‸ We can have Chief Lamb come up and please with our invitation and
we'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:00:05–00:00:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have Councilman Bolvera lead us in a pledge afterward. If
I
can have you all please stand.
Let us pray. Our dear, gracious Heavenly Father, Lord, we just thank you for this day, Lord. We thank you for all the gifts and guidance that you provide us each and every day, Lord. Lord, we pray for those families that have been affected over in the Bahamas, Lord, and we pray for the families affected by the hurricane in Texas, Lord, with all the flooding. We ask, Lord, that you continue to put a hedge of protection around our city council and around our city, and especially around all of our employees, Lord. We thank you each and every day for the services that they provide to our community. We thank you for the guidance and direction that you provide each and every one of us as we make decisions for the best part of our community, Lord, and for our citizens that live here. We pray, Lord, that you continue to watch over us. Thank you for each and everything that you do. In your holy name we do pray. Amen. Amen.
I pledge allegiance to
the flag of the United States of America and
to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Roll
call, please. Mayor
Williams. Here. Deputy Mayor Warner. Here.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:25–00:01:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Here.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:27–00:01:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:29–00:01:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
City Manager Ticanich. Here. ‸ Assistant City Manager here.
Here.
Thank you.
All right. Thank you, ma'am. Mr. Mayor.
Okay. We're going to move on to
item number two on our agenda. Mr. Mayor, I'd like to make ‸ changes to the agenda for this evening's meeting before we approve them. Under awards and presentation, item three, number two, humane society. And then under Council Business, we're going to postpone number nine, number one under number nine. And then with that, I make a motion that we accept the minutes of the regular meeting. September 25th, 2019. Okay. This is for our
regular meeting. Yes, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:17–00:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So number nine under Council, we only have one item under Council Business.
we're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:02:26–00:02:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
talking City Business?
Mm-hmm.
Yes.
Yes.
Council Business. City Business.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:34–00:02:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yeah. I'm sorry. I apologize.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:38–00:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Make that City Business, please. All right. Yes, sir. I'm sorry for that. It's under City Business.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:45–00:02:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then we're adding on.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:49–00:02:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we accept the regular meeting of September 25th, 2019, and the minutes of
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:02:56–00:02:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
August 30th.
Second.
Okay. Let's ‸ make a
we got a motion for the agenda. So you
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:08–00:03:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the Humane Society, as well as postponing 9-1 on the City Business.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:15–00:03:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Now
I need a second for that.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:18–00:03:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:23–00:03:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:25–00:03:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
meeting of August 30th, 2019.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:33–00:03:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Motion is approved.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:35–00:03:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:37–00:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. We're going
to
move on to awards and presentations. And first item up. It's a proclamation. The Salvation Army for domestic violence.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:03:56–00:03:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It says, whereas the Salvation Army Brevard County Domestic Violence Program is a certified domestic violence center whose mission is to provide a safe and empowering environment for survivors of domestic violence to escape abuse and to educate the community about the problems. And whereas
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:17–00:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
services such as domestic violence shelters, 24-hour hotlines, counseling advocacy, referrals and safety planning, and whereas the organization
provide
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:38–00:04:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
counseling, advocacy services to 545 domestic violence survivors and 278 adults and children were provided safe shelter last year. And whereas the organization strives to spread awareness through education and training services and as a primary prevention initiative that teaches healthy relationships, education at elementary schools and engages teens in the topics of dating, violence, and whereas the Salvation Army Domestic Violence Program collaborates with numerous agencies to deliver innovative services and improve systems response responses to domestic violence to improve victims safe and increase abusers accountability.
And
now therefore I, Jake Williams, Jr., on behalf of the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:40–00:05:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
do hereby recognize and honor
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:45–00:05:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:51–00:05:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:05:53–00:05:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
end domestic violence in our communities. Wherefore I hear unto set my hand and cause a seal of the City of Cocoa to
fix
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:05–00:06:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
this 25th day of September 2019.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:06:08–00:06:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
take a picture
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:06:12–00:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:34 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
‸ We'll be going back down again for... ‸ Okay. And next up, we have the Humane Society. And it's where as Brevard Humane Society is participating in Remember Me Thursday.
[unclear audio — 0:11 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:08:15–00:08:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:27–00:08:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
public candlelight ceremony with the goal of remembering those orphan animals who died without a loving home and shining a light on the orphan animals still waiting
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:41–00:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:44–00:08:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cooperation with the animal organization and ‸ rescue groups from around the
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:56–00:09:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Center and where as. The Remember Me Thursday campaign
would
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:08–00:09:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
assist in not only bringing attention to the orphan pets in Cocoa, Florida, but will therefore result in increased adoption of these pets.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:16–00:09:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of Cocoa, and on behalf
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:09:20–00:09:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
official
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:09:28–00:09:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
declared as Remember Me Thursday.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:09:31–00:10:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:10:40–00:10:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
jail people that work in
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:10:44–00:10:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay, so I just.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:10:57–00:11:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:04–00:11:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and they were discarded. ‸ Unfortunately there were hundreds of thousands of them all across the United States and the movement of No Kill has really made such a difference. And it just makes me really proud to be part of a county that
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:11:35–00:11:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the Humane Society 67 years ago and this Remember Me Thursday is to remember that we do still have homeless animals looking for a home and this Thursday we invite the public to come out all of you and then we close it off next Thursday with the blessing of the animals because we consider animals as part of our family and it is a community support effort. It's not a fundraiser.
It
doesn't cost anything. We just want people to know the value of an animal's life is the same as a human when it comes to them having a right to live and to thrive. So we are very proud to be part of the city of Coco and that
y'all
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:19–00:12:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
would recognize us accordingly. So thank you so much.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:12:23–00:12:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
‸ All right. Okay, we're gonna ‸ move on to delegations. We got a one card here
well,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:35–00:12:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a couple of cards here and first up is Mr. Greenwood and if you could please come up and state your name and address, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:48–00:12:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I just wanted to bring up two issues that basically I'm gonna ‸ give to everybody here.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 00:12:57–00:13:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:13:16–00:13:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:19–00:13:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
That's in front of the historic library. That's a five year
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:28–00:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A lot of people got upset about it. Thank God I was able to get some people to look into it and not go any worse than that. The discussion that was brought up with the
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:13:38–00:13:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the city that did maintaining of the trees that could potentially avoid that. That's the one thing I wanted to say very quickly. The other thing is about something that's affecting a lot of citizens in the city. And it's the gravel charging ‸ that the Code Enforcement Board is doing. Last night's meeting there were several people. One was able to show up. The other two had to decline for issues that they're going about gravel driveways. He was getting a lot of assistance from Brenda Warner, one of the council members here.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:15–00:14:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There was a lot of information that was shared. And the main thing that was discovered is that any of these $250 a day charges for a code that is vague and can be misconstrued, which also was stated by our city attorney in a letter in reference to it and several staff. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:14:38–00:14:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because this definitely needs to be rewritten. It's going to take time to do it. I highly recommend that since it was a unanimous support ‸ by the chairman to bring it to the attention of the city ‸ manager and ask that this stopped being looked into and charged for gravel. This is something that never required a code and it's only been in the past year or so. And it's gotten to the point now where there are people that can't sell their house, that live paycheck to paycheck, that can't refinance their house, and the lien can be attached on anything, including and above the particular house that's there. I'd like to see if there's a consensus that we could stop all the charges with everyone until this gets better corrected. It is vague, it's more commercial than residential, and it's hurting a lot of residents. I knew that this was happening.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:41–00:15:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Now the year or
so
that's gone by, it's obvious. It's hurting a lot of people and it's wrong. It is unenforceable. Thank you. Thank you, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:53–00:15:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:15:55–00:15:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Next
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:58–00:16:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, you're the last one. Oh, you're the last one on the delegation?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:09–00:16:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:16:12–00:16:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Oh, okay. Yeah, he needs to fill out a card if you don't.
But he can come up and
hear
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:18–00:16:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
about that.
So
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:21–00:16:21 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:21–00:16:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
proceed.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:21–00:16:38 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
My name is Sudhir Kotecha. People cannot speak my name, so I am known as SK, first name and last name. I live at [address]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:39–00:16:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
apartments, 1430 Dixon Boulevard, Cocoa,
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:41–00:16:43 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:16:44–00:16:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
apartment number 215.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:16:44–00:16:45 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:49–00:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The Florida room is for residents.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:16:58–00:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
administrator.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:09–00:17:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which was running for eight years without any proper authority and proper licenses or they didn't pay tax or anything. And they take the property of deceased tenants in Florida room illegally. D
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:40–00:17:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
unfairly ‸ targeted me and sent me to jail with handcuffs on October 9, 2018,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:17:56–00:18:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on grounds of false charges of burglary and theft. This is highest degree of discrimination because I am from India, originally from India,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:11–00:18:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This abuse of elderly, every afflicted, physically weak, innocent residents with low income and ‸ police department is encouraging and favoring these bullies and liars. It's no good.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:32–00:18:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
I have ever seen such a number one crook, vindictive, liar, and mean man like administrator, administrator Joseph A. Down in my life of 74 and a half years in India as well as in USA. I, I, at the end I will request police to act very properly, nicely on July 3 when D Miles make a complaint against me. The, the
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:19:09–00:19:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
her any questions. He did not ask for the video and he, he, he lied to me that he came to my apartment two times, knocked my door, but I was,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:28–00:19:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He, he called me two times. It was wrong. I was never, I never received a missed call from him. My time is over?
Yes, sir.
Okay.
Yes, sir. We, fill out a card and we'll, we'll get your information and,
uh.
Mr. Mayor,
we
have the cards.
You have it? Okay.
And, uh.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:19:53–00:19:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:54–00:19:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yeah, give it, give it to her.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:19:57–00:19:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Thank you. ‸ Okay,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:06–00:20:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yes,
sir.
Thank you.
Um, yes, I live in the same facility. I have also been targeted by the same gang of bullies that intimidate, call the police and lie and try to run out the people that they don't like.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:33–00:20:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and three different entity names. However, it's still doing business as Westminster Asbury. And
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:20:45–00:20:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, that has taken over and lies to the police. And then the police just don't do a proper investigation. I reached out to Chief Cantaloupe
in
2014. He has, he has dehumanized me. He has, uh, been indifferent to me. And out of all these, and I've also reached out to the city manager and out of all these educated people in the police department and the city, I'm begging that somebody find out what can be done to disband this mob that falls false charges
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:21:30–00:21:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
targets
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
litigation for people that they don't think should live there. Furthermore, this mob, this group that has so much control and so much power, they're not even legal. Chief Cantaloupe is supporting that.
He knows that they don't have a business tax receipt and they're running this store, which is more a clubhouse than a store, and he helped them find a loophole because they told him that they were volunteers and that they
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:21:51–00:22:06 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:22:06–00:22:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
residents, and he just simply believed them. That is not the case. He talked to gang members. Gang members told him what the gang wanted him to hear, and that was it. But there has to be something that can be done.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:22:07–00:22:20 · gap filled by a machine re-reading (not checked by a person)
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:22:21–00:22:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or just Sudair. It's been other people, and there's been older ones that's actually accelerated their death because we're elderly and we're disabled and we're low income. ‸ So ‸ I'm pleading, I'm reaching out to anybody that can give us the help we need to disband this mob of, well, the core of the leaders is the administrator and four people, and then they have some followers.
Now,
I would like to submit this letter that I wrote because ‸ in this letter I recommended some policies that I would like to be considered to be put into place.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:07–00:23:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the public to read. And each and every one of you to get a copy.
Yes, ma'am.
If
you can get to our clerk right here,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:19–00:23:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Carry it right over here. Yes. She'll make sure we get copies of that. Thank you, ma'am.
So has a complaint been filed?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:23:32–00:23:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:36–00:23:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at both of
their
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:42–00:23:42 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
meetings, but prior to a majority of members sitting on council. Last year, maybe a year and a half ago, Ms.
Lenore
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:50–00:23:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
came forward. Myself, Samantha Sanger, met with her. Probably spent about 60 hours of research. I'll provide you the memo in regard to all the concerns that she raised ‸ and my investigation into the allegations. And I can just tell you it really comes down to, I think, the police department is being put ‸ in a very difficult position when it's tenant-landlord and tenant-tenant issues. And they are wrapped in the middle of it.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:18–00:24:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I don't think it's appropriate to comment because I think there's an ongoing criminal case that the state attorney's office is pursuing that they signed an affidavit of prosecution of which the police department had a legal obligation to respond to. So I will provide all of you the memo that we put together based on all the information that Ms. Lamar brought forward previously.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:24:49–00:24:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, she's brought the issues on two occasions to the police advisory committee.
So here's issues.
So with regards to conduct that goes back years, I mean, ‸ there was a three-year gap in between an incident that happened and when it was reported. But it just, I'll let the memo speak for itself, ma'am. It just, there's no city policy or regulation that's going to be able to regulate, you know, the tenant-landlord or the versus tenant, you know, issues. There are some instances where Ms. Lamar is a complainant. There are some instances where Ms. Lamar is the subject of a complaint. And there's numerous instances like that. So it's an ongoing thing. And it's just, again, our officers are called. There's a call for service. They respond.
But
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:52–00:25:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:25:58–00:26:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
committee?
Yeah.
When
we get all the information, Well, there was no police misconduct, you know, alleged.
And he didn't fill out a complaint?
No, but based on our discussion, I did meet with SK and reviewed the information.
Thank you, sir. We're going to move on to our reports. Any advisory boards or committees? Okay. Mr. Weegraff, up
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:31–00:26:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
No report at this time.
No report, sir.
Chief?
No report, sir.
Chief Prince? No report, except this will be my last meeting. Yes, sir. Before retiring on Friday. So I just want to say thank you very much. It's been an honor to be the fire
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:53–00:26:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and represent the city and the
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:57–00:26:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I have
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:01–00:27:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in as fire chief.
will
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:06–00:27:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
do an excellent job,
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:08–00:27:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
even better job going in the future. So thank you.
And, sir, I haven't worked with you long, but I've enjoyed the time that I have had with you.
So
we thank you.
No reports, ‸ sir.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:21–00:27:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. Walsh? No report tonight, sir.
Thank you, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:25–00:27:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
sir.
I can't keep that
going.
So
I just want to apologize right now. It sounded good.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:41–00:27:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I want to take the opportunity to introduce Brian Smith. Mr. Smith, can you please stand up? Mr. Smith started Monday. He is our incoming public works director. As you know, Mr.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:27:59–00:27:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will be retiring after 35, 36 years.
Did you say 39? 39
years service with our community. Mr. Smith comes to us having previously
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:14–00:28:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:17–00:28:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
He has a bachelor of science and civil engineering from the University of Florida. He's also a certified floodplain manager, has served on Orlando's, the Metroplan Orlando Technical Advisory Committee, similar to our Space Coast TPO, as well as their management and operations committee, as well as the Seminole County Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group. And so we are, he's sort of hit the ground running, working with Ed to try to transfer some of that 39 years of institutional knowledge.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:28:54–00:28:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of October.
Thank you, sir. And welcome on board. I don't know if you want to say anything. I mean, you don't have to, but.
I just want to say I look forward to working with each and every one of you and continuing Mr. ‸ Weaver's legacy here and just making improvements throughout the city.
I
really look forward to it. So thank you all. Thank you, sir.
Welcome. Yeah.
Now you got to deal with ‸ Mr. Greenwood in the back now, so
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:29:29–00:29:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Delegation met. The city, you know, did not have any specific asks. And also we were kind of Matt and myself were tied up, and I'll go into that a little bit. But we do want to still put together a letter to Senator Wright
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:53–00:29:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I offer up to you, consistent with Space Coast League of Cities,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:05–00:30:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:12–00:30:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
coastal resiliency planning that they continue to provide funds for planning as well as potential project implementation, the community partnership school program through UCF. As you know, Endeavor Elementary is a community partnership school, and we're asking for continued funding through the Children's Home Society. And then local control
or you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:30:37–00:30:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
eliminate the preemption on short-term vacation rentals.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:30:42–00:30:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the standard that Governor DeSantis laid out when he, you know, vetoed the plastic straw bill, if you will, and that they would honor and respect home rule, and that local government, local elected officials, are best capable of making decisions that affect local communities, we're a unique, diverse state. The Cocoa Beach is different than Cocoa,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:15–00:31:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Each community has its own issues and challenges, and the residents of each community, through you as the elected body, should be able to determine, you know, what works best for our respective communities. So if you have any other issues, I'll be drafting a letter to go out ‸ this Friday. ‸ Council are generally okay with that. I mean, if not, please just let me know of their issues. Okay, related to that, we have two members that serve on the Florida League of Cities legislative policy committees, in terms of three,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:31:58–00:32:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:02–00:32:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
conference is coming up November 13th
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:32:05–00:32:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
15th. ‸ November 13th is a date of the council meeting, but the meetings that day are, I don't want to say they lack substance, but there's a research symposium,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:17–00:32:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
board meeting in the evening, but the ‸ heart, the meat and potatoes of the conference ‸ will be the 14th and 15th, and so we're asking, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:32–00:32:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as the two members of the,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:37–00:32:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will be attending that conference.
Yes, sir, I will be in attendance.
I'll be attending that
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:43–00:32:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
So we'll coordinate that with the city clerk's office, and I will be attending as well. Okay. Sorry, Mr. Mayor. Oh, no, I ‸ actually
had that on my list. I'm glad you mentioned that.
So number three, today, as I mentioned, the community partnership school program, ‸ back in 2014, we first met with the Brevard Public Schools District, Matt, myself, Dr. Julie Smith,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:14–00:33:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
College Children's Home Society, the Brevard Public Schools, and with the idea of applying for a planning grant for a community partnership school for Endeavor Elementary. 2015, that became a reality, and today, Matt and myself, as members of the Matt and Leadership, excuse me,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:33:40–00:33:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the Endeavor Elementary underwent its Community Partnership School certification review by the UCF on-site assessors. I think it went pretty well.
‸ I
think it speaks, I mean, there's some significant achievements that have been made with Endeavor in terms of the parental engagement, the resources that have been brought, you know, community-wide with Brevard Health Alliance, and there's a number of them,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:11–00:34:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and I know in the upcoming 12 months, their goals, primary objectives, are to increase parental engagement and activities and increase participation by 30% of families, ‸ as well as ‸ to increase the utilization of the healthcare services, specifically the medical services, dental services and behavioral health services,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:39–00:34:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
spent in tutoring by 130%.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:46–00:34:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the Leadership Council,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:34:53–00:34:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the assessors to find out what the outcome of that assessment was. It's a year earlier than they needed to apply for the certification, but it's important, and with that in mind, there is currently a planning grant through UCF. It's their center of innovation and education, although Children's Home Society works with them, ‸ but there's a planning grant, and we forward it
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:35:23–00:35:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because we think it would be ideal, the students essentially ‸ being surrounded by a support network of not just focus on academics, but also looking at, you know, the issues of health, whether ‸ it be medical, behavioral, dental, as well as other, you know, support in terms of the social component and increasing parental engagement, And it has shown in the last year and a half, two years specifically, we have seen Endeavor go from a very, if you recall,
it
was an F school. I mean, you got an F, and then you get a D,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:09–00:36:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the testing in five years, and they're a solid C.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:17–00:36:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Cabinet and the Leadership Council, we see it as an opportunity, you know, when you look at some of the systemic issues our community faces, it's an opportunity to break that cycle of generational poverty, generational ‸ low educational attainment, generational incarceration, And so we're hopeful that maybe Cocoa High will provide,
you
know, we'll reach out to the superintendent as well,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:36:45–00:36:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a sixth grader to go into a junior, senior high and having a protected environment, at least an environment of enhanced resources and support, and then going into, you know, a high school could be very challenging, and we would like to see that continuity being maintained, and as you know, in this year's budget and previous budgets, the city has been very, and they were lauded today on numerous occasions for support of Endeavor Elementary, so I just want to let you know that we'll report back to you once we hear the outcome of the certification review.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:28–00:37:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Well,
they would ‸ apply.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:35–00:37:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
No, no, no, ma'am. They would apply. ‸ Actually,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:39–00:37:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and ‸ there are several others, but the first elementary school was Endeavor Elementary, And so we are hopeful that Cocoa High will apply for a planning grant to set themselves up to establish a community partnership school. we did speak with Jarvis Wheeler who was, his role is going to be increasing with Children's Home Society about,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:38:13–00:38:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because it is a feeder school. It just,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:38:19–00:38:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to provide that continuous, you know, level of support, and there's a lot of community organizations that have lended time, ‸ their time, their money, as well as even in-time donations, you know, to make it possible along with the police department, community relations unit. So, we'll report back to you once we find out the results of that. And last, you know, I did have a conversation, and as you know, this is the last meeting prior to the, to the end of the fiscal year, and so, you know, Monday, September 30th, the fiscal year ends. The city did, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:02–00:39:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that serve a municipal purpose, we budget, I think, about, it's $3,750, which represents $750 per member. To date, there's only been $1,000 donated to Cocoa Youth Athletics. The donation policy requires a 60-day application. You have to turn your application in within 60 days, provide all the requisite financial information, the project, And there's been a request that a member, you know, provide the balance of their donation, or their amount dedicated for each member to the Marine Resources Council, and, you know, in speaking with the city attorney, we could waive the time frame for the application submittal, But what it would require is that the, the app,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:39:57–00:40:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they would still have to complete the application and invoice the city. And within the application, establish the ‸ purpose for which they'll use the funds and to be aligned in terms of being a municipal purpose,
now it'll
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:40:14–00:40:15 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
all have to be done by Monday, September 30th, because ‸ that's when the fiscal year ends,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:40:21–00:40:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to, if it's after September 30th,
And they could, and they would be applying for basically for the same thing they were two years ago, the report card, the annual report card that is produced on the condition of the Indian River Lagoon.
So, then that, so that'll make it easier for them if they wanted to do that, but it's just so, if council, if there's consensus with council to waive the 60-day application fee, or the 60-day application time frame, we will accept their application, it just has to be, the application, the invoice must be submitted by Monday, September 30th. If it's not, it will fall into the next fiscal year, which would go against the next fiscal year's donation policy.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:08–00:41:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Yeah,
I'm okay.
I'm okay with it.
Of course I am.
And last but not least, or no, it's not, what's that?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:25–00:41:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
don't think I did,
sorry.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:41:28–00:41:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Florida State College to talk about Cocoa Campus programs and initiatives.
I
know, Mr. Mayor, you received the invite as well,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:39–00:41:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so that will be coming up. We'll certainly, we'll report back. And then now, last but not least, you know, Chief Prince mentioned, this was his last meeting. there was a chain of, change of command ceremony, Friday, September 27th at 10 a.m. at Fire Station One. I would encourage you to come out, and I'd like to take the opportunity to thank,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:07–00:42:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
professional, but he did a lot of things for our department in ‸ short tenure, you know, in terms of his professionalism, his leadership, brought stability, He guided and worked for Public Works in the development of three fire stations to maximize ‸ service and enhance service for our citizens, as well as, you know, enhanced the,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:38–00:42:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know, he was responsible through his efforts of lowering our ISO rating.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:53–00:42:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And with that, we also have great confidence
and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:01–00:43:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you know, soon to be chief, you know, lamb.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:06–00:43:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and wish you and your wife, Susan, the best, and we hope you'll visit. If I visit Gainesville, it certainly would be your house and not somewhere else in Gainesville. And that's it, Mr. Mayor.
Thank you, sir. I just got a few things here and then I'm going to turn it over
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:34–00:43:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then we'll work our way down. But, but anyway, I wanted to talk about the bus stop
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:43:41–00:43:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:43–00:43:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was there this morning and, and I'm glad I was there because there's a gentleman that walks around in the city, you know, He's at some of our stops and up near the Wawa. He was actually trying to get money from some of the parents, or cigarettes and, and of course, the kids were a little agitated about him.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:05–00:44:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have an officer there at that bus stop in the morning because it was, I just felt sorry for the kids there and some of the parents that can't be there because they either have to go to work and there are a couple that are there, but then just the harassment that they get.
And
so, and then also as well, when they get out of school, we can have a car there because they're pretty quick about getting on the bus. When the bus
arrived
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:30–00:44:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
there, they're on there.
having this
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:44:32–00:44:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
it was a quick process. So, we could just have someone there just to keep an eye on them.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:44:38–00:44:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I know they, they abated that issue over there.
It
looks really nice. It was a mess for a long time. So, I'm glad I, I called ‸ Mr. Blount to see if we took care of that issue
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:44:59–00:45:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And
he says, no, we, we abated that issue.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:02–00:45:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And also,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:45:05–00:45:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I know Ms. Bernice Cox was in here and we were talking about the signs. And I went by and I looked at the signs that were up and ‸ they're, ‸ really nice signs and they're cheap. And we have some locations in the city that we really need to stick these signs up because not everyone
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 00:45:21–00:45:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
those signs. If we have just a couple of people that see those signs and slow it down, then I think it'd be nice. But there ‸ are certain places we need to have those signs up. ‸ Because we have some streets throughout our city leaving our schools where there's no sidewalks.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:36–00:45:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so, I just like for the look at possibly getting some of those signs and put them up. ‸ You know, say, slow down kids
that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:46–00:45:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you know, ‸ watch out for the kids. You know.
Yes, we can look at that. Probably the best solution would be safe routes to school If there are some areas that we need to look at.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:00–00:46:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Because
you guys did a great job putting them up. They look nice. ‸ I liked them. I looked at them and I said, ‸ they stand out and you see them. You can't miss them.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:13–00:46:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It might not be a major difference. ‸ There are people that's going to ignore them, but there will be some that actually look at them and actually adhere to them.
‸ You
know we just
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:46:22–00:46:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
look at that. if you can.
You
know. And then also, two other things. I'm about to pass the other ones but two other things.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:32–00:46:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and I know we've been busy. There's a lot of stuff going on right now, but we really need to start addressing some of our parking issues during our major events downtown. So, I don't want that to just go by the wayside. We've had a number of parking studies done and we need to actually start moving on something like that so we can address these issues so we can grow. And, as ‸ well as the museum,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:02–00:47:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
that's been on the burner for a while and we need to do something. I mean, it's just been sitting around and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:13–00:47:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, I know there's some stuff that has to happen. I know there's a lot of stuff that's been going on, but
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:20–00:47:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
us start to move on things instead of just talking about them.
so,
and, and then just a couple of great events down in the park this weekend. The walk to end,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:34–00:47:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and also the VIP benefit for the Bahamas on Sunday. So, a couple of great events. Kudos to all the folks that were down there. Our leisure services employees did a great job. So, the police department, fire department, great for all of them that was down there. ‸ good turnout. With that being said, I'll turn it over
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:57–00:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for his report.
Thank you, sir.
I just had a few things. The first thing, thank you to Chief Cantaloupe for getting ‸ the patrols out on, I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:11–00:48:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They took a picture out there of you at Fern and Prospect, which is a good thing.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:48:20–00:48:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
wasn't so good. But, it's a good thing because you're making people uncomfortable. And that's the whole goal of it, is to change. The only way we
could
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:48:29–00:48:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
change the outlook of it is to, you know, make people, I feel comfortable selling drugs in the part where kids should be. So, I thank you for that. ‸ I know you will make sure it stays consistent. And I think, you know, like I said,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:48:46–00:48:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But, ‸ like I said, ‸ I got more good calls than bad because the people that live in that area is not all bad. A lot of people that's in the park, they don't live in the area. They walk to the area. They ride their bike to the area. So,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:05–00:49:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And we should protect the good. ‸ So, thank you for that. And the segues as well. I got several pictures of the segues going down the road. So, that was good as well. The, Chief Prince, I'll tell you this. My life is better because I met you. Number one, your love for God.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:31–00:49:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, I look up to you for that. So, I thank you.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:41–00:49:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, and I know you have a young man that is going to make you proud. If not,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:49–00:49:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
to have to shave his head a little more, I guess.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:53–00:49:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Appreciate you.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:49:59–00:50:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Emma Jewel is having their solar flower installed. I think it's already installed now. But having a ceremony for a solar flower,
I
think you'll like that, Councilman. I think you'll love that. So, it is going to help their students in the STEM program. It's a beautiful thing to see a school not only maybe five, ten years ago, people was breaking in, stealing, cop right out of
the
walls and busing windows. And now it's become a jewel in the community. So,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:32–00:50:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is ‸ a blessing
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:35–00:50:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there right now. So, Friday, I think
is that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:38–00:50:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
two o'clock, the ceremony is.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:40–00:50:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And also, a meeting with
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:47–00:50:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:48–00:50:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
4 p.m. Friday
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:51–00:50:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was a lot of issues
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:50:53–00:50:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Matt, I don't know if you're available, but I would love to have you there Friday at four if you can.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:51:01–00:51:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, I've talked to Matt about this as well. They're not doing a great job with keeping our facilities up in the area. So, hopefully, Commissioner Loeber can help me and help us with some of our facilities.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:13–00:51:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
You know, hopefully, Some of the parks he's never been to. So, I think it would be a good challenge for him to help us and in turn would make him look good as well. So, that's it.
Okay. Just one quick thing before I turn it over to the Deputy Mayor. Also, Mr. City Manager, I wanted to challenge you and the employees that, you know, when our employees are out and about riding around throughout the city, you know, going to their jobs, if they see some items that are in areas that they shouldn't be, like carts with crap in them or whatever ‸ that's next to ‸ the roadway,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:51:54–00:51:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and if it's not, if they're not going to an emergency or whatever the case might be, if they got room in their vehicle or truck, I just challenge them to just pick it up if they can. You know, not to go through the city picking up trash, but just some items that actually stands out in the city because I ‸ do it myself ‸ and it says a lot to the community when they see our ‸ folks out, you know, when they're big items that are sticking out there. And ‸ I'm not talking about something they can't handle, but I mean, just something really simple they can just grab and get out of the roadway in a safe way without putting themselves in harm. So ‸ just a challenge for them. It just says a lot.
uh,
‸ definitely tell them to be careful.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:52:44–00:52:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
him out of the street. So, yeah, gotta be careful when you're in the road. People don't pay any attention. Um, just a few things, Mr. Mayor. Um, after the legislative, uh, Florida League of Cities legislative meeting in Orlando, uh, at the very end of that, there is going to be, um, an advanced, uh, EMU class and I will be attending that. That's actually, um, starts as the conference gets over ‸ so I will be there for that on the 16th and 17th. I also wanted to thank Mrs. Dolores McLaughlin and Mr. Larry Brown for a wonderful dinner the other night for the PAL family night. Um, and, uh, like to challenge more of, uh, the parents of those children to come out and enjoy dinner with their kids. Um, Mr. Brown puts on a really good, um, meal
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:36–00:53:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and I know they would have a better time if their parents were there with them.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:43–00:53:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for allowing me to take one of his police officers, canine officer Copper, um,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:58–00:54:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
where he was able to, um, compete and earn a best of breed title and add some more points to his, um, um, quest for a championship, um, to make him, um, a well-rounded, well-trained officer for the police department. And speaking of training, um, I would also like to thank the Brevard Kennel Club for, um, their, um, funding, uh, one of our, uh, other canine officers, Officer Rhodes, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:31–00:54:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um, some, uh, training that they're doing this week. Uh, the Kennel Club not only paid the training fee, uh, they paid for, uh, um,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:54:44–00:54:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
trip, uh, to the training facility. So, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:54:49–00:54:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and Officer Rhodes are getting, uh, a week's worth of training that, uh, they otherwise normally wouldn't get. So I want to thank them. And to Chief Prince, I wanted to say, when you came on board, um, I was really kind of concerned, uh, about our fire department. There were a lot of things going on and there, there was a huge void in leadership there. Um, by most standards, your time here has been short, but your impact has been spectacular. Thank you very much. I could not have imagined anybody who could have possibly done a better job than you have done. I, I don't know how you got here, but I am so thankful you did. Thank you very much. And I know you're leaving our department in a wonderful place and that Jonathan will be able to continue that, having had an opportunity to learn from you. And, uh, I hope you won't be a stranger to Coco. Thank you.
That's it, Mr. Mayor. Thank you, ma'am.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:55:44–00:55:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, I just want to wish the same sentiment, uh, Chief, uh, It was a pleasure when you first came here.
I
forget how many years ago, but I was on ‸ council when you first got here.
And
it was a pleasure. And you brought us a long ways working with fire stations and new fire station designs. and great job. We're going to miss you. You got a good, good man. I just hope he can fill the shoes. It's kind of, He's kind of shorter than you are. So
we
bought him a cushion.
Pay him
some
paper. He'll be good.
We bought him a cushion for the truck so he can sit up higher. And also I want to thank, uh, we had new lights installed at Lost Lakes.
‸ It
looks like a ballpark now.
I
mean,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:56:33–00:56:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:38–00:56:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they had a contract to do it and it makes a big, big difference now. People aren't afraid to walk at night. So I want to thank them for doing that And hopefully they'll get into the city and start doing the city streets pretty soon Because it does illuminate a lot better than the regular old lights that they have up there. And that's all I have, Mr. Mayor.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:56:59–00:57:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will be the
first
one. But anyway,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:03–00:57:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Well, speaking of almost being hit while helping a turtle across the street, this morning I attended the kickoff,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:12–00:57:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
There's a symposium.
Vision Zero is a campaign. It's actually, um, looked it up. the whole idea behind this is that there should be no pedestrian deaths. Oh,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:57:31–00:57:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ started in Sweden back in 1997 but has, um, come to the attention of Brevard, particularly in light of the reports that came out earlier this year that showed that
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:57:42–00:57:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
states in regard to pedestrian deaths. and even within Florida, Brevard was very high on the list, and within Brevard, our Route 1 and 520 are a focal point of, um, accidents and pedestrian deaths. So, it's a serious problem and, and, you know, of course, a couple weeks after I came into office, uh, you know, someone in our neighborhood
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:13–00:58:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, um, this is a campaign I really want to pursue over the next year. It's really meant to be an education campaign to really slow things down, to ‸ really calm the traffic down. We've seen that work in a couple of places, and thanks for the signs on Michigan Avenue. I've heard a lot of feedback that that's been a good thing. So, we'll look forward to working on that more. And one of the things that was said today that struck me, of course, we had a couple of staff that were there, Abby Diaz from Public Works and, um, Samantha from Communications but,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:58:50–00:58:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and they talked about this kind of overlapping that, you know, the strategy of going in there with some messaging and signs and with some, you know, police monitoring. So, hopefully, we'll be working with the police department on that too.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:10–00:59:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
most wonderful experience, one of the most wonderful experiences for me since being in office was to be the, uh, guest chef at, uh, Emma Jewell Academy and that school is really impressive. They're doing some very innovative things. This was, they do one day a month where they recognize their scholars on a particular value, and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:37–00:59:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, I know the chief has participated in that and I know they have invitations out to other council members.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 00:59:45–00:59:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, Just as we are launching the Coco Tigers chorus to Carnegie Hall in a couple ‸ weeks to perform, um, discovered that Cambridge Elementary has started a chess club and only after a few weeks of practice, they went to the competition
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:09–01:00:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, I would really like to find ways to celebrate that as well. Um, And then this week, that actually since the last, uh, conference meeting before, I've had a lot of communications from constituents in regard to stormwater, in regard to our stormwater plan and, um, that has been heavy on my mind. ‸ Still studying that plan and, and convinced that it's a good plan that particularly after we incorporate the full system modeling, after we integrate the park master plan, that that's going to serve us well. And, you know, to your points,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:00:52–01:00:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, I really think in a couple years we'll see some, uh, changes and benefits and even some community social benefits in regard to the projects that involve green infrastructure.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:04–01:01:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
What I'm not so pleased about is the process. and I think I probably speak to staff as well, that it got kind of all pushed together at the end
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:15–01:01:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and certainly if I'm in office, if we do anything like that again, I would really want any letters to go out earlier because it wasn't until those letters went out that I got challenged and, um, was really forced to research and think about some things that I hadn't.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:37–01:01:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um, we're all united that we do need to invest more in stormwater, that we do need to be more storm prepared.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:01:48–01:01:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we've got those storms out in the Atlantic that are reminding us how important that is, as well as, uh, Greta speaking at the United Nations this week about climate change and adaptation. I just found out, um, and I didn't know, Matt told me a couple days ago that the credit, the credits that we were going to put in place, that they cannot be addressed this year. And I've spent a couple of afternoons now on the phone with constituents that have made significant investments in their property, either when they were developing it,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:30–01:02:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as well as, uh, where they've actually installed or, or, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:02:38–01:02:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ponds. Is
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:40–01:02:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because when we set this up, when we decided to go with that tier system, I was really supportive of going with the tier system because
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:02:54–01:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But, if we're entering into this with no opportunity for those who have already made the investment, who have already modeled the good behavior, is there,
any something creative, rebate
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:03:09–01:03:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
program, can we consider,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:03:14–01:03:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
than two or three dozen people at the most that would really have legitimate requests.
‸ Yeah, currently, uh, the city has, uh, defined impervious area, uh, with pretty strict language, And so some of those improvements based on that definition are not, uh, do not meet the definition, and therefore, are considered impervious, and count, uh, for that impervious square footage on the property.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:51–01:03:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they have filed an appeal.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:03:59–01:04:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, She is reviewing those case by case. Uh, their appeal for this, uh, assessment, year, is related to the amount of impervious area on their property. So if they disagree with the square footage that's been set by the consultant, uh, they file an appeal, and then, uh, Abby works to validate that.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:31–01:04:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on that line. And so, it is very important to make sure there's an accurate measurement to ensure that they're in the proper category. Now, as far as the credit goes, uh, there is,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:04:48–01:04:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, that will be adopted by October 1st. Now, what that is related to is, uh, generally commercial property or anyone that has a St. John's permit, uh, which could be a residential subdivision. Now, if they, if they meet the requirements for a St. John's, uh, permit, they can receive a 20% discount and the modified, uh, language allows up to a 40% if they meet a more severe storm as well as duration.
And
so.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:31–01:05:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
needs to happen. because we
need to.
but it's, we need
to. We
got a lot of stuff on the agenda. Okay. We just need to.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:05:41–01:05:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We'll cut this off. But, yeah. I'll tell you, that November 1st when those bills go out,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:05:49–01:05:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I have a feeling. I've gotten calls. So, um,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:05:53–01:05:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
make sure we don't get people so turned off that we can't
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:06:00–01:06:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the plan. So, um, but anyway, we're going to hear more about, more about that at the, at our town hall, October 15th. So, I hope that, um, a lot of people show up for that. and I too, like everybody else have really appreciated working with Chief Prince and, uh, I hope you get to do some gardening ‸ as you've taught me. And thank you very much for your service.
And I wasn't trying to cut you off.
I
just, well, we
need to have it addressed. and I'm not getting anywhere just
yeah
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:06:38–01:06:38 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
but this conversation can go on for a long time because there's, there's some issues. So, yeah. And, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:44–01:06:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:06:47–01:06:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Prospect. Uh, that's, I forgot about that too. And thank you.
Thank you, sir. Okay, We're going to move on to our, uh, public hearings. And, uh, I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:03–01:07:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:06–01:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We got a motion from Deputy Mayor Warner. Second from, um,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:07:11–01:07:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Uh,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:17–01:07:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Uh, Mr. City Attorney.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:07:22–01:07:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of City Council of the city of Cocoa. Brevard County, Florida adopting amendments to the city of Cocoa comprehensive plan based on the city's evaluation and appraisal of the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to section 163.3191 Florida statutes providing for the repeal of prior
inconsistent
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:07:42–01:07:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
ordinances and resolutions incorporation into the Comprehensive Plan, legal status of the Comprehensive Plan amendments, severability, and an effective date. This is first reading of this particular ordinance as the title indicates. These are, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:07:57–01:07:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
comprehensive plan amendments. There's a special process under the statute for processing these, uh, proposed amendments.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:08:05–01:08:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
transmitted to the state of Florida and other reviewing agencies for comments and then comments will come back to the, to the City Council for consideration and staff for consideration uh, before final adoption which would be probably maybe about 90 days from now approximately.
Okay.
Thank you,
sir. Um, We do have a presentation for you tonight. However, I'm going to kind of reverse the order and give you, um, the recommendation first. Um, Planning and Zoning Board heard this item last night. Uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:08:43–01:08:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to approve, uh, but they had, um, a recommendation that in the, uh, it's policy 5.1.1.3, um, which is trash service essentially, the level of service for that. Um, we had in, I'm sure you read in depth the entire, uh, four inches of text that we sent you. I apologize. It had to be that long. Um, but, uh,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:11–01:09:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
times a week for trash pickup. Um, we were proposing, uh, language that said one to two times a week as needed. Um, and the board, uh, recommended that it stay at two times. So that was the only change, um, that's that, that recommendation. Um, I wanted to let you know that in 2010, last time we did this comprehensive year update, um,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:37–01:09:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have them come back and work with us again,
uh,
for this project
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:09:44–01:09:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:09:46–01:09:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and they will be, uh, providing you the presentation tonight. So I'm going to turn it over to them and, uh, if
you
have any questions at the end, I will be happy to chime in. Thank you.
Mr. City Manager.
‸ we can wait.
I
just wanted to, I think my,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:07–01:10:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on the, the proposed recommended change.
Yeah.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:10:12–01:10:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the trash pickup.
Just, yeah, we got a contract coming up, and it certainly provides flexibility. It's not lowering the level of service. It's just saying one to two and as technology develops, I mean,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:10:28–01:10:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We have people that aren't using it twice a week. So it's just something it was, uh, as we retain a consultant with among the various waste providers to evaluate and provide us proposals, in when this contract with waste management ends, uh, keep in
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:50–01:10:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:10:53–01:10:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the comp plan, it, uh, it, it binds your hands to some degree, but it also, by one to two, provide you a little bit of flexibility. That's all that we're looking at is the possibility of providing flexibility in light of evolving technologies.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:08–01:11:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, cans that people will tell us, I only use it once a week. Why ‸ have to pay?
Yeah. I know that in 2010, or probably before that, and we were working on that and we're amending our comp plan. And
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:11:26–01:11:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that was brought up.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:29–01:11:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
conditions, um, you might not get picked up on your pickup day and then they would have to wait like two weeks. And that was the reason why we went to the, the two days. The reason I had that in there, but my question was,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:49–01:11:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it says as it needed, who, who determines that?
Are
we,
do we determine that
or?
Well, ultimately, ultimately, yes, you do.
in the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:12:02–01:12:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
in that you approve the contract. So as we, you know, what has been recommended previously and, uh, as I've looked at other models,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:12–01:12:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, providers will agree to, to retain and pay a single consultant to assist in evaluating proposals,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:28–01:12:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
But you ultimately would determine in, in the contract negotiations, and then we could highlight specific periods where there would be the need for two. it just, I mean, that, that's all that part of, that, all that part of that negotiation and trying to get a better level of service, but also the proper level of service and ensuring that we're hitting the, that, that level of service that providing what's needed, but not paying too much to the point where we're paying for more than what's needed.
So what you're asking us to do is leave this alone so that when it comes time to negotiate that new contract, we have the flexibility and we're not set with having to.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:13–01:13:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
it's just that you've got a contract coming up and I think you want that flexibility. Yeah. And otherwise, if you have in your comp plan, establishes a level of service of two times a week, then what would have to happen is if the contractor ‸ comes in and says, listen, we've got a program we're going to do once a week, but on these, ‸ these high volume or these peak weeks or times ‸ of the year, we're going to do, you know, we'll do twice a week. We would have to go back and do a
conference
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:13:41–01:13:41 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
plan amendment to amend our level of service.
Okay.
Okay. All right. Thank you,
sir.
You're all. Good evening. Hey. Mr. Mayor, members of the council, thank you for having me back.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:13:54–01:13:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And sorry, we didn't get to you sooner. I know we had a hurricane out there that kind of messed up our schedule. So I apologize for that, But
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:06–01:14:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and nice to be working with Mr. Manager.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:12–01:14:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:19–01:14:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
going to ‸ dig into every policy. I certainly appreciate the solid waste level of service discussion last night,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:34–01:14:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
dive into that unless you want to bring it up. So we'll hit the kind of high level highlights of each of the elements, give you an idea of how we looked through the comprehensive plan and how we communicated our proposed changes with staff,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:55–01:15:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we did the year in 2010, and then we'll look at some of the mapping, And most of the mapping has to do with the coastal resiliency plan that you saw not too long ago. So with that, you have 14 elements in your comprehensive plan. I consolidated all of the infrastructure elements in one, but that's the makeup of your current comprehensive plan, starting with the future land use element, and then moving on. ‸ That was the required amount of elements you had to have at the time that we worked on the plan, and that started with the Growth Management Act, and then
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:42–01:15:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
When we went through the Community Planning Act changes in 2011, they changed this process on us a little bit. So every seven years, a city and or county is required to look at their comprehensive plan.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:05–01:16:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about two and a half inches thick, And we had to look at pretty much every single policy in the plan, And then we had to tell the city whether or not we felt like they were meeting that standard in the policy, And then we provided recommendations on what you should do with each policy. The state said, okay, and ‸ the Community Planning Act ‸ said, no, you don't need to do that anymore. All we want is a letter telling us whether or not you're going to make changes based on the changes in the statutes, and if you are, you get one year to make those amendments. Well, that letter was sent to the state in 2017.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:16:47–01:16:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
behind schedule, so we just ‸ got to get these in. Now, ‸ the ramifications are, and as you may already know, if you, say, for example, have a really nice redevelopment project in downtown and you happen to need to change a future land use map,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:07–01:17:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ear, ‸ or your ear amendments, pardon me. So we've got to get ‸ this process taken care of. What we've advised staff and what we typically advise our clients when we're dealing with the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:17:27–01:17:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
amendments at this stage is that we kind of hold off on doing a full plan update. because, one, it's not warranted, it's not needed. You have sufficient data analysis to get you through a relatively short horizon period, But you're under the scrutiny through the state-coordinated review process, which
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:50–01:17:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
kind of implement what the state wants to do in your plan. Now, if you come back and do amendments after we're done here, let's say in a few years, you have an opportunity to submit a plan that you'd like as a community and you'll have less input from the state, and that's done through the expedited review process, and I'll get into that a little bit here. So we're going to talk a little bit about the changes to the statutes, look at some of our recommendations, and this is what we did in the matrix here. So
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:29–01:18:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're totally fine if staff would like to include this as part of the data analysis sent to the state. It's completely fine. Essentially, it shows all the changes to the statutes since the last time we updated the plan, and it gives you an idea of what our recommendations are to staff, and staff has responses in that matrix. So what ‸ changed?
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:18:59–01:19:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
came around, kind of
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:19:07–01:19:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in the growth management laws here in the state, removed concurrency for transportation, park ‸ school concurrency, pardon me, changed the year process, as I mentioned.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:23–01:19:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It did roll some of those rules into the statute, didn't keep them all, but it kept some of them, and then of course
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:37–01:19:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
or plan amendments. So ‸ you have the expedited review, which is a 30-day review, and then the state coordinated review process, which is 60 days. And then in 2013, they provided alternatives to transportation concurrency, so if you did decide to remove transportation concurrency from your plan, they provided some different avenues with mobility standards and things like that. There were some preemptions to fuel terminal uses. Then 2015 came what they've noted as the, or called the peril flood statutes, and so you're pretty familiar with that, if you were, or participated in the resilient COCO plan and the coastal resiliency and adaptation action planning. ‸ And so that kind of set those wheels in motion. And then in 2016, there were some changes to ‸ DRIs. Essentially,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:20:46–01:20:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
them. They still can, you know, the developments themselves and the development orders are still good if you still have DRIs around, but essentially got rid of them. You don't have to do DRIs anymore. And then since 2018, really only kind of minor changes. So what you'll see in the document, you'll see strike through and underline, and those changes are generally, we're removing references to rules 9.J.5 and 9.J.11, which there are quite a few of those. There are a lot of time frames that you'll see in the plan, and ‸ that was a requirement by the state. ‸ You know, it'll say, for example,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:33–01:21:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
parks and rec plan or something, or something to that extent. And maybe the city's not ready to do that, or they already did something that's called something else, And so we've gotten rid of some of those time frames so you're not held to those standards anymore. And then we, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:56–01:22:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we've essentially, that was the frame or lens that we used as we moved through the comprehensive plan and made those changes.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:22:13–01:22:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For the future land use element, you'll see that there's a future land use map. Now, that's not, we're not proposing any map changes. It's just a new map to go along with the plan. So I just want to make sure that's clear. Also, we've got a new coastal high hazard line that's shown in there in the new map, as well as wetlands. With the transportation element, we've, again, confirmed that you're continuing to use concurrency. We recommend not touching that until after we get through this. We don't want to have to deal with any new data and analysis. We've already kind of confirmed with the state and said, it's okay, you don't need to update all your data analysis now. Just get through the statute changes, and let's kind of move on. And then when you get to a point when the city's ready to kind of go through some visioning and wanting to fully update the plan, then after this process is when you should do it. So for the infrastructure elements, as I like to call them, we did, there were some changes to the stormwater element. Of course, we've talked about the solid waste residential pickup. I will note that there was a policy that was removed, and that is, I don't know the exact policy, but it refers to no net zero discharge. And so that policy was removed because
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:23:45–01:23:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that was mentioned as well at PNC last night. Coastal management, that's where the bulk of the changes are. Now, through your work with the planning council, they had proposed amendments as part of their work through the ‸ Resilient Cocoa Plan, That is the majority of their work with some changes that ‸ we've addressed ‸ and added. So that's what you're going to see a lot of. And that kind of is sprinkled throughout ‸ the plan. Housing, again, ‸ updating some of the statute references, adding a Parks and Rec master plan to recreation open space element, updated some of the agency references. Here, there is a tiered level of service standard for the ‸ schools, or school concurrency,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:45–01:24:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And that was based
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:47–01:24:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for example, for a specific time frame.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:55–01:24:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:24:56–01:24:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So there's no need to have those ‸ years tiered out like it was.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:02–01:25:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
essentially allowing schools to, if they were overcrowded, to limit the enrollment and provide for relief at other schools.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:25:21–01:25:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the capital improvements plan inside the text of the comp plan and just reference it so that when you do, submit it to the state, because you're required to transmit to the state annually. That as you go through your budgeting process, you have your CIP, you just say, here you go, Mr. Mann at the state, here's our plan, and it's just referenced in the comp plan. We're not having to go back and update the text
of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:25:50–01:25:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the comprehensive plan because that's not required by statute. And then we added some budget priorities.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:00–01:26:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we already mentioned the ‸ level of services that were tied to specific time frames. See here, onto the pool stuff, the mapping, this is the stuff I like. So we updated the surge zones map based on the SLOSH model, updated the existing land use, future land use in the coastal area,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:26:23–01:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then provided for a new coastal high hazard map and a new projected sea ‸ level rise map. So next steps will take in your input, provide for any revisions to ‸ the amendments. We have about 10 days to get this bundled up and packaged and sent to the state. The
state,
like I said, has 60 days to review. They issue what's called an objections, recommendations, and comments report. Now this is different from the expedited review process, and this is really
why I, you know, as a planner,
we recommend that you do your big changes in a, you know, about a couple years away from this process because you have to address the objections, recommendations, and comments report. If you do not address it, you can't get a notice of compliance.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:22–01:27:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and we want to make sure we get the monkey off our backs and just kind of get through this ‸ process so we don't have, you know, the state looming over us when we want to do a cool redevelopment project in downtown Cocoa.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:38–01:27:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ So, and here are some of the maps. This is the future land use map.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:51–01:27:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The wetlands and water bodies. This is the projected sea level rise. I didn't mention last night.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:03–01:28:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
level rise.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:08–01:28:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So if you notice there in the legend, we've got 2040, 2070, and 2100 shown in this map. So that does, that is promising. Here's the existing land use and future land use maps that I mentioned in the coastal planning area. And the floodplain and kind of hard to see, but this is the coastal planning area
here.
And all of the surge
sounds
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:28:45–01:28:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
based on the slosh model.
So
that is it. That is all I have for you. So entertain questions.
Thank you,
sir.
Thank you very much.
‸ Mr. Mayor,
I
want to make a couple comments. One,
I
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:03–01:29:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that worked very hard to get us where we are today. Chris and Pat worked with us back in 2010.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:13–01:29:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
but if you recall, actually the 1990 to 2000 plan, what
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:24–01:29:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the 2010 plan, I thought, was a, it represented a very significant or a wholesale rewrite. ‸ While our main issues that were identified, you know, through our year data ‸ review and analysis was housing and redevelopment. We evaluated it and we
thought
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:49–01:29:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
those were still the same because this plan, the 2010 plan, was adopted while we were still in the middle of the Great Recession.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:29:57–01:30:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we start seeing any additional activity coming back. And in the 2010 plan, in large measure, working with Chris and Pat and our staff, you know, I felt that we, in our planning and zoning board, that we, I would say, swung for the fences in many respects. I mean, there were probably some stronger plans out there that had more binding policies, but we did a lot of encouraging, you know, shall encourage and ‸ use language that would move us in the direction of being more oriented towards smart growth, you know, sustainable practices
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:30:40–01:30:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just low-impact development,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:42–01:30:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ they don't address because it's kind of difficult and I know
and they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:30:49–01:30:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
can become very complex.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:30:51–01:30:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
city tried to rewrite the plan development regulation, what ‸ that resulted in, I thought the 2010 plan really took into consideration and provided that flexibility for the city to move in the right direction. ‸ I do want to add that I did speak with DEO and as well as they confirmed that once we transmit this conference plan amendment within the 10 days, once they receive it, you know, they have a time period to determine whether or not it's sufficient, but once that's done, the city is in compliance. You know,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:31:35–01:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We're in compliance because the statute only provides that you submit your based conference plan amendment. So that would put the city back in compliance in terms of, unfortunately, we haven't had anybody that has been knocking at the door with great urgency on a conference plan amendment. That's all I had to add. Again, thank you to SME and our staff.
Well, this is a public hearing,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:32:03–01:32:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and over to the public for any public comments and then I'll bring it back for discussion.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:32:09–01:32:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If anyone out there want to speak on this item. Seeing that, I'm going to close it public and reopen it to the council for discussion and a motion.
I just have a question.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:32:30–01:32:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I just wanted to ask. So I'm trying to understand it conceptually, so ‸ excuse my ignorance on this, but the comp plan, the strategic plan is our main document. The comp plan encompasses ‸ our direction, our guidance.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:47–01:32:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If we wanted to do a master tree plan, did that need to be in the comp plan first? Or if we wanted to do, you know, there's like, I've been reading about areas that are devastated after a storm and they implemented tree
planting.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:33:07–01:33:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Is that something that would have to be in here?
Or
just...
I think the existing, what's being proposed is that we do develop a post-disaster redevelopment plan.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:20–01:33:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:23–01:33:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
is it's like, it's your constitution on your land use in terms of how you're going to regulate development and growth that provides the overarching goals, objectives, many of which are aspirational in terms of, you know, in terms of by this date, we're going to try to endeavor to do this, this, this, this, this. And then there's some that are very specific and binding. Like when you get into the future land use settlement, you're establishing within each of the future land use categories the various densities, intensities, impervious service ratios, other specific policies that will guide development within on a piece of property that has that designation. So ‸ it actually, you know, you have the comp plan and then the zoning. The strategic plan that we have is really an organizational document ‸ that guides the ‸ city ‸ and in terms of where we aspire to go as an organization, as a community. And in many times, there is some linkages between. There are, you will take our strategic plan, You'll find some stuff that there are rooted in our comp plan as well. I mean, there is, so I guess it's, one's organizational trying to move in this direction, but this is, this is legally, you know, binding and it's like you can have, it, I,
the
best way
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:34:53–01:34:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
describe it, literally, it's your constitution on your land. It regulates the development and growth. It allows you ‸ to do it in an orderly fashion. You can, you know, some established urban servicers or ‸ growth boundaries to make sure that you have, you know, maybe the densities that are greater within the, you know, closer to the downtown or in the areas that are more apt for that urban infill development, where you have, you know, maybe more rural or rural and character
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:23–01:35:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, on the periphery and not allowing for, you know, dense development that would, you know, arguably be inconsistent or incompatible with that development pattern.
Okay. And I just have one other thing that, and I have a- As
a recovering planner, I would say that.
Right.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:46–01:35:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
I ‸ am, I aspire to.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:52–01:35:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is the one
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:35:56–01:35:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I just, I just noticed it.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:00–01:36:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
will target businesses with incentive packages and programs, including, and then it lists the number of programs we have, but I think probably census was originally written. We, the opportunity zones were introduced as part of the Trump tax package last year and will be in effect actually through the life of this document. So if you're just a list. ‸ And I
apologize, what page,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:36:29–01:36:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
And
it's policy 1.3.1.6.
Yeah, that's an excellent point actually, because especially since the state allowed the Florida Enterprise Zone program to sunset, policy 1.3.1.6. what I will share and I think both Chris and Pat can attest, as you transmit this, when it comes back, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:07–01:37:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you can still make some modifications as long as they're not going to be something that's going to be wholly inconsistent, what we did, you know, we transmitted previously. So we could change, we would want to update
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:37:22–01:37:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Enterprise Zones to the, you know, the federal opportunity zones. It's an excellent, you know, catch.
And I can make, if that's a consensus, I can make that change tonight if you want.
Adopt it, yeah, you can make ‸ that change tonight. It'd
be
probably even better.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:37:41–01:37:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so please be.
I mean, there's been several eyes that have looked at it. I mean, I even worked with Dodie and Angela at the early, you know, when the initial came through. I just haven't seen that.
Oh, I just
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:37:54–01:37:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
some dream projects. for opportunities. We'll see.
Okay.
Thank you, ma'am. We got a
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:02–01:38:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I would, ‸ if you would, I ‸ would, ‸ more
specific in the motion.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:38:11–01:38:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Yeah, I would think so.
I
mean, you might as well do it now and just create, ‸ and we're talking, you know, it's a Florida Enterprise Zone, the federal opportunity zones.
Okay. All right.
then I'll go ahead and make the motion that we pass on first reading
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:38:32–01:38:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
adopting the amendments
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:36–01:38:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
comprehensive plan based on the City's evaluation and appraisal report of the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to section 163.3191,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:38:47–01:38:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and authorizing transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. And add to that the change that was just discussed on page 1-26 to change the wording. You want to add that wording in?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:07–01:39:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Federal opportunity zones. And to not include the recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Board at last night's meeting.
Second. We have a motion from Deputy Mayor Warner,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:30–01:39:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Passes unanimously. We're going
to
move on to item number two, which we have two resolutions here, 2019-84, adopting the final millage, and item number B, approve resolution 2019-85, adopting the final budget and CIP for the City of Cocoa. Ms. Bowman.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:39:57–01:39:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm sorry I spoke so long.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:05–01:40:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was a joke.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:08–01:40:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Yeah,
she made changes.
Good evening, Mayor and Councilmembers. This is the final budget presentation for the adoption of the final millage rate and the final budget
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:21–01:40:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, just to remind y'all, this is a step in the truth and millage or trim process where
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:32–01:40:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
done, and this is the final step in the process for budget adoption.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:41–01:40:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
rate for fiscal year 2020 and then adopt the final budget for fiscal year 2020 as two separate actions. As a reminder, the City has to have a balanced budget in place and approved by October 1st of each fiscal year in order to continue operations. And also, the millage rate at this point in time cannot exceed the millage rate that was approved on July 24th
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:13–01:41:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, this is the representation of the changes in the Avalorum tax base and then you'll see on the bottom line there that the City has experienced
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:41:27–01:41:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in taxable value. That was largely due to Walmart and the urban property coming on the tax rolls. ‸ Looking at the history of the millage and the Avalorum revenue,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:42–01:41:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We budget conservatively at 95% because that's pretty much our collection rate.
[unclear audio — 0:09 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:41:53–01:42:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
increased revenue in Avalorum. This slide shows you what the millage options were as we've gone through this process. You've been presented several times with what these options are, but just as a reminder, the current rate is at 5.9790
mils. The rollback
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:25–01:42:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
rate was 5.7844
mils
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:28–01:42:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And then there's a majority rate that could be considered.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:42:33–01:42:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to 12.0927 if majority, supermajority selected that option. So,
this
slide shows changes in property values, and it actually got cut off some ‸ there at the bottom. But taking into account the homestead exemption, one last one that you can see, is a $200,000 home with a property value increase, including to save our homes, The value would have gone up to $203,000 with a $50,000 homestead exemption. Taxable value would actually be $150,000,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:25–01:43:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:28–01:43:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be a $23 increase for that property. This slide shows you where Cocoa is in relation to other cities in Brevard County And you can see that we rank number six at 5.9790 mills. So, as a public announcement, I'd like to say that the city is the taxing authority. The rollback rate is 5.7844
mils.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:44:03–01:44:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
The rollback rate represents a 0% increase in property taxes. The millage rate to be leveled is levied is 5.9790
mils,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:44:16–01:44:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And that millage rate represents a tax increase of 3.36% as a percentage change of the rollback rate.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:27–01:44:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are no questions, then I'd like to remind council that they need to take an action to approve the resolution 2019-084 to adopt the final millage rate of 5.9790 mills for the city of Cocoa for the fiscal year
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:48–01:44:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:51–01:44:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:54–01:44:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:44:58–01:44:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that we got a supplement of changes and those changes were just to, what were those changes about?
You have received a budget several months ago back in July. Okay, so
that's...
And so those were changes from that July budget to the one that you just recently got. I'm just highlighting for you what it was that changed from one point to the next.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:23–01:45:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to go back and...
Not necessarily tied to the rate. There were some things that were capital items that John was considering where to get the funding. And so he had it built in, but through balancing the budget was able to provide the funding to allow some of the capital. Some of it was changes in how we decided to do an allocation of salaries because we just went through the allocation study for stormwater and we reviewed it again with the water and sewer fund. And so we changed how people's salaries are split up between the funds because the cost is now being picked up with the calculation of the allocation.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:09–01:46:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
that changed but it wasn't directly related to the establishment of the
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:46:15–01:46:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay, great. Thank you, ma'am.
This time because there's a public hearing, I'm going to close it to the council at this time. and look to the public for any public comments.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:46:24–01:46:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
come up and speak on this item feel free
to
do so. Seeing that I'm going to close it to the public at this time and reopen it to the council.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:37–01:46:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'd like to make a
motion. You get
it. Go ahead.
I approve resolution 2019-084 adopting the final millage rate of 5.9790 mills
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:46:54–01:46:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fiscal year 2020 commencing October 1st, 2019 and ending on September 30th, 2020 which represents an increase
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:04–01:47:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
over the rollback rate of 5.7844.
Thank you, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:14–01:47:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Second.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:17–01:47:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Do we need you to do this? Yes. Yes.
Okay.
‸ I'll make a motion
to approve. You're
going to
do
the next one or do we just do it?
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:32–01:47:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
with the millage rate.
Yeah. And now I'm going to
review the budget itself with you and then you'll adopt the budget. So you've got the first step down.
Okay.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:47:44–01:47:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Okay. So this part is for the budget and this is a pictorial of the revenue budget. You can see the revenues are pretty steady for the most part in the different funds depicting general fund water and sewer and the stormwater fund. And then looking at it numerically, comparing one year to the next,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:13–01:48:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
One is the capital projects fund and general fund.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:19–01:48:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:22–01:48:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that in
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:48:25–01:48:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they were budgeted and there were interfund transfers that happened to put the money in these separate capital projects funds. And so the big decrease is that obviously we aren't doing those projects or having to budget for those projects again in this fiscal year. Same thing down here with the water and sewer fund. Between the water and sewer fund and the capital projects fund, We took out the bond issue in 2018 and from that we did a whole bunch of interfund transfers to track the money in a separate fund. So that is the cause of those large swings. So overall, the city's budget decreased $26 million
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:08–01:49:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then this is a look at the trends in the revenue over a time period from 2015. and as you can see again, the revenue trends looks like it's maintaining pretty steady. The categories are taxes, other permits and fees, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeits
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:49:34–01:49:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And those are all categories that the state and the GASB Government Accounting Standards Board tells us we need to report like that.
Okay.
What's going on here?
Okay. So this slide is showing you the funding source and as I said, this is how we have to report the numbers and it's showing you the change, which percent is, percent of the budget. So as you can see your taxes up at the top
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:12–01:50:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
$9.7 million.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:17–01:50:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
includes water billing services, garbage collection and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:23–01:50:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
represent 30%, 30.2% of general fund revenue. And then the other big portion is what's called other sources, which is inter-fund transfers, which includes the water and sewer return on investment transfer and the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:41–01:50:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then also use of fund balance ‸ reserves. Looking at the water and sewer fund by funding source, you can see again, almost all the budget is charges for services because it's a utility fund, and so is the fees for providing the utility services. I'd like to note in the non-revenue, there's a decrease of $1.4 million and that's due to a change in accounting treatment of budgeting for capital projects. So previously we were re-budgeting every year and now we are budgeting in the year we're taking it out,
more
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:51:21–01:51:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
carrying that for
whatever is
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:51:22–01:51:22 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
not spent. Stormwater fund is budgeted at $1.7 million.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:51:30–01:51:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that there was a change, which was the addition of the street sweeper that was ‸ on the agenda at
the end
of this evening, so we included that in the budget since we knew about that. Taking a look at the expenses, again, expenditures, you can see 2019, it looks like it went up a lot because we had those inter-fund transfers, but other than that, it stays pretty steady. So looking at the expense budget by department, here you can see general operations decreased significantly,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:13–01:52:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That was those capital projects that were budgeted in fiscal year
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:19–01:52:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then in community services, you see a big drop there, 62% decrease. That was because we had budgeted for the payment to Walmart,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:52:32–01:52:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that in 2020. So overall there's a decrease of $7.3 million on the expense side and that represents roughly 15.4% decrease. ‸ Taking a look at in general fund by category, biggest changes again are your grants and aids decreased due to hurricane Irma in the prior period. So we don't have that any longer. And then also $6.3 million decrease in the other, which is those inter-fund transfers that we did to accommodate for capital projects. Looking at the budget for water and sewer by division, overall you
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:28–01:53:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Large one is engineering as capital projects that were budgeted in fiscal year 2019. And as you'll see in a second, the utility fund is heavily focusing on projects that are related to the bond issue right now. So there isn't as much budgeted in the actual operating fund. So overall water and sewer fund has a $5.2 million increase or about
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:00–01:54:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then looking at water and sewer fund by category,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:10–01:54:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you see the capital. You see there's a change in the capital spending because they're focused on the spending the bond proceeds. And again, it reflects the $5.3 million decrease in their expense budget. Looking at stormwater fund, salaries and benefits decreased about 23%. And then increase in operating expenses,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:39–01:54:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so overall there's an increase of $153,000 or 9.6% of their budget. ‸ This slide shows you the capital budget for general fund. Largest portion there is really the police, which is vehicle replacements, which are programmed vehicle replacements. Overall the capital spending is $697,889. And the rest of it represents just routine capital spending that needs to happen. Of note in the public works department there are some vehicles, some carts that are going to be replaced that city manager programmed in some electric vehicle to do the sustainability. In the water and sewer fund, again, this is capital spending. You see a large portion here is in ‸ engineering and the capital spending for infrastructure. It's related to several various capital projects that they have.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:55:50–01:55:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
again, that's some smaller equipment that adds up to the $594,700.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:59–01:56:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:01–01:56:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fiscal year 20. And then we look at all the other funds and up
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:11–01:56:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's for the events center. And then the water and sewer bond projects down here,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:22–01:56:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So overall all ‸ the other
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:28–01:56:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So at this point in time I'd be happy to ‸ answer any questions on the budget portion. And then again to remind you that it is a public hearing and the requested action is going to be to approve resolution 2019-85 to adopt ‸ the final budget and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:56:52–01:56:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:56:56–01:57:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'd be happy to answer any questions.
Thank you,
ma'am.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:04–01:57:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Did the
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 01:57:07–01:57:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
salaries actually go down?
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:12–01:57:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The allocation changed of the salaries.
Okay. So that was just an allocation?
Right.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:57:25–01:57:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Because
we're doing more
in stormwater but those salaries didn't actually go down, they're just allocated. When we did
the stormwater study, we looked at the allocation of the salaries and we actually went through a full-blown justification of the salaries of how much time different people spent. And so the allocation changed is not people changed or salary was taken away from them. It's an accounting thing.
Thank you, ma'am.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 01:57:54–01:57:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
up to the public, the public comments.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:04–01:58:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
and what is the waiting for the council?
[unclear audio — 0:12 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:09–01:58:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fiscal year 2020, commencing on October 1,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:24–01:58:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:58:32–01:58:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Warner. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. Thank you, ma'am.
You're welcome.
Good job. Okay, we're
going
to move on to Council Business.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:58:51–01:58:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:00–01:59:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mr. City Manager.
‸ Mr. Mayor, as you're aware, and you can provide a little bit of history prior to some members joining, you know, returning and they're joining the council. Back in 2017, there was a workshop, you know, held ‸ between the municipalities with CRAs and ‸ the county commission. And, you know, following an effort where a member, there was two, but one specifically that sought to revoke and modify the delegation of certain municipal and CRA authority. While the motion was defeated, there was a commitment on
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:59:48–01:59:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and ILA regarding their respective CRAs. The ILA's were limited to those CRAs that were created post adoption of the county charter in 1994.
because in that case
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:00:06–02:00:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
you
know, ‸ the board of county commissioners ‸ were required to, if you wanted to create a new CRA, where ‸ they needed to delegate the powers, you know, to
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:22–02:00:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:25–02:00:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the county for the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:00:34–02:00:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In 1998, the city council created those agencies under the delegation of powers provided by the county commission. And, you know, following the workshop, probably, I mean, I would say beginning in August after that workshop, you know, I think the county manager got ‸ final direction in July.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a possible machine repair could not be placed · 02:01:00–02:01:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
county, the ‸ county attorney, county attorney staff, and some
of the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:01:10–02:01:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
members of staff, we met ‸ and we were in the process of negotiating. We just came into, we were at a point where ‸ essentially there was just some fundamental differences, you know, and some ‸ matters that ‸ we felt were pretty significant. As you're aware, with the election of the new commission, there was a last-minute agenda item related to Diamond Square CRA to revoke its powers while it was defeated. We subsequently did meet with
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:01:43–02:01:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in January of 2019, at which time he shared his concerns and his desires related to the county, ‸ city, and the CRA, specifically the ILA's. So the city and the county subsequently reengaged in negotiations between March and all the way up through August. And ultimately, consensus was reached based on positions that the county commission had provided the direction to the county manager and what we were trying to accomplish in terms of protecting the city's
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:19–02:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
On September 9th,
the
county manager did notify the city that the CRA, ILA's interlocal agreements
have
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:02:28–02:02:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
been approved by the board at the September 5th meeting. So I want to briefly review ‸ the two CRA, ILA's. The U.S. one-quarter CRA, ILA provides that the agency shall terminate by September 30th, 2020, which is two years earlier than it ‸ was scheduled to terminate, and that the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:02:50–02:02:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fiscal year 2020. It was projected
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:02:57–02:02:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
about $185,000 total. The U.S. one-quarter CRA budget was developed in advance, knowing ‸ in the
mind
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:03:06–02:03:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that we were currently working and we were nearing consensus on the ILA, at least at the staff level. So ‸ that budget was developed and
[unclear audio — 0:20 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:19–02:03:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:41–02:03:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
year will cover that debt service payment. Thereafter, the city would be responsible for the debt service payments, you know,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:03:56–02:04:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is the maturity date. If approved, staff would work with the city attorney to take the necessary actions to terminate the CRA during the fiscal year 2020.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:10–02:04:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It would involve the
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:16–02:04:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you know, any other, you know, statutory requirements in terms of terminating or sunsetting that agency two years earlier. With regards to the diamond square CRA, ‸ I think it's important to note that the county did provide in section 18 of the interlocal agreement that
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:04:39–02:04:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the CRA ILA was contingent upon the approval
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:04:43–02:04:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
one
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
The provisions include, one, the diamond square termination date. As you know, it was set to
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:04:56–02:05:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And they are providing for an extension of 10 years. That's located in section five of the agreement. The board of county commissioner, you know, is,
uh,
are, they are approving the diamond square ‸ redevelopment plan update that was, you know, dated March of 2014 and presented to them several times since that's in section 10. Uh, what,
one
of the things that the county did, as you know, the county had, had claimed some financial circumstances that necessitated
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:05:35–02:05:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in terms of the, the contributions the county were making the CRAs countywide. They are, you know, doing this and they have done it with others in terms of, uh, you know, limiting their, the expense that they provide to the CRAs due to other, uh, expenditure needs and funding needs they have related to other infrastructure. Uh, roads was one of the big issues that was raised throughout the workshop and subsequent meetings. So they are, you know, they, we ultimately agreed on,
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:18–02:06:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
an amount not to exceed $150,000. That's found in section six of the agreement. I, I should add that the, the
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:06:31–02:06:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
funding is $121,000. And that includes the contribution or the payment from both the general fund and the district for recreation fund. Uh, and that amount is, uh, much larger than what was originally proposed at the county.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:06:56–02:07:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
limit or they have the limit the use of any of their county TIF contribution for a major administrative expenses for an amount not to exceed 25% of the county's TIF contribution. Uh,
the
diamond square CRA may use the city TIF contribution for the balance of administrative expenses. However, the,
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:07:24–02:07:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
a maximum of 25% of TIF, you know, uh, funds could be used for
the city.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:07:40–02:07:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I do have, that's found in section 11. I do have some numbers in the budget or in the agenda item. Uh, the current TIF for the diamond square CRA is 257,312. That 25% overall, uh, for administrative expenses is 64,328 dollars. And then if you look at the amount that the county is saying that they will only allow for, um,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:09–02:08:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
However,
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:08:16–02:08:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
are ones related to water service for the community garden.
And
then there was one
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:08:30–02:08:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I think the county manager and attorney also believe that was an administrative expense. Uh, the other provisions that the, and this was a provision that was added at the meeting, um, on September 5th, you know, that the city
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:08:48–02:08:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the diamond square CRA would agree that no county tax increment funds would be used to fund travel expenses for board members section six. However, that does not preclude and we sought that clarification that, uh, expenses
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:02–02:09:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
fund those expenses provided
they're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:09:08–02:09:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
within that 25% overall administrative expense limitation from when the CRA was first created.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:15–02:09:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, that they must attain the board of county commissioner agreement prior to incurring any indebtedness for which county,
[unclear audio ▶]
the
county
tax increment funds will be pledged as a source of repayment. Um, and then one of the issues that was going to
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:34–02:09:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
and as we proceed with negotiations is that,
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:09:42–02:09:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
commissioner uh,
uh, would
like to see a himself or
a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:09:50–02:09:50 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
designee that meets
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:09:52–02:09:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the board of county commissioners to serve as a member of the, uh, of the diamond square CRA board. Thus necessitating, uh, the reforming of the board as a seven member board with one member being the district two, uh, member. Uh, we offered some alternative language and that was rejected. And so what you have is what we ultimately came to is so with the reformation, the reforming of the board, uh, the city after
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:27–02:10:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
these, uh, but
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:10:34–02:10:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
except for the first three members would be appointed, uh, one, two and three years respectively. And then the other three members of the city council would appoint would be four year terms. Uh, and then that no CRA board member may serve more than two consecutive terms followed by at least one year off the CRA board before they may be considered for reappointment. ‸ I think the expressed desire was to see turnover and new faces and ‸ you know on the Diamond Square board. Then there was a requirement and they actually had some additional language and we fell back on what we thought was appropriate in terms of what the state, with the recent legislative changes, the statutory changes regarding annual reporting and the finance audit report requirements, that template, and we're already working based on the statutory requirements, and they agreed
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:38–02:11:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and as I indicated earlier
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:43–02:11:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to create the US 1 corridor and Diamond Square CRAs of which
both
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:11:51–02:11:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
were scheduled to terminate in September of 2022 and the city council created them by ordinance. Thus, it's appropriate that these agreements come to you as the City Council created the agencies. ‸ However, if approved because ‸ the way the agreements were structured it does require that each of the agencies acknowledge I think probably for us 1 CRA it's not significant in that the City's going to absorb, you know, ‸ that remaining debt service, but it's also, but for the Diamond Square, is the acknowledgement of some of the limitation additional limitations placed ‸ on the diamond square CRA you know by the county commission. So presuming all the ILAs are approved and executed the city would undertake the necessary actions actions to reform the diamond square CRA board as well as the actions to terminate the US 1 CRA
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:12:50–02:12:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
There is no
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:12:55–02:12:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
undertake ‸ the actions necessary to terminate the US 1 CRA and according to the statutes and the disposition of the ‸ current property that the US 1 CRA owns and again the debt that the US 1 CRA has out until October 1st of 2022 which is actually fiscal year 2023 would be
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:13:24–02:13:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:13:29–02:13:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that increment value increases due to the appreciation of property values redevelopment projects and or new construction the county's contribution is capped at $150,000 with those additional limitations on the administrative expenses. ‸ However, we thought in light of the alternative of ‸ the county could just let the CRA expire in 2022 and we ‸ certainly ‸ believe that the diamond square CRA as well as the US 1 CRA they have fulfilled and continue to fulfill their purpose in terms of facilitating and enhancing redevelopment. So, there's a number of projects I've got to point
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:17–02:14:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
affordable housing
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:30–02:14:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
facade program the US 1 streetscape project. They also had some very successful commercial facade programs and they also
recognize
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:14:47–02:14:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
businesses
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:48–02:14:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
In terms of stormwater improvements. I
think that's where
the
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:14:58–02:15:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:03–02:15:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
at it and you see there's more than one you know those foundations poured or the form boards up but there's also that stormwater pond you know at Bernard and Whaley where they acquired property from the housing authority and did stormwater improvements. They assisted in stormwater
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:24–02:15:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in terms of doing the engineering designing and participating in the construction costs to a degree on that as well as you know in the March 2014 plan envisioning not the stone street corridor but also peach tree in terms of the efforts that they of getting that what I'll call phase two of peach tree street I mean
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:55–02:16:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
years ago and the question was can we ever get phase two or the next phase done in the on peach tree and I think as you know it's
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:16:10–02:16:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's a really good project. Other projects include I mean they have provided down payment assistance through residential programs. They provide residential facade programs a commercial facade program.
[unclear audio — 0:15 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:16:27–02:16:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:16:42–02:16:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
aspirational that a new Dr. Jolie Smith Center be built. And if you drive over on Washington and Stone, I mean, you can't miss the footprint that's going up as we speak.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:16:58–02:17:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, I mean, there's a lot of things that, you know, they have done. And I think they're very judicious and effective. ‸ Partner with the city and Stormwater Utility Fund to a degree on the regional stormwater facility that enabled the Wawa, the Dollar General, as well as there's additional capacity there in that facility, that stormwater
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:28–02:17:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And then they've also participated in some of the Brownfields program projects that we've completed, we've
completed
Family Dollar, cleaned up 13 different contaminants,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:42–02:17:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:43–02:17:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And they participated in that. And we had kids playing on that field. So for anyone to suggest that the agency has not, you know, fulfilled its purpose or has, you know, been a failure, I think it's, you know, I think the record speaks for itself and their progress speaks for itself. And the board is to be commended for that. So with that, Mr. ‸ Mayor, members of council, the recommended motion is to approve the interlocal agreements between the Brevard County Board of County
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:18:14–02:18:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If
you
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:18:20–02:18:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
do, we will be taking these agreements too, since they are signatories on the agreements.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:18:29–02:18:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
to meet on October, or the board is scheduled to meet on October 21st,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:18:35–02:18:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
on October 28th of this year. I'll return to council.
I've got a couple things here before I turn it
over.
I've got
a
couple things here before I turn it over,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:18:48–02:18:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
wanted to ask you to as well.
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:18:52–02:19:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
nothing to do with what's getting ready to happen, right? I mean, we can be eligible to...
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:19:09–02:19:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
‸ Well, but they can't execute. ‸ I spoke to the county manager today and let them know that ‸ it's September. I mean, they initially took it on August 20th, and it got tabled, and then it came up on September 5th. And
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:19:25–02:19:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and U.S. 1 CRA meetings, so it would be after that point at which you would reform the board.
And,
Anthony, you can correct my interpretation or not, you know, if it's incorrect, but nothing prevents the City Council from appointing the existing members that are on there, but the ‸ ultimate reality is, is you're ‸ going to have one less appointee in terms of what you appoint,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:19:57–02:20:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
provide us an appointment, a full voting member appointment.
Okay.
And then my other question is, what if, you know, ‸ we have trouble now getting some board members to fill some of these positions? What if we come to that ‸ two-term limit, and then you can't fill those positions? Then what do we do? And these folks, they'll want to serve. Is there a provision? I didn't hear a provision in there for that. I mean,
there is no provision for that, Mr. Mayor. I mean, I ‸ understand what you're saying, and I think there are,
obviously,
‸ the one-year term, the two-year term, and three-year term,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:20:42–02:20:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
five years would be there two terms.
they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:20:47–02:20:47 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
have to step off for a year.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:20:49–02:20:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
would obviously be six years.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:20:52–02:20:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:20:53–02:20:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So you'd still have a majority. You know, there'd be four. And I think they structured it that way purposely and to provide time to find members to fill the slots. I mean, ‸ I guess the worst-case scenario is if you take the one-year member that is off in four years, they sit a year, then they come back.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:21:17–02:21:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
‸ That's arguably what could happen. Or you might find, you know, other interested.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:21:24–02:21:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
years.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:21:30–02:21:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Well, I'll just go on record.
I
don't like the deal. Number one, I really don't understand why I wasn't a part of this negotiation process because I'm just really, you know, when I got the agenda, I'm just seeing it now. I don't, it's very hard to find volunteers on our boards. And I don't,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:21:56–02:21:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
question. How much money is the county, on average, the amount of money that they give this CRA for Diamond Square?
Okay.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:07–02:22:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
No. I mean, as I indicated, ‸ for the upcoming year, the projected amount in large measure, as we indicated going back, I think, January of last year, I mean, ‸ but it's the total amount between the general fund
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:25–02:22:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:28–02:22:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:30–02:22:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And when we first started the process, they
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:34–02:22:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:35–02:22:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
with the new evaluations coming out
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:22:42–02:22:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
other projects coming on.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:22:45–02:22:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
sunset dates and repayments, and ‸ they've done it. ‸ I think
they've done
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:22:55–02:22:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Cape Canaveral. I believe they've also done Rockledge. They've done Cocoa Beach. They pretty much have touched all of the ones, Palm Shores, ‸ Melbourne. I think the one that's out there that's remaining, and there may be another one, but I know Palm Bay is one that's out there that exists in terms of whether or not there's agreement.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:23:25–02:23:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
That's a good idea, huh?
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:23:32–02:23:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
my position to recommend to the county what they do with their CRA.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right?
That's right. I guess that ‸ was ‸ my biggest thing is I feel like we've been handcuffed. ‸ The Diamond Square budget is already small as it is. Now they're saying that we have to take on the administrative costs now. They're capping us at $150,000, and, you know, potentially in 10 years, you know, our property values could go up, which more than likely will
happen.
I
think within about two years, you'll be at that $150,000. But what I would add in that two years, the agency would cease to exist absent this agreement because of this agreement.
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:24:25–02:24:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
2014 plan, and extend the agency life by 10 years.
‸ Is there a possibility for the administrative costs be allocated to the city? And that the city pays for that through the general fund?
Not the general fund, no, sir.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:45–02:24:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have to pay for the administrative fees?
Yes, ‸ we already allocate just like we discussed the allocation of the funds for water and sewer. We're doing that. And we actually split the costs between the two CRAs for the staff that support the CRAs.
I
got you.
So you do not, I mean, $30,000 is not,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:25:06–02:25:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's not just salary, that's other expenses, legal among other things. And it's not covering, you know, that was one of our points when there was one provision proposal that they wanted to cap ‸ at 25.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:25:24–02:25:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:25:26–02:25:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
reappointing members that's already on, because I know he had an issue, and you said this several times about,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:25:39–02:25:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
which causes,
I
guess, to him is an issue. I want to make sure that before we reappoint, if we do that, that he doesn't have an issue with that moving forward.
Well, what I would suggest is the county commission, I mean, I have their signed copies of these agreements. I mean, they have voted on it, and there's nothing in there that precludes the city council from appointing. So once we enter into this interlocal agreement, you know, that provides for the extension of 10 years, the Diamond Square CRA, and then the reformation of the board is, yes, you get to appoint, you know, who you want. You know, just that first, we'll say seat one is one year,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:26:24–02:26:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
two is two years,
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:26:26–02:26:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
three is three years,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:27–02:26:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ And then to address, I guess, long-term his issue, although it's, if with a 10-year extension and a two-year term limit, ‸ it's eight years, they're saying one person can serve on the board. How
many years is the district two appointees term, John?
Yeah, I'm sorry.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:26:51–02:26:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The district two appointee, how ‸ many years ‸ is... It's
a four-year term.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:57–02:26:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
I want to actually, you know, and Matt did bring it up, so It does say the remaining six members of the agency board shall be appointed by the city. The existing agency commissioners may be reappointed to the agency board. So ‸ it specifically states in the agreement that that's ‸ perfectly fine.
And then as ‸ their county commissioners change, you know, on three elections, we can always hopefully revisit this, you know, and ‸ tweak some of this stuff or change some of this stuff through negotiation. But anyway, I'm going to, if you guys don't mind, I'm going to,
Mr.
Yardley, let him get up there and say a couple words if he'd like there for three minutes or so.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:41–02:27:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I've come to speak against
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:48–02:27:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And I've come to speak against this, and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:27:54–02:27:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a bad idea. There's dirty politics behind this, okay? ‸ I feel so sorry for your city manager who's going to
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:28:04–02:28:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You sent an honest man to deal with
the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:28:09–02:28:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
nest of vipers. Of course, I agree. Here's what this, we're talking about tip money. Tip money. ‸ These are tax dollars that would otherwise go to
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:28:21–02:28:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And the control over those monies is by citizens and
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:31–02:28:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:33–02:28:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
school, my wife was pregnant with twins, and I took the first job that had health insurance. And I moved to Brevard, ‸ and I
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:42–02:28:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I
[unclear audio ▶]
Because it has potential. We've always had potential. But ‸ here's the way the politics work in Brevard. You got one city, you got one county commissioner for Titusville. You got one county commissioner for Merritt Island. You got three county commissioners for South Brevard, okay? We get nothing, okay?
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:29:04–02:29:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
all right? We have blighted areas. Blight is one of the findings that the US-1 RDA is trying to deal with. You know what the two biggest blighted areas in the US-1 RDA are?
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:29:19–02:29:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Drive down Michigan Avenue on the way to my office and look off to the right, and what do you see? A forest of invasive Brazilian peppers on the county maintained right away, okay? These people do not do their job in our community. You guys, somebody was complaining about our recreational facilities, okay? Our recreational facilities run by Brevard County are inferior, ‸ okay? We get nothing from these people. ‸ Now, you got a bunch of those South County, I'm not going to use the R word, wackos, okay?
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:30:00–02:30:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
One, they don't like Coco getting anything, and Coco never gets anything from the county, and they see us with money, and they want to take that money from us, and they're going to take that money,
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:13–02:30:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it in Satellite Beach.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:16–02:30:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
were probably corrupt, okay? There were South County problems in the RDA. You don't have those problems in your CRAs. Your city manager has run these things tightly, okay?
[unclear audio — 0:06 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:37–02:30:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
your CRAs. ‸ Their claim that
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:46–02:30:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
They're bullies. They're trying to push you around. ‸ It's like the old, I got this bullshit lawsuit, and I'm going to bring it,
and
you should pay me.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:31:01–02:31:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ And I know what John's doing. ‸ You have a CRA that has been tremendously successful, and he wants to protect them, and he's thinking that if he gives up the US-1 CRA for a year, which is only $200,000, because really that's what the US-1 CRA, that we don't collect that much because we're still blighted, but it's still $200,000, and
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:31:28–02:31:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the CRA that has done a tremendous job in revitalizing an area that was once blighted,
and
he's offering up some of the diamond square, but not as bad, and he's pulling the plug on the US-1 because we don't do anything yet.
Right,
right. Okay?
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:31:48–02:31:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
that we took out to improve the facilities of US-1, and that $200,000 is going to Palm Bay, and it ain't coming here.
Yeah.
‸ And that's something you should think about. And the other thing, when you're dealing with bullies and you give in to their bullying, they come back at you.
Mm-hmm.
Okay? So if you think that the good RDA is being protected by pulling the strings on US-1 and cutting some diamond square out, I don't think you're just going
you're
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:32:27–02:32:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
they're going to see you as weak, and they're going
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:32:30–02:32:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:32:33–02:32:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
10 years, right? Yeah.
But the resolutions that were adopted,
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:32:43–02:32:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and 97-161, which delegated the powers to create diamond square, were for a period of 25 years.
[unclear audio — 0:08 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:32:56–02:33:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right. There was unquestionable blight. There was a proper study done. These were legitimately blighted areas.
‸ Yeah. So,
I
mean... I don't disagree, and I just would add, I mean, I've been a significant proponent of CRAs, both locally and statewide, but with it being a delegated, again, with the county charter, they hold the cards in terms of whether or not they want to approve, you know, in terms of the creation of a CRA, and within the existing resolution,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:33:45–02:33:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and
we saw this in January of earlier this year, where they sought to revoke, you know, the powers of diamond square because they didn't have any debt, so they could have, they reserved that right to do that. So they've claimed other, you know, circumstances by which funds are, required for other... I'm not disagreeing about Dixon, 1997 study about...
I understand exactly...
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:34:15–02:34:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah,
yeah.
I mean, the other thing is that what he's saying, he's protecting us by getting the best deal he can from this nest of vipers,
but
I don't think the nest of vipers... The nest of vipers is telling him we got nothing, but I don't think they're right. I think we're in a stronger position than we are.
They're definitely wrong. There's no doubt about it, and one of them probably hadn't spent... Well, probably both of them, ‸ two of them haven't spent very much time within the city. You know, they just recently visited the city and don't know what's been happening here, don't know what was happening before.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:34:53–02:34:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Like the deputy mayor stated. So... But it's ‸ probably the best deal we have right now. I don't like this term limit for board members. I think it's a little ridiculous. ‸ But the fact is, they're both sunset, what, in 2022, and
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:10–02:35:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
For 10 years.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:14–02:35:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:35:18–02:35:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the only thing that ‸ I let the county manager know today that I had to make change to the document because they identified
their
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:35:27–02:35:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
wrong redevelopment agency on the signatory page. I corrected it.
Yeah, but hopefully, as new county commissioners come in and we develop a relationship with those county commissioners, which we haven't... in the past, and we'll be able to revisit this... ‸ You're so
optimistic.
‸ We'll be able to revisit this and maybe make some changes to this.
Thank you for
letting me...
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:50–02:35:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:52–02:35:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
I
knew I was going to get
crushed,
but I just wanted to say...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:59–02:36:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Well, next time we send John down to visit the pit of vipers, maybe we can send you with him.
Mm-hmm. And
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:09–02:36:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We'll give her opportunity to ask a few words if she'd like.
Good evening to the mayor and council. Thank you for this opportunity to ‸ speak to you. We've fallen, but we're not broken. I think that in this case, there are some deals that may have needed to be done to save us, but we are strong. We do not intend to appear weak in any way. We don't know exactly what your decisions may be in regards to reassigning the same individuals. We hope that you do consider that.
[unclear audio — 0:03 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:37:00–02:37:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is a volunteer board. It seems to me that we are being treated unfairly in that sense. Because we are volunteers, we have been given a lot of time and effort to the joys that we are seeing now in the ‸ community. So we hope that this council will realize that those who are currently on this board are worker bees and will continue to work to fulfill the goals ‸ that plan that has now been approved. And I was glad to hear that. We've been trying so very hard to get some of those ideas that the community wanted to bring to the table done.
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:37:46–02:37:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this particular commission that currently exists control everything. We see that they are going to be a part of the board. That's going to be very interesting. I think that that will bring to light some of the attitudes and some of the things that we have to conquer, challenges that we're going to have to ‸ conquer. But I do know that ‸ there's still much work to be done in Diamond Square. I appreciate the 10 extra years associated with getting that work done. I will be constantly working, whether I'm on the board or off the board, trying to make sure that the goals and objectives in the Diamond Square community are met.
[unclear audio — 0:04 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:38:36–02:38:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that they will continue to ‸ fight for what we want to see in our community. It is our right as citizens in this city and in 626 to control our destiny. Yes, ma'am. And so I want to make sure that you are aware that that's something I think will continue to happen.
[unclear audio — 0:07 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:03–02:39:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for us in the past and I hope and pray that you will continue to be. Yes, ma'am. Thank
you. And we thank both of you for coming up from the US1RDA board
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:39:21–02:39:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the other members that are here as well.
So...
I guess my man, I just don't like being controlled by anything. Oh,
yeah.
Even my wife sometimes, you know. ‸ I feel...
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:39:33–02:39:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:39:35–02:39:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
These people are above and they should be able to serve. Yeah. Amen. ‸ And what
is the wishes of the council? Mm-hmm. The chair, I'll make a motion. I feel like this is a strong-armed robbery. I feel
like I'm being strong-armed.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:39:57–02:40:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
And
so I'm gonna make a motion that we approve.
Second. We got a motion from Deputy
Mayor Warner,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:14–02:40:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes unanimously. We're gonna move on to item number two on the city business, which is a multi-year contract. Approved, ‸ entering into a co-op purchase agreement with the issuing of a purchase order
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:32–02:40:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:05 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:40:35–02:40:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for the milling, paving, and striping of Pioneer Street from Dixon Boulevard to Peachtree Street.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:46–02:40:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:10 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:40:50–02:41:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Can I just make a motion that we approve this? Go ahead. Motion
to approve.
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:04–02:41:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:41:05–02:41:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed?
I don't know
anybody
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:41:13–02:41:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:41:14–02:41:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio ▶]
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Mr.
[unclear audio ▶]
Flag: the machine readings disagree here · 02:41:16–02:41:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
have you already, yeah, Mr. ‸ Mayor, Council,
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:41:20–02:41:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Just so Council knows, that's not part of the annual paving program.
This
is the, ‸ Okay.
Have you already selected the
the the bramps
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:41:30–02:41:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that need to be changed?
that they
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:41:33–02:41:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
already been allocated?
‸ They're pretty much all going to be changed because I don't think
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:38–02:41:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Some of them really,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:42–02:41:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
but ‸ I think they're all being changed out. Okay.
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: a language review questioned the wording · 02:41:50–02:41:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that includes ramps, curving, sidewalks,
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:41:54–02:41:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, with that being said, you have your informational agenda? Yep. Motion to adjourn. So we get a motion adjourned
[unclear audio — 0:01 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:42:06–02:42:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[unclear audio — 0:02 ▶]
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:08–02:42:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? It passes.
Thank
you.