The date is the archive folder's. For a video from the City's channel this is usually the day it was posted, not necessarily the day of the event.
This recording is not attached to a meeting in the meetings list.
The title above is the recording's own. This page does not establish what kind of event the recording is of, and it shows no City record for it.
Other recordings lists the recordings with a machine transcript that are shown on pages of their own; Meetings lists the meetings.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of this recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome.
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube; on this page it moves the player above the transcript.
2 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 1 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 5 voices separated from the audio.
No word has been replaced by anything else.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 95.2% of 206 content words.
Dotted words (8 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
2 passages (8% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (1 stretch). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
00:01:14 (5 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Suspect passages (their words are not shown; listen to the recording):
00:00:12 · 00:00:59
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:12–00:00:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
hard-working people I ‸ have ever met. Incredibly organized, incredibly well managed. I felt the managers were really on top of their game. And, you know, before this, my relationship with my town was more like, please pick up my garbage, please come when I have a fire or an emergency. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:59–00:01:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording