Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Regular Meeting

Date: 2021-04-15
Status: City minutes and machine transcript available
Source: CivicClerk event #924

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 📋 Agenda (PDF, 157 KB) 📄 Minutes (PDF, 3.9 MB) Watch on the City's meeting portal ↗

Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Built only from the City's minutes (1243_CE_Reg_Minutes_04_15_2021.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

Listed present when the roll was taken: Jim Gifford, Edward Green, George Brown, Sharri Scott, Kimberly Curtis, Demetrius Thomas
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: Lloyd Roberts, David Lightholder
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Anthony Marchica (Police Lieutenant), Steve Murdick (Code Enforcement Officer), Gerald Pettengill (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)

Adopted actions (9)

to approve to the agenda of April 15, 2021 (moved by Curtis, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve the minutes of March 18, 2021 (moved by Green, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to amend Staff's recommendation give the property owner until June 15, 2021 (60 days) and a fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Green, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staff's recommendation and a fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of One thousand three hundred dollars ($1,300.00) (moved by Brown, seconded by Green); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6

Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)

$150.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staff's recommendation give the property owner until June 15, 2021 (60 days) and a fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1243_CE_Reg_Minutes_04_15_2021.pdf, p. 3); fiscal period not recorded)
$150.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staff's recommendation and a fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per day and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1243_CE_Reg_Minutes_04_15_2021.pdf, p. 4); fiscal period not recorded)
$1,300.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of One thousand three hundred dollars ($1,300.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1243_CE_Reg_Minutes_04_15_2021.pdf, p. 6); fiscal period not recorded)

Agenda (the City's wording)

The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_04_15_2021), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 11 voices separated from the audio. 24 short machine repair(s) (28 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.7% of 6,950 content words. Dotted words (143 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 169 passages (23% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] Speaker 1

I think the appointed time has arrived.

[00:00:03] Speaker 2

Hello.

[00:00:04] Speaker 1

Bring this meeting to order. This is the Code Enforcement

[00:00:07] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:07–00:00:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:13] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:13–00:00:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:19] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I pledge

[00:00:20] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it

[00:00:26] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

stands,

[00:00:26] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:26–00:00:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:40] Speaker 1

And would you call the roll, please?

[00:00:43] Speaker 6

Mr. Gifford?

[00:00:44] Speaker 1

Present.

[00:00:45] Speaker 6

Mr.

[00:00:45] Attribution uncertain

Brown?

[00:00:46] Speaker 1

Present.

[00:00:47] Speaker 6

Mr. Green?

[00:00:48] Speaker 1

Present.

[00:00:49] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Mr. Lightholder?

[00:00:52] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:52–00:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:54] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Kimberly Curtis? Here. And Lloyd Roberts? And Demetrius Thomas? Okay.

[00:01:06] Speaker 1

And would you swear in our officers, please?

[00:01:09] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice

Yes, sir. ‸ You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing about

[00:01:17] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:17–00:01:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:18] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes, ma'am.

[00:01:22] Speaker 2

‸ Okay.

[00:01:25] Speaker 1

Everyone should have an agenda, and it appears that there are some changes to make for the record, so I will read those off to ‸ you.

[00:01:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:40–00:01:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:48] Speaker 1

Item number eight, 21-0019, complied. Item number nine, 21-0024, also complied. And in the noncompliance section of the agenda, the first item, 20-1055, as complied.

[00:02:23] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:23–00:02:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:30] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:30–00:02:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:37] Speaker 1

Good.

[00:02:38] Speaker 3

Good.

[00:02:39] Speaker 1

Wonderful.

[00:02:40] Attribution uncertain

[00:02:40] Speaker 1

like compliance. With those changes, I'll take the motion to approve.

[00:02:46] Speaker 7

I'll motion to approve.

[00:02:50] Speaker 1

I'll second.

[00:02:50] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:50–00:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:02:52] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:02:52] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? There are none. So the agenda is approved for tonight.

[00:02:58] Speaker 6

Excuse me, Chairman, was that Kim? Yeah.

[00:03:01] No voice detected

Okay.

[00:03:05] Speaker 1

And if you have reviewed the minutes of March 18 meeting, are there any changes?

[00:03:15] No voice detected

[00:03:15] Speaker 1

not, I will take a motion to approve those minutes.

[00:03:20] Speaker 3

Mr. Chair,

[00:03:21] Attribution uncertain

[00:03:21] Speaker 3

move to

[00:03:21] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:21–00:03:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:26] Speaker 7

Okay.

[00:03:27] Speaker 1

[00:03:27] Attribution uncertain

need

[00:03:27] Speaker 1

a second.

[00:03:28] Speaker 7

I'll second.

[00:03:29] Speaker 1

Thank you. Motion

[00:03:31] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:31–00:03:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:31] Attribution uncertain

move

[00:03:31] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:03:31] Speaker 1

with

[00:03:32] Attribution uncertain

[00:03:32] Speaker 1

second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed or none.

[00:03:35] Attribution uncertain

[00:03:35] Speaker 1

the minutes are approved. Okay. I welcome our new member or new alternate? Alternate. Alternate. New alternate. At any rate, welcome to the board. Thank you. And

[00:04:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:11–00:04:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:18] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

The property address is 6 0 1 Lucas Lane.

[00:04:21] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:21–00:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:24] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. Photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of permits required, permits required,

[00:04:38] Attribution uncertain

permits

[00:04:38] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

required fences. Storing outdoors. Accumulation of trash and litter. Storing junk or autos. And trailer

[00:04:50] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Machine re-recognized

and

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:50–00:04:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:04:50] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

yard. I visited the site ‸ total of nine times and found some progress made on the property.

[00:04:57] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:57–00:04:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:59] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

this case. But ‸ as of my last inspection, April 15th, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working on this case since August 21st, 2020. And I brought this case before the code board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on April 1st and it was sent certified and posted on the property.

[00:05:24] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:24–00:05:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:30] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

That the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $150. be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's nobody here for tonight for the property.

[00:05:43] Speaker 1

Okay. Thank you. If no one has any questions, I'll take a motion.

[00:05:53] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:20]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:53–00:06:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:15] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:06:20] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Brown. Thank you. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Any opposed?

[00:06:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:24–00:06:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

passes. And next up is

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:25–00:06:34 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:06:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:34–00:06:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:38] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Machine re-recognized

Property address is

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:38–00:06:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:06:39] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:39–00:06:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:40] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Machine re-recognized

Cocoa Boulevard. For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, Code Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:40–00:06:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:06:54] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:54–00:07:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:00] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

and grounds, and permits required. I visited the site nine times and have found no progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in the case, but as of

[00:07:12] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:12–00:07:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:17] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

violation. I've been working on this case since July 23rd, 2020,

[00:07:22] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:22–00:07:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:07:23] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved.

[00:07:28] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:28–00:07:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:32] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

and it was sent certified and posted at the property in violation.

[00:07:34] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:34–00:07:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:40] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come

[00:07:43] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:43–00:07:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:48] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

The violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's nobody here this evening for the

[00:07:54] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:54–00:07:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:54] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:07:57] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

to mention, I had a phone call with the owner or representative.

[00:08:00] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:00–00:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:04] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

and they selected a demo contractor, and they requested 90 days to get through the process and take it down. Staff would probably be more comfortable with 60, but

[00:08:16] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:16–00:08:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:16] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

it be known that they did contact me yesterday and asked for 90 days.

[00:08:20] Speaker 1

Okay, and I think as the sign says there, that's the gateway to

[00:08:24] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:24–00:08:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:24] Speaker 1

that the

[00:08:25] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:25–00:08:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:27] Speaker 1

i would I would suggest at least 150 if someone has to make a motion. Mr. Chair. Go

[00:08:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

ahead. uh

[00:08:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

i'm

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:35–00:08:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:08:37] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

just questioning um all the growth that's by the highway on 520. Is that part of the problem with this property or? who's Well,

[00:08:49] Speaker 5

some of it is. Some of it on the one side belongs to the railroad, and then some of it is actually city property with some overgrowth of weeds. So, um it depends on where you're looking. Like, all this in the back is theirs. Just slightly in the front by the sidewalk that's actually city right away. So the city needs to go in there and. Clean out that area, but then the flower beds

[00:09:16] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:16–00:09:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:09:16] Speaker 5

offset belong to this building. Okay,

[00:09:20] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I know

[00:09:21] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that was a convoluted answer to an easy question, but it's it's a dividing line. So part of it is, but part of it isn't.

[00:09:28] Speaker 2

That's funny that our city of

[00:09:30] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:30–00:09:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:30] Speaker 2

can't see that everything's overgrown there and they can't take care of it.

[00:09:35] Speaker 5

They, they could.

[00:09:36] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

They could. They should. put a fine on them. Maybe we'll wake them up.

[00:09:43] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:43–00:09:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:44] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:09:45] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

taxpayers, so we don't want ‸ Yeah, we

[00:09:47] Speaker 2

don't need them uh Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion on this one.

[00:09:51] Speaker 1

Go ahead, please.

[00:09:52] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

uh That we find it in violation and that we extend the uh the time to correct the violation to 60 days and also change the fine from

[00:10:06] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:06–00:10:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:08] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

a day on the fine to 150

[00:10:11] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:11–00:10:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:12] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

if not corrected.

[00:10:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

I'll

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:18–00:10:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:10:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

second. Thank you. Motion on the floor with a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? There are none. That motion passes.

[00:10:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:38–00:10:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:43] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

[00:10:48] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

[00:11:06] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:06–00:11:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:10] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

yard which has since complied i visited the site nine times and found some progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection, April 15, 2021, the property remained in violation. I've been working

[00:11:27] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:27–00:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:31] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a

[00:11:36] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:36–00:11:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:40] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

‸ certified and

[00:11:41] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:41–00:11:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:51] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

um in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or

[00:11:55] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:55–00:11:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:58] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

per day. uh For each day, the violation remain until compliance is achieved. ‸ property owner is here tonight uh and

[00:12:05] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:05–00:12:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:09] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

able to be in full compliance within that time frame

[00:12:11] Speaker 1

Okay, which which were the two that are already

[00:12:14] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

compliant? Parking in the yard?

[00:12:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Parking in the yard

[00:12:17] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

and the trailer in the yard.

[00:12:19] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:19–00:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:20] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:12:22] Speaker 2

driveway. ‸ Okay. those boarded up windows are in another property.

[00:12:27] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

The boarded up window uh is on that property and somehow I uh skipped that on the on the paperwork. that's supposed to ‸ the property

[00:12:34] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:34–00:12:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:12:38] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

the uh

[00:12:39] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:39–00:12:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:44] Speaker 1

Okay. And there is someone here?

[00:12:47] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

Yes, sir.

[00:12:47] Speaker 1

Do you wish

[00:12:48] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:48–00:12:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:49] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:12:51] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:12:52] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

he was he was fine.

[00:12:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

You're good with ‸ it. Okay. okay

[00:12:59] Attribution uncertain

all

[00:12:59] Speaker 1

right. Then I'll take a motion. I'll

[00:13:02] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

make a motion.

[00:13:02] Speaker 1

Please, go ahead.

[00:13:03] Speaker 7

In regards to case number 20-1200, that the

[00:13:08] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:08–00:13:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:14] Speaker 7

violation is to be corrected within 30 days or a 50 per day fine be imposed until compliance is ‸ achieved.

[00:13:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Okay.

[00:13:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:24–00:13:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Motion on the floor with a second. All in favor say aye. Aye.

[00:13:32] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Aye.

[00:13:33] Speaker 1

Any opposed?

[00:13:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:34–00:13:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:39] Speaker 1

Thank you, okay Okay.

[00:13:53] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:53–00:13:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:53] Speaker 1

is 20-1254.

[00:13:57] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:57–00:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:03] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of Article 2, Sign Regulations, Section 3-21, prohibited signs and features. I visited the site nine times and found no progress made on the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection, April 15, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working

[00:14:34] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:34–00:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:38] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

case before the Code Enforcement Board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on April

[00:14:44] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:44–00:14:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:14:45] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

2021, and it was sent certified and posted on the property the

[00:14:51] Attribution uncertain

property

[00:14:51] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

Staff recommends in case 20-1254 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of 25 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And their attorney is here to speak on their behalf.

[00:15:09] Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

Steve, I just got one question.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:15:09–00:15:14 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:15:11] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Machine re-recognized

Yes, sir.

[00:15:13] Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

This is not a repeat,

[00:15:14] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:14–00:15:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:15] Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

we've had violations at this place. Are these different people a while back?

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:15:15–00:15:37 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[00:15:22] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

Yes, it's a different property owner. We did have an issue with a broken window at one time and the building being open, but this is not the same. There used to be a paint place there. Right. And so that goes back to that.

[00:15:38] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:38–00:15:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:15:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

you. Okay. And

[00:15:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:42–00:15:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Yes, sir. Okay.

[00:15:49] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

Yes, sir. The board for the record. My name is Tony Willie Bryce preparing on behalf of the client. My client who is a proprietor of pit crew roofing.

[00:15:59] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:59–00:16:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:02] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

speak to both my

[00:16:03] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:03–00:16:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:08] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

here before the board tonight to request an extension for 90 days to come into compliance. The reason for my particular request is pursuant to the violation. The request can be remediated by the application of a different type of licensing, which will permit my clients to both house that vehicle there as well as conduct other activities at the property. Uh,

[00:16:29] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:29–00:16:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:32] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

Uh, my client has employees over 30 people within the community. Uh, they've been active member of the community with for over a decade. Uh, we just would ask the board ‸ afford us 90 days to both apply for the proper licensing as well as to get that licensing in place so that we'll be in compliance with the board regulations.

[00:16:52] Speaker 1

Is this licensing that would come from the city or

[00:16:54] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

the license that would come from the city and

[00:16:57] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized

I've

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:57–00:16:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:16:57] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

spoke to my clients. We would have to request to be afforded the opportunity to apply for the requisite licensing for the act of the nature of the activity.

[00:17:05] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized

that's

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:05–00:17:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:17:05] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

transpiring at the property.

[00:17:06] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:06–00:17:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:09] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:17:10] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

There's business licensing that other property owners that run conduct businesses in the area had that allows them to put park their box trucks in

[00:17:18] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized

front

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:18–00:17:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:17:18] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

both in front of their, their property as well as in front of their businesses. And

[00:17:22] Speaker 5

just to kind of clear this up, um, this particular building has a business tax receipt, but it's for office use only, uh, through the work hours Monday through Friday.

[00:17:33] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:33–00:17:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:36] Speaker 5

It's not to be part of a roofing business.

[00:17:39] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:39–00:17:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:46] Speaker 5

advertising.

[00:17:46] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:46–00:17:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:51] Speaker 5

by zoning and meet all the requirements and that becomes the office for the roofing company. And obviously they can park their, their vehicles on site. However, they would have to meet zoning and all the zoning requirements that go along with that.

[00:18:08] No voice detected

[00:18:08] Speaker 5

typically moving the truck would be our violation. Instantaneously that could be done relatively quick, um, to meet zoning requirements based on the size of the property and stuff. They would need to really meet with zoning, find out how many parking spaces they need, what they can use, where they can park.

[00:18:27] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:27–00:18:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:32] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

abate

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:32–00:18:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:18:32] Speaker 5

this one violation, make it go away. If the truck leaves, that would actually cure the violation. Then they could go through and do the business tax.

[00:18:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And we didn't

[00:18:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:43–00:18:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:46] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:18:47] Speaker 5

Um, we, our case was already ongoing since October. The roofing trailer or whatever that's in there has just appeared this month. Correct.

[00:18:58] Speaker 1

Yes. Okay. Well, 30 days is certainly sufficient to move that truck. Uh, it looks like it's got all its wheels on it. And, and, uh, I would, I would add

[00:19:13] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

to that that the truck is, is an active, uh, participant in,

[00:19:16] Attribution uncertain

[00:19:16] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

the business itself. It's, it's, it is conducive to the business and necessary for the conducting of the business itself. So, uh,

[00:19:24] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized

pursuant

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:24–00:19:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:19:25] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

to moving the truck, the truck needs to be on site at particular times to conduct the normal business during the, during the business ‸ hours.

[00:19:34] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:34–00:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:41] Speaker 2

that says that it can't block all the traffic coming in there and other parking spaces?

[00:19:48] Speaker 5

Well, that's where the planning and zoning would come in once they attempted to get the correct license. Cause again, currently they're only to have employees there for office

[00:19:57] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

use.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:57–00:19:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:19:58] Speaker 5

Therefore, the truck is not based on office shoes. Once they applied for the correct license, zoning would tell them where their parking spaces are.

[00:20:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:07–00:20:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:07] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:20:09] Speaker 5

So to answer your question, that's actually taking up a couple parking spaces. It probably would not be allowed to be parked there.

[00:20:17] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:17–00:20:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:21] Speaker 5

to the planning and zoning department.

[00:20:23] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:23–00:20:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:29] Speaker 5

No, you can't block your entrances. You can't use it.

[00:20:32] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:32–00:20:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:36] Speaker 5

doesn't operate from that location. It's advertising off site as a vehicle sign.

[00:20:44] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

On a simplest thing, the best thing to do probably is to find this in violation. If they move the truck, they're okay. And then they can go and get the other. Uh, adjustments with the board while border adjustment or planning.

[00:21:01] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:01–00:21:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:01] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:21:03] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

move the truck, comply the violation and then seek help through planning and zoning and.

[00:21:11] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:11–00:21:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:21:15] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

[00:21:19] Speaker 3

Mr. Manager.

[00:21:21] Speaker 5

Yes,

[00:21:22] Speaker 3

how frequently is that truck there and for what durations?

[00:21:26] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

It's been there pretty much. I personally working during my shift not seeing that truck move. Um, as well as living here, I drive by quite frequently and I personally have not seen the truck move. The, uh, truck owner has said that she can provide GPS records. Proving that it moves, but I have not seen it move when the truck first arrived on scene there. Uh, there was, there was no tag and the tires were flat. Uh, we discussed that and she took care of that immediately got the truck operational and put a tag on it. Uh,

[00:21:57] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:57–00:22:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:01] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

Uh,

[00:22:01] Attribution uncertain

[00:22:01] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

moved from the center of the property at one point to the end, but then I haven't seen it move again since.

[00:22:13] Speaker 1

Okay. Well, it seems to me that 90 days is, uh, excessive. Uh, 30 days is certainly adequate to move the truck and we're not citing for the lack of ‸ licensing. That would, that would be something you just would have to address. Uh,

[00:22:39] Speaker 5

and even the licensing portion necessarily can be done a lot quicker than 90 days as well.

[00:22:45] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:45–00:22:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:51] Speaker 5

through.

[00:22:52] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:52–00:22:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:56] Speaker 5

roofing businesses can operate in that particular

[00:22:59] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

zoning

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:59–00:22:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:23:00] Speaker 5

Um, but then that would all go through once they made an application for that and then they would have to deal with that. That would take maybe 30 days. Um, I think it can be done quicker than 90. But they weren't cited for that. They were just simply cited for the truck vehicular sign.

[00:23:16] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

Well, the reason we requested the 90 days because, uh, as I've experienced a lot of other applications, there was a backlog with applications and the processing thereof. Uh, so we're, we're asking for an additional time period because again, we don't know what the ‸ backlog is, how fast these applications are going to process or approve.

[00:23:31] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:31–00:23:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:35] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

back for several months to do COVID-19. We're requesting additional time just to afford us the ability to make sure we clear through the backlog and get the proper documentation without having to run into a time issue with respect to getting those things approved.

[00:23:47] Speaker 3

Okay.

[00:23:48] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice

I'd also like to point out in those pictures, just for clarification purposes, the black truck that is adjacent to the, uh, my client's pit crew truck is not their vehicle.

[00:23:56] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:56–00:24:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:01] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:24:03] Speaker 1

And nor, nor is the issue of, uh, licensing of the business or business license or any of that. None of that is being cited at this point. The only thing that's cited is, is the vehicle sitting there that says roofs in 10 days.

[00:24:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:18–00:24:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:27] Speaker 1

it is would satisfy the requirement here. And then that, then you

[00:24:32] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:24:32–00:24:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:32] Speaker 1

then you have an open book to go and get, uh,

[00:24:35] Attribution uncertain

uh,

[00:24:36] Speaker 1

licensing or, uh, variances or whatever it is you may need to do to, to operate the business the way you want to do it.

[00:24:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:45–00:24:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:46] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:24:48] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

backlog and we are turning out

[00:24:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

our BTRs within 10

[00:24:52] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

days

[00:24:52] Speaker 1

to two weeks.

[00:24:53] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:53–00:24:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:59] Speaker 5

receipts daily when it, there's no log. So we're good. I

[00:25:04] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

appreciate

[00:25:05] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

that. Thank you.

[00:25:06] Speaker 3

Mr. Chair, I would like to make a motion in the case of two zero one two five four, uh,

[00:25:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:12–00:25:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:17] Speaker 3

in 30 days or

[00:25:18] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized

a fine

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:18–00:25:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:25:18] Speaker 3

be imposed. But $25 per day until compliance is achieved.

[00:25:23] Speaker 7

I'll second.

[00:25:25] Speaker 1

Okay. Motion on

[00:25:26] Attribution uncertain

the

[00:25:26] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

floor on the floor with a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Are there any opposed? Hearing none, the motions passed.

[00:25:35] Speaker 9 (introduced as “Tony Willie Bryce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

Thank you for your time.

[00:25:36] Speaker 1

Thank you, sir. Okay.

[00:25:49] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:49–00:25:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:54] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

Property addresses 722 Johnson Street for the record. I'm Steve ‸ code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with the case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of accessory structures. Storing outdoors. Storing

[00:26:17] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Machine re-recognized

junk or

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:17–00:26:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:17] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

autos. Accumulation of trash and litter. And district intent single family

[00:26:25] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Machine re-recognized

residence

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:25–00:26:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:26:25] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

as a, it was apparent they were operating a repair shop out of the, on the side of the property there.

[00:26:33] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:33–00:26:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:35] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

and found no progress made on the property on my last attempted. Uh, I made, I have, I'm sorry. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on April 15th, the property remains in violation.

[00:26:52] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:52–00:26:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:56] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

and have brought this case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. ‸ I sent a notice of hearing on April 1st, 2021. It was sent certified and posted on the property.

[00:27:08] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:08–00:27:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:14] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or ‸ fine of $125 be imposed for each day.

[00:27:20] Attribution uncertain

The

[00:27:20] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there's nobody here this evening for the property.

[00:27:27] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And did you, have you spoken to anyone? I have

[00:27:30] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

spoken to the property owner. He's in Felsmere. He was attempting to get permits. I spoke to the tenant as well. The tenants last statement was, was, well, we can't pull a permit because it's not our property.

[00:27:42] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:42–00:27:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:45] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice

So I have the property owner himself was had come down and said he was looking and getting the permits.

[00:27:50] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:50–00:27:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:51] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice

told him that he couldn't get one without a contractor, he just assumed that he wasn't going to get one. So that's why it came before the code board.

[00:27:58] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:58–00:27:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:27:58] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:27:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:27:58] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:28:00] Speaker 1

Okay. Good. Motion to one.

[00:28:06] Speaker 7

I'll make a motion, please.

[00:28:08] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:08–00:28:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:12] Speaker 7

recommendations that the property is found in violation

[00:28:15] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:15–00:28:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:20] Speaker 7

compliance is achieved.

[00:28:22] Speaker 3

Second.

[00:28:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. Motion on forward the second all in favor say aye. Aye.

[00:28:30] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:28:30–00:28:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:30] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

opposed? There are none. ‸ The motion passes. Next item is C, C, ‸ where did I get that?

[00:28:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:41–00:28:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:44] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:28:47] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:47–00:28:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:51] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of maintenance of structure or grounds and storm drainage. I visited the site five times and found no progress made on the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on April 15th, 2021, the property remains in violation.

[00:29:22] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:22–00:29:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:26] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:29:26–00:29:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:27] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

brought this case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent notice of hearing on April 1st, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation.

[00:29:41] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:41–00:29:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:46] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or find a $50 be imposed for each day.

[00:29:52] Attribution uncertain

The

[00:29:52] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

violations remain until compliance is achieved. There's nobody here this evening.

[00:29:59] Speaker 1

‸ What's going on here? There's no building, right? No, sir.

[00:30:03] Speaker 5

No, they were supposed to build a boat repair building.

[00:30:08] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:08–00:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:10] Speaker 5

They got as far as the slab, which you can see, um, on some of these pictures.

[00:30:16] Speaker 1

‸ I can see a slab in the background there, but

[00:30:19] Speaker 5

what they did is their silt fence has collapsed and been removed.

[00:30:23] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:23–00:30:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:28] Speaker 5

So this area here, all the water runs off and that just keeps getting deeper and deeper. And they piled up some items inside there. And then this area slopes down. It's actually eating the ground away next to the old Durango's building.

[00:30:44] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:44–00:30:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:30:47] Speaker 5

And you can see how it goes right down and follows that little trench and it's just eating all the land away, which is actually creating his wall to crack.

[00:30:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And what contact have you had with the owner? ‸ I was gonna say we've had,

[00:31:01] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

uh,

[00:31:01] Attribution uncertain

uh,

[00:31:02] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

we've had contact with them on. They've actually done several properties in the area.

[00:31:07] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:07–00:31:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:10] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

Um, I've posted it and I've driven by their own properties. I haven't been able to, uh, uh, get them pinned down on this property.

[00:31:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. I don't know

[00:31:18] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

if he ran out of money.

[00:31:19] Attribution uncertain

[00:31:19] Speaker 5

used to keep in really good contact with Mr. Hevia. He owns a place on Stone Street, the old convenience store that got rehabbed. He fixed that up. Um, but on this project, he's just been missing in action.

[00:31:33] Speaker 1

I would suggest again, because this is a kind of a main drag area for the city that they find be a little increased. Uh, I don't know. 30 days is sufficient to whatever they'd have to do.

[00:31:47] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:47–00:31:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:48] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:31:50] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice

And they need to address the silk fencing fencing issue. Uh, there's a section where they have part of it up and ‸ I don't know why they. Why they stopped at that point, but it's, uh, yeah. That's really the main issue is probably the ‸ storm drainage. Um, and then a little bit of the cleanup. They did a mo today, as you can see in the picture.

[00:32:11] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:11–00:32:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:14] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice

I haven't seen anybody on site on that location at all. Um, he was doing, uh, and if I don't know how much the work he's doing himself, for instance, on the property on Stone Street. I had met him out there at that property before.

[00:32:27] Speaker 2

So is he a general contractor to do this?

[00:32:31] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:31–00:32:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:36] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

doing as far as pulling permits.

[00:32:37] Speaker 8 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:37–00:32:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:41] Speaker 8 (name unresolved)

hasn't done anything further with the property other than scrape it off and get the slab put down, which I believe was done by another contractor.

[00:32:53] Speaker 1

Okay.

[00:32:54] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:54–00:32:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:56] Speaker 2

Okay.

[00:32:57] Attribution uncertain

[00:32:57] Speaker 2

give an old try. I, I believe you're correct on the, uh, the amount of fine per day. Uh, okay.

[00:33:08] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:08–00:33:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:13] Speaker 2

And that the, uh, uh, the, um, fine for the violation will be $150 per day. Until the, uh, uh, is, uh, the correction is performed.

[00:33:30] Speaker 1

Yeah. How many days?

[00:33:32] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

Uh, was he asking for more days?

[00:33:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:35–00:33:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:36] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:33:36] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:33:37] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

Okay. 30 days.

[00:33:38] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:38–00:33:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:39] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:33:40] Speaker 1

Okay. Motion on the floor with a second. All those in

[00:33:43] Attribution uncertain

favor

[00:33:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

say aye. Aye.

[00:33:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:45–00:33:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Any opposed?

[00:33:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:46–00:33:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:34:00–00:34:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:15] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:15–00:34:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:21] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:21–00:34:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:24] Speaker 5

minute.

[00:34:25] Speaker 1

Oh, we've lost our picture again. Yes.

[00:34:58] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:34:58–00:36:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:35:39] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:18]

[00:35:57] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:36:00] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:29]

[00:36:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:37:00] Speaker 1

How are we doing?

[00:37:05] Speaker 5

Mr. Chair, due to the technical difficulties, we don't have pictures to present. And so the last three cases that we

[00:37:13] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:13–00:37:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:22] Speaker 5

Amherst Court. We'd like to table.

[00:37:30] Speaker 10

Do you have physical copies?

[00:37:32] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I don't have physical copies.

[00:37:34] Speaker 1

So item 10,

[00:37:35] Attribution uncertain

we'll

[00:37:36] Speaker 1

table. We've got two of each, basically.

[00:37:38] Speaker 5

We've got two of each,

[00:37:39] Speaker 1

two pictures of each. Yes,

[00:37:43] Speaker 5

we'd like to table them.

[00:37:46] Speaker 1

Number 10 and number 11.

[00:37:48] Speaker 5

‸ Excuse me.

[00:37:51] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:51–00:37:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:53] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:37:54] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:37:54] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:37:57] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:37:57] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:37:58] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:37:59] Speaker 11

And I've been waiting

[00:38:00] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:00–00:38:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:01] No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:38:03] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

No, that's, that's not your Amherst. Oh. You're the lien reduction?

[00:38:07] Speaker 10

Yes.

[00:38:08] Speaker 5

Yes, that's not your.

[00:38:10] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:10–00:38:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:11] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

That's

[00:38:12] Speaker 5

another Amherst.

[00:38:13] Speaker 11

I'm down.

[00:38:15] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:15–00:38:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Um, we'd also like to table that. However, we can proceed with the lien reduction. Sure. And the property owner is here.

[00:38:31] Speaker 7

Okay.

[00:38:35] No voice detected

Okay.

[00:38:35] Speaker 1

With those corrections, uh, to the agenda that brings us to the lien reduction section.

[00:38:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:43–00:38:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:52] Speaker 1

Uh,

[00:38:56] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

yes, sir. For the record, I'm Gerald Pettengill, uh, code enforcement officer. The code enforcement board held a public hearing on September 20th, 2012. At which time the board found the owner, Joseph W.

[00:39:10] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized

Parish

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:10–00:39:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:39:10] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

in violation of the following. Section 6-1001 fencing

[00:39:15] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized

and

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:15–00:39:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:39:15] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

exterior structure. The code enforcement board provided the owner time to correct said violation. Therefore, consistent with the code enforcement board's order, a lien was started against the property effective October 19th, 2012. The lien ran at $25 per day from October 19th, 2012 until

[00:39:38] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:38–00:39:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:43] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

The total fine is $10,725. Code records show on-site inspections were conducted and contact was made. The current owner, Kimberly Minot, is requesting that the lien be reduced to zero. Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien.

[00:40:09] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:09–00:40:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:13] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:13–00:40:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:40:13] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

current applicant owned the property at the time the violations occurred.

[00:40:17] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:17–00:40:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:22] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

The number of violations

[00:40:24] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:24–00:40:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:27] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

Number of inspections performed was eight. Length of time the property was in violation before correction. Previous code violations, yes. Property taxes for 2020 are paid, no outstanding tax bills. Other liens, records show no outstanding liens on the property and no water liens. Property inspection, March 3rd of 2021 ‸ was in compliance before and prior to the code board meeting. The current market value of the subject property,

[00:41:06] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:06–00:41:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:11] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

property appraiser.

[00:41:13] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:41:13–00:41:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:14] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:41:14] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:41:18] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)

Staff submits their cost sheet for case number 12-734 in the amount of $1,280.65. Staff's recommendation is based on the gravity of the violations, the amount of time it took the property to come into compliance and

[00:41:37] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:37–00:41:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:44] Speaker 4 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:44–00:41:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:48] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:41:49] Speaker 1

And this might not, you'll need to be sworn in, please.

[00:41:52] Speaker 6

You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so how can you God?

[00:41:56] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I do.

[00:41:56] Speaker 6

Please state your name and address for the record.

[00:41:59] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:59–00:42:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:42:00] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:42:01] Speaker 11

And do you want the business address or my home address?

[00:42:04] Speaker 6

Your home address?

[00:42:07] Speaker 11

2170.

[00:42:09] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:09–00:42:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:14] Speaker 1

Thank you. Okay, and before you start, I just want to clarify one issue for you.

[00:42:21] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:21–00:42:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:27] Speaker 1

Council.

[00:42:28] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:28–00:42:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:33] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:33–00:42:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:43] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:42:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

[00:42:50] Speaker 1

Mm-hmm. And typically what we look at in reducing fines is how much money has the city had to expend on this particular property. Mm-hmm. And in this case, the total is $1,280.65. So, uh, even though you're asking for zero, tell us what you'd like to tell us.

[00:43:15] Speaker 11

Well, I, $1,200 would have been fine and excited about it. But I would like you to consider, um, I brought it in compliance within several months of purchasing it, did a lot of repairs to it. I signed off that it was in compliance.

[00:43:32] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:32–00:43:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:35] Speaker 11

reductions. When I came to get the lien reduction, I was told the same

[00:43:39] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:43:39–00:43:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:43:41] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:43:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:43:41] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:43:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:43:41] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:43:42] Speaker 11

permits, that I had to pull, um, um, surveys. Uh, I couldn't be told what I actually needed to do because they decided they, at that point in

[00:43:58] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:58–00:44:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:00] Speaker 11

the shed, which is what was on the property at the time I was signed off at. And

[00:44:05] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:05–00:44:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:10] Speaker 11

the property when I bought it. So I've expended a lot of money and surveys and engineering because when it came down to the end, after I did all these things, I was told the shed had to be removed because there had to be a sticker inside the

[00:44:25] Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

show

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:25–00:44:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:44:26] Speaker 11

that gave them the building structures that I had to remove it. So I had to go to the expense of removing the shed.

[00:44:35] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:35–00:44:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:41] Speaker 11

told it was in compliance. ‸ Then I was told to go get this and pay for a survey, pay for engineers. I did all that, took it back to the permit department to get it corrected and was told, well, you have to have the stuff that's inside the shed.

[00:44:54] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:54–00:44:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:57] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:57–00:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:59] Speaker 11

um, plastic shed to go buy at a Walmart. So I've lost value in the property

[00:45:06] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:45:06–00:45:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:06] Speaker 11

I just, I don't, you know, they've been very nice to me, but nobody could give me an answer. So it's devalued the property and removing the shed that was perfectly acceptable when I bought it.

[00:45:19] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:19–00:45:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:23] Speaker 11

acceptable. And I was told to do all these things. I spent all this money and still had to remove the shed.

[00:45:29] Speaker 5

Mr. Chair, if I can, just to kind of bring it into focus. ‸ What happened in 2019 has nothing to do with the

[00:45:36] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

case that's

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:36–00:45:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:45:36] Speaker 5

before you for the

[00:45:37] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:37–00:45:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:45:38] Speaker 5

reduction. That case was cited and closed. Our city code actually states if you apply for a

[00:45:44] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:44–00:45:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:45:44] Speaker 5

reduction,

[00:45:45] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:45–00:45:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ So

[00:45:48] Speaker 5

when doing the review of the application, we found that there was never a permit pulled for the fence. Never a permit pulled for the shed and the shed did not meet the setbacks because it was actually used as part of the fencing. The fence stopped wall of the shed fence. So we made her, we sent her a notice of violation to get those corrected so that when she comes to the board.

[00:46:12] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:12–00:46:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:17] Speaker 5

and closed back in 2013. She is correct. She was in compliance. We just could not bring her forward for a

[00:46:24] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:24–00:46:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:46:24] Speaker 5

reduction until all violations were corrected on the property.

[00:46:27] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

But your acceptance in 2013 clearly states that the fence is in compliance.

[00:46:34] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:34–00:46:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:38] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

No, what you were told is you needed a permit.

[00:46:40] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:40–00:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:46] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

and needed to be repaired. So they cited that they overlooked the fact that there was never a permit for the fence. You can't use a wall of a shed as part of the fence and it wouldn't meet the side setbacks of the property.

[00:46:59] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:59–00:47:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:04] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:04–00:47:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

2013.

[00:47:08] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:08–00:47:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:13] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

of your letter. I could not bring you to this board while your property still had violations on it. So yes, you had to fix those. But they didn't pertain to the case you're asking for the reduction for. What you're asking for the reduction for.

[00:47:30] Attribution uncertain

I'm going to

[00:47:30] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

leave it

[00:47:30] Attribution uncertain

[00:47:30] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

to y'all. I, you know, I've this $1,200. That's fine if that's the way it needs to be.

[00:47:36] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:36–00:47:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:41] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

perfectly acceptable in 2013. And it's documented. ‸ Then I was told to jump through these hoops. And was told finally after I jumped through these hoops. That without the sticker inside the shed. There was no reason to even do it. They were going to make me take it off no matter what. And I'm calling it a sticker. I somehow there's some kind of dimensions. You probably know what I'm talking about.

[00:48:08] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:08–00:48:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:10] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

[00:48:14] Speaker 5

wind load. It's what happens when you get a building permit. You put that down. It shows the manufacturers. Specs for the shed. That's the sticker she no longer had by 2019 in the shed. Okay.

[00:48:27] Speaker 10

So Dennis it was recorded. The lien was recorded, right? Because I see in the application it says that they want the applicant wasn't aware of the lien. Yes.

[00:48:38] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

From the previous owner it was recorded. I'm not sure how Miss Minot got the property or what title company she used.

[00:48:47] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:47–00:48:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:47] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:48:47] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

[00:48:49] Speaker 10

[00:48:50] Speaker 11

bought it from the previous owner and there was no title insurance involved in the purchase.

[00:48:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:56–00:48:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:57] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:48:57] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:48:58] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:58–00:49:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:01] Speaker 11

and I brought it into compliance.

[00:49:06] Speaker 5

Okay.

[00:49:07] Speaker 11

Well, either way it's fine with me.

[00:49:10] Attribution uncertain

[00:49:10] Speaker 11

just feel like I've spent a lot of money trying to correct what I corrected in 2013.

[00:49:18] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:18–00:49:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:22] Speaker 1

That kind of comes under the category of buyer beware.

[00:49:26] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:26–00:49:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:29] Speaker 1

So, generally, we can recommend that the fine be reduced to that amount of the city's cost. But I need a motion to do that.

[00:49:40] Speaker 2

Mr. Chair.

[00:49:41] Speaker 1

Go ahead, Mr. Brown.

[00:49:42] Speaker 2

I'd like to make a motion on this case 12-734 that we reduce the fine down to $1,300.

[00:49:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Okay. And that's a recommendation to city council.

[00:50:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:01–00:50:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:04] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Okay. Motion

[00:50:06] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:06–00:50:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:07] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none. The motion is passed. You will get notice from our secretary of when it's going to be on the agenda for city council. And, of course, you can appear before city council and make the same case you made just now.

[00:50:30] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:30–00:50:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

That's their prerogative.

[00:50:37] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. And then once I get notice and it goes through them, I'll get a bill or... Yeah. If you just...

[00:50:44] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I mean, you could before the council meets even, you could just write a check for that amount if you want to. The $1,300? Just be ‸ done with it.

[00:50:51] Speaker 10

No. No.

[00:50:53] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:53–00:50:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:53] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Because they might not... They might change them. So I'll get a bill.

[00:50:58] Speaker 5

Immediately the day after the council meeting, after they've made their ruling, we will notify you what the ruling was and Darla will work with you and get you an invoice and whatever you need.

[00:51:09] Speaker 11

Okay.

[00:51:09] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:51:09–00:51:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:10] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:51:11] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:51:11] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:51:11] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

[00:51:16] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

[00:51:20] Speaker 5

Manager announcements? The only announcement...

[00:51:24] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:51:24–00:51:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:29] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:51:29–00:51:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:36] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:36–00:51:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:42] Speaker 5

an area.

[00:51:44] Speaker 1

Oh, okay.

[00:51:45] Attribution uncertain

Um,

[00:51:46] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

previous Code Officer, uh, Katie Carver, she accepted a position with another company and she left us. So she will no longer be with us. So we are looking for our third code officer once again.

[00:52:04] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:04–00:52:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:07–00:52:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:12] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

and find out what this issue is. Because this is the third or fourth time that it has happened. The

[00:52:18] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

computers are

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:52:18–00:52:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:52:19] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

shut down.

[00:52:19] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:19–00:52:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:23] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

hard copies as a backup.

[00:52:25] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:25–00:52:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:28] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

But I think it works better if we just bring the hard copies anyway.

[00:52:32] Speaker 1

At least until we know it is 100%.

[00:52:34] Speaker 5

Absolutely. So our apologies and we will fix that.

[00:52:40] Speaker 1

Okay. Anything else? Any comments from the board? Nothing else?

[00:52:47] Attribution uncertain

And

[00:52:47] Speaker 1

the, uh, next meeting is same place, same time, May the 20th of 2021. And this meeting is adjourned.

[00:53:00] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01]

Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:53:00–00:53:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:06] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:53:06–00:53:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:06] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T09:40:39 · 5,371 ordinary words, 1,678 in suspect passages, 142 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.