be. We haven't specified ‸ exactly who that provider will be.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:24–00:51:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
sure. I do also want to note because that has come up in meetings with staff before they're very aware of the security and the lighting. um and as part of this, we'll do a lighting photometric study that shows the coverage. And then obviously
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:07–00:52:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:18–00:52:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:22–00:52:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a lot of the things are dependent on the review time. Some of our long lead design items like survey are done and and now it's when I can get that water management district permit, we will you know be ready to put it out to bid. Thank
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:56–00:53:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Station also. Her area of expertise is uh transportation planning. And uh ‸ always want an opportunity to brag on Gators there. Myra just completed her PhD. at the University of Florida. All
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:22–00:53:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
i'm excited i i have you have no idea how excited if i get excited over p.m peak hours and parking in a um in the downtown district, just the opportunity to work on the Brightline Multimodal Station, I mean, it's, it'll be like the best
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:53:51–00:54:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:09–00:54:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:15–00:54:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:22–00:54:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:32–00:54:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:41–00:54:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
request agency approval of the two quotes provided by Empire Computing and Consulting for the installation of security cameras at various locations, which we will suppress that information because of security reasons. Be mindful of that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:03–00:55:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:19–00:55:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:31–00:55:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:36–00:55:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:51–00:55:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:52–00:56:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:05–00:56:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:18–00:56:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:24–00:56:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
task orders, purchase orders and the budget amendment. And again, please be mindful about the discussion about the sensitivity of being secured. If you have any additional questions, you may
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:43–00:56:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 00:56:49–00:57:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:26–00:57:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:49–00:57:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:56–00:58:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:09–00:58:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:20–00:58:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
CRA, we can get more with the same amount versus if we can get more security with 88 000 than, say, three police officers. Now think about the extended amount of time. and
just laying it out. It's up to you. whatever the wishes of the agency uh be in support of. um My thing is, like you all agreed, safety first and foremost. But we can get more people through security than we can with a police officer in a longer period of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:25–00:59:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
noted, the interlocal agreement was executed in October of 2022 by the agency. ‸ In 2025, we amended the redevelopment plan, which does include a provision for implementing a community policing program. And
it for this fiscal year in order to continue moving forward until a decision is made by the agency on uh security and community policing efforts. And so we needed to budget for that since we did not budget for it for this fiscal year. So we're requesting approval of the uh amended and restated in our local agreement uh with the effective date uh for this fiscal year. And then a budget amendment for the interfund transfer uh that will also come back at the December 9th City Council meeting to uh move the funds
I have um two lights, three lights that are illuminating. But before, um can you address my first question about the number of security officers versus the police officers? And Councilman
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:03–01:01:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
did bring out an excellent point um about sometimes we may have three different distractions oror cases where we're entertaining an issue with the police officers. Somebody might be mad at their girlfriend. That requires an officer. The number of hours on that shift. um And I think they can work hand in hand. ‸ I'm just asking the question, ma'am. Can you elaborate on that?
Yes, sir. Several months ago, we did bring back a proposal from a security company, the one that we use here for City Hall for approximately 92 hours of a week for security coverage in the
for the the full 92 hours a week, 365 days a year. And, uh and that would be for one security guard armed security guard to patrol pretty much every day, all day long. And, and then the, what, what we're bringing to you tonight is for
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:04–01:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from 10 p.m to 3 a.m for police officers uh so the coverage is a little different for the the timing as far as the numbers are concerned. uh so I'm just answering that question for you.
didn't, um carry this forward into the plan because you guys were going to make a decision as to whether or not you're going to continue with the police department or, are the, the private, uh security services. ‸ Well, that decision wasn't made. And so in the interim, we need to go back to this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:01–01:03:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah, no, that's correct, um stockton i mean this establishes the agreement between the CRA and the city and also modifies the um community policing policy that gives um the um the city and the CRA the option to use either or or both
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here · 01:04:07–01:04:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:37–01:04:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, and it, and it is, it is not a, it wouldn't be a special detail. I mean, unless you're going to pay for the special detail. And so, um, you know, it's a, it's an operational tactical question, which probably shouldn't be answered in a, in a, in a public setting.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:00–01:06:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
he would have to call an officer. So my thing, I just want to make sure that we go that route, uh, the response time of an officer would be adequate and that it would make sense for the dollars that we're spending. Uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:21–01:06:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so, and so the more severe the call, the, the, the, the higher the priority. So, so it just depends on the type of call, you know, security guards won't also have noise meters, you know, so, and, and I don't want to get into it before we get to the workshop. But if you, if you look at the crime rate in the village and you look at the issues in the village, what you, what you really need are more, uh, code officers on, on a, on a night shift because they would have the noise meters and would be able to, to cite the violations. But I'll, I'll get into that when we get into the workshop.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:10–01:07:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a route where we go and contract with a security firm, I don't know if these conversations are, have already been taking place, but what, what length of an agreement will we have to go?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:37–01:07:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. And then the third thing I would just, it's not really a question is to ask. Uh, and that's either route that we take. Um, if it's renewing the contract with PD, or going with the security firm, my request would be, um, I would like as a member agency member to request a biannual report from either, uh, entity. Um,
Is that it? Okay. I'm next and then we'll get to you. Um, I just want to clarify what we're doing tonight. We have to do to keep the police paid. Is that what I'm getting? And then we're going to discuss security and everything else at the workshop. None of that is coming into play tonight.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:03–01:09:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:06–01:09:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
this is basically the new interlocal agreement for right now. It's going to cover what we already cover, but it's giving us the opening to do additional stuff. Once to sit. No,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:33–01:09:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:44–01:09:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:46–01:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:00–01:10:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:05–01:10:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the private security firm to report on their performance and services. With respect to oversight, the policy also adds provisions that when private security personnel are assigned by the, by the agency and paid for by the agency, then the private security personnel still have to have general oversight of the chief of, of the chief of police and the city manager.
report those to the chief of police and the city manager. So there's a reporting protocol for private security, just the general framework. Okay. To allow them to operate as, you know, somewhat of an enhancement in terms of eyes on the ground, but subject to supervision by the police chief and city manager. That's all new.
Okay. And I was, I was reading ‸ that said that there would be police officers assigned during the day. If this is what we decide for the, for the community policing after we do the workshop and where they would have the officers on the ground would have input as to where they think the issues are and they would develop relationships with the community and the merchants and the, you know, the downtown. Um, this just to me, and I, I read all of this and I, you know, I always do, um, just seems very much more specific than, and, and many more options and, and things that could be covered.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:12:19–01:12:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:19–01:12:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
first part of the background information where it says the police department will submit reports detailing the hours supported during this project and ‸ finance will calculate the expenditures for each reporting period.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:45–01:12:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about sometimes there, there are not officers during the hours that theoretically we are paying for that they get called away to other parts of the city, which is in and of itself is fine. Um, ‸ some of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:49–01:13:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't think she, she, she's much better ‸ finance director than just that. So she, she, she was ready to drill down to the lowest level of detail that she can.
but I am concerned about this particular expenditure and it being a CRA expenditure. And I just kind of would like to keep a little, maybe a little better track of it. Um, ‸ this agreement that I'm assuming this, that we're voting on tonight does say that it, the community policing program provides that we can pay officers and, or, or, and private security. Um, I'm looking forward to the workshop because I, I want to hear more from what the people want. And not just, not just the village merchants, because the CRA is bigger than that. So I hope we can get people to like residents and, and people from further out in the CRA than just the three streets in the middle of the downtown,
so that we are covering as much as we can as an agency and, and using the agency money for, um, and I think once we do, hopefully once we do the workshop, we can fine tune a little better. Uh, the coverage because I, I, I'm concerned as are all of us in the downtown about some of the vandalism and, and homeless issues, but that's not all the noise is a thing that of course I ‸ don't live in the downtown. So I don't know. I'm not aware that it's as bad as it is as late as it is. So,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:57–01:16:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:45–01:16:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lot of break-ins on the outer rims of the uh community. uh Saturday night, 9.04 pm car stolen off of st charles came in off of florida ave left off on florida so all these you know perimeter roads, they're easy in and easy out. So, they can hit you andand leave. So, I don't know how we cover, really, ‸ village is not that big. We just don't have the personnel. Or we need uh additional support, somehow, to get this kind of to stop. Because these people are already saying they they're just kind of fed up. They want to leave.
i Hopefully, will be able to come up with some ideas. I think we have to have better communications amongst ourselves as residents in the village. That's why I like the having the dashboard where we can report things that we see. We can track it. We can see what's happening. And communicating with each other so that we're the ‸ eyes. Because we live here. We see. We saw the, uh what was ‸ the mobile guy? The mobile, well,
thank God. um But it would come it came out that he was taking and pirating electricity and water off several different businesses. and um it it was like we just kept calling and, you know, well, he can park there because it says he can park there between this hour and this hour. You know, he's taking up three spaces. I mean, then when I saw the the electric electrical cord, I was like so excited. But I had had an emergency and I had to go. So, I couldn't take a picture. We shouldn't have to do that. But once we, you know, brought it forward, everybody in the village was like going, yeah, he's over here. He's over there. So, that really helps. We can kind of do some of that amongst ourselves. But we need to have a vehicle to be able to see what's happening and talked with each other. Because I think we can patrol ourselves also, ‸ but it's getting out there and getting the information. And that's all I have to say. I do think we need it. We need it for our residents. We need it for our merchants and just for our visitors, too.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:46–01:19:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:58–01:20:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:24–01:20:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
guard out front. You had an officer sitting there because I'm carrying now. Because you want protection. So I want that same protection for 100 merchants, for all my businesses, for all the people that come into this building. They're going to Disney because why? I'll tell you why. Why they're going to the avenues?
We need more lights. The council has been working on that with Stockton and the CRA. We need more police presence. Stockton has been working very hard with our chief to make that happen, which has worked. We have seen the difference. Okay? And we need more cameras, which tonight you voted for. If we do those three things, we have what we need to make this village and this community ‸ continue to move forward. So we can work, eat and play together. I will not
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:21:53–01:22:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:22:08–01:22:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reason why I'm saying that is because, one, I'm a firm believer that we can maintain both, but I would rather have more eyes present and being vis visible by the by the citizens and business owners and those that do visit the downtown area.
but we already know that we have this is the highest number we've ever gainfully employed a police officer. But what I'm thinking of, even when I've gone to Tampa, they've had security officers there in the downtown area. When
They were present. They were uh visible throughout the community. And and I'm saying that's what I believe in right now. um And we do have that issue about carrying weapons in a a a building, especially this building. um And you're not allowed to carry in this building unless it's an AR-15. So if you have a concealed weapon on you, you know the rest of that story. So my thing that I'm asking is I'm looking for a second and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:54–01:23:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:59–01:24:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:24:12–01:24:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:24:27–01:24:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think it will help us tremendously make rational decisions about what we're going to do moving forward. Those call sheets mean a lot. And if they have access to non-emergency calls on what they were for, were they for noise or I don't know the labels that they put on it. But I think it will help all of us because, you know, calls are everything. So I really
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:33–01:25:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:41–01:25:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
for 2025. We need to know those numbers. I think it'll help us out a lot. It'll stop us from and stop others from having several conversations and just throwing out things. We need to see what the facts are.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:00–01:26:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:07–01:26:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:17–01:26:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:42–01:26:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It says that the special districts must create performance measures and standards and have goals and objectives for each program and activity that's undertaken by the district and that by December 1st, each special district must publish the annual report on their website ‸ that details the goals and objectives and performance measures.
these accomplishments are from the 2022 COCO CRA plan update, which were the goals and objectives that we had at that time. So in the 2024-2025 fiscal ‸ year, the goals and objectives were
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:27:35–01:27:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:27:40–01:27:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:27:46–01:27:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:03–01:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the CRA. ‸ So a lot of that is what we're doing. Crime prevention, obviously, we talked about that tonight. We're working towards trying to make improvements to the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:34–01:28:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
by establishing these community policing initiatives under the urban design improvements. Again, it's all about ‸ restoring the vibrancy of the village, strengthening the identity, improving walkability. All of those are being accomplished with a lot of the task and the budgetary items that we ‸ did in the fiscal year 2025. In addition to what other agencies like FDOT have also accomplished with ‸ the transformation of the 520 corridor,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:13–01:29:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
One of the things that the CRA did accomplish and did have a goal was ‸ to start doing some affordable housing and to actually work with that initiatives, which under the consent decree was a requirement. We purchased 203 Orange Street to to use as a potential affordable housing project in the heart of Cocoa.
based on the budget tonight in the 2025 goals and objectives. The five goals that we have are invest ‸ in place, making initiatives, improve connectivity, enhancing mobility, diversify, improve housing stock, foster sustainable economic development and strengthen the resilience of the CRA through the budgetary impacts of what we have in the F.Y. 26 budget. One of the biggest projects that we have is the waterfront with the find grant.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:10–01:30:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
budget is going to be used to restore and do the resiliency for the waterfront ‸ and improve that. In addition to the facade grants and some of the other programs that we have in the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:25–01:30:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:30:38–01:30:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:30:55–01:30:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
That is the booklet that we do provide to all of you after the March 31st deadline, uh, which we will incorporate a lot of these into that report. So that it'll be a full scale report. Okay. But yes,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:37–01:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chair's going to call the question. All in favor saying aye. Aye. Great job, ma'am. Staff, city manager, madam, community development director, associate members, and all that good stuff, ma'am. It's beginning to look like Christmas.
I don't know if you mentioned it when you were just speaking or not, but is there an update on the five acres? Um, the five acre lot off of Roselle back here. Yeah.
mean, we're back to the drawing board in terms of issuing an RFP. Remember, we've been out one, two, three times on that. Um, last time we didn't get any response to the RFP. So,
requires a mixed use component. Um, last time part of the problem probably was, and, and with those density bonuses, that's a very valuable piece of property. Um,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:39–01:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:01–01:34:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:34:31–01:34:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:41–01:34:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:22–01:35:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chair entertains a motion to adjourn. Where do the wishes of the agency? Move to adjourn. We have a motion on the floor by Vice Chairperson Weeks. Second by the chair.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:29–01:36:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:39–01:36:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:36:50–01:36:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording