City Council

Council Visioning Session 5/3/2014

Date: 2014-05-03 (the meeting date its title states; the video was uploaded 2014-11-04)
Status: Machine transcript available
YouTube: watch on YouTube ↗

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 🎬 Recording ↗

No City record on file — no AI-written text

The City's record

What the City's record shows

The City's minutes for this meeting are not on file in this archive. This briefing states only what the City's agenda lists. Nothing here is taken from the machine transcription.

No agenda from the City is on file for this meeting.

The recording's machine transcription is below. It is unverified: words and names may be misheard, and it cannot establish who acted or how anyone voted.

Agenda (the City's wording)

No agenda for this meeting was found in the City records this site holds. That does not mean the City published none.

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube; on this page it moves the player above the transcript.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 2 voices separated from the audio. No word has been replaced by anything else. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.7% of 151 content words. Dotted words (6 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 4 passages (31% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:00–00:00:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:05] ▶ Play Speaker 1

but collapsing it with the demolition program and making that I guess we'll take that out make it a slash demolition program. Let's talk before we do anything that's just where we're at. Don and Clarence you haven't spoken on this particular issue. Any comments?

[00:00:24] ▶ Play Speaker 2

I ‸ agree with Mr. Furbish in regards to the amount of complaints that the citizen was and it wasn't to counsel. I get the complaints.

[00:00:35] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:35–00:00:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:40] ▶ Play Speaker 2

goal that we maintain a certain level of staffing.

[00:00:44] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:44–00:00:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:47] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:47–00:00:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:51] ▶ Play Speaker 2

it should be any question as to whether ‸ or not we're going to hire ‸ to replace those officers and maintain staffing at a certain level.

Transcript revision built 2026-11-08T10:56:08 · 104 ordinary words, 47 in suspect passages, 0 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.