Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Board Meeting

Date
2026-01-15
Status
Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #1362
Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2026-05-21, pp. 11–14; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2026-05-21, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended. The City has not posted the approved minutes. The approving motion, “to approve to the minutes of January 15, 2026”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2026-06-18 agenda packet (2376_06_18_2026_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 11–14).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (2328_5_21_2026_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 11–14). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Lloyd Roberts, Josue Otero, Sharri Scott, Dik Muller, Gloria Weatherspoon, Jody Hatcher, Thomas Zimmerman
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Listed absent: George Brown
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Jason Brimm (Code Enforcement Officer), Nathan Propst (Code Enforcement Officer), Terra Whittington (Code Enforcement Officer), William Burrows (Code Enforcement Officer), Kristin Eick (City Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary), Jennifer Justiniano (Acting Director), Councilperson Weeks (Code Enforcement Liaison)

Adopted actions (6)

  • to nominate Mr. Roberts for Chairman (moved by Roberts, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 11–14
  • to nominate Mr. Otero for Vice Chair (moved by Otero, seconded by Roberts); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 11–14
  • to approve to the agenda of January 15, 2026 (moved by Scott, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 11–14
  • to approve to the minutes of November 20, 2025 (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 11–14
  • to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 11–14
  • to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 11–14

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2026-05-21, pp. 11–14; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2026-05-21, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended. The City has not posted the approved minutes.

Source: 2328_5_21_2026_Agenda_Packet.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2026-05-21 meeting, packet pp. 11–14; lines 368–558 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes
Meeting Minutes 
January 15, 2026 
 
 
A meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Cocoa was held on Thursday, January 15, 2026, 
in the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed. 
 
OPENING MATTERS: 
 
Chairman Roberts called the meeting to order at 6:01 P.M. The Board Secretary called the roll. 
 
MEMBERS PRESENT: 
 
Lloyd Roberts                                 Chairman  
Josue Otero Vice Chairman 
Sharri Scott Board Member  
Dik Muller Board Member 
Gloria Weatherspoon Board Member 
Jody Hatcher 1rst Alternate 
Thomas Zimmerman 2nd Alternate  
   
MEMBERS ABSENT: 
  
George Brown Jr. Board Member 
  
OTHERS PRESENT: 
 
Jason Brimm Code Enforcement Officer 
Nathan Propst Code Enforcement Officer 
Terra Whittington Code Enforcement Officer 
William Burrows Code Enforcement Officer 
Kristin Eick City Attorney  
Darla Crowl Recording Secretary  
Officer Medina Police Officer 
Officer Shaker #39 Police Officer 
Officer Anderson #22 Police Officer 
 Jennifer Justiniano Acting Director 
 Councilperson Weeks Code Enforcement Liaison 
  
  
   
The Board Secretary swore in all Staff members giving testimony. 
 
NEW BUSINESS: 
 
1. Election of Code Enforcement Board Chairman  
 
Motion by Mr. Roberts, seconded by Mr. Muller to nominate Mr. Roberts for Chairman.  
Vote on the motion carried unanimously. 
 
2. Election of Code Enforcement Vice Chairman 
 
Motion by Mr. Otero, seconded by Mr. Roberts to nominate Mr. Otero for Vice Chair.  Vote 
on the motion carried unanimously. 
 
 


Code Enforcement Board 
Agenda 
January 15, 2026  
Page 2 
 
 
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES: 
1. Approval of Agenda: January 15, 2026 
Chairman Roberts noted changes to the agenda (Items complied, tabled and withdrawn) 
Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Mr. Otero, to approve to the agenda of January 15, 2026.  Vote on the 
motion carried unanimously.  
 
 
2. Approval of Meeting Minutes: November 20, 2025. 
 
Motion by Mr. Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve to the minutes of November 20, 2025.  Vote on 
the motion carried unanimously.  
 
3.   Submit to the record of all documents & notices for all cases on the Agenda.  
 
4.  Officer Brimm introduced 2 new Code Officers to the Board.  Terra Whittington and William Burrows 
 
 
CASES: 
1.  CE-25-1611 – 236 Orange St.      
Tabled. 
 
2.  CE-25-1641 – 115 Stone St. 
 
Code Enforcement Officer Nathan Propst provided an overview of the Case history and presented 
exhibits for the Board’s review. Code Enforcement Officer Propst testified that the Property Owner was in 
violation of Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction and Property Regulations. Article III, Property 
Maintenance Standards. Division 4, General Requirements. Section 6-1001, Exterior Property 
Areas. (I) and Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction and Property Regulations. Article III, Property 
Maintenance Standards. Division 3, Nuisances. Section 6-901, Accumulation. (1) of the City Code.   
 
Code Enforcement Officer Propst requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be 
given until February 18, 2026 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of up to two hundred 
fifty dollars ($250.00) Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction and Property Regulations. Article III, 
Property Maintenance Standards. Division 4, General Requirements. Section 6-1001, Exterior 
Property Areas (I) and up to two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction 
and Property Regulations. Article III, Property Maintenance Standards. Division 3, Nuisances. 
Section 6-901, Accumulation. (1) per day until found in compliance.   
 
Chairman Roberts asked Officer Propst if there had been any contact with anyone at that location.  Officer 
Propst confirmed that no contact had been made except by certified mail which was returned with no 
signature.  Officer Propst explained this property is near City Hall and goes by frequently and has not seen 
anyone for contact.  More discussion amongst the Board members and staff. 
 
Motion by Ms. Scott, seconded by Mr. Muller, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property 
Owner in violation.  Vote on the motion carried unanimously.  
 


Code Enforcement Board 
Agenda 
January 15, 2026  
Page 3 
 
3.  CE-25-1605 – 144 Lynell Ln 
 
Code Enforcement Officer Nathan Propst provided an overview of the Case history and presented exhibits 
for the Board’s review. Code Enforcement Officer Propst testified that the Property Owner was in violation 
of Chapter. 6, Building, construction and property regulations, Article. III, Property maintenance 
standards. Section 6-901. - Accumulation. (1) and Chapter. 6, Building, construction and property 
regulations, Article. III, Property maintenance standards. Section 6-900. - General. (b) (5)   
of the City Code.   
 
Code Enforcement Officer Propst requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be 
given until February 18, 2026 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of up to two hundred 
fifty dollars ($250.00) Chapter. 6, Building, construction and property regulations, Article. III, 
Property maintenance standards. Section 6-901. - Accumulation. (1) and up to two hundred fifty 
dollars ($250.00) Chapter. 6, Building, construction and property regulations, Article. III, Property 
maintenance standards. Section 6-900. - General. (b) (5) per day until found in compliance.   
 
Chairman Roberts had questions for Officer Propst about the extension cord going from property to the 
other.  Officer Propst explained as of the last inspection the extension cord was gone.  Ms. Scott had 
question about the city property and the property the violation was on.  Attorney Eick asked if each violation 
was two hundred fifty dollars fine ($250.00).  More discussion amongst the Board members and staff. 
 
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the 
Property Owner in violation.  Vote on the motion carried unanimously.  
 
4.  CE-25-1566 – 2414 Tulane Dr.  
 
Complied. 
 
5.  CE-25-1565 – 2909 Ithaca Ct.  
 
Complied.  
 
6.  CE- 25-1646 – 1335 W King St. 
 
Complied. 
 
7.  CE-25-739 -126 Orange St 
 
Tabled.  
 
8.  CE-25-740 – 127 Orange St. 
 
Tabled.  
 
 
NON-COMPLIANCE: 
None 
 
Manager Announcements:  
 
None 
 


Code Enforcement Board 
Agenda 
January 15, 2026  
Page 4 
 
NEXT MEETING: 
 
The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on February 19, 2026. 
 
ADJOURNMENT: 
 
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:31 PM. 
 
Approved on this ______ day of ___________________, 2026. 
 
______________________________ 
Lloyd Roberts, Chairman 
 
______________________________ 
Darla Crowl, Recording Secretary 

Agenda (the City's wording)

No time links are shown for this meeting.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

  • 1. Call to Order
  • 2. Invocation
  • 3. Pledge of Allegiance
  • 4. Roll Call
  • 5. Swearing in Officers

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

  • 1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of January 15, 2026.
  • 2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of November 20, 2025.
  • 3. Submittal of Document Packet

III. Cases

  • 1. CE25-1611 / 236 Orange St., Cocoa, FL / Mark Kepic (Kepic Family Revocable Living Trust) property owner of 236 Orange St., Cocoa, FL, in violation of the following City Codes. City of Cocoa Code Chapter. 17 Streets and Sidewalks, Article 1. In General. Section 17-4. – Curb cuts and driveway construction. (a) - Permit required. It shall be unlawful for any person to cut, remove or alter the curb of any sidewalk or of any property line, or of any park, or any curb constructed on or adjoining any street of the city, or to construct any driveway across any sidewalk of the city, without having first obtained a permit from the city manager for such cutting, removal or alteration, or the …
  • 2. CE25-1641 / 115 Stone St., Cocoa, FL / Landscape Unique LLC property owner of 115 Stone St., Cocoa, FL, in violation of the following City Codes. City Code Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction and Property Regulations. Article III, Property Maintenance Standards. Division 4, General Requirements. Section 6-1001, Exterior Property Areas. (i) - Defacement of property. No person shall willfully or wantonly damage, mutilate or deface any exterior surface of any structure or building on any private or public property by placing thereon any marking, carving or graffiti. It shall be the responsibility of the owner to restore said surface to an approved state of maintenance and repair. City Code …
  • 3. CE25-1605 / 144 Lynell Ln., Cocoa, FL / Jerry Pratt property owner of 144 Lynell Ln., Cocoa, FL, in violation of the following City Codes. City Code Chapter. 6, Building, construction and property regulations, Article. III, Property maintenance standards. Section 6-900. - Generally. (b) -General conditions of property which constitute nuisance. (5) Buildings or structures which are boarded up, except when placed for temporary hurricane protection and removed within thirty (30) days. City Code Chapter 6, Buildings, Construction and Property Regulations. Article III, Property Maintenance Standards. Division 3, Nuisances. Section 6-901, Accumulation. (1) - All owners, agents, custodians …
  • 4. CE25-1566 / 2414 Tulane Dr., Cocoa, FL 32926 / DUNN, REESE'S MARY MICHELLE property owner of 2414 Tulane Dr., Cocoa, FL 32926, in violation of the following City Codes. City Code City Code Chapter 6. – Building, Construction and Property Regulations. Article III. – Property Maintenance Standards. Sec. 6-900 (b) - General conditions of property which constitute nuisance. It shall constitute a nuisance for any person, to whom this article is applicable, to permit one (1) or more of the following conditions to exist on real property within the city: (9) - Motor vehicles parked anywhere within the front or corner side yard area, except on city approved and permitted driveways.
  • 5. CE25-1565 / 2909 Ithaca Ct., Cocoa, FL 32926 / Jonathan Dickey property owner of 2909 Ithaca Ct., Cocoa, FL 32926, in violation of the following City Codes. City Code Chapter 6 – Buildings, Construction and Property Regulations, Article III – Property Maintenance Standards, Sec. 6-901 - Accumulation (1) - All owners, agents, custodians, lessees and occupants of real property within the city shall, in accordance with the notice set forth in this article, cut and keep cut to a height of not exceeding twelve (12) inches all weeds, grass or underbrush on any property owned, controlled or occupied by them within the city and shall remove any trash, debris, refuses, filth, junked appliances or …
  • 6. CE25-1646 / 1335 W. King St., Cocoa, FL 32922 / Daniel Carter property owner of 1335 W. King St., Cocoa, FL 32922, in violation of the following City Codes. City Code Appendix A - Zoning, Article XIII – Supplementary District Regulations, Sec. 5 – Visual Screens (Fences, walls, hedges) – (d) General Requirements. Which states: Barbed wire is prohibited in all but industrial zoning districts.
  • 7. CE25-739 / 126 Orange St., Cocoa, FL / Billias Family Trust, property owner of 126 Orange St., Cocoa, FL, in violation of the following City Codes. City Code Appendix A. Zoning, Article. XIII, Supplementary District Regulations. Section 5. - Visual screens (fences, walls, hedges), (d) General Requirements. Which states: Barbed wire is prohibited in all but industrial zoning districts.
  • 8. CE25-740 / 127 Orange St., Cocoa, FL /J.G. Billias and Sons Incorporated, property owner of 127 Orange St., Cocoa, FL, in violation of the following City Codes. City Code Appendix A. Zoning, Article. XIII, Supplementary District Regulations. Section 5. - Visual screens (fences, walls, hedges), (d) General Requirements. Which states: Barbed wire is prohibited in all but industrial zoning districts.

IV. Non-Compliance

V. Manager Announcements

VI. Next Meeting Date: The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on February 19, 2026.

VII. Adjournment


Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:01] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:01–00:01:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:03] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:44 ▶]
[00:00:48] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:00:48] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:22 ▶]
[00:01:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[00:01:18] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:18] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[00:01:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1
allowing us to see another year. Lord, just continue to guide us and bless us and do ‸ best interest for the city of Cocoa.
[00:01:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Jesus' name we pray. Amen.
[00:01:32] ▶ Play Speaker 2
Amen.
[00:01:33] ▶ Play Speaker 1
‸ I have a pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
[00:01:39] ▶ Play No voice detected
United
[00:01:40] ▶ Play Speaker 3
States of America
[00:01:41] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:41–00:01:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3
and justice for
[00:01:49] ▶ Play No voice detected
all.
[00:01:56] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Roll call.
[00:02:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:00–00:02:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:02] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:02–00:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:03] ▶ Play No voice detected
Mr.
[00:02:03] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
Brown.
[00:02:05] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Miss
[00:02:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:05–00:02:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:15] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
I
[00:02:16] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:15–00:02:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4
Do
[00:02:25] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:24–00:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:02:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Alright, ‸ new business. We have elections.
[00:02:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:47–00:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1
year, we have elections. I would like to remain as chair, so I nominate myself. I'll
[00:03:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:05–00:03:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1
on the floor, but now
[00:03:10] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:10–00:03:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:10] ▶ Play Speaker 1
got to put it to a vote. So, I'm sorry, is there anyone else?
[00:03:18] ▶ Play Speaker 5
Mr. Chair, just typically what we would do is make sure there's no other nominations, and then close that portion, just ‸ to be sure.
[00:03:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Yes, ma'am. Are there any other nominations?
[00:03:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
I think
[00:03:34] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:34–00:03:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:03:43] ▶ Play Speaker 1
and so are we good with that?
[00:03:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3
Yes.
[00:03:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1
So is that?
[00:03:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3
You want to do all in favor?
[00:03:53] ▶ Play No voice detected
Okay.
[00:03:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1
All in favor? Aye. Aye. Aye. Move the polls.
[00:04:01] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Motion passes. Okay. It's your point.
[00:04:07] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right.
[00:04:10] ▶ Play Speaker 2
‸ So vice chair. I'd
[00:04:13] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:12–00:04:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:15] ▶ Play Speaker 2
I'll second answer. Is there anybody wants to run against?
[00:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6
‸ I think you're doing a fine job.
[00:04:23] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Thank you. So all in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? Pass unanimous. Thank you.
[00:04:33] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All right.
[00:04:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1
So we're clear to go on, correct? All right.
[00:04:39] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
All
[00:04:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1
right. So we have the agenda for tonight will be amended. So item number one has been tabled.
[00:04:57] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:57–00:05:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:01] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Item
[00:05:02] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:01–00:05:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Item number seven is tabled. Item
[00:05:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:12–00:05:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:15] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:05:15] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:05:17] ▶ Play Speaker 1
So what we have remaining is item number two and item number three. All right. I'll take a motion to approve.
[00:05:32] ▶ Play Speaker 3
I'll motion to approve the motion. The agenda changes.
[00:05:38] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I second. I have a motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed?
[00:05:44] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:44–00:05:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:46] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:46–00:05:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:48] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm sorry.
[00:05:49] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:49–00:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1
I'm
[00:05:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:49–00:05:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1
All right. Going back. Meeting
[00:05:57] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:56–00:05:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:59] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:59–00:06:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:05] ▶ Play Speaker 1
No recommended changes. Take a motion to approve. Motion to approve.
[00:06:13] ▶ Play No voice detected
I
[00:06:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1
have a motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed? Motion passed unanimously, ma'am. All right. It's the middle of our document packet.
[00:06:25] ▶ Play Speaker 7
Mr. Chairman, I would like to submit the PowerPoint presentation and the packet of documents for each case into the record. Also, I'd like to introduce two new code officers to the board. If you all, you can go ahead and introduce yourself.
[00:06:40] ▶ Play Speaker 8
‸ Code enforcement officer Tara Whittington. I'm glad to be here today. It's a pleasure meeting you all.
[00:06:46] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
William Burroughs. Nice to be here. Thank you. Welcome. Welcome. Welcome. Thank you. All right. Document packet has been submitted. So we'll move on. You know, we have such a long agenda here. So, you know, I don't know what we're going to do with all this time. All right. Item
[00:07:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:12–00:07:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:20] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:07:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9
everybody. I'm code officer props. This is for landscape unique LLC address 115 stone ‸ street. Property owner did allow for the following violations city code chapter six building construction and property regulations article three regarding exterior property areas. As well as city code chapter six buildings construction property regulations article three accumulation. Here's
[00:07:50] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:49–00:07:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:53] ▶ Play Speaker 9
That
[00:07:54] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:53–00:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:01] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Here's the first photograph. As you can see, there are some junk and debris accumulated on the side of the building as well as some overgrown grass.
[00:08:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
In
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:12–00:08:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:08:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9
the background there, you can see some graffiti. I'll have a different angle on that here in a second. This was taken November
[00:08:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:17–00:08:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Here's another angle of that graffiti as well as some grass and debris. And this is along the backside of the building. Also taken November
[00:08:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:30–00:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:35] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Here is a pile of debris along the backside of the building. ‸ Appears that someone may be residing there and storing items there during my observations. That's what I've noticed. This was also taken November
[00:08:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:48–00:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:53] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Graffiti on the front door of the building. Also taken November
[00:08:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:56–00:08:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Additional graffiti on the building. And again, taken November
[00:09:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:03–00:09:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9
More graffiti. Same date. Here you
[00:09:15] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:15–00:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9
as the general warranty deed for 115 Stone Street. Here is the Sunbiz for the LLC that owns 115 Stone Street. As you can see, they are inactive admin dissolution for annual
[00:09:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:34–00:09:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Next, on the right side, you will see the tax rolls. And they are paid up to date until 2025. Here's
[00:09:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:45–00:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9
And I
[00:09:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:52–00:09:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:55] ▶ Play Speaker 9
And I completed the affidavit of posting the same day posting it at City Hall. Here's a certified mail receipt for the NOV. And here is a mail return receipt. It was returned to sender. Here's the notice of hearing that I mailed out to the owner and registered agent ‸ 115 Stone Street. I mailed this out on December 31st, 2025.
[00:10:25] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:25–00:10:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9
And I also posted the property. Here's a picture of the posting at the property. And here is a certified mail receipt of the notice of hearing going out to the registered agent. I have not received a mail return receipt at this time. This photograph of the notice of hearing was taken December 31st, 2025. As of today, this morning, or rather this afternoon, all the violations still exist. Still graffiti on the building. There's the front and the side with all the debris that was previously photographed. Here's the same graffiti still existing on the building. And as you can see in this photograph on the right, there appears to be more debris on the backside of the building. Case summary,
[00:11:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:24–00:11:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:25] ▶ Play Speaker 9
I hear this case from Officer Mack. And I
[00:11:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:28–00:11:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9
I went to inspect the property and I found the following violations that were cited. I sent out a letter, or ‸ excuse me,
[00:11:36] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
I
[00:11:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9
sent out a notice of violation and I completed the
[00:11:38] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:11:38–00:11:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:39] ▶ Play Speaker 9
And I
[00:11:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:40–00:11:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Gave
[00:11:45] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:44–00:11:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:47] ▶ Play Speaker 9
And on December 31st, I inspected the property again.
[00:11:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:51–00:11:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:55] ▶ Play Speaker 9
to sender. And as of today, the violations still exist.
[00:12:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:03–00:12:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Staff recommends the code enforcement board find the property in violation. Issue an order requiring the violations to be corrected and assess a
[00:12:14] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:14–00:12:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:18–00:12:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9
2026 at 4 p.m. Staff is available for questions.
[00:12:29] ▶ Play Speaker 1
There's been no contact with anyone at that location?
[00:12:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9
That's
[00:12:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:33–00:12:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9
On some biz, the registry agent is Tom Dixon. I have attempted to mail him both the NOV and the NOH. And
[00:12:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:41–00:12:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9
everything else. And
[00:12:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:45–00:12:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:50] ▶ Play Speaker 1
And no one has been to the business that you know of or been no one has seen anyone there as far as because it just seems like I know they're out of town. But does anyone come
[00:13:05] ▶ Play Speaker 9
check on the property? I'm not sure, sir.
[00:13:07] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
I
[00:13:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9
haven't
[00:13:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:07–00:13:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:09] ▶ Play Speaker 9
And it just seems that the accumulation just gets more and more on the backside of the building. But I haven't seen any movement. I haven't seen anybody go in or out. And
[00:13:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:17–00:13:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:20] ▶ Play Speaker 9
And I drive drive these roads pretty regularly and I don't see any activity.
[00:13:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1
So the biggest issue with this, would that be the accumulation of trash? And I just say that from a standpoint of if there's no one there, someone has been on the property accumulating that trash. Those people, whoever owns it, I'm sure is not doing it. So we see it looks like they're the population of homeless that has accumulated that stuff. So I'm just trying to understand. Is that the biggest issue to this? I understand the visibility of the paint on the ‸ wall and on the door. But again, just recently. Have we talked to anyone at any adjacent properties?
[00:14:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9
I have not, sir. Um, there's a building beside it and I have not made contact with those personnel yet.
[00:14:38] ▶ Play Speaker 1
I just asked because, you know, um, I would think neighbors may have some kind of information of contact. You know what I mean? Uh, questions, comments?
[00:14:54] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:54–00:14:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:14:56] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:15:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6
Mr. Brim, is that something that y'all would normally do is to reach out to ‸ neighbors?
[00:15:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7
It would honestly be a case by case basis. And it's not that we're, it's beyond our scope, but it kind of depends on what we're dealing with at the time.
[00:15:16] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:16–00:15:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:21] ▶ Play Speaker 7
If someone was there, we would
[00:15:23] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:23–00:15:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[00:15:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:15:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:15:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1
Okay. I'll take a motion.
[00:15:39] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:15:39–00:15:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6
as charged and the respondents shall correct the violation no later than 4 PM on February 18th. In the event the respondent does not comply by this date after
[00:16:04] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:04–00:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6
a fine
[00:16:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:08–00:16:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6
each day the violation continues per violation also. The
[00:16:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:16–00:16:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6
The respondent is ordered to contact code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order.
[00:16:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:35–00:16:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
have a motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye. Aye.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:35–00:16:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:16:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:39–00:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:42] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Motion passed unanimously.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:40–00:16:44 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:16:44] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:44–00:16:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:50] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:16:51] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:16:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Next up item number
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:51–00:16:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:16:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:54–00:17:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:02] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[00:17:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:07–00:17:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9
for the following violations. City Code Chapter
[00:17:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:16–00:17:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Construction, and Property Regulations, Article
[00:17:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:18–00:17:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:20] ▶ Play Speaker 9
as well as City Code Chapter
[00:17:22] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:22–00:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Construction, and Property Regulations, Article three
[00:17:25] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:25–00:17:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Maintenance Standards. Here's an aerial view of ‸ Line L Lane. And I would like to note that on the rear of the property, you can see that it abuts city property. Here's our first photograph. As you can see, there's very tall sawgrass in the backyard. Here was some accumulation of items in the backyard. There's also a tent. I also notice wires running in between the units. Here's just a closer photograph of the unit on the left hand side. Here's the border window. It's been boarded. And it's still currently boarded. Here is the Brevard County
[00:18:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:19–00:18:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9
deed for the property.
[00:18:25] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:25–00:18:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9
and 2025 annual tax bills. And on the right hand side, you can see my notice of violation,
[00:18:38] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:38–00:18:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:42] ▶ Play Speaker 9
to the property owner. the
[00:18:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:46–00:18:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9
was posted the same day as the notice of violation was mailed.
[00:18:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:51–00:18:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:53] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
the
[00:18:53] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[00:18:55] ▶ Play Speaker 9
you can see the certified mail receipt and the mail return receipt, which was returned to sender. Here is the notice of hearing on the left, dated December
[00:19:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:08–00:19:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:09] ▶ Play Speaker 9
On the right is an affidavit of a posting, showing that I posted ‸ in City Hall and on the property. It was done the same day. On
[00:19:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:18–00:19:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:23] ▶ Play Speaker 9
On
[00:19:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:23–00:19:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9
notice of hearing mail return receipt, which was signed by Mr. Pratt. These are photographs from today, earlier this morning. As you can see, the sawgrass is still existing. The city has cut the
[00:19:46] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain
property that some
[00:19:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9
of it that was abutting their property, and they try to take care of uh most of their side of it, but the property line does run up to the fence. There are still items in the back. Some of it has been picked up. As you can see right here on the sawgrass, there are still uh it's a lot of homeless activity in ‸ the sawgrass and other activities going on in there. and as you can see on the left hand side of this picture on the right, the city did clear out some of it. Case summary. On November 14th, I conducted an initial inspection of the property. notice an accumulation of junk debris in the grass ‸ the border window. I gave a corrective uh date by December 1st. I sent out the
[00:20:39] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:39–00:20:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9
follow-up inspection. Violations that were originally cited um were still existing, so i corrected the uh I extended the corrective action time and decided to follow up on the property uh 19 december 2025.
[00:20:58] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:58–00:21:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9
was still in violation. I know the NOH, posted the property, and posted it in City Hall. And that's whenever Jerry Pratt eventually signed for his notice of hearing. On this on January 15th, violations still exist on the property.
[00:21:21] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
Yes, that's correct. the The
[00:21:23] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:23–00:21:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:27] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
parcels uh duplex. So basically the violations around that portion of the duplex, I guess ‸ the best way to
[00:21:34] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:21:34–00:21:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:21:35] ▶ Play Speaker 1
so my concern when you said there's wire going from one to the other.
[00:21:45] ▶ Play Speaker 9
Yes, sir, it looked like an extension cord. um When we were there today, I did not see the wire anymore. So it looked like they removed that.
[00:21:56] ▶ Play No voice detected
okay
[00:21:57] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:21:56–00:22:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:02] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:22:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:22:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6
So you're saying on here, Coco has come inside the fence and cleaned up a good portion of that tall grass?
[00:22:20] ▶ Play Speaker 9
That's correct.
[00:22:30] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:30–00:22:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:33] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:22:33–00:22:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:35] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:22:38] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:22:48] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:48–00:22:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[00:22:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:22:57] ▶ Play Speaker 9
correct, sir. He signed for the notice of hearing, but he never contacted our office.
[00:23:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1
any questions
[00:23:09] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
i'd like to make a motion? Yes, sir. Please.
[00:23:12] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:12–00:23:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find a respondent in this case in violation of the city codes as charged, and that the respondents shall correct the violations no later than 4 pm
[00:23:40] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:40–00:23:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:43] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:23:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9
can go forward for you.
[00:23:44] ▶ Play Speaker 2
Thank you. in the event respondent does not comply right by this date after considering the factors in section 162.09
[00:23:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:55–00:24:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2
afforded
[00:24:06] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:24:06] ▶ Play Speaker 2
date. ‸ the respondent is ordered to contact minutes. Next meeting, February
[00:24:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:11–00:24:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:22] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:24:23] ▶ Play Speaker 7
here.
[00:24:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So which
[00:24:24] ▶ Play Speaker 7
is
[00:24:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it?
[00:24:24] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:24–00:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:26] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:24:27] ▶ Play Speaker 7
be my fault. You're correct. It's the 19th. So
[00:24:31] ▶ Play Speaker 2
we need to go back and read
[00:24:32] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:32–00:24:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:34] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[00:24:36] ▶ Play Speaker 2
because we've been saying February 18th.
[00:24:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7
We normally do the compliance dates for the violations the day before. Okay.
[00:24:43] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:43–00:24:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:47] ▶ Play Speaker 7
‸ The violations normally we do prior to the next code
[00:24:50] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:50–00:24:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:52] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:24:52–00:24:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1
There's
[00:24:56] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:24:55–00:24:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:58] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:24:58–00:24:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T13:50:13 · 2,080 ordinary words, 767 in suspect passages, 23 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.