Partial recording. The available recording covers only part of this meeting. Analysis is limited to the recorded portion.
(capture status: partial)
Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (812_CE_Reg_Minutes_07_20_2023.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Lloyd Roberts, George Brown, Chris Davis, Michael Simpson, Sharri Scott, Verna Hughes, Aurora Ramirez, Josue Otero
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines; no independent membership list of this board is available to confirm that the roll is complete.)
Listed absent: David Lightholder
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Dennis Bunt (Code Enforcement Manager), Augusto Gonzalez-Ruiz (Code Enforcement Officer), Vince Buonocore (Code Enforcement Officer), Michael Folger (Code Enforcement Officer), Debra Babb-Nutcher (City Attorney), Darla Crowl (Recording Secretary)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Scott (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (25)
to approve to the agenda of July 20, 2023 (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve to the minutes of May 18, 2023 (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 3
to amend Staff's recommendation and give the property owner until September 19, 2023 (60 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 4
to amend Staffs recommendation and give until September 19, 2023 (60 days) and an amended fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Brown, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to amend Staff's recommendation and a fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) be imposed and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 5
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Simpson, seconded by Davis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 6
to amend Staff's recommendation give until September 19, 2023 (60 days) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Ramirez, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 7
to amend Staff's recommendation give until September 19, 2023 (60 days) and a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) and find the Property Owner in violation (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED 6-1 (result not printed; worked out from the count); ayes: not named in the minutes; nays: Scott — the City's minutes, p. 8 Corrected to match the minutes, page 8.
to approve Staffs recommendation and a fine of five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day and find the Property Owner in repeat violation (moved by Scott, seconded by Davis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 8
to amend Staff's recommendation and find the Owner to have been in Non-Compliance and are incompliance as of the date of the Hearing, July 20, 2023 and no fines shall be imposed (moved by Davis, seconded by Ramirez); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 9
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Simpson, seconded by Davis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 9
to amend Staffs recommendation and table until the August 17, 2023 (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 10
to amend Staffs recommendation and find the Owner to have been in Non-Compliance and are incompliance as of the date of the Hearing, July 20, 2023 and no fines shall be imposed (moved by Simpson, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 10
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Davis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 10
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Compliance (moved by Davis, seconded by Simpson); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 11
to approve Staffs recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Brown, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 11
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Davis, seconded by Hughes); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 11
to approve Staff's recommendation and find the Owner in Non-Compliance (moved by Davis, seconded by Scott); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 11
to amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) (moved by Brown, seconded by Davis); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 13
to approve Staffs recommendation (moved by Davis, seconded by Brown); CARRIED — the City's minutes, p. 15
Motions for which no result was read from the minutes' text (1)
to amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) (moved by Brown, seconded by Simpson); no result was read for this motion from the minutes' text — the City's minutes, p. 14
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$50.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staffs recommendation and give until September 19, 2023 (60 days) and an amended fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (812_CE_Reg_Minutes_07_20_2023.pdf, p. 5); fiscal period not recorded)
$150.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “amend Staff's recommendation and a fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) be imposed and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (812_CE_Reg_Minutes_07_20_2023.pdf, p. 5); fiscal period not recorded)
$500.00 — Code Enforcement: decided in an adopted motion. “approve Staffs recommendation and a fine of five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day and find the Property Owner in repeat violation” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (812_CE_Reg_Minutes_07_20_2023.pdf, p. 8); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,000.00 — Code Enforcement: recommended to another body (City Council decides; not a final approval). “amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00)” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (812_CE_Reg_Minutes_07_20_2023.pdf, p. 13); fiscal period not recorded)
$50.00 — Code Enforcement: named in a motion for which no result was read. “amend Staff's recommendation give until September 19, 2023 (60 days) and a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) and find the Property Owner in violation” (motion result: none read; the City's minutes (812_CE_Reg_Minutes_07_20_2023.pdf, p. 8); fiscal period not recorded)
$2,000.00 — Code Enforcement: named in a motion for which no result was read. “amend staff's recommendation to City Council the lien reduction be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00)” (motion result: none read; the City's minutes (812_CE_Reg_Minutes_07_20_2023.pdf, p. 14); fiscal period not recorded)
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. No recording can be started from here.
incomplete recording: The City's published MP4 for this event is truncated on its CDN: 1925644288 of about 3286575083 bytes (58.6%) were published and the file has no moov atom, so no player opens it. The audio of the first 7017 s was recovered from a scratch copy (frame walk of the mdat + libavcodec frame-length oracle); the rest of the meeting is not in any published file.; 432 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review; 1 stretch(es) where a voice was detected and no words were recognized.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 24 voices separated from the audio.
47 short machine repair(s) (58 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 91.5% of 18,513 content words.
Dotted words (394 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
432 passages (21% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Voice detected, no words recognized (1 stretch). Something may have been said here that the transcript does not have:
01:50:51 (10 s) — neither reading has words
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:00:36–00:01:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:32–00:01:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:47–00:01:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:50–00:01:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:04–00:02:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:22–00:02:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right. We have the agenda meeting for tonight. I'm going to set a motion to amend it and let me let you know what I'm looking to amend. All right. Our
Number nine will be our sixth. Number 10 will be our seventh. Number eight. I'm sorry. Number 11 will be our eighth. Number 12 will be our ninth. And as we go back here. Number
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:54–00:03:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:24–00:04:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:00–00:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:03–00:05:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of permit required appendix a article 15 section 2 a for the unpermitted work performed on the roof and the windows. I visited the site eight times during my first inspection. I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case. But
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:05–00:06:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:13–00:06:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:23–00:06:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
state your name and the address you live at in the microphone, please.
[00:06:29]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Anthony
[00:06:29]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:29–00:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:36]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Good evening. My name is Anthony De Los Santos. I'm here
[00:06:39]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:07]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:38–00:06:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:45]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Please
[00:06:46]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:45–00:06:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:06:48]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
and this did not perform any of the work requiring a permit here. STOA acknowledges, however, that it failed to respond to the notice of violation that was sent in February 2022 and it has been working diligently to correct violations since its receipt of the subsequent notice in June 2023. In fact, STOA has approved this contractor's bid in the current amount of $20,000 for a general remodel permit that will allow for corrections pertaining to the roof, the windows, and any additional corrective work required on the property. Our contractor does estimate that it will take about three months to complete the necessary work on the property. So
[00:07:23]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:05]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:23–00:07:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:07:28]Speaker 9 (introduced as “Anthony De Los” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:39–00:07:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
renoticed them. It wasn't until June that they reached out and just today they reached out and said they had a contractor assigned to get the work done within three months.
So in theory it's finished. So exactly what's needed besides the permit that was required in which they needed to actually do the work in which they did with that permit, correct?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:38–00:08:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:44–00:08:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
impact windows or regular glass and that's up to them. But even with that, you could submit all that and all that information within 30 days. It's going to be issued and you're going to call rate for a final inspection because it
Yeah, I do. I was just saying, ‸ I was thinking if they had any other work that they wanted to do besides that, that they would get permits for as well. So to account for that, they would ask for the four months respectfully. But I think for the work
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:11–00:09:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be able to be permitted in that finish within 30 days, like whatever ‸ has been done. But they may want to do additional work. I'm not privy to that information. So again, if there's a permit
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:39–00:09:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I think what they told me was that the work was actually done by the previous owner, not by them, the notice that we can take care of it now. And they're just since they're in Phoenix
that they need that extra time just to account for at least three months if you could. That way you can account for the extra, you know, in case there's any issues with the permitting process and what they have to get, get done for you.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:35–00:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
roof, the windows and any additional corrective work required on the property. So that's why I said there may be additional work that they decide to do to make the property whatever they're trying to do with
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:50–00:10:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:00–00:11:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So now you have to get two permits opposed to one. I got it. I understood. Yep. For the previous work and then any future, current, current, future work. Well, it can't be any current work. Any future work. So, yeah. All
I'll let them know. Now, if that's not applicable, if it does not fit, you need to ensure that you respond to these gentlemen so they can assist you further. Fair enough. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:52–00:11:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:04–00:12:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:22–00:12:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. All right. Just a little off topic. Hope no one objects. Just for the record. I'm a part of a mentoring group for the Masonic Lodge and we do a lot of volunteer work and we do a lot of mentoring with the kids. ‸ Some of our kids have come in today in which we're looking to show people that we're here to help these people that possibly elderly that may not be able to help themselves with some code violations and try and just get some volunteers. ‸ Those are the gentlemen that came in with the white shirts, black ties. They're our mentoring group. Stand up, please. Just like to mention them. They are called the Knights of Pythagoras and they're young men from ages five to 18. There's so we have some people that come before us that we'll do that on a case by case basis. They need to get in touch with us at the school and we'll go by that on a case by case basis. ‸ All right. So I think you guys time for that and I think you guys for your time for allowing me to just put that out there. All right. Now moving on. Case number
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:50–00:13:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:58–00:14:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:14:03–00:14:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:08–00:14:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:14–00:14:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:21–00:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:29–00:14:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:21–00:15:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
recommend 30 days be given to come into compliance or a fine of $100 be imposed for each of the violation remains until compliance is achieved. The property owner is present.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:15:36–00:15:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:45–00:15:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ I legally own the property now. It's head down from my grandmother. I've been there for 50 years now. And I do have my business license for what I do. I'm a handyman and I remove metal. I leave my stuff on the trailer sometimes because of my health issues and then I haul it away. I
I've been trying to buy the property from the city since 2018, but they keep pushing and pushing and pushing. My goal was to extend that my land to that land to put me a garage so I won't have to have all this debris for my business. ‸ But I'm pretty much waiting on the city now because they keep pushing me off and off.
so they said August, but they keep saying the same thing over and over again. I'm trying, you know, I'm, ‸ you know, I'm, I'm disabled. I don't, I don't make a lot of money, but I'm trying, sorry, I'm trying to resolve the problem by trying to get this lot. So it's from eyesight.
Yes, the property that's next door. It's an empty lot, but you can't build on it. You can't put anything on it. Only, only thing, uh, ‸ be good. Whoever
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:42–00:17:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. And I've been trying to buy from them for a while and they keep pushing me off, pushing me off, pushing me off. I know they had on the news that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:09–00:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't know, sir. I must've been years ago. Uh, guy had owned it, I stayed in Miami, but I guess something happened to it. Then the city had bought it, but I call myself, try to maintain the lot, uh, cut, cut
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:43–00:18:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:44–00:18:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
but it's a way of doing things. Uh huh. So what they're trying to get to you is you have to number one, you're trying to run a business and now, but you're bringing all this stuff. So now it's looking bad on the residential area. And if you're running a business, cool, but you've got to get a business tax receipt. And
business license for your property if they're going to allow you to do that. And I'm not sure if they're going to let you do that because it's residential. And
That's absolutely correct. And when he gets a residential business tax receipt, there'll be restrictions on it. He still can't violate regular codes in the zoning or under chapter six. So he'll have to meet those. If he was to put storage in a fully enclosed garage or building, then that would be out of sight and that would not be a violation. But yes, the way you explained it is exactly what he needs.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:48–00:20:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
my office. Hold on. We're going to go back. You were told, again, we believe half the stuff we're told and 10% of the stuff we see. So we've got to be able to research those things on our own, especially when we're dealing with something that this is what we do for our living. You understand what I'm saying?
he needs to explain to them what they're doing and change that. So it's possible he does have a residential BTR for office use, but that means exactly what it says office use.
So, again, it's not the point of that the city is trying to make money. It's the point of the city is trying to keep things up to code in which everybody can prosper and property values can remain high. Yeah,
truly understand. That's why I was trying to purchase that lot from the city so I can build me a, add it on to my house to build me a two-door garage so everything will be out in the eyesight. You know, that's what I'm pretty much working on now.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:18–00:23:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:28–00:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just, I can't be working out there because if something happened, then the city would be responsible. But that's why I try to try to cut the grass or cut the,
I understand. I'm just concerned about you using the property without having any permission or ownership of it at all. It just seems improper to me that you would do that. Um,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:33–00:25:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Now, the biggest thing we're here to work with you, not against you. I appreciate it. So to get this cleared up, how much time do you think you will need? Um, they're recommending 30 days.
Uh, if I can get a little more time for me to get in contact with the city again, so I can, as long as they can sell me this property, I can get started into, um, making what you see ideas, not an eyesore.
45 minutes is a lot less than 30 days. So if you get, if you're given 30 days, then it's your testimony that that's plenty of time for you to remedy all this.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:05–00:27:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:17–00:27:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:27:21–00:27:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:41–00:27:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Now motion on the floor by Mr. Davis second by Mr. Brown. All in favor say aye. Aye. ‸ No pose. Motion passes. Mr. Drake, AKA snappy. The biggest thing is for you to work with those gentlemen. They could be your friend, but other people feel like they're their enemies, but it's because of
Because they're not working with them. They, they're going to tell you everything you need to do. It's just like in school, just follow directions. And I know you didn't do that too well all the time.
But just work with these guys and they'll get you to the promised land. I promise you. Okay. ‸ All right. ‸ Thank you. All right. Our number three tonight is going to be number four. CE
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:46–00:28:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:50–00:28:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:53–00:28:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:56–00:28:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:00–00:29:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:03–00:29:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:13–00:29:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:22–00:29:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
My first inspection. I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I've attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case, but as of our last inspection on July 20th, 2023, the property remains in violation. I've
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:34–00:29:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
had contact with a property owner and provided two extensions. I brought this case before the code enforcement board as I've been working this case for 280 days and the violations have not been fully resolved. I sent the notice of hearing on June 1st, 2023, and it was sent certified and posted on the property in question violation.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:54–00:30:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:30:19–00:30:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:41–00:30:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:10–00:31:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:41–00:31:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Well, the storing junk autos, ‸ they all have to be registered and properly running. So just putting the batteries in and getting them running is only half the bat on all the violations. Yes. Last time I spoke with Mr. Sampson was back in 2017 when he had several cars parked. So he needs to keep them on the driveway.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:34–00:32:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:38–00:32:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:40–00:32:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
You've been through this process before. And he's stating that he's spoken to you about these same issues, but we keep going back. Because what happens is you could come off now. And then when you come back, you're going to be a repeat. No, I won't be coming back. I'm moving forward. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:39–00:33:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:49–00:33:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Those opposed. Motion passes. All right. Mr. Sampson. If you have any issues, please get with the code enforcement officers to notify them so they can work with you. Okay. I will. Thank you for being here. ‸ Right. Number
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:23–00:34:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:47–00:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:52–00:34:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the property which were millings to the Jason to stormwater drain system. And for the unpermitted fence around the vacant commercial lot storage of recreational vehicles appendix a article
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:02–00:35:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:19–00:35:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:24–00:35:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:30–00:35:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:35–00:35:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:41–00:35:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:46–00:35:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:51–00:35:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; the machine readings disagree here; words the first reading may have missed; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:02–00:36:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:13–00:36:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:30–00:36:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
according to that chapter 14, article 13, I believe it was, the recreation of vehicle is correctly stored. I did read today that it's actually a zoning violation. And I didn't have the time to research on the zoning violation given that I expected it was the city ordinance code issue. And the milling, I didn't, I didn't, I didn't know that, basically I just wanted it to patch certain parts of the property because water was puddling on it. But I don't want to build anything permanent on it. And if that's the only way for me to keep the milling, then I will just request time to have it removed in order to achieve compliance.
So if he wanted to use millings, he would have to go to the city engineer and community services and get it to be an approved product to put down. Right now, only concrete, asphalt, and pavers are approved for driveway. So
he's going to do a driveway, he's got to get a permit and then the substance he uses ‸ has to be approved because millings can wash off into the storm drain. I will tell you right now, they usually don't approve millings unless they're in an industrial area and they're packed a certain way. The
there's actually two lots here. He owns a lot with the house, which is one property, and then there's this property that's in front of us. It's two separate properties. So the RV cannot be on the property that's vacant because there's no primary structure, so you can't use it for accessory uses. So that's going to be part of it as well. It looks like it's one property, but it's technically two. One is a residential property, the other is commercial, general, whatever the zoning is for that. So it's actually two separate lots, and that might be confusing in this situation.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:59–00:39:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That is correct. It should not have a fence, but looking at the aerials, the entire aerial record shows that there used to be a chain link half wood fence. So I don't know if at one time it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:17–00:40:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have two properties. One is vacant commercial where the house is sitting at is residential. So if fixing the issue regarding the RV is moving it to the residential, will solve the issue. ‸ That's what I wanted to eventually do. Anyway, I just didn't move it because the code started.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:55–00:40:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:41:25–00:41:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:27–00:41:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, I don't know what his plans are for the property. If he wants to run a bobcat or something and dig up the millings and leave it dirt, that would not require a permit. If he wants to make an actual driveway like you see here, he's going to have to get a driveway permit and get it approved.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:56–00:42:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:12–00:42:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ say this again. Repeat exactly what you just said. I'm sorry. You just said you paid somebody with a bobcat, right? Yes. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. No. No. You certainly
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:17–00:43:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:53–00:43:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:57–00:44:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately show the property during my visits and my findings. ‸ Permit required, appendix A, article 15, section 2A. For the unpermitted porch built on the north side of the house. The additions built onto the utility area on the east side of the house. Attached to the carport and the unapproved substance placed in the parking area. Section 20-58, parking buses, large trucks in residential areas or on streets. And for the landscaping trucks and trailers parked on the property and at various times. Chapter
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:47–00:44:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
found the property in violation of the above-mentioned sections of the city code. I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in ‸ this case. But as of my
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:19–00:45:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:26–00:45:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:44–00:45:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And it was certified and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in case 22-841 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance. Or a fine of $75 be imposed for each day. The
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:46:16–00:46:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. Please state your name and address for the record.
[00:46:25]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
My name is Pastor Luis Barillas. And
[00:46:27]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:27–00:46:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right. First of all, we pass by this address every day with our school bus. And the grass looks very nice. Thank you. What can you tell us about it, sir?
[00:46:45]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Yes, sir. Well, I'm personally representing Luis. Like I mentioned before, I'm a pastor as well. So he's one of my church members. So I'm a little aware of the situation he has with his property. He acquired this property, I could say, around one year ago, May something last year. This was his first property. He's been doing landscaping for a few years. So, of course, ignorance or lack of knowledge that all the permit that he needed to do, ‸ he was so excited to have his first property ‸ acquired. So he started to do a lot of good things in that property.
[00:47:35]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
know,
[00:47:36]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:35–00:47:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:47:39]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
he started to try to see how he could comply ‸ with the permits and
[00:47:44]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
thing
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:44–00:47:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:47:45]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
As a matter of fact, in probably the last two, three weeks, even when the letter for this hearing was sent, I got involved trying to help him. And I'm a witness that he's been trying to work with different people. And probably
[00:47:58]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:57–00:48:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:48:00]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Why? Because, for example, when I try to offer to help him, ‸ I came to the city myself and I asked them, what do we need to comply? They told me I needed to contact planning and zoning, and then we need to get an engineer and different things. As a matter of fact, he hired somebody, an engineer, and the only response he got, it was like, oh, well, ‸ we're still talking with the
[00:48:25]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
code
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:25–00:48:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:48:25]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
enforcement. Probably they will want you to just turn off what you did already. And, you know, ‸ we're just going back and forth. So ‸ my only concern is, like, probably the best way to resolve this. Because he said he's been investing a lot of money. At the end of the day, he's like, this is my last thing. If I have to destroy it, I will destroy it, you know. But if
[00:48:49]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
there's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:49–00:48:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[00:48:49]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
another way to do it properly, he's more than willing to do it.
property, you can see the back portion area, which is about half of the house, you know, maybe a little less. He extended that. That's already done. If he wants to keep it, it would be better for him to get an engineer's letter because they can't spec what's already been built as far as those overhangs. So
doesn't meet the setbacks. So he either needs to redesign it to meet the ‸ setbacks of the property or just remove that, you know, in its total. So that's all he has left. He
to that property. Otherwise, we're ‸ in the same situation as Mr. Drake, bringing all the items outdoors and stuff. But this is where we are today. He just needs to get those permits, and the
it looks nice. I think that might be another path for you is to go through the Board of Adjustment and get approval for the setback so that you could keep this beautiful porch. And
then that's where that came from when he went there, and they said you have to go through planning and zoning. He would have to go to planning and zoning, make application to the BOA, pay whatever their application fee is, and then they would make that decision.
It's been going back and forth. I believe at one point Mr. Lightholder was involved trying to help him get permits as well. Obviously, we've been working with for over 200 days, and we have spoken to him. Officer
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:14–00:51:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
him. We've spoken to several people. Those are really the only two things that he has to do. He has to go get the permits for that area and then just make sure that he doesn't violate the BTR by parking the heavy
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:27–00:51:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:37–00:51:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:51:38–00:51:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But they've been gone. So we're satisfied with that, but we don't want him to bring them back just because he went and got his BTR. Okay. That's why we're trying to...
The storing outdoors is items in the back of the property. There was some landscaping material, different stuff that was piled up in the back of the property. Some of that may have been related to the construction work being done on the property, and without a permit, it's considered storing outdoors.
We got permits required in storing outdoors. If he gets a permit and the items are related to the permit, then he would be allowed to have them for the course of the permit.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:46–00:52:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:09–00:53:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to get an inspection every six months. Otherwise, it's going to expire. So as long as ‸ he keeps getting inspections, he would be fine. But he's going to have to do it in stages.
Right. If he applies to go to BOA and submits an application, they give him a date, we would automatically hold our code case until they made a ruling on whether or not they were going to accept it. But if they say no, then he's got to make that decision on whether he's going to tear it down and ‸ make it smaller or come into compliance.
How long does it take to get that permit approved? Because I know that goes to a whole different other meeting. So is this something where it's just going to get, like, parked and moved?
It's not going to be over-the-counter, but it's probably going to be a 30-day process, depending. His big problem is going to be the back roof area that he added because
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:54:09–00:54:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:42–00:54:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:54:59–00:55:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:07–00:55:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to make a motion, please. Yes, sir. Case number CE 22-841 be found in violation of permits required storing outdoors. and the violation be corrected within 60 days or a fine of $50 a day will be imposed. Second with discussion. Yes, sir.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:49–00:55:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:06]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:06–00:56:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:08]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the
[00:56:08]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:08–00:56:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:11]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
this is only extension. She was like, I don't think it should be a problem to issue a permit just for that one. So according to us, it was going to be an easy thing just to pay the fines or whatever. But then it turns out that later they said, oh no, you have to turn it off. I don't know where the communication came from And probably in trying to get it in compliance, he's been trying to get help from different people.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:55–00:56:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:56]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
letter, engineer letter, ‸ If we refer to who does that, for example, because we don't know anybody, you know, if we know, we can pay, do whatever we have to do and resolve it.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:18–00:57:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:33]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
until we voted. Or if we have just something like we can explain ‸ very well to the engineer what we're looking for or what is being required from the city. That way, I can look online and just trying to find an engineer office.
‸ Okay. And I would just like to mention for them, the permit text at the counter, they take a quick glance, they look, they see it, but then it starts to go through planning and zoning and then approval from the building official. So if you have any questions on building, I would suggest that you make an appointment with the building official and go straight to the main guy and get all the answers. But as far as everything else, if you stay in contact with us, we'll
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:58:21–00:58:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:47–00:58:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:48]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
[00:58:51]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
so you'll get a direction of where you need to start. All right. They'll give you the roadmap. I promise you. I ‸ promise you. That's all we need, sir. Yes, sir. You have a wonderful day and
I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case. The photos accurately show the property during my visits and my findings of chapter
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:35–00:59:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:46–00:59:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:53–00:59:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
afford the property manager an opportunity to establish a timeline and addressing the code violations. I have not received a timeline from the property manager and no permits for the violations cited have been applied for. I
and posted on the property in violation. Staff finds in case 23-14 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days ‸ be given to come into compliance or a fine of $100 be imposed for each day the violation remains until compliance is achieved. Property
Yes. Okay. You swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Yes. Okay, state your name and address for the record.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:57–01:01:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:09–01:01:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:01:11–01:01:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Sure. So from the last time we were here, there were a lot of open items, which up until today, we had addressed everything except for the roof. The roof was the biggest topic of the last meeting and,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:41–01:01:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the expense of that, et cetera. So we did have, we have been researching and we found an engineer to give us an inspection, give us a letter saying, hey, this is the condition of the roof. We did bring his report, but I wasn't sure. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:57–01:02:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:02:21–01:02:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
all of the potholes. ‸ I guess ‸ another big issue that an officer has is the trash, you know, around the property. This is a weekly occurrence. I don't know how... I said this last time. I don't know how to close that out. Every, you know, as soon as we remove something, within a couple of days, there's another, you know, item.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:45–01:02:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So again, that's exterior general conditions. That's underneath the roof of the one out building. That needs to be fixed. And then the areas over the walkways, which we discussed last time. And
That like areas like that, that all needs to be patched and fixed. And if you remember in the back, there was an area where there was a crack where you could see light through the out
they did not inspect the entire roof and that leaks and stuff may occur on other buildings. That might be approved and then the roof would be okay. But the exterior general conditions and the exterior general conditions related to the parking lot have not been cured as of today.
So you're receiving real income from this? Correct. All right. And part of my problem with this case is that you didn't provide or follow up with our code enforcement as we asked you to do at the last meeting with that timeline. ‸ And it's obvious from the pictures that you're not in compliance with the parking lot. This is a pretty large property. It
It covers several acres of land and it is a blight on this community and the condition that it's in. I don't, I wish that we weren't here, you know, for this type of thing. But you're making money on the property. Because of that, you know, purpose of earning income on there, you should be held to a higher standard. And you're
that's not obvious. I mean, you know, ‸ we have, you're correct. I did not provide a plan timeline because we were working in the back of the building. We
So we have painted over rotten wood, for example. Yes, the paint was on, is on the building. However, none of the other items that were, have been brought out in the past and tonight have been repaired. It
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:00–01:06:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. Mr. Vincent, how do you know that it was painted over? Because it is of some distance and we went there and we evaluated the wood, right? We did the repairs necessary if
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:18–01:06:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be changed because you had an issue with going inside the spaces and said you see daylight inside. We addressed all that. ‸ I spent almost $20,000 servicing, doing everything necessary to comply with that. And one of my concerns is if you see something there, you don't communicate with me. I said to you, listen, I'm here to work with you but for some reason you don't communicate with me. You quietly go to the property, see something, don't tell me, right? It's a big property. You know, it's not easy to just go and just see everything all at once. Some of those photos
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:58–01:07:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I will just mention this. If they fixed all of those items, they did so without permits because those are structural items, that hole in the building that showed daylight. So if work is being done
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:17–01:07:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
unpermitted, that's an issue as well. We concede that they painted the back of the building, but exterior general conditions means exactly that. No boards over doors, no roofs falling down, no cracks over the walkway, picking up the trash. That's all we're saying. You may have done some things but you did not do everything. And the board ruled to table this provided that they brought a timeline and set a time frame to correct because they were asking for years. Now they're saying they did it all in 30 days. We
you call them like, hey, can you come walk the property with me and help me to understand what you see? They'll be more than happy to do that because that's part of their job. So the thing is we want you to get this straightened because I used to that used to be my pit stop riding from my house to the river because I was tired on my bicycle going fishing. So that used to be my spot. So I sympathize with you but the goal is to get the property up to par in which you are limiting your liability because if
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:01–01:09:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:07–01:09:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a new tire. You understand? So the only thing they're trying to do is get you to understand that we've got to get this up in code because if it continues it's going to continue to depreciate and go down. so
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:30–01:09:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:49–01:09:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:59–01:10:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
by today before I get to it I don't know how to explain that part. ‸ Because things happen sometimes for example I'm going to tell you something with the garbage in the back. I'm having a big problem with people passing through there and dumping stuff every single time. Now I have a limited amount of dumpsters and if I get overwhelmed with garbage I put what I can put in the dumpster. I
The first time I spoke with him the first thing I said to him hey listen I am here to work with you. You're doing your job. I understand that My job is to work with you he can communicate that I said that to him but I personally think and this is just my opinion that he would go there see something and ‸ you know he can just give me a call to just say Patrick this is a situation I heard there's no communication in that part and I
me give you an example how many properties are you dealing with you dealing with that one property? ‸ correct okay these gentlemen deal with all the properties ‸ so dealing
phone and call him I promise you he'll answer every time if not he'll get back with you So it's a lot easier if you picked up the phone and say hey even if you called him every day he might get tired of you but guess what he's got to answer the phone ‸ he's going to give you that respect that you deserve okay
Mr. Chair I would also like for the record, since this is a second hearing as I mentioned in the first hearing, we did have a meeting with the city manager and the police chief and councilman Hearns and we
that needed to be done and we covered everything back then and there is things on that property today that have been there they didn't just crop up this ‸ area right here did not just crop up in the last 30 days so this is what I'm saying is we have been in contact
[01:12:19]Speaker 19 (introduced as “Luis Barillas” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:12:26–01:12:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
how to fix the back road. and you know we can give all the advice we want but they have to start to act on it so that's what we're saying is they need to give us a timeline or tell us how many days they need to correct these violations it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:05–01:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:13:28–01:13:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is perfectly fine so we don't need a new roof at this present time based on his assessment that's what he told us did you pay him for that yes get your money back
so now your engineer can work with our engineer because your engineer is working on other city codes so they don't look at the same thing all the time the way our city engineer looks at it because our code says one thing now he's thinking about a code from California so they don't match up talking
get on the same page with our people so now we're talking the same language and now we're on one accord so now you know exactly what you need without spending all this extra money
I mean he's here not me you know so I'm depending on what he provides me and this is what he provides me so you're saying that I need to get ‸ with the city engineer right which I didn't know anything about that so I
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:15:12–01:15:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:29–01:15:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
see that there's two lien reductions on our agenda case docket for tonight that we're considering so it certainly will be possible if you were to be in noncompliance and to have fines assessed to come back to the board after your work is completed and you're in compliance and ask for a reduction in the future I just wanted to make sure you were aware of that so I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:55–01:15:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we follow ‸ staff recommendations provide for a 30-day remedy or a fine of $250 per day the reason I increased my fine is because of the size of the lot the blight that it occurs on the community and the visibility that it has along our main corridor in US 1
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:29–01:16:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:53–01:16:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:57–01:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in favor say aye aye those opposed the ayes have it motion passes you understand you have 30 days to come to a remedy but the biggest thing is stay in contact with them to if you get them out there just walk the property with you to help you understand what's going on and I'm sure they'll work with you okay I thank you guys for being here
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:55–01:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the address ‸ 1420 Stetson drive I am submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case the photos accurately show the property during my visits and my findings of permit required appendix a article 15 section 2 a ‸ for the windows that were replaced ‸ in the front of the house
visited the site 10 times during my first inspection I found the property in violation of the above mentioned ‸ section of the city code this case was initiated after several citizens complaints and two subsequent search warrants by the Cocoa Police Department I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case but as of my last inspection on July 20th 2023 the property remains in violation I have been working on this case since January 31st 2023 and have been in contact with the property owner I
I have been working this case for 170 days and the violation has not been fully resolved I sent the notice of hearing on June 9th 2023 and it was certified and posted on the property in violation staff finds in case 23-102 that the owner ‸ violation ‸ recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or a fine of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:19–01:19:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:39–01:19:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:41–01:19:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:49–01:19:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:12–01:20:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
didn't know about the January one but in March the SWAT team showed up and busted the house up the next day well that very day but the next day I went and saw Vince Mr. Vince I'm sorry and
we bought the house back in 2020 this front window was done and we looked for labels we looked for everything we could find on the window and Mr. Vince had recommended that I go to Ace Hardware Lowe's Home Depot to try to get some sort of the type of window that they the people had put in there and it is a high impact window but there was never a permit pulled for that front window and I couldn't get anybody at our ‸ Ace Hardware or Lowe's or Home Depot to even help me with it because they did not well I'm not a contractor I don't know how to do all of that stuff and so to know how to take care of getting a permit with the city involved in something that was in violation I really didn't know how to do that but like I said we had completed I called Dixon
see if we could find the name brand see if we could find anything on that front window but like I said it is a high impact window but the people that had the house before ‸ had replaced it and I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:53–01:23:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:24:00–01:24:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I I didn't know that we would we were in violation of anything because when we bought the house we bought it from a realtor and I I'm pretty sure the realtor was from ‸ like that Fort Lauderdale Miami area and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:24:40–01:24:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:55–01:24:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
well the it looks like it could be something very simple but then seems like it could be complex so the best advice I can give you is stay in contact with these gentlemen so they can help you and walk you through the process to get this done as painless as possible because at this point all you need is a window I'm sorry a permit so ‸ you need to get with them to ensure that you got to walk it hand in hand in this process to get this done as painless as possible
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:15–01:26:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
he and even though I bought the house he said to me you know do you realize how many times we've heard that story about people you know moving in or buying a place and the proper permit to put and pulled on the windows but I wouldn't have known
can immediately apply for that permit a contractor knows how to do that ‸ especially a reputable one like window world so I just wanted to know if you intended to move forward in that direction and if you were going to do it within the next 30 days because what's been recommended by our staff is that we give you a 30 day window
so I just wanted to make sure that ‸ if we follow staff recommendations and provide you with that 30 day window that that's a sufficient amount of time for you to get window world hired
like a plexiglass that will not suffice as the repair of the window so even if you just do the glass you got to make sure it's the correct glass that needs to go into the window you can't cut a piece of plexiglass and slide it in there and say okay it's fixed okay but
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:57–01:28:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:07–01:29:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:26–01:29:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:56–01:29:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:57–01:29:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:01–01:30:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:30:10–01:30:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:30–01:30:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the autos on the property that do not have current registrations as well as the autos that are not operable storing outdoors chapter 6 section 6 dash 900 B 11 for the items stored ‸ outdoors around the carport area the tires vehicle parts equipment and tools to work on vehicles and other miscellaneous items I visited the site eight times during my first inspection I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:33–01:31:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
posted on the property in violation staff finds in case 23-426 that the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days to be given to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day the violations remain until compliance is achieved
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:10–01:32:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:32:16–01:32:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
went by there today both of the boats are gone I told them it wasn't gone by tomorrow I was going to have them towed away been having problems with these renters I am going to give them a two week notice because I'm selling that property so but they have moved the boats I told
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:47–01:32:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to clean up the place I agree ‸ yeah it needs to be fixed so like I said when I drove by today the boats were gone and there was one truck parked there it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:13–01:33:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:29–01:33:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:31–01:33:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:53–01:33:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:57–01:34:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:02]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
[01:34:06]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the record my name is Michael Folger code enforcement officer I'm submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case the photos accurately depict the property during my visits and show my findings of weeds chapter 6 section
[01:34:21]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:20–01:34:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:24]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
storing junk autos chapter 6 section 6 dash 902 b1 and 2 I
[01:34:31]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:30–01:34:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:34]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case but as of my last inspection July 20th 2023 the property remains in violation we've
[01:34:49]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:49–01:34:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:34:50]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
case since October 13th 2022 and have made attempts to contact the property owner 2023
[01:34:58]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:56–01:35:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:00]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
violation staff finds in case 22
[01:35:04]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:03–01:35:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[01:35:07]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
the owner is in violation and recommends 30 days be given to come into compliance or a fine of $50 be imposed for each day the violation remains
[01:35:15]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
till
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:35:15–01:35:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[01:35:16]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:19–01:35:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right ma'am what can you tell us ‸ I do I believe I have a buyer for the truck okay I'm not sure where you're drawing the line ‸ referring to those as junk they do run ‸ they're not pretty but they do run they have current tags I didn't know that was an issue I understand there's an issue with the weeds I've been working on it I
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:00–01:36:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
mid-spring during that time the neighbor behind me without my permission came over into my backyard cut down a bunch of my Australian pine trees and left the mess in the yard if you know anything about Australian pines if you don't take them out completely they come back with a vengeance which they do which they did I've been working on those the if this was taken today I was out there this morning till noon if
did go back and get more water I'm working on it I'm not I'm not sure what it is you want me to do about the truck is it because it needs a paint job is it
Mr. ‸ Chair if I can ‸ all vehicles must be registered and operable so they cannot have flat tires they cannot have low tires they cannot sit in the same position for months and years at a time and just sit there and disintegrate so
a new tag and updated it then that's good but you can even see in this picture the tires are actually dry rotting they're losing air already this vehicle has not moved in a very long time So if it runs, she can contact Officer Folger and he'll go out there and she can start it up and back it up and show that it runs but it has to be roadworthy and operable as well as legally tagged and registered
[01:37:37]Speaker 24 (introduced as “Michael Folger” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
definition has nothing to do with the look of it it doesn't have anything to do with the paint being scratched it has to do with actually being roadworthy let
can provide that to Officer Folger and show that there's a current registration assigned to that vehicle that would at least show that it does because as of right now it
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:22–01:38:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:47–01:38:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:00–01:39:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the plate was current. They told me that when I put a sticker on there, which I did in April, they told me to take a box cutter and do like an X. And they said that if somebody tries to steal it, it's going
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:39:02–01:39:17 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:17–01:39:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:40:06–01:40:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
pretty much in compliance there's some weeds in the driveway I sprayed them with wound up last night if you're looking at like I don't know if you're concerned about the backyard or not I would ask for more time on that simply because I work in the evenings on this and with all the rain and I get a dry evening I'm out there working on it but we've had so much rain that it's it's very difficult and it's very difficult to where I was out there this morning and eventually I just had to quit because it was just so hot
in the case of CE 22742 I place the motion to proceed with the staff recommendation on the violation of weeds and storing junk on autos for an extension of 60 days or $50 a day if it's not
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:41:24–01:41:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:28–01:41:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in favor say ‸ aye aye those opposed motion passes Thank you very much. yes ma'am Thank you for being here if you work with officer Folger he'll get you to the promised land
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:55–01:41:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:02–01:42:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:25–01:42:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:37–01:42:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:42–01:42:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
miscellaneous outdoor storage items near and around the carport I visited the site eight times during my first inspection I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code. I attempt to gain voluntary compliance in this case by my last inspection July
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:58–01:42:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the property remains in violation I've been working on this case since October 13th 2022 and I have not had any contact with the property owner after several attempts I brought this case before the code enforcement boards I've been working this case for 280 days the violations have not been fully resolved I sent the notice of hearing on June 1st 2023 and it was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:20–01:43:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:27–01:43:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:30–01:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:31–01:43:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:43:34–01:43:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:40–01:43:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:44–01:43:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:49–01:43:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:54–01:43:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:01–01:44:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
submitting a packet of documents and photos associated with this case the photos actually depict the property during my visits and ‸ show my findings of exterior general condition section 6-1003 a through p for the roof of the second structure on the property untreated raw fascia wood and the exterior and disrepair for the walls trim fascia storing junk auto section 6-902 B1 through 2 for the storage of unregistered and unserviceable vehicles storing outdoors section
miscellaneous outdoor storage items permit required of index A article 15 section 2A for the unpermitted AC units and shed on the property the shed actually has an expired permit from 2021 I visited the site nine times through my first inspection I found the property in violation of the above mentioned sections of the city code I have attempted to gain voluntary compliance in this case but as of my last inspection on
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:05–01:45:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:11–01:45:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:17–01:45:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:19–01:45:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
violations have not been fully resolved I sent the notice of hearing on June 1st 2023 and it was sent certified and posted in the property in violation due to longevity of the case and no progress made staff finds in case 22-590 that the owner is in violation and recommend 3 days ‸ to come into compliance where
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:37–01:45:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:48–01:45:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:51–01:45:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:02–01:46:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'd like to say that those pictures are all older pictures and that picture yes it was taken today however that vehicle was sold and it was moved today and I have proof of that right here with the towing through triple a as far as the painting what happened was it was a mix-up at Lowe's with the color of the paint as you can see it was very close they mixed up the hue we were trying to go over and it started raining so that I just have to go back and get the correct paint and correct that as far as the vehicles on the property every vehicle on the property runs all the vehicles on the property have been registered in the state of Florida with the exception of the the truck that I have in the back the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:09–01:47:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
pulled it out today because I wanted to take a picture of it to get a solid answer because I've been given from the first time that I talked to officer officer Gonzalez the the letter was initially sent to 501 Wilson there is no 501 Wilson It does not exist. my address is [address] ‸ because I'm
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:58–01:47:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:06–01:48:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:48:11–01:48:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
he didn't respond to me for months. I have where he stopped responding to me for me trying to come into compliance. Mr. Roberts being the athletic director at the school that I work at knows that I was teaching as well as the basketball coach I was coaching at Jolie Smith we set up to meet at I believe it was 530 he showed up 15 minutes early I told him hey I'm at Jolie I'll leave early I'll let the head coach finish practice and I'll come to meet with you so that we can discuss everything that needs to be done and he said you still have the bus here that's not in compliance I don't I'm gonna go ahead on because you're not done with everything that you need to be done with so I've tried to do everything I can do to come in compliance I refuse to have conversation with officer Gonzalez
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:06–01:49:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
he's been extremely rude and demeaning to me and I just want to get this done I'm a foster parent of three kids I'm fighting for these children in court I have my own two biological
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:16–01:49:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
problem I have children I can't have there's no permit for a installation of an AC on your website I've done everything that I can and so now I'm here to rectify it with whatever you ‸ can offer me
once I realized that the first notice got returned there's multiple addresses for this parcel so I sent them out to each and every one of them ‸ regardless and I told them that
but you got the notice to appear today yes he put it in my yard so that's the only way you were notifying you didn't receive any mail from officer Gonzalez
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:25–01:50:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
first started I didn't get it when it initially started afterwards I started receiving mail like I said when I talked to him when I got the first letter it was already 60 days into the case so I'm like hey I'm not being non-compliant I didn't get a letter and ‸ that's when he said you need to have the property appraiser fix it that's your problem like I said it's
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:01–01:51:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:02–01:51:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this property trying to get it rehabbed and do everything that I can but like I said I'm literally fighting for my children's lives and to do what I can do and it's it's hard I'm one person on a single income in
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:31–01:51:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:32–01:51:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you take off 60 days it's obvious that this case we've been working with this gentleman to get this corrected because we're almost up almost progress made on the property as far as the paint I could care less if it matches the exact color because our code doesn't dictate that it just says that you can't have unprotected areas of the thing we're really dealing with the AC units if
so that needs to be done so those are the two and then whatever debris is scattered around the property needs to stay off as far as a jet ski it's going to be depending on where he's parking because this is a unique piece property because it borders Wilson but then there's a side street called Lucas so
he has to watch where he parks especially trailers and stuff because he has to meet those setback requirements so that's kind of where we are right now I understand that he said he didn't get the notices but I just want to point out that even if you take 60 days off of this case we've been working to get this property corrected this has not been a ‸ forceful ‸ push you in we've been trying to get it corrected
thank you for clarification ‸ I want to just say that I understand that ‸ you're frustrated and the first step in correcting this process is just showing up here which not everybody does so
yes I was going to say he hasn't responded to a message since I sent him ‸ the video of the bus running in October of 2022 that's the last response that I ‸ had ‸ well the last response I had from him was September 20th of 2022 I did talk to Mr. Bunt in December when I mentioned that officer Gonzalez didn't respond to me he stated ‸ that they had been busy and all this stuff which I don't feel like is a reasonable excuse for over 60 days of
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:06–01:54:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:54:21–01:54:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:54:39–01:54:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:48–01:54:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:56–01:54:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:03–01:55:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to the dog cage ‸ the dog in it there's of course the jet ski that's inoperable there there's just miscellaneous items throughout the property excuse me
that's going to be the situation it's not because somebody doesn't like the way something looks typically if your property is falling apart and the seats all sun rotted and it's just sitting there then it ‸ becomes storing junk and autos and etc
‸ officer Gonzalez explicitly stated to me that he didn't believe that my van or the bus ran because of the way they looked and then that's when I sent him the video of him and he stopped responding to me
spoke with Nigel regarding the bus. Again, we go back to roadworthy. You can't have doors ripped off of a bus with open things and equipment hanging off. And just because you can turn a
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:56:07–01:56:17 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:17–01:56:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
dade city someone ‸ today yes because the person that bought the vehicle okay lived in dade city so they didn't have a way to ‸ drive here to get it and drive it back okay so I