[00:00:00] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:00–00:00:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:03] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:00:08] Speaker 2
Okay, good evening.
[00:00:09] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:00:10] Speaker 2
call this meeting to order
[00:00:11] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:11–00:00:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:22] Speaker 2
Okay, so,
[00:00:23] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:23–00:00:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:27] Speaker 2
Who's going to read the? Oh,
[00:00:28] Speaker 3
sorry. So ‸ this is Payne Fink. He is our redevelopment coordinator. He's actually going to be assisting us tonight as the recording secretary, and he'll be doing the swearing-in
[00:00:40] No voice detected
as well.
[00:00:41] Speaker 2
Okay. All right. Okay. Mr. Fink, would you please proceed with roll call?
[00:00:50] Speaker 1
Yes, sir.
[00:00:51] Attribution uncertain
Mr.
[00:00:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Roberts. Mr. Otero. Here. Mr. Brown. Miss Scott.
[00:01:00] No voice detected
Here.
[00:01:00] Speaker 1
Mr. Muir.
[00:01:01] Speaker 4
Here.
[00:01:02] Speaker 1
Miss Weatherspoon. Mr. Pockin.
[00:01:05] Speaker 4
Here.
[00:01:06] Speaker 1
Miss Hatcher.
[00:01:07] Speaker 2
Here.
[00:01:08] Speaker 1
Mr. Zimmerman.
[00:01:14] Speaker 2
Mr.
[00:01:14] Attribution uncertain
McClendon. Okay.
[00:01:15] Speaker 2
Would anybody like to do invocation? Any volunteers? Going once, going twice? All right, I'll do it really quick. Okay. Good evening, everyone. Let's bow our heads. Thank you, Lord, for giving us this opportunity. Give us the wisdom to make the right decisions. Amen.
[00:01:36] No voice detected
Amen.
[00:01:38] Speaker 2
Let's do the Pledge of Allegiance, please. Okay. Anybody begin it? I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, for liberty and justice for all. Thank you. Okay.
[00:02:11] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:11–00:02:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:14] Speaker 1
Yes, sir.
[00:02:14] Speaker 2
Mr. Fink, would you please swear the officers in, please? Yes, sir.
[00:02:22] Speaker 1
You swear to tell the truth? Nothing but the truth. So I hope you got it. I do.
[00:02:31] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:02:35] Speaker 2
All right. Before we move forward the agenda, we've got the minutes, regular minutes of October 15, 2026. Can I get a motion to approve?
[00:02:50] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Mr. Chair, there is a few adjustments to make.
[00:02:53] Speaker 2
I'm sorry?
[00:02:54] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
There are a few adjustments to make with compliances. ‸ For
[00:02:58] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the?
[00:02:59] Speaker 3
For the cases.
[00:03:01] Speaker 2
Gotcha. Okay. Go ‸ ahead, please.
[00:03:04] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ Okay. So
[00:03:04] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:04–00:03:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:06] Speaker 2
Okay.
[00:03:07] Speaker 3
Case number three is tabled. Case number four is complied. And then noncompliance case number one has also complied.
[00:03:20] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:20–00:03:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:22] Speaker 2
The
[00:03:22] Speaker 3
noncompliance case number one.
[00:03:25] Speaker 2
It has complied?
[00:03:26] Speaker 3
Yes.
[00:03:38] Speaker 2
Okay. With the amendments, could I get a motion for our regular meeting October 15, 2026?
[00:03:46] Speaker 4
Make a motion.
[00:03:48] Speaker 2
Go ahead, sir.
[00:03:50] Speaker 4
To approve the minutes.
[00:03:55] Speaker 2
Approve the agenda.
[00:03:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:56–00:03:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:56] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:58] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. Uh, let's see here.
[00:04:03] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:03–00:04:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:06] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:04:07] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it wrong. ‸ The agenda. Motion ‸ to approve the agenda. Thank you.
[00:04:11] Attribution uncertain
Take it
[00:04:11] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
back. Okay. Okay.
[00:04:18] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:18–00:04:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:20] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:04:21] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:04:22] Speaker 2
Those against it. Okay.
[00:04:24] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:24–00:04:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:26] Speaker 2
Okay. So
[00:04:27] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:27–00:04:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:30] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:30–00:04:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:35] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:35–00:04:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:41] Speaker 2
I second. Okay. We have a motion to approve
[00:04:45] Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:45–00:04:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:04:46] Speaker 2
a second.
[00:04:46] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:46–00:04:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:49] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:04:49] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:04:50] Speaker 2
Those against it. Okay. Motion passes. Okay. Um, Ms. Jennifer, could you please submit the document packet?
[00:05:01] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:01–00:05:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:02] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:03] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:05:05] Speaker 3
documents for each case into the record.
[00:05:07] Speaker 2
Thank you. Okay. All right. So first case is complied. Let's go to case number two, CE 26-16.
[00:05:25] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
All right. Good evening. This will be my case, case 26-16. I'll be presenting.
[00:05:32] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:32–00:05:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:35] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
Property owner is Tom Andrew Dixon. Violations are, uh, chapter six, section 6901 accumulation, chapter six, section 61001
[00:05:46] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:46–00:05:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:49] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
City code appendix A, chapter 12 reference local business tax, section 1211 and section 6902 regarding, uh, discarding junk, inoperable, or abandoned motor vehicles. Property owner did allow for the following violations under section 6901 for accumulation. The accumulation in this instance is regarding overgrowth of, uh, grass and debris, which you'll see in the photos. The property owner also did allow for section 61001 reference exterior property areas. G, accessory structures. And this is in regards to the fence, which will be shown in the photos. Zoning appendix A, this is reference to the local business ‸ tax receipt. And in this case, it is a rental property. So it's regarding the property owner not having a rental, uh, BTR
[00:06:44] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
associated with the property.
[00:06:48] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:48–00:06:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:56] Speaker 7
And for this case, it's going to be showing two vehicles with expired tags. Case summary on February 3rd, 2026.
[00:07:07] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:07–00:07:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:07:07] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:07:09] Speaker 7
this came from a previous code officer. Officer Winnington noticed that the property was still in violation. She had previously looked at it. Uh, April 29th, an amended notice of violation was mailed. June 16th, 2026,
[00:07:22] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[00:07:23] Speaker 7
the
[00:07:23] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:23–00:07:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:26] Speaker 7
July 24th, I assumed responsibility of the case. ‸ I reached out to the property owner at the number, which I redacted the last four.
[00:07:33] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:33–00:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:35] Speaker 7
I left a text, uh, ‸ was hoping to hear back from him. ‸ Property owner did call me, ‸ stated he would take care of it.
[00:07:41] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:41–00:07:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:44] Speaker 7
Uh, August 12th, I reached out to the property owner, ‸ left a voicemail again. I inspected it. And as of that day, it was still in violation. August 26th, I spoke with the property owner, Mr. Dixon. ‸ He stated he was in the area and he was going to stop by the property. He was going to have someone take care of the grass, um, and have
[00:08:05] Attribution uncertain
the property.
[00:08:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:05–00:08:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:05] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:08:07] Speaker 7
September 2nd, after inspecting the property again, the fence was a dirt broken. I amended the notice of violation to include the fence.
[00:08:14] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:14–00:08:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:20] Speaker 7
October 2nd, property was posted with the notice of hearing. October 15th, today, the property remained in violation.
[00:08:30] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:30–00:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:30] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:08:30] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:08:31] Speaker 7
January 29th. It shows the, it's a corner side lot, the overgrowth. This goes up to June 23rd.
[00:08:42] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:42–00:08:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:46] Speaker 7
is expired. The car on the right, you'll see in a later photo, is also expired. This is some of the debris in front of the carport and on the side, the tires, the miscellaneous automotive parts. This is the other side of the property, if you're looking at it on the left side, part of the ‸ yard, the broken fence, and you can see into the backyard where there's debris and the grass is overgrown.
[00:09:17] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
there's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:17–00:09:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:09:17] Speaker 7
another
[00:09:18] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:18–00:09:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:23] Speaker 7
This is when the property was posted with
[00:09:25] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:25–00:09:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:09:26] Speaker 7
notice of hearing on October 2nd. The notice of hearing affidavit of posting. The receipt for the notice of hearing being mailed. So, this is the yard as of today. The violation regarding the front yard was the only thing that had been complied with.
[00:09:48] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:48–00:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:50] Speaker 7
So, the only thing that seemed to have been complied with was the overgrowth in the front yard being
[00:09:55] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
mowed.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:55–00:09:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:09:57] Speaker 7
There's the right photo of the car on the right with the expired tag.
[00:10:01] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:01–00:10:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:04] Speaker 7
The Virginia tag expired 2019.
[00:10:09] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:09–00:10:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:10] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:10:10] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:10:12] Speaker 7
And those are from today.
[00:10:15] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:15–00:10:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:23] Speaker 7
Staff recommends that the Code Enforcement Board find the property in violation and order the owner to bring it into compliance on or before November 19, 2026, which is 35 days. If the compliance deadline is not met, staff recommends imposing a daily fine not to exceed $250 per violation per day. And we're available for questions. And the property owner is not here.
[00:10:50] Speaker 2
And you have talked to them?
[00:10:52] Speaker 7
I've talked to
[00:10:53] Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized
him
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:53–00:10:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:10:53] Speaker 7
quite a bit. He also owns additional properties in the city.
[00:10:57] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:57–00:10:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:59] Attribution uncertain
He's
[00:10:59] Speaker 7
tried to get things accomplished. I know it's a renter. I've never got to speak to the renter. He has. So I don't know if it's an issue of him having problems getting the renter to work with him. But he ‸ didn't say whether he would be here or not. So ‸ that's pretty much all I have.
[00:11:16] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
So those vehicles are from the renters or
[00:11:18] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
yes
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:18–00:11:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:19] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
Okay.
[00:11:21] Speaker 6
Can I ask...
[00:11:23] No voice detected
I
[00:11:23] Speaker 6
guess I just don't understand. What is the business that they're doing? You're saying no business tax receipt. ‸ What business do they
[00:11:31] No voice detected
have?
[00:11:31] Speaker 7
The owner owns it and he rents it out as a rental property. And as a rental property, he's required to have a rental VTR associated with it. And it was checked as of today and he does not have one. Okay.
[00:11:50] Speaker 2
Any other questions from the board?
[00:11:54] Speaker 5
Mr. Chairman, or
[00:11:55] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:55–00:12:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:04] Speaker 5
of $250. If that's what you, the board chooses to do, that is not a recurring one.
[00:12:10] Speaker 4
Okay.
[00:12:21] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:21–00:12:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:21] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:12:24] Speaker 2
needed to get a...
[00:12:26] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:26–00:12:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:27] Speaker 2
BTR?
[00:12:28] Speaker 7
The BTR was on the original notice. The only amendment was when the fence was added.
[00:12:35] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:35–00:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:40] Speaker 7
months for the BTR.
[00:12:44] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And am I trying to provide an excuse or... It looks like
[00:12:48] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:48–00:12:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:50] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:12:51] Speaker 2
Would it be possible maybe he'd... That BTR notice wasn't clear? Because that...
[00:12:57] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:12:57] Speaker 2
mean, he's got a lot of violations.
[00:12:59] Speaker 7
Well, it was laid out in the notice that... Yeah. And the deputy director has it.
[00:13:04] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:04–00:13:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:06] Speaker 7
has no rental business tax receipt. In parentheses, BTR. And then it lays out the city code that it references.
[00:13:19] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. Any further questions? Okay. Could I get a motion? And if you want to practice, if you're new, I'd recommend... I highly suggest to practice down.
[00:13:47] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Hey,
[00:13:47] Attribution uncertain
you
[00:13:47] Speaker 2
gotta get in there.
[00:13:49] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:49–00:13:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:50] Speaker 2
Okay.
[00:13:51] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Based on the evidence and the testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find respondent in this case in violation of city code as charged. And that respondent shall correct violations no later than 4 p.m. on November 9th. Was that
[00:14:11] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:11–00:14:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:13] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:14:14] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:14–00:14:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:14] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:14:17] Speaker 2
Don't we do it one day before?
[00:14:20] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
November 18th. My apologies.
[00:14:23] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:23–00:14:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:24] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
I apologize.
[00:14:24] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:24–00:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:25] Speaker 4
In the event a respondent does not comply by the state, after considering the factors in section 162.09 Florida statutes, a fine in the amount of $250 per day.
[00:14:40] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It's a flat. It's a flat.
[00:14:42] Speaker 4
So that's ‸ $250.
[00:14:46] Speaker 2
Fine.
[00:14:47] Speaker 4
Fine for the BTR and $250 per day for the other violations. Will be imposed for each day the violation continues past the aforestated date.
[00:15:01] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:01–00:15:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:06] Speaker 4
to verify the compliance with this order.
[00:15:12] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:12–00:15:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:13] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:15:13] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:15:14] Speaker 2
Okay. We have a motion with the first and a second. Um, those that are in favor of the motion say aye. Aye. Aye. Those against it. Okay. Motion passes.
[00:15:28] Speaker 5
Yes. So, and just to, for the record, to clarify $250 for the per day for the other three violations. Correct. Thank ‸ you.
[00:15:40] Speaker 4
$250 one time for the BTR.
[00:15:43] Speaker 5
Correct. And yes.
[00:15:49] Speaker 2
One second. Okay.
[00:15:57] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:57–00:16:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:03] Speaker 2
Is that tabled? Am I reading the wrong one? I'm sorry.
[00:16:12] No voice detected
That one?
[00:16:13] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:13–00:16:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:15] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:16:16] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:16] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
is the
[00:16:16] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
table
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:16–00:16:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:16:17] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
Okay.
[00:16:18] Speaker 3
The next one will be 1930 Ivy Drive.
[00:16:22] Speaker 2
Number five. Gotcha. Number five. Okay. Next case.
[00:16:26] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:26–00:16:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:34] Speaker 2
The
[00:16:34] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
respondent is First Key Homes, presented by myself.
[00:16:39] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:39–00:16:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:46] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
61003A, B, and F. Property owner did allow for the following violations. City Code, Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction, and Property Regulations, Article 3, Property Maintenance Standards, Section 6-1003, Exterior Structure. A, Generally, the exterior of
[00:17:14] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:17:14] Speaker 8
structure shall be maintained in good repair, structurally sound, and sanitary so as not to pose a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare. B, Protective Treatment. All exterior surfaces, including but not limited to doors, door and window frames, cornices, porches, trim, balconies, desks, fences, shall be maintained in good condition. Exterior wood surfaces, other than decay resistant woods, shall be protected from the elements and decay by painting or other protective covering or treatment. Peeling, flaking, and chipped paint shall be eliminated and the surfaces repainted. All siding and masonry joints, as well as those between the building envelope and the perimeter of the window, doors, and skylights, shall be stabilized and coated to inhibit ‸ future rust and ‸ corrosion. Oxidation stains shall be removed from the exterior surfaces. Surfaces designed for stabilization by oxidation are exempt from this requirement. F,
[00:18:23] Attribution uncertain
exterior
[00:18:25] Speaker 8
walls. All exterior walls should be free from holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials and maintained weatherproof and properly surface coated where required to prevent deterioration.
[00:18:40] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
Case summary on March
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:18:40–00:18:43 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:18:43] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:43–00:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:44] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
2026, City of Cocoa
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:18:44–00:18:46 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:18:46] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:46–00:18:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:48] Speaker 8
to the attention of Officer Whittington.
[00:18:51] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:51–00:18:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:55] Speaker 8
a notice of ‸ violation. On July 24, 2026, this case was signed to me.
[00:19:03] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:03–00:19:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:08] Speaker 8
obtained for the property, resolving one violation. On August 21, 2026, I sent two emails to the property owners requesting updates. One came back with an auto reply. The other email said the issue was brought to management who would contact the vendor for repairs. It said they would provide me with an update shortly, and they did not.
[00:19:33] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:33–00:19:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:36] Speaker 8
to the property owner who came back with an auto reply message.
[00:19:40] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:40–00:19:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:45] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:45] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:45] Speaker 8
came out and spoke with me. She said someone had come out about a month ago to do an estimate. That was all she knew.
[00:19:54] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:54–00:19:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:57] Speaker 8
of hearing via certified mail, posted copies at City Hall and on the property. There has been no additional communication with the property owners.
[00:20:09] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:09–00:20:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:16] Speaker 8
receipts plus the Green Court. This is a picture of the posting on the property.
[00:20:24] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:24–00:20:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:30] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:20:30–00:20:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:33] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:33–00:20:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:40] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:20:41] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:20:43] Speaker 8
is the side going towards the back of the property. It was also taken in September.
[00:20:52] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:52–00:20:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:00] Speaker 8
Staff recommends that the Code Enforcement Board find the property in violation and order the owner to bring it into compliance on or before November 19, 2025, 35 days.
[00:21:13] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:13–00:21:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:18] Speaker 8
to exceed $250 per violation per day.
[00:21:21] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:21–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:30] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:21:33] Speaker 5
officer?
[00:21:34] Speaker 2
Yes, please.
[00:21:36] Speaker 5
So, with regard to, I believe, the second violation,
[00:21:41] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
okay, there is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:41–00:21:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:21:43] Speaker 5
one regarding oxidation, correct? Which was the second violation?
[00:21:48] Speaker 8
Mm-hmm.
[00:21:49] Speaker 5
And then the third violation, which is subsection F, is related to holes or breaks in the exterior of the surface, correct?
[00:22:00] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes.
[00:22:00] Speaker 5
And so, what is the ‸ issue with the structure that you are finding an issue with for the first violation, which is subsection A?
[00:22:17] Speaker 8
Okay. When ‸ he sent out the notice of violation, it was about
[00:22:22] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:22–00:22:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:25] Speaker 8
not
[00:22:26] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:26–00:22:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:29] Speaker 8
Okay. There appears to be some damage to the roof as well. So, the structurally sound part was in question.
[00:22:37] Speaker 5
Okay. So, the ‸ pictures of, like, the soffits and the eaves are what
[00:22:41] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
you're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:41–00:22:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:22:42] Speaker 5
relying on for that particular violation?
[00:22:45] Speaker 2
Mm-hmm.
[00:22:45] Speaker 5
Okay. Thank you.
[00:22:47] Speaker 2
For number one.
[00:22:48] Speaker 5
Yes. That's what he said for violation, the first one, which is subsection A.
[00:22:58] Speaker 4
Could I ask a question?
[00:23:00] Speaker 8
Yes, sir, please.
[00:23:02] Speaker 4
Is this a rental property?
[00:23:04] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, it is. And there's tenants in the ‸ home at the time.
[00:23:09] Attribution uncertain
That
[00:23:09] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
was
[00:23:09] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
my next question. Yeah. People are actually living there. Yes, they are. And the garage is an attached garage, it appears.
[00:23:19] Speaker 8
Yes.
[00:23:23] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:23–00:23:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:27] Speaker 8
I don't know that it's to that degree, but it definitely needs to be repaired. It's exposed to the weather and creatures.
[00:23:36] Speaker 4
In your view, how much damage is done to the garage?
[00:23:42] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:42–00:23:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:45] Speaker 8
Yes, that's where all the fire was contained, in the garage.
[00:23:50] Speaker 4
Is the roof of the garage open?
[00:23:53] Speaker 8
Did
[00:23:54] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you notice?
[00:23:54] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
There's a section between the block wall and the roof that's open. I
[00:23:59] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
saw that. I'm talking about, is there an open?
[00:24:02] Speaker 8
On top of the roof? ‸ I couldn't see that.
[00:24:05] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Not
[00:24:06] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
from the street, I couldn't tell.
[00:24:07] Speaker 4
I'm trying to figure out, in my own mind, if it's structurally damaged.
[00:24:13] Speaker 6
Can you back up to the pictures?
[00:24:15] Speaker 8
Pardon me?
[00:24:16] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:24:16–00:24:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:18] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:24:25] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:24:29] Speaker 4
That's what I'm looking at.
[00:24:30] Attribution uncertain
Um,
[00:24:33] Speaker 4
this, the picture on the right, you can see
[00:24:38] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:38–00:24:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:41] Speaker 4
Is it burned fairly far in?
[00:24:45] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:45–00:24:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:50] Speaker 8
It's, it's really hard to tell the extent from the outside.
[00:24:55] Speaker 4
Nobody
[00:24:55] Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
let
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:55–00:24:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:24:56] Speaker 4
you in. I understand that.
[00:24:57] Speaker 8
I, the property owner is the only one that could allow me to go in.
[00:25:02] Speaker 4
Okay. The, the owner, do you know if the owner owns multiple properties in the area?
[00:25:15] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:15–00:25:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:24] Speaker 4
And what, what was the message you got? You said that it was a standard.
[00:25:29] Speaker 8
Oh, it was, uh, we, we considered your request and it sent it up the chain. Got it. It was a blanket. Okay. Uh, response.
[00:25:43] Speaker 7
If I may, I also went out and I spoke to
[00:25:45] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:45–00:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:49] Speaker 7
And the tenant told me that she had been told by the property management company that they were aware of it. And they were going to work on it.
[00:25:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:56–00:25:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:56] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:58] Speaker 7
And that she told me there had been nothing done. That they had been out there. Nothing had been done. And, um, she was living there with, I
[00:26:04] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:04–00:26:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:07] Speaker 7
So it was, the damage is extensive. I mean, the pictures only show what it shows, but ‸ the damage is, is pretty extensive.
[00:26:15] Speaker 4
And the fire was March 23rd. Is that when
[00:26:18] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:18–00:26:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:19] Speaker 4
The fire date, March 23rd.
[00:26:22] Speaker 8
Uh,
[00:26:22] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:22–00:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:25] Speaker 8
That's when it was given to, uh, Officer Whittington.
[00:26:29] Speaker 1
So it was before that.
[00:26:30] Speaker 8
Any time before that, yeah.
[00:26:34] Speaker 1
So that's.
[00:26:36] Speaker 6
So can, can, can I ask a question? Who makes the decision on when a home like this is inhabitable? Like you, you shouldn't be living there with children or anybody, period. Who, who makes that decision? Who makes that
[00:26:52] No voice detected
call?
[00:26:52] Speaker 3
That would be either the fire department,
[00:26:54] Attribution uncertain
um,
[00:26:54] Speaker 3
the fire marshal or the building official. Okay.
[00:26:57] Attribution uncertain
Um,
[00:26:57] Speaker 3
this was reported to us by the fire chief. Um, so I'm not exactly sure based on his assessment. Um, but I know that he did report it to us that it had been done.
[00:27:06] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:06–00:27:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:11] Speaker 3
it wasn't taken further, but we don't know that for sure.
[00:27:20] Attribution uncertain
Anybody want to?
[00:27:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
I feel like I have a million more questions that I think need to be answered outside of this board. I would be good with moving forward with a daily fine, but I still feel like there's questions that need to be answered regarding this one, my opinion.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:27:20–00:27:41 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:27:36] Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
Shall we discuss it?
[00:27:38] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
Well, I think it needs to be, I think the fire marshal
[00:27:42] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:42–00:27:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:42] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:42] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:43] Speaker 6
take another look at this and figure out is this something that he's comfortable with code enforcement moving forward? Or is this something that needs to be looked at to have these people moved out of this house?
[00:27:55] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:55–00:28:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:00] Speaker 6
It,
[00:28:00] Attribution uncertain
it,
[00:28:01] Speaker 6
somebody else needs to look into this. You, you have the health of people actually living in this home with the smoke and the damage that's happening.
[00:28:09] Speaker 4
I don't disagree.
[00:28:11] Speaker 2
Yeah, I totally
[00:28:11] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:11–00:28:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:16] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:16] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:17] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:17] Speaker 6
a recommendation to the fire marshal to go back and address it.
[00:28:23] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:23–00:28:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:24] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes,
[00:28:25] Speaker 3
I am going to send an email out to the director and also, um, work towards ‸ the building official and the fire chief to see if we can have them visit again.
[00:28:34] Speaker 2
Okay.
[00:28:34] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:34–00:28:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:40] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:41] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:28:43] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:44] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:28:55] Speaker 6
charged and the respondent shall correct the violations no later than 4 p.m. on November 19th. In the event respondent does not comply by this date after considering the factors in section 162.09 Florida statutes, a fine in the amount of 250 per day per violation will be imposed for each day the violation continues past the aforesaid date.
[00:29:21] Attribution uncertain
The
[00:29:21] Speaker 6
respondents are ordered to contact code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order.
[00:29:31] Speaker 2
Second.
[00:29:32] Speaker 4
I second.
[00:29:35] Speaker 2
Okay. We have a motion. We have a second by Mr. Dick. Or do you want me to do it since I said it first? It doesn't matter?
[00:29:46] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:46–00:29:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:55] Speaker 2
Okay. Motion passes unanimously. Wow. Okay. Next case is CE 26-000074 1303 South Lakemont Drive.
[00:30:15] Speaker 3
Mr. Chair, I would like to address the address and all of the documentation, property ownership in the agenda is correct, except for the requested action and the recommended motion has incorrect address. However, the names that are the property owners are correct. All of the other documentation is correct. Just those two spots where the address is wrong. So it is 1303 South Lakemont and the property owners are here.
[00:30:41] Speaker 8
Okay.
[00:30:41] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
Thank you. The respondents are Ronnie L. Hooks and Mindy
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:41–00:30:49 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:30:49] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:49–00:30:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:49] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
Laws.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:49–00:30:49 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:30:52] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:52–00:30:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:53] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
of City Code Chapter 6, Article 3, Section
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:52–00:30:56 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:30:56] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:56–00:30:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:59] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
and City Code Appendix A, Article 15, Section 2A, Building Permits and Applications. Property owner did allow for the following violations. City Code Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction, and Property Regulations, Article 3, Property Maintenance Standards, Section 6901, 1, Accumulation. All owners, agents, custodians, lessees, and occupants of real property within the city shall, in accordance with the notice set forth in this article, cut and keep cut to a height of not exceeding 12 inches, all weeds, grass, and underbrush on any property owned, controlled, or occupied by them within the city, and shall remove any trash, debris, refuge, filth, junk, appliances, or other noxious matter located upon such property, except that the owners, agents,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:59–00:31:59 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:31:59] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:15]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 00:31:59–00:32:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:15] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
grass, and underbrush on a strip 100 feet wide around the perimeter of such property, which fronts on a public street, drainage, or utility easement, or is contiguous to occupying property, and to remove any trash, debris, refuge, filth, junk, appliances, or other noxious matter on the entire property. Number two, City Code Appendix A Zoning Article 15, Administration and Enforcement, Building
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:32:15–00:32:49 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:32:49] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:49–00:32:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:52] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
and Certifications of Occupancy Section 2, Building Permits and Applications A, No person, firm, or corporation shall commence or cause to be commenced the erection, construction, or alteration of any building, structure, sign, or canopy within the City of Cocoa until an application for a permit, therefore, has been previously filed with the City of Cocoa as provided herein and in the other ordinances of the City, and until a permit, therefore, has first been issued by the City. No person, firm, or corporation shall commence or cause to be commenced any repair to any existing building structure, sign, or canopy in the City of Cocoa until an application for a permit, therefore, has been previously filed with the City of Cocoa as provided herein and by all other ordinances of the City. No repair shall be commenced upon any building structure,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:32:50–00:33:53 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:33:53] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:53–00:33:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:53] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
until a permit, therefore, has been issued by the City of Cocoa in every case where such proposed repairs will exceed $500 in cost. All work done on or pursuant to any building or sign permit issued by the City of Cocoa shall conform to the plans and or specifications, therefore, as approved prior to the issuance of such permit, and any deviation therefrom shall constitute a violation of this code. Case summary. On January 14, 2026, Building Inspector Marco Delano noted that the property owners had built a deck at the front entrance of the house. There was no permit and citizens served, so I sent a notice of violation and posted a copy at City Hall. On January
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:33:53–00:34:45 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:34:45] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:45–00:34:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:45] Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized
I spoke with the property owner, Mr. Hooks.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:34:45–00:34:47 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:34:47] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:47–00:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:51] Speaker 8
it on February 4th Mr. Hooks was granted an extension of the compliance date due to be he was working out of town on February 12th,
[00:35:02] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:02–00:35:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:02] Speaker 8
copy of the notice of violation on the property because the mailed copy had been
[00:35:07] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:07–00:35:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:14] Speaker 8
he
[00:35:14] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:14–00:35:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:15] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:15] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:35:16] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
would need a permit for that as well on April 14th an application for a permit was received extended the compliance date to allow for the review process April 15th planning ‸ zoning sent him a message indicating he could they could not review the application until the application fee was paid. They also requested a survey for the fence and instructed him that the fence and deck would need to be on separate permits. The application fee was not paid, no requested information was submitted, and the permit was denied on April 20th a second application for permit was received planning Zoning requested that the application fee be paid, and additional information was needed. The application fee was not paid, and no requested information was submitted, so the permit was denied. may 11th property owners added a tarp over the deck
[00:36:16] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:16–00:36:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:23] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
been denied June 18th I contacted Mr. Hooks to discuss the violations he indicated he was waiting for July 1st when the new state building code laws would go into effect ‸ I advised him that since violations were already on the property those changes did not apply in this case
[00:36:41] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:41–00:36:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:47] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
the fence to bring the property into compliance and expected that to happen in the next two to three weeks I extended the compliance date two weeks to give him time to do the work on July 13th I spoke with Mr. Hooks requested more time to get the work done I extended the compliance date an additional week on August 13th he stopped me on another street to discuss the case I explained that I could not continue to extend the compliance date without any progress on
[00:37:20] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:20–00:37:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:24] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
‸ on September 14th
[00:37:27] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:27–00:37:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:30] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
did and I explained that if the deck and fence were not dismantled as he had said by the end of the month I would have to present the case before the code board on September 30th
[00:37:42] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:42–00:37:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:47] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
City Hall and on the property
[00:37:51] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
This is a copy of the affidavit of posting
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:37:51–00:37:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:37:54] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:54–00:37:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:56] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
This is the certified mail receipt. It's a picture of the posting on the property. This is a picture of the deck. In question.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:37:56–00:38:11 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:38:11] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:38:11–00:38:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:18] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:38:20] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:38:20–00:38:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:21] Speaker 8
one of the permits. Planning his own, he spelled it out for him that they had to be on separate permits.
[00:38:29] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:29–00:38:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:35] Speaker 8
This is his second one, ‸ same circumstances. This is today, a picture of the deck and a picture of the fence. Staff recommends that the Code Enforcement Board find the property in violation and order the owner to bring it into compliance on or before November 19, 2026, 35 days. If the compliance deadline is not met, staff recommends imposing ‸ a daily fine not to exceed $250 per violation per day. And the property owner is here.
[00:39:18] Speaker 2
Okay. Do you guys want to step forward?
[00:39:22] No voice detected
Yes, sir.
[00:39:26] Speaker 2
And if you allowed Mr. Fink, he's going to swear you in. Are you both going to speak? No, I am. Okay.
[00:39:34] Speaker 1
Do you swear to tell the truth? Nothing but the truth.
[00:39:36] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:36–00:39:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:37] Speaker 2
I do. Okay, sir. Thank you.
[00:39:41] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Okay. On the permit deals, I started doing,
[00:39:44] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:44–00:39:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:46] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:39:48] Speaker 3
say your name and address, please?
[00:39:51] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm Ronnie Hooks.
[00:39:52] Attribution uncertain
The
[00:39:52] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
address is 1303 South Lake Mont Drive, Cocoa, Florida 32922. Okay.
[00:39:57] Attribution uncertain
Initially,
[00:39:57] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
when I started on the porch on the deck, I called City of Cocoa. I asked them about a permit. They said if
[00:40:05] Attribution uncertain
it
[00:40:05] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
was under $2,500 and a
[00:40:09] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:09–00:40:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:11] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:11–00:40:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:15] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Nothing was said about that deck for about four months after it was built. Even after it was said, I come up here, tried to pull a permit. They refused it twice. I did everything they asked me to do.
[00:40:27] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:27–00:40:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:30] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:30–00:40:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:33] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
me with it. She said there's nothing they could do. It's all done on the internet.
[00:40:40] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:40–00:40:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:40] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
do it. So that's what I did.
[00:40:42] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:42–00:40:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:44] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I was working out of town at the time, so
[00:40:46] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:46–00:40:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:48] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I was working in Tampa. Now,
[00:40:51] Attribution uncertain
as
[00:40:51] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
far as the clutter around the side of the house, that's something that comes and goes about weekly because I'm sitting here doing stuff in the garage, taking it out, in, out, and in.
[00:41:01] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:01–00:41:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:04] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I stopped progress on the fence because I was
[00:41:07] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:07–00:41:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:09] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
So this is all really going back to the permit itself. And I've already tried to pull the permits on twice.
[00:41:20] Speaker 2
‸ Officer, could you go back to that picture where the front of the house is? That one. So did I understand you correctly? In order to be for him to be compliant, he's got to tear that down?
[00:41:33] Speaker 8
No, he either had to get a permit or take it down. He, at one point, had told me he would take it down.
[00:41:40] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I did say I would take it down. And then what I was going to do is put it right back up because he said if it was started before the permit or before the deadline of having to have a permit on anything under $7,500, that I'd have to tear it down more or less and then start over.
[00:41:57] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:41:57–00:41:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:59] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Because I've been trying to pull the permit on it.
[00:42:01] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:01–00:42:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:04] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
It's not even attached to the house. It's not supposed to have a permit anyway.
[00:42:08] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:08–00:42:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:13] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:13–00:42:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:15] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
But I'd like for you to understand that the reason why we have code enforcements is so that we could keep our city beautiful.
[00:42:25] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:25–00:42:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:29] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
Does anybody have questions?
[00:42:31] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:31–00:42:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:35] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:42:39] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:42:43] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:42:43] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:42:44] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
They said that part after they had said initially, well, you need to add this to it, add that to it.
[00:42:50] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:50–00:42:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:52] No voice detected
But
[00:42:52] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
you paid the
[00:42:53] No voice detected
permit fee.
[00:42:53] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:53–00:42:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:56] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
thing.
[00:42:57] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:57–00:42:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:58] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I
[00:42:59] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
even caught up here and asked them.
[00:43:00] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's why it's been denied. That's where you're at right now. You need to get your permit approved by paying your permit fee. And they're going to continue to deny it until you actually pay it. You have to pay it or they're going to just keep denying it.
[00:43:14] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Well,
[00:43:14] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:43:14] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
mean, at that time I was working out of town and I couldn't come up here to pay it. I came up here and tried to pay it one time and they said no. And I said I showed them on their laptop that I had theirs where my card was not going through. I actually right there at the glass door on the third floor.
[00:43:27] No voice detected
They don't take payments at the window,
[00:43:28] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
do they?
[00:43:29] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:29–00:43:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:30] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:43:34] Speaker 3
through the permit. Because the application was submitted online, it should have alerted to make a payment. You are able to view your permit, view all the comments, make the payments online. In worst case scenarios, our permit techs do take card information over the phone and put in the information into the permit itself to accept it. I do want to add that it is not even the permit fee, it's the permit application fee. And all the additional reviews that you see actually should not have even been done without that $25 application fee being accepted. So it was not just the application fee that was not paid on both of them. There were questions asking about a survey with survey information that was not done for one of them.
[00:44:18] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:18–00:44:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:23] Speaker 3
it is. But ‸ generally it really was the application fee was not paid for either.
[00:44:27] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, it starts with
[00:44:29] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that application
[00:44:29] Attribution uncertain
fee.
[00:44:29] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:29–00:44:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:32] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:44:32] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
asked them what
[00:44:33] Attribution uncertain
to
[00:44:33] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
do.
[00:44:33] Attribution uncertain
Do you have
[00:44:33] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
another
[00:44:33] Speaker 6
card that you could possibly use?
[00:44:34] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
It's my bank card. It goes through and everything.
[00:44:37] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I don't know. I can't think of why the system is not taking your card.
[00:44:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:42–00:44:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Your
[00:44:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
application's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:43–00:44:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:44:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
not going to get approved until you can pay the fee. So, I mean, at this point, I mean, it is what it is.
[00:44:54] Speaker 2
‸ Yeah. Yeah.
[00:44:58] Attribution uncertain
And
[00:44:58] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
then from the, could you go to the, the dates of events?
[00:45:05] Speaker 8
To
[00:45:06] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
where? To the dates of events.
[00:45:08] No voice detected
The summary.
[00:45:09] Speaker 2
The summary. Thank you. Right here. This is fine.
[00:45:19] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:19–00:45:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:23] Speaker 2
tried to work with you several times.
[00:45:26] Speaker 4
Yeah.
[00:45:27] Attribution uncertain
10
[00:45:27] Speaker 4
months.
[00:45:28] Speaker 2
Yeah. Okay. Um, if, do we have any other questions?
[00:45:34] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I do. Go ahead. Okay. Now I've got pictures of everything on the same street that I'm on. I've talked to every one of these people.
[00:45:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:41–00:45:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:41] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:45:44] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:44–00:45:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:45] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:45–00:45:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:47] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
concentrating on one person on the street instead of each individual person.
[00:45:52] Speaker 2
Okay. Um,
[00:45:54] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Ronnie Hooks” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I mean, I've got pictures right here.
[00:45:55] Speaker 2
That's, I understand that, but you still don't have a permit. You still haven't paid. You still have to pay for your permit. Even if they're concentrating on you, you still have to pay for your permits.
[00:46:06] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:06–00:46:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:46:09] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:46:15] Speaker 4
I'll make a motion based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order. I move to find respondent in this case, in violation of city codes as charged and the respondent shall correct the violations no later than 4 PM on November 19th. And
[00:46:37] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:37–00:46:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:43] Speaker 4
question.
[00:46:44] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:44–00:46:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:45] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:46:49] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
fine in the amount of $250 per day will be imposed for each day in violation.
[00:46:55] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:55–00:46:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:46:56] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:47:00] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:00–00:47:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:07] Speaker 4
with this order.
[00:47:09] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:09–00:47:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:12] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:47:13] Speaker 4
well my comment is 10 months come on
[00:47:20] Speaker 2
okay we have a motion for mr. Mueller in a second
[00:47:34] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:34–00:47:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:38] Speaker 2
Okay. Motion passes unanimous
[00:47:43] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:43–00:47:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:45] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:47:48] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:47:52] Speaker 2
an announcement somebody has an announcement
[00:47:53] Speaker 3
I I do have an announcement
[00:47:55] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:55–00:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:58] Speaker 3
so what I have passed out for you is the Code Enforcement
[00:48:02] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:02–00:48:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:02] Speaker 3
Reduction revenue that we've received over the past month on this began September 17th and
[00:48:07] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:07–00:48:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:48:07] Speaker 3
current as of October 14th with the lien reduction Program, we've
[00:48:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:12–00:48:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:16] Speaker 3
in revenue from older liens. Some of these cases, one is back to 2015. There's a couple from
[00:48:22] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:22–00:48:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:25] Speaker 3
older cases that have had fixed liens on the properties. And with the program that we have, an administrative program to do the lien reduction, we've actually been able to get these through and get these payments in and actually collect a lot of revenue in the past month so I just wanted to share that with you I also wanted to announce that we will be canceling the November and December meetings just for the holidays get everything ‸ to start fresh in the new year. So on the next screen, that it says that the date is actually January 14th
[00:48:57] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:57–00:49:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:00] Speaker 3
2027 thank
[00:49:06] Speaker 2
you okay
[00:49:08] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:08–00:49:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:16] Speaker 2
much I call this meeting to adjourn
[00:49:33] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:49:33–00:49:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording