This recording is not attached to a meeting in the meetings list.
The title above is the recording's own. This page does not establish what kind of event the recording is of, and it shows no City record for it.
Other recordings lists the recordings with a machine transcript that are shown on pages of their own;
Meetings lists the meetings.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of this recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome.
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube; on this page it moves the player above the transcript.
2 suspect passage(s) marked in place.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 1 voices separated from the audio.
No word has been replaced by anything else.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.9% of 42 content words.
Dotted words (2 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
2 passages (43% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Suspect passages (their words are not shown; listen to the recording):
00:00:08 ·
00:00:10
in a strategic planning initiative and crime was one of the issues that we identified as ‸ of a paramount importance. And
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:08–00:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:10–00:00:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Transcript revision built 2026-11-08T10:56:08 · 24 ordinary words, 18 in suspect passages, 0 machine re-recognized.