The City's agenda only — no minutes record on file — no AI-written text
The City's record
What the City's record shows
The City's minutes for this meeting are not on file in this archive. This briefing states only what the City's agenda lists. Nothing here is taken from the machine transcription.
The City's agenda: CC_Reg_Packet_08_04_2020 (its items are not yet read into this briefing).
The recording's machine transcription is below. It is unverified: words and names may be misheard, and it cannot establish who acted or how anyone voted.
Agenda (the City's wording)
The City's agenda for this meeting is on file (CC_Reg_Packet_08_04_2020), but its item list has not been read reliably by machine yet, so no outline is shown.
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, on YouTube, in a new tab.
76 suspect passage(s) marked in place.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 9 voices separated from the audio.
5 short machine repair(s) (6 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs, whether a voice was detected where the words are and a language review for likely mishearings.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 91.4% of 3,269 content words.
Dotted words (113 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
76 passages (20% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:28–00:00:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
group. She's here to present the additional candidates that were provided to you in email. And she's going to give you an update on the recruitment process. Good discussion. The next steps after that.
I do have an update that I received as I was driving here. One of the candidates has withdrawn this evening from ‸ consideration. Therefore, the only candidate that I have to present for your further consideration would
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:17–00:01:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I submitted a packet to you. On the first page of that packet, you have the three finalists that you selected at the last meeting prior to reopening the search. Those were your top three candidates at that time. We received a total of eight applicants during that window. That you selected. For further applications. Out of those eight. There were two that I recommended for further reconsider for further consideration and one essence. With. So in fairness and transparency, I recommend that a virtual meeting be held. With the one candidate so that you can make. ‸ More informed decision. If you choose to add an additional candidate to your list of those that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:31–00:02:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For interviews for the finalists for your consideration. The dates to be determined. Based upon your availability as well. We can host virtual town hall meetings with the assistance of your IT department. And residents will be allowed to submit questions to the candidates. Each candidate would have about 45 minutes. Sometimes it takes out and sometimes it does not but we would schedule them one hour apart. On day two.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:28–00:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We would. Have a round Robin tight. Where. Council can meet with each candidate here in chambers. So that you're all hearing the same questions receiving the same answers. Have a break for lunch. And. Continue the afternoon. And. Have a special meeting at
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:32–00:04:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Gardner-Young. So if we interviewed Dr. Moffitt and Ms. Gardner-Young, Mr. Stockton, that would be three candidates. I think in the case of Stockton, we're familiar with his credentials and his experience and the relationship. So I would feel comfortable just going straight to the in-person interviews and trying to make up for some time already lost.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:52–00:05:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:28–00:06:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:46–00:06:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:57–00:06:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The town hall, we can do it either virtually or do it in person at a city facility. If you'd like to do it more in person with the candidates. So we just need to know to make arrangements. We can check the availability, such as the Jolie-Smith Center or... You're talking
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:49–00:08:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:58–00:08:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:06–00:09:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:09:38–00:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:58–00:09:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
What we've experienced in the past is that residents can submit their questions online via email, either beforehand or during a live stream if your system has that capability.
there are certain questions that certainly will be omitted when you're talking about the race, religion and stuff like that and sexual preference and so forth and so on. But there's a whole list of things that probably need to be looked at as well.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:08–00:12:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
not have enough time in an hour interview. You're not going to necessarily have enough time for questions. We'll have to group them together and choose the... Prioritize them.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:18–00:13:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:23–00:13:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:13:49–00:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:11–00:14:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Donna, if you could help us write a bio so we could post to the public on each candidate. Sure. Like a candidate page, maybe per person or something. No?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:35–00:14:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:46–00:14:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
go from there. So what is the process after... So when we get done with this process next week, is the following week we'll have the discussion for a selection or how will... What will we do?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:54–00:16:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
try to get some feedback before from the city council. and then I go in and describe an agreement. And some of the provisions in the agreement are going to be a candidate's asks. That a policy and business
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:41–00:16:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:44–00:16:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in a way that I find legally sufficient to recommend to you all on the business terms. And they could be subject to negotiations right up to the point of when the draft contract is submitted to the city council for consideration. Because those types of issues are out, you know, outside of, you know, my purview. You know, who am I getting in between what a candidate is asking and what the employer of the
council is willing to give. You know, that's a negotiation and it's between the candidate and the council. In terms of that document in proper form and legally sufficient, you know, I make certain recommendations to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:26–00:17:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:43–00:17:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:48–00:17:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:51–00:17:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:18:06–00:18:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
still climbing and going up ‸ and, you know, just make a decision or just leave it alone. and just let it go where it goes. but just too much activity there. and nothing's happening. and like I said ‸ there's no mass no nothing going on there. and
For the face coverings. For the face covering, but ‸ they're still not wearing the mask. yeah what the council had previously done as far as action was essentially close the parks to recreational passage only So it still allowed users to walk or use the park space, but not necessarily ‸ congregate in the areas maybe something you want to consider.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:04–00:20:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
suggest that you just yeah I suggest that all council when you get the opportunity, just drop out there Pull up in there. And you don't know exactly what we're
and handed out masks to people now I'm not sure you know once we leave are they keeping them on? I don't know but short of you know putting together an overtime ‸ detail and just sitting somebody in those parks or sitting two or three officers in those parks on a 24 or
you know I don't know if we can we can't be in there every minute like I said we've worked but you know at being in and out, at doing drive-throughs of them of you know working with them trying to work with the like ‸ I said I met you know with several of
I know the majority of them very well especially at Provost Park and you know talk to them explain to them you know and I get that yeah we understand we understand we understand but you know once we once we're leave for a little bit, are they taking them off? Are they grouping back up? I mean last time I was in there there were there were probably 30 or 40 people when I drove up in there after I finished talking to for probably 30 minutes there might have been 10 left so I mean the ‸ presence will do it I mean we can we can work on, I'll work on putting together an overtime detail and you know set two officers in the park for at least the daylight hours
and it's and it's not so much as sitting in there it's just ‸ driving in there from time to time, walking through maybe and just getting back in the car. but we're not and I know I'm not asking for anyone to just sit out there. I
‸ until another officer drives in there you know they know ‸ and I admit I mean they can see the marked cars especially at Provost They can see us coming from you know any way we come, they see us coming way ahead of time.
we're working on actually using the JAG grant which will be coming to you guys in the next meeting to to purchase cameras we actually met with the vendors Monday
to go to all the parks and actually have them lay out ‸ what systems they think and what cameras they think we would would best work for us And what we could do and you know
how we can install them, what analytics we want to look at for that system so that's it's coming It's just a matter of you know getting it put together. yeah
and I don't know the cost of that, that playground equipment that was just installed over there but some nice ‸ new equipment and and man the kids families don't want to take their kids out there They utilize the equipment. I see them at the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:43–00:24:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:29–00:26:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording