The date is the archive folder's. For a video from the City's channel this is usually the day it was posted, not necessarily the day of the event.
This recording is not attached to a meeting in the meetings list.
The title above is the recording's own. This page does not establish what kind of event the recording is of, and it shows no City record for it.
Other recordings lists the recordings with a machine transcript that are shown on pages of their own; Meetings lists the meetings.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of this recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome.
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube; on this page it moves the player above the transcript.
9 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 3 voices separated from the audio.
1 short machine repair(s) (1 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 98.7% of 669 content words.
Dotted words (5 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
9 passages (12% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
replaced the existing reclaimed waterline system, basically installed the new footing and seawall structure. The concrete pours have been completed to date as of last week. During the demolition phase of the contract, as we were installing the reclaimed water system, we had to,
to verify that they were still intact and what conditions they were in. And one of the things that we did find was that the majority of the tie rods were completely severed or corroded, in which we had to propose to the city to replace and install a complete new tie back system for the new seawall. It did turn out to be approximately
With that being said, we're still on track at this point to finish the project per the initial anticipated completion date, which is currently June 28th. So, provided weather conditions and no tropical systems come through, we are on track to finish the job at that point in time. The final work that's being completed between now and the anticipated completion date are all the finished products for what you can see behind me. The stucco is going on, taking place at this point. We have the platforms being configured, getting ready for the stainless steel cable rail system, as well as at the end, we have to do the final landscaping and sodding and things of that nature. And, of course, the wall structure that you see behind me is not the final product as far as color. It will have a stain coating system on it that's going to basically incorporate with the rest of the riverfront, with the park, so everything will match very well.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:17–00:02:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
provide full view. It's going to be a very big change from the existing timber overlook platforms that had a rail system that was, it pretty much blocked the visibility of the water. And, at the end of the day, the timber structures were deemed unsafe and they were closed off to the public. So, we're excited to be able to construct the new concrete platforms and have folks get out there and actually enjoy the water for what it is. So, with the concrete platform overlook structure, it's going to sustain and withhold much stronger storm conditions, higher surge if it were to happen in this location. And, it's just an overall much better design and ‸ very, very durable structure that will last for years and years here on the riverfront.
[00:03:12]▶ PlaySpeaker 3 (introduced as “Greg Galzerano” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm Greg Galzerano, project manager with C&D Construction. And, we're here at the Cocoa
[00:03:17]▶ PlaySpeaker 3 (introduced as “Greg Galzerano” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:17–00:03:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:20]▶ PlaySpeaker 3 (introduced as “Greg Galzerano” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And, we've installed these floating docks from Bellingham Marine, driven all these piles in to minus 20 feet. Okay, so
[00:03:30]▶ PlaySpeaker 3 (introduced as “Greg Galzerano” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:30–00:03:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:34]▶ PlaySpeaker 3 (introduced as “Greg Galzerano” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
They replaced an old wooden dock they had here before. It's 250 feet long, 10 feet wide. The piles are in the ground 30 feet. They were all driven and jetted.
[00:03:45]▶ PlaySpeaker 1 (introduced as “Samantha Sanger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Both of these projects came about because of Hurricane Irma came through and destroyed all of our facilities here at the waterfront. And, through FEMA funding and fine grants and our CRA, we were able to fund both of these projects.