civic record · cocoa, florida
Police Community Relations Advisory Board

Police Community Relations Advisory Board Regular Meeting

Date
2023-03-23
Status
City minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #978
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Built only from the City's minutes (1328_PA_Reg_Minutes_03_23_2023.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • The minutes' roll could not be read for this meeting.

Adopted actions (6)

  • to approve the agenda from the regular meeting of March 23, 2023 (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); PASSED — the City's minutes, page not read
  • to approve the minutes from the regular meeting of October 12, 2022 (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); PASSED — the City's minutes, page not read
  • to elect Alton Edmond (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); PASSED — the City's minutes, page not read
  • to elect Al Boettjer (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); PASSED — the City's minutes, page not read
  • to except the findings on both cases (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); PASSED — the City's minutes, page not read
  • to adjourn the Regular Meeting of March 23, 2023 (moved by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record), seconded by (not read reliably from the minutes' text — the page is the record)); PASSED — the City's minutes, page not read

Agenda (the City's wording)

The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (PA_Reg_Notice_03_23_2023), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. It is 6.06 p.m. on Thursday, March 23rd, and I, Alton Edmond, chairman of this committee, do call this meeting to order. At this time, all please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. To the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. You may be seated.
[00:00:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:40–00:00:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Our invocation. Mr. Betcher, would you like to lead us?
[00:00:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:46–00:00:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:47] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:00:51] Speaker 2
the people here with today have your sense ‸ of balance in making decisions and that the public understands that you are looking out for all of us. We pray for those people in uniform, both in law enforcement and the military, and we pray for the citizens of Cocoa, that they may always be treated well. Amen. You
[00:01:19] Speaker 1
may be seated for real this time.
[00:01:25] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:25–00:01:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:32] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:01:33] Speaker 1
Present.
[00:01:34] Speaker 3
Ms.
[00:01:35] Attribution uncertain
Brown?
[00:01:37] Speaker 3
Mr. Bukart?
[00:01:39] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:39–00:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:41] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:43] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:44] Speaker 3
Weiss?
[00:01:45] No voice detected
Mr.
[00:01:47] Speaker 3
Thomas? And Mr. Betcher? Present. Is that right?
[00:01:53] Speaker 1
You got it
[00:01:54] Speaker 2
right.
[00:01:55] Speaker 1
Excellent. It sounds like we have a quarrel.
[00:01:58] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:01:58] Speaker 1
want to take a moment to thank everyone for being here and want to give a special shout out
[00:02:03] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:03–00:02:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:09] Speaker 1
to join us this evening. Thank you. We will begin with just a brief moment to review our meeting agenda. So that we can approve it. I will entertain a motion when you all are ready.
[00:02:34] Speaker 2
Motion to approve the agenda minutes.
[00:02:37] Speaker 1
Do I hear a second?
[00:02:38] Speaker 5
I'd like to approve with just one amendment.
[00:02:41] Speaker 1
Yes, ma'am.
[00:02:42] Speaker 5
There's
[00:02:43] No voice detected
an incorrect
[00:02:44] Speaker 5
section that I'd
[00:02:45] No voice detected
like to just take
[00:02:45] Speaker 5
out on
[00:02:46] No voice detected
what your
[00:02:46] Speaker 5
thoughts
[00:02:47] No voice detected
are.
[00:02:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Wait. I think you're looking at something different.
[00:02:55] Attribution uncertain
Oh,
[00:02:55] Speaker 5
okay. I'm sorry. The minutes are today.
[00:02:57] Speaker 1
Yes. We're approving the meeting agenda for today.
[00:03:01] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Okay,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:01–00:03:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:03:01] Speaker 1
So we have a motion. We have a second. All in favor, please signify by saying ‸ aye.
[00:03:05] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:03:06] Speaker 1
Any opposed? The motion to approve our meeting agenda for today, March 23rd, passes unanimously. At this time, I'll entertain a motion as to our minutes ‸ from October 12th. And I believe that there was ‸ an amendment on the floor.
[00:03:27] Speaker 5
Yes.
[00:03:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:30–00:03:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:32] Speaker 1
Your mic on?
[00:03:35] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:35–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:38] Speaker 5
Yes,
[00:03:38] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:38–00:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:39] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:39–00:03:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:40] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:40] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:42] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
Okay, great.
[00:03:45] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:45–00:03:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:51] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
clause where it
[00:03:52] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:52–00:04:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:06] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I believe. Committee member Weiss asks if there's any follow-up. I think for the gentleman that made the complaint, I think we can just do it like that rather than to find out if the employment, because that's not, we'll just leave that bit out if that's okay.
[00:04:21] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:21–00:04:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:25] Speaker 1
All right. And so, is it a, are you making a motion to approve the minutes with that amendment?
[00:04:32] Speaker 2
Yes.
[00:04:33] Speaker 1
Do I hear a second? Second. I hear a second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye.
[00:04:37] Speaker 2
Aye.
[00:04:38] Speaker 1
Any opposed? That motion also passes unanimously. And it appears that we are here again for our, um, a new year and a selection for our chair and vice chair.
[00:04:59] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:59–00:05:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:02] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:03] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:05:12] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:05:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:05:26] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:05:29] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:29–00:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:32] Speaker 5
you. No,
[00:05:33] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:33] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Oh, Mr. Oh,
[00:05:34] Attribution uncertain
a
[00:05:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
second. Yes. Sorry. Um, and, uh, as for vice chair, uh, do I hear a motion? I will move for Mr. Betcher to remain the vice chair.
[00:05:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:51–00:05:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:54] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:05:55] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:05:55] Speaker 1
please signify by saying aye.
[00:05:57] Speaker 5
Aye.
[00:05:58] Speaker 1
Any opposed? That motion also passes unanimously.
[00:06:04] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:04–00:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:18] Speaker 1
A complainant, uh, the complainant is West Melbourne police department. Uh, brief synopsis,
[00:06:24] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[00:06:25] Speaker 1
July 11th, 2022 West Melbourne police department received a complaint from Academy sports that
[00:06:32] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:32–00:06:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:35] Speaker 1
entered the Academy sports store in West Melbourne and attempted to purchase a firearm for a third party. after being told that the store would not sell him any firearm, Henderson became argumentative and refused to leave the store after being asked by the store several times, uh, Henderson's arguing with the store manager over the attempted straw sale purchase of a firearm for a third party and his refusal to leave the store forced academy sports staff to call West Melbourne police. Um, ‸ Sergeant Bradshaw was unable to conduct a formal interview with Henderson in this case. Um,
[00:07:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:17–00:07:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:29] Speaker 1
um, in the discussion as it relates to this topic, Mr. Commander, um,
[00:07:42] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:42–00:07:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:46] Speaker 1
Henderson?
[00:07:48] Speaker 6
There was no discipline because he resigned prior to, uh, being disciplined. Yes, sir. And also just a little add tab 10, which is, um,
[00:07:59] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:59–00:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:03] Speaker 6
Uh, another complaint that was filed against him by Florida highway patrol. So I just didn't know if you wanted to cover that now since it's the same officer.
[00:08:12] Speaker 1
Okay. Uh,
[00:08:13] Attribution uncertain
no
[00:08:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
problem. I recall this one very clearly our
[00:08:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
texter
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:16–00:08:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:08:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
and driver on I 95 and he had a child in the front seat.
[00:08:21] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:21–00:08:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
and driving ‸ and, um, and he, uh, appeared, uh, argumentative, uh, and in cooperative, uh, with the highway patrolman. And as a result, a complaint was filed and, um, and once again, he, uh, wasn't disciplined because of his, uh, resignation. Correct?
[00:08:46] Speaker 6
Correct. That's correct.
[00:08:47] Speaker 1
Thank you, sir.
[00:08:50] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:50–00:09:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:00] Speaker 1
Yes.
[00:09:02] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I have a question. Wait, um, if somebody is asked to leave and they do not leave is that trespassing charge? Is that a normal thing that would happen?
[00:09:13] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:13–00:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:14] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
if that, why that didn't happen or, um, in this case, or is it just, or
[00:09:22] Attribution uncertain
is it just, he
[00:09:22] Speaker 5
was asked to leave and he did not leave? ‸ And he was not, I'm just curious if there was a, if they could have been brought up, if, if I had done it, for example, would I have gotten a trespassing charge or would I have just been? ‸ Allowed to go ahead and leave.
[00:09:38] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. So what happened was he did eventually leave after they threatened to call law enforcement. He stayed in the parking lot in his vehicle.
[00:09:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:45–00:09:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:50] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
They actually went to his house and trespassed him from the store later on that day.
[00:09:55] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay.
[00:09:55] Speaker 6
So it did occur. It's
[00:09:57] Attribution uncertain
just,
[00:09:57] Speaker 6
it's just a different jurisdiction.
[00:09:59] Speaker 5
Thank you.
[00:10:00] Attribution uncertain
I'm
[00:10:00] Speaker 5
just curious.
[00:10:05] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I believe generally, uh, ‸ trespass warning, um, often has to be issued and should be issued before you can be charged with trespass.
[00:10:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:14–00:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
And so when they served him with the trespass at his house, he was then trespassed.
[00:10:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:23–00:10:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
then he could have been arrested for trespass.
[00:10:27] Speaker 5
Thank you.
[00:10:28] Speaker 1
You're welcome.
[00:10:32] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:32–00:10:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:36] Speaker 2
that.
[00:10:36] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:36–00:10:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:46] Speaker 2
think it's pretty clear.
[00:10:50] Speaker 1
‸ I will just for the sake of, uh, uh, for cautionary sake, uh, I will open the floor, uh, to the committee. Is there any further
[00:10:59] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:59–00:11:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:02] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:02–00:11:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:05] Speaker 1
The two items just discussed.
[00:11:08] Speaker 2
All right.
[00:11:09] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Um, we have a motion. I
[00:11:11] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
have a motion to accept the findings on 22 12 CC.
[00:11:17] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:17–00:11:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm sorry. I, I'm just, I'm just curious. Um, it
[00:11:25] Attribution uncertain
was
[00:11:25] Speaker 5
he actually on police business or he was not on police business and he, who was in the car with him.
[00:11:30] Attribution uncertain
Is
[00:11:30] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that, um, they text the highway patrol and the texting incident. Yes.
[00:11:35] Speaker 1
There was a child of the minor wasn't identified. Generally when a minor is involved in any police contact, uh, their name is
[00:11:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
not,
[00:11:44] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
is not put in the, into the record.
[00:11:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:47–00:11:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
wasn't clear.
[00:11:54] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And he was not on police business or anything. That was just what he, he
[00:11:58] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
said he was on police business, but it ‸ doesn't appear that he was.
[00:12:02] Speaker 5
Okay. Okay. Great. Thank you.
[00:12:05] Speaker 1
‸ So we, we have a motion to approve both of those items on the floor from Mr. Betcher.
[00:12:10] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:10–00:12:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:13] Speaker 1
Am I correct? That is correct. Do I hear a second?
[00:12:16] Speaker 5
A second.
[00:12:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
here
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:17–00:12:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
a second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion passes unanimously. Thank you.
[00:12:26] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:26–00:12:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:32] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Uh, the
[00:12:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
complainant
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:33–00:12:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
alleges that former agent Thomas Horton committed criminal acts while agent Horton was employed with the Cocoa police department in 2009. Um, it appears, it appears that this was unfounded. I believe that this was the ‸ case in which, um, the department, uh, reached out and tried to get in contact. Um, and, uh, had, no,
[00:13:07] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
this was
[00:13:09] Speaker 1
the case where he would not cooperate.
[00:13:11] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:13:11–00:13:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:13:25] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:13:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:13:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:28–00:13:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:29] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:13:30] Speaker 6
was an inmate had filed a complaint through the, uh through the mail system about a case that was several years old. And um the officer that was the, um the complaint was filed was, has been retired for several years. So there's no way of really knowing other than the case that he filed, he's actually in jail for. So he's claiming that the officer lied on the affidavit of his arrest and the case report. But that's what he's actually in jail for. The state filed on it and he was ultimately convicted on it. Understood.
[00:14:07] Speaker 2
So commander, just uh to, ‸ clarify things. If, if he was an active officer, uh and he was
[00:14:22] Speaker 5
investigated
[00:14:22] Speaker 2
and, uh then left during the course of the investigation. it's my understanding that. In a case like that, when somebody resigns, even if you sustain the ‸ findings of the investigation, unless it's criminal and moved to the state attorney's office. That you cannot discipline them in any way, shape or form because they're no longer an employee. Am I
[00:14:49] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
correct? That's correct on certain charges. And now
[00:14:52] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:52–00:14:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:56] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
they could, they can go after the certification of the officer, even if they didn't work with us anymore.
[00:15:04] Speaker 2
Okay. I don't know if that helps you understand that a little bit.
[00:15:08] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
A little bit. um I guess. My question is, I wonder why he filed it. if He filed it much after the fact. Yeah. The case. um
[00:15:18] Speaker 6
I don't know if he put the case number in here because that's what tell me. um
[00:15:23] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:23–00:15:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:24] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:15:30] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
a complaint from 2009, especially when the officer is no longer here. I
[00:15:35] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
was just wondering what motivated him to go ahead and put this complaint. ‸ I
[00:15:39] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
think his motivation is to try to show that he was wrongfully convicted because of officer misconduct.
[00:15:47] Speaker 4
‸ And he filed a complaint in 2019, 10 years later.
[00:15:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. Right. I believe that this was the case in which he claimed that he had filed a complaint previously, but there was no complaint to be found. Right.
[00:16:05] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And
[00:16:05] Speaker 1
so, um and so because of the age of the case, it just didn't really go anywhere. Is there any further discussion as it relates to
[00:16:14] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:14–00:16:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:20] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:16:22] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:16:26] Speaker 4
I'll second it.
[00:16:27] Speaker 1
Okay. We got a second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye.
[00:16:30] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye. aye
[00:16:31] Speaker 1
Any opposed? Okay. That motion passes unanimously. now we have 22-11-CC. complainant Hilda Sinclair. the complaint ‸ alleges that Corporal Taylor failed to interview a witness and or suspect and complete a thorough investigation. this case was investigated by
[00:16:54] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:54–00:17:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:02] Speaker 1
due to the fact that he was not able to gather enough probable calls for a second person of interest. Miss Sinclair wanted both persons arrested. Corporal Taylor attempted to explain that his investigation revealed what his investigation revealed. However,
[00:17:14] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:14–00:17:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:15] Speaker 1
was not satisfied with his response. The conclusion of fact was
[00:17:19] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:19–00:17:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:25] Speaker 1
This was the case, um where there was lack of cooperation on behalf of, um the victim as it related to that second person. And so, uh
[00:17:36] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:36–00:17:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:40] Speaker 1
the charges. um
[00:17:41] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:41–00:17:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:49] Speaker 1
you'd like to add, um commander?
[00:17:51] Speaker 6
No, sir.
[00:17:53] Speaker 1
Okay. um I will entertain a motion to approve the findings
[00:17:58] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:58–00:18:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:59] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:18:04] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:18:07] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:18:08] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:08] Speaker 1
a second. All in favor, please say goodbye by saying ‸ Aye.
[00:18:10] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:18:10] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:18:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Any opposed? All right. The motion passes unanimously to approve the findings, uh as it relates to
[00:18:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:17–00:18:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Moving on to
[00:18:21] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:21–00:18:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
where the complaint is attorney
[00:18:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:25–00:18:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:30] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
that officer Landis was dispatched to a crash scene involving several vehicles. And after arriving on scene, officer Landis failed to conduct a proper and thorough crash investigation and document said crash on the appropriate forms. This case was investigated by Lieutenant
[00:18:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:46–00:18:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
of this incident. The video shows Officer Landis arriving on scene. Officer Landis never asked the fire personnel or either driver of anyone had injuries. Officer Landis fails to identify the driver of the at-fault vehicle. He also fails to ask the drivers if their vehicle were um if their vehicles were operational. Officer Landis fails to fill out the required uh crash paperwork. The conclusion of fact was sustained against Officer Benjamin Landis. Why does that name sound
[00:19:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:19:23–00:19:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:25] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:19:29] Speaker 6
was another accident that was not uh
[00:19:31] Attribution uncertain
investigated
[00:19:31] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
correctly
[00:19:32] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:32–00:19:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:33] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:19:34] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
uh homicide case
[00:19:36] Speaker 1
i knew that name sounded familiar i i recognize that one for sure um uh any discussion as it relates to this item.
[00:19:46] Speaker 2
uh Commander, this was sustained. Was there any disciplinary action as a result?
[00:19:52] Speaker 6
There there was. um There was a written reprimand, I believe, and then it was um
[00:19:56] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:56–00:20:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:03] Speaker 6
or verbal reprimand because there was some mitigating factors that um he said the fire personnel, when he was when the fire personnel was speaking to the to the driver,
[00:20:14] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:14–00:20:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:18] Speaker 6
injuries. So
[00:20:19] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:19–00:20:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:22] Speaker 6
but that's what it was with the fire personnel, and we weren't able to determine if it actually happened or not because the body cam did not pick it up. So that was the mitigating factors in that portion where it says he didn't ask if they they had any injuries. But the other part is Florida State statute states that if a vehicle is inoperable either by airbags or the condition of the vehicle, it has to be towed from the scene. And these vehicles weren't towed from the scene. And that's where it kind of got where he was sustained on on that section.
[00:20:53] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:53–00:20:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:55] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:20:57] Speaker 2
in this area since he had two significant issues? I
[00:21:01] Speaker 6
don't believe any type of traffic training because you're you're really limited to what's available for training. And
[00:21:07] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:07–00:21:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:08] Speaker 6
which is significant training already for for traffic. So
[00:21:14] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:14–00:21:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:18] Speaker 6
to make sure the supervisor supervision is is making sure he's properly um documenting these traffic crashes.
[00:21:25] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Has he been removed from the uh traffic investigation process? Yes.
[00:21:30] Speaker 6
He was a THI. Investigators removed from that. from
[00:21:34] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that And
[00:21:34] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that's a part of the the
[00:21:35] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
disciplinary process, yes. okay
[00:21:38] Speaker 4
How long has he been on the force?
[00:21:40] Speaker 6
um i probably around seven, eight years, if I had to guess. Maybe not much. maybe Maybe
[00:21:50] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:50–00:21:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:21:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
kept coming up, so it's probably best that he was moved somewhere else. i Thank you. Thank you for that input. I saw. Are you about to comment? No,
[00:22:03] Speaker 5
no. i My questions got answered. Thank you.
[00:22:06] Speaker 1
Perfect. No problem. I just want to make sure you have an opportunity to be heard. yeah.
[00:22:09] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:09–00:22:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:13] Speaker 5
that he did that. I mean, it wouldn't be a, an, like, an, like a negligence thing or, I mean.
[00:22:20] Speaker 2
Would that be accurate, Commander? When
[00:22:24] Speaker 6
it comes to accidents, when you have ‸ a fender bender, if you will, there's very little we have to do. You, the drivers have to exchange information. That's about the extent of it. And it kind of gets gray on when officer action is needed. So, like I said earlier, one of them is if there's injuries,
[00:22:43] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:43–00:22:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:46] Speaker 6
Or if a vehicle's inoperable, a full report has to be done or any type of criminal charge. it has to be done. But when there's minimum, act and minimum of damage there's there's a, all we have to do is make sure information is exchanged, which he said, that's all he needed to do on this one.
[00:23:06] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:06–00:23:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:10] Speaker 6
He says he should,
[00:23:11] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:11–00:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:14] Speaker 6
didn't need to re to do that report. That would have been required. But we want to provide the best service there. There is to the citizens. So we feel like he should have went a little bit further in his, in his, uh responsibilities as far as investigating it. Thank
[00:23:28] No voice detected
you.
[00:23:29] Speaker 1
‸ Understood. Thank you. Commander.
[00:23:31] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes.
[00:23:31] Speaker 1
um any further discussion as it relates to this matter? i entertain a motion for approval.
[00:23:39] Speaker 4
I'll make that motion. We
[00:23:42] Speaker 1
have a motion. Do
[00:23:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:23:43–00:23:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:43] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:43] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:44] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:23:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
That motion passes unanimously. Moving on to
[00:23:57] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:57–00:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
a, complaintant Sergeant Ronald Betts on
[00:24:04] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:04–00:24:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Sergeant Betts of the
[00:24:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:14–00:24:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Police Department. He said that Sergeant Betts advised him that on Sunday night into Monday
[00:24:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:19–00:24:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
of a male and female at Sandbar Sports Group who refused to leave after being asked to do so by bar staff.
[00:24:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:27–00:24:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:35] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
against Officer Paul Noland. Commander, do you have any specific concerns or input as it relates to this item?
[00:24:47] Speaker 6
um Just that it was a um it was an isolated incident with this officer. You know, we haven't had any issues with it with him in the past. And um he um he was
[00:24:59] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:59–00:25:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:05] Speaker 6
related incident. So um that and
[00:25:07] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:07–00:25:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:10] Speaker 6
uh police conduct, and our policy.
[00:25:12] Speaker 1
AP, could you explain what that is?
[00:25:14] Speaker 6
Sorry, EAP.
[00:25:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yeah
[00:25:17] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
employee assistance program Okay. So it's just a mandatory um attendance of that. Okay. Okay. okay Excellent.
[00:25:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
um
[00:25:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:25–00:25:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
was reading that, i I was wondering what his discipline was because honestly, i felt I felt a little bad for him in this situation because it felt like the woman that he was with was the one that was really causing the commotion. um
[00:25:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:43–00:25:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
to drink, but he
[00:25:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:47–00:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
broken any laws or done much of anything. ‸ And so I felt bad for him because it's mostly the company he was with. So I'm glad ‸ he got the retraining and the services that he needed
[00:26:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:00–00:26:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:03] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And
[00:26:04] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you're exactly right. It was an incident. And really where it went bad for him is he's identified himself as an officer and then failed to cooperate with
[00:26:13] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:13–00:26:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:13] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Beach when they showed up. Yes. So if he would have remained just, you know, an innocent party and stood back and ‸ let them deal with it, he would have been fine. But once you, once you identify yourself an officer and then you fail to cooperate with the investigation, that's when you. Yes, yes,
[00:26:29] Speaker 1
sir. I understand completely. Any further discussion as it relates to this item.
[00:26:34] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
i think that The other board members might, uh like to know that there is an agreement between all the agencies in Brevard County. that They have contact with some other law enforcement officer that they reported to the agency so that they can appropriately deal with it. and
[00:26:55] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:55–00:27:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:02] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
said, at the point that he identified himself, he was no longer a John Doe citizen. He was a police officer involved in an incident, and that required them to report it. That's how Sergeant Betts did that. So for somebody that's not familiar with all of this, you is you think it's kind of happenstance, but it's not. If a law enforcement officer is involved with any agency agency, the agency is going to report it to the agency they work for. As well as the military.
[00:27:34] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:34–00:27:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:34] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:27:38] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
well. So. Excellent. Any
[00:27:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
further discussion? I'll entertain a motion for approval then. as a ‸ motion
[00:27:47] Speaker 2
to approve. Do
[00:27:49] Speaker 1
I hear a second?
[00:27:50] Speaker 2
A second.
[00:27:51] Speaker 1
All in favor, please signify by saying aye.
[00:27:54] Speaker 2
Aye. aye
[00:27:55] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Any opposed? The motion passes unanimously uh
[00:27:58] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:58–00:28:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
is upset due to her
[00:28:15] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:15–00:28:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
from tron's after being
[00:28:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
towed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:25–00:28:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:28:26] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
by
[00:28:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:27–00:28:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
PD. In reference to being involved in a shooting, she feels she had to pay for her bill due to her not cooperating with Sergeant Mills terms. um it appeared that, um she was the victim and shot at, and, uh she was asked to report to the, to
[00:28:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:47–00:28:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
PD to do a report. And because she couldn't get there within, uh the time that the officer wanted her to come. And
[00:28:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:54–00:28:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:59] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
um due to being a victim of a crime and having a son that was a victim of a crime. um the officer decided to tow or Sergeant Mills decided to tow, uh the vehicle. um it appears here that the, uh that, the allegation that there was a policy violation was in fact sustained. uh ‸ those of the public that are listening uh would be happy to know that she was in fact refunded the 581.11 uh that she had to pay uh for her vehicle being told because in fact she was the victim. and um And the uh
[00:29:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:45–00:29:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:48] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:29:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:29:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
promoted, right? Yes,
[00:29:52] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
‸ commander.
[00:29:53] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:53–00:30:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:30:02] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that action was wrongful and he uh instructed staff members to uh issue a receipt and um and that action was sustained. Any discussion as it relates to this item? Anything you'd like to add, Commander? Yeah,
[00:30:15] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I just want to um i just want to put ‸ a little bit better in perspective. The victor she was a victim of a shooting. Her vehicle was shot. We towed it for evidence value.
[00:30:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:25–00:30:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:29] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
and then she refused to cooperate after that. We have a policy that if if I tow your vehicle as a suspect, you're not gonna
[00:30:39] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:39–00:30:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:40] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
tow your vehicle to to process it.
[00:30:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:43–00:30:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
So we're not going to have taxpayers payers pay for that. So we're going to force you to go pay the tow bill before we return your car to you. And in this instance, she was a victim of which She's also possibly involved somehow. So when she refused to cooperate, the Sergeant at the time just said, we're not, we're not going to pay the bill then if you're not going to cooperate
[00:31:04] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:04–00:31:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:08] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
and that's why the case was wind up paying her out anyway. I just wanted to make that clear
[00:31:14] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:14–00:31:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:16] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
to process the vehicle.
[00:31:18] Speaker 4
How long do you hold the cars when they're brought in um as evidence? Pretty
[00:31:25] Speaker 6
much just to get a warrant. So we we tow it for safekeeping until we can get a warrant. Once we get the warrant, which is usually a day or two, then we process it and then release it. Either to the tow company for them to wait for
[00:31:39] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:39–00:31:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:31:39] Speaker 6
get paid or they can go there and pay the the tow company and then come show us the receipt and they can drive the car if if it's able to be driven. thank
[00:31:48] Speaker 2
you and the tow companies are uh authorized tow companies with the the agency
[00:31:55] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:55–00:31:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:55] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:31:56] Speaker 6
we have um ‸ we have a
[00:31:57] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:57–00:31:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:57] Speaker 6
list of records that we use for tow rotations, but specifically on criminal cases. We have one tow company, which is trons that we use just for investigative toes
[00:32:08] Speaker 1
Excellent. Any further discussion?
[00:32:13] Speaker 2
I
[00:32:14] Speaker 1
will entertain a motion for approval at this time of
[00:32:17] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:17–00:32:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:22] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:32:23] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:32:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
all in favor please say aye aye aye any opposed that motion passes unanimously on to 22-15-cc complaintant officer amanda torello I remember this one. Officer Torello alleges that Detective Cox discriminated against her during the interview process for Detective. She also alleges that
[00:32:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:49–00:32:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:58] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
during a debriefing in front of
[00:33:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:00–00:33:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
and Sergeant Moon. ‸ This case was investigated by Commander
[00:33:06] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:06–00:33:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:06] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Am I pronouncing
[00:33:08] Speaker 6
your name
[00:33:08] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
correct? Yes, sir.
[00:33:08] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:08–00:33:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:09] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Yep. Okay, perfect.
[00:33:10] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:10–00:33:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Cox. Officer Torello alleged that there was some backdoor promotional process because Cox called her and spoke to her about having daycare issues um and ‸ claimed to have intimate knowledge of the testing process. Cox was not involved in that process and was not on the interview board. um the other incident was an inappropriate comment that Detective Cox, uh said to Officer Torello in front of other employees. uh Detective
[00:33:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:47–00:33:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
He did. He said that he did not know that Officer Torello was offended and would have apologized to her. um and, this isn't here in this, um in
[00:34:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:01–00:34:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:02] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
but I believe he also said that they had joked in the past and that she had been okay with it, um as well. So he thought that they had a report.
[00:34:13] No voice detected
um
[00:34:13] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:13–00:34:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:17] Speaker 1
uh and whether he was aware or not that Officer Torello was offended is not an excuse and that type ‸ behavior will not be tolerated. The conclusion was that this disciplinary action was sustained against Detective Cox. Commander, could you tell us about the type of discipline that, uh that he underwent as a result of this?
[00:34:36] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:36–00:34:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:41] Speaker 6
incident. um
[00:34:42] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:42–00:34:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:48] Speaker 6
uh because he basically came in ‸ admitted to making the comment. That's why I handled it as an EIR. And then it obviously would go further than that. And they had a friendly relationship prior to this. Like I, like I documented, it was, it was in a, um a training atmosphere uh with a lot of people there. And a lot of people joke in those, even though they probably shouldn't. And uh this was a learning event for him. So moving forward, you know, he he definitely recognized his issues and he we haven't had
[00:35:21] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:21–00:35:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:22] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:35:24] Speaker 6
um
[00:35:24] Speaker 2
I'm sorry, the innuendo
[00:35:27] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:27–00:35:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:37] Speaker 2
promotional process. So she was denied the promotion.
[00:35:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
detected
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:41–00:35:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:35:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
promotion. Yes.
[00:35:43] Speaker 2
Right. And, uh and there was more to that as well. Am I correct? That the city took a position with this as well. uh
[00:35:51] Attribution uncertain
and
[00:35:51] Speaker 2
had an outside attorney come in to review the case?
[00:35:55] Speaker 6
No, not, not that the, um not the process of the detective, uh interview. So this is an internal process for detectives. We did have a board, a three-person
[00:36:08] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:08–00:36:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:16] Speaker 6
the board. So her complaint was that, uh Mike Cox, had information that was going to either expel her from the interview or get her the promotion which wasn't valid because he had nothing to do with the the process of it it's
[00:36:32] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:32–00:36:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:36:32] Speaker 6
independent board and none of the detectives have any uh say in who gets promoted or not
[00:36:39] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:39–00:36:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:42] Speaker 6
so this kind of was lumped into a two-part complaint she complained about the comment and the cid promotion that she didn't get.
[00:36:53] Speaker 1
Okay. Okay. And so it was sustained as it related to the comment as the promotion, was it unfounded or?
[00:37:00] Speaker 6
Yeah, he admitted to talking with her, but what he was telling her was that, you know, some techniques that she could use for the interview. And, um
[00:37:11] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:11–00:37:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:18] Speaker 6
the same, the same information. He told them what to to learn, you know, to to study with the case law because of the interview process. So ‸ he admitted to giving her some stuff to, to, uh to study, but he also gave it to the four or five other people that were interviewing as well. So that's, that, that's the only, uh part that he shouldn't have, even though he was doing, doing him a favor. He's just telling,
[00:37:44] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:44–00:37:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:45] Speaker 6
know that to be a detective, you got to get daycare because you're on call and you're in the middle of the night, you get called out.
[00:37:50] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:50–00:37:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:54] Speaker 6
mother, that she wouldn't be able to be a
[00:37:56] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:56–00:38:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:01] Speaker 5
Was the comment meant to, was it like, was he trying to give her a constructive comment?
[00:38:06] Speaker 6
Yeah, he was saying,
[00:38:07] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:07–00:38:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:13] Speaker 6
when you're sleeping. Nothing ever happens during the day. So, and, and, because I was a detective as well. So you have to have backups for daycare issues. um
[00:38:23] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:23–00:38:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:28] Speaker 6
in case that happens if she got called out. And that's what he was trying to relate to her.
[00:38:32] Speaker 5
I meant the, the comment that, the, uh the comment that was, um the resting voice.
[00:38:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
okay Yeah. What was your question with it?
[00:38:43] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
I, I
[00:38:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:44–00:38:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
don't even know what that means, to be honest with you. I didn't know if that was like, if he was trying to be constructive. It was, ‸ that something that he was ‸ No, it was,
[00:38:51] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:51–00:38:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:58] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
you're not smiling or you have no emotions, you look like you're mad. So she had that with the voice is what he was saying.
[00:39:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So
[00:39:08] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that's what he was trying to make fun of that when she's talking to, it was, it was, um it's a CNT, which is the hostage negotiation team. They were training that day in part of the training, they were talking to a, you know, a suicidal person and
[00:39:24] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:24–00:39:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:28] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
the background on it.
[00:39:29] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. Thank you.
[00:39:30] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:39:30] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 00:39:30–00:39:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:39:36] Speaker 1
sir. Yes. Any other discussion as it relates to this item? all righty I will entertain a motion for
[00:39:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:43–00:39:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:47] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:48] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:49] Speaker 1
I hear second?
[00:39:49] Speaker 5
I'll second. All
[00:39:51] Speaker 1
right. All in favor, please
[00:39:52] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
signify
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:52–00:39:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:39:52] Speaker 1
by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? ‸ That motion passes unanimously.
[00:39:57] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:57–00:40:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:09] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:09–00:40:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:16] Speaker 1
second consisted of a
[00:40:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:18–00:40:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:24] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No, that's correct.
[00:40:24] Speaker 1
Thank you, sir. um the, uh video was watched and
[00:40:32] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:32–00:40:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:37] Speaker 1
and, and, uh this complaint was reviewed.
[00:40:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:43–00:40:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:49] Speaker 1
station to use
[00:40:50] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:50–00:40:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:40:50] Speaker 1
bathroom while inside. She observed
[00:40:52] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:52–00:40:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:55] Speaker 1
after
[00:40:56] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:56–00:41:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:02] Speaker 1
what miss Curtis needed. She told him
[00:41:04] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:04–00:41:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:08] Speaker 1
she needed anything else. She said that he was
[00:41:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:11–00:41:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:15] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:41:15–00:41:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:22] Speaker 1
Any discussion as it relates to this item.
[00:41:24] Speaker 2
Seems
[00:41:27] Speaker 1
pretty straightforward. Yes, sir. um and was, was this one where she didn't, uh didn't follow up with any information when reached out or contacted?
[00:41:40] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. In the beginning, And he said
[00:41:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:41–00:41:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:46] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
but he couldn't, he left the business card. Should not call back or come to the police department.
[00:41:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Okay. Well, pretty hard to
[00:41:55] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
investigate if
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:55–00:41:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:41:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you know, don't contact her reach out. Um, any discussion as it relates to this item? All right. I'll entertain a motion for
[00:42:06] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:06–00:42:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
‸ I hear
[00:42:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:14–00:42:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:15] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:42:16] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:42:17] Speaker 1
All in favor, please. Take about by saying aye.
[00:42:19] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:42:19] Speaker 1
Any ‸ opposed motion passes unanimously. And finally, uh, same Ms. Curtis, 22 dash 18 dash CC second complaint involves a call from 2021. That was investigated by officer mighty and the written report. It states that he was called to the complainants residents about harassing text messages. After speaking to the complainant, he asked to see the alleged messages. Ms. Curtis stated that she did not have any text messages at that time. Officer mining
[00:42:49] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
closed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:49–00:42:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:42:50] Speaker 1
the case out with no further actions required. Sergeant Bradshaw investigated this case. The second,
[00:42:58] Speaker 6
I believe that's a
[00:42:59] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
duplicate. Yeah. It looks like I was about to read it again. I was like, I paused.
[00:43:02] Speaker 6
Right. I'm wondering if it's actually the two complaints with separate complaint numbers. Let me check the,
[00:43:08] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[00:43:09] Speaker 6
yeah.
[00:43:18] Speaker 1
Yeah, that's, that's a duplicate. Yeah. All right. No problem. Um, this one appears pretty straightforward as well. I
[00:43:27] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
think it's the same case two separate case numbers, but it's the same complainant. Yes, sir. That's, I believe that's how
[00:43:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
he set it up.
[00:43:35] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:35–00:43:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:37] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
prior,
[00:43:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:38–00:43:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Um,
[00:43:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:49–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
to this item? Um,
[00:43:53] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:43:53–00:43:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:53] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:43:53] Speaker 1
Uh, I'll entertain a motion for approval.
[00:43:57] Speaker 5
Motion to approve.
[00:43:58] Speaker 1
Do I hear a second? Second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye.
[00:44:02] Speaker 5
Aye.
[00:44:03] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:03–00:44:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:08] Speaker 1
um, passes unanimously. Um,
[00:44:19] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:19–00:44:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:20] Speaker 1
Uh, we do have a few citizens here, uh, and I do have one card. From Reverend JB Dennis address, um, phone number here from national action network. Um, Mr. Dennis, please come forward. State your name and address. And thereafter you will have three minutes to
[00:44:49] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
address the committee.
[00:44:52] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:52–00:44:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:55] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
I am the current president of the ‸ national action network.
[00:45:00] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:00–00:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:02] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:45:02–00:45:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:06] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
we have millions of members and hundreds of chapters throughout the United States. And our number one agenda is police misconduct. And I'm going to briefly say to all the new people who don't know me, uh, back in 2016, we was getting so many
[00:45:22] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:22–00:45:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:24] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
We had to come up with something to hold them accountable and get some transparency. So it took us 26 months to get resolution 2018.
[00:45:34] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:34–00:45:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:36] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I'm really here tonight as an observant.
[00:45:39] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:39–00:45:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:45:39] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
at the last meeting, I was
[00:45:41] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:41–00:45:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:45] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
recording this meeting.
[00:45:46] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:46–00:45:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:51] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm happy to announce that's going on tonight. I'm very happy. And I see we're missing three members of,
[00:45:57] Speaker 2
uh,
[00:45:58] Speaker 8
brother chair. Can you give me the name of those three people who does not have nobody sitting up there? Text it to me, please. Uh, I will ask for,
[00:46:06] Speaker 1
um, we have, we took attendance in the beginning. Um, uh, could we please call the names of the
[00:46:14] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:14–00:46:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:15] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:46:15] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:46:17] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:46:20] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:46:20] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:46:27] Speaker 8
Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Uh, first of all, uh,
[00:46:30] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:30–00:46:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:33] Speaker 8
we was in Jacksonville, he and I was in the same church for 13 years.
[00:46:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:38–00:46:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:38] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:46:39] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
And I want to say that we have a great police chief. And I think he done weeded out some of the, the bad that was already when he first got here,
[00:46:47] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:46:47–00:46:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:47] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
police union voted, uh, 40 to 10, no confidence votes in his leadership. But I know him personally, we was in the same church. We got a great police chief and I want to personally
[00:46:57] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:57–00:47:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:02] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
do all the rest of the meetings. So, uh, I don't know if any of y'all know me personally, but as a civil rights activist, not only do we march and protest, we'll take you to court. We'll appoint attorneys for people who have, uh, civil rights violated. So I think the city has come together now. ‸ One accord. I'm very proud to see you people sitting here, especially the chair and the man to his right.
[00:47:27] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
there for
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:27–00:47:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:47:28] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:28–00:47:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:29] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
Let's say good night.
[00:47:31] Speaker 2
Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir.
[00:47:34] No voice detected
Uh,
[00:47:35] Speaker 1
do we have any other public input?
[00:47:40] Speaker 2
Any other public input?
[00:47:45] Speaker 1
All
[00:47:45] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
righty.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:45–00:47:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:47:46] Speaker 1
None heard. It looks like our next meeting date is scheduled for Thursday, May 25th, 2023. Feel free to go ahead and mark your calendars. Uh, I'm assuming that it'll also be at 6 PM. However, um, closer to that. Yes. Okay. So it'll also be at 6 PM Thursday, May 25th, 2023. Go ahead and mark your calendars. Uh, thank you so much for being here. It means so much. Even if it's a few of us in the room, uh, that we have people from our community that are interested in what's going on. And, uh, and, um, involved in that, uh, at this time, I will entertain a motion for adjournment.
[00:48:26] Speaker 2
I motion to adjourn.
[00:48:28] Speaker 1
Do I hear a second?
[00:48:29] Speaker 2
Second.
[00:48:30] Speaker 1
All in favor,
[00:48:31] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:48:31–00:48:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:32] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye.
[00:48:33] Speaker 1
Any opposed?
[00:48:34] Speaker 3
Which one is the second?
[00:48:35] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:48:35–00:48:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:36] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:48:36] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:48:37] Speaker 3
We say this. Okay.
[00:48:38] Speaker 1
We'll, we'll go,
[00:48:39] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:39–00:48:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:40] Speaker 1
Um, uh,
[00:48:41] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:41–00:48:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:43] Speaker 1
And I do call this meeting to adjournment. That feel good.

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T11:26:29 · 5,485 ordinary words, 1,569 in suspect passages, 17 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.