They were renters, they moved the car and they cut the grass.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:06–00:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:10–00:00:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
problems. Well, I'm going to get something else, but it's going to be maybe a... ‸ Who voted Stanford? ‸ I don't
know.
I
might build it, but
basically
I'd
rather have something.
‸ Hi, Deborah. Well, that's what my wife says.
‸ I'm surprised you haven't seen me.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:52–00:00:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:57–00:01:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
had a house there.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:02–00:01:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No,
I
know. 2807.
But
it handles good.
‸ I
got paid in the early 60s.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:01:12–00:01:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
a black interior.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:13–00:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
But
I think what I'm going to end up doing is selling.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:19–00:01:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For me?
Yeah. I go up to Tennessee. We have a camera up to Tennessee.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:27–00:01:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A little place called Elizabethan, up above Johnson City.
I know they're younger than me.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:34–00:01:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Is that
by...
Memphis? Nashville? No,
no. It's on the... It's
up by...
Oh, it's up in the corner? So it's Knoxville?
No, Knoxville is down below. We're... As
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:50–00:02:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
This is the Code Enforcement Board for the City of Cocoa, July 16, 2015.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:19–00:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
me to pledge the flag.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic ‸ which expands,
one nation, another God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for
all.
Madam Secretary, call the roll please.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:43–00:02:49 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Jim Gifford? Present. George Brown? Present. Michael
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:49–00:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. David Lightholder? Virginia Weaver? Here. Michael
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:50–00:02:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:55–00:03:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
in our officers please?
do you swear your testimony be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you God yes okay
should have everyone should have an agenda in front of them and I have a few changes I'd like to make for the record under cases the following items have complied. Item 1, item 3, item 5, item 7, and item 8. In the non-compliance section of the agenda item number 3 has complied for those changes I'll take a motion
‸ Second.
All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion is passed. The agenda is approved and we have the minutes of our meeting of June the 18th any changes to be noted
I move that we accept the minutes with one amendment and that is adding our two new code officers that were inadvertently left off the list.
‸ they are added they are at
for your copy
my copy that I'm going to sign so motion I need a second second
okay
Motion with a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? ‸ minutes are approved. ‸ who
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:36–00:04:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
good evening mr. chairman
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:58–00:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
do you want me to say the case number mr. chairman you usually do that
oh I'm sorry I'm almost awake yeah first case
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:18–00:05:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Royal [address] Orlando Florida location of violation is
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:31–00:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this property is currently not occupied for the record I'll be submitting five photos from the property of my inspections during my first inspection on June 30th I found the property in violation of section
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:45–00:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
61001 C driveways section 61003 G roofs and drainage and section 61003 M windows this case was initiated by officer Ceruto for the above mentioned violations upon receiving the case
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:04–00:06:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
had been made contact was made with the owner on or approximately
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:14–00:06:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
he requested more time to gain compliance I advise mr. Royal there's been no progress since May when the case began therefore this case had been assigned to the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:25–00:06:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
upon my inspection today the property had been mowed cleared up and at the current time it appeared that some repairs began but the case still remained in violation staff recommended the property owner be found in violation of the above mentioned violations and given until August 19 2015 34 days for a fine of $100 per day shall be imposed until compliance is achieved
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:52–00:06:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the
owners here on his behalf to speak
Okay. Mr. Royal, if you'll come forward to the podium. And you ought to be sworn in, please. Oh,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:59–00:07:10 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:07:11–00:07:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the secretary. Oh.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:07:11–00:07:14 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Do you swear,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 00:07:14–00:07:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
oh Hello.
Hello.
What
are you going to tell us about this property? Well,
uh when I bought the place, it was in condition like this. The condition was pretty much what you see here. uh What he said is pretty much is true. as I've started on some things, and I just don't, I really just need more time to, you know, do the updates and then the permitting. And I'm from Orange County. And I just didn't realize that the work that, you know, needed to be done, uh it's just,
it's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:08–00:08:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
just so much that needed to be done that I couldn't get it all done and the permits and the time that they allowed me. So what I'm doing is I'm just here asking for more time to get everything done.
Okay. What what is your time frame for getting this house put back together?
I think that uh around the end ‸ of November, and that's because of the permitting and... Have
you applied for permits? Yes,
I do have a permit that I apply for. And uh it's for the um the wiring and now the drywalling, and I'm just trying to bundle things as I, you know, go, but...
Are you, you have a contractor? Are you doing this work yourself? ‸ I'm
doing it, trying to do it myself. And uh you know, I got other people that's working with me that's doing it.
What's the status of permitting? Do you have a... I don't,
I didn't check for any permit.
‸ Well,
I don't know the status of the permit we'll have to check on that, but he's you can't get it as a home an owner builder permit, you'd have to, he doesn't live there. you You'd have to get a contractor to do the work.
Okay, because I was told that if I was going to live in the house, which I plan to do in the future... Okay. ...like the drywalling and the windows and stuff like that, I can do myself.
‸ did
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:34–00:09:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
did speak with ‸ at the uh building department? I
think so. I i spoke
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:41–00:09:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, that I have to get somebody to do the uh the drywalling.
Right.
And, uh I mean, he's a nice gentleman and everything, ‸ but...
Okay. Well, I'll speak with him as well and just get clarification. I'll have to get clarification if there was ‸ if there was a discussion with a building official, because yes you are supposed to live in the home, or if you're intending to live in the home, is if that's what you're...
oh yeah, absolutely. You know,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:05–00:10:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
up here a lot. And it's just a slow process. I mean, I want to do everything according to the codes and basically it's just time. It's just
gone
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:16–00:10:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
out.
Well, as far as that issue, we'll we'll resolve that issue with the building official as as far as the owner builder as part of
it
Yeah, because the obviously the permitting will be important in order to get the job completed. uh
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:31–00:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
work. This is July, August, September, October, November.
Four months. and And I inherited the house. I mean, I bought it like that. And, you know, it's just that I didn't realize it was that much work every time we get in it. It's, you know, when you tear something down, it's always
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:55–00:10:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
come across problems and then, you know, it's just taken.
Occasionally in in situations like this,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:05–00:11:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to to work with you that way. uh But four months is is really a a lot a
lot
longer time than we usually allow for a job like this to happen. If you had a contractor
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:23–00:11:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
needs to happen.
um
‸ what if we give him a certain number of days and he can always come back and and show us the progress, etc., etc.,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:41–00:11:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Give him time to see where he's at with it then
that That would be more than fair.
okay
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:57–00:12:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be safer and look better and then go uh down the road a little bit more on windows and stuff like that? Like putting the soffit and fascia on it?
Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:15–00:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
was from today where I said the property's been getting
‸ So the place is presentable and nothing, there's not animals getting into the roofs and all that. Is there something we could work out where he could, because he he wants to get this.
Right, that would be at the discretion of the code board.
It says he has to has a roof problem too. with the roof and soft and facial Is it is
going to need a new roof on the on the building?
Yeah. oh yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:48–00:12:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
tearing up some of that, but the more I get into it, the more I see that it's it's going to need everything. And this right here already started to... I got somebody's coming in, we're going to break all of that up and we're going to resurface we're going to resurface the whole driveway.
Sir, ‸ I could ask, when did you purchase the house?
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:11–00:13:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
you've had it since uh August. It's almost a year. Yeah. But you've had the house.
And I've done some things. I mean, when I first got it, you couldn't even see the door from the trees. I mean, we've done work in it but apparently on the outside, we haven't really scratched the surface. I mean, I mean, it's even the fence, you know, which we started on. It's it's some little things that we've done, but we haven't, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:48–00:13:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:52–00:13:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
uh wow that's a good question i would say about a month about a month ago because i wasn't aware that i had to have a permit for you know
[unclear audio — 0:16 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:14:06–00:14:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about what he needed. And, you know, that's why we was just at a standstill with that. But everything revolved around the permits. That's why I'm asking the time, because uh it's just the department issues. and And that's the biggest thing.
Well, to get a permit issued is is it's not a long process. okay Okay. Once you apply, they're processing those very quickly, a matter of a few days, not weeks. So it's it's important that that
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:55–00:14:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
My thinking is, and I want to hear what the city's position, I guess, too, but uh it's just maybe we give you 90 days to to get going on this and make real progress. uh But I think you're going to have to stay up to date with the code officer and let them let them be able to see progress, call them and tell them what you're doing,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:22–00:15:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
me, you know we can like I like that idea ‸ working in stages. If there's some things that I can do first, you know just priority, you know ties, everything.
there are There are some things that you probably can do without a permit, and they can inform you of those things. uh But things like replacing the roof, that requires a permit. yeah Replacing, if you're putting new windows in, yes that's going to need a permit. um so
they
have the expertise on that. uh What
I'd like to suggest, along with making a motion, if I
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:03–00:16:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that we give Mr. ‸ Royal 90 days for completion of the project and setting
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:15–00:16:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to schedule certain things to be done by a certain time. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:23–00:16:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
making sure that the that you've done that and according to code. That would be great.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:34–00:16:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a motion.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:38–00:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
with a second. Any discussion? I
just uh wanted to say one thing. um Is there
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:45–00:16:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:50–00:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
well Typically what we've done is the ‸ kind of left it to the code officer's discretion. If we get down to 90 days, not on the 90th day, but close there.
there's There'll still be a second hearing for a non-compliance hearing. if Whatever date you set tonight, if he doesn't meet that deadline, there'll still be a second hearing before the fines imposed. So
yeah
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:14–00:17:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at the end of that 90 days, if he comes back and there's no progress, you can either give him additional time after the at the non-compliance hearing or you can review it. And that'll be the his deadline before a fines imposed on the property.
Okay. Thank you.
Okay. Motion on the floor of the second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. aye Any opposed? ‸ Hearing none, the motion is passed. uh Mr. Royal, that's that's your marching orders. Thank you. uh work Work with the officer to get a schedule in place, get your permitting done. Good luck on it. Put it together.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:53–00:17:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yes sir
Okay. Next item is
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:01–00:18:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
and it's
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:15–00:18:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Location of violation it's going to be 629 South Georgia Avenue, and the property is not occupied. in
urban california during
my first inspection ‸ on May 28th, I found the property in violation of section 6-900 b1 accumulation of truck and debris, 6-900 b4 maintenance of a structure, 6-900 b7 failure to secure, which has been complied,
6-1003F exterior walls, and section
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:18:50–00:18:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:18:54–00:18:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
facilities outside. For the record, I'll be submitting six photos. I sent the notice of violation on May
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:18:57–00:19:03 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:03–00:19:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2015 to the owner and gave a compliance date of June
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:19:03–00:19:07 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:07–00:19:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2015. I've had no contact with the property owner.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:19:07–00:19:11 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:19:11–00:19:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chris Counselor had contact with the property management company. He was advised the failed to secure violation will be handled as a priority.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:19:12–00:19:19 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:19–00:19:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
property in July 8th the property had been secured The other violations have
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:26–00:19:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As of my last inspection today, the violation still remains. Staff recommends that the property owner be found a
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:37–00:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a fine of $250 per day
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:43–00:19:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
‸ shall
I make the motion? go ahead KCE 15-504
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:56–00:20:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
recommendation of the code officers
second
‸ motion
on the floor
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:12–00:20:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
with a second any discussion? yes uh
I uh I just got a question is there somebody that maintains that property because it's all clipped and manicured? there was
nobody maintaining it until the code supervisor Chris Council was able to get in contact with the management company. At that point, they secured the property, and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:34–00:20:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Thank you very much. Any further questions? all those Hearing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion is passed. and next item is CE 15-555
the property owner is the estate of George K Bradley and it's in care of Ruth Collins she's
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:05–00:21:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This property is currently occupied. For the record, of submitting five photos of the property during my inspections. During
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:19–00:21:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which has been complied,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:33–00:21:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
6-1001
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:41–00:21:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which has been complied. I sent the notice of violation to the owner and gave a compliance date of July
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:53–00:21:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2015. On my re-inspections of the property, minor violations, excuse me, minor progress had been in the process. Therefore, this case had been assigned to the July 16, 2015 code
board
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:07–00:22:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Contact was made with the owner. She advised she will have her son address the violations. and made contact with her son, who is present today, and explained in detail the violations and how to gain compliance.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:18–00:22:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from the front yard, and the means of egress violation are in compliance. However, the other violations still remain. ‸ staff recommends that the property owner be found in violation of the above mentioned
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:36–00:22:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
shall be imposed until compliance is achieved.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:47–00:22:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is that uh ‸ vehicle that we see there? uh
That's part of... That's one of the vehicles that wasn't removed that uh doesn't have a compliant tag. That's under the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:02–00:23:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Exterior
sanitation is when the property has... a could have mildew on the fascia, the side of the house, the rusting, and they might not exactly need to repaint the property, but they still need to have it maintained and kept properly to prevent it from getting further damage.
Okay. Good
afternoon, board.
they need to be sworn in, please.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:23:27–00:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
My
name is Derek Spencer Collins,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:36–00:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:37–00:23:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. Okay, Mr. Collins, uh what can you tell us ‸ about finishing up the rest of what needs to happen here?
uh Good afternoon, board. uh I had spoken to Officer Dale about the situation that I'm in with this house. This house is in probate, and I really didn't want to spend a lot of money in painting it, but I have a pressure washer coming over, and uh I have made some improvements.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:10–00:24:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
complaining about as exterior jump. Right. And I'm in process of getting an enclosed shed so I can host my bicycles, because with me suffering from PTSD, I get out and work on bicycles. I started with three. I have about 60 now. ‸ And it's from people coming over, seeing me working on bicycles. Hey, can you fix this for me? Sure, why not? And I had to get an enclosed shed for my hobby, and this helps me out. The cars, I've had them about nine years now, and I'm still in the process of getting the proper paperwork to get them into my name.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:53–00:24:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
now, and I'm in the process of getting the owner of the car, previous owner, to get the proper paperwork.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:05–00:25:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Officer Dale and Supervisor Chris, and we mentioned some matters, and they've seen the progress that I have been making. And I'm
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:18–00:25:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
picked up and organized and within 30 days? Yes,
sir.
So the only the violations here, let's see, accumulation of junk.
That's my bicycle.
uh Parking in the yard, that's taken care of? Yes.
Okay, storing junk
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:49–00:25:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
autos, the auto's gonna ‸ go? That's what they're saying, but those have already been addressed. that I had them parked in the lawn in front of this gate, so I took them and put them in the garage and on the driveway itself.
This this automobile here is gonna ‸ go? Yes. okay
So a little
cleanup with the pressure cleaner on the paint? Yes. And uh
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:12–00:26:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
it has been removed. Okay. So I'm doing the picture.
Everything should be able to be taken care of by this gentleman
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:24–00:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
that's around the home?
Yes. That's gonna ‸ be, I have a large enough shed coming to take care of that, like the bicycle frames. I have 50 frames in there. Color coordinating yard, which I thought looked pretty decent, because I have a a wilderness area behind me that blocks the view from public.
So, but the like the uh washing machine is sitting out? yeah
that's gone already, that left that day. Mr. Chair.
Go ahead, Mr. Brown. ‸ like to
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:53–00:27:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
accept the City of Coco's recommendation,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:05–00:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I would like to give the amount of time to uh get everything up to code to 30 days instead of 14 days. Second. Okay.
Motion on ‸ floor with a second. Any discussion?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:24–00:27:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
aye aye aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion is passed.
I thank you, board. Thank
you.
okay
Okay. okay
okay
that's that's all the cases. So that moves us to the non-compliance section of our agenda. First item there is
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:57–00:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
the same, and the property is vacant. For the record of submitting three photos of the property. The property is in violation of
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:17–00:28:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:26–00:28:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
came before the board June 18th 2015. the owner was to correct the above mentioned violations by july 15
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:41–00:28:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
per day would be imposed until all the violations are corrected. As of my last inspection today, the violations still remain. Staff recommends the owner be found in non-compliance.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:28:54–00:28:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Mr. Chair?
I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:00–00:29:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have
Mr. Brown.
‸ like to make a motion
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:03–00:29:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be found in non-compliance. please
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:11–00:29:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:29:16–00:29:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
none, all those favor say aye aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion is passed. Next. ‸ item is
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:24–00:29:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The
property owner is in nova Investments, LLC, 1000 Legion Place, Orlando, Florida. Location of violation is 1205 Japonica Lane. The property is currently vacant for the record of submitting four photos of the property.
properties
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:44–00:29:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
in violation of section 6-900 before maintenance of a structure,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:49–00:29:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
exterior walls, and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:54–00:29:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
decorative features. This case came before the June
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:59–00:29:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2015 code board. The owner was to correct the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:04–00:30:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
100 per day would be imposed until the violations are corrected. As of my last inspection today, the property still remains in violation. Staff recommends the owner be found in non-compliance. Mr. Chair? Go
ahead, Mr. sysville
In case CE15-473, I move that we find the violator in non-compliance.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:28–00:30:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:45–00:30:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Motion is passed. And next item is C15-485.
‸ property owners Raul Santana, [address], Northwest, Winterhaven, Florida. Location of violation is 1102 Montclair Road. The property is currently occupied. For the record, of submitting two photos of the property. properties in violation of Section 61001G, Accessory Structures, defense which had been complied. 61003B, protective treatment. Case came before the June 18, 2015 Code Board. The owner was to correct the above mentioned violations by July 15, 2015,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:34–00:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
until the violations are corrected. As of my last inspection today, the property still remains in violation. Staff recommends the owner be found in non-compliance
mr
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:49–00:31:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
the owner in
noncompliance. Second. Who was that? Mike?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:31:56–00:32:03 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:04–00:32:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Brown.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:32:05–00:32:16 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Motion on the floor with a second. All those in favor, say aye. Aye. Any opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:16–00:32:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That motion is passed. And that completes our noncompliance section, brings us down to loan reduction.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:32:16–00:32:25 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:26–00:32:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
same property, we can hear them all as one? Yes? Okay. Okay. And that item is CE12-516, CE13-505, CE15-085.
Yes, sir. Code Enforcement Board held a hearing on July for the first case, 12-516.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:05–00:33:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The Code Enforcement Board held a hearing on July 19, 2012, in which the Board found the owner, Paul M.
Kitzel,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:33:15–00:33:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
in violation of Section 6-900B1 for accumulation of trash and debris. They provided the owner with sufficient time to correct the violation. There was a lien imposed and recorded on July 28, 2012. The lien ran at $25 per day from July 28, 2012
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:35–00:33:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The total amount of this lien was $18,350, and the current property owner,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:43–00:33:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is requesting the lien to be reduced to $3,350. For the second one, it was found in violation of Section 6-1003 for
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:58–00:33:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It came to
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:02–00:34:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A lien was recorded against the property effect of June 15, 2013. This lien ran at $25 per day from June 15, 2013 until compliance was achieved August 1, 2014. And for this lien, the total being $10,300, the new owner is requesting a lien to be reduced to $2,300.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:31–00:34:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
January
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:38–00:34:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fence.
Yes.
It did not comply. A lien was recorded on February 6, 2015. This lien ran at $100 per day from
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:55–00:34:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The total of this lien is $8,400. The property owner from Federal Loan Mortgage Corp. is requesting this lien be reduced to $1,400.
Did we ‸ have a lien associated with the removal of ‸ that fence? Or is that the lien?
That was the 15085, sir. That was the case that we had with the white, it's in the block fence. Right.
then
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:33–00:35:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
it ended up having a running lien because they didn't comply by the Code Board's order.
Did the city remove the fence or did the owner?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:41–00:35:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yeah
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:42–00:35:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Okay.
Okay. What's the total amount that they want to settle on?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:49–00:35:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
$7,050. For
the three, right? Yeah. $7,050. Mr. Chair?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:02–00:36:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The representative is here. Oh, he is? Yes.
The
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:07–00:36:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
We're
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:12–00:36:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And you're an attorney?
I am an attorney.
Okay. What
do
you wish to tell us?
This is a house that was in foreclosure. It went into foreclosure on August 9, 2012. This was quite a while ago. The plan at the time was Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo was finally able to obtain a final judgment on March 13, 2014. There was a sale that was held on May 15, 2014. And the
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:53–00:36:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Fargo at
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:59–00:37:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a quick claim deed from Wells Fargo to the current owner.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:09–00:37:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so the basis of the request, respectfully, the lien reduction on forgiveness of those amounts, is based on the new owner just having the property,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:26–00:37:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so we have these fines that were running, unfortunately,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:35–00:37:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then from June 15, 2013 on the 13, 5, 0, 5. I'm just addressing those two separately.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:48–00:37:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because we can't go on the property until
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:55–00:37:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have legal title to do so, then those problems were addressed and
incurred
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:01–00:38:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
With respect to that last one, I just noticed when I was looking through the application, that was a lien that was assessed while the new owner had title and was in possession of it. So that was in 2015. And I was listening to the officer to see if I had my dates wrong,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:22–00:38:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was. The owner did have a possession. That lien was in place on February 15th, and it was resolved about two and a
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:35–00:38:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's the only one that occurred and accrued during the time of the new owner.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:50–00:38:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
these are big institutions. They normally have people who go around and do these inspections. This fence and I think it was graffiti also is what I understand was a little bit different than the other violations. And so that one might be a little bit different because we did have ownership of it at the ‸ time. The reductions are based on roughly the time that the new owner had legal title and was able to go in and enter the property and cure those
code
violations. And so ‸ the bank had it from June 2014, and then the new owner, July 8, 2014.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:40–00:39:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ For that last one, though, quite frankly.
‸ It appears that the amounts of monies that your client requested
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:39:52–00:39:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be reduced to correspond with what the city is willing to accept. So we really don't have any conflict.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:01–00:40:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make a recommendation to city council, and city council has the final say. They can change what we say, but they don't usually. So we'll ‸ make a motion in a moment here, and then you'll be, you know, the status from us. Thank you very much. Thank you for being here.
Mr. Chair. Go ahead. Let's see. In case CE 12-516, I move that
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:36–00:40:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In case CE 13-505, I move that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:46–00:40:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:49–00:40:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In case CE 15-085, I move that we
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:56–00:41:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Excuse me. The total
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:03–00:41:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
I'd like to second that.
Go ahead. Thank you. ‸ Second. Motion on and forward with a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion is passed. And thank you for coming all the way from Boca Raton.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:33–00:41:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
back.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:39–00:41:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you.
Okay. Okay. We have some items here for certification of demolition costs. The first one is at 618 Blake Street for $3,861.61. Do we need any explanation of that?
Or
do we have to take a motion?
Just a motion would be.
I'm sorry?
Just a motion. Just a motion is fine. Unless there's any questions.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:27–00:42:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Street, $3,861.61. I move that we approve.
Second.
Okay. Motion with a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none. Motion is passed. ‸ Next item is to certify the cost of demolition at 803 Blake Street for $2,970.33.
Mr. Chair, I move that we approve the certification of demolition costs at 803 Blake Street for $2,970.33.
I'll second that.
Thank you. Motion with a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion is approved.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:30–00:43:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Chair.
Mr. Kluge, jump right in. Jump right in.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:46–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:53–00:43:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that we pay that.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:00–00:44:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:01–00:44:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:03–00:44:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Motion on ‸ the floor with a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion is ‸ approved. And last, we have a resend business tax receipt orders. Not sure what ‸ that means. It has
rings. Basically, what happened is, at the last board hearing, we kind of jumped the gun a little bit and asked for a fine to be imposed after just the initial hearing, but we didn't give ‸ a date. We didn't give them any time to comply with the violation after the initial hearing. So, basically, we rescinded it. And we've actually gotten some compliance since those letters went out. So, we're just asking you to rescind the order from last time so we can go back, rework it, and give them some non-compliance time. Give them some more time to comply with the violation.
Okay. Okay. So, we are going to rescind the following orders. Here's
[unclear audio — 0:28 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:59–00:45:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
need a motion to
resend
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:28–00:45:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
all of those orders.
Mr. Chair.
Go ahead.
I'd like to make a motion that we
resend
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:35–00:45:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the business tax receipt on the board orders that you read off. Second.
Okay. Motion with a second. All those
chairs
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:47–00:45:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
say, aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the motion is passed. And that brings us right to the end of the agenda. Our next meeting will be August the 20th, 2015. Right here, ‸ same place, same time. And Mr. Brown will be the chair.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:46:13–00:46:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:14–00:46:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's amazing. You're going to take a vacation on this?
No, I'm going to take my daughter to college.
Oh, okay. Well, let's get it.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:27–00:46:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
George, I'll help you with the English language, no problem.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:31–00:46:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:34–00:46:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Have
a good evening.