[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:00–00:00:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:06–00:00:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
our pleasure
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:11–00:00:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
by roll call. With everyone, including myself,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:00:20–00:00:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
your cell phones and pay booth, etc.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:25–00:00:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All
right,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:28–00:00:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'd like to give thanks for allowing us all to arrive here at beautiful Cocoa City Hall tonight safely. I'd like to give thanks for watching over us as we just endeavor these recent storms.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:43–00:00:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this storm or the effects from the storm. Continue to watch over our city and let us prosper. In the name of Jesus, amen. Amen.
Let's play.
I
pledge allegiance to
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:00:59–00:01:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Madam Clerk, may we do roll call, please, ma'am.
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:18–00:01:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:31–00:01:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
that is being brought forth by councilman Goins. So I think this should go on. Is that city business? Is that my? Yes.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:48–00:01:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:51–00:01:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the agenda to reflect on the city council, sorry, ma'am, and sirs, city council agenda item, and it will be item number three,
no,
six. Seven, three.
Seven, three.
Okay. It will be item number seven, three. Yes, ma'am. Okay. Cool. All right. Now I'm looking for a second.
Second.
I have a second on the floor to amend the
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:19–00:02:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this particular item to be added to the agenda.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:27–00:02:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
say by saying aye. Aye. And then nays. Aye as heaven. Aye as
heaven unanimously.
Okay. Proceeding on to
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:39–00:02:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
With the wishes of council.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:49–00:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:52–00:02:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:56–00:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chair's more public question. All in favor saying aye. Aye. Any nays.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:02–00:03:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you very much. Proceeding
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:06–00:03:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Great Florida Space Coast, Miss Angela Neal.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:15–00:03:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Hi. Thank you guys for having me here today and letting me be part of this, the council meeting today. I'm here on behalf of the Economic Development Commission of Florida Space Coast to share the unified brand that was developed and launched. This past January.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:37–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
And
so you can see the logo and tagline here.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:41–00:03:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. There we go. So a little bit of background. This was two years in the making and about one year ago I came to the city council to share with you guys the progress and how we were getting feedback and how you can contribute to that feedback. And so it's really exciting to have full circle and be able to share the brand with you today.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:03–00:04:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:04–00:04:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
It
did take two years to from the well not ‸ the idea came multiple years even before that. But from the time that we started to put the
pen
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:11–00:04:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
on the paper and how we're planning this out to execution. It was two years. We had over 3,000 participants in the brand and so that was between internal stakeholders throughout Brevard County. The municipalities. There were a lot of the professional organizations businesses and then in addition we reached outside ‸ of the county and across the United States actually to do surveys. And then also two focus groups or four focus groups in two different areas. That was Raleigh, North Carolina and Houston, Texas.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:40–00:04:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to ensure that we were understanding the internal feedback from our community to make sure it represented who we were and had everybody's voice in it. In addition to understanding the external community and what they thought we were and where there's opportunities for improvement and ways that we could really position ourselves as a community the way that we would like. So a little bit about the brand. And so whenever you look
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:06–00:05:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
trademark and that's a piece of the brand. There's a brand story. There's messaging. There's a color palette. And at the end there's actually going to be a QR code where you can go there and access and download the brand guide. And our goal for and the reason we want to involve the community is we would love to see this brand as a
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:28–00:05:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:05:30–00:05:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
so we could use this brand side by side with all the municipalities with Brevard County's brand, but also all the business entities where we all rise together and can flourish and prosper and just really show that unified voice and do well as a whole. So this tomorrow launches here is the tagline and it means
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:52–00:05:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And no matter which ‸ direction humanity heads next know that its launch pad is Florida Space Coast. We also have some additional taglines that you can utilize like push what's possible or pursue what's next. So depending on what your business is or what you do, you might find some other taglines that could be beneficial in helping to position your business. This is the color palette and I won't go into a lot of detail there just to be cognizant of the time. But this is again on the website that you'll have access ‸ to if you do the QR code. This is the icon and as you can see, it's three different contrails, one going up like the rocket contrail and then also the sunrise and sunset.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:35–00:06:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
then we also have the green at the bottom that's representative of the green space and nature in this area. It was extremely important for us to recognize and appreciate nature in this brand because we want to attract businesses and people that attracted. They respect nature the same way that we do.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:56–00:06:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that's what that purple is representative of.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:02–00:07:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You can see a lot of different shapes in here if you really look at it. It's kind of like ‸ the modern day Picasso of Florida's Space Coast. So this is the brand altogether. And next I'm going to show you guys a short video. And if you listen to the video very carefully, that's actually our brand story. And everything that's in this video was what we heard from the community. All the footage is from the community. It's local footage. But everything that you'll see in it is what the community told us throughout those two years. And everything you'll hear through the story is also that. So I hope that when you hear it, you'll think, I did say that or that was what we said or that's what we think. And so I'll go ahead and share that with you now.
Oops.
Maybe there's a...
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:54–00:07:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Can you play videos on here?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:58–00:08:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
A
PDF. So there's not a video here. So this is the beautiful sunset that you will find in the video. But this video will be accessible to you if you...
‸ One,
it's on YouTube. And so if you look
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:17–00:08:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But in addition, you will have access to it whenever you... Maybe that's another reason to fill out ‸ the little form and get all the access to the brand guide. But you'll have access to the video. You can share that out. I am disappointed that we weren't able to share it. But it's a beautiful brand story. And you'll be able to see that and read it ‸ whenever you go. So some of our caught in the wild people wearing... You'll see the lapel pins.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:42–00:08:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You can put it on signage. So we are not saying no to anyone putting that logo and icon anywhere. That ‸ helps to represent their business and
help
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:08:55–00:08:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to represent our community. And this is, again... We had 1,500 pins distributed. This was back maybe at the beginning of July. So there have been a lot more as well. And so you'll see people in the community. And we can also give you some if you stop by the EDC or
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:10–00:09:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:12–00:09:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:16–00:09:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or if you go on their website, you can look at the issue. We had
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:21–00:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
about how you can position this area
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:27–00:09:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a great place to live, work, and play. You'll see billboards throughout the community.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:31–00:09:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And, again, you'll see the ‸ icons and the fonts and everything that's in line with the brand. These are some digital display ads you'll find on Florida today. We also have blogs that you
could
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:47–00:09:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
participate in that we will publish in Space Coast Daily. And so we're accepting community writers. And so that's a way for you to not only amplify the brand but also what's important to you
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:58–00:09:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the community. And then this is the ‸ QR code that I've been promising you guys this whole time where you can view the video and then download any of the other brand assets available. And that is all I have. Do you guys have any questions?
[unclear audio — 0:23 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:16–00:10:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:39–00:10:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We had an excellent
camaraderie
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:48–00:10:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
there in representation
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:51–00:11:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]
Thank you. Thank you. And it is a community brand. And I think it's a great way to ‸ bring the community together. And so this isn't an EDC brand. ‸ They're executors of pulling it together, but it's a community brand. So thank you for that.
Yes, even Senator,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:36–00:11:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
recognized him on our
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:11:40–00:11:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:11:41–00:11:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:44–00:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, excellent.
Thank you. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:51–00:11:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We will proceed in this order, please.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:57–00:11:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then Deputy Mayor
Hunt.
Hello, Angela.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:03–00:12:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I know we were going to do a series of ads in professional publications. Do you know what any of those are offhand?
So right now we also have, which I didn't share today, but there's,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:20–00:12:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't know if anybody's seen that. So there's those.
So
there's
those.
And then ‸ we do have, we're starting out local. ‸ We want to really saturate Brevard County and make sure that our community understands what the brand is and is sharing that out because that's going to give more leverage as we reach outward and start to advertise outside of the area.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:44–00:12:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just us advertising it. So it's going to be a little bit more effective, but also fiscally responsible with, with how we're spending the funds.
Yeah. I was referring to the trade magazines because I know we're trying, this is also a way to attract people to our area. And they've
done some different articles
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:06–00:13:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
articles as well. So, okay, thanks.
Yes.
Yes.
I just wanted to extend a big thank you for coming out here tonight to present this, um, and, uh, recognizing
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:13:21–00:13:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, Coco plays a major part in the space coast. Without Coco, you get no space coast in my opinion. So thank you for caring enough to come out and include us in your circle and making the space coast a better place. So thank you for that.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:13:35–00:13:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Have a good day. Thank you for the time.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:13:44–00:13:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
I have one card submitted. Is there another one?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:59–00:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, ma'am. Okay.
Are
you wanting to speak on a particular item or you want to speak on a delegation?
Uh, you tell me. I have concerns about my residential property that's backing up to a commercial property between them.
Delegation then. Yes, ma'am. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:20–00:14:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
So, you're up, ‸ ma'am, Mrs. Lewis.
Okay. Thank
you.
Yes, ma'am. State your name for us, please. Okay.
My name is Michelle Lewis and I live at [address]. Um, my property is 10 acres where I raise livestock and, um, three small children, um, by myself. And,
[00:14:52] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:52–00:14:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is developing the apartments there and they've cleared the, a lot of the brush from behind my house. Um, luckily I was able to speak with them and they didn't clear all of it yet that to create a little bit of a buffer. Um, my concern was I spoke with their project manager as
[00:15:14] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:14–00:15:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
who is the owner, one of the partners in the development. And they said they had no plans of putting up any sort of fencing or anything that comes along my property line. Uh, so I've, I've tried multiple times to contact the zoning department who sent me to the building and permitting. And,
[00:15:34] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:34–00:15:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Jennifer regarding, um, you know, looking into this,
uh,
John
[00:15:41] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:15:41–00:15:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
did give me a little information where he just confirmed the property plans that they do not have a plan to put up a fence or a buffer or a wall. Um, so I tried to do a lot of my own research, um, and speak with a lot of the developers. I know that are friends of mine and everybody's under the, um,
[00:15:58] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:58–00:16:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
impression that there is supposed to be some sort of wall to protect us. I lived there for 10 years.
[00:16:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:07–00:16:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
year old boys and I am a single mom and I
[00:16:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
manage
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:13–00:16:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the ranch all by myself. And now that we've lost that, that privacy buffer and you know, we just don't feel very secure. You know, the animals are highly ‸ exposed, uh, to everything that's going on. Uh, I'm concerned because they did share with me their site plans and it shows that their parking lot is going to be right up to my fence line. We also have a survey dispute going on because the title company that provided me with a survey before I bought the place 10 years ago, um, shows that my fence is a foot and a half inside my property.
[00:16:46] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:46–00:16:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So there's a big dispute there. So we're just trying ‸ to work that out amicably. Um, and, uh, but they did, when I asked them, you know, what's, what's going on? Is this 13 feet really a huge deal for you guys?
[00:17:02] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
Because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:02–00:17:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I don't want to interrupt their business. I'm not trying to stop it from happening.
I
just wanted a buffer so I can keep my kids safe. You just never know who's going to be looking over there. Or when you drive down
[00:17:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:13–00:17:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
my entire backside of my property is exposed. You can see all of my valuables that we keep in our barn. Our barn was built, you know, in a specific distance from the fence to, to try to keep everything, you know, as it should be according to the city. Um, so I guess I just wanted to bring it to your attention to see if there's anything that can be done to pursue, uh, having them build a wall. I spoke with
[00:17:37] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:37–00:17:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He came to my house. He showed me all his plans and he basically said the best he can do is a little privacy fence, but it would be on my property and I would be responsible for maintaining that. And my day is already packed full with other things I have to maintain there. And so when I ‸ looked into the municipal codes and things, and even though I have to apologize for my ignorance on a lot of this,
[00:18:00] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:00–00:18:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm not educated in that way, but I, it's my understanding that with
[00:18:07] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:07–00:18:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that there has to be at least an eight foot barrier. And I wanted to just see if that's correct or if that's, or how, how I need to pursue looking into this further so I can provide that security and protection for my family and my animals.
Yeah, the code may require a barrier between commercial and residential.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:33–00:18:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So,
so
that wouldn't be applicable in this case there. And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:42–00:18:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
correct me if I'm wrong on that. But I think, I think it's the difference between this is not a commercial, uh, property.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:51–00:18:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
buffer between commercial and residential. But again, this is, this is primarily residential to residential.
Okay. So can you define what commercial versus multifamily is? Because everything that I've had look up, including my attorney says that it is commercial property because it's a business where they're renting apartments.
It's, it's a, it's a multifamily apartment complex.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:18–00:19:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. So when I look at a zoning map and it says commercial, it's, that's not exactly what it is
[00:19:27] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
there
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:27–00:19:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah, you're, you're, the zoning, the zoning may be commercial because this is, this came under the statute that allows, uh, multifamily
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:37–00:19:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
commercial if they're doing affordable housing. And so, so you may see commercial on the zoning map. But again, this project is a multifamily residential. And so, so, so that's probably the inconsistency. That's probably causing the confusion.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:54–00:19:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh,
[00:19:59] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
he said that he would put up a, a privacy fence that separates just part of my property, not the whole thing. And even then a privacy fence, you know, it can get knocked over at any time. I have animals that can run through a privacy fence. You know, I'm
going
to have headlights coming into my property. There's gonna be parking lot lights everywhere. There's gonna be noise. It's, it just really creates a huge safety and security issue for not only my family and I, but the animals that I raised there that I've been raising for 10 years. And, you know, I go
[00:20:30] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:30–00:20:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like that. Um, and they're very sensitive to things like that, which is why I, I just wanted to bring it to attention. I just don't know what to do at this point. So I appreciate your time. I'm.
Yeah. I'll, I'll reach out to Mr. Mears and see what I can do.
[00:20:51] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:51–00:20:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:20:53] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
Okay. Well, thank you guys very much. One
more question. ‸ Is this the property here at
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:59–00:21:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, yes, I'm directly across 524 and I'm parallel with the power lines there. So I'm on the north side of 524. And so there's, there's 10 acres right there that backs right up to, ‸ but yes, sir.
[00:21:13] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:13–00:21:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's right across. Yes, sir.
Thank
[00:21:19] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
you.
I
appreciate your time.
Yes.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:21–00:21:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:23–00:21:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Good evening, all.
Good evening.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:30–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just giving you a little update about what's been going on with us. Um, since the last time we spoke, we've expanded our medical and mental health. We now have two staff nurses, a mental health counselor, along with, uh, three volunteer nurse
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:49–00:21:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We continue to do our Monday and Wednesday mobile team that goes out between six and 11. We are averaging anywhere from 70 to 85 people per day out on the road with anywhere from six to 12 new people. That means never seen before, um, on each of those days. Wednesday nights, we continue our dinner between four and 5 PM average of 20 to 30 people. Then we have our third, uh, Tuesday and Thursday outreach days between eight and 12 30 PM. We're averaging 130 to 150 per day. Um, all of these people will receive a hot shower and a hot meal plus the other services that we offer. We also have Bible study on Saturdays, which ‸ is averaging now from 40, 30 to 40 people with the option again for a shower and always a hot meal. We have two gentlemen currently in our moving forward program.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:52–00:22:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Monday at the age of 35 and one at the age of 49 has registered for the new upcoming CDL classes at the Brevard County adult learning center. In addition, we have four celebrate recovery meetings that happen on our property in front of you. There is our new magazine along with an invitation for our fall fundraiser. I'll be happy to answer, answer any questions. If you have any.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:22–00:23:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
You got, you have the documentation to support that.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:41–00:23:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:44–00:23:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So clearly beyond a shadow of a doubt, it's indicative that people are aware of the great accomplishments. Even through resistance, ‸ you recognize your positive productivity, rewarding, improved lifestyle for the various individuals because you know you can't give up. You can give out, but you can't give up. Yep. And that's what we're doing. ‸ Thank you very much. Now I want to ask one question. I don't know if it's a good question or not, but here it goes. We talked about that.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:21–00:24:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think Deputy Mayor was there too as well. That event. Yep.
You
want to elaborate about that. Some of the people you're encountering. The organizations. I
can tell you that when we raised the question on the House Bill 1365 and simply asked what the candidate's plan was, I can tell you that most candidates did not even know what House Bill 1365 was, let alone have a plan. The one person that I did speak with did say that the cities are not doing their part. They are not taking responsibility for their homeless communities and that there are funds out there for the cities to approach and ask for.
That's not true. Let's be honest. And if you read the bill, it talks about counties. Let's be frankly honest, brutally honest. Let's be honest again. No one wants it in their own backyard. But I know the real deal. And the real deal is this.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:28–00:25:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Like it ‸ if you don't. It's just like I saw a sign.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:33–00:25:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's right.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:35–00:25:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I deal with the data. I know what I encounter because I'm on a major corridor. But I won't give up. But I'm willing to help those that want to be assisted.
Thank you.
Once they learn how to comprehend House Bill 1365 to its fullest, and then I think you will see, fortunately, our government did not provide any funding for this mandate.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:08–00:26:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So
it's going to fall on the county, which they will include the municipalities.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:18–00:26:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They don't even have it on their docket for allocation for that. But I'm part of the homeless coalition with Mrs. Amber Carroll and a long list of other individuals.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:32–00:26:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Sarah Sloan
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:34–00:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're in full force to address the concerns. We have a plan where there is no other plan.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:47–00:26:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
three in the entire United States of homeless population.
Really?
Truthfully. That's the way they conveyed it to us. Wow. So we have to be proactive and not reactive.
And let me just add to that. The last point in time count showed that Orange County was in a deficit of 900 beds. Brevard County is in a deficit ‸ of over 700 beds.
Wow. So I'm not saying the numbers are skewed. But it does add up. I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:18–00:27:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's 100 plus thousand.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:27:21–00:27:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right. Mm-hmm.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:25–00:27:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Any other questions?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:31–00:27:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:33–00:27:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you and what Scott do. You know, the things you come up here and report to us is one thing. But to actually, you know, go out to the campus ‸ as I was out there today with you. And you hear some of the stories that they are capturing of some of our homeless people throughout the community. And it is for a variety of reasons. But to go out there if you haven't been and just experience it, it's a huge issue that we have ‸ countywide, statewide, nationwide. And I just appreciate
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:06–00:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with this issue. We talk about being proactive as a city. You know, we had pushback when you guys first came to the city. And I thank the council for taking that brave step and allowing Matthews
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:21–00:28:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
if you haven't already, make sure you get a chance to subscribe to their magazines. They actually go ‸ throughout the community and actually capture the stories of some of our homeless citizens throughout the community. ‸ Unfortunately, we even have homeless deaths here. And I thank you all for at least trying to help these people become, you know, better their situation. So thank you for that. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:49–00:28:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
We have some things coming in the works that we're working on. And I look forward to presenting that to the council.
Tell us quickly about your podcast and then we'll proceed forward.
About our podcast? Yes, ma'am. So our podcast is actually called
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:10–00:29:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You will
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:13–00:29:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about the ins and outs of homelessness, the challenges. I have been on before with the perspective as the advocate. I have been doing mobile for six years now. And I can tell you that even advocacy from being the inside advocate to the outside advocate, it's very different when you meet people out where they are. Okay. So the podcast is amazing. You get all different kinds of point of views. And we ‸ have asked for candidates to come on and give ‸ their point of view. We want to hear it all, whether we agree or not. We want to have the discussion
an
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:57–00:29:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
open discussion about it.
Thank
you. Thank you for your time.
Yes, ma'am. Thank you for your time. This concludes this portion of delegations. And we will proceed forward to ‸ consent agenda items for the wishes of council.
Motion to approve.
We have a motion on
the
floor by Deputy Mayor Hearns
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:27–00:30:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:29–00:30:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
favor saying aye. Aye. And in a's, ayes have unanimous. Proceeding on to public hearings.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:38–00:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the audience, turn it over to the public. Give you three minutes to expound on this particular item. And then we will proceed forward. ‸ Item number 6-1. Approve the second and final reading of ordinance number 10-24.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:00–00:31:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the referendum ballot. Extending the program for additional 10 years. If
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:11–00:31:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
may, as you guys know, there's nine points of this on page 202 that we address. I mean, it's standard procedures now. It's a way of enticing businesses to come to the City of Cocoa. And it's fair and equitable. But it's going to be left up to the citizens on how they would like to address this issue. That's why I'm going to be, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:34–00:31:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Providing for a referendum election in ballot language for the November 5th, 2024 election.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:45–00:31:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:47–00:31:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Providing for coordination with the supervisor of elections. Providing for severability and an effective date. It's also a public hearing item. The council
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:03–00:32:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
requesting that this referendum be placed on the ballot.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:06–00:32:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
When circumstances warrant for economic development and job purposes. That authority has been in place since 1995.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:20–00:32:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Yes, sir. This is the second reading. And I did address in the agenda item. The one question that councilman Koss had last time. So if there's any other questions, I'm happy to answer them.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:43–00:32:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And open to the public. Please come forward and state your name for us, please. So we can address your concerns. Going once. Going twice.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:01–00:33:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
public and return to the council. What is the wishes of? Council. Motion to approve. We have a motion on the floor by Deputy Mayor Hearn. Second. Second. Okay. You got it? Did you get it? Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:17–00:33:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going to call the question. All in favor by saying aye.
Aye.
Any nays? Ayes have it unanimously. Proceeding on to the next item.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:29–00:33:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Consideration of the preliminary plan unit development.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:33:35–00:33:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Consistent with Appendix A zoning. Article 11. Section 17.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:41–00:33:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Single
family residential subdivision. Plus or minus 57.23 acres of property located on the east side of North Range Road. ‸ North of Kathy Kim Street. This was approved unanimously by the PNC Board.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:04–00:34:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're talking about positive control
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:09–00:34:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we're moving forward. Mr. Steve Noto. ‸ Yes
sir. Thank you mayor. Good evening council.
For
the record. Steve Noto. RBI planning and landscape architecture planning consultant for the city of Cocoa. Presented to you this evening.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:26–00:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As you mentioned mayor. The subject property is just over 57 acres in size. Located on the east side of North Range Road. North of Kathy Kim Street. Adjacent to Hooper Road. To the west. Subject property is currently vacant. Approximately half of the property.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:45–00:34:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The proposed
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:48–00:34:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Future land use of the subject property is low density residential LDR. Which allows a maximum of seven dwelling units per acre. On the overhead and in your packet is a screenshot of the future land use map of the general area.
You
can see the majority of properties are LDR.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:11–00:35:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Which are VLDR. Which stands for very low density residential. Subject property is a mixture of three zoning districts.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:20–00:35:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then one small portion of it has no zoning. And again as you can see on the zoning map. Surrounding zoning districts are similar in nature.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:30–00:35:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:31–00:35:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
To the west.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:35–00:35:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
With ‸ multiple open space tracks.
And
associated infrastructure. The project is proposing two lot types. 40 feet wide and 50 feet wide. There's also some 55 feet wide lots proposed.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:35:52–00:35:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
31
or
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:53–00:35:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a minimum 40 feet wide. And 30
or
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:35:56–00:35:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
minimum 50 feet wide. And as I mentioned the developable ‸ area of the property. Is 28 and a half acres.
Now from a
process perspective.
A
little bit different. Than other types of projects that have been proposed. This is just the preliminary PD. So if the item is approved. There are no entitlements that run with this. It's not the final approval. They still have to go through final PD.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:18–00:36:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The plans that would be associated with the final PD. Would include the development standards.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:25–00:36:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:27–00:36:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I'll give you a ‸ brief overview. ‸ Of the proposed subdivision.
You
can see on the overhead. The overall site plan that is proposed. And again I'll walk you through some different components of it here.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:43–00:36:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The main access point is adjacent to Hooper Road. With secondary access point just to the north. And as I mentioned the proposed plan.
shows
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:53–00:36:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a mix of 40 feet wide and 50 foot wide lots.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:56–00:36:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You can see on the overhead. There's some faint color. That was meant to show. A variety of lot widths.
The
light blue. Indicates a 55 foot wide lot. The red is 50. And the yellow is 40. And they're interspersed throughout the community. The proposed setbacks are 20 feet in the front. 5 on the side.
And
20 in the rear. That's compared to the typical code requirement. Of 25 in the front. 8 on the side.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:37:24–00:37:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
15. And then 15 feet for the rear. As I mentioned at the opening. Approximately half of the property is wetlands. Those are going to remain as wetlands. They will not be disturbed whatsoever.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:38–00:37:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They'll be put into a conservation easement. To add on to that. There will be no connection. To ivy drive to the east. As you can see. There's a proposed cul-de-sac. In the upland area. And that's where the project ends. The land of development code for PUDs. Requires a minimum of 20% open space. The project is required.
To
provide 5.7 acres. The applicant's providing 9.45.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:03–00:38:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I'll walk you through some of those right now. Track B is the largest. Which is on the south side of the property. Or the project rather. It is a stormwater pond. That will include a sidewalk path. Benches. And the pond will be stocked with fish. In accordance with FWS recommendations. ‸ Tracks E,
F,
O, and P. Are adjacent to two of the street areas. Those are general open space areas.
With
benches and trees. Tracks G and K. Consist of stormwater ponds.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:38:35–00:38:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have sidewalks along the top of the bank. And those will be interconnected. To the other sidewalks.
That
are within the community.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:38:44–00:38:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
H.
Which
is on the north side of the property. Will consist of a dog park. Sidewalks and open space. And
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:38:50–00:38:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
also include a tot lot.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:51–00:38:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The preliminary development plan. Does not require a landscape plan. But when they get to final. A full landscape plan will be reviewed. And recommendations will be made on it.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:04–00:39:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
land development code.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:09–00:39:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Having said that. They are proposing a six foot tall. Fence and wall around the perimeter.
Of
the property.
The
final details of that. To be shown
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:17–00:39:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the final development plan. One important thing. That was talked about during project review. With staff. And with the applicant. Was the lot dimensions.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:29–00:39:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Are not common lot widths. Seen
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:33–00:39:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so. What we recommended. Or what was recommended by staff. To the applicant.
was
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:38–00:39:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you need to show up.
With
your A game. For architecture. And your ‸ A
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 00:39:42–00:39:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lot landscaping. So these renderings. That are shown on the overhead. Right now. Are the conceptual. Architectural renderings. For the homes. That would be placed. Throughout the community. There is not a final builder. At this point. However. If the project. Is approved.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:57–00:39:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
plan. Which. That is our intention. As reviewing staff. Is to make sure.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:03–00:40:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Whenever the builder. Shows up. To construct.
In
the neighborhood.
Or
in the community. They will have to follow.
The
regulations. Shown on this plan.
And
that includes. Any additional language. That may be placed. On the plan. In the staff report.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:16–00:40:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That may get into. Some specifics. About the actual materials. That are to be used. On the homes. So there are a number of findings. That have to be met. As part of a preliminary PD request.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:40:31–00:40:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here in the next few slides.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:35–00:40:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In
terms of character.
And
density. As I mentioned. ‸ The area around the property. Consists of LDR. Parcels and VLDR. The VLDR. Land use is a maximum. Of four dwelling units per acre. Now. With this subject property. If the applicant chose. To develop the entire property. Which they could do. Through wetland mitigation measures. And other. Types of mechanisms.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:01–00:41:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:04–00:41:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
However.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:08–00:41:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If
‸ possible. Which would give them a maximum of 200. They're not even doing that. The proposed density is 2.14 dwelling units per acre. Which gives them the maximum of 61. And I'll mention. When they first submitted. The project for review.
It
was 71 dwelling units. All of the lots were 40 feet. And so through review and negotiation. They eventually split. The lot widths in half. Some were 40s. Some were 50s.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:37–00:41:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
With the maximum allowed. And it's even below it. Of the VLDR. Future land use across the street.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:50–00:41:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:41:53–00:41:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the relationship with surrounding neighborhoods. I mentioned the density comparables. One other thing to point out. Is the minimum square footage. For the homes. Per zoning code is 1,200 square feet. As you saw. It was a variety of one story. Two story homes. Those floor plans will range in size. From just under 1,600 square feet. To just over 3,000 square feet.
In
size.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:14–00:42:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the final PD. Will be locked in. And so when permitting would occur. Whoever is pulling those permits. Would have to match the renderings. And the details of the final PD plan. Provision number four.
Is
the provision for future public education. Recreation facilities. Transportation. Water supply. Sewage disposal. Surface drainage. Flood control. And soil conservation.
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:37–00:42:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
shown in the preliminary development plan. Water and sewer will be provided by a city of Coco. Via existing water lines. On the west side of North Range Road. And an existing lift station. Loaded on the east side of North Range Road. Surface drainage. ‸ Flood control. And soil conservation. Will be addressed with the proposed stormwater ponds. That are designed to comply with the water quality.
And
quantity requirements.
Of
the city and state.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:57–00:42:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Of the development. As I mentioned. There are two points of access. Proposed from North Range Road. The secondary access. Which is to the north. Is roughly 700 feet. From the main access point. No improvements are proposed. On North Range Road. As the traffic impact analysis. Found that all impacted roadways. Were projected to operate. Operate adequately at build out. And that was. That study was done based on 71. Dwelling units.
So
of course there's an improvement. Going down to 61 there as well. The nature intent. And compatibility of common space. Including the proposed method. For the maintenance of conservation. Of said common space. As I mentioned. There are multiple. Open space. Common space tracks. All of those will be owned. And operated by the future HOA. The availability and adequacy.
Of
primary streets. And thoroughfares. To support traffic. To be generated. Within the proposed PD. As I mentioned. The internal roadways. Actually those will be local roadways. To access points.
It
is intended. Or anticipated rather. That the internal roadways. Will be private. Owned and maintained by the HOA. And as I said. The TIA. Traffic impact analysis. Was done. Reflecting 71 units. And at that point. No additional. Improvements were proposed. Or required of North Range Road.
And
the same remains. For 61. Proposed units. Availability and adequacy. Of water sewer service. Support the PD. As I mentioned. The project will connect. To an existing 12 inch water line. Located on the west side. ‸ North Range Road.
And
then sewer. Will connect to an existing lift station. And it was found. That there was sufficient capacity.
To
support. The proposed preliminary PD. Is also consistent. With allowable uses. Under the LDR. Future language category. Of the city of Coco's comp plan.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:37–00:44:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Flu one. And flu policy. One one two three. And mayor. As you mentioned. The planning and zoning board. Unanimously recommended approval. Of the project. At their meeting last week.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:47–00:44:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Of the preliminary PD. Consistent with appendix A zoning. Article 11. Section 17. For the three parcels. Totaling
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:57–00:45:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
With the parcel ID numbers. Show on the overhead. I'll be happy to take any questions. The applicants engineer. Is also here this evening. If you have any technical questions.
Greg.
Yes sir. Greg Crawford. Yes sir.
Very
good. I have a quick question.
‸ I
was.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:16–00:45:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Could you digress.
And
take us back to those photos.
Of
the facilities.
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:22–00:45:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the homes. Thank you. As children. Because of the cost.
Of
owning a new home. A lot of families. Are having
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:34–00:45:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
And
you know. Go to post education. High school.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:40–00:45:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
My question is. I'm looking at a.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:46–00:45:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
garage. I'm just trying to see. You know. We're dealing with one area.
Over
there. Off Jackson Street.
The
Arlington apartments. During the time.
Of
its construction. Vehicles. Not everyone owned.
The
vehicle. Now that we have family members. Staying at home.
Doing
local. Etc. Etc. Being educated at home.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:10–00:46:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You
get what I'm saying. Yes sir.
‸ Trying
to make sure.
It
doesn't.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:46:14–00:46:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Of traveling. Along that road. Parking on the street.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:19–00:46:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Okay. Devin the mayor.
Yes. If you could take me back. Yep. Right there. Was there a reason. Given him. Given why they won't connect. Ivy drive to this property.
So the applicant. Did have a neighborhood meeting. Last fall.
And
actually one of the concerns. Was. Making sure a connection. Was not provided. By one of the neighbors. They requested that a connection. Not be made between the two. That would also impact the wetlands. I imagine the. Engineer could talk. A little bit more. As ‸ that decision as well.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:59–00:47:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Growing up. I was. Attended Cocoa High School. Many of the kids. Right now. There's a pathway.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:47:05–00:47:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They use that to. Access Cocoa High School. And the elementary school. And. You know. I don't know what the neighbors. Think in that community there. But. I. I would love to see. A. Safer route. For the kids to take. In access to the schools. Instead of being locked out. That's all I have on that.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:47:27–00:47:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Yeah. Um. Let's see. Where do I start?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:38–00:47:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
foot. Lots.
Oh sure. Um. So we've. Our. Our company of course. Is based in Orlando. It's something we've been seeing in Orlando. For some time now. Where. Home builders. Are trending more towards. The 50 foot.
Has
been common for a while.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:58–00:47:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:00–00:48:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Have become a bit more popular.
To
try and. Bring down the cost. Also. There seems to be this trend. Of. The desire to have more. Building square footage. On the property. As opposed to yard space. Now that may be. Differing demographics. In differing areas.
You
know. To your point mayor. Amount of folks. That are either staying at home. Or having larger families. Um. In communities I've worked in previously. The trend has been. Towards. Generally speaking. Lots.
That
are less than 5,000 square feet. In size. Having 20 foot. Rear yard setbacks. But having homes. That are. 2,000 to 3,000 square feet. In size.
And
they're still selling. For premiums.
And the price point. On these homes.
These. From what was discussed.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:44–00:48:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But it sounds like. A minimum. A $300,000 starting point.
Okay. And. What does.
A
conservation easement. Mean.
So the wetland area.
Will
be held. In conservation. In perpetuity. So no.
Construction
within. And there'll be a separate legal document. To ensure its. Protection. For years to come.
And. Whose ownership. Is that property in.
The conservation easement. I believe the intent is to dedicate it. To St. John's. And the city. We'd have to get in the details of that. A little bit more in the final PD.
So then they would be responsible for that. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:26–00:49:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um. ‸ They're 57 acres total.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:34–00:49:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So. It's. It's more like. 4.6 per acre. Which I'm okay with. Sure. Um. But I just. As I was reading through this stuff. I'm thinking. Having walked all those neighborhoods. In College Manor. And knowing a lot of those folks. And hearing the stories. About how heavy equipment. Has gone missing in those wetlands. I mean those wetlands. When they get wet. They are really muddy. And you know.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:09–00:50:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So
I know you can do it during dry. During the dry season. But not so much during the wet. It ‸ really. They're pretty significant wetlands. Um. So anyway. I just. It took me until the very end. Where you talked about. That. You know.
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:34–00:50:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
actually. You know. The wetland buffer.
And
that. There was only. That it was. Less. Than the. 2.6 dwelling units per acre. But. So we have.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:59–00:51:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Recently
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:01–00:51:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And. We thought. That the developer. Was also going to be doing.
The
building. And then they sold it. To. D.R. Horton. And. Um.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:21–00:51:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know. What the houses look like. And they really don't. Look the way. People in the neighborhood. Had anticipated. For them to look.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:30–00:51:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:34–00:51:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I mean. How strong is that.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:40–00:51:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is too cumbersome. I want to change the architecture on it.
I
mean.
I would say the.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:51:50–00:51:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
able to hold their feet to the fire on that.
With the final PD. Yes. That would be. The intent and requirement of that document. That if. If these renderings are shown. Unless there's. Loose language that says you have to meet the general intent. You know. There's some vagueness to that. But if the demand or the requirement of the PD. The demand of the PD is. That you have. And it can be written in a manner that says.
You
know. Windows have to have certain types of dressings. And you have to have certain type of stone finishes on the facades. Varying door colors. Varying. Types of facade finishes next to each building or across the street. There's. A variety of ways where you can build it into the language of the PD. Where the only way to change it would be to come back to this council. And request an amendment.
Okay. And in terms of when they do the clearing. So they still have to go to. Abide by our tree ordinance.
Correct.
Okay. And that will be coming up.
That would be part of the final PD request. Yes. Which would also come before the council.
Okay. I apologize for my mistake.
Okay. Well that's all my questions. Thank you.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:53:06–00:53:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Um.
Can you go back to the uh. The.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:53:18–00:53:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um. So. I know
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:21–00:53:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Especially on the. On the. South end by Stetson and ‸ other areas.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:32–00:53:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:38–00:53:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and any improvements that
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:53:44–00:53:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
might have to do. Um. Because of the new project.
Sure. Yeah. And the engineer ‸ could probably. Um. Get into that a little bit more. In a little bit more detail. Something we would look into much further. As part of the final PD plan.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:58–00:54:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
They have a traditional history of being flooded there. And as you know that is a county road.
And
that. Various individuals have been struggling with that. You're right. Flooding is a severe issue there. Councilwoman calls ma'am. Greg come to the podium please sir. Go ahead. Councilwoman. Yeah
it was actually. This is probably more for Abby. Because I was just.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:26–00:54:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
His question triggered. In my mind. In our budget. We had talked about spending.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:32–00:54:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
On that particular section of Range Road. That we needed to rebuild that. And does that. Address some of the flooding issues. We've had.
There. No. That would just be for the rehabilitation. And repair. Of the condition of the road.
Repairing it. As it is now.
Yeah.
‸ It wasn't real evident. When I rode down the road. I mean it. Wasn't very clear to me. How that section of the road. Was different. Than other sections. But. Does that happen. Before the building takes place. Yes.
It ‸ happens.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:13–00:55:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Of that road. Just. Uh. North of. Kim. Kathy. Kim. Right.
Okay. So. Impact fees. Don't go. Toward. The rehabilitation. Of that road. Do they.
Uh.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:31–00:55:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:55:32–00:55:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Capacity related.
Okay. That's the only way you spend impact fees on it. Okay. And. Okay. So it's not capacity related. Because we
are increasing the capacity. With
this. But.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:56:01–00:56:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay. Okay. I get that. Thanks.
Good evening. My name is Greg Crawford.
With
Florida Engineering Group.
I
represent the owner.
With
regards to the project. A civil engineer. On that.
[00:56:16] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:16–00:56:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh. So appreciate the presentation. Stevens presented with the project. So he's done a great job. And kind of explaining what we've tried to do with this. Our discussion that we had with the. The city.
[00:56:27] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:27–00:56:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lots. At 71. To the 50-50 mix that we have now. Uh.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:34–00:56:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:56:34] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:56:35] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:35–00:56:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
came with questions. That were discussed a few minutes ago.
I'll
try to take and. Go ahead and do that. I know from a parking standpoint. Uh. We are looking at basically. It's a two car garage.
[00:56:45] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:45–00:56:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There is that foot front setback. That basically allows you to have two cars. Even there.
[00:56:49] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:49–00:56:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Within a lot. Without having to get out into the right of way. Uh. So I think that might help address. With regards to what you're talking about. Having maybe a few more cars. And just two for a normal. Uh. Family. On that. And um. So yeah. So have the two car garage.
[00:57:06] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:57:06–00:57:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:07] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:07–00:57:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then there was a discussion.
With
regards to the connection to ivy lane. Uh.
[00:57:12] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:12–00:57:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We
had uh. Had a neighborhood meetings. Uh. That was one of the concerns from the neighbors. That they did not want to have the traffic cutting through. And go and make that connection between range road. And the other roads there. Uh. There are actually two parts to it. One is that one with the um. Concern with regards to connection. Two.
[00:57:30] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:30–00:57:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh. ‸ The where the existing ivy lane is. That actually they don't own. The property owner doesn't own. So in order to be able to take that line up.
There
would be property to have to be purchased from somebody else anyway. In order to try to do that. Because the line. The roads don't line up with property that is owned by the current property owner. That's trying to develop the lot right now. So ‸ that's where we've kind of gone with. Is going ahead and doing the dead end. But we did take them for earlier discussions that we had with the city. When we were doing some earlier development. Uh.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:57–00:58:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:57:57] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
street. In order to allow it to come through. And keep that intersection close. Instead of an offset road. Uh. On
[00:58:06] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
them
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:06–00:58:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And then um.
[00:58:10] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:10–00:58:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:13] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:13–00:58:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
easement is something that is placed into ‸ perpetuity. Uh.
In
order to
[00:58:18] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:18–00:58:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
development. Uh. Typically those are owned by the HOA.
But
they have a development right. Over top of from the St. John's.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:24–00:58:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:58:24] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Uh. Any development on that. But uh. Really. Typically isn't given over to St. John's or anything like that. Uh. But it's put in an easement that would protect it from development later date. And in order to do anything you'd have to go back through. A lot of. Hoops in order to try to take and do anything other than leaving it as a conservation easement. And then um. At the house.
[00:58:49] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:58:49–00:58:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I know that just to follow up. We have talked with the owner of the property. The developer. Uh. With it. And he knows about the different elevations
[00:58:57] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Machine re-recognized
are
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:57–00:58:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
put in there. And he's. He's good with trying to have that as being part of the development agreement. Uh. At the end. In order to take and have those looks being what they have to follow. Regardless of who comes in and actually does the building of the homes themselves. They would need to follow that that look uh
[00:59:10] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:10–00:59:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So um. You know we're looking forward to try to move forward with this project. We've been working for quite a while. We'd like to go ahead and get this through to make sure we know what the lot count is. Uh. With regards to the development of the 50-50 mix. Now when we can move forward to try to get the construction plans put together. And come through and do the rest of the uh. Development permitting process with the city.
[00:59:31] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:31–00:59:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Start getting the project moving forward. And here for any other questions that you might have.
Yes uh. So I understand what you said about the neighbors in that community uh. Adjacent not wanting traffic. Did they elaborate as to uh.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:53–00:59:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Coming through that location.
I don't think they differentiated but I believe the vehicle traffic was really their concern.
Okay. Because
uh.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:04–01:00:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
to access school from that way. And um. I know it's still preliminary but. Um. Maybe we could look at even possibly adding a side sidewalk through there and allow kids to still access Range Road to get to school later down the line. But um. Um.
I
just wanted to know if their concerns was cars or just foot traffic period. So
[01:00:27] ▶ Play Speaker 16 (introduced as “Greg Crawford” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
like I said it really wasn't discussed but I think their intent or that was really for vehicular traffic. They didn't want to come through there. Perfect. Thank you.
‸ Any questions from Mr. Cranford? Thank you sir very much.
Thank you. I'm seeing.
Sure.
Like
the closest portion.
Do
we have any other cards or any other comments from the public?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:00:48–01:00:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
close this portion of public comments and return it to council?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:55–01:00:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ It is not permanent correctly. Mr. Steve correct
mayor. This would be the only reading of the preliminary PD.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:07–01:01:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:08–01:01:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:14–01:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:15–01:01:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Aye.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:18–01:01:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:21–01:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:24–01:01:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to create new minimum yard requirements applicable to the properties located in the diamond square community redevelopment area. Zone are you to excuse
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:44–01:01:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I know for a fact one of our council members inquired about that from district number one. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:58–01:02:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah.
But,
um, as we move forward and the beautiful type of quality homes that are constructed there. And I'm gonna ‸ turn it over
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:11–01:02:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I do would like to say on
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:16–01:02:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:25–01:02:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:36–01:02:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a article 11 section three of the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:44–01:02:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
requirements applicable to properties located in both.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:49–01:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
square community redevelopment area providing for the repeal of prior and consistent ordinances and resolutions incorporation into the code severability and an effective date. This is first reading and also ‸ public hearing item.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:05–01:03:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Good
evening. I'm Lucy city planner. So as mentioned, this is a zoning tax amendment to promote new new single family development within the diamond square community through the revision of technical amendments that relax.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:38–01:03:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:03:45–01:03:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
C.R.A.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:03:48–01:03:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And Rosa L. Jones drive to the south. This area comprises residential homes, commercial businesses, and light industrial uses.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:07–01:04:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cocoa has invested millions to enhance streets, drainage, purchase land for affordable housing, and build a new community center. To further support development, ‸ the proposed ordinance aims to relax yard setbacks requirements for single-family homes within the diamond square CRA the ordinance addresses the issues faced by non-conforming lots that have difficulty meeting the setback requirements of the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:36–01:04:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
face challenges due to their irregular shapes and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:45–01:04:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ making compliance difficult. By creating new, last restrictive setbacks requirements for this area, the new ordinance aims to facilitate development and improve land use efficiency. as you can see, the current requirements for setbacks for the front setback is 25 feet, for the side interior lock setbacks 8 feet, for the side corner is 15 feet, and for the rear is 15 feet. So what staff proposes is the changes for reducing to 20 feet for the front setback, the interior lots are back to reduce to 5 feet, the side corner lock setback to be reduced to 10 feet, and the rear reduction to 10 feet. and
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:39–01:05:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a building enveloped,
a
building that would almost
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:05:48–01:05:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the whole lot, but we still have to consider the mass maximum impervious area and the coverage that is permitted under the medium density residential, that is the future land use. So
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:08–01:06:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city
[unclear audio — 0:22 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:13–01:06:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
future growth and development. Discourage the profiliferation or urban sprawl and implement the goals, objectives, and policies of this comprehensive plan. Continue to support the revitalization of its Florida enterprise zone is designated Florida brownfield area the Diamond Square redevelopment area,
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:57–01:06:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the Heart of Cocoa area, concentrating on issues such as crime, economic development, and affordable housing. Staff requests that the City Council approves Ordinance 12 2024 on this first reading, a zoning tax amendment to create new minimum yard setback requirements applicable to properties located in the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:17–01:07:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:07:44–01:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:07:58–01:08:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:00–01:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
stated there on five feet on each side and go back 10-15 feet in the front and 10 feet in the back and I think that we can endure that. So I would
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:18–01:08:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that with resistance.
But
now that I understand the full content of this, I think I will support this.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:32–01:08:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:35–01:08:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you for changing your mind. I appreciate it.
I haven't voted yet.
I think I appreciate staff for working through this.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:47–01:08:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because I think it's time for our city and all cities really to wake up and realize that housing's market and the type of product is changing.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:03–01:09:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I ‸ have a room I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:09–01:09:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I don't need to have a 2,500 square foot home. Most families now don't need a huge home. And so a lot of families are looking for that 1,200, 1,100, 1,300 square foot home. And you'd be surprised that the old way of thinking is
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:30–01:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
really not. And so things are changing. I think we have to adapt to that. And I believe staff, city manager have done a good job of ‸ making that swift change. So I appreciate them. And hopefully we can get a unanimous vote on this. And the next
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:52–01:09:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
27.
Okay. ‸ Is that it, sir? Yes, sir. Okay. We'll proceed in this order. Councilwoman calls and city manager with.
Okay. So this is similar to what we just discussed, right? Yes.
And
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:10:14–01:10:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the other developments, just almost the same thing. So how do we, because we're creating more impervious surface,
how do we mitigate for that? Well, it's not creating more because we do have the, the future land use, um, regulates the impervious area based on the future land use zoning. So that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:38–01:10:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So that would not change. The setbacks were, the yard requirements will not affect the impervious
requirements.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:48–01:10:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, it counts in everything. So normally when the impervious area is calculated is all the surface, not only the house.
Driveways.
Driveways, sidewalks, whatever, you know, and then they also have requirements for, um, the backyard coverage. There's a, they have to meet.
So, but I mean, I'm looking at, aren't we expanding the size of the house? Well,
this is just an example. So, yeah, it probably won't look like this, you know, it depends on the size of the lot and everything has to be taken consideration. Here is just to give an idea if you use a small
lots
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:29–01:11:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
because there's some lots in, um, this area,
there
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:33–01:11:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
40 feet wide, you know, so it's just to try to accommodate those lots, but they still have to meet all the requirements. And
I understand that.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:43–01:11:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
flooding, even in this state and in areas where, and thinking back about even the 2017 storms that, um, the areas that flooded ‸ the most were those that had the most impervious surface.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:03–01:12:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for every vehicle in the city. I mean, they just developed that way for whatever reason. It just happened that way.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:17–01:12:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when the rains came. So,
um,
I'm not opposed ‸ to this, but, um, I'm just curious if it's going to impact us stormwater wise. That's my question. I don't know if anyone has an answer. Really?
I think, um, I didn't help on this item, but some, so if there, you said they're 40 feet wide Lucy.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:47–01:12:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
LDR land use is 0.65. So if we just add a 4,000 square feet, that's 2,600 square feet of impervious. So I think if it's, if someone's building, let's say a 1800 square foot home and then you have, um, 20 by 20 driveway, roughly, you're going to fall under that fall at or under the, uh, the max impervious allowed by the land use. So it should be roughly the same.
Yeah. So really the ideal here is that people go up.
It could leave them that way.
Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:29–01:13:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which we'll be talking about a little bit later on the rates. But that was the reason we teared it the way we did for there to be an economic driver. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:45–01:13:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, I just want to, um,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 01:13:53–01:13:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
that when we review building permits, me and Jennifer, we do take that in consideration. We also be a look every permit that comes, uh, through the city. And if we have any doubts or if you're not sure, we always ask Abby to assist us in trying to determine that. So it is something that we take seriously. It's just, I want to bring to your attention.
But none of those ratios are affected by the setbacks.
And
so, so none of the ISR ratios are affected. We haven't changed those. In other words, the requirements, um, for, for, uh, impervious surface there.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:29–01:14:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, just want to, want to make sure that we're getting that message across there. It's, it's, it's not, it's not a,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:43–01:14:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
small homes.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:48–01:14:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or shaped lots. Um, so,
uh,
uh,
again, I think this is a, this is a good thing. It's a long overdue thing within the, uh, within the diamond square. And as we, uh, go across the, uh, us
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:10–01:15:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:19 ▶]
to your heart. All right. Any other questions before I turn it over to the public? Seeing,
uh,
chair related to close this portion to council and over to the public. ‸ Please come forward and state your name. Your concerns.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:52–01:15:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, Dick.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:15:55–01:15:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
close this portion to the public and return to the council? What are the wishes of council?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:00–01:16:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
call the question. All in favor. Aye. It's unanimous. So, yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:16:09–01:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh,
proceeding on to the next item. Item number four. Request to postpone the city
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:23–01:16:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of an appeal regarding the city of Cocoa
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:30–01:16:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the proposed special exemption to permit the sale of beer and wine in the CBD dash CBO district as outlined in Appendix A, zoning Article 11, Section 13, C6, and Section 22L of the city of Cocoa.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:16:55–01:17:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
But, hey, um, you can make a motion but we still have to give the public the opportunity. I'll second it for discussion. But, Mr. City Manager, do
you
want to say anything, sir? Uh,
no, sir. This is just a simple, uh, postponement request.
Okay. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:17–01:17:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, no, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:22–01:17:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Thank you very much, sir.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:17:24–01:17:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Please come forward and state your name and your concerns, only pertaining to the postponement of this.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:37–01:17:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We have a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:40–01:17:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
chair.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:17:44–01:17:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Aye.
Aye. Aye. Aye's added unanimously. Proceeding on to
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:50–01:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, excuse me, request for a special funding for land.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:02–01:18:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I do have two cards.
Yes, thank you. This is an item that I requested to be put on the agenda.
Um,
basically what I'm seeking is Council's approval to, uh, allow staff to
draft a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:18:15–01:18:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
letter, uh, to our state rep and even the governor, um, requesting, uh, some kind of special funding or grants to give the city the opportunity to purchase any like sensitive, any sensitive, um, environment, environmentally sensitive properties that we may have here in the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:35–01:18:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
those properties. Um, and that's my asks for this. I hear from the rest of the council on the item councilman going. Uh,
the only question I have who determines what is environmentally sensitive. That's my only question that I have.
Um,
I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:19:00–01:19:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
planning to, uh, bring forth any recommendations on those properties throughout the city.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:13–01:19:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
um,
environmentally, environmentally sensitive lands would be those that have an impact on an impaired water body such as the Indian River Lagoon. Um, also environmentally sensitive lands, all wetlands are considered environmentally sensitive ‸ because they act,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:38–01:19:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they act as the liver, the kidneys, they clean the water, they give it an opportunity to, to filter. Um, and they also give us the capacity to protect against
the water.
And the storm surge and, and heavy rainfalls. So those are all considered, uh, environmentally sensitive. Um, I'm wondering, the request for special funding and I thank you for bringing it forward. I think, you know, particularly we looked, you know, tonight we've entertained, you know, several proposals were developing very quickly. We have, um, in our packet tonight, and I went through, we have, um, you know, in some part of the process, we have
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:31–01:20:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um, in the near future that have submitted plans or are interested in doing so. Um,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:45–01:20:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
since I've been serving for the last six years. So we're in a boom period. Um, we're developing quickly. And we can easily lose sight of the importance of having natural areas that provide not only passive recreation, but protect environmentally sensitive lands, provide corridors for wildlife, and protect us during storms, um, by offering more flood capacity.
So,
the question I had was not, uh, whether or not I'd support this, you know, I support trying to do this, but there are several programs already in place that we can apply to,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:39–01:21:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:46–01:21:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right. Uh, there, and there is like a hundred million that the governor put toward, you know, purchasing environmentally sensitive properties. Like, I don't know that we have really looked at doing those. And then the other thing that, that has come up, because there are areas that we would, you know, where we will start to impede on wetlands, but are important for development. So, where is there mitigation, a mitigation bank? So, that is where, if you're forced to develop a certain area, you can actually apply monies to protect, you know, another wetland. Well, we don't, in Brevard County, we have no mitigation bank. So, when we've had people propose eliminating wetlands, or reducing wetlands, the ability to actually mitigate, and for cocoa to get the benefit from that, since we're actually going to suffer the losses, the ecosystem services, that we're not going to have because that wetland will be reduced.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:08–01:23:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
some sort of, and they call it
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:12–01:23:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:19–01:23:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the county. She was saying that the, the county had looked at that 20 years ago, but, I mean, basically let it go. So, the mitigation banks, there are mitigation banks in Volusia, for example, or south of us, but perhaps there's an opportunity for us to identify our environmentally sensitive areas, and form some sort of mitigation bank where we could benefit from these other areas that are being developed.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:58–01:24:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
proposal or your motion, to have staff look at both of these.
both the EELS program. The EELS program would have
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:24:13–01:24:17 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:24:17–01:24:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
some cases because the referendum where the EELS program was renewed in the last election specified that
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:24:18–01:24:28 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:28–01:24:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
an impact on the Indian River Lagoon are high priority. So I know they have a limited amount of funds, but we also have several properties that are very environmentally sensitive and do impact the lagoon. So anyway, but we still have to hear from the public, I think.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:24:53–01:24:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
So that's what I'd like to offer. And again, thank you.
Yes. Question, I have just a few questions. Who will be the individual or company, even though I know you said that you try to direct it to staff, the city manager and staff, will determine what is privately owned on environmental sensitive lands? Who and what and how will they determine this? That's my first question, because I have some reservations about this. What is an ecological balance? And who determines what is an ecological balance? How do they classify that or determine that? And then the third thing to me, this is like almost a form of eminent domain, because you're taking somebody's product.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:56–01:26:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
growth. And I think he would have some concerns about this as well. So that's the reason why I do have reservations about supporting this. I have sincere reservations and you ‸ can tell me and give me an excellent sentence, but I'm looking at the end of it all. And then when it's your own property, it's your property. You have to protect your property.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:27–01:26:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:26:33–01:26:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:26:35–01:26:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:42–01:26:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and I have 25 acres and seven acres of wetlands that I'm not building on, but the community doesn't want me to build on the ‸ actual buildable pieces of property. And I found out that the city is now wanting to purchase my property. Guess how high my property is going to be when the city comes to me to ask me to purchase my particular piece of property. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:16–01:27:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's just so many different factors. I think great, great idea for sure. I just it's just so many different things that I think we just need maybe in the future once we, you know, once you figure that out and maybe you
could
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:27:35–01:27:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
propose that ‸ whenever you get to that.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:39–01:27:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
I
was just going to say that to the first question, science determines what is environmentally sensitive. The science is there and we don't have to recreate anything. You can be assured when something is environmentally sensitive. We can easily test that.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:01–01:28:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
do not take anyone's property. The property owner has to agree and they sell it at a market rate.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:15–01:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I'm not familiar with any other state programs where they do this kind of property. So those are the only two that I really am aware of.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:33–01:28:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they require the owner to agree to it.
What happens if the owner has a different value of
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:44–01:28:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, then probably. Can
I finish, please?
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:52–01:28:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think it's ‸ amendment number five in reference of due process. And that's the question. What is the due process of what you think my land may be valued? Whereas
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:08–01:29:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I may have a different value.
then
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:14–01:29:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that's the reason why I'm just saying, I know for a fact ‸ when people are not aware or are not knowledgeablely aware or are sad enough to know exactly their full rights. Sometimes they take advantage of it and that's what we call eminent domain and it's done throughout the United States. And I don't want to be a part of that. That's my concern and that's where I stay. So, uh,
kind of the echo off Councilwoman costs point, um, you would, I would expect for a property owner, you know, you would make an offer based off the market price. Um, now ‸ the property owner agrees or thinks his property is worth more. Um, it goes back to the basis.
You
can't buy what you can't afford. So we don't have the money to, you know, purchase it at that price and it doesn't make sense. I wouldn't even encourage the city to go after that property at that point.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:09–01:30:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:30:15–01:30:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
property for the city's, uh, ‸ benefit.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:18–01:30:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
favor and adding that into my motion for staff to go and speak with the county in regards to those funds. My only, uh, my only proposal for that would be if the county did provide us funding to purchase some of these properties that the city maintains ownership of it, or we have the right to make decisions on those properties and not the county,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:46–01:30:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um,
yeah,
I just had one more comment just to say that in most cases with the eels properties, you have property that because it's environmentally sensitive, there's some,
that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:31:12–01:31:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the permitting and the, um,
mitigation
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:31:15–01:31:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
involved.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:20–01:31:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about here. Um, and I understand that the, um, the mitigation banks that those, those properties are, I mean, they are extremely valuable because there are so many people that want to mitigate and build. But,
um,
so it's, it's a good dollar amount that you get for those properties.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:51–01:31:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
no stomach for doing eminent domain on anyone. Um, but we're talking about properties that may be so expensive to build on that. And
I think that
there may be some appetite for considering this.
Um,
just my two cents. It, it looks like, like this is probably going to die if we vote on this. So my
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:33–01:32:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bring back more information.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:41–01:32:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
have a lot more questions and I don't want to sit on the diets and have all these questions that I'm not really getting. I need, I need, I'm the type I need to see it and stomach it. And so, so it just won't die because I believe this is a good idea that you bring it to the table. Maybe at the next council meeting, can you, um, we can direct staff to bring
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:04–01:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
process is. And I think I, I will feel better, um, about vote on it
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:33:15–01:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't think it's, it's a rush for today.
You know
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:17–01:33:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
my opinion,
I
don't, again, I don't want it to, to die now in my opinion.
Yeah,
I
just, I just wanted to say, um, it's only respectful to, um, allow the citizens that came here to
speak.
I'm just trying to exhaust this avenue. Okay. Okay. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:42–01:33:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
up the floor to the two members that submitted their cards? Do you have any comments?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:52–01:33:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
within the prerogative of the city council to seek money for,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:57–01:34:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
whatever that turns out to be.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:05–01:34:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Manager?
Actually,
I
prefer to, uh,
to,
uh, give you my comments after the speakers, if you don't mind, Mr. Mayor.
Yes, sir. Okay. First on the list,
uh,
Frank Sullivan. And then after, well, let's do ladies first. Mrs. Smith.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:26–01:34:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:27–01:34:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr.
so
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:34:30–01:34:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
would you let the ladies go first, please, sir? Mrs. Smith.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:33–01:34:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Hi, uh, Jenna Smith, [address], Cocoa, Florida. Mayor Blake, council members and staff. Um, hearing your conversation, this sort of changes the order of the presentation I made up. But what I would say is I'm particularly interested in an environmentally sensitive property at the intersection of Dixon Boulevard and Indian River Drive. And what I would like to invite council and staff is that we all get together and we go look at that property. Because it's an amazing wetland that's been there for years. I can't conceive how anyone could build on it. It would be a disaster because water flows into that area. It's like a bowl. And so water flows from the north, south and west. It flows directly on the ground if it's raining or coming off the road. But it also flows in underground streams. And how is a developer going to stop underground streams? You can't do it.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:00–01:36:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when we have a rainy season. It's probably doing it right now. And it's just going to be in. Where's it going to go? Is it going to go in the river? The river is already in its capacity. I grew up in sharps on the river and we lost about 15 feet of our shoreline because of the river having more water in it.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:28–01:36:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
has already lost about five feet. And they even have a, what do they call, a seawall. So wetlands, as Councilman Cross was saying, purifies the water. So the water is flowing into the wetland. It seeps through and is purified and then goes into the river. And our river is called things like a endangered water body by the state.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:08–01:37:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:14–01:37:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Florida. And they referred to our river as being inhabitable. It's a habit, habitated collapse for manatees. Those are both just sort of negative things that are out there in the world as they talk about Cocoa. The river at Cocoa. And do we really want to be known that way by professionals all over our state? I don't. And that, so can we arrange like a, what do they call it, like a
group
and we go and look at that area together? How can we do that?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:38:15–01:38:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:38:26–01:38:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
part of the river. And we have a chance to do it with saving that wetland. And I invite us to form some kind of a something.
I know it.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:44–01:38:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Well, thank you for listening. You
have a question. uh Councilwoman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:52–01:38:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
I just wanted to respond to we cannot, all of us cannot go because of Sunshine Laws to look at an area we would need to uh visit individually. So, um that can be, that could be arranged.
Okay. um ‸ Well, I'm willing to take it all of you individually and we'll do like a, um you know, where you go around and look at
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:20–01:39:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
[01:39:32] ▶ Play Speaker 9 (introduced as “Michelle Lewis” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
‸ Okay. We just haven't done anything like that.
There are some significant caveats ‸ That's why
I understand it, but I'm saying we can still be in the same build up and
we're doing that.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:39:46–01:39:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
We go to a town hall meeting, we all are there, sir. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:50–01:39:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
card, but let me just, on that on that particular,
on
that particular site, you have a a site plan application. Is that a preliminary, is that a PUD that they're applying for?
I'm sorry, say that again?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:05–01:40:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
they
they
have a minimum preliminary subdivision plan in review right now.
Yeah, so you so you so you have you have that going through the process. So I'm not, I'll let Anthony advise you on on whether you should be visiting that site individually or as a group there. But they're they're in the uh in the site, in the site planning review process. um And so they've submitted their application, they've paid, um they're in that in that uh review process right now. Recall that that process is, there's a staff review, there's comments back and forth. There is the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:44–01:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
coming to the City Council.
um
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:41:02–01:41:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Sullivan, ‸ thank
you
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:16–01:41:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
guy here. I'm just kind of bring a little history is what they want to bring.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:25–01:41:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they had all the water kind of collected and funneled to the south. So, and just around just around the point there, they had a pump station where they would pump it under the road. I mean, it would come under a culvert and they'd pump it into the Indian River. So ‸ they kind of control that. What messed that up was when Dixon Boulevard was put in, that flow then had a back had a dike there. So actually, when Councilman Hearn came up with some ideas what to do with that property, I thought it's probably going to solve some problems for you all. Because when that home,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:05–01:42:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because all those springs that come out on
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:13–01:42:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we're just fortunate the rest of the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:20–01:42:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that those springs all come underneath the road and come out at the river. That's just such a low area. So if there's a environmentally acceptable solution to that piece of property, that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:35–01:42:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:38–01:42:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
if it's not, I think it's going to come back and haunt you all as a council when they want to develop it because it's going to be hard to do. I can remember when you had to close the apartments up there in Dixon because they couldn't flush their toilets. So those springs are going to be there. And that's that's the only
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:57–01:43:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
to be compensated, but uh somehow I think it's going to be a problem for you that could have a good solution. So thank you. That's all I've got to say.
How's it going? Yeah, I
just want to bring it back a little bit to my main point of my ask. um Certainly uh there was some inspiration by a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:28–01:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but my proposal isn't specifically for one property. We have multiple locations throughout the city with sensitive, environmentally sensitive ‸ properties. um So this isn't in regards to a certain property. um I am in favor i am in favor of tabling this in in order to save this initiative because I think this is something good um to give staff a chance. And it doesn't have to be even at the next meeting just so you guys can uh gather a very informed uh information to give to the council in regards to the EELS program and also on the uh wetland mitigation uh bank uh
that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:44:12–01:44:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Councilwoman Cost Reference. um So I am in favor of tabling that uh if staff is uh have the ability to gather that information and bring ‸ back to the council. uh It doesn't have to be at the next council meeting. I just wanted, you know, I don't want it to be a year from now, but I want you guys to have ample time to gather all the information to present to us. um Again, my ask isn't for one particular property. We have multiple properties throughout
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:41–01:44:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um And for further clarification, I'm not proposing taking anyone's property.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:51–01:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:00–01:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh ‸ My motion is the table. My ask uh to direct staff to bring back to the council more information on how the EELS program works and how we could possibly go after funding from that. um As well as uh bring more information for the council on uh wetland mitigation banks. And if that's something that we, that will be feasible in the city of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:27–01:45:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:29–01:45:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You have a motion by
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:33–01:45:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but I, I, I, ‸ okay. And that we're up for discussion. Correct.
Okay. ‸ because
a couple ‸ things, we have on which we all do. um time. ‸ That's the first thing. Secondly, um I think it has been revealed that we know we could eloquently state here. um it wasn't designated for a specific area for a specific area, but it was identified tonight. And I have a problem with that because when you own your own property and you have people wanting to control your property and then it's your private property. uh I'm not in favor of that.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:18–01:46:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and paint it any kind of way you want. The bottom line, if it's my property and I meet the guidelines and the criteria and I'm with within within the framework of the law, then I should have that right to exercise my property rights, period, point blank. That's my assessment. uh Council
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:38–01:46:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
your friend is
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:40–01:46:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
my proposal isn't to one specific property. I, as Council know, I had a meet and greet off Indian River Drive where I spoke to the the my constituents in District
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:54–01:46:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and this idea was brought up to me by my constituents. So, I'm bringing to the dais the concerns and wants that my constituents would love to see in the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:05–01:47:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:06–01:47:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
However, we cannot just go out and take anyone's property. So, what I'm doing, I'm being proactive by proposing proposing something that we can utilize in the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:23–01:47:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:24–01:47:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
may come up and identified as
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:28–01:47:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
property. ‸ you take that property off, and then I'll have a stronger recommendation and consideration for this ecological balance that you all are describing to us that uh it doesn't really meet the criteria. At this
current time, my motion is for staff to bring back more information on programs that we already may have in
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:59–01:48:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, I will bet you a dollar to a donut that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:04–01:48:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I guarantee ‸ Because it's already been identified by two individuals already. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:12–01:48:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, taking a stance on it. That's all. If it's done decent in order, I
don't have a
problem with it. But that's not decent in it or That's all. Councilman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:25–01:48:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
sir.
um i had I had something
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:30–01:48:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
now. But um I do understand that you, at the end of the day, we're listening to our constituents. And when extension was bringing you issues, hey, you're gonna ‸ bring it to the table. So, I can i can appreciate that point. but But to the mayor's point, um thank you to to miss Smith for for making that point. I think we all, like again, just like the mayor said, we all have had this conversation before. We've had multiple residents come in with issues with not only that property, but a property um to the south of that property. um And and so, it is to me, when we talk, I'm not an environmental guy. I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:11–01:49:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
i I do all those things. But also we have to be able to trust engineering. But we only want to trust engineering when it's convenient for what we want. That's the issue that I'm having because, okay,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:28–01:49:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you have mitigation on this particular property. You cannot build on
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:33–01:49:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:35–01:49:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
still people going to have issues with that. And so you can't please everybody at the end of the day. And so if, if and I'm not sure, um how how many acres can they build on that piece of property? Anybody have that answer?
That property is not what we're discussing. But
that that but that is what it's
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:00–01:50:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
i think
I could provide that perhaps at a separate
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:08–01:50:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. okay
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:10–01:50:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Point taken. Yeah. Point
taken. Point taken. um So i I'm going to vote yes to to postpone it um for now uh for more information, but I just wanted to make that point. uh And it's under reviewer as we
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:26–01:50:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this time. So.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:36–01:50:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, and then I know she's Councilwoman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:43–01:50:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going to say that uh
so
i just want to make sure for the record.
So my motion is to, uh table my proposal, uh to drop the letter up to the governor, uh and direct staff. To bring back more information to the council on the eels program at the county. And as well as bring back information on how wetland mitigation banks work. And if it's something that can be
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:13–01:51:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
multiple requests. if you want to table it? Just table it. And then we can make a decision. Then you can come back and ask to make, you
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:26–01:51:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's all, ‸ it's like uh we're in conjunction. I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:33–01:51:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
yes sir already seconded?
Yeah.
Okay. So the motion's on the floor, mayor, and needs to be dispensed with.
but But what I'm saying is he's wanting to table it, but then he wants to get additional information. I'm just. Well,
I mean, that's if the council wants to table an item and give direction to provide additional information. um
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:04–01:52:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
base,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:52:09–01:52:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you know, and to gather additional information ‸ it'll be put back on an agenda uh at
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:15–01:52:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
requesting of additional information. That's frequently the the case when
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:24–01:52:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the agenda with adequate background information for
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:32–01:52:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
‸ seems like it needs to be further developed and more research and background provided to the council at the appropriate time so you can discuss it a little bit more specifically.
Okay. We have a motion on the floor. Just gonna ‸ call in question. All in favor by saying aye. Aye. That we table this. Correct. Yes, sir. And
get more information.
That's what I would like to hear. Thank you. I'm in favor of it. It's unanimous vote. Proceeding on to the next item item number two.
Mr. Mayor, before you leave this one, I ‸ didn't want to get in the way of your of your
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:53:22–01:53:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on this. The
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:23–01:53:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
program is pretty easy to get you the information. I'll just send you the link. um I don't think
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:28–01:53:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:29–01:53:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there the The tax, the special tax, I think, is uh remains there to pay off the debt and to uh and to maintain those uh those properties that are already in inventory. um ‸ There are, and and and again, I've asked the question about mitigation banks there. You have to have land to actually do the banks ‸ It's a convoluted, long, drawn out process. There are hundreds of acres of mitigation banks uh in
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:01–01:54:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there. I know that for sure because i I've talked with the um the assistant uh county manager who's in charge of that particular area there. Again, I will caution you caution you all about um the property that has a site plan submitted um on on the corner of uh Dixon and Indian River. um And so those are those are pretty easy things to get uh to you guys because it's just links to the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:32–01:54:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
program. And then it'll be a link to the uh to uh
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:36–01:54:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um Your comprehensive plan actually does define environmentally and environmentally sensitive areas
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:49–01:54:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it says conserve protect and uh and appropriately manage the natural resources and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:58–01:55:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
quality possible. And it gives a it says environmentally sensitive areas at a minimum environmentally sensitive areas shall contain one of one or more of the following natural resources and it goes a through F. uh That policy that goal also prescribes that we coordinate with appropriate governmental entities to protect environmentally and environmentally sensitive lands which extend into adjacent municipalities.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:34–01:55:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the information is either in your comp plan
and online with regards to the EELS program and the St. John's Water Management District program. So I'll be able to quickly get you that
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:55:41–01:55:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:51–01:55:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know that that will move the needle for you because, again, I don't think, and I'll talk to Mike Knight about this, I don't think that
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:55:52–01:56:00 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:56:00–01:56:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:01–01:56:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
phase of that program. I think they're on the under the uh the maintenance phase of that, but we have to get you that information.
It's a process by the way.
yeah Yes, ma'am. i
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:16–01:56:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
And we were concerned about that many years ago so that we would have to purchase property elsewhere throughout the state of Florida. And even like you alluded to,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:39–01:56:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's a bank for us. So that is the reason why I'm still having reservation and hesitation.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:46–01:56:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to say that the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:50–01:56:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
program is not an acquisition. They have their eye on a property right now. It's a process ‸ you just
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:57–01:57:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
have an advisory board. Yes, ‸ That looks at the priorities. Yes,
ma'am. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:04–01:57:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in our past in 1990. And I got to the county in 1994 and spent 23 years there. So, yeah, I understand. I don't, I don't know that any, that they're reviewing any of the properties on our inventory, but that's an easy enough question. Mitigation banks are actually set up, I think, by the uh St. John's Water Management District.
There
there are
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:26–01:57:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
those out to you. So it's pretty easy information, but but again i again, I still don't know that that moves you guys further to
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:57:37–01:57:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:38–01:57:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
sponsorship of the Space Coast Black Chamber
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:49–01:57:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:57:54–01:57:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
easier ask. So, um as you know, the Space Coast uh Black
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:02–01:58:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of Commerce has been a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:04–01:58:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
many initiatives in bringing business businesses, small businesses to
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:10–01:58:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and they're also recognizing uh some of the small business uh startup owners
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:20–01:58:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um So, I'm asking that we, uh if Council agreed to purchase a table, a sponsorship table, uh to this event.
uh
‸ how
much is
this sponsorship thing?
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:58:32–01:58:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
uh Where is this? I believe I
had
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:58:36–01:58:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
an email.
uh ‸ 1500 did you get that email
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:42–01:58:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
uh would be reserved for all the council members to attend, if you
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:56–01:59:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
the 24th
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:59:32–01:59:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:08–02:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, ma'am. ‸ I
seconded it.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:16–02:00:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If
we got,
I
know Mayor Blake won't be here. I won't be here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:00:26–02:00:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll be here on the 24th.
Okay, you'll be good. Okay. So you think
it'd
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:00:31–02:00:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be better off instead of the person to the table, we just do a sponsorship.
So
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:00:37–02:00:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
won't have a table with, because that's what happened to me last time where people was out of town. And we had a table, but I was ‸ the table. Well,
I
think also in the sponsorship, it also pays for our membership as a city ‸ to the chambers as well. That's included in it ‸ as well.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:01:00–02:01:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right.
‸ But I'm cool with it. But I
just
want to point that out, that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:08–02:01:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not there.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:11–02:01:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
also looks bad, too.
Right. So I'll be there for sure. And as I stated, this also will cover ‸ the city's membership as part of the chambers, as a member of the chamber as well. So, um,
yes, I'm definitely positive. Positive on that. We have a motion on the floor. I do support this. I do have some concerns and reservations, so I'm going
to
call the question. Let me make sure. So you're saying $1,400. It's going to be $1,500.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:56–02:01:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
24th.
Thank you.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:02:02–02:02:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
At 6 p.m.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:08–02:02:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:10–02:02:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah.
Okay.
All right. We have a motion on the floor by Deputy Mayor
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:18–02:02:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to observe the cost of $1,500 on the 24th to support the Chamber of Commerce.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:02:29–02:02:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
‸ All in favor say hi. Hi.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:33–02:02:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:02:34–02:02:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the record reflect 3-1. I do support the Chamber of Commerce, the Black Chamber of Commerce. I just have some concerns. I know I'm not in town. And I still could independently, you know, if I decide to make a donation. All right. Proceeding on the next item. Under City Business. No.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:02:56–02:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Sir,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:02:58–02:02:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
You have item number 7-3. Yes, sir. Let me, do you want me to read it over? No, no, that's fine. Background check. Yeah, you can.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:09–02:03:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
off for the agenda item.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:14–02:03:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
supervision training and equipping all of the participants.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:26–02:03:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Elaborate and, yes, I'm in support of safety and participation of all participants. That's very important. The partner agreement that we have, excuse me, sir, recreation partner agreement we have with the county or where do we stand currently with that, sir?
Yeah, so we recall that you guys just approved the, uh, the parks operating agreement. And so we have that agreement for each, uh, organization that wants to have organized, I'll say organized activities within a park, they enter into a, uh,
uh,
rec partner agreement. And so that's a non-exclusive agreement that gives them use of the facilities. Um,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:15–02:04:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
can forward to you all. It gives them, uh, non-exclusive use of the facilities. They have certain obligations. Um, the county has certain obligations. The county enters into that on behalf of the, of the district cities. So remember the district
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:32–02:04:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
then
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:36–02:04:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, specifically this, this district, the district
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:44–02:04:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number of other districts. Um, and so they bring these rec
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:50–02:04:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh,
[unclear audio ▶]
which consists of a representative from the city, uh,
uh,
the county, and then
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:00–02:05:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so it's a way of actually, uh, setting the rules in place for the, uh, organizations who utilize the, uh, the, the facilities there. Um, what you read on the agenda report is a section of the, um, the agreement that says that it is a responsibility of the organization to provide for the safety of the participants. Um, and so this is an issue. We live in a different day and time. Um, and so, uh, with the, with the little league events there, and, and I'm pretty sure we're only talking about the little league events at, at, um, wherever we have rec partner agreements at our city parks there. And so,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:46–02:05:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is that to require, um, through an amendment of the agreement, which we'd have to reach out to the county and ask them to amend it or to just simply say that, um, and again, I'll talk with
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:05–02:06:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
how we actually, um,
um,
codify this, uh, to say that
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:12–02:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
organizations who have rec partner agreements, the city council is requiring that you have, uh, some sort of law enforcement detail for the games, uh, slash events that you're putting on, uh, for that particular day.
If, if we have law enforcement there at the game, I'm just asking, who absorbs that cost?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:41–02:06:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. I just want to point a clarification. And if they do not provide that,
what
happens then?
Then it can forfeit their rec partner agreement.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:54–02:06:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I
mean, what, say for example, if, well, I've never really seen a situation where, um, an organization, which is a nonprofit, hires a, uh, off duty detail, say one officer, I think it might end up being just say 350 bucks and they just not pay it.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:15–02:07:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
that before, but. I mean, I'm sure
it has happened, but, uh, we just have to come up with a plan to, to be able to address it. Okay. If it does come up, but rarely does that happen here. Yeah. My thought
process is, is that the council, if you direct tonight, you're actually directing me to advise the, uh, county parks and rec director that you all believe that the rec partner agreement should be amended to require the rec partner, the organization, the contractor to provide for security for their, uh, events, their games. We, we only have two, uh, rec partners. I think those are just in the sport of a football. So, so they would be required to provide, um, uh, law enforcement security. Should I be calling it security chief? Probably.
If, if you're
required
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:08:22–02:08:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
law enforcement, I mean,
you're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:08:23–02:08:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
going to give them the option as far as ‸ that they want to hire security?
Yeah,
that's,
that's the question. I think so.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:29–02:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is sworn law enforcement.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:33–02:08:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
payable by the organization for the entirety of their games. And so, so
this thought is really, uh, trying to be proactive. Um, we have been reactive on many different things and just like last year,
um,
situation have happened at a certain part. Um,
and
then we get called and now we in the uproar and trying to rush and do all these different things. Um, if you recall at the last, uh, budget hearing, um, I asked for a meeting, but we did not as a council really direct, um, our city manager to do it. We didn't motion it. We didn't do ‸ the proper things to get it done. And so I blame myself for that.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:22–02:09:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:26–02:09:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we're going to get blamed for anything that happens at provost park or Australia or wherever else. So, uh, I make, I make, so, so this, this what I, ‸ I'm gonna
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:09:40–02:09:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this what we do at the park that I'm a part of. If there's five games played on that particular Saturday or Sunday or whatever game day that is, is one officer. Um, and if they start at nine o'clock in the morning, I'm not saying nine o'clock in the morning, officer need to be there. Most of the time situations happen from, uh, 11 a.m. In between that last game, the 11 to five areas. So six hours, five hours, whatever
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:08–02:10:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
two officers need to be hired. And so I want to put that stipulation in there.
Um,
number one, it protects us. Uh,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:19–02:10:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
changed. Everybody not smiling and laughing no more.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:26–02:10:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They, they, they kind of street the game of football like the streets. Um, and that's, what's going on. Um, ‸ be honest with you right now. And so I'd rather be in front of it instead of behind ‸ eight ball. And also,
it'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:10:40–02:10:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
help our officers out because I believe our officers need that off detail as well.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:45–02:10:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, um,
I second that motion to amend my motion to reflect yours, but I have the city light, but I want to make sure you exhaust that ‸ because you're right, sir.
This
is a brand new stadium. We have to get it right. You know, they're watching. We're under the microscope. We're under the magnifying glass. Let's be honest. This is just a big elephant in the room and there are some haters out there, but it can be done and it will be done.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:16–02:11:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
or I'm just a student.
Yes, sir. Mr. Mayor. And so just so I make sure that we're on the same page.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:27–02:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
partner agreements in place to require, um, um, law enforcement,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:39–02:11:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
one officer, five or more
games, two officers. Okay. Five or more games, two officers, five or less games, one officer, um, make that a requirement, uh, of the rec partner agreement. And I'm assuming that, um, we don't want to go as far as to say if, if the, if the rec partner is not amenable to that, uh, amendment, then your request would be for the county to terminate the agreement with the rec
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:12:21–02:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
don't think we need to give them an option.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:12:23–02:12:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:27–02:12:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
rec partners choose our parks to be in our parks. And so when you choose to be in our parks, working with our kids, then I think that
comes
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:12:37–02:12:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
with great responsibility. And so within that responsibility comes sometimes
cost.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:12:42–02:12:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And so you, you charge the kids in some cases, uh, donations come in for game day sponsorships. So you need to do whatever you need to do to make sure that your kids at your park are safe.
That's it. And so they, okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:13:02–02:13:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No. If, if they do not, they get one time and you're out or.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:13:11–02:13:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
on that.
I
got my own opinion about that. They shouldn't. I just say they shouldn't even argue about that point. Um, because again, I'll just be frank.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:13:24–02:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And what happens is when you don't have an officer there, you have to call 911.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:14:03–02:14:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
time frame? So you have about
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:13:37–02:13:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:13:38–02:13:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
20 minutes or so of that movement. And
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:13:39–02:13:41 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:13:41–02:13:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we don't need it. Luckily, PD is right down the road. Um, but having that officer there deters people from acting a fool because they see that cop car. They see, they just know that they don't want to they
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:13:42–02:13:58 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 02:13:58–02:13:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
don't want that problem. And so, um, again, I think we just need to be proactive.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:13:59–02:14:03 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:05–02:14:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
effective immediately because yeah, this is Tuesday. Remember there are probably games on Saturday. So, so I have to get the, get the, uh, the request out tomorrow morning.
Yep.
Um, so effective immediately. If they can't mobilize, uh, that quickly, the, the two organizations, um,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:31–02:14:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Or do you want me to work something out with the police chief for, for
Saturday? Well, just, just, just,
just
in my opinion, we just went through this last year, um, at
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:44–02:14:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to be,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:48–02:14:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:51–02:14:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was practice maybe once or twice, but then it was game days as well for the remaining of the season. Yes.
Okay.
And so my, that was my purpose of bringing this forward in July. Um, again, I knew this time was coming fast. I apologize for not making the motion like I should have.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:12–02:15:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:19–02:15:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going to come down the pike because we just, they just had to pay for this six months ago. And so, um, maybe you can give some grace. That's up to ‸ the council on that part. But I mean, I'm standing firm on, on, uh, off duty officers.
‸ I'm definitely, uh, in favor of your motion. Um, I would also be in favor if we could work something out with PD for this coming Saturday with the short notice. Um, however, I don't think we'll have any issues with the partners adhering to the, uh,
uh,
the ordinance that we're proposing,
uh,
right now ‸ I coach football as well. I, I haven't been to a field where they don't have, uh, law enforcement, uh, patrolling.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:16:12–02:16:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to them, I don't think we'll have any issues with them adhering to that. So,
yeah,
I'm just curious what the expenses and so the cocoa athletic league, are they, I mean, from what I understand, they operate at the margins. So we're not making anything prohibitive, right?
What's, what's our early detailed costs? Samantha,
you
got the top of your head?
$50 an hour.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:16:45–02:16:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
police officer.
We
charge more for a commander.
If it's a commander, I think it's 55 an hour, but just a regular police
officers
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:16:55–02:16:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
50.
And if, if it's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:16:57–02:17:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:12–02:17:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Guess, you know better than I.
I mean, there are, ‸ there are, there are costs.
There are costs.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:27–02:17:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
businesses. You have certain things that ways that you can, uh, raise those funds.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:38–02:17:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of your kids, which, but also we do know that there are some kids that can't afford it and things of that nature. Um, but you have to be able to control your parents and or coaches. Yeah. And the issue is no one can.
Yeah.
You just, you just don't know what's going on in the, in the community. You don't know who messing with who girlfriend. You don't know. You don't know what can transpire away from the field that end up spilling on the field in some cases. You know what I mean? And so we haven't had a whole lot of issues, but I just think that this could help all of us not get those phone calls and we can kind of rest easy to know that CPD is already there. You know what I mean? Just in my opinion.
City Manager, do you understand the direction that we have? I know we have a game that's up and coming.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:18:28–02:18:33 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:18:33–02:18:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I trust your negotiation skills and process, whatever that agreement may be. Um, let's work through that, but saying after that first grade, that grace period, I think
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:18:35–02:18:47 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:18:47–02:18:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we should apply immediately. Um, I'm 100% with you
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:18:48–02:18:52 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:18:52–02:18:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:18:52–02:18:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:18:57–02:18:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at all costs. Because there again,
we're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:19:02–02:19:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
under the magnifying glass,
trust me,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:19:05–02:19:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and the microscope. So we get you both. so
So this is for uh youth sports because we have we have other rec partners. We have a soccer, lacrosse, rugby
okay
i know we do have soccer. I'm pretty sure we have soccer leagues. We have rugby for sure.
right So
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:19:50–02:19:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:19:57–02:20:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yeah that could start somewhere
yeah i I think that's a good
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:08–02:20:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
youth organizations coming back saying, well, we're not the only rec partners inside the parks. And you're not. it Even though we know we haven't had reports, too many reports, and maybe Chief can bring that back at a later day of
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:27–02:20:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the parks is the uh
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:20:36–02:20:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But uh yeah
I just want to make a comment. um And I understand your concerns. Yeah.
But
I've coached youth sports for uh
probably
about 10 or 15 years. Yeah. And typically when you have an issue at some of those games, it's always or somewhat of one of those rival type games. And so, you know, to require that for every game for for the youth, unless something has changed where they got a plethora of funds.
yes
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:21:16–02:21:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So to to your point, so most more than likely, those two partners have five home games. right And so, um and
it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:21:28–02:21:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
may make they may have a playoff game or something like that, something of that nature. But normally it's just normally five to maybe six total. um But currently that's what
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:21:40–02:21:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but they also said ‸ you better do it without saying it. And so that's what we do because we've had issues as well. And some things out of our control is just, you know, just stuff just happened between just relationships and you just don't know. And so you want to be able to control that, that environment. So, yes, so, so to your point,
yes, things
have changed a whole lot, to
be
honest. And the game usually is two hours or? uh Usually it's an hour and a half per game. So
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:16–02:22:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So which is, if
you say 50 to 300 bucks. Okay. So it's, it's, so they, the the law enforcement presence will be there at a, you know, I'll come up
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:32–02:22:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a period of time after the end of the game. Yep. Okay. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:46–02:22:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like that. Yeah. okay
yeah
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:01–02:23:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
um the manager shared, um a rec partner agreement with me, um earlier, uh before the meeting and I'm looking it over, um you know, there is an
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:23:17–02:23:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in there that obviously protects the county. Interestingly, there's, there's another paragraph that protects the school board when, when the, when, when it occurs on school board property. But,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:23:31–02:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So included in that request to amend for law enforcement officers, I would recommend, uh asking the county to also include an indemnity and hold harmless provision for the city of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:50–02:23:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
since the city of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:51–02:23:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
owns the land. And also, add the city of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:23:55–02:23:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as an additional named insured on the contractor's insurance, which is likewise, provided, um to the county. So
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:04–02:24:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:27 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:24:10–02:24:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:24:37–02:24:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
validating
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:47–02:24:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:30 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:24:56–02:25:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:25:28–02:25:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Thank
you, Mr. Mayor. This is an annual agenda item that we bring to city council
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:25:40–02:25:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They normally do a revenue sufficiency study each year and review the results with city council individually and then once that's complete and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:25:55–02:25:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we have a lot of
[unclear audio ▶]
bring it back for acceptance. This year they determined that only a 2% increase in utility rates was needed as opposed to a 4% ‸ rate increase. So there's currently a resolution in place that says it the 4% will continue for so many years and because the increase is being reduced. This resolution is necessary to supersede the previous resolution. However, we are asking for the 4% to be reinstated in fiscal year 26 unless Stan tech comes back and determines that the 4% isn't needed at which time we'll be presenting another resolution ‸ to supersede for budget year 26. So staff is requesting council approval to approve this resolution.
Do we have any questions for Mrs. Bowman? Seeing none, I'll take the lead on this one. What ‸ wishes of council? If not, ‸ make the motion to approve staff recommendation pertaining to the resolution.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:27:05–02:27:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:27:09–02:27:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:27:11–02:27:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Second by Deputy Mayor Hearn.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:27:18–02:27:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:27:19–02:27:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Aye. We have ‸ unanimous vote. Proceeding on to item number 8-2. Approve the preliminary assessment resolution 2024-071 for
prior
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:27:31–02:27:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
protection for fiscal year 2025. Mrs. Bowman.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Once again, we hire Stan tech to perform an assessment of the, um, a review of the, uh, fire assessment each year. Uh, they determined that there was an increase that was needed, which is a 4% increase, 3% increase, um, for next fiscal year. And so, um, this is adopting the preliminary resolution to, um, incur those rates. And then, uh, the, at the next meeting, the final resolution will be brought back to council.
Do we have any questions for Mrs. Bowman?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:14–02:28:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:18–02:28:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Chair, it's going to
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:30–02:28:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Aye. Aye.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:28:33–02:28:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Once again, approve the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:36–02:28:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:46–02:28:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. So once again,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:28:53–02:29:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
is needed to support the stormwater utility. Um, again, they met with city council members to review the results. And so this preliminary
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:10–02:29:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
brought back for a final resolution at the next city council meeting.
What are the wishes of council? Uh, can
I ask a question?
Okay. Yes, ma'am.
Give
me a second. We have a motion on
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:28–02:29:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, I wanted to ask, is it the stormwater plan is a 10 year plan, right?
Yes.
Does it, do we, at the end of 10 years, do we renew, does this automatically renew the assessment? Or do we present a new plan or how does that work?
So, uh, staff is looking at, uh, possibly, uh,
uh,
contracting services, uh, to develop a new, uh, 10 year plan, uh, next fiscal year.
Okay, next year and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:11–02:30:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. Okay. Okay. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:30:17–02:30:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:23–02:30:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Four corners.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:30:27–02:30:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
update.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:28–02:30:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. Thank you,
Mayor. Sir.
Um, tonight we're gonna go ‸ over, uh, update on the visioning session. That was done, uh, back in June. Um, give
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:42–02:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
presented. I think all of you were there, um, at the workshop. Um, so
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:48–02:30:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
give you a,
uh,
just a brief reminder of what the work is all about. What was presented, um, feedback we received and then recommended next steps. Uh, ‸ so just as, uh, ‸ some background, um, RBI was asked by staff to do a review.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:31:08–02:31:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
and state or five 20 generally shown
on
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:31:14–02:31:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the area on the map shown on
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:31:15–02:31:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
one to five 20 goes west to Fisk. Um, and then a little bit north of, uh, of King street, uh, and the us one intersection.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:31:29–02:31:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
specific area where the zoning districts don't comply
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:31:36–02:31:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So
it creates a consistency issue, which creates issues with permitting and redevelopment opportunities. As part of that analysis,
it
was identified that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:31:47–02:31:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's the intersection, um, of two CRAs.
Of
course, this cocoa CRA and the diamond square acts as an entrance into cocoa village. Really an entrance into the city of cocoa itself. And so it was chosen as the starting point of the overall visioning process. Uh, the four corners, again, generally
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:32:06–02:32:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There are 22 parcels in that intersection with six different property owners.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:32:15–02:32:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
an existing conditions review of the four corners and ‸ understand through that analysis how the mixed use vision, which is the future land use designation of these parcels
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:32:29–02:32:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
And if there are gaps in the vision, create opportunities for a shared theme in the intersection and throughout the entire corridor. So we provided to the, to the audience and the staff, you know, what does urban mixed use mean? Uh, graphically, you know, this is kind of a general image, uh, where you can kind of get a good idea of, of dense urban development where you ideally have a vertically integrated mixed use building, of varying densities dependent on, um, size of your property and other bulk zoning requirements.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:33:00–02:33:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is different. All situations are different as far as
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:33:07–02:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So this image is meant to show a best case scenario. Now, having said that all the properties within the study area have a zoning district of CP commercial parkway, which is mainly focused on, uh, ‸ commercial uses fronting a main highway and the uses that are permitted in that CP are, are generally a very auto oriented type of, uh, use.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:33:30–02:33:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not really a zoning district that encourages or brings in mixed use development. Uh, and so what does that mean? Auto oriented development? Well, this is kind of a tongue in cheek image, of course. Um, but you could extend auto oriented development to mean
your building is set back
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:33:51–02:33:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
far from the street. You have parking in the front.
It's
not pedestrian friendly, and you may have uses that are specifically auto oriented ‸ car washes, drive through restaurants, things of that nature, gas stations and the like. And so CP, when you look at your comp plan, it's not a zoning district that is compatible with the mixed use future land use. And it certainly doesn't encourage the mixture of uses or uses that are pedestrian oriented, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:34:15–02:34:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, of importance to point out here in this intersection, too, is there's some challenges with the right of way.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:34:23–02:34:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
feet wide. Only half of it is improved at this point. So that really impacts the pedestrian nature of the corridor.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:34:32–02:34:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
how you improve the right of way, how you may not be able to. Um, it's something that, you know, is being looked at a little bit closer as we've seen, uh, pre application meetings come in for development at the intersection. Having said that, it does allow for opportunities though for pedestrian ‸ multimodal improvements and I'll get to that in a few minutes. So just, uh, overall existing condition analysis, the intersection struggles with
audio-oriented
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:34:58–02:34:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
uses that are not ‸ a pedestrian scale. They don't encourage walkability. Um, it's not all because of the existing buildings.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:05–02:35:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:11–02:35:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the right of way with traffic counts and railroad infrastructure, it's difficult to create a pedestrian scale environment that you might see in a mixed use neighborhood. Um, so knowing that the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:22–02:35:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and there's existing conditions that create challenges to that, we want to figure out, um, what real world strategies are out there that may help the aesthetics of the corridor, um, which then could improve the design and uses of the area. So we showed, um, an existing condition out in Orlando at 50 and Fern Creek, where you have two pretty standard, um, nationwide uses. And we did an exercise with those that attended to say, Hey, what do you see or not see in this image? And what do you think is a little bit different, um, from what you might see from your typical, in this case, Starbucks. Um, and this being a more urban environment building was brought to the street. There is nice foundational landscaping.
The
building architecture is done in a manner that might be slightly different than a more auto oriented, uh, type of coffee shop. Uh, ‸ we have large window finishes that are facing the street, which improves pedestrian safety. Eyes on the street is a big, um, urbanism theory type of thing. And that improves the safety of a, of a street for pedestrians and general users of a neighborhood.
Uh,
this specific Starbucks does have a drive through. It's behind the building. Um, so it's hidden from the main thoroughfare, the main arterial. And then even on the secondary street,
you
can see here, it's hidden through landscape treatments that are appropriately designed to not interfere with the overhead power lines. You can see there's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:36:41–02:36:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:45–02:36:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they
[unclear audio ▶]
a manner to, uh, be done in a contextually sensitive way. And then they also had a stem wall, uh, which helps block, um, lights from the cars.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:56–02:37:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:37:01–02:37:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to ‸ show how some, uh, typical auto oriented uses can be designed in a manner that are more pedestrian friendly, help create a more urban environment. And just, uh, from an aesthetics point of view, buildings are done in a manner that are more pleasing in a more urban manner.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:37:19–02:37:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
And so we took each site and did a 3d render of a variety of different uses, um, throughout the corridor to show, Hey, what can happen if you identify architectural themes that you want to bring in, you want to change your set back requirements. maybe your landscape requirements to encourage, you know, something that's a little bit more inviting, something that improves and increases property value, something that activates right-of-way areas that may not be utilized to their full potential right now I'll go back a couple slides what I enjoyed about this slide is our our render person added in a bus shelter and meandering sidewalk here because there is there is a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:13–02:38:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but she moved it over here to 520 and and I asked her to kind of you know add some embellishment to the landscape to show how, you know, if the right-of-way is
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:38:25–02:38:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the community ‸ And she did those types of right-of-way treatments
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:30–02:38:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, what happened at the workshop? We sent out 1800 public notices in conjunction with staff and included the flyer here that staff put together there was also a city Facebook event that was made on the city's Facebook page
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:52–02:38:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the workshop in person. There was about two dozen that attended online.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:02–02:39:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for ideas and solutions that's for streetscape land use mobility and urban design.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:11–02:39:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
some of the talking points. So, happy to share this information here with you tonight. ‸ When you talk about land use, you can see the variety of ‸ sticker placements on this board. And this was a, this is a scan of the board that was at the meeting. And on the left side of this slide are some of the talking points, some of the feedback we received. Some of it was very specific. You can see this first bullet point, an actual specific idea for a restaurant that had a basically a
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:46–02:39:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a certain type of theme that mirrored a restaurant that was previously adjacent to the railroad tracks also received some feedback that auto-oriented uses could be okay
if they're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:40:00–02:40:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
well buffered the screen from the road. So they're attractive enhanced with building ‸ architectural standards. That's kind of where we're headed to with that type of conversation. is
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:07–02:40:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which that's inevitable, if they're designed it in a certain manner, it can be an asset to the community. So you can see some of the feedback. you know At the top left, there's a lot of density going on there, but really nice building treatments, landscape treatments, and you can see as you go down the board, some pretty very some pretty specific negative reactions to certain uses and some positives on what I think are just mainly related to retail uses, restaurant uses, and building designs that reflect nicely on the community.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:42–02:40:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There's also a feedback that encouraged
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:47–02:40:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the residential above retail office and the neighborhood based small-scale retail and service spaces are also ideal, especially in that specific intersection Now, when it came to mobility, there was a lot of support for using the right-of-way to move sidewalks further from the travel lanes, at landscape buffers ‸ create ‸ more pedestrian friendly environment, but they're also sense of sensitive to the fact that the roadways are pretty heavily trafficked by cars that connect the region, so it's also going to have to remain vehicle friendly So there's strategies that
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:16–02:41:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
into your right-of-way improvements, and you can see the feedback ‸ received here was really great. You know, these are all pretty modern mobility type of ideas with bike share. Bike lanes,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:41:33–02:41:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
modern, but how you stripe them and how you place them into the fabric of the right-of-way is, there's a lot of unique ways to do that. ‸ For Streetscape,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:43–02:41:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to connect Stone Street across ‸ railroad track, and then there was also the flip of that, where it was not a supportive idea because ‸ the aesthetics and the practical issues of trucks and transportation to the through the intersection. Pedestrian overpasses in general, very expensive to undertake, takes a lot of coordination between multiple different agencies.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:42:07–02:42:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Brevard as well, where they can be done, but it's it's a bit of an undertaking. You could see the feedback
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:15–02:42:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
based on the imagery we provided, which are features we would encourage in this intersection and in the corridor. We came to urban design. Urban design, it was very clear, those in attendance want high quality building architecture, they want the buildings brought to the street they want cars to be hidden I mean you can just see it you know the bullet points on the left side there allow variety of uses enhance US 1 to 520 include pedestrian safety improvements, landscape buffering needs to be improved. And then the last bullet point on this specific
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:42:53–02:42:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the results of the workshop next week and then just a little bit of, you know, kind of back and forth when it comes to density is not wanting to exceed the three-story building heights. And that's always a tough one, building height, density, mixture of uses, usually mixed use, vertically integrated. You want height to achieve the financing that's needed for those types of buildings. So that's something to be
fleshed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:43:18–02:43:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
out
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:43:18–02:43:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There ‸ again, ‸ allowing for rooftop entertainment, certain types of architecture, and then using, again,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:43:26–02:43:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of other cities that have done these types of exercises.
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:43:35–02:43:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:43:35–02:43:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was one specific example,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:43:38–02:43:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this type of work.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:43:42–02:43:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
my attention that the area should represent the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:43:48–02:43:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and that one caught me by surprise because I I see this
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:43:53–02:43:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
beach or to Merritt Island specifically. This is a very cocoa centric intersection that focus should really just be
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:44:02–02:44:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about the pedestrian overpass, and extending the visioning to the north side of 520. Now, that's an interesting point because there is no zoning land use issue on the north side of 520. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:44:17–02:44:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's kind of the next phase of this exercise. So ‸ something we're going to talk to staff about ‸ because if you're going to do a proper corridor study, you, of course, want both sides of the street to be included. So that might be more of a design related discussion, less a solution based item related to zoning and land use inconsistencies so as I mentioned our upcoming meeting is ‸ this coming Monday to the Diamond Square CRA but we do have a recommendation for the council and we are looking for a request on direction on on to where to go with this. And so first off, ‸ summary of
the
feedback is providing for ‸ recommendation that the city continue to follow and implement the vision outline
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:44:59–02:45:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that the mixed use future land use and the goals and goals and policies of the mixed use and the comp plan are the way to go in the corridor. That being said, the current zoning districts that regulate the the parcels are not structured in a manner to support the mixture of uses. And that goes to setbacks, permitted uses, building heights, etc ‸ And there are at least two commercial districts that exist within the corridor that are not compliant with the mixed use future land use. So we have five recommendations as a result of the workshop. The first would be to update the comprehensive plan to include the CP commercial Parkway as an applicable zoning district within the mixed use future land use designation in the comp plan. ‸ Currently it is not. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:45:45–02:45:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is that you have a zoning district that is not compatible with the land use. So
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:45:52–02:45:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That being said, as a second step, create a four corners overlay that provides zoning standards that support a mixed-use pedestrian and friendly environment. Those, so the overlay would include incorporation of specific design standards relating to building architecture, site landscaping, build landscape buffers, ‸ location of the building, parking, building heights, and site access. And then
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:46:16–02:46:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
conditional special exception
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:46:21–02:46:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
prohibited uses within the overlay. So the zoning sort of becomes secondary and the governing factor would ‸ be the overlay itself. So you can create something unique just to that intersection
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:46:34–02:46:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:46:37–02:46:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:46:37–02:46:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
The imagery we showed you showed a number of improvements in the right of way to enhance pedestrian environment enhance public transit that would take coordination with D.O.T. In conjunction of that coordinate with Space Coast area transit on bus shelter improvements and encourage use of the public transit infrastructure that is already out there and so that's where the bus shelters come into play.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:47:13–02:47:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
corners so that initial map showed area that went over to Fisk as I mentioned on the south side of 520 we could take what we do here as a framework and start to find the solutions for the remainder of the corridor which may include looking at the north side from a design perspective. ‸ So that is the conclusion of the presentation happy to take any questions you may have but as a reminder we are looking for direction on those five items this evening.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:47:44–02:47:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they have uses that they actually that they absolutely do not favor it's okay for them to say so and give you that direction tonight also.
‸ Yes, sir, we would we would request that that direction be given this evening that way for example for one and two that would kick off a comp plan amendment process and a land development code update. So if there are specific things that you want to see put in there if you wouldn't mind letting us know this evening and we'll coordinate with staff to make sure they are brought back to you accordingly.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:48:22–02:48:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I mean. Yeah,
so so and so to be clear if there are uses like. Steve should I throw out examples now
I mean. Yeah, any you know if there's if there are uses that are currently permitted in the CP or any other commercial parkway or rather commercial zoning districts that are heavily auto oriented that you want to stray from since we're trying to try and create a mixed use environment. Now would be
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 02:48:52–02:48:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
mention that if there's building heights that you want us to look into density requirements you want us to look into now would be the time to give us that direction. I
think
I'm asking.
I have a ‸ question.
I have a
question.
Looking at one through five recommendation. Must we include all five or can we do one out of the five, two out of three? I'm just trying to make sure. But to me personally, I like all five.
It can be phased. It'll be phased either way. But we could certainly break it down even further if need be.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 02:49:25–02:49:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Road 520 and US-1 with relations to landscape and pedestrian
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:49:41–02:49:45 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:49:45–02:49:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as well as any opportunities for private sector improvements on those topics. So with that being said, if you're going to have that conversation with FDOT, I would like to suggest the possible proposal of a pedestrian bridge across the State Road 520 is just a suggestion when speaking with FDOT along those topics.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:49:46–02:50:11 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:50:11–02:50:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
already been included in your future discussions that you're going to have with F dot That's it understood. Thank you
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:50:25–02:50:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to say that I no one wants a car wash
Now would be the right moment.
Yes, sir. You don't want car wash
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:50:35–02:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank
you, sir. Uh,
well, I think the last time and uh one of our planning
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:50:41–02:50:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We had did have some community members come out to force their opinions when another car wash tried to come in Yeah, so that's probably the only thing that I would have so ‸ I made a motion that we
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:50:58–02:51:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
discussion Yeah,
I the this recommendation is not in our package
Should be in your staff memo Okay
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:51:22–02:51:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
page four or five?
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:51:25–02:51:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I assumed when it said it didn't say anything about recommendation I assumed that it was going to be the same thing I'd already seen so I didn't really had an opportunity um Um to think about this more but I mean I'm certainly am not opposed to any of the recommendations I see here um, I think that Good luck with the coordinating with the Space Coast Area Transit um, I'm hopeful And um FDOT has
I think
that's um kind of made
their
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:52:04–02:52:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you know the 520 Just knowing how um The public comment and ‸ the process they went through In terms of changing what they have there now Could be a little difficult in terms of the timing
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:52:22–02:52:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
well I'm all for that um, but I know that's a big ticket item that Has to be put on a list somewhere and works its way to the top Yeah, um just to not have any smoke shops either
Oh, yeah, yeah
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:52:51–02:52:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, you know an abc store we don't want that I I mean I would just rather not I would just rather
So
you
can't right okay okay good
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:53:12–02:53:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
That's
it
There's a question used Yeah Oh, okay Okay, councilman goes
No gas station Yes
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:53:35–02:53:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that's it
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:53:39–02:53:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Additionally
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:53:50–02:53:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
i'm just going I'm gonna leave it up to you all to bring us back multiple options
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:53:58–02:53:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:54:00–02:54:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I got
one one quick question for steve steve
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:54:06–02:54:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:54:08–02:54:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Seem to be neighborhood based small scale retail service based uses right right is that what you're recommending? I
get to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:54:19–02:54:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
move forward with an overlay and What about
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:54:22–02:54:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uses that the council just said and not What they want to see right so would we be amending the cp zoning district as a result of that or
so the thought was that We would to avoid the conflict it would we would move the cp into the mixed use and then that overlay would act as really is the the ‸ enforcement factor for the for that intersection. And so your zoning really almost becomes somewhat irrelevant. You're you're consistent with your land use but when it comes to your permitted and prohibited uses you're going to the overlay Okay for that information
‸ like the overlay your your your recommendation is those
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:55:05–02:55:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
assuming right
yes sir
Okay
Thank you
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:55:16–02:55:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
We're going to call the question all in favor say aye aye aye we have unanimous vote
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:55:31–02:55:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
let me ask a question does anyone need a recess before we conclude this? I'm just
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 02:55:42–02:55:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because then we have reports now Approved resolution 2024-077, adopting a revised fee schedule. Thank you sir for planning and zoning a lot split applications and community development district review for new developments within the city of coco
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:56:06–02:56:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of us and I think your wish has been granted. uh Mr. City Manager, and I know you miss Jan. I'm coming to you.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:56:20–02:56:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
bringing this back because uh obviously development should pay for itself there. And so So these are our recommendations with regards to
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:56:32–02:56:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
now and then i think we also have a CDD uh fee in there also.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:56:45–02:56:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Well, good evening, everyone. Mr. Mayor and council members and staff. I'm Jen Webster, city planner here at the city of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:02–02:57:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so I just have a few quick statements as described in your staff report regarding this resolution. The proposed resolution introduces fees for the city's new lot split application process established by
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:15–02:57:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
council. Additionally, it establishes a new fee for the community development district review as per florida statute section 109.005 which is typically typically used in planned communities and large developments. The review of a community development district by legal staff involves a comprehensive examination of various aspects related to the establishment and operation. of The district. This fee is, as I mentioned, established in the Florida statutes and is comparable to other municipalities review
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words the first reading may have missed · 02:57:54–02:57:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
asking, a lot split
for
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:57:57–02:57:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a lot split for ‸ residential single family, uh would be 500 plus
add
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:58:03–02:58:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
fees for a multi-family and non-residential lot split would be 1250 plus
add
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:58:09–02:58:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
fees. uh
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:58:10–02:58:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the community development district fee would be 15 000 for that review.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:58:19–02:58:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
thank
you
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:58:29–02:58:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
unanimously Okay. This concludes tonight's, um council meeting. um reports. Great job, staff. Seriously. I know it's been ‸ long and tedious. I did. I understand it perfectly. Trust me, your works are
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:59:13–02:59:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of this upcoming
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:21–02:59:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to education, and so forth.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:29–02:59:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
i thank you for being a good and thank
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:36–02:59:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh
thank
you mr mayor um just
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:59:49–02:59:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a reminder and then before she gets there um uh
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:58–03:00:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um I didn't give you all the recommendation on the uh on the, uh
uh
the priority or the ranking committee. And so I would recommend that that um consist of it's in the cra I would recommend that
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:16–03:00:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um a designee by the city manager. So it would be a three-person committee that would rank and send that that uh that ranking up to uh up to the council. We're preparing to release the RFP probably sometime next week. um So that'll that'll be on the street sometime next week. um So I just needed to clean up that item. And so if the council doesn't have any objections, then we'll set that as
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:00:49–03:00:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I needed to clean up or Rebecca with regards to that? rfp
No, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:58–03:01:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
oh
just real quick.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:01:02–03:01:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is due Friday at noon in the city clerk's office.
And so if anybody else has, anybody else has a report, i I didn't bring my listing down, but I'm not sure. You got something. Yeah,
sorry. I apologize. I'll be fast. um I just wanted to do a quick recap. We had our back to school supply drive event on August 2nd on Friday. We had a great turnout. We gave out all the backpacks. um We over 100 backpacks. We partnered with some of our local um food trucks in the area and they gave out free food to all of the people that were there. There was um
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:01:47–03:01:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and hot dogs and just lots of stuff for for everybody. uh jerk Flavors gave out um
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:01:57–03:01:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
free meals at the event. um We had bike helmets from the Space Coast TPO. um So lots of great stuff, gave out lots of items. And hopefully we will grow it next year and hopefully get some more supplies that we can hand out to the community. So it was a really good event. um ‸ I just wanted to do a quick reminder. We have the Travis center computer lab that is doing ‸ we're doing a grand opening for that on friday august 23rd at 10 a.m at the Travis Center. And then we are partnering with the historic Cocoa Village Main Street to do the small business conference on monday august 26th at 8 30 a.m at the coco civic center um This is for small businesses that are interested in learning a little bit more about business development, um marketing, those types ‸ of things. So it's a full day summit for them. And that is on Monday, August 26th at the Civic Center. in cocoa village
mr mayor did you want me to report out on the dc trip
please um
and so as as the council is aware uh we had a delegation that included uh the mayor uh chairman steel from the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 03:03:19–03:03:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
county board of county commissioners uh chairman um lloyd from the Port Authority, um Linda Weatherman from the uh EDC, uh ‸ Georgiana
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:03:31–03:03:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:03:34–03:03:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Ketchum from Space Florida, Mike Miller from uh ‸ Space Florida, um and then Brightline representatives. uh um And I think I don't think I missed anybody uh
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:03:48–03:03:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh at 7 a.m on tuesday morning and uh arrived in dc in the first meeting. Arrived in dc approximately uh 9 50 and got to the to the uh to the Capitol area. uh Approximately 10 20 10 25 was our first meeting with
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:04:13–03:04:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and his staff. uh uh uh
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:04:20–03:04:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was our next meeting with, um Senator Rubio's uh staff. Three o'clock was our next meeting with, uh Congressman Posey's staff. And then, um we had a meeting with the deputy administrator for the federal railroad administration. And I think that's the agency where the grant, uh comes through. And that was the, the deputy administrator is, uh Jennifer Mitchell. And then we had dinner with a member of the office of the secretary of transportation the u.s department
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:04:57–03:04:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that was a full day after having um flown out at 7 a.m in the morning and then the next morning was um um was, a nine o'clock meeting with, uh staff on the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:05:15–03:05:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh at 10 30. there was a meeting on the house side on the house subcommittee on railroads pipelines, and hazardous materials. And then there was a lunch with, um um Mrs. Quinn, who's the senior advisor for NASA. And then we quickly rushed to the airport and made it back home. And so you can see within those, uh
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:05:45–03:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was, uh packed full of meetings. um very productive meetings. um everybody, at least our delegation left, uh Washington feeling positive with regards to uh our chances on the, uh on the application. I will tell you that one of the, one of the, most significant points was our ranking with regards to discretionary grant funding for either transportation or rail transportation. And we rank 49th out of 50th in terms of discretionary grant funding. And so, um again, in the mayor of i and I have already sent personal notes to our delegation
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:30–03:06:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:06:34–03:06:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:06:39–03:06:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and uh
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:06:43–03:06:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to in regards to presenting the uh
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:49–03:06:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
story. so So uh I think a very successful trip. I give you that detail because I think prior to us taking off on the trip, it was there was something implied that it was a it was a uh a junket. um I can tell you the mayor's uh I don't know, I may be slightly larger than him now, but the rooms that we stayed in are were uh probably 11 by 11. And so and so um so it was, uh again, a a business trip that uh that, uh again, I think was very successful. And uh ‸ we hopefully will know something with regards to the grant within the next couple of months.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:07:31–03:07:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
that we sat in on, you know what I'm saying, in reference of what took place in the state,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:07:43–03:07:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
‸ So, so we, we actually, we actually got a chance to sit in on ‸ the live, uh committee meeting ‸ with regards to the set, the assassination attempt. And so, uh that was, that was, uh that was probably a leisure time during the trip to actually sit in on that committee meeting there. And so that was an interesting, uh committee meeting there, but that was the one sort of diversion that we had was we did have a few moments to actually, uh see that meeting live and in living color color there. I actually, I think I just have two pictures.
uh
Yeah. So
this is, uh on the left side of the picture. Yeah. That's, uh the mayor. oh That was a joke. uh Michael Lloyd, uh Linda Weatherman, Georgiana Gillette and pictures ‸ do make you look bigger
than
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:08:59–03:08:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you actually are. That's me on the right side of the picture. Here's another picture. um that is, uh the Brightline intern, uh Lucas
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:09:12–03:09:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there. And he was invaluable to, uh taking us around Washington, dc And so so big shout out to Lucas uh for for uh all the the work that he put in. They actually gave us a a briefing booklet that talked about the project that had briefing notes for each of the uh individuals that we met with.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:09:38–03:09:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I think that's it. That's it for me.
That's
it for me, Mr. Mayor. Thank you very much.
Great
report. Okay, here we go. um Can I say one thing?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:09:59–03:10:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:03–03:10:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the certification.
Thank you. Yeah, two dogs that just recently got certified. They had to do 800 some hours of training.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:10:17–03:10:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh those dogs are now on the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the machine readings disagree here · 03:10:22–03:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
that's what the man oh it's
uh let's see. I think, uh well, you already talked about, um next Friday we have, or is it a week from Friday? That we have our ribbon cutting at Travis. um but, so that's the extent of my report. I did just want to say one thing about our last council meeting and about the whole process for our district three appointment. I'll never be fooled by a pretty speech again.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:11:23–03:11:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
used for ‸ personal family matter. um and I'm really looking forward to having someone in this space ‸ that is committed to us and that has shown their commitment in the time they've lived here.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:11:54–03:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
sweet today. So uh as I stated, I was uh over there hanging out at matthews Hope today and and see what was going on over there. And this is one of the things that they have in the works. As we know, they are a non-profit and um that organization can use all the help that they can receive. So something that they're throwing,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:12:39–03:12:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
wanted to give ample time for the citizens
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:44–03:12:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and beyond to uh be aware of this event. They're
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:48–03:12:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:51–03:12:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
dinner and 7 30 p.m for the speakeasy entry It'll be located at the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:13:00–03:13:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So you can
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 03:13:06–03:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about that event if you want to know more. And also, I wanted to report that
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:13:13–03:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a pep rally. and They're making this, they're opening ‸ up to the community. So uh they we really need to make this a big event, make it successful as our Tigers start their season off and go bring us back a third state championship in a row
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:13:33–03:13:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but uh that event will be august 15th 7 p.m As I stated, it's open to the community. It's a free event, so I'm hoping everyone show up and show out for our Tigers. It'll be live streamed by uh West News. um I hate that I won't be able to attend. I don't think any of us would be able able to attend because of the Florida League of Cities event. um I had a small ask of Samantha. If you could maybe see if it's feasible to reach out to who's organ I don't know if it's the Booster Club or the actual football team hosting this event, but maybe if there's a feasibility that maybe us council members can call in and maybe say a few words of encouragement to the
uh
football team, if that's possible. I don't know. if um And that's all
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:14:22–03:14:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:14:23–03:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:14:40–03:14:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
so this was the uh
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:14:44–03:14:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
i think we had probably about between 50 ‸ 60 uh men ‸ in the community come uh celebrate the the young
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:14:54–03:14:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
mayor attended this event. um
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:15:01–03:15:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
he always get in the newspaper some kind of way. uh This is our photo with with uh
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:15:16–03:15:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:15:22–03:15:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Mike Bale. oh
[unclear audio ▶]
God. Well, actually,
he spelled principal and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 03:15:29–03:15:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
and the mayor also, we uh attended
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:15:43–03:15:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If you didn't know it, Mr. wasden was a um uh head basketball coach for
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:15:52–03:15:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
University, made the Final Four. um And he he actually wrote a book that is actually really, really good called Once a Coach, Always a Coach. um And so we celebrated his birthday um last two weeks
ago, a week
and a half ago. uh This is a funny sign. um You know, we always go back and forth about people like building and don't like building. And so uh if you can't read it, go away. uh We missed the cows. So people are really upset about so much building going on ‸ Brevard County. But at the same time, I think we are at a deficit on um on homes in Brevard. So I thought that was a funny thing. uh You know, we can't please everybody. I just say that. And that's it.
Hey, Anthony, my name is
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:16:42–03:16:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
of members of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words the first reading may have missed · 03:16:59–03:17:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
sorry. uh Can we back up one more period please? Yes, these are the newest members of our
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 03:17:14–03:17:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and under
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:17:19–03:17:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
new
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:17:24–03:17:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lady is Mrs. Stewart. I think she transitioned from being an alternate
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:17:34–03:17:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as well. And you know the old nostalgic guys, Greenwood, um um former Councilman Todd Anderson, and uh uh what's
Mrs.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:17:52–03:17:52 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
chabot's husband First name? ‸ Ron, thank you. I forgot. that Forgive me, Ron, but I know your last name. That's the most important
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:17:59–03:18:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
your immediate left is from Chipley, Florida. Right? can you remember his name, Councilman
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:19–03:18:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He's from Chipley, for artists. ‸ You're on it, sir. And the gentleman to the far right
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:26–03:18:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
in which Councilman
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:29–03:18:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in the book of Coach
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:32–03:18:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it was heavily attended. It was jam-packed there at um time out in the back. But they actually won the game. They actually won the game. Something comparable to what
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:18:45–03:18:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:18:49–03:18:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
really did their thing. And these are two legends ‸ there to support um Coach um
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:59–03:19:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Tom
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:01–03:19:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
who's been a, pretty much, you
can
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:19:03–03:19:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
say, a patriot of the community of
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:06–03:19:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh While we were at Washington, dc this is a statue pertaining to the Seminole Indian, acknowledging the Seminole Indians there at Washington, dc as we were walking from one side, say, from the center side to the house side. um i'm When I did my count, we had walked just on that first day, Tuesday, over seven plus miles. And guess what, ladies and gentlemen? We had to be at the airport at 4am That's right. In the previous night, we had an event as well. As you can see in myself uh Michael
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:48–03:19:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mrs.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:48–03:19:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there with our three pins on, showing our support,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:58–03:19:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
TPO, and EDC. oh I don't know how I got that one. I was lucky. You know that it has some fella on the far right and in the middle. And there we go again. But I don't know how that happened, but I want to say thank you very much. uh A job well done. We will be at um the Diplomat
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:20:17–03:20:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as we step up and become one of the few cities in
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:20:21–03:20:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to become president of the Florida League of Cities. So again, to staff, city manager, city attorney, and council, and the members of the Florida League of Cities, Jeannie, um I want to say, business garden i thank you for your leadership. partner and Relationship. Everyone should be a part of the league. Come one, come all. Is there anything else that needs to be said?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:20:47–03:20:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
race, and buy local, spin local, keep it local. Thank you, City of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:20:56–03:20:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
staff and everyone. Go in peace. Chair maintains a motion ‸ to adjourn.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:21:03–03:21:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 03:21:08–03:21:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]