Do we need to do anything for that?
Yeah, you can move to postpone to the date starting
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:07–00:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
‸ Okay, so I make a motion to move that to the May 20th date.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:16–00:00:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:19–00:00:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Aye. Any opposed? Okay, motion passes to move that, and we'll move on to the next item, which is a residential setback variance for 765 Dryden Circle. Lucy, thank you.
Yeah,
good evening, Chair and Board members. For the record, I'm Lucilene Ribeiro, planner with the City of Cocoa. I would just like to make a correction on your staff report.
[00:00:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:49–00:00:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
structure setback, but in reality is for a 20-foot rear property setback. And also in one of the conditions is missing the
[00:01:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:07–00:01:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
exhibit A.
[00:01:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:11–00:01:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I just would like to make the corrections for the record.
Thank you.
So the applicant, Ricardo Mendez, is here ‸ with his wife, is requesting a variance to reduce the required rear setback in order to construct a screen patio. The property, the variant request is from Appendix A, Zoning, Article 11, Section 17G, with the minimum yard requirements to allow, as I mentioned, the reduction to the required rear yard setback to permit the construction of the screen patio.
[00:01:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:52–00:01:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
used for the property's neighborhood commercial. So just to give you
[00:02:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:02–00:02:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2002 between Brevard County and the developer. Phase one of this project ‸ was planted in 2003 and built in 2004. And the second phase, it was built in 2006. The property, as you can see, highlighted in red, 765 Dryden Circle. It's approximately,
is
a single-family residential under the ‸ plan unit development zoning. And it has approximately 0.12 acres.
‸ So
the request is due to everybody's unique layout.
[00:02:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:57–00:03:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So this is part of the phase two. And there is an easement, drainage easement, around this storage pond. There's a 10-foot drainage easement that actually goes around the retention area. On your left side, where
[00:03:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:20–00:03:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all those lots is the block F. So it's lots 1 through 44. And they have a special condition that most of their rear backyard, their backyard pretty much, is the whole setback is actually required. And I'm going to go over some of the aspects and analysis that we did while looking and researching this division development. ‸ So to compare, initially compare, this residence with the neighbors, I actually chose the house that you can see that has a pool. So
[00:04:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:07–00:04:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know, the garage is 400 feet, around 400 square feet. And then there's ‸ a small porch that is 23 square feet.
The
house that has the pool, the neighboring home, is actually a two-story configuration. Even the square footage is pretty similar, but the first floor actually is a smaller square footage. So the homes that you see on your right side of the screen actually have ‸ more space in their backyard than the neighbors to the west that have a smaller, pretty much no, really, not ‸ enough space to be considered as a backyard. So I want to just to show this
[00:04:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:52–00:04:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a comparison and then why he's coming to request the variance. So here is just a staff analysis that we ‸ did to try to ‸ show the hardship. So you can see, actually I have to say that the drainage is in yellow.
[00:05:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:19–00:05:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All the lots are the same size. They're 50 by 105, 105 feet. And he's proposing to expand the building structure. So for us, it's a part of the home. When you build the porch, it's considered a part of the building footprint. And that he's proposing a 10 by 34 screen porch. So when we combine the setback ‸ requirements with the conditions, ‸ there's a limit usable backyard area.
[00:05:54] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:54–00:06:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the setback is his whole rear yard, just to clarify.
[00:06:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:09–00:06:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the PUD, just to cover the PUD development,
[00:06:18] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:18–00:06:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
amenities, they have some type of recreation for the residents to compensate for the size of the lots. So some of these conditions were already pre-designed, and it was not, when the person comes and purchased
[00:06:40] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:40–00:06:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
lot,
you
know,
[00:06:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:42–00:06:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
already recorded, they just choose the model of the homes that they decide, you know, normally there's a variation between four or five types of homes they can pick and choose when they purchase the property. ‸ So the majority of the homes is common to have the drainage easement throughout the phase one and phase two of ferns metals. They all have a 10-foot drainage easement, and the only difference is the layout of the home. Some, they have more than 20 feet in the rear yard, and some has less. And in his situation, he only has the 20 feet that is the required setback. So the hardship is not self-imposed. We're trying to make a point that
[00:07:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:33–00:07:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are presented the way they are. The homeowners, we did a research, and then actually
[00:07:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:44–00:07:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The build ‸ owners are allowed to build porches, but in this situation, it's hard for him to meet the setback and have the space to build the porch. So by granting this variance,
[00:08:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:02–00:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The, any residents that has similar circumstances could come and request the same type of variance. So again, this is just a minimum request. He's requesting 10 foot as the 20 foot requires. It is the minimum that he needs in order to have the screen porch built. So the staff recommended approval with certain conditions for this variance. So the first condition will be that, and I have to apologize because it's not accessory structure, so I have to take it back. ‸ It's not from the accessory structure, but if he decides to expand or enlarge the, and
[00:08:54] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:54–00:08:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as a conceptual that is actually attached and is being approved with this request,
[00:09:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:00–00:09:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we actually, the 10 by 34, it is the measurements that we have. He has an open building permit now that is waiting for this variance to be approved, and when the variance is approved,
[00:09:14] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:14–00:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then moving on to construction. So if he, for some reason, decides that he needs more than 10 feet, then
[00:09:25] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:25–00:09:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
board. And honestly, I don't know if
[00:09:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
he's that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:29–00:09:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
going to happen because we have a drainage easement.
[00:09:31] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:31–00:09:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
requesting for ‸ his porch.
[00:09:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:42–00:09:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:09:45] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
not effective until he's actually building permit
[00:09:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:49–00:09:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
also approved. So here we just give the applicant the 12 months for him to get the time to get the permit approved, ‸ but I will say that he already have a permit open, so I don't see him needing the 12 months as necessary, but we
[00:10:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
added
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:06–00:10:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
just in case. And then if the board ‸ seems that, finds that there's any other conditions that didn't necessary for the approval, we can take that in consideration as well. If you have any questions, I'm available and the applicant is here also.
Lucy, that's not a metal attached garage, right? That's a screen porch?
Yes.
Oh, is that what you said?
[00:10:27] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. Oh, okay. Yeah, so I have to, like, apologize. This is from probably, like, a previous slide that didn't get replaced, yeah.
So number one,
we
could say subject structure for that, and then we could just say screen
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:40–00:10:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yes. Okay. All right. Thank you. Is the applicant here and wishes to speak or add anything to that?
I'm good.
Or if you do speak, they just have to swear you in.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:54–00:11:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
explanation. I just want to... I'm so
sorry. I'm so sorry. Could I just swear you in really quick?
A what?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:07–00:11:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Yes. Thank you so much.
Like ‸ I was saying, thank you, Lucy, for the explanation. I just want to add that my request is just to allow a minor reduction to the setback. And my drawings are...
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:33–00:11:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not without affecting any neighbor or community property.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:52–00:11:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lab already done through your office and ‸ now we have the setback issue.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:08–00:12:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be fair if we can use that word. But I will appreciate to the board
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:20–00:12:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:26–00:12:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
So, Mr. Just to confirm, so those measurements are correct, right? 10 by 34? Okay.
[00:12:36] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:36–00:12:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, okay.
Does the board have any questions for Lucy or the applicant?
Yes. So, we're seeing that there is a slab already, a 10 by 34 slab already laid out on that property?
The slab was already ‸ approved and poured.
So, it is there?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:00–00:13:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the...
‸ Prior to the current ‸ permit.
Okay. ‸ So, this is just to put a screen porch on the exact size of the slab, correct?
Yes, sir.
Okay.
[00:13:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I can give you some context to that. So, the permit, actually, one of our planning and zoning employees gave him the wrong information and ‸ approved the building permit in there. They read the plat. They
read the plat wrong.
When you look at the plat, they believe... Actually, I have... ‸ Actually, I don't think you can see. But here, you see that you have a 20 feet rear setback?
Mm-hmm.
[00:13:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:43–00:13:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
feet.
Oh.
When he read the survey, the original survey. So, but by looking at the
[00:13:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
plats
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:55–00:13:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that we have available to the property appraisers website, then you can see that actually the whole backyard is 20 feet. It is not the drainage that's 20 feet.
[00:14:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:05–00:14:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
approved. It was constructed. And then when he submitted for the porch, I caught the mistake. And we asked him to just submit for a variance. The city did not charge him for fees for the inconvenience. So, he didn't have to pay for the cost for the application. Okay.
Thank you, Lucy. Thank you.
So, I had just one question for you. What will this structure look like? Will it be aluminum and screening? Or will it have a ‸ more solid type roof? And what is the public access along that easement for any type of utility or maintenance? Or will there be public access behind that screened porch?
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:03–00:15:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We still have like
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:12–00:15:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:16–00:15:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, ‸ it's an open area. Easy to work for anybody.
I
probably can explain that. So, normally when you have a PUD subdivision, the lots are smaller. They're constraining you. Normally you have some type of easements,
you
know, drainage. Or sometimes is on the sides ‸ of the property also. There are easements for inutility.
So,
normally PUDs are really common to have a five foot inside interior
[00:16:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
easements
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:01–00:16:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and then some other easements in the back, like in the rear. So, what happens is when ‸ the property owner purchase the land and they come, they actually allow to install a fence. So, they sign a holding harmless with the city ‸ in case if someone needs to access that easement, ‸ the fence becomes demolished for some reason that the property owner is responsible for replacing and not the utility company or the municipality itself. So, most plan unit development ‸ projects are designed the same way. And
[00:16:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:38–00:16:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, there's not really, he
[00:16:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:44–00:16:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
When you look at the area, so the easement does not end or begin where the stormwater is. There is still a little more ‸ space. It is just the space safe in case, you know, if you get a
[00:17:04] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
storms
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:04–00:17:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
rain, that, you know,
[00:17:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
there's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:06–00:17:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
stormwater can fill it in. So, it has some room for accommodating. But that area is not considered part of the lot. So, that area is considered part of, is a separate track that pertains to the HOA. So, most of the tracks, they're common tracks. They're
[00:17:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
pertaining
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:21–00:17:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to the HOA.
[00:17:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:22–00:17:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
I
hope that helps. Yeah. Yeah.
And to answer to your question about the screen porch per se, ‸ the screen porch ‸ is designed to have like four columns and one center column. And the rest is going to be a screen all around it.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:17:46–00:17:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mm-hmm. The water.
All right. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:53–00:17:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:59–00:18:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Has the HOA approved this? The Architectural Committee of the HOA approved this already?
I haven't submitted anything to the HOA
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:15–00:18:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
They got to approve your plans for expanding.
They already approved my slab. I can tell you that.
But you're expanding it, right? Correct?
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:30–00:18:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, no, not the slab. He's not expanding. The slab is already poured. Just putting the screen on it.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:36–00:18:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:38–00:18:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
No, I'm waiting for the permit to be approved.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:43–00:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ I
mean, if the HOA stops, ‸ it's not nothing to do with us, right?
Or, I
mean...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:58–00:19:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Right.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:05–00:19:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They still got to approve it.
Okay. I think we're ready to vote if someone wants to make a motion.
Make
a motion that we approve the special exception as presented by Lucy. Second.
This is the variance,
not
the
[00:19:35] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
special exception.
It is the variance.
The
variance. I'm sorry. The variance.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:38–00:19:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
If I could just add also what the two... What are these called? ‸ The two requirements here... Or the two conditions that the staff recommends. The one that the subject structure shall not be expanded or modified, etc. And number two, that the variance shall not be effective until
the a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:01–00:20:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
secures a building permit for the porch, not metal detached garage. ‸ All
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:06–00:20:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
All are... Do we have a second for that?
Seconded.
Oh, I'm sorry. All in favor?
Aye.
Aye. Any opposed? All right. Motion passes. Congratulations. Thank you.
Thank you.
Mr. Melendez. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
All right. Moving on to
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:24–00:20:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, Lucy.
Oh, you're welcome.
Just trying to...
[00:20:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
just give
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:20:38–00:20:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:20:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:20:39–00:20:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
a second, please.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:20:39–00:20:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:21:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:05–00:21:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:12–00:21:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Brevard
so
[00:21:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
‸ the item is a special reception request for the property
[00:21:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:24–00:21:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:30] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
an automotive repair establishment within ‸ existing commercial structure. so the proposed,
[00:21:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:39–00:21:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:42] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
he's gonna ‸ have two employees, and then the autos operation will be from 7 30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Saturdays so under the general commercial zoning district automotive repairs is permitted under special reception, so it's not permitted by right, and so that's why he's here to request, in order to operate his business. So, the applicant is proposing a small scale automotive repair, ‸ operating inside, as you can see, with the building. There's two, it's kind of hard to see, because the building is painted black, but there's actually two bay doors in the front. It used to be out of repair in the past, but
[00:22:34] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:34–00:22:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:37] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
they were granted for this property, and after so many years vacant, there was a CrossFit business they occupy the facility for a few years they actually went through a site plan amendment process because of the change of use, and now the property was for lease again it was vacant and John who is is leasing the property to operate his out of mobile repair business. So, just to cover the zoning, so
[00:23:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
there's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:10–00:23:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:23:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
zoning is general commercial, and it is compatible with all the
[00:23:14] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:14–00:23:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Boulevard and
[00:23:18] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:18–00:23:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:27] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
so just to give some background information that I did so the building is about
[00:23:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:32–00:23:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:34] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
is around half acre. So, when the special reception, we, in your staff report, we have to do an analysis for criteria that meets the special reception, and the criteria that follows our code actually involves ingress, the
[00:23:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:23:52–00:23:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
there will be the access, the parking, refuse areas and services, you know, there will be your trash collections, utilities, screening, ‸ buffering, signs, yards and open space, if any, if when applicable, heights, landscape, renewal and termination and if it's compatible with the surrounding areas.
[00:24:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
So I pick a few of those
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:15–00:24:18 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:24:18] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:18–00:24:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
go over with you that
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:19–00:24:21 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:24:21] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:21–00:24:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:23] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
the most important.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:22–00:24:24 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:24:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:24–00:24:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
first one is parking. So the site has direct direct access to North Cocoa Boulevard. That is a major arterial roadway. It has adequate access for either vehicles of emergency or any kind. You actually have two points of access in the property, as you can see.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:24–00:24:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:24:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:44–00:24:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the property has about roughly 10 parking spaces and two handicapped spaces. They're like delineated as you can see on top of your screen. We believe that this use is not going to create any major traffic for the area since it's a small business with only two employees. So we don't anticipate any traffic intensity in the area. ‸ We do have environmental concerns as you may recall from previous special exceptions for similar business. ‸ We do have a few requests that the applicant will have to meet. So he is not operating the business yet. The business is not open. He is waiting for his ‸ special reception approval. And then he has ‸ to go through a site plan amendment process. Because in our code there is a change of use. And every time there is a change of use the business is required to go through a site plan process. To see if there is any special considerations that needed to be taken. And in this situation the environmental is one. Because
[00:25:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
he's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:57–00:25:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:25:58] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
going to probably do ‸ with chemicals, fluids, oils and it's going to be changed. His business tax receipt probably will require him to have ‸ all the license.
[00:26:08] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:08–00:26:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
sellers.
[00:26:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:13–00:26:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:26:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the one who review this type of business. They look for compliance. How the oils is
[00:26:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
the dispose
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:19–00:26:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:26:20] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
the store. And so
[00:26:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
we're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:22–00:26:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:26:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
going to be looking to see this more detailed review after he gets his special reception approved. So here is just to add. We also require that he does follow FDEP. Sometimes ‸ FDEP has regulations for car washes or auto repairs. He is just following state regulations.
[00:26:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:44–00:26:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
We are ‸ going to ask during the site plan process that he will follow with them. To see if
[00:26:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
there's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:55–00:26:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:26:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
any special requirements for this property. So we are asking for the environmental portion to be a condition of approval for the special reception.
[00:27:07] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:07–00:27:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
And he has not proposed landscapes for the property. We will have to contact the actual property owner since
[00:27:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:16–00:27:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
just leasing.
[00:27:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:17–00:27:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:23] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
But we do have language that does require ‸ some type of screening or trees. Every five foot that should be ‸ at the front portion of the property. The major issue that we encounter most of the time. When we
[00:27:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:39–00:27:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Is the irrigation. Some of these properties were built in the 60s and the 50s. And sometimes the cost for them ‸ to actually make the connection. To the reclaimed water for irrigation is really high. So it's hard for us sometimes to impose landscape requirements. When there is no way for the tenant or the property owner to keep. You know. Spend them. To have the financial investment to spend in irrigation. And then have to maintain the landscape in the property. So that's the major challenge that we have. When we see business that come to us. To try to comply with that portion of the code. So we do recommend approval. For the special exception request. And we have some conditions. That we ‸ like to ask the board to take in consideration. So the special exception shall not be effective. Until the applicant secure all the permits and approvals necessary. For any redevelopment. In this case. In this situation. And also with the condition. That he will have his site plan amendment approved. In a matter of within six months. So his next step will be the site plan. Amendment approval.
And
then from that he can get his business tax received.
[00:29:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:05–00:29:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:05–00:29:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Another condition. If is the use of the extended. Enlarged or expanded. Additional special
[00:29:15] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
reception
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:15–00:29:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
approval. Shall be required.
[00:29:18] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:18–00:29:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That we are attaching. With your agenda package.
[00:29:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:22–00:29:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That should be binding up with the applicant. And if there is minor modifications. That could be acceptable. Because he still has to go through the site plan. Process review.
[00:29:35] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:35–00:29:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:39–00:29:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As long as minor. But we don't foresee anything. Major
[00:29:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
since it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:44–00:29:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is a existing structure. All the automotive repair activities. Shall be conducted entirely. Within enclosed structures. So our code actually requires. The automotive. Automotive repair to be indoors.
We
do not allow automotive repairs outdoors. So for we are reinforcing. Here. By stating that. So if there is any activities. On the outside. He will be in violation.
Of
not just the special reception. But our code as well.
[00:30:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:16–00:30:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Including any applicable automotive repair registrations. The applicant should demonstrate compliance. With
[00:30:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
our
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:29–00:30:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
applicable environmental ‸ regulations.
[00:30:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:32–00:30:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the site plan review process. Subject to review and approval.
[00:30:36] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:36–00:30:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Reclaimed water environmental division. This shall include. Probably handling storage. And disposal. Automotive fluids. And related materials. As ‸ well as any
[00:30:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
require
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:46–00:30:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Pretreatment or containment system. I believe the. The reclaim water. A department. They do have requirements. For in case. To avoid spills.
[00:30:59] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:59–00:31:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have to say. But they do have. Some guidelines that they follow. When they review this type of business.
Also the applicant should
be.
[00:31:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:09–00:31:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Environmental protection regulation. Regarding the storage handling. Disposal of hazard materials. Outdoor storage. Of inoperable vehicles. Automotive parts. Or hazard materials. Should be prohibited. Unless
[00:31:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
screened
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:26–00:31:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And
approved. Through the site plan review.
‸ So
we try to set. This
[00:31:30] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
as
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:30–00:31:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a condition. To avoid. Having cars. Stores. For long. Cars that. Might not. Be drivable. Or for a long. Extended period. Or maybe car parts. Or anything related. To this type of business. So he would be. If something happens. In the future. He will be in violation.
Of
his special
[00:31:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:52–00:31:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So failure. To comply with this condition. Should be grounded. For grounds. For revocation. Of the special reception. And then any other. Conditions.
That
the board. Feels is.
[00:32:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:09–00:32:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reasonable. To ask.
We
can add as well. Or we can modify. This conditions. The applicant is here. If you have any questions. Related to his business.
Thank you Lucy.
[00:32:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
You're welcome.
One quick question.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:21–00:32:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
It should be part of the package. Is the. Is actually the.
The
site plan?
[00:32:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Yeah.
[00:32:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
it's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:29–00:32:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:32:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
actually this. Yeah. The same. As I showed. That picture. Should be the same. I see the zoning. This one right here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:38–00:32:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh. It's not in there?
[00:32:40] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:40–00:32:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. I just was looking for.
I
didn't see it in there.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:49–00:32:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:32:53] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Oh yeah. That's not it. Okay.
[00:32:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:55–00:32:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Let's see. Let's look at the agenda.
Mr.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:58–00:32:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Would you like to. Say anything. Or. Or you're fine. Okay.
I do have one
question. Okay. Yeah. Any questions?
Yeah. Lucy. You mentioned that. I think it was the last. Exception. About timing. ‸ Outdoor storage. Yes. So what is that? So what is the period of time for that? Is it a week? Is it a day? Is it hours?
[00:33:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
We don't actually have that language in our code.
[00:33:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:33–00:33:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I guess my question is then. How would it be enforced? Because the applicant needs to understand that. So if he has a couple of cars that he's waiting on parts and they're not drivable and they have to be stored inside and only has two bays, then he's not going to have a tow truck on site to every day move two or three cars out of a bay to put them outside and every afternoon have to put them back inside. ‸ So, you know, I don't know how many cars a person does in a day. But when you say that, you know, there's a period of how long they can stay out, I think the applicant needs to understand what that is before the neighbors start to call. Because we all know the neighbors are going to call at some point. Right? So,
yeah. Is it practical, right, that he can even have stuff stored behind it or what?
Right. So he needs to understand what does he need to do? Does he need to park them behind the building and put in shrubs so that they're not seen and that's acceptable?
[00:34:40] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:40–00:34:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Maybe he can help answer that question. But there is an area behind the building that is fenced in. I know code enforcement normally, as for what I've seen ‸ from past cases, they look to make sure the car has a license plate, a valid tag,
[00:35:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:01–00:35:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:03–00:35:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
of, you know, deterioration that shows that the vehicle was parked there for a long time. But ‸ we don't have ‸ that language in our code that actually sets a specific time frame.
Yeah, if you could swear in real quick and just answer that,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:20–00:35:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be great.
I
just want to
be fair.
Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? I
do.
Thank you.
Yeah, there's a gate right in the back of the building. And it's kind of like a U-shape and then goes ‸ up to the front. And actually, you cannot see ‸ from the back because that's the railroad track. So, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:44–00:35:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then if we have to, you know, ‸ put something on a fence to make it easier or nobody can see it, it's fine, too. But, I mean, I don't, that's it. I'm
just asking a question for your fairness. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:01–00:36:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
You
don't want to open your business and you have two cars out there that need, I don't know, a whole new transmission. Definitely. Yeah, definitely.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:09–00:36:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Right. And then code enforcement show up and say, hey, you can't have these cars. Yeah. Okay. So, yeah.
Thank you very much. I heard. I just want to make
sure it's clear so that it's on record for you. ‸ Thank you very much. You're welcome.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:25–00:36:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:26] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:36:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:36:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:55–00:36:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:36:55] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:36:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I see what you mean.
You can
propose to install a fence.
I
understand. Thank you. ‸ Okay.
I'm
not exactly sure who the owner is, but I would like to question any type of landscaping that needs to be put in the front of the building because that's
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:13–00:37:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think. And also, maybe if you want to do landscaping in the back or eliminate that requirement because in the front is ‸ not going to be really beneficial. It's not going to enhance the property that I can see from
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:37–00:37:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:38–00:37:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so, I'd like for some leeway to be given on that requirement
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:49–00:37:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to be onerous potentially to the owner and certainly to somebody who's trying to run a business, not water plants. Yeah.
So, the ‸ previous special receptions that were granted or taking consideration for this type of business,
[00:38:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:06–00:38:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of most of them located in front of the base, the working base, to try to give some screening from ‸ the visual for this intensity sometimes from having these repairs. I have to say that for what I've seen,
you
know, like we don't really have a lot of requirements in our code that, you know,
[00:38:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:41–00:38:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
would force or obligate the property owner to do it. As I mentioned,
you
know, the irrigation, it is a problem because we don't force them to install irrigation
[00:38:52] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:52–00:38:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
actually changed in this situation.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:00–00:39:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:02] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
But we will make a note. I'll make a note of that. Especially
with the size of the lot.
Yes, it is a small lot.
Yeah. This one seems pretty easy to me, but
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:12–00:39:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the north as a motorcycle
[00:39:22] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
repair?
Yeah. ‸ So, it's a very similar approval ‸ here.
Yes, it is. It's the same situation. And what ‸ the property owner did, she installed, she actually planted plants, like small brushes throughout the property. She didn't understand what the meaning of the screening meant. She still didn't get her
[00:39:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:39:44–00:39:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
She got actually an extension for her site plan approval. But the struggle that we had actually with that, it was the accessory structure. Because we don't have, because it seems, I don't know if you all noticed, that there is a shipping containers that lately has been used as
[00:40:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:06–00:40:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
structure. And we don't have actually language that regulates those.
[00:40:12] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:12–00:40:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that specific property owner has one that was ‸ installed at her property after the special reception.
Any other questions from the board to the applicant or to Lucy? Yeah, I got one.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:31–00:40:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as, like, you specialize in transmission or just in general?
In
general.
All of it?
okay.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:43–00:40:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
All right. Thank you.
Thank you very much. Thank
you.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:51–00:40:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Move to approve this special exemption as written.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:59–00:41:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
With all the conditions. Right. Yeah. I think ‸ that's just standard now, right? Like, it's always with you.
We have a second already?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:12–00:41:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? All right. It passes. Thank you very much. Thank you. Good
luck.
The only other thing on our agenda here is the annual election. I don't remember how we did that last time.
Just open the
floor for nominations.
I would like to nominate the current chair and vice chair to remain in their positions. That would be Dan and Robert.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:41:50–00:41:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Can we just ask for a quick break? Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:41:59–00:42:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:59] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I'd like to make a motion for a... A break.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:10–00:42:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 (introduced as “Lucilene Ribeiro” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay. All in favor? Aye.
Aye. Any opposed? Break passes. What else do we do?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:18–00:42:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:19–00:42:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I second. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? All right.
Congratulations.
Thank you. All right. Other business? Do we have any other business? I don't think so.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:41–00:42:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So a motion to adjourn.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:49–00:42:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
All in favor?
Aye. Any
opposed? We will adjourn. Thank you guys very much.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:59–00:43:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]