civic record · cocoa, florida
Planning & Zoning

Planning & Zoning Regular Meeting

Date
2023-07-12
Status
City minutes and machine transcript available
Source
CivicClerk event #678
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written text Briefing final

The City's record

What the City's record shows

Built only from the City's minutes (858_PZ_Reg_Minutes_07_12_2023.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.

Attendance (the roll call)

  • Listed present when the roll was taken: Justin Simpson, Michael Dobrin, Todd Anderson, Aleck Greenwood, Veronica Lopez, Wesley Park, Marcus Wheeler, Merrybeth Burgess, Katherine Stewart
  • (Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
  • Listed absent: Chris Bankhead, Ron Chabot
  • Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Charlene Neuterman (Community Services Director), Luci Ribeiro (Planner), Kristin Eick (Board Attorney), Joanna Zurinsky (Recording Secretary)
  • Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: ANDERSON, BURGESS, DOBRIN, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, SIMPSON, STEWART, WHEELER (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)

Adopted actions (8)

  • to APPROVE THE JULY 12, 2023 SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA WITH AN AMENDMENT TO MOVE IV.5 to item IV.1 (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by PARK); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, STEWART, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to TABLE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2023 MINUTES (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by PARK); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, STEWART, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 1–2
  • to OPPOSE PZ-23-02100004 N Range Rd — Cocoa Woods Zoning Map Amendment (Ordinance 12-2023) based on 18A and 18H (moved by ANDERSON, seconded by DOBRIN); PASSED 7-2; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, STEWART; nays: PARK, WHEELER — the City's minutes, p. 4
  • to APPROVE the SR524 Large Scale Comp Plan Test Amendment (Ordinance 14-2023) (moved by GREENWOOD, seconded by ANDERSON); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, STEWART, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 6
  • to APPROVE the Adamson Creek Phase Two Zoning Map Amendment to PUD/Preliminary Subdivision/Large-Scale Site Plan/Development Agreement (Ordinance 10-2023) in conjunction with (Item _#3) Consideration of the Adamson Creek Phase Two Preliminary Subdivision/Large-Scale Site Plan/Development Agreement … (moved by WHEELER, seconded by GREENWOOD); PASSED 8-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 8
  • to APPROVE PZ-23-02100005 Central Brevard Sharing Zoning Map Amendment (Ordinance 11- 2023) (moved by GREENWOOD, seconded by ANDERSON); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, STEWART, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 10
  • to APPROVE PZ-23-021000056 Mike Erdman Zoning Map Amendment (Ordinance 13-2023.) (moved by GREENWOOD, seconded by PARK); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, STEWART, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 11
  • to ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 12, 2023 (moved by PARK, seconded by P GREENWOOD); PASSED 9-0; ayes: SIMPSON, DOBRIN, ANDERSON, BURGESS, GREENWOOD, LOPEZ, PARK, STEWART, WHEELER; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 11

Agenda (the City's wording)

No agenda for this meeting was found in the City records this site holds. That does not mean the City published none.

Transcript Partial transcript

Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard. It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's minutes do that (above). A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.

Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.

[00:00:00] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 1:37]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:00:00–00:01:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:16] Speaker 1
All right,
[00:02:16] Attribution uncertain
ladies
[00:02:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
and gentlemen, we seem to be up and running. We're going to go ahead and try to get this started.
[00:02:22] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:22–00:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:02:29] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
While they're testing things out, I'm going to go ahead and ask if you have a cell phone or any type of, you know, digital device that you communicate on, please either put it on vibrate, silent, turn it off, whatever you need to do. If you need to make or receive phone calls, please step out into the lobby. And then once you're done with it, you can come back in.
[00:02:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:53–00:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:04] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
Mr. Simpson, is your microphone turned on?
[00:03:08] Speaker 1
It is. Okay. Okay.
[00:03:21] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:21–00:03:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:03:46] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. Yes. Here.
[00:03:51] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:51–00:03:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:04:03] Speaker 1
Everybody please rise. Face the flag. Remove your hats.
[00:04:10] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I pledge allegiance
[00:04:12] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
to the flag of the United States of
[00:04:14] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
America
[00:04:15] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and
[00:04:23] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
justice for all.
[00:04:24] No voice detected
Amen.
[00:05:01] Speaker 1
All right.
[00:05:06] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:05:06] Speaker 1
Has everybody had a opportunity to look over tonight's agenda for the July 12th special planning and zoning agenda? Yes. Yes. Okay. Do I have a motion to approve the minutes for tonight's agenda?
[00:05:26] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:26–00:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:26] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:05:29] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:05:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Second. All in favor to approve the agenda as presented. Aye.
[00:05:40] Speaker 7
Any opposed?
[00:05:42] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:42–00:05:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:44] Speaker 1
All right.
[00:05:45] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:45–00:05:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:05:46] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:46] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:05:46] Speaker 1
Now we look to, has everybody had the chance to look over the June 7th meeting? Has everybody looked at the minutes for that?
[00:06:00] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I don't think we have, we don't have a hard copy on
[00:06:03] Speaker 6
the minutes, right?
[00:06:04] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:06:04–00:06:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:04] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:06:05] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:06:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:06:05] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:06:09] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:06:09] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:06:12] Speaker 1
Yeah.
[00:06:12] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:12–00:06:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:15] Speaker 1
Okay. Um, do we have a hard copy?
[00:06:21] Speaker 10
I'm sorry. What was the question?
[00:06:23] Speaker 1
If we had a hard copy for the June 7th meeting for the minutes?
[00:06:30] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:30–00:06:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:32] Speaker 10
Joanna, did you print it?
[00:06:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:06:33–00:06:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:33] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:06:36] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:06:36] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:06:38] No voice detected
Okay.
[00:06:40] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:40–00:06:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:43] Speaker 10
agenda items. So
[00:06:46] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:46–00:06:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:51] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:06:52] Speaker 1
tonight's agenda?
[00:06:53] Speaker 10
Yeah, for tonight's agenda. Okay.
[00:06:55] Speaker 1
Because I believe that's what the main populace is here for, correct?
[00:06:58] Speaker 10
Yes, that's correct. Okay.
[00:07:01] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
I was able to review the minutes online yesterday, but I know we don't have a hard copy. Would it be appropriate and allowable to wait to approve the minutes of that particular meeting at our next meeting? Would that be allowable to do that? So that would give the board a chance to really, um, I mean, our hands are full tonight. I think, uh, since we do not have a hard copy.
[00:07:32] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:32–00:07:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:35] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
to review it. It was pretty extensive meeting.
[00:07:39] Speaker 1
I think we're able to do that.
[00:07:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:41–00:07:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:41] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:07:41] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:07:41] Speaker 11
Yes, there's no problem with that.
[00:07:43] Speaker 6
Do we need a motion to do that? Um, to move the minutes till the next meeting? I don't think you even need a motion for that, right?
[00:07:52] Speaker 11
I mean, you've approved the agenda, which included the minute. So I would suggest making a motion to continue it to the next meeting.
[00:08:04] No voice detected
Um,
[00:08:05] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
would the board prefer to approve last month's minutes next month? So we can go ahead and get started since we're already running behind.
[00:08:12] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:12–00:08:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:08:12] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
just give everybody a chance to review them.
[00:08:15] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay.
[00:08:15] Speaker 1
Can I have a motion to postpone the approval of June 7th minutes to next month or to the next meeting?
[00:08:21] Speaker 6
I'll make that motion.
[00:08:22] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:22–00:08:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:08:26] Speaker 1
next month. Say, aye. Aye. Any opposed? None heard. Okay. So let's go ahead and dive in. ‸ I believe that the Cocoa Woods is item E, correct?
[00:08:47] Speaker 10
That's correct.
[00:08:48] Speaker 1
Okay.
[00:08:55] No voice detected
All right.
[00:09:02] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:02–00:09:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:09] Speaker 1
Okay. Uh, which item are you wanting to speak on? You are wanting to speak? ‸ Okay. Just want to make sure. Thank you, sir.
[00:09:19] Speaker 10
Uh, good night everyone.
[00:09:21] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:09:21] Speaker 10
just want to introduce myself. I'm Lucy.
[00:09:23] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:23–00:09:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:26] Speaker 10
and we also have Stacy there. She's the new city planner. Uh, and we have
[00:09:32] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:32–00:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:33–00:09:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:33] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:09:34] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:09:35] Speaker 10
that has been assisting our department and he's going to present this agenda item.
[00:09:42] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:42–00:09:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:09:45] Speaker 12
is Steve noto. I'm the ‸ director of planning with RBI planning and landscape architecture based out of Orlando. We've been helping staff here the last couple of months with day to day operations of the planning department. And as she said, I'll be presenting this item this evening. Uh, on the overhead, we have, uh, the location map of the item in question, uh, for this request. It's two parcels that total 19.23 acres. Uh,
[00:10:12] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:12–00:10:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:15] Speaker 12
and a half north of Lake drive. At the Southwest intersection of tiger trail and North range road. The current zoning
[00:10:24] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:24–00:10:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:28] Speaker 12
And the current future land use category is
[00:10:31] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:31–00:10:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:33] Speaker 12
Um, the
[00:10:34] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:34–00:10:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:10:35] Speaker 12
future land use category allows a maximum of seven dwelling units per acre. Um, so if maxed out completely over just over 19 acres, um, if someone were to develop the two parcels to the max, you're looking at just under 140 dwelling units. That is not the request this evening. However, I want to make that clear. The applicant, um, who is present this evening is requesting to rezone the two parcels from the
[00:11:02] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:02–00:11:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:09] Speaker 12
Um, as I said, the future land use category is seven, uh, sorry, LDR, which is seven units per acre. Their intent is to construct 122 townhomes. Um, however, this just being the rezoning portion of their request, what we look at are the 16 findings of fact in the code of ordinances and then consistency with the comprehensive plan.
[00:11:31] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:31–00:11:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:36] Speaker 12
‸ the 16 findings of fact, um, that detail the requirements of the city in order to make a recommendation on a rezoning. Um, and then also in there is a quick analysis on the consistency with the comprehensive plan. Of course, one of the, uh, very important things when reviewing a rezoning is does the request that zoning district comply with the comprehensive plan and the overlaying future land is category.
[00:12:06] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:06–00:12:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:11] Speaker 12
land use district of LDR. So we have found consistency with the comp plan in that specific manner.
[00:12:17] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:17–00:12:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:23] Speaker 12
that mainly have to do with the housing element that just, we just wanted to bring attention to some of the policies that the city has, um, that encourage. Infill and redevelopment for housing.
[00:12:33] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:33–00:12:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:39] Speaker 12
RU 1 7 to the RU 2 15 for the two subject parcels that total roughly 19 acres.
[00:12:53] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:53–00:13:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:01] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:13:01] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:13:03] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:13:03] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:13:04] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:13:04] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:13:09] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:09–00:13:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:13:13] Speaker 12
So we tied our analysis to the findings of fact outline your staff report. I'll be happy to take any questions you may have. And again, the applicant is here this evening. If you have specific questions for their team, thank you.
[00:13:29] No voice detected
All right.
[00:13:34] Speaker 1
Let's see. Uh, with it being quasi digital, do you want to do we have to swear anybody in if you want to, do we need to swear them all in at once?
[00:13:43] Speaker 11
Um,
[00:13:43] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:13:44] Speaker 11
would recommend swearing in everyone at once just because of the number of folks that are here to give testimony.
[00:13:51] Speaker 1
Okay. When I call your name, I'd like you to please stand so that way we can go ahead and swear, swear you in. Um, Sue Lindeman. Jerry Grove. James Tidwell.
[00:14:07] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:07–00:14:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:09] Speaker 1
James Jordan. Peg Waddell. And Dr. Bleakley.
[00:14:21] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:21–00:14:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:23] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:14:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:14:43] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:14:47] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:47–00:14:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:49] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
they're if they would like to speak first, but Okay,
[00:14:52] Attribution uncertain
‸ yes
[00:14:52] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:14:52–00:15:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:14:53] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:14:55] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:14:59] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:15:00] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
[00:15:11] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:15:18] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:15:19] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:15:21] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:15:27] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:15:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:15:40] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:40–00:15:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:15:41] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:15:42] Speaker 5
a question if he's available still ‸ For the benefit of the audience here curious if you could are you in a position where you can give an example of the type of construction the units would be would they be concrete would they be
[00:16:00] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
wood?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:00–00:16:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:16:00] Speaker 5
would they be multi story or are they going to be townhomes or are you able to offer that right now.
[00:16:06] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:06–00:16:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:07] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:16:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
[00:16:21] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:16:24] Speaker 5
And these would be available for purchase or rental only.
[00:16:28] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:28–00:16:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:29] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:16:31] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. ‸ I guess at this point then that that will be enough for me. I was going to ask some other questions, but it seems like you're basically making plans.
[00:16:42] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:42–00:16:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:45] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:16:48] Speaker 5
Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Chairman.
[00:16:51] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:51–00:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:16:55] Speaker 1
Right now.
[00:16:57] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:17:02] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:17:02–00:17:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:03] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:17:04] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:04–00:18:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:17:04] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:17:10] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:17:12] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:17:12] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:27]
[00:17:40] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:17:41] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:17:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:17:41] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 1:15]
[00:18:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:56] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:18:58] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:18:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:19:08] Speaker 1
Mr. Grove.
[00:19:14] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:14–00:20:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:19:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:17] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:19]
[00:19:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:19:38] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:39] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:39] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:19:49] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:49] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:19:55] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:56] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:19:56] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:20:01] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:20:07] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:07–00:20:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:15] Speaker 15
$10,000 per day for violation. And real quick, authorized bill
[00:20:22] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:22–00:20:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:26] Speaker 15
the state bill for ‸ driveway, has been placed with an estimated
[00:20:30] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:30–00:20:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:38] Speaker 15
The driveway. The lot is 500 feet long, 50 feet across the front, 170 in the back.
[00:20:44] Attribution uncertain
It's
[00:20:45] Speaker 15
a pylon.
[00:20:46] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:46–00:20:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:48] Speaker 15
So I had to put in front of it.
[00:20:51] No voice detected
So
[00:20:52] Speaker 15
now I'm going through hoops, without
[00:20:54] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:31]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:54–00:21:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:26] Speaker 15
everybody's going to get affected in a little different ways. But I wish this would have happened ‸ before I started my house.
[00:21:35] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:35–00:21:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:40] Speaker 15
Corps of
[00:21:41] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:41–00:21:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:44] Attribution uncertain
and
[00:21:44] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:21:44] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:44–00:21:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:46] Speaker 15
‸ that.
[00:21:47] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:47–00:21:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:21:51] Speaker 15
I got ‸ the letters, the pages, it's all just got to be done. I just don't get flooded even in warps.
[00:21:58] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:58–00:22:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:00] Speaker 15
And if you look at those maps, they come at the very end and it butts out. And I don't know what's going to be done, but
[00:22:09] Speaker 15 · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:09–00:22:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:22:10] No voice detected · Machine re-recognized
it
[00:22:10] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:10–00:22:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:15] Speaker 15
But my biggest thing is anything that's north of me is the water flows from the south to ‸ north through the woods. So keep that in mind.
[00:22:24] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:24–00:22:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:28] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:28–00:22:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:28] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:22:28] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:22:28–00:22:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:33] Speaker 1
Mr. Tidwell.
[00:22:43] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 1:00]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:22:43–00:23:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:23:44] Speaker 6
Are you on Fairfield?
[00:23:46] Speaker 8
Yes, 2,500 Fairfield. I'm on the corner lot.
[00:23:49] Speaker 6
‸ I'm
[00:23:50] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
fairly high. ‸ And even then, I had a thing I've had about, I think
[00:23:59] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
it was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:59–00:23:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:23:59] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
32 to 36 inches. But that
[00:24:03] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:03–00:24:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:06] Speaker 8 + overlapping voice
whole lot. My lot is also low in points. It can maintain water at times. Not much.
[00:24:15] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:24:15] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:15–00:25:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:15] Attribution uncertain
have
[00:24:15] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:24:26] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:24:26] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:19]
[00:24:45] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:24:46] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:14]
[00:25:02] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:02–00:25:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:02] Speaker 1
Thank you. Mr. Bibby.
[00:25:15] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:15–00:26:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:25:20] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:25:26] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
[00:25:36] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:37] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:38] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
[00:25:50] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:51] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:25:52] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:53] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:54] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:25:57] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:25:58] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:25:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:25:59] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:00] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
[00:26:16] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
[00:26:29] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:26:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:30] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:31] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:26:31] Speaker 16
Oh,
[00:26:32] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yours was the one we put a drain in. Yeah.
[00:26:34] Speaker 16 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Oh, I remember that. Yeah, okay. I remember you had more hair than I ‸ was. Yeah,
[00:26:41] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
that's quite a long time ago. Yeah.
[00:26:43] Speaker 16
I do appreciate it. There's
[00:26:47] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:47–00:26:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:53] Speaker 16
range. It goes behind our property. House
[00:26:57] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:57–00:27:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:00] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:00–00:27:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:02] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:27:06] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:07] Speaker 16
backyard. He's
[00:27:09] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:09–00:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:09] Speaker 16
water back there, which actually flows into my yard. Drainage is going to be a
[00:27:17] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:17–00:28:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:25] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:25] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:27:28] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:27:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:27:46] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:27:47] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
[00:27:57] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:28:04] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
[00:28:16] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:19] Speaker 16
I
[00:28:19] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:19–00:29:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:28:29] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:28:34] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:56]
[00:29:31] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:31] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:29:35] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:29:35] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:29:42] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:29:44] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:29:53] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:29:55] Attribution uncertain
Thank
[00:29:55] No voice detected
you.
[00:29:57] Speaker 12
The applicant's proposing 122. Yes, sir. He is proposing townhomes. Yes, sir.
[00:30:05] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:30:05–00:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:13] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:30:22] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:22–00:30:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:22] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:22] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:30:25] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:25] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:30:27] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:27–00:31:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:30:28] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:28] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:29] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:29] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:30:33] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:33] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:22]
[00:30:54] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:30:54] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
[00:31:12] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:12] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
[00:31:23] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:23] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:31:32] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:31:32–00:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:34] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:31:35] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:31:37] Speaker 9
I
[00:31:37] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:31:37–00:31:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:31:40] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:31:41] Speaker 9
But
[00:31:42] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:31:41–00:31:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:44] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:31:44] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:31:50] Speaker 9
We're
[00:31:51] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:50–00:32:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:31:53] Attribution uncertain
just
[00:31:53] Speaker 9 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:32:02] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:32:09] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:32:12] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:32:17] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
[00:32:34] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
How are they going to deal with that on the property? There has to be tortoises on that property.
[00:32:42] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:42–00:32:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:32:52] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
Thank you very much.
[00:32:53] No voice detected
Thank
[00:32:53] Attribution uncertain
you.
[00:33:28] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:53–00:37:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:33:30] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:30] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:33:32] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:33:34] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:33:44] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:44] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:44] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:44] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:33:45] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:33:46] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:33:48] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:33:56] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:21]
[00:34:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:34:18] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:34:26] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:34:29] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
[00:34:45] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:42]
[00:35:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:35:29] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:35:35] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:35] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:36] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:36] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:35:38] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:38] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
[00:35:55] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:35:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:35:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:36:08] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
[00:36:15] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:14]
[00:36:29] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:36:37] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:37] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:39] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:39] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:40] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:40] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:36:44] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:36:44] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:45] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[00:36:49] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:36:52] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:36:53] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
[00:37:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:21]
[00:37:30] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:37:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:34] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:34–00:39:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:37:45] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:37:55] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:55] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:37:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:37:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:38:01] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:21]
[00:38:23] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:38:23] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:46]
[00:39:09] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:39:18] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[00:39:27] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:39:27] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:39:27] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:28] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:18]
[00:39:46] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:39:46] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
[00:39:59] Speaker 16
Next
[00:40:00] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:59–00:42:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:40:08] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:40:09] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:40:10] Attribution uncertain
the
[00:40:10] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[00:40:20] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:19]
[00:40:40] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20]
[00:40:59] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:40:59] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:41:00] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:41:00] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
[00:41:14] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
[00:41:31] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:41:31] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:41:41] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
[00:41:52] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
[00:42:03] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:42:04] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:42:05] Speaker 16 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:16]
[00:42:21] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:15]
[00:42:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:42:36–00:42:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:42:37] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:42:37] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
that, would the board like to make a quick discussion? Is there any questions for the developer? Mr.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:42:37–00:42:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:42:51] Speaker 11 · Machine re-recognized
Chairman,
[00:42:51] Speaker 11
Yes, the ‸ staff and then the developer should be given an opportunity to speak before you deliberate.
[00:43:00] Speaker 1
‸ Well, I was just asking if
[00:43:01] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:01–00:43:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:02] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:43:03] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice
thank
[00:43:03] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you. First.
[00:43:04] Attribution uncertain
Yeah,
[00:43:04] Speaker 1
I was going to.
[00:43:12] Speaker 6
‸ Do you have
[00:43:13] Attribution uncertain
a
[00:43:13] Speaker 6
question? I
[00:43:13] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:13–00:43:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:43:19] Speaker 6
Does staff want to?
[00:43:21] Speaker 12
Steve. Sure. No, thank you. I think a lot of the comments, first of all, thanks for bringing a lot of those to our attention. Clearly, public hearings have a purpose, and this is exactly one of them. I think a lot of these issues are types of issues that get resolved if and when a project gets to subdivision review, site plan analysis, things of that nature. At a rezoning stage, some information, a lot of information may not be known, and so staff in general is put in a position where they have to make recommendations purely on some information or findings that are in the code. The developer, the applicant may be able to touch on some of these issues, specifically the drainage or some of the traffic issues questions. At
[00:44:06] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:06–00:44:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:11] Speaker 12
I can't really comment on many of the questions that were brought up tonight. Other than in the event we get a submittal for a site plan, subdivision, whatever it may be, that's when RBI would be reviewing it, other consultants and city staff. And those types of ‸ reviews would come back before this board.
[00:44:38] Speaker 1
Would
[00:44:38] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:38–00:44:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:44:45] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:18]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:45–00:45:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:45:03] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:45:04] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:20]
[00:45:24] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[00:45:31] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:45:32] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[00:45:47] Speaker 1
Does the board have any more questions? Or would you like to deliberate?
[00:45:52] Speaker 4
I'd make an observation. I've heard many of the residents speak tonight. They have all expressed problems with what you're planning. And what you're saying is, trust me, the
[00:46:10] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:10–00:46:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:12] Speaker 4
How many times have we heard this? I would not feel comfortable if I were arrested in accepting your promise to look at it in the future. Once you start that ball rolling,
[00:46:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:46:30–00:46:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:33] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[00:46:34] Speaker 4 · Machine re-recognized
very difficult to stop it. I think a lot more planning has to go into this before we move forward because for us on the board, that's fine. We don't live there. But for those who do,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:46:33–00:46:53 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:46:52] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
you know, they're going to be out of luck.
[00:46:54] Speaker 4
I'd
[00:46:55] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:54–00:46:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:46:56] Speaker 4
say, gee, this is a great idea. ‸ Based on years of experience, there are too many unanswered questions. I
[00:47:06] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:06–00:47:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:08] Speaker 4
but I would be very reluctant to approve anything at this time. Thank
[00:47:13] No voice detected
you.
[00:47:24] Speaker 6
Yeah,
[00:47:24] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:24–00:47:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:26] Speaker 6
My concern is density. I've been on this board now for almost 20 years. ‸ There's a reason these boards are made up of citizens that live here and have a vested interest in our community. My perception of the Range Road, Cox Road
[00:47:48] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:47–00:47:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:54] Speaker 6
Changing the density to a higher density in this area, I would be strictly opposed to. And I don't think that there are
[00:48:07] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:07–00:48:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:15] Speaker 6
of this location. And there's
[00:48:17] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:16–00:48:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:22] Speaker 6
community. And I think we need to continue that and keep it that way.
[00:48:28] No voice detected
Thank you.
[00:48:35] Speaker 11
Mr. Chairman, if I can address something. I just want to clarify and make sure everyone's clear on the board. This proposal will not increase the maximum density because the future land use of low density residential remains the same. So it still will be a seven dwelling unit an acre max. That's what it currently is. However, ‸ the RU 215 zoning district does allow for townhomes as a product, right? So that
[00:49:06] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:05–00:49:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:10] Speaker 11
the property. So I just want to be clear with the board about that.
[00:49:18] Speaker 5
Can
[00:49:18] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:49:18–00:49:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:19] Speaker 5
something for clarification? Thank you, Mr. Chair. The property across the street, I think the doctor had mentioned that that's zoned multifamily. Is that correct?
[00:49:34] Speaker 12
Yes. There are parcels across the street to the east, Mr. Greenwood, that have the RU 215 zoning district.
[00:49:42] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
And that
[00:49:43] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:42–00:49:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:46] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Right. And those are owned by the
[00:49:49] Speaker 12
school board.
[00:49:51] Speaker 13
Oh. ‸ That changes. That's
[00:49:56] Speaker 13 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:49:56–00:49:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:49:57] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
Yeah,
[00:49:58] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:57–00:50:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:05] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
That was the only question I had. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
[00:50:14] Speaker 1
Are there any other questions, comments from the board?
[00:50:18] Speaker 17
Yeah, Mr. Chair, the thing that sticks out for me with this whole item is the wetlands environmental. I may have missed it, but I didn't see anything from the Department of Fish and Wildlife, ‸ which generally something's generated through the state and federal when it comes to those kind of areas that are zoned because of that reason. I don't see anything or have anything that confirms the zoning because they're wetlands, and I think that should be addressed. I
[00:50:50] Speaker 17 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:49–00:50:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:50:54] Speaker 17
do anything or change anything.
[00:50:58] Attribution uncertain
That's just a comment
[00:50:58] Speaker 17 · Machine re-recognized
my observation.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:50:58–00:50:59 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:51:01] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:51:01–00:51:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:02] Speaker 18 · Machine re-recognized
would that be something that would be brought up when they propose an actual site build? Typically,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:51:02–00:51:24 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[00:51:08] Speaker 12 · Machine re-recognized
yes. When you get to the subdivision site plan, that's when the studies are required. In my experience, if a board or a council or slash commission wishes to see those types of studies earlier on, that's typically a request directed to staff to bring
[00:51:24] Attribution uncertain
from my observation.
[00:51:26] Speaker 12
I
[00:51:26] Attribution uncertain
would prefer to agree on
[00:51:26] Speaker 12 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:51:26–00:51:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:51:31] Speaker 12
Thank you.
[00:51:34] Speaker 5
I have
[00:51:35] Speaker 12
another
[00:51:36] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
question with the attorney. Is this something that the issues that's been brought up during the meeting tonight, is this something that the developer could bring back additional information and table this with more information about the questions of the mitigation that might be needed, if it's a wetland area? I mean, I understand their intent, but it's true. We need to clarify the issues of drainage. Now, the codes are a lot different now than they were back in the days when these houses were built. I
[00:52:17] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:17–00:52:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:22] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And the code is not the
[00:52:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
80s, early 90s. So
[00:52:28] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:28–00:52:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:52:28] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[00:52:32] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
they were built then, which could have prevented some of the drainage problems they're having now. So I feel that everyone really needs more information, and it's mainly the drainage issue as well. And I think that that's probably the way that we need to look at this.
[00:52:54] Attribution uncertain
I
[00:52:54] Speaker 5
know the staff has looked at it
[00:52:56] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:52:56–00:52:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:52:56] Speaker 5
all the facts that were brought up. Very intense, but we just need more information on top of that. Since we really don't know if they're wetlands or not, you know.
[00:53:09] Speaker 9 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It seems like it
[00:53:11] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
is, but you know, I'm not a St. John's Water Management District person. And so that's basically how I feel. I
[00:53:19] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:19–00:53:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:22] Speaker 19
I just wanted to add an air of comment in regards to what it is that we are positioned and tasked with to look at and examine. I think the sentiment in the regard of
[00:53:34] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:34–00:53:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:53:38] Speaker 19
and hold those in trust. But at the end of the day, the mitigating factor that resonates for me at this point is when we talk about intended land use, whether it was a single family dwelling or whether it was a multi unit dwelling, you're still going to have the encumbrance of issue that still arises from these secondary things that we're now discussing. So I think I'm at a position where I now understand and know that these things are addressed in the aftermath beyond planning and zoning. Once these things are presented to the building department, am
[00:54:17] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:17–00:54:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:23] Speaker 11
The subdivision, the preliminary subdivision and engineering plans will be brought back to this board.
[00:54:30] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, so that is correct. So at that time, we would have full and full access and availability to review it for its for its thorough content as to what is being presented. What
[00:54:41] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:41–00:54:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:54:45] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
canvas, if you ‸ look and you have you have what is considered to be a comparable. The comparable is where whether you like it or not, the comparable is across the street. So for sake of definition, there is a comparable. So
[00:54:59] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:58–00:55:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:00] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
We have to take things in the incremental step as to where we are today and what our future review of that information may be. Doesn't
[00:55:09] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:09–00:55:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:12] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
It affects that gentleman's pocket. So ‸ that's what he intends to do. When I say that you're misconstruing what I'm saying, he has to present the binding information back to us at that time. I'm
[00:55:27] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:26–00:55:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:30] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
saying he has to submit those research documents back either through the staff or through whose staff is mitigated with with RBI. Those
[00:55:39] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:38–00:55:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:55:43] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
position here today is still going to be the same. We have to review it for what it is, not for what it is intended to be when it's ‸ when it's at its intention. Then that's when you can make a sound and reasonable decision about the intention. Like you said, I don't know if he's going to put based off of the notes that said that the maximum land use for that particular unit was I wrote it over here. Was 140 units was max. But if the proposal is 122 that fits within legal definition. Now,
[00:56:16] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:15–00:56:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:17] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
That's not my position today. My position today is is purely to speak towards what is the intended use. So I just wanted to bring that forward because I think sometimes when we table we're tabling why.
[00:56:30] Speaker 5
Well, I can answer that because it's exactly the information that you're saying that you need to make a legitimate decision. And that's why I thought it might be a good idea that we ask the developer to address this concern about drainage. That's very important. And
[00:56:48] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:47–00:56:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:52] Attribution uncertain
And
[00:56:52] Speaker 5
I think once you do go to the St. John's River water management department and the other departments in reference to the water, the number of ‸ units also plays into that. They might be told they cannot build that many units. That's my other point. That's
[00:57:12] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:11–00:57:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:16] Speaker 5
Talk some coverage and density based on what they discover, whether that is a mitigation requirement for the drainage issue. Right. And right now the builders are completely at
[00:57:28] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
risk for that. Right. So, I mean, no matter what we decide, that's a table or to approve. They're still going to be at risk for those decisions. So I mean, that I think it's why I'm leaning in this direction here is
[00:57:38] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
because
[00:57:39] Speaker 18
I fully agree that I couldn't imagine people building my backyard. I mean, I
[00:57:42] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:42–00:57:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:46] Speaker 18
Okay, so I can't exactly compare that, but I do have some area and other property that I couldn't imagine someone built right behind me. We can make motions now to not pursue this any further right to or to defer it until ‸ later time to table it. Right. And I, and I respect that, but my, when does it come back? And then these folks are still coming back again. If, if we were to approve this, that gives them the financial stability to do those studies. Because right now we're putting on more risk. I'm
[00:58:18] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:18–00:58:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:20] No voice detected
We
[00:58:20] Speaker 6
can also deny
[00:58:21] Speaker 18
it or take exactly. Exactly. Absolutely. That's what I'm saying. Right. Right. But, but, but to, you know, uh, to,
[00:58:33] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:32–00:58:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:38] Speaker 18
the place where they've shown what they can build. Right. And at that point, they'll be under the scrutiny of the city to provide, you know, water effects of the, of the nearby residents and things like that. So, uh, I,
[00:58:50] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:49–00:58:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:50] Attribution uncertain
I, I agree
[00:58:50] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[00:58:51] Speaker 18
Mm hmm. Yeah. That's it.
[00:58:58] Speaker 6
I'd like to make a motion, please.
[00:59:02] Speaker 1
Please.
[00:59:03] Speaker 6
I'd like to make a motion to deny ordinance number 12 dash 2 0 2 3.
[00:59:21] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice
I would recommend that if you, if the board is considering a motion to deny, um, uh, for the benefit of the city council, if you have any specific, if you're pointing to any specific criteria. That
[00:59:36] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:35–00:59:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:37] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[00:59:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
which we are proposing the denial. Um, I believe it should, you're taking, I,
[00:59:47] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:46–00:59:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:59:50] Speaker 1
Yes. I, I, I know, I know that. I meant, um, as far as legal is concerned, we have to identify the specific points.
[01:00:02] Speaker 19
For
[01:00:02] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:02–01:00:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:06] Attribution uncertain
It
[01:00:06] Speaker 19
would
[01:00:06] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:06–01:00:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:00:12] Speaker 19
So those are the line items under which we could submit for denial.
[01:00:20] No voice detected
Okay.
[01:00:24] Speaker 1
All right. ‸ I have a motion. I have a second. So we're going to put forward a vote. And with the vote of,
[01:00:35] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
aye
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:00:35–01:00:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:00:36] Speaker 1
we are voting. For a recommendation to deny. The proposal for city council. Um, with comments for 18 a. 18 H. Is that, uh, well, that was, that's fine. Yes, sir. Okay. With a, uh, vote to deny as I. All in favor. Say,
[01:01:10] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
aye.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:10–01:01:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:01:12] Speaker 9 · Machine re-recognized
Aye.
[01:01:13] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
Aye. Aye.
[01:01:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Are there any opposed? Nay. Nay.
[01:01:24] Speaker 19
Nay.
[01:01:26] Speaker 1
‸ Wes. Yes. Correct.
[01:01:29] Speaker 6
Correct. I think it's actually not to deny, but to oppose. And
[01:01:37] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:36–01:01:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:37] Attribution uncertain
is,
[01:01:37] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:01:37] Attribution uncertain
it
[01:01:37] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:01:38] Speaker 1
Well, the recommendation is to oppose it. Correct. Right.
[01:01:42] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. Because it ultimately goes to the council.
[01:01:44] Speaker 1
Yes. So for right now, our recommendation as I count is to oppose. Um,
[01:01:54] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:53–01:01:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:01:57] Speaker 1
The rezoning based solely on, um, notes 18 a. And 18 H. We believe that those notes, um, do not meet,
[01:02:09] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
qualifications.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:02:09–01:02:10 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:02:15] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:02:15–01:02:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:16] Speaker 6 · Machine re-recognized
Next item.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:02:16–01:02:17 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:02:26] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:02:26–01:02:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:42] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
We can move to the next item.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:02:42–01:02:49 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[01:02:46] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Next item.
[01:02:47] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
Yeah, we're going to move to the next
[01:02:49] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:49–01:02:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:51] Speaker 1
23
[01:02:51] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:51–01:02:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:02:54] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:02:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
a compliment amendment. So we have our city manager, Stockton
[01:02:59] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:59–01:03:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:02] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
And also we have Abigail Morgan, there's the city engineer. If the board has any questions and ‸ we also have Charlene Norderman
[01:03:12] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:11–01:03:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
questions related to the SR 524.
[01:03:23] Speaker 17
Let
[01:03:23] Speaker 17 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:23–01:03:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:26] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:03:30] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:03:37] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:03:40] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:03:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:03:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:03:47] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes.
[01:03:48] Speaker 5
20 what was it?
[01:03:49] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:03:49–01:04:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:03:56] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:03:59] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:03:59] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:03:59] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[01:04:23] Speaker 3
‸ Right, sir.
[01:04:23] Speaker 1
Yes, sir. Please.
[01:04:24] Speaker 3
Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the board. My
[01:04:27] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:27–01:04:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:04:31] Speaker 3
I'll try to take you through this item. This item is a text amendment to the transportation element in the capital improvement element of the comprehensive plan. It proposes to remove minimum level of service standards for State Road 524. As you all are aware, 524 is located in the city of Cocoa, but under the jurisdiction of the state of Florida, specifically Florida Department of Transportation. I'm going to talk about some transportation terms and again, as Lucy said, Abigail Morgan is the city's public works director and city engineer. And so if you have questions with regards to those specific traffic, traffic related issues, Abby is here to help. And so as we look at this, we basically talk about the maximum allowable volumes and levels of services that are particularly specific to this roadway. This roadway is divided into three segments, I-95
[01:05:47] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:46–01:05:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:05:55] Speaker 3
‸ I-95 to Cox Road and then Cox Road to ‸ Industry Road. The
[01:06:06] Attribution uncertain
maximum
[01:06:06] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:06:06–01:06:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:16] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
the roadway type, the roadway characteristics, traffic characteristics, traffic control, multimodal considerations, And generally, the higher the level of service, the more efficient those operating conditions are, the more efficient the roadway is considered to be. And
[01:06:38] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:38–01:06:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:42] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
screen better than on the ‸ larger screen there, but it gives you ‸ the FDOT level of service. And you'll note for this
[01:06:51] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
row,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:51–01:06:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:06:51] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
the current
[01:06:52] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:51–01:06:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:06:55] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
this change, the projected level of service is E. I'll note for you in the ordinance that's contained in your packet that if you note just by comparison the various levels of service within the city, you'll
[01:07:11] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:11–01:07:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:15] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
city are minimum level of service E and D. And so when you look at our roadway system, you don't see any C's or higher, which again was sort of surprising to me. But again, that's the current level of service standards that we have within the city of Cocoa. And
[01:07:39] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:39–01:07:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:07:43] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
specifically into the issue at hand, when you look at the latest traffic counts and the maximum allowable volumes, these counts are actually conducted by the Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization. And again, the new term that you haven't seen, which is on the chart, the last column on this chart is the average annual daily traffic. And
[01:08:07] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:07–01:08:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:13] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
of the of the Mav and the average annual daily traffic. And
[01:08:18] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:18–01:08:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:24] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
you can see that the average annual daily
[01:08:27] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:26–01:08:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:08:33] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I-95 to Cox Road, the average annual daily traffic counts were 12,870. And then from Cox Road to Industry Road, 14,380. And so again, to sort of home in on the issue, when you when you throw those counts against the approved projects already on the roadway, again, south of south of I-95 running I-95 to 520, you can see and I'm just going to draw your attention to the last column. You can see that there are plenty of remaining trips on that segment of the road. When you look at I-95 to Cox Road, you can see that that number gets smaller and there are only 4,142 remaining trips on the road. From Cox Road to Industry Road really is where the issue is. And you can see that when you throw those numbers against the projects that are currently approved, again, the Arbors, Sears Apartment, Dollar General. Dollar
[01:09:50] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:49–01:09:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:09:53] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:09:53] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
so there the Arbors is not currently CO'd, right? Yeah. That's the one that's told, right? And so you can see that there is a deficit there. That deficit is 896 trips. And this gives you sort of a graphic look at those different segments. This one shows you from 520 to I-95. The vested projects are in green. The projects that are under review are denoted by the orange sort of boxes there. You can see in this section we have two projects that are under review and we have no vested projects. Again, if you refer back to the previous slide, you can see that there's plenty of capacity on that side, on that section of the roadway. If
[01:10:50] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:49–01:10:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:10:55] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
you can see that there are three projects under review. And I apologize. I have it listed,
[01:11:00] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:00–01:11:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:06] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:11:08] Speaker 3
It's preserved, but I have it listed as something. And
[01:11:11] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:11–01:11:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:15] Speaker 3
unique about that is that that is coming to us as a result of not only, obviously, the developer wants to develop single-family homes there, but what's unique about that circumstance is that the
[01:11:31] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:31–01:11:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:34] Speaker 3
the stipulated settlement agreement. And if you need more details on that, I think the assistant city attorney can ‸ actually advise you on that. And
[01:11:44] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:43–01:11:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:11:47] Speaker 3
But ‸ there are a number of trips that are going to be associated with that particular project that, again, by agreement, the city has already committed to at least review that development proposal as a result of a court settlement with the county.
[01:12:08] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:12:08] Speaker 3
I'll let Kristen add anything if she ‸ cares to add on to that. From Cox to Industry Road, again, where we have the issue, there are currently two projects under review, and there are four vested projects. And
[01:12:29] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:12:29–01:12:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:34] Speaker 3
In some cases, they're up and operating. And in other cases, they may not have started. But again,
[01:12:42] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:41–01:12:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:47] Speaker 3
So
[01:12:47] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:47–01:12:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:12:52] Speaker 3
You know, obviously, roadway improvements lead to economic development and growth ‸ of the tax base. And so this is just simply giving you a very simple sort of, you know, one plus one equals two. And again, you
[01:13:11] Attribution uncertain
know,
[01:13:11] Speaker 3
the roadway improvements will allow the city to continue to grow. It will increase its tax base, obviously, tax base funds, those core services of government, such as police and
[01:13:23] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:23–01:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:13:30] Speaker 3
and here we go. So section 163.3180 of Florida Statutes renders transportation concurrency optional. And so per the state transportation concurrency, the need to have those minimum level of service is optional. And it's been optional since, I think, 2011 or before that point in time. Again, 524 is a state road, and the city has no authority, no ability to control the schedule and construction of capital projects to increase the capacity of the road. And so we're sort of handcuffed by the state's ability or willingness or financial ability or willingness to actually improve that roadway. And
[01:14:22] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:21–01:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:26] Speaker 3
approve projects that will enhance and grow the city and community and obviously the tax base. Again, I listed here one
[01:14:35] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:35–01:14:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:38] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:14:38] Speaker 3
then,
[01:14:38] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:38–01:14:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:40] Speaker 3
‸ the stipulated settlement agreement that is associated with that project. Most of these projects are going to take some time, and they're not going to come online at the same time. And
[01:14:52] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:52–01:14:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:14:56] Speaker 3
and so we don't anticipate that all of the traffic associated or the traffic volume or the numbers associated with these projects are going to come on the roadway at one particular point in time. And
[01:15:09] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:09–01:15:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:15] Speaker 3
tax amendment with a plan going forward, let me talk a little bit about that. And so the city gets impact fees from developments that can be ‸ utilized to accelerate the
[01:15:29] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:29–01:15:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:15:32] Speaker 3
Again, it's a state road, and so it's kind of, if you will, perhaps out of the box to actually say we're going to participate as a sort of smaller entity with a larger entity to provide some financial assistance in moving that project ‸ along. That's because of the critical nature of actually addressing this issue. Again, that's our growth area. And again, if we don't address this problem, then we are not able to approve projects. We're not able to, again, grow the tax base and all of those things that I've previously advised. And so once the improvement project is complete, the roadway capacity will grow beyond what is currently needed. And I think in your package, you actually have one PDF that actually talks about what those remaining trips will be after the project, after the roadway is widened. And
[01:16:36] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:36–01:16:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:16:43] Speaker 3
segments that I've highlighted previously. The city is actually working with the Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization, the Florida Department of Transportation, and the county to leverage funds and apply for grants to accelerate the project. So let me just talk about where the state is with regards to that project. The
[01:17:19] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:19–01:17:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:22] Speaker 3
planning phase is completed. The project development and environmental study phase will be at final draft in September of this year. And
[01:17:34] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:34–01:17:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:41] Speaker 3
completion. The
[01:17:42] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:42–01:17:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:17:49] Speaker 3
week, just as of this week. The design is estimated to be $6.5 million. The right-of-way acquisition is estimated to be $17.3 million. And the construction is $54.5 million. Again, those numbers include a section from, not from a 520 to I-95, but from, are we calling that South Friday Road? Yes. So from South Friday Road to I-95. Well, that's only a couple of hundred feet, but that includes an interchange, a redesign, and reconstruction there. And
[01:18:29] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:29–01:18:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:18:31] Speaker 3
And then from I-95 to Cox Road is a basic widening project. And then from Cox to Industry is a basic widening project also. And so, again, to bring you a plan that addresses the facilitation or the hastening of the project, I want to talk a little bit about our sort of fiscal plan, our plan to at least engage the FDOT in terms of what the city can do to move the project along. The city currently has approximately $4 to $5 million in impact fee revenues. Those projects that were listed on the maps will bring in
[01:19:26] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:26–01:19:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:32] Speaker 3
And
[01:19:33] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:32–01:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:19:42] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
cost
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:19:42–01:19:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:19:43] Speaker 3
Generally, once the design is ‸ funded and addressed, FDOT moves that project within the five-year plan horizon. And
[01:19:55] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:54–01:20:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:00] Speaker 3
that 524 is the number four ranked project on the ‸ Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization's overall project ranking. Last year, it was ranked number 11. And so it's moved from number 11 to number four. State
[01:20:19] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:18–01:20:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:20:26] Speaker 3
project listing or the project ranking. Last year, that was number six or seven. And so we've engaged Space Coast TPO with regards to the urgency of this project. And you can see that the rankings have moved up. Generally, if you are within those sort of the top tier, the top five, then we're looking at do we get into the five-year ‸ planning horizon and five-year project horizon. And so we will be looking at ‸ fiscal year or project plan year 2029. That is, ‸ those rankings come out in September or sometime this fall. And
[01:21:12] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:12–01:21:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:16] Speaker 3
they're submitted to the Florida Department of Transportation. Generally, the Florida Department of Transportation relies heavily on what's submitted through
[01:21:28] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:27–01:21:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:21:33] Speaker 3 · Machine re-recognized
We're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:33–01:21:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:21:33] Speaker 3
also the state TPO are applying for and have ‸ benefit of the governor's new initiative, which is moving Florida forward funding. And so that may be a potential opportunity for funding that seeks to or can facilitate acceleration of the project. And again, as you all are aware, and we heard a lot about the federal infrastructure bill. And so, again, it's our intent through the partnerships with Space Coast Transportation and with FDOT to actually seek funding there. And
[01:22:09] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:08–01:22:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:22:20] Speaker 3
for some period of time, perhaps. But also that we have a plan going forward in terms of we're going to utilize the $8 to $10 million to either assist in funding the design or assist in funding the second phase, which is right-of-way acquisition. The right-of-way acquisition really is primarily associated with stormwater retention. And
[01:22:47] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:47–01:22:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:22:56] Speaker 3
state in doing that. We think there's sufficient right-of-way to do that. And so optimistic that, again, the $17.3 million that they listed for the right-of-way acquisition is an
[01:23:10] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:09–01:23:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:12] Speaker 3
number or a large number. And
[01:23:14] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:13–01:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:23] Speaker 3
and capital improvement element. And
[01:23:26] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:26–01:23:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:23:27] Speaker 3
take questions if you have them, sir.
[01:23:37] Speaker 6
I appreciate staff being proactive on this. I think it's a fantastic answer to a looming problem, looming question that we have here. And we've always known for many, many years that 524 was going to blow up. And
[01:23:57] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:56–01:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:24:00] Speaker 6
this. And
[01:24:01] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:01–01:24:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:24:07] Speaker 5
All the information that we've received. It's a good project. And
[01:24:11] Attribution uncertain
we
[01:24:11] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
got all this. I cannot believe the amount of work that you all have done. It's unbelievable. Yes, good job. And very, very professionally done. I'm
[01:24:23] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:22–01:24:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:24:29] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm
[01:24:30] Attribution uncertain
ready to
[01:24:30] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:29–01:24:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:24:32] Attribution uncertain
this
[01:24:42] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:24:54] Speaker 1
Do I have anybody from the audience that would like to make comment on this at all?
[01:24:57] No voice detected
I
[01:24:58] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:24:57–01:24:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
It's a deal.
[01:25:04] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Cleroy
[01:25:05] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:04–01:25:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:05] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
doesn't have to fill out a card. Yeah, we all know.
[01:25:09] Speaker 21
Yes,
[01:25:10] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:25:09–01:25:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:11] Speaker 21
I'm
[01:25:11] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:25:11–01:25:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:15] Speaker 21
And
[01:25:15] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:15–01:25:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:20] Speaker 21
attention. They're based on the ‸ process. I'm a committed because from 95 East to Cox Road. And from Cox Road to Industry Road is a nice event. For all of us that live in that area, ‸ it's just nice to sit here tonight.
[01:25:40] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:25:40] Speaker 21
to
[01:25:40] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:25:40–01:25:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:25:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:25:41] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:25:42] Speaker 21
going to happen for us because of the staff's intervention. It's
[01:25:56] Speaker 5
a necessity.
[01:25:57] Speaker 21
And I've been out there, my first house
[01:25:59] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:59–01:26:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:26:02] Speaker 21
So, I'm back
[01:26:06] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:06–01:26:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:26:08] Speaker 3
Mr. Chairman, let me make sure. I don't want to oversell it or I don't want to promise things that I can't promise or deliver there. And
[01:26:18] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:18–01:26:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:26:21] Speaker 3
But, you know, what I presented to you is aspirational. And so, you know, we're going to be at the table with FDOT, a transportation planning organization, has promised to be there with us. Again, trying to push them to accept some city dollars to actually accelerate the design of the project. And so, we're there pushing. But, again, this is their state road. And ultimately, the ball is in their court with regards to this particular project. So, I just wanted to make that clear.
[01:27:06] Speaker 8
I did have
[01:27:07] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
one question for the city manager. And I don't want to run down a rabbit hole and I want to get off on track here. But most people don't realize that 524 ends at Industry Road at the post office. When
[01:27:25] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:25–01:27:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:27:32] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
a county road. When the Walmart was approved 20 years ago, when I was on the council, we fought at the time to get Walmart to four lane that from Michigan to industry. Unfortunately, we lost that battle. That's going to create a bottleneck over time. Is
[01:27:56] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:56–01:28:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:02] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice
Is
[01:28:02] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:02–01:28:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:08] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
the transportation planning organization
[01:28:10] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:28:10–01:28:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:28:10] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
actually put, I think, in the kitty. I
[01:28:15] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:15–01:28:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:18] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
I
[01:28:18] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:18–01:28:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
And
[01:28:24] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:23–01:28:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:30] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
of it. And ‸ so they're very interested in that. I think that design is actually funded. And
[01:28:37] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:37–01:28:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:42] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
They may be just above us in terms of ranked priority. So
[01:28:46] Speaker 6
the timeline will be somewhere within the same 12, 18 months, probably, something like that.
[01:28:51] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
Yeah,
[01:28:51] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:51–01:28:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:28:58] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
‸ And again, I know you guys don't want to be here all night, but you also reminded me that, you know, as we ‸ look towards perhaps a Brightline station, I've been told that 524 used to run
[01:29:20] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:19–01:29:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:22] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well, it ran all the way to the port. Okay. ‸ And so I know that at one particular point in time in discussions with Brightline engineer, he was excited, at least for the moment, about the possibility of that roadway doing that again.
[01:29:40] Speaker 6
Yeah,
[01:29:41] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:40–01:29:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:29:49] Speaker 3
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
[01:29:53] Speaker 1
Okay. So, all right. So just so I'm understanding correctly, because, wow. Sorry, it's been a long day. So
[01:30:06] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:05–01:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:09] Speaker 1
Or no?
[01:30:11] Speaker 3
Yeah, we're removing the level of service.
[01:30:13] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:30:13] Speaker 3
so
[01:30:13] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:13–01:30:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:15] Speaker 3
Okay.
[01:30:16] Attribution uncertain
We're
[01:30:16] Speaker 1
moving.
[01:30:16] Speaker 3
Yeah. And so if you if you if you look at your ordinance, we would strike it from that roadway from the transportation element, and we would strike it from the capital improvements element. Okay.
[01:30:33] Speaker 1
And
[01:30:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:30:33–01:30:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:30:55] Speaker 11
So maybe maybe this just to put it plainly. Currently, the level of service means that the any projects that come before the board would need to meet that minimum. And so what will happen if we remove the level of service is that that will no longer be a basis to deny a project. Right. If the if State Road 524 would fall below a level of service D
[01:31:28] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:27–01:31:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:34] Speaker 11
That would not be a basis to deny a project that impacts 524 going forward. So I just want to be clear.
[01:31:44] Speaker 1
There's a level of risk.
[01:31:46] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah.
[01:31:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:46–01:31:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:31:54] Speaker 1
You know, I'd see in here the level of service exhibit details what the various letter rankings mean during peak hours.
[01:32:01] Attribution uncertain
The
[01:32:01] Speaker 1
roadway will likely be similar to State
[01:32:04] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:04–01:32:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:32:11] No voice detected
Yeah.
[01:32:12] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
There's no
[01:32:12] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
there's no level of service on that section of roadway. Right. And
[01:32:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
FDOT just took away a lane from both directions from us through the village. And that's just caused all kinds of mayhem through there.
[01:32:31] Speaker 3
Right. Yeah. Yeah. That's so ‸ that'll get better. And
[01:32:35] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:35–01:32:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:32:38] Attribution uncertain
And
[01:32:38] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
so
[01:32:38] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:38–01:32:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:32:42] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
designed to to to slow traffic down through the village. But again, that that written in the agenda report was just to illustrate that there are sections that have no level of service. Uh, minimum standard currently. And that's one of the sections. Yeah.
[01:33:06] Speaker 1
Okay. All right. All
[01:33:09] Attribution uncertain
right.
[01:33:09] Speaker 1
Are there any other questions or concerns or deliberation that this board would like to make before? Before we make our motion.
[01:33:27] Speaker 18
Yeah, I just want to say that I do support taking this away, but I find it interesting that those of us who scrutinize. The level of freedom we're giving those others like the city. Are willing to give the freedom back to the city to build. Carb launch. We'll just say
[01:33:45] Speaker 6 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
by
[01:33:46] Speaker 18
taking away this restriction. Uh, again, I, I, I support it, but I mean, uh, should we not send it back to them and ask for how to impact the citizens? If we, uh, if we do this and. Whether there's going to be flooding involved if, uh, they expand the roadway. All right.
[01:34:03] Attribution uncertain
I,
[01:34:03] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I just see that. That's it. And
[01:34:06] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:06–01:34:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:08] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
I have it myself. So, uh, yeah, I just like us to think about that when we, when we make these approvals and things like that. So that's all I have to say. Thank you.
[01:34:22] Speaker 1
Yeah, because, uh, I know, especially from earlier when we talked about E, one of the considerations was traffic on range road. And now we're essentially taking that away from one of the items that they have to.
[01:34:41] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Continue
[01:34:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:41–01:34:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:48] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:34:50] Speaker 6 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:34:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:34:52] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:34:53] Speaker 1
I understand that. But at the same time. With these in place, we're already at. ‸ Stage or number two and number four.
[01:35:04] Speaker 18
And what's funny is I support this because I know that the FDOT responds to emergency more than necessity.
[01:35:12] Speaker 21
Yeah.
[01:35:13] Speaker 18
So that's why, you know what
[01:35:14] Attribution uncertain
I
[01:35:14] Speaker 18
mean? But I just, yeah. So that's
[01:35:16] Speaker 18 · Machine re-recognized
unfortunately
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:35:16–01:35:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:35:16] Speaker 18
what I understand.
[01:35:17] Attribution uncertain
Sadly,
[01:35:17] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yes. I, I hate to agree with that. But also, again, I go back to Cocoa Village and I show, and
[01:35:25] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:25–01:35:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:32] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:35:33] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
strong. They're so strong. You can't really fight them. Yeah. So. Um. And I don't like what happened on 520 also. And I'm on that a lot. Yeah. Because I have to service things in the village. But. It is what it is. I mean, it did, it does slow down the traffic. Oh, it definitely has already. Not that we needed it. Well, yeah, but it, it is good for the downtown area though. That was a major raceway there. And, um, it, I was hoping that they would put a median in the middle for landscaping and all that and have the double lanes on opposite side of the median
[01:36:14] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:36:13–01:36:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:15] Attribution uncertain
it was.
[01:36:15] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:36:15] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:36:20] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:19–01:36:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:22] Speaker 5
But.
[01:36:23] Speaker 1
All right. Um, so there's no further discussion on. The item in front of us.
[01:36:34] Speaker 5
I'll make a motion that, uh, we approve according to the staff recommendations.
[01:36:42] Speaker 18
Yeah. I'll
[01:36:42] Attribution uncertain
second
[01:36:42] Speaker 18
that.
[01:36:44] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
I have a motion. I
[01:36:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
have
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:45–01:36:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:36:45] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
a second. All right. Um, all
[01:36:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:50–01:36:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:36:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Are there any opposed? None heard.
[01:37:00] No voice detected
Thank you. Approved.
[01:37:04] Speaker 1
My pot. Item B. 23
[01:37:16] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:15–01:37:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:23] Speaker 1
Looks
[01:37:24] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:23–01:37:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:26] Speaker 1
Yeah.
[01:37:27] Speaker 17
Mr. Chair, sir. I need to recuse myself. I live in Adamson Creek subdivision.
[01:37:33] No voice detected
Okay.
[01:37:35] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So, Mr. We will have, um, a form for you to fill out and then it'll go in the minutes, um, as well. So just make sure you, uh, contact, uh, Monica. To get a form and
[01:37:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
then Kristen, um, for this, how
[01:37:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:50–01:37:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
About
[01:37:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:53–01:37:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:37:54] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:37:54] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:37:56] Speaker 1
How would we decide about a tie?
[01:37:58] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:37:58–01:37:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:37:58] Speaker 1
we have eight.
[01:37:59] Attribution uncertain
Oh,
[01:38:00] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:59–01:38:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:01] Speaker 11
if a tie occurred, um, then the motion fails. So,
[01:38:05] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:38:05–01:38:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:07] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:38:18] No voice detected
Yeah.
[01:38:27] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 01:38:27–01:38:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:28] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:38:30] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:38:32] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:38:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:38:37] Speaker 10
for
[01:38:38] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:38:37–01:38:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:39] Speaker 10
have Adamson Creek phase two ‸ this is the final phase for the I
[01:38:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:44–01:38:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:50] Speaker 10
this project are the development agreement,
[01:38:53] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:52–01:38:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:38:59] Speaker 10
development, a preliminary subdivision, and approval for large-scale site plan I'm sure everyone
[01:39:11] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:10–01:39:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:14] Speaker 10
area
[01:39:15] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:14–01:39:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:18] Speaker 10
that was a Adamson Creek phase one that also was divided in multiple phases three
[01:39:25] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:25–01:39:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:26] Speaker 10
the years, since 2006. This will be the final submittal and approval for this area. As you can see, the location is just west of the 95 and north of the 524 State Road. So
[01:39:52] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:52–01:39:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:39:58] Speaker 10
combination of very low density residential and conservation, as
[01:40:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:40:01–01:40:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:08] Speaker 10
for a county residential as well. We have a portion of, that is located to the east of this parcel that is still
[01:40:18] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
county
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:18–01:40:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:40:18] Speaker 10
residential.
[01:40:19] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:18–01:40:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:30] Speaker 10
spaces and entities that will include a walking path surrounding by a stocked stormwater pond along with the fishing platform and other open spaces areas. in the subdivisions the
[01:40:45] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:44–01:40:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:40:50] Speaker 10
feet The development agreement proposes that the project contains 70
[01:41:04] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:04–01:41:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:05] Speaker 10
75 acres overall. The development will take 14 acres of space and a conservation easement will be designated to the city for a total approximately 50 acres. And
[01:41:22] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:20–01:41:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:26] Speaker 10
the Arbor mitigation bank. Here you can see the area that is going to be dedicated as a conservation easement on the right side of the of the map. Here we have our zoning that now is our
[01:41:46] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:46–01:41:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:49] Speaker 10
will be resumed to PUD as the items
[01:41:53] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:52–01:41:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:41:53] Speaker 10
Creek neighborhood to the north. here's our ‸ future land use for this parcel for
[01:42:04] No voice detected
this
[01:42:06] Attribution uncertain
parcel
[01:42:06] Speaker 10
Staff made a
[01:42:08] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
pod
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:08–01:42:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:42:08] Speaker 10
analysis to the to this project and the
[01:42:13] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:12–01:42:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:16] Speaker 10
the developers proposing last than a unit per acre. The proposed single-family development will be compatible with the whole adamson
[01:42:26] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:25–01:42:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:26] Speaker 10
neighborhood and all the residential properties surrounding that area. The
[01:42:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:33–01:42:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:36] Speaker 10
gives the developer flexibility with
[01:42:39] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:39–01:42:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:42:39] Speaker 10
design to promote conservation for the low ad the
[01:42:42] Attribution uncertain
land
[01:42:42] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
wetlands preservation
[01:42:43] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:43–01:42:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:42:44] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
a more efficiently used management, securing
[01:42:48] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:46–01:42:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:42:55] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
a part of the site plan analysis, our traffic signal warrant study was required by the public works department. And after discussion with the Brevard County and FDOT and um a traffic signal warrant was required. So the the planning ‸ zoning department um is making a recommendation that um further improvements
[01:43:23] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:23–01:43:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:43:33] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Also the
[01:43:34] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
plat, the preliminary plat
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:34–01:43:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:43:36] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
that it was provided. ‸ is not being finalized and we
[01:43:42] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
had
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:42–01:43:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:43:42] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
comments from a third party surveyor the comments were attached as um as an exhibit with your package and the developer as with the engineering team will address those comments ‸ the
[01:43:55] Attribution uncertain
comments
[01:43:55] Speaker 10
before the next city council meeting that is july 25th So staffs recommends the planning ‸ zoning board recommend approval to the city
[01:44:09] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:09–01:44:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:13] Speaker 10
adamson
[01:44:14] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:13–01:44:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:14] Speaker 10
phase 2
[01:44:15] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:14–01:44:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:15] Speaker 10
approval of the adamson
[01:44:17] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:16–01:44:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:17] Speaker 10
phase 2
[01:44:18] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:17–01:44:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:18] Speaker 10
agreement between the city
[01:44:20] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:20–01:44:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:25] Speaker 10
approval
[01:44:26] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:25–01:44:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:32–01:44:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:38] Speaker 10
the preliminary plat to conform with the plat review comments provided by Southeastern
[01:44:44] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:43–01:44:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:44:48] Speaker 10
also provide traffic control at intersection of 524 and Adamson Road as determined by FDOT. Staff recommends approval
[01:45:00] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:59–01:45:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:45:07] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:45:07] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:07–01:45:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:17] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:15–01:45:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:45:32] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
We do have the applicant here and the engineer just to let you know if you have any questions also for ‸ the developer and the engineer. They're present. Now
[01:45:43] Speaker 1
with the traffic control, are you are you saying like a stoplight? Is that what you're saying?
[01:45:48] Speaker 10
Well, the recommendation, yeah, the warrant it was for a stoplight but after the county in FDOT FDOT just did a preliminary
[01:45:57] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
they still want the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:45:57–01:45:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:45:59] Speaker 10
review, but the county, since the items
[01:46:02] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:02–01:46:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:02] Speaker 10
it
[01:46:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:02–01:46:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:11] Speaker 10
be sufficient since maybe road markings or any other type of improvement and then traffic light but also it was determined that it would be taking considerations FDOT recommendations
[01:46:26] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:25–01:46:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:29] Speaker 10
we were waiting to see what those recommendations are to be able to discuss that with the
[01:46:37] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
with the developer. And according to according to this, it's um upon
[01:46:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:46–01:46:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:53] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:52–01:46:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:46:54] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:46:55] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:46:57] Speaker 1
recommendations from county and FDOT
[01:46:59] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
yes that's correct
[01:47:00] Speaker 1
before they begin phase two
[01:47:02] Speaker 10
yeah that's correct. For for them to be granted the site plan approval as well as the, you know, preliminary subdivision, the the development agreement and everything else that's being requested tonight.
[01:47:18] Speaker 1
And you said the engineer is here?
[01:47:21] Speaker 10
Yes, he's here.
[01:47:22] Speaker 1
‸ Real quick, does ‸ anybody on the ‸ board have any questions for the city?
[01:47:32] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:29–01:47:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:47:33] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:47:35] Speaker 10
here Abigail Morgan if you have any technical
[01:47:37] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
questions
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:37–01:47:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:47:38] Speaker 10
related to that ‸ She was part of the decision, of process, ‸ process decision. okay
[01:47:46] Speaker 1
okay
[01:47:52] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:47:46–01:47:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:47:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:47:52] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:47:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:47:56] Speaker 20 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:47:56] Speaker 20 + overlapping voice
sorry it's okay
[01:47:57] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
sorry I
[01:47:59] Attribution uncertain
think
[01:47:59] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
that's
[01:47:59] Attribution uncertain
true
[01:48:00] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
I think that's true I do thank you good
[01:48:03] Speaker 20 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:02–01:48:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:08] Speaker 20 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
engineer I think in contrast ‸ to the case we heard earlier this one because it is a We
[01:48:17] Speaker 20 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:37]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:17–01:52:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:48:54] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
[01:49:04] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:04] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:49:06] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:49:08] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:08] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:49:08] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:49:11] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:38]
[01:49:49] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:49:53] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[01:50:01] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:50:01] Speaker 20 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:12]
[01:50:14] Speaker 15 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:50:16] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[01:50:24] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[01:50:31] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:28]
[01:50:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[01:51:08] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:25]
[01:51:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[01:51:42] Speaker 20 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[01:51:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:51:52] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[01:51:56] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:51:56] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:51:58] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:51:58] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:51:59] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:15]
[01:52:14] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:14] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:52:16] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:16] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:17] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:17] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:52:22] Speaker 5
Yes, thank you. My compliments on phase one. The work you've all have done over there is beautiful. The other thing that I noticed, what is the dimensions of the pond that you're referring to? Is that around two or three acres approximately?
[01:52:42] Speaker 20
Yeah.
[01:52:43] Speaker 5
It is?
[01:52:44] Speaker 20
That
[01:52:44] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:44–01:52:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:52:47] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:52:47] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:52:48] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:52:51] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:52:52] Speaker 5
There's a lot of information here, so. A roundabout. It doesn't have to be specific. It
[01:52:59] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:59–01:53:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:01] Speaker 5
because you are basically not involving any of the other property that you have, and it's good that that could ‸ be made available for your extra fill that you were saying. For that pond. I think it's a very nice plan.
[01:53:18] Speaker 20
Yeah, we tried to minimize the, there's only one small level in the past. Other than that, it was fortunate that there was a continuous space that we were kind of up front.
[01:53:31] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 01:53:31–01:53:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:34] Speaker 5
‸ Well, I think you should let it be known more often publicly about the rest of the property that you're not developing. That's really a major positive thing about your project. Thank you.
[01:53:48] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
I
[01:53:48] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:53:48–01:54:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:53:53] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:53:54] Attribution uncertain
uh,
[01:53:55] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[01:54:03] No voice detected
Thank
[01:54:03] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:54:03–01:54:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:54:05] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:54:10] Speaker 1
Any more comments or questions?
[01:54:14] Speaker 19
It's good. It's good.
[01:54:20] Speaker 9
We provided FDOP the
[01:54:22] Speaker 17 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
traffic impacts.
[01:54:31] Speaker 19
Chair, if no further comment, I will go ahead and make a motion.
[01:54:34] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I think we have to open up to the public.
[01:54:38] Speaker 19
I'm ready to roll.
[01:54:48] Speaker 1
I have a.
[01:55:08] Speaker 5
We can't hear you.
[01:55:10] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
Speak into
[01:55:11] Speaker 4
the microphone.
[01:55:11] Speaker 5
Speak
[01:55:12] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
into
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:55:12–01:55:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:55:12] Speaker 5
the microphone. We couldn't hear you.
[01:55:14] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
There
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:55:14–01:55:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:55:14] Speaker 5
you go. I
[01:55:14] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:14–01:55:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:55:15] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:55:25] Speaker 17 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:55:26] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09]
[01:55:36] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:55:36] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:55:43] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:55:44] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
[01:55:52] Speaker 1
there any other comments from the audience. Okay. I don't have any further. This is very well detailed. This
[01:56:24] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:23–01:56:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:56:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:56:34] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:56:36] Speaker 1
I've been back there. It's very, very nice. Very neat. If we have nothing further
[01:56:46] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:13]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:45–01:56:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:56:59] Speaker 1
entertain a motion if we have one.
[01:57:02] Speaker 19
I'll make the motion.
[01:57:04] Speaker 1
I'll second it. What is your motion, sir?
[01:57:08] Speaker 5
Okay.
[01:57:09] Attribution uncertain
That
[01:57:09] Speaker 5
we follow the staff guidelines that are ‸ in the
[01:57:13] Speaker 13 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
approval process. Yes.
[01:57:14] Speaker 5
There you go. Is
[01:57:15] Attribution uncertain
that what
[01:57:15] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you wanted to say? Yes. Okay. All of the above. Yes.
[01:57:20] Speaker 1
Okay. So, for the record, you're making the motion. ‸ To approve ordinance 10.
[01:57:29] Speaker 19
To approve ordinance 10. Okay.
[01:57:32] Attribution uncertain
You
[01:57:32] Speaker 19
want me to actually read it. Okay.
[01:57:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I just, so for the record. Yep. All
[01:57:37] Speaker 19
right. So, I'm making the motion to
[01:57:38] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:38–01:57:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:57:42] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:57:43] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:57:46] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
That actually made it a little worse. Oh,
[01:57:49] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:57:48–01:57:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:57:50] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:57:52] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:57:52] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:57:53] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
The recommendations need to be included.
[01:57:55] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
Yes,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:57:55–01:57:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:57:55] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well, and also because the ordinance deals with the PUD, but it doesn't, it doesn't address, for example, the preliminary subdivision. So, there's multiple things.
[01:58:05] Attribution uncertain
Which is
[01:58:05] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
in section
[01:58:05] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
C.
[01:58:06] Speaker 11
Right. So, so I would suggest maybe reading the, reading the, um, motion as presented on the screen.
[01:58:15] Speaker 1
So,
[01:58:15] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:58:15–01:58:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:58:16] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[01:58:18] Speaker 11
Yes.
[01:58:19] Speaker 19
Okay. So,
[01:58:20] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:19–01:58:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:58:23] Speaker 19
a rezoning ordinance, 10-2023 of one parcel
[01:58:28] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:27–01:58:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:58:33] Speaker 19
a large scale site plan preliminary subdivision consistent with chapter 18 subdivisions and appendix A zoning of the city code and development agreement for Addison Creek phase two in conjunction with
[01:58:44] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:44–01:58:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:58:48] Speaker 19
scale site plan development agreement. I learned pretty quick.
[01:58:51] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. With the conditions recommended by staff.
[01:58:54] Speaker 19
With
[01:58:54] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:54–01:59:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:58:57] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[01:58:58] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[01:59:01] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:59:06] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[01:59:09] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All in favor, say aye. Aye. Are
[01:59:14] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:14–01:59:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:19] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Motion.
[01:59:21] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:19–01:59:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:24] Speaker 1
Okay. That was for B and C. We can go on to D.
[01:59:33] Speaker 10
The next agenda item ‸ central reward
[01:59:35] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:59:35–01:59:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:35] Speaker 10
is the zoning map amendment. Integration
[01:59:42] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:17]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:59:41–01:59:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:59:59] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:58–02:00:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:04] Speaker 10
the capacity of the existing operations facility on Aurora Street. The nonprofit organization provides emergency assistance and guidance to those in our community who are struggling to obtain life's most basic needs. They have been serving the community since 1978. The proposed rezoning is not contrary to the established land use pattern, which is commercial to the north and single family residential to the south and
[02:00:31] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:30–02:00:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:36] Speaker 10
property directly to the east. The rezoning will provide a transitional use between the heavier commercial uses along 520 and the single family residential uses to the south and east. And we provide a natural expansion
[02:00:50] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:49–02:00:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:00:55] Speaker 10
Here we have a location, the property that was
[02:01:00] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:59–02:01:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:01:04] Speaker 10
And
[02:01:05] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:04–02:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:01:10] Speaker 10
Here we have our current zoning as a single family residential.
[02:01:16] Speaker 4
No,
[02:01:18] Speaker 10
I can't see. Sorry. I'm like, I can't
[02:01:20] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice
try to start to see that. Is
[02:01:21] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:21–02:01:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:01:22] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
There's no city zoning. Oh yeah, there's no city zoning.
[02:01:25] Attribution uncertain
I
[02:01:25] Speaker 10
apologize. Okay. So this whole area has no city zoning assigned as you can see, not just this particular property, but the surrounding areas as well.
[02:01:36] Speaker 11
But it is currently county single family residential. RU19.
[02:01:41] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:39–02:01:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:01:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[02:01:46] Speaker 10
Yes, that's correct. And here is just our feature land use. There
[02:01:54] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:54–02:01:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:01:59] Speaker 10
So staff has determined this amendment to be consistent with both the code of the city of Cocoa
[02:02:04] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:04–02:02:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:02:08] Speaker 10
recommends that the planning zoning board recommends approval to the city council of the zoning map amendment consistent with appendix a zoning article 22 to change the official zoning map designation ‸ of one parcel from the Brevard
[02:02:23] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:22–02:02:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:02:26] Speaker 10
the city
[02:02:27] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:27–02:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:02:33] Speaker 10
And I believe we do have some local residents that would like to also have something to say for this agenda, particular agenda item.
[02:02:45] Speaker 19
So,
[02:02:46] Attribution uncertain
let
[02:02:46] Speaker 19 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:45–02:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:02:50] Speaker 19
I'm asking staff. Well, I do reside in that area and I do have a question. So should I recuse myself? Or should I just ask my question?
[02:03:04] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
How close do you live?
[02:03:06] Speaker 19
It is it is not within the app. Well, that's what I'm getting my maps. It's not within the outline maps, but this Aurora I'm very familiar with this area. Aurora runs when you're coming off of King Street 520 and you take Aurora down. I live in Pine Grove Park, which is going to be and forgive me north, south, east and west is like telling me which way the sun rose. But I live in Pine Grove Park, which is literally single family residence that is coming off of that. So that's where I reside. So I have a question more than anything in regards to the intended use. So I think it's fear for me to ask that. But I just wanted to put that out there right up front. So it would be no questions about what I what I was what I am thinking.
[02:04:00] Speaker 11
Did
[02:04:00] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:00–02:04:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:04:02] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[02:04:04] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[02:04:06] Attribution uncertain
That's correct.
[02:04:06] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
OK. So as long as you feel that you're able to be an impartial decision maker. OK. I don't believe you're it's required that you recuse yourself. But again, that would be a decision for you if you feel you can't can't make a decision, you know,
[02:04:23] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
understood. I think I'm I'm pretty good with a neutral position.
[02:04:29] Speaker 10
I just want to point out the applicant is here
[02:04:32] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:32–02:04:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:04:35] Speaker 10
questions for the applicant.
[02:04:41] Speaker 1
I
[02:04:42] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:04:41–02:04:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:04:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:04:45–02:04:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:04:46] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
Joan Leonard.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:04:46–02:05:01 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[02:04:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
Do we
[02:04:57] Speaker 1 · Machine re-recognized
want the applicant to speak first?
[02:05:00] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
The
[02:05:01] Speaker 11 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 02:05:01–02:05:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:05:05] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[02:05:10] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:05:11] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[02:05:14] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[02:05:16] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:05:16] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I
[02:05:17] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:16–02:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:05:18] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:05:18] Speaker 1
I called your name. I apologize. We're gonna ‸ ask the applicant ‸ speak and then you can that way you can ask them questions.
[02:05:27] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice
I
[02:05:28] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:27–02:05:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:05:31] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice
is David Brubaker. I am the president and CEO of the central Brevard sharing center incorporated ‸ located at 113 Aurora street in Cocoa. Our purpose for this particular property is to expand our existing services. Our services consist of basic needs services, such
[02:05:52] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:50–02:05:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:05:58] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ We have a shower facility, so we have a lot of different basic needs that have gone on for more than 33 years at the Aurora street location. This particular property, as was stated, butts up to our current property itself. And, um, we look to expand our current services. For example, our food pantry. Uh, we literally work out of a closet. It's an amazing program. We distribute more than 50,000 pounds of food through that, uh, little food pantry, but we would like to do a better job and we can do ‸ even better job and serve more people through this project. So
[02:06:35] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:06:34–02:06:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:06:37] Attribution uncertain
we're going to be able to do a better job.
[02:06:37] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[02:06:39] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:06:39] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:06:40] Speaker 22
that neighborhood again for, um, more than 33 years. We're
[02:06:43] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:43–02:06:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:06:45] Speaker 22
We
[02:06:46] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:45–02:06:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:06:50] Speaker 22
Um,
[02:06:51] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:50–02:06:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:06:57] Speaker 22
just want to be able to serve more people. And I would just mention that more than 72% of our clients have a cocoa address. So this is a very, um, uh, great opportunity for us. And we were so excited to have this property. So I'd be glad to answer any questions in regards to our intent.
[02:07:20] Speaker 1
Do
[02:07:21] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:20–02:07:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:07:23] Speaker 19
I guess that's my cue.
[02:07:25] Speaker 1
Yes, I
[02:07:25] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
do. Thank you for giving a very thorough explanation, uh, to the services that you do provide to the community, um, and the city of Cocoa at large, as I am a resident of that community for over 35 years. So I say that even though I know I look very young. Um, so with that being said, where my, where my question lies for you on, on the big, the quest of what you're looking to do in your application, you're looking to have this property
[02:07:53] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:53–02:07:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:07:59] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
numbers right. That's
[02:08:01] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:00–02:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:08:03] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
rezoned from single family to multifamily property. That's correct.
[02:08:06] Attribution uncertain
So
[02:08:07] Speaker 19
under, under that, uh, definition, I, I think I would be within reason to ask what is the intended use.
[02:08:13] Speaker 22
So there is a social
[02:08:15] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:15–02:08:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:08:21] Speaker 22
us to, um, expand our services by building a facility on that property that would expand our service. It's not residential.
[02:08:33] Attribution uncertain
So
[02:08:34] Speaker 22
we're again, if there is an exception again for social services under that designation and classification. So what we would be doing is, um, building a state of the art expansion of our current facility. Uh, we do not plan
[02:08:50] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:50–02:08:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:08:54] Speaker 22
out a little bit better and giving a better flow and better service to our clients. I would state that the sharing centers operation of, uh, hours are from 9 to 3. Our office services that won't change. We
[02:09:08] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:08–02:09:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:09:12] Speaker 22
Most of our staff are off property at 4 o'clock. Uh, we will, uh, again, respect. The neighborhood. ‸ And, um, I think we've already done some great work on that property because it was a junkyard when we got it. It is now a vacant lot. Um, we plan on again, being great neighbors and respecting the community.
[02:09:34] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
So, so I, I'm very familiar with your property as I, as I do find myself, I,
[02:09:38] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:38–02:09:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:09:41] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So I'm just putting that out there. So I'm going to pull into the gate. Right. When I pull into the gate, you got the drop box for the clothes. You got the store right there. Then
[02:09:49] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:49–02:09:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:09:52] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
donation drop. And then you got the kitchen and your food services over here to the immediate left where there's a, there's a fence and you pull ‸ in. That's where you take your food shipments. When these nice 18 wheelers come down there too. So I, I, I, like I said, I know your property. Well, currently
[02:10:09] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:09–02:10:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:10:11] Attribution uncertain
Well,
[02:10:11] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[02:10:13] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
road there. I've seen it. I'm just saying, so it's, I'm not speaking of far city. You still haven't helped me to understand when you say expand your services. So we'd like
[02:10:23] Speaker 22
to expand
[02:10:24] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:24–02:10:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:10:28] Speaker 22
a closet. We would like to create a state of the art food pantry. Um, we would also like to move our executive offices. Um, from our current location to that location. We'd also like to have our client intake taken at that particular facility. So, um, the idea behind that would be our phase two and three. It's the expansions or the improvements that we can make on our current property. Once we have this, uh, particular. Building
[02:10:54] Speaker 22 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:53–02:11:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:10:55] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[02:10:57] Attribution uncertain
Um,
[02:10:59] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
[02:11:05] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
properties? Meaning if you're going to be intaking on roof, therefore they're going to be passing through to come back
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:11:05–02:11:11 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[02:11:11] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
to
[02:11:11] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:11:11–02:11:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:11:13] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice
Aurora side? Well, we haven't
[02:11:16] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
had that discussion in regards to traffic flow. Okay. But we are considering that flow from Aurora to Ruth, but that hasn't been established there. We've really just had some preliminary meetings of planning meetings. It's still the pie in the sky right now for us. It's gonna ‸ take several million dollars for us and we have to raise that money. So we're not talking about doing this within the next year or even two years, because we realize we have to raise the money in order to build this state-of-the-art ‸ facility that we're considering.
[02:11:49] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Thank you for your time. I think your neighbor, she's ‸ gonna be interested to know.
[02:11:54] Attribution uncertain
Oh,
[02:11:54] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm sure.
[02:11:55] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, can I just add something?
[02:11:57] Speaker 19 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes. I just wanna
[02:11:58] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ add that ‸ this particular property as the other properties that surround it, they don't have a zoning assigned and this is just an application for rezoning. The applicant would have to submit for a special reception that has to be approved by the Board of Adjustments and when they are ready for development, when they have the conceptual plan, wherever they're trying to propose, that is gonna ‸ be submitted as part of the special reception. So I just wanna ‸ highlight that what we discussed in here is just assigning a zoning to this parcel.
[02:12:34] Speaker 19
But it is, it still will be, ‸ we're still creating a spot zone, correct?
[02:12:40] Speaker 10
You
[02:12:40] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:40–02:12:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:12:43] Speaker 10
And
[02:12:43] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:43–02:12:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:12:45] Speaker 10
there's many uses that can be designated. That's what I'm saying is not only to social services. Gotcha. Okay, thank you.
[02:12:53] Attribution uncertain
Thank
[02:12:53] Speaker 10
you.
[02:12:57] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:12:53–02:13:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:13:01] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:13:03] Speaker 1
Yes, Ms. Leonard?
[02:13:05] No voice detected
Yeah,
[02:13:05] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:10]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:13:05–02:13:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:13:16] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
State your name for the record and raise your right hand, please.
[02:13:20] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
My name is Joan Leonard.
[02:13:22] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
[02:13:25] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I'm sorry?
[02:13:26] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Thank you, Ms. Leonard.
[02:13:31] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Thank you. It's a pleasure to be here. I've
[02:13:35] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:13:35–02:13:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:13:38] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I've seen a lot of changes. I'm a resident of 843 Egret Road, Cocoa, Lake Poinsett area. I
[02:13:49] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:11]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:13:48–02:13:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:14:01] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I have that commercial piece that is referenced. I know when the sharing center started, we were occupying that property at that time. We always knew they were going to expand and what they've done to provide county
[02:14:21] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:14:21–02:14:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:14:21] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the community. I am in
[02:14:25] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
supportive
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:14:25–02:14:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:14:25] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
of ‸ the expansion. We've all been neighbors. I wish them well. I do not feel it's going to impact the over acre that I own because of the future use and so forth. So I hope one day might be back to see you again. But I wish them well. I
[02:14:56] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:56–02:15:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:15:02] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Thank you all very much. And I look forward to seeing all the great things that
[02:15:06] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:06–02:15:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:15:09] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
forth. Thank you.
[02:15:14] Speaker 1
Mr. Dean.
[02:15:17] No voice detected
Thank you.
[02:15:20] Speaker 23
Arthur Dean. Yes, ma'am. I do. As you all know, a few of you gentlemen have been around the neighborhood there. We just had a new house built about seven, eight years ago on the corner of Ruth and Jackson. Well, now when it rains, the wife don't say get the umbrella. She
[02:15:43] Speaker 23 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:43–02:15:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:15:45] Speaker 23
because we wade water coming to the house. I mean, there's probably that much water in my driveway. What a slight rain. And if they build next to me on the other side, they're
[02:15:59] Speaker 23 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:59–02:16:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:16:00] Speaker 23
I'm going to be in a valley. I'm going to be drowned. I've
[02:16:05] Speaker 23 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:16:04–02:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:16:11] Speaker 23
And every one of my houses is going to be flooded if they come in there and build something in there. Like, that and more than a house. because the house on the corner, it pretty well flooded me. And if they come in there and build on those three lots that they've got, it's going to be unbelievable. I mean, I'm
[02:16:30] Speaker 23 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:16:30–02:16:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:16:33] Speaker 23
houses was built back in the 60s when Jim Walters built them about three inches from the ground. So
[02:16:40] Speaker 23 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:16:40–02:16:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:16:44] Speaker 23 · Machine re-recognized
You
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:16:44–02:16:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:16:45] Speaker 23
got to be on your P's and Q's or your belongings is going to get wet in the house. So I'd just like for y'all to think about that. If they come in there and build up like this, I'm going to be drowned. And ‸ they've been there a long time too, but I've been there since 1979. I mean, I came in there and spent everything I had to buy my three houses. And, uh, if they, if they build up over there on those lots, I'm going to be done.
[02:17:13] Speaker 9
Where's your property? What's your property in?
[02:17:16] Speaker 23
I own from, I own, um, on
[02:17:20] Speaker 23 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:20–02:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:17:23] Speaker 23
and I'll
[02:17:23] Speaker 23 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:23–02:17:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:17:27] Speaker 23
I own 180 feet on Jackson. 200 on Ruth. And approximately 225 on Aurora Street. And I thank y'all.
[02:17:51] Speaker 5
Mr. Chairman. Is
[02:17:54] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:53–02:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:17:58] Speaker 5
Um, first of all, I want to compliment the, uh, Brevard
[02:18:02] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:18:02–02:18:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:18:03] Speaker 5
Uh, it has been a major, uh, asset because the majority of all my properties, my rentals, I rent to honorably discharged vets. And they're very tight on their income. And, um, I
[02:18:22] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:18:22–02:18:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:18:30] Speaker 5
they would normally have made available to them. And that includes the other assets that you provide there.
[02:18:38] Attribution uncertain
As
[02:18:38] Speaker 5
far as the food goes, clothing, uh, that is a major asset. And
[02:18:44] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:18:44–02:18:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:18:45] Speaker 5
uh, on what you have done with that property. Now, I also have a question for Steve, if Steve's here, and if not, uh, somebody, uh, one other, uh, member on ‸ the staff in reference to the question about the drainage. Now, our current codes require on-site retention. Is that correct?
[02:19:10] Speaker 9
Yes, it does.
[02:19:12] Speaker 5
Okay. So with his plans of building on that property, he would have to provide, uh,
[02:19:19] Attribution uncertain
a
[02:19:19] Speaker 5
retention area or whatever the numbers are dictating,
[02:19:23] Speaker 17 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
which means,
[02:19:25] Speaker 5
‸ I'm sorry.
[02:19:25] Speaker 5 · Machine re-recognized
it's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:19:25–02:19:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:19:26] Speaker 17
correct.
[02:19:27] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
And then, uh, with that being said, if that includes a retention area, ‸ swelling and things like that, swell areas, uh, he would not be able to get a permit unless he satisfies that according to the guidelines to the code. Am I correct?
[02:19:41] Speaker 22
Yeah, that's
[02:19:41] Speaker 17
correct.
[02:19:42] Speaker 5
So I hope that that satisfies the concern of the other man that was here because he is not capable of going in there and ‸ start building without having to satisfy all the requirements for on-site retention that are stricter these days than they were back in the 70s. Am
[02:20:03] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:03–02:20:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:20:05] Speaker 17 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:20:06] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:20:07] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:06–02:20:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:20:08] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:20:08] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:20:09] Speaker 5
that a lot of the concerns, uh, are going to be addressed, uh, with what his plans are. And
[02:20:17] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:17–02:20:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:20:22] Speaker 5
lot. The city council supports his work. They are contributory to his work with that business that he's got. And it's an asset and, um, I approve what his plans are 100%. Thank you.
[02:20:44] Speaker 18
Are there any other questions or comments? Yeah, Justin, I have a quick one for staff. Is there any appetite to create a zoning? For, for our nonprofit organizations who are looking to do things that
[02:20:57] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:20:57–02:21:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:21:02] Speaker 18
Right? I mean, we've, we've come to conflict with this with, uh, with, with other organizations. Right? And, and it, it bears thought here, right? That we allow the zone to, that there's a niche that they need for that zone. so
[02:21:16] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:21:15–02:21:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:21:20] Speaker 18
justification of what,
[02:21:21] Speaker 18 · Machine re-recognized
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:21:21–02:21:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:21:21] Speaker 18
needed there. So just wondering.
[02:21:24] Speaker 11
Well, um, as the attorney, I guess I can't speak for staff necessarily, but I can say that, um, you know, there are multiple, uh, zoning districts that do allow for some type of what we would call social service centers or community centers. Usually they're addressed through a special exception, like as was described here. So
[02:21:48] Speaker 11 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:21:48–02:21:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:21:50] Speaker 11
Um, but you know, for like in this case, you already have a low density residential future land use. So those risk that restricts, you know, the range of, um, zoning districts that are an option for them, um, without asking for future land use amendments as well. So, um, but I mean, I, I'm sure that it's something that, um, you know, we'll, we'll discuss internally, um, and consider, but again, there are, there are other options as well under the code.
[02:22:23] Speaker 18
Yeah.
[02:22:23] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:23–02:22:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:22:23] Speaker 18
As I said, we just seen it a couple of times where folks have wanted it for a very respectable reason. And, but the, but the zones a little bit broader than it needs to be for what they need. And so
[02:22:31] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:31–02:22:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:22:33] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:22:34] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
I mean, there's a lot of special, uh, exceptions on the different codes that we have. Sure. And,
[02:22:41] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:40–02:22:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:22:41] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
them where they're quite lengthy. So I think that that saves, uh, time and trouble and paperwork. And at least they discovered something under the zoning they're asking for that satisfies their needs for their property. Yeah, exactly. And that's what happened.
[02:22:57] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, that's it. And I support it. I mean, if I just think, I don't know, you know, I, here I am ‸ just a regular old citizen, but, uh, in my world of software, you just add a dash to something, right? So you'd say, you know, are you whatever dash? And he added dash for social services.
[02:23:12] Attribution uncertain
What's the library
[02:23:12] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
zone? Yes.
[02:23:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
The library. Yeah. I have to look. I'm
[02:23:19] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:18–02:23:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:23:19] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
don't know from the top of my head. The
[02:23:22] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:21–02:23:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:23:22] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:23:23] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No, the one,
[02:23:24] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm just north of 520. Well, the county library. Oh, okay.
[02:23:30] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ That's commercial. Has to be commercial.
[02:23:35] Speaker 8
Yes. May
[02:23:36] Speaker 8 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:23:35–02:23:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:23:37] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:23:37] Speaker 23 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:23:38] Speaker 23 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
If you go down Jackson street, where they built these
[02:23:40] Speaker 23 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:23:40–02:23:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:23:42] Speaker 23 + overlapping voice
if you look at a roar, I mean, grace, you look at a two or three streets down there. When it rains, it floods. And I guarantee you, they got swells and they've got runoffs, but it don't go nowhere. When you've got no ditches, those streets don't have any ditches. We don't have any ditches. We have no pipes under the ground to take the water. When it rains, it runs down the road and that's it. If they build over there, if
[02:24:10] Speaker 23 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:24:10–02:24:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:24:12] Speaker 23 + overlapping voice
sure. The roads is going to be flooded. It's just no place for the water to go.
[02:24:41] Speaker 1
‸ So the only issue that I have with that is that it doesn't matter what we zone this as, eventually somewhere, some, some, somebody is going to buy one of the plots. And they're going to request some type of zone change, whether
[02:25:01] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:08]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:25:01–02:25:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:25:09] Speaker 1
And they're eventually going to try and build. I've been through there, especially even after a light rain, it is really bad. The only problem that I have is that I, I'm bound right now by what I have in front of me. Is
[02:25:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:25:45–02:25:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:25:47] Speaker 1
Was
[02:25:47] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:25:47–02:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:25:49] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
Was there anything when we annex these locations in the plan of, you know, we, we know
[02:25:55] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:25:55–02:25:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:25:55] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
County is not infrastructurally the same as what city was. Did
[02:26:00] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:26:00–02:26:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:04] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
you know, again, this is, this goes back to the earlier conversations item a was a discussion of, of training drainage on there, on their eye. Now it was more to deal with the land in that area. But you know, again, that was again, once County now city, uh, with
[02:26:17] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:17–02:26:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:17] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
with
[02:26:18] Attribution uncertain
no,
[02:26:18] Speaker 18
was there every, um, anything thought of when they annexed that when it came to solving things like this?
[02:26:26] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Not, uh, at the time,
[02:26:28] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:26:28–02:26:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:26:28] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
believe for what I see when
[02:26:29] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Machine re-recognized
annexation
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:26:29–02:26:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:26:30] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it was done because there's several properties
[02:26:33] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:32–02:26:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:34] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:26:35] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
many,
[02:26:35] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
many, they were an
[02:26:36] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:36–02:26:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:39] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Um,
[02:26:39] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:26:39–02:26:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:42] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
but, um, it's not, this is not a isolated case, but I believe it because it was done so long ago. You know, I don't, I don't have the knowledge or the background to say, but I believe, you know, I don't believe it was an issue. Then
[02:26:56] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:56–02:26:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:26:57] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:26:58] Speaker 18
consider an ordinance to protect ourselves in the future. That if we're, I look, I like annexing. I like the fact that we're not as patchwork as we used to be. Um,
[02:27:07] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:06–02:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:27:07] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:27:07] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:27:08] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:27:08] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:27:09] Speaker 18
but is there, uh, again, just a thought. I
[02:27:10] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:27:10–02:27:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:27:12] Speaker 18
but I think you would save future boards, uh, from this type of thought and consideration.
[02:27:16] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Well,
[02:27:17] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:16–02:27:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:27:19] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
Okay.
[02:27:20] Speaker 18
would we ever consider an ordinance that would watch out for the fact that if we're going to annex something like, like the County land we did in this area specifically, it's, it's
[02:27:30] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:27:30–02:27:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:27:34] Speaker 18
If you will, it's not plumbed for the way the rest of our city behaves. Uh, you know, there's
[02:27:39] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:38–02:27:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:27:42] Speaker 18
I assume it was just a matter of discussion between the County. Um,
[02:27:47] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:45–02:27:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:27:50] Speaker 18
kind of thing in the future, not retroactively. I wonder if it'd be the proactive thing to do to be, you know, again, to say, we're annexing and we're expecting a cost.
[02:27:59] Attribution uncertain
It's not a cost
[02:27:59] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
of
[02:27:59] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:27:59–02:28:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:02] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
with, uh, drainage usage and stuff like that. Yeah. Your issue is more the drainage. Yeah. It seems like it's, it's a pretty,
[02:28:09] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
it's
[02:28:09] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:09–02:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:10] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes, sir. Exactly. And I'm just throwing it out from a citizen standpoint.
[02:28:13] Attribution uncertain
I
[02:28:13] Speaker 18
want to, yeah.
[02:28:14] Speaker 3
Yeah. So, so in a, in a word, what? No, I
[02:28:21] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:20–02:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:21] Speaker 3
I don't know if it was a voluntary annexation. I
[02:28:24] Speaker 3 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:28:24–02:28:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:27] Speaker 3
discussions with the County, or, or whoever about addressing issues prior to actually taking the property.
[02:28:37] Speaker 18
Yeah. And I'd see it from here on out. That doesn't solve this right now, but
[02:28:39] Speaker 3
it's in front
[02:28:40] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
of us and it's a discussion we're talking about. Right. So, yeah,
[02:28:42] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:28:42–02:28:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:42] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
I get, I get what you're saying. Yeah.
[02:28:44] Speaker 1
Yes, Ms.
[02:28:45] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:28:45–02:28:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:46] No voice detected
Can
[02:28:46] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:28:46–02:28:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:47] Attribution uncertain
thank
[02:28:47] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
you, and
[02:28:47] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:28:47–02:28:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:28:53] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
That area, we're all on septic tanks as well.
[02:28:57] No voice detected
Right.
[02:28:58] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And not on the city system and have been. And when we were taken into, annexed in, that was a concern of mine because I actually came and spoke at that time. And there were seven businesses that were fit. And
[02:29:12] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:29:12–02:29:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:29:14] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
And that's a concern ‸ because we were all pumping out a septic tank and watching that. And that goes on with the water problem because I know there's a situation where I better to the sharing center and I
[02:29:29] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
could
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:29:29–02:29:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:29:30] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
they know, and
[02:29:31] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:29:31–02:29:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:29:33] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
there's a drainage and that has to stay clear so that it doesn't puddle up and build up and so forth. And I just, I ‸ know you might, might all know that, but I just feel all of that goes into what we're discussing on future development and so
[02:29:50] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:29:50–02:29:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:29:52] Speaker 14 (introduced as “Joan Leonard” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Absolutely.
[02:29:53] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice
So, um, I
[02:29:56] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:29:55–02:29:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:29:59] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice
However, I would tell you that back in 2004 when it was annexed, the
[02:30:05] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:04–02:30:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:30:09] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice
put sewer to the community that was
[02:30:11] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:30:11–02:30:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:30:11] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice
sewer over there. We
[02:30:13] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:13–02:30:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:30:14] Speaker 22 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So I know exactly what you're talking about. The sharing center has been there for 30 some odd years. I've been there for 20. We're very respectful of that. And we don't want to cause, um, any, um, any type of further, um, concern. But what we're here today is talking about our zoning. Once we get that established, then we can bring back our plan and you can scrutinize that in regards to.
[02:30:42] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice
Dr.
[02:30:43] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:42–02:30:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:30:46] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So I appreciate you listening. Yeah.
[02:30:48] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
‸ Appreciate you. If we don't have any further discussion, can I ask for a motion?
[02:30:55] Speaker 5
I'll make a motion that we approve according to the guidelines of the staff's recommendation. So
[02:31:01] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:31:00–02:31:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:31:02] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Second. All in favor to approve. Say aye. Aye. Aye. Are there any opposed?
[02:31:18] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:31:18–02:31:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:31:28] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:31:29] Speaker 18 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 02:31:29–02:31:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:31:30] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:31:30] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[02:31:31] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
them resolved, right? Discussion.
[02:31:37] Attribution uncertain
I'm
[02:31:37] Speaker 18 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:31:37–02:31:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:31:38] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[02:31:43] Speaker 7 + overlapping voice
I just want to thank you for your, your consideration of this. It will be something that will be an improvement to the area. Believe me by the time we get finished with it and we do just, we want to increase our service to the needy of our, of our community. So ‸ thank you for your consideration.
[02:32:00] Speaker 20
Hi, Frank.
[02:32:00] Attribution uncertain
I
[02:32:01] Speaker 20
forgot to say hi to you.
[02:32:02] Attribution uncertain
What
[02:32:02] Speaker 20
I
[02:32:02] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:32:02–02:32:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:32:03] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[02:32:06] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
We have our last agenda item. Mike
[02:32:10] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:32:10–02:32:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:32:15] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
We do have Tracy as the representative for the applicant. Okay. Consideration of zoning map amendment consistent with appendix A
[02:32:26] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:32:26–02:32:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:32:28] Attribution uncertain
2nd.
[02:32:28] Speaker 10
change the zoning map of a portion to a single parcel with approximately 9.1 acres from Brevard County. B
[02:32:35] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:32:35–02:32:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:32:40] Speaker 10
The
[02:32:40] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:32:40–02:32:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:32:45] Speaker 10
full parking and affiliated infrastructure. And
[02:32:48] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:32:47–02:32:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:32:54] Speaker 10
building with associated parking. This rezoning with no way impact the level service for facilities in this area. The
[02:33:03] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:33:02–02:33:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:33:07] Speaker 10
commercial. BU
[02:33:09] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:33:08–02:33:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:33:11] Speaker 10
was the Brevard County previous zoning designation. Here
[02:33:17] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:33:16–02:33:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:33:20] Speaker 10
North side of the parcel is already been
[02:33:23] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:33:23–02:33:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:33:27] Speaker 10
I believe is a Nissan. Is it a Nissan dealership? And
[02:33:31] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:33:31–02:33:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:33:37] Speaker 10
site plan approved in 2022 to create a new
[02:33:42] Attribution uncertain
area to create a over
[02:33:42] Speaker 10
full parking on the South side of this parcel. And for some reason, that portion of the parcel never being zoned and it still holds the counties only. So here you can see you can have a better view of ‸ the portion of the parcel that we're discussing today. Here we have our future land use for the parcel. So the staff recommends that the planning zoning board recommends approval to the city council of the zoning map amendment from
[02:34:15] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:15–02:34:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:34:25] Speaker 1
Can
[02:34:25] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:34:25–02:34:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:34:26] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:34:29] Speaker 1
So the uh, the other white area there,
[02:34:31] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:31–02:34:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:34:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:34:36] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[02:34:41] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:34:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[02:34:47] Speaker 9
Oh,
[02:34:48] Speaker 6
I know you're talking about it's now the
[02:34:49] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Cadillac. Yeah,
[02:34:50] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:34:50–02:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:34:51] Speaker 20 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:34:51] Attribution uncertain
Yeah,
[02:34:51] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:34:51–02:34:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:34:52] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay, so that's Camping World. Got
[02:34:54] Speaker 5
it. All right.
[02:34:54] No voice detected
Okay,
[02:34:55] Speaker 12
thanks.
[02:34:56] Speaker 5
I
[02:34:56] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:34:56–02:34:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:34:57] Attribution uncertain
to be talking about it.
[02:34:59] Speaker 5
They've been there years too.
[02:35:04] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. Are you talking about Camping World?
[02:35:07] Speaker 5
Sorry?
[02:35:07] Speaker 10
No, he said Camping World needs to be part of the city.
[02:35:10] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah, they've been there for years. Yeah,
[02:35:12] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:12–02:35:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:12] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[02:35:16] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
they are part of the city. Yes.
[02:35:18] Attribution uncertain
Oh,
[02:35:18] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
they are? They are. Yes.
[02:35:20] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yeah. I thought they were county.
[02:35:22] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
No,
[02:35:22] Attribution uncertain
no,
[02:35:23] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:22–02:35:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:23] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:35:23] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:35:23] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:35:24] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:24–02:35:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:27] Speaker 3 + overlapping voice
I see.
[02:35:30] Speaker 10
Yeah, like I mentioned before, there are several parcels through the city of Cocoa that for some reason never, we were next to the city, but never zone,
[02:35:39] Speaker 10 · Machine re-recognized
reason
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:35:39–02:35:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:35:40] Speaker 10
to a city of Cocoa zoning designation. So,
[02:35:43] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:06]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:43–02:35:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:49] Speaker 1
Would
[02:35:49] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:49–02:35:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:35:52] Speaker 2 (name unresolved) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:35:53] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
It was, ‸ unless you have any questions.
[02:35:56] Speaker 1
No. Okay. Anybody have any questions? I
[02:35:59] Speaker 10
just have to highlight the planning zoning board made a recommendation for rezoning since the, um, a site plan was approved with no zoning aside to that particular parcel and the applicant submitted for an amendment to the same site ‸ plan approved.
[02:36:17] Speaker 5
I'll
[02:36:17] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:17–02:36:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:36:20] Speaker 5
Yeah,
[02:36:21] Speaker 5 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:36:20–02:36:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:36:22] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[02:36:27] Speaker 21
All
[02:36:27] Speaker 21 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:27–02:36:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:36:28] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:36:29] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:36:31] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Aye. Are there any opposed? None heard? Okay. It's
[02:36:38] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:36:37–02:36:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:36:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
All right. Uh, I take it with, uh, with that, there is no, um, is there any tree board update Alex?
[02:36:55] No voice detected
Hey, let
[02:36:57] Speaker 2 (name unresolved)
me
[02:36:58] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
respond. I
[02:36:59] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:36:59–02:37:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:37:01] Speaker 1 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:37:02] Speaker 1
I'm just,
[02:37:02] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
I'm just doing a formality. You took the wind out of my sails because I was going to say that because we're here so late, that's not something that we should even bother with right now because we didn't even have the minutes and all. They worked. Do
[02:37:16] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:37:16–02:37:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:37:19] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So out of respect for that, you know, so even though you're teasing, but, but I want to give my compliments to this board because about two or three years ago, I brought it to the attention to this board that the tree board was lost designation for the city tree city USA. And this board ‸ voted unanimous, which I think Mike was here when that happened. You were the chairman. Right. And ever since that this board has approved that it has done nothing but positive results for the city of cocoa. We have stopped losing oak trees and now I hope that we I'm afraid that the Laurel oaks all at the college over there. Uh, they're also dying because they only live like 75 years, but the one designation, if it's a live oak, oh, I'm
[02:38:10] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:09–02:38:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:13] Speaker 5 + overlapping voice
I will continue to do so. Sorry.
[02:38:17] No voice detected
I'll
[02:38:17] Speaker 10 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:17–02:38:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:18] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
[02:38:24] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Currently.
[02:38:24] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
That's what I want to just bring it up. I'm sorry
[02:38:26] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:38:26–02:38:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:38:26] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
interrupt. So
[02:38:27] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:27–02:38:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:32] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
16.
[02:38:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
August
[02:38:33] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:33–02:38:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:35] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
[02:38:39] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
Okay. All
[02:38:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:38:40–02:38:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:40] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
but
[02:38:40] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
we
[02:38:41] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
will follow up tomorrow. Do
[02:38:43] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:42–02:38:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:47] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
too?
[02:38:49] Speaker 10
Yes.
[02:38:50] Attribution uncertain
We
[02:38:50] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
hope no. It's not going to be so many polemic items at least.
[02:38:54] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
So
[02:38:55] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:38:54–02:38:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:55] Speaker 4 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:38:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice
August
[02:38:56] Speaker 1 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:56–02:38:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:38:57] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:38:58] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Yes.
[02:38:59] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Machine re-recognized
I want
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:38:59–02:38:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[02:38:59] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice
to discuss with Monica tomorrow and she will
[02:39:01] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:39:01–02:39:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:39:06] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:39:06] Speaker 10 + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:39:07] Speaker 4 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:39:08] Speaker 4
Yes. Yes.
[02:39:14] Speaker 1
‸ I will ask a request for adjournment, please. Motion to adjourn. Do I have a second? Yes. All in favor? Aye. See you all next month. Thank you.
[02:39:26] Attribution uncertain
Thank
[02:39:26] Speaker 1
you.
[02:39:30] Speaker 5
August the
[02:39:31] No voice detected
16th at six. Six.
[02:39:34] Attribution uncertain · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:33–02:39:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[02:39:34] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]
[02:39:35] Speaker 7 · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
[02:39:36] No voice detected · Unclear audio
[unclear audio]

Transcript revision built 2026-10-27T11:27:14 · 12,674 ordinary words, 7,575 in suspect passages, 229 machine re-recognized.

Ask about this meeting

Use the search to ask a question about this meeting in particular, or compare it across other meetings in the archive.