Okay.
And I'm going to move on to approval
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:03–00:00:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:06–00:00:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be removing the presentation by family promise. So if there's any other changes that need to be made. ‸ Motion
to approve agenda ‸ and amendment.
Second. We
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:26–00:00:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Next up,
we
have our minutes from our special meeting of August 4,
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:40–00:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All the wishes of the Council. How beautiful. We
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:00:57–00:01:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Okay. We have nothing
on the awards
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:01:10–00:01:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and presentation. We're going
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:13–00:01:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Greenwood.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:25–00:01:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:33–00:01:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:01:40–00:01:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
made, and one was a very big support. ‸ unanimous position ‸ this council has taken to try to correct some of the issues that we're having to deal with that basically created ‸ people
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:58–00:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and I was reelected twice it took that long to correct it and I want to compliment this council for seeing that it's necessary to ‸ that again. History repeats itself obviously. There's a lot of negatives, and it also adds up to what you all are familiar with, the majority of you were, as
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:21–00:02:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ reputation that
we
had, and it's directly connected to the most recent changes in the way that we've got all these projects that want to come here, and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:36–00:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I just
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:42–00:02:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ very, very ‸ supportive of your list of both, and it was unanimous. Even one council member wanted it done a little differently. However, it was still unanimous. You all felt that it was necessary to look into it and try to correct the things that the city's going through right now thank you
thank you sir next up we have a mr. mike graham
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:03:12–00:03:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the city with the
city with
uh uh sorry,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:24–00:03:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
utility. uh I'm resolving those issues, of course. But after the meeting, I met with numerous members of the community, and I then emailed
this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:03:36–00:03:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
council about setting up a water
[unclear audio — 0:13 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:38–00:03:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:53–00:03:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just in case you still haven't got your email system working. uh none of you responded. The only people who responded were actually candidates
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:12–00:04:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was really surprised about that. uh by the way, I live in
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:19–00:04:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in ‸ Cocoa, North area of Cocoa, the Incorporated area. Can I see who up here represents my issues, you know, represents me here? No
one.
No
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:31–00:04:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They are customers.
they're yeah they're water customers.
We represent the city council. ‸ Okay.
Yeah, we're,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:04:44–00:04:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh we do respond.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:48–00:04:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
utility without any representation. You know, some of our most honored
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:56–00:05:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
she's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:00–00:05:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
like this. Then we fought a war with England because there was no representation, taxation, without representation. You know, and that's what's going on here. I think it's, you know, time that something's done. You know, maybe we should, you know, pass the hat by the mayor a crown and red coats for the city council and, you know, a Benedict Arnold outfit for the city manager. But, you know, this is ridiculous. The majority of your customers live under the
tyranny
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:05:30–00:05:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
of this water utility but have no voice here to be heard. I think that's long past time. I'm asking everyone here, watch me on video, and see me on social media to contact your state, especially your county representatives, and ask them to take
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:48–00:05:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:05:51–00:05:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That way we would have representation that
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:05:51–00:05:55 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:05:55–00:05:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
some of these issues. Right now we have tax, in
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:05:56–00:05:59 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:59–00:06:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
representation. You
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:00–00:06:02 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:02–00:06:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
call it anything else, but that's what it is. It's time to end the tyranny of the Cocoa Water Utility, make it the
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:02–00:06:08 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:08–00:06:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Water Utility, and have everybody represented. Thank you.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:09–00:06:13 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:13–00:06:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make it clear,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:06:13–00:06:14 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:14–00:06:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the way.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:16–00:06:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I didn't get anything from you. I didn't
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:20–00:06:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:22–00:06:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I hear what you're saying. It doesn't work that way. So you operate? But just like, just ‸ hear me. ‸ I heard you. I'll just listen.
Okay.
Just like you're in here making the statements that you're making right now, there's dozens of other phone calls that we get from issues that we've actually resolved. So, I mean, I know you've got an ongoing issue. You opted to go to court or whatever you decided to do. That's correct. You know, but ‸ you do have representation.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:06:51–00:06:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:06:57–00:06:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
I don't see a single elected official up here that represents me.
Well, the people of Rockledge have their elected officials to deal with us. And if you live in the county, then your county commissioner can represent you here in front of us. He
regularly works
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:11–00:07:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
inspected, ‸ doesn't notify the homeowner, doesn't let them inspect their work. You don't see a problem with that?
Sorry.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:26–00:07:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
My question is this.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:07:30–00:07:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
What are you looking for?
I think the management of the water utility should be handled by the county.
And not the city of Cocoa.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:38–00:07:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Well, they have their own water utility to handle.
Yeah. I get my water from you. I know. Okay. So the utility is the Cocoa water utility.
Okay. Thank you, sir. We appreciate you coming up. Thank you, sir.
Glad to see you've recovered, Mike.
Thank you.
Okay.
I
think that's the last card we had on the delegation.
I
have an e-comment.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:09–00:08:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. His
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:19–00:08:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Williams.
If he's going to call out anyone, then we're not going ‸ to listen.
I mean, if he's going to address the council,
if he's
going to
address this as a whole, then that's fine. But ‸ it's not going to be an individual tax or ‸ whatever.
I don't know ‸ what you're going to read into the record, but you can certainly address the chair. Because that's anybody that ‸ is a resident of
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:01–00:09:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
has the ability to come in and address matters of public concern to them. But direct your comments ‸ to the chair, ‸ just like everybody else. And we do have certain rules regarding ‸ not invoking slanderous or ‸ defamatory or obscene comments or anything like that. Not suggesting that that's what's in the email, but the general rules regarding public decorum apply to email comments, just like somebody physically being here making the comments.
And that's what this is.
I
didn't, to be honest with you, I didn't read this to or interpret it yet before reading it out loud.
‸ Do you want to read through it first?
Well, I mean, I'd be more comfortable giving it to Anthony and having Anthony. Okay.
It's fine with me.
What am I going to be the judge of?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:57–00:10:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
public comment?
I don't have a voice for radio, but I will read it. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:15–00:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
board chair called for an FBI investigation to take place, alleging city staff were engaged in development schemes, etc. In that meeting, in that item, the chair never once mentioned myself or
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:33–00:10:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yet on August 13th, 2020, the chair gave an interview
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:39–00:10:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which was published online on August 13th, 2020, and in the print edition of August 14th, 2020. In this article, the mayor
in
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:55–00:10:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
his position as mayor
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:57–00:11:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
involving city staff, moving
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:03–00:11:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
add up.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:08–00:11:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with a home on it. We have never sought nor obtained any lien reduction forgiveness other than the negotiated agreement with the city to build new homes for families to own. I have requested that the chair either produce a single example and transaction that was claimed was done through code harassment liens or immediately issue public apology and admission.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:38–00:11:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make outright false on
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:43–00:11:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The city of Cocoa has chosen,
to
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:11:48–00:11:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
not provide an apology and acknowledgement that they have no evidence to support the chair's claims. Tonight, the chair produces evidence and documentation in support of his accusations, or the chair removes themselves from council immediately.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:03–00:12:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank
you, sir.
Is that it?
No other e-comments? Okay, thank you, ma'am.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:12–00:12:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
items.
Particular items.
Okay. Okay. Okay, we're
going
to move on to our reports. Did the advisory boards or committees? Okay, city administration. Brian. Okay.
There's just one item. Consent item number one for the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:33–00:12:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:37–00:12:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:42–00:12:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
reports.
Okay, thank you, sir. Becca.
No report, sir.
Thank you. I
provided each of you a copy of the 2019 annual report for the police department that we received back from the printers.
Thank
you.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:04–00:13:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
contributed did a great job in that.
Thank you, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:12–00:13:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. Thank you. I just wanted to give you an update on currently where we're at with COVID-19 across the state and both locally. Currently, we're at 652,148 cases. Brevard County has 7,742 cases.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:29–00:13:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Within the city limit, we have currently active 24 cases.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:37–00:13:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the county's average of positivity rates. The county as a whole
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:13:46–00:13:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
their positivity
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:47–00:13:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The city as a whole, as far as ‸ the positivity rate goes, we're
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:13:56–00:14:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we're certainly seeing the numbers go down, but I think it's due to a lot of what we're seeing with the mandate of masks, the protective measures that are being taken, and certainly, if anybody's been watching the news,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:15–00:14:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
due to COVID-19. So every update that I've gotten from the state,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:24–00:14:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
painstakingly twice a week.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:30–00:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
numbers come wintertime, along with the flu and some of the other respiratory issues that we're going to see. So we're certainly being urged to continue with the CDC recommendations and guidelines, with following social distancing, hand washing, face covers, all those things. Certainly the governor is pushing very hard for a vaccination, as much as everybody else is, to hopefully get that out. But I just don't want there to be a false sense of security right now. Certainly we're seeing a drastic drop in our numbers, both locally and statewide. But I think it's due to a lot of the protective measures that we're seeing. That's what's causing this drastic drop in this rate change in the number of positivity cases that we see across the state. And we just need to continue to hold fast to that and whatever the city council's directions are.
Thank you, sir. And welcome back. Mr. Mayor, I'd like to just add on to that. At the August 12th city council meeting, city council adopted emergency ordinance related to face coverings. Within that ordinance, it states that the city council will periodically review ‸ the ordinance. And specifically every 30 days following the effective date to determine whether the ordinance should be terminated, depending on
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:11–00:16:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:13–00:16:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You
don't have to take any action. The only action that would be necessary is if you wanted to terminate the ordinance. It's done by a majority vote. We did try to bring in the county medical director,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:30–00:16:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but we do plan on bringing him in, working to bring him in at the next time that we would bring this back for review. So you have some, besides just hearing from us and the reported numbers that come from the state, from a medical professional on where we're at with the current pandemic.
I can tell you I'm in support of continuing it.
Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:55–00:16:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to continue.
Any other comments? No. I'm in. Okay.
You? I'm fine. Deputy Mayor. Thank you.
I
mean, I'm good. I think the mandate has held everybody accountable, including myself. ‸ People hold me accountable every time I step my toe out the car. I know.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:22–00:17:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yeah. So I think it's working. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:26–00:17:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
over. ‸ I mean, there are some people that ‸ just don't do it or maybe can't afford to get
mass
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:33–00:17:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
or whatever the case may be. But I believe it's working.
so
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:37–00:17:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Thank you, sir.
Now
do
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:17:40–00:17:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
we need a motion for that or just ‸ consensus is good? Okay. Community development. That's right.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:50–00:17:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
As
you
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:51–00:17:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so I just want to make you aware that we through our PR division, Samantha and Rachel have worked on these very nice flyers. They're out in the customer service lobby. And we're also going
to
be at the new
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:08–00:18:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We are working on postcards and also
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:13–00:18:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which is through the schools. And some other email blasts.
The
FYI for the survey to get input from the residents. As far as what they're looking for with the parks and different amenities things that they'd like to do differently.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:32–00:18:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so if you would share it on your Facebook and ‸ social media to get that out there. We've had a, with all this COVID, we've had a very low response on the survey. So any help that you could provide, we'd appreciate it.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:50–00:18:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, that was my question. ‸ How is the survey going? You already answered that question. It's not going very well. What do you think we can do other than just sharing it on social media? Is there any other thing you think of?
‸ And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:07–00:19:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
go to every resident. She's doing more of the blast. We're putting it downstairs with the, at the water customer service billing station. So that'll maybe help us get some, some people to fill it out. And then also through the schools, we're hoping, because we want some input from the kids as well. Okay. As also at the Julie Smith Center.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:36–00:19:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
I
was just going to say, I just took the survey the other day. And I think one of the issues is
it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:43–00:19:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
takes a long time. It's pretty lengthy. Yeah. So, well, I don't know if they can shorten it up now. But the other thing is they were looking at putting signs out in parks. Did you say they had done that?
Not yet. We're working on getting that all done.
Okay. With one of those, what are they called?
The
QV codes that you put your phone on?
Yeah.
‸ Yeah.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:08–00:20:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay. Great.
And I had one other thing just to give you an update on the CRF funds the city received for rental and utility assistance. We opened the application process up ‸ last Friday.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:24–00:20:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:27–00:20:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all of those funds. Today, we received email confirmation from Representative Posey's office.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:38–00:20:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, we'll also be looking at doing some additional rental mortgage assistance, utility assistance, helping people to pay their water bills, get them caught up. Okay.
Thank you, ma'am.
Jack.
Thank you, sir. Pat, me?
No report.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:21:03–00:21:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Attorney? Thank you, sir.
Mr. City Manager? I do have a couple of items. The first one is related to City ‸ Council's direction to conduct or reach out to the FBI to have an investigation conducted here at the City of Cocoa. And
then, post
that council meeting, we have reached out to the FBI and gathered the information. That information was
unprovided
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:21:40–00:21:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to the ‸ mayor ‸ as he brought forward the item to be able ‸ to coordinate that meeting with that local agent and bring forth the information that he had.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:54–00:21:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we have made the contact and initiated the process.
And that meeting is scheduled for the 15th. Okay.
Okay. And then the final item that I have, we did receive a request yesterday from the Tourism Development Office with the county. They're looking for conference room space for their sports committee meeting on October 21st, 2020, from 1 to 4 p.m.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:33–00:22:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:38–00:22:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:44–00:22:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
has a lot of the rooms, meeting rooms at the government center used up, and which they typically utilize.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:22:58–00:23:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
looking
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:00–00:23:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
facility rentals.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:05–00:23:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
think maybe because ‸ the, you know, the TDC is located right here in Cocoa Village as well. So, just looking for an approval from city council on that.
Do you need a motion or consensus?
‸ If we can just get a motion. Motion
to approve. Second.
We have a motion from Councilwoman Cost, a second from Councilwoman Warner. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed. The passage unanimously. Okay. Nothing further to report. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Councilwoman Warner.
Just one thing. When you get a chance, I got a copy of the police annual report for 2019 earlier, and I just wanted to point out, since a lot of the public might not get to see it, in 2019, our police department answered 58,581 calls for service.
made 1,369 arrests, had 36 citizen complaints, no use of force complaints, and
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:24:06–00:24:15 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:15–00:24:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
are working. And I think we need to make sure that we stay on top of the latest innovation and body cameras so that our officers always have the protection of body cameras, and so does the public.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:44–00:24:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
58,581 calls with only 36 citizen complaints. That's just pretty amazing. That's great customer service. Because I guarantee you, we've had more citizen complaints than that. It's the front desk of the water department.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:05–00:25:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
anyway. ‸ So, thank you guys very much. Appreciate it. That's it for me, Mr. Mayor.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:25:13–00:25:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay, well, let me start with, I think that each of you will be getting a copy of Form 8B, the memorandum on voting conflict.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:25:27–00:25:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and so I needed to make that announcement as required by this process.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:42–00:25:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
have to sign a form whenever you don't vote. Oh, okay. Okay.
Sorry.
So,
I was going to say, ‸ and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:57–00:26:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in regard to continuing to do our online participation even after we're over this COVID mess.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:14–00:26:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
month that's ‸ really going to improve things for all the six people that are at home right now watching, but perhaps we can double, triple, and even quadruple it and increase our citizen engagement through that remote connection that will become so much more of a quality experience next month. So, excited about that. And also about my town hall, which is going to be on October 20th. It's going to be at the Museum of Natural History on Michigan Avenue, ‸ and it's going to be a little different than we usually do town halls.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:59–00:27:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but I wanted the opportunity for everyone to see that museum and to be able to go through and look at the exhibits. They've got a couple of additions that they're going to be doing, and we'll be talking about that more as well as all the other assets that are in District 4 that make the whole so much more than the sum of its parts. At that meeting, the theme, really the umbrella of what we'll be talking about, concentrating on at that town hall, is how we have been moving toward becoming more storm prepared. I'm not sure that everyone realizes all the different pieces of work that have been going on for the last two years, whether it be the resiliency plan, the sustainability plan that's going to be concluding in the next month. ‸ We're embarking on a tree inventory, making the most of our natural and green resources, and, of course, our 10-year stormwater master plan, which we'll be talking about more tonight. All of these pieces come together and have a sweet spot that ‸ is driving us toward being more storm prepared and, in fact, being leaders within the Space Coast
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:25–00:28:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We have a lot of work ahead, and it's not perfect, but we're working toward it. And I think it's really a worthy goal.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:40–00:28:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because, as you know,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:43–00:28:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:49–00:28:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
green soup out there, weather conditions have not been serving the lagoon well as of late. What we need is a period of little dryness, a little cooler temperatures, because
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:04–00:29:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:12–00:29:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're from Titusville to Galley and all the way down the Banana River, and they're still not identified yet. So working on that, we all need to say a prayer for a little bit of sunshine, a little more sunshine and cooler temperatures. And then, well, the last thing I wanted to talk about was utility customer service. I actually had somebody approach me in the grocery store this week, and, you know, somebody who had a leak, which, you know, commonly happens, a lateral breaks, it was on their side. They had it repaired, but they still had an enormous bill. They went through the city, they filled out the form there, they had the water part reduced significantly, but didn't know, because
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:12–00:30:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that they have to go to Rockledge and fill out a form there in order to get the wastewater, the sewer end of that bill reduced. Well, the average bear of our 80,000 customers, ‸ they probably don't realize that they have to go to yet and fill out yet another form in order to get the entirety of that bill reduced. So I discussed with Matt, and I hope that we can move forward in customer service to look at how we might consolidate that process. It seems to me that we should be able to work with the other municipalities so that there is at least just one process for having the entirety of it reduced. And
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:59–00:31:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for how they waive, we need to negotiate with them. because as you can see, this is really impacting our perception as someone who delivers customer service. And that is really important. That perception, once we lose that, it's big. It's hard to get it back. So anything we can do to increase our ‸ customer service, to increase our ability to assist people, particularly during this difficult time, is important.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:41–00:31:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that is, it's for Jason's one-year-old birthday. I ordered it a long time ago, but
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:52–00:31:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:54–00:31:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
had to believe in himself, had to believe, all the kids had to believe in him.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:02–00:32:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
where the kids didn't have food and toys. And the moral of the story was that you have to believe in yourself. And I'm making this public presentation because as you and I know, we run into that a lot.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:17–00:32:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
don't believe we ‸ do it, but I think we do. And the first start is believing that.
Thank you. ‸ Appreciate
you.
That's it.
Thank you, ma'am.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:33–00:32:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yeah, I just got one thing to say. I met some of the officers with their new cameras, and they seem to have a high rating with them, and I don't know, I presume they're working out great. John?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:50–00:32:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I didn't
catch the last part
of what you
said.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:32:54–00:32:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they're using, they're working out great. Oh,
we've got a few hiccups with them, with the body placement. Yeah,
yeah.
How they're using their mics, but they seem to love them.
Yeah, they do. They said they don't have that hanging from their head and all that.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:10–00:33:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
saying hitting the button over there. So, yeah, thank you very much.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:18–00:33:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
you guys are doing. Like Ms. Warner said about the complaints, that's a hell of a ratio of 36 for 58,000 calls. I think that's great. You should be a part of that and thank you, man, for that. Hard work. I should say. Thank you. Thank you, sir. That's all I have to say. Thank you, sir.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:37–00:33:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I
just had two things. Just two events. September 19th, Love Incorporated is doing a food distribution at Jolie Smith Center at, I believe, 10 a.m. So that's Saturday, September 19th. And also September 27th at Provost Park,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:01–00:34:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
helping convicted felons gain their rights back to vote And
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:12–00:34:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:19–00:34:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Restoration is hosting the event at Provost Park at September 27th and I believe it is from 12 to 5, September 27th.
And
that's it. Thank you, sir. That's it?
okay
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:34:35–00:34:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
First of all,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:39–00:34:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that they're doing on Pine Needle Road. It's been a process. I've gotten phone ‸ calls. Some folks, I guess all of a sudden became experts on doing the roads. ‸ and I said, we're aware that there were some little potholes in the crown that was forming. They're taking care of those, but this is a rebuild. This is not just a resurface job that you generally see. So I've tried to get that out there and just tell them to just be patient. and just remember that for 30-something years, you've been traveling ‸ on what was an eyesore and a nightmare And ‸ what we have there now is for better than we've seen in a number of years. So I'm very grateful ‸ and I think the folks that live there are very grateful for what they're seeing there. Also, I want to, thank the staff for our staff as well as the ‸ U-Haul there in Rockledge for helping unload all the pallets of produce that were being given away at the church.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:41–00:35:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:47–00:35:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to say, roughly about 50 pallets of produce, boxes of produce. that we gave out in two days, a week apart. And I'm so grateful for all the folks that were involved ‸ and everyone that played a role because there's a lot of folks out there that are still hurting.
I
mean, folks are losing their homes. They don't have jobs right now. They were furloughed and thought they would be going back to their jobs and it's just not there. And they don't know where to turn right now.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:27–00:36:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
here and you have all these folks that are suffering right now, there's so much more that we can be doing as a community and others can be doing ‸ as well other than some of the other silliness that's going on.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:45–00:36:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I'm so grateful for the staff that have stepped up to ‸ help and assist with the forklifts and other stuff that ‸ they've given with reference to all floating and all that stuff. I'm grateful to our utilities department, customer service,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:06–00:37:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We had ‸ a number of water customers that had some issues ‸ and they addressed those issues and took care of those issues and those concerns.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:16–00:37:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
thankful to the staff. Hopefully they got them already, but I will pass those on if they hadn't gotten those. Also, you know, I know it's election time. Hopefully moving forward after this election, we'll look at our sign ordinance again because ‸ just the signs I see downtown, the way that they're tracking from the village, I think it's it's a mess. I mean, it's one thing to put signs out. It's another thing when you just basically trash ‸ your village with a bunch of campaign signs. And there's a lot of places, you know, I can see them in the residential neighborhoods and other places where they should be, but down here in the village and other places ‸ like that, ‸ it's just, to me, it's just ‸ too much. Hopefully moving forward and after this election, I hope that we look at our process and how we do things when it comes to putting signs out and folks putting sounds out in the city of Cocoa. But with that being said, you know, I'm just, Chief, thank you for the great numbers. I'm glad things are looking better. Thank you. And I'd like to thank you guys for the masks that I took over to the parks because
they were
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:38:33–00:38:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
very grateful.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:36–00:38:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a mask.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:40–00:38:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the park. and when I asked them, I said, hey, you know, you guys got to clean this up. And right away, they knew because they see me there all the time stopping in there and right away they started picking it up.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:55–00:38:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this anymore.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:00–00:39:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
got it. They got right up and started picking the stuff up, putting it in the ‸ trash containers. But they did ask me, they said, I said, Mayor,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:39:14–00:39:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
You have an extra
mass
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:15–00:39:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And I was grateful that I was able to get some from our fire department to take over there and drop them off. ‸ But, you know, people do it if we just, if you just take the time and talk to them, man, because I'm so sick of seeing our city look the way it looks. man, I just, it's just ridiculous. And we got some great people in
this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:38–00:39:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
city. We have people
talk
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:39:41–00:39:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
about the city of Coco being a jewel. Yeah, it is. It's a jewel. But you've got to polish that jewel And you've got to take care of that jewel. And that just hadn't been happening. And, but moving forward, we need to really put some emphasis on our ‸ main fairfares. It's just, it's what people see driving through our city. I've been talking about this for, since I've gotten elected.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:08–00:40:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And it's just, it shouldn't be. We don't see that in other communities. We shouldn't have to see that here in the city of Coco. And other people shouldn't have to see it. But with that being said, we're going to move on to our consent agenda.
We
get a motion
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:26–00:40:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second from Deputy Mayor Goins. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed. ‸ Passes unanimously.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:36–00:40:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Our first item up is approve the final fire assessment resolution.
Yes, Mayor and Councilmembers. This agenda item is to approve the final fire assessment resolution.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:48–00:40:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
year 2021. Beginning in 2006,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:01–00:41:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
has done a fire assessment and most recently
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:07–00:41:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2020,
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:10–00:41:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but ‸ analysis each year to build in a 3% increase to fire assessment rates within the fiscal year 2021 budget.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:30–00:41:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was approved
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:36–00:41:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2020, city council meeting. After the approval of the preliminary assessment resolution, City Council is required to hold a public hearing in accordance with the ordinance and
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:41:50–00:41:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the purpose of adopting a final assessment resolution, formally approving the fire assessment rates. The final assessment hearing is being held tonight,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:00–00:42:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2020, and if approved, the final rates are then submitted to Brevard County tax collector for the purposes of collecting the fire assessment on the annual non-avalorem assessment portion of the annual property tax bill no later than
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:18–00:42:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'd also like to note that pursuant to the discussion at the last council meeting
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:26–00:42:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we have updated the verbiage on this agenda item memo to address the fact that ‸ there is debt coverage tied to this fire assessment So that it's a little bit more informative pursuant to the discussion. So at this time, I'd ‸ also like to point out
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:51–00:42:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the revenue, which is about $2.76 million.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:00–00:43:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:01–00:43:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the fire department's fiscal year 21 budget. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:06–00:43:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the non-avalorem assessment roll.
Thank you, ma'am.
And because this is a public hearing at this time, I want to close the discussion to the council and open up to the public for any public comments.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:29–00:43:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the public and reopen it to the council. We get a motion
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:37–00:43:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:40–00:43:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. We'll move on to item number two. Rebecca.
Yes, Mayor and Council members. This agenda item is to approve the final stormwater assessment resolution number 20-196 and the non-avalorem assessment roll for stormwater utility services in fiscal year 2021. Since 1992, the city has done a stormwater fee charging based on a single-family unit rate for ‸ parcels based on different criteria.
And
then, in 2019, through council approval, the method of collecting it was changed to going on the tax bill, and therefore it's a special assessment.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:36–00:44:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with adoption of the non-avalorem assessment roll. So, at June 25th, again, at the budget workshop, council approved the recommendation by the consultants to build in a 90% increase to stormwater rates with the fiscal year 2021 budget. Per ordinance, similar to the fire assessment fee, it's required that council first approve a preliminary assessment resolution which was approved
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:08–00:45:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city council meeting. At tonight's council meeting, there is a public hearing being held in accordance with ordinance and Florida statutes for purposes of adopting a final assessment resolution formally approving the stormwater assessment rates. And the rates
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:26–00:45:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are included on the agenda item.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:33–00:45:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in 9% in fiscal year 2021 and 22 and 3% each year thereafter. Those increases will provide for funding for the operations of the stormwater fund in addition to capital projects in the stormwater fund.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:56–00:46:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
resolution 20-196 and the non-advalorem assessment roll for the stormwater utility services.
And then I wanted to add that the way we collected the stormwater fees prior to the tier system that we have now posed some possible legal issues And that was one of the driving forces ‸ behind that as well. ‸ Some legal challenges possibly.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:29–00:46:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, I was hoping Brian, you should tell us now when we have the,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:37–00:46:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, sorry. I know that we had talked about incentives for people reducing their stormwater fees.
Yes, so that's our stormwater mitigation credit policy. ‸ We are in the final draft of that. We're hoping to have that either at the next meeting or the first one in October.
Okay.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:47:00–00:47:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
So that provides credits for both your commercial, non-residential, as well as residential properties. Commercial, it's a little bit more rigorous for them. They have to go through St. John's for their permits anyway.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:14–00:47:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We just need a property survey with the plan for things like rain gardens, ‸ infiltration ditches, and things like that.
And when would they be able to apply for that credit?
Once that's adopted, they could apply.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:31–00:47:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to make that application to be on this year's tax roll for that reduction. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:41–00:47:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so they can get 5% for each different item that they choose.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:48–00:47:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it for two years as well.
And one more question, if I can, Mayor. The plan is front-loaded. Can you explain the benefit of front-loading? In other words, we planned
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:05–00:48:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
years in a row, which is stiff. But there's a benefit to that. Could you explain that?
It allows us to have more cash available for some of these ‸ projects instead of being entirely grant-dependent, as we've seen with the Fisk and Broadmoor Acres project, from my understanding, has been on the books for a few years now. So this would allow us, if we needed to, if those grants fall through, we have the cash available to fund that. And then even if we do cash fund some of those projects, there are opportunities to go back and recoup some of that money later with grant opportunities since projects usually take a while to complete. also ‸ allows us to get a lot of designs on the shelf to where we're a little bit more competitive with St. John's
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:55–00:48:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:55–00:48:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Most agencies for grants are moving towards construction-ready projects. We're starting to see that in
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:05–00:49:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So if we have the designs ready, we can move to the top of the list over a lot of projects that have been sitting there for years and years.
And again, the stormwater master plan, we had really not dedicated enough funds to stormwater management for probably a decade.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:29–00:49:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
catch-up here.
Yeah, we do. There is a lot of catching up. I will say from the water quality aspect, we're doing pretty well. The goal is by 2030 to have 100% reduction. I don't think very many entities in our area are going to meet that. Right now, we're in a third out of about eight within our region, which is pretty good. We've hit a lot of the low-lying stuff and tackled some of our large stormwater facilities. So trying to figure out some of those smaller projects that can give us a big bang as well.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:07–00:50:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:08–00:50:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at this time to the council and open it up to the public for any public comments.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:23–00:50:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it to the council. What
are
the wishes of
the
council? We get a motion
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:31–00:50:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cost, a second from Councilwoman Warner. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:50:39–00:50:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 00:51:19–00:51:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:22–00:51:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is the fiscal year 2021 budget presentation. So at this public hearing tonight, I'm going to be requesting two things of Council. One is to adopt a tentative millage rate for fiscal year 2021 and secondly to adopt a tentative budget for fiscal year 2021. And then also we'll be setting a second public hearing to be held at September 23rd this year at 6pm here at the chambers. And just to note, the city does need to have a balanced budget by October 1st
in accordance with state statutes.
So the first thing tonight is the adoption of the tentative millage rate. And of note, the tentative millage rate can't exceed the millage rate of 5.979 mills that was approved by City Council on July 22nd at their council meeting.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:31–00:52:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
So just to give you a review of where we're at, the first thing we look at is our Avalorum history. As you can see those years in the red where there was a reduction in the percentage of change was still recovering from the Great Recession. In fiscal year 2020, you
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:52:55–00:53:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That was largely due to new construction. And then in 2021, we're set to experience a 6 percent increase in property values. Looking at that graphically, you can see that dip where those negative numbers were going back to 2009. So we're actually right about at the same levels as we were at 2009. So looking at your trim rate options, as I said, you can't go above the 5.97
mils
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:34–00:53:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
but you can go below and you can go ‸ back to what is called the rollback rate of 5.8274
mils.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:53:41–00:53:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:42–00:53:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cause an increase increase in revenue of $410,846. Also as a component, reminder that the US-1 CRA will be sunsetting on September 30th. So the city will have two CRAs after that point. And so as part of that, the city has to
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:13–00:54:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
CRAs. So this slide is showing that at the current proposed millage rate, the city would be contributing
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:26–00:54:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
CRA. If you went with a rollback millage rate, the increase would
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:40–00:54:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and $4,200 for Diamond
Square.
Then as part of our process with budget adoption, we always look to see what the other cities are doing in our area. And
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:59–00:55:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the lower portion, but definitely not the lowest rates. If you notice Cape Canaveral and West Melbourne have 3.7 and 2.6 as their millage rates and that's because they're getting county services. So at this point in time, I would like to ask if you have any questions, any comments, and then I'll lead you with what I need for you to vote on.
I just have one quick question. So I
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:35–00:55:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
talking about we had 1.7 billion value. So a difference from the 1.1, and I understood from Matt that that was the properties ‸ that I guess we don't tax, right? Is that in line with what other municipalities, is that about right?
It seems like a lot. It depends on what the makeup is of the city and what kind of exceptions that the city has, and also with, so that goes with land use and things like that. So I don't know that there's necessarily a standard of how much of a reduction there is. That's just the composition of the city. So the 1.16 that I showed was actual taxable value that we'll collect revenue from.
Okay. And the rest is like churches and nonprofits and
city government. We own a
lot of
property. Okay. Okay. So at this time, I'd like to make a public
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:41–00:56:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:44–00:56:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:48–00:56:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:52–00:56:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be levied is 5.979. This millage rate of 5.9790 is an tax increase, and it will be advertised as a tax increase,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:04–00:57:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the rollback rate. So the ‸ requested action that I'm asking from council is to approve
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:13–00:57:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
adopting the tentative millage rate of 5.979
mils
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:57:20–00:57:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
for the city
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:21–00:57:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:25–00:57:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. We'll make a motion.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:32–00:57:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yeah. I'm sorry. I apologize for that. Okay. At this time, I'm going to go ahead and I'm going
to
close it to the council and open it up to the public for public comments. I do have one card here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:47–00:57:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Chairman. I do have a small piece of paper I'd like to pass out to the council, if I may.
That's right.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:58:02–00:58:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
You
can.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:04–00:58:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:58:07–00:58:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You should just give them to us. We'll pass them down.
It's all in your inbox as well.
And Greg, make sure you're talking to the mic when you're up there so everyone at home can hear you too. All six of them.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:58:24–00:58:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Greg Stoll, [address], Cocoa, Florida. Hi, Rebecca.
Thanks.
What I've handed you and is in your mailbox are my taxes for the city of Cocoa from 2010 to 2020 proposed. ‸ Basically, what I wanted to say was I compare the consumer price index urban to the percent of tax increases that I have been paying.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:59:06–00:59:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:09–00:59:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The reason I'm more concerned about this these days is because I'm now on, some say fortunately, a fixed income. I've always known as retirement. So, Chief, thank you for your service. We understand we've made some major improvements. Stormwater assessment. I talked about that at the public hearing. I agree we need to do things. I just found out about the mitigation. Thank you very much.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:51–00:59:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
But if I look at the percentages that have gone up just last year, 18 to 19, 23.73% for me.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:10–01:00:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Your total taxes.
My
total credit.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:17–01:00:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Wouldn't everybody have increased them?
Oh, I fell into tier one, which is the bad one for school. Yeah, me too. ‸ Okay. ‸ So, basically what I'm asking you is to please be fiscally responsible in the future. I know you are working very hard. But we also have a major contract negotiation coming up with
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:00:52–01:00:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Do we not?
Yeah. Waste management. Yeah.
Okay. And what's going to happen there? Non-advalorum tax. Take them to the map.
To just point out just one thing, that we did take the stormwater from your utility
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:12–01:01:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, what's the, you know,
it's not.
quite
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:01:16–01:01:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And that was, yeah, that was increased.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:01:18–01:01:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Okay. I did include it as like total taxes.
Yeah.
Okay. That's all. Thank you.
No, ‸ she was just trying to make it clear that that's what happened. So,
‸ people
see that increase, they know that it, you know.
Right. But before that, it was in the cocoa utility bill.
And the utility bill,
yes.
And I've
included that as tax.
Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:43–01:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
was the storm.
Yeah.
Okay. Thank
you.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Any other comments? This is a public hearing.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:57–01:01:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to close it to the public, reopen it
to the council. I'd like to make a motion, Mr. Mayor, to approve a
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:05–01:02:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
adopting the tentative
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:10–01:02:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the city of Cocoa, commencing on October 1st, 2020 and ending on September 30th, 2021.
We
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:23–01:02:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second. Second from Councilwoman Warner. With
discussion, Mr. Mayor.
With discussion.
I just wanted to say, in preparation for this, I looked, not locally, but I did a search and started reading some nationwide articles on what was happening in other parts of the country. And I came across several cities in several different states that are, and not that their tax structure is identical to ours or they have stormwater or fire fees or whatever, but I'm looking at some cities
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:00–01:03:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this year. I mean, like, I mean, serious. I mean, we're looking at a 2.6% change. I'm seeing cities
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:14–01:03:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I mean, it wasn't just one or two. There were multiple cities. And I'm thinking, what are, what's happening? So now I'm like really curious. What's happening to them that hasn't happened to us? That they're suddenly in such dire
straits.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:34–01:03:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:34–01:03:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the city of Cocoa has a pretty diversified revenue base.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:42–01:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
COVID, they're experiencing large reductions in their other revenue sources that they may have. And the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:03:54–01:03:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is the one that they can control.
Well,
I
mean, nationwide, our property values are doing pretty good. Real estate market is doing great. Property values are going up. So, but I mean, I was reading an article in one city.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:07–01:04:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
doing furloughs for their police officers because they're, they're like almost to the form of bankruptcy. It's like, I'm feeling really good about 2.6% after reading all that stuff. So thank you guys for working so hard to, to do so that we don't have to face that. Because I mean, I, I read an article where there were 300 people standing outside of city hall. And there was another community where there were thousands in front of the county commission chambers because the county was raising taxes so much.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:44–01:04:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of what's going on in the rest of the country. So thank you all.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:52–01:04:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed. It passes unanimously.
Okay. Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:04–01:05:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
budget and discussing the capital projects for the year. So first we're going to look at revenues. And this slide shows you a comparison of the amended budget for this fiscal year 2020 as compared to 2021. You'll notice some large numbers on there that
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:27–01:05:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We are creating some new funds in this next fiscal year. There's different state mandates where we have to do reporting on building permit revenues and numbers of permits issued and things like that. So we created a separate building permit fund. So that's where you see a large change there. And then also through the utility rate study, we developed a water impact fee fund and a renewal and replacement fund. And those two funds, one, we have to do reporting on impact fees in accordance with state statute. And so we segregated those impact fees. So whatever revenue we collect, it's very clear what we collected. And then again, what we spent the money on. And then the renewal and replacement fund is going to track the capital projects for the utility fund. So it gets those large swings from the capital spend that the utility has to do. And what's left in that water and sewer fund is really the operational component of a water and sewer utility system. So you see big changes there. The other big changes, one is the capital projects fund. There at the top, there's a 98.8% increase. That's because we had the waterfront project down here,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:49–01:06:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so now we don't have those projects until governmental funds have to pay for some large capital
project.
In addition, in the special
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:04–01:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A large portion of that is the Civic Center was budgeted in fiscal year 20 of about $5.6 million.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:15–01:07:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:21–01:07:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then $150,000 for the riverfront in the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:26–01:07:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that's not budgeted any longer. Excuse me, because as you can see, that project is complete in this fiscal year. And then ‸ on the bottom, the water and sewer capital project bond fund, all the projects were totally budgeted in fiscal year 20, so there is no spending being budgeted. However, whatever projects are not complete in fiscal year 20 will be re-budgeted through an agenda item coming back to council to carry that money over so that there's adequate budget to finish the projects. Then this is looking at general fund by itself, general funds funding sources. So you can see that the taxes,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:09–01:08:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and utility service taxes, community service tax, make up 24.4% of the budget. And then charges for services such as water billing services, garbage collection fees, and
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:21–01:08:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
makes up 30% of the ‸ revenue.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:25–01:08:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
from the utility fund. That represents 28% of general fund budget. So the general fund budget is $41,351,033. And then this shows you graphically what the changes were in each one of those categories that was on the other chart. And you can see that other than 2016, when charges for services went up, that was probably when having ‸ something to do with ‸ the other fees. Everything really remains pretty much steady from year to year. So I just wanted to review here in preparation for the budget. As you know,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:13–01:09:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
exactly what that impact was going to be. And we're still not sure what it is going to be and how long this is going to last as the economy is still not back at full strength right now. So in fiscal year 20, the city manager brought back a budget amendment May 13th. And he did some reductions in the 2020 budget, such as freezing positions of vacant parks and right-of-way coordinator, streets and stormwater manager, HR intern, and a summer youth internship.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:51–01:09:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
retreat,
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:09:55–01:09:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
IT security study. And we got lucky there's two rubber crossing repair costs that we found that we weren't going to need to do. So in all,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:08–01:10:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we did have Stantec, ‸ our consultant, look at what's the worst case scenario, ‸ least worst case scenario and average. And they estimated the impact could be as much as $556,000. So we did make a significant decrease in our budget. Then looking at the 2021 budget, looking forward, the state came out with estimates and we compared that to what we had budgeted to the state's estimates.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:42–01:10:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the impacts. ‸ But we did go ahead and reduce some of the categories because they are dependent on economic activity, such as local option gas tax, local business taxes,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:58–01:11:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then state revenue sharing. So we did reduce revenue and additional $114,000 trying
to take a conservative approach to the budget.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:14–01:11:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
see the revenue for the impact fees is budgeted at $2.2 million. And then the rest of the utility fund has charges for services at $66.5 million. And then other non-revenues such as pulling from fund balance for capital projects is $8.5 million.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:38–01:11:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The stormwater fee, the only revenue source there, there's some very minor ones, but the only revenue source there is that special
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:11:57–01:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then here looking at revenue trends graphically, you can see the water and sewers going up and down, depending upon whether we're pulling out a fund balance, doing debt issues, things like that.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:15–01:12:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So looking at the expenses for fiscal year 21 by fund, again, this is similar because we have to have a balanced budget on the revenue side, on the flip side, on the expense side. You'll see the same percentages that I went over on the revenue slide that shows the change from year to year on the
expenditure side also.
Then this slide is demonstrating the general fund expenditures ‸ by category. So personal services went down by six tenths of a percent, but there is a 3% increase, plus whatever was built into contract negotiations is built into the budget there. Operating increased 8.1% or a million dollars. The capital spending, again, because those capital projects are getting completed, and I'll show you the capital spending in the different areas in a moment, decreased by 7.7%. And then our grants and aids decreased by 24.7% because we got a lot of those projects done with the waterfront where we had a lot of grant funding there.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:32–01:13:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
budget.
That's supposed to be personnel services, right? It's not personal services.
Either one.
Okay.
It depends on which book you look at. Oh, okay. Personal services is all inclusive of your salaries and your benefits. Okay. Okay. So this slide here is showing you the general fund capital budget. As you can see, the capital spending has been reduced significantly. Again, trying to stay within what we're projecting our revenues are going to be. So
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:21–01:14:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
department has a small amount of capital spending. Total capital spending for general fund is budgeted at $668,324. Then in the water and sewer fund, looking at that by division. As you can see, there's different categories, infrastructure, machinery and equipment, and IT hardware. There's not a lot of significant spending going on there. The CCRIP project is in full steam right now. So total capital spending in the water and sewer fund itself. So this one represents just the routine things like vehicle replacements and things like that is $891,541. So again, this is segregating the big capital projects from just the routine things that normally
need to be
replaced. And then if you look here, this is where the large capital spending is in this renewal and replacement fund.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:31–01:15:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then in engineering, they do a lot of the design and running the projects. There's $8.2 million budgeted. So the total amount of capital spending in the renewal and replacement fund is $10,284,879. And in stormwater, they have $290,000 in infrastructure and $190,000 in machinery and equipment. So they have a total of $480,000 budgeted for capital at this time. However, we have in the budget built in some contingency because we're waiting to find out on some grant status of $296,724. So we'll have to move that money out of contingency if these grant opportunities don't materialize. So as I said, we needed to do a lot of reductions. And the city manager worked with the departments a lot in trying to contain the spending. So there was a lot of capital spending being deferred.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:35–01:16:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not sure about the economy, the first thing we do is defer capital spending. So this is a list of things that were deferred. The fire department is in need of a pumper truck for $640,000. Police department needs additional vehicles, even though we did budget for some vehicles that total about $175,000.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:01–01:17:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We deferred for $120,000.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:11–01:17:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fiscal year
22, next year.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:20–01:17:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:28–01:17:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the mid, point, and the maximum of the pay grades for general employees or as outlined within each union contract or by way of an MOU with the unions. Some of the unions contracts were already negotiated that established that and some of them, HR has been working with the unions to obtain an MOU. So the classification of pay grade schedule was provided to council with the proposed fiscal year 21 budget books. And this was done because city council at the budget workshop discussed working towards getting a minimum wage of $15 an hour. So this is just moving the minimum up for the pay grade. Also in fiscal year 21, what's included in the budget is a pay study, which hasn't been done since 2014 and implemented in 2015.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:30–01:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
above the minimum pay grade that's already established because ‸ wages are higher. And a lot of times HR is having to do small market studies to find out if we're going too low and they're finding out we're going too low and what our state
of minimum rate is.
And so, like I said, the, um, this pay grade schedule hasn't been updated since 2015. So at this point in time, I would like to be able to answer any questions or allow you all to have comments.
Can you go back a couple of slides? Um, when you're looking at the one, yeah, right there. And I just want to,
uh,
and maybe the city manager can explain a little bit because, you know, some people can take this for here the wrong way because I know we had multiple SUVs that came in and that, and you're talking about the pumper truck for the fire department. Uh,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:35–01:19:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
affected any kind of services by any means. So if you can, uh,
yes, Mr. Mayor, uh, on that list, you see seven unmarked police patrol cars. Uh, we prioritized the, uh, those patrol sworn officers that you see on the street that respond to those 58,000 calls for service.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:01–01:20:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
detectives administrative staff.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:07–01:20:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
fleet manager who has a complete evaluation on each vehicle and, uh, can make the determination as to can this last another year? Uh, do we need to substitute this vehicle for another?
And we really wanna focus on keeping that replacement schedule for those sworn officers on a rotation so we never go without. But there's other things that do impact that, such as the plant production of those vehicles. We're
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:20:25–01:20:43 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:20:43–01:20:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
year. We did six last year that ‸ still awaiting those final ones to come in. So, you know, accidents happen with the vehicles And so sometimes their life expectancy is even shorter than what we anticipate. But we're trying to maintain that minimum standard for at least our patroller sworn. You see the Pierce Enforcer pumper truck, that's a request from the fire department. They have one of their older units is in need of replacement. That was ‸ particularly a challenging decision as, you know, working with the fleet manager, they do feel that we can get by another year based on ‸ the repairs that were being made to the current unit. What we do need to consider with that also is the downtime associated with any repairs that would be necessary. And so we take that into account as well.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:42–01:21:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
fleet, the fuel tanks. They did not pass inspection. And so that's something that I don't know that will be done this fiscal year. If you'll see that item at council, it's likely to be next fiscal year. That will be bringing that back for your consideration.
And they were looking at the above ground tanks, right? That
is correct, yeah. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:07–01:22:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, that's the actual software management system for our entire fleet. So when a vehicle comes into the shop to be serviced, there's a software system where all the parts inventories track the vehicle condition.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:22–01:22:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
which vehicles we can defer, which ones we should keep in the service.
Thank you.
And I know you explained about the unknowns of COVID-19 and you explained that very well. I just wanted folks to know that see this right here. It's not like we're doing without. We're just not changing the equipment out right now because we can still get by ‸ what we have right now in some cases.
Yeah, that's a very good point.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:52–01:22:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. That's it. ‸ This is a public hearing, so at this time I'm going to close it to the council and open it up to the public for any public comments. Mr.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:23:06–01:23:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you have to, you ‸ had your
car
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:23:08–01:23:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
for this. Okay, you're good. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:13–01:23:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to close it to the public. We open it to the council. What is the wishes of the council?
Motion to approve.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:19–01:23:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
If you could read aloud the request of that. Oh, I'm sorry.
Approve resolution number 2020-202
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:28–01:23:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
commencing on October 1st, 2020 and ending on September 30th, 2021. Second.
We
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:42–01:23:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
motion
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It
passed
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:23:49–01:23:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
unanimously. Thank you,
matt
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:23:51–01:23:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:51–01:23:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
second public hearing for September 23rd at 6 p.m. here in the chambers and at that time Council will be requested to adopt a final millage rate and adopt the final fiscal year 2021 budget and that will be advertised in an upcoming newspaper.
Thank you. Good job, ma'am.
You're welcome.
Appreciate it. Good job,
Rebecca.
Thank you.
Perfect. We're going to move on to Council business to approve the current total enforcement lien
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:26–01:24:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:24:32–01:24:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:35–01:24:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Is somebody supposed to speak on it? Motion to approve.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:44–01:24:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
make that second. Chair make ‸ second. All
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:24:52–01:24:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
unanimously. Item number two. ‸ Approve the
code
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:00–01:25:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
enforcement
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:01–01:25:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
1311 in Elizabeth Avenue to be
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
enforcement board. Yes ma'am. Can you? She's got it.
Okay. My e-comment is from Larry Sinclair
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:25:21–01:25:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the comment is this code reduction is nothing short of special treatment for a friend of the mayor or board chair in the fact that Alec Greenwood continued to ignore the code liens and violations and was allowed to use his seat on planning and zoning board to have zoning change to permit his violation to not be a violation is a violation of ethics laws in the law.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:50–01:25:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and their failures refusal to comply for two years is not worthy of a lien reduction that
allows
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:26:00–01:26:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:00–01:26:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Everyone else George Brown Jim Gifford and others should be immediately removed from serving on the code board after this blatant display of favoritism and ignoring the facts that Greenwood perjured himself before this code board in 2017.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:17–01:26:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a friend. This board and its member who repeatedly
talk
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:26:26–01:26:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
about what Greenwood has done and donated to this city is an outright lie and you can't produce a single instance of a single donation by Alec Greenwood to this city.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:37–01:26:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will personally pay for every citizen who has had to pay a cent and code lien since 2017.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:26:48–01:26:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:56–01:26:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
discussion on this. Go ahead. ‸ Everyone pays what the city recommends. I
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:06–01:27:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Now, because ‸ we've never gone to zero with anybody. Yes, we have. Yeah, we have. When? You show me. Back
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:27:19–01:27:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I think it was 2014, 2015. I'm not talking. I'm talking lately, you know, with the council. So why
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:26–01:27:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But the staff recommended that he pays $2,600.92 like everybody else would pay. That was you, me, or anybody else.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:40–01:27:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I'm not for it. I'll tell you that right now.
Okay. Thank you for your question, sir.
Any other questions? The recommendation, what I'm reading is to approve the code enforcement claim for the property
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:27:56–01:27:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
zero.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:00–01:28:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
That's the code enforcement. The
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:05–01:28:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:11–01:28:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:28:24–01:28:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Do you have enough information on it?
Excuse me
why
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:28:35–01:28:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I take this mask off. I'll do my best.
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:38–01:28:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to the city's work. It has nothing to do with the ‸ fines that were incurred.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:58–01:29:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city, which is the $2,692. The code board voted, and they opted to go with a fine of zero.
‸ The property
owners
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:18–01:29:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
here, and ‸ I can tell you, ‸ I was a part of the home maintenance plan that came about, and ‸ this is the gravel that we're talking about. That was one of the solutions that was recommended at the time during the home maintenance plan. There was gravel, there was ‸ mulch, and there was also pine needles that someone can use to put down as part of their driveway. And it was
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:47–01:29:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
point in time, and our code enforcement supervisor at the time that stated to that as well.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:57–01:30:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but there
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 01:30:02–01:30:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
different folks that ‸ got in our code enforcement that became members or employees with the city on the code enforcement and some things that ‸ just look, I guess things are looked at differently. But I'm just telling what I know and from my experience and what was told and what was stated in here. During the time when we created this home maintenance plan that was intent back then, I don't think anything's changed verbiage-wise, but here we are.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:34–01:30:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This whole thing about ‸ doing someone a favor, I don't do anyone favors like that. So I just want to clarify that.
Just kidding.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:52–01:30:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
any kind of a gain whatsoever, but for very simple circumstances, I was the first to be charged for putting gravel down when I was upgrading this property. It was never enforced before that.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:10–01:31:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
commercial. ‸ Then there was a
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:14–01:31:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It's, you cannot decipher the difference between commercial and residential. And there were some other later residential units that were charged. And that basically they voted that this should not be enforced any longer. And it came before the council and the city manager at that time, because
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:43–01:31:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's what transpired. Basically, I don't really like to bring it out this way, but I was singled out for this one item. I was given information by the police. I'm sorry, by the building chief that there is no permit required to put gravel down.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:06–01:32:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And it's still like that.
It's
been there for years. I've been a license, state license builder, and I've known that this gravel was always a way to keep from just having a dirt driveway, which is what was there. And that is also a good base for when you want to come back later and put concrete on it. And it provides a solution because concrete, of course, is a lot more expensive than the gravel, but it solves the problem about the dirt driveway. Basically, by having this ordinance that really was vague and not clear, and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:49–01:32:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it basically was sending the wrong message to the city that the city preferred any renovations, leave dirt to your front door. Don't put lime rock or anything else down. The other options for coverage, much more expensive than concrete. They're beautiful, but it's done in very expensive homes. And this is all over the city.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:15–01:33:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that now the gravel issue,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:20–01:33:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
didn't make sense to me. So I left it alone because of people ‸ making statements that I'm being self-serving.
I
knew that there would be other people with the same position as myself. And sure enough, that's what came up. There
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:36–01:33:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and that's when they made a vote that they feel it's highly recommended to stop enforcing this code because it's so
big
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:45–01:33:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
and it's still like that.
Thank you, sir. And I just want to add that, you know, we have a lot of, some of
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:52–01:33:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the early 50s. I mean, the early 60s and late 50s. They didn't have driveways.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:00–01:34:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There was ‸ homes and dirt going up to the carports. And you can see
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:06–01:34:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then some of the older subdivisions that we have in the city. And that's why when we came up with this home maintenance plan, we looked at ways of different things that we can do other than requiring someone to put down a concrete driveway or whatever the case might be because it was very expensive for some of
the
folks that live in some of these homes.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:34:28–01:34:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
And then there was also residents that had a single-car garage that was built, you know, back in the early 60s. Didn't have a double-car garage. And now they have a husband and a wife and a kid with a vehicle. They had nowhere to drive. And our ordinance ‸ prevented it from parking on the grass. So what they, in turn, said, well, you can park parallel to your driveway, but you'd have to put gravel, mulch, or pine needles down to represent a driveway. So here we are. There's some stuff that needs to be changed and maybe need to be tweaked in there and need to be looked at. But there's a number of homes still today that have the gravel driveways. I mean, they do. There's a number.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:35:15–01:35:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If you ever
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:16–01:35:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:19–01:35:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Maybe because of
its
location, ‸ because of its location, you know, to City Hall. ‸ And, you know, I don't know. I don't know the story behind it. But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:33–01:35:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I thought it was absolutely ridiculous.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:38–01:35:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I knew what the Chapter 6 involved and what it was all about and why it was put in place.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:47–01:35:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
far. We need to just start looking at stuff and maybe making some corrections and ‸ making some modifications to some of these codes.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:00–01:36:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and what's going on in your city and make those necessary changes
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:36:08–01:36:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
benefit your ‸ residents, ‸ in a sense.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:11–01:36:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
I had a house that had gravel for a parking pad
because
we were told we couldn't park on the dirt. So, we put down gravel for the parking pad. Had to get a permit. No problem. Just had to make sure that that gravel was secured so that it wouldn't, because the house was on a slope, so that the gravel wouldn't wash down into the gutters during a rainstorm. No problem. Six years later, went to replace that gravel because it had worn down over time and was told that gravel was not a possibility. We've had a couple other residents in here who were cited. I'm pretty sure ‸ we had a gentleman in here who was cited for gravel because he was complaining that he had bought a car for his daughter and now he had no place for her to park. Mrs. Bunt, has there been some change in the code over the course of years? Because I'm living in one of those homes, the mayor mentioned, that doesn't have a driveway. And when I called and asked about putting some mulch down, I was told I couldn't do it.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:25–01:37:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Or does it change depending on who you talk to?
I hope it doesn't change depending on who you talk to because the code is what's written in black and white. So, it says that an approved substance, either asphalt concrete or approved substance, is approved by ‸ either the city engineer or the community development director. So, I've been here since 2005. We've never allowed any kind of pine needles, mulch, millings. And it's the type of gravel that he used.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:59–01:38:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
It was out into the road two years later. It's still out in the road.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:06–01:38:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
board.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:12–01:38:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
code enforcement board found him in violation of the city's code. So, that's why the fine was running this long. Once he complied, he was able to come in for lean reduction.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:25–01:38:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
apron. Community development oversees the actual driveway. So, there is approved rock that is allowed in a driveway.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:38–01:38:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because even though he installed it ‸ before the driveway apron, it is still two years later was coming out into the street, which was going down the stormwater. So, that's why he was ‸ found in violation.
Okay. So, you cannot use mulch, millings, or anything in your driveway. So, when I was told I was not allowed to put mulch to park on.
Correct.
That was correct. That
was correct.
Okay.
And there are, yes, there are some other houses that do have rock. It's the type of rock that they use or they were grandfathered in prior to the city's change of the code. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:20–01:39:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, that notate that.
Okay. I know the one gentleman in District 2 that ‸ I dealt with, ‸ he had put his original gravel down back around 2000, and he was just trying to improve it and make it look better when he was told he was violating the code by doing that. So, I think he did get a letter saying that he was grandfathered in because it had been down so long. And he wasn't adding to it. He was just trying to make it look better than it looked currently. So, I think that's what he got. So, somebody who does have that situation who wants to ‸ make improvements can call your department and possibly get a letter saying their grandfathered in. Correct. Okay. And that
has happened. Also, ‸ I don't have to disagree with Mr. Greenwood, when code enforcement was with community development, we had cited, code enforcement had cited other people for the type of rock ‸ and millings as well. Okay. And mulch, that kind of stuff.
I think we actually cited an industrial building for millings or something. I seem to remember a few years ago to a commercial building, had put millings down without a permit and got cited.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:37–01:40:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
speaking with Public Works is that possibly ‸ having different standards for industrial, commercial properties. Because some of, like, your industrial properties, if you require them to put concrete or asphalt down their driveway, it would be a substantial cost to them. So, depending on whether, sometimes they have secondary driveways, and so we'd have to look at each one depending on whether or not, you know, their primary driveway would probably be asphalt. Because
some of these commercial enterprises have huge, heavy trucks, and so it is a huge ‸ cost to put in a concrete or asphalt driveway. Okay. Thank you.
Ms.
Bunn, there's,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:22–01:41:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ But Ms. Bunn, I just wanted to add that I was in those public meetings, and I know there was a lot of concern from the residents with reference to, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:34–01:41:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
parallel with their driveways, and they couldn't afford to put in that second driveway. I'm going to bring that documentation in so you can see it, because it was mentioned, and, uh, and it was actually, there was an article as well from our, our, um, community development director and the code enforcement supervisor at the time, And they were allowed to put plastic down and put mulch down on top of that plastic,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:58–01:42:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They identified their driveway as a secondary driveway parallel with their current driveway. And,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:42:08–01:42:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but that did happen in the meetings.
I
was there.
I do have
that article.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:13–01:42:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm just saying it is the, what the city code says. Yes. That it's approved material.
Yeah, it was, yeah, we had the code, but there was this, this, this just happened because there were, residents that was in uproar because they were going to have to park in the yard and they didn't want to get cited. ‸ And so the city agreed at that time that they would allow certain things to happen, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:34–01:42:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
And the main concern is the stormwater. If it washes out into the street and into the stormwater, it just causes a lot of issues and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:45–01:42:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So that's really that what determines the type of material.
Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:42:53–01:43:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:02–01:43:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
you roll it. If it's dry, it's horrible material. So, I think we need to look at this code and make some changes to this. Um, maybe at the next meeting we can review this and within the next two weeks or so to kind of look at, um, what
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:43:08–01:43:22 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
‸ we can do to make changes because some of this stuff is maybe old and antiquated and, you do have people with smaller
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:31–01:43:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which costs right now 150 a yard.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:39–01:43:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that grass, but yet they can't afford to, to pour a driveway. So we got to come up with something to accommodate, um people that can't afford, um to pour concrete. So I think we need to review that. And
let me just correct myself. It's actually loose millings.
loops Okay.
Right. And that's where there was a property in the Regina
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:08–01:44:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
subdivision. It had a slight incline and they put down loose millings. ‸ And those loose millings were also coming out into the street. ‸ So similar. We do have some with the crush, um millings where they actually heat them up. That's not a problem.
Yeah. I do myself. Yes. um
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:27–01:44:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to, but, but I know how to do the work as well. And I'm, you know, fortunate to be able to do that, but there are so many people that cannot afford to do it. And then they're going to get a violation for parking on their grass when they cannot afford. So it's, ‸ we can alleviate some of these things that we can change this code. So ‸ I request that we look at it. I know we got to handle this item. um but moving forward, maybe we can look at the item and, and, ‸ specify the particular, materials and the practices of that material.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:04–01:45:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
‸ put a process with
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:45:14–01:45:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
‸ because it has to be impervious. So we don't have any alternatives to that.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:36–01:45:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this, I kept riding by that house, so
i was just
and I haven't seen any indication of stones, of of them moving. I guess it's compacted now. Because
he came into compliance, so he removed the rock. it He's pushed it up. Okay, well this was
before, yeah, this is before that. This was about a year ago when I was looking at it.
[unclear audio — 0:14 ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks; the machine readings disagree here · 01:46:01–01:46:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, ma'am. I just don't want us to get into all these little personal issues, because, you know, I know the gentleman that actually made the statement about this one case right here actually
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:46:17–01:46:27 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:27–01:46:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a recommendation by the Code Enforcement Board and, ‸ of course, the council at the time elected it to take it down to zero. So you know this is ‸ just ridiculous. The code enforcement made a recommendation. These guys have a lot of years of experience on that board and they have their reason for making their recommendation. And it is what it is and that's why I made the motion.
We
got a second. There's no more discussions. I'm going to go ahead and call the question. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? No. I didn't get everything. ‸ Who voted for? I know we had
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:17–01:47:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
item number three.
Thank
you. Approve the current code enforcement lien for property located at 112 Derby Street to be reduced down to $1,007.60 as recommended by the code enforcement board. I got a second from the chair. So we
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:43–01:47:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:46–01:47:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
saying aye.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:48–01:47:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:50–01:47:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Item number five or number four. I'll consider a requirement on Mr. Michael Kern and Mr. Paul
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:00–01:48:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
pension board through September the 30th, 2024. We got a motion
from
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:09–01:48:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:17–01:48:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, sir.
That includes the ratification of Mr. John Casey to the police pension board?
Yes,
ma'am. Okay. Thank you. Yes.
Okay. We can move on to item number five. Consider the appointment of Stefan Harrell as a member of the General Employee Pension Board through
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:33–01:48:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:40–01:48:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
saying aye.
[unclear audio ▶]
Aye. Opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:45–01:48:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Item number six. Consider approving a city manager
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:50–01:48:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, sir, for being here. If you all didn't know, this is our ‸ new city manager right here.
Thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:07–01:49:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
As ‸ the council directed, we put together a draft employment contract. The employment contract is in proper legal form and sufficiency, substantially similar to what we've used in the past, but ‸ a more updated version. Um, you know, as stated in the agenda item, the,
um,
with respect to compensation and benefits, uh, that are being requested, um, by Mr. Witten. Those are, those are set forth and not only in the contract, but, um, itemized them in the agenda item for the, for the council to see. So, um, ‸ the contract is in order. Um,
it's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:49:54–01:49:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
ready for you to consider and vote if necessary.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: flagged by the automatic checks · 01:49:59–01:49:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Well, she's got an e-comment if she wants to.
And this e-comment is from Larry Sinclair at 1052 Mitchell Street. I'm just going
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:50:08–01:50:16 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:50:16–01:50:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Comment. Any city manager employment agreement must contain within a clause which specifically authorizes and directs the new city manager to immediately contact Brevard County
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:50:16–01:50:30 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:30–01:50:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and or Florida Department of Law Enforcement. to conduct investigations
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:50:31–01:50:35 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:35–01:50:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
any member, council has violated ethics laws, city charter terms, Florida sunshine laws. Without ‸ such investigation requests disclosed to council until a final investigative report has been produced.
Thank you, ma'am. I
make a motion to approve the contract presented to us.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:59–01:51:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
a second from
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:03–01:51:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Warner.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:04–01:51:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? The passage
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:10–01:51:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you, sir. If you want to...
I'm going to make a comment, Mr. ‸ Maybe tell people when you plan to start work. October 9th.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:32–01:51:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you for the honor of becoming your city manager.
I'm
looking forward to...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:51:39–01:51:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
working with
‸ staff, to uh make the city the best place
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:51:54–01:51:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
thank
you,
sir. Welcome on board. Okay. Our last item up is our city business has
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:04–01:52:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
rate
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:08–01:52:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:52:42–01:52:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:52:17–01:52:25 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
No, wait a minute. What comment? I want to hear from Rebecca. Rebecca's
had to talk all night.
This
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:52:25–01:52:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is suspending it. Give her a break.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:52:25–01:52:42 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
Well, the word suspend should tell everybody they need to know they're not getting a 5% rate increase.
Yes, this agenda item is to approve a resolution suspending the automatic 5% increase.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:52:44–01:52:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
our consultant, comes forward with the revenue sufficiency analysis. And so in this fiscal year, staff has been working with them to do a full utility rate study update. And because the utility rate study is not ready for adoption at this time, we're requesting that council
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:07–01:53:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in ‸ the last rate study. And we will be holding a workshop in the coming months. We're working out the schedule to discuss the recommendation from the consultants regarding miscellaneous fees, impact fees, the consumption tier, and the unoccupied property policy issues that we've looked at.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:53:31–01:53:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when we went through the budget workshop. So any of these things that are being looked at during the course of the full utility rate study may increase or decrease a customers bill and it will be back brought back to council for approval with that full utility rate study by way of a advertised public hearing in the near future. Thank
you, ma'am. we got a motion and a second, right? ‸ All in favor, signify by saying
aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 01:54:00–01:54:04 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:05–01:54:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All
in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye.