Code Enforcement

Code Enforcement Board Meeting

Date: 2025-02-20
Status: Draft minutes and machine transcript available
Source: CivicClerk event #70

📄 Read the City's record 📝 Transcript 📋 Agenda Packet (PDF, 684 KB) 🎬 Recording ↗

Built from draft minutes printed in an agenda packet — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-04-08, pp. 273–281; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-03-20, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended. The City has not posted the approved minutes. The approving motion, “to approve to the minutes of February 20 2025”, is in the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-05-15 agenda packet (1822_05_15_2025_Code_Board_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 9–12).

Built only from this meeting's draft minutes (1778_04_08_2025_City_Council_Agenda_Packet.pdf, packet pp. 273–281). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

Listed present when the roll was taken: Lloyd Roberts, Josue Otero, Sharri Scott, Michael Simpson, Melissa Acosta, Dik Muller, Gloria Weatherspoon
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: George Brown
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Tom Wilkinson (Code Enforcement Manager), Micheal Mack (Code Enforcement Officer), Justin Simpson (Code Enforcement Officer), Jason Brimm (Code Enforcement Officer), Kristin Eick (Board Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary), Anthony Marchica (Commander), Mark Baaden (Lieutenant), Patricia Weeks (City Councilwoman Liaison)

Adopted actions (11)

to approve to the agenda of February 20, 2025 (moved by Otero, seconded by Acosta); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to approve to the minutes of January 16, 2025 (moved by Muller, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Otero, seconded by Acosta); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property Owner to have been in violation (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to amend Staff’s recommendations and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Otero, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Otero, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED 6-1 — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Acosta, seconded by Scott); CARRIED 5-2 — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand eighty dollars and fifty cents ($1,080.50) (moved by Roberts, seconded by Simpson); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council for the lien reduction to be in the amount of one thousand two hundred ninety-three dollars and fifty cents ($1,293.50) (moved by Weatherspoon, seconded by Simpson); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council for the lien reduction be in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00) (moved by Simpson, seconded by Acosta); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero dollars ($0.) (moved by Roberts, seconded by Simpson); PASSED — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281

Motions for which no result was read from the minutes' text (2)

to nominate Mr. Otero for Vice Chair (moved by Muller, seconded by Simpson); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281
to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00) (moved by Weatherspoon, seconded by Otero); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the draft minutes, packet pp. 273–281

Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)

$100.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): named in a motion for which no result was read. “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00)” (motion result: none read; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-04-08 agenda packet (1778_04_08_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-04-08, pp. 273–281; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-03-20, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended)
$1,080.50 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand eighty dollars and fifty cents ($1,080.50)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-04-08 agenda packet (1778_04_08_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-04-08, pp. 273–281; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-03-20, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended)
$1,293.50 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council for the lien reduction to be in the amount of one thousand two hundred ninety-three dollars and fifty cents ($1,293.50)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-04-08 agenda packet (1778_04_08_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-04-08, pp. 273–281; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-03-20, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended)
$100.00 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council for the lien reduction be in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-04-08 agenda packet (1778_04_08_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-04-08, pp. 273–281; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-03-20, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended)
$0 — Code Enforcement: in draft minutes not approved as written (not counted as adopted): recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff’s recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero dollars ($0.)” (motion result: PASSED; the draft minutes printed for approval in the 2025-04-08 agenda packet (1778_04_08_2025_Ci; fiscal period not recorded) (draft minutes printed in the City's agenda packet of 2025-04-08, pp. 273–281; approved by the Code Enforcement Board according to the draft minutes of 2025-03-20, whose own approval is recorded in later draft minutes but not yet confirmed in the City's approved minutes; the motion does not say whether they were amended)

Draft minutes, as printed in a later agenda packet

Source: 1778_04_08_2025_City_Council_Agenda_Packet.pdf, the agenda packet of the 2025-04-08 meeting, packet pp. 273–281; lines 5814–6187 of the City's text of that file. The packet's own page footers are left out below.

Read the draft minutes

Meeting Minutes
February 20, 2025
A meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Cocoa was held on Thursday, February
20, 2025 in the Council Chambers at 65 Stone Street, Cocoa, as publicly noticed.
OPENING MATTERS:
Chairman Roberts called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. The Board Secretary called the roll.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Lloyd Roberts Chairman
Josue Otero Board Member
Sharri Scott Board Member
Michael Simpson Board Member
Melissa Acosta Board Member
Dik Muller Board Member
Gloria Weatherspoon 1rst Alternate
MEMBERS ABSENT:
George Brown Jr. Vice Chairman
OTHERS PRESENT:
Tom Wilkinson Code Enforcement Manager
Micheal Mack Code Enforcement Officer
Justin Simpson Code Enforcement Officer
Jason Brimm Code Enforcement Officer
Kristin Eick Board Attorney
Darla Crowl Recording Secretary
Anthony Marchica Commander
Mark Baaden Lieutenant
Pedersen Police Officer
Ms. Weeks City Councilwoman – Liaison
The Board Secretary swore in all Staff members giving testimony.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES:
1.Approval of Agenda: February 20, 2025
Chairman Roberts noted changes to the agenda (Items complied, tabled and withdrawn)
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Acosta, to approve to the agenda of February 20, 2025.
Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
2.Approval of Meeting Minutes: January 16, 2025.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 2
Motion by Mr. Muller, seconded by Mr. Simpson, to approve to the minutes of January 16, 2025. Vote on
the motion carried unanimously.
3. Submit to the record of all documents & notices for all cases on the Agenda.
4. Election of Code Enforcement Vice Chairman
Mr. Brown – No votes
Melissa Acosta - No votes
Motion by Mr. Muller, seconded by Mr. Simpson, to nominate Mr. Otero for Vice Chair. Vote on the
motion (6-yay) 1-Nay (Ms. Acosta).
CASES:
1. CE-24-311 – 638 Brevard Ave.
Code Enforcement Officer Justin Simpson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Officer Simpson testified that the Property Owner was in violation of
Chapter 12 Local Business Taxes, Sec. 12-1 (a), (b) Business Tax Receipt Required. and Code
Appendix A Zoning, Art. XI, Sec. 13 District and Intent – CBD, Central Business District, (C) (6)
Special Exceptions, Bar or Lounge, with or without a package store. of the City Code.
Officer Simpson requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be given until March
19, 2025 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a one-time fine of two hundred fifty dollars
($250.00), Chapter 12 Local Business Taxes, Sec. 12-1 (a), (b) Business Tax Receipt Required.), to
have been in violation Code Appendix A Zoning, Art. XI, Sec. 13 District and Intent – CBD, Central
Business District, (C) (6) Special Exceptions, Bar or Lounge, with or without a package store per
day until found in compliance.
Attorney Eick had questions about violation 2 for dates and how long the property owner was given. She
also wanted to remind the Board for Business Tax Receipt it is a one- time fee and does not run daily.
Violation (1) Motion by Vice Chairman Otero, seconded by Ms. Acosta, to approve Staff’s
recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
Violation (2) Motion by Vice Chairman Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve Staff’s recommendation
and find the Property Owner to have been in violation. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
2. CE-24-860 – 900 Friday Rd
Code Enforcement Officer Justin Simpson provided an overview of the Case history and presented
exhibits for the Board’s review. Officer Simpson testified that the Property Owner was in violation of
Accum. Of Trash and Litter, Sec. 6-900 (b) (1) (a-d), Exterior Structure (Window, Skylight and Door
Frames), Sec. 6-1003 (m) (1) (2), Permit Required, App. A Art. XV Sec. 2 (a) and Site Plan Approval
Required, App. A Art. XIII Sec. 1 (B) of the City Code.
Officer Simpson requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be given until March
19, 2025 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00)
Accum. Of Trash and Litter, Sec. 6-900 (b) (1) (a-d), two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) Exterior
Structure (Window, Skylight and Door Frames), Sec. 6-1003 (m) (1) (2), two hundred fifty dollars

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 3
($250.00) Permit Required App. A Art. XV Sec. 2 (a) and two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) Site
Plan Approval Required, App. A Art. XIII Sec. 1 (B) per day until found in compliance.
Benjamin Weismann: attorney for the property owner.
Attorney Eick asked why a site plan is required? Officer Simpson stated that there was not a site plan on
file for the work that was being done on the property. The property owner contacted Planning and Zoning
about converting the units into apartments. He was told at that time he would need to turn in a site plan if
he was going to convert to apartments. Attorney Eick gave the Board Members more information on
when a site plan would be required. Chairman Roberts asked about the stop work orders placed on the
property. Officer Simpson explained Officer Gonzalez posted stop work orders and several stop work
orders were placed on the property which were either taken down or covered up. Attorney Weismann
gave his view of the case. Attorney Weismann went through each violation stating why he thought the
violations were not valid. Chairman Roberts stated that people do not put up signs for leasing if they
don’t plan to lease. Attorney Weismann gave pictures and documentation of the property to the Board
Members with no dates. More discussion amongst the Board members, staff, City attorney and the
property owner’s attorney.
The first motion by Mr. Simpson and Vice Chair Otero was withdrawn. The motion passed.
Accum. Of Trash and Litter, Sec. 6-900 (b) (1) (a-d) was found to have been in violation and no fines at
this time. Exterior Structure (Window, Skylight and Door
Frames), Sec. 6-1003 (m) (1) (2) was found to have been in violation and no fines at this time.
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Ms. Scott, to amend Staff’s recommendations and find the
Property Owner in violation. Vote on the motion carried unanimously.
Permit Required, App. A Art. XV Sec. 2 (a) with a two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) and Site Plan
Approval Required, App. A Art. XIII Sec. 1 (B) was removed with no fines.
Motion by Vice Chair Otero, seconded by Mr. Simpson, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the
Property Owner in violation. Vote on the motion carried (6-1) Nay Chairman Roberts.
3. CE-24-336 – 1106 Abington St.
Code Enforcement Officer Jason Brimm provided an overview of the Case history and presented exhibits
for the Board’s review. Code Enforcement Officer Brimm testified that the Property Owner was in violation
of Roofs & Drainage, Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003 (g) and Exterior General Condition Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003
(a)(b)(f)(g) of the City Code.
Code Enforcement Officer Brimm requested that the Board find the Property Owner in violation and be
given until March 19, 2025 (30 days) to come into compliance or impose a fine of two hundred fifty dollars
($250.00) Roofs & Drainage, Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003 (g)and two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) Exterior
General Condition Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003 (a)(b)(f)(g) per day until found in compliance.
Chairman Roberts asked what the fees were based on. Officer Brimm referred the question to Manager
Wilkinson. Ms. Scott asked about the third violation. Officer Brimm explained two of the violations
covered the same type of violation, so he took it off the agenda. More discussion amongst the Board
members and staff.
Motion by Ms. Acosta, seconded by Ms. Scott, to approve Staff’s recommendation and find the Property
Owner in violation. Vote on the motion carried (5-2) (2-Nays – Mr. Simpson and Ms. Weatherspoon)
4. CE-24-417 – 803 Eden St

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 4
Complied.
NON-COMPLIANCE:
None
LIEN REDUCTIONS
1. CE-19-01336 – 1043 Olive St
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on May 20, 2021, at which time the Board found the
owner, Carol & Alan Bassett in violation of the following:
XI.Fail to Secure Struct Ch 6 Sec. 6-900 (b)(7)
IX.Exterior General Condition Ch 6 Sec. 6-1003 (a)
IV.Boarded Up Buildings Ch. 6 Sec. 6-900 (b)(5)
XVI.Maint. of Fences App A Art XIII Sec. 5(g)1-6
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner sufficient time to correct said violation. Therefore,
consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing was held on August 19,
2021.
The lien ran at $100.00 per day from June 20,2021 until compliance was achieved on June 27, 2024
Code records show onsite inspections were conducted by Officers Steven Murdick, Augusto Gonzalez
and Myself. The case was closed leaving a fine of $110,310.00.The current owner (Nicholas Critelli), is
requesting that the lien be reduced to admin cost.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; No
•Applicant resides at the property: yes
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; Four
•Number of Inspections performed: 16
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, February 20, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior
to the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $160,030.00 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
Staff submitted their cost sheet in the amount of $2,130.53

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 5
Staff’s cost for the fine/lien would be reduced to $2,130.53 which is the cost of staff to prosecute this
case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the property to
come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Property owner was sworn in: Nicholas Critelli, 1043 Olive St.
Mr. Critelli explained that he knew about the violations, but the realtor told him the bank was supposed to
fix the violation. Mr. Critelli said he ran into a Code Enforcement Officer in the field which let him know
there was a running lien. He stated that if he knew there was still a running lien on the property he would
not of purchased. He bought the property in 2021 per Manager Wilkinson. Officer Mack told the Board
Members that the property owner came to the office several times to find out about the violations. Officer
Mack went out to the property with the property owner to go over the violations. Mr. Critelli worked to get
the violations corrected. Vice Chair, Otero asked if there were more pictures. Manager Wilkinson stated
this was the picture from today. More discussion amongst the Board members, property owner and staff.
Motion by Chairman Roberts, seconded by Mr. Simpson, to amend staff’s recommendation to City
Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one thousand eighty dollars and fifty cents ($1,080.50).
Vote: Yay (6) Nay (1) (Ms. Scott) Motion Passed.

2. CE-18-283 – 1049 Olive St.
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on July 19,2018, at which time the Board found the
owner, Migdalina Yomara Cardona in violation of the following:
IV.Boarded Up Buildings Ch. 6 Sec. 6-900 (b)(5)
Business Tax Receipt Ch. 12 sec 12-1 (a) (b)
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner sufficient time to correct said violation. Therefore,
consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing was held on September
20, 2018.
The lien ran at $50.00 per day from August 21, 2018 until compliance was achieved on December 13,
2023 Code records show onsite inspections were conducted by Officer Augusto Gonzalez and Myself.
The case was closed leaving a fine of $97,030.00. The current owner (GLENDY ADALI BARRIOS) is
requesting that the lien be reduced to admin cost.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; No
•Applicant resides at the property: yes
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; Two
•Number of Inspections performed: 18
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, February 20, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior
to the Council Meeting.

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 6
The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $207,570 according to the
Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
Staff submitted their cost sheet in the amount of $$2,374.25

Staff’s cost for the fine/lien would be reduced to $2,374.25 which is the cost of staff to prosecute this
case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the property to
come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
The property owner was sworn in: Ms. Moralez (daughter translating for mother), 1049 Olive St
Ms. Moralez (daughter) stated that when they found out about the violations they made sure to correct.
Ms. Acosta asked when the property was purchased. The response was 2018. Officer Brimm wanted to
let the Board Members know that him and Officer Mack did an inside and out inspection of the property.
Officer Mack stated that they were working with Officer Gonzalez on this case. The boards were taken
down because the broken windows were replaced. More discussion amongst the Board members,
property owner and staff.
Motion by Ms. Weatherspoon, seconded by Mr. Simpson, to amend staff’s recommendation to City
Council for the lien reduction to be in the amount of one thousand two hundred ninety-three dollars and
fifty cents ($1,293.50). Vote: Yay (6) Nay (1) (Ms. Acosta) Motion Passed.
3. CE-17-582 – 312 Belmont Dr
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on June 21, 2018, at which time the Board found the
owner, James Yoder in violation of the following:
XXVIII Roofs & Drainage, Ch 6 Sec 6-1003 (G) XXVI Protective Treatment Ch 6 Sec 6-
1003(b)
XXXV Weeds, Ch 6 Sec 6-1001 (d)
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner with sufficient time to correct said violation. Therefore,
consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing was held on August 16,
2018.
The lien ran at $50.00 per day from July 21, 2018 until compliance was achieved on December 27, 2024
Code records show onsite inspections were conducted by Officers Steven Murdick, Augusto Gonzalez
and Myself. The case was closed leaving a fine of $117,550.00. The current owner (James Yoder), is
requesting that the lien be reduced to City’s cost.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes
•Applicant resides at the property: yes
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; Three
•Number of Inspections performed: 20
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 7
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, February 20, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior
to the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $115,580.00 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
Staff submitted their cost sheet in the amount of $$2,587.16

Staff’s cost for the fine/lien would be reduced to $2,587.16 which is the cost of staff to prosecute this
case. This reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the property to
come into compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Property owner was sworn in: James Yoder, 312 Belmont Dr.
Mr. Yoder explained that Code Enforcement let him know that his roof was in bad shape. Mr. Yoder gave
more testimony he was not notified there were still violations on the property. He thought his property
was incompliance. Vice Chair Otero asked about the weeds on his property and will he maintain the
yard. More discussion amongst the Board members, property owner and staff.
Motion by Mr. Simpson, seconded by Ms. Acosta, to amend staff’s recommendation to City Council for
the lien reduction be in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00). Vote: Yay (6) Nay (1) (Vice Chair
Otero) Motion Passed.
5. CE-22-00884 – 3645 Longbow Rd
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on April 20,2023, at which time the Board found the
owner, Victora Tucker in violation of the following:
Accum. Of Trash and Litter Ch 6 Sec. 6-900 (b)(1)a-d
Unsafe structures Ch 6 Sec 6-805 (a-e)
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner with sufficient time to correct said violation. Therefore,
consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing was held on July
20,2023.
The lien ran at $50.00 per day from May 20,2023 until compliance was achieved on March 1, 2024 Code
records show onsite inspections were conducted by Officer Mike Folger and myself. The case was
closed leaving a fine of $14,330.00. The current owner is requesting that the lien be reduced to city’s
cost.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; No
•Applicant resides at the property: No
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; Two
•Number of Inspections performed: 6
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 8
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, February 20, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior
to the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $103,830.00 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
Staff submitted their cost sheet in the amount of $1,546.68
Staff’s cost for the fine/lien be reduced to $1,546.68 which is the cost of staff to prosecute this case. This
reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the property to come into
compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Property owner was sworn in: Kevin Kader, 421 Blue Jacket Ln, Orlando
Manager Wilkinson let the Board Members know that the property owner is planning on selling the
property. Mr. Kader stated he bought the property with the lien on the property which he was
unaware of. There was a fire at the property prior to him purchasing. Mr. Muller asked at the
closing if he was told that the title was clear. Mr. Kader stated it was bought as is and he was not
told.
Motion by Ms. Weatherspoon, seconded by Vice Chair Otero, to amend staff’s recommendation to City
Council the lien reduction be in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00). Vote: (7-0) Motion Past.
6. CE-16-00461 – 1235 Holmes St.
The Code Enforcement Board held a public hearing on May 18,2017, at which time the Board found the
owner, Johnny & Lillie Dennis in violation of the following:
Section 6-1001 (g) Damage Fence
Section 6-1003(b) Protective treatment
Section 6-900 (b) (9) Parking in the grass
Section 6-1001 (d) High Grass and Weeds
The Code Enforcement Board provided the owner sufficient time to correct said violation. Therefore,
consistent with the Code Enforcement Board’s Order a Non-Compliance Hearing was held on September
21, 2017.
The lien ran at $100.00 per day from June 18, 2017 until compliance was achieved on September 20,
2017 Code records show onsite inspections were conducted by Officers Steven Murdick, Augusto
Gonzalez and Myself. The case was closed leaving a fine of $9,400.00.The property owner (Johnny &
Lillie Dennis), is requesting that the lien be reduced to cost.
Staff utilized the following factors in making its recommendation to reduce the lien:
•Whether the current owner owned the property at the time the violation(s) occurred; Yes
•Applicant resides at the property: yes
•The number of violations related to the subject lien; Four
•Number of Inspections performed: 15
• Property Taxes: Taxes are paid through 2024

Code Enforcement Board
Agenda
February 20, 2025
Page 9
• Other Liens: Records show no outstanding liens on the property. No water liens
• Property Inspection: The property was inspected this morning, February 20, 2025, and
was in-compliance before the Code Board Hearing. An inspection will also occur prior
to the Council Meeting

The current market value of the subject property; the current market value is $370,720.00 according to
the Brevard County Property Appraiser as a Single-Family Residence.
Staff submitted their cost sheet in the amount of $2,268.77
Staff’s cost for the fine/lien be reduced to $2,268.77 which is the cost of staff to prosecute this case. This
reduction is based on the gravity of the violations, the length of time it took the property to come into
compliance, and the total amount of the City’s Cost.
Motion by Chairman Roberts, seconded by Mr. Simpson, to amend staff’s recommendation to City
Council the lien reduction be in the amount of zero dollars ($0.). Vote: (7-0) Motion Passed.
NEW BUSINESS:
None
OTHER BUSINESS:
None
ABATEMENT APPEALS:
None
Manager Announcements:
None
NEXT MEETING:
The next regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board will be held on March 20, 2025.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 8:12 PM.
Approved on this ______ day of ___________________, 2025.
______________________________
Lloyd Roberts, Chairman
______________________________
Darla Crowl, Recording Secretary

Agenda (the City's wording)

No time links are shown for this meeting.

An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.

I. Opening Matters

1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Roll Call

II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes

1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of February 20, 2025.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of January 16, 2025.

III. Cases

IV. Non-Compliance

V. Lien Reductions

VI. New Business

VII. Other Business

VIII. Abatement Appeals

IX. Manager Announcements

X. Next Meeting Date

XI. Adjournment

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.

How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 18 voices separated from the audio. 41 short machine repair(s) (47 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one. Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review. A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 90.3% of 16,548 content words. Dotted words (519 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading. 423 passages (25% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there. Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:05] ▶ Play Speaker 1

How are you

[00:00:06] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

doing?

[00:00:09] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:09–00:00:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:12] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:13] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:00:17] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:19] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:19] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:00:23] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:00:26] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]

[00:00:40] ▶ Play Speaker 4

I don't know where Mr. Brown is.

[00:00:44] ▶ Play Speaker 2

We can start.

[00:00:45] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:00:45–00:00:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:50] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:00:51] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:52] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:00:54] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:00:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:00:56] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:56–00:00:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:00:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:01:00] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:00–00:01:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:02] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:01:05] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:05–00:01:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:07] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:07–00:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:21] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:21–00:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:22] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:01:23] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:01:24] ▶ Play Speaker 4

You get to move.

[00:01:29] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:29–00:01:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:32] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:32–00:01:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:41] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:41–00:02:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:01:43] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

[00:01:55] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:02:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:02:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I have the Pledge of Allegiance.

[00:02:12] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:02:12–00:02:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

justice for

[00:02:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1

all.

[00:02:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right, we have a roll call.

[00:02:34] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Mr.

[00:02:35] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Roberts.

[00:02:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Present.

[00:02:37] ▶ Play No voice detected

Mr.

[00:02:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Brown.

[00:02:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Excuse. Present.

[00:02:43] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Jerry Scott. Present. Michael Simpson.

[00:02:47] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Here.

[00:02:49] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:49–00:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:50] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:50–00:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:51] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Here.

[00:02:52] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:52–00:02:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:02:53] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Present.

[00:02:55] ▶ Play No voice detected

Here. Here.

[00:02:55] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right, we have our swearing in of our officers.

[00:03:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4

You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God.

[00:03:06] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Yes, I do.

[00:03:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right. Have our approval for our meeting tonight.

[00:03:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:14–00:03:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8

have a few changes. You'll bear with me here. Item number three. Number two has been taken off maintenance

[00:03:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

of fences.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:27–00:03:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:03:33] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Item number four has complied. Under lean reduction, item number four has been

[00:03:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

tabled.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:42–00:03:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:03:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8

With those changes, I'll take a motion to approve. Move to approve.

[00:03:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Second.

[00:03:52] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:52–00:03:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:54] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All in favor say aye.

[00:03:55] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Aye.

[00:03:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Those opposed? Motion

[00:03:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:57–00:03:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:03:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

unanimously. We have our approval for our meeting from January 16th. Are there any changes? Not, I'll take a motion to approve.

[00:04:13] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:13–00:04:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:04:15] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:04:17] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:19–00:04:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:04:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[00:04:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:04:27] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:04:28] ▶ Play Speaker 11

second.

[00:04:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay, we'll go with

[00:04:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:29–00:04:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All in favor say aye.

[00:04:36] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Aye.

[00:04:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Those opposed? Motion passed unanimously.

[00:04:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:41–00:04:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:04:55] ▶ Play Speaker 10

I'm sorry. I'm sorry. What was the packet?

[00:04:57] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Submit the packet.

[00:05:03] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Mr. Chairman,

[00:05:04] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:05:04] ▶ Play Speaker 10

would like to submit the PowerPoint presentation, the packet, the documents for each case

[00:05:08] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

and to

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:08–00:05:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:05:08] ▶ Play Speaker 10

the record. I apologize.

[00:05:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Thank you, sir. Welcome back. Thank you. Do so noted. All right. So with that being said, we at our last meeting, we had our voting for our chair and vice chair.

[00:05:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:26–00:05:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:33] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Mr. Brown was a nominee and Mr. Otero was a nominee. So we'll have a vote.

[00:05:44] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:44–00:05:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:05:47] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:05:55] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

was that there were a number of board members not present. So I would recommend that we open the floor for nominations and then to ensure you don't have any additional ones. Yes, ma'am.

[00:06:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Sounds good. Are there any additional, I'm sorry. Are there any additional nominees for vice chair? Mr. Otero,

[00:06:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

are

[00:06:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8

you still? Yes, yes, sir. Okay. Yes, sir. Are there any other nominees? Okay. So we have two that are present. So what is the protocol due to Mr. Brown not being here?

[00:06:37] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

He can still be a ‸ nominee. And if you're accepting what was from ‸ last time, then he would still be a nominee. Yes, ma'am.

[00:06:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Right.

[00:06:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:46–00:06:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:06:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So we'll start off with Mr. Brown. All in favor of Mr. Brown.

[00:06:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:57–00:06:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:07] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:07–00:07:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:10–00:07:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:13] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:07:16] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:07:18] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:07:19] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:07:19] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:07:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:07:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:27–00:07:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:07:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:07:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:07:32] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:07:37] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I got myself

[00:07:37] ▶ Play Speaker 11

confused.

[00:07:39] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Well. I'm

[00:07:40] ▶ Play Speaker 11

sorry. No, Mr. No. Listen, I haven't finished my coffee.

[00:07:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay. So did you vote? Okay. So one, two, three, four, five, six for Mr. Otero. So I have six votes for Mr. Otero.

[00:08:06] ▶ Play Speaker 13

And one

[00:08:07] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Machine re-recognized

day

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:07–00:08:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:08:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So if I'm counting correctly,

[00:08:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4

congratulations,

[00:08:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Mr. Otero. Thank you, sir.

[00:08:22] ▶ Play No voice detected

Mm-hmm.

[00:08:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So we have to change the.

[00:08:27] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:27–00:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:08:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:08:37] ▶ Play Speaker 5

It seems too, so, so enthusiastic.

[00:08:45] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Okay.

[00:09:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:09:00–00:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:09:01–00:09:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Mr. Otero.

[00:09:06] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:09:06–00:09:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:08] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:09:08–00:09:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:11] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right. So, all hearts are clear. We'll move on.

[00:09:16] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:16–00:09:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Good evening, board. Okay, so we're

[00:09:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:30–00:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:35] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:35–00:09:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:39] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Based on the photo evidence and testimony presented at this hearing, the code enforcement officer finds the property of

[00:09:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:46–00:09:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:09:47] ▶ Play Speaker 9

in violation. For number one, BTR Chapter 12, Section 12 1 a and B. Number two, prohibited uses and structures. pendants

[00:09:59] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:59–00:10:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:10] ▶ Play Speaker 9

we have the business owner of

[00:10:14] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:14–00:10:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9

They are currently leasing Unit

[00:10:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:18–00:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9

to the Old Florida Barbershop. I've already been in communication with them. They have submitted their application.

[00:10:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:26–00:10:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:10:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9

They should be coming into uh compliance, hopefully by tomorrow or whenever building will send them back there, accepted. So, but as of tonight, they are still currently in violation. the

[00:10:50] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

violation for

[00:10:50] ▶ Play Speaker 9

the following next couple slides, you're going to see uh the violations for prohibited uses and structures. The violation did exist because the business engaged in selling alcohol bar lounge type atmosphere, which needs special permissions by planning and zoning. Plus, they did not have a current BTR to operate for the uh their back uh back unit. So, ‸ here you have the uh the original sign that was posted there. As of uh yesterday, they posted a new sign there stating that the backyard is closed. They are no longer conducting business. They are in compliance um for violation of prohibited uses as of this time.

[00:11:35] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:11:35–00:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:11:36] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

originally

[00:11:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

when you um clicked or took a picture of the QR code from the first sign, this is where it brought you um on your phone and this is kind of what brought it to our attention for the prohibited uses. As you'll see through the slides, they had uh numerous activities and different events that they were hosting in the back they they called the backyard. um As you can see just from this slide here, rotating craft beer selections. um Just a couple other different things that they were trying to incorporate. And then of course this one here, all day happy hour, again, meeting the special exception which they did not have. um Also the violation of the BTR for not operating a business whatsoever. um These are the different inspection dates that we went.

[00:12:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:26–00:12:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9

with CEO Gonzalez. From there, CEO Folger took over the inspection and the case. And then on

[00:12:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:41–00:12:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9

pertaining to the BTR. the

[00:12:49] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

vtr

[00:12:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9

We didn't have any contact with the owner at that time.

[00:12:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:52–00:12:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:12:57] ▶ Play Speaker 9

The property owner did reach out to me then we've been opening communications since. And

[00:13:04] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:04–00:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9

uses and is now working diligently to try to correct the

[00:13:10] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:10–00:13:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9

What I'm asking the board tonight is to find the respondent. In violation of the city code business tax receipt, chapter 12, section 12, 1, a and B,

[00:13:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:26–00:13:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9

compliance by 4 pm on 16 april 2025.

[00:13:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:33–00:13:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

like the board to find the respondent as in violation of city code prohibited uses and structures. appendix a article 11 section 13, Charlie

[00:13:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:46–00:13:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9

failed to correct the violation by ‸ time specified for the original code enforcement. But

[00:13:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:52–00:13:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:13:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9

imposed. Any violation of the same code by the same respondent within five years from the date of this order may be treated as a repeat violation for which a fine of up to 500 per day may be imposed.

[00:14:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8

so this is what we talked about last week for those who weren't here we're looking to go on record to say there was a previous violation that has been corrected. So no fine for that, but still have one violation. And with that being said, if these, if this comes up with this business again, within the next five years, instead of going 250 per day for the violation,

[00:14:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

will

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:49–00:14:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:14:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8

go to 500. just want to ensure that everyone's caught up um

[00:14:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:57–00:15:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:00] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:15:01] ▶ Play Speaker 13

the officer, but I'll let you finish.

[00:15:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

i'll just gonna ‸ find out if someone was here for the property.

[00:15:06] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um Currently, no, sir. nobody is uh Nobody was here. um

[00:15:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:12–00:15:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:18] ▶ Play Speaker 9

application. For the uh commercial rental

[00:15:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:21–00:15:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:22] ▶ Play Speaker 9

so that way they can print out Unit

[00:15:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:24–00:15:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um And they felt that with uh my presentation that their voice would be heard well enough.

[00:15:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:32–00:15:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:36] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:15:39] ▶ Play Speaker 13

the violation related to Section 13 C6, um

[00:15:44] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:44–00:15:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:50] ▶ Play Speaker 13

was given in the notice of violation to comply? I

[00:15:54] ▶ Play Speaker 9

believe the original

[00:15:55] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:55–00:16:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:15:59] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:16:01] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:16:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 + overlapping voice

‸ Okay.

[00:16:04] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:04–00:16:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:11] ▶ Play Speaker 13

you showed pictures and things, were the photos that you showed taken after then April of 2024? Yes.

[00:16:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Okay.

[00:16:22] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Thank you. um ‸ Also, just for the board, I know we've uh discussed before on BTR uh violations,

[00:16:31] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:31–00:16:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:35] ▶ Play Speaker 13

So that cannot be imposed per day. And there's an attorney general opinion to that effect. So I think we've talked to that. We've talked about

[00:16:48] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:48–00:16:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:16:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[00:17:00] ▶ Play Speaker 5

All right. um No questions.

[00:17:04] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

is everyone's mic on up there

[00:17:22] ▶ Play No voice detected

yes

[00:17:29] ▶ Play Speaker 5

what are you doing let me find let me find my let

[00:17:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12

me go ‸ make that motion. Yes, sir. Okay, for um

[00:17:38] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:38–00:17:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:39] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:17:46] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:46–00:17:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:17:51] ▶ Play Speaker 12

I move to find respondents in the case in violation of the city codes as charged. And these violations are

[00:18:07] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:07–00:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:08] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:18:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:18:14] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:14–00:18:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:15] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:18:16] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:18:16] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[00:18:24] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:24–00:18:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:18:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

And that the respondent shall correct the violation no later than 4 pm I'm going to say 30 days

[00:18:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

from now. and Let me make an addendum to that. um Just because there was a previous violation and they wanted to ensure that it's in the record that there was a previous violation for prohibited uses and structures, but it is now in compliance. So I want to ensure that we read that in.

[00:19:07] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:07–00:19:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:11] ▶ Play Speaker 13

because um if you look at your motion sheet, um

[00:19:15] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:15–00:19:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:23] ▶ Play Speaker 13

It was the if the board's going to find that they were in violation, but they are in compliance now and no fine be imposed. So that would be number five And then the BTR would be a number one on the motion sheet.

[00:19:43] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Okay.

[00:19:49] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:49–00:19:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:49] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:19:52] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:19:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8

you just go ahead, separate it.

[00:19:54] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:54–00:19:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:19:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

and then make a motion on the second one to where there was a previous violation but it has been corrected. But we would not take

[00:20:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it off. Just like we were discussing last time. Yes. okay for uh I guess for instructional purposes we're going to go with uh first violation which is Chapter 12 Local Business Taxes,

[00:20:22] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:22–00:20:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:31] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

That's going to

[00:20:32] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:32–00:20:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:36] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

be per day. Correct. It's

[00:20:38] ▶ Play Speaker 13

a one-time fine.

[00:20:39] ▶ Play Speaker 12

one-time fine and

[00:20:44] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:44–00:20:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:20:44] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:20:44] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[00:20:52] ▶ Play Speaker 12

[00:20:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8

we have a motion on the floor.

[00:20:57] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Second. ‸ motion on the floor with

[00:20:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8

the second. All in favor say aye aye.

[00:21:01] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Aye.

[00:21:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Those opposed?

[00:21:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2

I have a question.

[00:21:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes, ma'am.

[00:21:07] ▶ Play Speaker 2

um Code enforcement officer said that he applied for this business tax receipt today. um Do we really think that he's going to be able to get this within 30

[00:21:21] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:21–00:21:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:29] ▶ Play Speaker 9

[00:21:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:30–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:21:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9

we found out that they uh were did not have a commercial rental business tax receipt which still falls under chapter 12.

[00:21:42] ▶ Play No voice detected

[00:21:43] ▶ Play Speaker 9

So we initially we're going to bring this just to have uh noted of the violation with no fine. And then when we did a little bit more research, we found out the no commercial rental use. um And then that's why he went ahead and applied applied for it. From my understanding, he should be able to get it by as early as tomorrow. It is all and how quickly the building department processes his request. The application is in.

[00:22:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:12–00:22:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:17] ▶ Play Speaker 9

So I don't see any reasons why he couldn't be within compliance of 30 days.

[00:22:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:21–00:22:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9

proposed day before April's code board. So if you feel that 30 days is more

[00:22:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:33–00:22:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:37] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:22:38] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:22:38] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:22:47] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:22:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

now I need to know

[00:22:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:49–00:22:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:55] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:55–00:22:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:22:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

that.

[00:23:01] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Okay. uh now for the second one. Yes, sir. Okay. For second violation, code up index, a zoning article 11, section 13 district intent, CBD central business district.

[00:23:14] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:18 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:14–00:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:23:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12

So I moved to find respondent. Was in violation of city code as chain charged and failed to correct the violation by the time specified for correction by the code enforcement officer. ‸ That violation is now corrected and no fine is imposed. Any violation of the same code by the same respondent within five years from the date of this order may be treated as a repeat violation.

[00:23:59] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:59–00:24:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:12–00:24:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:23] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:24:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:24:29] ▶ Play No voice detected

So,

[00:24:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8

madam attorney.

[00:24:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:31–00:24:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

it says per day.

[00:24:41] ▶ Play No voice detected

Verbiage.

[00:24:42] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Uh-huh. um yes. But, so that would be only if there's a repeat violation. It could be up to

[00:24:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:49–00:24:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:24:50] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:24:52] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:24:53] ▶ Play Speaker 13

only in the event that the violation occurs again. The same violation. Okay.

[00:24:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Well, I asked because we have it 250 per day on the first and then 500 per day. So, verbiage should be taken out per day for 250 But, remain for the 500

[00:25:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9

That's specifically for the BTR only. That was uh an error on my part. The 250 is just a flat fee or a flat fine of 254 BTRs only. In other instances, you we could do 250 per day for uh per violation.

[00:25:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay. I just want to ensure that we cover.

[00:25:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Okay.

[00:25:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right. Thank you very much. ‸ Item

[00:25:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:45–00:25:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:25:53] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Okay. We are looking

[00:25:54] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:54–00:25:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Based upon the photo evidence and testimony presented,

[00:26:02] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:02–00:26:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:10] ▶ Play Speaker 9

is in violation. Accumulation

[00:26:12] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:12–00:26:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:15] ▶ Play Speaker 9

6-900. Number two, exterior structure, window,

[00:26:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:19–00:26:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9

required. appendix A, article 15, section 2A. Number four, site plan approval required. and it's A,

[00:26:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:34–00:26:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:41–00:26:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:49] ▶ Play Speaker 9

there... ‸ I understand it says trash and litter, but the uh the section of the code also states um loose items

[00:26:57] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:57–00:26:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:26:58] ▶ Play Speaker 9

throughout the property as well. Which, and this here, you can see that they are kind of

[00:27:04] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

haphazardly

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:04–00:27:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:27:05] ▶ Play Speaker 9

placing construction materials throughout the property. Violation of exterior structure, window, skylight, door frames, section

[00:27:16] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:16–00:27:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Violation exists because the property has multiple windows and door frames that are not in good repair,

[00:27:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:24–00:27:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:26] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:26–00:27:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:27:33] ▶ Play Speaker 9

that have

[00:27:36] ▶ Play No voice detected

been

[00:27:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9

destroyed on the property. There are other multiple ones. Violation of permit required. Violation exists because ‸ property has not applied for nor been approved for. the

[00:27:48] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

property or building

[00:27:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9

permits required for the work being done. as you can see here also required for work being done the initial inspection

[00:28:04] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:04–00:28:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9

complaint came in from

[00:28:08] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:08–00:28:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:13–00:28:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9

As of

[00:28:20] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:20–00:28:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9

inspected the property and still found it in violation. We did post a new stop walk order. There was a previous stop work

[00:28:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:32–00:28:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:39] ▶ Play Speaker 9

plan

[00:28:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:28:41–00:28:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:44] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:28:44] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

advertising

[00:28:44] ▶ Play Speaker 9

the leasing of the units for the property. On 23 January, myself and CEO Brim met with the property owner,

[00:28:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:52–00:28:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:28:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9

in the middle of the site plan. Property owner stated units were no longer being presented as apartments. was still trying to be as a hotel motel use.

[00:29:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:07–00:29:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:11] ▶ Play Speaker 9

I asked the board to find the respondent ‸ violation of city codes as charged and

[00:29:15] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:15–00:29:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9

by 4 p.m

[00:29:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:19–00:29:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:21] ▶ Play Speaker 9

and there is a representative here for the uh for

[00:29:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:27–00:29:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:29:34] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]

[00:29:47] ▶ Play Speaker 13

can can you explain why a site plan is required? In this instance. So

[00:29:54] ▶ Play Speaker 9

uh site plans are usually required in order to get building permits. um The site plan that is on file is from the previous owner. There's no current um site plan on file for the work being done. And um from my understanding, the owner originally was speaking with planning and zoning on trying to convert it to rental and leasing ‸ apartments. And he was instructed then that any construction being done or any conversions would require site plans. um And thus he decided ‸ either to not go that route or I can't really speak for the property owner. But he was told then that site plans would be required.

[00:30:46] ▶ Play Speaker 13

So I guess I have to advise the board that building permits do not require site plan approval. A site plan would be triggered. The need to obtain a site plan would be triggered if there was a change of use

[00:31:03] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:31:03–00:31:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:04] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:31:04] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:31:07] ▶ Play Speaker 13

that would be the focus i would I would recommend to the board that you focus on that issue um because that is the only thing that would trigger the need to obtain a site plan approval.

[00:31:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:26–00:31:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:27–00:31:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[00:31:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8

And to your knowledge, everything from what you showed from January to now that was done without a permit or anything because they were still under the stop work order?

[00:31:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Correct. We've posted the stop order stop work order multiple times to the property.

[00:31:56] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:56–00:31:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:31:59] ▶ Play Speaker 9

[00:32:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:00–00:32:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9

September of 2024,

[00:32:03] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:03–00:32:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:32:11] ▶ Play Speaker 9

on 5 February. According to him, he believed that since he had been in contact with CEO Gonzalez, that there was no more violations or anything. So he removed the stop work order. We posted a new stop work order because still no building permits or, anything had been filed with the city. And he was still constructing and still making renovations. uh we visited the property on 4 February and he had actually covered up the stop work order. And then when, uh myself and my manager spoke with the property owner on 5 February, ‸ had been completely removed, uh from where we had posted it.

[00:33:03] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:03–00:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:08] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:33:08] ▶ Play Speaker 14

to appear before the board. um there, i I believe. So

[00:33:13] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:13–00:33:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:16] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:33:17] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:33:18] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

an attorney. Okay. Yes. my name

[00:33:21] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:21–00:33:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

code enforcement hearing.

[00:33:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8

[00:33:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

there are four charges that, uh he's being charged with. uh I want to talk about ‸ site plan approval first. um

[00:33:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:33–00:33:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:33:38] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

a change of use. And the premises has been operated as a motel the entire time. There was a period in the very beginning where he was using more exacting standards for who he would let uh into the motel purely because, as you saw from the photos and as you can imagine, there was lots of issues with ‸ the premises. There was issues with the previous owners, uh people who were being there in terms of crimes and there had to be officers on site at all times. So as part of a plan to improve the clientele of the motel so they could be safe. So it gave the appearance of a lease of this appearance of a apartment complex, but there's not been any apartment rental occurring. So with that, there were

[00:34:29] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:29–00:34:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:35] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

um But there wasn't a requirement for a site plan approval because the use has been the same as the zone approved use

[00:34:41] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:41–00:34:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:44] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:34:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

course um You said the the usage is still for a motel, yes

[00:34:52] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:52–00:34:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:34:55] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:34:56] ▶ Play Speaker 14

an idea. I guess it was in his head that he thought he could utilize that to try and get people to uh just

[00:35:03] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:03–00:35:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:07] ▶ Play Speaker 14

It wasn't really uh apartment leases from what I understand and

[00:35:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:11–00:35:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14

understand ever since a communication he had with code enforcement that they're referring to that type of language has been removed. The only thing now that he is doing that's in any way similar to uh apartment

[00:35:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Machine re-recognized

leases

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:24–00:35:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:35:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14

he does still do background checks on people if they want to. But he only offers daily and month and uh weekly rentals. So a daily and a weekly rental is not an apartment complex and it matches the use of the zoning and the evidence.

[00:35:41] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:41–00:35:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:35:44] ▶ Play Speaker 14

So there's not actually any evidence before you of apartment uses other than some signs from a long time ago. There's no current ever since the notice was posted uh in September. And then we move on to the accumulation of trash and litter. There's been no pictures presented of trash and litter that's been there since the notice ‸ violation was posted. And I do have some photos of the premises. And as you can see from his photos and if you would like to review these photos if I could approach. uh For you guys to review them if you're interested. It would show that there's not really debris anywhere. So obviously he needs to,

[00:36:25] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:25–00:36:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:28] ▶ Play Speaker 14

the debris needs to be removed, but there's not currently any debris or trash issues with the premises. And then when we get to the experience exterior structures, of course, ‸ you're sort of in a catch-22 here. so And this is why

[00:36:43] ▶ Play Speaker 15

the city ordinances do allow for emergency remediation.

[00:36:48] ▶ Play Speaker 14

We're in a circumstance where, as you saw from the pictures, the place was decrepit. There's no other way to describe it.

[00:36:54] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:54–00:36:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:36:57] ▶ Play Speaker 14

allowance for fixing these types of things from an emergency perspective. Now, he was supposed to apply for the permits much quicker than he has. And there's been a miscommunication of what's required from a permitting perspective from the city versus the state. That's why I understand from speaking to the owner. So

[00:37:12] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:12–00:37:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:17] ▶ Play Speaker 14

number three, for sure. There wasn't permitting. But

[00:37:21] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:21–00:37:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:24–00:37:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:25] ▶ Play Speaker 14

walls anymore. So there isn't actually an outstanding issue for one, two, or four. And the only thing I would request that's different, from other than, of course, a finding of only a violation of number three, is that maybe there's given a 60-day time period to apply for the permitting to get everything up to code.

[00:37:42] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:42–00:37:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:37:46] ▶ Play Speaker 14

for the permitting. Of course,

[00:37:48] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:48–00:37:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:37:48] ▶ Play Speaker 14

contractor, uh in doing so, it does take a little bit of time to get that approved and to get all that corrected. But construction, there's no more construction on the premises, as I'm aware.

[00:37:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:59–00:38:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:38:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:38:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ What happened to this? I know they probably didn't tell you. But what happened with the stop work order? Because when you post a stop work order, that means everything stops. So then they should be able to get in contact with code enforcement officers to actually have some communication, some clear lines of communication before now we go spend out more money when we possibly shouldn't be doing this at this time. So let's address that, because that's one of the things I have the biggest problem with,

[00:38:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:38–00:38:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:38:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8

But I think that's one of the biggest things. I

[00:38:46] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

completely agree, sir. I think that the issue there was he spoke to a code enforcement agent, I believe his name was Gonzalez. And from his understanding, Mr. Gonzalez had ‸ what had approved it. I don't think there was a misunderstanding here on how this functions, I think. And it

[00:39:03] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:03–00:39:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:10] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

from what I've been told by uh the principal for

[00:39:12] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:12–00:39:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:13] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

Lofts. He believed that uh Augusto said everything was fine, and that's why he thought the work order was dispensed with when he explained to him Because from his understanding,

[00:39:23] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:23–00:39:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

was that the city had believed that he was still trying to, because

[00:39:30] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:30–00:39:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:39:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

to discuss converting this uh motel into single bedroom apartments. And he found out about the zoning and all ‸ that, so he changed his mind from that. And I think that, along with these leasing postings, which is obviously not the smartest idea of a way to you know increase uh the uh type of the value of the property in terms of people who are um staying there, uh it was probably not the best method, but that combined uh finding with the previous discussion is what led to this belief that there was a single bedroom apartment uh rental scheme going on. Which was not the case, and then from his communications with Mr. agosto uh Mr. Gonzalez rather, I believe there's just a miscommunication here where he thought when he spoke with him he toured, he has toured the building with the code enforcement multiple times. He believed that

[00:40:30] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:30–00:40:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:40:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So, it was a mistake, clearly.

[00:40:39] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Officer, um I have a question. There was two work orders, two stop work orders, correct?

[00:40:48] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Officially, there were officially they were two stop work orders. um we had We had told him when he covered up the second stop work order and removed the covering that that was his third warning of a stop work order.

[00:41:01] ▶ Play Speaker 11

‸ Okay, so there was multiple stop work orders, but the work continued. There

[00:41:09] ▶ Play Speaker 14

was emergency work that had to be done. the

[00:41:11] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:11–00:41:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:15] ▶ Play Speaker 14

So the ordinances do consider a circumstance where you can ignore even a stop work order to fix those. When you have an issue with the structure, like for example, if the structure of this room randomly collapsed, of course, you should be applying to it for a building permit immediately after. That was a huge mistake and that's what needs to be fixed. And I think we can all agree there needs to be a permitting fix here so everything's permanent. But you are allowed to immediately fix structural issues even without permits and even without uh the with a stop work order. That's what states in the Chapter

[00:41:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:47–00:41:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14

of the city ordinances. It talks about emergency uh remediations. So I think he believed he was doing

[00:41:55] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:55–00:41:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:41:55] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:41:59] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So can we go all the way back? ‸ So on the site plan, approval required. um

[00:42:09] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:09–00:42:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice

okay that one needs to be removed.

[00:42:18] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:18–00:42:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:21] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:42:25] ▶ Play No voice detected · Machine re-recognized

Yes.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:25–00:42:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:42:26] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Well, I guess i it's not my place to advise the board to dismiss or not. um But what I'm saying is that you would need to determine that there was a change of use. And meaning, I think that the testimony has been that it was a motel and that it is no longer operating as a motel.

[00:42:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:49–00:42:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:42:54] ▶ Play Speaker 13

the definition if you need that, if there's more discussion about that. But that would be what you need to determine.

[00:43:01] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:43:01–00:43:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:01] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:43:01] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:43:02] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:43:02] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:43:03] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]

[00:43:16] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Is that correct? Your feeling for today,

[00:43:20] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:43:20–00:43:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:24] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:43:26] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Sorry, but I do want to just address because I believe the attorney did say he wanted to submit some pictures of that. So, Mr. Chair, if it's okay, if would you be okay if he approached to give you the pictures? We would need to admit that into evidence.

[00:43:41] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:41–00:43:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:43] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[00:43:48] ▶ Play Speaker 14

was I do have a scope of work for the work that was previously done as well, if you would like to review it. but

[00:43:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Is that the work that was done um under the stop work order?

[00:43:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:56–00:44:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:43:57] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:44:00] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:44:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2

in an emergency situation, ordinances and codes can be ignored using the attorney's words.

[00:44:12] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording; words the first reading may have missed · 00:44:12–00:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:44:20] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]

[00:44:30] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:44:35] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:44:35] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[00:44:43] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]

[00:45:02] ▶ Play Speaker 13

So, again, on the, on, without, the issue of, without a permit, the attorney has, is admitting that there is a violation of number three, which is failure to obtain the building permit.

[00:45:18] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Right.

[00:45:19] ▶ Play Speaker 13

Regardless of an emergency. um

[00:45:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14

If I can provide a little bit of clarification on that,

[00:45:27] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:27–00:45:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:45:29] ▶ Play Speaker 14

The reason why I'm providing that is more of an explanation of why, um the, hotel the motel operate acted the way he did. It doesn't excuse his conduct. He was supposed to get building permits, and he didn't. But it's why he did it, and the idea is about, the ultimate goal here is to come into compliance, and to act in accordance with the law. And it's more of an explanation that was not a willful, as I know how it sounds, but I'm trying to explain. ‸ he wasn't, it sounds like he just gets these stock recorders, trashes them, and ignores them. And I'm trying, and I'm just providing some context for why he acted the way he did, because he's not, from my understanding of them, there wasn't this, ‸ under uh intentional willful violation violation. It was a negligent violation of thinking that there was this emerging had to be done. And then when co-enforcement walked the property with him, misunderstanding ‸ the words that they were telling him.

[00:46:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

so just to help me understand,

[00:46:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:34–00:46:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

drive through it?

[00:46:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:38–00:46:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:39] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

okay. All right. Just checking.

[00:46:41] ▶ Play Speaker 14

Of course, of course. I

[00:46:43] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

have a question that kind of matches ‸ yours. So,

[00:46:49] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:49–00:46:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:46:53] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

these items. Yes.

[00:46:55] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Can

[00:46:56] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

you go to the picture for today? Because we're looking at this one. Now the building looks completely different. That would not constitute as an emergency, though. So,

[00:47:09] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:09–00:47:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:13] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

You know, it had to be done. You know, they had to ignore everything. But now we're looking at a completely different building. I don't think that would be an emergency to ignore

[00:47:27] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:27–00:47:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:32] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Does that make sense? I

[00:47:34] ▶ Play Speaker 14

understand what you're saying and I do agree with you. But

[00:47:36] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:36–00:47:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:47:38] ▶ Play Speaker 14

there hasn't been structural changes. So when you do repair a window or you repair an awning or those types of things, it will look completely different. Even if from a structural perspective, the outside may look different, but the inside, the core structure has not changed at all.

[00:47:52] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Right. But if there was a stop work order, the building looks painted. So if, a stop if correct me if I'm wrong, if a stop work order, that means stop. ‸ Like you can't do anything, but they continued. They

[00:48:08] ▶ Play Speaker 17

did. You

[00:48:09] ▶ Play Speaker 11

know, I understand what you're saying. The emergency parts, you know, the doors, the windows, stuff that will put in danger ‸ the public. ‸ but I don't think the public's in danger by painting the building. I don't think the public's in danger. I

[00:48:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

mean, I'm not. ‸ required to steal buildings. i

[00:48:28] ▶ Play Speaker 13

I guess I just want to advise the board. I think we're getting a little uh off topic. um Frankly, I would suggest that we focus on the actual violations that were cited because failure to, you know, to abide by a stop work order is not even a cited violation here. So we might be getting a little bit off topic.

[00:48:52] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:52–00:49:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:48:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:48:54] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:48:56] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:48:56] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:48:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[00:49:07] ▶ Play Speaker 8

be to convince those gentlemen that the usage is still the original usage.

[00:49:16] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes. The intent

[00:49:17] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

is still the, but again, when you put those lease for lease and you're trying to lease something. So now you ‸ give that interpretation that, okay, this has changed. Yes.

[00:49:31] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

But he corrected that action when he was told to by code enforcement.

[00:49:35] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:35–00:49:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:35] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:49:39] ▶ Play Speaker 8

is what I'm saying.

[00:49:40] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

But

[00:49:41] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:41–00:49:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:45] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

code enforcement talked to him. There hasn't been a single lease

[00:49:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

provided,

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:49:47–00:49:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:49:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

a sign from the website or anything. There's no evidence

[00:49:52] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:52–00:49:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:49:55] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

a lease ever.

[00:49:55] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:55–00:50:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:00] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

a this was a code violation ‸ was posted in September, and then now the question is, is he in violation now, and there's no evidence that he has, and

[00:50:08] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:08–00:50:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:13] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

know uh short term a day, or weekly, just like a Motel

[00:50:17] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:17–00:50:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:18] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

extended

[00:50:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:50:19–00:50:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Mr. Chair, I have a question. Yes, sir. ‸ so, um uh officers, uh Simpson, my question is, in your, in your, um visiting this property, has it been open the whole time?

[00:50:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9

Yes.

[00:50:33] ▶ Play Speaker 5

So,

[00:50:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

that

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:34–00:50:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:50:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5

the business has been running and taking in money the whole time that they have been Correct. In

[00:50:39] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized

construct

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:39–00:50:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:50:40] ▶ Play Speaker 9

There have been, um there have been people inside the units, um every time we have visited ‸ the site. So,

[00:50:48] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

okay, so, Mr. Chair, I have a motion, I

[00:50:50] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:50–00:50:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:50:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[00:50:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

All right.

[00:50:59] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Okay. So, uh

[00:51:00] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:00–00:51:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:05] ▶ Play Speaker 5

uh based on the evidence of the testimony presented, which is in, uh

[00:51:10] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:51:10–00:51:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:10] ▶ Play Speaker 5

into the order, I move that the respondents in this case be found in violation of the city code as charged. Number one accumulation of trash, uh number two exterior window and skylight, uh number three, uh permit required. And number four site planning approval. uh and the respondent shall be uh shall correct the violations no later than by 4 pm on march the 19th 2025.

[00:51:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:38–00:51:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:46] ▶ Play Speaker 5

the factor of section 6162-09 Florida state statute is a fine in the amount of, uh

[00:51:57] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:57–00:51:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:51:59] ▶ Play Speaker 5

a day. And will be imposed for each day of the violation continues to pass afterwards.

[00:52:07] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:07–00:52:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:14] ▶ Play Speaker 5

the code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order.

[00:52:19] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:19–00:52:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:22] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

[00:52:31] ▶ Play Speaker 7

you're breaking it up, right? He had the accumulation of trash, but he just provided evidence that he, there is no more trash. because I'm assuming when

[00:52:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:38–00:52:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:52:41] ▶ Play Speaker 14

Okay.

[00:52:42] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yeah. So just give him an opportunity to look at those. Well

[00:52:46] ▶ Play Speaker 12

how do you how can you

[00:52:48] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:48–00:52:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:52:52] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:52:53] ▶ Play Speaker 13

I'm sorry so for the attorney were these photos taken today when were they taken?

[00:52:59] ▶ Play Speaker 14

They

[00:53:00] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:00–00:53:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:05] ▶ Play Speaker 14

via email. Okay

[00:53:06] ▶ Play Speaker 13

this past week.

[00:53:07] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Machine re-recognized

this past

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:07–00:53:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[00:53:08] ▶ Play Speaker 14

week yes.

[00:53:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12

But

[00:53:09] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:09–00:53:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:53:12] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

but he's providing testimony to tell you when it was taken. Okay.

[00:53:17] ▶ Play Speaker 12

[00:53:18] ▶ Play Speaker 13

so now the there is a motion on the floor and it was seconded correct and so it it is actually uh unless there's a consensus from the board you would need to act on that ‸ motion unless there's a consensus to withdraw the motion.

[00:53:38] ▶ Play Speaker 7

And

[00:53:40] ▶ Play Speaker 13

then take it I think the recommendation was to take these one by one correct? The violations one by one is what you were suggesting?

[00:53:49] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Yes. I agree that it should be one by one. I just would like to be able to see the pictures but

[00:53:57] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yeah. And and all the board members should be given the opportunity to review the pictures. I

[00:54:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8

just want to um i'm sure that we are clear um is that because it's not a

[00:54:09] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:09–00:54:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:17] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ violation.

[00:54:17] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay sorry. It wasn't stated like that.

[00:54:20] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yeah.

[00:54:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ you're gonna have to amend that. Just amend it.

[00:54:27] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Okay I would like to amend my uh motion and

[00:54:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:30–00:54:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:54:36] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Be opposed upon the uh property brought in complaint until it's brought into compliance. Second.

[00:54:55] ▶ Play No voice detected

okay

[00:54:55] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[00:54:55] ▶ Play Speaker 5

wow wow

[00:54:56] ▶ Play Speaker 11

[00:54:57] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

there's

[00:55:03] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

a motion on the floor um again the

[00:55:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:55:08–00:55:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:55:10] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[00:55:10] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ just giving a pause okay

[00:55:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ and while while we're waiting on that um this attorney so in this uh number one my question is is because of the time frame, and they may, they have brung it into compliance from then to now, even though it was a forward or previous situation. So even, um but, and uh Officer Simpson didn't bring it into compliance. uh So will we wait for the officer to bring it into compliance or by his testimony and showing that it is brought into compliance, then that's still acceptable?

[00:56:00] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:00–00:56:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:07] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice

It's their burden of proof to demonstrate that there is a violation. Right.

[00:56:11] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:11–00:56:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:18] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

provided, that the violation no longer exists. Right. At least in his view.

[00:56:23] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:23–00:56:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:56:26] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:56:27] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[00:56:30] ▶ Play Speaker 13

if the board were inclined to find that a violation did exist, right, after the notice of violation and the time given in the notice of violation, ‸ but it has since been corrected, that is also a possibility in terms of emotion and there would be no fine imposed for that. So that would be again, a number five on the motion list. If that's what the board was inclined to do.

[00:56:57] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Okay. ‸ So would I amend or just go back and...

[00:57:04] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So, again, it's it's been seconded, so it's really not permissible to do that. So, but if if the board as unanimously consents to rescinding the motion, then you can kind of start over.

[00:57:21] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:21–00:57:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:24] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[00:57:25] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[00:57:26] ▶ Play Speaker 11

all

[00:57:28] ▶ Play Speaker 12

right

[00:57:28] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:28–00:57:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12

before we rescind? Because ‸ when the motion was passed, second, and then...

[00:57:42] ▶ Play Speaker 13

So it was seconded...

[00:57:44] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

...would be the approval, and then

[00:57:46] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

we Well, the

[00:57:48] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

board

[00:57:48] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

just... I'm sorry.

[00:57:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:49–00:57:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:57:56] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

withdrawing that motion. So the motion is not on the floor anymore. We're starting fresh. No,

[00:58:01] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yeah ‸ totally understand that, but I thought the process was that we went through the steps completely, and then... when the board... denies or does not uh pass the the motion, we can go back and rescind ‸ right? Isn't that what we're supposed to be doing? No, we were saying now we can go ahead and just skip that and just say automatically rescind. When

[00:58:27] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

there's a consent, oh go ahead, Mr. Chair.

[00:58:29] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

When

[00:58:30] ▶ Play Speaker 13

there's a consensus of the board

[00:58:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

okay

[00:58:32] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

uh to to rescind or withdraw the motion, then it can be withdrawn. You don't have to go through the whole process. But that's, again, only if there's a consensus. In this case, there was. Okay.

[00:58:43] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Thank

[00:58:44] ▶ Play Speaker 13

you. mm-hmm

[00:58:47] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so yay

[00:58:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So, the motion has been rescinded unanimously.

[00:58:55] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:55–00:58:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:58:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

in which we will need to separate it the same way we did on the first one.

[00:59:05] ▶ Play Speaker 11

‸ Question.

[00:59:06] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:06–00:59:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[00:59:14] ▶ Play Speaker 11

one, two, and four would then be a number five, correct? Is that correct?

[00:59:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Well, we have not. you They he testified to those things, but has those things, are those been proven, especially as far as the site plan? Because that is the biggest thing, because once again, you put a sign out and now when you put that sign out, you're changing the in the usage of the facility. So now you can't just say, oh I take that back because now you showed intent to do something different. So, it has not been proven that that's the case. ‸ Again,

[01:00:04] ▶ Play Speaker 13

it's the code enforcement officers burden to prove that there was a change of use. That it was essentially that it was a motel and that it is no longer operated as a motel.

[01:00:22] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:22–01:00:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:24] ▶ Play Speaker 11

‸ Would it be wise to table to give some time for the code enforcement officer to provide that evidence if needed?

[01:00:37] ▶ Play Speaker 12

That's something, that's an option. Or do they have, to we ask them if they have the evidence down Or they did they? No, that's definitely

[01:00:47] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:47–01:00:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:00:52] ▶ Play Speaker 12

evidence now?

[01:00:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9

As of current, their website has been changed to uh be presented as a motel. So

[01:01:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:00–01:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9

The only thing that we would have is a photo of the application of the leasing agreement application that I could present to the board if you wanted to see that.

[01:01:18] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

what

[01:01:25] ▶ Play Speaker 9

do you think?

[01:01:25] ▶ Play Speaker 2

When

[01:01:26] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:26–01:01:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:01:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[01:01:36] ▶ Play Speaker 9

That's when we pulled it from the site.

[01:01:39] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized

5 February 2025 is when we pulled it from the site. Yes.

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:01:39–01:01:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:01:44] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized

Oh.

[01:01:46] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Machine re-recognized

So an application was submitted, you pulled it from the site.

[01:01:52] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:52–01:01:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:01:53] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:01:54] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:01:59] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice

apologize.

[01:02:02] ▶ Play Speaker 4

‸ Okay.

[01:02:03] ▶ Play Speaker 13

The question was either for the officer or for the attorney. Are you aware of whether or not the business is licensed as a

[01:02:11] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:02:11] ▶ Play Speaker 13

a motel meeting with the state?

[01:02:15] ▶ Play Speaker 9

um Currently, no. We have no evidence. um They presented no evidence that they were operating as a motel.

[01:02:23] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:02:24] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:24–01:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:28] ▶ Play Speaker 9

evidence and we've received

[01:02:31] ▶ Play Speaker 9 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:31–01:02:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:02:36] ▶ Play Speaker 14

And also there is a requirement for notice of violations and there's been no notice of a violation accusing them of illegally operating as a motel. From my understanding it is currently licensed as a motel.

[01:02:46] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 01:02:46–01:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:02:49] ▶ Play Speaker 14

would suggest since the, since the COCO is completely planning to make submissions to get birth permitting and all that, that if you did table this motion uh and table your determination as you're, you're planning to give until March 19th uh to uh come into compliance. It would give code

[01:03:12] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:12–01:03:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:16] ▶ Play Speaker 14

building permits applied and show good faith to

[01:03:19] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:19–01:03:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:26] ▶ Play Speaker 14

into compliance. So

[01:03:28] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:28–01:03:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:32] ▶ Play Speaker 14

to give them the opportunity to come up

[01:03:35] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:35–01:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14

full compliance so that we don't have an issue here. And the site plan will be taken care of with the building permits, because when you apply for the building permits, you don't have to have a site plan. But if there was an intended change in use, they would have to provide that to get the building permits. So that issue with the building department

[01:03:55] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:55–01:04:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:03:56] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:03:59] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:03:59] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:04:03] ▶ Play Speaker 15

if if there was conversation that people have been residing ‸ there during the construction. Yes, sir. um and during that time, it sounds like

[01:04:18] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:18–01:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:23] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:04:24] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

And there certainly is no evidence of a lack of licensure that's been provided ‸ Is

[01:04:28] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

there a license, current, current valid license? From

[01:04:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14

my understanding, yes, sir.

[01:04:34] ▶ Play Speaker 15

When could we see that?

[01:04:37] ▶ Play Speaker 14

We could, if this was tabled, that could be brought as part of the site camp compliance.

[01:04:41] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Why isn't that in all of this documentation?

[01:04:45] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

Because I would be required to be given notice that that was actually a charge being levied. uh

[01:04:50] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:50–01:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:04:52] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:04:53] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Of course. If, if it applied for a license

[01:04:58] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:58–01:05:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:00] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:05:02] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

wasn't applying for a license.

[01:05:03] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:03–01:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:07] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

they saw that there was a leasing application on February 5th.

[01:05:10] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:10–01:05:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:13] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

But I don't wanna ‸ I'm not here to say that he's not speaking the truth. I have no idea. I misunderstood. Yes.

[01:05:20] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So question, wouldn't that be included in the site plan? Excuse me?

[01:05:25] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

The, the, the site plan is for if you want to change the use. If it's already so cited as a motel, it would be in the current site plan. So that should actually be able to provide evidence.

[01:05:36] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:36–01:05:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:05:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

be showing what the current site plan is, which is a motel. So it is an indirect way of proving that, yeah, it should be coded right now. And that's why I've been told as well as a motel, because otherwise the allegations that they're doing apartment to be, have that be outside the site plan, you have to ‸ know what the site plan is to begin with.

[01:05:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay. ‸ so the, ‸ Just to be clear, the site plan was due to the possible usage of not being a motel. So

[01:06:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:13–01:06:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8

that, they would have to bring that burden of proof to say that this was going on and you admit that they had a sign out there for that. So now wouldn't it be for you to say, bring them the burden of proof to say that that's not the case? I

[01:06:32] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

don't, the ‸ the defense,

[01:06:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:33–01:06:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:35] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

I mean, your your your city attorney should probably be saying this, but the

[01:06:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

burn

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:39–01:06:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:06:39] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

‸ proof is always on their side. There's not a, ‸ the

[01:06:41] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:06:41–01:06:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:06:42] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

this is not a circumstance where a burden ‸ proof shifts from one side to the other. They have the

[01:06:46] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

burn

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:46–01:06:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:06:46] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

proof of showing it's outside a site plan. If they're saying that it's outside the site plan because it's being operated as a apartment ‸ complex and it's supposed to be cited as a motel, inherent in that statement is that it is currently site, the current site plan is as a motel, so

[01:07:00] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:00–01:07:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:05] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

of proof of showing that it's currently operating as an apartment complex. And from my perspective, I don't believe they they provide that burden because

[01:07:15] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:15–01:07:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:18] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

which I'm not trying to suggest it's

[01:07:20] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:20–01:07:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:23] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

to consider. um And

[01:07:25] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:25–01:07:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:31] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

and I believe, I don't want to

[01:07:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

put

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:33–01:07:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:07:33] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

words in your mouth for when you found it, but part of what I was suggesting is, is you were thinking of tabling it. If we tabled this right now, it would give them the time to provide the case that you would want for some of these evidentiary things. And

[01:07:46] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:46–01:07:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:07:50] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

after this hearing is to go get with the contractor, get everything uh fixed. As you can see from the pictures, there's not an intent to, you know, operate a subpar facility or anything like that. There was just a huge misunderstanding. So I do believe tabling provides both sides a more equitable outcome.

[01:08:11] ▶ Play Speaker 13

but I will just, I'm sorry, but I'll just confirm that the burden does not shift. It is the city's burden to prove the violation.

[01:08:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8

[01:08:24] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

because we was just on this for a really long time, so I was going to recommend that if, I was going to recommend that if we do decide to table it, that we table what um we're unsure of, right? Like we got proof that there is probably no trash. We know that the exterior structure was fixed because the windows and doors and all of those things were fixed. So then the only thing on the table is three and four. If that's the case, if y'all are still confused, I i don't feel confused. But if there's still some unreadiness, ‸ we're going

[01:08:54] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

to table, we just table

[01:08:56] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

the whole thing and...

[01:08:57] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:57–01:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:01] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

a change our status recommendation on this matter, maybe help the board a little bit? uh ‸ Staff would be okay with

[01:09:08] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:08–01:09:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:13] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

on number two for the structure windows, and staff would actually ask the board to change its recommendation for a fine of

[01:09:21] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:21–01:09:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:22] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

a day active tonight

[01:09:24] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:24–01:09:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:29] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

occupied. It's a commercial building and

[01:09:31] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:31–01:09:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:09:34] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:09:37] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:09:38] ▶ Play Speaker 10

could we could withdraw number four.

[01:09:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Okay, so you are you want to your recommendation is to keep one, two, and three and discard number four.

[01:09:50] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

My recommendation would be finding the facts for one and two, a fine, daily fine of 250 a day for all the permits required effective ‸ immediately, and then table number four. Or draw number four, I'm sorry. Okay. It's a commercial property. They're currently active in the business. They've got residents residing in there, and there's no permits. Pull. And there was three stop work orders prior to today's hearing.

[01:10:25] ▶ Play Speaker 14

No actual evidence provided that anyone's there right now. But also, it would be drastic to have one person in a code enforcement hearing being given immediate fine when everyone else, in their own recommendation, gave a month. So if they wanted to do that, at the very least, I think it would be fair to give a month to come into compliance with building permits, it's not even possible to get burning building permits that quickly.

[01:10:47] ▶ Play Speaker 14 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:47–01:10:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:48] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:10:50] ▶ Play Speaker 12

There

[01:10:52] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

was a misunderstanding of what the building permit requirement was.

[01:10:55] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:55–01:10:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:10:57] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Chair, I'd like to set a motion. Yes, sir. Okay. For case uh CE 24 860 uh based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find

[01:11:09] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:09–01:11:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:25] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:25–01:11:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:25] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:11:25] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:11:27] ▶ Play Speaker 12

is exterior structure, window, skylight, and door frames, section

[01:11:31] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:31–01:11:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:32] ▶ Play Speaker 12

250 per day. And permit required, 200, permit required is not 250, correct? I

[01:11:41] ▶ Play Speaker 13

think, I think, well, correct me if I'm wrong um

[01:11:44] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:44–01:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:11:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13

a finding of fact was that they, there that a violation existed but has since been corrected and that no fine be imposed. Correct.

[01:11:57] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

correct That is for violation

[01:12:00] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:00–01:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:01] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

and

[01:12:01] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:01–01:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:01] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

That would be staff's recommendations I have not seen the pictures that the attorney provided, but if we can stipulate that

[01:12:07] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:07–01:12:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:08] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

and

[01:12:08] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:08–01:12:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:09] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

have been taken care of,

[01:12:10] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:10–01:12:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:14] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:14–01:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:15] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

would be

[01:12:15] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:15–01:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:15] ▶ Play Speaker 12

correct, attorney? yeah Yes. Okay,

[01:12:20] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:20–01:12:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:27] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:12:27] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:12:28] ▶ Play Speaker 12

violation

[01:12:29] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:29–01:12:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:29] ▶ Play Speaker 12

accumulation trash and litter, and violation number

[01:12:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:33–01:12:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:33] ▶ Play Speaker 12

exterior structure window skylight, i moved to find a respondent was in violation of city code as charged and failed to correct the violation by the time specified

[01:12:45] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:45–01:12:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:48] ▶ Play Speaker 12

That the violation is now corrected and no fine is imposed. Any violation of the same code by the same respondent within

[01:12:56] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:56–01:12:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:12:56] ▶ Play Speaker 12

years from the date of this order may be treated as a repeat violation

[01:13:02] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:02–01:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:07] ▶ Play Speaker 12

is that correct?

[01:13:11] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I have a motion on

[01:13:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:13:13–01:13:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

with the second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. close the polls Motion passed unanimously.

[01:13:22] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Mr. Chair, I have uh ‸ another motion. Yes, sir. uh

[01:13:25] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:25–01:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:13:31] ▶ Play Speaker 12

[01:13:32] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

for the event of the city code based

[01:13:32] ▶ Play Speaker 12

on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find respondent in this case in violation of the city codes as charged. for permit required And that the respondents shall correct the violation ‸ later than 4 pm 30 days from today. in the event respondent does not comply by this date after considering the ‸ factors in section 162.09 florida

[01:14:06] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Machine re-recognized

statues.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:06–01:14:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:14:06] ▶ Play Speaker 17 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

[01:14:07] ▶ Play Speaker 12

fine and

[01:14:08] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:08–01:14:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:15] ▶ Play Speaker 12

for each day. The violation continues past the

[01:14:17] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:14:17–01:14:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:18] ▶ Play Speaker 12

date.

[01:14:19] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:19–01:14:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:24] ▶ Play Speaker 12

to verify compliance with this order. second

[01:14:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Motion on the floor with the second. All

[01:14:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:34–01:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I'll be a nay. Okay, so now for the uh chairman, for the fourth one, we're gonna

[01:14:44] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:44–01:14:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:14:44] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:14:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:14:46] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:14:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:14:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8

they're making money on that and we're giving them 30 days. They've been making money on this the whole time. So they have no permit and they're still making money but don't have a permit. So I just want to explain why I'm a nay.

[01:15:05] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:05–01:15:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:16] ▶ Play Speaker 8

one.

[01:15:20] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:20–01:15:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:22] ▶ Play Speaker 8

No.

[01:15:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:23–01:15:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ So

[01:15:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:25–01:15:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8

He recommended to um take it off, withdraw it.

[01:15:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:38–01:15:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:42] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:15:43] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Yes. There's no motion on that, right?

[01:15:45] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:45–01:15:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:15:46] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Okay. Okay. All

[01:15:49] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right.

[01:15:50] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ I

[01:15:50] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

just asked just to make sure I understand correctly uh what's been ruled on? So for number three, we have 30 days until March 19th again in compliance with all the

[01:15:59] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:59–01:16:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:04] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice

you board and thank you uh

[01:16:06] ▶ Play Speaker 14 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:06–01:16:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8

all right item number three ce 24-336

[01:16:23] ▶ Play Speaker 17

good evening i'll try to go through this as painfully and

[01:16:27] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:27–01:16:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:30] ▶ Play Speaker 17

all right

[01:16:30] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:30–01:16:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:16:38] ▶ Play Speaker 17

this case is based upon photo evidence ‸ testimony presented at this hearing the code enforcement officer ‸ myself finds the property of 1106 abington street in violation for the following one roof and drainage chapter six section 6-1003 g number two exterior general conditions chapter six section

[01:17:00] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:00–01:17:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:17:03] ▶ Play Speaker 17

and g i inherited this case from officer folger

[01:17:10] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:10–01:17:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:17:16] ▶ Play Speaker 17

regarding violation of roofs and drainage a violation exists because this property's patio roof is not sound, tight, and free of defects that allow the rain. This is a picture of the back patio area, so it's not the roof of the home itself, but it's the patio. Following pictures on the left is Officer Folger. Mine is on the right. Photo depicts inspection on April

[01:17:43] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:43–01:17:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:17:43] ▶ Play Speaker 17

2024, which would be Officer folgers

[01:17:46] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:46–01:17:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:17:48] ▶ Play Speaker 17

Violation of exterior general conditions. A violation exists because the property has not maintained the exterior of the property. The fence has not been maintained and kept in good condition. The exterior wall, you can see to the right, is also not kept in good condition or maintained. As far as the inspections go, on March

[01:18:12] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:12–01:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:13] ▶ Play Speaker 17

a complaint

[01:18:14] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:14–01:18:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:17] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:17–01:18:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:23] ▶ Play Speaker 17

generated. The notice violation was mailed out to the property owner with re-inspection to be conducted on or after 30 days.

[01:18:29] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:29–01:18:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:33] ▶ Play Speaker 17

owner of the property contacted Officer Folger ‸ requested more time. Folger noted no progress had been made.

[01:18:39] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:39–01:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:44] ▶ Play Speaker 17

‸ property, ‸ no improvements had been made. As of February

[01:18:48] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:48–01:18:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:18:49] ▶ Play Speaker 17

went to the property again, placed a notice of hearing as well as mailed out via certified mail to the owner. Photographs were taken and uploaded. The certified mail was delivered and confirmed that it was picked up. On February

[01:19:03] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:03–01:19:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:04] ▶ Play Speaker 17

today, ‸ conducted ‸ follow-up inspection of the property. ‸ was found to still be in violation. No contact was made with the owner. I was not given any contact information from the previous officer to make any contact with them. And when I went to the property, each individual time, there was never no one there. On the left, you can see the photo of the front of the house. And the middle one, you can see the fence on the left side of the property.

[01:19:26] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:26–01:19:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:19:31] ▶ Play Speaker 17

which was taken from another street because there was no other way to see it. But it's clearly visible there and shows basically the other side of the initial photo of the patio where the top of the roof is peeling away from it. As of today, the property remains in violation. Staff recommendation, I

[01:19:55] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Machine re-recognized

ask

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:19:55–01:19:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:19:55] ▶ Play Speaker 17

the board to find the respondent in violation of ‸ city codes as charged and impose a fine of 250 per day per violation, if not brought into compliance by 4 pm on march 19 2025.

[01:20:07] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:07–01:20:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:20:15] ▶ Play Speaker 17

I didn't see her when I actually went out a few minutes ago.

[01:20:27] ▶ Play No voice detected

‸ So

[01:20:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8

the 250 per day, what is that based on?

[01:20:32] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Machine re-recognized

now

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:20:32–01:20:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:20:33] ▶ Play Speaker 17

defer to the code manager. It's

[01:20:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10

based on the state statute. ‸ We can have longevity of

[01:20:39] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

the

[01:20:39] ▶ Play Speaker 10

case and to my knowledge that we haven't had any contact from the property owner trying to get it resolved or come to compliance. Yeah,

[01:20:48] ▶ Play Speaker 13

just and just as a reminder, those factors under the statute is the gravity of the violation, how severe it is,

[01:20:55] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:55–01:21:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:21:00] ▶ Play Speaker 13

committed by the violator.

[01:21:04] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Can I

[01:21:05] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:21:05–01:21:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:21:12] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[01:21:18] ▶ Play Speaker 17

There was three charges initially. One was for a separate code violation regarding just fences, which is covered under the exterior. So I was not trying to hit the property for three violations. Yes, ma'am.

[01:21:35] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ Any more? Take a recommendation?

[01:21:41] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Mr. Chair, I would like to make a motion, please.

[01:21:46] ▶ Play Speaker 2

Yes, ma'am.

[01:21:47] ▶ Play Speaker 11

um In reference to KCE 24-336, 1106 Abington Street, um based on the evidence and testimony presented, which is incorporated into the order, I move to find the respondent in this case in violation of the city codes as charged roofs and drainage um chapter 6, section 6-1003G, and exterior exterior general condition, um and that the respondent shall correct the

[01:22:20] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:22:20–01:22:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:22:21] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:22:21] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:22:25] ▶ Play Speaker 11

2025

[01:22:26] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:26–01:22:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:22:41] ▶ Play Speaker 11

um will be imposed for each day the violation continues past the um date. The respondent is ordered to contact the code enforcement officer to verify compliance with this order.

[01:22:56] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

Before I second, can I ask a question? Can I do that? Yes, sir. um

[01:23:00] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:00–01:23:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:23:04] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Does anybody know if this is a rental property or is this just a regular homeowner? That's

[01:23:08] ▶ Play Speaker 17

a regular homeowner. It's home study okay Okay.

[01:23:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:23:19] ▶ Play Speaker 5

I just had a quick question. I

[01:23:23] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

have a question just to be clear, too. So, could you said it's homesteaded. Like, people live in this house? or we Yes.

[01:23:29] ▶ Play Speaker 17 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'm sorry, ma'am.

[01:23:31] ▶ Play Speaker 7

I was saying, did somebody, do we know if somebody, like, lives there?

[01:23:35] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:35–01:23:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:23:39] ▶ Play Speaker 17

had. There was photos he had of a car in the driveway multiple times. And I never saw that same car. I also did a little research on my own and found the owner on social media. That's how I recognized her when she came in. So, it's, and I look back at the deed and

[01:23:58] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:58–01:24:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:02] ▶ Play Speaker 17

‸ someone living there actively. And there's an active water account with the

[01:24:06] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:06–01:24:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:07] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:24:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8

a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor, say aye.

[01:24:13] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Aye.

[01:24:14] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:24:14–01:24:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:15] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:24:21] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:21–01:24:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:22] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:24:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:28–01:24:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:31] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:24:31] ▶ Play Speaker 13 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:24:31] ▶ Play Speaker 13

like. Roll call vote.

[01:24:38] ▶ Play No voice detected

‸ okay

[01:24:44] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:24:44–01:24:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:24:44] ▶ Play Speaker 7

okay

[01:24:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8

We have a 4-2 split. And we have, uh we are on to our violation cited. Number one. oh I'm sorry. We're on to our, uh lean reductions.

[01:25:26] ▶ Play Speaker 10

all right We're ready? Yes, sir. I'll just wait and see. Yes, sir

[01:25:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:25:32–01:25:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:25:47] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[01:25:55] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:25:55–01:25:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:25:58] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:58–01:26:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:07] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[01:26:15] ▶ Play Speaker 10

have any further questions? Did

[01:26:17] ▶ Play Speaker 12

they say to how much they want ‸ to ‸ cost

[01:26:21] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

and

[01:26:23] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:23–01:26:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:35] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ How are you, sir? ‸ well.

[01:26:38] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Thank you. Okay. You are the property owner.

[01:26:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. You need to be

[01:26:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:43–01:27:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:26:43] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]

[01:26:51] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[01:26:55] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[01:27:00] ▶ Play Speaker 6

thank

[01:27:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4

you

[01:27:08] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:08–01:27:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:10] ▶ Play Speaker 6

initially talked to the real estate agents on the property she told me that the property has some violations. And, well, first of all, it was owned by the bank and

[01:27:25] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:25–01:27:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:31] ▶ Play Speaker 6

We were supposed to close within 30 days. And then the agent got back to me and said that the bank was taking care of the violations. And that as soon as they do, we can close on the property so I waited probably two months and after the second month the realtor called me up and told me okay the bank because I guess they had to see ‸ you guys

[01:27:54] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:54–01:27:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:27:57] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I don't know. So after the second month, the realtor called me up and said we can close on the property I wired the money to the closing company and closed on the property and then probably like a year I don't

[01:28:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized

know,

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:28:12–01:28:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:28:12] ▶ Play Speaker 6

close to a year later

[01:28:13] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:13–01:28:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:28:16] ▶ Play Speaker 6

and he told me, oh you have running violations on your property and then that's kind of how it started and then I worked with him, took care of all the violations. And and now we're we're pretty much at where we're at right now and so now I'm just trying to work to get this taken care of but if I knew there was running violations on the property I would have never bought it I mean it

[01:28:44] ▶ Play Speaker 8

when did you purchase it sir to

[01:28:51] ▶ Play Speaker 6

be honest with you I don't know the exact date I purchased it it was it was I would have to look it up to be honest with you but I've owned the property now for a good two years

[01:29:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:05–01:29:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:29:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6

until probably after a year after owning it and I'm sorry what year did you

[01:29:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8

purchase it

[01:29:19] ▶ Play Speaker 6

to be honest with you I'd have to look it up I don't know the exact date

[01:29:23] ▶ Play Speaker 10

mr. chair I'm showing ownership changed in 2021

[01:29:31] ▶ Play Speaker 8

How many violations were there?

[01:29:32] ▶ Play Speaker 10

At the time,

[01:29:34] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:34–01:29:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:29:38] ▶ Play Speaker 10

structure, general exterior ‸ the structure, boarding up the building, and a maintenance maintenance offenses

[01:29:52] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:52–01:29:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:29:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes, sir.

[01:30:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:02–01:30:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:03] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:30:06] ▶ Play Speaker 3

like to say the gentleman came he was forthcoming about everything. Came in, came

[01:30:11] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:11–01:30:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:16] ▶ Play Speaker 3

he was immediately trying to take care of things along with you know his business and and with us to correct all the violations so he's been very you know of say proactive and to correct in ‸ all of this and

[01:30:34] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:34–01:30:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:30:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3

with him there. So, yes, he has.

[01:30:47] ▶ Play Speaker 10

mr. Wilkinson what's the

[01:30:49] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:49–01:31:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:31:07] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:31:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Any discussion?

[01:31:24] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Do we have other pictures?

[01:31:27] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

That is the current picture that I have today from the previous pictures. The building was painted. It wasn't painted. It was broken windows and was boarded up. But no, I don't have any current pictures from the previous case. That's the one I took today.

[01:31:42] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:42–01:31:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:31:45] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right away work from utilities. Where there was no grass, I'm sorry. There's no

[01:31:50] ▶ Play Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

grass. Right, yeah, they dug up like half my yard and part of my driveway. But the property

[01:31:55] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

is in good condition. There are no current violations on the property.

[01:31:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

So he didn't do that.

[01:31:59] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:31:59] ▶ Play Speaker 6

was somebody else that

[01:32:00] ▶ Play No voice detected

did that.

[01:32:00] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Correct.

[01:32:03] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I just want to say the property looks nice.

[01:32:05] ▶ Play Speaker 6

I appreciate it.

[01:32:06] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I like the color.

[01:32:07] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:32:07] ▶ Play Speaker 6

appreciate it.

[01:32:17] ▶ Play Speaker 12

And sir, you're asking to reduce it to cost?

[01:32:20] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Yes, sir.

[01:32:24] ▶ Play Speaker 12

I'd like

[01:32:24] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

to make a motion. In the case of CE 19-01336, I'd like to set the fine at $1,080.50.

[01:33:03] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Would that be it?

[01:33:12] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:12–01:33:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:15] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Never mind. Never mind. I'm sorry. Are you

[01:33:21] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

seconding? ‸ I'm second. I'm second.

[01:33:24] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:33:24–01:33:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:25] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:33:25] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:33:25–01:33:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:33:25] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:33:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:33:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:33:27] ▶ Play No voice detected

[01:33:27] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

was just going to ask, why the 50 cent? But just,

[01:33:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

just a

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:30–01:33:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:33:31] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

second and I'll leave it right there. Sorry. Sorry. My

[01:33:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8

granddad ‸ always had change in his pocket.

[01:33:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:37–01:33:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8

We have a motion on the floor with

[01:33:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

the

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:45–01:33:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:33:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8

second. All in favor say aye.

[01:33:47] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Aye.

[01:33:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ Those opposed?

[01:33:49] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:49–01:33:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:33:50] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:33:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8

We have motion passes six to one. All right.

[01:33:57] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:33:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8

appreciate it. Yes, sir. So, um, you get with, um, code enforcement officers. They'll get you a date when it goes to city council and they have the final decision.

[01:34:11] ▶ Play Speaker 6

Okay.

[01:34:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right. Well, I ‸ appreciate your hope. Yes, sir. You have a good evening. All right. Thank you. All right. Next. CE 18-00283. Yep. Same side.

[01:34:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:36–01:34:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:38] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:38–01:34:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:40] ▶ Play Speaker 10

location is 1049 Olive Street.

[01:34:46] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:34:46–01:34:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:47] ▶ Play Speaker 10

ran at $50 a day from August 21 to 2018.

[01:34:51] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:51–01:34:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:34:55] ▶ Play Speaker 10

The case was closed, leaving a fine of $97,000. And the current owner, excuse me if

[01:35:03] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:03–01:35:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:08] ▶ Play Speaker 10

reduced to the city's cost. And

[01:35:10] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:10–01:35:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:15] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:15–01:35:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:17] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:35:18] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:35:19] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:35:22] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[01:35:31] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:31–01:35:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:35:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Thank you. All right, ma'am. What would you like to tell us?

[01:35:43] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Yes. Yeah, so when we received a phone call to tell us that our house was in

[01:35:51] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Machine re-recognized

the lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:35:51–01:35:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:35:52] ▶ Play Speaker 16

we immediately made

[01:35:54] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:54–01:36:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:36:02] ▶ Play Speaker 16

on the next day. So, um, we're asking for this

[01:36:08] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Machine re-recognized

lien

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:08–01:36:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:36:08] ▶ Play Speaker 16

because ever since we've been notified, we, we did everything we were told to.

[01:36:18] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:18–01:36:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:36:22] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:36:24] ▶ Play Speaker 10

And the two violations were for boarding up the buildings and a business tax receipt.

[01:36:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ But that was from the previous?

[01:36:35] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Correct.

[01:36:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So this is from the bank? Is this a foreclosure?

[01:36:43] ▶ Play Speaker 10

I believe it was, yes, sir. Yes, Mr. Chairman.

[01:36:51] ▶ Play Speaker 11

When do they purchase the home?

[01:37:01] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:01–01:37:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:37:06] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Ma'am,

[01:37:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

can you tell us

[01:37:07] ▶ Play Speaker 10

when you purchased

[01:37:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8

a home?

[01:37:08] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:37:08–01:37:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:37:10] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:37:13] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:37:14] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Machine re-recognized

towards the end of 2018?

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:37:14–01:37:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:37:22] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

Their application was in 2018, so I would agree, yes.

[01:37:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

So 2018 to 2023, how many violations there were?

[01:37:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

Two.

[01:37:44] ▶ Play Speaker 8

When did you move in?

[01:38:06] ▶ Play Speaker 16

We used to rent back in 2016 at the property, but then purchased until 2018.

[01:38:14] ▶ Play Speaker 12

When you say rent, you were renting the place out?

[01:38:16] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Yeah.

[01:38:18] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

So you were the landlords?

[01:38:20] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

No, we

[01:38:20] ▶ Play Speaker 16

were the

[01:38:22] ▶ Play Speaker 12

tenants.

[01:38:24] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Oh,

[01:38:24] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice

you were the tenants? Yes.

[01:38:25] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:25–01:38:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:38:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:38:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes.

[01:38:32] ▶ Play Speaker 10

And that's the current picture I took and the property is clean and there are no current violations on the property.

[01:38:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Why was it boarded up?

[01:38:45] ▶ Play Speaker 10

That I couldn't answer. That was before I was here.

[01:38:55] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Do you want to ask them? Can you tell me why was it boarded up?

[01:39:00] ▶ Play Speaker 16

Why?

[01:39:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes, ma'am.

[01:39:06] ▶ Play Speaker 16

I'm pretty sure it was due to trash on the empty lot and we used to have chickens and heavy machines on the empty lot next door.

[01:39:35] ▶ Play Speaker 10

And the violence was because of the boards? According to the order, it was for boarding of the buildings chapter 6 section 6.9 B 5 and for a business tax receipt.

[01:39:49] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:49–01:39:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:39:52] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:52–01:39:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:39:54] ▶ Play Speaker 10

The landlord or the tenants? The landlord was

[01:39:57] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

running

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:39:57–01:39:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:39:58] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Okay.

[01:40:01] ▶ Play Speaker 7

But

[01:40:02] ▶ Play Speaker 10

previous owner was running without.

[01:40:06] ▶ Play No voice detected

Oh,

[01:40:07] ▶ Play Speaker 17

wow. If I may add

[01:40:10] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Machine re-recognized

some

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:10–01:40:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:40:12] ▶ Play Speaker 17

Officer Mack and I went to ‸ the property, went inside and out.

[01:40:15] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:15–01:40:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:40:20] ▶ Play Speaker 17

we had. It looked very well maintained and

[01:40:23] ▶ Play Speaker 17 · Machine re-recognized

take

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:23–01:40:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:40:23] ▶ Play Speaker 17

care of. If that benefits any information that we could give you.

[01:40:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

‸ I'm still trying to understand. They were tenants previously. So they were on the property. And I'm just trying to understand because you had a violation of boarded up buildings. So that's, I'm just trying to get an understanding of that. Somebody help? Lifeline?

[01:40:51] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:40:51–01:40:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:40:52] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:40:52] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

had boarding up of a boarded up windows. I mean, you said

[01:40:59] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

there was

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:59–01:40:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:40:59] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

two violations. One was boarding.

[01:41:01] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

One

[01:41:01] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

was according to the order.

[01:41:02] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:41:02] ▶ Play Speaker 10

was boarded up buildings chapter 6 section 6.9 and for a business tax receipt.

[01:41:09] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Oh,

[01:41:09] ▶ Play Speaker 10

tax receipt. Thank you.

[01:41:10] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I have a question. Um, so the violations were closed December 13th. Correct?

[01:41:21] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Correct. That's when it was brought to staff's attention.

[01:41:23] ▶ Play Speaker 11

They moved in in 2018.

[01:41:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:27–01:41:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:41:29] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

16. No,

[01:41:30] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

no.

[01:41:30] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Well, no, as the owners. As the owners. They were 18. So I'm just, ‸ I don't know

[01:41:37] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:41:37] ▶ Play Speaker 11

it makes sense, but I'm just kind of confused why it ran so long. If they were now the new owners in 2018.

[01:41:43] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Does that believe they didn't know they had to lean against the property? Oh. The.

[01:41:53] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice

One more question. Ma'am, when you guys moved in, ‸ do you guys take the boards out and everything?

[01:42:01] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

When you when you purchase the property, when you became owners, did you guys take the boards out and everything?

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:01–01:42:07 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:42:07] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:07–01:42:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:42:14] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:42:16] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Machine re-recognized

So you you guys put the boards up, the metal

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:16–01:42:18 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:42:18] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:18–01:42:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:42:19] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Machine re-recognized

I mean

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:19–01:42:19 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:42:19] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:19–01:42:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:42:20] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:20–01:42:20 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:42:20] ▶ Play Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:20–01:42:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:42:22] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized

Yeah. On the windows,

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:42:21–01:42:22 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[01:42:22] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:22–01:42:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:42:28] ▶ Play Speaker 16 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:28–01:42:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:42:30] ▶ Play Speaker 16

the window.

[01:42:33] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Mr. Chair, may I, may I say something please? Please indulge me. This case,

[01:42:41] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:41–01:42:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:42:51] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

boarded up windows he had mentioned it to her husband, her father who is, who does landscaping that the the windows I think it was a I think it was a permitting issue if I if I remember correctly of Augusto telling me that so what they had was I guess they took the boarding down and

[01:43:17] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:17–01:43:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:43:23] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

and you know put in. that was That was my understanding. So that's a combined lot. And it's two lots. They combined it

[01:43:35] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

into

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:35–01:43:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:43:35] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

one but as far as the

[01:43:36] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:36–01:43:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:43:38] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

think

[01:43:39] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:39–01:43:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:43:43] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice

this is talking so I'm not gonna I'm not gonna assume but I'm gonna say that maybe there was a defect within you know the windows that were boarded up until they got them replaced or fixed.

[01:44:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:00–01:44:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:44:09] ▶ Play Speaker 3 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:44:10] ▶ Play Speaker 3

you need permits that means you're especially for windows that's gonna be you know you taking them out I mean as most you know like replacing you know the frame and everything so that's uh that's what information that I have and that I received from Mr. Augusto

[01:44:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8

okay

[01:44:29] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

so if that I know that doesn't help ‸ that much but that's, that's my case. on But we did inspect and everything was taken care of that was asked of in inside and out you know so I'm you know them and they were more more than you know more than helpful and it was

[01:44:51] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:51–01:44:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:45:08] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

could I ask a question um It sounds to me like in the conversation, were these violations running prior to them purchasing it when they were renting it?

[01:45:37] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:36–01:45:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:45:39] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:45:40] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]

[01:45:50] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:45:52] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:45:53] ▶ Play Speaker 2

the house there are no boarded up windows but I can only see one side of the house ‸ but everything that's happening today was prior to them purchasing it.

[01:46:05] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

Got

[01:46:05] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

it. My thought process still prior to them purchasing it they were living there they were tenants.

[01:46:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:12–01:46:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:46:15] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:46:15] ▶ Play Speaker 2 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:46:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:46:21] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

Most of the

[01:46:22] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:22–01:46:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:46:23] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

long

[01:46:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:46:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

to you. Right.

[01:46:27] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:27–01:46:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:46:27] ▶ Play Speaker 2 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:46:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes definitely.

[01:46:31] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Definitely. And the other thing

[01:46:33] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:33–01:46:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:46:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5

running a business on the on the second lot without permits then it's

[01:46:42] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:46:42] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

going to affect both addresses right wouldn't that be the case. Well yeah that would be the case.

[01:46:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3

Yes.

[01:46:50] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:50–01:46:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:46:50] ▶ Play Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:46:51] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:46:52] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

Yes. So that'd be the case. So even though it wasn't that particular house because of the connection they were getting fined from the I mean it became a fine from the landlord so unfortunate.

[01:47:04] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:04–01:47:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:47:10] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:47:12] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:47:12] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:47:15] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:47:15] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:47:17] ▶ Play Speaker 12

please.

[01:47:19] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Okay wait.

[01:47:21] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

We have a question.

[01:47:22] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Yes. So. Um. I just I guess just a point of order to consider or maybe not a point of order I don't know. To consider. Um. That. The code enforcement officers

[01:47:33] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

said

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:33–01:47:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:47:35] ▶ Play Speaker 7

Same thing with the previous case that we just heard that they were very amenable as soon as they you know they've been working with code enforcement to make sure they got everything done. We got pictures today. Everything is done. Um. So just have that be a consideration as we continue on with the motion. Um. You know this standard set of the standard met.

[01:47:58] ▶ Play Speaker 8

With that being said. I'll

[01:48:01] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

take

[01:48:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8

a motion from you

[01:48:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Machine re-recognized

man

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:48:01–01:48:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[01:48:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes.

[01:48:04] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice

I make a motion

[01:48:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:05–01:48:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:48:15] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:48:15] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]

[01:48:28] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'll do it. Put it in.

[01:48:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I'll do it. She's doing it. Thank you.

[01:48:36] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Wait don't write a month. Oh

[01:48:37] ▶ Play Speaker 7

no.

[01:48:39] ▶ Play Speaker 12

You can just read

[01:48:39] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

it. Yeah once I get the. Okay. Um. I move that the board recommends the city council that the lien be reduced in this case from. From.

[01:48:57] ▶ Play Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:57–01:49:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:49:03] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:49:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:05–01:49:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:49:10] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Second. Have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor say aye.

[01:49:15] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Aye.

[01:49:16] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ Opposed.

[01:49:17] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Nay.

[01:49:19] ▶ Play Speaker 8

We have a. 5-1. ‸ Yeah.

[01:49:23] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I just want to say nay because I think it should be lower.

[01:49:25] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:25–01:49:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:49:32] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay.

[01:49:33] ▶ Play Speaker 11

I'm just saying. The lot has nothing to do with the house.

[01:49:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All right. So that motion passes.

[01:49:41] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:41–01:49:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:49:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8

go to city council and they have the final say so.

[01:49:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:45–01:49:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:49:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8

more information and let you know when it's going. And if I'm not mistaken, you should be notified also.

[01:49:55] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Okay.

[01:49:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay. Thank

[01:49:56] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you.

[01:49:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

All right. You guys have a good evening.

[01:49:58] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Thank you. Mr. Chair.

[01:50:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Yes, ma'am.

[01:50:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:00–01:50:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:50:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:50:05] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

You're not counting

[01:50:06] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yourself.

[01:50:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I've done that often, obviously.

[01:50:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5

You are somebody.

[01:50:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Yes, sir. Yes, sir. All right. Next on the agenda. CE 17-00582.

[01:50:26] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Yes, Mr. Chair.

[01:50:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:27–01:50:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:50:27] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[01:50:35] ▶ Play Speaker 10

The

[01:50:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:50:36–01:50:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:50:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10

ran at $50 a day from July 21st, 2018.

[01:50:40] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:40–01:50:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:50:43] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Case was closed, leaving a fine of $117,000 and the owner, James Yoder, is requesting the lean to reduce the city's cost. Mr. Yoder, I do believe, is here.

[01:50:54] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:54–01:51:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:50:58] ▶ Play Speaker 4 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:51:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:51:00] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:51:01] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

but the truth will help you God? I

[01:51:03] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

do.

[01:51:03] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Please state your name and address for the record.

[01:51:06] ▶ Play Speaker 1

James Yoder, 312 Belmont Drive.

[01:51:09] ▶ Play Speaker 4

Thank you.

[01:51:11] ▶ Play Speaker 1

All right.

[01:51:11] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Good, sir. What can

[01:51:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you tell us? A long time ago. First, I went 30 years and didn't have a single violation. So it shows I take care of my property. But the roof had aged and code enforcement notified me. And it was a metal roof and it had pitting. So I was on Social Security at the time. And I found this high tech paint and ‸ painted the whole thing. It was supposed to seal everything and it was white. I took pictures.

[01:51:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:49–01:51:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:51:51] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

The gentleman was very nice. He said he'd look at it the next week. Well, like four years went by. I thought I didn't get a letter. I didn't get a phone call. So that's why it got so large. I thought it was okay. But one day I got a letter and it said they were going to take legal action and that there had been a fine running. I called them that day of course and said I didn't know. But I said I would respond immediately that, you know, I didn't know. But right away I started calling everybody.

[01:52:28] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:28–01:52:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:52:31] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I was on Social Security and I couldn't get anybody to work with me. But God blessed me and I inherited a lot of money from my business partner. So I called a lot more roofers, called painters, and I had everything done.

[01:52:48] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:48–01:52:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:52:51] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

for each of you of all the work that was done.

[01:52:54] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:54–01:52:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:52:54] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:52:58] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Can I give you the letter?

[01:53:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Please. How many? I'm sorry, they'll come get it for you. How many violations were there? Okay. Thank you.

[01:53:21] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Mr. Chair, the violations were for the drainage and roof like Mr. Yoder had spoken about, protective treatment and weeds, excessive weeds.

[01:53:41] ▶ Play Speaker 12

Mr. James, what are you doing about the weeds now?

[01:53:46] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Everything's been cut down. I hired two landscape companies. I cut the ones, the only thing they told me about was the one by the house. And you can see by the photo I've left, cut everything down and there's a four foot border around the whole house.

[01:54:03] ▶ Play Speaker 12

I understand that. But are you saying like, do you have somebody to cut it? Do you do it yourself?

[01:54:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1

The landscapers did the, by the both fence. I have chain link fence.

[01:54:13] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:54:13] ▶ Play Speaker 1

mean, they did that, but I did the hole around the house.

[01:54:18] ▶ Play Speaker 12

So, from here on out, do you have somebody to come cut your grass? Is that what you're telling me?

[01:54:22] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

I do it every week now.

[01:54:24] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:24–01:54:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:54:25] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

‸ I have a brand new mower. So I, I love doing it. No problem.

[01:54:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Thank ‸ you.

[01:54:35] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:35–01:54:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:54:38] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Yes. The property is maintained and Mr. Yoder has been contacting me since I've started with the city and he's very been forthcoming and trying to get this resolved.

[01:54:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8

‸ Is there anything in the record to say why Mr. Yoder wasn't contacted? Uh, why someone never went out to check the property?

[01:55:09] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:09–01:55:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:55:09] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:55:12] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay. I live at [address]. Um, a neighbor at 321 has got my mail.

[01:55:20] ▶ Play No voice detected

He,

[01:55:20] ▶ Play Speaker 1

uh, a Latin gentleman, very nice. And he was bringing it down, but he moved out of state. And for some reason, someone could 312 with 321. So I don't know if my mail still goes there. That man moved out of state, but he always brought me my mail.

[01:55:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I'm not gonna ‸ let you accuse our post office.

[01:55:41] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Oh no, I didn't say that.

[01:55:43] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:43–01:55:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:55:45] ▶ Play Speaker 1

that's what was

[01:55:47] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:55:47–01:55:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:55:48] ▶ Play Speaker 1

And the man was very nice. He brought me my mail.

[01:55:56] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:56–01:56:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:56:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8

so I applaud you for your hard work

[01:56:08] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[01:56:22] ▶ Play Speaker 5

mr. Yoder you've been in this residence for what? For the last 30

[01:56:25] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:25–01:56:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:56:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]

[01:56:42] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

[01:56:45] ▶ Play Speaker 5

I want to make a motion I mean ‸ I'll make a motion

[01:56:48] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:48–01:56:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:56:58] ▶ Play Speaker 5

in this case and that we just we take this lien reduction down to $100 I'm not

[01:57:09] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:09–01:57:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:57:11] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:57:13] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:57:15] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

[01:57:21] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[01:57:21] ▶ Play Speaker 8

second if you say it's only payable in ‸ hundred and ‸ dollar bills. we have a motion on the floor with the second. All in favor say aye.

[01:57:31] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Aye. Those

[01:57:32] ▶ Play Speaker 8

opposed? Nay. All right. so I got to get this right so

[01:57:38] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:38–01:57:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:57:44] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:44–01:57:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:57:44] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:57:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8

so mr. Yoder we have made our motion and it will go to city council and again they'll make that final decision. But we thank you. Thank you.

[01:57:59] ▶ Play Speaker 11

house looks nice

[01:58:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I should

[01:58:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5

have zeroed

[01:58:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:03–01:58:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:58:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

[01:58:10] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:58:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[01:58:19] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[01:58:19] ▶ Play Speaker 10

this is lien reduction CE 22-00884 at long address at 3645 Longbow Road lien ran a $50

[01:58:29] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:29–01:58:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:58:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10

closed,

[01:58:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:36–01:58:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:58:40] ▶ Play Speaker 10

current owners requesting that the lien be reduced ‸ the city's cost and mr. chair and board I'd like to go ‸ and let you know that I've been in contact with this gentleman. Also, also he is he bought the property in his investment. He is selling it yeah I've also talked to the current buyer who is an active duty Air Force who's waiting to try to get this resolved so they can move forward where they're closing. so I've been in contact with both the current property owner who fixed the issues he did not own the property when this was going on and

[01:59:20] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:20–01:59:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:59:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8

okay

[01:59:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:26–01:59:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:59:28] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[01:59:30] ▶ Play Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

nothing but the truth so help you God yes please state your name and address for the record

[01:59:33] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:33–01:59:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:59:40] ▶ Play Speaker 18

all right sir. First of all,

[01:59:45] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:45–01:59:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[01:59:47] ▶ Play Speaker 18

So, um thank you. Thank you everyone so uh yeah when I bought the property it was um it had been destroyed by a fire I believe I'm pretty sure as soon as I bought it we we got to work with all the permits needed and yeah that's that's that's about it

[02:00:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8

What the shortest time frame that we've had tonight? Yeah.

[02:00:16] ▶ Play Speaker 18

I didn't know uh I'm assuming if the liens are not from from when I owned the property right

[02:00:27] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:27–02:00:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:00:28] ▶ Play Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[02:00:33] ▶ Play Speaker 18 + overlapping voice

so no

[02:00:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

okay yeah it looks like you started before you yeah yeah

[02:00:39] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

before you I

[02:00:40] ▶ Play Speaker 18

did not know uh it had leans on it I I'm this my second project I the first one was nowhere near nowhere near this one was just it was simple um

[02:00:49] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:49–02:00:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:00:54] ▶ Play Speaker 18

buy a property the title had to be cleaned so I did not know it had

[02:01:00] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

[02:01:00] ▶ Play Speaker 18

had leans on it or or I

[02:01:03] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Machine re-recognized

assume

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:01:03–02:01:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:01:04] ▶ Play Speaker 18

that it would they would pay for it in order to sell the property or else I couldn't buy

[02:01:08] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:08–02:01:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:01:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8

And what is staff

[02:01:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:14–02:01:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:01:14] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[02:01:22] ▶ Play Speaker 10

and if you'd like I miss chairman I do have an email from the potential buyer that he sent me as well do

[02:01:29] ▶ Play Speaker 8

you want to read it oh

[02:01:32] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

I can read it or I can just bring it up to you oh

[02:01:34] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:34–02:01:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:01:40] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

structure.

[02:01:45] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

can I ask a naive question but you said this house was this house was burnt it caught on fire I believe so yes but but you don't you don't you y'all wouldn't know that

[02:01:56] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:56–02:01:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:01:58] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:01:59] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

an unsafe structure yeah it looked like it was burned it

[02:02:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5

was burned yeah the

[02:02:05] ▶ Play Speaker 10

permit the permits, there are uh there were permits issued for the property to get uh reconstructed. it does have new windows in a new roof in it I mean that's the credit's a beautiful property and it's that's beautiful

[02:02:18] ▶ Play Speaker 11

and

[02:02:19] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the owner has more worked with it according to what I have on records this

[02:02:24] ▶ Play Speaker 5

and y'all forgive me this is an off question because I don't know and they you know they say no stupid question. um so with would uh a fire causes damage? Would that stop? Would that, would that stop? uh links or, or just code, uh violations. Let me say that.

[02:02:44] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:44–02:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:02:47] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

[02:02:52] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

right right like that and unintended so that could

[02:02:57] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

generate a that's okay like I just had a question I just that could generate

[02:03:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

the actual whole case right right right so do you have uh knowledge that that was the case

[02:03:09] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yeah from the court record recorded record

[02:03:12] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:12–02:03:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:03:16] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

and I would say yes that was it was due to the fire for unsafe structure according to the code board uh order here it just says unsafe structure and for junk and debris which I would say

[02:03:29] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:29–02:03:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:03:31] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice

time okay

[02:03:32] ▶ Play Speaker 5

but uh that madam attorney would could you answer that question because it's just for my my just curiosity would if there was a uh violations if there were violations on a home or business and there was a fire with those with those violations stop

[02:03:49] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

I suppose it would depend on the severity of the fire and you know whether or not if the whole structure was eliminated, then the fines may stop running, but the lien remains, right? The lien attaches to the property itself, um so but

[02:04:09] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:09–02:04:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:04:16] ▶ Play Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

would have to

[02:04:16] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

get up ‸ Then you would have to get a permit for the whole building or permit to rebuild because

[02:04:21] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:21–02:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:04:24] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

because it's been on fire. So you would have to get a permit and or or whatever violations it was,

[02:04:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:30–02:04:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:04:34] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

yeah I mean and I'm saying it but I just

[02:04:38] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:38–02:04:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:04:41] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

thank you

[02:04:42] ▶ Play Speaker 8

[02:04:44] ▶ Play Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

asked did I ask

[02:04:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

what was staff's cost

[02:04:47] ▶ Play Speaker 10

yes you did but I'll repeat again

[02:04:49] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:49–02:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:04:53] ▶ Play Speaker 10

thank you and you said there was an email that

[02:04:55] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you were going to read

[02:04:56] ▶ Play Speaker 10

uh yes I've got uh from Kevin's a potential buyer it was an email sent to me uh earlier this month my name is

[02:05:06] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:06–02:05:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:05:08] ▶ Play Speaker 10

I ‸ am attempting to buy

[02:05:09] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:09–02:05:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:05:13] ▶ Play Speaker 10

owner

[02:05:14] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

has

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:05:14–02:05:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:05:14] ▶ Play Speaker 10

applied for a reduction

[02:05:15] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:05:15–02:05:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:05:15] ▶ Play Speaker 10

fees

[02:05:16] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:16–02:05:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:05:20] ▶ Play Speaker 10

information on the status of this request I am not interested in swaying you either one way I'm asking for the expedite this as soon as possible if there ‸ anything you can do and I need me to help push this forward please let me know my family and I are excited to join the space coast community and hope you and your family are well and look forward to hearing from you soon respectfully staff sergeant Ryan Borman United States Air Force

[02:05:45] ▶ Play Speaker 15

Mr. Mueller you had something I I just want to ask a question when when you bought the property uh at the closing, did the person doing the closing make you aware there was a cloud on the

[02:06:03] ▶ Play Speaker 18

title?

[02:06:05] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:05–02:06:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:06:08] ▶ Play Speaker 18

as as is, what it's called as is, because it was uh a property intended to be rehab um so no and like I said my lack of experience I didn't do a title search because I thought that in order for the deal to close, the title had to be

[02:06:22] ▶ Play Speaker 18 · Machine re-recognized

clean.

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:06:22–02:06:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:06:22] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice

It's most unfortunate, but it happens.

[02:06:26] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:06:26–02:06:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:06:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[02:06:27] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[02:06:29] ▶ Play Speaker 15 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:06:29–02:06:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:06:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:06:53] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:06:53–02:06:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:06:55] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

You're ready. I

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:06:55–02:06:56 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[02:06:56] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:06:56–02:06:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:06:56] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:06:57] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

the board

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:06:56–02:06:57 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[02:06:57] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:06:57–02:06:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:06:58] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Machine re-recognized

to the city council that the lien be reduced in this case from

Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:06:58–02:07:02 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)

[02:07:02] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:07:02–02:07:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:07:04] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the machine readings disagree here; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:07:04–02:07:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:07:05] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:07:05–02:07:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:07:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:07:17] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[02:07:17] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[02:07:20] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:07:20–02:07:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:07:27] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:27–02:07:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:07:31] ▶ Play Speaker 7 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[02:07:40] ▶ Play Speaker 7

We don't have any proof that the new owner was aware

[02:07:52] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:52–02:07:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:07:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[02:07:55] ▶ Play Speaker 8

All in favor say aye Aye

[02:07:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:57–02:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:07:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8

The motion passes unanimously Thank you

[02:08:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:03–02:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:08:03] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[02:08:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:08:04] ▶ Play Speaker 8

So ‸ you give it ‸ those gentlemen they'll get you more information Thank

[02:08:07] ▶ Play No voice detected

you so much

[02:08:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Thank you for being here and your patience

[02:08:12] ▶ Play No voice detected

All

[02:08:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8

right

[02:08:13] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:13–02:08:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:08:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:14–02:08:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:08:21] ▶ Play Speaker 10

This is lien reduction C e 16-0-0-4-6-1 at 1235 home street

[02:08:29] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:29–02:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:08:31] ▶ Play Speaker 10

day from June 18 2017 until

[02:08:33] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:33–02:08:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:08:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Case was closed

[02:08:37] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized

leaving

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:08:37–02:08:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:08:38] ▶ Play Speaker 10

a fine of nine thousand four hundred dollars and a property owner of Johnny and Lily Dennis is requesting that lien reduced To cities cost Will cities cost

[02:08:51] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:51–02:08:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:08:53] ▶ Play Speaker 10

hundred and sixty eight dollars and seventy seven cents sir And it was

[02:08:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:59–02:09:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:09:03] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[02:09:09] ▶ Play Speaker 11

What were the violations?

[02:09:11] ▶ Play Speaker 10

There were four violations high grass weeds parking on the grass protective treatment and damage defense

[02:09:20] ▶ Play Speaker 5

And why is it coming to us now?

[02:09:22] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:22–02:09:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:09:22] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Because this was 2017 right? If I'm not mistaken

[02:09:27] ▶ Play No voice detected

[02:09:27] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Believe they made application. Let me see when they made application

[02:09:33] ▶ Play Speaker 10 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:33–02:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:09:47] ▶ Play Speaker 8

I Don't know about anybody else but I Want to make a motion right

[02:09:55] ▶ Play Speaker 5

now?

[02:09:55] ▶ Play Speaker 1

Okay.

[02:09:56] ▶ Play Speaker 5

I'm gonna ‸ make a motion. Go ahead. Go ahead. I'll second

[02:10:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Sorry, darling, I moved at the board recommends yada yada yada whatever it is. I want ‸ to go to zero second

[02:10:11] ▶ Play Speaker 11

Triple it

[02:10:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:14–02:10:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:10:15] ▶ Play Speaker 8

second all in favor say aye aye Those opposed We didn't even swear you in Motion passes unanimously

[02:10:28] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

wait, do y'all have

[02:10:30] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:30–02:10:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:10:33] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice

people talk

[02:10:36] ▶ Play Speaker 10

‸ Are

[02:10:36] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you

[02:10:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:10:37–02:10:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:10:37] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

to LC Dennis? Yeah, I'm

[02:10:40] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:40–02:10:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:10:43] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Okay For a hundred years now I was born and raised here My

[02:10:46] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:46–02:10:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:10:48] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Oh yeah?

[02:10:49] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:49–02:10:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:10:50] ▶ Play Speaker 1 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:10:53] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:10:53] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:10:54] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

Okay I'm Johnny Dennis over on Johnson Street Yes, sir

[02:10:59] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:59–02:11:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:11:00] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

Lloyd, my

[02:11:01] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

mother's

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:11:01–02:11:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:11:02] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

Emma Okay Very good

[02:11:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:11:06–02:11:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:11:06] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

thank you Yes, sir

[02:11:08] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:11:08–02:11:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:11:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Thank you Well, thank you for your patience Yeah,

[02:11:14] ▶ Play Speaker 10

thank you for it Okay Thank you, ma'am Thank

[02:11:17] ▶ Play No voice detected

you Thank

[02:11:17] ▶ Play Speaker 10

you

[02:11:18] ▶ Play No voice detected

That was crazy

[02:11:19] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:11:19–02:11:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:11:21] ▶ Play Speaker 10

Nothing

[02:11:22] ▶ Play Speaker 8

matters

[02:11:22] ▶ Play No voice detected · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:11:22–02:11:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:11:25] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[02:11:25] ▶ Play Speaker 12 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:11:27] ▶ Play Attribution uncertain

120

[02:11:27] ▶ Play Speaker 12

days And

[02:11:28] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

you got $2,000

[02:11:29] ▶ Play Speaker 12 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

It was

[02:11:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Listen It closed It opened In the same year

[02:11:34] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:34–02:11:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:11:35] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]

[02:11:39] ▶ Play Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

us Because they applied

[02:11:40] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

‸ Since we still up here It's crazy that From 2017

[02:11:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized

we're

Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:11:45–02:11:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)

[02:11:45] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

still working on that Yep

[02:11:48] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice

Yep

[02:11:49] ▶ Play Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:11:49–02:11:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:11:50] ▶ Play Speaker 5 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

[02:11:50] ▶ Play Speaker 5

The unfortunate part is They were the last ones in just like Uh

[02:11:57] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Alright ‸ So Um We have No abatements We have no New announcements

[02:12:03] ▶ Play Speaker 8 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:03–02:12:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:12:06] ▶ Play Speaker 11 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

[02:12:10] ▶ Play Speaker 15 · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]

[02:12:12] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices

Alright

[02:12:12] ▶ Play Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:12–02:12:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:12:14] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio

[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]

[02:12:23] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

no more Nothing else

[02:12:25] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio

[unclear audio ▶]

Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:25–02:12:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording

[02:12:26] ▶ Play Speaker 8 + overlapping voice

We will adjourn

[02:12:28] ▶ Play Speaker 5

Thank you all very

[02:12:29] ▶ Play No voice detected

much

[02:12:30] ▶ Play Speaker 8

Thank you

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T13:15:17 · 12,526 ordinary words, 4,353 in suspect passages, 150 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.