Board of Adjustment

Special Board of Adjustment Meeting

Date: 2026-07-01
Status: Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source: CivicClerk event #1507

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 📋 Agenda Packet (PDF, 40.4 MB) Watch on the City's meeting portal ↗

Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2026-08-19, pp. 7–9; approved with amendments by the Board of Adjustment according to the draft minutes of 2026-08-19 (that draft's own approval is not found in the records on file); the approving motion: “approve the July 1, 2026, Special Meeting Minutes with amendments to grammatical errors”; the amendment is quoted from that motion and is not applied in these records. The City has not posted the approved minutes. The approving motion, “to approve the July 1, 2026, Special Meeting Minutes with amendments to grammatical errors”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2026-09-16 agenda packet (2505_Board_of_Adjustment_September_16_2026.pdf, packet pp. 7–10).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (2455_BOA_August_19_2026_Full_Agenda.pdf, packet pp. 7–9). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

Listed present when the roll was taken: Dan Quattrocchi, Robert Butler, Pam Shaia, Jose Pacheco, Jennifer Moton, Ashley Lanier
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: Robert Dyar, Margaret Goudelock
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Kristin Eick (City Attorney), Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Luci Ribeiro (City Planner), Breanna Earley (Recording Secretary)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Butler, Lanier, Moton, Pacheco, Quattrocchi, Shaia (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)

Adopted actions (2)

to approve the July 1, 2026, Special Meeting Agenda, and to approve the June 17, 2026, Regular Meeting Minutes as written (moved by Shaia, seconded by Moton); PASSED 4-0; ayes: Quattrocchi, Shaia, Pacheco, Moton; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 7–9
to adjourn the July 1, 2026 meeting (moved by Moton, seconded by Pacheco); PASSED 6-0; ayes: Quattrocchi, Moton, Shaia, Pacheco, Lanier, Butler; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 7–9

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Source: 2455_BOA_August_19_2026_Full_Agenda.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2026-08-19 meeting, packet pp. 7–9; lines 188–313 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes

MEETING MINUTES
July 1, 2026

A Special meeting of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Cocoa was held on Wednesday, July 1, 2026, in the
Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed.

I. OPENING MATTERS:

Chair Quattrocchi called the meeting to order at 5:37 pm.

The Recording Secretary called the roll.

ROLL CALL:

Dan Quattrocchi Chairperson
Robert Butler Vice Chair
Robert Dyar Board Member
Pam Shaia Board Member
Jose Pacheco Board Member
Jennifer Moton Board Member
Margaret Goudelock Board Member
Ashley Lanier Alternate Board Member

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Dan Quattrocchi Chairperson
Robert Butler Vice Chair
Pam Shaia Board Member
Jose Pacheco Board Member
Jennifer Moton Board Member
Ashley Lanier Alternate Board Member

MEMBERS ABSENT:

Robert Dyar Board Member
Margaret Goudelock Board Member

OTHERS PRESENT:

Kristin Eick City Attorney
Stockton Whitten City Manager
Luci Ribeiro City Planner
Breanna Earley Recording Secretary

I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES:

AGENDA: Special Meeting of July 1, 2026

MINUTES: Regular Meeting of June 17, 2026

* Motion by Board Member Shaia ; Seconded by Board Member Moton to approve the July 1,
2026, Special Meeting Agenda, and to approve the June 17, 2026, Regular Meeting Minutes as
written.

Ayes: Quattrocchi, Shaia, Pacheco, Moton

Motion Passed Unanimously (4-0).

II. OLD BUSINESS:

III. NEW BUSINESS:
1. PZ 26–00700002 –Variance - 1198 N Indian River Dr
Luci Riberio, City Planner, presented a PowerPoint for Variance 1198 N Indian River Dr1.
Applicant presented a PowerPoint for the variance2.
Vice Chair Butler arrived at 5:53 PM.
Applicant continued providing a history on 1198 N Indian River Dr.
Alternate Board Member Lanier arrived at 5:58 PM.
Applicant continued with the PowerPoint presentation.
Chair Quattrocchi asked why the zoning was changed.
Ribeiro, explained the zoning.
Quattrocchi asked about the demolition.
Applicant explained the site plan and what would be rebuilt.
Board member Moton, asked about flooding and drainage requirements.
Ribeiro, stated the impervious area is the only thing considered.
Board member Pacheco, asked about the setbacks.
Ribeiro, detailed the setbacks.
Pacheco, asked about elevation.
Applicant stated the final elevation would be 4’8.

1 Exhibit A: PowerPoint
2 Exhibit B: Applicant PowerPoint

Attorney Eick, wanted to ensure the board was aware all criteria was met to provide the
variance.
Board member Shaia, asked for further clarification on the job scope.
Applicant explained.
Quattrocchi asked why the addition is necessary.
Applicant provided explanation for why it neds to be done.
City Manager Whitten explained if the applicant were to rebuild as is, they would s till
experience the conditions and issues they are currently.
Pacheco, asked about the criteria needed.
Attorney Eick, further clarified the criteria needed.
* Motion b y Board Member Shaia ; Seconded by Board Member Moton to approve with staff
recommendations as presented and written and relief from Appendix A, Article X, Section 5
governing expansion of nonconforming structures.
Ayes: Quattrocchi, Moton, Shaia, Pacheco, Butler, Lanier
Motion Passed Unanimously (6-0)
IV. OTHER BUSINESS:
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: July 15, 2026, at 6:00 pm at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, FL.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
* Motion by Board Member Moton; Seconded by Board Member Pacheco to adjourn the July 1,
2026 meeting.
Ayes: Quattrocchi, Moton, Shaia, Pacheco, Lanier, Butler
Motion Passed Unanimously (6-0)
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 6:46 P.M.

______________________________________
Dan Quattrocchi, Chairperson

______________________________________
Breanna Earley, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

No time links are shown for this meeting.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

1. Agenda: Special Meeting of July 1, 2026.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of June 17, 2026.

III. Old Business

1. Variance 1198 N Indian River Dr

IV. New Business

V. Other Business

VI. Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2026, at 6:00 pm at 65 Stone Street in Cocoa, FL.

VII. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 11 voices separated from the audio. 54 short machine repair(s) (67 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 88.8% of 10,116 content words. Dotted words (259 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 275 passages (26% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] Speaker 1

‸ We'll

[00:00:00] Attribution uncertain

make

[00:00:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it work. All right.

[00:00:02] Speaker 2

Good evening.

[00:00:04] Speaker 3

Welcome to our City of Cocoa Board of

[00:00:07] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:07–00:00:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:12] Speaker 3

please stand for the pledge.

[00:00:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:17–00:00:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12]

[00:00:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:00:33] Speaker 3

All right, Brianna, if we could do a roll call, please.

[00:00:37] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:37–00:00:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:39] Speaker 3

Here.

[00:00:40] Speaker 4

Board member, or Vice Chair Butler. Board member Dyer. Board member Shia.

[00:00:47] Speaker 1

Here.

[00:00:48] Speaker 4

Board member Pacheco.

[00:00:49] Speaker 1

Here.

[00:00:50] Speaker 4

Board member Moten.

[00:00:51] No voice detected

Here.

[00:00:52] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:52–00:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:55] Speaker 4

Alternate board member Lanier. And city attorney Ike.

[00:00:59] Speaker 5

Here.

[00:01:01] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Thank you. If we can get a motion to approve the agenda and meetings ‸ from ‸ last time combined, please.

[00:01:11] Speaker 1

I'll make a motion that we accept the agenda and the minutes.

[00:01:16] Speaker 3

Do I have a second?

[00:01:19] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:19–00:01:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:21] Speaker 3

All right. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? All right. Those pass. And we'll move straight into our business for this evening, which is the variance at 1198 North Indian River Drive. Lucy thank you very much and we will turn

[00:01:39] Speaker 7

‸ so we have the applicant tonight

[00:01:45] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:45–00:01:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:47] Speaker 7

and I apologize if I

[00:01:48] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

mispronounce

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:48–00:01:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:01:48] Speaker 7

your last name ‸ so a very tonight we are here for our variance requests from Appendix 8, Article 10, Nonconformities, Section 5, to allow for an approximately 861 square foot addition to a nonconforming residential structure that increases its nonconformity. And

[00:02:11] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:11–00:02:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:19] Speaker 7

to allow a reduction of the required

[00:02:21] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

front

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:21–00:02:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:02:21] Speaker 7

setback from 50 feet to approximately 25 feet

[00:02:25] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:25–00:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:28] Speaker 7

So the zoning district for this properties is residential state and has a feature land use of very low density residential. so in summary, the the request is to expand a legally nonconforming home. The new addition has, as mentioned, 861 square feet addition. The variance is to allow the expansion within the existing front setback and also seeking a relief from the 50 feet required to approximately 25. so staff did a historical research and the original lot

[00:03:09] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:09–00:03:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:11] Speaker 7

division of lands of Robert Dixon is one of the first

[00:03:14] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:14–00:03:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:15] Speaker 7

created in for the

[00:03:18] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:18–00:03:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:23] Speaker 7

this area was

[00:03:25] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:25–00:03:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:30] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:30–00:03:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:35] Speaker 7

plot So

[00:03:42] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:42–00:03:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:45] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:45–00:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:48] Speaker 7

single-family residential district with a 20-foot front setback requirement. In 1959,

[00:03:54] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:54–00:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:02] Speaker 7

residential state zoning state

[00:04:08] Attribution uncertain

zoning

[00:04:08] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:08–00:04:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:08] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

[00:04:13] Speaker 7

regulation, making it a legally established non-conforming structure. ‸ In 1974, the property was

[00:04:21] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

rezoned

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:21–00:04:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:04:21] Speaker 7

to the current residential

[00:04:23] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

state

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:23–00:04:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:04:23] Speaker 7

that we have today, which requires a 50-foot front setback. Planning staff also identify a 1977 Board of Adjustment variance approving the construction of a detached garage.

[00:04:36] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:36–00:04:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:43] Speaker 7

both the subject property

[00:04:44] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

and

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:44–00:04:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:04:45] Speaker 7

the property across the street and ‸ just as a reference as you can see

[00:04:49] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:49–00:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:53] Speaker 7

used to be at some point in history got combined with the lot 18. And furtherly you know, later on got divided and sold separately. We were not able to track when that exactly happened, but based on the variance application, that is actually part of your package, you can see that information that was provided to you.

[00:05:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:17–00:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:22] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:22–00:05:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:22] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:18]

[00:05:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:05:41] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:05:41] Speaker 7

that is that a structure has been located on this pro subject proper for over

[00:05:46] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:46–00:05:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:46] Speaker 7

years the city has treated the resident as a legally established non-conforming structure subject to the applicable provisions of the city land development regulations.

[00:05:56] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:56–00:06:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:01] Speaker 7

at that location uh so would it be

[00:06:04] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:04–00:06:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:09] Speaker 7

my research I was not uh able to find any records or pictures that would demonstrate that it actually there was um a structure

[00:06:19] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:19–00:06:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:26] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

website. So to provide an overview of the existing residents and the proposed improvements, staff prepared

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:26–00:06:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:06:35] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:35–00:06:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:36] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

table, comparing information obtained from the property appraiser's records, the boundary survey and architectural plans submitted with the building permit application that we have on hold at the moment waiting for this variance. Um, the applicant states that the reconstruction of the affected portion of the dwelling would allow deterioration of structural components to be addressed and provide an opportunity to relocate mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems to locations more consistent with current building standards. So you can see the property

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:35–00:07:13 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:07:13] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:07:13–00:07:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:14] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

information card gives you the living area

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:07:14–00:07:18 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:07:18] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:07:18–00:07:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:19] Speaker 7

second

[00:07:20] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:20–00:07:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:24] Speaker 7

the size for the garage. And so give a

[00:07:27] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:27–00:07:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:32] Speaker 7

Normally our zoning review is based on the survey that is considered a legal document. So the survey actually shows

[00:07:42] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:42–00:07:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:47] Speaker 7

square feet. And then if you add the garage, the porch, and the

[00:07:52] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:52–00:07:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:57] Speaker 7

just for the record, the architectural drawings there's actually part of your package shows a different measurement. So

[00:08:05] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:05–00:08:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:14] Speaker 7

square feet if you have any questions related to that I can further to explain to you.

[00:08:20] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:20–00:08:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:29] Speaker 7

the required variance criteria. The ultimate determination must be based upon the confidence substantial evidence presented during this public hearing.

[00:08:39] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:39–00:08:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:46] Speaker 7

self-created hardship, no special privilege, incompatible compatibility with the neighborhood.

[00:08:54] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:54–00:08:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:56] Speaker 7

staff reports. That is number, the criteria A through F. So the subject property is unique within the residential state zoning district because it's the only residential state

[00:09:13] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:13–00:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:16] Speaker 7

And it's categorized by an irregular waterfront configuration created by the Mandarin shoreline of the india river unlike the surrounding interior lots to the west the parcel has a constrained building envelope to its limited average

[00:09:34] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

depth

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:34–00:09:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:09:35] Speaker 7

and irregular shape. So the average

[00:09:38] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

depth for this lot

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:38–00:09:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:09:39] Speaker 7

is actually 61 feet. The proposed addition would bring the residents to the maximum

[00:09:46] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:46–00:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:49] Speaker 7

district while maintaining the existing residential use as the established building and established building line. Unlike the subject property, the surrounding residential state lots generally have sufficient width and depth to accommodate development while while meeting the required 50 foot front setback. the subject property The subject property's

[00:10:12] Attribution uncertain

irregular

[00:10:12] Speaker 7

configuration, limited average depth, and waterfront location reduce the other available building envelope in a matter there is not typical of other properties within this district. The existing resident in his location were established prior to the current honors acquisition of the property and prior to the adoption of the current zoning regulations. ‸ Granting the request variance would not authorize additional residential density, commercial activities, of the vision of the property, or any use otherwise prohibited within the residential state zoning district. The variance would allow improvements to existing legally established single family residents while maintaining the property's existing residential use.

[00:10:58] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:10:58–00:11:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:10:59] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

[00:11:05] Speaker 7

preserve the established building line, and represent the minimum relief necessary to reasonably rehabilitate and use the existing

[00:11:13] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

residence.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:13–00:11:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:11:14] Speaker 7

In making this determination, the board should evaluate the evidence presented regarding the property's physical characteristics, characteristics the proposed ‸ improvements,

[00:11:24] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

and

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:24–00:11:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:11:24] Speaker 7

any feasible alternatives. So staff recommends approval of the requested variance provided the board finds the applicant has presented competent

[00:11:34] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

substation

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:34–00:11:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:11:35] Speaker 7

evidence demonstrating that all required variance criteria have been satisfied including that the requested relief represents the

[00:11:43] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

minimal

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:43–00:11:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:11:43] Speaker 7

practical variance necessary to allow the reasonable use of the ‸ property as discussed in the staff report If the applicant does not provide sufficient evidence addressing this matter

[00:11:54] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:54–00:11:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:56] Speaker 7

or deny the application because the record would not establish that the requested variance the minimum variance necessary to make reasonable use of the building or structure

[00:12:06] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:06–00:12:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:09] Speaker 7

and he's gonna ‸ go over And I'm available for questions ‸ Can

[00:12:15] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I ask a question to you before we do? Yeah

[00:12:17] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

sure Maybe

[00:12:18] Speaker 3

he has this on his powerpoint

[00:12:20] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:20–00:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:20] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:12:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:12:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:12:22] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

Or does he have the the proposed on the survey plan to show what's proposed?

[00:12:27] No voice detected

I have a site

[00:12:28] Speaker 3

plan showing

[00:12:30] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:30–00:12:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:31] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:12:33] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:12:34] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:12:37] Speaker 7

Yes

[00:12:38] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:38–00:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:12:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:12:40] Speaker 3

Okay

[00:12:42] Speaker 7

So if you look in your package you should have

[00:12:44] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:44–00:12:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:46] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:46–00:12:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:46] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:12:46] Attribution uncertain

We had

[00:12:46] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the schematics of like ‸ the elevation and stuff like that But we didn't have a survey Right To show like a proposed like it'd be helpful to have a survey to see what's where it's proposed Yes

[00:12:59] Attribution uncertain

[00:12:59] Speaker 3

you have that on yours?

[00:13:01] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:01–00:13:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:02] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:13:02] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:13:02] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:13:03] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:13:03–00:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:09] Speaker 3

Sure, let's do that Let's do or

[00:13:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:12–00:13:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:12] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:13:13] Speaker 7

I don't know if

[00:13:14] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

the

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:14–00:13:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:13:14] Speaker 7

The addition would be ‸ the the airing blue

[00:13:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

That's the 865

[00:13:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:21–00:13:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:23] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:13:24] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

Okay

[00:13:29] Speaker 3

Yeah, I have questions and I'm sure you guys do too But I guess let's go ahead and swear in the applicant Mr.

[00:13:35] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

quick

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:35–00:13:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:13:35] Speaker 3

Is it Quigley? Yeah, please come up and swear in and then you could give your presentation and then we'll ask questions

[00:13:42] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:42–00:13:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:46] Speaker 4

nothing but the truth?

[00:13:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Yes, I do so Thank

[00:13:49] Speaker 4

you

[00:13:52] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

No, no, it's not with, oh this changes

[00:13:54] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:54–00:13:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:13:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:13:58] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Okay Okay First of all I'd like to say thank you guys very much for having us here The stakes are high The decision that you guys make, it's going to determine where I live and how I live going forward

[00:14:14] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:21]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:14–00:14:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:14:34] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

[00:14:42] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

I do appreciate that Thank you for your consideration and everything So all the students have to have something to do with this My neighbors, these are my neighbors They're the three closest neighbors to me

[00:14:57] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:57–00:15:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:07] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:07–00:15:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:16] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

He lives right directly across the street

[00:15:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:19–00:15:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:21] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

So thank you to the academy

[00:15:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:24–00:15:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:25] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Colette Farrell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:15:25] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:15:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:15:25] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:15:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:15:26] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:15:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:15:27] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Okay And me, my name is Tim Quigley and this is my wife Carla Quigley

[00:15:36] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:36–00:15:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Office down in Broward County

[00:15:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:43–00:15:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:45] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

My wife is registered, retired registered nurse and down in Miami And about four years ago when we were starting to plan our retirement We wanted to get a house on the water And we searched almost all on the coast for it And this one popped up And we were like, okay, let's go check it out And then on the first sight that we saw it We fell in love with it We realized that the house needed a ton of work

[00:16:14] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:14–00:16:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:16] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So we bought it and took a chance on it That was about three years ago this

[00:16:22] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:22–00:16:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:22] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

And so you guys have seen the progress that we've done throughout Hopefully, they've done a good job ‸ But we want to continue to do that And

[00:16:31] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:31–00:16:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

plan was to save the old section of the house That we were talking about The old section of the house, what it is Is Originally It was

[00:16:45] No voice detected

‸ Okay

[00:16:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I mean You know

[00:16:47] Speaker 1

what? We

[00:16:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

can actually restart the slide So This property is Magnolia 10 I don't know if

[00:16:55] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:55–00:16:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

aware of that

[00:16:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:56–00:17:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:02] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

And it was on the original homestead of the

[00:17:05] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:17:05–00:17:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:06] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

John Smith And And he They had the first John Smith ‸ No,

[00:17:16] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:16–00:17:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

‸ Okay, so It was the site of the

[00:17:21] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:21–00:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:24] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Right there on that lot And then That was also the first voting precinct Before the

[00:17:29] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:29–00:17:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

So that spot Had A road on it And it was a wagon trail That went through And Because it was before cars And everything that was

[00:17:42] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

brought

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:42–00:17:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:17:42] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

in was by

[00:17:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

steamboat.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:43–00:17:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:17:44] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

And I'll get to the variance but the history is important

[00:17:48] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:48–00:17:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:52] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Has been there since the 20s and 30s And it was After the post office

[00:17:58] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

burned down,

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:58–00:17:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:17:58] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:17:58–00:18:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:01] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

A cottage

[00:18:02] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:02–00:18:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:03–00:18:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:04] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

They didn't even put it straight

[00:18:05] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:05–00:18:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:07] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And then From that time To around the 60s They did multiple additions on it And if you look at it You can

[00:18:15] No voice detected

see The house And I'll show you

[00:18:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Which Okay And then

[00:18:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:19–00:18:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:20] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Another interesting point In June of 2000 It became a designated highway

[00:18:25] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:25–00:18:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

So we get a lot of traffic through there And everybody's always broken And

[00:18:31] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:31–00:18:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Wants And I'm something proud of Proud of There

[00:18:36] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:36–00:18:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

to do So

[00:18:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

there is

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:41–00:18:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:18:42] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

the property

[00:18:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:43–00:18:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Um You can see the improvements that we've done Um

[00:18:50] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:50–00:18:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:52] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And

[00:18:53] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:53–00:18:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And also on this slide Notice How much land is available on ‸ There's really No other land available Anywhere else

[00:19:04] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:04–00:19:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:08] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

[00:19:09] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

kind of

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:09–00:19:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:19:09] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

sticks out at you That the obvious place

[00:19:11] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:11–00:19:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:12] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

In the

[00:19:12] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:12–00:19:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:13] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And if you look at this picture right here You can see how crooked the house is That On the south end It's the closest to

[00:19:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:23–00:19:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And that's important

[00:19:27] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:27–00:19:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:30] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And so The setback Actually

[00:19:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:33–00:19:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:34] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

As I go

[00:19:35] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:35–00:19:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Is the furthest thing back It's

[00:19:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:43–00:19:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:43–00:19:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:45] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

one inch It's

[00:19:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:51–00:19:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:55] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; words the first reading may have missed · 00:19:55–00:19:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And potatoes Because I know There's a lot of information And it can be very confusing

[00:20:04] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:04–00:20:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:08] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Before we started And I'm gonna ‸ break it down As simple as I

[00:20:12] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:12–00:20:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:14] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And hopefully It's clear to everybody in this room

[00:20:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:17–00:20:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:18] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:18–00:20:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:19] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:20:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

That you're doing the right thing

[00:20:21] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:21–00:20:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:20:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And I hope that we

[00:20:25] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

can prove

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:25–00:20:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:20:25] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

that. So the requested variance, just as was in Ms. Lucy's PowerPoint, is from Appendix A, Article 11, Section 1, and it's from 50 feet to 25 feet. That's the request. And the reason for my request is to allow property rights commonly

[00:20:44] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:20:44–00:20:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:45] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

by other properties in the same district under the terms of the ordinance. I'm not asking for anything that's outside

[00:20:51] No voice detected

of the ordinance.

[00:20:52] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Everything I'm asking for

[00:20:54] No voice detected

[00:20:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

in the ordinance,

[00:20:55] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:55–00:21:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

that I needed to meet these standards, and these are the standards that you guys have to use to vote to approve this variance. All four of these need to be met. And actually, in the code, which is interesting, it says that there's four that they need to meet, but then in a separate section, it has a fifth one. And it's the minimum variance cost. So technically, there's five things that you guys have to meet, even though here it says four. I'll show you the fifth one. And that fifth one kind of almost threw me for a loop. So if we go through it,

[00:21:45] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:45–00:21:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:49] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

given to the

[00:21:49] Attribution uncertain

property

[00:21:49] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

for the land, structure or building involved, and which are not applicable to other land buildings and structures in the same district. So just at the glance, you can see the picture of the lot. You know that it's nonconforming. It's special. Number two, that literal interpretation of the provisions of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the

[00:22:14] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

ordinance.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:14–00:22:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:22:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:15–00:22:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:18] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

‸ and I do not want to be deprived of all of the associated rules that go along in ‸ residential estate.

[00:22:29] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:29–00:22:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

And the literal interpretation of the code does not allow

[00:22:37] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:37–00:22:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:22:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

to. You see, it's the literal interpretation of 50 feet is depriving ‸ of commonly enjoyed by other properties. So I feel like I need that. And I'll do more, I'll prove it even more in the next slide. Number three is that the special conditions and circumstances in reference to and number one do not result from the ‸ actions of the applicant. This happened, the whole reason why we're in this is because the zoning rules were changed.

[00:23:13] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:13–00:23:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

It was fine until they imposed residential estate on this property. ‸ Had it never been changed, there wouldn't be a problem. So then number four, the granting of

[00:23:27] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:27–00:23:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

I'm not asking for anything special. Not even a setback. Even the setback that I'm requesting is in residential estate zones. There is 25 feet, which I'll show you the exact word.

[00:23:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:54–00:23:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:58] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

However, you have to qualify to get it. So I'm not asking for any special privilege. I'll show you the cost. If I can keep your attention. I hope that I am. So what created the hardship? The zoning changes created the hardship. The zoning changes created a legally non-conforming lot. ‸ The RE zoning is 150 feet.

[00:24:24] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:24:24–00:24:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:28] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:24:28–00:24:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

So picture this here has wide invariance. There's an average of 60 and they're requiring me they're requiring me a 50. That leaves 10 feet left. But guess what? It's a 35 setback from the rear. ‸ Where do you build?

[00:24:56] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:56–00:25:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:57] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:25:01] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Because the setback is 15.7

[00:25:04] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:04–00:25:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:06] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

okay, so basically the

[00:25:08] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:08–00:25:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:11] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Which I found out

[00:25:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:15–00:25:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

That's what we commonly know as the grandfather clauses. Those grandfather clauses were put in place to protect properties like this. From situations like this.

[00:25:29] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:29–00:25:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

non-conforming codes and ordinances.

[00:25:35] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:35–00:25:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

unharmed created by zoning changes. And it also allowed the city to adopt any zoning standards. And our, which I'll show you the language

[00:25:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:46–00:25:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:25:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

the code, our code allows for rebuilding of the home in the current footprint. And I'll show you that it's impossible to build inside my current footprint. And I'll also show you that the code allows for enlargement of a non-conforming structure. ‸ So long as the alteration does not increase the

[00:26:07] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:07–00:26:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:09] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

But it does allow for enlargement, but you can't increase the

[00:26:11] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:11–00:26:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:12] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:12–00:26:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:18] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

I'm decreasing the

[00:26:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:19–00:26:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:21] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Okay. Here's the actual wording. Exact wording of the code. No such structure may be enlarged or altered in a way which increases its

[00:26:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:32–00:26:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

It doesn't say no such structure may be enlarged or altered. It says in a way which increases its

[00:26:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:38–00:26:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

I'll show you how I

[00:26:40] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

mean

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:40–00:26:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:40] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

that. And then B is any structure or portion thereof may be altered to decrease its

[00:26:45] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:45–00:26:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

I'll show you how I

[00:26:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

mean

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:47–00:26:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

that. My existing

[00:26:50] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:50–00:26:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

on the property is 15 feet 8 inches. I'm going to show you a picture of where that 15 feet 8 is. And then the post-construction setback ends up being 16-9.

[00:27:01] No voice detected

Okay. So I'm reducing

[00:27:05] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

the non-conforming. But that's within the existing footprint. So the non-conforming gives me the right to do that automatically. The part that's questionable is the additional square footage that I'm requesting.

[00:27:20] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:20–00:27:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:20] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:27:25] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

It starts at 25-8. So if the existing setback is 15-8 or 16-9, and I'm building at 25-8, that's not increasing the

[00:27:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

nonconformity.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:38–00:27:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:27:40] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

That's... It's not a...

[00:27:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:27:43–00:27:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:44] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Okay. The... The... You can see the cottage.

[00:27:49] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:49–00:27:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:50] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

That's what was dropped there. And then it's one addition on the left. Another addition towards the water. Okay.

[00:27:57] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:57–00:28:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:01] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

two-story structure.

[00:28:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:03–00:28:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:06] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

All of the cottage portion, that's going to be removed. But in removing that, and wanting to build a square house, do you see that

[00:28:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:28:16–00:28:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

current closest portion to the road. And that's at

[00:28:24] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:24–00:28:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Okay.

[00:28:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:26–00:28:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:28] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Leaving the closest portion of the house, the front corner of

[00:28:32] Attribution uncertain

the

[00:28:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

garage. That's at 16-9 at the end. So, it's actually decreasing the non-conformity by one foot, which the non-conformity

[00:28:42] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:28:42–00:28:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

only one foot by distance. But that whole bathroom is being removed, so there's a lot of area of non-conformity that's being removed. And all that's gone. So, anybody who's construction does not increase the non-conformity. Okay. These are the rules in place that I'm just asking to follow. That I'm just asking to be allowed to follow. And this is residential estate zoning, what we fall under.

[00:29:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:15–00:29:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:21] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

My lot depth is at the deepest point is about 100, and the average is 60. So, how can you put the same front setback requirements on me? And such is the need for my areas. And then F shows... This is the exact wording of the code. F is the minimum yard requirement, 50 feet. Front setback of 50 feet.

[00:29:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:46–00:29:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:48] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

I'm not asking for any special privilege, because the setback requirement is 50 feet. But within the residential estate zoning, it allows for 25. And that's the second, the third line right there. A front setback of 50 feet, or average depth of existing front yards and develop lots within 100 feet of each side. But not less than 25 feet. So, I don't have anybody on

[00:30:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

each

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:17–00:30:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:30:18] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

side. Because I'm on the peninsula. So, I can't average. So, the default was to go to a front setback of 50 feet.

[00:30:27] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:27–00:30:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

the way to 25 feet. There are some people that are getting 25 feet with this code legally. And I'm asking for a variance to get what's already in this code.

[00:30:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:41–00:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:44] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:44–00:30:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

I think we established

[00:30:48] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:48–00:30:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:48] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

establish it again.

[00:30:50] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:50–00:30:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:58] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Okay, here's this. This is the best slide of the whole thing. And in this, and my disclaimer on this, is this is not the official site plan that was submitted to Lucy. And also, there are some numbers on this that are exact with the lines. But some numbers, not numbers, the numbers are all correct. ‸ But the lines, in the area of

[00:31:24] Attribution uncertain

the

[00:31:24] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

lines, they had to be estimated because I was using reference points. But the general idea of this site plan is accurate. So what it shows is this

[00:31:36] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

property

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:36–00:31:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:31:37] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

with a 50 foot setback is the red line.

[00:31:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:43–00:31:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And it's kind of on an orange. And I actually think I was way too generous on that.

[00:31:52] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:52–00:31:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:55] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

So you can see that the whole house sits outside of the setback. So the yellow line is my requested variance. And if I get a 25 foot variance there, it would put my entire addition behind the setback allowing me to build. And that's all I'm asking for. That's all I'm asking for. So now, how am I limit shortening or reducing the nonconformity? And the reason why I'm reducing the nonconformity is because that area of the house that stuck out, that's in red right

[00:32:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

there,

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:41–00:32:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:32:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

is going to be removed. And that area sat the closest to the house that was at 15-7. So post-construction I'm improving it to 16-9.

[00:32:52] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:52–00:32:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:55] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

property sits on

[00:32:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

an angle.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:56–00:32:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:32:59] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

So now I'm back to the same thing, granting of the variance. We went through that. And I hope that the information that I gave you makes you feel comfortable hitting each and every one of these points.

[00:33:13] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:13–00:33:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:33:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:17–00:33:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:18] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

So I'm going to go through them real quickly. Because these are the things that you have to say yes in your mind and you have to feel good about. And I want the city to feel good about it too, that we're doing the right thing. You know, for the city we're doing the right thing for this guy.

[00:33:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:33–00:33:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

the land, structure, and building. It's pretty obvious to see that they're special circumstances. Number two, literal interpretation

[00:33:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:47–00:33:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:50] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

of rights commonly

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:50–00:33:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:33:50] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

enjoyed by other properties.

[00:33:52] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:52–00:33:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

I think that that's pretty true too. The literal interpretation is a 50 foot.

[00:33:59] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:59–00:34:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:02] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

That the special conditions

[00:34:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:03–00:34:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:07] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

the actions of the applicant. It was the change of the zoning that

[00:34:11] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:11–00:34:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:12] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

So that's not my fault either. And the granting of the variance

[00:34:16] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:16–00:34:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:16] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:34:17] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

the applicant

[00:34:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

‸ any special privilege

[00:34:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:19–00:34:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

into the same district.

[00:34:24] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:24–00:34:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:30] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

I didn't qualify for it. But I'm not asking for a special privilege. So there was one more thing. And this is just a kind of a show

[00:34:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

I'll be

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:41–00:34:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:34:42] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

quick here. When I bought the property and then now how much nicer it looks. We're

[00:34:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

improving

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:47–00:34:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:34:48] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

it. We want to put a nice

[00:34:49] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:34:49–00:34:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:49] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

so that ‸ everybody

[00:34:53] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:53–00:34:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

This was the seawall when I moved in there. And then I ended up breaking all that stuff up with a

[00:35:02] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

jackhammer

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:02–00:35:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:35:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And was able to put a layer of rock on top of it. And now when you drive by it's a really nice little seawall. That was the house before.

[00:35:16] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:16–00:35:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:20] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:20–00:35:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

And I want to do nice things for the city. And the city deserves it. And that corner deserves it.

[00:35:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:32–00:35:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

So you can see that I'm not trying to build something outrageous. I'm just trying to build a regular house that matches the neighborhood. That matches its own construction. This is some of the reason why the foundation. How it's crumbling. I tried to repair it.

[00:35:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:56–00:35:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:00] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

The wood rod. The ACs under the house that keeps getting flooded. See here the stem wall.

[00:36:06] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:06–00:36:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:08] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And with a jack hole in the house. I mean these are necessary. It's necessary. It's

[00:36:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:36:15–00:36:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:16] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

past its useful age. So that's what I got. I hope that I

[00:36:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

proved

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:23–00:36:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:36:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

the case to you guys' satisfaction. If not, if you have any questions at all. I've gone over these codes over and over and over again. To understand them.

[00:36:37] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:37–00:36:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Oh.

[00:36:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:47–00:36:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:49] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And it wasn't

[00:36:50] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Colette Farrell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

in my PowerPoint, I guess.

[00:36:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:51–00:36:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:53] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:36:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Okay. So the code says that I can build within the existing footprint. And that is there. When you saw the footprint. Okay. The footprint. There's no way you can put a concrete block house in that kind of footprint. And then so when we were going through the overall design, we said we first had a big house.

[00:37:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:17–00:37:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:18] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

the whole thing.

[00:37:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:19–00:37:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:23] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:37:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:37:24] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

We need to reduce this

[00:37:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

down.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:26–00:37:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:37:27] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

And me and the wife talked and the designer, what is exactly absolutely necessary? Well, what's absolutely necessary was to make it safe. We're right on the river. We needed to make it safe. And we wanted to build it to 185 mile per hour. We made the standards. So it was going to be concrete

[00:37:43] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

block,

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:43–00:37:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:37:44] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:37:44–00:37:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:45] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:37:45] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:37:46] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:46–00:37:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:50] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

section. And so we wanted to get that down into the concrete envelope. So that was, that, we need the additional square footage because we're moving the utilities from under the house. And we need to move them up to a higher ground.

[00:38:08] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:38:08–00:38:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:09] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

also moving from the garage, which is the low area, up into the house to build the utilities. The relocation of the front bathroom that reduces the nonconformity is in that additional square footage as well. And then the remaining part is the bedroom.

[00:38:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:26–00:38:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:30] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

And every bit, it's nothing

[00:38:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:38:32–00:38:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

excessive.

[00:38:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:33–00:38:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:36] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

There's not,

[00:38:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:38:38–00:38:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:41] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

needed to build a safe,

[00:38:44] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:44–00:38:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:44] No voice detected

home.

[00:38:46] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:46–00:38:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:47] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:38:47] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:38:50] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:38:50–00:38:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:53] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

If you have any questions, please. And thank you for your consideration. Thank you for listening to me. I don't know if I

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:38:53–00:39:00 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:39:00] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Thank you.

[00:39:06] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:06–00:39:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:08] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:08–00:39:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:10] Attribution uncertain

[00:39:10] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

want to open up questions to the staff and to you. I just have a quick question myself. Why, why was it changed to that zoning? Is that zoning typically a larger, like a state use type of a zoning that's out in Canaveral Groves area or something like that with bigger acreage? Or was it because it was a half acre lot? Or is the surrounding zoning around him all R1? Or, I guess I'm just trying to understand the zoning.

[00:39:40] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:39:40–00:39:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:40] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:39:40] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:39:41] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

R1 was the first zoning district that was assigned to this parcel. Back then, that was 1940s. ‸ All the other properties actually were zoned

[00:39:51] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:51–00:39:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:55] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

So, I would not compare to Canaveral Groves, as you mentioned, but I would compare to the Indian River Drive. Because when you look at all those properties to

[00:40:04] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:04–00:40:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:07] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

There are

[00:40:07] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

a lot of large properties.

[00:40:08] Attribution uncertain

Large

[00:40:08] Speaker 7

lots with large front yards and large homes. So, if you compare to those homes,

[00:40:15] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:15–00:40:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:18] Speaker 7

has the lot configuration, as you could see through the survey. And it was shown. So, he doesn't really have a square lot. You know, it's kind of round. And he does not have the depth that most of the lots, the neighboring lots have.

[00:40:35] Speaker 3

Okay.

[00:40:36] Speaker 7

So, ‸ if you compare to the neighbors, ‸ this neighborhood along Indian River Drive, he is the only one with unique situations and that would require variants to actually meet. He wouldn't be able to meet the 50 foot setback. There's no way. But at least, you know, he need to make usable, you know, to be able to have an ‸ structure. I feel, you know, is the only location even for an addition. Because even if you move the ‸ home to be, like he mentioned, to

[00:41:12] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:12–00:41:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:16] Speaker 7

would have a rear setback issue.

[00:41:20] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:20–00:41:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:24] Speaker 7

be close to the river.

[00:41:25] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

what

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:25–00:41:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:41:26] Speaker 7

you know, since it is a flood area, we probably not recommend it as well.

[00:41:31] Speaker 3

Okay. Thank you. Your addition, it's really, it's not totally an 861, right? Because you're demoing a portion and then adding back 861. Is that right? I think

[00:41:43] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:43–00:41:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:51] Speaker 3

But there's a portion you're demoing of that, right? And then rebuilding.

[00:41:56] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:41:56–00:42:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:08] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:16]

[00:42:24] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

area is the additional area that I'm building onto.

[00:42:29] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:29–00:42:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:33] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

move the utilities bill. And it's where I moved that bathroom, that front bathroom that I was taking off the

[00:42:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:42:39–00:42:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

moved it to that blue

[00:42:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:42:41–00:42:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:45] Speaker 3

So that's all getting rebuilt. ‸ The new. But the total addition is 861. That's

[00:42:53] No voice detected

correct.

[00:42:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Okay. Okay.

[00:42:55] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:55–00:42:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:56] Speaker 3

coming off the back end.

[00:42:57] No voice detected

It's

[00:42:57] Attribution uncertain

all getting rebuilt.

[00:42:57] Speaker 3

What about your septic? Are you on sewer?

[00:43:00] No voice detected

I'm on

[00:43:00] Attribution uncertain

sewer.

[00:43:01] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. I was

[00:43:01] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

going to say it didn't look like there's any more room for that in there. But

[00:43:04] Speaker 3

any questions from the board to staff or to Mr. the applicant?

[00:43:08] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:08–00:43:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:10] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So just to make sense out of it, if he was not adding the 861 square feet, he ‸ actually would be allowed to refurbish or remodel the home because the code does allow for. The existing

[00:43:24] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

footprint.

[00:43:25] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

Yes. For non-conforming properties. But now he's asking is the expansion. So that's why we're discussing only the 861 square feet

[00:43:34] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:34–00:43:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:43:34] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

not the total remodel.

[00:43:36] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:36–00:43:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:43:38] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:43:38] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:43:40] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

also too? Yes.

[00:43:41] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

That's correct. Like

[00:43:42] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that would not come up if he was just remodeling his home or tearing out the whole set up.

[00:43:47] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:47–00:43:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:52] Speaker 7

they would not need for a variance.

[00:43:54] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

Okay.

[00:43:55] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:43:55–00:43:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:01] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

board

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:01–00:44:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:44:02] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:02–00:44:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:07] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:07–00:44:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay.

[00:44:10] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:10–00:44:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:12] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:12–00:44:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:13] Speaker 6

drainage requirements? The flooded flooding and drainage requirements?

[00:44:20] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:20–00:44:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:26] Speaker 6

The ‸ requirements for the drainage and flooding.

[00:44:31] Attribution uncertain

[00:44:31] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the stormwater. Um, so when we look at a staff level, when we look at for impervious area,

[00:44:41] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:41–00:44:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:46] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

Uh, we did take in consideration that the

[00:44:49] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:44:49–00:44:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:50] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

is just a protection since he's exposed to the lagoon. So we don't consider that as part of the impervious area, but as a just a barrier

[00:45:01] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

and

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:01–00:45:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:45:01] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

protection from the lagoon itself.

[00:45:03] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:03–00:45:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:11] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

So there's no issues there. Um, he is not regrading the site.

[00:45:16] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

because

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:16–00:45:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:45:16] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

normally, you know, to, for us to request the system from public works or 30 party. They're specialized. They're a consultant that does the floodplain review, uh, or this kind of review normally, um, is when there's some type of regrading or changing and the on the surface itself.

[00:45:35] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:35–00:45:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:43] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

drainage, it would be the impervious area because it is a comp plan requirement. Okay.

[00:45:49] No voice detected

Thank you.

[00:45:50] Speaker 11

Thank

[00:45:50] Attribution uncertain

you.

[00:45:50] Speaker 11

You're welcome.

[00:45:51] Speaker 7

I have

[00:45:51] Speaker 4

a question.

[00:45:52] Speaker 11

Uh, sometimes, uh, the setbacks are on the front are different from the sides. So we have, we have the 50 foot. Is that 50 foot all around? Or is there a different setback for the sides and the rear or the closest to the water?

[00:46:09] Attribution uncertain

[00:46:09] Speaker 11

should say in the back. Okay.

[00:46:11] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So the interior, uh, lot that would be the sides is 15 feet. So it would be 50 from the front. So

[00:46:19] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it's 15 on the side.

[00:46:21] Speaker 7

‸ 15 on the sides and 35 on the rear. But because of the lot is so unique, even us to determine where does the interior, you know, the sidelines and then the rear stars is difficult to determine.

[00:46:35] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:35–00:46:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:35] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

[00:46:42] Speaker 11

or the water?

[00:46:43] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:43–00:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:47] No voice detected

Oh, of the.

[00:46:48] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Because that's the closest to the water. 28.

[00:46:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:51–00:47:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:53] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:46:54] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:46:56] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:47:01] Speaker 11

The blue.

[00:47:02] No voice detected

Setback written with a blue line.

[00:47:03] Speaker 11

Okay.

[00:47:05] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:47:05–00:47:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:47:05] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:47:08] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:08–00:47:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:13] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:47:13–00:47:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:13] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:47:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:47:20] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:47:20] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:47:21] Speaker 3

On this one, it's a 28, it looks like.

[00:47:23] Speaker 10

Or I mean, there's, there's a number 28 going from that diagonal.

[00:47:26] Attribution uncertain

[00:47:26] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

don't know

[00:47:26] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

if this is this wrong.

[00:47:28] Speaker 10

But we would.

[00:47:29] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:29–00:47:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:30] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09]

[00:47:39] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

number than if you go on a 45. Right.

[00:47:43] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yeah. So, but how far the northeast corner goes with.

[00:47:46] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:47:46–00:47:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:46] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:47:46] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:47:48] Speaker 11

Right. Because if it's still 15 and we're.

[00:47:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:47:51] Attribution uncertain

[00:47:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

means if you can see the picture behind you there. Right. The blue area is the corner.

[00:47:57] No voice detected

And

[00:47:57] Speaker 11

I'm a good, I'm

[00:47:58] No voice detected

a good 40 feet.

[00:48:00] Speaker 11

‸ Right. Okay. So he's still.

[00:48:02] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:02–00:48:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the line configuration has really no limitations side to side. Mm-hmm. A lot of limitations are depth. Right. So side to side I'm good. That's why that was the perfect place to put it. Yeah.

[00:48:15] Speaker 11

Yeah, yeah. And how high from the ground you said you, you will be?

[00:48:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

My, my

[00:48:20] Speaker 11

final

[00:48:20] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

floor

[00:48:21] No voice detected

elevation.

[00:48:21] Speaker 11

Right. Once you're in the house, how, how high are you?

[00:48:23] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

The final

[00:48:24] No voice detected

floor elevation. Mm-hmm.

[00:48:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

It's that, that property right there sits at 4 o'clock. Okay. That's the female flood county.

[00:48:32] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yeah.

[00:48:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:32–00:48:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:36] Speaker 11

That's, that's where you'll be?

[00:48:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

It's just above. It's still low. Yeah. But

[00:48:40] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:40–00:48:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:43] Speaker 11

All right. Okay.

[00:48:46] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:46–00:48:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:48:47] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Thank you. Thank you very much. I have applicant cards here or speaking cards. What's, what's our time limit on speakers, Kristen?

[00:48:57] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

Um.

[00:48:58] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:58–00:48:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:59–00:49:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:59] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:49:02] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that. Typically it would be. Oh, I

[00:49:03] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

thought we used to have that.

[00:49:05] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Well. Okay. I mean, if you would like to set that, it could be three minutes. That would be what typically. Okay.

[00:49:13] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

with

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:49:13–00:49:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:49:15] Speaker 3

the board like

[00:49:16] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:16–00:49:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:16] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:16–00:49:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:19] Speaker 3

minutes? Second? Yes. Hi. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Um, I'll call your name and please come up

[00:49:31] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:31–00:49:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:34] Speaker 3

minutes to please speak. Um, Mr. Frank Manfredi.

[00:49:38] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:49:38–00:49:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:49:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:49:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:49:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:49:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:49:44] Speaker 3

Okay. Uh,

[00:49:49] Attribution uncertain

Donna

[00:49:49] Speaker 3

Manfredi.

[00:49:50] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:49:50–00:49:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:54] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:49:54] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:49:55] Speaker 3

Thank you.

[00:49:56] Attribution uncertain

Uh,

[00:49:56] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:56–00:50:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:50:03] Speaker 1

You

[00:50:04] Speaker 3

got three minutes. Um.

[00:50:09] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:09–00:50:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:11] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:50:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:50:25] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I don't have to tell the truth. Okay.

[00:50:30] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

If you could just raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

[00:50:35] Speaker 10

I do.

[00:50:36] Speaker 4

Thank you.

[00:50:37] Speaker 10

Okay.

[00:50:37] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:37–00:50:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:40] Speaker 10

and Carla are great neighbors. That's the truth. They're looking to come here. Uh,

[00:50:47] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:47–00:50:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:50] Speaker 10

I think it's, uh, really important to consider, uh, the impact of, uh, a further delay in this whole process. Um, and I, I think a lot of, uh,

[00:51:08] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:08–00:51:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:13] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:51:13–00:51:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:14] Speaker 10

a volunteer. Um, I've come before, um, review, uh, historical view, uh, review committee ‸ couple ‸ times and done very well with citizen volunteer, uh, committee. So I, I hope it's a favorable call tonight.

[00:51:38] Speaker 3

Thank you. Thank you.

[00:51:39] Attribution uncertain

Thank

[00:51:39] Speaker 3

you, Mr. Crow.

[00:51:41] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:41–00:51:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:45] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:51:45] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:51:50] Speaker 4

‸ Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? I do. Thank you.

[00:51:56] Attribution uncertain

Um,

[00:51:57] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Colette Farrell” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

hi, I am Colette Farrell and I am the lady who owns lot 18 currently the one that was shown used to be part of their property. I also own the lot in the house south of it. Like,

[00:52:07] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Colette Farrell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:07–00:52:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:08] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Colette Farrell” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

So I'm probably their closest neighbor. Um, and the only thing I really wanted to say is I am also in support of them doing this home since they have moved there three years ago. I have seen nothing but improvement to that whole area and property. I've seen nothing but them doing with the top most care and with the best people in the community doing it. And I'm proud to be their neighbor and hope that you will please approve this so we can continue to make our neighborhood beautiful.

[00:52:33] Speaker 3

Thank you. Thank you.

[00:52:35] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:35–00:52:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:52:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:40–00:52:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:42] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. He's

[00:52:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

voting against me.

[00:52:45] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Um, one just thing I want to make a comment to the board, uh, that Lucy shared with me. Um, if we're going to make a motion on this, uh, to approve, um, it does need to say that, uh, we believe that the applicant has provided competent evidence based on his, you know, to approve, I guess the variance we're, we're, and then there's two, right? I mean the front setback from 50 to 25 and adding the 861 extension.

[00:53:17] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Um, Mr. Chair, ma'am. Is

[00:53:19] Attribution uncertain

that

[00:53:19] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right? Yes.

[00:53:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:20–00:53:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:23] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Absolutely. Before you begin to deliberate. So I just want to make sure the board is clear about the criteria and what is required to be found. Um, ‸ you know, as the board knows,

[00:53:35] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:35–00:53:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:40] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

order to approve the variance. And I wanted to provide a little bit more clarification on the second criteria, um, which, uh, has been up on the screen, but it says, um, that the board has to find that literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance, which is the zoning ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly.

[00:54:02] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:02–00:54:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:08] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:08–00:54:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:12] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

and courts in Florida have analyzed or interpreted what that means. And have said that it means that a board of adjustment would have to find

[00:54:26] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:26–00:54:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:32] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

for the purpose for which it is zoned, which essentially means that without the variance,

[00:54:37] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:37–00:54:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:38] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

the applicant would not be able to use the property for residential purposes. So as was already stated,

[00:54:45] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:45–00:54:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:53] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

rebuilt, the residence be rebuilt in the current footprint. um So essentially, the board would have to find, in order to approve the variance, um that the lot could not be used for residential purposes without that

[00:55:11] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:11–00:55:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:14] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

[00:55:16] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:16–00:55:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:18] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:55:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

obviously he can remodel the house

[00:55:21] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right without

[00:55:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

adding

[00:55:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:23–00:55:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:24] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

so what

[00:55:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:55:25] Speaker 3

you saying ‸ that second criteria is the hardship? That

[00:55:29] Speaker 5

is what you would need to find for the hardship. It stated perhaps another way is that without that variance, they could not build a house um and use it for residential purposes, use the property for residential purposes and meet all modern building codes and so forth. They they must have that 861 square feet in order to use it for residential purposes. And that is how, as I said, courts have interpreted what that second criteria means. So I just wanted to provide that clarification before you deliberate.

[00:56:08] Speaker 1

Board chair,

[00:56:09] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

I have

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:56:09–00:56:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:56:09] Speaker 1

a question.

[00:56:10] Speaker 3

Yes.

[00:56:11] Speaker 1

Based on what the attorney just said, can we go back to, the

[00:56:20] Attribution uncertain

white so it's

[00:56:20] Speaker 1

easier for me probably to look at the slide that has the blue, the red, and the white. I think that's quite

[00:56:28] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Okay.

[00:56:29] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So at looking at this, so the white is.

[00:56:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 00:56:34–00:56:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:37] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

can, I can ask it to staff, but yeah. So looking

[00:56:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:40–00:56:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

And that part of the house, if you took down everything else, is it livable? What is in that part of the house currently?

[00:56:59] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

‸ which is basically only one foot above. I

[00:57:02] Speaker 3

think it's white and red.

[00:57:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

Yeah. The white portion is

[00:57:05] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized

the

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:05–00:57:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:57:05] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

garage and the bedroom that we're keeping.

[00:57:07] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay, so the white is what you're keeping. Yes. Okay. And the red is the main part of the house right now? The

[00:57:14] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

red is all the hodgepodge of additions. Okay. That's the hodgepodge of additions. And the

[00:57:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

hodgepodge of additions is what you showed me underneath the house with the structural beams and all the

[00:57:26] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

demolishing that part of the house.

[00:57:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Okay.

[00:57:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:28–00:57:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:57:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:57:35] Speaker 1

the blue and you just did the reconstruction of the red, would you have enough living space in that house to make it a house?

[00:57:46] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:46–00:57:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:57:51] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:57:52] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:57:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

additions, correct? Right.

[00:57:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

if the code The code is that I can rebuild in the current footprint.

[00:58:00] Speaker 1

Correct.

[00:58:01] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Now, if you look at the current footprint, I don't know what kind of modern architecture that I can put concrete block to match all of those bends in turns, for one. You know, that is just not practical. And then if I'm, when

[00:58:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:17–00:58:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

rid of what's the subfloor underneath. So I need to relocate the utilities to the higher elevation. That's for safety and to, um so it's not a fire hazard. um

[00:58:32] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:32–00:58:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:58:34] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:58:38] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

from the garage elevation also to that higher elevation where the additional sweat pages And then the other part that I absolutely need,

[00:58:47] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:47–00:58:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

that I can feel safe during a hurricane. I mean, is that unreasonable? And, if I can, if I can.

[00:58:58] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

Do you

[00:58:59] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

mind?

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:59–00:58:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:58:59] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

You can come back up to the ‸ Yeah,

[00:59:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

just come back up. So, I guess I'm just trying to make sure

[00:59:03] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

that we

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:59:03–00:59:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:59:04] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

understand how to accept this request. I want, okay, good. I'd

[00:59:09] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

rather

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:59:09–00:59:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:59:10] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

be clear. Based on what the attorney just said, so you got to help me here. Yes. So, go back to that. I want you to go back to the plot,

[00:59:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:17–00:59:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:21] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

It's been a long day. All right. So, the white is what is ‸ The white key we're not touching. Okay. It's garage,

[00:59:28] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right?

[00:59:29] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:29–00:59:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:31] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:59:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the current house, which has the um limited, first of all, it's a um at sea level or a threat for where

[00:59:44] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it's current conditions for living. I have handouts and that that have the whole additional square footage in it, and

[00:59:53] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:53–00:59:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

stuff. I

[00:59:57] Speaker 1

don't know that we need that much of a breakdown. I think I just need to, we need to just understand. is

[01:00:06] Speaker 8 (name not verified)

in each room, and it shows why none of the rooms are excessive. None of

[01:00:10] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:10–01:00:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[01:00:11] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay, that's not my question.

[01:00:12] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

i I

[01:00:13] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

think the question is,

[01:00:14] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:14–01:00:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:17] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Or like, I mean, like, can you live in a

[01:00:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:19–01:00:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

just said, okay?

[01:00:20] Speaker 1

He can, you know, according to the to the laws of the bigger government here, he can redo his home.

[01:00:34] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Correct, on the existing

[01:00:35] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:35–01:00:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:35] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[01:00:36] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

existing footprint without adding to it.

[01:00:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:38–01:00:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:39] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[01:00:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

[01:00:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

add this

[01:00:48] No voice detected

addition

[01:00:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

why why it's necessary. And I'm thinking, i'm understanding the reason it's ‸ I guess that's the hard

[01:00:53] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

question. That's

[01:00:54] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:00:54–01:00:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:55] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Why is this addition necessary? I mean, I i live in a 2 000 square

[01:01:00] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:00–01:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

she said, that's the only one that's having a little bit of pause with us is, what you know, I mean, it's, you bought a non-conforming building, right? Or I mean, right, it was, it was a non-conforming building that you bought. I

[01:01:21] Speaker 10

don't know if

[01:01:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you knew that when you bought it or not, but that's what it was. So you have to prove to us, why do you need a 2 800 square foot house and not a 2 000 square foot ‸ Okay.

[01:01:30] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And I'll do my best. um Based on what she's telling us. Okay. Based on what she's telling you and based on what the criteria is that you guys have to follow to approve it. And the criteria is the four things behind you there. And I think we're

[01:01:49] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

fine on three of them.

[01:01:51] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Which one is the,

[01:01:52] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

which one? The the one that she said. And the one that she said. is causing the hardship. i

[01:01:57] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:57–01:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:02] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

it says

[01:02:03] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:03–01:02:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:07] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:07–01:02:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:12] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

for the minimum. But that is in

[01:02:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:15–01:02:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:17] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

on here. But the minimum variance criteria has to work together with number two, which says that you can't deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the ordinance. So number two, you have to say, okay well, whatever residential estate gets, I should be able to get two. That's the way I interpret that. It says it would if the literal interpretation would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district. So that minimum variance, when I interpret the minimum variance, it has to work in conjunction with this.

[01:02:56] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:56–01:03:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:01] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

and you don't give me the variance, then you're depriving me of commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district. ‸ So you can it's almost like you can't see both. If you said you have to build the minimum on that one, it means that you can't agree to number two because you would be depriving me of the rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district. So i that's a kind of a and that's what I said from the beginning. I was like, you actually have five criteria that you're voting ‸ on to approve and the minimal variance should be the fifth. It's not on there, but the minimum and it's minimum, but minimum to me when i've seen minimal variance and I also read it with number two.

[01:03:48] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:48–01:03:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:53] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

under what qualifies as residential estate. And I also, I'm not an attorney and I'm not trying to go, go head to head, but I did try to look up as much case law and I would be curious to know what case law discusses it. No, we're not going to go. I don't want to, I don't want to do that because I,

[01:04:14] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:14–01:04:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:15–01:04:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:15] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice

[01:04:16] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:16–01:04:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:19] Speaker 8 (name not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes, sir. I mean,

[01:04:21] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

and so, so if the question is if, if, if not the addition and if he just rebuilds what he has is, is it a home? Does he still enjoy it as a home? And so, Tim, I thought that the addition was for you to do the electrical the mechanical the ac uh correctly i.e

[01:04:46] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:46–01:04:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:47] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

house there and so and so

[01:04:49] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:49–01:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:53] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

I don't think he has any way to relocate the AC, which is under the house. And so uh

[01:05:00] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:00–01:05:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:04] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I think the answer for me is no. and so And so I think therein lies your ability to say that the addition is a requirement because he's basically moving those uh mechanical uh HVAC systems uh electrical that make a home a functioning home. So that that's my take of it.

[01:05:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

That's the answer I'm looking forward Thank you Stockton. Thank

[01:05:31] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you. But I have a question from what what she said. um did you also say that if if this let's say uh the variance is is done and approved ‸ and he doesn't meet it afterward it will not be livable if he doesn't meet all the all of the uh what he's presenting today. The size of the home and all and everything. Is that what we're saying? Are you

[01:05:54] Speaker 2

asking me?

[01:05:55] Speaker 11

oh actually I mean that's what if that's what she stated if I'm understanding right. sorry

[01:06:02] No voice detected

uh are you saying the attorney?

[01:06:03] Speaker 11

‸ The attorney, yes. I'm

[01:06:04] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:04–01:06:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:06] Speaker 11

so so I understood that

[01:06:09] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:09–01:06:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:14] Speaker 11

with this and let's say he doesn't meet it somewhere meaning that property becomes unlivable because he's it it ‸ wasn't constructed or built to what was presented. That's not what you said. No.

[01:06:28] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'm not sure if ‸ Because you said

[01:06:30] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

something about will he be able to

[01:06:32] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:32–01:06:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:34] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[01:06:37] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

um and this is related to number two um not number five uh is that you have to demonstrate that without the variance you it is virtually impossible to use the property for the purpose for which it is zoned which is residential. Got

[01:06:57] Speaker 11

it. So

[01:06:58] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

he must have the variance again the board would need to find he must have the variance in order to use the property for residential purposes.

[01:07:08] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:08–01:07:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:09] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[01:07:09] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[01:07:12] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you're going to use the space to put in your electrical and your ac and get it out of the flood plain

[01:07:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:18–01:07:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:20] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

answer. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. That's the answer. Right. And

[01:07:25] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it's obvious. Okay.

[01:07:26] Speaker 3

um yeah thank you and thank you applicant for all the explanation of everything. We're trying to digest this in 30 minutes and you guys have been working on it for many

[01:07:37] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right months.

[01:07:38] Speaker 3

So um do I have any or is there discussion by the board, or is there any motions at this point, or continuation, or deny, or approve, or what do we what kind of motion are we do we have, or does anybody want to make a motion?

[01:07:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'll make the motion, but i need a lot of help from staff in this motion, please. So, Lucy, I'll look at you to help guide me through the words, and I'll take it from that, is that's acceptable to everybody on the board? I want to make sure we cover it all. I think Lucy said it earlier. It may be in the package somewhere, and I can read it.

[01:08:14] Speaker 7

Yeah, so you you can add to the motion that, you know, the approval is based on the staff analysis presented, you know, the analysis presented by staff and the applicants.

[01:08:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay, so I'll make a motion that we accept the staff's findings and recommendations as presented and written.

[01:08:36] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Which is to approve? Which is to approve, yes, thank you. And then is the the variance request from Appendix A?

[01:08:46] Speaker 1

Yes, ma'am, and the variance request from Appendix A?

[01:08:50] Speaker 7

Article 10, non-conformities. Article

[01:08:53] Speaker 1

10.

[01:08:54] Speaker 7

Non-conformities. Local formities Section 5.

[01:08:57] Speaker 1

Section 5.

[01:08:58] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

To allow for an approximately. To

[01:09:01] Speaker 1

allow from approximate.

[01:09:02] Speaker 7

861 square foot addition.

[01:09:05] Speaker 1

861 square foot addition.

[01:09:09] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

And. And. A reduction. To allow

[01:09:14] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:14–01:09:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[01:09:17] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[01:09:19] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

50 feet to approximately 25 and

[01:09:21] Speaker 1

to allow the setback from 50 feet to approximately 25. thank you lucy i appreciate the help

[01:09:27] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

Do I have a second?

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:09:27–01:09:43 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:09:29] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

I second it.

[01:09:33] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Congratulations, sir. Thank you for what you're doing.

[01:09:45] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:09:45–01:09:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:49] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

Do we have any... No new business, other business, next meeting date,

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:09:49–01:09:56 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:09:56] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:56–01:10:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:01] Speaker 3

could have a motion to adjourn

[01:10:04] Speaker 6

I have a motion to adjourn please

[01:10:05] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

second second second all

[01:10:09] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

in favor of adjournment aye any opposed have a good evening everyone thank you

[01:10:16] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

Happy Fourth. Thank you.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:10:16–01:10:16 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:10:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:10:16–01:10:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:21] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[01:10:22] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized

Okay. What?

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:10:21–01:10:28 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:10:28] No voice detected · Machine re-recognized

Oh,

[01:10:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; part of a long flagged stretch · 01:10:28–01:10:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:34] Speaker 8 (name not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[01:10:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[01:10:36] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

[01:10:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[01:10:48] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

[01:10:52] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[01:10:53] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:52–01:10:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:53] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[01:10:56] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Good night. Yeah, I'm

[01:11:00] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:00–01:11:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:00] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[01:11:01] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:01–01:11:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:04] Speaker 7

Oh, okay.

[01:11:05] Speaker 1

I'm so sorry.

[01:11:08] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:08–01:11:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T14:25:41 · 7,491 ordinary words, 2,763 in suspect passages, 235 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.