Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (1047_CC_Reg_Minutes_05_28_2024.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines.)
Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Anthony A. Garganese (City Attorney), Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Monica Arsenault (City Clerk), Abigail Morgan (Public Works Director), Rebecca Bowman (Finance Director), Jonathan Lamm (Fire Chief), Charlene Neuterman (Community Services Director), Evander Collier IV (Police Chief), Jack Walsh (Utilities Director), Tammy Gemmati (Administrative Services Director), Samantha Senger (Communications & Economic Development Director), Robert Beach (Chief Technology Officer), Lisa Richardson (Help Desk Support Tech)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Matthew Barringer, Mike Blake (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (10)
Il. Approval of Agenda and Minutes: ie Agenda: Regular Meeting of May 28, 2024. (24-316) — to amend the agenda for the Regular meeting of May 28, 2024 to move Council Business item VII.3 after Consent and before Public Hearings (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
to approve the minutes for the Regular City Council of February 27, 2024 as written (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
to approve the Consent agenda (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Matthew Barringer); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 3
Council approval to apply for a Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) grant from the Federal Railroad Administration in conjunction with the S — to approval of a Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) grant from the Federal Railroad Administration in conjunction with the Space Coast Transportation Planning Office (SCTPO) in the amount of $705,000 for the recommended 4-quadrant gate system at W. Highland Drive; Approve the Resolution; and … (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 4
Vi. Public Hearings: ue Request to Postpone Consideration of a Zoning Map Amendment consistent with Appendix A, Zoning, Article XXI, to chan — to postpone the item to the July 9, 2024 City Council meeting at 6pm at Cocoa City Hall (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 5
Conduct the Final public hearing on the proposed FY2024/2025 Action Plan; approve the Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan for submiss — to approve the L proposed FY2024/2025 Action Plan; approve the plan for submission to HUD and authorize the Mayor to sign all subsequent certifications and agreements (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 5; the vote on p. 6
3. Approval of a Final Plat consistent with Chapter 18 Subdivisions of the City Code for the Lakes at Cocoa Grove and approval of an Improve — to approve the Final Plat for the Lakes at Cocoa Grove, subject to the condition set forth below and approve the execution of the proposed Improvements Agreement in lieu of requiring a performance bond for the public subdivision improvements (moved by Matthew Barringer, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 7; the vote on p. 8
to approve staff’s recommendation to reduce the lien to $2,622.08 for discussion (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 9
to allow Councilmember Koss to replace Councilmember Goins as the Alternate member for the Space Coast TPO (moved by Matthew Barringer, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 11
to adjourn the Regular meeting of May 28, 2024 (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Matthew Barringer); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Matthew Barringer, Alex Goins, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 12
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$2,622.08 — Council: decided in an adopted motion. “approve staff’s recommendation to reduce the lien to $2,622.08 for discussion” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1047_CC_Reg_Minutes_05_28_2024.pdf, p. 9); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,726 — Council: Consent agenda item 1, approved with the Consent agenda. “Approve a Resolution Amending the FY24 Budget, BAF# 24-086-A, for the acceptance of a donation of a Cool Guard System in the amount of $2,726.” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1047_CC_Reg_Minutes_05_28_2024.pdf, p. 3); fiscal period not recorded)
$75,000 — Council: Consent agenda item 2, approved with the Consent agenda. “Acceptance of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Vulnerability Assessment Planning Grant in the amount of $75,000; Authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement to be sent to FDEP for execution; Approve a Budget Resolution and BAF amending the FY2024 Budget in the amount of $75,000 for the grant agreement.” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1047_CC_Reg_Minutes_05_28_2024.pdf, p. 3); fiscal period not recorded)
$202,265 — Council: Consent agenda item 4, approved with the Consent agenda — authorized up to (a spending limit, not an amount spent). “To Approve the Purchase with Hydra Service, Inc., Debary, Florida for the Systematic Replacement of Lift Station Pumps, Project No. WS1141, Utilizing the Orange County Contract No. Y21-170-MV effective August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2024; and To Authorize a Budgeted Expenditure for these Services not to Exceed $202,265.” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1047_CC_Reg_Minutes_05_28_2024.pdf, p. 3); fiscal period not recorded)
$1,200,000 — Council: Consent agenda item 3, approved with the Consent agenda (requested (grant application): the amount asked for in a grant APPLICATION the body approved or authorized (whether it was awarded is not in the record; not an adopted amount)). “Approve a Grant Application of $1,200,000 for an ODLCC Installation Resiliency Grant for the design of the Pineda Causeway Phase 2 Water Main Design; Authorize the City Manager to sign any documents related to the grant application.” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1047_CC_Reg_Minutes_05_28_2024.pdf, p. 3); fiscal period not recorded)
$705,000 — Council: requested (grant application): the amount asked for in a grant APPLICATION the body approved or authorized (whether it was awarded is not in the record; not an adopted amount). “approval of a Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) grant from the Federal Railroad Administration in conjunction with the Space Coast Transportation Planning Office (SCTPO) in the amount of $705,000 for the recommended 4-quadrant gate system at W. Highland Drive; Approve the Resolution; and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Grant Application for discussion” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (1047_CC_Reg_Minutes_05_28_2024.pdf, p. 4); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CC_Reg_Packet_05_28_2024), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube, in a new tab.
489 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 1 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 22 voices separated from the audio.
38 short machine repair(s) (43 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 90.5% of 18,954 content words.
Dotted words (545 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
489 passages (25% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (1 stretch). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
01:15:10 (6 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:00–00:00:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:12–00:00:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:16–00:00:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:31–00:00:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:54–00:00:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:05–00:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:12–00:01:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:33–00:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:08–00:02:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:20–00:02:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:30–00:02:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:38–00:02:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:52–00:02:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:59–00:03:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:07–00:03:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:15–00:03:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:18–00:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:29–00:03:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
addressing the current homelessness crisis ‸ Taking place in our community with each discussion and action. We see more progress. So thank you so much We are hearing a lot of chatter about the need in addressing the house bill 1365 That makes sleeping outside illegal come october 1st And we look forward to continuing the conversation with our local leadership and how to address this crisis And are willing to take the lead when it comes to coco and our surrounding communities We believe that we are the most qualified in taking the lead But we are very concerned that we are way behind the curve with this new law going into effect soon
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:27–00:04:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:34–00:04:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:39–00:04:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:47–00:04:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:55–00:05:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
my great pleasure to share with you the recent victories that Matthew's hope has achieved In a world where challenges seem insurmountable It is moments like these that remind us of the power of community compassion and relentless dedication Firstly, we are thrilled to announce the hiring of a mental health counselor This crucial addition to our team is already making a profound impact Providing much needed support and guidance to our guests as they navigate their journeys towards stability and wellness Mental health is a cornerstone of a fulfilling life and having this resource available marks a significant step forward in our mission We have also had the joy of seeing 10 of our guests secure jobs within the past few weeks This is more than just a statistic. It represents 10 individual stories of hope determination and new beginnings Each job signifies a path to independence and self-sufficiency bringing our guests closer to the lives they aspire to lead
on the verge of being housed This achievement underscores our commitment to ensuring that even the most vulnerable among us have the chance to find stability and dignity Our spiritual outreach has also seen remarkable progress over the past two weeks alone
embracing a new chapter in their lives. Additionally our bible study sessions on saturdays continue to draw a consistent group of 40 attendees fostering a sense of community and shared faith. In practical terms, We have seen two guests receive phones which they worked for with us enabling them to maintain vital contact with their parole officers This small yet significant step is crucial for their continued progress and reintegration into society Furthermore our outreach programs are making a tangible difference
in our work initiatives, diligently working to pay off debts and move towards a sustainable, independent future. Their dedication shows the transformative power of opportunity and support Our medical services are another area where we see remarkable impact We are averaging over 50 people weekly receiving essential medical care This consistent support ensures that our guests can maintain their health and well-being which is fundamental to their overall journey
between mobile outreach bible study and elsewhere Each individual we serve is a testament to our commitment to making a difference These victories are not just milestones for
self-sufficiency brings us closer to our vision of a world where everyone has the opportunity to thrive. Thank you for your continued support and belief in our mission together we are changing lives one victory at a time god bless you all
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:03–00:08:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:18–00:08:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. So, um I think the previous speaker was, you know, how do we get further ahead? And I am in agreement to that. And, Mayor, thank you, because that point of connection from staff is is a reality. uh You know, when i when I think about opportunities that there might be,
um from a policy, I would welcome that conversation on some of those ideas. And so, you know, city, I hope we might be able to bring some of those ideas back to council that would arise from there. uh the The second, though, ‸ is even something like from a tax incentive or tax break, you get that at a federal level possibility. But what does that look like as a city level? So, I complete program. I hire individual out of program. the Individual lasts for six months. And then the city is able to give a break, you know, relative to a business. I'm actually going to address that later in presentation. So, I think that those are some of those policies that that we might be able to help connect. And from an economic development standpoint, I think that also feels falls in our wheelhouse as well. So, and
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:09:27–00:09:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:41–00:09:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:52–00:09:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chair's gonna ‸ call the question. All in favor saying aye. Aye. And thennays, ayes have it unanimously. Okay. Thank you. Proceeding on to item uh originally 7-3. And we're going to talk about this particular item from council business. Council approval to apply for the RCE, a railroad crossing elimination grant from the federal railroad grant administration in conjunction with the Space Coast Transportation Planning Office,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:25–00:10:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
stated in the records. I know we have a deadline to meet, and I'm not going to consolidate them both, but I know May 28th is the date that is very important to us. Mrs. Morgan, would you like to expound on this particular item?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:48–00:11:07 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:07–00:11:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:21–00:11:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:27–00:11:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Kittleson and Associates we've been supporting the Space Coast TPO on this railroad crossing elimination grant application so what I'd like to speak with you this evening is just give you a little overview of the project, the recommended Railroad Crossing safety enhancements, and what we're doing for next steps. So as part of the Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant program, we are anticipating that the notice funding opportunity will be released sometime this month and in anticipation for that the Space Coast TPO has been working with partner organizations to come up with looking at Railroad Crossing locations to identify safety enhancements. So over the last few months, we've been reviewing existing conditions and looking at the crossings we would like to include in this grant application, and we've developed potential preliminary safety enhancements we've coordinated with all of our partners Brightline FEC and local staff, to go through these alternatives.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:35–00:12:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
cost estimates. A couple weeks ago, we met with local staff and everyone had made a selection for the recommendation. Now we're going through and presenting those to to you all and your your colleagues in the City of Melbourne and and in the county
and we'll look to do that over the remaining couple months as shown in the schedule. The different enhancement types that we were considering at these locations, we identified crossing locations that have currently two quadrant gate systems and the FRA has safety effectiveness ratings for different types of enhancements, including full four quadrant gate systems
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:25–00:13:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that currently have two quadrant gate systems. Three of them are within your city, but one being maintained by, by, by you is West Highlands Drive so that's the one we would like to discuss go through the alternatives that were identified, recommended and seek your approval. At this location over the last five year period, we identified no crashes with the railroad. but we still see an opportunity to make the enhancement since it's currently a two quadrant gate system. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:07–00:14:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:13–00:14:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
also including, just a three quadrant gate system with a median on one side to prevent vehicles from moving over. That cost seems to go, starts to go down, but also the effectiveness does as well. Ultimately, what was recommended was the four quadrant gate system, which has a total construction
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:36–00:14:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
estimated maintenance according to the information we received from FEC so as part of this grant application, if this grant is awarded, then the city would need to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:48–00:14:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:50–00:14:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
within the year that you maintain but you also have Michigan Avenue and Dixon Boulevard that is maintained by the county in last week's Commission's meeting
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:15:19–00:15:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
on one side at Dixon Boulevard there was one fatal pedestrian crash in 2020 before Brightline made their enhancements and so due to geometric constraints, the only alternative we were able to see feasible here was a four quadrant gate system so following your
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:44–00:15:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
released this month and like I said at the top we would be working on the application over the next couple months anticipating that there would be a window of 75 days to submit the application and so hopefully we'll have that submitted by the end of July
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:05–00:16:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on this. I do have a light on. I do not have any cards for this particular item. Needless to say, but I support this project. It's a no-brainer, sir. Thank you very much, Mr.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:32–00:16:45 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:48–00:16:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I do give a big thanks for taking the safety of our citizens very serious here in the Cocoa, especially with this West Highland, West Highlands drive being in district two. I'm very supportive of this project. And again, just thank you for taking the safety of our citizens serious. So, you know, I don't know if anyone else wanted
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:17:11–00:17:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:36–00:17:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:41–00:17:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is in your district. Is this not in your district? Yes, ‸ sir. Okay. ‸ We have a motion on the floor by Deputy Mayor Hearns. I'll second it for discussion because I would like to hear from the others. Madam Clerk, do you have the motion?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:59–00:18:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:03–00:18:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. The only, really the only question, the only question I have is I'm a yes on the grant. I know that not now. I'm guessing at some point in the future, not within the recent, not within the short term, we'll probably be talking, someone's going to bring up the word quiet zones, And my only question is that with whatever the investment is into the design of our crossings now that we're going to go for,
or is this step one, do this, step two, talk about quiet zones? And the only reason I'm saying that is just from an application standpoint of grant funding. I don't want to spend money on one and then rip it all up to get to the next one, you know, three years down the road. So ‸ that's my only question is, ‸ are quiet zones
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:13–00:19:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
But again, as I said, a couple of meetings back there, I would recommend to you all, and obviously it's the council's decision that ‸ you not do quiet zones ‸ for a period of time.
the horns for a period of time. But I think we've been asked as staff about our preference for quiet zones or not. And I've expressed my opinion to be that, again, you need to hear the horns for a certain period of time. But we can put that on as an agenda item so that ‸ you guys can have a policy discussion on that.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:20:13–00:20:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
You know, I would rather than learn that there is a big horn with a big train coming through until we get to that point. I just, my concern being is that, you know, you put a project in, you rip a project out, you put a project in, and those are big money projects. And so ‸ that's really the only question. So we'll get there when we get there, if
these are still going to be there regardless of the quiet zones or not. Sounds good. I'm assuming everybody knows what the four-quadrant gate system is there.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:04–00:21:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
where a vehicle can attempt to do what's considered a vehicle violation, where they get out of their lane and attempt to cross using the available space
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:20–00:21:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the approaching lane, but also for the receiving lane so that that maneuver cannot be made. And the alternatives mentioned that have the three-quadrant gate system, what that meant was on one side it would have the full four-quadrant gates, but on the other side it would have some sort of physical separation to prevent that movement, either a median or flexible delineator. But in this case, ‸ staff recommended a four-quadrant gate system at West Highlands.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:22–00:22:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:30–00:22:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:43–00:22:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:50–00:22:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:55–00:22:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:58–00:22:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:59–00:23:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Currently, it's a two-quadrant gate system. So what was happening at Jackson was exactly the scenario that we're trying to prevent, where vehicles took that open space and tried to get around the gates.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:14–00:23:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Correct. If the four-quadrant gate systems were there, those vehicles would not have been able to make that maneuver without actually physically obstructing the gates.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:23:30–00:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:53–00:23:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:57–00:24:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:06–00:24:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Dixon Boulevard, that was the only alternative that was recommended there for Michigan. ‸ They have not made a final determination. They just approved to include the crossing in the grant application. So among those would be...
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:59–00:24:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:05–00:25:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:14–00:25:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:39–00:25:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:40–00:25:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:48–00:25:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:53–00:26:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All of them. Every crossing, railroad crossing to me, that's just my assessment. I'm entitled to listen to everyone, but I'd rather be on the side of safety, safety, safety, safety, safety first and foremost, especially when it's brand new. And I'm an old former schoolteacher. I want to train you up the right way. So once you've been trained, shame on me. Knowledge is power. And I'm a firm believer in
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:30–00:26:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:47–00:26:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
identifying the preliminary set of alternatives, we were looking at the FRA specifications and what they would allow long term. And for either medians or flexible
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:09–00:27:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:22–00:27:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, you answered my questions about Michigan. But if we're looking at ‸ four quadrant, do I understand this correctly? That the maintenance will be 10,000 per year. That would be the city's maintenance costs, whether it is a city or county road? Or is that just where it's a city road?
My also my understanding is that as part of these if new enhancements are made, that new maintenance agreements would need to would need to be made with FEC. ‸ Okay, and the maintenance costs that that were presented came from FEC's current schedule.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:54–00:28:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to clarify that maintenance cost is just for the new components that would be that would come from that. So any sort of track maintenance that gets done that that cost is not inclusive of that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:26–00:29:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:34–00:29:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:56–00:30:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:03–00:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, ears start to perk up and you're out here to be good for this tax payers money, but I know we agreed as a council that we were gonna, uh, ‸ utilize this, uh, possibility of a train station for the best of our citizens. I think, uh, it sounds like a lot of negotiations ‸ here. And I know we have, uh, we have the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:54–00:30:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:59–00:31:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output; words the first reading may have missed · 00:31:09–00:31:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:19–00:31:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:31:30–00:31:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:31:33–00:31:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:40–00:31:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:00–00:32:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:15–00:32:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:31–00:32:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. All right. If you have any questions, please expound on just the postponing of this particular zoning map. Chair, ‸ like the closest portion to council over to the public. Please submit a card indicating your concerns just pertaining to postponing of this particular zoning map amendment. Going once, going twice. children and close this portion to the public ‸ return of the council. What are the wishes of council?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:11–00:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:15–00:33:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:26–00:33:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:32–00:33:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to authorize the mayor to sign a subsequent certification and agreement if you may look at page one of three and I'll turn it over to mrs. Noodleman but you will see the information on page one of three and also page two of three mrs. Noodleman this is standard procedure it goes to total Housing Activity, the Family Promise, Central
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:09–00:34:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:17–00:34:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:20–00:34:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:31–00:34:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:37–00:34:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have not received our CDBG allocation for next year yet we anticipate receiving that in the next few weeks of which I will notify every one of that change when it happens. The overall purpose of our program is to develop the communities and to provide quality housing, suitable living and expanding economic opportunities for persons of low
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:01–00:35:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all CDBG funds must be expended benefiting those low and moderate income persons. Home program funds can only be used for housing activities, benefiting those low and moderate income persons our goals of ‸ our consolidated a plan for the CDBG and home the city of Cocoa adopted a one-year action plan which identifies community development projects which shall be undertaken between October 1 of 2024 and September 30th of 2025 the city
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:32–00:35:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of CDBG as required by HUD the ad was placed in the in the newspaper summarizing the proposed projects with a 30-day comment period that comment period was between April 19th and May 19th there were no comments that were received during that time as you noted mr. mayor
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:11–00:36:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:15–00:36:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:23–00:36:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:38–00:36:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:48–00:37:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as well so we're requesting that you approve the proposed action plan and the submission to the to HUD and authorize the mayor to sign all subsequent certifications and agreements.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:23–00:37:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:42–00:37:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So they they're required to submit a quarterly report to us for reimbursement. And in that report, it has to note the addresses and the funds that were provided to each of those addresses. They have to convert confirm with us that they are in fact city residents through
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:26–00:38:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, ma'am. and You're correct. I'll second it for public discussion. You're correct. Yes, ma'am. okay do we have any other questions for mrs. um mrs. newton say none
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:13–00:39:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:25–00:39:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:30–00:39:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:52–00:39:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:57–00:39:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:03–00:40:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:08–00:40:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:11–00:40:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:16–00:40:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:25–00:40:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:30–00:40:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:33–00:40:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:40–00:40:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:45–00:40:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:49–00:40:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:16–00:41:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Grove. I'll just talk about the location, the existing conditions on the site, the request, a little bit about the history, which we're all very familiar with at this point. Our findings uh touch on two of the outstanding issues that were um outlined in the staff report, and then finally I'll conclude with our recommendation. So we're here talking about the project that's north of 528 and east of 95. It's just about 246 acres in size. It's got a low density residential uh future land use map ‸ designation, which allows for up to four dwelling units per acre, uh and it's zoned RU 1-7, which allows for single family uh As you can see from the maps on the screen, uh there's property within the city opposite the 528 right of way to the south, but the remaining property on the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:08–00:42:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we're uh considering a final plat for 350 dwelling units, and of course that improvements agreement, which has been worked on uh through the City Attorney's Office. uh Relatively long history uh within this project. I'm not going to read through all of this. I think uh we discussed all this back in February when the preliminary plat was done. The only update here to this slide was
February 13th. uh So in terms of the findings, the layout's consistent with the previously approved um layouts that the City's seen uh including the 2023 amended settlement agreement and then of course the preliminary plat. So the preliminary plat site plan is on the top of the screen and theand the final is on the bottom. You can see they match. uh Unit counts 350. It's less than was originally contemplated in 2008. um And it's exactly what was contemplated when Council approved the settlement implementation agreement amendment in 2023. uh So in terms of those two uh minor issues, uh just ‸ couple things ‸ are a little different about this one. We do have a comp plan policy that requires a
um So their their proposal is to dedicate a five foot uh wetland buffer preservation easement on those lots that surround uh the tract for a total of 25
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:47–00:43:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and impact more wetlands so you can meet the 25 foot requirement we prefer to preserve those wetlands. So this was the solution that was agreed upon by the applicant. uh ‸ And then issue number two, uh and Mayor, I think you touched on this in the intro uh regarding the performance bond uh that is required by city code. um As you can see here in section 18-31. uh The improvements here in this case is a little bit different. because they're going to be accomplished
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:21–00:44:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So they're going to publicly advertise and solicit bids for the construction of those improvements. uh And then they're going to require their contractor following the award uh to post a payment performance bond. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:09–00:45:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be obligated to construct those improvements if the CDD or the developer developer defaults. uh So all of those terms are outlined in the improvements agreement and ‸ if they don't have a surety bond with the rider by December 1st 2024 the developer ‸ the district is going to have to do a performance bond to the city. So basically i have six months uh to bid out the improvements and get a contractor on the hook uh who ‸ ultimately will
subject to a performance bond. So uh those are the two things that make this a little bit different uh than the last time you saw it. uh Staff recommendations to approve um and also uh approve the proposed improvements agreement
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:55–00:45:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:59–00:46:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:02–00:46:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:39–00:46:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:41–00:46:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Let me first, and I think I can speak for the clients on this, say we are thankful, Council, to your staff. We have been, what's a kind word, diligent, I think is probably a good word, relative to how hard we have pushed in terms of timing to move this process forward. So, Mr. Whitten and all the directors that have been involved, probably Lucy and Abby a bit more to a degree on this go around than the last go around. Ultimately, to the city attorney and his staff, clearly Anthony and Kristen have worked very diligently to protect the city's interests, particularly on the two outstanding items that Eric has referenced and to Eric and the Inspire team for their work to help us get here. You probably get tired of us repeating this timeline issue over and over again. Not so much going back to the kind of 04-08, but multiple times you have asked us, the community has asked us, what happens? You come here, it's 2019, you sign the settlement implementation agreement, and then you go away for four years and then come back in 2023. And we were here in December, we were here again in February for the preliminary plat and now we are back again for the final plat. But I would say to you, with due respect to both sides of my team, the Mountain Cove home half of our development team sat and waited for the four years while Brightline completed and built this train that would ultimately provide the opportunity for this site to be developed at the lakes at Cocoa Grove.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:34–00:48:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:47–00:48:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that in addition to the approval of the plat that is being recommended tonight, there are two specific issues that are before you. We believe that we have negotiated a solution and presented one to the staff that works. But ultimately, it is something that only you can approve. And those are specifically, I think Eric referred to them in the presentation as, quote,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:49:16–00:49:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
on the wetlands in the second regarding the performance and surety bond issue. And someone asked Mr. Gonzalez if he would touch on those issues. ‸ Clearly, I'll leave the procedure to
but those are ones I think that are left to the Council's approval as it relates specifically to this final plat that is before you today. Again, Mr. Mayor and Council, we do request your approval. We'll ask Mr. Gonzalez to do those and then the team would be happy to take any questions that you may have.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:49–00:49:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:01–00:50:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
33128. Kendall covered it well. Eric even covered it better. I think the issue here, we have to all get creative, right? Sometimes and I think creativity from day one, you know, you don't build a system like this and you don't accomplish what we've accomplished without getting really creative and figuring out solutions to these problems. And as Eric said, we didn't want to impact more wetlands. We already had mitigated all the wetlands and this was form over substance. The
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:39–00:50:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:52–00:50:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have the ability to levy taxes and things like that. So it really does help and it helps maintain that master plan that is done with this community. This is going to be a world class community and ‸ we're happy to bring that to Coco and be part of that first step in Coco. First a community like this and then a train station is where they were coming next. So I just want to say thank you. It's been a long road. We're talking about we met in 2012 when we were just talking about Brightline. Here we are talking about a station in Coco, which at the beginning was not. But I got commend the mayor because he's been relentless over the years. And that's ‸ a great word for him because he's relentless for the people of Coco. And we appreciate that. And we appreciate the partnership that you guys have given us over the years and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:53–00:51:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:52:02–00:52:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:19–00:52:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I think that this is an example of as a community, how do you get to yes? Uh, when there may be boundaries or complex issues that that are in line with that. So a huge appreciation to city staff for their work and navigating what that, what that would look like. Uh, additionally, the, uh, we talked a lot about affordable housing.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:30–00:53:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Like we're about, we are, we are, we are about out. Uh, and so that phase three, there's no phase four over there. Uh, and so, you know, going from a footprint that was, uh, you know, originally like 600 houses and we drilled it down to about three from a density standpoint. There have been a lot of concessions to make this to the best that we could to meet the needs. And if you, if you're not at two grand and some change on an apartment right now, you know, uh, the, the way we do that is we add some more homes that are reasonable, uh, to folks that can get into the market. And, and this is about as reasonable as I think it's going to get. And I also believe it to be a great community. You have the, from a wetland standpoint, the mitigation is appropriate. I bet you those ponds turn into some fishing holes somewhere along the way. And so I think it fits the community again, unabashed, uh, for any individual that would try to turn this into a conspiracy. Uh, you know, some nonsensical, I mean nonsensical, uh, you know, where there is no there there. Uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:03–00:55:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:21–00:55:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from a development standpoint, the, the fact that there is a bond that would be required six months after performance or lack thereof. What exactly? Uh, and so thank you. I think that sums it up and I appreciate it. Thank you, council.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:56:42–00:56:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
It's just to understand it more. Um, when we talk about, you know, our comp plan has a 25 foot upland buffer. Now, what is first of all, the upland buffer is that for the purpose of, you know, during heavy rainfalls and flooding conditions, reducing risk.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:16–00:57:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, it's typically for the animals that tend to live within the wetland system. They need an upland portion, uh, to function. So it's recommended by a lot of environmental consultants to put that buffer in there.
be placed over all of that area. Um, which will prevent people from, you know, putting fences in it and things like that to ensure that it's, it's consistent. So,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:56–00:57:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
For example, the, the flooding that we had and that the London Cove area a couple of years ago. Um, so, I mean, that's something that seems to happen, but,
bring up the point that probably detaching five feet in the back does not really serve the environmental purposes or help us generate the ecosystem benefits of having that full 25 feet. But I guess you have to reduce that to be able to fit the design of the homes in there.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:56–00:58:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:09–00:59:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:10–00:59:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. I see. I do not have any other additional cards. And then pass the candy down. Sure. Like the closest portion to the public and return to the council. What are the wishes of council
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:51–00:59:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just want to make sure that the record reflects, at least my understanding of the motion, that outstanding issue number one and number two are as, uh, as recommended by staff.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:14–01:00:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
revision to the task order to clarify focus areas in each council district. This is a citywide study. It will include a focus on the city maintained roadways and summarize relevant findings within each district. The cost for this study is $34,900.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:16–01:01:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Good note. Okay, do we have any questions for Mrs. Morgan, sirs or ma'am? Where are we going to get this money from? You know what? Let's be... Come to the podium, Mr. Greenwood. Yes, sir. Please. Yes.
You're absolutely right. How much of the commercial business... Says... That... Right. That you ‸ represent... Maybe you can go to them and ask them how much can they share in this cost.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:49–01:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:10–01:03:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:16–01:03:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:28–01:03:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:30–01:03:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right. ‸ So, only thing I don't want to happen is if Mr. Greenwood or whoever goes back to businesses that maybe be mostly downtown area, they automatically assume that golf carts would be only legal downtown. ‸ I don't believe that's what our conversation was about for a downtown-only golf cart, right?
on public record. This is not a situation just for Cocoa Village. This is selective streets within the city of Cocoa that would be legal, that would be probably low speed, 20 miles an hour, whatever it is.
And you're right, we did discuss that because of the widening of the sidewalks along the major corridors right about now, you guys... Yes, sir. You're clearly
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:04:41–01:04:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:49–01:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As recommended by the Code Enforcement Board on August 15, 2019, the property owner was found to be in violation of weed section 6-1003D for the accumulation of tall weeds, grass, and or overgrowth exceeding 12 inches in height. Protective treatment section 6-1003D for the disrepair of protective treatment, paint to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:37–01:05:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:57–01:06:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:10–01:06:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:59–01:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lien reduction inspection was completed and compliance was confirmed. Mr. Anderson was compliant, cooperative, and maintained communication throughout his lien reduction process.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:11–01:07:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:07:35–01:07:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:03–01:08:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:30–01:08:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. Very smooth process. Yeah, there were some several efficiencies, but he made it very easy. He got permits and stayed in touch with us throughout the process.
good evening, sir. Um, this property is located in District 2, which is the district that I represent. And, uh, you know, some of the properties we've been having a lot of issues over the years with properties like this. And I commend you for wanting to take on the task to ‸ improve this property. Um, we have landlords we have a hard time with, as Mr. Gonzalez can contest. So I thank you for taking that on and helping beautify the area. Um, thanks. Uh, I'm very pleased to hear the fact that you guys collaborated and you were willing to go through all the motions that needed to be done to improve this property. So I thank you for that. And, uh, I am a, I am accepting of the motion.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:47–01:09:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:51–01:09:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just, it, this is my, my questions are more related to city policy, I think. Yeah. Uh, and, and, and you are an exemplary, an exemplar of, you know, from a policy standpoint. So to your credit
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:10:11–01:10:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
so it, and the history behind that. So we were a couple of years into that. So about four years, right. So you've got a property that for four years out of compliance. So as a policy, as a city council, I, I would ask that we maybe take a look at, not maybe, I would hope we would be willing to take a look at what method or practices can be improved to get a property in compliance quicker.
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:51–01:10:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:07–01:11:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
90,000 multi-year fines with the really only clawback being at the sale of the property. And right now, we are about over a lot of any enforceability prior to, except for the goodwill, I think, of the individual. Meaning
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:11:08–01:11:29 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:30–01:11:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:45–01:11:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
from I think I was here when when when you went through with code enforcement. So, it was a quick claim, right so mr. Matlock I think got incarcerated correct right so previous owner gets in car incarcerated fine I quit claim it to you right and so to your credit you have done everything you know minus a minus the concern on a $90,000 whammy. But it's a quick claim, and now it's no violations whatsoever, or no fine whatsoever from a policy standpoint one of the concerns I am not asserting that you this is your intent
if I was a slick businessman I just quit claim it put in for the two grand right put in for the two grand and then I just got rid of a $90,000 lien on a own probably if I'm quit claiming a house I might be able to get that out of steel right so ‸ I'm under duress I did and again that is not my assertion to you sir at all but I'm saying from a policy that's that's a pretty slick way to get around any any violations or any fines so ‸ I think from a policy those are the questions that I have and my hope would be that if there is more we can do to for staff from policy from an enforceability standpoint we might be able to ‸ visit I think the three things I see most consistent is somebody somebody purchased a property without doing a an effective title check and the relief is not
the title check that was improper So if somebody did a title check and they said hey, there's nothing on it And then there's something on it then you as the person seek relief to the agency that that did a horrible title check for you if there was a matter of improvements that were made
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:41–01:13:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
coming off of just show a receipt for what you did great You know something along those lines but I just I see that there's a lot of policy because here's an example of a gentleman who is I think you're on the road right
which is fantastic. Thank you for that work and then but There's a you know, this is this is a great one, but for the neighbors that had to endure that for three years That's not right you know and I just I might maybe ‸ not at this moment but staff I would welcome recommendations of how we get out of this hole
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:24–01:14:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we still have a few more properties within my district that we have the same issue with and I wish the process could move a lot faster So what it sounds like are you looking for consent from council? ‸ to direct staff to bring us some more aggressive measures to speed these processes up
you have a extensive background and code enforcement and chief call you We believe in you that you guys could probably bring us some some measures back
the relationship how was the report this man young man had a not pleasant disposition then I'd be willing to drop the hair on but I'm trusting your professional judgment as well as I trust chief
professional judgment and that is the reason why I am a firm believer in you and the code enforcement board and even the liaison it's a goal it's a roll of the dice ladies and gentlemen let's be honest if some we know if someone is heartfelt and sincere then there's others who are the carpetbaggers who just backing up to get the paycheck ‸ and that's our thing and I think that's the reason why I'm asking Mr.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:43–01:16:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:50–01:16:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:00–01:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but uh I'm still in favor if there's something out there much more that we can do is when I tell you we have a few properties Mr. Gonzalez I'm sure you know what I'm talking about we had tents and illegal mobile homes and uh so if there's anything you could do I I will welcome you bringing it forth to council uh maybe it's just a matter of policy um so great points though because ultimately I'll say this ultimately you're right mayor the goal is compliance um ‸ So,
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:59–01:18:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
don't know if it's 30 days, 90 days, or whatever the case may be. The point that I'm saying to you, yes, sir, I'm in favor, but how can we fine-tune it? That's the question. That's what we all fundamentally are
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:18–01:18:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:28–01:18:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No. So I guess the question that I have for you, Deputy Mayor Hearn, as far as what could we do, I think we're kind of in a pickle because all you can really do is put liens on the property. And so, I mean, I'm not sure about the jail and all that. I don't think that comes into play, right? You just put a lien on it, correct?
He follows that policy to the law no matter who it is. And it is what it is. ‸ And so, I took, I got a property that I purchased. I purchased it for cheap. But I also took on the lien that came with it. It's on me. I have to do the due diligence on my property. That's my responsibility. And so, whether I'm renting it, whether I'm staying in it, whether it's my fourth house or whatever the situation is, I have to take on that responsibility. And so, I just, I just caution us on that as well. It's just, you know, do we go case by case on every single cold case? I ‸ don't, I don't know. You know, I just, ‸ that's where, yeah, you're right.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:40–01:20:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:54–01:20:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Turned around, sold the house. So, is there, I mean, so I'm very sensitive about that because it just did not seem right. Although, he did put value into it. You know, he went in and redid it. But, in terms of how much he reduced the liens is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:20–01:21:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:24–01:21:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:44–01:21:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
look, if we give you this reduction by whatever the amount is, and you sell a house within 30 days, 60 days, or whatever that may be, then it's some kind of... I don't know what that is, but you just... Have you done anything like that or seen anything in any cities?
You're seeing this, these lien reductions after the property has been brought into compliance. So, that goal should always be met, probably 99.9% of the time,
I know in one... I know the council's wrestled with a couple of, um, pre-compliance, um, situations where we've done code enforcement agreements. To, and the goal was to have this new party come in and actually bring the property into compliance. And then there was a forgiveness at, after the fact. So, we've done some of those creative agreements in the past. Um, so, I mean, it's, you know, under the right circumstances, perhaps we can, we can, we can do a condition.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:23:54–01:24:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
must live in the house for a certain period of time. And if they sell the home or move to a different location, they have to pay back the difference or the loan that we've granted them.
Yes, sir. There's a 10 year, uh, mortgage that is placed on a home. If a person receives first time home buyer assistance, that would have to be repaid.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:28–01:24:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:48–01:24:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:13–01:25:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But I, I know you're sincere about it, sir. And I'm just banking on the collaboration you have with this young man, the professionalism and with ‸ also the city attorney,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:37–01:25:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:38–01:25:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
two questions. One is for this gentleman's case itself. Right. The other is, I think, and I know in my intent was just, can we ask staff if there are any opportunities for improvement to policy? Two separate questions. And so, and or if that is the, maybe intent we're going, fantastic. But I don't want to conflate the two. My intent is not to conflate the two.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:27–01:26:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:26:50–01:26:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:25–01:27:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:49–01:27:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:28:03–01:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:32–01:28:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:39–01:28:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a senior, and graduating. And I am here because I am promoting menopause. I have had my practice in Titusville for 14 and a half years, and now I'm online, Dr. Donna G. MD, and I wrote a book called Not Your Granny's Menopause. So this came up because we are doing speaking events, and we had a speaking event at Cocoa Public Library recently, where we talk about the conversation. The conversation about menopause.
to their daughters about menopause. Our theme for June is couples, husbands needing to learn menopause and how to navigate marriage and menopause. We have events at the Cocoa Public Library on June 30th and another event on June 23rd
You also are a self-funded health group. And so the notion of ‸ being able to educate your employees through the mechanisms that you have with regard to health care and the provision of health care within the city employee section is also important. So the book is a guide. There's a community. There's a podcast. I mean, I do all kinds of things when it comes to menopause. But I want to bring up the notion that we need to put this front and center to talk about issues that affect ‸ women. And this is a health and wellness issue that will have impact on us all. So I have information for all the council members and the pertinent members of staff. But I'm honored to be allowed to come and let you guys know that I have a book. I can circulate my copy if you'd like to see it in person. It's called Not Your Granny's Menopause, The Ultimate Guide to the Change.
Oh, please. Let me tell you. Yeah. The last 10 years of my practice, ‸ maybe 30% of my practice was taking care of women in menopause. And there's a lot out there and you see all of these things online and whatnot. It's huge. How do you get objective, appropriate, reasonable, reliable information? That's really the question anytime anything is on the internet.
I can tell you all kinds of stories about that. Okay. So that's part of the speaking aspect of it. But getting it into the public discourse so that we eliminate the silence and eliminate the notion of shame.
Yes. And when you get your handouts, there's a QR code with all of the contact information. You'll get a chance to see all of the avenues that we can do something. You could do something as simple as get a set of wholesale copies of the book and distribute.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:10–01:33:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
employee health fair, we could do a workshop like that as part of an employee health fair. So there are any number of ways that you can promote the understanding, the education, and the improvement in experience regarding menopause for the women and the people in those women's lives when it comes to menopause.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:33:34–01:33:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:39–01:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:08–01:34:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll give you the details. I graduated number two in the class. I was an honor student. I went to Johns Hopkins University. I have a BS in biomedical engineering.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:33–01:34:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:11–01:35:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Love it. ‸ I just wanted to add, there's a gentleman in the very back that has a ‸ very positive event that's coming up. You may want to get her contact, sir. Okay. All right. Good? Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:35:36–01:35:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:39–01:35:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:47–01:35:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:15–01:36:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
quick. They're both graduating, Mr. Schaller and Mr. Ramirez will be graduating from Eastern Florida State College tomorrow at the Melbourne campus at 5 o'clock.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:36:16–01:36:27 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:27–01:36:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're completely done with minimum standards in EMT school. They'll take their state test on that Friday. And once they pass that, we should get their results back either that day or Monday. But either way, they
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:43–01:36:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:37:01–01:37:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is. Yeah, absolutely. That was one of the things that I said in the news interview, that that was a ‸ product of all the things going right, starting from the mother immediately
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:28–01:37:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:36–01:37:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there right behind that and introducing ACLS protocol showed a positive outcome. And any time you can have those, it just shows the working relationship between our police department, our fire department, our 911 dispatchers, because that's another key tool that helped us get early activation of the system and showed a positive outcome for that young man and saved his life.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:09–01:38:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, absolutely. So, you know, a lot of times as public safety personnel, we're very reactive in things and don't think about the overall outcome that may happen. And that certainly was a point for both of those young men that arrived on scene. Watching them during their interviews, you could tell both of them had young kids at home. But the very first one that was there immediately grabbed the child, didn't worry about anything else that was going on, and immediately put his mouth in the child's mouth and started rescue breaths. And one of the things that really struck me on that was he even said the young boy spit water up in his mouth as he was doing that. So just to see him reactive that quick, where some people may have froze and waited for other equipment to get there, he saw the advantage of early interception into the rescue system and doing CPR on that child to save his life. So, you know, again, ‸ my hat's off to those two police officers and that quick interaction that they had.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:39:51–01:39:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:01–01:40:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
staff can go away and work on the balanced budget proposal. And ‸ so a number of items that I'm going to be bringing to you in terms of direction as we go into that break that require your attention.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:49–01:40:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:57–01:41:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:41–01:41:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know, the county is, in terms of any sort of shelter facility, is going to be in the driver's seat on that. And so I would just say pay attention to that very brief summary of the bill there. Uh, we have a visioning exercise, uh, scheduled for June 17th, which is also a combination of the visioning and the, uh, Diamond Square, uh, board meeting. That's June 17th at the Dr. Jolie Smith Community Center. Um, the visioning is for
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:25–01:42:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:30–01:42:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
sort of as a dilemma with regards to how you notice that. So, um, that is still the Cocoa Village CRA. But I think you all are aware of the, uh, historical issues surrounding the parcels on the southwest corner there.
direct mailers to, uh, the parcels that are in the Cocoa Village CRA and direct mailers to the parcels that are in the Diamond Square CRA. Again, that for that, that intersection is a countywide, uh, citywide issue because it pertains to what we want the sort of centerpiece intersection to be and to look like there.
so we'll do direct mailers to those two CRA parcels. And then we're going to do the, the, the normal advertisement posting on social media, um, to everybody else in the city there. So,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:48–01:43:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:52–01:43:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:57–01:43:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:46–01:44:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
one phone call to Miss Abigail Morgan and um and got got it taken care of immediately. And so, I appreciate um public works and um whoever else that she sent out to uh get that done. I don't know if that was
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:23–01:45:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh I attended. uh My son, he also graduated with the, um graduate for every age nowadays. So, uh but it was ‸ great accomplishment to watch all these young people um go across the stage. uh This was the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:41–01:45:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:57–01:46:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so, by, ‸ what I understand by 2026, but that i gave that information just showed some of the crashes ‸ the reason why uh they want to do some um construction on that area. Because we know traffic gets backed up on the eastbound, well, northbound of fifth Boulevard heading towards 520. And so, um this just shows how that looks. So, it's pretty big project. uh As you can see, it's our it's funded, they say early 2026 uh for construction. So, um but thenthat'd be a good thing. Again, perfect time in provost park. It's going to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:44–01:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:59–01:47:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a lot of kids who didn't want to talk at all at the beginning of this program, and then all of a sudden they're leading the program at the end of the session. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:35–01:47:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:54–01:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:00–01:48:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:13–01:48:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:17–01:48:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:19–01:48:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:24–01:48:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right next to the cupcake place or something in that area. um But she she really helped my daughter and other athletes um perform at the highest uh because my daughter was stiff as a board for like two months. And because we ran across uh
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:48:42–01:48:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:43–01:48:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:46–01:48:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:51–01:48:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um Good for the kids. I also see so many individuals show love um towards them as well. um This was a great picture. um Our mayor was a teacher for a lot of these young men. And you've seen the young men and women come across. They remember him stepping from middle school. And this is Josh Brown. uh He would be attending Stetson University. uh He
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:21–01:49:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, Air Force as well. So um so on on a on a kind of sad note, it goes back it goes back to um the previous slide from the d.o.t um while crossing the roads uh the our young people right now it's ‸ summertime. Again, they're not going, um unfortunately, they're not going to the crosswalk like they're supposed to.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:02–01:50:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
don't understand the importance of uh of being safe and they really don't have the patience for it. um These two young uh young people were or hit by a car, um I believe two days ago. um And so it it's kind of crazy because I just had just seen him with another group of kids and and when you see stuff like this happen. um it is And he's four years old and my son is four. And so, um so as far as
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:35–01:50:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:43–01:50:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
long and they're just going across the road back and forth. And so um if if you can let let officers know, Chief, to kind of keep eye um keep an eye on that area, because again, you're
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:15–01:51:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yep. Ii also, it's the last thing. I brought something to um the city manager earlier today. um I really wasn't too happy yesterday at our parade. um And I brought something to him to that he's going to bring as far as the policy. um Because we really don't have, um from my understanding, the controls over who gets in the parade. um And
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:04–01:52:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:31–01:52:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:40–01:52:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and we had ‸ discussion about it and i also talked to several individuals and leisure services to kind of just kind of figure out what what's our process with that particular parade. um And we didn't have the controls over the submission of who. And so I just wanted to bring it to you guys attention and let y'all know I did talk to the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:33–01:53:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:51–01:53:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as a city might be able to foster connections through programs you know from ‸ economic development standpoint ‸ you know it's the private sector's job to find themselves employees and that's a that is a private sector sector
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:54:22–01:54:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:55:02–01:55:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that doesn't have a big old American flag on the side of it. And I love it. I absolutely love the pride from our industry partners, the manufacturing sector. It is, it you know,
So I just i share that with you. um i I just, I really appreciate that. And it's where the rubber hits the road, man. It is America at its finest. So thank you uh to all of our folks who who demonstrate that pride and proudly. uh The other is uh thatthat red flower, that's a hibiscus. And that's out of the Cocoa Conservation Area. And so I went out there, you know, took a walk because I think we,we
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:44–01:55:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is this is something that we're talking about a little bit and there are improvements, um you know, it might be modest, but it is good, solid improvements and they are reasonable, uh that make that a great place to go out. So if you haven't been out there, some beautiful stuff. And so this is yours truly, you know, the rule good rule of thumb is, you know, you stay upthe path, you veer off the path or whatever, but it is a conservation area, which means that there is wildlife out there. So, um I, please know what you're walking into because we're
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:31–01:56:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:50–01:56:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
water, just pretend there's a gator in it. Okay. So as a reminder, the flip side is on the right hand side, please slow down. When you're driving, that's a beautiful scent, you know, crane, please, please, please slow down. There is no need for that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:29–01:57:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:57:34–01:57:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
in over there. uh it, it seems very Florida friendly landscaping and it seems like it's not going to die. uh that being said, whatever is going in on that one side, there's still a whole lot of equipment on the other side of the road. So ‸ this is what we're shooting for, fantastic. If it's not what we're shooting for, this would be the time where, you know, please let's give some feedback before, you know, the whole thing gets done. But it really is a beautiful um and I think a sustainable way to actually add something to the community. uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:06–01:58:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
final phase. And Chief, thank you very much for your involvement with that and bringing back that last report. Because exactly what Chief said from a development standpoint is exactly what they did. They took the stuff, they mulched it up, and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:21–01:58:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:58:24–01:58:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
got a no burn notice, right? So uh i just I just want to say thank you. But that's it. I mean, we're done. So whatever development it is, I mean, that that that's and those are about 300.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:55–01:58:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
radar is because there was, uh we had, you know, medical use. And from a policy standpoint, there are folks that got ahead on policy. There are folks that were way behind on policy. When we talk about the, the adult gaming, right? That was all of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:21–01:59:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:26–01:59:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
policy and some people are behind on policy. So we have six months at a minimum to, and I'm guessing the year, the year after the state legislator if i'm a betting man is going to have to work out whatever.
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:42–01:59:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
issue. But i I just share that with you because what I would hate for is whatever the intent of the voting population is that whatever that intent is, is absolutely, uh implemented horrifically. And then changes the landscape to the community to something that nobody had intended just because nobody had policy at least ready. So I, I i only say that just, you know, to be thinking about it.
we, ‸ did go out and we celebrated Memorial Day as a, you know, as a,‸ community yesterday. And just as a, just, you know, for one thing, as one veteran and one representative, um I think that we were all there with good intent. I just, as a as a culture, uh I really don't think that that's a great campaign day. So I just share that with you. And I think that everybody who was who was there uh was there for the right purpose and
so forth and so on. But uh that was distasteful, in my opinion. So, you know, don't do that. But, you know, you run your own stuff. uh But anyway, so uh there was a gentleman who spoke uh really well about the the value of
uh And so, ironically, I wasn't even in Brevard County at that time. And then when I wound up moving here, somehow I found out that Doc was down in Palm Bay. uh And so I just share that with you. He gave me another year for sure. So uh appreciation to Doc and Rangers lead the way. Thank you.
I guess you would call them subcommittees, or that the bicycles and pathways and the Vision Zero, which I helped start there. And I would like to serve as the alternate. And so I'm asking you that um since I'm at the meetings anyway. um
meeting where we discussed this. And we never discussed that particular position. I know, Alex, that you've got, you know, so many other responsibilities so so do we take a vote or ‸ consensus? And can we have that communicated then?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:03:14–02:03:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:04–02:04:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:25–02:04:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:03–02:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:39–02:05:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:18–02:06:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:30–02:06:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:56–02:06:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Myself, you can see councilman in the background. We even had school board member Trent there, which was an outstanding support, and the principal's from Mrs. A.G. Cambridge, and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:13–02:07:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:19–02:07:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You can see, like I said, Mr. Trent there. Is that it? That's it, sir. Well, y'all, y'all killin' us, brother. But it's all good in the neighborhood. Let me say this much for the eventful memorial,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:43–02:07:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All gave some, and some gave all. And I'm happy to say that we acknowledge our men and women that pay the ultimate price so that we can celebrate. Our freedoms. And even though we come from different tribes, we belong to one race, and that's the human race, because we're all God's children. Special shout out to Mrs. Hardwick.
third grade class had the opportunity to speak with them, too, as well. And the list goes on, and I have tons and tons of pictures, but it's all good. Thank you, because we do it for the love of our community and the love of my city. So we say thank you, Team Coco. Together we stand. Never will we fall. Thank you very much, Chair.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:34–02:08:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:42–02:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:45–02:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording