Planning & Zoning

Planning & Zoning Board / Local Planning Agency Meeting

Date: 2026-09-02
Status: Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source: CivicClerk event #1394

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 📋 Agenda Packet (PDF, 8.2 MB) 🎬 Recording ↗

Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2026-10-07, pp. 8–12; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2026-10-07).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (2537_10_07_2026_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 8–12). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

Listed present when the roll was taken: Marcus Wheeler, Tamisha Findlay, Susan Milhoan, Victoria Jones, Russell Sengel, Todd Anderson, Aleck Greenwood, Richard Cravens
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: Wesley Park, Ron Chabot
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Kristin Eick (City Attorney), Luci Ribeiro (City Planner), Breanna Earley (Recording Secretary)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Anderson, Cravens, Findlay, Greenwood, Jones, Milhoan, Sengel, Wheeler (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)

Adopted actions (5)

to APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 2, 2026 AGENDA AND THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 5, 2026 AS WRITTEN (moved by JONES, seconded by ANDERSON); PASSED 8-0; ayes: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–12
to POSTPONE BOTH ITEMS TO A DATE CERTAIN OF OCTOBER 7, 2026, AT 6PM AT 65 STONE STREET, COCOA, FL 32922 (moved by WHEELER, seconded by JONES); PASSED 8-0; ayes: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–12
to APPROVE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by GREENWOOD); PASSED 8-0; ayes: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–12
to APPROVE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (moved by FINDLAY, seconded by ALTERNATE MEMBER GREENWOOD); PASSED 8-0; ayes: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–12
to ADJOURN THE MEETING (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by FINDLAY); PASSED 8-0; ayes: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens; nays: none — the draft minutes, packet pp. 8–12

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2026-10-07, pp. 8–12; approval not found in the records on file (the meeting that received these draft minutes was 2026-10-07).

Source: 2537_10_07_2026_Agenda_Packet.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2026-10-07 meeting, packet pp. 8–12; lines 228–431 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes

MINUTES
CITY OF COCOA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD/ LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
September 2, 2026

A Regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board Local Planning Agency
was held on September 2, 2026, at City Hall, 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, FL, as
publicly noted.

I. CALL TO ORDER:

Vice Chair Wheeler called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL:

Wesley Park Chairperson
Marcus Wheeler Vice Chairperson
Ron Chabot Board Member
Tamisha Findlay Board Member
Susan Milhoan Board Member
Victoria Jones Board Member
Russell Sengel Board Member
Todd Anderson Board Member
Aleck Greenwood Alternate Board Member
Richard Cravens Alternate Board Member
Kristin Eick City Attorney

PRESENT:

Marcus Wheeler Vice Chairperson
Tamisha Findlay Board Member
Susan Milhoan Board Member
Victoria Jones Board Member
Russell Sengel Board Member
Todd Anderson Board Member
Aleck Greenwood Alternate Board Member
Richard Cravens Alternate Board Member
Kristin Eick City Attorney

ABSENT:
Wesley Park Chairperson
Ron Chabot Board Member

STAFF PRESENT:

Luci Ribeiro, City Planner; and Breanna Earley, Recording Secretary.

Planning & Zoning Board
Regular Meeting
September 2, 2026
Page 2 of 5

Vice Chair Wheeler led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance.

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes:

1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of September 2, 2026

2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of August 5, 2026

* MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER JONES ; SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 2, 2026 AGENDA AND THE
MINUTES OF AUGUST 5, 2026 AS WRITTEN.

AYES: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens

MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).

III. Old Business:

IV. New Business:
1. PZ 25 -00500006 Ord No. 05 -2026 Small -Scale Comp Plan Amendment 3600 Grissom
Parkway (POSTPONED)
2. PZ 25 -00900014 Ord No. 06 -2026 Zoning Map Amendment 3600 Grissom Parkway
(POSTPONED)

* MOTION BY VICE CHAIR WHEELER ; SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
JONES TO POSTPONE BOTH ITEMS TO A DATE CERTAIN OF OCTOBER 7,
2026, AT 6PM AT 65 STONE STREET, COCOA, FL 32922.

AYES: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens

MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
1. PZ 26-00200003 Ordinance No. 13-2026, Zoning Text Amendment Sec. 5 – RU-2-15,
Multiple-Family Dwelling District.

Ms. Ribeiro provided a presentation for Ordinance No. 13-20261.

Board Member Sengel asked if this would create unconforming use.

Ms. Ribeiro clarified that it would not change use.

1 Exhibit A: PZ 26-00200003 Ordinance No. 13-2026, Zoning Text Amendment Presentation

Planning & Zoning Board
Regular Meeting
September 2, 2026
Page 3 of 5

Board Member Sengel stated that if there is a piece of property that is nonconforming, it
should be brought to the Board’s attention.

Ms. Ribeiro stated there are properties that have a density issue.

Vice Chair Wheeler asked if there are any current plans being reviewed.

Alternate Member Greenwood inquired about a townhome project on Dixon Blvd.

Board Attorney Eick clarified they are single family homes.

* MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER ANDERSON ; SECONDED BY BOARD
MEMBER GREENWOOD TO APPROVE WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS.

AYES: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens

MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
2. PZ 26-00500004 Ordinance No. 14-2026 – Comp Plan Amendment Amending Figure
FLU-1

Ms. Ribeiro provided a presentation for Ordinance 14-2026.2

Board member Anderson asked for clarification on the item.

Ms. Ribeiro explained this would remove an inconsistency.

Alternate Member Cravens asked about height restrictions in RU-225.

City Attorney Eick noted it was four stories.

Board Member Sengel asked about nonconforming properties being created.

In response, Ms. Ribeiro stated that in her research she found nonconformities with density
issues but this would not alleviate or create any more issues.

* MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FINDLAY ; SECONDED BY ALTERNATE
MEMBER GREENWOOD TO APPROVE WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS.

AYES: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens

2 Exhibit B: PZ 26-00500004 Ordinance No. 14-2026 – Comp Plan Amendment Presentation

Planning & Zoning Board
Regular Meeting
September 2, 2026
Page 4 of 5

MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
V. Tree Board:
Alternate Member Greenwood asked if there was an update on the trees that were removed.
Ms. Ribeiro explained that she needed to investigate it and that staff was reviewing.
A discussion on the removed trees was held.
Ms. Ribeiro detailed city code and process.
Alternate Member Greenwood asked about a site plan for the property.
Ms. Ribeiro stated that to her knowledge, the trees were on private property.
Board Attorney Eick stated it is the Code Enforcement Board’s responsibility to levy fines
for violations.
Board Member Jones asked if the owners were aware there was a violation.
Ms. Ribeiro explained that the owners came forward to try and comply.
Board Member Jones asked if information is provided to property owners to ensure they’re
following city code.
Ms. Ribeiro stated no.
Board Member Milhoan wanted clarification on the process of tree removal.
Board Attorney Eick explained if the trees are mitigated, their permit would be approved.
VI. Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2026, at 6:00pm, at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa,
FL 32922.
VII. Adjournment:

* MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER ANDERSON ; SECONDED BY BOARD
MEMBER FINDLAY TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.

AYES: Wheeler, Findlay, Jones, Sengel, Anderson, Milhoan, Greenwood, Cravens

MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).

MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:55 PM.

______________________________
Wesley Park, Chairperson

Planning & Zoning Board
Regular Meeting
September 2, 2026
Page 5 of 5

Respectfully Submitted By:

______________________________________
Breanna Earley, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of September 2, 2026.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of August 5, 2026.

III. Old Business

IV. New Business

1. 3600 Grissom Prkwy Rezoning (POSTPONED)
2. 3600 Grissom Pkway Comp Plan Amendment (POSTPONED)
3. Ordinance 13-2026 - City Initiated Zoning Text Amendment - RU 2-15
4. Ordinance 14-2026 - Large-Scale Comp Plan Text Amendment to amend Figure FLU-1 — 00:23:36

V. Tree Board

VI. Other Business

VII. Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 7th, 2026, at 6:00 pm at 65 Stone Street in Cocoa, FL.

VIII. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 10 voices separated from the audio. 18 short machine repair(s) (20 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 90.8% of 7,460 content words. Dotted words (166 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 224 passages (29% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Yes, you're right next to Marcus. Yes.

[00:00:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I don't even know if I can look. I can look either because I shipped it.

[00:00:09] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:09–00:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:10–00:00:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

All right. It is now 6 o'clock p.m. If we're ready to call this meeting to order. So if we could please, we have line ‸ item number two, which is normally not on our agenda item, which is the

[00:00:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

invocation.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:31–00:00:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:00:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

I will, though, go ahead and outline one. I guess I can take charge of that. So,

[00:00:40] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:40–00:00:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

before we begin our meeting today, we fall to acknowledge your goodness and our dependence on you. Grant the leaders in this room, wisdom, discernment, and a deep sense of justice. Help us to serve our community with humility and compassion. We ask these things in your almighty name. Amen. ‸ If

[00:00:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

you

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:56–00:00:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:00:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

could please stand for the

[00:00:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:58–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:00] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:01:01] ▶ Play Speaker 2

pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

[00:01:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:01:15–00:01:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:16] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:01:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:01:17] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:01:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Chairperson Park. Vice Chair Wheeler.

[00:01:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Present.

[00:01:23] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Board Member Chabot. Board Member Finley.

[00:01:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Here.

[00:01:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:28–00:01:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:29] ▶ Play No voice detected

Present.

[00:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Board Member Jones.

[00:01:31] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Present.

[00:01:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Board Member Anderson.

[00:01:34] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Here.

[00:01:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:34–00:01:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:35] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Here.

[00:01:37] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Alternate Board Member Greenwood.

[00:01:39] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Yes.

[00:01:40] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Alternate Board Member Cravens. ‸ And City Attorney Ike.

[00:01:44] ▶ Play No voice detected

Here.

[00:01:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Thank you.

[00:01:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Thank you. Moving on to item 2, approval of agenda and minutes. Has everyone had an opportunity? Well, let's start with the agenda. From

[00:01:54] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:54–00:01:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3

has everyone had an opportunity to review that?

[00:02:01] ▶ Play No voice detected

Yes.

[00:02:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3

All right. So if we could please, if we could have a motion to approve that agenda as printed.

[00:02:08] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

I'll make a motion to approve the regular meeting minutes

[00:02:12] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:12–00:02:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:16] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:16–00:02:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:02:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:18–00:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:21] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:21–00:02:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:22] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:02:22] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

All set. Thank you.

[00:02:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

We have a motion in second. All in favor?

[00:02:29] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

All

[00:02:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3

right. All right.

[00:02:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

The

[00:02:30] ▶ Play Speaker 3

motion approved unanimously. We'll go on to the minutes from

[00:02:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:33–00:02:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:35] ▶ Play Speaker 3

I will now say, do everyone have an opportunity to review those minutes?

[00:02:39] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Yes.

[00:02:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3

All right. And if so, if we could have a motion?

[00:02:43] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Go.

[00:02:50] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:50–00:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:51] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:02:52] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:02:52] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:02:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

we have a motion. We have a second. So we'll call it. All in favor? Aye. Moving on to old business, as we don't have any existing old business, we will move on to item number four. Item number four is new business.

[00:03:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:07–00:03:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

I'll outline. I will make a motion to postpone items. One,

[00:03:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:15–00:03:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:17–00:03:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:18] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:18–00:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

to next scheduled meeting, which will be Wednesday, October 7, 2026, at 6 p.m.

[00:03:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:25–00:03:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

which is our city hall. Can I get a second?

[00:03:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

I'll second

[00:03:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4

that, Mr. Chair.

[00:03:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3

All right. And if so, ‸ can we get a vote on that? All in favor?

[00:03:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:38–00:03:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Moving on to item number three, ordinance 13-2026, city initiated zoning text amendment, RU215. We'll wait for staff on that.

[00:03:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:55–00:04:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:04:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:04:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:04:13] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:04:19] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:04:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:04:22] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:04:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:28–00:04:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6

a city initiated zoning

[00:04:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

tax

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:31–00:04:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:04:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6

amendment to appendix 8, article 11, section

[00:04:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:34–00:04:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6

to make certain clarifying amendments related to townhome residential divisions, providing the repeal prior inconsistency ordinance and resolutions. So there are two issues being addressed tonight. The first issue

[00:04:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:54–00:04:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

in paragraph BB that remain after the city consolidated its landscaping and tree regulations in 2020. Also, it removes ambiguity caused by the RU225 district cross-reference to the RU215 townhouse provisions when a project is located within the waterfront overlay. So this amendment clarifies which standards apply and avoids project by project interpretation, does not change the underlying zoning, future lane use designation, or allowable density. This is a city initiated housekeeping item and coordination amendment.

[00:05:48] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:48–00:05:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6

city.

[00:05:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:55–00:05:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6

a single contagious area, but is distributed across several locations throughout the city. The map properties are primarily located along or near the US1 North Cocoa Boulevard corridor

[00:06:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:09–00:06:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:12–00:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Cocoa Village, specifically with the south of the village area.

[00:06:24] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:24–00:06:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6

including areas near University Lane and North Cocoa Boulevard. Under the Cocoa Waterfront Overlay District, the underlying RU225 zoning is located in the Uptown neighborhood area

[00:06:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:40–00:06:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

south of the village. So when we look at the land development, we consider the zoning classification of a parcel, the future lane use designation, and the applicable overlay sub-district. The underlying zoning remains in place, but the waterfront overlay forms-based standards controls where applicable. So this table from the Cocoa Waterfront Overlay District shows the permitted uses by sub-district and underlaying zoning district. The highlighted column showed that

[00:07:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:14–00:07:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

within portions of the waterfront overlay, including the Uptown neighborhood and south of the village sub-districts, as mentioned. Under the residential section of the table, single-family attached dwellings or townhomes are permitted

[00:07:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:33–00:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Multifamily dwellings are also permitted. This is important to Ordinance 13-2026 because the overlay already contemplates townhome,

[00:07:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:46–00:07:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:50–00:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

So this table is ‸ also part of the Waterfront Overlay Regulating Plan and identifies the building types that are allowed within each of the overlays

[00:08:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:08:09–00:08:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Unlike a conventional zoning district that primarily regulates development through uses and standard dimensional requirements, the Waterfront Overlay uses a form-based approach. The regulating plan identifies the types and forms of building appropriate for each sub-district, based on the desired development pattern. As shown here, the overlay includes a specific townhouse building type, and

[00:08:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

townhouse

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:37–00:08:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:08:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6

are identified as an allowable building form in several sub-districts, including Heart of Cocoa, King Wheeler Corridor, Uptown Neighborhood, South of the Village,

[00:08:48] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:48–00:08:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6

This is relevant to Ordinance 13-2026 because the Waterfront Overlay does not simply identify townhouses as a permitted residential use. It also establishes a specific form-based framework for how the townhome development is intended to occur.

[00:09:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:07–00:09:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:13–00:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6

alongside these overlay requirements can create two distinct regulatory frameworks for the same development. Ordinance 13-2026 clarifies that within the Waterfront Overlay, the overlays adopted form-based standards governs the townhome townhouse building type, rather than also applying the conventional townhouse

[00:09:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:40–00:09:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6

So here ‸ to give you an idea, what is the zoning regulations under Section 6? So

[00:09:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:53–00:10:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6

That cross-reference is why the RU-215 townhouse provisions are relevant in RU-225. And it is also the regulatory overlap that Ordinance 13-2026 is intended to clarify.

[00:10:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:14–00:10:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Instead,

[00:10:23] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:10:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6

clarifies that when townhouse development occurs within the Waterfront Overlay,

[00:10:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:29–00:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6

This

[00:10:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:39–00:10:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6

for two different sets of development standards to apply on the same property or development. So to help illustrate, this table compares the conventional townhouse standards

[00:10:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:55–00:10:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

with

[00:11:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:00–00:11:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The main point is that the two regulatory systems were written for different development patterns.

[00:11:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:10–00:11:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6

are more conventional,

[00:11:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:11:14–00:11:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6

standards, while the Waterfront Overlay is designated for a more compact urban form.

[00:11:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:23–00:11:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of one acre,

[00:11:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:30–00:11:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6

a comparable one acre minimum. The conventional standards also generally require larger lots with lots areas between 2,000 and 2,400 square feet and lots width between 20 and 28 feet. The overlay allows smaller townhouse lots, beginning approximately 16 square feet and 15 feet in width. There are also differences in setbacks

[00:11:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:59–00:11:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:11:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

building placement. The conventional standards require greater separation between townhouse groups

[00:12:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:05–00:12:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:12:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

a 25-foot rear setback. The overlay allows a zero-foot side setback for attached units and a 15-foot rear setback, which supports the compact development pattern intended for the Waterfront Overlay. Lot coverage is another significant difference. The RU-215 townhouse standards allow a maximum lot coverage of 40% while the Waterfront Overlay allows up to 60%. The two systems also regulate height in parking differently. RU-215 establishes a maximum height of 35 feet

[00:12:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:44–00:12:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6

unit. The overlay regulates height by building type and places greater emphasis on the location of parking within the site. So the issue is not that one set of standards is ‸ necessarily better than the other. The issue is that applying both set of standards to the same townhouse development can create conflicting requirements. Ordinance 13-2026 resolves the conflict by clarifying that within the Cocoa Waterfront overlay, the overlay's form-based townhouse standards

[00:13:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:18–00:13:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6

[00:13:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:28–00:13:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:30–00:13:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the amendment and its relationship to the comprehensive plan and the city's overall planning program. For the first criterion,

[00:13:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:43–00:13:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6

[00:13:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:51–00:13:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6

‸ Paragraph B-B of the

[00:13:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:57–00:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6

that is no longer necessary because

[00:14:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:05–00:14:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

consolidated ‸ its landscaping, tree protection, replacement, and mitigation ‸ requirements through ordinance 12-2020. This amendment removes that obsolete and potentially duplicated language. The second issue is the regulatory overlap

[00:14:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:25–00:14:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:30–00:14:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6

[00:14:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:35–00:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6

However, within the waterfront overlay, the city has already adopted a separate form-based set of townhouses standards.

[00:14:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:47–00:14:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6

staff and applicants could be required to reconcile two different regulatory systems during each individual development review.

[00:14:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:58–00:15:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

including compact attached housing on smaller lots,

[00:15:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:13–00:15:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:15] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:15:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:15:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6

In addition to the overlay standards could interfere with that intent development pattern, and in some cases prevent townhouse developments on parcels where the overlay specifically allowed that building type. within the waterfront overlay,

[00:15:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:34–00:15:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:37–00:15:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:40–00:15:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6

by the code. It is also important to emphasize that this amendment does not do. It does not rezone any property.

[00:15:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:55–00:15:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

within the waterfront overlay, and does not waive the overlay requirements.

[00:16:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:03–00:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6

where it currently exists. The amendment also does not change any future land use designation or increase density. All development remains subject to the applicable comprehensive plan density limits and other requirements of the zoning ordinance. For this reason, staff finds that the amendment is justified because it removes obsolete language, eliminates regulatory ambiguity, and allows the waterfront overlays adopted

[00:16:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:35–00:16:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6

standards to operate as intended. So staff recommends that the planning

[00:16:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

is only

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:41–00:16:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:16:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

board recommend approval to the City Council of Ordinance 13-2026, and I'm available for questions.

[00:16:50] ▶ Play No voice detected

Thank you.

[00:16:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yeah, that's a lot to digest. Yes. Um,

[00:17:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:02–00:17:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8

create any type of um, unconforming use to any property in the overlaying district?

[00:17:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No, we're not changing the uses. We're just ‸ clarifying the type of um, regulations that would um, govern certain type of developments

[00:17:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:27–00:17:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:31–00:17:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

There are classified by building type.

[00:17:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:44–00:17:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of the building types. And then under that, um, there are uh, certain provisions as for lot size, square footage, setbacks.

[00:17:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:57–00:18:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6

But this, we are not changing or proposing changes on the uses that are permitted for this existing. Okay.

[00:18:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:13–00:18:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:15] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yeah, in general, it relaxes things versus, you know, being more constrained in the overlaying district is what I'm getting out of this. And that's correct.

[00:18:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

But

[00:18:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

I'm just, I just want to go on record that if there's, if there's a piece of property or something out there that is nonconforming, we should know about that ahead of time. And so we don't run into the issues like we

[00:18:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:34–00:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Um, so I'm ‸ just, just trying to clarify. Yeah,

[00:18:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6

so ‸ the next item ordinance 14, 2026 is actually to fix this inconsistency because there is an inconsistency in the south of the village between the future lane use and the zoning. And I'm going to address that on the next item.

[00:18:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:56–00:19:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6

it could affect is just the density. So the density for that area is going to be cap of 15 dwelling units and I'm, you're going to see on my next PowerPoint presentation. So for right now, development cannot occur because of the future

[00:19:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

land

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:16–00:19:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:19:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6

use conflict. So this is, is just not only, um, we're not proposing only to fix that conflict between the future lane use and the zoning, but also clean some of the language in the conflict between the zoning regulation and the overlay regulation. Okay.

[00:19:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I'll probably ask the same question after the next one.

[00:19:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Okay. Um, and then just to add, since we were talking about that, there are properties under the south of the village that do have a density issue. So it's not going to fix their problem, but it's just going to allow for new redevelopment for the vacant lots.

[00:19:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:55–00:19:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Okay.

[00:19:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3

And I'll ask, are there any current plans currently presented before the city regarding these existing, um, I would just say properties that were presented to us?

[00:20:09] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

We do have a project under review for townhomes.

[00:20:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:14–00:20:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes. Subdistrict.

[00:20:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:19–00:20:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:20:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[00:20:27] ▶ Play Speaker 3

if I understand it. Because I figured there had to be some type of, you just don't arbitrarily just put something out

[00:20:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

there

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:32–00:20:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:20:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3

just because we're being nice. We're doing it because there has to be some attachment to it to make relevant sense. So that's, that's the behind the curtain view. So now that we know the behind the curtain, there is something that is, that is prevalent. That's pushing this. What we're trying to do is just remove ‸ inconsistency. So this project has the potential to move forward.

[00:20:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes, that's correct.

[00:20:53] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Okay. Thank you. That's, that's what we need to know. At least I need to know.

[00:20:57] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I have a question.

[00:20:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Go ahead, sir.

[00:20:59] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Thank you. Um, this is a simple question. It's a reference to the project that's being planned on the corner of Dixon and River Road. The group of townhomes that are supposed to be built there. Is that still on and going?

[00:21:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6

‸ Which street is that? Is that the one though? I'm sorry, what was the street

[00:21:20] ▶ Play Speaker 9

again?

[00:21:21] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Dixon Boulevard and River Road.

[00:21:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:24–00:21:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice

Is that,

[00:21:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:27–00:21:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[00:21:30] ▶ Play Speaker 7

think that's what they're called.

[00:21:31] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:31–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:33–00:21:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:34] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:21:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:21:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Oh, I thought that

[00:21:35] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

they were.

[00:21:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:36–00:21:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:36] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Because

[00:21:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I thought they were going to go to,

[00:21:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:21:38–00:21:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:40] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

they're not townhomes?

[00:21:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9

They're not townhomes.

[00:21:43] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Those

[00:21:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3

were single, single unit dwellings.

[00:21:45] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Single family.

[00:21:46] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

They had

[00:21:46] ▶ Play No voice detected

alley

[00:21:46] ▶ Play Speaker 7

access. Right, I remember that.

[00:21:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Existing thoroughfares for easement on the River Road, but those are not supposed to be.

[00:21:54] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Okay. So,

[00:21:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:21:56] ▶ Play Speaker 7

misunderstood from the drawings, I thought, because it's been a while and I was just curious. My question was going to be if ‸ this, the changes here would affect that project and obviously it's not.

[00:22:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No, yeah, because that property is

[00:22:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:08–00:22:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:22:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6

single family residential.

[00:22:10] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Mm-hmm.

[00:22:11] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:11–00:22:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:18–00:22:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:19–00:22:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:22:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:22:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

as a subdivision. Okay.

[00:22:22] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:22–00:22:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:24] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes. Correct.

[00:22:25] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Okay, thank you.

[00:22:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:29–00:22:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:33] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:22:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:22:34] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:22:34] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:22:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3

questions, concerns?

[00:22:40] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:40–00:22:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:48] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:22:55] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I'll second it.

[00:22:57] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:57–00:23:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:22:58] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:22:59] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:23:07] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:23:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:23:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Let me get back to my notes. How good is the amount

[00:23:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6

of resistance?

[00:23:14] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Moving

[00:23:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

on, the

[00:23:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

item listed up under new business number four,

[00:23:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:17–00:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

amendment

[00:23:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:22–00:23:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'm assuming staff will be presenting that as well. Yeah, that's

[00:23:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

correct.

[00:23:30] ▶ Play Speaker 3

We'll have a listen.

[00:23:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:36–00:23:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:40–00:23:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:40–00:23:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes.

[00:23:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6

So ordinance 14-2026 is a large scale comprehensive plan tax amendment.

[00:23:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:49–00:23:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:53–00:24:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6

residential but only for properties located in the south of the village sub district of the Cocoa Waterfront Overlay district.

[00:24:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:07–00:24:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6

use. So the affected area has a medium density residential future land use and

[00:24:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:28–00:24:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the south of the village sub district

[00:24:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:38–00:24:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

village as we previously discussed The issue is that figure Flu one as you can see In the picture in your screen Current list is are

[00:24:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:54–00:24:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

zoning district But

[00:25:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:25:01–00:25:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:01] ▶ Play Speaker 6

not list are you two to five so that creates a inconsistency for land development

[00:25:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:14–00:25:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6

through a new note note 11

[00:25:24] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:24–00:25:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6

village of the district only

[00:25:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:29–00:25:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6

maximum density controls No future land use map changes rezoning or density increases proposed

[00:25:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:44–00:25:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6

So staff

[00:25:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:51–00:25:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

one inconsistency while creating another issue with the waterfront overlay

[00:26:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:04–00:26:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6

under the waterfront overlay. so

[00:26:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3

[00:26:23] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:23–00:26:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:23] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:26:23] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:26:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the south of the village overlay framework So the alternative would eliminate The need for the rezoning or to amend the

[00:26:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:40–00:26:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:50–00:26:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and avoids

[00:26:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

unnecessary

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:56–00:26:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6

changes As I showed before as you can see under the waterfront overlay sub districts There are you two to five it is an allow zoning district for the uptown neighborhood as well as for the south of the village So just to give a little bit of a background for the waterfront redevelopment framework

[00:27:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:22–00:27:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6

walk about walkability riverfront connectivity and neighborhood character The plan recommended a farm base overlay tailored to different waterfront sub districts

[00:27:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:39–00:27:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6

sub district The over the overlay regulates development through a regulating plan and building types writer than conventional zoning standards alone as

[00:27:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:57–00:28:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:00–00:28:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:06] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Residential uses include the townhouses in multifamily development. So is an allowable use under the sub district

[00:28:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:15–00:28:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

standard.

[00:28:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:20–00:28:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:28:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6

aligns the comprehensive plan with existing zoning and overlay framework

[00:28:27] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:16 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:27–00:28:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6

the applicable goals objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan So just to be clear Every new development still has to go through a review process

[00:28:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:56–00:29:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6

any school concurrency review with needed There are requirements under their comp plan for development

[00:29:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:10–00:29:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No reduction in adopted level service is anticipated from the amendment itself So with the comprehensive plan consistency it supports the medium

[00:29:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:28–00:29:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6

density Promotes

[00:29:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

redevelopment

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:35–00:29:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:29:35] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and unfilled with an established urban area and improved consistency between the

[00:29:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

future land

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:41–00:29:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:29:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:41–00:29:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:45] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:29:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:29:46] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:29:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:29:46] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:29:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:29:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:51–00:29:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

redevelopment So staff recommends that the planning ‸ zoning board recommends approval to

[00:30:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:04–00:30:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:19–00:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:21–00:30:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:29] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:29–00:30:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6

And I'm available for questions if you have any questions.

[00:30:37] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:17 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:37–00:30:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:53] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:30:54] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:54–00:30:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:30:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I wouldn't say give it the option but it's just to fix the inconsistency. Because now we cannot approve site plan development for that area because of the inconsistency.

[00:31:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:08–00:31:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:14] ▶ Play Speaker 6

or redevelopment, we have to check, we use the future land use element under the comp plan as a reference for zoning, what is permitted under the future land use designation. And now that area with the south of

[00:31:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:31–00:31:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6

allable zoning under the comp plan. So we're just trying to fix the inconsistency without increasing the density.

[00:31:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:42–00:31:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:46] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:46–00:31:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:49–00:31:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6

is dictated by the future land use, so we use the future land use as a reference for density.

[00:32:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:03–00:32:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6

language under that zoning that actually establishes the density. So to not increase the density under

[00:32:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:15–00:32:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6

we're trying to limit it as a 15 dwelling units per acre and

[00:32:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:21–00:32:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:32] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:32–00:32:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:39] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

that have a height restrictions?

[00:32:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Height I believe so yes I'll have to get in the

[00:32:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:47–00:32:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:49] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:32:50] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you're building tall. is Do

[00:32:54] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:54–00:32:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6

any other question?

[00:33:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:10–00:33:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:33:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:33:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:33:15] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Nonconforming creating nonconforming properties.

[00:33:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Well so to go back to that topic so the properties there are a few properties because I did I did a research on that area and there are a few properties that do have a density issue. So they are nonconforming with our code, but this is not going to solve or make their issue even worse.

[00:33:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:42–00:33:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

It's not going to give them a solution

[00:33:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:44–00:33:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:33:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes that's correct.

[00:33:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ Yes because of the density and also now I'm thinking that there are a few properties that have some unique layout. They have like multi-family buildings in a single family in the same lot. So they're like, the code does not even allow that type of development. So there are some nonconformities in that area, but with this amendment, is not going to solve or or make the issue worse than what it is right now.

[00:34:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay.

[00:34:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:28–00:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8

to get this right but I don't remember the geographical area of the consent decree. This doesn't apply to that correct?

[00:34:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

No the consent decree is are you to ten and is in a separate is the heart of Cocoa sub district a different

[00:34:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:49–00:34:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:50] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:34:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:34:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:56–00:35:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:35:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3

the board and once again I'll open it up to the two gentlemen in our public gallery. Any questions, concerns, any comments?

[00:35:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:08–00:35:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3

thank you for coming. So for that I'll close it and I'll bring it back to the board. If we can bring this in ‸ question.

[00:35:23] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I may I'll move to approve. Doesn't seem like there's other questions.

[00:35:30] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:30–00:35:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

We'll call it to a vote. All in favor say aye. Aye.

[00:35:36] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I got a question.

[00:35:37] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Okay.

[00:35:38] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Alec made the motion the last time he made a motion there was an issue because he's an alternate. He can't make the motion. ‸ I remember. Well we have two board members missing. So he can do it now? Okay. Yeah. Okay.

[00:35:53] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:53–00:35:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:54] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

minute. Last time yes. ‸ Last time ‸ we had a full house. I'm sorry. ‸ Okay. All right.

[00:36:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

‸ So we have a motion. We have a second. So we'll bring it in. We'll vote all in favor.

[00:36:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:11–00:36:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

right. Any opposed? So the motion passes unanimously. All right, let's get back to our next line item. So we're now to our most prolific item of the night.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:36:11–00:36:24 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:36:25] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:36:25–00:36:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:30] ▶ Play No voice detected

Thank you for

[00:36:33] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the recognition. I had a simple question if there's anything new we can bring up in reference to the abundance of oak trees that were cut down, on, 520 one of the businesses there. Is anything else has developed?

[00:36:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6

‸ How many inches I don't recall how many inches were removed, but I do recall that the fine I think there are 40,000 for the fines, but

[00:37:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:04–00:37:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:09] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Well, it's not so much the inches I was just curious if they're still in the process of trying to correct the removal of the trees that were not done for the permit

[00:37:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:19–00:37:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6

to To

[00:37:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

evaluate

[00:37:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6

how many inches were removed he gave me Final assessment, so I'm just finalizing the report the property

[00:37:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:40–00:37:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:43] ▶ Play Speaker 6

business came forward. He did submit an application and after the fat application for a tree removal So now it's just matter of me issuing the report for them and the code enforcement and then to see what the next steps are

[00:37:58] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Now this was definitely in

[00:38:01] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:01–00:38:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:38:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6

All the trees were identified as in private property

[00:38:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:07–00:38:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:11] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:11–00:38:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:13–00:38:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'm

[00:38:17] ▶ Play Speaker 7

sorry.

[00:38:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6

They were all

[00:38:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

identified

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:19–00:38:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:38:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

as being in a pro located in private property

[00:38:23] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Oh I from I'd have to look at the survey for that because That changes things

[00:38:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:32–00:38:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7

That's how I felt

[00:38:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6

No, they're in private

[00:38:39] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ Otherwise, they

[00:38:40] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

just

[00:38:40] ▶ Play Speaker 8

they're just being They didn't pull a permit to pull the trees down That'd be the only

[00:38:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:45–00:38:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8

No,

[00:38:48] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

they are in violation because they're all especially trees. So they are in violation. So Actually would it be the opposite if the trees were in the right-of-way

[00:38:58] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:58–00:38:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Oversee by FDOT not us because it's not our right away So we wouldn't have no jurisdiction even to apply our code

[00:39:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:07–00:39:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

to answer for their actions and follow to comply to our code

[00:39:18] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

What's the difference between private property for a residential versus a commercial is there a difference? Yes,

[00:39:24] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yeah Well in our code we do have language that exempt single-family residential So if there is an existing single-family home in a lot they are allowed to cut the trees without ‸ our permission But if he's a

[00:39:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:41–00:39:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:45] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

to build a single-family home Then they will have to comply with our code and mitigate those trees on site before they build a home But after that that home is already, you know

[00:39:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:56–00:39:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

to follow the code anymore. They are free to Cut the trees as they wish

[00:40:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:04–00:40:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

they have to apply for a permit and

[00:40:15] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:15–00:40:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

removing trees

[00:40:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:19–00:40:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:40:21] ▶ Play Speaker 8

the process and got and and did the permit What's the chance of them getting approved to take the trees down?

[00:40:28] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:28–00:40:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:40:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

there is

[00:40:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

there's no Now is an after-the-fact permit. There's already a violation established, right? So the permit is an after-the-fact they still have to pay fines.

[00:40:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I Understand that

[00:40:44] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:44–00:40:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8

denied as my question?

[00:40:53] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:53–00:40:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:40:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Just be fictitious.

[00:41:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:01–00:41:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

it have been approved?

[00:41:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6

It depends what they're proposing because they are required to mitigate those trees So they have to replant so when someone proposes to remove on a specimen tree or oak tree or They have to show How what is the plan for replacement?

[00:41:24] ▶ Play No voice detected

Okay,

[00:41:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6

so and then if there is no For some reason there's no space on site, you know on the on the property There's no location for those trees for some reason then they have to pay into the arbor mitigation fund They will make a payment a contribution Before they can get a permit

[00:41:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay, so this is just like going in reverse they're ‸ gonna ‸ end up doing all that anyways They were there there's a process in which they could take those trees down. I'm not saying yes or no I'm just saying that there is a process

[00:42:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:01–00:42:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:42:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8

know, the city's property and they were And that's I think that's why we are all in an uproar about the size of these trees and how many were taken down Okay, I understand it better now

[00:42:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yeah, but

[00:42:18] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:18–00:42:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6

‸ They're gonna be fine and penalized and they have to ‸ replace those trees

[00:42:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:26–00:42:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:27] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:42:29] ▶ Play Speaker 7

if I can and is it alright ‸ if I speak

[00:42:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Thank

[00:42:31] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

you

[00:42:35] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:35–00:42:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:42] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

about the trees that were cut down Now

[00:42:44] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

they provide

[00:42:45] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

anything like that because I think that'll satisfy the concern that Russell had brought up because I I remember the city planting those trees So I'd like to see a survey or something Because there's a conflict here Whether it's a

[00:43:08] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:08–00:43:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:11] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

it's D.O.T The city has an ordinance D.O.T. don't they have to sort of work with the city ordinance as well on On the the guidelines of how we want the landscaping along our major arteries?

[00:43:26] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I just want to say to my knowledge the trees are located in private property not on the right-of-way

[00:43:31] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:31–00:43:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:34] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:34–00:43:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:43:36] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:43:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:43:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7

order to fix this issue with the trees gone

[00:43:40] ▶ Play Speaker 6

The evaluation was based on staff Public works is responsible for making that determination

[00:43:47] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:47–00:43:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6

but we don't rely on the information provided by the property owner The assessment is done by staff This should be clear and then

[00:43:59] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

well Is it possible where the staff can get a summary with a copy of the site plan or am I being Asking for something that's

[00:44:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

would you like me to bring to the next council here? Well,

[00:44:10] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that's what I was gonna

[00:44:11] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:11–00:44:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:44:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I mean, I'll just say that the the Code enforcement board is the board that really has the jurisdiction to deal with the violation. So right, I mean I suppose that we could present it But again, you know this this board is not going to impose penalties or anything like that So well,

[00:44:44] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I was for years I was under that opinion and And I really feel that the city planted those trees I

[00:44:52] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

can try to confirm with public works. I would not know personally so I have to confirm with my

[00:44:57] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

memory

[00:44:58] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:58–00:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:45:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:45:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I would say that At this point if we fast-forward to present day with the city

[00:45:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:45:08–00:45:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

them or whether the the

[00:45:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:10–00:45:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

it's not going to resolve the fact that they're not here

[00:45:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:19–00:45:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

were at present The reality is this they're gone. We've identified that to be the first fact The second fact that we've not identified is that we as this board being the tree board We did go through a fervent conversation in our last meeting to

[00:45:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:39–00:45:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

this would be approached in terms of

[00:45:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:45:44–00:45:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the circumference of these trees would be will be the findings towards What these types of scopes would be towards whether they would be mitigated and what these fines ‸ would be

[00:45:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:52–00:45:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

be stiffen But the applicant if you want to tell the truth that it's just money to them and you already said that's just one sale

[00:46:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:04–00:46:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

ordinance and and what we have the ability to do towards finding It's not going to change it at this point. So it's well fortunate But the reality is all they're going to do is mitigate the trees or

[00:46:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:46:19–00:46:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

for the mitigation where they're going to put some nice New trees out there I guess ‸ Yeah,

[00:46:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I still have ‸ I

[00:46:31] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

still

[00:46:32] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:32–00:46:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:33] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:46:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:46:34] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:46:35] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

right,

[00:46:35] ▶ Play Speaker 7

go ahead

[00:46:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4

My question was Were the owners aware that they were committing a violation like it was there a part of like a response or anything like that once they were notified

[00:46:49] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

They did come forward to try

[00:46:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:51–00:46:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:46:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

for compliance to try to comply But the only thing that I know is that the trees were causing damage to the cars. That was the reason given so If they were aware of our I'm not ‸ I'm not sure ‸ they knew

[00:47:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:47:08–00:47:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

permit is required ‸ or not

[00:47:10] ▶ Play Speaker 4

now is there any types of notices or information that is sent out to uh business owners Especially if they own property to let them know about these sorts of ordinances So if you have new businesses that come and they may want to Remove a tree that's on their property

[00:47:29] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:29–00:47:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:36] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:36–00:47:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6

to provide or any type of we don't

[00:47:42] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:47:42] ▶ Play Speaker 6

normally is when the applicant comes forward and asks the question or you know the property owner or

[00:47:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3

business owner come and ask the question

[00:47:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:50–00:47:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:53] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

moment i'm the only planner Okay, so it would be hard

[00:47:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:56–00:47:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

them ‸ all the regulations that we have Normally, we try to make them aware of basic Regulations when they submit for a business tax receipt because then we have to review those But it's not every business that applies for one

[00:48:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:13–00:48:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:21] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:21–00:48:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:25] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:48:25] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:48:25] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:48:26] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

put something out that the public can see so that this information is readily available? And so we're being proactive instead of reactive Everybody's in the uproar because they're hearing different versions of this story um

[00:48:39] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:39–00:48:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:42] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice

Uh and I know people are passionate, but I mean

[00:48:46] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:46–00:48:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

regardless of how people feel about the trees So I think if we can do something to make sure that the public has the information in advance It would stop a lot of confusion. That's just my little two cents. Thank you so much. Thank

[00:49:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3

you. You're welcome We had uh two additional Yes, sir, mr. I

[00:49:08] ▶ Play Speaker 7

think susan was before

[00:49:12] ▶ Play Speaker 5

‸ clarification. Someone asked if they had submitted a request Before taking the trees down would it have been approved could it be denied if it was approved They would just have to replace The trees somewhere on the property or

[00:49:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:30–00:49:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:31] ▶ Play Speaker 5

if it were denied Would they be prohibited from taking those trees down?

[00:49:37] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:37–00:49:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:41] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:41–00:49:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:44–00:49:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:47] ▶ Play Speaker 9

going to replace the trees or mitigate as Required by the code then the permits should be approved Yeah

[00:50:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:01–00:50:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:02] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:50:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:50:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Yes. Yes, sir.

[00:50:04] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

Thank you. Uh, I don't want to drag this out, but i'm just going to give an example of what I was hoping to receive about this subject

[00:50:14] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:14–00:50:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

wherever there was a tree that was removed incorrectly We received a site plan showing where the tree is at and pictures to give us an idea of what that was involving and That's what I was wondering if I if we were ever going ‸ to Get additional information showing where the trees were and and the ones that were removed right now. It's strictly verbiage I know that we're moving on going to the future at this point

[00:50:49] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:49–00:50:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:54] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And I didn't know if you all were ‸ going to provide it for this This particular case or not because right now I I'd have to look up the site plan and try to Understand it myself.

[00:51:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Yeah, mr. Greenwood just to be clear if you look under the landscape or uh code under

[00:51:17] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:17–00:51:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

the tree board There's no language or any type of uh Description or anything that dictates that staff has to bring tree removals to the tree board

[00:51:32] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:32–00:51:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:36] ▶ Play Speaker 7

[00:51:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

‸ I was just trying to explain that those violations when the curve they are handled by the code enforcement board And we do have language in our codes that dictates that

[00:51:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:50–00:51:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:56] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

So i'm not sure what was done in the past. I wasn't here But i'll tell you that

[00:52:01] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that's what's causing the confusion because Whenever we had an issue with the tree being removed we would get additional information to show with pictures where it was located the subdivision, the name of the subdivision, where it's located in the subdivision. And that's why i'm confused because i thought that that was coming So if if it's not required then we just need to drop it

[00:52:22] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:22–00:52:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:25] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

that's all

[00:52:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Yeah, maybe i can clarify that a little bit in the past there have been agenda items that have been brought to the tree board When someone wants to remove a tree an oak tree specifically in the city right of way Those are the only times that agenda items are brought to this board for recommendations on whether that tree can be removed and what the replacements would be.

[00:52:53] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Mm-hmm

[00:52:53] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

and that's the reason that we have had You know as you said pictures and things like that brought those were for requests to remove trees. I remember yeah,

[00:53:04] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I remember

[00:53:05] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

But

[00:53:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I was hoping that

[00:53:06] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:06–00:53:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:53:07] ▶ Play Speaker 7

would be the same It would be presented the same way with this

[00:53:11] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:11–00:53:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:53:14] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice

case this is not

[00:53:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:16–00:53:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:18–00:53:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

It would again be a code enforcement matter if it was in the state right of way That is not something that this board oversees either right the only time is if it's in city right of way like a city road um And ‸ that's yeah, I understand it was

[00:53:41] ▶ Play Speaker 7

visual information.

[00:53:42] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:42–00:53:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:46] ▶ Play Speaker 7

that Thank you.

[00:53:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

All right excellent. So if not, we will now move on to item agenda item number six other business or if we'd like to phrase it Any open conversations that we would typically have at this time Everyone's hushed today All right, we'll move on then so we'll close it up for uh other business

[00:54:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:11–00:54:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

That we do have our next scheduled meeting on october 7th 2026 at 6 p.m

[00:54:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:21–00:54:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

Now in homage to our chair who is not here. He always typically likes to bring something forward As to the next up-and-coming events, so we actually have three on the u.s calendar So the next I wish you all

[00:54:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:39–00:54:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:54:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

present labor day.

[00:54:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:41–00:54:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:45] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Um ‸ and may all blessings be unto us until we meet again And if no other business, I will ask ‸ Yes, that is correct. All

[00:54:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

right,

[00:54:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so we've posted in second all in favor

[00:54:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:57–00:54:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:59] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

deal Oh Oh, I got through it You

[00:55:10] ▶ Play Speaker 4

did great

[00:55:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:13–00:55:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:14] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:14–00:55:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:55:19–00:55:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:20] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:55:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:55:25] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:55:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:55:26] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:55:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:55:30] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:55:30] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T14:25:55 · 5,355 ordinary words, 2,238 in suspect passages, 49 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.