We
ask that you lead us and guide us here tonight and may all things done be done according to your will and your pleasure.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:07–00:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We pray for local government and our citizens. These and all of the blessings we ask in your name. Amen. Amen.
Take
the flag, please. I pledge allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America and to the republic for which
it stands.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:25–00:00:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
Here we go.
Ready? Mayor Parrish? Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:46–00:00:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. Councilwoman Blanco? Here. Councilwoman Warner? Here. Councilman Whipple? Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:52–00:00:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:00:53–00:00:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:55–00:00:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here. Thank you.
Make a motion to approve
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:00–00:01:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is there a change?
Yes.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:06–00:01:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay.
Okay. Mr. Overe? We're
going to move the consent agenda item to the multi-year contract.
Motion.
Do you need a motion on that?
Second.
All those in favor?
Aye. Aye.
Any opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:23–00:01:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Opposed?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:38–00:01:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:39–00:01:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:41–00:01:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:50–00:01:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:50–00:01:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
All right.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:56–00:01:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Maybe you want to say anything?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:04–00:02:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
30 seconds behind.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:09–00:02:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:09–00:02:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:10–00:02:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay. We're doing delegations.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:14–00:02:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:25–00:02:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:26–00:02:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:29–00:02:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:37–00:02:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
And this is for Copper.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:42–00:02:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:47–00:02:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:47–00:02:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:49–00:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No
cookies?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:54–00:02:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:56–00:02:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:02:57–00:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you very much. Thank
you
very much.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:03–00:03:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Copper couldn't make it tonight, huh? Busy? He's got an
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:03:13–00:03:21 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
early morning.
He's got an early morning tomorrow. Ah. That's it.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:03:21–00:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:03:23–00:03:23 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:25–00:03:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Good evening, Mr. Mayor, distinguished guests and visitors. From the National Action Network, tonight we are here for an update on our Citizen Police Review Board. The last update I got, I believe it was the last one, from the Assistant City Manager. And we were talking about, you've been working on data. Have we reached the date for a public workshop over to the public yet?
We ‸ have ‸ been working with the Center for Public Safety Management.
they're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:15–00:04:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
currently have been contracted and I think they, my last correspondence with them, they will be having a draft report prepared for our city, which is a review of the operational workload analysis of the police department. And with that, once we get that back, the mayor has expressed the desire to have another community crime summit. And then that's when we will address that and bring forth proposals. Okay. When will we have a workshop
open
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:44–00:04:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to the public? Until I get that study back and have the opportunity to review the study and also sit down with the chief and the consultants on that study. And all of them are retired chiefs and or city managers, the Center for Public Safety Management. They have committed, if I recall correctly, by the end of September. But we believe that may be a little bit ahead of schedule. Okay. Thank you very much.
Also, I'd like to add, speaking with Reverend Dennis last over the phone, I did provide him the contact information for those individuals at ‸ Center for Public Safety Management so he could reach out to them and express his concerns or interests as well.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:26–00:05:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. Mr. Dennis, you've been coming before council on this issue for quite some time.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:33–00:05:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:34–00:05:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
and that our administration is talking to you about your concerns.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:44–00:05:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:44–00:05:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:51–00:05:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:05:52–00:05:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. Okay.
My thing is I just wanted to make sure that you were happy with how
we're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:01–00:06:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
handling this situation. And patience truly
is a virtue. Yes, because it's been over six months.
Yeah.
Okay.
You'll be back. Patience. Thank you.
All right. Very good.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:17–00:06:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:28–00:06:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:32–00:06:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, sorry.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:35–00:06:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:39–00:06:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
At the last meeting, the city manager implied that we were misrepresenting information about water fluoridation. I think what you meant to say was ‸ that we brought up facts in opposition to the documents you presented to the council. I think everyone in this room would agree that mercury is bad when exposed to the human body, yet
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:07:02–00:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
teeth. The ADA is a private group of dentists who have a vested interest in bad teeth. Excessive overexposure to fluoride has been linked to an increase in dental fluorosis. In a statement by the ADA in 2007, they warned parents they should consider using water that has no or low fluoride in it when making baby formula. The city manager also claimed the CDC is in support of water fluoridation. However, they also issued a statement that claimed in children younger than eight years old, combined fluoride exposure from all sources, water, food, toothpaste, mouth rinse, and other products contributed to enamel fluorosis. The World Health Organization tackled the issue of water fluoridation in a 134-page book called Fluoride in Drinking Water. This book discusses the problems of overexposure to fluoride in the body and even has nine different plans and procedures for removing ‸ fluoride from the water.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:17–00:08:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is generally lower than the rates here in the U.S. The U.S. is one of 26 worldwide countries that actively fluoridates water and has more people drinking this water than the other 25 countries combined.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:08:41–00:08:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
water fluoridation is an unnecessary risk. Robert Carton, a former U.S. EPA scientist, stated fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud in this century, if not of all time. Dr. Paul Conant also made a statement that teeth are the window to the bones. If you've seen damage to the teeth, what damage haven't you seen?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:09:21–00:09:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
caused by overexposure to fluoride. To date, there are over 2,746 medical professionals, including medical doctors, dentists, psychologists, and neurologists that have signed and or published formal statements against water fluoridation. I am not here to debate the facts of fluoridation's negative impacts on the human body. I am here to ask if you will stop this unethical practice. We, the people, are bound to the International Property Management Code ‸ that forces us to connect to power and water services, ultimately denying us the right to boycott this practice. If you are not willing to stop this practice, I am simply asking how do we force you to stop? As the power of the government ultimately lies in the consent of the government, it is my opinion that this is not a political issue to be voted on. It is a business practice that must be stopped in order to stand on the right side of history. Thank you for your time. And if anybody has any information on how we can go about stopping this, I would like to hear it.
Mr. Mayor, are there other
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:35–00:10:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:10:36–00:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on this topic? No sense
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:38–00:10:40 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:10:40–00:10:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I can wait. I can address
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:41–00:10:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:10:42–00:10:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
comments now. I can wait until after. There's a follow-up since he referenced some of my comments.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:10:42–00:10:50 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
John, thank you. We'll comment in a minute.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:52–00:10:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
C.J. Watson, 1203 Montclair Road.
Thank you.
So the water fluoridation is still forced medication. So would Anthony, the city attorney, have any insight on how this is being allowed in our city?
Anthony?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:40–00:11:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:11:48–00:11:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Can we ask any questions to the city council?
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:02–00:12:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
What would you like to ask?
Just the legality behind forced medication. How is it?
We don't know anything. No comment?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:19–00:12:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Don't know anything about it? All I can tell you is I grew up on cocoa water.
Mike, chief of police.
He has nothing to do with the water. He's the chief of police.
I feel like it's a legal issue to force medication on the population.
Nobody's forcing you to drink it.
I'm forced to shower in it. I pay for the water.
I do too.
I would just ask that you direct your comments towards the council and not to the staff directly, other than myself.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:13:03–00:13:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:11–00:13:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ It's an opportunity for the public to speak so the council can hear.
Anything you'd
like
to
say?
Yeah, I was just trying to, I guess, ask Jack if we can get some kind of way to test the fluoride we're putting in the water and see how many other chemicals we're putting in besides fluoride.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:41–00:13:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lead in this stuff
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:13:46–00:13:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
putting in the water.
So
I'm just...
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:49–00:13:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
John doesn't want you to talk to him.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:56–00:14:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're the elected officials. Okay. And so it's not really right asking. You had a couple hours.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:14:09–00:14:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Don't we have a water quality report that we put out every year? It's
published on the website, the 2016 water quality report.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:15–00:14:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think I got a copy of it in the mail, too, at one time. It's online. It is online. Yeah. So the answer to that question is online. Okay. On
the
city's website. All the chemicals that are in our water and how much.
But not what's coming from the fluoride that we're getting specifically.
Well, hey, it also includes the amount of fluoride we put in there, right? Any chemical that comes up in the test, it shows up.
It does include fluoride. It's a required reporting. I think the maximum is four parts per million. We're at 0.16 parts per million. ‸ In 2016 was the numbers that were reported. Two.
Maximum.
Maximum.
Maximum.
Is there anyone else I could talk to directly about this issue of the...
I would be more than glad to meet with you if you want to... I got your contact information.
Because it is forced medication.
I'm not sure I'm going to agree with that. But I'll be more than glad to meet with you. And I can myself, Jack. But I mean, I think it's already met.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:40–00:15:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. I just want to say for people who might not know. Since you're using the fluoride to combat tooth decay, which is a disease. Then what you're using is medication. Because you're trying to prevent a disease. So it is forced medication. But I'll get your email. Try to set up a meeting. I tried to talk to the mayor. I sent you an email. I didn't get anything back yet. But I'll send another one. Let's see if we can get some meetings going.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:18–00:16:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
We
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:22–00:16:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
got a lot going on here.
Oh, I know. I see it's busy. No
excuses.
I
mean, if
I
didn't work for a living,
I
probably could... All right. Yeah. We appreciate it. Thanks. Thank you. All right. Brad Whitmore.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:00–00:17:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Council Members, and staff.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:09–00:17:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the apparent
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:15–00:17:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That opens up unprecedented opportunities to turn our waterfront into its full, fully potential waterfront destination jewel that we have with this unique setting of a protected basin with a beautiful park and a historic village wrapped around it. So with that in mind, doing a little brainstorming here and thinking
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:37–00:17:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
multi-year plan, looking down the road, and what all could we think about? Boating improvements, dinghy docks, day docks, a bigger T-dock, a mooring field, a shoreside facilities to support the mooring field as required with water, garbage, pump-out, other structures. Looking at the park itself, making it a safer, happier, more inviting place than it currently is with the connector being finished for a beautiful walkway around our waterfront. LED lighting to light it up at night to where people feel safe when they're walking in. Removing shrubbery and bushes to where it's landscaped but not overgrown so people can't hide. ‸ Adding perhaps new structures that could serve any number of functions such as facilities for different kinds of meetings, maybe getting the Coast Guard Auxiliary to come back in because they're a positive influence. Perhaps have a canoe, kayak, concession, rental, that kind of thing. That would be a great addition to
the
community to have people be able to go down and get out on the water. Also, reestablishing the fishing pier would be enjoyed by many and should be on the list of things that we should be looking at. And I heard a great idea recently, and that is to create a beachhead along the shore there to where you could bring small boats in or launch said kayaks and canoes from.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:59–00:19:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think it could be done.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:03–00:19:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think it's a wonderful idea. All this sounds great, and how are we going to pay for it?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:09–00:19:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
What I suggest that we do is get serious about getting involved in the grant process through the two grants that FWC administers, the Boating Infrastructure Grant Program and a similar one, and matching funds through FINE, Florida Inland Navigation District.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:27–00:19:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
create boating destinations. They have stated that they view us as a prime candidate and would love to see us get developed, and I would really like to see us take advantage of that. Also on the agenda, this December, which will be here before we know it, the Sail to the Sun Rally will be visiting us for a third time, which is always exciting. The city's done a great job to welcome that cruising rally that leaves Norfolk, Virginia, and goes to Miami over a two-month time period, stopping at little cities along the way. We are currently one of the favorite, if not the favorite cities because we do such a nice job of taking care of these people. So they're coming back, and even on top of that, more exciting. This year we have a planned cruiser seminar. More information on that. It's going to be really exciting, and it's going to put us on the map. We're going to be noticed as a result of that. So what I think makes sense to me is do some brainstorming, come up with a multi-year plan, break it down, work the funding for the multi-year plan through the grant agencies, and turn our beautiful waterfront into something that is truly spectacular, and make it a focus as a boating destination. So with that being said, any questions?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:43–00:20:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:46–00:20:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
But when we do, we'll be on the clock, and we're going to need you.
Okay.
And I think you hit it right on the head, exactly. But the value of people coming off the river and leaving and the interaction is something we should go right at. Absolutely.
Absolutely. Not just as a recreational facility for the city, but for bringing traffic in for commerce to come into the village and spend money. Quick little story. I was down walking the docks like I frequently do. There was a jet ski in one of the boat slips tied up properly with a fender. And I looked at it, and I looked up, and there were two women in bikinis. And I said, your jet ski? Yes. You came to Cocoa Village? Yes, we did. We're going to Ryan's for lunch. And I thought, isn't that great?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:36–00:21:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:39–00:21:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:21:41–00:21:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:42–00:21:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
go to Ryan's for lunch on a jet ski, which I found to be rather amazing. So we know we're marketable in a lot of ways.
So there you have it. Thank you.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:54–00:21:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Thanks, Brad.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:00–00:22:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Ambassador, I should say. Green Apples. Donna? Name and address for the record, please.
My name is Donna Kettner.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:13–00:22:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:22:13] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
111 Harrison Street. First, I'd like to say thanks to the chief and your officers. A couple of weeks ago, an attempt to break into my store, your officers were incredibly on the spot. They had the dog there. They traced the blood. They found the guy. They contacted the hospitals. They
contacted the hospitals.
Really, thank you. I was very, very impressed that they really were on the ball. ‸ I'm here tonight because I've been before you many times about the drainage behind my building. I bought that building over 10 years ago.
[00:22:56] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:56–00:23:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
his little buildings to go around it. Okay. You don't have to be a genius to know that water flows down. Okay. His property is going to be higher than my property. The city said, don't worry about it. We'll make sure that you're protected and all of that. Well, I'm paying for an attorney now because I'm being sued by Troy. This city said, don't worry. We'll take care of you.
[00:23:33] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:33–00:23:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I've swept the streets. I've built a clientele. I bought a house here. I bought a building here. And I feel like I'm talking to deaf ears. Do I go to the county? Who do I go to to make sure that, oh, Scott Davis has been a really nice guy. But all I keep on hearing is
[00:23:58] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:58–00:24:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:24:01] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:01–00:24:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
may be built. So does anybody get back to me and say, hey, this is the plan. Let's sit down and talk about it. In this day and age, I don't know any community that's building new construction and isn't making sure that the water drainage is going under the ground. Okay?
[00:24:23] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:23–00:24:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is new construction going on.
[00:24:28] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:28–00:24:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I ‸ pulled a permit to have ‸ the roof fixed because I maintain my property. You saw the pictures I brought before you. Does he maintain any of his properties so far? No. He does not. I brought you pictures. I'm so upset that I left my dinner in Cocoa Beach to come here because I went to the attorneys this morning. My employees say that his builder comes in and says that they're going to build all these curbs around the outside of my easement. It's an easement. My plumbing's underneath that. The water runs underneath that.
[00:25:10] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:10–00:25:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's not new construction. He's turning around the tables and saying, I've done something wrong. No.
[00:25:20] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:20–00:25:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That water was spilling in for over a year, and I came before you to get it corrected. Maybe more than a year. It was spilling down and pouring into my back room because he fixes nothing. I'm livid. What more can I say to you? Where do I go? I have an attorney. My money is going into an attorney. How can he get away with this? This is outrageous. It's outrageous. It's new construction. The water should go under the ground, and it should be his expense if he has to move it, not mine. Guys, I don't know what to say. ‸ My hands are up to you. What do I do?
I
can. Well, I know there was a stop work order that has been lifted, but
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:13–00:26:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and get a status, and I'll personally ‸ go down and speak to Donna.
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:21–00:26:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[00:26:34] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
I mean, a retention pond
[00:26:36] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:36–00:26:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:26:38] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice
You want it to grow? Retention ponds in the middle of your downtown? I'm sorry, guys. We have to think outside the box here, and I'm paying for it right now, because he's a lawyer. I'm not. I have to pay somebody to fight him, and I've worked hard to be able to buy that building and operate my business for 38 years in this town. I have painted it. I have maintained it. I pressure wash your sidewalks. I've established a clientele that comes back to this downtown. It's an embarrassment. I've showed you piles of garbage. You allowed... This is going to be his fourth restaurant. He doesn't have a dumpster on his property?
[00:27:28] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · Unclear audio
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:28–00:27:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:27:30] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices
All of these restaurants? Go to the bank? He was pouring grease behind my building. I had to go... What is it, the EPA? What group did I have to go to? I forgot. I'm so upset that I'm boiling, but I dropped everything to come to this meeting, because I want all of you to know that I am very, very concerned.
Donna, thank you.
Very concerned.
You
have to
follow up. Get with planning and zoning, code, building and permitting, and code.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:28:02–00:28:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:28:09–00:28:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:28:14–00:28:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:27–00:28:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that according to the American Dental Association more than 70 years of scientific research has consistently shown an optimal level of fluoride in community water ‸ safe and effective in preventing
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:41–00:28:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
adults
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:45–00:28:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
water fluoridation remains one of the greatest achievements of public health in the 20th century, an inexpensive means of improving oral health that benefits all residents of community, young and old, rich and poor alike
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:02–00:29:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the Center for Disease Control and Prevention reaffirmed the importance of community water fluoridation for the prevention of tooth decay and cavities, and also reaffirmed fluoride's demonstrated effectiveness, stating community water fluoridation is one of the most practical, cost-effective, equitable, and safe measures communities can take to prevent tooth decay and improve oral health. Water fluoridation's biggest advantage is that it is the best best method for delivering fluoride to all members of the community, regardless of age, education, income level, or access to routine dental care. Fluoride's effectiveness in preventing tooth decay extends throughout the life, resulting in fewer and less severe cavities. In fact, each generation born since the implementation of water fluoridation has enjoyed better dental health than the preceding general generation specifically ‸ regards to the EPA on November 23rd of 2016 the Environmental Protection Agency received a petition filed jointly by several entities and individuals asking the EPA to exercise its authority to quote unquote prohibit the purposeful addition of fluoridation chemicals to US water supplies the petition contended the purposeful fluoridation of drinking water presents an unreasonable risk to human health from neurotoxicity, and that a ban on the use of fluoridation chemicals is necessary to curtail this unreasonable risk. Specifically, the petition did claim that studies of fluoride exposed human populations have consistently found that those persons exposed to water fluoride levels below the current maximum contaminant level goal of four milligrams per liter which is set by the EPA's office of water have lower than average IQs additionally the petition claimed there are links between fluoride fluoridated water, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and fluoridated water, and hyper hypothyroidism. after careful consideration the EPA denied the petition finding that the petition did not set forth a scientifically defensible basis to conclude that any persons have suffered neurotoxic harm as a result of exposure to fluoride in the US through the addition of fluoridation chemicals to drinking water or otherwise from fluoride exposure in the US in reaching this conclusion the EPA found that the petition did not present a well-founded basis upon which to doubt the health
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:27–00:31:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:31:34–00:31:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Thank you.
Yes, sir. Item 5.1. This is to approve the participation in the Taylor Creek Reservoir St. Johns River Water Supply Project WS0919 and to authorize the city, I'm sorry, to authorize the mayor, city manager, and city attorney to finalize and execute all required property agreements, and legal instruments, and to approve the project permitting budget and expenses as a multi-year agreement from 2017 through 2019 and to authorize the city manager, utilities director, and city attorney to implement project agreements. Council members, this is a fairly large agenda item with a lot of attachments. I wanted to go ahead and read the summary of the project for you and if you have any questions, please ask me at the end. Taylor Creek Reservoir St. Johns River Project is a multi-phase collaborative project that utilizes the TCR and ultimately the St.
Johns
River for water supply. In 2000, the St. Johns River Water Management District determined that due to environmental constraints, traditional sources of water will not sustain demand in Central Florida and identified the TCRSJR as an alternative water source. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the three water management districts that comprise the Central Florida Water Initiative have determined that no new fresh groundwater is available in Central Florida. This cooperative project has been identified and included in the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:23–00:33:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
River Water Management District Regional Water Supply Plan, which was approved by all the applicable state and regional regulatory agencies after an extensive public participation process. The City of Cocoa, Orange County, Orlando Utilities Commission, Toho Water Authority, and East Central Florida Services, which is the Desert Ranch, have been working to develop a collaborative agreement to permit to and secure necessary water supplies for future potable and agricultural water needs. Those agreements are now complete and scheduled for review, consideration and approval by the various governing bodies, including the City Council of the City of Cocoa. The agreements include very specific and detailed procedures and benchmarks for developing and allocating new water supplies, interconnections among the participants, and cost-sharing allocations. The agreements are important because these water suppliers have chosen to work together in the interest of the entire region and the citizens they collectively and individually serve. The agreements represent a public-private partnership with public agencies and private company, ECFS, and a private property owner,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:27–00:34:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The expenses related to the project will be shared proportionally. As an added benefit because it's a regional project and an alternative water supply, it will be eligible for additional grant funding from the St. Johns River Water Management District and the State of Florida.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:44–00:34:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and execution by several or all of the parties involved in the project. The list of agreements is as follows. The
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:54–00:34:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the Water Supply Agreement, the Water Supply Project Permitting Agreement, the Project Land Trust Agreement, Drainage and Flowage and Storage Easement Agreement for Public Water Supply, the First Amendment to the Taylor Creek Reservoir Settlement Agreement dated June 23, 1993, and the Drainage and Flowage and Storage Easement Agreement for Public Water Supply to Cocoa. There are several other non-substantive legal instruments that will require execution by several or all of the parties. The four primary agreements for the City of Cocoa are the General Implementation Agreement, the Wholesale Water Supply Contract, the Permitting Agreement, and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:34–00:35:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
1993. All agreements must be approved, signed, contemporaneously by all agencies and executed in order for the project to move forward. In addition,
the
St. Johns River Water Management District has also provided a letter agreement to be executed by all of the water suppliers.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:54–00:35:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The letter also outlines the dismissal of the lawsuit between St. Johns River Water Management District and Farmland Reserve Incorporated with respect to the right to store water in the TCR and its use for public water supply. The agreements stipulate that a perpetual easement for the City of Cocoa's existing consumptive use permit will be granted along with the creation of an easement and trust over the reservoir to protect its rights of the TCR project participants with the City of Cocoa as the trustee. This is a significant outcome for Cocoa, securing the reservoir for water supply for as long as it is needed for such purposes.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:32–00:36:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
phases. Water from the St. Johns River will not be taken until it is needed and conservation and reuse will continue to be developed by all participants. The first phase is the permitting phase, then wholesale water purchase phase, the maximizing dial phase, and then finally a dial expansion and or an option for a non-dial plant. The agreements attached to this agenda outline how the collective water suppliers will work together, share costs, and meet the future water supply needs of their respective service areas for the benefit of the public. During phases two and three, the City of Cocoa will provide potable water to the other water suppliers using the existing dial plant. However, during phase three, the dial plant will be expanded to its maximum surface water capacity of 24 million gallons per day. The cost of potable water was analyzed and a methodology for developing the future rate is included in the wholesale water supply agreement.
Stantec, Mike Burton, also known as, participated in developing the water rate model for the project. The Wholesale Water Supply Agreement also includes a rate for the water requested in Phase 2 as a percentage of the inside
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:37:24–00:37:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:37:36–00:37:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
rate because the projected rate had to exclude water utility expenses not related to the city providing water to the project, such as distribution costs to Brevard County
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:37:36–00:37:47 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:47–00:37:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
in Cocoa's service area. The Taylor Creek Reservoir will be used to store source water to be treated at the Dial plant. As demands increase in the future, the reservoir will need to be augmented by water from the St.
Johns
River in order to meet demand and increase the reliability of the source water. In phase four of the project, the water suppliers have an option to construct a major plant expansion at Dial and or to select a different water supplier and location for a new phase four water plant. In either case, the
city
will continue to provide finished water through phase three, plus or minus 24 MGD annual average,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:24–00:38:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
day permitted TCR allocation and the raw water for the entire project, including phase four. The city will also be responsible for ‸ raw water system for the project related to withdrawing water from TCRSJR. All capital contributions for any required plant expansions and raw water system will be paid by the water suppliers per their pro rata proportion. In the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:38:49–00:38:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for its pro rata share, 6% or $360,000 as outlined and estimated in the permitting agreement. The permitting phase includes St. Johns River Water Management District permit, consumptive use permit, environmental resource permits, NPDES permit, as well as many other potential permits that will be determined upon submittal of the cup for a regional project. Furthermore,
in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreements, the city will be the project administrator for the project in the initial permitting phase, phase two, phase three, and the raw water system. If phase four involves a dial expansion, the city will also serve as project administrator for the phase four dial expansion. The other water suppliers receiving water from the city will be responsible for the transmission lines necessary to connect their existing water systems to the dial point of connection. Other water suppliers will serve as project administrators under the transmission line agreement and for a non-dial expansion in phase four. The actual point of connection will be determined under the agreements. The staff has reviewed the attached documents in close coordination with the city attorney, city manager, and the city's water ‸ resource consultant, Mark Furlow of WRA. The staff recommends approval of the agreements slash project documents and initial project funding. Upon approval of the agreements by the city council, the mayor, city manager, and city attorney shall be authorized to finalize and execute all required project agreements and legal instruments. The agreements will become effective upon approval and execution of all the parties. Upon the agreements becoming effective and the parties proceeding with the project, the city manager, utilities director, and city attorney will implement the project agreements in furtherance of the City's best interests and advise the City Council of the status as may be necessary in the future. Future project expenditures will be presented to the city council for consideration in the ‸ future as required by the agreements and as deemed necessary.
That's all I have on that item, and I'm here to answer any of your questions if you have any.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:40:44–00:40:50 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Anybody
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:51–00:41:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
‸ maybe the water tower being built. ‸ this is probably the most historically important boat since the creation and what this is going to do I guess what I like to
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:20–00:41:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it's we avoid
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:29–00:41:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're actually smart enough to do that, which is good. But it's also going to take our lease that was up in 2043 and basically guarantee water forever is how I look at it as
long
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:52–00:41:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
is Because 2043 it's coming pretty quick. And this is a big moment for the for all of us and for the citizens and I probably could stretch it and say we're everywhere else in the country is having shortages of water and water issues.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:42:16–00:42:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not everybody, but there's a lot of areas that are going to moratoriums
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:20–00:42:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know I'm not married more down the road I'll probably be fighting that But this is going to stretch the water supply. And it's not even, you know,
it's using
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:34–00:42:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a very small percentage of it probably for the next 50 years. But we're um we're witnessing something here and Jack and I talked
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:42–00:42:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
uh thank you brother you voted for that I think you were here signing
the bond.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:53–00:42:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
million
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:54–00:42:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for surface water with the opportunity to sell water in a bigger scale. But this is going to um be a giant responsibility for the city. But it's a it's an honor for us to to uh just be a small part of this, um you know, partnership. so Anybody want to say anything? John? ‸ just
want to thank Jack, um Anthony, or city attorney,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:20–00:43:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and uh in to make sure
they're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:28–00:43:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
representing the city and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:29–00:43:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yeah and They put a lot ‸ a lot of time and work and effort put into this, and we appreciate the efforts of our partners, because, you know as you know, it's been going on for several years.
Something I failed to say,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:46–00:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
one message that that it sure looks viable, and I've talked to a few folks about it, is that when this deal goes through and the permitting is done and and water is pumping to the west, um there's probably a real chance for stabilization of water rates. I mean, that's that's the truth of it.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:11–00:44:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and um you know, worried about water and worried about how high it is. But I think we have a good chance of stabilizing it, at least in this region, in this uh this area. So, okay. I think
that's one of the big things for me, Mr. Mayor, is that we all know that at some point in the very near future, we were going to be involved in basically a water war. I mean, we've seen it up in North Florida between Florida and Georgia. You know, we've seen it in other areas where um when water is in short supply, people start to fight over water. And um I'm not sure that that what Jack said made it very obvious, but this has been seven years in the making to get to where we are today.
um
When the mayor and I came, or when I came back to the council and the mayor came to the council, this was already in process. and um
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:06–00:45:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and um
But the service water ‸ expansion in 2000. But we would not
be where we are right now with this
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:19–00:45:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it was not for the staff and the management that we
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:28–00:45:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
job to do, but these are the people who sat at the table and have negotiated um non-stop for the last five years to get us to this point. um Not only are we going to be um secure in our ability to provide water to Brevard County and to Central
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:48–00:45:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in control, which was also a big issue. we're We're going to be able to um expand our dial plan if we need to, make some other changes if we need to, but for me, just knowing that I'll be able to leave here in three and a half years and that those documents that I was a part of back in 2000 that had a an end date no longer have an end date to them is a big deal. Yeah.
And the closet said
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:18–00:46:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah.
Yeah. So so this to me, this is a big deal. This is, in all the years I've spent on the council and all the things that i've that I've been a part of and done, this is like, for me, this is like the biggest, the biggest thing I've ever voted on. Yeah. ‸ As far as importance to the city. Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:36–00:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
uh um intense rough you know um debate. So, and five and a half years and we're glad it's over and we have these agreements to bring to you that are, said it's a good deal for
cocoa
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:57–00:46:58 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and a great deal for the,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:59–00:47:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Central Florida, yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:03–00:47:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, you know, I came from out west. I lived out west for over 30 years and I've been here since, what, 2005 now? We were talking about water wars and water shortages 25, 30 years ago. It's a real, it's real. It's a big issue and it's only going to get bigger. water
and
this, like they said, secures Coco's future with the water in perpetuity. so That's the thing that we really need to remember. This is, yeah, for the district. This is, this is a big deal. And I just hope that everyone that's listening and out in the audience just realize the significance of this. And the staff did do a phenomenal job in getting this agreement together for us.
I
just want to say that I'm happy that we were able to reach a conclusion
about
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:03–00:48:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
going forward
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:05–00:48:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to uh secure the water rights and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:13–00:48:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to outer space. I want to say that the EPA is the guiding light for us. And
we are
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:24–00:48:24 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
well within the EPA guidelines for the safety of our water. So, no matter who comes forward with their personal desires in regards to what's in there, the
water is safe it's
service by, it serves our entire communities, surrounding communities, Kennedy Space Center,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:45–00:48:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
abroad. So, I'm happy that we are uh adhering to the guidelines for the EPA. the Water is safe. If it wasn't, I wouldn't be drinking it. I have a couple of bottles right here now. And it's good water, good product. And nobody wants to buy anything that's not good. And you may look at this as people with that that
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:49:19–00:49:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's
not the case
uh We are doing what needs to be done for our city. So, I'm happy that we reached this conclusion that we will have the rights to to manage these resources and partnering uh around us. are happy to be partners with us as a city. That's it, Mr. Mayor.
‸ I'd like to say thank you to Jack and the city attorney, city manager, assistant city manager, and anyone involved in this battle. I think has been going on for a long, long time ever since. I think I've been on the city council, hasn't it, John? It's been quite a few years. And, and you know, I want ‸ my
hat
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:08–00:50:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
off to you guys for the great teamwork it took by all of you to get this process done. And it's going to be a big thing for the city of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:15–00:50:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and Central Florida.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:16–00:50:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Okay. All in favor? Aye.
‸ Any opposed?
motion carries
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:28–00:50:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:40–00:51:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
to the city utility charges and utility rates for
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:30–00:51:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as Burton and Associates, FY 2018 rate
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:39–00:51:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:43–00:51:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lines, hydrant, wastewater, and
reclaimed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:51:48–00:51:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
water fixed monthly charges and usage rates effective October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018, and to provide for the update of the utility handbook and the city code, and we're available for questions.
And uh our consultant is here, and she has a presentation.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:52:12–00:52:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:52:25–00:53:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:11–00:53:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just going to briefly tell you about this study that we conducted this year, and then you can ask me any questions that you have at the end. We've been working with the city for a few years. We were formerly Burton Associates for government financial consultants.
We
do things, among other things, utility rate development and rate updates.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:32–00:53:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:35–00:53:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was a senior consultant on this project, and Peter Napoli was the analyst. Just briefly, what I'm going
to
talk to you about is why we were brought in to conduct this study, the analysis that was performed, and the financial plan that came out of it. Somewhere in there, I threw the fire assessment, which I understand right now I'm not talking about, so we'll
ignore
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:55–00:53:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that part, and then move on to our recommendations going forward. We've been working with the city since 2010 when we helped update your rate structure for water, sewer, and reclaimed water.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:08–00:54:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and that was a 10-year financial plan. Each year, we've been asked back to come in and update that 10-year plan and verify or adjust any of the rate adjustments that were planned as necessary.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:25–00:54:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So for this study, we got the fiscal year 2016 audited financials as provided by staff, the budget for 2017, and the proposed budget for 2018. We look at your debt service schedules and your five-year capital improvement program, and any restrictions that you have on your cash flows, debt service coverage requirements and any reserve policies that you have.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:52–00:54:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
into the cash flow modeling. Any escalation of costs, because we assume that expenses will continue to increase going forward. The execution of the budget, because usually no one executes exactly 100% of their budgeted expenses. Any system growth, any changes in volume that are expected moving forward into the future. And then we talked briefly about your historic interest earnings and borrowing terms so that we can set some of those assumptions, again, as the cash flows run through the model.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:55:26–00:55:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It annually calculates the cash flows and looks at whether in each fiscal year you would have a surplus or a deficit. And we show the results on our panel on a graph. But basically, the way it's summarized is that if the cash-in is greater than the cash-out, then you have a surplus in that year. You build up your reserve balances, and going out into the future, it's what we would consider a sustainable financial situation. Conversely, if the cash-out is greater than the cash-in, then the city is operating at a deficit in that year.
It'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:56:02–00:56:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
draw down the reserve balances and may calculate borrowing to pay for expenses in the long term.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:09–00:56:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be not a sustainable financial plan.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:17–00:56:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a little hard to look at. But if you see in this upper left graph where there is a black line and then blue and green bars, the black line represents the city's target reserve requirement. And the bars in each year you see in the first five or six years are just basically at the reserve requirement.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:38–00:56:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
fund balance.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:44–00:56:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
outside of a five-year projection period. So what we see is that at least in the near term, it looks like you're financially sustainable. And in the out years, it looks like you will have some reserve balances that would help you to cover any unexpected expenses that may happen in that five- to ten-year time frame. Just so you know where you are relative to the rest of the nation, this is a graph that looks at your historic rate increases for the past five years and then the rate increases going forward five years. And it compares it to the U.S. CPI water and sewerage maintenance series, which is part of the CPI calculation that looks at the change in the water and sewer costs to the average consumer, which is a good way of looking at how utility costs are increasing across the nation. The orange line is the city of Cocoa, and the green line is the U.S. CPI water and
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:57:39–00:57:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
series. So as you see, where their ‸ average increase over
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:44–00:57:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:46–00:57:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As for comparison with local entities, on this bar graph, the light blue line on the top is showing Cocoa's proposed rate, and the light blue line below it is Cocoa's current rate as compared to all these other local entities. This is given everyone else's rate at this year,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:15–00:58:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:16–00:58:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on the graph,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:20–00:58:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
increases this year.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:25–00:58:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so much on that graph, depending on what the rate increases of the other entities are. ‸ And recommendations. We do
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:42–00:58:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which you saw in the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:46–00:58:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
necessary in this fiscal year. That rate increase would be effective October 1st.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:54–00:58:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
planning targets and creates a financially sustainable plan for the funding of all your capital project requirements in the long term. If you have any questions, I'm happy to answer them.
Any questions? No.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:14–00:59:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cocoa,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:19–00:59:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
affect the other cities yet, right?
Right.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:24–00:59:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
their planned rate increases are, we would have no way of showing what everyone's rates would be for next fiscal year. If everyone else did not have a rate increase this year,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:38–00:59:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. Thank you very much.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:59:46–00:59:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:54–00:59:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
get
it for you. Okay. I'm going to close this to the council, open it to the public. I'm going to call Sandra Wilson.
Hello.
‸ I live on [address]. Name and address for the record.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:18–01:00:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
I'm here to address our rate increase. Last year. What city? What city?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:29–01:00:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:30–01:00:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Yes. And so last year we got information saying that we had an issue with our water and the trihaline methanes were up. And when you read the letter, you guys were paying a fine. And it was because of the elevated levels of bacteria contamination in the water, which I would associate to septic systems. So I've got my current water bill here, and it's $45 for 1,000 gallons. And according
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:59–01:01:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
customers. Right? Would
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:11–01:01:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:15–01:01:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
280,000. Okay. That's
running
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:19–01:01:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
it up.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:19–01:01:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
water bill of $76 times 280,000 customers, my calculator tells me that's $21 million a month.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:33–01:01:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:37–01:01:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
80,000? You
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:42–01:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:44–01:01:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
It's like 85.
You're looking at the population, but one household may serve four or five people, or may serve three people. Well, either that way. This is my problem.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:56–01:02:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
reuse. I can tell you during the budget workshop we presented the budget, and the utility department budget,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:09–01:02:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then there is additional to operate, you know, the electricity, the chemicals. It's, I think, the
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:19–01:02:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:02:28–01:02:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So last year we had a problem with fines, and I understand that. And so last year you guys had an increase in your sewer. It came about six months ago. We had an increase in our sewer charges.
Okay, that's the county. You're in Merritt Island, so the county did your sewer.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:46–01:02:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay,
I understand, but we provide water regionally. The county provides your sewer, so therefore the county, ‸ you know,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 01:02:55–01:02:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
sewer
rates. Since last year.
For this, in the city of Cocoa customers, the county
raised
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:01–01:03:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
for the county customers, they're two separate entities. We do, we bill, since we bill, we have all the customers in the service area, we bill for all the entities and those services combined. So
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:13–01:03:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But that doesn't mean that it's the city of Cocoa.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:03:20–01:03:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then we're also writing a checkout to those cities for their
money.
And
‸ so
what I'm trying to get to,
where I'm trying to go down this road,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:30–01:03:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And ‸ all of Port St. John, Cape Canaveral, North Merritt Island, South Merritt Island, they're all in septic, so they're not paying sewer. So if you raise their water bill by 5%, they're looking at pennies. But when you start raising ours and we get quadruple on our sewer, it's a lot of money.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:51–01:03:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:03:53–01:03:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city of Cocoa is not raising your sewer. ‸ If there's a proposed rate increase for your sewer bill, it's Brevard County. If you look
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:02–01:04:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Cocoa.
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:07–01:04:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:10–01:04:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
River Lagoon.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:15–01:04:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:19–01:04:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's confusing.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:04:22–01:04:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:26–01:04:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Right.
And for all those entities, meaning ‸ the other governments,
the counties
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:32–01:04:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, we're not reselling it. We are the ones that treat it and we provide it to the customers. And now those that you have other services, if you're in the county, your trash, your sewer, stormwater, the county sets those rates. But we bill them. Just like
we
bill on behalf of them. We get because we're already billing for water, so therefore we have a contract to bill for these other entities.
Well, I'm in the environmental industry, and I'm really concerned about our water. What are we
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:02–01:05:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I would
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:04–01:05:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
how to get these people off septic. How do we achieve that? ‸ The county. That's the county.
That's
the county. Okay. Hey, ma'am,
here's the here's the bar carry. Here's Cocoa.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:18–01:05:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. So the city owns the water.
It
provides All
right. So then if I wanted to get off Cocoa water and drill my own well and provide water for my own self and take care of my own self,
I
would be able to do that from the county?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:33–01:05:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
How come?
I don't think the state would
They
would not allow it. Yeah, they would not allow it.
Well, why not? Because, I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:41–01:05:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
It's the city's water service area secured by special act of the legislature. So you guys own the
water underneath my house?
No.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:05:49–01:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Actually, the water doesn't come from underneath your house. The water comes from, if you're at East Orange County, and our plant is in East Orange County, and it's piped through a distribution system, and it comes in. So when
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:00–01:06:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it's quality water.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:04–01:06:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No, ma'am.
And I can't tap into it.
Well, it And it can be fixed.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:17–01:06:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
acquired the Cocoa Beach water system because of the saltwater intrusion into their system.
Okay. All right.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:06:30–01:06:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
We appreciate it. Anybody else like to speak on this public hearing? Come on up. Sure. Come on up.
You
got to come up. Name and address.
My
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:06:48–01:06:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm
going to reference
the last water statement, the reason I'm here. You're talking about 10% public water tax. I've heard the PowerPoint presentation the lady made a while ago, a very good one, by the way. She's talking about 4%.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:08–01:07:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Then she's talking 5%. This has 10%.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:13–01:07:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
looking at a rate increase? What's the percentage?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:20–01:07:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That item is coming up, the public service tax. ‸ Just like there's a public service tax on electricity, gas. The city is through financial planning.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:32–01:07:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This water, the rate that's proposed right now, ‸ the item for consideration, is based on the water rate for ‸ all the consumers of
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:41–01:07:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The public service tax is related to in-city customers only. And that item is like, it's two items away because we're going to table two items every minute. So
that'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:53–01:07:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
be an appropriate time to ask about the public service tax. And
I have one really stupid question. Oh, my water bill
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:06–01:08:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a line entry that says stormwater residential. Is that for the introduction of or removal of stormwater?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:14–01:08:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because I've got a lot of it. It's non-fluoridated. It's pure and it's free. You can have it all.
I'm not sure it's pure, but we already handle it. That's why ‸ we manage. ‸ I've
talked to several of your individuals already at Public Works. They're well aware of it.
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:08:34–01:08:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
got a flooding problem, and I'd be more than happy to give you all of it. Free.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:41–01:08:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Where?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:43–01:08:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and Date Court Intersect.
Oh, yeah.
Last
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:50–01:08:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ago.
And
I'm from the class of 66, so
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:56–01:08:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:58–01:09:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
‸ Thank you for your
time. Thank you, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:03–01:09:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:09–01:09:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Okay.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:09:21–01:09:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Motion to approve.
I just have one thing I would like to say before we do that, because I'm not sure from reading the agenda item that
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:09:32–01:09:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
really understand it, that normally we have an automatic 5% annual increase in the water rate.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:41–01:09:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:44–01:09:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
One year we didn't do
it. One year it shows. Yeah.
The next
two years. It's. One year we did it.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:52–01:09:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
it shows that we don't need to increase the water rate 5% this year. So rather than just go on with that 5% increase that would have just automatically went through, we're going to take it back down to 4% because we don't need that extra 1%.
So
what was it last year, the year before? It was like 3%.
Two years ago it was 3%. The year before that there was a no increase. Yeah.
So I just wanted to
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:25–01:10:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
very closely at every penny we spend in the water system, we're making sure that we don't ask for more money than we have to have to do what we have to do with the water system. So I just wanted to point that out because I don't think you'd get that from reading the agenda item. It just looks like there's a 4% increase, not that we're actually, you know, making less of an increase than would. Normally be, be there.
Right.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:56–01:10:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And on that note, I'll go ahead and second Mr.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:11:02–01:11:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed?
Mr. Mayor. Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:11–01:11:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's regarding the future land use
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:19–01:11:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes. Change in low density, medium density, and conservation, and a development agreement. I'm requesting that item be tabled until the next meeting. We're continuing to work with the representatives. And let me give you the specific date for the record.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:11:42–01:11:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be tabling it until September 12th.
Okay. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:47–01:11:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All right.
And then I'll, Mr. Mayor, for item number 3, ordinance number 09-2017, which
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:11:59–01:11:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be the second and final reading, amending the zoning designation for the subject property from RR1
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:04–01:12:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:10–01:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
a motion to
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:22–01:12:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Final reading.
Second.
All in favor? Aye. Aye.
Any opposed? Okay.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:35–01:12:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:12:37–01:12:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make a motion that we
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:38–01:12:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
Okay. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? All right. We'll see the end of
the
future date again. Chief.
Thank you, Mayor. I ask for Council's consideration and public comment on the allocation of the 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant in the amount of $23,464 for fiscal year 18.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:13:19–01:13:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Would anybody like to speak on this Justice Grant? Okay. Close it to the public. Bring it back to Council. Opposed, I agree.
Motion to approve.
Second. Okay. All in favor? Aye. Aye.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:55–01:13:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Any opposed? Okay.
Mr. Mayor,
um,
next item is to approve the second and final reading of ordinance 11-2017, amending Chapter 19, Article 2, Public Service Tax, electing the option to levy a public service tax on water service.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:14–01:14:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and it was held for the purposes of looking at the 2016 budget, as well as future budgetary issues in light of the city moving forward with a strategic ‸ plan and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:30–01:14:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fiscally sustainable path, of which under the specific objective was to diversify and enhance the revenue base to available to fund city operations. There was a review of the various revenue sources available to the city, as well as other measures, and one of them that was identified was to implement a public service tax on water service. It achieves the purpose of diversifying the city's revenue sources, and
then
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:15:02–01:15:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
it allows for reduced reliance on the volatile property values, prevents a disproportionate shift of the tax burden to higher-valued residential and or non-residential property, and it promotes greater equity and fairness
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:15:15–01:15:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that all residents and consumers and municipal services share in the cost for those services. And then it also provides greater assurances and stability to our rating agencies. And during our budget priorities workshop, in lieu of increasing the
military
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:15:30–01:15:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to cover the revenue shortfall for the upcoming budget, City Council directed the
military
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:15:36–01:15:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
would be remain at the current fiscal year rate, and then a public service tax would be imposed for fiscal year 18. ‸ This would enable the city to further attain its goal of being long-term fiscally sustainable. The proposed ordinance sets the rate at 10% and
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:15:51–01:15:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just for the water services
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:53–01:15:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city. It establishes the effective date for the tax as of October 1, 2017, and it provides certain exemption for governmental agencies, religious and educational institutions. And I can request the recommended motion is to approve the second final reading of
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:17–01:16:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
levy a public service tax on water service.
Let me just read the ordinance and by title, ordinance number 11-2017,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:36–01:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
article 2, public service tax, electing the option to levy a public service tax on water service, making other conforming and technical amendments to chapter 19, article 2, providing for the repeal of prior consistent ordinances and resolutions, incorporation into the
code severability
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:16:54–01:16:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and an effective date. This is second and final reading of this ordinance and a public hearing item, Mayor.
Okay, thank you. I'm going to close it to the council, open it up to the public. Would anybody like to speak on this public service tax? Come on up. Hi.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:23–01:17:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:27–01:17:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It, uh,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:17:38–01:17:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you look at it that way, for in-city customers.
For city customers, right.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:42–01:17:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on a monthly basis would be about $2.73.
Mm-hmm. So, it's not that I'm opposed to a public service tax, and certainly I chair the Utilities Advisory
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:00–01:18:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
go up at the same time is not going to be difficult for me or my neighbors on Indian River Drive, but for a lot of people in Cocoa, it's going to change their perception of how reasonable it is, and I think if the advisory board had even known that this was going to be raised at the same time as the rates, that there would have been some concern.
I will share with, you know, for the benefit of the public, first, they're going to two separate funds. The water rates fund the Utilities Fund, and the Public Service Tax will be in the General Fund. Uh, it will ultimately raise about $334,000.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:46–01:18:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
same, because what you're having is if you don't keep the, if you were to raise the military, you need about
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:18:54–01:18:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make up for the difference in the public service tax. And what this does is, is we've seen a burden being placed, a shift of the burden on the responsibility for, like you mentioned, you know, the non-residential properties and the higher-valued properties, and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:15–01:19:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
exemption, are paying almost nothing for some of the services that they receive. So this is providing greater equity
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:19:25–01:19:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
preventing that shift ‸ of that tax.
I'm not sure how that'll be explained to the average bear, but the perception is going to
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:33–01:19:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the rates that
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:36–01:19:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's going to leave the perception that, you know, we have.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:46–01:19:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I got on that neighborhood app, and it's all over there. I'm surprised there aren't more people here. Right. Because they were really concerned about, you know, I was alerted because they said there was going to be a 10% increase. And, of course, I hadn't heard about that. So I don't know how you're going to do the public relations on this, but for people to understand that's going to be really important going forward.
I fully understand that. And I think one of the things that we discussed at our Budget Priorities Workshop and the Budget Workshop that's been had as well as the first hearing on this, uh, absent the revenues coming in, you know, the city has, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:31–01:20:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
city's facing, you
[unclear audio ▶]
obviously salaries are going up about 3%, but insurance, you're looking at 5% to help.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:41–01:20:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:20:45–01:20:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
I just want to, well, the general fund operates differently, and I mean, in terms of it's separate from the utility fund, you can't just use the utility fund to fund the general fund, but what is
compensation?
But our bills will go up at the
same time. I understand.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:57–01:21:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
closely at
their
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:03–01:21:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
bill.
Alternatively, we'd be looking at potentially cutting four positions because we've cut operating this year by 12%. Three of the last five years we've cut operating expenses, and two of the last five years salaries and benefits have gone up. This year we can get hard-
Well,
again, I
really support the city having the staff they need to do, you know, a good job. So that's not the issue to me. But as chair of the Utilities Advisory Board, I would have kind of liked a heads up on it before I read it in social media because it gets directed to me because people know I'm in that position.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:41–01:21:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of an increase.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:21:48–01:21:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
you know, ‸ is ‸ on a budget. So, anyway, just wanted to make that point.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:03–01:22:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Anybody else like to speak?
‸ I know Ms. Cos brings up a good point, but I just want to-
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:18–01:22:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It doesn't include the sewer bill.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:21–01:22:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:23–01:22:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:30–01:22:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ I did read on my utility bill- my last utility bill that was in very fine print that we were looking at this 10% increase.
And
so, I made it a point to be at this meeting tonight. Section 19-31, Disposition, Appropriation, and Use of the Revenues. So, I was glad to hear the city manager explain that this money
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:58–01:23:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will be paying in addition on their water bill is actually going into the general fund.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:07–01:23:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
money for your general fund and not off the backs of the citizens using water. Because as it was explained also to some other people here this evening, we have no other choice but
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:25–01:23:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:26–01:23:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was a year ago this past March. But I'm not pleased with a 14% increase.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:37–01:23:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
would like to see more of a water benefit, not to pay for the general fund. And that's all I have to say. Thank you for your time.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:23:50–01:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Okay. We're going to close it to the audience. Bring it back to Council. Jerry?
Brenda.
Brenda.
Yeah, I just wanted to say that Lorraine made a really good point. The public relations aspect of this is pretty much a nightmare. And I mean, we all know because we sat in our budget meetings that we don't have the public in the budget meetings. So they don't get the background and the explanation as to why we're doing things a certain way. I mean, if
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:36–01:24:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
millage rate going up, sooner or later you begin to feel like that only the property owners are ever the ones that are paying any extra for the bills. And you know that you've got all these other people in the city that are benefiting from the services that aren't paying what you're paying as a property owner.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:58–01:25:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are high due to the value of your property. And we have a high percentage of renters in the city.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:10–01:25:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
more and that the burden of the increase of costs. And I do have to say that in all the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:28–01:25:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as city manager for a while, I don't think I've ever seen anybody cut more out of a budget every year than John does. I mean, how ‸ we've managed to continue the level of service ‸ with the budget cuts that he's done.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:47–01:25:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and that we need to do a better job of ‸ explaining ‸ what's going on and why it's going on. Whether we use the social media platforms that these things are being discussed on or whether or not, you know, we find another method of doing it, we do have to do a better job. We know exactly what we're doing, but the general general public doesn't. And it does. If you said to me and I had no experience with this, I am increasing your water rate 14%, I'd be right here going
why
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:26:28–01:26:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
too.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:29–01:26:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
4% this year. Why is my water going up 4%? My groceries are going up. My gas is going up. Everything is going up. But 14%? That's
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:39–01:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ridiculous is exactly what I would tell you. But if you look at all the details behind it, it's perfectly understandable to most people. But we're not doing a very good job of explaining to the public what we're doing and why we're doing it. We need to do better.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:56–01:26:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I am really disappointed that the chair of our utilities advisory board was not aware that this 10% utility service tax was on the table. That, you know, when we have people who volunteer their time and their effort to help the city move our agenda forward and to do the things that we need.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:18–01:27:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We owe it to them to make sure that they're informed.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:24–01:27:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the public. And they need to be able to explain what's going on just as much as we do. That's it.
Good point. Yes, ma'am.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:27:37–01:27:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, I just wanted to say that with Mrs. Costa's remarks, I do agree with her as well as far as the increase. And just so you know, we did grapple with this. It wasn't an easy decision that we had to come to. I, for one,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:27:39–01:27:53 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:27:53–01:27:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the idea of having to pay more for my water either, but the reality is that these are services that are provided in that no matter where you live, there are going to be increases over time. And we tried to keep them as minimal as possible. So, and everything that Brenda touched on as well, I think that, you know, the volunteers for the boards and with the issues that are specific to the board they sit on, that they should have those type of items provided to them. Because I know the app that she may be referring to, I'm also on that app myself, and I do see all the comments that are made in regards to agenda items.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:27:54–01:28:36 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:28:36–01:28:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we do need to do a better job of communicating to our citizens so that they feel like they're in the loop,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:28:36–01:28:47 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:28:47–01:28:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they're just as informed as we are. So, thank you,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:28:47–01:28:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:28:51–01:28:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well said. I agree. John,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:28:52–01:28:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:28:55–01:28:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I agree, and we'll, Samantha,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:28:58–01:29:00 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:29:00–01:29:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and she'll have her post stuff. You know, we did put together a statement regarding the PST. I mean, we did put it out in the water bills. It was at the last meeting, but we'll make sure we get it out on, you know, not just promote the location
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:29:01–01:29:16 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:29:16–01:29:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the website as well as put together some fact sheet, you know, and get that posted. So, residents understand
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:29:16–01:29:23 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:25 ▶]
Flag: part of a long flagged stretch · 01:29:23–01:30:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:04–01:30:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ So we'll go to chief
thank you mayor Asking Council to approve a Code Enforcement
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:20–01:30:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Reduction Request in the amount of $5,800 for the property located at 1053 Hickory Lane code enforcement board held a public hearing on July 17, 2014 which time the Board found the owner, and over investment group LLC BLM LLC in violation of the following accumulation of junk and trash The actual fine ran at
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:44–01:30:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:44–01:30:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for a total of $52,800 current market value of the property is $34,930 code enforcement board at its regular meeting on July 20th 2017 recommended that the lien be reduced to $5,800 It would also be staff's recommendation to follow the Code Enforcement recommendation also I believe there's a gentleman here tonight representing the owner who would like to speak.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 01:31:16–01:31:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:25–01:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Chief.
Address if you could. Sorry.
Yes. Scott Ross. My office address is 1000 Legion Place in Orlando, but I'm here on behalf of the property at
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:48–01:31:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Mayor, Chief, thank you for a few minutes of time.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:58–01:32:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of ‸ the property. They took title just about a year ago, at
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:08–01:32:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:12–01:32:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ownership. Our clients worked expeditiously to try to clean up the property. They brought it into compliance as quickly as they could.
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:30–01:32:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Bunt, I believe it is. And I believe that the hard costs for this trash lien approximate $800. We appreciate very much the recommendation to reduce the total lien amount to $5,800.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:59–01:33:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we would request of the council or excuse me of the commission is that the total lien amount be reduced further to an
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:09–01:33:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
really the hard cost amount that the city needs to recover with an additional sum that's appropriate.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:33:22–01:33:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
for about a year
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:30–01:33:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so we would just ask for a little bit more grace from the commission to reduce the total amount to $2,000 or thereabouts.
Okay.
Thank you.
I have a question to the chief. Normally the recommendations we get from the code board, the amounts are directly associated with ‸ hard costs with the cost of the any demolition or trash removal or mowing and any staff time and lien filings or anything by the attorney's office
any
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:34:12–01:34:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
attorney's fees. Is that what this is based on or is there something punitive in here?
No, there's nothing punitive. It is based ‸ on mostly on the hard costs. Okay. We show that they actually took ownership of the property on 522 of 15. It was brought into compliance on 629 of 17. So it was almost two years ‸ before we brought into compliance.
My apologies. I have a partial file and I was referencing a letter one of my partners wrote. I wasn't looking at the deed. So I'll certainly accept the chief's recollection.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:34:46–01:34:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I would also add, I mean, this is on these properties. I mean, I know one of the statements, or I think in the request,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:34:46–01:34:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:34:55–01:34:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was that they were unaware of the liens at the time when they purchased the property. Well, everybody's
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:34:56–01:35:04 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
unaware of the liens at the time.
Well, but these are investment groups, and they do due diligence,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:35:04–01:35:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not your everyday person. But the other thing
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:35:04–01:35:06 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:06–01:35:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was other costs to the community to the neighbors specifically that had to endure and You know the condition of the property for the period of time in which it's set and just repair and not being maintained So there are costs to the community that are not just hard costs
I'm familiar with the property because that was
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:26–01:35:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was just a little Like I said normally the information that we get from the code board and the recommendations that they make are directly related to hard costs I was just concerned that that ‸ there might be Something that we weren't seeing there since I wasn't at the code board meeting, but no that's I'm fine. I just Chief answered my question. I just I know one of the things that they take into consideration is the length of time between the possession of the property and the and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:57–01:36:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
chief answered my question that it was
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:04–01:36:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
hard costs I I've watched the code board work.
I
know they they try very very hard to to be fair and Come to reasonable Solutions to these problems and nobody on the code board has the idea that
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:24–01:36:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
punitive It's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:36:27–01:36:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is gained and that's the whole purpose
and they all
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:36:32–01:36:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
understand ‸ that so I'm fine with the agenda item Thank you
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:38–01:36:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:40–01:36:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:42–01:36:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:36:46–01:37:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
All right. Okay, so we go to... Yes, sir.
This is to consider the appointment of Mr. Herbert ‸ as the first alternate member to the Board of Adjustment.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:36–01:37:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
All of them in favor. Okay, all in favor? Aye. Any opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:47–01:37:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
‸ I
figure we do it after.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:37:54–01:37:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:59–01:38:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Rip, how you doing?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:02–01:38:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm glad to get back on the Board. Work was getting me out of the area.
It
was hard to comply with, but now I do have a job inside the city of Cocoa
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:13–01:38:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I'm five minutes in the house and 15 minutes in here. Welcome back.
Welcome back.
Glad to have you back.
Some makes it easy.
‸ John wants to know.
Have
you been to Flying J?
I've been by it.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:31–01:38:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Pretty good.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:38:36–01:38:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:38:37–01:38:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Let's turn in. So
we will see you at the next Board of Adjustment meeting then, right?
Yes, ma'am. Okay. All right. Thank you, Mayor. Yep, Chuck is here. Where?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:50–01:38:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Hey, Chuck.
Thanks for coming.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:55–01:38:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
my boss.
Thank you.
All
right,
great.
I'm
going to come up with something to use more cocoa water on.
We'll do it. Okay. So. Karen?
Good evening.
Good evening.
Before you this evening, we have a request to approve a preliminary subdivision that would take a vacant lot and divide it into ‸ 105 subdivisions. This is a lot that is located south of 520 and just east of Clear Lake Road. This item came to planning and zoning back in July and then more recently to a special planning and zoning meeting on August 20. No. Let me get you the date.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:05–01:40:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was approved at that meeting. We also have a representative from the applicant in case you have any additional questions, but we would recommend that you approve this subdivision.
Just for the record,
Mr.
Merch, 103 lots. It's 103 lots.
It's 103 lots.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:25–01:40:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a request to reduce the lots to 103.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:40:33–01:40:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Hello.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:40:52–01:40:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Address, 504 North Harbor City Boulevard, Melbourne, Florida. And I'm here to answer any questions that you may have.
I have a couple of questions. Who's the developer, the builder? I'm sorry, the builder.
The builder is going to be D.R. Horton.
D.R. Horton?
Yeah, they're under contract on the property.
Okay. And do we have a price range yet on these homes?
I don't have that.
‸ Hasn't been determined?
Yes.
Okay. And do we have an average square foot ‸ of the models as far as, you know, what's the average size?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:30–01:41:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:32–01:41:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right.
Okay. Okay. So they should be medium-priced homes?
Yes. Yeah.
Yeah. Okay. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Are there any other questions? Thank you. That's
good.
Thank
you. Motion to approve.
Second. All
in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Very good. Congrats. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:42:07–01:42:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:09–01:42:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
include a transfer from the water sewer fund to the general fund, reflecting the actual cost of the fleet building expansion project.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:21–01:42:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And this is going to true up the transfer of the water sewer portion of that ‸ project. Motion
to approve. Second.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed?
All
right. Chair.
Chair.
This item is asking Council to approve the preliminary assessment resolution. It's ‸ for fire protection assessment for FY 2018. And we're available to answer any questions. Vita's here also. She's the consultant that we work with for the fire assessment program. And she's available to answer any questions you might have.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:10–01:43:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Motion to approve.
Second.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:18–01:43:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
All those in favor?
Aye. Aye.
Opposed? Motion carries.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:28–01:43:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Who's taking it? You are? Yep. Okay. Good.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:38–01:43:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, Vita. This item is asking Council to approve a resolution to amend the FY17 budget to reflect the actual state contributions for police and firefighter pension plans. Those dollar amounts came in slightly higher than what was projected by the actuary. And so this is just an amendment to both the revenue and the expense accounts.
And
it's a wash in the general fund.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:09–01:44:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Second. All those in favor?
Aye.
Opposed? Motion carries. Monthly year contract. Administrative service director, Ms. Tammy?
This is to approve a multi-year contract pending approval
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:28–01:44:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Shard Snyder for retiree and COBRA
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:33–01:44:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:38–01:44:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And authorize the city manager to negotiate and sign an associated contract approved by the city attorney, which is currently still being drafted. And ‸ I just want to add a little bit more. Currently, we ‸ offer ‸ a lot of retirees benefits for life and then some other different schedules of benefits depending on their hire date. We currently do that process in-house. And it involves multiple people between admin services and finance. And what this does is it's going to outsource that to a third party to ensure the retirees have more frequent access to their benefits. They'll be able to pay their benefits online and other different ‸ streamlined services for payments.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:34–01:45:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:44–01:46:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:18 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
renewal terms in the contract. We've been with UCIS since 1997. So we've had a long-term contract with UCIS. There's a representative for UCIS in the audience this evening. We went out for ‸ bid. We had several different, three different bidders, and UCIS was the first choice between our committee. So.
Motion to approve.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? No.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:46:50–01:46:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Check.
Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:58–01:47:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to update the water system capital plan, project WS-1210,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:09–01:47:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
pending the approval of the FY 2018 budget. This is a substantial capital plan update. This is the first major update we've done since we originally did the effort in 2010-2011, so it's been about almost six or seven years. ‸ Typically do them every five years, but because it took us a year or two once we got the capital plan rolling, you know, we've kind of used that a little bit longer than normal. But this is a substantial update where we go through and evaluate and look at our program overall, ‸ and ‸ sort of kind of like how we all do a strategic plan that you all just finished with the city, very much represents a strategic plan for the utility.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:55–01:47:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed?
jack
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:48:03–01:48:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:03–01:48:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:48:07–01:48:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
This next item is to authorize the city manager to sign a multi-year application service provider order with Superion, LLC, formerly
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:48:13–01:48:22 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:48:22–01:48:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Sector, to provide Superion,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:48:23–01:48:25 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:48:25–01:48:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
administration applications.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:48:25–01:48:34 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Second.
All in favor? Aye. Any opposed?
All right, so we
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:48:39–01:48:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
number nine.
We have the consent item that moved?
Yes, that's number nine.
Okay. Yes, sir. That's revised item number 9.9. And this is ‸ approve the continuation of work under task order 41 with CDM Smith, provide SCADA system
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:57–01:49:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the LCPs, and RTUs, and on an
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:03–01:49:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to extend the service time, and to approve the resolution amending the FY 2017 budget.
Motion to approve. Second.
All in favor? Aye.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:49:16–01:49:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Any opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:21–01:49:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Anybody
in the audience from an advisory board or a committee that would like to speak? Okay. Go to the city administration. Andrew, that.
Just a couple reports real quick.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:40–01:49:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Again, to bring council update, our staff has checked all the pipes on Brevard and they're all clear out to 520. We requested DOT to check their pipes because it goes along King Street from basically the top of the hill all the way down to the river. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:50:04–01:50:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So they're in the process of cleaning that. That may or may not have had anything to do with the flood, but it certainly didn't help things. So they're in the process of doing that. They were supposed to have been there last night. I drove by about 930 and didn't see them.
So.
We'll
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:29–01:50:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We've also replaced the grate, the 308 Brevard. That's been done, and hopefully that'll solve the problem.
Did
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:47–01:50:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Hang on.
Yes. Ms. Shea is aware that we've replaced the grate.
Okay, great. I got a phone call.
I
was
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:50:58–01:51:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We showed her the new grate. So there's a new $700, 300-pound grate. That's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:07–01:51:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Wow. Yeah, she was
going to go on the Internet and find you one.
Yeah.
Yep.
That's
funny.
Right, and then probably you're interested in an update on
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:21–01:51:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That is approaching the end of the construction process. The floors are down. The walls are getting painted. We'll be spipping up the outside a little bit with some trimming and painting, and we'll be ready to go in September.
Great. Very good.
It's very nice inside. That's
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:51:46–01:51:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
It smells like varnish right now. It
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:55–01:51:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
It's beautiful. All new wood floors and everything. Great. It looks very nice.
Okay. Thank you. Chair?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:04–01:52:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
just want to remind everybody that we'll be at Orsorio's tomorrow morning from 8 to 9 for coffee with a cop. Come out, meet the members of the police department, and have a cup of coffee.
Is copper coming?
Copper will be there.
He's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:22–01:52:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Thank
you, Mayor. I just wanted to remind ‸ council that on Thursday night at 6, we'll be having our annual awards ceremony for
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:57–01:52:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Hope you all can come out. That's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:01–01:53:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thursday night. Yep. We'll be recognizing our firefighter of the year and some other awards there. We
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:08–01:53:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
secretary, Deborah Rowan, is retiring. So we'll be recognizing her as well. And then the reason we're wearing these red shirts, of course, is on September 9th, we'll be having the second annual 9-11 stair climb. So we hope everybody will come out and participate, buy shirts. We're
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:31–01:53:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So even though he's not wearing a red shirt.
I'll be there to do the stair climb.
Yeah,
I'll leave you again. So also, if nobody has anything to do tomorrow at lunch, we're having a United Way fundraiser at the fire department, police and fire together. It's called Eat and Compete. So come out and see if you can win. Station
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:03–01:54:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yep. Station one. No,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:07–01:54:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Tomorrow.
Chief, in the awards is Thursday night. What time? Six?
Six. Yes, sir. All right. Thank you.
Thank you. Karen?
I don't have anything to report.
Okay. Thank you. Jack?
We'll
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:25–01:54:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Had enough agenda items tonight.
Great job, man. Hey, great job.
And
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:33–01:54:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay.
I
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:41–01:54:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:42–01:54:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
safety manager. He's in the audience tonight. He worked really hard on the workers' comp, TPA, RFP, and bringing that to y'all. So I just wanted to recognize him for his hard work on that project. Thank
[01:54:58] ▶ Play Speaker 19 (introduced as “Donna Kettner” — machine-transcribed, not verified) + overlapping voice · overlapping voices · Unclear audio
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:58–01:55:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I would like to provide City Council and citizens an update on the annual repaving. Just to give you a heads up, some of it's already started actually yesterday up in the Cocoa North area. And starting next
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:03–01:56:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the microsurfacing. So they'll be stretching those annual dollars a little bit further in that area as we've had other good results with that technique in the High Point area. Final item, just to let you know, the next City Council meeting on the 12th will be bringing the Lee Winter Park agreement. The
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:31–01:56:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Very
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:36–01:56:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, Mr. Mayor, members of the council. Just a couple items. One,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:46–01:56:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
population estimate in from the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:51–01:56:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the latest estimate increases
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:59–01:57:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
The other item I want to share with you is on August 9th, as you know, there was the, well, prior to August 9th, as you know, there were several workshops. Or a main workshop ‸ with the county commission, with the mayor and ‸ several members of the community and some city managers regarding CRAs. And there was the direction to work on interlocal agreements. The city attorney, the assistant city manager, and myself met with the county manager and the county attorney to discuss the ‸ two delegated CRAs, delegated authority CRAs,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:42–01:57:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we'll be expecting a draft ‸ from the county attorney's office. Once we get that, we'll probably be scheduling a workshop with the council to discuss, you know, the direction of those. I know Ed talked about the Leon ‸ Jule Collins Museum of African American History and Culture at the Harry T. Moore Center, and that the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:10–01:58:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just want to remind everybody to please join us as we celebrate the dedication of the Leon ‸ Jule Collins Museum of African American History and
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:24–01:58:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
then just, again, the staff will work in getting ‸ information up on the website. There's some information on the website, but we'll get more information, make sure it's more prominently displayed, and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:46–01:58:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
tax. I know it was a difficult decision in speaking with each of you, but it
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:57–01:58:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
levels of service and provide ‸ fairness and equity and not be reduced to the needing to raise the military. So I want to thank you for that, and that's all, Mr. Mayor.
Okay. Appreciate that. ‸ Mr. Webble?
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I just want to say that I've enjoyed the seminar that we went to in Orlando, Florida League of Cities, learned a lot on the upcoming legislative actions, or should I say reactions to what they're trying to do to us. I
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:59:43–01:59:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to get behind our local representatives to support CRAs, because it's actually needed in our community to eliminate the blight that we've experienced on several occasions within our communities. The legislators in Tallahassee, they're trying to do away with the home rule. That
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:16–02:00:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and if you want to make changes or suggestions, you would have to travel to Tallahassee. So let's support home rules and get behind your local officials to support their actions and reactions to what's going on in Tallahassee. Also,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:39–02:00:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
new business.
I
became a one-year-old this past weekend. The food is great. I enjoyed the presentation of the restaurant itself. It's very clean. Excellent food. Brenda, do you know the address? I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:08–02:01:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Fiskin School right by the armory. Right by the armory. 935 School Street.
935
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:01:16–02:01:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Jerk flavor. That's good. Excellent Caribbean food. And ‸ that is it, Mr. Mayor.
Thank
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:01:28–02:01:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Jerry?
Yes, thank you, Mr. Mayor. I, too, want to say I really enjoyed attending the Florida League of Cities conference this past weekend, Thursday, Friday, Saturday in Orlando. Along with Mr. Tukanich and Councilwoman Warner, we're on a committee. I'm on the Utilities and Natural Resources Policy Committee. And we had two topics that were discussed and voted on, and they were both related to water. So, again, it goes back to how important the natural resources are in this state. And, again, how important it is that the city has the ability to provide the service through the agreement that was worked out. That guarantees that we have the source that we have in perpetuity. Because
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:02:34–02:02:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there's many regions of this state that are preparing for large battles over water rights and the ability to obtain water. So we are very fortunate to be in the position that we're in. And
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:02:36–02:02:51 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:02:51–02:02:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
like to thank the city for the opportunity to attend. And it's always a great way to network, meet other officials,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 02:02:52–02:02:58 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
elected
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:02:59–02:03:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you network with them, you talk to them about their ‸ particular cities and what their issues that they're facing. The overwhelming response that I received from the ones that I met when they would see
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:16–02:03:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
coco
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:21–02:03:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have such a nice, you know, downtown, the village, we love the village, ‸ right on the water. So we have so many features in this community that people in other parts of the state are aware of and, uh you know, we um we just need to make
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:03:43–02:03:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
light and do our part as elected officials and then you're the citizens do your part, ‸ you know, just, you know, make sure that you let people know that, you know, there's a lot here, there's a lot of opportunity, we have a lot of growth coming up. So um just, you know, always promote the the city and I think we'll see a lot of great things in the next few years and I hope to be a part of it. So thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Thank you. Very good.
Brenda?
um
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:16–02:04:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cities um seminars and ‸ conventions, it was um some very good presentations. I want
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:29–02:04:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
president of Florida League of Cities. um He's from um Tallahassee, which is undergoing some of their own challenges right now, but I know that uh President
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:41–02:04:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um Very, very interesting person with some great ideas coming up. And um like ‸ Jerry said, the networking with with other cities and learning what their issues are and how they're dealing with their issues. ‸ I tell you, you actually, you leave there thinking, wow, we've we've got it good compared to what some of these cities are dealing with. I mean, um some of their um their crime issues and and the fact that they're related to opioid abuse and you know what's happening to their um neighborhoods and their communities because of uh of drug use is is really frightening. And I mean, we all know we have our share of problems, but believe me, there are cities in much worse shape than we are and and uh not because they're larger cities either. You know, so um it was really good to to hear some of those stories and uh and get a heads up and and look and see how they're handling there's those issues so that we can stay out ahead of them. and um going
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:05:42–02:05:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I had been a regular customer there for a while, so I knew how good the food was. Mr. Whipple got a big surprise. Yes. um I think maybe as a fundraiser for United Way, we could maybe do like an oxtail eating contest between him and the the police chief maybe? ‸ because they're both into uh the oxtail, which I understand is really good, but um I haven't had anything from there that is not just excellent food. Yeah, definitely excellent food. And
miss
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:06:19–02:06:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Paulette Mr.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:22–02:06:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
were not residents of coco
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:26–02:06:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:27–02:06:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
decided we were the community that they wanted to um
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:32–02:06:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:06:33–02:06:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and that's a really good feeling to know that that people had options and and ‸ they chose us. So please support them. I know uh they get uh really high marks from uh everybody who eats their food, and they got a really, really nice write up in the paper a few months ago um about their food. so The
food critic, right? The
food critic, ‸ Yes, that Ms.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:57–02:06:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
other day. She actually, she and I went in for lunch one day, and she wrote up a review of them. And uh ‸ I did hear from from Ms. Paulette that it did help her business uh after that review came out, that she actually has people coming from uh out of coco
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:13–02:07:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
her food. They also do catering, which is uh that's nice. But uh just real thrilled that they they made a decision. I mean, to me that speaks a lot if somebody looks around the Central Florida area and says we're going to open our business in coco
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:28–02:07:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that says a lot for us.
And
that is it for me. Mr. Mayor, see you ‸ in the morning for
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:34–02:07:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
working okay did We just start calling it coffee with copper. he
brings
a bigger crowd. Sorry to say, Chief, no
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:07:49–02:07:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reflection on you, but he does bring out a bigger crowd.
okay
Yeah, I just have a couple ‸ things.
had
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:08:01–02:08:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the uh groundbreaking for Fire Station two
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:03–02:08:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
three
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:04–02:08:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
believe, since the
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:05–02:08:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I had an opportunity to meet the owner of the company this morning when I visited the place, and he was very, very pleased with this
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:19–02:08:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
coco
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:21–02:08:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so far so good, ‸ he had the busiest weekend for any of his stores this weekend. was packed. So
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:30–02:08:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mike garden's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:34–02:08:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
look at the
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:39–02:08:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to be working pretty good. So, and again, John and Matt and the attorney and Jack, thank
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:47–02:08:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
really appreciated the all the hard work that John and Matt doing staying here late at night to get this stuff finalized. Thank you. oh
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:59–02:09:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
meeting. oh
yeah, we had our neighborhood watch meeting. I thought about that. District three
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:05–02:09:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
made a good presentation. I got several phone calls, and they were very pleased with your presentation. John, ‸ chief of police, and friday chief also, and we
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:15–02:09:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we had a pretty good turnout. So I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:22–02:09:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going to continue. So that's all I have to say. Thank you very much, everyone, for coming.
Mine's coming up in October,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:32–02:09:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
um One thing I just want to remind the council and the city manager and the attorney and everybody that we were elected by the citizens and we were elected that you know to do to make the hard decisions. And this is not easy. Sometimes you have people come up emotional and you have a another group comes up and and uh basically, you know, it's a free country. I can say things, too. You know, say things about your water system that you really don't, you know, you
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:18–02:10:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in front of everybody. But, you know, it's it's a tough thing just to sit back here and hear things that are maybe true or not true. But, but uh I can tell you this. We have a great water system, great water. uh John and Jack and the whole staff, I appreciate everything you've done for the, uh for the contract and everything you've been doing for years and the re the rebuilding of the water system. You've done a great job. And uh coco
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:48–02:10:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
visit, and live. And we have a lot of people moving in, a lot of people uh opening businesses. And so it's you know we're enjoying this. This is not a downside. Even tonight, you know, when you're when you start to pull ahead of other cities or communities, you're going to get things like this. People are going to come in. they're going to They're going to try to bring you down, you know. And guess what? We're bringing it up. And there's nothing anybody can do to stop it. This is, uh when we're done, you know, we're going to make sure that we can look in the mirror and we did the the best things we could do for the uh the citizens. And we're going to guarantee the citizens have a great place to live where it's safe and it's uh better than the next place, better than the next town, because we have the brain power here at all levels to do it. John,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:41–02:11:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you heard anything on the parking study at all? any uh any Any?
At the last CRA meeting, I believe they said, I think they still said it was in August, September. now i have to I have to check. I i forget, Mr.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:00–02:12:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and get back with you.
Okay. And also, Mr. uh Whipple was right, um and Brenda and Jerry, on the the legislative session coming up, it was it kind of overshadowed the League of Cities meetings. uh You know, the the all the cities were talking about it. You know, and i and I stress again, we must be ready in the fall here for for uh doing our part
is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:12:28–02:12:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
um kind of derailing these legislators that do it really don't understand what home rule is and how important it is. uh yeah So, we're you know, we're going to do that. But let's see. uh uh
i want to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:12:44–02:12:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Chief, I want to thank you for the Dixon Diner. I guess you got the gentleman that i decided to keep breaking in there. You know, you saw that on Facebook. and And um I don't know what it is. It's like all
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:12:57–02:13:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
seems like a lot of things are going on right now. And it's uh it's not just there ‸ here, it's everywhere. And I just ask the citizens to look around and be aware in your uh surroundings, your neighborhoods, what's going on. Because uh it's kind of weird times right now. I'm
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:13:18–02:13:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:13:21–02:13:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on the same page and, uh you know, stay safe. um I guess the only thing I add is I'm excited about leaving
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:13:31–02:13:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
coming up. you know and um Hopefully, John, we're going to have another budget uh meeting soon.
‸ Well, on September 5th, we'll be presenting, you know, the, we did the proposed budget at the budget workshop. but September 5th is the first budget hearing and uh then September 13th is the final budget hearing.
Okay. um Just, you know, one thing about being nimble, you know, ‸ in a business or i mean any occupation probably is, you know, we were, uh well, I'll talk to you all because i got there's too much detail here. But it's just some things I'm thinking about that maybe all of us considered before that fifth meeting on the fifth, you know. Just a couple things. um That's it. And the fine
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:23–02:14:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, on
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:26–02:14:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
yet. I mean, they they they
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:14:30–02:14:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:36–02:14:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Yeah.
‸ So. I
just talked to them about that this morning. Yeah. Yeah,
okay. I was aware of that, ‸ I didn't know if it changed or not. Okay.
Well, if it does, I'll let
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:50–02:14:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thursday
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:14:58–02:15:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
that's really it. I mean, I'm very optimistic on the direction we're going and
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:14–02:15:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
That's
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:15:34–02:15:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
somebody needs to
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:42–02:15:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we'll give it up tonight. But, um I
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:47–02:15:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we got
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:53–02:15:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:56–02:16:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]