Section 2, the approval of the agenda in minutes. We have our agenda for the regular meeting this evening, April 1st, 2026. Has everyone had a chance to look over the agenda?
Yes.
Yes.
All right. Oh, we didn't do roll call. I don't see it on my thing. I'm like Ron Burgundy here. Can we do a roll call?
Yes.
Thank you, ma'am.
Chairperson Park.
Here.
Vice Chair Anderson. Here. Board Member Chabot. Here. Board
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:28–00:00:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Board Member Finley. Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Milhom. Board Member Jones. Here. Board Member Stewart. Board
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:37–00:00:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Greenwood.
Here.
And City Attorney Ike. Here.
All right. Thank you. Thank you for the reminder. ‸ Roll call complete. We'll move on to the agenda. If everyone's looked it over, we ‸ give a motion.
I'll make the motion.
Okay. Motion to approve the agenda, sir.
Approve
the agenda. Okay. Motion to approve the agenda by Mr. Chabot.
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:02–00:01:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
second?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:05–00:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Last meeting... Our last meeting, almost at last month's, December 3rd, 2025. Has everyone had time to look over those meeting minutes?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:01:15–00:01:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
All right. Motion to approve. Do you have a second?
Second.
Second. All
right. Miss
Finley. All right. Any further discussion on the meeting minutes from our last meeting in December? All right. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Wonderful. We have no old business, so through new business, we have the annual election of the chairperson and vice chairperson. Do we have any nominees for chairperson?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:46–00:01:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll accept the nomination.
I'll second.
What would you like,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:56–00:01:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If there's no other nominations, then you can hold your vote. If there are other nominations, that can be made at this time.
Oh, yeah, please.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:10–00:02:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Wheeler. You don't want to work?
I was contemplating that also.
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:21–00:02:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I'll just put it out there.
Well,
so move.
There we go.
One at a time, or can we do a vote?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:41–00:02:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I would do the chair, yeah, one at a time.
All
right. Any further nominations for chair? All right. That is a voting item.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:57–00:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
one. Yes.
All
in favor, please say aye.
Aye.
All right.
Any opposed? Nay.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:04–00:03:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right. We'll do the vice chair next. We have a nomination for Mr. Wheeler.
Mr.
Greenwood already cleared
that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:14–00:03:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
We
have a second by our current vice chair. Any other nominations ‸ for vice chairperson? All right. Seeing none, all in favor of Mr. Wheeler becoming the new vice chairperson, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Say nay. Excellent. Congratulations.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:33–00:03:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:35–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So moving on to items under item 4, 2, and 3, the request to postpone those two items. I'll make a, I'll move to postpone items 2 and 3 under new business to the next regular planning and zoning board meeting on May 6, 2026
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:59–00:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:02–00:04:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Discussion on postponement. Anybody have any discussion ‸ about the postponement? All right. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? All right. Motion. Motion passes. On to item 4 under new business.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:23–00:04:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:27–00:04:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So this is,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:32–00:04:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's a future land use map comprehensive plan amendment for the Grissom 46 acres annexation. And I just want to say if there's anyone, uh, if the applicant is here, uh, for this item, raise your hand at, thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:52–00:04:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, and this will be for one of, uh, two, uh, related ordinances. So this is the first, uh, for the future land use map comprehensive.
Ms.
Webster.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:04–00:05:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't know if that's able to be done.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:07–00:05:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:09–00:05:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Good to go. Thank you, ma'am.
Okay. Thank you. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:20–00:05:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:25–00:05:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
future land use map and comprehensive plan amendment for the Grissom 46 acres annexation.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:33–00:05:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
plan amendment for 36 parcels containing 45.26 acres of vacant property located in unincorporated Brevard County
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:47–00:05:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
per acre, to city of Cocoa industrial. This request is being made concurrently with ordinance 03-2026, which is a zoning map amendment to change the zoning from county general use to city of Cocoa M2, which is our manufacturing and industrial zoning. It's also in consider in consideration of ordinance 01-2026, a request to annex these properties into the city of Cocoa. The annexation itself doesn't require planning and zoning board approval. However, it does require two city council hearings. The first hearing is scheduled for April 14th. The second is tentatively scheduled for April 28th. The applicant has requested the planning and zoning board's recommendation of approval of the rezone and the comp plan amendment prior to presenting their annexation requests before city council. Although staff is not requesting approval of the annexation today, the request for the comp plan amendment will be presented in context with the annexation as they are directly related.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:59–00:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city council also approves the request to annex the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:05–00:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Staff will request that this be a condition of approval. And so the subject parcels to receive this comp plan amendment are located generally east of Grissom Parkway, north of Oxbow Circle, and south of Canaveral Groves Boulevard, west of a 370-foot-wide Florida Power and Light right-of-way, and more specifically northeast of the intersection
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:32–00:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the reason for these requests is that the annexation area is within the city of Cocoa wastewater
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:41–00:07:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
any new development in the service area requires. Per the city of Cocoa code chapter 22, any non-city property that requires the city of Cocoa wastewater service and is contiguous to the city boundary must be annexed into the city. In this case, the southern boundary of the annexation area is contiguous to the northern boundary of the city of Cocoa.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:09–00:08:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:13–00:08:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Industrial LLC, who is seeking to purchase, combine, and develop the aggregated property as an industrial complex of the warehouse and distribution operations, contractor offices, light and heavy manufacturing, outdoor storage, and heavy equipment rental repair service and sales. The applicant provided a concept plan and these example photos with their application.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:42–00:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:45–00:08:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
allows for four dwelling units per acre. With this amendment, the applicant is seeking the city of Cocoa industrial future land use designation, which, according to the city of Cocoa comprehensive plan, shall be regarded as appropriate for activities associated with industrial development, which can include materials processing, materials assembly, product manufacturing, and storage of finished products. Uses can include manufacturing facilities, warehouse distribution centers, and truck terminals.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:17–00:09:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and light industrial zoning designation as part of another ordinance. And just kind of an overview of the surrounding property uses. You have, basically to the north, you have the county vacant properties, and there is residential manufactured homes there to the northeast of the site. And over to the west, ‸ off of Grissom, you have a Dollar General, you have the Brevard Christian Church, and you have a United Rental Storage, which is under construction at the moment.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:59–00:10:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
City of Cocoa, and then, of course, Amazon. And I wanted to go back one slide and just mention that the surrounding future land use there to the ‸ west is
is there
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:20–00:10:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
CC, which is like core commercial, and their neighborhood commercial. So that's their future land use. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:26–00:10:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:30–00:10:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the new boundary would look like with the annexation and the future land use map amendment.
All right.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:10:43–00:10:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All good.
And then, so the planning and zoning staff report covers the analysis. According to chapter 15 article two sections 1510 and 1511 for compliance with the comp plan to determine the impact to the city elements. And that has determined that the future land use change will not negatively impact the city's budget, but will contribute positively to the city's economic base. That preliminary analysis has shown that the city can provide services at the same level of service provided to other residents and businesses.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:26–00:11:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The considerations are that there are a significant number of trees on the subject parcels, which the applicant plans to replace and or mitigate
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:11:46–00:11:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:46–00:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Another consideration is per the comp plan regarding neighborhood protection and in consideration of the low densities, uh, ‸ residential characters surrounding the county land use. The city will require an opaque compatibility buffer, which will minimize visual noise and environmental impacts from the new, um, industrial future land use assignment.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:16–00:12:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
applicable comprehensive plan goals, policies and objectives, which include, but are not limited to, uh, goal 1.1 to create and maintain a broad range of land use activities,
uh,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:35–00:12:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, uh, that these areas shall be regarded as appropriate for activities associated with industrial development.
Uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:46–00:12:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That is, um, it establishes or to establish and maintain a stable and growing economic base. And then to the right there, we have our, uh, future land use table, uh, showing that, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:02–00:13:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which we'll discuss in a minute is compatible with the industrial future land use.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:10–00:13:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
the city council also approves the request to annex the subject parcels into the city. So the condition of the condition is, uh, that the future land use map comprehensive plan amendment will only be valid if city council also approves the request to annex the subject parcels into the city of cocoa ordinance 0 1 2026.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:36–00:13:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with this condition,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:43–00:13:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
use map designation of the real property from Brevard County residential for the city of cocoa industrial.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:56–00:13:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
All right. Does anyone have any questions for staff? Yes, sir. Yes.
Thank you. Uh,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:05–00:14:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
some specific information if we could discuss that in reference to the tree mitigation and also the buffer, the opaque buffer. I'd like a little more information of how that's going to be, uh, handled.
So, um, so the applicant intends as mentioned intends to, um, uh, replace or mitigate, uh, the, the trees that are being removed. And that will be obviously according to our code requirements. And
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:40–00:14:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
requires a wall between industrial and residential land uses. And zoning. So, so that will be, that will be part of when they come for site plan development. Yes.
We'll
make sure that's on the plan for that buffer.
What kind of wall? Is it sort of open as far as different options or? The
code says ‸ wall. So, so, is
it block?
Maybe a block wall, concrete block, concrete wall.
You all prefer that.
That our interpretation of that is just the wall, wall as opposed to fence at wall as opposed to,
as
opposed
to wood also wood fencing. Is that something that's going to be possible? Do you know? Or
we, we can, yeah, we can request that of the applicant at the plant at the time of site planned about.
Well, in order to support the noise potential, things like that. I mean, even on I-95 you have concrete block.
I
mean, so that should say something, I think.
Yeah. And there is a height, there is a height limit. I believe it's 10 feet for the industrial zoning district. So, so that would be their maximum. And I do know they are working on a tree survey at the moment. So, so when they get ready for their to submit their site plans, it will include the tree survey.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:04–00:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the trees?
‸ Well, when we get to when we, the, this is can, will be considered a large scale site plan. So yes, it will come before the board.
Okay. And,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:17–00:16:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
terrific project for Coco. Um, but in, you know, me,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:24–00:16:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'd like
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:29–00:16:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I hope that they would strongly consider, uh, oak trees as a way to solve the tree requirements.
Thank you.
Thank you very
much. And
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:39–00:16:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
‸ And I can imagine, ma'am, that, um,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:45–00:16:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:49–00:16:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I haven't, uh, I'm not sure of that comparison. I can look that up and, and get back to you on that.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:00–00:17:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Thank you. Anybody, anybody have any other questions for staff? Um, protected species, um, anything we need to be concerned about?
They, um, they are required to submit a phase one environmental site assessment. So we'll, we'll be seeing that, but their initial analysis is that they're not, um, there's ‸ low to a little impact, environmental impact. But like I said, we'll take a look at that analysis when we get it.
Thank you. Anyone else? Mr. Jones. All right. I don't
share. So just as a matter of clarification for the gallery, because I'm not sure as to whether or not they're made aware.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:42–00:17:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
general public. And I'm just clarifying for their sake that there was no responses. They will receive regarding this. So I just want to clarify that because there was only one that I was truly concerned with. And if that neighbor didn't say anything, I don't think there's much else for us to really say here today.
Thank you, Mr. Wheeler. That's correct. We, we did not receive any questions, comments, um, on.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:08–00:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
500 feet. And we didn't receive any questions or, or objections.
All
right.
Thank you. I don't have any cards in front of me for this item, but we'll, uh, open it up to the public.
and be
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:24–00:18:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
like to have any questions or ask anything about this?
Oh,
right. We'll take it back from the public,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:31–00:18:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:18:33–00:18:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like to make a motion?
I'd like to make a motion to accept ordinance. Oh,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:39–00:18:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll second it.
All right. We have a motion to approve with a second. Uh, any further discussion? All right. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? All right. Motion passes.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:54–00:19:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
For
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:02–00:19:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Take it.
Okay. Great. Thank you. Okay. So continuing on, this is a now ordinance 03 2026, which is the zoning map amendment request for the Grissom 46 acres annexation. And so again, reminder, this is an applicant initiated and this is for the zoning map amendment for the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:41–00:19:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
off Grissom Parkway. And the request is to change
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:50–00:19:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, this request is being made concurrently with the previous ordinance 02 2026, a future land use map comprehensive plan amendment and in consideration of the annexation ordinance 01 2026. Um, so the applicant is requesting, uh, the planning and zoning boards recommendation of approval again, uh, of the
rezone
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:22–00:20:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and CPA City Council prior to their presentation. Of the annexation before city council. Um, and again, all those staff, we're not requesting the approval of the annexation at this point. Just, uh, the request for
rezone
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:35–00:20:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is presented in context with the annexation. Um, and a note on this as well. Uh, they're all tied together as a package.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:45–00:20:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
annex the subject parcels into the city and only if the city council approves companion ordinance 02. 2026 the future land use map amendment staff will request that these be conditions of approval. Okay. And that was just, this is a repeat slide. So, um, the subject parcels to be rezoned again, they're off Grissom Parkway, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:14–00:21:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, uh, and the reason for the request as a reminder, it's because the properties are, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:26–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And because of that, they are required to annex into the city. And here's the concept plan again, uh, showing the, the site layout and the, uh, example photos of what the construction could potentially look like. And then on the zoning. So the general use county zoning, uh, covers rural residential unimproved land and areas without specific development trends. However, this is low density in character.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:06–00:22:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
vocational schools, storage facilities, transportation facilities, warehousing and distribution. The city requires a wall between these two uses to buffer and minimize visual noise and environmental impacts. And, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:28–00:22:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:29–00:22:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
wholesale commercial.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:36–00:22:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the request
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:41–00:22:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
compatible with the existing county zoning on the west. And again, you have your general use surrounding,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:52–00:22:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And again, just a review of the, of the surrounding land or property uses. And so, and with the zoning analysis, um, the planning, uh, and zoning, the staff report covers this analysis of the criteria, according to appendix a article 21 section one G regarding the impact to land use patterns, school districts, consistency with the comp plan, traffic, stormwater and other utilities and public service. And has determined that, um, that it
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:34–00:23:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city can provide adequate services. It will not negatively adversely impact surrounding density, um, or stormwater facilities. Zoning change will not adversely impact property values. In fact, it creates an economic development opportunity, which will increase property value in the overall area and the city.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:58–00:24:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
zoning will require this
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:05–00:24:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
compatibility buffer wall to minimize the visual noise and environmental impacts. And also, um, there are no impact to the roadway, a level of service anticipated, but a traffic impact analysis will be required with the development plans. And again, we have our consistency with the city of cocoa code or rather, excuse me, the city of cocoa comprehensive plan and the, um, land use element, uh, for the industrial district. And here are the conditions. So the approval of this zoning map amendment ordinance shall be conditioned upon the adoption of ordinance 01 2026, the annexation. And this ordinance shall not become effective
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:52–00:24:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
council.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:58–00:25:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
null and void. Um, this ordinance shall also only become effective immediately upon
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:09–00:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:12–00:25:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the city of cocoa, Florida and pursuant to the city charter.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:19–00:25:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this ordinance to rezone shall become null and void. So therefore staff
requests
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:29–00:25:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the planning and zoning board recommend that the city council approve with these conditions. This ordinance 03 2026 changing the zoning map designation of the real property from Brevard County general use to city of cocoa. M to manufacturing and industrial.
Thank you.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:25:50–00:25:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Thank you, ma'am. Any questions for staff on this item? Yes,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:55–00:26:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
partially paved up to let me go back to a map here. So it is partially paved up to just
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:26:01–00:26:14 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:14–00:26:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of course the, uh, with the development of this site, um, the, the rest of the, this roadway, uh, to the east would be paved.
Whose responsibility for paid? Is it gonna
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:28–00:26:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
become a public right away from the city? ‸ Cocoa or ‸ developer? ‸ Who's gonna ‸ incur the cost of putting that road in?
Well, that is a Brevard County road. So that will be a discussion between Brevard County and the developer.
Good question. Anybody else have any questions for staff on this item? Okay. Then I will close it to the board and open it up to the public. Anybody from the public want to speak on this item? Okay. We close this to the public, bring it back to the board. Anybody else? Anybody have a motion or like ‸ discuss further?
Move to approve.
Move to approve by Member Greenwood
second,
second and second. All right. Uh, any further discussion? All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes.
Thank you.
Thank you, ma'am. Our next item is item six, but we are drawing towards, uh, launch. So maybe make
a motion to take a break.
Yeah. That count out is resumed to two minus six. Exactly. So,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:39–00:27:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
second. Mrs. Jones. All in favor, say aye.
Aye.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
All opposed. Enjoy the section for agenda item number six, M-2 ZTA large scale.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:58–00:28:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
My name is Lucilene Ribeiro
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:04–00:28:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the agenda item before you tonight is a request for
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:17–00:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
appendix eight article 11 section 19 of the city's code of ordinance. The proposed amendment would expand the list of permitted uses to include large scale commercial recreation centers and gym and fitness facilities greater than 12,000 square feet within the M-2 manufacturing industrial zoning
district.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:42–00:28:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
regarding an existing tenant beach line raceway RC. This business has operated a radio control vehicle racetrack since 2017. However, this type of use is not clearly defined in the current code, creating some ambiguity regarding its classification and long-term compliance. ‸ The proposed amendment is intended to address this gap by formally recognizing this type of recreation and use and establish clear standards for similar uses moving forward.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:35–00:29:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
industry road. The surrounding area is characterized by industrial uses including automobile storages vacant industry industrial land and public right away.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:52–00:29:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
9 pm, Saturday from 10 a.m to 6 pm and Sunday from 11 a.m to 5 pm with hours that may vary and is closed on Monday, Tuesdays and Thursdays. So the zoning for this property is M-2 manufacturing industrial with the industrial future land use.
Staff finds a clear need for this amendment. So first, it provides a clarity within the code by defining and regulating recreational uses
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:27–00:30:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:39–00:30:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not currently addressed, second, it supports an existing
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:40–00:30:44 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:44–00:30:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
unique recreation opportunity within the community. Third it creates opportunities for the adaptive reuse of industrial buildings, particularly those with large floor areas they may not be suitable for traditional ‸ industrial activities. The proposed amendment formally recognized this category of recreational use and establishes clear development standards for similar facilities. This may include but are not limited to bowling alleys, roller ice skating, arcades, in go-karts, indoor play areas and other comparable recreational activities. The amendment also includes provisions for gym and fitness facilities that sit in 12,000 square feet as well as accessory uses such as food and beverage services, provided those uses remain incidental and subordinated to the primary use. Finally these uses are generally low impact as they are conducted within enclosed structures with an option to a screen or cover outdoor area. And generate a significant it does not generate a significant impact on the surrounding areas. So the commercial recreational structures they are permitted by right are located in general commercial commercial Parkway PUD urban mixed use code commercial and core commercial and also are
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:27–00:32:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
The proposed amendment is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan particularly the future lane use element it supports GO 1.1 and objective 1.1.1 which promotes a broad range of lane use activities while also supporting economic development and protecting public health safety and welfare The amendment aligns with policies that allow complementary commercial uses within industrial areas provided they remain compatible with surrounding uses. In this case the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:32–00:33:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and are expected to not create the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:39–00:33:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:42–00:33:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
policy 1.1.2.10 supports this approach by allowing commercial uses that complement and support industrial operations
Additionally, the city code maintains key limitations, including prohibiting outdoor amplifying sound, requiring
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:34:05–00:34:13 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:13–00:34:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:13–00:34:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
enclosed structures, limiting accessory uses to those
that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:21–00:34:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
are clearly incidental and subordinate to the principal use. While outdoor accessory areas are permitted, the requirement for screening and enclosure provides an appropriate level of mitigation to maintain the industrial character of the M2 zoning district. Based on the analysis presented, staff finds that the proposed zoning tax amendment is justified, consistent with the comprehensive plan, incompatible with the M2 zoning district. Therefore, staff recommends that the planning ‸ zoning board forward this item to the City Council with a recommendation of approval the business owner actually is here tonight. If you have any questions related to the business activities.
‸ Anybody have any questions for staff? here the board? right. now close it to the board and open this item to the public. anybody like on the
um
anyone from the public like to speak.
all right I
take it back from the public and give it back to the board and what are the boys whispers? Is
the beverages, food and beverage, is there gonna ‸ be alcohol?
if it If the new business proposed alcohol, it has to follow the alcohol ordinance. okay
I'll
make
a motion to accept the text amendment to appendix a article 11 section 19 of zoning ordinance
all right I'll second that motion any further discussion on this ordinance ‸ item
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:06–00:36:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Any opposed, say nay. All
right.
Motion passes. Moving on to item number seven.
good evening while she's pulling that up I'll just introduce myself up Alexis Crespo
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:47–00:36:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
for this one with RBI planning and landscape architecture Did that not come through? You can
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:56–00:37:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Is it what Can
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:05–00:37:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
second
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:37:14–00:37:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:37:21–00:37:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:37:45–00:37:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:48–00:37:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
through it I don't
[unclear audio ▶]
I
kind of yes it'll work ‸ is it possible to see the whole slide? um Just
change the view. So ‸ the top hand, go from file home, ‸ Perfect. Okay. Great. ‸ all
right perfect thank you so again for the record Alexis Crespo representing staff the applicant is here and they will have a presentation so I'll just cycle through this here um the request before you this evening
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:26–00:38:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
consideration of a large-scale site plan as well as a preliminary plat.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:33–00:38:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
half of it is proposed for development or
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:40–00:38:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's a relatively small project with seven single-family lots proposed. Subject property is outlined in red on your slide. um it's located um at the intersection of north Indian River Drive and Dixon Boulevard just about a quarter mile um to the east of the US 1 intersection and uh you can see there is uh the large predominant portion of the property is to the west of Indian River Drive and there is a sliver of land that has direct adjacency to the Indian River Lagoon um
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:19–00:39:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
red area area in the corner is RU 215. Similarly um the property is predominantly in the very low density residential future land use category um with
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:39–00:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ So both allowing for residential development of the property um at densities um
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:50–00:39:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
requesting seven units well below the maximum attainable density uh per the future land use map.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:02–00:40:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
but they are proposing um seven single-family lots. um
those
lots are
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:11–00:40:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the bottom of the slide so we've we've changed the orientation on you just because the plan is in landscape format. So north is to your right, south is to your left and east uh
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:26–00:40:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So those seven lots will front on Indian River Drive there will be shared uh driveway access points serving those lots a total of four points of ingress egress um to the uh shared driveways between uh the proposed lots along that roadway and the balance of the property is proposed as either conservation storm water management or areas where trees will be replanted on the site. So there's no amenity recreation facility. These are a third acre lots or
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:02–00:41:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
their own on-site pool as you'll see in elevations provided by the applicant. um ‸ in order to provide private on-site rec through their lots. um And again, the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:16–00:41:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
where you don't see any lots on the towards the north or the top of the lots is going to remain as a conservation area um as those are where the highest quality wetlands are located on the site. And the total
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:33–00:41:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You can see a future development area is is at the um top left hand of of the parcel um that is just reserved for future development so any uh additional activities on that parcel it's 0.6 acres so it's relatively small that would have to come back before you through the site plan review process
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:00–00:42:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that runs alongside the large-scale site plan just simply depicting the lots um ingress egress utility easements and the technical information required on plats. And that has been reviewed by your staff as well as your city attorney as well. So I've noted it's seven single-family detached lots. These are about a third of an acre in size.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:30–00:42:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to provide access to the homes.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:35–00:42:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We are going to ask um Abby as well as Tom um to go into a little bit more detail on drainage and floodplain mitigation as based on the property's location. We really thought that was an important part ‸ for you to all to understand. In terms of preservation, I noticed
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:58–00:43:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
preserved. That's going to be a mix of just open space areas, tree planting areas, as well as the wetlands that are being preserved through the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:09–00:43:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
development track on
the
west side of the property. These are
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:17–00:43:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ and I'll um let them go through more detail of the intent for these homes in their application. In terms of wetlands, um this was an important item through the staff review. This has been under review by your staff for a number of years actually because we really needed to work through the environmental constraints of the site. Through this review process you'll hear they produced several environmental reports and had to update those to be found sufficient by staff. They also had to do hydrological studies modeling and drainage calculations all that played into this.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:01–00:44:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
year. And that provided staff with additional sureties that the state agency that really handles wetland mitigation impacts and preservation did approve the proposed design. So they did provide that to the city as part of the review.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:24–00:44:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
wetlands in order to allow for those seven lots within the site. They are required to mitigate for those impacted wetlands and purchase mitigation bank credits prior to site construction to account for ‸ those wetland impacts. The wetland impact plan is a part of the large scale site plan plan set that was attached to the application package. So the primary areas of impact are along the east side of the site where the lots are. That's where wetlands will be cleared and filled to
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:07–00:45:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
management and other aspects of the site design.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:15–00:45:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the site is the wetland preservation area And that is where based upon the data analysis they provided the environmental reports That is where the highest quality wetlands existed on the site and therefore Where the preservation was ‸ proposed? In terms of tree mitigation, they did submit plans related to on-site Trees there will be a total of 207 trees proposed for removal within the development. I'm just going to switch back there. You can see those are marked with the x's and are really just throughout that primary development area where the lots will be located. They're proposing a combination of replanting trees on site as well as mitigation of payment. So
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:09–00:46:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of it and then
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:18–00:46:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
staff for consistency with your code.
So
I'm going to pass it to Tom or abby to go through the drainage aspects
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:46:37–00:46:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I can do it for you. Okay, thank you
So the project was permitted through st john's stormwater system was redesigned to meet enhanced criteria
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:52–00:46:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
discharge to the indian river design accommodates off-site flows such that off-site flood elevations are not impacted
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:02–00:47:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reduction Which is required to discharge for a class 2 water Water body
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:14–00:47:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and under drain system and the wet detention with littoral uh vegetation and biosorption activated media filter. Overall system ensures no adverse impact to water quality
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:47:37–00:47:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
groundwater absorbed observed approximately 0.6 to a one foot below ground surface with seasonal highs near or at grade ground water may rise above Existing grade during heavy rain events typical of coastal conditions ‸ site grading and stormwater infrastructure are designed to improve both surface and subsurface drainage.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:11–00:48:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:16–00:48:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The recent survey performed by Indian River Survey did not locate artesian wells on the neighboring parcel. Construction recommendations include temporary groundwater control during construction, controlled fill placement, and settlement and settlement monitoring where needed. Use of appropriate structural fill and slab drainage systems.
all right uh good evening everybody just real quick
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:54–00:48:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
want to introduce myself um tom amstead i work for geosyntec consultants and uh i'm here representing staff and i was uh hired to review the review the floodplain uh management uh as as they
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:09–00:49:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh So uh first off uh this this uh proposed project is in FEMA zone AE uh so it's a coastal flood zone
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:49:22–00:49:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
in other words hurricanes or or strong winds that push waves up onto the site. um the uh um The proposed finished floors are uh about well are greater than one foot above the base flood elevation. Actually, they're about three and a half feet above the base flood elevation. And um moving on to the to the next slide. um So, just regarding our review of the floodplain management, just, you know, kind of a quick summary of it, is that the the project would not alter uh the the impacts from storm surge waves um
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:07–00:50:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to the north of the south of of the proposed project. And also, the project uh would not alter how, well,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:21–00:50:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
onto the site itself. um ‸ But that would be the extent, um the the limit of the impacts. um Overall, there's a negligible uh change to the flood storage in the Indian River Lagoon. And uh we do not anticipate any adverse off-site flood impacts from this project
All right. um I'll just wrap it up for staff here. uh We did uh include a detailed analysis of the application's consistency with your comprehensive ‸ plan.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:56–00:51:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are consistent with the range of allowable uses and densities in the underlying low density residential and very low density residential future land use categories
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:08–00:51:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
below. um
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:14–00:51:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the coastal management element,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:18–00:51:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ was analyzed based upon those um policies. uh The site will not impact public access to the lagoon. uh There is a strip of of the property that is uh seaward or east of Indian River Drive that will remain undeveloped. There will be no blockage of any public views that are currently enjoyed um from ‸ roadway or adjacent properties um in this regard. In terms of the coastal high hazard area, the site does sit entirely within the coastal high hazard area. You've heard about
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:51–00:51:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
conducted for the application demonstrating um no adverse impact. uh What we also look to from a land use standpoint is to reduce the number of units within coastal high hazard. So, looking at applications that request lower than the maximum attainable density. In this case, uh the underlying future land use categories could allow upwards of 31 units, and they're uh proposing uh seven units, which um is in line with the objectives of that under that policy. um There's also been um incorporated into the design protection from flooding, storm surge, and related impacts, further validated by the fact that they obtained their environmental resource permit. We also found the application consistent with the conservation element in terms of the protection of the higher quality wetlands on site um on-site mitigation of tree removal. In order to be consistent with this policy,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:52–00:52:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it was found that the um habitat was not um available, or there was no protected species on on the property. uh With that, staff has recommended approval of the proposed large-scale site plan and preliminary flat, finding that it does meet the requirements of the city's code, as well as comprehensive plan. I'm happy to answer any questions. All right. Thank you very much.
um Chairperson Park, uh before the board
asks
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:26–00:53:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
any questions, I did want to allow Mr. Greenwood to um to disclose his conflict that he has. so
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:34–00:53:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the audience area, or do I stay
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:40–00:53:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
sit with the audience if you're comfortable with that. Yeah.
Well, i he
uh he does own
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:48–00:53:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this one. So, for that reason, he's going to recuse himself. All right.
Thank you. All right. Any questions for staff? I got some. Yes, sir. ‸ cost of the homes, what's ‸ going
to
be the cost?
We do not um ask that as part of our application process, but I believe the applicant can field that one as part of their presentation.
Okay. Sewer or septic?
uh sorry. Yes, it's going to connect to, um City of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:19–00:54:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
utilities for both, uh potable water and sanitary sewer, and there is capacity to serve the project. And
endangered species on the property. um
they did an extensive, uh protected species survey,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:32–00:54:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the comp plan. All
right.
I messed up.
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:43–00:54:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
a hurricane, that particular area floods. um I just wanted a clarification. Is Indian River Drive, is that, uh considered county or state road? Who has jurisdiction
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:05–00:55:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city
room
City road. oh
really? Okay.
Well,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:11–00:55:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, that's right there is a small county section north of McFarland.
All right no further questions. All
right.
i have
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:23–00:55:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
or statement, that area floods um all the time. How can you explain to me how how you're going to mitigate when the road is a certain height no matter what? How are
you
going to mitigate it preventing it from flooding? i
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:45–00:55:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
kind
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
road itself
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:55:56–00:56:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Right. In this case I'm just trying to figure out how how that how you're going to prevent that area from flooding.
Well the the properties themselves like the the homes themselves that the proposed ‸ elevation of those homes is 6.5 feet um so the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:19–00:56:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
above the the floodplain elevation.
Sorry somebody said six
is it six feet?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:26–00:56:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:26] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
right okay. Right so then as far as the houses themselves preventing them from flooding just from a regular storm they'll they'll be well above. The
plan is to really just bring in more dirt.
Yeah well as far as the the the site itself yeah they're they're essentially bringing in fill and building the houses up on
fill
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:56:45–00:56:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And then as for off-site flows they're proposing to you know put inlets on the west side of the of the development and then direct that that runoff directly to the Indian River. Like basically create a bypass system for their for their proposed development.
Okay so my concern is water runoff. Okay. If you if you're saying
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:57:09–00:57:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. Okay. For for ‸ off-site flow for on-site runoff that runoff is captured and and uh directed to one of the two on-site uh ponds and and and detained there before it's released to the Indian River. Okay.
Thanks. Okay. All right. Good question. Anybody else? All right. Then I'll close it to the board and open it up to the public. Again I don't have any cards for anybody
would
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:41–00:57:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
like to speak but anybody who'd like to speak on this one?
I believe the applicant would like to make their presentation first and then we'll do the public.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:49–00:58:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:27–00:58:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but everyone has short microphones here right
okay so my name is Kelly Delmonico
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:35–00:58:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
me here. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:41–00:58:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
either as we go or I'll probably get to some of that stuff in this presentation and thank you to staff and their consultants for that presentation
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:56–00:58:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but I do have to reiterate some ‸ of the things. So
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:02–00:59:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
newer neighborhoods so
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:09–00:59:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They've been established for a long time before our stormwater requirements were put in place that we have today. And Riverwalk subdivision is just to the north of that and you can see that neighborhood is being constructed with stormwater conveyance and storage. Terrace apartments is immediately to the west and then we have Dixon Boulevard to the south and Indian River Drive to the east
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:37–00:59:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
over 30 dwelling units but we're only seeking seven. We're not looking to change the future land use designation here or the zoning. So we're looking to keep all of that the same and develop within those means so the RU 17 and the RU 215 zoning that is there today is consistent with the low and very low density future land use classifications I did turn the map, so notice
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:10–01:00:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but this just helps us to zoom in. So when we were initially considering the design of this seven lot subdivision, there were a lot of things we thought about. The first was reducing access onto Indian River Drive and then it was the conservation of wetlands stormwater treatment and retention and then buffering with the existing homes. So you can see that in no situation are any of these new lots proposed immediately adjacent next to an existing home. The existing homes are all either next to a conservation area or a retention and landscaping area. Sorry to go back. So
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:50–01:00:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
due diligence and design. So this is what we submitted back in 2023 to the city. And you can see the difference here is that there is that private access drive on the west side of the lots that connects to Dixon Boulevard
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:09–01:01:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
land development regulations in Cocoa and they requested us to instead put the driveways onto Indian River Drive and
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:22–01:01:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we decided to alter it here so you can see that
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:30–01:01:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Drive where we have shared driveways
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:39–01:01:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
six and then lot seven will have its own individual driveway so instead of there being seven driveways onto Indian River Drive there are only four
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:54–01:01:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
of you know lots five and six. You can see that they have that shared driveway in the middle in the orange. And we're doing something interesting with the homes here. We're rear loading the garages. So the front of the homes are facing the rivers, the driveway is coming up the middle, and then the users of those driveways will head behind the house where they can go in the garage or they can turn around. And what that will do is that will make it so anyone pulling out onto Indian River Drive doesn't have to back out there are limited driveways so it reduces those conflicts with vehicles coming through and this design that I showed you before it is consistent with the land development regulations and the comprehensive plan
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:39–01:02:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
is what you were looking at so it depends on the market rate at the time that this is developed but probably around 1.5 million dollars would it be my guess there are significant costs to do this development for so ‸ few lots so they will be upwards of 1 million dollars
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:04–01:03:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which I've colored in just a little bit to talk about some important points so while we're consistent with the land development regulations and the comprehensive plan we are providing a significant portion of
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:20–01:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
quality the blue areas are the retention and then the yellow is the development area where those single family lots will be back in August of 2024 as we were going through this process with the city and working on stormwater and design and driveways
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:50–01:03:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I sent this letter out to them and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:58–01:04:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so they could see what we were proposing and I asked people to reach out to me should they have questions so I had ongoing communication with four different property owners in the area and I'm just going to summarize some of the things that we talked about their concerns if you have questions or want to get into more detail we can do that but generally speaking there were four concerns that the neighbors had the first and most importantly which we've already talked about earlier with staff and their consultants is the roadway flooding and the stormwater the second concern was traffic the third concern was driveways and the fourth concern was conservation and wetlands so to touch on those a little bit I'll start with the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:47–01:04:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
been put in a conservation easement where we are preserving those wetlands up there near the uplands on the west side of the property so we designed the project to minimize the wetland and surface water impacts to the greatest extent practical and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:05–01:05:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which are low quality and isolated with significantly altered hydrology invasive vegetation and limited ecological function So mitigation will consist of a combination of on-site and off-site wetland mitigation in addition to us putting money and mitigation credits into an approved mitigation bank. So for the roadway flooding and stormwater, we're definitely aware of
the
of the occasional flooding events that happen on Indian River Drive and to some of the low-lying homes along that area and you know we of course we share that concern with our neighbors However, we neither own, maintain, or have control over that roadway.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:48–01:05:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
over is how high we are building these homes to make sure not only these homes that are being built are protected and out of the flood zone, but that we don't have any adverse impacts to on any of our neighbors. And so all the documentation that we have submitted and our correspondence and communication with the city, we have verified that there should not be any adverse effects on any of our neighboring properties.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:22–01:06:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
institute of transportation engineers calculations each single family lot only creates about 9.6 trips per day so we would calculate this out at about 66 trips per day for this neighborhood which is definitely still within the acceptable level of service for the adjacent roadways just for comparisons purpose the Indian Hills subdivision just to the north with 38 homes that's about 357 trips a day so very de minimis impact for the transportation system here
[unclear audio — 0:19 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:06:58–01:07:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Indian River Drive we do have permits already from the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Army Corps of Engineers So in accordance with all provided evidence and in alignment with the staff report, we believe this request is compliant with the City's Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan, and kindly request your recommendation for approval for this site plan and preliminary
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:44–01:07:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
request. Anyone on our team is happy to answer your
questions
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:47–01:07:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:49–01:07:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank you for this presentation I just have but a question and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:58–01:08:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not ‸ the overall impact of these seven proposed lots I think that's well within the acceptable I'll say code and permissible within that but my my question exists around as I look at this and as I was I
was
thinking about about this
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:18–01:08:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ actually build docks on the property that is now going to be facing the water
so that's not something we've determined at this time
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:34–01:08:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if we can get through the preliminary plat approval process
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:41–01:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:45–01:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
accordance with the code.
I was just going to add that the city we do not regulate the
docs
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:54–01:08:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:54–01:08:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they have a permitting system for docks
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:00–01:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah and I'll just add that the sliver of property that you see actually adjacent to the river those are open space tracks and
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:12–01:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there are only I think four open space tracks
right there are little little slivers of 0.01 and 0.2 acres or a quarter acre in some situations something we'll explore but the important part for us right now is that we're able to subdivide
Okay thank you that's it for me
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:37–01:09:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:40–01:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No
I'm saying the same entity that controls the docks will that they also control it
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:48–01:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't think anyone's interested in putting a ramp in I'm not sure that they the army corps would support a ramp in this location But
once they move in they see the river and maybe they want to boat Yeah
we would if anything they would explore the possibility of like a neighborhood dock because like Miss Ike said it they don't they're not broken into individual lots They'll be owned by the HOA Yes sir Yes
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:16–01:10:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Good questions anyone else have any questions?
All right
thank you
Thank you Thank
you
Okay, so we will open it up to the public to speak on the matter if anybody would like to speak on this item Please come forward
[01:10:41] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:41–01:10:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:43] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I'm one of the residents that lives two houses away from new development proposed development
[01:10:52] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:52–01:10:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I'm so
sorry sir I need to swear
you in
Oh okay And also before you leave if you could please fill out one of the delegation cards Um out there I'll show you if you need but let me just get you sworn in
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:06–01:11:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yeah
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:10–01:11:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:13–01:11:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
nothing but the truth?
So help me God
Thank you so much
[01:11:20] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
All right. My name is Bill Chatterton and I live at [address]
[01:11:25] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:25–01:11:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:29] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
development is proposed I just wanted to say that I'm not against the project in itself The project in itself though what they've laid out and looked at and all this
[01:11:41] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:41–01:11:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:43] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
project in itself It doesn't look at the holistic point of view from the community all the neighboring houses and so forth One of the things you asked uh Russell was about the flooding And everybody else has been down that street up and down that street Well, there's a couple things that uh that in my mind and I don't have any hard data To tell you that this is the the facts of everything But this is just my living in ‸ the area Having engineering background Uh done drilling oil and gas and stuff like this So I have a tendency to believe I think I know what it's going on So one of the first things is that you have a 20 acre Uh retention pond on
[01:12:29] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:29–01:12:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:32] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Okay, and we were probably in balance back at the 2007 through the
[01:12:38] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:38–01:12:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:43] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:43–01:12:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:48] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
was flowing water was going through the substrates of the coquina Out to the river with no issues even during storms and things like this. Yeah, we would have minor flooding But the vacant land that they now are looking at was never wet It was dry. It was always relatively dry And my neighbor to the west She grew up as a little kid from the uh Has now has a piece of property that is underwater most of the time Because there's a breakout ‸ And so what happens is
[01:13:25] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:25–01:13:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:13:28] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Now you've got us1 expansion some more water dribbling into the into the world into that substrate You have the riverwalk development They took out lots of coquina And it sort of created a ‸ dam
[01:13:46] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:46–01:13:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:13:52] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the low point at the intersection of Dixon and Indian River Drive So now you have this water that now has to hit this this what you call I would say Construction material structural fill and now has to it's diverted To the south and now the breakout breakout if you don't know what a breakout is is when your water table is Backed up from flowing out to the river especially at high high water points It has nowhere to go but to break out into land
[01:14:29] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:29–01:14:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:34] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
off of Dixon ‸ You notice that stream of water that flows along that in Dixon It breaks out right there That's a water table breaking out From the retention ponds and all the water that's been flowing
[01:14:49] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:49–01:14:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:55] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
had to put the French drains in you know at their their out-of-pocket costs around Anywhere between eight ten thousand dollars to to remedy the problem
[01:15:05] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:05–01:15:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:10] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
So unfortunately her house her yard is completely inundated And then you also have that ditch that runs along that one side to the north That is completely got foliage and undergrowth and the city has a tough time ‸ to kind of keep up with that thing It just grows fast and everything froze in Florida So it's somewhat challenging to keep up with it, but it blocks off a lot of water
[01:15:38] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:38–01:15:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:43] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
have to do some de-mucking There'll be some sub-excavation going on They're going to have to re-compact the fill material in So they're going to block up more water flow that goes out to the river That's going to change the groundwater hydrology
[01:15:59] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:59–01:16:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:02] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
separate the wetlands from the new development And what do you think the water is going to try to push through that retention wall? Well, if it doesn't push through there It's going to go further to the south and then invade the water
[01:16:16] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:16–01:16:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:18] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
They live in a couple of houses to the south of Dixon and they're constantly flooded ‸ So when you do all that,
[01:16:27] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:27–01:16:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:16:28] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
got more water And then you also have two retention ponds with a couple of swales that are connecting to the different driveways
[01:16:38] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:38–01:16:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:41] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
But you're going to have a reverse if you have a water topping and high river That water ain't going anywhere That surface water can if it is a deluge of rain
[01:16:51] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:51–01:16:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:54] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:54–01:16:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:56] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
You've only got four foot of free board on the retention ponds to the proposed retention ponds If you're not more maybe four to five foot retention Free board that's not going anywhere Also on top of that all the storm drains do not have any blow backflow prevention So all that high water to table High water pushes back up against any of the outflows from the retention ponds that are being proposed So you got constant water around the area That's why that whole area is just one big swale On top of that you got all the downhill We're downhill it's everything is downhill We're right there in the center of two slopes
[01:17:39] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:39–01:17:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:41] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
from the Manor area And I can't tell you that most of the water bypasses a lot of the inlets It rolls back fast and then also river walk is not completed yet You don't have your your top coating yet of your finish coat to crown the water To go into the retentions They're flowing straight out to Indian River Drive And then just heading south And flooding out my neighbors to the south All the way over to the house on the point and so forth ‸ So you got to have some sort of backflow There is an inline backflow prevention that could be done But
[01:18:24] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:24–01:18:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:27] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
The bottom line is that there's a lot of issues that's not centered around the project in itself But it is centered around the infrastructure to support the project And that's what we're having issues with right now And you know, let's ‸ see
[01:18:44] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:44–01:18:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:47] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Tidal influence, limits upon discharge
[01:18:52] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:52–01:18:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:57] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:57–01:19:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:02] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
‸ One of the things about, you know, there's some proposed My thoughts of what could be done Is I think there needs to be a bit more of a study
[01:19:12] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:12–01:19:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:16] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Again, I'm not against the project The project ‸ looks like a very good project It's going to probably bring some things to the community But you know, who's going to be the insurance company that's going to underwrite flooding? You know, how do you how do you disclose to the buyer?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:19:35–01:19:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[01:19:35] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
You know, how does that get written up in the sale of that property? I'm not sure that too many property owners want to hear I can't get in or I can't get out during a major storm So, and that doesn't have to be a hurricane So, you know, I'm not sure how that does But then we also have that high ground water table So, you know, we have that driveway vulnerability Is it still an issue, a concern? I mean, I like the fact that they did it to the back, which is great But still access to getting to that driveway Could be a different story So if you got emergency response to someone in that units How do you get to them? Are they going to be flooded out? How does fire get to an issue there? ‸ So there is safety concerns there And a couple of things I, you
know,
I just brainstorm these things
[01:20:35] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:35–01:20:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Drive in Dixon Yeah, yeah, that's cheating dollars
[01:20:41] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:41–01:20:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Reduced ‸ 20 acre, you know, the percolation rate of your 20 acre pond Could probably help if you can reduce the percolation rate I'm not sure you're going to But, you know, it's a good thing to do to slow it down Improve catch basins and check your ‸ catch basins to see Is the water flow hitting it? Is it going so fast that it's just zooming ‸ right past that catch basin? I see that the county is doing a lot of work To the north on Indian River Drive
[01:21:25] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:25–01:21:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Their areas that they're rebuilding it And doing new curbing and new catch basins up there Pretty good sized ones at that I think the expansion at the Indian River Drive And Dixon, ‸ it's right on top of the river
[01:21:45] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:45–01:21:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Between the river edge and the road Maybe three? I don't know why we can't just build it out Put about another 10 foot out there
[01:21:57] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:21:57–01:21:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
build that up But that's just my thoughts
[01:22:02] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:02–01:22:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know, ‸ I know that there's been some thoughts and comments About building the road up some But everybody's concerned that it becomes A big old swamp swale Well, that's what the pumps would need to be doing
[01:22:23] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:22:23–01:22:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
To the seawall So that's just my thoughts of what I see in the neighborhood Having lived here for the last 10 Actually living here after I rebuilt the house 10 years now So And you talk with the people And you just get a sense of what's happening
[01:22:46] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:46–01:22:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Verbalizing their concerns with all the water issues ‸ And you hear someone putting in French drains And things like this And you go, wow, ‸ that's a lot of money But it's just a lot of things that the city needs to consider That their internal infrastructure system Can it support the development in itself? That's the challenge And I think the city needs to take ownership of some of the pre-existing conditions I think maybe a hydrology A little bit more in-depth hydrology study And maybe this is a point where you kind of leverage Conditional use permits with that As part of the project development And, you know, look at the different features Of
[01:23:41] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:41–01:23:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
how this project is going to be built
[01:23:44] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:44–01:23:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is this, is this, is the retaining wall going to change anything?
[01:23:53] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:53–01:23:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
projects And when I work at big mega projects I look at all the things that I do studies I do lifting studies I do analysis I do maintenance studies I do all that kind of studies I look at everything before I even start
[01:24:11] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:11–01:24:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You're looking at a lot of things to make sure That they go as smooth as possible
[01:24:20] ▶ Play Speaker 17 (introduced as “Bill Chatterton” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:20–01:24:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I'll fill this out
all right
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:24:23–01:24:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Thank
you,
Mr.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:24:25–01:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Anyone else like to speak on the matter?
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:30–01:24:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I live about a mile from this area I walk almost every day Just one second,
ma'am
You want to swear me in first?
Yes, if you could please raise your right hand And then I will also need you as well To fill out a delegation card, please Thank you so much Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the truth The whole truth and nothing but the truth?
I
do Thank
you so much Thank
you, ma'am
So I'm Janice Smith
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:02–01:25:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I walk almost every day I do a walk jog So I go down to Dixon on the river road
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:17–01:25:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
three years And sometimes I mean as Bill so well described The river and that swamp area often meet The river overflows The swamp overflows And some of One of my concerns is there's a lake That starts about Eight to twelve feet From the river road And I would just like to know If the developers Are they going to fill in that entire lake? Because it's deeper than just a swamp area The other thing I would like to say I assume all of you have seen that area
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:13–01:26:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You really should Drive down there Get out of ‸ the car And walk along the edge of the swamp And back into the apartment buildings The apartment buildings There's sometimes that water just trickles up Into the parking lot So there's some kind of underground water flow Coming into that area It's not just water coming on top of the soil Which is a big problem The other thing I'm concerned about Is if the houses are up six feet from the road Did I understand that correctly? When we have some of these downpours
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:27:04–01:27:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flow off of those houses That property Where's it going to go?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:13–01:27:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right now it isn't Because we've had a dry period But in rainy periods And when we have the surges ‸ It's up there There's no place for that water to go I mean you can't If something's full You can't put more water into it Without it overflowing itself So there just seems to be a lot of problems With this project That maybe need to be looked at Even more
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:49–01:27:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Maybe looking at I can't remember the word he used But
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:58–01:28:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
To look at more as a total And then the other thing I would just like to ask is When is Florida going to stop building in flood zones? The cities I know the city is always battling There's floods out in West Cocoa There's floods on the river road And what are cities to do? We should stop building in flood zones for one thing And the other is Why take out the sable palms? Isn't that our state tree? That's all I just have a lot of concerns about this I don't see ‸ how it can happen Without it affecting the surrounding homes Okay, thank you
Thank you ma'am Anyone else? Yes sir
My name's James Smith
[01:29:07] ▶ Play Speaker 20 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:07–01:29:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the truth The whole truth and nothing but the truth? I do Thank you so much
I just wanted to mention that I've walked that property myself And even in the dry season There's several thousand gallons of water Coming off that property every single day And so I'm curious of how they're going to handle that
[01:29:31] ▶ Play Speaker 20 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:31–01:29:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
During the last hurricane The water went I would say almost up Halfway up Dixon Boulevard And
[01:29:43] ▶ Play Speaker 20 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:43–01:29:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The
tidal debris was There was also a stranded dolphin Female with a baby That was halfway up there They had the dolphin rescue people Came and rescued it But the water level was so So high that it drove the dolphin up that far And so That's pretty much all I wanted to bring up Because there is a huge amount of water that comes off of that place And the water level at right now is
[01:30:25] ▶ Play Speaker 20 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:25–01:30:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:29] ▶ Play Speaker 20 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:29–01:30:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:30] ▶ Play Speaker 20 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:30–01:30:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with a triangle A diamond shaped sign on it And if you stand there You'll look down and see one of the drain For that property There's two There's one there and one further north
[01:30:45] ▶ Play Speaker 20 (introduced as “James Smith” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:45–01:30:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
almost the same height Within Say within 12 inches But That's a huge concern for me Of how they're going to solve that problem So Thank you for listening to me Thank you sir
Anyone else like to speak on this item?
Okay
Then we'll allow for The property owner The applicant To ‸ come and discuss the topics that were brought up
So we have throughout this process with the city and in your agenda packages and in our presentations and staff's presentations
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:33–01:31:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city that talk about hydrology and stormwater If you have any specific questions of us We're happy to answer that We have our development team with us But I wasn't sure how deep into those things that the board wanted to go or if you have further questions for us
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:58–01:32:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Towards the retention areas
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:07–01:32:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, holding the engineer up
Thank you
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:11–01:32:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
there
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:32:18–01:32:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you
[01:32:19] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Well, good evening everybody My name is Richard Campanelli I'm with MEI Partners I'm the engineer for record And I've been working on this project for some time With the help of Tom and Abby and all the group that reviews this We spent a lot of time going through the performance standards Okay? Coupled with the St. John's folks that look at this Okay?
[01:32:42] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:42–01:32:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:32:48] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and respect the observations that Bill has and these folks have And you know, obviously stormwater management Particularly floodplain management is ‸ very serious item We all know that and we can all agree to that What I was required to do by the Water Management District was to develop a hydrologic and hydraulic study
[01:33:12] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:12–01:33:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:33:17] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
The property that you were working on right now
[01:33:19] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:19–01:33:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:33:26] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
consideration Bill's concerns about groundwater Because that's a geotechnical study Right? However, I did do a substantial and significant study with hydrology and hydraulics And what happens is A substantial amount of water flows down that hill And that's a pretty good substantial elevation change of maybe 10-15 feet Maybe even more And so when it gets to the bottom where we're receiving the project receives this water We have to manage it, right? So there's a stormwater management plan that you that you ‸ guys talk, you know, ‸ look at it and reviewed it
[01:34:05] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:05–01:34:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:09] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
a plan that we think meets the performance standards Okay? We know it meets the performance standards And the reason why I say that is because there's a net reduction of water Leaving that that's basically a flume ride down that hill to the river, okay? Now one of the residents mentioned that that that system always discharges, right? Because what happens is it gets to the bottom and it like sort of pops out over the curve and enters the river We're going to control that with this project, okay? We're going to be able to say we are meeting the conditions of the performance standards for not only water quality but for water quantity, okay?
[01:34:55] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:55–01:35:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:02] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
call a bypass ‸ system, okay? It has a sort of a system inlets of a network of inlets like a header basically all along the backside of that And so it picks up that water and lets it get around the property ‸ and and you know get to the river, right? So it doesn't want to move in the north towards the north. It doesn't want to move towards the south It'll it'll kind of make its way up there down to the bottom and serve as not only for hydrating the wetland and the conservation easement to the to the west But
[01:35:37] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:37–01:35:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:41] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Now we are allowed to do that through the water management district, okay?
[01:35:46] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:46–01:35:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:53] ▶ Play Speaker 21 (introduced as “Richard Campanelli” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Indian River if you get a 10-year event in most cases local roads are designed for a 10-year event And maybe in this case, it's probably some somewhat worse obviously based on what everybody's saying But if there's a capital improvements project that you all looking at or something that we can work together on We're certainly willing to entertain that
Any questions for this gentleman?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:25–01:36:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:30–01:36:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:36:35–01:36:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Delmonico anything anything further ma'am?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:38–01:36:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
All right, then we'll close this portion from the public bring back to the board ‸ The wishes of the board Questions for staff
Uh chairperson Park. I just want to make sure that staff didn't also want a chance to address any of the public comments
Well, I wanted to speak on the North Fisk pond contributing to the drainage ‸ concerns So that stormwater pond associated with the US 1 expansion project was designed and permitted through St. John's To treat and attenuate stormwater The pond was constructed in accordance with approved plans and there is no evidence in the permit or design That support it create it is creating Drainage issues along Indian River Drive Okay.
Thank you Anything else from staff?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:46–01:37:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank you very much. All right. Back to the board
I'll make
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:51–01:37:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
site plan
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:37:55–01:37:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:37:58–01:38:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
the board That would also include the preliminary plot as well. Yes.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:09–01:38:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
motion in a second any further discussion on the side before we call to a vote Excellent. All right. All in favor. Please say aye. Aye. Opposed say nay. All right. The motion passes
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:34–01:38:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:38–01:38:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We have nothing under that And anybody want to discuss anything on the tree board?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:46–01:38:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All
right Next we move on to other business.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:55–01:38:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:00–01:39:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:03–01:39:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here at
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:07–01:39:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Mayor,
do
you have anything to say? Thank you for
it. I enjoyed sharing the view, the launch with you all tonight Yeah,
thank you very much to the city manager and staff for letting us go
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:19–01:39:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:23–01:39:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right. I'll make the motion to adjourn Second all in favor, please say aye. All right. Have a great night
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:31–01:39:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:33–01:39:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:39–01:39:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Good
to meet you all
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:50–01:39:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I thank you all
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:58–01:40:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Thank
you
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:03–01:40:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:40:18–01:40:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording