civic record · cocoa, florida
Planning & Zoning

Planning & Zoning Regular Meeting

Date
2023-06-07
Status
City minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #780
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Built only from the City's minutes (1020_PZ_Reg_Minutes_06_07_2023.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Justin Simpson, Michael Dobrin, Todd Anderson, Chris Bankhead, Ron Chabot, Aleck Greenwood, Veronica Lopez, Wesley Park, Marcus Wheeler
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Listed absent: Merrybeth Burgess, Katherine Stewart
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Luci Ribeiro (Planner), Kristin Eick (Board Attorney), Monica Arsenault (Recording Secretary)
  • Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, DOBRIN, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, SIMPSON, WHEELER (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)

Adopted actions (8)

  • to APPROVE THE JUNE 7, 2023 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA AS WRITTEN (moved by PARK, seconded by WHEELER); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to APPROVE THE APRIL 5, 2023 MINUTES AS WRITTEN (moved by CHABOT, seconded by PARK); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 06- 2023 TO THE CITY COUNCIL (moved by LOPEZ, seconded by PARK); PASSED 5-4; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, BANKHEAD, LOPEZ, PARK; nays: ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, WHEELER — the City's minutes, p. 5
  • to RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 07-2023 TO THE CITY COUNCIL (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by BANKHEAD); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 6
  • to RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORDINANCE 08-2023 AS WRITTEN WITH AN AMENDMENT TO UNSTRIKE THE WORD “LOTS” FROM SECTION 6, ITEM B (moved by PARK, seconded by ANDERSON); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 7
  • to RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 09-2023 TO THE CITY COUNCIL (moved by GREENWOOD, seconded by WHEELER); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 8
  • to RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF GRANTING AN EASEMENT TO PIVOTAL UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. (A.K.A. FLORIDA CITY GAS) FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING A PIPELINE LOCATED IN LEE WENNER PARK FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF GAS THROUGH THE PIPELINE (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by GREENWOOD); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 9
  • to ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 7, 2023 (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by LOPEZ); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BANKHEAD, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 10

Motions not adopted (1)

  • to RECOMMEND DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 06-2023 TO THE CITY COUNCIL (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by GREENWOOD); FAILED 4-5; ayes: ANDERSON, CHABOT, GREENWOOD, WHEELER; nays: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, BANKHEAD, LOPEZ, PARK — the City's minutes, p. 5

Agenda (the City's wording)

The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (PZ_Reg_Agenda_06_07_2023), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:00–00:00:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:00:04] Speaker 1
them off whatever if you do have to take a phone call I ask you to please step into the foyer or ‸ the hall. Other than that, thank you for being here and Monica please get the roll call going.
[00:00:17] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Sure. Justin Simpson here. Michael Dobrin here. Todd Anderson here. Chris Bankhead here. Ron Chabot here. Alec Greenwood here. Veronica Lopez here. Wesley Park here. Marcus Wheeler here. Mary Beth Burgess and Catherine Stewart. Thank you.
[00:00:35] Speaker 1
All right. Everybody could please stand for the pledge.
[00:00:43] No voice detected
‸ I
[00:00:44] Speaker 3
pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible,
[00:00:54] No voice detected
with
[00:00:54] Speaker 3
liberty and justice for all.
[00:01:07] Speaker 1
Okay. Okay. All right. Good evening board. Has everybody had at least a chance to briefly look over tonight's agenda?
[00:01:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:18–00:01:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:24] Speaker 1
a copy or at least sent them an email, the link. Um, has everybody felt confident enough to at
[00:01:32] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:01:32] Speaker 1
briefly look it over? Okay. Yes.
[00:01:35] Speaker 4
Yes.
[00:01:36] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:36–00:01:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:41] Speaker 4
All right.
[00:01:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All in favor to approve tonight's minutes is, as a, as a, thank you. All right. Aye. Aye. All right. And minutes for last board's
[00:01:57] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:57–00:01:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:01:59] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Has everybody had a chance to go through that, um, and see any corrections or any comments they ‸ want to make for that one?
[00:02:08] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:08–00:03:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:14] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:14] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:02:16] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:16] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:30]
[00:02:49] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:02:54] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:02:54] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:02:58] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:03:01] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:02] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:03:12] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:03:12] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:03:15] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:03:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:18] Speaker 1
Oh, the previous one was for the agenda
[00:03:21] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
for
[00:03:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
tonight's agenda.
[00:03:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Sorry. Yes.
[00:03:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Now we're on last month's minutes. Okay.
[00:03:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:28–00:03:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:30] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:03:31] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:03:35] Speaker 1
minutes. Aye.
[00:03:37] Speaker 5
Aye.
[00:03:38] Speaker 1
Any opposed?
[00:03:39] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
okay
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:39–00:03:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:03:41] Attribution uncertain
Motion
[00:03:41] Speaker 1
carries to approve April 5th meeting minutes. Okay.
[00:03:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:45–00:03:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:50] Speaker 1
is good. I guess we'll move right into new business. I see there's an item 23-347. The consideration of ordinance 6-2023.
[00:04:06] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:06–00:04:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:13] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:04:19] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:19–00:04:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:23] Speaker 6
A future land use map amendment
[00:04:26] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:26–00:04:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:30] Speaker 6
land use map designation of one parcel
[00:04:33] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:33–00:04:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:44] Speaker 6
‸ Subject property
[00:04:46] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:46–00:04:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:52] Speaker 6
City is requesting to change this parcel from commercial to high density residential.
[00:04:58] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:58–00:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:02] Speaker 6
on a portion of the property if the amendment and a subsequent zoning map amendment is approved. ‸ Staff does not expect the level of service of public facilities to be dismissed beyond their acceptable levels of service with this change. The future
[00:05:21] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
lane
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:21–00:05:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:05:21] Speaker 6
use of the surrounding area is a combination of commercial, neighborhood commercial, high density residential, medium density residential, and mixed use. All of these use promote higher density residential development. The subject property was previously zoned as
[00:05:39] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:39–00:05:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:46] Speaker 6
The institutional zoning was allowed ‸ an electronic sign to be placed. The property is located between principal arterial US-1 and minor arterial Forest Avenue roadways. Access to
[00:06:02] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:02–00:06:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:06:02] Speaker 6
larger capacity roadways is typical for high density land uses. This is the location ‸ you can see between Hillcrest Forest Avenue and US-1.
[00:06:15] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:15–00:06:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:21] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
Here's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:21–00:06:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:06:21] Speaker 6
the future land use map as show as
[00:06:25] Speaker 3
commercial.
[00:06:28] Speaker 6
And ‸ how the zoning map will be assigned for high density residential. ‸ Staff has determined this amendment to be consistent with both the code of the city of Cocoa and the comprehensive plan policies and objectives. Staff recommends the planning and zoning board approval ‸ to the city council of ordinance 06-2023.
[00:07:04] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:04–00:07:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:07:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:07:09] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
[00:07:20] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:07:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:07:21] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:07:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:07:22] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:07:25] Speaker 1
I have a Hannah French.
[00:07:31] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Hello good evening. I'm Hannah French with Framework Group.
[00:07:35] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Before you start. Yes. Okay I'm sorry go ahead put
[00:07:39] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
this up here. My name is Hannah French. I'm with Framework Group
[00:07:43] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:43–00:07:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:46] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:46–00:07:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:51] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I'm also here to represent the Porchlight Foundation. The Porchlight Foundation is a 501c3 nonprofit that was founded by the executives of Framework Group. And the idea is that in any market where Framework Group develops market rate apartments, Porchlight will partner with the local nonprofit to develop ‸ homeless or very low income apartments.
[00:08:15] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:15–00:08:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:18] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
Hope. And I wanted to share a little bit about what would happen if this comprehensive plan amendment and subsequent partial rezoning were to be approved.
[00:08:27] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:27–00:08:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:31] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
it was formerly a church that Matthews Hope has done a phenomenal job of renovating. And they now offer an array of services to unhoused community members in Cocoa from the basics of a hot meal, a food pantry, hygiene, showers, manicures, haircuts, physical health care, mental well-being health care. It's just an incredible service offering in this community. But what I think is missing is this transitional housing piece. And they've proven that they've been able to do this in Winter Garden. They have transitional housing as part of their program.
[00:09:05] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:05–00:09:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:11] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It's where they save up for a vehicle or save for that deposit for their permanent housing, their next step. And so there are existing classrooms as part of the former church that we would seek to renovate and convert to a single room occupancy or studio type transitional housing unit. So these are existing. They're not adding, you know, it's not new construction. It's a renovation. But this is really important to enabling real life change. So this is the piece that really moves people out of homelessness and into lives of stability and independence. So I'm here tonight from Tampa to express my support for this comprehensive plan amendment. I appreciate the ability to speak tonight and your consideration. Thank you.
[00:09:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Thank you.
[00:10:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:00–00:10:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:05] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:10:06] Speaker 8
Yes, sir.
[00:10:10] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:10–00:10:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:13] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
‸ So we have, I will share with you that thus far, we purchased the property with our partners back in May of last year. We have since renovated the
[00:10:23] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:23–00:10:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:28] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
code, to bring it into space that could be used effectively. We are currently, though we're not fully open, are already serving over 500 homeless men, women, and children living here in Central Brevard. In fact,
[00:10:40] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:40–00:10:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:44] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
Everything is based at the far ends of the county. On top of that, a recent report came out through the Homeless Services Network, or the
[00:10:51] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:51–00:10:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:53] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
that the number of homeless women over last year alone has increased by 43%.
[00:10:59] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:59–00:11:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:02] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
And
[00:11:03] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:03–00:11:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:08] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's just Brevard. And the bulk of the homelessness in this community and why I came here is I started living in this community four years ago. And I kept seeing the homeless and seeing what was going on. And I moved away from that a little bit to get away from my first location.
[00:11:23] Attribution uncertain
It's
[00:11:23] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
been there for 13 years in Winter Garden. But as we started to look at what was going on, we realized that you've got a problem here. What makes the problem even tougher is the fact that you have local municipalities that dump homeless people into
[00:11:35] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:35–00:11:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:37] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
We've actually heard them publicly speak about it. So our approach to things is two things. Our goal is to move people towards a life of independence and self-sustainability. We are not about a handout by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, most of what you'll get at Matthew's Hope, it's because you worked for it. The other goal, though, is the fact that we also try to hide people in plain sight. And here's simply what I mean by that. When they're able to come to our facility and get a shower, a haircut, meet with my medical team, my mental health care counselors, or whoever they need to speak to, we're able to move them to project their lives forward, away from homelessness, as opposed to becoming
[00:12:13] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:13–00:12:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
On top of that, our fastest growing population right now in this area is young families with children. So therefore, we have a Montessori preschool that is currently,
[00:12:28] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:28–00:12:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:30] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
and we are at capacity already. That's a very highly unusual thing to happen when you open a school in the middle of the school year. But we're at capacity already. But we also realize that our success over the years is being able to have transitional housing for these individuals and sometimes small young families. Most of them are single moms with kids. To have a place to put over their head that is safe while we move them towards a life of independence and self-sustainability. And
[00:12:56] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:56–00:12:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:57] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
We help them by helping if they've had legal issues or health issues, getting those issues taken care of, so that
[00:13:03] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:03–00:13:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:05] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
truly independent and self-sufficient. There's no such thing as a certificate, hey, you graduated from a program, whatever. Your graduation
[00:13:12] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:12–00:13:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:13:12] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
the fact that if you invite me to dinner at your home that you're now paying for it. That's thanks to me. The rest of it I really don't care about. The thing I think I want to stress to the ‸ board tonight is that in allowing us to do this, not only will we take several people off the streets, but we're ‸ going to give people a place to get back on their feet. We know that Brevard, as you all know, has some of the lowest income in the entire state of Florida. It also has the lowest bit of capacity for services. And so our goal is to be able to come in here and do that. And we have a proven track record. You can
[00:13:47] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:47–00:13:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:52] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:52–00:13:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:55] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
between Orange County and Brevard. So we ask for your support. We ask you to look at this. And if you haven't seen what we do, come down for a visit. We'd love to see.
[00:14:03] Attribution uncertain
We
[00:14:03] Speaker 9
just, we are, in fact, I just left. Tomorrow we are going for our final inspection for our
[00:14:13] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:13–00:14:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:14] Speaker 9
‸ We just built a
[00:14:15] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:15–00:14:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:16] Speaker 9
so that the homeless of this community can be showered before they go into my hair salon and get a haircut and get their laundry done at my laundry service. So the next step is to be able to do that transitional housing. And I promise you, it will be an investment of your time and your effort like you've never seen a payoff before. Thank you for your time. And if there's any questions, I'll answer them. Thank you, sir.
[00:14:46] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's all I have for cards for the comments. Is there
[00:14:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
anybody else in the crowd that would like to speak at all on this matter?
[00:14:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:56–00:14:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:57] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
to the board for comments. Are there any comments from the board?
[00:15:00] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:00–00:15:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:01] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
[00:15:17] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:15:17] Speaker 6
that's a different ordinance. I'm
[00:15:20] No voice detected
sorry.
[00:15:20] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:20–00:15:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:21] Speaker 6
That's another item.
[00:15:23] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:23–00:15:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:24] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:15:24] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:15:33] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:33–00:15:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:41] Speaker 6
But the number is it?
[00:15:52] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:52–00:16:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:05] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:16:05] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:05–00:16:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:06] Speaker 1
No.
[00:16:06] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:06–00:16:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:07] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:16:07–00:16:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:17–00:16:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:18] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:35]
[00:16:53] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:53–00:16:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:58] Speaker 2
For this one is 12,
[00:17:00] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:59–00:17:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:03] Speaker 6
How
[00:17:03] No voice detected
many? 25.
[00:17:09] Speaker 6
I don't think this is, um... Just
[00:17:13] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:17:12–00:17:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:23] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:17:33] Speaker 11
I've got a question.
[00:17:36] Speaker 1
Do you find Alex? Oh, yeah. Go ahead, Rob.
[00:17:40] Speaker 11
Oh, I've got several, actually. Are we talking about building new buildings, too, on that property?
[00:17:49] Speaker 9
No, sir. What we're talking about right now is there's a...
[00:17:52] Attribution uncertain
The
[00:17:52] Speaker 9
buildings are already there in space. It would allow us to do, I believe we talked about 14 to 16 units that are currently just the largest classrooms I've ever seen. They're... That's why they're large enough to be able to put an efficiency type apartment in there. So the footprint of the place doesn't change.
[00:18:10] Speaker 11
Okay. Are
[00:18:11] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:11–00:18:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:12] Attribution uncertain
Are
[00:18:12] Speaker 11
you planning on building buildings on the future on that property? There's been no discussion of that.
[00:18:18] Speaker 10
Does
[00:18:18] Speaker 11
it allow
[00:18:19] Speaker 10
you to do that?
[00:18:21] Speaker 9
My understanding... Yes. My understanding is it would. Yes. No,
[00:18:28] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:27–00:18:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:29] Speaker 9
also that ‸ this is not long-term housing. Typically, no one is with us for
[00:18:34] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:34–00:18:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:39] Speaker 9
And like I said, we ‸ have ‸ staff on site as well that would be on site at all times.
[00:18:46] Speaker 11
Okay.
[00:18:46] Speaker 9
So
[00:18:47] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:46–00:18:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:18:49] Speaker 9
It's not a shelter.
[00:18:50] Speaker 11
So I have to ask the question. ‸ Who's going to reside and how are those people vetted whether they're, you know, and I'm not anti anything.
[00:19:03] Attribution uncertain
It's
[00:19:03] Speaker 11
a
[00:19:03] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:19:03–00:19:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:04] Speaker 11
And are they, you know, you could be housing sexual offenders, alcoholics. I mean, you... I just need to know what's going to happen there.
[00:19:15] Speaker 9
Absolutely. And
[00:19:16] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:16–00:19:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:17] Speaker 9
What's interesting is if you actually look at the other organizations, they... It's
[00:19:22] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:22–00:19:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:23] Speaker 9
We do a background check on every single person that walks in our door, even the people that don't live there. Right now, we're serving basically 50 people a night serving a meal. Each
[00:19:33] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:33–00:19:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:36] Speaker 9
If we identify you as a sexual offender, we will typically come up to you. We will let you know that your report came back to us. We've identified you as an offender. We
[00:19:45] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
ask
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:45–00:19:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:19:45] Speaker 9
what was your hope in coming here today? ‸ They say something like, Pastor Scott, I was hoping to get a, I don't know, some shaving stuff, a haircut, whatever, blah, blah, blah. I said, we're going to take care of that this moment. And then what's going to happen is we're going to flag ‸ your file. If you come back, we'll have to call the police. However, if you let us know where you're living in the community, we will be glad to have one of our mobile teams come out there and serve you there with food, clothing, and hygiene. We also do random drug tests for the people that live in our housing. You cannot drink, nor can you do any kind of substances while you're in our housing. We
[00:20:21] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:21–00:20:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:24] Speaker 9
The other thing we do is we inspect each unit once a week. They don't know when we're coming, but we go in there because the way we look at it is they're keeping it in shape for the next family or person that's coming through. So you're a guest in our program. We do not allow them to set up their residency there. That answer?
[00:20:43] Speaker 11
‸ Yeah, that's pretty good.
[00:20:45] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:20:45] Speaker 11
just, you know, with all those homes around there.
[00:20:49] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
I ‸ will tell you that about those homes over there. I'm going to tell you we're going to have the nicest ones there. ‸ I know the community well. In fact, if those houses go up for sale, we'd probably love to try to buy them. We own several homes. We
[00:21:04] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:03–00:21:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:06] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
Literally, if you're familiar with Winter Garden, we're three blocks from Main Street and Winter Garden, Plant Street. We
[00:21:14] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:14–00:21:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:17] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you to go by there if you haven't been to that property. We have a very high standard. And I will just tell you, without giving a whole lot away, if one of the police officers were here, they would tell you we're an ‸ upgrade. I
[00:21:31] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:31–00:21:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:32] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:21:35] Speaker 11
You know,
[00:21:35] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:21:35] Speaker 11
days run into each other.
[00:21:37] Speaker 9
We
[00:21:37] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:37–00:21:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:41] Speaker 9
facial recognition from 300 feet. So if something were to happen, we can actually feed that information to the police department, and they would be able to run it through their system and find out who that person was. It's pretty slick. It's a little scary also that we could do that.
[00:21:56] Speaker 11
Yeah, because there's one house already up for sale on
[00:21:59] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:59–00:22:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:04] Speaker 11
Is the plan long-term to buy those houses up?
[00:22:10] Speaker 9
You know,
[00:22:11] Speaker 11
I
[00:22:11] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
wish I had a crystal ball that clear. Obviously, I think ‸ if houses across the street were to become available to us, we might look at that. Again,
[00:22:21] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:22:21] Speaker 9
would encourage you, and don't just take my word for it, call the mayor, city manager, or chief of police of Winter Garden Police Department, and they will tell you that our houses are as nice as any home you've ever seen. And it's done very purposely like that. We want to set a standard high. We want to set the bar high. And our expectations are high. I've
[00:22:40] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:39–00:22:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:44] Speaker 11
Been
[00:22:44] Speaker 9
there as a child and as an adult. And ‸ the problem is ‸ most of our systems are set up right now to perpetuate homelessness rather than move people out of homelessness. And that's where our successes come from. Help us. Help them. Help themselves. Handing
[00:22:57] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:57–00:22:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:59] Speaker 9
It's like feeding a kitten. Feed it once. Come back tomorrow. It'll be there to have this milk again.
[00:23:07] Speaker 11
Thank
[00:23:08] Speaker 3
you.
[00:23:08] Speaker 9
Any other questions?
[00:23:10] Speaker 3
Yes.
[00:23:11] Speaker 9
Yes,
[00:23:11] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:11–00:23:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:13] Speaker 3
Yeah,
[00:23:13] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:13–00:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:16] Speaker 3
I
[00:23:16] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:16–00:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:22] Speaker 3
So
[00:23:23] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:22–00:23:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Do you need a copy of the staff report?
[00:23:28] Speaker 3
I
[00:23:28] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:23:28–00:23:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:30] Attribution uncertain
staff
[00:23:30] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:23:30] Speaker 3
Because
[00:23:31] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:30–00:23:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:32] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:23:34] Attribution uncertain
done.
[00:23:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:36] No voice detected
I'm going
[00:23:36] Attribution uncertain
to
[00:23:36] No voice detected
work
[00:23:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:36–00:23:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:48] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:23:49] Speaker 9
In
[00:23:49] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:49–00:23:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:52] Speaker 9
looks like today. Other than the fact we ‸ put a new roof on it or something. But
[00:23:56] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:56–00:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:00] Speaker 3
But
[00:24:01] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:24:00–00:24:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:06] Speaker 6
Can I say something before I continue? We're not rezoning at the property at the moment. So just to clarify that for you, what we're doing now would be to change the future land use. Because the future land use now is institutional.
[00:24:24] No voice detected
Commercial.
[00:24:25] Attribution uncertain
Commercial,
[00:24:25] Speaker 6
sorry. Commercial. The
[00:24:26] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:26–00:24:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:32] Speaker 6
I believe they're going to rezone part of ‸ the portion of the property. But that's going to be a separate application. What we're discussing now is just the future land use for the property.
[00:24:44] Speaker 3
All right. So commercial.
[00:24:46] Speaker 6
Yeah, let me, I can go back here. Yeah. So we were discussing is the future land use map, not the zoning map. It's strictly, yes. And then in the future, they will have to apply to rezone. ‸ And then the proposed
[00:25:06] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:05–00:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:11] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:11–00:25:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:25:11] Speaker 6
going to be a ‸ partial rezoning. But what
[00:25:17] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:25:16–00:25:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:17] Speaker 6
now is the future land use. I just want to make sure you have that clear. Yes, that's correct. So
[00:25:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:25:27–00:25:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:31] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:32] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:32] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:34] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:35] Speaker 6
to provide, ‸ they can provide a conceptual plan then to justify
[00:25:39] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:38–00:26:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:42] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20]
[00:26:02] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
there, but it's not making a
[00:26:05] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:05–00:26:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:06] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:26:06] Speaker 3
property.
[00:26:07] Attribution uncertain
Is
[00:26:07] Speaker 3
that correct?
[00:26:07] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No. No. Well, first off, we also keep in mind we have a Montessori preschool on property. We have something like 40 children under the age of five. That would never work anyhow. It's not even possible. But we wouldn't allow it and never would allow it. It's,
[00:26:23] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:22–00:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:25] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
I'm the first guy who wants to put a siren on you and paint you orange. The other side of it, they're human beings. And
[00:26:32] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:32–00:26:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:36] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
wherever that is, and if we can help you out there with food, clothing, and hygiene, we will do that. But they will not be staying on. And typically what happens when they do, once we identify them, normally what happens, ‸ they're going to get a meal and they're going to get some basic services right there, which is probably going to typically add up to some food, clothing, hygiene, you know, maybe a sleeping bag, something like that, rain poncho. It's very limited because we're not going to let them stay on site. Yeah. Yeah. There's.
[00:27:03] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:03–00:27:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:04] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
[00:27:16] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:15–00:27:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:19] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:27:23] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:27:28] Speaker 3
homes. Are
[00:27:29] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:29–00:27:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:30] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:27:30] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:32] Speaker 9
Well, ‸ it's our, we have their support. In fact, they're actually, they're actually actually right now ‸ to partner with them further, but not from our housing standpoint. Those houses are the homes that we own and or have a long-term rental agreement on. So basically if you were to drive to Winter Garden, you're going to see two locations within about a mile of our facility that one has, it's a duplex with four units and with eight units. And the other ones are the,
[00:28:02] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
our
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:02–00:28:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:28:03] Speaker 9
six homes side by side.
[00:28:04] Attribution uncertain
We
[00:28:04] Speaker 9
bought
[00:28:05] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:04–00:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:10] Speaker 9
10 27 Vineland Avenue, which is the main street going down into Winter Garden. The
[00:28:17] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:17–00:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:21] Speaker 9
happened in Winter Garden. I
[00:28:22] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:28:22–00:28:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:23] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:24] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:28:24] Attribution uncertain
front
[00:28:24] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:25] Speaker 9
Now in Cocoa here, everything is on the same property on that property. The
[00:28:30] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:30–00:28:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:34] Speaker 9
you can see it, is, is built out with the, the church facility down what you see the kind of drop off there, like Florida drops off on the side. And the rest is the outreach center. So along the back, if you look at very, the long backside ‸ facing Wells Fargo, that's ‸ easiest way for me to describe it. Those are classrooms. That
[00:28:57] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:57–00:29:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:00] Speaker 9
And they just, I have no idea how big that church was in the past, but you could fit a lot of people in those classrooms. And
[00:29:07] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:06–00:29:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:09] Speaker 9
the services would be right there for them to have. And
[00:29:12] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:11–00:29:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:15] Speaker 9
so forth.
[00:29:16] Speaker 3
But
[00:29:17] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:29:16–00:29:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:23] Speaker 3
have children that are in a homeless situation and being among their kids, which I highly support.
[00:29:29] Attribution uncertain
Is
[00:29:29] Speaker 3
that basically...
[00:29:29] Speaker 9
Yeah,
[00:29:30] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:29–00:29:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:31] Speaker 9
Typically, we run about 80 to 90 percent end up being single women with children. Occasionally, we will do a single man with a child, which we're the only ministry that I know that does that anywhere because once they're ‸ over the age of 11, no shelter will take them. Yeah. And it
[00:29:48] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:48–00:29:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:29:53] Speaker 9
over the age of 11 when we were homeless. That's just that, again, don't take my word for it. Look it up yourself. They will not take young boys over the age of 11.
[00:30:03] Speaker 3
It
[00:30:04] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:30:03–00:30:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:30:10] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:30:11] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:30:13] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:30:15] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:15] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:30:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:16] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:30:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:30:20] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:21] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:21] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:30:27] Attribution uncertain
You
[00:30:27] Speaker 3
say
[00:30:27] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:27–00:30:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:30] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:30:34] Speaker 9
Yes, sir. Like I said, we have a 13-year history, and I encourage you, whether you visit our website or just Google my name or Matthew's Hope, and I think you'll see that we have had tremendous support to the point, like I said, Orange County right now is trying to give us $700,000 to partner with them over the next year on some other areas. So we, you know, nobody really does what we do, where you have, you know, medical team working with people, people with mental health. You know, I will tell you one thing you have, a very interesting thing that we
[00:31:04] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:03–00:31:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:07] Speaker 9
you
[00:31:07] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:07–00:31:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:13] Speaker 9
Now,
[00:31:14] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:13–00:31:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:15] Speaker 9
ill, disabled, difference. You also have the mentally ill ones and quite a few. But
[00:31:21] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:21–00:31:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:22] Speaker 9
we have six right now that we've identified here in this community who are deaf, and the only reason they're homeless is because they're deaf, which I find just crazy. But
[00:31:32] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:32–00:31:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:33] Speaker 9
Our greatest, fastest growing populations, like I said, are typically young families, seniors,
[00:31:39] Speaker 11
that
[00:31:40] Speaker 9
have, that don't, no longer have the income to stay in their homes. That's the second. Third, fastest growing is that we have people with disabilities because they're outliving their caregivers. And that was not the case 30, 40 years ago. Now, you know, these kids that were dying at 30, 35 years old are now living to be 60, 70 years old due to modern medicine. The problem is, is their caretaker dies, and nobody's there to continue to take care of them. That is not an area that we venture into as far as on our site. What we will do is we've helped many of those people get assisted living and other programs that are ‸ available to them.
[00:32:14] Speaker 3
What
[00:32:14] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:14–00:32:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:20] Attribution uncertain
Now,
[00:32:20] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:20–00:32:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:29] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:32:30] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:32:32] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:32:33] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:32:34] Speaker 9
typically you're not going to see them in our housing because what
[00:32:37] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:36–00:32:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:39] Speaker 9
Lieutenant General Jay Gardner on my board, um, who's been helped to very successfully help veterans get into veterans housing. So typically they're not, it's not that we've never housed any, we do, but it's rare. Um, I will say I was fascinated by the numbers, which are typically way off. The point in time count is usually off anywhere in my guesstimation, 20 to 30%. And they're saying these kinds of numbers that 5% in one year, and
[00:33:03] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:02–00:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:09] Speaker 9
So.
[00:33:10] Speaker 3
My
[00:33:10] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:10–00:33:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:11] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:33:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:13] Speaker 3
I'm
[00:33:13] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:13–00:33:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:16] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:16] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:33:19] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:19] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:33:20] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:20] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:15]
[00:33:35] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:33:39] Speaker 9
Disability
[00:33:39] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:39–00:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:41] Speaker 9
I'm sorry. Getting a disability check disables people more than any disability they have. And we've proven it over and over again. I mean, what is somebody going to do in central
[00:33:51] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:50–00:33:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:54] Speaker 9
besides get in trouble? And what happens is they often don't get what they need and
[00:33:58] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:58–00:33:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:59] No voice detected
They don't have income
[00:34:01] Speaker 3
enough that
[00:34:02] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:24]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:02–00:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:34:26] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:27] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:34:27] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:34:29] Speaker 9
The other thing I'll just say to you too, is that anybody who wants to ‸ work at Matthew's Hope can. If you were to come there any given day, you'd see people in a shirt that kind of looks like mine, except it's a gray silver. And what we do is we pay them points instead of dollars, but points are backed by real dollars. So if you want to pay your child support so you can see your children, we'll do that. If you want to have your teeth replaced, we'll do that. You want to go to college, you need a computer. We'll do that. You want to, you need four tires and a tune-up because you're living in your car. You can do that, but you're going to earn it. And we will do the same thing with ‸ vets. So it's going to supplement what they do, but they're going to have to figure out how to do that.
[00:35:05] Attribution uncertain
Very well said.
[00:35:05] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:05–00:35:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:12] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:35:19] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:19] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:35:20] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:35:23] Speaker 9
Anything
[00:35:23] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:35:23–00:35:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:25] Speaker 4
I got to go ahead. I do appreciate your time this evening. I do have a question that I want to pose just for the base knowledge and consideration of what it is that you're requesting. As I have not been
[00:35:39] Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
privy
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:39–00:35:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:35:39] Speaker 4
to that information ‸ in the package that has been received. So I'm prefacing
[00:35:43] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:43–00:35:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:45] Speaker 4
To where is the funding that you receive from?
[00:35:49] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:48–00:35:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:35:54] Speaker 4
looking for? So we can look at something optimistically year
[00:35:57] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:57–00:36:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:02] Speaker 4
year nine, year 10, whatever the duration of time may elude to be. And I'm wondering where the funding comes from. So that's my question before I make any decision. Thank you. We
[00:36:13] Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
print it.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:13–00:36:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:36:16] Speaker 4
I work in banking.
[00:36:17] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:36:17] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
can say that
[00:36:18] Speaker 9
too. That's,
[00:36:19] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:18–00:36:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:20] Speaker 9
Mr. Wheeler. The truth is, is that first off, again, we have a 13 year history and for 13 years in a row. Now our income last year, our budget was $6 million. And that is raised through the community, through our fundraisers, but mostly through the community, because what happens is people have seen the results of what we do in the areas that we're in. And that's who we are. Our
[00:36:43] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:42–00:36:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:36:44] Attribution uncertain
of our income,
[00:36:44] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:45] Speaker 9
comes from individuals, which that is completely unheard of. We've, we've to this point, if I do my thing with orange County, that'll be the first time in 13 years, we've done any kind of government grant. Everything else is through the
[00:36:57] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
various
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:57–00:36:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:36:57] Speaker 9
supporters. We've had porch light. And
[00:37:00] Attribution uncertain
that's the right
[00:37:00] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
part of what they've come to us with is they are literally coming in with some funding to go along with another grant that I already have for $400,000. They're
[00:37:08] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:08–00:37:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:10] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:10] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:10] Speaker 9
with helping us provide the necessary professionals that we need in the way ‸ of contractors. And we also have a wood shop and
[00:37:20] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:20–00:37:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:24] Speaker 9
If you were to come to our offices, you would see that all our furniture was built in our shops from old pews. We, we try to be, we become self-sufficient for the main reason is everyone else is fishing in the same ponds. Everybody's always wondering why nonprofits don't work well together. And part of it is because you
[00:37:43] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
are
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:43–00:37:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:37:43] Speaker 9
literally making them all fish out of the same pond. So why would they work together? They want to catch the same fish you want to catch. So all we did is said, we'll just go over here and dig our own pond. And that's what we did. And we've been successful at it for 13 years. I, I don't have a crystal ball. Anybody else does, but, but our record shows that we'll be fine.
[00:38:06] Speaker 4
Thank you.
[00:38:07] Speaker 11
Thank you. How
[00:38:09] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:09–00:38:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:11] Attribution uncertain
the community?
[00:38:11] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:38:11] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:11–00:38:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:17] Speaker 11
How are they going to be shielded from them?
[00:38:20] Speaker 9
Well, the, the nice thing about this property is, is our gates are supposed to arrive any day.
[00:38:25] Attribution uncertain
Now
[00:38:25] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
they're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:25–00:38:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:38:25] Speaker 9
custom built, but basically the areas that someone can enter into to get to where the families and or our children for the, for the, for the,
[00:38:33] Attribution uncertain
for the
[00:38:33] Speaker 9
preschool, there are gates that you have to have a code to get into. And they literally go the height of the area,
[00:38:39] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:38:39] Speaker 9
walkway to go through. Uh,
[00:38:41] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:40–00:38:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:42] Speaker 9
And, uh, if
[00:38:43] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:43–00:38:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:38:45] Speaker 9
next week, we'll, we'll have men, but it's all done by code. Along with that. Like I said, we have 40 cameras down up in all those highways and all over that place, those hallways. And there's really not much we can't see. Uh, and those are monitored. And
[00:38:59] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:58–00:39:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:05] Speaker 9
13 years. And we've literally served hundreds of ‸ people through our housing. And I think the key key is to make the investment for safety purposes first. And, and I, you know, without taking shots at other organizations, they just don't do it. It's expensive, but it pays off in the long run. Keeps you out of lawsuits also, which is kind of nice.
[00:39:30] No voice detected
Right.
[00:39:31] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:39:30–00:39:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:39:38] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:38] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:39] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:39:40] Speaker 6
This one.
[00:39:41] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Um,
[00:39:44] Speaker 10
that's
[00:39:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:18]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:39:44–00:40:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:03] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:40:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:40:09] Speaker 10
density. In the middle of the neighborhood. I'm
[00:40:13] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:13–00:40:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:18] Speaker 10
But if they sold the property next month, we are, we are allowing someone. moving.
[00:40:26] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:26–00:41:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:40:26] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 1:10]
[00:41:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:41:38] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:41:39] Speaker 11
That's why I asked, will there be future buildings?
[00:41:43] Speaker 10
I'm
[00:41:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:41:43–00:41:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:44] Speaker 10
residents.
[00:41:46] Speaker 11
Yeah, there's got to be plans for future building then.
[00:41:50] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Why
[00:41:50] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:50–00:41:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:41:52] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:41:53] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice
That was my, you clarified it.
[00:42:01] Speaker 1
Why do we need the change?
[00:42:04] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
May
[00:42:04] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I
[00:42:05] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
speak? It
[00:42:06] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:42:06–00:42:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Are
[00:42:08] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
we going
[00:42:09] Attribution uncertain
through?
[00:42:09] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So I want to clarify two things. One, the sponsor of this is the city. We are not sponsors. We're here in support of a city-led initiative. But the second is, as Ms. Ribeiro explained, we would need to seek, the owner of the property would need to seek a rezoning subsequent to this approval. And it's only a partial rezoning. So it's not the full 5.88 acres. It's only a portion that would be rezoned because the rest of it would remain as is. So that Matthew's Hope can offer those services. So
[00:42:40] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:39–00:42:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:45] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
of a much smaller piece of that.
[00:42:49] Speaker 6
I just want to add that this particular parcel was zoned RU-225 in the past and was RU-215. And the church, the previous owner who owned the church, rezoned that parcel to institutional so they could have electronic sign that was not
[00:43:09] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:09–00:43:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:13] Speaker 6
So I just want to point that out as well.
[00:43:16] No voice detected
So
[00:43:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:43:16–00:43:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:18] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:43:19] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:43:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
In the past, yes. And it was done in 2016. It
[00:43:28] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:28–00:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:31] Attribution uncertain
It
[00:43:31] Speaker 1
was very recent because that sign was only put there right before the church went out of business. So, yeah, it had to have been very recent.
[00:43:39] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. Yeah. So what I just want to point it out, there was not a zone institutional as is now.
[00:43:45] Attribution uncertain
It
[00:43:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
was, you
[00:43:46] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:45–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:48] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:43:52] Speaker 6
Previously, it was. No,
[00:43:53] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:53–00:43:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:54] Speaker 6
you know, he mentioned in the future, he was concerned about the future, but I would just want to point out that in the past, it was on. We had the same zoning.
[00:44:04] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:44:04–00:44:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:11] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:44:11] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
[00:44:24] No voice detected
I
[00:44:24] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
guess I would need to understand why that would influence the decision. But, again, ‸ what we would plan to, if this comprehensive plan amendment is approved, and we return with the rezoning request, it would be a fraction of the total parcel. And we want to be sure that we can add the number of units that we are seeking. And medium density may not allow us to do that. We'll convert the classrooms. It's an
[00:44:49] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
ad
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:49–00:44:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:44:50] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
It is an
[00:44:50] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
ad
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:50–00:44:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:44:50] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of units, but it's a renovation.
[00:44:52] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
I'm
[00:44:52] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:52–00:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:59] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
about the entire parcel being re-zoned eventually to a high density. If you're saying there's another area that
[00:45:09] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
you want
[00:45:09] Attribution uncertain
to do that.
[00:45:09] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
May I direct a question to the attorney? I'm sorry. I don't believe that we would be able to re-zone the entire property and for Matthew's Hope to be able to function in its current capacity. Okay. Am
[00:45:24] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:24–00:46:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:25] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:45:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:45:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:45:27] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:45:27] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:45:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:45:36] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:45:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:45:37] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:49]
[00:46:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:46:25] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:25–00:46:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:26] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:46:33] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:33–00:46:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:35] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
I just want to point it out. The ordinance was 14-2016 and it was to amend the zoning map from RU215 and RU225 to institutional.
[00:46:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:45–00:46:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:50] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the zoning actually changed. It was 2016. It was 2016. Yes.
[00:46:59] Speaker 12
I've got a quick question here. So back to where we started with this, what we're talking about is land use and taking it from what is currently commercial down to high density residential.
[00:47:14] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, so this is the future land use map now, how you see, that's the future land use that we have ‸ now and
[00:47:20] Speaker 8
this is how
[00:47:21] Speaker 6
you look.
[00:47:23] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So what I'm saying is it's currently commercial in a neighborhood as far as the land use.
[00:47:31] Speaker 10
So
[00:47:32] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:31–00:47:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:36] Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well, if I was going to resell it, I would prefer it to be commercial. That's my point. How
[00:47:42] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:41–00:47:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:43] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:47:44] Speaker 12
said, ‸ as an investor, I would prefer it to be commercial. I don't think it's really a downgrade.
[00:47:51] Speaker 3
Well, the commercial, I think
[00:47:53] No voice detected
if I understood correctly,
[00:47:54] Speaker 3
allows RU215. Is that correct?
[00:47:56] Speaker 6
Yes.
[00:47:57] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
So again, my question was, why does it have to be
[00:48:00] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:00–00:48:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:07] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:48:07] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
Sorry. I want to clarify that. No, ‸ commercial feature land
[00:48:11] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:11–00:48:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:16] Speaker 3
In
[00:48:17] Speaker 13
order to have residential units, that is the reason for the request to change it to high density residential. Other options could be medium density residential, you know, as a future land use. But ‸ commercial does not provide for residences, except in certain limited circumstances. There are, like, for example, a PUD, you did a mixed use PUD. But
[00:48:47] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:47–00:48:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:52] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:48:52–00:49:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:01] Speaker 13
What I'm saying is that ‸ would be an option.
[00:49:04] Speaker 10
If
[00:49:04] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:04–00:49:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:05] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:49:07] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:49:10] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:49:12] Speaker 1
How many of the classrooms are you wanting to convert?
[00:49:15] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I think we have 14 to 16 available.
[00:49:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:18–00:49:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
That's right. And
[00:49:20] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:20–00:49:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:21] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
acres is that?
[00:49:21] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That's the piece of information I don't have, is what the split between the current and residential zoning would be. So. Okay.
[00:49:31] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:30–00:49:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:34] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:49:37] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:49:42] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Okay. I don't believe I'm allowed to direct a question to staff. Is that right? It has to be directed to the committee.
[00:49:56] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I would suggest that you ask your question to the chair and if he would like to pass that on, that would be fine.
[00:50:02] Attribution uncertain
A
[00:50:02] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
question to the chair is in the future land use.
[00:50:09] Attribution uncertain
I didn't believe that we were able to submit.
[00:50:09] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:09–00:50:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:09] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
is a city sponsored, but it's all or nothing on the parcel. I did not believe we were able to come in with a partial future land use change. It was the entire parcel or nothing. That was my understanding.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:50:09–00:50:33 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:50:21] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
And to that question, I'm going to refer it to staff for the legal issue.
[00:50:27] Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized
No, we do have parcels in the city that have a split future land use, so it would be
[00:50:34] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:34–00:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:35] Speaker 13
have, you know, the legal description exactly of the land that was going to be each future land use category in that circumstance. And
[00:50:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
then I would also assume that that would probably mean that you would have to figure out exactly how much land you have for your classrooms that you're wanting to convert. And
[00:50:58] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:50:57–00:51:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:05] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
those classrooms you're wanting to convert. Um, because if you're doing the, say we do medium density and it's 215, then it's only 15, um, dwellings per acre and you're wanting to do 16 of those classrooms, but it's only an acre. You're, you know, so
[00:51:28] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
that's, that's exactly right. And I think that's why the high density was suggested. But
[00:51:33] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:33–00:52:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:36] Attribution uncertain
out.
[00:51:36] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:51:36] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:51:38] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:47]
[00:52:27] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:52:33] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
an ability to amend this potential ordinance in this session, or would there need to be a return?
[00:52:42] Speaker 1
Do we have the ability to change it from high density to medium density,
[00:52:46] Speaker 13
or
[00:52:48] Speaker 1
do we have to wait?
[00:52:49] Speaker 13
I don't think we would have the ‸ ability to change it here, because we have advertised the ordinance by title, which includes that it's high density residential. So, I think it would have to come back if that would be the applicant's desire, and we would advertise it.
[00:53:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:12–00:53:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:15] Speaker 3
Do you mind?
[00:53:18] Speaker 13
We have to advertise at least 10 days in advance of the meeting for a future land use map amendment.
[00:53:29] Speaker 1
So, potentially next month.
[00:53:34] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:34–00:53:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:53:40] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:53:40] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:53:48] Speaker 1
Do we have any further comments on the matter?
[00:53:52] Speaker 5
Yeah, I'll say as
[00:53:53] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
it stands,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:53–00:53:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:53:54] Speaker 5
I'll say nay to that. I don't see the problem with a future land use map change.
[00:53:58] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:58–00:54:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:01] Speaker 5
you, Mike,
[00:54:01] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
but
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:01–00:54:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:54:02] Speaker 5
I do. It is going to happen. That's okay.
[00:54:05] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:05–00:54:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:06] Speaker 8
How long have you been in Winter Park?
[00:54:09] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:09–00:54:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:11] Speaker 9
13 years.
[00:54:12] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:12–00:54:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:29] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:29–00:54:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:32] Speaker 8
Our church supports it. I really don't see anything wrong with it. There are issues we're raising that we try to make ourselves look important. And honestly,
[00:54:46] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I oppose the city staff.
[00:54:49] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
I've opposed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:54:49–00:54:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:54:50] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the city staff on many cases. ‸ I don't see anything wrong with what is being proposed. Just a personal feeling.
[00:54:59] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:59–00:55:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:02] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:55:04] Speaker 8
we
[00:55:04] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
are.
[00:55:05] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
We're trying to
[00:55:06] Speaker 10
be something
[00:55:06] Attribution uncertain
more
[00:55:06] Speaker 10
than
[00:55:07] Speaker 8
we
[00:55:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
are.
[00:55:08] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:08–00:55:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:11] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:55:11] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:55:12] Speaker 5
these other, you know,
[00:55:13] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:55:14] Speaker 5
gave you all the chance to talk.
[00:55:16] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:16–00:55:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:17] Speaker 5
You know, those are all residential areas sitting in a commercial future land use.
[00:55:22] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:55:22–00:55:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:22] Speaker 5
already inappropriate. Right? ‸ So ‸ I think we should
[00:55:26] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:26–00:55:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:28] Speaker 5
and make it all commercial. That seems absurd too, right? So, I mean, I agree that it's going to be an odd duck out. ‸ But they'll have to come back and give us the exact what they would like out of the ‸ rezoning of
[00:55:40] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:40–00:55:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:44] Speaker 5
Yeah. So, by doing this, the citizens still have the power to direct where this land use goes. Because it is institutional and has to be rezoned. So, if they sell it, I want to sell it to a high-rise community without the
[00:56:03] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
rezone,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:56:03–00:56:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:56:04] Speaker 5
all the rest of that institutional, and
[00:56:06] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:06–00:56:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:09] Speaker 5
is RU. So, we could then say, well, the roads don't support that and the community doesn't support that. So, we shouldn't do that. So, there's ‸ the potential. ‸ I see your point, actually.
[00:56:19] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:56:19] Speaker 5
understand it. But I see the potential to stop something in the future if that does occur, if they decide to sell the land and ‸ it's rezoned as a high-density. But I also don't see those houses being sold and
[00:56:34] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:56:34–00:56:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:34] Speaker 5
McDonald's either. Right? So, ‸ it's an odd use of the future land use with all those houses in there to be commercial in the first place. So, that's why I ‸ support the high-density.
[00:56:45] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:45–00:56:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:48] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
as he said, for these type of activities. And I think we need to move forward. Not go home and not pat ourselves in the back and say, look, we managed, we denied something. I don't see them going anywhere.
[00:57:04] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:57:04] Speaker 8
really don't.
[00:57:12] No voice detected
I think we...
[00:57:13] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I think we...
[00:57:14] Attribution uncertain
They
[00:57:14] Speaker 3
come back figuring out just exactly how many units they need to be able to build. They might be able to be more comfortable with the medium or low density instead of the high density, which is really going to ‸ extreme base on the base.
[00:57:37] Speaker 9
Is it... Maybe I missed something here. My understanding is we're not doing a zoning meeting tonight, correct?
[00:57:44] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:44–00:57:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:48] Speaker 9
what we're asking for, that we would
[00:57:49] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:49–00:57:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:54] Speaker 9
what we want to build, and you guys can turn it down? Is that not correct?
[00:57:58] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:58–00:58:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:00] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:58:00] Speaker 5
That's my understanding. That's my...
[00:58:04] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:04–00:58:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:05] Speaker 9
No, no.
[00:58:06] Attribution uncertain
What
[00:58:06] Speaker 9
I'm asking is my understanding, in all fairness, my understanding is this is not a zoning meeting, correct? ‸ Okay. So, what I'm saying is what we're asking for is for future use, which then would require us to come back each time we wanted to do something different. Is that not correct?
[00:58:24] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:24–00:58:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:24] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:58:24] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:58:25] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:58:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:58:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:58:34] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:58:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:58:39] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
No, I understand that. I'm just trying to... Here's the thing. It's taken us a year to get here. Because, quite honestly, the city couldn't figure out what it was. Because everybody believed it was residential, even to the point when we bought it. Because it had been residential for forever. And it was done, and we learned going back through. We learned that it was made institutional just recently so they could have the sign out there.
[00:59:07] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:07–00:59:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:14] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
a storage unit, and a couple other buildings that look like somebody should plow them down. That's what it's surrounded by. And, you know, obviously, I'm not the guy who should come up here and ‸ try to fight for this against what you all are saying. But I'm asking you to step back for a minute and look at what the reality of it is. I mean, who in the hell is going to ‸ build on that little chunk of property?
[00:59:40] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:40–00:59:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:44] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
it's legally set up, correct? It's not that we are
[00:59:48] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:48–00:59:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:50] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
It happens to be that ‸ it was switched to that because of this reason.
[00:59:56] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:56–01:00:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:00] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
with, and the people that wanted to buy it before us coming in
[01:00:04] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:04–01:00:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:07] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
That would have been a nice thing to add to this.
[01:00:09] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:09–01:00:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:12] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:12–01:00:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:15] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And so what I'm saying is, if I'm understanding it right, and I'm certainly not an attorney, but I've had to go in front of these boards for the last umpteen years, and my understanding is what we're asking again is for consideration for future use. But, however, if we went to build something, right now we'd renovate a building that's already in place. If we were to build something, we still have to come in front of the board and get that approved. Is that not correct?
[01:00:46] Speaker 1
Yes. That's, well, I believe
[01:00:50] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:50–01:00:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:53] Speaker 1
Up to
[01:00:53] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:53–01:00:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:58] Speaker 13
Yeah, there's several different, I think, ‸ questions going on. One is in terms of zoning, if they wanted to have residential units, they would need to apply for at least a partial unit. And
[01:01:15] Attribution uncertain
then we'll
[01:01:15] Speaker 13
rezone to, you know, to apply for either
[01:01:19] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:19–01:01:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:23] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:23–01:01:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:39] Speaker 13
district in high density residential. So that's a possibility going forward. But in terms of constructing something that would depend, as you said, on whether or not it would be considered ‸ a large scale site plan, which this board hears, or a small scale site plan, which are done administratively. Right.
[01:02:00] Speaker 1
So depending on how grand you go depends on whether or not it comes before us or not.
[01:02:07] Speaker 9
Well, the one challenge we would have is that if we were to do what's being brought up here is then we shut everything else down we have. Because what happens is we have our parking lot ‸ out there in our garden and a couple of things like that. I mean, the reality of it is, is that
[01:02:25] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:25–01:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:28] Speaker 9
Matthew's hope. It just doesn't even make any sense. Um, I don't know how I can, you know, we're not in the building business other than building people up.
[01:02:41] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:41–01:02:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:47] Speaker 9
in the foot over and over again.
[01:02:49] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:49–01:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:52] Speaker 9
And here's the thing. People are always saying not in my backyard. Well,
[01:02:56] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:56–01:02:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:59] Speaker 9
And they're going to be there more and more. I think we bring something here to the city that clearly the commission understands is beneficial to the entire community. The Cocoa village, you want, you want to have people with
[01:03:13] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
you or
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:13–01:03:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:03:13] Speaker 9
against you. ‸ Just go with the people
[01:03:15] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:15–01:03:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:03:15] Speaker 9
the merchants in the village. They're with us. They understand what we're doing. They understand that we brought up the value. We spent three and a half million dollars that I mentioned that that was on top of the million and a half dollars to buy it.
[01:03:25] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:25–01:03:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:27] Speaker 9
It would make absolutely no sense for us to walk away. But what would make a lot of sense as this is drug out this past year is if we can get the approval to go forward with the motion to be able to look at future land use ‸ and then come back before you. And if we ever decide to build something, then we would do that. We want to be good neighbors. You know, a lot of this, unfortunately, when we bought the property initially, it was believed that it was it was a residentially based property.
[01:03:59] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:59–01:04:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:04:01] Speaker 9
get to where we are at tonight. It's been a it's been a circus at best. But we got here. And all I'm asking is to really look at this nice and hard and consider who's living there now, what is surrounded by and what it can do for the community. And I think in all due respect, Mr. Anderson, you mentioned that, you know, you're all for what we're doing, but just not those high density thing in all due respect. I mean, let's look at what's there because what is there? I mean, have
[01:04:34] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:34–01:04:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:04:37] Speaker 9
We're the nicest thing on it. Have you been in the property since we bought it?
[01:04:52] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:52–01:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:04:54] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:54–01:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:04:54] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:04:54] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:04:55] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:04:58] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:05:02] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:02–01:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:03] Speaker 9
What is you anticipating happening?
[01:05:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:05–01:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:05] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:05:08] No voice detected
Well,
[01:05:10] Speaker 9
if Kristen, I believe you were in on all those phone calls, correct?
[01:05:16] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:16–01:05:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:17] Speaker 9
calls?
[01:05:19] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
I was, but I mean, again,
[01:05:21] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:21–01:05:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:24] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:05:26] Speaker 9
I'm trying not to drag this out another few months. I'm trying not to lose any more money while I'm trying to do this. And what I can tell you is that it was through the recommendation of the city that this is how we go about it.
[01:05:40] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:05:40–01:05:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:05:44] Speaker 9
Can I, may I ask, what is it you think could happen there?
[01:05:50] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:05:50–01:06:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:52] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[01:06:03] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:06:03–01:06:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:06] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:06:11] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:11–01:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:17] Speaker 9
And yet,
[01:06:18] Speaker 10
nobody's
[01:06:21] Speaker 9
here.
[01:06:22] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:22–01:06:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:24] Speaker 9
And here's the goofy thing to me is the fact that ‸ we can't change this here. And again, I'm not trying to be argumentative. I know you don't know me. But I also, there's a reason why we invested here.
[01:06:35] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:35–01:06:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:37] Speaker 9
What you had, you had a church that was dead. You had a property that was full of rats. And $200,000 worth of mold remediation. It was done.
[01:06:47] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:47–01:06:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:49] Speaker 9
That's just the facts. The truth is, I can show you one email after another where the neighbors have thanked us. Thanked us.
[01:06:58] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:58–01:06:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:59] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I understand what you're saying.
[01:07:01] No voice detected
We're
[01:07:01] Attribution uncertain
talking
[01:07:01] No voice detected
about land.
[01:07:03] Speaker 9
Okay. All right. Okay. We're talking
[01:07:05] Speaker 10
about.
[01:07:07] Speaker 9
And I guess that's a good thing about votes. ‸ I don't know. But I think that it's fair to say that I think ‸ you need to step back from it and look at it a little harder. I'm just asking you to do that.
[01:07:17] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:17–01:07:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:07:17] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:07:17] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:07:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[01:07:27] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:07:28] Speaker 10
It
[01:07:29] Speaker 3
has nothing to do with your wonderful work.
[01:07:32] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:32–01:07:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:34] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:07:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:07:34] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:07:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:07:34] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:34–01:07:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:42] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
to add the additional units instead of the whole.
[01:07:46] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:07:46–01:07:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:47] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No, we're not
[01:07:49] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
adding any land.
[01:07:50] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:07:50–01:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:58] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:07:59] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:08:01] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:08:02] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:08:03] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:03–01:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:04] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
so I can't make that change.
[01:08:06] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:06–01:08:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:10] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:08:10] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[01:08:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:08:17] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:08:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:08:20] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Please, if I can, as a pastor, you're bringing us
[01:08:22] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:22–01:08:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:24] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
Okay. That's insulting.
[01:08:27] Speaker 3
I wanted to make it very
[01:08:28] Speaker 10
clear because
[01:08:29] Speaker 3
if I was on this board and that was my purpose, because
[01:08:32] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:32–01:08:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:36] Speaker 3
I've been here for 45 years. And I'm very familiar with this area also. I'm also a
[01:08:43] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:08:43–01:08:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:45] Speaker 3
And I think that what you're asking for, you would be able to have and achieve by going, instead of the 25 units an acre, to work with the
[01:08:57] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:57–01:08:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:58] Speaker 3
And it seems like it is important.
[01:09:00] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So I
[01:09:01] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
do
[01:09:02] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
want to clarify that this is a city-led initiative. And we are here speaking in support.
[01:09:08] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:08–01:09:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:08] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[01:09:13] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
seem like we are the applicant. But I don't have standing to change what the proposed ordinance is as a city-led initiative. So I do want to remind everyone of that.
[01:09:24] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:32]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 01:09:24–01:09:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:55] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
keep in mind, and that was years later. We turned down a project, three or four years later
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:09:54–01:10:01 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:10:01] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:10:01–01:10:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:01] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
along this beautiful apartment
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:10:01–01:10:03 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:10:03] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:10:03–01:10:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:04] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
All
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:10:04–01:10:04 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:10:04] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:10:04–01:10:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:05] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
this has nothing to do
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:10:05–01:10:06 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:10:06] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
with
[01:10:06] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here · 01:10:06–01:10:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:08] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:15]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:08–01:10:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:24] Speaker 10
That's what it's called, future land use. So whether I
[01:10:28] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:10:28–01:10:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:28] Speaker 10
or whether
[01:10:29] Speaker 3
I land on this type of boat
[01:10:32] Speaker 10
is
[01:10:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:33–01:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:38] Speaker 10
like Wesley was talking about,
[01:10:40] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:10:40–01:10:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:41] Speaker 10
than I do, but he has, you know, he understands the process. I want everybody to understand the process.
[01:10:51] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:51–01:10:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:59] Speaker 10
But high density is 25 units per acre in the future.
[01:11:07] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:07–01:11:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:08] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:11:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:11:11] Speaker 11
Can I ask, ‸ when was this decided? When did you want to go forward with this?
[01:11:17] Speaker 9
We actually first talked to the city one year ago this month. It has taken several months for the city attorney and others to work together to try to figure out exactly why it was what it was. And, you know, all I can say is maybe it's poor record keeping in the past. I'm not sure. You know, those people are long gone, ‸ have made those decisions. Uh, but yeah, we,
[01:11:46] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:46–01:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:49] Speaker 9
what we could do. We made the investment believing that we had the support of the city. But as, uh, Ms. French said is that, you know, we're the city brought this in. ‸ We're here and support it and trying ‸ to understand, help you understand what it is that we're doing there. But I, I do encourage, I think that, uh, it's wise to always look at the what ifs. But I think why we look at the what ifs, we also have to look at what is and what was.
[01:12:17] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:17–01:12:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:21] Speaker 9
be, what could be is going to fail at most decisions because you have to look at what was and what is. We have the track record. The property was in fact residential because of a fricking sign is why I'm standing here.
[01:12:37] No voice detected
I
[01:12:37] Speaker 9
just, I mean, really. And, and so, uh, you know, it's disappointing at best, but, but I, but it's been a long time. And I'm hoping that we've lost some money waiting and I've expressed that to the city manager. Uh, I've expressed that to the mayor and the commission that we've lost a couple hundred thousand dollars in this process already. And, and yes, we are anxious to try to move it forward because we realize that we've made a hell of an investment into the community and it's going to continue to cost us money. And it is, we are, we do care. Um, I don't disagree with you. Um, I understand your concern, but I would ask that for a true decision to be made is to look at what was, what is, and what might or might not happen. But I would hope that our history. That is well founded. Would be in consideration. I mean, we're not in the development business. We're not looking to put a bunch of houses there. That's not who we are.
[01:13:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:38–01:13:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:13:38] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:13:43] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:13:45] Speaker 11
ask questions. I'm a rookie at this. So what I will say that I'm going to do what's best for the citizens. I'm not grandstanding. I'm not trying to make myself look good.
[01:13:56] Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized
because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:13:56–01:13:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:13:57] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:57–01:13:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:00] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:00–01:14:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:05] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:05–01:14:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:13] Speaker 11
I can't.
[01:14:14] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:14–01:14:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:18] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:14:18] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Louis, Missouri charity properties is our partner. They are a large backer of what we do and have been for about eight years. So those
[01:14:28] Speaker 11
people, according to this board of adjustment, special exception application dated 23 January this year. And it says special exception, a monastery school daycare. And that's it. Why wasn't the residential put in there?
[01:14:55] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:55–01:14:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:56] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:14:58] Speaker 9
Um, typically in a religious organization, you can do all this as a religious organization. What
[01:15:07] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:07–01:15:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:10] Speaker 9
were these changes that were made. So what happened is we had to come back after construction. Everything was approved to do. We spent the money. We renovated the building. We actually had students waiting, ready to come.
[01:15:24] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:24–01:15:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:25] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:15:28] Speaker 9
for DCF asked that we have a, a, um, the city approval to have the school there, which is highly unusual for a religious organization. It just doesn't happen. But rather than battle it, we just said, well, you know what? It doesn't matter to us. We just want to be good neighbor. Let's go through the process. So that's why it was done that way. Okay.
[01:15:50] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
To Todd's point. Um, so this guy at St. Louis is a majority owner. I read it.
[01:15:57] Speaker 9
Yes, sir.
[01:15:58] Speaker 11
Okay. So, uh, you know, as a business guy, I'm thinking as a business guy, I'm thinking if he's the majority owner, he could sell it at any time.
[01:16:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:07–01:16:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:09] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:16:09] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:16:10] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:16:10] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:16:13] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
think it's fair, but I would also ask you to do this charity properties and 10
[01:16:18] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
talents
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:18–01:16:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:16:19] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
foundation are not in the business of selling properties. If you look them up and it's easy enough to do, you can go to charity, um, guide star and look us up and look them up. If you go to guide star, what you're going to find is they invest throughout the United States and around the world in ministries doing this type of thing.
[01:16:37] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:37–01:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:40] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
us build schools and,
[01:16:42] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:42–01:16:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:45] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:45–01:16:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:49] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice
because if for some reason we were sued, they show is that they have the deeper pockets than we do. And they would take over from there because unfortunately, ‸ this world of ministry, people still like to see you.
[01:17:05] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:05–01:17:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:08] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:17:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
going to look into that, that, um, from
[01:17:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:13–01:17:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
So you're not going to want to sell that property.
[01:17:21] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:21–01:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:23] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
look at it that deeply from a business standpoint, you're not going to want to sell that
[01:17:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:28–01:17:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:30] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
If you sell, huh? If you build on it with a 501 C, then again, you have to look at it as with the income, with the income, because you have to justify the income.
[01:17:49] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:49–01:17:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:50] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:17:52] Speaker 1
if that was going to be buildable property with the 501 C backing it that way, with that amount of income, trying to go through with a 501 C, it would be very difficult to, quote unquote, launder that money.
[01:18:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:18:05–01:18:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:13] No voice detected
Um,
[01:18:14] Speaker 1
so I think this item has been,
[01:18:18] Speaker 10
yep.
[01:18:21] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; part of a long flagged stretch · 01:18:21–01:19:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:21]
[01:18:43] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20]
[01:19:02] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:19:03] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
what they really needed
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:19:02–01:19:04 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:19:04] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; the machine readings disagree here · 01:19:04–01:19:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:04] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:19:05] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
I wrong?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:19:05–01:19:19 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:19:07] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
No, but I did want to make just one point, and maybe I'm not sure if it would affect your decision. But again, our,
[01:19:19] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:19:19–01:19:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:20] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
comprehensive plan in the table that's at the beginning of the future land use element lists the allowable zoning districts for each future land use category. And for high density residential,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:19:20–01:19:34 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:19:35] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 01:19:35–01:19:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:36] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
still allowable?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:19:36–01:19:37 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:19:38] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:15]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 01:19:38–01:19:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:53] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
but of course still it is high density. I mean, 25 would be the max, but the board could at a later point, when you consider a rezoning application. That would have
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:19:53–01:20:06 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:20:06] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:20:06–01:20:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:07] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
potentially a lower, uh, density allowed. My question would
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:07–01:20:14 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:20:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
be for the rezoning application for the,
[01:20:15] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:20:15–01:20:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
wanting to split the zones.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:17–01:20:22 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:20:18] Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized
Right.
[01:20:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
Is there a minimum size requirement
[01:20:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:20:22–01:20:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
when they do a rezoning application that goes before us or do all zoning rezoning applications go before us? Or is it like
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:22–01:20:33 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:20:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:20:33–01:20:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
plans?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:33–01:20:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:20:34] Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized
No, all rezoning applications come before this board.
[01:20:37] No voice detected · Machine re-recognized
Okay.
[01:20:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:39–01:20:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:20:40] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
already made a motion to deny it.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:40–01:20:43 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:20:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:43–01:20:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:49] Speaker 1
high density, 215 is allowable, which means that we can make sure the 215 would go forward, which is what both of you are already saying you would be
[01:21:05] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
in. Right.
[01:21:08] Speaker 1
Right.
[01:21:09] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:09–01:21:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:09] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:21:11] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:21:12] Speaker 1
just keep that in mind. Yes. With however the board decides to go forward.
[01:21:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:18–01:21:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:23] Speaker 1
Let's continue the vote. Now the current motion is to be denied.
[01:21:33] Attribution uncertain
So
[01:21:34] Speaker 1
when you say yay, that means you are in favor of denying the current agenda.
[01:21:39] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:39–01:21:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:41] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:21:42] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:21:42] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:21:46] Speaker 5
So zero units per acre. If we approve this tonight, if we were to have approved it, they can do nothing on that property still. That's the truth. That's the fact later on. They have to decide that's just, I understand everything's going on, but we approve this tonight.
[01:22:01] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:01–01:22:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:22:04] Speaker 5
With this approval. If it was to be approved. That's just, no, we deny they can't do it. I'm saying if we were to approve this right now, they could not go back there and build on that property or start their residential because it has not been rezoned.
[01:22:20] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:20–01:22:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:22:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:22:21] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:22:22] Speaker 5
I just wanted to get clear that ‸ you
[01:22:24] Speaker 1
got it. So ‸ I've already ‸ got the motion. I've already got the second. All those in favor of denying this current item. Yeah.
[01:22:43] Attribution uncertain
This
[01:22:43] Speaker 1
is me calling it all those in favor of denying.
[01:22:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:46–01:22:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:22:52] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:22:52–01:23:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:22:54] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:22:55] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:22:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:23:00] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:23:01] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:23:05] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:23:07] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:23:11] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:23:13] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:23:14] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:23:15] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:23:18] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:23:20] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:23:21] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:23:21–01:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:31] Speaker 2
Veronica?
[01:23:35] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:23:35–01:23:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:36] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:23:38] Speaker 2
Marcus?
[01:23:39] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:23:39–01:23:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:42] Speaker 2
I told everybody.
[01:23:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:23:46–01:23:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:47] Speaker 1
Yeah.
[01:23:48] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:23:48–01:23:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:49] Speaker 1
Okay. So if I have
[01:23:53] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:53–01:23:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:56] Speaker 2
It is. Yeah.
[01:23:57] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:57–01:23:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:58] Speaker 1
Okay. So with that, I'll go ahead and say that we are approving.
[01:24:10] Speaker 13
Yeah. Make a motion. Somebody needs to make a motion on that.
[01:24:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
We'll go ahead and make a motion to approve the motion. Do I have an approval?
[01:24:20] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:20–01:24:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:24:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Go ahead and get it. All in favor of approving current agenda, say aye. Aye. All in favor
[01:24:34] Speaker 8
of
[01:24:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
denying, say approval. Say nay. Nay. Yes. Okay. Again, roll call. Monica, please. What
[01:24:41] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
are we, what exactly, what are we voting on? Okay. So I've got several graduate degrees.
[01:24:48] Attribution uncertain
‸ You
[01:24:48] Speaker 8
left
[01:24:48] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:48–01:24:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:24:50] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm sorry.
[01:24:52] Speaker 1
Approval of the ordinance. Okay. Approval of the ordinance. Sorry.
[01:24:58] Speaker 2
Okay. Justin.
[01:25:00] Speaker 1
Aye.
[01:25:01] Speaker 2 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:01–01:25:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:03] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:25:05] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Approval of the ordinance. Aye.
[01:25:07] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
Todd. Nay. Chris. Aye.
[01:25:11] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:25:11–01:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:11] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Nay. Alex. Nay.
[01:25:15] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:25:15–01:25:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:16] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice
Wesley.
[01:25:17] Speaker 1
Aye.
[01:25:17] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:25:17–01:25:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:18] Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Nay. Thank you.
[01:25:20] Speaker 1
Okay. I believe this count is still five to four. ‸ Okay. Motion passes. Now with that, thank you everybody for the diligent questions. And so again,
[01:25:40] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
thank you
[01:25:42] Speaker 1
for the opportunity.
[01:25:44] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:44–01:25:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:45] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:25:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:25:49] Speaker 1
So, okay, let's move on to the next one.
[01:26:00] Speaker 3
Um,
[01:26:03] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Mr. Chairman, uh, Mr. Zinka,
[01:26:06] Attribution uncertain
a
[01:26:06] Speaker 13
quick question. Um, I was just wondering, are you here only for the M2? Um, can, I would just suggest perhaps, um,
[01:26:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
moving forward. Yeah. We could move
[01:26:18] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
to that one.
[01:26:19] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:19–01:26:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:26:19] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:26:23] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:26:27] Speaker 1
Um, I have no issues with that. Is everybody okay with us?
[01:26:31] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:31–01:26:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:26:33] Speaker 1
Okay. Yep. All right. So we'll jump to item D. Um, the ordinance for city council.
[01:26:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Okay. Consideration of zoning tax amendment ordinance 09, 2023.
[01:26:48] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:48–01:26:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:26:52] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
council regarding
[01:26:52] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:52–01:26:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:26:57] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
the list of permitted and special reception uses related to
[01:27:01] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:01–01:27:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:04] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
district.
[01:27:05] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:05–01:27:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:11] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
automotive, gasoline, fuel cells, and accessoric convenience store, storage, storage, and restaurants in
[01:27:19] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:19–01:27:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
The planning zoning board requested that the staff bring back an ordinance to allow self-service
[01:27:26] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:26–01:27:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:29] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
reception.
[01:27:30] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:30–01:27:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:34] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
the minimum spacing, spacing requirements for retail automotive, gasoline, fuel cells, and
[01:27:40] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:27:40–01:27:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
convenience stores
[01:27:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:42–01:27:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:45–01:27:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:50] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
reception on parcels. There
[01:27:52] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
are
[01:27:53] Speaker 6
four acres or less. This
[01:27:55] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
will
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:27:55–01:27:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:27:55] Speaker 6
promote growth on this model lots within the district while still preserving larger parcels for more intense industrial uses, which are encouraged in M2.
[01:28:06] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:06–01:28:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:12] Speaker 6
removing this use within the underlying central business district. So here we have the zoning area for M2 that includes 130 parcels.
[01:28:28] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Those are the ‸ parcels that are four acres or less, correct?
[01:28:32] Speaker 6
Oh yeah.
[01:28:32] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:28:32–01:28:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:33] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:28:34] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes.
[01:28:37] Speaker 6
And they're going to be affected by the ordinance. The proposed change for retail automotive, gasoline, fuel cells, and necessary convenience stores and restaurants is related to the spacing requirements. Currently, the use is not allowed within 4,000 feet of a property within the same proposed use, regardless of the zoning district. Staff believes that the intent of the spacing requirements was for the distance requirements to only apply within the same district. This amendment clarifies that the 4,000 feet only applies within this district.
[01:29:09] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:09–01:29:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:14] Speaker 6
for gasoline stations capable of servicing heavier industrial uses. Staff has determined this amendment to be consistent with both the code of city,
[01:29:24] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:24–01:29:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:28] Speaker 6
and objectives. Staff recommends the planning zoning board approval to
[01:29:33] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:33–01:29:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:38] No voice detected
Okay.
[01:29:40] Speaker 1
Do we have any comments from the public?
[01:29:47] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:47–01:29:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:50] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:50–01:29:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:53] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:29:53] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:29:56] Speaker 14
We were here before April 5th. I know you remember this. Wanted to thank you again for your time and patience at that meeting. This is what you asked for. We're happy with it. We ask that you approve it. Thank you.
[01:30:06] Speaker 14 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:30:06–01:30:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:10] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:30:15] Speaker 3
Wow.
[01:30:18] No voice detected
I'll make a motion to approve. Okay.
[01:30:21] Speaker 1
Do I have a second? I'll second. ‸ All in favor of approval of.
[01:30:26] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Mr. Chair, just make sure the others with her didn't want to speak with you. ‸ There's others.
[01:30:33] Speaker 1
Good.
[01:30:38] Speaker 15 (name not verified)
‸ Good evening. My name is Michael DeChristopher, and I made the recommendation to ‸ the council to change the text on the distances between fuel station just to maintain in the M2 zoning.
[01:30:49] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:30:49] Speaker 15 (name not verified)
with the help of Lucy, she was able to provide the information that was needed for you to consider tonight.
[01:30:57] Speaker 1
Thank you, sir. Thank
[01:30:59] No voice detected
you,
[01:31:00] Attribution uncertain
sir.
[01:31:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
And you're good, sir. He said he's ready. All right. All in favor.
[01:31:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:13–01:31:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:14–01:31:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:16] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Any opposed? ‸ Motion carries in the past.
[01:31:21] Speaker 3
Thank you very much. ‸ Thank you.
[01:31:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you.
[01:31:23] Attribution uncertain
You
[01:31:23] Speaker 1
all have a great night.
[01:31:24] Speaker 6
Bye.
[01:31:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:31:27–01:31:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:29] Speaker 1
Now let's get back to.
[01:31:31] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:31:31–01:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:33] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:31:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:31:43] Speaker 7 (introduced as “Hannah French” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Consideration of
[01:31:44] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
comprehensive plan tax amendment. And.
[01:31:47] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:47–01:31:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:49] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Adopting a large scale comprehensive plan tax amendment. Amending figure.
[01:31:55] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:55–01:31:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:56] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Set for in the future
[01:31:57] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
lane
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:31:57–01:31:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:31:57] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
use element to provide the RU17 zoning district. As an allowable zoning district in the medium density residential future land use category. To provide the institutional zoning district. As an allowable zoning district.
[01:32:13] Attribution uncertain
In
[01:32:13] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
multiple future land use categories.
[01:32:18] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:18–01:32:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:32:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
To help encourage development within the medium density residential. MDR. Land use. By adding single family residential. RU17. As an allowable use. Currently there are a number of vacant properties on RU17. Within the MDR. That cannot be developed. Due to this conflict. In the land use table. There are also a number of existing developed properties. With this inconsistency. Medium density residential allows.
[01:32:48] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:48–01:32:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:32:51] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
For single family development.
[01:32:53] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:53–01:32:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:32:55] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Therefore. This amendment is already consistent. With the city zoning code.
[01:33:01] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:32]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:01–01:33:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:33:33] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
of religious, educational, health, and cultural nature.
[01:33:38] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:38–01:33:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:33:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
community, and institutional uses are already allowed
[01:33:46] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:46–01:33:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:33:50] Speaker 4
Here you can have, you see a map
[01:33:53] Speaker 6
with the zoning,
[01:33:56] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:56–01:34:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:02] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:02–01:34:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:05] Speaker 6
comp plan. Most of the, part of the, as you can see on the, on the bottom of the screen, most of those areas are located with the Diamond Square area. Staff has determined this amendment to be consistent with both the code of city of Cocoa and the comprehensive plan policies and objectives. Staff recommends the planning zoning board approval ‸ to the city council ordinance 07, 2023.
[01:34:36] No voice detected
Okay.
[01:34:39] Speaker 1
Can I open up to the board for comment? The board have any questions for this?
[01:34:49] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:34:49–01:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:50] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:34:51] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. It is.
[01:34:54] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And I just want to
[01:34:54] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
say that the, the issue is, especially with the Diamond Square area, is that most lots, probably there was a resident or there was a single family there that was demolished, they're vacant lots. And there now there's people that are trying to develop on those lots and, and now the conflict kind of prevents them from developing. So that's just to solve the issue. And also to add institutional to all, you know, just open up to other future land use options. So.
[01:35:29] Speaker 10
Okay.
[01:35:30] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:35:30–01:35:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:35] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:35:35] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:35:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:35:43] Attribution uncertain
Do
[01:35:43] No voice detected
I, uh,
[01:35:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
all
[01:35:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:48–01:35:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Aye. Do I have any opposed?
[01:35:57] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:57–01:35:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:59] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
All right. Motion carries.
[01:36:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:01–01:36:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:05] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Let's see.
[01:36:06] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:06–01:36:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:11] Speaker 6
Yeah.
[01:36:12] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
considerations on in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:12–01:36:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:36:12] Speaker 6
tax amendment ordinance 08-2023.
[01:36:16] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:16–01:36:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:23] Speaker 6
tax amendment regarding accessory structures regulation.
[01:36:27] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:27–01:36:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:32] Speaker 6
to setbacks for accessory structures
[01:36:34] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:34–01:36:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:38] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:38–01:36:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:46] Speaker 6
April 25-2023 meeting and requested staff to proceed with the tax amendment. The main changes related to
[01:36:54] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
these
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:54–01:36:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:36:54] Speaker 6
ordinances are remove the required building to building setbacks on the same lot. Currently, no structure can be constructed within 10 feet of a building on the same lot. This would include small sheds or pump houses that residents typically have adjacent to their homes. The change includes that no accessory structure may be placed to obstruct any grass or a grass points exterior doors or windows.
[01:37:24] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:24–01:37:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:32] Speaker 6
except that retail transactions cannot be conducted within the assessor structures as providing that statute. ‸ Clarify that lots fronting two streets means a true lot which sits
[01:37:46] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
barely
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:37:46–01:37:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:37:46] Speaker 6
between two public or private roadways and does not apply to corner lots. Provide directions that when accessory structures are constructed on corner lots, the front and corner lot setbacks will apply for the site adjacent to the roadway.
[01:38:04] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:04–01:38:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:11] Speaker 6
the city of Cocoa and the comprehensive plan policies and objectives. The staff recommends the planning zoning board recommend approval to the city council of ordinance 08 2023.
[01:38:26] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:26–01:38:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:33] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
in front of us here? Is this the new text or I remember looking on the agenda and it looked like it was different text than this. I know it's only page 100 out of 200. Uh, I couldn't tell ‸ exactly where it is. Right. But it does read the text here and I was wondering this. I assume it's the old one because on the new one it has all the strike throughs and I haven't seen that yet. I might have missed it in several pages. Um, but on the agenda, it showed the strike throughs.
[01:38:56] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:56–01:38:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:00] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
I can't, uh, exactly remember where it says, uh, I think it struck through on, uh, section
[01:39:06] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:06–01:39:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:08] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:39:10] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:10–01:39:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:10] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:39:13] Speaker 5
with all the
[01:39:13] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:13–01:39:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:15] Speaker 5
and I don't see it in the paperwork again. I like, I may have missed it.
[01:39:19] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:19–01:39:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:22] No voice detected
Um,
[01:39:23] Speaker 5
yeah, but
[01:39:23] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:23–01:39:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:27] Speaker 5
the word lots. And I think that
[01:39:29] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:39:29–01:39:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:39:29] Speaker 5
would actually be, it said through lots, but the lots was crossed out.
[01:39:32] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:32–01:39:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:35] Speaker 5
saying?
[01:39:35] Speaker 13
I
[01:39:35] Attribution uncertain
see.
[01:39:35] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I see that I can make that correction to the ordinance. That's it.
[01:39:39] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. And
[01:39:39] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:39–01:39:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:42] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:42–01:39:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:45] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
out of that.
[01:39:46] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:46–01:39:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:47] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
But, um,
[01:39:48] Speaker 10
yeah,
[01:39:49] Speaker 5
so ‸ the removal of servants quarters was a good, good thing. Thank you for updating our city like that. But that, that would be my only recommendation. If no one else has anything,
[01:39:58] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
up
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:39:58–01:39:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:39:58] Speaker 5
uh, I'll wait to make the motion.
[01:40:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:40:03–01:40:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:05] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:40:08] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:40:08] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:40:10] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:40:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:40:14] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:40:15] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:40:16] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:40:16] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:40:18] Speaker 3
strictly for additions and new construction? ‸ Because there are questions
[01:40:25] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
that have
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:25–01:40:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:40:25] Speaker 3
been brought up about sheds in their
[01:40:28] No voice detected
location.
[01:40:28] Speaker 6
‸ Yeah. So this is to address that concern.
[01:40:32] No voice detected
I'm sorry.
[01:40:33] Speaker 6
This will address that concern about installing a shed in single family residential.
[01:40:41] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:41–01:40:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:43] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:40:43] Attribution uncertain
Cause
[01:40:43] Speaker 6
now a lot of residents are having trouble with the corner lots requirements.
[01:40:47] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:40:47–01:40:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:48] Speaker 6
the setback is 15 feet. Right now from the fence and 10 feet from the house. Um,
[01:40:53] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:53–01:40:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:55] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:40:56] Speaker 6
Yeah. And that was discussed during the city council meetings. So this is to address the problem.
[01:41:01] No voice detected
All right.
[01:41:02] Speaker 3
Thank you.
[01:41:08] Speaker 5
I'd like to make a motion to approve with that one change.
[01:41:12] No voice detected
Okay.
[01:41:14] Speaker 1
All right.
[01:41:16] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:16–01:41:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:20] Speaker 1
ahead and state exactly what
[01:41:21] Speaker 5
changes you wanted to. Okay. Sounds good. Yeah. The motion is to, to, uh, approve as written except for one change on section six item B. Uh, the lots is struck through.
[01:41:33] Attribution uncertain
It
[01:41:33] Speaker 5
says through and the next item, the next word says lots and
[01:41:37] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
it's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:37–01:41:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:41:37] Speaker 5
struck through and, and,
[01:41:38] No voice detected
uh,
[01:41:39] Speaker 5
we making the change to unstrike that.
[01:41:41] No voice detected
Yeah.
[01:41:41] Speaker 13
That was just a, a typo.
[01:41:43] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:41:43] Speaker 13
apologize. Yeah.
[01:41:44] Speaker 5
Okay.
[01:41:46] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
All right.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:46–01:41:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:41:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And then Todd, you second it. Okay. All right. All in favor. ‸ All in favor say aye. Aye.
[01:41:59] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:59–01:42:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:00] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
hear any opposed. None heard. The consideration is passed.
[01:42:15] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
Consideration
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:15–01:42:15 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:42:15] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:15–01:42:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:17] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
park. Consider providing a recommendation of approval of granting an easement to pivotal utilities holding
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:17–01:42:23 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:42:23] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:23–01:42:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
gas for the purpose of constructing operating and maintaining a pipeline located in Lee
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:24–01:42:30 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:42:30] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:30–01:42:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:31] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
for the transportation of gas through the pipeline. Pursuing to appendix A, Zoning, Article 11, Section
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:30–01:42:39 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:42:39] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:39–01:42:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:40] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
the City Council should be required to authorize all uses
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:40–01:42:43 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:42:43] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:43–01:42:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:46] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
on any and all lands on lease or controlled by the city of Cocoa within and outside the boundaries of the city further the planning and zoning board is required to provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding such proposed uses of land and development ‸ projects on city owned land. Pivotal utilities has requested to construct operate and
[01:43:09] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:09–01:43:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:43:13] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
for this to take place. Staff work with Florida City Gas to find the area of least impact to the parks future renovations. Florida City Gas will be required with to restore the areas to an equal or better condition.
[01:43:27] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:43:27–01:43:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:43:27] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
City Gas will be required to relocate the gas main upon request from the city at Florida City's gas expense.
[01:43:34] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:34–01:43:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:43:38] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
City Gas as to any and all claims liability fines related to the gas line in detail in the easement. Florida City Gas has agreed to compensate the city $112,400 for this easement based open appraisal. Here's the location for the existing gas main and the proposed gas main. In yellow. Staff
[01:44:08] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:08–01:44:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:12] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Council of granting an easement to pivotal utility holdings Florida City Gas for the purpose of constructing operating
[01:44:19] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:19–01:44:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:22] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
transportation of gas through the pipeline.
[01:44:27] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:44:27–01:44:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:54] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:44:54–01:44:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:56] Speaker 15 (name not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:56–01:44:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:57] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:44:57] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:57–01:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:00] Speaker 4
Is there any type of environmental impact that is done in relation to this, just out of curiosity?
[01:45:11] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
You mean like an environmental impact statement or something like that? Not with the city.
[01:45:18] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:18–01:45:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:25] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice
the city for the construction. But I, right, I imagine that there probably is certainly consideration. I mean, they're going to have to get other permits to do the underwater construction and everything like that with federal agencies. So.
[01:45:51] Speaker 1
Any other comments, questions?
[01:45:55] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:55–01:45:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:02] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I don't think I
[01:46:03] Speaker 6
have that information.
[01:46:04] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:04–01:46:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:09] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
the
[01:46:10] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
easement is, yeah,
[01:46:13] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:46:13] Speaker 13
proposed easement is 10 feet wide. I will say that the city has spent quite a bit of time negotiating the terms of this easement with Florida City Gas to try and make sure that we're, you know, including terms most favorable to the city, which includes, like we, like Lucy said, the ability for the city to request them to move the pipeline. And in that case, they would have to pay for that. And the reason for that, obviously, is if there was some desire to develop, you know, Lee Wenner for other public improvement, we, you know, the city would have the ability to ask them to do that.
[01:47:07] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:47:07–01:47:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:47:08] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:47:08] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:47:14] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:47:17] Speaker 1
Okay. Um, all in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Do I have any opposed? None heard. Motion carries.
[01:47:38] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I have a quick question. Yes. Uh,
[01:47:41] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[01:47:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
staff, uh, consider creating
[01:47:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:45–01:47:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:47:47] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So I'd just like to verify with the board if that will be an issue. Um, since the normal day will be after the holiday will be a July 5th,
[01:47:57] Speaker 5
I
[01:47:57] Speaker 6
believe.
[01:47:58] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:58–01:48:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:03] Speaker 6
for July 12th and
[01:48:05] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
we would
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:48:05–01:48:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:48:05] Speaker 6
just like some feedback if
[01:48:06] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
you would
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:48:06–01:48:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:48:07] Speaker 6
be okay with the board members to reschedule.
[01:48:11] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Um, I think July 12th would actually probably be a better. Yeah. Especially since July 5th, ‸ my son's birthday.
[01:48:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:48:19–01:48:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:20] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:48:22] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And
[01:48:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'll be getting back from SeaWorld.
[01:48:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:24–01:48:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:27] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay.
[01:48:28] Speaker 1
Okay.
[01:48:28] Attribution uncertain
Um,
[01:48:30] Speaker 11
yeah.
[01:48:31] Speaker 6
Um,
[01:48:33] Speaker 11
a single subject.
[01:48:34] Attribution uncertain
So
[01:48:34] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
what's the date for? No,
[01:48:36] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
unfortunately I don't think so.
[01:48:38] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:38–01:48:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:39] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:48:40] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
no,
[01:48:40] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it's not going to be
[01:48:41] Speaker 4
a single.
[01:48:42] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:42–01:48:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:43] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:48:44] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:48:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Um, ‸ have assistant from a RBI is a third party consultant. Steve, he was here, but he had to leave. I wanted to introduce him, but maybe in the future he will be handling this meetings.
[01:48:58] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:58–01:49:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:01] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
can introduce you to them. Okay.
[01:49:06] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:06–01:49:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:08] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[01:49:14] Speaker 1
Um, we'll see here. We have nothing new for the tree board. Correct.
[01:49:21] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:49:21–01:49:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:24] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It's on the page. It's
[01:49:25] Speaker 1
on the list online.
[01:49:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:49:28–01:49:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:31] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:49:31–01:49:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:31] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:32] No voice detected
I know.
[01:49:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:34–01:49:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:34] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[01:49:39] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:40] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:40] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:40] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:49:41] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:49:44] Speaker 3
to share with everyone that the, uh, designation of the city,
[01:49:52] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:49:52–01:50:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:49:54] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:49:54] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
[01:50:12] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:50:13] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:50:13] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:50:14] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:50:14] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:50:18] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:50:19] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[01:50:25] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:50:25–01:50:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:50:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:30–01:53:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:50:38] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:52]
[01:51:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:14]
[01:51:44] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:53]
[01:52:37] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:37] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:52:39] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:39] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:39] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:39] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:47]
[01:53:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:14]
[01:53:40] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:53:44] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 01:53:44–01:53:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:56] Speaker 1
I'm going to open it up to open discussion. Is there anything that the board would like to openly discuss before I ask for the end of the meeting?
[01:54:11] Speaker 5
Yeah, I appreciate Mr. Anderson's point on the high density. I really did. I didn't think about that until you mentioned it, and it gave me greater thought.
[01:54:19] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:54:19] Speaker 5
mean, obviously, we didn't agree, but I do appreciate it.
[01:54:28] Speaker 11
I will not be at the July 12th meeting.
[01:54:33] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:33–01:54:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:54:34] Speaker 11
sucking a few beers down.
[01:54:42] Speaker 4
I
[01:54:43] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:54:42–01:54:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:54:45] Speaker 4
Just as a matter of clarification, because I don't want to leave not knowing, and I don't know.
[01:54:51] Speaker 3
What
[01:54:51] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:51–01:54:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:54:52] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
Well, probably IPA, but
[01:54:54] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
that was where we were
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:54:54–01:54:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:54:55] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
going with that. Anheuser-Busch.
[01:54:58] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:58–01:54:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:55:01] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice
‸ Did we come to a conclusion ‸ in the work that we've done here for the benefit of the verbiage that needs to be rewritten for the organization that's looking, Matthew's Hope, to change that from high density to? Can
[01:55:21] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:55:21–01:55:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:55:23] Speaker 10
So
[01:55:24] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:23–01:55:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:55:29] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[01:55:39] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:55:40] Speaker 3
got the idea that there's really it's
[01:55:46] No voice detected
not comfortable
[01:55:47] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
what was passed, and it goes forever. However, when they come here, I hope they pay more attention to the RU215 idea, which still allows them to do what they wanted to do. And I hope that when they come back before us for that, that that's the position they take. But right now, they could
[01:56:11] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
go 25 units an acre. ‸ I just want to mentally have my wheels around.
[01:56:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ Well, right now, they can't go 25 units an acre because they're commercial.
[01:56:24] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:24–01:56:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:56:32] Speaker 1
Well,
[01:56:33] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:56:33] Speaker 1
mean, the last people
[01:56:34] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:56:34] Speaker 1
mean, if you look at it that way, I mean, we could have got a lawsuit from, you know, the last time.
[01:56:39] Attribution uncertain
So,
[01:56:39] Speaker 1
I mean, I know. I know. But,
[01:56:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:43–01:56:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:56:45] Attribution uncertain
like
[01:56:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:56:46] Speaker 1
look at it like that, then, you know, that's why we don't get paid.
[01:56:49] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:56:49–01:56:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:56:52] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:56:53] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:52–01:56:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:57:00] Speaker 6
Are you saying about the ‸ houses that are being built?
[01:57:04] Speaker 8
The
[01:57:04] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:04–01:57:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:57:07] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:57:10] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:57:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:57:14] Speaker 6
Oh,
[01:57:14] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:14–01:57:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:57:16] Speaker 6
property, but I believe the developer went bankrupt. I'm
[01:57:20] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:20–01:57:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:57:22] Speaker 6
to someone else or not because it was prior my time with the city. So, I don't know if Kristen maybe
[01:57:29] Speaker 13
I do know that a bankruptcy case was filed for ‸ but I honestly don't know the status of the ‸ but I assume because of that that, you know, the work has stopped.
[01:57:43] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:43–01:57:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:57:49] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that are completed, the sold was able to move in. So, you have, I think, four units
[01:57:56] Speaker 3
that are closed.
[01:57:56] Speaker 8
But in
[01:57:58] Speaker 3
addition to that,
[01:57:59] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:59–01:58:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:58:07] Speaker 3
supposedly, for the five acres across the street. And that's been settled the way that I understand it. Oh, you know that, Wes?
[01:58:16] Speaker 5
I've heard those things. I've heard those things.
[01:58:18] Speaker 3
But I just wanted to make sure the board
[01:58:19] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
understood.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:58:19–01:58:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:58:22] Speaker 13
Yeah. The city litigated that issue and that has been resolved, yes.
[01:58:28] Speaker 8
Okay. Alex, you might know that. The Starbucks that we approved three, two, three, four years ago, is that ever going to
[01:58:37] Speaker 3
‸ they went into some problems with ‸ Starbucks, even though that they were in agreement to a point to do exactly what you're talking about,
[01:58:48] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:48–01:58:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:58:54] Speaker 3
when that
[01:58:54] Speaker 8
happened. Okay.
[01:58:56] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:58:56] Speaker 8
the final one is the last one. The
[01:58:58] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:58–01:59:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:02] Speaker 8
What are we really just adding?
[01:59:05] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
I can answer that. No,
[01:59:07] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:22]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:07–01:59:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[01:59:36] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
median in the middle to where you could put landscaping and trees and things like that. But instead of that, I think the parking issue was their other main reason for doing what they're doing. And that lane that they eliminated, Mike, is where they're going to put additional parking for cars. But I can tell you something. I would never park
[01:59:55] No voice detected
my car there.
[01:59:56] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:56–01:59:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:58] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:59:59] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It eliminated my little
[02:00:00] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:00–02:00:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:03] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:03–02:00:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:10] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:00:11] Speaker 1
Yeah. When I saw that, I was like, that's going to cause a bunch of accidents.
[02:00:15] Speaker 8
Matter of fact,
[02:00:15] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it's almost caused quite a few accidents already.
[02:00:17] Attribution uncertain
And
[02:00:17] Speaker 3
the backup. I mean, I can't believe the traffic backup. ‸ Just by that one lane.
[02:00:27] Speaker 1
‸ Well, that's
[02:00:28] Speaker 8
what happens when people not here from here make decisions for here. So,
[02:00:32] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
okay. If the board's got nothing else
[02:00:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:34–02:00:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:36] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Got a second? Second. All right. Everybody. If that's nothing else, I'll
[02:00:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:42–02:00:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
All in favor? Aye. All right. Everybody. We will see you July 12th.
[02:00:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 02:00:50–02:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:52] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:00:52] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T11:27:04 · 11,497 ordinary words, 5,581 in suspect passages, 373 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.