Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (1075_CE_Reg_Minutes_05_20_2021.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Edward Green, George Brown, Kimberly Curtis, David Lightholder, Demetrius Thomas
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: Lloyd Roberts, Jim Gifford, Sharri Scott
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Anthony Marchica (Police Lieutenant), Steve Murdick (Code Enforcement Officer), Gerald Pettengill (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Adopted actions (14)
to approve to the agenda of May 20, 2021 (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve to the minutes of April 15, 2021 (moved by Brown, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 1
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Lightholder); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staff's recommendation and give until July 20, 2021 (60 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Curtis, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner as a repeat violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Curtis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to amend Staff's recommendation and find the Owner to have been in Non-Compliance for 29 days and no fines be imposed (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Lightholder, seconded by Thomas); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CE_Reg_Agenda_05_20_2021), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
220 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 15 voices separated from the audio.
26 short machine repair(s) (31 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.8% of 8,783 content words.
Dotted words (175 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
220 passages (22% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:00–00:00:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:38–00:00:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:50–00:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:46]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
First case is case number 19-785.
[00:01:51]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:51–00:01:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:54]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, Code Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of accessory structures, storing outdoors, ‸ storing junk in auto or autos, which has since complied, and accumulation of trash and litter. I have visited the site 10 times and found some progress made on the property.
[00:02:24]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I've
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:24–00:02:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:02:25]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection, on May 20th, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working this case since December 14th, 2020, and have brought this case before the Code Enforcement Board.
[00:02:41]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:41–00:02:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:46]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
on May 3rd, 2021. It was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 19-785, the dealer be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance, or the fine, which would be amended to $75, be imposed for each day. The violations remain until compliance is achieved. I don't know
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:17–00:03:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:38]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Next case, please. Case number is 20-1183. The address is 309 Churchill Drive. For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, Code Enforcement Officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of parking in the yard, which has since complied.
[00:04:10]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:10–00:04:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:19]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:19–00:04:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:19]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:04:22]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case since October 23rd, 2020.
[00:04:25]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:25–00:04:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:28]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on May 3rd, 2021. It was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 20-1183 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance. Or a fine which would be amended to $75 per day be imposed ‸ as long as the violation remains until compliance is achieved. And the property
[00:04:54]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
owners
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:54–00:04:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:04:55]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:02–00:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:14–00:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, Mr. Edwards, I'm not really telling. I'm really more asking. Those things on my front yard, I start a little business, farming. ‸ And I was wondering who I can go to to help me get a piece of land, because those are really herbs that I grow and sell. And I know I don't have any space in the back. So one of the reasons why I'm here is just to ask if,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:51–00:05:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ that is something you might want to speak with the community development people with at the city hall to see if there's any help that can be had. Uh, I know that there's, if I'm not mistaken, a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:35–00:06:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So, I guess the best I can do is refer you to the community development folks at city hall and see if they can help. But that does not help you with regard to this particular issue.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:09–00:07:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The buckets are, are the container that I contain. I sell ashtrays to burn sage or candles because I also make candles. So, the picture you're looking at right now, those are
that I made and they are drying. So, the cooler, of course, is for my juicer. The, when I make the juices, my house, you know, cannot hold everything. So, those tables, because I go out and set up tables and sell, and that's what I do for a living for about a year now.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:22–00:08:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
My main purpose here was to find out if I, it's hard to find, you know, sometimes if you want to find who owns something, you just have to just go through the way, and then you will see the owner pop up. If you want to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:57–00:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
violation, you will know the right person to talk to. So, I'm not here to contest what Mr. Murdoch does. I'm just here to see if I can get a piece of land to go plant my herb, probably build a shed, and, you know, make my street look pretty again.
on the other side. I get the fence guys come out, so they came out and give me an estimate because I'm going to put up some nice fence. That's why I haven't
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:51–00:09:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:12–00:10:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:17–00:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:31–00:10:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:20]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
‸ Next case is 20-1389. The property address is 114 Harrison Street. For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of protective treatment. I visited the site 10 times and I found no progress made on the property.
[00:11:47]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I've
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:47–00:11:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:11:47]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on May 20th, 2021, the property remains in violation. I've been working
[00:11:57]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:57–00:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:01]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I
[00:12:05]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
sent
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:05–00:12:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:05]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
a
[00:12:06]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:06–00:12:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:09]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and posted on the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 20-1389 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or ‸ fine of $25 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And there is nobody here tonight for the property.
[00:12:35]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
areas
[00:12:35]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:35–00:12:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:35]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
need to touch up paint and also remove some flaking paint where they've got a coat ‸ that's flaking off, as well as some staining from like a moldy, mildewy type staining. ‸ You can see the areas where the
[00:12:49]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
paint's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:49–00:12:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:12:49]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
flaking away there. Yeah, ‸ a pressure washer would help, but then they're still going to have to do some touch up with paint. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:13–00:13:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:20–00:13:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have a second. I have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Passes unanimously. Next case, please.
[00:13:47]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Next case. For the record, I'm Gerald Pettengill, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. I'll also tell you this was one of Katie Carver's cases that I inherited when she left us. So after her first inspection, the property was found to be unsecured, failure to secure structure, general exterior condition, boarded up building, maintenance of fences, and a rental business tax violation. We visited the site seven times. Four of those were Katie's. Three of those were mine. Found some progress made on the property. We've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. But as my last inspection,
[00:14:43]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:43–00:14:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:47]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
We've been working this case since 11-2 of 2020.
[00:14:52]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:52–00:14:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:55]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on 4-28-2021. It was since certified and posted on ‸ the property in violation. Staff recommends in case 20-1336 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day the violation remains until compliance is achieved.
Mr. Chair, for the record, there is no business tax receipt violation. So the violations will be failure to secure structure, boarded up buildings, exterior general condition, and maintenance defenses.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:38–00:15:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:42–00:15:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll make a motion for case number 20-1336 that the board accepts staff recommendations that the property is found to be in violation and the $100 per day until compliance is achieved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:41–00:16:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:42]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:23–00:17:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you can speak in just a moment. We'll get right back to you. Okay, so could Officer Murdoch, could you give us a quick synopsis of what we've already spoken about?
[00:17:39]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, code enforcement officer.
[00:17:41]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:41–00:17:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:46]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with the case. The photos actually depict the property during my visits. After my first inspection, I found the property in violation of accessory structures, ‸ storing outdoors, storing junk or autos, which has since complied, and accumulation of trash and litter.
[00:18:05]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:05–00:18:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:09]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on May 20th, the property remains in violation.
[00:18:16]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:16–00:18:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:21]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
before the board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on May 3rd, and was sent certified and posted at the property. Staff recommends in case 19-785 that the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come into compliance, or a fine of $75 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved. And the property owners here would like to speak.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:57–00:18:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:57]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Please state your name and address into the microphone.
[00:19:00]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
My name is Jerome Bell. I'm here for my mom. She's
[00:19:04]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:04–00:19:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:19:04]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
property owner. But everything that you told me was in the backyard in the vehicle.
[00:19:10]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the vehicle's gone and I cut down three trees,
[00:19:16]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
moved
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:16–00:19:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:19:17]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
all the junk out of the back, and ‸ you've been by there and you can see that.
[00:19:20]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yeah, I was actually by there this morning. These are the pictures from this morning. There's still the blue thing there. There's the pile of trash. Still the remains of the old garage structure or whatever the carport structure ‸ was in the back, as well as the fence itself is still dilapidated.
[00:19:37]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes, that's the last thing that's got to be moved. And
[00:19:40]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
once it's all done, we'll get 30 days to finish and we'll take it. You call me back out and if it looks where it needs to be, we'll get it closed out.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:03–00:20:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:16]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
but I got a question about
[00:20:17]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:17–00:20:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:20:17]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
shed right there. They want me to remove that?
[00:20:21]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:20:21–00:20:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:24]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:24–00:20:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
What I suggest you do, if that's what you want to do, is you need to speak to the building official. Because even in 30 years ago, that would not have been considered a shed or a structure that was suitable to be a shed. And it would never have obtained a permit. So if you intend to keep it there, I would discuss that with the building department.
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:03–00:21:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to have that because it was never designed or built to be a shed. It's beyond what it was designed for. But again, this board can't give you those answers.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:28–00:21:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:28]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:21:30]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:30–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:33]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Do you have an issue with the way you've already started taking down the, the carport or whatever that was in the back, the with all the metal on the roof.
[00:21:42]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:42–00:21:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:43]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
want to finish that. And then the junk and the junk and debris that's out there that's still piled up out there and along the fence line
[00:21:50]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:50–00:21:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:56]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
care of it. So you can call me. I'll come out anytime you ask me to come out and ‸ I
[00:22:02]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
have been calling the number that I was given.
[00:22:05]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
You
[00:22:05]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:05–00:22:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:07]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
calls on my phone.
[00:22:10]Speaker 11 (introduced as “Jerome Bell” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:10–00:22:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so basically what you see in this picture, the area that you've already done all that cleanup on and removed all that stuff, which was quite a bit, ‸ finish cleaning that, finish cleaning the pile, come over here on this side, get rid of those outdoor storage items. And then we're just dealing with this section here.
[00:22:44]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And if your intention is to keep
[00:22:46]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
the fence,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:46–00:22:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:22:46]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
then the fence needs to be installed properly, which would be a permit as well.
Yes, sir. Okay. Thank you very much. As I said, the board has already voted on this. We've heard what you have to say. So, unless any member of the board would like to make a motion to revisit our decision, our decision stands.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:31–00:23:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. And we can resume with item 7, 1105 Clear Lake Road.
[00:23:48]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
For the record, I'm Gerald Pettengill, code enforcement officer. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. Again, ‸ I'll tell you this is one of my inherited cases from Ms. Carver. After our first inspection, we found the property in violation of landscape requirements, accumulation of trash and litter, weeds, protective treatment, and a required site plan. I visited there.
[00:24:23]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:23–00:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:26]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Three of them were mine and found some progress made on the property. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of my last inspection on May 20th, 2021, the property remains in violation.
[00:24:40]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:40–00:24:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:45]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
this case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent notice of hearing on April 28th, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in violation. The
[00:25:01]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
recommends in case 20-1399, the owner be found in violation and given 30 days to come in compliance or a fine of $50 being post for each day the violation remains until compliance is achieved.
[00:25:17]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:17–00:25:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:20]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and litter, taken care of the weeds. They still need the landscape requirements and the protective treatment. And I don't do
[00:25:29]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:29–00:25:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. Well, what they need to do is they need to revise or at least come back up to what they submitted as a site plan, which is basically in this picture. There was actually a hedge at one time that went up against the curb, went there and then came down.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:12–00:26:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:27–00:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:30–00:26:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:26:40]Speaker 14 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:40–00:26:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I didn't know there was any bushers or hedges on the side of the building. Uh, I just became property manager back in November, and I wasn't much with that property. So whatever needs to be done.
[00:27:03]Speaker 14 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:03–00:27:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, I'd be more than happy to get it done. I am working on getting a landscaper to come and do some landscaping. The problem is nobody wants to work.
[00:27:16]Speaker 14 (name not verified) · Machine re-recognized
because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:16–00:27:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
they're all sitting home collecting unemployment. So it's really hard to find a company ‸ to come out and do something.
[00:27:22]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Okay. Just to clarify, there's not a problem with, with the landscaping next to the building. The problem is you're required to have landscaping out around the parking lot as a barrier between Clear Lake Road and, uh, your parking lot. And
[00:27:39]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:27:39–00:27:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If you actually go to the front of the building where the stone is, where your parking lot starts, you have to come down and then along the front between the sidewalk.
me try to get the other picture down that way. That's all you need. Next to the car wash, there's no landscaping required. It's all asphalt. And then the drive in the back of the property, which borders up to, I don't know if you own that land or if ABC land clearing still owns the land behind it.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:39–00:28:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that are native and going to do good. You're more than welcome to contact us. We'll give you that information. And then the protective treatment really up underneath where the lights are.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:50–00:28:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And then just keep an eye on your property because a lot of people tend to walk through the back and they tend to drop all their plastics and all their stuff. And just make sure you have somebody check that out. That's what the accumulation of junk, trash and debris was. It was actually junk and trash that people just discarded as they cut through your lot.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:46–00:29:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:04–00:30:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
recommendations that the owner is found in violation and that they will be imposed $100 per day. Until ‸ compliance is achieved achieved and it's within 60 days.
[00:30:50]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:30:58]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:58–00:31:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:00]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case.
[00:31:04]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:04–00:31:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:10]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
by our Officer Carver as well. i'm some uh The
[00:31:15]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:15–00:31:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:18]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
found in repeat violation of storing outdoors. I sent a notice
[00:31:22]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:22–00:31:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:24]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of March and it was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation. Remains in violation and has been out of compliance for 80 days after the date that it was found in repeat violation. And there is nobody here for the property this evening.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:46–00:31:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:47]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:31:47]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
This is a repeat violation.
[00:31:49]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:49–00:31:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:53]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
We'll get to where they'll clean it. And actually, it looked as today that is they might have finally made their attempt. But then it falls right back into disarray. the The people when they are there are not very friendly as far as towards uh uh listening to what needs to be taken care of. um And so we brought it back for repeat violations because it's the time frame between last time it was at the ‸ board and now has been very short. Yes.
And just for the record, this case has actually appeared before this board three times. um it's been cited more than that. They will clean up the best that they can. And then
Yeah. Next week, it'll go back to being the same way. So that's why we went ahead and did it as a repeat violation after getting a finding a fact order from this board.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:32:59–00:33:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:36–00:33:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:41–00:33:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:16]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
actually post it on the day that that we issue it where normally you know you do the 30 days. um
[00:34:23]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:34:23–00:34:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:24]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
repeat like this we actually post the notice the same day at the property as well as mail it out certified. So they we make sure that they they know that that's the start.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:33–00:34:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
so they received a repeat notice which includes the date of the hearing and the notice of violation ‸ everything's posted. So they know that the violation actually started March
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:43–00:34:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, uh uh mr Chair uh on this motion would be uh uh repeat uh violation 21-66 that a fine of 500 a day will be imposed starting with the date of march 1st 2021.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:48–00:35:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not come into compliance then the fines will be ‸ imposed. In this phase of our meeting we are looking at cases that have already been through that process. uh The board will hear testimony and the board will have two choices. Yes. The property is in compliance or no it is not. And that's where we go from here. First case please.
[00:36:40]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
First case is case
[00:36:42]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:42–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:43]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:43–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:43]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
dash
[00:36:43]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:43–00:36:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:44]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:44–00:36:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:44]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:44–00:36:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:44]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:44–00:36:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:45]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:45–00:36:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:48]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
is 1221 Cypress Lane.
[00:36:51]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:51–00:36:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:55]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
actually depict the property during my visits. This case was also started by Officer Carver.
[00:37:01]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:01–00:37:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:08]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation of exterior general condition maintenance of interior of the structure pools and spas accessory structure. Weeds failure to secure accumulation of trash and litter premises identification and wrongful disposal disposal of excrement, etc. on the property with an into a natural outlet inlet. I sent a notice of hearing for non-compliance on May 3rd and it was sent certified and posted. At this time the property remains in violation and there is not anybody here for the property this evening.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:48–00:37:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have a motion and a second. All in favor. Aye. Opposed. It is passed unanimously. Thank you. Next, please.
[00:38:12]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Next case is
[00:38:13]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:13–00:38:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:16]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
for the record. I'm Steve
[00:38:18]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:18–00:38:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:18]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
code enforcement officer. The pro the property address is 514 North Carolina Avenue. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case.
[00:38:28]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:38:28–00:38:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:29]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
depict the property during my visits. this case was also started by officer carver
[00:38:34]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:34–00:38:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:39]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
they actually depict the property during my visits
[00:38:42]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:42–00:38:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:48]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation of permit required, boarded up buildings, and rental tax receipt. I sent a notice of
[00:38:57]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:57–00:39:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:03]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation.
[00:39:06]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:39:06–00:39:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:38–00:39:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:38]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:39:42]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, code enforcement officer,
[00:39:44]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:44–00:39:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:48]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with the case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was proper for the
[00:39:57]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:57–00:40:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:00]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
was found in violation of accumulation of trash and litter. Weeds and district content and principal uses and structures. I sent the notice of
[00:40:11]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:11–00:40:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:16]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
certified and posted. At this time, the property remains in violation and there's nobody here this evening for the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:28–00:40:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:30–00:40:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is there a second? Second. I have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Thank you. Next, please.
[00:40:44]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:44–00:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:48]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
For the record, I'm Steve Murdoch, code enforcement officer. Property address is 139 circle drive. I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case
[00:41:02]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:02–00:41:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:41:02]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
brought before the code enforcement board on March 18th, 2021 and was found in violations of permits required. I sent a notice of hearing for noncompliance on May 3rd, 2021
[00:41:14]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:14–00:41:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:41:14]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
was sent certified and posted. At this time, the property is in compliance, but was out of compliance for 29 days after the date set forth by ‸ the board. And the property owners are here this evening.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:57–00:42:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:57]Speaker 14 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:01–00:42:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:07–00:42:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:24–00:42:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the area. We looked at several other places, but this area here was very quiet, peaceful. And we felt like this was the home that we wanted to have and where we wanted to say this is truly our home. We do apologize to the board for the inconvenience that we have caused use as well as the enforcement. But all of those things actually happened prior to our purchasing of the property. Once we acquired the property, then we hired a contractor to look at it to see what could we do ‸ and what needed to be done in order to put us in compliance. And when we evaluated what the cost factor was going to be, we felt that our budget
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:11–00:43:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:41–00:43:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
immediately corrected it. But I just wanted to make it known that it was not the McCanns that created or added to the violation. They inherited it through the sale of the property.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:44:13–00:44:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:18]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes. Yes. And they, from the time ‸ that ‸ I had contact with them, they immediately took action to reverse the issues caused by the prior owner, who was actually, I had to stop
[00:44:32]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
work I'm
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:32–00:44:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:44:32]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
not once but twice for no permits ‸ at that specific location.
[00:44:39]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:39–00:44:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:42]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
immediate action in order to try to correct the issue.
No, but Mr. Watson did contact me prior to the sale. So we did let him know. But then he assured that as soon as they became the owners, they would fix it, which they did in a matter of a couple of weeks.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:15–00:45:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:21–00:45:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:27–00:45:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:54–00:45:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:56–00:46:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
were down in South Florida and they knew they wanted to move up this way. And about the third place, I think they had a contract for a place in Vieira and they said, you know, we'll, we'll hold this for a few years and then we'll sell it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:34–00:46:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:58–00:46:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:08]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:08–00:47:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:13]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:13–00:47:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:21]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
I am
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:21–00:47:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:47:21]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits. This case was initially started by officer Carver. This case
[00:47:31]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:31–00:47:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:47:32]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
brought before the code board on February 18th, 2021.
[00:47:36]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:36–00:47:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:43]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I sent a notice of hearing for noncompliance on May 3rd, 2021, and it was sent certified and posted at this time.
[00:47:51]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:51–00:47:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:55]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And I don't believe there's anybody here this evening. Oh, yeah, the gentleman's here this evening to speak for the property.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:16–00:48:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:22–00:48:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And what would you like to tell us, sir? What ‸ are the violations?
[00:48:44]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Protective treatment and roofs and drainage. So the protective treatment is for areas where the paint is stained or damaged, flaking or missing, and the roofing portion is where the soffit is missing on the one side of the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:21–00:49:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, why don't you show a photograph of today or...
[00:49:26]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
That is today, sir.
[00:49:28]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:28–00:49:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The reason why I'm miffed about that, that is no longer... That is not current. I tried to get a photograph printed out. I have it on my phone, but that's...
[00:49:49]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Sir, that's time to... That's date
[00:49:51]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:51–00:49:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:52]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:52–00:49:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:53]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:53–00:49:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:53]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
stamp
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:49:53–00:49:53 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:49:53]Speaker 5 (introduced as “Steve Murdoch” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:53–00:49:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That you're showing and conveying to the board is inaccurate. So, I... I am doing work and it... this has turned into a much larger effort than I thought. So, what I'm trying to do there
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:49:54–00:50:20 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
then I ‸ don't have them for evidence for our case. But basically, he has cleaned up a lot of the mold and mildew around the house. He took care, nobody parks there anymore. ‸ The pile of stuff that's there was not part of our original case, so that's not going to be heard today. He has a few areas, like that area of concrete that needs to be touched up and painted, and a few other places around the property, and then he needs to correct this section of the roof. And that's all he has left to do.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:51:51–00:51:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:51:52–00:51:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:14–00:52:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:36–00:52:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a motion. Do I have a second? Second. And, before we vote, I will just read into the record that I and the board members have viewed the photo that the gentleman has provided, and that we have seen from the photo that he has provided, that the protective treatment condition matches up with what has been shown in evidence by staff. Okay. And, we have a motion and a second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:19–00:53:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. Right now, you're in noncompliance. Let's go. Fix those areas. Steve will even meet you out there. Get those fixed as quick as you can, and then we can address anything that happened after that. Okay? Okay.
is the resolution from the board? The resolution from the board is that we found you to be noncompliant, sir. So, until you can bring those last items that you just spoke with Mr. Bunk about, until you can bring those into compliance, a fine will start to accrue. So, as soon as you get those ‸ things in compliance, you can make a report and the fine will cease.
And then when you do, I'll walk you through the lien reduction process and you can come back and go that way. So, the quicker you get it done, the lower the fine, and then you can still go for a reduction on top of that. So, that's what I was saying when I said you're not...this isn't ‸ the final step. You have other steps. But the first step is to come into compliance.
‸ And the way the fine works, sir, is it does not come out of your pocket. We're not asking you to come in and pay day by day by day. What happens is it accrues as a lien against the value of your property. And as, as Mr. Bunk just stated, once that's resolved, you'll have the opportunity to come in and request a reduction of that, which ‸ the board would consider.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:13–00:55:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:45]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
were found...property was found in violation of storing outdoors, storing junk or autos, and business tax receipts. We visited the site 10 times.
[00:55:58]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:58–00:55:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:00]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Three of those were mine. Found some progress made on the property. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as my last inspection on
[00:56:09]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:09–00:56:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:10]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
21, the property remains in violation. I've been working or we've been working this case since October 19th of 2020. And
[00:56:19]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:56:19–00:56:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:20]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
brought the case before the code enforcement board as the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent a notice of hearing on April 28th, 2021, and it was sent, certified, and posted on the property in violation. Actually, it was handed to the homeowner.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:36–00:56:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:39]Speaker 10 (introduced as “Gerald Pettengill” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Staff recommends in case 20-1287 that the owner be found in violation given 30 days to come in compliance for a fine of $75 being imposed for each day. The violation remains until compliance is achieved.
I'm sorry. This is not compliance. That's his summary. He forgot to delete the box. Yes. So, we're just asking that the board find the property in noncompliance. In noncompliance.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:57:18–00:57:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:57:38–00:57:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:40–00:57:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a motion and a second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Passes unanimously. And that is our last case listed. There are no lien reduction cases tonight. Mr. Manager, do you have any announcements for us?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:16–00:58:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:47–00:58:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)