I'm going to have our Deputy Mayor lead us
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:02–00:00:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the application. Father, I pledge and we'll do a roll call and go from there. If I can please have everyone stand.
Father God, thank you for being with us today. Thank you for just being with us for the last few days as we make this vital decision for our city. Be with us today as we have conversation about our next city manager. May we make the best decision for our citizens of the city of Cocoa. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:36–00:01:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:18 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay. I'd like to welcome everyone. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:16–00:01:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
did you want to come up and kind of explain this process a little bit? Or what we know?
but...
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:25–00:01:26 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:27–00:01:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Honorable Mayor, Council Members, it's a pleasure to be with you today. You've had an interesting two days, and now it is time to vote. This evening, we will take the same process as we did on previous votes. You will have a ballot with your three candidates. I will ask you to rank them your number
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:01:31–00:01:54 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:54–00:02:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:01–00:02:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
Thank you. ‸ We have a... Yes, sir. Oh, okay. We have a card here. Mr. Oliver, that wanted to speak. I'm a reference to our city manager, if you want to at this time. Just state your name and address. Or just your name. We have your address.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:23–00:02:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Apologies for not making that last line if that was a more appropriate time to speak, but I had a conflict. I couldn't make it. I wanted to speak
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:35–00:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
over a decade through different projects. ‸ His experience at the county, he... I can say with ‸ all sincerity that we didn't always agree and probably more often than not we disagreed. But I left every meeting with him with the utmost respect for how he handled himself and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:02:59–00:03:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on the other side of the table and his staff. I think he would be a true asset for the city as you guys navigate ‸ our way forward together through the next period of time. Also,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:11–00:03:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
known
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
the city. And again, I can't speak enough for the mayor. So with that, thank you all. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Was there any more?
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:26–00:03:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I guess we can have a little bit of a discussion. If you all would like to turn your lights on and...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:41–00:03:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:47–00:03:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Can we take our masks off when we talk? Because I want to make sure everybody hears this clearly.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:56–00:03:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not able to be heard well. I want to thank Donna. It's been a great two days. Interesting process. You brought us some great candidates. Toughest decision I've ever had to make. And this is not my first time picking a city manager. But it's definitely much tougher than it was the last time.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:24–00:04:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the best choice for the city of Coco. Any city would be blessed to have in any of those three candidates. ‸ I think the way we did things, especially today with ‸ an hour and a half and an opportunity ‸ to interact with them, not just ask questions like we did in the video conferences, but ‸ to be able to do some back and forth, really gave me ‸ a better perspective about their personalities and allowed me to see them and not just their ‸ responses to and questions. ‸ So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:06–00:05:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for what we were able to accomplish here today. And I'm hoping that our staff getting to meet them made them comfortable with where we are
at
this
point in time and that we can move forward from here. So I
just wanted to say thank you to Donna while she was still standing up here and say that no matter where we end up tonight, we're going to be okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:36–00:05:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
I was thinking this afternoon after the interviews that it would
be
so nice to have a 5-0 vote. ‸ As Councilwoman Warner said,
we
just, the room is not a bad candidate here. And I really, you know, I did an analysis. It's like all positives for all three candidates in different areas. So it's even hard to compare them one to the other.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:21–00:06:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
would we be able to have another vote after that? Or, well,
I
guess we'll see how it goes. But given the fact that we're going into an election, it just might be nice to empower the city manager with
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:43–00:06:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
unanimous vote. We're able to do that in the process.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:54–00:06:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the decision is going to be subject to have employment contract come back to the city council. At that point, you ‸ will have to vote again ‸ on a written contract. So at the very least, there is that opportunity to ‸ make the vote. And depending on the results, you know, if you wanted to take another ‸ vote after you vote to make this election, I guess ‸ you could do that.
It's
kind of perfunctory. But the bottom line is that vote, majority vote, is to direct that a contract be prepared and be brought back to you.
Okay. Well, I just wanted to ‸ say a few things about the qualifications. Since we had the opportunity to take a deep dive today, and folks in the audience and at home did not, you know, ‸ haven't been privy to it yet. But I mean, when I started to jot things down, starting with Dr. Moffitt, I mean, that guy is data and science. And, you know, myself as an environmentalist, and ‸ having that background, that appealed. And his emphasis on process. And I just was very confident that there wasn't a plan he couldn't put into place and set up metrics to make sure it happened. And I also had a sense that he was a unifier. And that, you know, he... That different parts of our community could really embrace him. So he had all those things going for him.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:38–00:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You want to get something done. I felt like, you know, he was on top of that. You know, just in the time we spent with him, he taught me things about finance. Site development. I think he'd be great with the developers. You know, emphasis on job creation. His emergency... You know, emergency experience. The
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:07–00:09:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:09–00:09:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'll have to say that Karen really stood out. I mean, she was exceptional. She was... She
was... Not
only highly qualified.
I
mean,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:31–00:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But she's a planner. She's got that law degree. She was obviously an idea person. A real thinker.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:41–00:09:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a real leadership position within the county. And she seemed fearless. So, like I say, I don't have any negatives on these guys. This is a tough decision. It is. Now, the good news is that they're all highly qualified and any one of them will do a great job. And the bad news is this is the most agonizing decision. ‸ So, that's...
I
just... wanted to make that clear. That whoever... Whoever we... Whoever gets majority of votes, that they will have my full support.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:33–00:10:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
thank you, Donna, for the hard work that you put in to get us to this point where we are now and bring three terrific candidates to us. And then, like Lorraine said, ‸ they're all qualified. They're all super people.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:51–00:10:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
you know, and everybody wins. And, you know, may the best man win, or best woman, I should say.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:58–00:11:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We got a lot of good answers. And I'm very proud to say that we're going to be in the process of doing this. And thank you again for all the things you've done
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:11–00:11:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you.
Deputy Mayor.
One thing I can say is that no one can say that this process was not transparent. This was, it was difficult at times, but it was very transparent so that the citizens can be engaged in the process. Like I said earlier today, there are some cities that make this decision without even having citizen input at all. So the fact that we took the time to do this so strategically, I believe it's a plus. I've gotten a lot of texts, a lot of emails, a lot of calls up to midnight last night about this situation, which is a good thing. because I ‸ think that it shows that
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:06–00:12:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:15–00:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
County. And so that, so
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:24–00:12:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I appreciated it because I believe that that's why I think all of us are sitting here today, because we love this city.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:35–00:12:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
And it's tough Because these are good candidates. and I believe it's a win-win regardless of who we choose. I just,
run
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:51–00:12:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
ready to vote. And I don't, I don't really want to go into details on who, how I feel
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:59–00:12:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You know, we'll, ‸ see how it goes when we rank. ‸ But I appreciate the process. I appreciate the staff going through it, the process with us.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:11–00:13:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, and I appreciate
counsel
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:15–00:13:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
for, we didn't always agree through this process. But I think that's why we have five different people, five different mindsets, five different opinions. So, whatever we come up with, we just have to live with it. And so, I need my sheet ‸ ready. I'm ready to vote. So, thank you. Thank you,
sir.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:42–00:13:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because it was ‸ a learning ‸ experience for me ‸ and there were some super, super good candidates here. These three finalists here, man, ‸ they're all, they all stood out. But, you know, I'm looking at the big picture. I'm looking at the future of our city. I'm looking at, and we all are, and I'm looking at what we've been, where we're trying to go. And I'm basing it on some input that I got from some residents as well as their experience of the candidates. And I know early on there were some folks that was concerned about some candidates not having their ICMA certification, which, had they looked at the paperwork, you know, we were asking that they have that, but if they didn't, it wasn't a,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:41–00:14:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you ‸ know. So, but I haven't heard that here recently. And, so, but anyway, with that being said, three super good candidates. I think they're always great, but ‸ I'm ready. I'm ready to make my decision so we can move forward and move our city forward and, and, and get to business. Councilwoman Warner.
Yeah, just, you know, in the emails and the text messages and everything that, that I received during this process,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:20–00:15:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was asked several times was my personal process for, for dealing with this.
I
mean, they could see what we were doing here and in the meetings and stuff, but, I had a couple people ask me what my thought processes were and how I handled this. So, I just wanted to say that when we first got the list from Donna and she had provided us with not just the resumes and, and the information that she had gained from talking to them, but any, you know, internet searches or any information that she had found about them.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:52–00:15:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but I also chose to make some phone calls and have some conversations, not with the candidates themselves, because I wanted to see the same thing that everybody else up here saw at the same time, but I did call the communities that they worked in and talk to people in those communities. I called elected officials, I called their staff members, and I actually employed some of our business people to call some of the business people in their communities and talk to them. So, I just wanted the public to understand that that was, that was my behind the scenes process that I was using.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:32–00:16:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was trying to get impressions of them from their communities and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:38–00:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that was extremely helpful to me. The very first person I called about one candidate had no idea that they were searching for another job and literally cried. So, that was, that was tough to be the first person to tell somebody that their boss was looking for another job, But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:00–00:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to find people to talk to in those communities about those people. So,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:08–00:17:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
out there because I realized during that process when you do decide to look outside your community for a job and you have a job, that you're putting yourself in a position where your community may not want you to come back after you go for another job interview.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:30–00:17:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and took that risk because they wanted to come to work for us. And I hope that whoever we do not choose still has a job to go to on Monday morning. And if they don't, I'll be happy to call again to their communities and talk to them. But that, to me, when I realized, ‸ wow, these people are taking a risk of losing their current position to come and interview with us.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:01–00:18:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
caring enough about our community and what goes on here to do that. So, other than that, I am ready to start this process.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:18:12–00:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, ma'am.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:18:42–00:20:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:07–00:21:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have a tie. So there's two number ones for
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:17–00:21:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:29–00:21:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I don't know if Anthony wants to suggest anything. I would recommend having a discussion and making a motion.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:47–00:21:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:50–00:21:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's always a possibility when you use math that there's a tie, but obviously it's majority vote of the city council. So you all need to decide who you want to select. You can do another ‸ ballot.
where
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:22:09–00:22:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you can just discuss the two top ‸ two and decide ‸ which of the two gets first attempt at negotiating a contract and ‸ making it through the final background check.
Okay.
So
you
have to select one of the candidates, right, subject to final contract being negotiated and completion of the final background check. So like I said earlier, you will have one other opportunity to vote, but you'll be voting on the terms and conditions of a contract at a subsequent meeting. But you need to give, you need to select one and give direction to proceed to the contract negotiation phase. Well, let's take a vote
on the top two then. If we have a, do you have any sheets that we can?
[unclear audio — 1:05 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:23:10–00:24:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:29 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:44–00:25:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you.
Thank you.
So
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:44–00:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. So like I said, I wasn't going to be unhappy either way it went.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:26:25–00:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:09–00:26:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
want to put a motion out there just to direct that we proceed with
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:26:09–00:26:14 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:14–00:26:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and final background check?
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:26:14–00:26:25 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
I'll make a motion that we instruct the city attorney and interim city manager to negotiate
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:26:25–00:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
final background check on Stockton-Whitten.
Second. I'm sorry. Second. I'm sorry.
Let the ladies have the lead here.
Get a motion from Councilwoman Warner, a second from Councilwoman Calls. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Passes unanimously. I
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:50–00:26:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and all the hard work that you put in.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:59–00:27:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:03–00:27:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
by.
Okay.
Can we also just thank the public who participated, all the people who emailed and text messaged and called Alex at midnight?
Okay. He's on his way.
Oh, he's coming?
He's on his way.
She had instructed all the candidates to ‸ linger around City Hall.
‸ I think everybody's
going to be really happy.
Like I said, there was not a bad choice. I mean, we couldn't go wrong. I may change my focus and move to Macon instead of Douglas.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:28:32–00:32:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 2:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:41 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:46 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:17 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:35–00:32:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you. And
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:32:36–00:32:37 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:37–00:32:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be negotiating your contract. If you have any words you'd like to say, this
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:32:38–00:32:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
is
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:32:42–00:32:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you for, again, allowing me into the process. Thank you for the honor of serving the city. And so I appreciate, again, all that you all have done to make the process a fair and open process, and hope to serve you and the citizens of Cocoa well.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:32:43–00:33:01 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Thank you, sir.
Welcome back to local government.
Thank you. Thank you. If that's it, I'm
just going to...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:13–00:33:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:14–00:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:17–00:33:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Aye.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:20–00:33:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:21–00:33:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording