civic record · cocoa, florida
Planning & Zoning

Planning & Zoning Board / Local Planning Agency Meeting

Date
2026-10-07
Status
Machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #1395
The City's agenda only — no minutes record on file — no AI-written text

The City's record

What the City's record shows

The City's minutes for this meeting are not on file in this archive. This briefing states only what the City's agenda lists. Nothing here is taken from the machine transcription.

On the City's agenda (10-07-2026 Agenda Packet)

  • I. Opening Matters
    1. Call to Order
    1. Pledge of Allegiance
    1. Roll Call
  • II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes
    1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of October 7, 2026.
    1. Minutes: Regular Meeting of September 2, 2026.
  • III. Old Business
  • IV. New Business
    1. PZ 22-00100001 - London Cove - Large-Scale Site Plan and Preliminary Plat
    1. Sky Powersports Large-Scale Site Plan
  • V. Tree Board
  • VI. Other Business
  • VII. Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, November 4th, 2026, at 6:00 pm at 65 Stone Street in Cocoa, FL.
  • VIII. Adjournment

An agenda lists what was scheduled. Whether an item was approved, amended, tabled or not taken up is stated only where it is verified above, or once the minutes are on file.

The recording's machine transcription is below. It is unverified: words and names may be misheard, and it cannot establish who acted or how anyone voted.

Agenda (the City's wording)

Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

  • 1. Call to Order
  • 2. Pledge of Allegiance
  • 3. Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

  • 1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of October 7, 2026.
  • 2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of September 2, 2026.

III. Old Business

IV. New Business

  • 1. PZ 22-00100001 - London Cove - Large-Scale Site Plan and Preliminary Plat — 00:42:39
  • 2. Sky Powersports Large-Scale Site Plan

V. Tree Board

VI. Other Business

VII. Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, November 4th, 2026, at 6:00 pm at 65 Stone Street in Cocoa, FL.

VIII. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:19] No voice detected
‸ Thank you.
[00:00:29] Speaker 1
Excellent. We'll call this meeting to order. If everyone could please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.
[00:00:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:39–00:00:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:40] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:00:41] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
of the United States of America and to the republic for which it
[00:00:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for
[00:00:51] Speaker 3
all. Thank you.
[00:00:56] Speaker 1
Mrs. Chabot, you have roll call? Thank you.
[00:01:01] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:01–00:01:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:02] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:02] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:01:10] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:11] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:01:21] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:21] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:01:25] Speaker 4
All right.
[00:01:27] Speaker 1
Excellent. All right. We'll move on to... ‸ Any questions?
[00:01:41] Speaker 7
Yes.
[00:01:45] Speaker 8
So... Item number two. Or I'm sorry. Number one. Is there anyone here for the London Cove item? I don't believe so.
[00:01:58] No voice detected
So...
[00:01:59] Speaker 8
If we could perhaps change the order for now. If the board is amenable to that, see if any... If the applicant shows up for it. Otherwise, I would recommend that we postpone it.
[00:02:14] Speaker 1
Okay. I
[00:02:16] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
moved
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:16–00:02:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:02:17] Speaker 1
to...
[00:02:17] Attribution uncertain
You
[00:02:17] Speaker 1
say switch those two?
[00:02:18] Speaker 8
Yeah. Switch the order.
[00:02:20] Speaker 1
Switch item one and two under new business.
[00:02:23] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:23–00:02:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:24] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:24] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:02:27] Speaker 1
seconds.
[00:02:28] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:28–00:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:30] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:02:32] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Ms. Finley or Mr....
[00:02:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:34–00:02:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
All right. Motions made
[00:02:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:41–00:02:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:02:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
second. Any discussion? All in favor?
[00:02:44] Speaker 9
Aye.
[00:02:45] Speaker 1
Any opposed?
[00:02:46] Speaker 9
Okay.
[00:02:48] Speaker 1
The agenda has been changed as such. Any other... Anything else on the agenda that we'd like to make adjustments for or find approval with has changed? Okay. ‸ All right. Then I'll move to approve the agenda as written with the changes as placed.
[00:03:14] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Can
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:14–00:03:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:03:15] Speaker 1
I get a second? Second. All right. Second. Thank you. And Ms. Finley? All right. Any discussion on the agenda?
[00:03:25] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:25–00:03:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:28] Speaker 1
And any opposed?
[00:03:29] No voice detected
All
[00:03:29] Speaker 1
right. The agenda stands now. Our second one is the meeting minutes from last... Our last meeting on September 2nd. Does anybody have any changes or requests?
[00:03:41] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:41–00:03:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:41] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:03:45] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:45–00:03:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:49] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
meeting on September 2nd, 2026, as printed.
[00:03:53] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:53–00:03:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:53] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right. We have the motion from Mr. Wheeler and a second by Mr. Chabot. Mr.
[00:03:58] No voice detected
Chabot. Sorry.
[00:04:01] Speaker 1
It's okay.
[00:04:01] No voice detected
What was that?
[00:04:02] Speaker 1
We have a motion to approve the minutes from the last meeting by Mr. Wheeler and a second by Mr. Chabot.
[00:04:06] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:04:07] Speaker 1
Yes, ma'am. Any discussion on the minutes?
[00:04:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:11–00:04:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:13] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:04:13] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:13–00:04:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:16] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:16–00:04:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:17] Speaker 1
All right, good. We have the ayes. Any nays? All right. Then the motion passes. That's odd. All right. So there's nothing under our old business. So we'll move towards new business,
[00:04:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:27–00:04:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:37] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:04:45] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:45–00:04:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:45] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:45–00:04:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:47] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:47–00:04:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:54] Speaker 7
The guy was hers.
[00:04:56] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:56–00:04:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:57] Speaker 7
That's yours.
[00:04:57] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:57–00:04:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:01] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:01–00:05:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:02] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:05:07] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:07–00:05:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:10] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:10–00:05:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:10] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:05:12] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:12–00:05:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:13] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:14] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:14–00:05:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:14] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:05:15] Speaker 7
It's not there?
[00:05:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:05:16–00:05:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:23] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:25] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:25–00:05:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:27] Speaker 7
Yeah.
[00:05:28] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:28–00:05:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:30–00:06:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:32] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:05:40] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:05:54] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:05:57] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:06:08] Speaker 10
Good evening, Chair and Board members.
[00:06:11] Speaker 1
Good evening.
[00:06:11] Speaker 7
Good
[00:06:11] Speaker 10
evening. For
[00:06:12] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:12–00:06:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:15] Speaker 10
Tonight I am presenting a request for approval of a large-scale site plan for Sky Power Sports of Cocoa. Do you have the clicker?
[00:06:24] Speaker 7
Here, here.
[00:06:25] Speaker 10
Oh, right
[00:06:26] No voice detected
here. Wow. Wow. Wow.
[00:06:37] Speaker 10
So Sky Power Sports has operated its existing location
[00:06:41] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:41–00:06:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:45] Speaker 10
approximately five and a half years.
[00:06:47] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:47–00:06:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:53] Speaker 10
1981 when the original store opened in Lake Wells. Over the years, the family expanded the business to as many as five locations before consolidating its operations
[00:07:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:03–00:07:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:08] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:08–00:07:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:17] Speaker 10
from West King Street to a new purpose-built facility designated to accommodate its vehicle display
[00:07:24] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
cells
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:24–00:07:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:07:25] Speaker 10
and maintenance operations.
[00:07:30] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:30–00:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:37] Speaker 10
So the subject property is approximately 4.92 acres and is currently vacant. It is located at the intersection of 524 and Friday Road west of Interstate 95. Surrounding uses include an existing commercial business to the north, a car wash and
[00:07:57] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:07:57–00:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:58] Speaker 10
business to the east, and vacant land to the south and west.
[00:08:02] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:02–00:08:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:08] Speaker 10
jurisdictional wetland, identified as wetland in W1, occurs near the eastern portion of the site and extends into the adjoining property.
[00:08:16] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:16–00:08:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:18] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:08:18] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:08:23] Speaker 10
the western boundary of the site. And that information can be found on your environmental report. That is one of the attachments with this agenda pack. So the subject property is on general commercial.
[00:08:40] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:08:40–00:08:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:40] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:08:45] Speaker 10
other properties within the city. They are also zone general commercial. The property contains two feature land use designations, commercial and conservation. The majority of the site is designated commercial, which supports the proposed commercial development. A portion of the eastern side of the property is designated conservation and corresponds with the jurisdictional wetland area. The proposed development includes approximately 0.16 acres of direct impact to the wetland within the conservation designated area. Because that area remains designated conservation, development cannot simply proceed based on the commercial designation ‸ applicable to the remainder of the property. The project must first satisfy the applicable provisions of
[00:09:37] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:37–00:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:43] Speaker 10
So the
[00:09:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:44–00:09:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:51] Speaker 10
power sport dealership with the building generally located in the center of the property. A wet detention pond is proposed along the western portion of the site, while the primary site access and utility connections are provided along Friday Road. A jurisdictional wetland identifies, and as previously mentioned here, is located the eastern side of portion of ‸ the property and extends to adjoining property to the south. The site plan provides 131 parking spaces compared with the 98 spaces required by the code, including five accessible spaces. Of the total parking provided, 34 spaces are identified for employees and 97 spaces for customers. The development also includes dedicated vehicle display areas,
[00:10:41] Attribution uncertain
a
[00:10:41] Speaker 10
50 foot by 14 loading zone, internal drive aisles, circulation, landscape, utility stormwater management, and other associated site improvements. Starting with existing conditions on Friday Road, the Space
[00:11:02] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:02–00:11:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:06] Speaker 10
approximately 1,850 average daily vehicles on Friday Road near State Road 524. The directional count is approximately 940 vehicles northbound and 910 vehicles southbound. Looking at the current level of service, the same Space Coast TPO data identifies this portion of Friday Road as currently operating at a level of service A. For comparison, the city's comprehensive plan established a minimum level of service E. For Friday Road between State Road 524 and State Road 520. Based on the available information, Friday Road is therefore currently operating well above the city's adopted minimum level of service standard.
[00:11:56] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:56–00:12:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:11:58] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:12:05] Speaker 10
trips associated with ‸ this project. During the peak hours, the project is estimated to generate approximately 98 trips during the morning hours and 128 trips during the evening hours. It's important to note that 1,463 daily trips represent the ‸ total trips generated by the development and should not be interpreted as additional to the 1,463 vehicles traveling on Friday Road. The application does not include a project-specific trip distribution, identifying how
[00:12:47] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
those
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:47–00:12:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:48] Speaker 10
streets will divide between Friday Road, State Road 524, and the surrounding roadway network. Therefore, staff cannot calculate a post-development level of service for Friday Road from the information submitted for the project. I thought it was worth mentioning that, you know, the project, the State Road 524 is the higher volume for FDOT arterial serving the project area and is currently the subject of planned capacity ‸ improvements.
[00:13:19] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:19–00:13:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:25] Speaker 10
a current level surface, level surface, service deficiency on Friday Road. However, the proposed development will contribute additional traffic to the surrounding roadway network. Starting with the utilities as part of the analysis for the development plans, the project will receive city water and sanitary sewer service. The utility department has several remaining technical plan comments, which we ‸ incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval, and we'll discuss later in this presentation. For stormwater, the project proposed a wet detention pond on the western portion of the site with downstream discharge to the existing drainage system.
[00:14:17] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:17–00:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:25] Speaker 10
2025, addressing the project's stormwater management system and associated environmental permitting.
[00:14:32] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:32–00:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:38] Speaker 10
to applicable city development and comprehensive plan requirements. Finally, for the tree mitigation,
[00:14:44] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:14:44] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
landscape plan identifies a total protected trees replacement requirement of 1,806 inches. The applicant is providing 640 inches of credit through on-site replacement and preservation,
[00:14:58] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:58–00:15:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:04] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Based on the city's mitigation rate, the deficit results
[00:15:07] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:07–00:15:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:14] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
fund.
[00:15:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:15–00:15:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:24] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:24–00:15:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:27] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
previous acreage discrepancy and conformed that proposed direct impact to the wetland as 0.16 acres. So when I was completing this staff report, I noticed there was a discrepancy between the site plans and the environmental report as the total acreage for the wetlands. So the engineer was able to solve that discrepancy by answering and confirming that it is 0.16 acres total. So the low quality, so the engineer also confirmed that the affected portion of the wetland is classified as low quality, because
[00:16:09] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:09–00:16:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:14] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
not say which portions are low or which portions are moderate. So this supports the comprehensive plan review, but
[00:16:24] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:24–00:16:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:30] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
still needs to be documented. So a revised environmental report is going to be required as well as a revised
[00:16:38] Speaker 7
site plan just to conciliate the discrepancy with the acreage. The
[00:16:43] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:43–00:16:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:51] Speaker 10
credits through FarmTown Mitigation Bank to address the proposed wetland impacts. With the updated information, the 0.16 acre direct impact and the low quality classification have been clarified. ‸ So what remains for the city that ‸ needs to be addressed, as I mentioned, is going to be the revised environmental report
[00:17:18] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:18–00:17:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:17:18] Speaker 10
site plan to satisfy ‸ the comp plan policy. That is one of conditions of approval. So for the ‸ comprehensive plan consistency,
[00:17:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:33–00:17:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:40] Speaker 10
while protecting public health, safety, welfare, community appearance,
[00:17:44] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:44–00:17:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:17:45] Speaker 10
natural resources.
[00:17:46] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:46–00:17:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:52] Speaker 10
protections for environmentally sensitive areas and requires impacts within conservation areas to comply with the conservation element. Policy 12.1.6.15 wetland protection requires avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts and mitigation when impacts are unavoidable.
[00:18:12] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:12–00:18:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:24] Speaker 10
portion therefore when the wetland has minimal restoration potential
[00:18:28] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:28–00:18:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:18:28] Speaker 10
beneficial restoration or enhancement is achieved through mitigation. So that's the ‸ conditions to the final approval.
[00:18:37] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:37–00:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:44] Speaker 10
city's wetland mitigation requirements
[00:18:46] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:46–00:18:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:18:47] Speaker 10
priority order for mitigation location.
[00:18:53] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:53–00:19:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:04] Speaker 10
the affected area remains as a jurisdictional wetland within the conservation future land use designation. Because development is proposed within this area, the applicable conservation element policies must be addressed. Second, the updated information from the engineer identifies the affected wetland as low quality. However, the policy here presented also requires the applicable determination regarding minimal restoration potential. So the low quality classification alone does not fully satisfy the policy. Third, the ‸ project has received a St. John River Water Management District environmental resource permit and has reserved the mitigation credits. These credits are intended to offset the proposed wetland's impact. Finally, staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring the applicants to provide the remaining documentation demonstrating compliance with the policy before development occurs within the conservation designated area. Once the policy criteria are satisfied, the applicable commercial future land use category may apply to the affected area, as provided by the comprehensive plan. So the proposed condition allows the site plan to move forward while ensuring that the required comprehensive plan determination is completed before development occurs within the affected conservation area. So the proposed commercial use is consistent with the commercial future land use designation applicable to the upland portion of the site.
[00:20:49] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:49–00:20:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:53] Speaker 10
based on available Space Coast TPO data.
[00:20:56] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:56–00:21:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:00] Speaker 10
and reserve wetland mitigation credits, and the recommended conditions preserve the required comprehensive plan determination and remaining utility compliance. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of the large-scale site plan for Sky Power Sport, subject to the following conditions. Prior to development within the area designated conservation on the future land use map, the applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating the affected well land satisfies the criteria of comprehensive plan policy,
[00:21:38] Attribution uncertain
as
[00:21:38] Speaker 10
here mentioned, upon satisfaction of the requirements of this policy. The applicable commercial future land use category should apply to the affected area as provided by the comprehensive plan.
[00:21:50] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:50–00:21:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:57] Speaker 10
line at the water and sanitary sewer crossing in accordance with the City of Cook utilities requirements.
[00:22:04] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:04–00:22:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:11] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:11–00:22:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:14] Speaker 10
shall be revised as the current plans the spec for connections.
[00:22:19] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:19–00:22:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:26] Speaker 10
an upstream tap with an anchoring T in accordance
[00:22:29] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:29–00:22:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:33] Speaker 10
The proposed 3 inch PVC water line shall be revised to a minimum of 4 inch PVC water line as 3 inch PVC water lines are not permitted
[00:22:43] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:43–00:22:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:45] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:45–00:22:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:49] Speaker 10
here if you have any questions. Thank you.
[00:22:55] Speaker 2
I do have a question. Thank you for the thorough presentation. ‸ My question is regarding one of Alex's top subjects trees. Of all things I would pick tonight.
[00:23:09] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:09–00:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:14] Speaker 2
in review of this, my only question to staff is regarding to why is it, and this is for my knowledge to help me understand, why is it that when we ‸ start to do the calculations based off of the number of trees within ‸ this parcel of land, why do we not calculate where the building itself is going to go?
[00:23:34] Speaker 10
Because under our landscape requirements, there is a section that says that the building footprint
[00:23:41] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:41–00:23:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:46] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. So ‸ that would clarify as to, and it does say trees located within the proposed building footprint and within 7.5 feet of the building footprint are exempt from the applicable tree replacement requirements and are not included in the mitigation calculation. But is that based off of code? Okay. Yes.
[00:24:04] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:04–00:24:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:04] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:24:08] Speaker 2
a code or if that's, if it's, that's how I got it. So I didn't understand that. So for that, that makes the mitigation applicable based upon what is being calculated and what is being therefore required to be paid to the city. I have no further question for ‸ the staff. Okay.
[00:24:30] Speaker 11
The homes to the east, are they going to be affected by this? The rain or water runoff from that property?
[00:24:45] Speaker 10
I'm not sure which house are you saying?
[00:24:49] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:49–00:24:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:49] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:24:52] Speaker 11
Well, that's east. This is where we're at. That's east going backwards.
[00:25:00] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:00–00:25:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:01] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:25:09] Speaker 12
commercial and then you have the highway. So if you go in ‸ east.
[00:25:15] Speaker 10
There are properties to the south, to the north. ‸ On the north.
[00:25:20] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
On the
[00:25:20] Attribution uncertain
north.
[00:25:21] Speaker 11
East. Okay.
[00:25:22] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:22–00:25:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:23] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:25:27] Speaker 12
And so if you go east, you have the one commercial, Dakotas, detailing, and then you have the highway going east.
[00:25:38] Speaker 11
Okay. I'll read this map wrong then.
[00:25:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:43–00:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:49] Attribution uncertain
It
[00:25:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
is
[00:25:49] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
my understanding not. Public Works did review for ‸ stormwater compliance, as well as they do have a permit with St. John.
[00:25:57] Speaker 1
Thank you. Good, Mr. Chabot?
[00:26:03] Speaker 11
I'm good. Okay. I just wanted to make sure that, you know, we don't have flooding of homes. That's a big subject. And we vote on it and then they flood out. We're responsible for it. So I just was going to double check. Very fine. Yeah, absolutely. Thank
[00:26:25] Speaker 1
you. Yes, ma'am.
[00:26:26] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:26–00:26:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:27] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:26:33] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:33] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:33] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:26:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:26:36] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:26:38] Speaker 1
whether if it was for approval, it would be based on including the conditions provided by staff.
[00:26:44] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:44–00:26:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:44] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:44] Speaker 1
Thank you. Any other questions for staff before we open it up? Okay. I have one card from the public.
[00:26:50] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:50–00:26:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:51] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:51–00:26:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:54] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:54] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:54] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:05] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Good evening, everybody. Good evening. Sorry if my enunciation isn't great. A, I'm a little nervous, and B, I had a bunch of dental work done today, so my timing is, as always, impeccable.
[00:27:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:19–00:27:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:25] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
this,
[00:27:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:25] Speaker 3
then expand out in a bunch of different directions. I live on this block. I'm technically in county, not in City of Cocoa, but there's a lot of zigzagging of lines out my way.
[00:27:41] No voice detected
And
[00:27:42] Speaker 3
my family has been on our property for 49 years. We are not even the most ensconced person in the properties that abuts us.
[00:27:51] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Excuse me, sir. Just one moment, please.
[00:27:56] No voice detected
We're going to need
[00:27:56] Speaker 4
to swear you
[00:27:57] No voice detected
in,
[00:27:57] Speaker 4
please.
[00:27:58] Speaker 3
Oh, sorry.
[00:27:58] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:58–00:28:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:03] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:05] Speaker 4
Say that again.
[00:28:06] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:06–00:28:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:07] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:07–00:28:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:08–00:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:08] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:28:10] Speaker 4
the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
[00:28:14] Speaker 3
Thank
[00:28:15] Speaker 4
you, sir.
[00:28:16] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:16–00:28:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:17] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:18] Speaker 3
Thank
[00:28:18] Attribution uncertain
you.
[00:28:18] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Do I need to redo what I already did?
[00:28:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:19–00:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:21] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:22] Speaker 3
If we're doing technicalities, I want to do them all.
[00:28:27] No voice detected
So
[00:28:27] Speaker 3
none of my neighbors talk to me about this. We see each other. I have to drive by two neighbors just to get out of my driveway.
[00:28:33] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:33–00:28:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:39] Speaker 3
field set back, and my mother's is even further back. I am curious as to why there used to be a big sign up about this a while back, and then there was no sign, and then very recently there is
[00:28:52] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:52–00:28:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:28:52] Speaker 3
approximately two foot by two foot sign. And when I went to measure the sign after I got out of my dental appointment today, it is so close to the road that someone almost hit me turning off of eastbound 524 onto southbound Friday Road.
[00:29:08] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:08–00:29:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:11] Speaker 3
got here, so I'm not sure if those will be shown or not. That corner there is very low lying.
[00:29:19] No voice detected
And
[00:29:20] Speaker 3
I wonder, is it too low for what's going on? It looked like from the picture you guys put up that that's where the retention pond is going to be at, at the corner of the road, but it is still fairly low there. I know I wasn't contacted. Have other people on the block been contacted?
[00:29:38] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:38–00:29:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:43] Speaker 3
I know there's a farmer back on 524 within half a mile of where this property would be that tried to buy pasture land from me a few years back. Has he been contacted? These are questions. These are not accusations. Why are these things
[00:29:57] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
these
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:57–00:29:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:29:57] Speaker 3
way? Who has been contacted? Are there going to be any noise regulations regarding what is going in there? There ‸ are a lot of people that with this head of gray hair ‸ on that block, I can call old with a straight face. I am not a spring chicken.
[00:30:18] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:18–00:30:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:23] Speaker 3
Because the turn lane to get from 524 to Friday Road is there, but it's not super long. And a lot of those gravel trucks are coming down there.
[00:30:31] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:31–00:30:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:35] Speaker 3
two miles east of there, are going down there. And Publix gets restocked through there. There's a lot of stuff in that little corridor. And apartments are going up all the time. You guys are the ones approving them. So are these things going to be accounted for? Because as I said, I've lived there off and on for 49 years. Most of the off was my mother's army service. There are a lot of things that have went in west of 95 in that part of the county that do not have enough turn lane, do not have enough easement, have gotten special consideration often from the county, not from y'all. But they have gotten that special consideration.
[00:31:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:12–00:31:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:19] Speaker 3
that same block are already high. How is this going to impact us? I already flood from when 520 was expanded 20 years ago. I was told by FDOT 30 years ago that it wasn't going to flood us. We were flooded in for a week after one hurricane.
[00:31:38] Speaker 13
Other questions,
[00:31:39] Speaker 3
when 524 expands, are they going to be in the way? Is there going to be, is there, is that factored into the plan?
[00:31:49] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:49–00:31:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:53] Speaker 3
it's city,
[00:31:55] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:31:55–00:31:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:59] No voice detected
So
[00:31:59] Speaker 3
that's all I got. I'm not trying to be a NIMBY, but we want things to be okay out where we are.
[00:32:05] Speaker 1
That's good questions. Thank you. Thanks so much. Staff, would you mind answering the questions on proper signage and posting of the meeting before the, before the meeting occurred?
[00:32:16] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:16–00:32:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:17] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:32:22] Speaker 10
send
[00:32:22] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
about our
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:22–00:32:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:32:23] Speaker 10
letters within 500 feet radius from the property and also post a sign at the property and ‸ staff did complete those.
[00:32:32] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
And then a consideration for a 524 expansion if it, if it is
[00:32:36] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:36–00:32:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No, it's not.
[00:32:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:38–00:32:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ It's the corridor between 95 and industry road.
[00:32:41] Speaker 10
Yes. That is correct.
[00:32:43] Speaker 1
That's true.
[00:32:43] Speaker 10
Okay. Um,
[00:32:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:44–00:32:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:46] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:46] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:47] Speaker 10
see. I'm not sure. Uh, I can't remember recall if there is a turning lane or any additional lanes that was required by FDOT. And that is, it is a separate permit that they have to pull with FDOT. So, and I don't think the engineer record is here today to answer that question.
[00:33:04] Speaker 4
Oh,
[00:33:04] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
here. Oh
[00:33:05] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yeah. Here you go. Oh, I apologize. He's here. So he probably can address that question.
[00:33:09] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:09–00:33:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:09] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:33:13] Speaker 1
Do you need to swear them in?
[00:33:15] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, please. Just.
[00:33:16] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:16–00:33:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:20] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
and nothing
[00:33:21] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
about
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:21–00:33:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:33:21] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
the truth?
[00:33:21] Speaker 13
I do.
[00:33:22] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:33:22] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:22–00:33:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:28] Speaker 13
applicant. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have and like to kind of summarize what we heard from Mr. Parrish, I guess first relative to the questions regarding drainage and other things.
[00:33:39] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:39–00:33:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:44] Speaker 13
and Friday Road, we did have to go through an extensive DOT permitting process for specifically drainage. There's a large drainage ditch on the south side of 524. It drains to the west. So we were the site plan. If you look at it on the grading plan, drainage plan, you'll see there's actually bypass piping, as well as a big pond in the back on the west side. Both of those are in there based on the fact that we had to work with DOT and obviously the site itself to accommodate the drainage for the Water Management District and DOT and then use a bypass system in order to route water around the site as it normally went through the site before we got there. As you know, when Water Management District permitting as well as DOT, there's a lot of different iterations of storms you have to run, models you have to deal with, grading you have to deal with. The site had some on-site little depressional areas. You have to account for those when you're doing your stormwater management ‸ plan.
[00:34:38] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:38–00:34:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:42] Speaker 13
environmental resource permit, the Water Management District was okay. We also have ‸ the DOT permit regarding the drainage issues and both were okay with that. So we paid attention to all the drainage that comes onto the property. We also paid attention to the site itself and the impervious area that we're putting down and took care of that
[00:35:00] Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:00–00:35:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:35:01] Speaker 13
that pond, a big pond on the west side. Both met the criteria of Water Management District and the DOT. DOT is pretty tough.
[00:35:07] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:35:07] Speaker 13
don't know if
[00:35:07] Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized
you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:07–00:35:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:35:07] Speaker 13
probably had to deal with that before, but they pay attention. So both met that requirement. The water at that corner, he's completely correct, it is low there.
[00:35:17] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:17–00:35:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:20] Speaker 13
It's a big distance, probably over 100 feet from the road itself to the right-of-way line for DOT on 524. So that area is where we did our work to help mitigate that drainage.
[00:35:33] Speaker 1
Excellent. Any other questions, Mr. Evans?
[00:35:37] Speaker 13
All right. Thank you, sir. Good. All right. Thank you.
[00:35:42] Speaker 10
And then just to answer the last thing, there was a concern about the noise. So then that property will, we do have a noise ordinance and it would apply to that property. I just want to mention that. I think it was one of the questions.
[00:35:53] Speaker 1
That's very good. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Any, anyone else for the public want to speak on this matter? All right, then. And we'll close it to the public, bring it back to the board, the ‸ wishes of the board.
[00:36:08] Speaker 11
On the noise, what is the, what is the, um, hours of operation?
[00:36:15] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:15–00:36:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:17] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:36:27] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So there's real noise
[00:36:29] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:29–00:36:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:30] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:32] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:32] Speaker 11
I've watched, you know, I've
[00:36:33] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:36:33–00:36:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:34] Speaker 11
by your place over here quite a bit and I don't ever see any noise problems or.
[00:36:41] Speaker 14
No, I, I, we built their facility in Sanford,
[00:36:44] No voice detected
um, 10 years ago.
[00:36:48] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:48–00:36:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:48] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:50] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:50] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:51] Speaker 1
you in for a second, sir. I appreciate it. And your name.
[00:36:55] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:55–00:37:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:55] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:58] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:00] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:37:01] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:01–00:37:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:02] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:03] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:03–00:37:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:08] Speaker 14
client's facility in Sanford. Back in 2017, 2018.
[00:37:13] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:13–00:37:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:20] Speaker 14
Um, as far as I know, the only time that you're going to hear any noise is when they're putting their product out cause they'll, they're going to store it in the back. They'll drive it around to the front, park it out along the street, whatever else. And then they put it away at night.
[00:37:35] Attribution uncertain
Um,
[00:37:36] Speaker 14
outside of that, I don't foresee any issues.
[00:37:40] Speaker 1
All right. You know, the questions for this gentleman, sit down.
[00:37:45] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:45–00:38:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:53] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:53] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:38:00] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
um, retention pond is going to be placed, correct? So that's, that's still something that has not been ironed out.
[00:38:11] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:11–00:38:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:19] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice
We've got a couple of retaining walls
[00:38:21] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:21–00:38:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:38:22] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:38:22] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:38:23] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:38:23] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That have 42 inch, uh, they got railings to meet OSHA requirements. Anything over, what is it, 30 inches, David? Anything over 30 inches, you've got to have fall protection.
[00:38:37] No voice detected
And
[00:38:37] Speaker 14
along the, along the retention pond, I want to say we've got areas where it's going to be 10 or 12 feet. So they'll be railing there.
[00:38:45] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:45–00:38:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:48] Speaker 14
400 feet of retaining wall that'll be approximately four feet tall. And it will have a 42 inch.
[00:38:54] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:54–00:38:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:59] Speaker 14
I think the questions were before on the, on the plans, it was kind of labeled by others and it's David calls out. It's my job to get it engineered and built by my people. And so we've now got engineered plans on it that will be submitted at, uh, when we submit for building.
[00:39:18] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:18–00:39:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:21] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:39:23] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:23] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
[00:39:41] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
[00:39:54] Speaker 1
But yeah,
[00:39:54] No voice detected
expand.
[00:39:55] Speaker 1
All right. Any further questions? Thank you, sir.
[00:39:59] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
i
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:59–00:39:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:40:00] Attribution uncertain
Appreciate
[00:40:00] Speaker 1
it. Thank you. All right.
[00:40:03] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:03–00:40:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:05] Speaker 1
‸ provide a motion? I think, I think Mr. Green was trying.
[00:40:08] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well, I wanted to wait till I appreciate it. I appreciate it. We're at that point. I'd like to make a motion to approve as presented and following the guidelines of the staff created. Okay.
[00:40:20] Speaker 1
All right. Second from Mrs. Malone. All right. Any further discussion on the motion? All in favor, please say aye.
[00:40:28] Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:40:29] Speaker 1
Any opposed? All right.
[00:40:31] Attribution uncertain
The
[00:40:31] Speaker 1
motion passes.
[00:40:32] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:32–00:40:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:34] Attribution uncertain
Thank you,
[00:40:34] Speaker 1
gentlemen. All right. Do.
[00:40:41] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah.
[00:40:45] Speaker 1
Esquire, do we want to postpone the second item or consider that?
[00:40:49] Speaker 15
He's on hold so we can go ahead as planned if you like.
[00:40:53] Speaker 1
Sounds great to me.
[00:40:54] Speaker 15
Cool.
[00:40:56] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:56–00:40:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:57] Speaker 4
Yeah. Mr. Bott. Mr. Bott.
[00:41:17] Speaker 15
‸ He said he didn't hear.
[00:41:23] No voice detected
I
[00:41:24] Speaker 1
encourage everyone to check out the new video by
[00:41:26] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:26–00:41:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:29] Speaker 1
Brightline station. It's quite good. It's quite good.
[00:41:37] Speaker 4
Mr. Bott.
[00:41:39] Speaker 15
Can you respond?
[00:41:47] Speaker 9
Can you guys hear me?
[00:41:48] No voice detected
Are you there?
[00:41:49] Speaker 15
Yeah. We can hear
[00:41:50] No voice detected
you.
[00:41:50] Speaker 9
Yeah. Yeah. I can hear you guys. I'm here.
[00:41:53] Speaker 15
Okay. Cool. So we're going to get started with staff's presentation and then follow along and
[00:42:00] Attribution uncertain
then
[00:42:00] Speaker 15
once the board has
[00:42:01] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:01–00:42:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:05] Speaker 9
Okay. No problem.
[00:42:10] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:42:10] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:10–00:42:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:17] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:17–00:42:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:18] Speaker 15
Oh, okay. Never mind. I got it. It's fine. It's a PDF. Oh,
[00:42:25] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
it's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:25–00:42:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:42:25] Speaker 7
a
[00:42:26] Attribution uncertain
PDF? Is
[00:42:27] Speaker 15
she?
[00:42:29] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:29–00:42:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:42:39] Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ Is
[00:42:39] Speaker 7
it
[00:42:39] Attribution uncertain
a
[00:42:39] Speaker 7
PDF?
[00:42:42] Speaker 15
All right.
[00:42:43] Attribution uncertain
We
[00:42:43] Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
can rock
[00:42:44] Speaker 7
it in from here.
[00:42:45] Speaker 15
Good evening.
[00:42:46] Speaker 8
Good evening. Hi.
[00:42:47] Speaker 15
Erica Hughes with RVI Planning and Landscape Architecture, Planning Consultant for the city. The request before us tonight is for a revised, large scale site plan preliminary plat for London Cove. The proposed project is approximately 22.7 acres in size with only 11 and a half being proposed for development and the request is for an infrastructure only site plan with no vertical construction of buildings or improvements such as parking or landscape buffers are included.
[00:43:21] No voice detected
Oh,
[00:43:22] Speaker 15
this is weird.
[00:43:24] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:24–00:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:30] Speaker 15
State Road 524, approximately a quarter mile south of State Road 528 between Coco Fire Station
[00:43:37] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:37–00:43:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:41] Speaker 15
Commons Shopping Center on their east side.
[00:43:47] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:47–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:51] Speaker 15
Neighborhood commercial is along the State Road 524 frontage and the remaining property is medium density residential and the corresponding zoning categories are CN commercial neighborhood along State Road 524
[00:44:04] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:04–00:44:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:11] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:11–00:44:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:16] Speaker 15
site plan for the property. The approval was for infrastructure only which authorized site clearing earthwork and construction of internal roadways, utilities and stormwater management to support future development. The plan was designed with six commercial lots ranging from an acre to almost two acres and access by London Boulevard. There's
[00:44:38] Speaker 15 · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:38–00:44:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:44:38] Speaker 15
site plan.
[00:44:39] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:39–00:44:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:39] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:44:40] Speaker 15
Since then, the applicant has revised the site plan to consolidate the six commercial lots into only two and the stormwater areas were redesigned. Internal roadways and access remain the same and the site plan also remains an infrastructure only with no vertical construction included. Any additional activities on the property will have to come back through the site plan review ‸ process. A preliminary plot is being processed concurrently with the site plan and creates the two commercial lots along the future along with the future development, stormwater conservation and access tracks and it depicts the utility easements and technical information required for plots. It's been reviewed by staff and city attorney's office as well. In summary, this is an infrastructure focus site plan to allow for road improvements and construction utility services, site grading and stormwater retention areas. Individual site plans will be required for future commercial out parcels and residential development and landscape requirements includes the planting of 635 replacement trees.
[00:45:46] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:46–00:45:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:52] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:52–00:45:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:56] Speaker 15
‸ that identified 743 existing trees of which 621 that generates using the
[00:46:04] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:04–00:46:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:08] Speaker 15
The applicant is providing 635 replacement trees in the common areas consisting of 429 canopy trees which are live oak, red maple, bald cypress, and slash pine,
[00:46:23] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:23–00:46:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:32] Speaker 15
We included a detailed analysis of the application's consistency with your comp plan in the staff report and two policies were highlighted.
[00:46:41] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:41–00:46:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:45] Speaker 15
are intended to be low impact and serve the needs of the immediate residential area. And this project will provide for neighborhood service commercial uses in accordance with the underlying neighborhood commercial future land use and CN zoning.
[00:46:58] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:58–00:47:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:02] Speaker 15
miles traveled and the project provides interconnectivity to adjacent properties
[00:47:06] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:06–00:47:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:10] Speaker 15
sides of the internal roads
[00:47:11] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:11–00:47:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:15] Speaker 15
walkability. The previous site plan approval recommended the following conditions and staff is recommending that they carry forward. First, this approval does not authorize the vertical construction of buildings or improvements other than those shown on the site plan and site plan approval is required before any vertical construction starts. Second, prior to construction the applicant must provide the city with the gopher tortoise relocation permit from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Third, prior to construction the applicant must provide the city with the required DOT permits for the connection to State Road 524 and other associated project impacts.
[00:47:55] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:47:55–00:47:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:55] Speaker 15
635 replacement trees must be planted in accordance with the
[00:47:59] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:59–00:48:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:04] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:04–00:48:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:48:05] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:48:06] Speaker 15
documentation and applicable environmental permits shall be completed prior to final site plan approval. With that, staff recommends that the Planning Zoning Board recommend approval with conditions to City Council of the revised large-scale site plan and preliminary
[00:48:22] Speaker 15 · Machine re-recognized
pot
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:22–00:48:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:48:22] Speaker 15
for
[00:48:22] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:22–00:48:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:24] Speaker 15
that they meet the requirements of the city's code and are consistent with comprehensive plan.
[00:48:28] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:28–00:48:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:30] Speaker 15
and the applicant is online available for questions as well. Thank you.
[00:48:35] No voice detected
All
[00:48:35] Speaker 1
right. Thank you,
[00:48:36] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
excuse
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:36–00:48:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:48:37] Speaker 1
Any questions for staff from the board? Yes.
[00:48:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, sir. Could we go over the list of the trees that you had mentioned that they were going to ‸ replace? Sure. They were like five or six different species, I think.
[00:48:52] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:52–00:48:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:48:53] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm sorry? Live Oak. Yes, ma'am.
[00:48:56] Speaker 15
Red Maple. Bald Cypress. And
[00:49:01] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:01–00:49:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:02] Speaker 15
Those are the canopy trees at 429 count. And then there will be
[00:49:08] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:08–00:49:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:11] Speaker 1
Thank you. You're welcome.
[00:49:13] No voice detected
Good.
[00:49:14] Speaker 1
Any other questions for staff? All right. I'll open it up to the public. I see someone there. Anybody would like to speak on this matter?
[00:49:26] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:49:26] Speaker 1
don't have any cards. Closing. Coming back to the board. Any further discussion? Mr. Chair,
[00:49:33] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
can we just check with the applicant to make sure?
[00:49:35] Speaker 1
Absolutely. Would the applicant like to speak on the matter?
[00:49:40] Speaker 9
No, I do not have any questions. Thank you.
[00:49:44] Speaker 1
Excellent. Thank you. All right. All
[00:49:51] Attribution uncertain
right. Motion
[00:49:51] Speaker 1
to approve.
[00:49:52] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:52–00:49:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:53] Speaker 1
And a second from Mr. Greenwood. Mrs. Malone.
[00:49:56] Speaker 8
Does that include the conditions? Thank you.
[00:49:59] Speaker 1
As recommended by staff. Okay. So the motion to approve
[00:50:02] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:02–00:50:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:50:02] Speaker 1
recommended by staff and second by Mr. Greenwood. It's on the floor. Any further discussion on the motion?
[00:50:08] Speaker 3
All right. All in favor, please say aye.
[00:50:10] Speaker 1
Aye. Any opposed? The motion passes. Thank you.
[00:50:17] No voice detected
All right.
[00:50:18] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:18–00:50:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:19] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:50:20] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:50:20] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:50:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:50:22] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:22–00:50:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:29] Speaker 1
right. We'll move on to ‸ item number five. The tree board. There's nothing under there, but just open it up. Anybody like to speak on it?
[00:50:39] Speaker 2
All right.
[00:50:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Closing and moving on to open discussion.
[00:50:43] Speaker 2
Any items for open discussion?
[00:50:47] Speaker 1
I like it. And I see no other business. Our next meeting date will be Wednesday, November 4th, 2026 at 6 PM at 65 Stone Street in Cocoa, Florida.
[00:51:02] No voice detected
And
[00:51:02] Speaker 1
move to adjourn. All right. So moved in a second.
[00:51:08] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:08–00:51:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:09] Speaker 1
Excellent.
[00:51:09] Speaker 2
Excellent.
[00:51:10] Speaker 1
All right. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. All right. ‸ We got it. Thank you all.
[00:51:16] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:51:19] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:19–00:52:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:51:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:27]
[00:51:55] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:51:55] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:51:58] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:52:01] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:52:01] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you, PNC.
[00:52:03] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:03–00:52:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:14] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:52:20] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:52:21] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T15:00:01 · 5,137 ordinary words, 1,638 in suspect passages, 22 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.