Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (1215_CE_Reg_Minutes_04_18_2024.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: George Brown, Josue Otero, Michael Simpson, Melissa Acosta, Dik Muller
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Absences: no absence line could be read from the minutes' text, so none is stated here; the first page of the minutes is the record.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Augusto Gonzalez (Interim Code Enforcement Manager), Micheal Mack (Code Enforcement Officer), Michael Folger (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl Recording (Secretary os)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Acosta, Brown, Otero (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (8)
to approve to the agenda of April 18, 2024 (moved by Muller, seconded by Otero); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve to the minutes of March 21, 2024 (moved by Simpson, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Simpson, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner July 18, 2024 (90 days) with follow ups, engineering letter ; and restored back to the original floor plan and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Acosta, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to amend Staff's recommendation. and give the property owner July 18, 2024 (90 days) for Exterior General Condition Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003(a-p) with follow up and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Otero, seconded by Acosta); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Simpson, seconded by Muller); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ; . ($1,500.00) (moved by Acosta, seconded by Simpson); PASSED 3-2; ayes: not named in the minutes; nays: Otero, Brown — the City's minutes, p. 6 Corrected to match the minutes, page 6.
to approve staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand six hundred twenty-two : dollars and eight cents ($2,622.08) (moved by Otero, seconded by Muller); PASSED 4-1; ayes: not named in the minutes; nays: Acosta — the City's minutes, p. 7 Corrected to match the minutes, page 7.
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$1,500.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “($1,500.00)” (motion result: PASSED; the City's minutes (1215_CE_Reg_Minutes_04_18_2024.pdf, p. 6); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,622.08 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “approve staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand six hundred twenty-two : dollars and eight cents ($2,622.08)” (motion result: PASSED; the City's minutes (1215_CE_Reg_Minutes_04_18_2024.pdf, p. 7); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_04_18_2024), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
289 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 14 voices separated from the audio.
30 short machine repair(s) (37 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 90.2% of 10,417 content words.
Dotted words (284 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
289 passages (24% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
I like to call the meeting of the City of Cocoa Police Department Code Enforcement Board to order. And we will start off with the Pledge of Allegiance, please.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:56–00:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
need the approval of the agenda and minutes, so we'll have the approval of the, uh, the minutes. Uh, when we've got to make some exceptions to the agenda here. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:41–00:01:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:11–00:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:30–00:02:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:00–00:03:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. You're going to do the first. ‸ Okay. And you're going to second it. So we got a meeting, uh, meeting agenda approved. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Okay. And we need the, uh, approval of minutes for March 21st.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:42–00:03:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:47–00:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:17–00:04:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:30–00:04:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:42–00:04:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:55–00:04:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number 28. For the record. My name is Michael Folger code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show findings of boarded
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:14–00:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:26–00:05:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:43–00:05:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:55–00:05:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:56–00:06:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
windows all around the building. Unsafe or dangerous building chapter six, section six, a 10. Home is dangerous to human life due to not having running water. A hazard to safety or health by reason of inadequate maintenance. Dilapidation. Obsolescence. Or abandonment due to not having any, any glass panes and any of the windows. Permit required
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:30–00:06:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on 4 18 2024, the property remains in violation. I've been working
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:00–00:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I have had some contact with the property owner. I brought this case before the code enforcement board as I've been working this case for 121 days.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:07:20–00:07:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:38–00:07:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
$25 for boarded up building. $50 for accumulation of trash and litter. $50 for storing outdoors. $50 for window glazing. $50 for unsafe building. And $25 for permit required. Be imposed for each day.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:18–00:08:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:39–00:08:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:32–00:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:42–00:09:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:49–00:09:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:55–00:10:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:11–00:10:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:22–00:10:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
property to separate families as defined by city code. The city code defines a family as a person or group related to each other by blood or marriage living under one roof as a single household unit. Staff has visited the site 14 times.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:10:43–00:10:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:46–00:10:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:52–00:10:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:58–00:11:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And staff has had contact with the owner between July of 2023 and October of 2023. And has met several contractors on the property. We brought this case for the code enforcement board as I've been working this case for 240 days.
on April 5th, 2024. And it was sent certified and posted in the property violation. Due to longevity of this case and no progress made, staff finds in case 23-843 that the owner is in violation.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:34–00:11:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
recommend 30 days be given to come in compliance. Or a fine of $50 for district and intent. $50 for permit required. And $50 for occupancy ‸ limitations be imposed for each state of violations remain. Until compliance ‸ is achieved. The violation for business tax receipt has been cured and it was removed.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:03–00:12:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:11]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
My name is Imran Qureshi. And I reside in California.
[00:12:15]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:15–00:12:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:30]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I just want to apologize to the board. Like, you know, I did some alterations to the property without pulling the apartments. And I wasn't aware of, like, you know, the things that I'm doing inside the property.
[00:12:40]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:40–00:12:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:43]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
When I was brought into my attention through the
[00:12:45]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
court
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:45–00:12:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:45]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
enforcement, and I've been diligently working, and they can vouch for that,
[00:12:50]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:50–00:12:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:53]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to come in and help me resolve these issues. But so far have not achieved much luck finding a good contractor who can help me with these things.
[00:13:02]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:02–00:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:07]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
company.
[00:13:08]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:08–00:13:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:11]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And they will start the work as soon as they can. All I'm requesting right now is just giving me some time, because every contractor is extremely busy, and it's very hard for them to commit and give me some time frame. When they can come in and get the work done.
[00:13:28]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:28–00:13:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:30]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
or three contractors a week I'm sending to the property. And since I live in California, this is very difficult for me, and I have some major health issues right now.
[00:13:54]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
‸ wish I had the answer for that. I mean, I can submit, I can, for
[00:13:58]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
your review
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:58–00:13:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:58]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
to look at ‸ this contract that I signed yesterday and give him the deposit of $2,000 to start the work. But I'm guessing maybe three to six months, because I need to put this behind me to kind of move forward with my health.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:14–00:14:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:37–00:14:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If this is single family, why is it broken up into two units?
[00:14:53]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
It wasn't necessarily broken into two units. Next, when I purchased the property, the property had, like, this ‸ add-on section, and it has a door that come from main house to this house. And what I did without pulling a permit, I closed that door. So one of the first thing on my list is to try to open that opening back up because the headers and everything is there, and install the door back in there again. So it would be single family home again.
I was recently in there approximately two weeks ago with a different contractor. I did see that the unit to the left, which was in one of the photos, is not occupied now. Just the main house, which was the living room, is occupied. That particular area doesn't have any issues with AC. ‸ We're not too concerned with that tenant being there. Our main concern was with the one that was altered to the left side.
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:31–00:16:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:31]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:32]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I can't really pull the permits because I'm not the person residing in the property. So according to the City of Cocoa you have to live there for two years. So I am bound by to hire general contractors.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:32–00:16:46 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:46–00:16:50 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:16:48]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
Basically I
[00:16:50]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:50–00:16:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:52]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:52–00:16:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:52]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:16:52]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
They don't even send you the estimate. They don't even send you the proposals or anything to work with you.
[00:16:57]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:57–00:16:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:59]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Um, there was another contract I have received like last week from another company. They want
[00:17:04]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:04–00:17:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:10]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
a finger, without even showing up with the property or looking at it or anything. So obviously as a working class person, you don't have that kind of budget to come up with, you know.
Uh, it's contingent upon the permits. That's what they wrote down. What is the timeline after the permits are issued? I would like to put it behind me ASAP.
‸ what I'm asking you is, did they give you a timeline after permits are pulled?
[00:18:06]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Unfortunately, Mr. Mueller, no, they have not given me that time frame. But the minute
[00:18:11]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:11–00:18:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:18:11]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
start the process, you bet I'll be on there ‸ behind trying to push them to get it done as soon as possible.
[00:18:18]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:18–00:18:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
trying to decide is we want to work with you. We need to establish a time. And if there's ‸ no documentation that says how long this is going to take after permits, it becomes very difficult for us to make a decision. So that's what we're trying to ascertain right now.
[00:18:42]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
There's no one going to be residing in that portion of the house. I'm just requesting the board if they can give me about six months, I'll make sure that whatever I need to do to get it all resolved in that time frame.
[00:19:12]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes, because
[00:19:13]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:13–00:19:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:17]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:17–00:19:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:20]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
people, try to arrange for them to come out there, take a look at the property. And then everyone says, okay, what do you want me to do? And the code enforcement violation is extremely vague. It doesn't specify one,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:33–00:19:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:33]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:19:35]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the manager of the code enforcement. I don't know if he's still there.
[00:19:37]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:37–00:19:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:43]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
out to the code enforcement board and asked them, like, give us a detailed outline. What do we need to do? You know, A, B, C, D, or one, two, three kind of thing. They've reached out to the city several times and everyone kind of backs off.
[00:19:52]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:52–00:19:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:53]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
This is so
[00:19:53]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
weak.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:53–00:19:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:19:53]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
If there's anything that was added that he wanted to keep, restore everything. Go back and add those things with permits on your own timeline thereafter.
I personally had to meet about three to four out there. It was that they left the job. They didn't want to get involved with it because ‸ there were issues with structural members that were altered. And they were going to require engineering.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:21:00–00:21:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Depending on what the property owner is choosing to do with that contractor, I haven't seen ‸ what scope of work they planned on doing. If there's some things that have been altered that he's choosing to keep, and they're not going to change it, the building
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:18–00:21:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
likely going to require some sort of engineering letter. Again, the fastest route is to return it back to what it was, back to exactly what the floor plan was. And that could take anywhere from about three months if the contractor began working soon. The permit can be issued with anywhere between three to five days from the building department.
Okay. I think it would be reasonable ‸ to continue the case and then get an update on where he is, because if it will require a letter from engineering and more detailed things, I think it should be continued. But with a follow up on what progress is made. So for example, just an example, if it's three months in those three months, ‸ something has to be done other than a vague contract. Like there has to be a letter, for example, like engineer, what specifically needs to be done to restore the property back to what it was.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:57–00:23:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
case, uh, to the, what did we say? Three months, three, 90 days, uh, code enforcement meeting, um, with the stipulation that there will be a follow up with detail on what progress is made. Um, and yeah, do I have a second?
You can do that. If you don't want to do that, then she needs to either make a new motion or you all have to vote down the motion on the table. There could be a finding of a violation, um,
of potential fines and give an extended period of time to, um, to come into compliance and require a three month followup or a followup in three months.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:46–00:24:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:47–00:24:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. One more time. In reference to case, C E 23, 843, 1206 to the plane. I moved to continue this case, um, to the code enforcement board meeting 90 days with a followup. Um, with the fines.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:59–00:26:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:07–00:26:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find the respondent in this case in violation of the city code ‸ as charged, and that respondent shall correct the violations no later than 90 days, and also providing a follow-up from the date of this order. A subsequent hearing may be held to determine compliance with this order, and daily fines may be imposed for each violation as follows. The rental tax has been corrected. District and intents, $25. Permit required, $50, and occupancy limitations, $50 per day. In determining the fines, the board has considered the following factors. The gravity of the violations, any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation, and any previous violations committed by the violator. The respondent is ordered to contact the code inspector to verify compliance with this order, and also a follow-up.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:09–00:27:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:11]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:12]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
May I say something before ‸ you guys vote on that?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:17–00:27:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:39–00:27:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:44–00:27:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:28:06]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
would like to speak. ‸ So one of the fines you guys are trying to impose is the occupancy. There is no multiple family occupancies in the property at this point in time.
[00:28:16]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:16–00:28:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:19]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Secondly, the structural. I have not touched any of the exterior walls of the property, neither have taken out any walls or added any walls to the property. The structure has not been altered in any way, form or shape. The only thing I've done, there was a door like this. I closed that door without even removing the header. So there's nothing structural that was going to alter in the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:44–00:28:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
permit required violation doesn't specifically state structural members. That was just me providing some more information on the permit required. There's permit required for everything. And it covers the renovation. It covers the plumbing. It covers the electrical. So whether we agree or disagree on the structural part, if you get the permit, you get it completed and you get it closed out with an approval, we're good to go.
[00:29:42]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I'm not the contractor, so I don't have all the know-hows about it.
[00:29:46]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:46–00:29:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:48]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
And
[00:29:48]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
they are
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:48–00:29:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:29:49]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
reputable company. They're actually coming all the way from Tampa to do this job. But all of us trying to ask you guys to make the correction on that portion of the motion that you made, that there is no occupancy, multiple occupancy in the property at this point in time.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:23–00:30:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it'll be scratched off and taken away. And then we will focus only on the things that are applicable that because you may, like you said, you take care of the permit. You ‸ take care of the occupancy. Those are two things that are out of the way and you ‸ only have one one left until you take you take all three of them away, then they will be in the 90 days.
the officers and then they'll come back and say it's already taken care of. You don't even come back in those 90 days because the contract is already taking care of everything. Right. So that's, that's what we're saying.
Okay. Okay. Okay. The code manager. Sir. This should be able to, he should be able to pull the permits, get, get done the way you want it done within the 90 days. Yes, sir. If
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:27–00:31:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Correct. It isn't like putting new roofs on and all this stuff, which we went through so much time to get it done. And this stuff should be able to be taken.
[00:31:50]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Okay. Um, may I have a copy of the contract back?
[00:31:53]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
Because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:53–00:31:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:31:54]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
that's the only copy I have. Yeah.
[00:31:56]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:56–00:31:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:57]Speaker 8 (introduced as “Imran Qureshi” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:13–00:32:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:42–00:32:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:48–00:32:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:06–00:33:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:11–00:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:18–00:33:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:29–00:33:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:37–00:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:49–00:33:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:07–00:34:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:13–00:34:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:17–00:34:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or a fine of $250 one time for a business tax receipt, $25 for exterior general condition, $25 for storing outdoors, and $25 for permit required be imposed for each of the violations remain until compliance is achieved.
violation has been cured, so that's going to be removed. So it's $250 one time business tax receipt, $25 for the exterior, $25 for storing outdoors, and $25 for permit. And the property owner is present.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:35:11–00:35:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:37–00:35:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:53–00:35:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:01–00:36:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:06–00:36:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're getting our roof fixed. We just got, some people came and told us that they're going to help us with the insurance to send us money to fix the roof, so we're working on that. It's been about a month since we've been waiting for them to just respond.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:36:44–00:36:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
were put in the extension, they were put in like seven years ago and now all of the sudden I need to get a permit for them. Um, so I don't understand if, uh, that's been going for a long time, but he explained to me that I need to go to the city.
Uh, we're working on painting the house. You know, that's going to take a little bit ‸ of money and time. Um, like I explained to the officer, I already talked to, uh, a friend of mine who's going to help me, uh, painting the house. So I just want to make sure also that way I don't get violated any codes.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:48–00:37:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
first step to get this stuff resolved is you guys showing up and that shows that you guys are interested in fixing this. Yes, sir. So thank you both of you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:27–00:38:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:51–00:38:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:17–00:39:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:44–00:39:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:30–00:40:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Here we have some, uh, pavers and some stones out there. We have the ladder that's been out there. Um, some cinder blocks by the fence. So it's miscellaneous outdoor storage.
violation? Well, there's no vehicle parking on the grass. One of them there is on pavers. The other one is a driveway extension on pavers. Uh, that vehicle there, uh, he's told me he's removed. I verified that today and the box truck was removed.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:53–00:41:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:02–00:42:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It wasn't taken to a code board. That case was cured at the time. And the, this current case from August, I have not received contact. That's why I sent the final notice. Do you remember
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:21–00:42:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But we still have a ladder. We still have the pavers. We still have the pressure washing machine. We still have the couch. We still have the outdoor thing and the lawnmower.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:06–00:43:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:24–00:43:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:33–00:43:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:36–00:43:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We still have a ladder. We still have the pavers. We still have the ‸ roof. We still have the outdoor couch. We still have like a lot of things. You know, it doesn't matter if you have contact for another case 200 and some days ago.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:01–00:44:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:09–00:44:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and I just moved them there now so they wouldn't just be all around the place. We moved the mop bucket and some of the trash. We're just working on it.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:41–00:44:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
uh, and I do park my, uh, my truck at the house at night. Like every morning I just go there, leave my personal truck and take my, uh, my truck to work.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:47–00:45:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:59–00:45:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So, um, we want to, we're not here to like just pressure and do it wrong. We want you here and we're glad you hear that you, that you see more clearly of everything that we would like to have done that you, you know, be in compliance. So that, uh, we all are, are right. So, and we thank you again for being here. That means that you're concerned.
everything that needs to be in compliance. So, and I don't think, like he said, I don't think that that 30 days is going to be enough time to get that roof
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:39–00:46:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:45–00:46:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, I would say, or, or just add that, you know, within the every 30 days, whatever we, we decide that, that you do have to contact, you know, the board or contact the officers and stay in constant contact with them that they see your updates. And then you can just get it resolved that way. And everything is taken care of, um, you know, even just the communication, communication, communication, communication is very important with us that, you know, and so you see how that within the last couple of days, you've been able to contact and everything is start working just to get the ball rolling on that side. So, um,
same that we did for the prior homeowner that they, you know, ‸ we do provide them a slight extension. With the, you know, that they provide some type of update, physical evidence that they are working with an insurance for the roof.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:25–00:48:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:06–00:49:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:33–00:49:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So it could be somewhere from three months or two years down the line. Every insurance is different. I don't have any information in front of me to tell me what stage he's at. So, yeah, I mean, we're not opposed to an extension for the roof. um it's not about the blight of the roof and things up there. It's for the safety of you guys. Correct. All right. We've got water damages because what water is not leaking in the, in the property doesn't mean that there's not water retention already going on there.
[00:50:00]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:08–00:50:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:50:29–00:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find respondents in the case violation of the city codes.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:48–00:50:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:05–00:51:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:12–00:51:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:17–00:51:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be the exterior general condition, correct? Yes, sir. so um so the violation of the city code as charge and that respondents shall correct the violation no later than 30 days. Okay. With that now with the exterior general condition.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:03–00:52:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right, we have a motion on the floor. Is there a second? I second. Okay, we have a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Nays, no nays. Okay, motion carries. Okay.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:52:21–00:52:34 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:54–00:53:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:09]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, my name is Michael Mack code enforcement officer.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:13–00:53:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:13]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:53:18]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of permit required
[00:53:29]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:29–00:53:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:34]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the rental home driveway, fence,
[00:53:37]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:37–00:53:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:41]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Section six dash one zero zero three eight through P for the unsanitary condition of the exterior of the home and accumulation of tall weeds, grass and overgrowth exceeding 12 inches in height. Staff visits the site 12 times. During staff first inspection, I found the property in violation of the above minted sections of the city code.
[00:54:03]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:03–00:54:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:07]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
my last inspection on April 18th, 2024, the property remains in violation. Staff has been working on this case since April 12th, 2023.
[00:54:18]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
staff has had brief contact with various property representatives via email.
[00:54:24]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:24–00:54:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:28]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case for 372 ‸ days. And the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on April 5th, 2024.
[00:54:39]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:39–00:54:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:43]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
due to the longevity of this case and no progress made, staff finds in case number
[00:54:50]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:50–00:54:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:51]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that
[00:54:52]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:52–00:54:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:56]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
compliance or a find of $25 for permit required $25 for exterior condition being posted for each day. The violation remains until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:18–00:55:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:55:31–00:55:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
correct the violations no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Uh, and a subsequent hearing may be held in determining the compliance with this order and daily fines may be imposed for each violation of permit required $25 and exterior condition $25.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:36–00:56:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:47–00:56:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:58–00:56:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at which time the board found the owner, Janet Johnson and Thomas Matlock, in violation of the following. Rental business tax, section 6-2003. The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner sufficient time to correct said violation, therefore consistent with the Code Enforcement Board's order, a non-compliance hearing was held on april 20th 2017.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:39–00:57:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:40]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:44–00:57:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:53–00:57:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:57–00:58:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:09–00:58:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
cost of staff. Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien. Whether the current owner owned the property at the time ‸ violations occurred, no. If the applicant resides at the property, no. This is a vacant single family residence at this time. The number of violations related to the subject lien, one. The number of inspections performed, 12.
Other liens, records show no outstanding liens on the property and no water liens. Property inspection, the property was inspected this morning, April 18, 2024, and was in compliance for the Code Enforcement Board hearing. An inspection will also occur prior to the council meeting. The current market value of the subject property,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:55–00:58:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:00–00:59:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:08–00:59:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
staff to prosecute the case This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took to come to compliance, and the total amount of the city's costs. And the property owner is present.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:35–00:59:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:47–00:59:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I purchased the property a year and a half ago and have been steadily correcting all the faults with the property, uh putting ‸ new fence, painting it, etc.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:51–01:00:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:00:54–01:00:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:57–01:01:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:11–01:01:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:16–01:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:26–01:01:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:34–01:01:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:42–01:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:52–01:01:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:56–01:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The person that had that before owed me actually quite a bit of money. ‸ ended up going to jail. He thought he was, ‸ i'm assuming to lose it. And I just got him to get a quick claim deed and I went to a title company.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:49–01:02:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:16–01:03:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:25–01:04:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And this ‸ particular case had three violations. Weeds, protective treatment, storing outdoors. So that, that case actually is where the blight and issues were. Um, the first case that you just heard was just for a rental business tax.
person buying it? The current owner didn't. Had nothing to do with the property back when all this occurred. Uh, he's gone through the lean reduction process now. It's been a few months. Um, the second that he purchased it, he wanted to do a lean reduction. Um, he went and started correcting the violations. We actually did an inspection just to kind of see where he was, went to the interior. Um, he told us I'll be back in a few months, get the permits, get everything done. And, and here we are. So he had nothing to do with those, with those violations. If anything, he fixed the property and, uh, cleaned up that good corner there.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:47–01:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
didn't appeal any issues that we've had in the past with lean reductions. He made it really easy to work through. Um, they didn't have any issues with this property owner. No, sir. And he got permits for everything.
[01:05:59]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Michael Mack” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the lean reduction process a lot easier. Uh, so he kind of sailed through once he was done and didn't require any additional inspections, which is why the inspection amounts are so low for those cases compared to some others we've heard.
And it was never really his fault that this occurred in the first place, if it makes sense. Um, and I think what's most impressive is, you know, he's worked with code enforcement, you know, hasn't lacked in communication, correct?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:57–01:06:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:15–01:07:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:35–01:07:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:45–01:07:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:56–01:08:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right. Um, I move. Oh, sorry. I apologize. Let me say the case number first. Um, in reference to CE 16-809 and also CE 19-304, property addresses 10-59 Cypress Lane. Hold on. Let
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:08:54–01:08:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, I apologize. Okay. I'm sorry. I'm going to amend. I apologize. Let me start over. I'm sorry. I thought we were doing both. I apologize. Well, thank you, but I apologize. Excuse me. Okay. I'm starting over. Uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:21–01:09:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to ‸ compliance, accrued amount of the lien, previous or subsequent code violations, any financial hardships and other mitigating circumstances. So that is my motion.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:14–01:10:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:11:04–01:11:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:28–01:11:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:11:38–01:11:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:51–01:11:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:11:56–01:11:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:11:57–01:11:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:00–01:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:12:05–01:12:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:12:13–01:12:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:19–01:12:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the case number and the violations and ‸ the amounts again that you'd like, but I mean, everything else that it was the same exact property owner at the time. Mr. Anderson's obviously still the same owner, but that was the only difference outside of the dates. So,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:43–01:12:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. So, uh, to go to force the board of public hearing on August 15, 2019, at which time the ‸ board found the owner, ‸ Janet Johnson, Thomas Matlock in violation of the following weeds
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:07–01:13:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:22–01:13:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:37–01:13:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:00–01:14:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:21–01:14:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:24–01:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:27–01:14:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:30–01:14:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:37–01:14:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The reasons for this production are the following as the previous case, constant and consistent issue. I mean, excuse me, no issues with communication with code enforcement.
Um, and he got permits. And, um, we, the board weighed in the gravity of the violation time it took to take in compliance, accrued amount, any financial hardships and other mitigating circumstances.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:33–01:15:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:43–01:15:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:53–01:15:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:37–01:16:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:05–01:17:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording