Built from the City's minutes records — no AI-written textBriefing final
The City's record
What the City's record shows
Built only from the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf). Page numbers are the minutes' own. Discussion is in the minutes' text; it is not summarised here.
Attendance (the roll call)
Listed present when the roll was taken: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss
(Checked against the ballots and the printed roll lines.)
Absences: the minutes print an “ABSENT” heading with no names under it.
Also listed as present (staff and other roles): Anthony A. Garganese (City Attorney), Stockton Whitten (City Manager), Lori Chabot (Recording Secretary), Abigail Morgan (Public Works Director), Rebecca Bowman (Finance Director), Charlene Neuterman (Community Services Director), Jonathan Lamm (Fire Chief), Evander Collier IV (Police Chief), Jack Walsh (Utilities Director), Lorne Stinnett (HR Director), Rob Beach (Chief Technology Officer), Megan Crutcher (Helpdesk Support Tech)
Named on at least one ballot later in the meeting: Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss, Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks (participation, which can differ from the roll: arrivals and departures are in the minutes' text)
Adopted actions (22)
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of July 8, 2025. (2025-444) — to approve the Agenda for the Regular Meeting of the City Council held on Tuesday, July 8, 2025, with amendments (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 2
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of April 22, 2025. (2025-445) — to approve the Minutes from the from the Regular Meeting held on April 22, 2025, as written (moved by Alex Goins, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 2
to approve the Consent Items with an amendment to move Consent item V.5 to Council Business item VIII.3 (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 3–4
1. Request to Postpone First Reading FCOD Comp Plan Amendment. (2025-384) — to approve Postponing the First Reading of the FCOD Comp Plan Amendment to the September 23, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 3–4; the vote on p. 5
2. Request to Postpone First Reading of Ordinance 02-2025 Creating Four Corners Overlay District. (2025-385) — to approve Postponing the First Reading of Ordinance 02-2025, Creating Four Corners Overlay District, to the September 23, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 5
3. Request to Postpone 2nd Reading of CDBG and HOME funding and the City's Action Plan to July 22, 2025, to preserve the ad. (2025-612) — to approve Postponing the Second Reading of CDBG and HOME funding and the City's Action Plan to July 22, 2025 to preserve the ad (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 5
4. Consideration of Resolution 2025-041 Approving the Cirrus Outparcel Lot Split. (2025- 609) — to approve Resolution 2025-041 Approving the Cirrus Outparcel Lot Split (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 6
5. Conduct a Public Hearing to review the affordable housing real property inventory list and approve a Resolution identifying certain real — to approve a Resolution identifying certain real property within the City to which the City holds fee simple title that is appropriate for permanent affordable housing and approve the process for which the disposal of real property will be administered by the City with an amendment to remove one … (moved by Lorraine Koss, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 7
6. First Reading of Ordinance 04-2025 Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Amendment. (2025-553) — to take a 15-minute break (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 10
6. First Reading of Ordinance 04-2025 Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Amendment. (2025-553) — to approve the first Reading of Ordinance 04-2025 Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Amendment. (2025-553) (City Manager) (moved by Lavander Hearn, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 3-2; ayes: Mike Blake, Lavander Hearn, Alex Goins; nays: Patricia Weeks, Lorraine Koss — the City's minutes, p. 11
7. First Reading of Ordinance 06-2025, Amending the City Code Regarding Code Enforcement Board Jurisdiction and Duties regarding Noise and E — to approve the first Reading of Ordinance 06-2025, Amending the City Code Regarding Code Enforcement Board Jurisdiction and Duties regarding Noise and Excavation Violations, and Code Enforcement Lien Reduction Requests (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 13
1. Consider the Appointment of Margaret Goudelock to Fill One of the Three Vacancies on the Board of Adjustment. (2025-583) — to approve the Appointment of Margaret Goudelock to Fill One of the Three Vacancies on the Board of Adjustment (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 13
2. The applicant, Floor Suppliers Inc. (Shiua Roopnarie), is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00, at t — to approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00 to $10,000 dollars at the property located at 1050 West King Street (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 4-1; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: Alex Goins — the City's minutes, p. 14 Unresolved conflict in the City's minutes: adopted motions in this meeting state different amounts for 1050 W King St — $10,000 (motion 13; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 14)); $5,000 (motion 16; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 16)). Both passages are shown; this site does not choose between them.
3. The applicant (Patricia Ahneman) is requesting a reduction of the current Code i Enforcement lien of $149,945.00 at the property located — to approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $149,945.00 at the property located at 1001 N. Indian River Dr. to the amount of zero (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lavander Hearn); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 15
4. The applicant (Deborah Raskett) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $5,400.00 at the property located at 49 — to approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $5,400.00 at the property located at 49 Parkway St. to the amount of zero (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 15
5. The applicant (Allen Condominium Association) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $331,270.00 at the proper — to approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00, at the property of 1050 West King St. be reduced to the amount of $5,000 (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Mike Blake); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 16 Unresolved conflict in the City's minutes: adopted motions in this meeting state different amounts for 1050 W King St — $10,000 (motion 13; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 14)); $5,000 (motion 16; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 16)). Both passages are shown; this site does not choose between them.
6. Approve an Agreement between the City of Cocoa and the Diamond Square Community Redevelopment Agency to allow the CRA Agency to solicit r — to approve an Agreement between the City of Cocoa and the Diamond Square Community Redevelopment Agency to allow the CRA Agency to solicit redevelopment proposals for properties located on Rosa L. Jones. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, p. 16
to approve to authorize the acceptance of a donation consisting of a 2008 Edgewater Power Boat 205CC motor, with an attached Suzuki 250-horsepower 4-stroke motor, with an estimated fair market value of $21,640, along with an accompanying boat trailer valued at $1,055. Approve a Resolution Amending the … (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 17–18
2. Approval of a MOU between the City of Cocoa and Brightline for the Cocoa Multi-modal Passenger Rail Station. (2025-589) — to approve an MOU between the City of Cocoa and Brightline for the Cocoa Multi- modal Passenger Rail Station (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Lorraine Koss); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 19–20
to approve PZ 25-02800001 Michael C. Blake Subdivision — Lennar Homes Development Agreement for Affordable Housing and Purchase and Sale Agreement (Amended and Restated) (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 19–20
to Approve Resolution 2025-043, Establishing the Upper-Level Management Benefits Policy, modifying the benefits available to the positions of Deputy Director, Deputy (Assistant) City Manager, Deputy (Assistant) Fire Chief, Police Commanders and the City Clerk and redefining the Definition of Executive … (moved by Mike Blake, seconded by Patricia Weeks); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 19–20
to adjourn the Regular meeting of July 8, 2025 (moved by Patricia Weeks, seconded by Alex Goins); CARRIED 5-0; ayes: Mike Blake, Patricia Weeks, Alex Goins, Lavander Hearn, Lorraine Koss; nays: none — the City's minutes, pp. 21–22
Money named in the minutes' motions (what each motion did with the amount, in its own words)
$10,000 — Council: decided in an adopted motion. “approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00 to $10,000 dollars at the property located at 1050 West King Street” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 14); fiscal period not recorded) Unresolved conflict in the City's minutes: adopted motions in this meeting state different amounts for 1050 W King St — $10,000 (motion 13; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 14)); $5,000 (motion 16; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 16)). Both passages are shown; this site does not choose between them.
$5,000 — Council: decided in an adopted motion. “approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00, at the property of 1050 West King St. be reduced to the amount of $5,000” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 16); fiscal period not recorded) Unresolved conflict in the City's minutes: adopted motions in this meeting state different amounts for 1050 W King St — $10,000 (motion 13; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 14)); $5,000 (motion 16; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 16)). Both passages are shown; this site does not choose between them.
$21,640 — Council: decided in an adopted motion. “approve to authorize the acceptance of a donation consisting of a 2008 Edgewater Power Boat 205CC motor, with an attached Suzuki 250-horsepower 4-stroke motor, with an estimated fair market value of $21,640, along with an accompanying boat trailer valued at $1,055.” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, pp. 17–18); fiscal period not recorded)
$1,055 — Council: decided in an adopted motion. “approve to authorize the acceptance of a donation consisting of a 2008 Edgewater Power Boat 205CC motor, with an attached Suzuki 250-horsepower 4-stroke motor, with an estimated fair market value of $21,640, along with an accompanying boat trailer valued at $1,055.” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, pp. 17–18); fiscal period not recorded)
$60,520.00 — Council: the amount an adopted motion changed FROM (not the amount decided). “approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00 to $10,000 dollars at the property located at 1050 West King Street” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 14); fiscal period not recorded)
$149,945.00 — Council: the amount an adopted motion changed FROM (not the amount decided). “approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $149,945.00 at the property located at 1001 N. Indian River Dr. to the amount of zero” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 15); fiscal period not recorded)
$5,400.00 — Council: the amount an adopted motion changed FROM (not the amount decided). “approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $5,400.00 at the property located at 49 Parkway St. to the amount of zero” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 15); fiscal period not recorded)
$60,520.00 — Council: the amount an adopted motion changed FROM (not the amount decided). “approve a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00, at the property of 1050 West King St. be reduced to the amount of $5,000” (motion result: CARRIED; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 16); fiscal period not recorded)
$331,270.00 — Council: listed on the agenda item (a proposal as listed, not an approval). “The applicant (Allen Condominium Association) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $331,270.00 at the property of 1723 Dixon Blvd., be reduced to the amount of the City's cost.” (not adopted as listed: the adopted motion states a different amount or scope; the City's minutes (2236_07_08_2025.pdf, p. 16); fiscal period not recorded)
Agenda (the City's wording)
Time links are automatic matches to the machine transcript and may be off.
An item without a time link may still have been discussed; the link is only added when the automatic match is strong.
I. Opening Matters
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Roll Call
II. Approval of Agenda and Minutes
1. Agenda: Regular Meeting of July 8, 2025.
2. Minutes: Regular Meeting of April 22, 2025.
III. Awards and Presentations
IV. Delegations
V. Consent Agenda
1. Approve a Task Order Amendment in the amount of $11,300 for the additional work approved through Amendment #1 of Grant 24PLN48.
2. Approve the Reimbursement of UpStart Cocoa Expenses prior to executing agreements and Revision of Trekalla's Approved Budget
3. Acknowledge the emergency purchase, PO# 83583 and 83579, for the costs to repair and replace the blowers at the Sellers water treatment plant as well as approve BAF 25-068-T to move funds to cover the rental of a temporary blower to ensure no disruption to productivity while repairs are made.
4. Approval of a street closure outside the CBD
5. PZ 25-02800001 Michael C. Blake Subdivision – Lennar Homes Development Agreement for Affordable Housing and Purchase and Sale Agreement (Amended and Restated)
6. Approve entering into a Locally Funded Agreement (LFA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for Design for Widening of State Road 524 (FPM 437983-1-32). Approve a Resolution Amending the FY25 Budget, BAF 25-073-A for the LFA. Authorize the City Manager to Execute and Administer the LFA Agreement.
7. Approve modification to the Fiske & Broadmoor Roadway and Drainage Improvements construction contract with Cathcart Construction Company to partially release retainage early.
8. Approve, as recommended, the proposed Fiscal Year 2026 benefit renewal medical, dental, life, and disability insurance; and to authorize the City Manager to sign related agreements.
9. Request approval of the revised FY 2025 Pay Plan.
10. Approve the Purchase of a Heavy Duty Mohawk 4-Post Drive-on Vehicle Lift with Accessory using Sourcewell Contract #121223-MRL. Approve a Resolution Amending the FY25 Budget, BAF#25-057-IFT, for the amount of $63,608.
11. Approve the Danus Utilities, Inc. Proposals for Lift Station Rehabilitation Services Utilizing the City of Clermont Agreement No. 2023-71 Effective August 8, 2023 through August 7, 2026; To Authorize a Budgeted Expenditure for these Services not to Exceed $325,541
12. Approve the Purchase with Hydra Service, Inc., Debary, Florida for the Systematic Replacement of Lift Station Pumps, Project No. WS1141, Utilizing the Orange County Contract No. Y21-170-MV effective August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2024, Renewed through July 31, 2025; and To Authorize a Budgeted Expenditure for these Services not to Exceed $143,136
13. To Approve a Purchase Order and Agreement with Hamilton Roofing, LLC for a new roof system on Wewahootee WG, Dyal WTP Admin Building, and Dyal WTP Dewatering Building; piggybacking a Brevard County Continuing Roofing Contracting Services contract, RFQ 6-22-13, Effective May 12, 2023 through May 12, 2026; To Approve a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Approve and Execute Change Orders in an Amount Not to Exceed $28,555.50 (10% of the Contract Amount) for a Total Combined Project Cost of $314,110.50.
VI. Public Hearings
1. Request to Postpone First Reading FCOD Comp Plan Amendment
2. Request to Postpone First Reading of Ordinance 02-2025 Creating Four Corners Overlay District. — 00:26:18
3. Request to Postpone 2nd Reading of CDBG and HOME funding and the City's Action Plan to July 22, 2025, to preserve the ad. — 00:28:20
4. Consideration of Resolution 2025-041 Approving the Cirrus Outparcel Lot Split — 00:29:24
5. Conduct a Public Hearing to review the affordable housing real property inventory list and approve a Resolution identifying certain real property within the City to which the City holds fee simple title that is appropriate for permanent affordable housing and approve the process for which the disposal of real property will be administered by the City. — 00:37:27
6. First Reading of Ordinance 04-2025 Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Amendment
7. First Reading of Ordinance 06-2025, Amending the City Code Regarding Code Enforcement Board Jurisdiction and Duties regarding Noise and Excavation Violations, and Code Enforcement Lien Reduction Requests. — 02:26:58
VII. Council Business
1. Consider the Appointment of Margaret Goudelock to Fill One of the Three Vacancies on the Board of Adjustment. — 02:47:05
2. The applicant, Floor Suppliers Inc. (Shiua Roopnarie), is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $60,520.00, at the property of 1050 West King St. be reduced to the amount of $10,000. — 02:47:27
3. The applicant (Patricia Ahneman) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $149,945.00 at the property located at 1001 N. Indian River Dr. be reduced to the amount of zero. — 02:57:35
4. The applicant (Deborah Raskett) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $5,400.00 at the property located at 49 Parkway St. be reduced to the amount of zero. — 03:01:57
5. The applicant (Allen Condominium Association) is requesting a reduction of the current Code Enforcement lien of $331,270.00 at the property of 1723 Dixon Blvd., be reduced to the amount of the City's cost. — 03:05:23
6. Approve an Agreement between the City of Cocoa and the Diamond Square Community Redevelopment Agency to allow the CRA Agency to solicit redevelopment proposals for properties located on Rosa L. Jones. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. — 03:11:31
7. Museum Discussion
VIII. City Business
1. Council approval is requested to authorize the acceptance of a donation consisting of a 2008 Edgewater Power Boat 205CC motor, with an attached Suzuki 250-horsepower 4-stroke motor, with an estimated fair market value of $21,640, along with an accompanying boat trailer valued at $1,055. Approve a Resolution Amending the FY25 Budget, BAF# 25-071-A. — 03:54:24
2. Approval of a MOU between the City of Cocoa and Brightline for the Cocoa Multi-modal Passenger Rail Station. — 03:56:00
IX. Informational Agenda
1. Bi-Weekly Report for June 5, 2025-July 2, 2025.
X. Reports
XI. Adjournment
XII. Notice to the Public
Transcript Partial transcript
Machine transcription of the meeting recording. The words are the recognizer's, except where a passage is marked as corrected or machine re-recognized; most have
not been checked against the audio, so words, numbers and names can be misheard.
It describes what was said. It cannot establish who voted how, an amount or an outcome — the City's
minutes do that (above).
A time links to its passage, and “Copy link” copies that link. “▶ Play” opens the recording at that moment, as the City's file, in a new tab.
849 suspect passage(s) marked in place; inspection incomplete: language review.
How this transcript was made. New machine transcription of the whole recording, with 26 voices separated from the audio.
100 short machine repair(s) (123 word(s)) are labelled in place, with the original words beside them: an ordinary word was replaced only where two further machine readings agreed on a different one.
Checks run on this transcript: the recognizer's own warning signs and whether a voice was detected where the words are. Not completed: language review.
A second, independent machine reading was compared with it word by word: the same words for 92.2% of 35,492 content words.
Dotted words (1,013 places) are ordinary wording differences: hover or tap to see the other reading.
849 passages (23% of the words) are marked suspect: their words are not shown ("unclear audio") and support no statement: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ; the language review questioned them; or no voice was detected there.
Agreement between two machine readings is not verification.
Inspection is incomplete: language review.
Speakers were separated by voice. A plain name rests on evidence tied to that voice; “provisional” is a name from an earlier text-only pass and is not verified; “Speaker N” is an unidentified voice.
If everyone would please join me in prayer. Dear Heavenly Father, I'd like to come to you at this moment and give thanks for allowing everyone to arrive here safely this evening. I'd like to ask that you continue to watch over us as a city, watch over our youth that's in attendance tonight. I'd like to ask
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:03–00:01:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:01:22–00:01:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:01:36–00:01:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:01:58–00:02:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:02:52–00:02:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:13–00:03:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
item number three. Under City Business, item number four. We have this resolution stated here at your desk, which talks about organizational effectiveness, establishing the upper level management. And I need a second to that for me, please, ma'am. Second. Please, sir.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:03:48–00:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:03:51–00:03:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:04:03–00:04:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:09–00:04:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:23–00:04:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Ayes have it unanimously. Proceeding on to item number three. It's not written there, but it's written there. We have an honorary member that will be introduced.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:04:54–00:04:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:04:57–00:05:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Chief Moore has more than 35 years of experience in the fire service. He comes with a plethora of knowledge and experience working his way up through the chain of command over throughout his career. We're very excited to have Chief Moore on board with
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:16–00:05:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:05:55–00:06:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we have a resounding, heartfelt, rightfully deserved, rightfully earned, where you never give up on your fellow human being. Because it comes back sometimes,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:06:29–00:06:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:03–00:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:07:12–00:07:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This achievement is a direct result of the dedication shown by teachers, staff, and administration. Their tireless efforts, their passion for education, and belief in our scholars have helped us reach this important benchmark today. We could not be more proud. But this is only the beginning. We are setting our sights even higher.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:13–00:08:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:08:28–00:08:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in our growth and success. And for that, we thank you for walking alongside us in this journey. And together, we are building something powerful for the future and for our community.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:26–00:09:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:09:30–00:09:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Academy is just not a school for scholars it ‸ is a family right and so I trust all the men and women inside of that institution I consider every male and extended father of my child. And so for me to say that, that's my my son, that's my boy, that's my that's my road dog. And so for me to trust anyone that's so precious to me should say a lot about that institution. And so again, congratulations job well done but you know we're not done and so and I know I know mr. Cole and all the teachers gonna keep pushing all of the scholars to even go higher I appreciate it as a parent I appreciate a lot more now as a parent because
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:10:32–00:10:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
sometimes they have too many kids in the classroom, things of that nature. So a lot of the scholars that are there, they need to be in a school such as in Majula Charter Academy so again congratulations much appreciated and if my son need to go to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:11:19–00:11:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:11:31]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Nehemiah Pierce” — machine-transcribed, not verified)
I know as a scholar standpoint that this school has been doing great things from our algebra one scores and from our science scores also I know the school will continue to do great things as we have done in the past we continue to level up from coming to a C school from a B school and I like to thank the educators the family members and our principal mr. Cole for all the things he has done for us so thank you guys
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:01–00:12:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
[00:12:01]▶ PlaySpeaker 13 (introduced as “Nehemiah Pierce” — machine-transcribed, not verified) · Unclear audio
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:12:21–00:12:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:12:25–00:12:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
switch to help you get your speech right but either way you got it right so kudos that speaks volumes because two things that come to my mind when I think of you all
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 00:13:29–00:13:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ we want to acknowledge that ‸ make sure that you understand everything is tight and all right. So thank you very much. Let's give them a round of applause. And card number three, it all starts with leadership. You know, we talk about big ships, little ships, but nothing like relationship, sponsorship, scholarship, leadership. and that I would like to bring forth the fierce leader along with the entire staff and wife of course Thomas Cole let's bring him up please ma'am please sir with a round of applause
start off with that this is a picture taken in June of 2012 we had just got our charter application approved and the mayor called us to the stage in June of 2012 at Juneteenth to be able to announce to the world that we're going to be
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:14:46–00:14:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
no one knew us at that particular time until our mayor who's standing in the background of that picture back there in 2012 that's me standing there that's my two boys our first enrollments at Emma Jewel Charter Academy in 2012 I think it is very very important for us as we continue to get old and grow and learn that we remember the foundation it's important to remember the foundation from the standpoint of the city
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:15:13–00:15:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that we had not recruited teachers. On that day that we had not included any students. but we had a mayor we had a city we had a whole community that stood behind us on that particular day and when I was standing on that particular stage there in 2012 all I had was a dream to offer at that particular time a dream and an opportunity at that time we all know how difficult it can be sometimes as parents when we're choosing the right school a person of middle or upper class if you are not happy with a traditional public school you can pay for a private school but a lot of people in our community cannot pay for a private school that's why we have Emma Jewel Charter Academy right there
school cost our goal is to provide all of our parents with a choice and a voice as far as what happened with their children it has been a very long long trip for us for a while we started out with a struggle and our mayor our city council
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:16:27–00:16:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:16:35–00:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:17:22–00:17:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
us because of the people that's been in front of us fighting us for us and during that first year I still remember Mr. Mayor you may not remember it we did not have enough money for those flashing lights out there.
to say, wherever you got to find the money for, you need to find that particular money. and I hope I'm not putting out too much of your business but I'm gonna ‸ put you on the spot a little bit there was also a portion of when we were first starting the national school lunch program would not fund you for the first three months until they see that you know what you're doing
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:18:18–00:18:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:18:27–00:18:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
so when it comes time to celebrating I want to celebrate not just with these great people my board chairman with our staff but also the great city officials that are still behind us for all those 12 years to get us to that point for that beat thank you so much and I love you all thank you thank
there's one thing I would like to say just two and then I'm gonna ‸ sit take a load off my feet and put it in the seat first thing I would like to say to whom much is given much is required and you all are fulfilling that dream the American dream because you're part of history
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:19:15–00:19:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
are part of this dream we call American dream and the last thing I would like to say is this continue to defy them ‸ because they do not define you you define you so continue to defy all those haters out there because when you define yourself and it's done decentlyin order, it's blessings like days like we're gonna ‸ celebrate today, tomorrow, and the immediate future. Amen? so thank you all members of Emma Jewel and the city of Coco and the staff I want to say thank you all for keeping this dream alive
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:05–00:20:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:18–00:20:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:20:47–00:20:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:21:36–00:22:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 00:22:55–00:23:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:23:11–00:23:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:16–00:23:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Proceeding under item number six, public hearing, as you all are clearly aware of, and I will do things decent and in order, the first three items request to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:23:41–00:23:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
This is just a postponement. I don't know how much we have to read into the record. Okay. All right. I just want to see if there's... I think Lucy and the City Attorney will have it.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:10–00:24:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
for future land use categories to include the commercial parkway CP zoning district within the four corners overlay district as an applicable zoning district in the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:24:25–00:24:25 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
use future land use designation. So, we respectfully come to request that the City Council will postpone and continue this item to the City Council meeting ‸ scheduled for September 23rd at 6 p.m. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:24:51–00:24:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
this portion to counsel and over to the public. Please come forward. You can only expound on about pertaining to the postponement of this first reading.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:07–00:25:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:09–00:25:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:25:12–00:25:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:26:06–00:26:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:26–00:26:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:31–00:26:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:26:45–00:26:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:26:58–00:26:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:27:01–00:27:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:27:13–00:27:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
section 23, four corners overlay district, establishing permitted special exceptions, and prohibited uses, providing for performance standards, including setbacks, parking, landscaping, and signage requirements, establishing building design standards, establishing the boundaries of the four corners overlay district. Thank
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:35–00:27:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:40–00:27:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:27:49–00:27:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to the public, please come forward and state your name and your concerns. You have 180 seconds to elaborate on this particular item. Going once, going twice.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:28:08–00:28:09 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
to approve. Second. Okay. We have a motion on the floor by Deputy Mayor Weeks and a second by Councilman Hearns. Chair's going to call up a question. All in favor saying aye. Aye. Aye. Any nays?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:28:34–00:28:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:21–00:29:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:29:25–00:29:26 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:32–00:29:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:29:49–00:29:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:30:10–00:30:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
plan unit development, better known as PUD, which includes the recently completed apartments, 280 units, multifamily residential. Yours truly. The floor ‸ is yours, ma'am.
Thank you. Good evening. The applicant WMG Acquisitions LLC is representing the property owner Coco Retail LLC and is legally represented in this matter by attorney ‸ Jessica Gown and planning and titleable manager Katrin Smith. The applicant WMG Acquisitions has submitted a lot split application for review and approval. The request seeks to divide a commercially designated lot in two separate parcels. The parcel in question represents
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:04–00:31:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:10–00:31:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:31:26–00:31:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:31:43–00:31:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
subject to council approval by resolution. This application meets all, the application we have received meets all the required criteria under the code and includes complete supporting documentation, including surveys, ownership authorizations, and verification of consistent with the original plat. In addition to the lot split application, I would like to highlight that the applicant also has submitted a formal request for a statutory extension of time to submit final development plans for Phase 2. So the applicant is required to do a PUD amendment to follow through with the project. As a specified in the development agreement,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:32:26–00:32:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:32:40–00:32:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Mending chapter 18 subdivisions and created a process for the lot split application. So this is the first time that planning zoning is bringing a lot split resolution for approval.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:07–00:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:22–00:33:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:33:24–00:33:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:25–00:33:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:33:38–00:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, that's correct. So under our subdivision code, they allowed to do the lot split one time. So if they decide, as I'm going to show, to subdivide again, then they'll have to go through a flat process.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:00–00:34:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
CVS and the McDonald's. And so how big are the, by splitting this, how big of buildings are they going to put on there? Do we know what's going to go in there?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:34:45–00:34:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:07–00:35:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:15–00:35:17 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
then probably in the future, they're looking to subdivide. But the, the applicant would have to go through a devil, a development agreement amendment in order to, for the council to approve, another subdivision and also to approve the, the conceptual plan that is being proposed. And also do the PUD amendment.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:35:49–00:35:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
providing for the division of one, originally platted lots owned by Coco Retail LLC, generally located at the intersection of state road 524, and in East industry road,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:06–00:36:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:17–00:36:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:28–00:36:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, sir. Okay. Do we, do we have any questions for them before I open it to the public? I mean, I like the project. I'm in favor of it. So I'm just trying to go through the preliminaries,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:36:46–00:36:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:36:51–00:36:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here · 00:36:58–00:37:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:23–00:37:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:37:27–00:37:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:37:29–00:37:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:37:32–00:37:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Conduct a public hearing to review the affordable housing real property inventory list and approve a resolution identifying certain real property within the city
housing and approve the process for ‸ which the disposal of real property will be administered by the city. We're following a program that we established. Now, I would like to turn it over to Mrs.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. uh Tonight, you're going to be uh approving uh through resolution, resolution 2025-040, uh the resolution that adopts the property inventory list and identifies that real property within the city of which the city holds fee simple title appropriate for permanent affordable housing. uh
packet. So, per florida statute section 166.0451 it provides that on october 1 of 2023 and every three years thereafter, each municipality shall prepare that inventory list of real property within its jurisdiction and of which the municipality holds that fee simple title appropriate for affordable housing. So, we must include the address and the legal description of each property and following the public hearing, the governing body of the municipality shall adopt the resolution that includes the inventory list of each property that is subject for permanent affordable housing. So, as a process for this uh disposal of the properties uh the city is going to adopt an RFP that is going to have a process for which uh developers can apply for and propose to develop those uh vacant lots. uh
Myers and several other cities in the state who have successful programs that are using this similar process, which is an RFP. um it provides with specific uh ground rules for the developers must have a track record of a proven track record of building affordable housing and
going through that process. So we'll be conducting that uh through an RFP process of which we will bring those to council uh for approval after we have selected the uh the candidates who are capable of uh building on those lots. On this list, you will see the Michael C. Blake subdivision. Of course, tonight uh you are approving the amended and restated agreement for that development. This stays, those lots stay on the uh vacant parcel list until they are conveyed over. um So once that uh sale has takentaken taken place, then those those lots will come off. You will also see the lot of 203 Orange Street, which uh we talked about last night at the
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:40:41–00:40:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
of which we will be putting out an RFP for disposal of that property as well. And and so in the in the near uh next few months, you will start to see those RFPs go out for the disposal of that property. So tonight we're asking for you to approve the affordable housing list through resolution and and allow for the staff to move forward with the process to dispose of the real property administered by the city. Thank you. Thank
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:14–00:41:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:41:35–00:41:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
As a part of this resolution, it is the council's authority to determine what uh properties stay on the list um through that resolution, but I would, I would defer to the city manager for any uh questions because I'm not familiar with that property being for a park. So I had not been made aware of that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:42:25–00:42:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:42:29–00:42:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:42:49–00:42:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
think it's just a more likely location for a potential park. That is 1204 Cambridge Drive. And that is in the Pine Ridge neighborhood, which uh you know borders up to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:43:13–00:43:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:30–00:43:30 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
take those off, or or you can bring those back at a at a different time there. butBut again, these are, we have to do this annually. These are ready to go, um especially the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:43:58–00:44:00 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
kept off this list just for the time being until we can determine if that would be an appropriate spot and if we can come up with a plan to finally fulfill my dream of creating a park in that park desert. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:26–00:44:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:44:45–00:44:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:45:10–00:45:10 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
floor and a second. I ‸ have to open it up to the public. You're right. I just caught it. Thank you. and And then I'll close ‸ it and then we'll vote on. ‸ Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:44–00:45:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:45:59–00:46:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:08–00:46:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:14–00:46:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 00:46:31–00:46:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:44–00:46:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:46:54–00:46:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:47:03–00:47:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:47:07–00:47:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:47:18–00:47:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there's a lot of information that's been disseminated throughout this city. and and And a couple of things. We're going to establish a definition for establishing alcohol usage. There's a definition stating to relating to the alcohol beverage regulation, adding a definition for alcohol beverages as an accessory. Also, a definition for a bar. There's no desire to have public consumption of alcohol in the public in a brown paper bag. Now they're going to give you some detailed definitions to clear up all misconceptions that's been spread throughout this community. So now you get the opportunity to get it straight from the horse's mouth. Now, Mr. City Manager, I do see your light on, sir. um And I know it's under your leadership. um And also, I'll just let you read in this city initiated amendment to the city codes ordered ordinance appendix a zoning article 5. uh
think of that, ‸ you think of folks walking around the city with brown paper bags of their their alcohol or beer of choice uh just drinking on the streets there. This is uh in part a clarification of uh bottle clubs. ‸ the example, and I'm sure Jen will give you the example is painting with a twist. Painting with a twist allows you to bring a bottle of wine as you partake in their main services. This clarifies the that they would need a state license to be classified as a bottle club.
or restaurant with your own bottle of ‸ liquor put it on the table and ask for a glass. So so it is it is not that but i'll I'll let them get into the into the ordinance. I just wanted to make that clarification because that's been put out there and this is certainly not that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:50:08–00:50:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
imposing separation requirements for liquor stores and package stores from certain other uses imposing separation requirements between location for on premises consumption of alcoholic alcohol and public parks and playgrounds. ‸ updating the zoning ordinance to be consistent with the state law regarding separation requirements between schools and locations or on-premise consumption of alcohol amending the method of measuring separation for purposes of alcoholic beverage regulations amending certain definitions to clarify the application of the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 00:50:48–00:50:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is first reading, also a public hearing item. Just to just generally before Jen gets into the details, if you recall, the city council requested that the ordinance be drafted with respect to adding distance requirements from ‸ certain alcoholic beverage establishments
additional revisions were made to update um definitions. um There were also some provisions added to supplement to clarify um alcohol as an accessory use um ‸ to certain types of um establishments, which the mint which the manager hinted, um talked about briefly. um In addition, it also uh updated uh provisions in the alcoholic beverage ordinance related to state law requirements and um also clarified um how separation uh distances will be measured under the city code. um Further, um ‸ a table was created so it wouldwould be easy to determine um the different um distance requirements uh from established uh licensed premises and other types of uses under under the code. ‸ so there's obviously more specific detail uh but this is following up with council direction ‸ updating the code pursuant to state law and making clarifications to definitions that are in this code that have been in there for many many years and also addressing um the issue of um excess certain establishments allowing an alcoholic beverage um um in a um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 00:53:34–00:53:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
little bit more on the history of the ordinance. In December of of last year, city council gave notice for staff, notice to proceed to amend the zoning ordinance to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 00:53:55–00:54:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for distancing requirements of 500 feet from public schools and private schools to basically bars. And then we're going, and they also requested us to review
between liquor stores and package stores and schools, churches, parks, and playgrounds and residential zones. And also to impose a 300 foot separation distance distance between locations for on-premise consumption of alcohol for parks and playgrounds. uh Also to amend the method of measuring separation distances under Appendix A, Article 13, Section 20.
or business tax receipts or approve applications for building permits, development orders, or other land use permits within the city, which would conflict with a pending amendments. So, um ‸ so the, the amendment, language is here, which, uh city council has already read and basically summarizing that it, uh results in, excuse me, it results in, revisions ‸ to
of our zoning ordinance. And so just to start real quick with the definitions, the definition of a package store was amended to be consistent with state law specifically regarding sealed original containers and that alcohol must account for at least 51 of the sales. The definition of package store beer and wine was also amended similarly, but limiting the sales to beer and wine. the definition of convenience store was amended primarily to differentiate liquor stores from
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 00:56:05–00:56:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So that definition in the Florida statutes for a bottle club is a commercial establishment operated for a profit, whether or not a profit is actually made, wherein patrons consume alcoholic beverages which are brought onto the premises and not sold or supplied to the patrons by the establishment, whether the patrons bring in and maintain custody of their own alcoholic beverages or surrender custody to the establishment for dispensing on the premises and which is specifically located in a building or other enclosed permanent structure.
been in the city's definition of a bar and has always been subject to the same special exception and distancing requirements where it's applicable. And so for the next definition, um there's been an increase in popularity of establishments wishing to to serve alcohol as a complement to another services uh such as beauty salon uh such
those that allow patrons to bring their own alcoholic beverages as a complement to the establishes primary activity, such as an arts and crafts workshop. So this code amendment includes the addition of a definition for establishment with alcohol as an accessory use. So we created this to capture this category and to establish uh regulations for it. So an establishment with alcohol as an accessory use won't have distancing requirements will not require a special exception. However, they must provide an affidavit saying that alcohol is not their primary business and that no revenue is derived from the sale directly. um
applicable um uh regulations in the zoning ordinance. And they still must meet all um department of business and professional regulation licensing uh for their particular business. And also just um just to note and and point out that an establishment with an with alcohol as an accessory use and also a bar bottle club are not synonymous with open container. so So creating this definition for establishment with alcohol as an accessory use is still requiring the business to contain that use within the business. And
possess an open container of alcoholic beverages, including but ‸ not limited to beer and wine, on or upon any street, sidewalk, or parking area open to the public
small change um was in Article 11, Section 12 in uh the general commercial category. There's a little bit of a discrepancy uh there. And as we stated before, liquor store and package store are synonymous and bar and lounge are all synonymous to each other. So this amendment eliminates that existing conflict in the in this district language. And so um moving on in Section 20, uh we modified some language with regard to restaurants, uh reducing the number of seats and adding a definition for a commercial kitchen. So we have reduced the number of seats to be required to be a restaurant from 40 to 20 seats. um We are requiring a restaurant to contain a commercial kitchen to prepare and serve meals. And we've created a definition for that commercial kitchen. And this revision, it was prompted by frequent inquiries from local business owners to the PNZ division, seeking clarification on what qualifies as a kitchen for the purpose of distinguishing a restaurant and
distinguishing that from a bar or lounge, which requires approval through a special exception. Additionally, the section has been revised to clarify that per Florida statute, Chapter 509, a restaurant
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:01:20–01:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the existing code basically says, or basically requires, as it is, as it states now, that there's a 300 foot separation from bars to uh to schools, churches and residential zones. So what we're proposing is to add parks and playgrounds to that uh distancing requirement and then we're adding the establishment of an off-premises consumption which is a liquor store package store in the grouping of establishments that would require um minimum distancing of 300 feet.
um being in compliant with the Florida statutes uh requiring that uh that schools in particular to bars be separated by 500 feet and not 300 feet. So we are changing that to be consistent with Florida statutes.
read the kind of just the basic ‸ measurement requirement or the measurement method. So churches will be measured from building to building, public parks and playgrounds will be measured from property line to building, residential zone from the zone boundary which is the property line to the building, and then the school property line to the building. And then um and the um
300 foot requirement from building to building. But you can see overall in general that most of the measure method of measurement is from the property line to the building which creates results in ‸ overall increased separation in the community from alcoholic beverage establishments. And staff was asked, we were also tasked with determining the need and the justification for these changes and the relationship of the amendment to the objectives of the code and the comprehensive plan. uh Also uh part of our analysis was determined if any of these code revisions were going to create any over restrictive or non-conforming conditions. So when we looked at uh the the addition of the parks and playgrounds. uh ‸ And you can see on the on the graphic here is a map uh showing all the parks uh and playgrounds in the city with the 300 foot buffer. And inin this exercise, we
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:21–01:04:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
non-conforming uh situations oror businesses that were created from this um this new addition to the code. And then with regard to the alcoholic beverages with on-premises consumption in schools, so basically bars to schools with a 500 foot offset per florida for Florida statute, um
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:04:48–01:04:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
bar located at 238 Peach Street, and this is due to the business being less than 500 feet from a school. And um this for non-conforming uses, they will they will be continued permitted to continue
a type of alcoholic beverage establishment requiring these separations, uh 300 feet from parks, schools, playgrounds, churches, and residential zones, this does create one new non-conforming use, a liquor store located ‸ 1105 Clear Lake Road, and this is due to its less than 300 foot proximity to a residential zone boundary. And again, it will be permitted to continue so long as it remains otherwise lawful and subject to the provisions of our Article 10 online conformities And so staff has determined that with the addition of parks and playgrounds to the to these list of community uses, from which bars and package stores have location distancing requirements,
and the addition of package stores as a type of alcoholic beverage establishment that has distancing requirements, the city feels uh we're taking steps necessary to address public health and safety concerns associated with the potential over concentration of liquor stores and other alcoholic beverage establishments in the city. And then just in in the staff finding in response to ‸ the justification justification and need for the change in the zoning code, the determination is that regulating the location of liquor store package stores is in the best interest of the community, necessary to protect vulnerable populations, particularly youth and families. The proposed amendment also updates key definitions and establishes a more price methodology for measuring separation distances, thereby improving clarity for enforcement and consistency with the city's land use regulations. And then also we um we reviewed and analyzed the consistency with our comprehensive plan um
to protect public public health, safety, welfare, and appearance. For neighborhood protection by ensuring that additional growth and development will be respectful of established neighborhoods that define much of the city's character.
continuing to support uh that revitalization of Diamond Square, Heart of Cocoa, and other areas, concentrating on issues such as crime, economic development, and affordable housing. And then by considering the topography facilities and services and other factors being consistent with sound planning principles, um which promotes public safety and welfare through planning and regulations.
the ordinance are consistent with um these elements of the comprehensive plan. And so staff requests uh the city council approve this ordinance 04 2025 amending the zoning ordinance of the city of Cocoa relating to the regulation of alcoholic
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; words the first reading may have missed · 01:08:27–01:08:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
for purposes of alcoholic beverage regulations. Amending certain definitions to clarify the application of the alcoholic beverage regulations. Modifying the regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverage sales as an accessory use. And amending the list of permitted and special exception uses in the general commercial CG district relating to alcoholic beverages thank you
and a point of clarification establishing that definition I think it's very important that we do comprehend its fullest intention and its initiative to define excessive accessory. Do we have any questions for mrs. Webster deputy mayor weeks and then councilman
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:10:37–01:10:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
well not necessarily two different codes but within the code it it does say and I apologize for not pointing that out or reminding that that in this central business district, that there are no distancing requirements. However, there's still there's still bars and package doors will still be subject to special exceptions. Okay.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:09–01:11:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:11:16–01:11:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:11:26–01:11:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
morality. We learned that in, back in prohibition days. and so so I my concern is that this is over regulating this this industry and I know that we have, some people who have bought property, which is going to come up, that we're told that they could put, and that's the only thing they could put there
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:12:00–01:12:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
after they've spent all that money and I don't think that that's right either as a city to do that so I have a lot of problems with this, not the definitions. That's fine. It's good to make the definitions but I don't like that we have that I think it's just too onerous with the way the distance and all of that is, is set I have a real problem with it ‸ mr.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:12:49–01:12:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
within Cocoa village there. So, so, so again, this is not, creating different codes there. Again, you have districts and sub districts that have different requirements already in the code. state law has changed with regards to the distance from from barn lounges and schools and churches
have to meet that. that That's changed. So that'll that'll change the distance requirements there and then for the property on 520 and Fisk that's not the only thing that they can be.
they under the zoning code, and under the land use, they can be other things. Their business decision was to go get the liquor license there. But again, that was their own personal business decision. But they do, under the code, they can be other things
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:14:34–01:14:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:14:39–01:14:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:14:50–01:14:51 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:15:01–01:15:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it was something else there. But again, the, the, the, they still have to work up to the zoning code and the future land use in terms of what they can be within the city, regardless of what, what any particular business prefers that they be, or, are the private matter of, what a business is holding them to be but but again I I hear that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:15:35–01:15:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
a few things I know with this within the city limits of Cocoa there's a not a lot of, buildings to choose from, for many different styles of businesses. Right.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:16:08–01:16:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
not saying that this is or isn't but I just I have an issue with this particular ordinance um because it could limit some businesses um ‸ unfortunately or fortunately I I definitely drink alcohol right
like I read through in this scene, like it's all a bad thing. Everything isis um looked at um from a negative standpoint as well but but when I some some individuals will look at it from the optics and and say you know in the village or other places you can do this or that with no issue but yeah I am three streets over Same thing we deal with with some of the regulations with food trucks on this street and that. And so um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:17:16–01:17:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:17:31–01:17:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:17:57–01:17:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
units. um And you say door, door to, building to building, they're not included. ‸ If you're a standalone school. all right So, so, well he just kind of clarified it from only you might could say that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:18:28–01:18:29 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the, those types of situations where a liquor store uh package store would be within a shopping center that is um at least 20,000 square feet then they would be exempt from any sort of distancing requirements or special exception. So, so that would be fine. That would be no problem.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:18:58–01:18:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
is totally on the other street, may not even face this particular business doesn't really um prohibit that particular church um unless they drive by it. but I just I just don't like all the regulation on it in my opinion um but I I do think it's consistent with what we did with the um not the hookah what was it the the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:19:38–01:19:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:19:46–01:19:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when the church members come out just like Zion Orthodox and the current building that's there now when they come out of there, they see a sign that had a... a some cigarette or whatever it was that was on the sign. But
um was turned the opposite way, houses were behind it, and totally separate from that particular building. So aa business would not be able to open based on that 500 feet, even though they do not cross paths. You know, that's... Me knowing that we don't have a lot of product that bothers me on ‸ the business side of it, where it prohibits um those style of businesses. So that's just my opinion.
Thank you. Thank you. for for that input. but And just but just to clarify that the 500 feet only applies to between schools and bars. All of the other distancing is 300 feet
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:12–01:21:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:21:37–01:21:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:21:38–01:21:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
or a school because once you're young you're going to have that influence and I don't care if it's facing you or or to the back of you my church prime example Metropolitan Missionary Baptist Church you know what's on the corner 520. ‸ Highways. Yes sir and you doggone right and what those jokers do they go into that store and here I am my church faces that building the side of the building the front part of that building, there's a side door that faces uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:22:30–01:22:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm sorry for those that do have a business I apologize there's nothing I can do about it but I'm not in favor of association of alcohol either by a church or either by a school okay or parks.
thank you for clarifying the thing about the the liquor store being in the shopping center. So that explains the 524 shopping center and my knowledge we just have that liquor store and the one on Clear Lake and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:23:34–01:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Kind of a boutique that's, yeah. Right. so this gentleman, this is his only business though is liquor stores I mean that's why he's opening a liquor store because he's not opening another kind of store because that's what he does right and was it wasn't I don't know is he here I mean it okay because I think he was over he was in the shopping center and I believe sold that when he had the idea to create this other liquor store you ‸ have to say I I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:24:22–01:24:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
well I did want to if I may just just to point out and just let council know that we, staff, wanted to make sure that that our our analysis was based on due diligence
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:24:45–01:24:45 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
our research. And and in in the ordinance itself, there are some citations made and backup information as to the the the the effect of the alcoholic beverage establishments on like vulnerable neighborhoods. And for instance, neighborhoods with a higher density of liquor stores have higher numbers of childhood accidents, assaults, and child abuses. And this is all based on research gathered. they be Liquor stores become places where social controls are weaker, increasing the likelihood of criminal and nuisance activities in the surrounding areas. A high density of liquor stores is linked to higher levels of crime and violence according to the CDC regulating the number of places in a given area where alcohol may be legally sold is an effective way to prevent excessive alcohol use and the CDC also recommend the use of regular regulatory authorities such as this type of licensing and zoning restrictions, to limit the outlet density due to the positive association between outlet density and excessive alcohol consumption and related items. so in particular to we want to make sure we back this up and
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:40–01:26:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:26:44–01:26:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
there will be somebody's gonna ‸ want to put a bar over by the train station and you've got probably apartments or multifamily stuff close by. We're we're
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the machine readings disagree here; a language review questioned the wording · 01:27:36–01:27:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
hurting ourselves by doing that by I think we're hurting ourselves by this the strength the amount of what is in this. If we kept it to the churches, which it you know is state code, we have to do that, or
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:28:06–01:28:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:28:16–01:28:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in my opinion and again I don't drink I hate alcohol but but I feel like it's just something that down the road, especially because you've got that whole area that's all going to get developed and it's gonna ‸ hurt us. So that's ‸ I'm gonna ‸ say I'm interested to hear the public as well
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:29:03–01:29:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:29:11–01:29:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as we consider the Brightline development that will probably be more of restaurants bars ‸ but if it were a liquor store we would probably be a part of some mixed-use development, ie a strip mall type development there. So so so again, and the the the the chart is on the screen, so we can refer back to that. And so so again,
So so 500 feet of schools, churches, again so we we have it on there again our the Crayton and the Cava I think that was last year that we actually put in, you guys actually put in that distance prohibition. And so this is this is a very similar to ‸ that. We can talk about, historically, the issues surrounding provost park again I think we all are well well aware of those but again this was brought back at the direction of council and so I'll reserve further comments mr. mayor
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:30:54–01:30:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:08–01:31:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
could remember certain elements in certain areas of this city especially I can I used to work at the fire station well the uh fire station right on 520 and uh this Boulevard and I could tell you some of the elements that it took the city a lot of work to get rid of in that location. We're talking about enhancing that location and other areas of the city especially in my district I think we can do better in regards
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:31:40–01:31:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
what we want here in the city as far as businesses I welcome you know anybody that's in the liquor business I welcome out we have plenty of other locations I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:31:48–01:31:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
than we have you know so I would recommend looking that way but I'm trying to keep the property values rising here and in uh and making it an inviting place and that's my stance on it
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:32:33–01:32:34 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:32:50–01:32:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:02–01:33:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:11–01:33:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:33:20–01:33:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:25–01:33:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:28–01:33:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:33:37–01:33:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
our site is on the southwest corner of uh West King and fist it's the site of the former convenience store that has um with gas um it's located immediately to the west across fist from the existing Wawa that's there um according to the
buffer analysis map on the agenda ‸ package, our site appears to be within the 300 foot radius buffer of a church, school, park, and uh residential zoning. So we kind of hit the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:34:13–01:34:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
there of the of the uh buffer requirements. um Our client acquired and had planned to redevelop the site as a packer packaged liquor store with no on-site consumption. So important to note that there's no on-site consumption there. um in May of 2023 our client obtained a zoning verification letter um confirming the consistency of a retail liquor store um uh on the subject property from the city uh in the property zone CG general commercial with a future land use designation of commercial. So they did obtain that prior to um acquisition of the site. um Our client, uh uh upon making uh various... uh uh They acquired the property in uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:34:56–01:35:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:07–01:35:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:35:37–01:35:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um but it obviously hadn't approved the ordinance by that date you're here now considering the ordinance. um the And and our our client had made certain improvements on the site, had begun making certain improvements on ‸ the site with the idea of um of uh putting the property to that use. um
essential moratorium on the new package service facilities pending the outcome of this ordinance, um it has a detrimental, it has had a detrimental effect on our client's ability to develop the property in a way that was consistent with the code when the property was purchased and when they applied for the BTR. um ‸ Again, the property is located um on a central commercial thoroughfare and I am out of time can
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:36:30–01:36:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
health, safety, and welfare of the community. Our client believes that the application of the ordinance, however, um to package liquor stores really doesn't serve that intent. Because the sale of packaged liquor is no different than any other retail sale. It's not for on-site consumption. So the application of the buffer requirement to a particular site selling
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:37:07–01:37:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And that's consistent with the Florida statutes and and the sections that have been cited, uh 562 45 um So clearly, that makes sense. But as Deputy Mayor Weeks pointed out, there's a Wawa across the street. So someone could go into the Wawa and purchase a can of beer
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:37:35–01:37:35 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
a cooler, already cooled, if they want to purchase liquor right across the street. It makes no sense to apply the buffer to our site when a convenience store doesn't have the buffer applied to them.
property as far as uh the convenience store use, that deed restriction was put into place in the deed that was purchased. So they can't develop this site as a convenience store by way of the deed. But if they did, they could still sell beer and wine there
commercial use of retail sale And so we're asking that the council either deny the ordinance as it's written, remove package stores from the distance requirements, from the buffer requirements,
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 01:38:52–01:38:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
calls. You don't get that person knocking at your door. At three o'clock in the morning. I do. On multiple occasions. A lot of these council members don't get it. Because
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:06–01:39:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
That's the problem that I have. So you can talk the talk, but do you walk over that way. I'm trying to stay calm because I know what it's like, sir. And I deal with it daily. So let me calm my demeanor. But they don't have to deal with it like I do.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 01:39:37–01:39:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:39:53–01:39:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
other things with it that are permissible inin the commercial general, the CG zoning classification. He cannot do a liquor... yeah I mean, I'm sorry. He cannot do a convenience store as it was prior... as it was previously utilized.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:12–01:40:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:20–01:40:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:40:49–01:40:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:40:51–01:41:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
property group, of the people in the streets, and now the board. The staff has done a wonderful job. that It's a very hard job of what they've done. But there's one thing that we need ‸ to bring out in the open. We haven't had to have this ordinance for 45 years that I've been in business. And um I really feel that because it's so
that either postpone it and have more input to go into it, because there's already some other, another couple of issues that could make it go bad. And uh there are two commercial property group people that had told me to state something publicly. But, um
uh One of them uh was Mac Osborne. uh And he said, heck yeah, you can use my name. He said, heck yeah, you just let them know, because I had explained to them what this was ‸ being proposed. And he said, not just no, hell no. Word from word
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:42:17–01:42:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:23–01:42:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
people. They also don't want it. One of them also allowed me to mention her name. But as a gentleman, I'd rather tell you privately rather than publicly.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:42:52–01:42:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And this is a good example. The downtown area does not, and you all know this, is not happy with food trucks being located there, except for big events.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:22–01:43:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:43:53–01:43:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:43:58–01:44:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:44:11–01:44:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they want to bring it up, ‸ fine. But um this has already been tried and tested in Melbourne. And I'm going to let that commercial property group owner uh bring that up. But this is something that I think needs to be delayed and looked further into it. No one in the commercial property group that I've been able to speak to is happy with this idea because it takes away tips from waiters and waitresses, just like the food trucks. Takes away the tips, takes away selling food, which is why we don't want food trucks there. I mean, tips, the liability. This is like, this is a
That was a, that was a particular type of license. That was a, that was an alcohol license. That's a license that allows them to serve, is that the bottle liquor
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:45:23–01:45:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:33–01:45:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:45:52–01:45:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
know how it takes away from anybody's tips there, because I'm going to go back to the example of painting with a twist. ‸ That currently has a bottle club license. You correct me if I'm wrong, Jen. they currently have a bottle club license issued, uh by the state as, as a part of the, their core business, uh
at at uh uh ‸ at painting with a twist there. You cannot bring your own bottle, glass of wine to the bar. And as I said before, and ask for a glass. I mean, you just it's just not what this is. um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:46:57–01:47:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you walk around with your own bottle when you go into a bar. and And they're going to allow you to actually just simply, again, serve yourself from what you uh what
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:47:16–01:47:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um And so I don't know where the confusion comes in because, again, the best example is uh ‸ painting with a twist. ‸ again, there may be some hair salons around here that actually allow you to bring in a bottle of wine. They may actually offer you a glass of wine that's
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 01:47:42–01:47:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:48:16–01:48:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
they require of a business like painting with a twist right now. Painting with a twist has that license if the, if the city code mirrors that, uh uh requirement, we're not, we're not giving you a second license on top of what the state would give you. I think what we're merely saying is, is that because the state is issuing this license because it's ancillary to your core, uh uh business, uh that you don't, we're not requiring you to, to go through the special exception process. Because again,
there. You're, you're, you're, you're some other type of business that has ancillary to your core business line of business, the ability for your customers to bring in, again, a bottle of wine or to be served, not for sale, a glass of wine. And I think that's as clear as I can make it, Mr. Mayor.
But what I'd like to add to that, am I able to speak? ‸ The way the restaurant business, when you go in there and you have a ‸ bring your own bottle kind of setup, they don't need to buy any liquor in the restaurant where they're eating. That's how it hurts their tips and the sales of restaurants, just like the food trucks.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:49:53–01:49:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:50:11–01:50:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah. Yeah. So, but but but but this is not changing the city's code to say that uh you can bring in your own bottle of liquor at the bar. um ‸ because again, that, that.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:50:46–01:50:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
construction, you measure from property line to property line. This measurement is done by building to building, which reduces the distance. That's the part I don't like. awesome um But that was it. That's all the points.
distancing, yes. so So the code uh prior to this ordinance, the way the code is written uh regarding distancing, that uh it regard as far as schools, churches, uh that the measurement is taken from building line to building line. But if it's a residential zone to uh
to the building, which is the alcohol beverage establishment. So it currently is, in most cases, building to building. so what we're doing So what we're doing is, um with the introduction of parks and playgrounds, that will be measured from the property line. And then you have the residential zones already being measured from the property line. And then the schools, uh with regard to the state statute, requires it to be measured from the property line. So so we are we are adding, uh just by adding those categories, we're adding the method of measurement from the property line. But we're also preserving uh some of the existing situations where you would measure to the building. So it just in an effort to try not to be so over restrictive Because the the original direction from City Council back in December was to overall, uh across the board, measure from property line to property line. But when we did that when we did that analysis and exercise, we discovered how restrictive it really was. And we we felt that uh that it was better to retain some of the original method of measurement from building to building
So, so, so, so, so, we were actually cognizant of, uh putting people out of business if they became, if they, if they no longer existed in the current line of business there. So, so again, um and go back to the chart, Jen. The chart gives the different different types of measurements. but we, we did make a conscious effort to actually do the analysis of under which method, what would become non-conforming.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:53:58–01:54:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 01:54:20–01:54:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:54:26–01:54:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So, so the the factors that make that particular property non-conforming are particularly, uh first and foremost, the uh adjacency to the park, which is behind the‸ property. um So, because they are adjacent to it, and so, with the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 01:55:04–01:55:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yeah, but, see y'all okay okay Yes, ma'am. No, I respect that. No, ma'am. I'm gonna close my mouth, and I'm gonna ‸ entertain a motion to take a recess break,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:10:49–02:10:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
favors say aye. Aye. I would like to just say thank you very much, council members, for your patience and audience, for your patience as well, and staff for your patience.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:11:54–02:11:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:12:33–02:12:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
corner. But I want to ‸ let it be known that what Mr. Blake is saying is real. We've worked so hard to clean that area up. And if you've not lived that reality, I pray you do then. I sincerely pray you reap what you sow. ‸ You live that if you're going to do that to my community. Please don't. Just please remember that I am, yeah, I'm one of the ones contacting. And driving by seeing disgusting things that I don't even need to see. Please is what I'm saying. Thank you.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:13:26–02:13:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I was just going to say, reading this, whether we pass this or not, we have to do the, of course, the state statute, meet the state statute, but that liquor store is not going to qualify over there based on just the
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:14:00–02:14:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and a lot of, um, especially with regard to the measurement and the different types of measuring. So the 500 feet, the Florida state statute requirement for the 500 feet is specifically from schools to bars. So establishments of on site consumption.
well, one of, one of the many things, but with regard to package stores is adding packaged and liquor stores to the grouping of alcoholic beverage establishments that should require distancing from other types of properties. And ‸ that measurement distance is to be 300 feet. And that is to be measured from building to building. Uh, if it's a school, it would be building to building. If it's a park, it would be, you know, property line to building,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:15:10–02:15:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:15:26–02:15:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:38–02:15:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:15:51–02:15:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
art gallery and she was doing her 15 year anniversary. So she was serving champagne. So now does that, now we have to go get a bottle club permit to share, to serve champagne.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up; a language review questioned the wording · 02:16:09–02:16:15 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:16:33–02:16:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And so, and so again, if you look at the state definition, which this, this ordinance would adopt the state's definition, it's up on the screen. I think this contemplates that that's a normal part of your business.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:17:01–02:17:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:17:15–02:17:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:17:27–02:17:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
as, um, Alex pointed out earlier, ‸ 45 years. We didn't need it. I'm confused as to why now we need it. I don't have a problem with everything else on the statute, but the bottle club is just too many questions. I really think I would ask that you table it and let's have some more discussion on it because here's my other concern. So if I have a business in the village and right now I serve food and let's say I want to become, I want to serve alcohol, but I don't want to go through the practice and the policies and the ordinances to get that permit for alcohol, but I can go get a bottle club.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:18:36–02:18:36 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Okay. Thank you, mayor. Thank you. The other thing is, is we've had a couple of incidences that have occurred before council and the board of adjustment. I'm not calling out any business at this point that were refused because of where it sat for various reasons. What prevents them now from going out and getting a bottle club permit? And now that establishment will be reopened. Yes, ma'am. So,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:19:09–02:19:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
be any money exchange. It's a private event where the proprietor is offering as, as a gift. There, there's no money exchanging hands unless there was an event fee.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:19:38–02:19:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
food establishment. Um, yes, um, I guess what I'm trying to say is that if it was a food establishment, of course, all of these businesses are still going to be subject to the state licensing for food preparation for restaurants, for seating, for all the different types of alcohol, um, licenses.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:20:32–02:20:33 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
they could be selling it themselves and making money for it. So, so I think that would be an unlikely, an unlikely situation. And I don't know if they would be allowed by the state to even do that, uh, because, um, and Mr. Greenwood, you brought up, uh, the example of the SFS license. So first, first and foremost, in order to have that license, you would have to be considered a restaurant. So, so that first and foremost, and yeah,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:21:11–02:21:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
definition of the bottle club is one that where it would have to take place and in a building or enclosed permanent structure. So a business that had an open air environment or an open patio, primarily, they would not be able to get a bottle club license.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:21:39–02:21:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
If you look at the note that's at the bottom of the slide, it's always been in the city's code. It's been in, in, it's been synonymous with a bar. And so again, I'm going to use painting with a twist. And so why would you take painting with a twist through a special exception for a bar with the distancing requirements when that's not their line of business? They are a painting with a twist business and they, and they, and they allow, uh, you to bring
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:22:19–02:22:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
so that, that was the, that was the, uh, uh, what we were trying to clarify and sort of stripping out and saying, okay, bottle club is just consistent with whatever state statute says it is.
already got one. Okay. But if somebody else wanted to do it, I'll just another little art studio. We do these things in the village all the time, you know, and as long as we are not making money off of it and we're offering as a free entity for a charitable event or non charitable event, then the bottle club doesn't apply. Correct.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:23:13–02:23:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:23:32–02:23:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
just wanted to make one point cause we're, you know, I know members of the public are talking about licensing with the state. So the city does, as everyone knows, does not license alcoholic beverages. So to the extent that,
any future business wants to allow alcohol on the premises, it would behoove those, that property owner or business, right. To check with the state about the licensing requirements. The city regulates zoning. Okay. So not, not the licensing of alcoholic beverages. So
may be saying about licensing requirements with the state that that's outside of the city's jurisdiction. Need to need to refer to the state about whether or not you need a bottle club license, whether or not you need a special events
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:24:25–02:24:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:24:47–02:24:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:25:01–02:25:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the residential is not a new addition to the code. It's always been in the code that that there's a separation requirement from a residential zone. So that's existing.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:25:32–02:25:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:25:46–02:25:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:26:02–02:26:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:26:52–02:26:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:27:03–02:27:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So we will come back with the second reading at our next council meeting or whenever staff prepares it for us. Item number seven. First reading of ordinance 062025. Amending the city code regarding code enforcement board jurisdiction and duties regarding noise and excavation violation and code enforcement lien reduction requests. ‸ Now the intent of this, as you will see, has multiple current code and draft ordinance established. It's a form of streamlining the process.
us, he may have could or should have resolved it prior to getting to us unless they would like to appeal it and then it will come back to us. And the reason why I'm saying that you'll see how ‸ under this draft ordinance is the council decision required only if the applicant does not accept the administrative reduction approved by the city manager.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:28:29–02:28:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:28:35–02:28:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
lead you through it there. I think, I think the best thing for us to do when we, when we, when we take you through the overview is to just take you through the agenda because we've laid it out pretty well in the agenda.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:19–02:29:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:29:24–02:29:27 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
six article two division one of the city code regarding the powers and jurisdiction of the code enforcement board amending chapters 12.5. And 13.5 of the city code regarding enforcement and penalties for mining and excavation operations and noise disturbances providing for a procedure for entering into code enforcement compliance agreements,
making additional housekeeping amendments in compliance with chapter 162 Florida statutes providing for the repeal of prior and consistent ordinances and resolutions and corporations
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:30:05–02:30:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And again, this is first reading, um, at least start off the discussion at a very high level. Um, first and foremost, the city's code enforcement board has the authority to consider certain violations of the city code. Um, and that is their limited jurisdiction to hear
This ordinance proposes to amend the code enforcement boards jurisdiction to hear code violations to include chapter 12.5 regarding mining operations. Um,
Um, and chapter 23 vehicles for hire. So again, if this ordinance passes, um, the code enforcement officers would be able to, um, prepare notices of violations for violate for code violations of those, um, three additional chapters of the city code. And those notices of
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:31:17–02:31:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
would be able to be presented to the code enforcement board for adjudication. So that's, that's one of the main, um, key points to this particular ordinance. And as the title says, there's some cleanup, um, of the, some of the language in the code, um, just, um, to bring it into compliance or just enumerate provisions that are in the Florida statute. Another key, uh, element of this ordinance is to create a new code enforcement, uh, section regarding compliance agreements. Um, ‸ under this provision, if it were to pass code enforcement officers, when, um, handling a code enforcement case with a violator, um, would be able to present a compliance agreement to the city manager for consideration. Where the violator, um, admits ‸ to the violation, but, um, has, um, terms and conditions in the agreement to bring the property into compliance without having to go through, um, the code enforcement process. Um,
um, the, um, the violation in accordance with the agreement, of course, then the matter would be presented to the code enforcement board. So that's, that's one key aspect. Another key aspect of this, um, of this ordinance would amend the code enforcement lien reduction process to streamline the process, um, by first eliminating the step of having to go to the code
lien reduction process that lays out, um, you know, the ability for, um, the city manager, um, to, um, enter into this lien or accept a lien reduction. In accordance with a standard lien calculation that's proposed in the ordinance.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:33:49–02:33:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
um, an administrative reduction table that would afford, um, the manager, the ability to, um, reduce the lien based on the reduction table and the calculations that are in this ordinance. So that's a very high level. I'm sure the council may have some questions about, about that calculation, but we can talk about that in a second, but that's the other key element, um, to this, um, to this, um, ordinance. And on that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:34:32–02:34:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
once the calculation is made in accordance with the code, that calculation, the adjusted lien reduction amount based on the calculation gets presented to the applicant. If they agree, um, to that reduced amount, then they can pay the, the, the reduced amount within 30 days. And then the manager has the authority to release the lien. If they don't agree to the standard calculation, then the matter of just like we have been dealing with for years would come to the city council. And then you would apply the, you know, all the factors and consider, you know, that, that calculation as well. And then the council would ultimately have, you know,
So that is a, is a proposal, a thought idea that hopefully, you know, if the council were to approve this kind of streamline the process a little bit and maybe take care of some of those lien reductions through a standard calculation process with agreement of the, of the, of the property owner. So I'd be happy to answer any specific questions. I don't know if we have a PowerPoint or anything on this. So
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:35:54–02:35:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
mean, ‸ like he said, we're trying to, to clean it up and make a, an easier route for some of these processes to happen. So that's, I think that's the best method for us to, to work on, on this process. Keeps the cases in house, keeps things moving in the right direction.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:36:29–02:36:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
The question that I have, I, I, I like this, the ideal of this, cause it speeds up the process. I think the last, this past year, they're going to kind of backlog that we, I know that we received several times.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:37:01–02:37:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:37:17–02:37:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:37:42–02:37:43 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:37:47–02:37:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:38:02–02:38:03 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:38:21–02:38:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:38:27–02:38:27 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
that the council approved. If they disagree, then they have to come to the city council and all bets are off. The council's not, not bound by the, by the calculation. The council then would consider the same criteria that the
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:38:48–02:38:48 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:38:55–02:38:55 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:39:45–02:39:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the fines, the fines would, the fines are determined based on the code enforcement board's order. Mm-hmm. And the amount of the daily fine. And the amount of days that it took to bring the violation into compliance. So, the swings in the, in the, in the amounts of the code enforcement liens, you know, depends on those two factors. What was the amount of the penalty per day and, you know, did the, did the violator expeditiously then bring it into compliance and cut off the lien from, from keep accruing?
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 02:40:40–02:40:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:41:06–02:41:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So will they, if they turn that down when they come here before us, we'll be hearing the same stuff that the code enforcement word used to, where we can null and void, whatever it is.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:41:22–02:41:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yes, ma'am. I, I believe that this will expedite the process because we'll be able to enter into an agreement with that property owner to, uh, to, to comply. Yeah. And I can see
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:42:20–02:42:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:42:23–02:42:23 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:42:40–02:42:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:43:08–02:43:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Keep in mind that, you know, the liens run in favor of the city council. So the city council ultimately has the only say only really legitimate say on lien reductions.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:43:30–02:43:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:43:40–02:43:40 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:43:48–02:43:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:44:12–02:44:13 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:44:16–02:44:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Greenwood. Thank you for hearing me. Um, the method that the, uh, code, uh, board, uh, has for violations that's done with the code board director. How are those, uh, are any of those requirements different for anybody in reference to the noise ordinance guidelines and fines? Is that also done through the code board director now or
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:44:57–02:45:05 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
as determined by the code enforcement officer, then a notice of violation can be prepared presented to the property owner and a case brought before the code enforcement board and the property owner could be, if they
found in violation could be fined for the noise violation today under the city code. We cannot do that because the code board doesn't have jurisdiction to handle noise violations. So this corrects it tonight. This is, this provides an enforcement tool. Enforcement
Mr. Greenwood, remember the noise violations were presented to the state attorney. Remember the letter from the state attorney that said I'm not prosecuting. Yes, sir.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:46:06–02:46:06 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:46:43–02:46:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:46:50–02:46:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:47:13–02:47:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:47:24–02:47:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:47:56–02:47:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:48:02–02:48:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:48:28–02:48:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
code enforcement board held a public hearing on May 18th of 2023, at which time the board found the property owner in violation of four counts of the ‸ city's property maintenance code from anywhere from accumulation of junk, trash, litter, exterior general condition, boarded up buildings, and roofs and drainage damage. The code board provided the property owners time of July 17th of 2023 to come in compliance and correct the violations. A non-compliance hearing was held on August 17th of 2023. The lien ran at $100 per day from July 17th of 2023 until compliance was achieved on March 13th, 2025.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:49:33–02:49:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:50:01–02:50:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:50:19–02:50:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:50:32–02:50:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:50:34–02:50:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Yes, I made the request for the reduction. When we got the notice, we did start to work on the different violations. The major violation was the roof. And we spent over $160,000 on the building. So we have to await insurance money to come in, in order to start the roof. And then we also had to basically find ‸ proper contractors, which we could not find because not a lot of contractors could work on that roof. So it took us a little bit of time to get that larger part taken care of. But when we did get the notice, we did start to work on different parts of the ‸ violations.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 02:51:33–02:51:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
When he says they cleaned up everything, but the only thing left was the roof and they wound up, I think you said you paid $160,000 for the roof because that's what I wrote down.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:51:52–02:51:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So the ‸ code enforcement board was unanimous to reduce it to $10,000, which is what he has agreed to do, the $10,000. So that was what the code enforcement board said.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:52:14–02:52:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:52:34–02:52:38 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:52:40–02:52:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:52:46–02:52:46 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:52:52–02:52:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
So I appreciate you addressing that with that being on front street. And I would just ask, I don't know how the board is going to vote on this, but you know, if those liens are reduced, I would just ask that you continue to keep up that property.
Thank you for that. And as you stated, you've been in communication with our police department. If you have any issues moving forward, please contact our PD and they can assist on that.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:54:57–02:54:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Yeah, but it was a challenge, but I think we, we sorted it out and we figured it out. And ‸ we have been, it's been a couple of months. We building us in much better condition. No homeless. Yeah.
Now, let me ask you a personal question. Sir, because we all put a sweat equity into your facility. I need a commitment from you, sir, as well. Because see, I know you, you're trying to sell your building. Yeah. And there are some projects that we're doing in the city of Cocoa, sir, that I would like for you to collaborate with my city manager, sir, that will enhance our community as a whole. Sir, can I get a commitment when you sell your building?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:57:05–02:57:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 02:57:24–02:57:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:57:43–02:57:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Come on down, ma'am. It's requesting a reduction of the current code enforcement lien of $149,945 at the property located on 1001 North Indian River Drive be reduced down to zero amounts. Excuse me, amount, rather.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:58:16–02:58:17 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:58:24–02:58:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and three quarters of a million value property reduction. And I at least want to hear about how the staff can recoup the costs. But let me hear from you, sir.
Code enforcement board held a public hearing on May 16th, at which time the board found the property owner in violation for the following codes. Permit required for screen enclosure, city code chapter six for pools and spas, the clean and sanitary conditions, and permit required for fences. Code enforcement board provided and gave the property owner significant time of June 16th, 2019 to correct the violations. Code enforcement board here
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 02:59:11–02:59:11 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:59:14–02:59:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 02:59:21–02:59:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 02:59:24–02:59:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
ma'am. I'd like it reduced due to the fact that we had complied prior to the violation. We had complied on the 11th of September, but they violated us on the 19th.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:25–03:00:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:55–03:00:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:00:58–03:00:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:01:08–03:01:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:01:16–03:01:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
We have a motion on the floor to waive the fees by deputy mayor Weeks and second by Councilman Hearn. Chair's going to call the question. All in favor by saying aye.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:01:57–03:02:02 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:02:05–03:02:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:02:09–03:02:14 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:02:19–03:02:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:02:38–03:02:41 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:03:05–03:03:05 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:03:10–03:03:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
in violation of the city code permit required based on the ‸ officer's testimony. The code ‸ enforcement board provided the owner of the significant time to come to come to compliance by June 17th of 2023. The correct violations. A noncompliance hearing was held on July of 20th of 2023.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:03:54–03:03:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
‸ Well, in this particular case, as you see, she had a letter showing that there was absolutely no liens on the property should never have been brought in the first place. So I move that we reduce it to zero. Okay. I'm looking for a
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:04:59–03:05:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:05:07–03:05:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:05:31–03:05:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:05:44–03:05:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:05:52–03:05:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:05:56–03:06:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:01–03:06:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Protective treatment, peeling and faking paint. And also chapter 6, maintenance and structures of grounds. Basically saying they're not maintaining the grounds. The code enforcement board provided the owner submission time of April 16th, ‸ 2017 to come to compliance. A noncompliance was held on April 20th, 2017.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:06:39–03:06:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:07:06–03:07:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:07:10–03:07:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we began managing the property once the lien was in place, which was in July of 2017. Ever since then, we've worked extremely hard to have the property in compliance. Pulls the entire community up to date. Um, less and less police calls. I do have the president of the association here with me.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:08:09–03:08:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
It was at the time the, uh, the code enforcement, they were hit. It was under one owner. Now it's been, it's a whole lot of different owners and they have worked hard to fix it up, but they need this, uh, a judgment reduced because they need to put a new roof on, on all the buildings. It's going to cost a ton of money to put roofs on all the buildings. Um, and, uh,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:08:36–03:08:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:09:06–03:09:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:09:28–03:09:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:10:04–03:10:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:16–03:10:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:10:28–03:10:33 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:36–03:10:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:10:48–03:10:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:10:52–03:10:53 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:11:26–03:11:31 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:11:38–03:11:39 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:11:39–03:11:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:12:09–03:12:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:12:17–03:12:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:12:24–03:12:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:12:38–03:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:12:55–03:12:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
asked us to bring back a discussion and a report on the expenditures over at the two museums, and we've done that. You can see the development timeline for both of the museums, and then you can see the expenditure history for for both of the museums. Remember that prior to, I think, 2021 or so, the ‸ museum, the Brevard Museum, was under management and operation by the historical society, I think it was. And so, again, that's why ‸ the expenses look different there, but we've given you the average annual maintenance, we've given you the operating costs there.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:13:54–03:14:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
when the when the previous contractor gave the gave it back to us there, they were staffing that, and so that's only a part-time staffer to the tune of approximately 17,000 per year. So that's that's the difference in sort of the personnel costs associated with the the two museums. We can answer questions if you have.
Triple G, raise your hand. He's on down the road to the podium, sir, because you have a card that you submitted. ‸ Okay. Just show your thoughts, then I'll hear from council.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:15:36–03:15:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
A visit to Buffalo Jump. I learned about that in history class. In British Columbia, Canada, where I got to talk with and experience what I had learned in school on how Native North Americans were able to survive. A visit to several museums in Savannah, Georgia that had artifacts from the slave trade making what I was taught in school oh so very real.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:16:50–03:16:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the difference of the maintenance costs and adding in the $16,889 brings a total of $44,521. and that's all I did was just take the maintenance subtract the difference and add the museum cost that we already have been given.
so I do not in my opinion and I think we talked about this in length before I do not believe that management of this style of museum with the programming that is needed in a brand new museum $16,889 would not be sufficient for any manager to come in to try to make this a successful endeavor like we expect it to be. But if we say equal I believe that would bring us pretty equal and even at 44 we still may not be able to find anyone to run the museum. I'm not sure what that number needs to look like, but I know that $16,889 is not the number.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:26–03:18:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:28–03:18:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:33–03:18:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:18:49–03:18:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:07–03:19:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:19:15–03:19:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
do it for all. And we're all in here are parents. All of us. And we haven't got two grandkids yet but some has not. But ‸ got to be fair and equitable across the board and We have to come up with a way.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:20:15–03:20:16 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
I guess the first question is so we're making a budget decision before we vote on the budget, before outside of budget talks is that what we're doing here or are we coming up with a proposed plan that will then be a part of those budget talks
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:20:56–03:20:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:20:58–03:20:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:21:01–03:21:01 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
going to discuss a plan that you know could be proposed as part you know of the when we go into our budget discussions Because we're going to have decisions to make. And if we're going to... You know, we're going to try to keep within certain perimeters You know, there are always... You know, there's going to be a give and take. and you know they're winners and losers. And we ‸ need to have a plan Now, it sounds to me like Well, first of all,
It seems a little divisive given the fact that... I mean this I'm not sure why ‸ We would divide it... that way I mean we have a natural history museum
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:21:56–03:21:57 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
natural history And then we have a cultural and history museum for the african-american community and for everyone that should be valuable to everyone as well. I went in um Charlene was nice enough to take me in the museum this week just to refresh my memory and take a look at the different interpretation ‸ exhibits and I think that the building itself is almost is a part of the interpretation right
and I was hoping that we could come up with a plan where we really feature that through a series We really make it an alive museum so it's there there aren't enough exhibits there that you would have a you know people passing through on a regular basis.
year's worth of speakers and ‸ you know featured speakers or maybe conversations that can be held there that bring people into that space and making it a real living museum rather than that I think there are six videos that you view as you go in.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:23:33–03:23:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
out who that that's a special talent. But, in terms of just doing ‸ I don't know how we set it up equally because the Brevard Museum having been in existence this long it has numerous interpretive exhibits you could spend an hour there easily it's different than
which is just as valuable but in a different way I mean I don't think we can try to do them the same way I think they demand different probably well I don't know if they demand different staff or not
kick off the Collins Museum that knows the community understands the history and also you know how to interpret through exhibitions so if we were proposing a certain amount that would go toward that yeah I would like to see that on the agenda when we go to look at our budget. but I think they're really two different entities the Brevard Museum and the Collins Museum It's hard to kind of put them up side by side
I agree with a lot of what you said and I did make the suggestion that we put it with Lee Brevard Did you contact them by any chance as a project Because they will come in and look at it ‸ as a project which I think would give us a lot more idea of how to steer it. because right now throwing money at it, we're throwing money at what? we don't know I agree that we need a better plan of some kind to get things off and ‸ running and so I too want to see it be successful but it's going to take time through the right process,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:26:24–03:26:30 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think they present in February So they would come and present to us what their project what they've come up with. and in the meantime working with them through the process you know will give us some ideas of the direction to go or to help I mean we don't have to go with what they say, but I just feel like it would be helpful to have outside And it's a free thing
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:27:03–03:27:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:27:14–03:27:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
route And what she expressed to me was we didn't have we don't have we do not have a plan. And so by us not having a plan, and we don't have a non-profit or some sort of a manager of the building she didn't feel like,
We went back and forth for a little while on the phone but you know to her point we don't have a manager or we don't have a plan for the building as of right now.
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:28:26–03:28:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:28:30–03:28:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
the day, I don't know what Lee Brevard would actually bring to the table there. And so what you're asking in terms of a plan is an RFP for some agency that has an ‸ expertise to actually come in and to manage and operate the museum That includes the day-to-day operations program and exhibit development facilities maintenance and improvements volunteer recruitment community engagement marketing fundraising financial reporting responsibilities and and and so you you
your plan would be an RFP for somebody that's capable of doing all of those things. I I literally have an RFP on my phone but to implement the plan, you need money and so and so it's always going to come back to money
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:29:33–03:29:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
you need marketing You need all of those things that would be in an RFP um and so again we we we come back to dollars that you're going to be able to appropriate in a budget to actually hire somebody to do all of those things. next week you will receive a balanced budget proposal. and so um and so we will be talking about how you want to adjust that, um to achieve whatever you want to achieve at the, ‸ museum. ‸ but again at the end of the day, at the beginning of the day, this is this is about uh expertise uh
in terms of doing all of those things that I, that I just outlined. That's the, the typical, uh book of services that's provided by someone that manages museums. And, and, and
the last conversation that we had about equal right but I also didn't want to go to war today about it And so that's why i kind of I went the route of, okay let me
said okay uh since the mayor was ‸ really adamant about equal, I said, let me come up with a way to get it somewhat in agreement And, and that's, that's the reason why I did it. I didn't do it because I wanted to, to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:31:37–03:31:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
right ‸ we should not be bickering over, over this because this is a great idea. ‸ however we go you know but I think a manager or a non-profit i think
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:31:48–03:31:49 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:32:10–03:32:12 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Remember there are folks who actually go to school and get degrees in uh in museum curation you know and so and so we don't have the ‸ time or the expertise. If you look at Hannibal square, they have a staff of three. yeah
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:32:43–03:32:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
donates, but it's run from a not-for-profit and I, I would assume that they do fundraising and they go out and get grants there. And so it is sort of a dependent ‸ agency. um But again, um there's there are dollars that uh is contribute that are contributed by the city uh to that not-for-profit to actually run the uh the museum. but‸ again, it's it is it is, if you're gonna ‸ put out an RFP, you'd ask for those things that I that i enumerated. yep yep
and And another thing to kind of piggyback on Councilwoman, cause that that's a good point ‸ about um you know the discussion about programming. But the RFP does just that. They they create the programming that we need for that museum. Let let the non-profit do that work. um to my Just in my my ‸ humble opinion on that.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:33:49–03:33:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
You can put lipstick on that pig. You can give that pig a week It doesn't matter. It still takes dollars and cents. And the second and most important thing about it is the perception of it. When you look at it with the naked eye, because we can talk about different institutions throughout this whole state, these United States. so
the millage rate. and And unfortunately, when people see it, they're going to ask that question. But the greatest thing that you can do is have skin in the game. There are several people that I've talked to who are willing to help assist in this. Because once you get the doors open um as a fundraiser, you can have birthday events there. You can even have a marriage uh a marriagethere. Someone can get married there at that facility. We must open up our hearts and minds in order to get that uh building utilized. um Now,
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:35:20–03:35:34 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output · 03:35:40–03:35:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 03:35:59–03:36:04 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
because you have to because people are going to look at it as perception, which is reality. So it's important that we just slow this down but do it decent and in order. And I know we can
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:36:18–03:36:24 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
it's not going to happen tonight. What I mean by that, it's not going to happen tonight. No dollar amount will be assessed. I think if we calm down, start putting pieces to the puzzle to make it a successful attraction center ‸ because all roads lead through that right now on Blake Avenue ‸ from Barbara Jenkins to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:37:18–03:37:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
now that some of those ladies will be willing to volunteer their time. ‸ I guarantee it. But they haven't been approached. And that's the reason why I'm saying slow this wagon down so we can do things decent and in order. Because it's going to cost money.
I was just going to say the appreciate, you know, it's not apples to apples, but the whole idea that we do have to invest in it. You know, I wholeheartedly support that. I think it's good for everybody in our community. And I'm wondering, is it an RFP or do we hire a consultant?
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:38:24–03:38:26 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cultural institution, celebrating the stories, achievements, and lived experience of African-Americans in Cocoa and Brevard County. Located in the historic Diamond Square, the museum currently features, and you insert what we feature, and aspires to expand its reach through innovative programming, dynamic exhibits, and strong community partnership. The city seeks a partner to transform the museum into a sustainable, vibrant destination that educates, inspires, and engages residents and visitors alike. ‸ And so you, you again, put an RFP out on the street for someone to come in
And so I don't know that a consultant will tell you all of the things that I just told you, and you got to pay them above and beyond what you're, what you're paying me and the rest of staff there. And so this is again, dollars and cents that are put on the table to issue an RFP for somebody to become the manager, the curator, the facilities manager, the marketing expert, the volunteer curator of the museum.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:41:11–03:41:13 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we're something that we have a museum that is in its infancy and has a potential to be this living, developing. I mean, it's, we need to make it alive. And we also have just a fabulous space there.
a plan fairly easily with our own staff in terms of we, and we have, we do, we facilitate events all the time, making it available for weddings or birthdays and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:42:32–03:42:32 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
If you want my honest good opinion, ma'am, stop it right here. Let us do what we need to do to bring a ‸ group of individuals that won't be committed. If you got one right here in the audience. I know you're looking at the time element. This
I, and you, and I know you're talking about a plan, which I understand. But I'm thinking, there's a difference between me consuming ‸ this and whereas you're forcing this on me. That's the point that I'm saying to you. Because there again, there again, it's going to require dollars and
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:43:36–03:43:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:43:45–03:43:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And you got the school there. So I mean, there's a thing in the Bible that says do things decent in order. Decent. We're not doing it decent right now. And it's not, it's going to be
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:44:07–03:44:08 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
because a lot of hearts are going to burn right about now. And that's the reason why I'm just saying, slow this down. We get this power in numbers. You're going to get people to volunteer their time.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:44:20–03:44:21 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
willing to volunteer their time. I already know it because I've been talking. So that's the reason why I'm saying, but I, ‸ I'm moving on based on what you all are saying.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:44:44–03:44:44 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
someone come in, open the door, and you're going to have people do whatever they want to do. Instead of having a manager in place that has a plan and a program that respects this building as much as it should be.
along with the nonprofit that's going to be running the museum, just like they do at Hannibal Square and other places. Those volunteers like this young lady just said just now, she's willing to volunteer. Mary, you said there's a few people that you know that may be willing to volunteer.
management of it, right? That that's to me, to run it properly with respect is to have someone that has the expertise, not just somebody who living down the street who can come open the door.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:45:57–03:46:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's as stated multiple times. He's he did not say one time that we do not have the money. He said he has to find the money. That's what staff is there for. It's not putting a
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:46:18–03:46:18 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:46:27–03:46:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
we're going to be 10 years down the road. That that that's what the process that we're going right now. If this was 2018 I can understand that statement. But at this point, it's not a rush.
inviting everybody who's interested not only in volunteering, but interested in perhaps running the museum, you know, do some ‸ sort of an event where we invite everybody in because we might find somebody a retiree, somebody who isn't going to cost an arm and ‸ leg, but willing to, you know, get
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:47:28–03:47:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
started. Because we have so many retirees here. And I'm sure there are people who've run museums and and done this kind of thing and maybe invite in the and see what kind of group of people would come to an event at the museum inviting, like I say, for volunteers, ‸ people with museum experience, stuff like that. Let's plan something and do some sort of a workshop or an event of that kind and do it fairly soon.
money we might be talking about for it. But I'm just throwing that out there as a way as a starting point. Let's see. We keep saying there. These people are interested. ‸ Let's get them all together and see what comes out.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:48:39–03:48:43 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
these particular volunteers. It's not the first time we had this conversation. And so it is. Yeah, it is. It's not is they and I'm not saying that they couldn't have done more. Right. I think
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:49:04–03:49:04 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said); a language review questioned the wording · 03:49:13–03:49:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:49:17–03:49:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I just want to make sure that you remember this day and this remember this opportunity that we are here now and we're able to make a difference now. Or we're going to be sitting here 10, 20 years from now wondering why ‸ that's what's going to happen. No, that's facts.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:49:57–03:49:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
other museums. So, you know, that ‸ we I think we have done a decent job. That whole community is really developing now with with all the housing that we're going to be doing there.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:50:19–03:50:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:50:34–03:50:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
cause you're absolutely right. That neighborhood is changing. It's a lot coming into the community. Yep. That's why it's the perfect time to bring in a manager for the museum now. Because they'll have maybe one or two years to get the program is situated. We have a lot of nonprofits here.
We got NAACP here. A lot of different people are already coming to the table, but they need that leadership. They need that manager in place to lead them to it. Just having dates in
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:51:16–03:51:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:51:19–03:51:20 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 03:51:21–03:51:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:51:26–03:51:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:51:43–03:51:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:51:46–03:51:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:51:52–03:51:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:52:06–03:52:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:52:14–03:52:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:52:19–03:52:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Well, ‸ if the conversation, so I- Okay. If everybody agreed to that, that a conversation could be had at the budget meeting, I'm down with that 100%. Just
for this museum. So I'm in agreeance that we need management. Um, obviously the council is in agreeance of moving it to a budget meeting. Um, I just think as a council, we need to start thinking, we need at least have faith and step out and try to move these. These type of agendas or initiatives forward. Um, I think we have nothing to lose from it only to gain in my opinion. So ‸ that's all I'll say on that. And I say that
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:54:07–03:54:07 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:54:11–03:54:12 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:54:27–03:54:28 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:54:28–03:54:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:54:41–03:54:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:54:49–03:54:52 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:54:59–03:55:08 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:55:11–03:55:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that this boat, excuse me, replaces the existing boat. And since it was contribution, it required a budget adjustment to recognize the value of the contribution. Hence this agenda item.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:56:05–03:56:07 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Okay. Moving on to item number eight dash to approve it. MOU between the city of Cocoa and Brightline for the city multimodal passenger rail system. Move to approve.
All right. There we go. We have a motion on the floor by deputy mayor of weeks. Second by councilwoman calls. Chair's gonna call the question. All in favor by saying aye. Aye. Any nays? Ayes have unanimously. Item number three under city business, which was item number five from the Michael C. Blake subdivision from consent. Item number five city manager, sir.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 03:56:54–03:56:54 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:56:56–03:57:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 03:57:21–03:57:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and the development agreement that have been amended. And, um, I hate to have Jennifer sit here and not let her do a presentation, but, but, but, but so we'll, we'll quickly get through that. So, so recall that this deal was for the Michael C. Blake subdivision. It was 32, uh, homes. Um, and that required a replatting of the subdivision because remember we're splitting the existing lots. So again, replatting is necessary. Uh, 32 homes, the two homes that are on mango. We're never a part of the Michael C. Blake subdivision. And so don't need to go through a replatting. Lennar is interested in starting those right away. We're interested in them starting those right away.
The ones that are on go back one slide. The ones that are on, uh, are in the subdivision again, that has to go through the replatting the whole site plan of approval process. Those are again, the, uh, the, the narrow lot homes, um, that will go on, uh, the 32 lots that are created.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 03:59:09–03:59:16 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh, get started right away. Uh, we were able to renegotiate the price for those two lots from 15,000, uh, per lot to $25,000 per lot. So, yeah, so it's, it's always, it's always about, you know, time, time, the time value of money, right? Um, so, so that they were gracious enough to do that. Um, and so we get started right away. We, uh, they build the two lots again, separate from the whole process of replatting the subdivision for the, for the 32 other homes there. And that's it in a nutshell. And Jen, I apologize for making you sit here all night and not let you do your presentation.
No, no problem. I didn't have a presentation for this per se. I just wanted to have some slides for you to support your narrative. So, okay. They're just visuals.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:00:14–04:00:14 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:00:15–04:00:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:00:20–04:00:21 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:00:21–04:00:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:00:27–04:00:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Go ahead. I just had a question. Um, weren't at one time we were looking at going into negotiations on, uh, possibly purchasing the lots on Barbara Jenkins to include in this project. Yeah. Or is that a house?
Uh, they, they did go out and get appraisals on the lots there. I think they will accept, uh, proposals. Um, I'm not sure what they're going to do with the proposals there, but they know that, uh, there are a number of folks out there interested in.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:01:19–04:01:23 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
And remember we have the recycled dollars from the sale of the first five, um, from the first five homes that we did in Michael C. Blake that we could actually, uh, purchase and, and do homes there. So the ball really is in the, uh, in the, uh, court of the housing authority.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:01:56–04:01:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:02:01–04:02:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, no, so, so, so the, the two lots are 25,000 a piece. The split, the splits are 15,000 a split. So that's 400 and ‸ some odd thousand dollars plus the 50. I
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:02:33–04:02:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:02:40–04:02:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I think, I think, well, we could, we could actually do that, but I think we have approximately 1.2 ish in that. I think it's, I think it's just, well, let me just call it 1.2 plus we'll have the 500,000. Right.
Flag: the recognized words and the detected speech do not line up · 04:03:45–04:03:48 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Right. So, ‸ so diamond square. So, so the pot is recreated. Let's just put it this way. The pot is recreated at ‸ approximately 1.7, but recall how we got there. We got there through a combination of general fund dollars and diamond square
I would say at a minimum, we should be looking at, um, if we're going to do something with that pot, then, then I think we somehow old diamond square portion of those proceeds. Gotcha.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:04:41–04:04:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:04:51–04:04:54 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:04:55–04:04:56 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Let me, let me just tell you my intent with regards to this was to attract and retain. Um, the best that we can. We, we have, uh, again, we have a deputy director for utilities. We have, um, an assistant fire chief. We have the two police commanders, and then we have the assistant finance director.
so they're, they're all, uh, second sort of in charge. You're second in charge. You should have. Second in charge, uh, personnel that are able to succeed, uh, the director. And so I think that, um, there needs to be some incentive in place so that we are, uh, appropriately taken care of when it comes to succession planning appropriately taken care of when it comes to retaining folks that who, in ‸ essence, should be being groomed to take over the leadership position. Uh, if something happens or if, uh, if the directors retire or move on. And so again, uh, we're not at market rate for the directors. We're certainly not at market rate for the deputy directors. ‸ And so I felt like, um, something needed to be in place to show that, uh,
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:06:36–04:06:37 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:06:59–04:06:59 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
And so just to recap very briefly, um, starting back in 1986, council started making some different benefits available to the directors as opposed to the regular employees. Um, ‸ this things got a change from resolution after resolution after resolution. And so we're trying to just establish a policy that the resolution adopts the policy as a document by itself.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:07:34–04:07:44 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:07:52–04:07:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:08:05–04:08:11 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
um, that applies to them if they retire from the city and within that policy is the definition of executive management, um, ‸ retirement. Um, and so, um, with this recent change, uh, there's a definite definition in there of the executive management team, which includes all those titles that the city managers just defined. Um,
so within that they're again eligible for some different benefits, which is, um, different vacation benefits, sick benefit, uh, life insurance while they're employed for the city.
all the other resolutions, um, there's just a policy and the resolution that, um, adopts the policy to make any kind of future changes easier. And it went back and forth and back and forth, ‸ back and forth over time.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:09:18–04:09:19 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
benefits package. It's it's, um, and I think, you know, we have a lot of stability, um, in our executive team. So, um, it seems to be working. So I'll make the motion to approve.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:10:45–04:10:56 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Um, again, it depends on, um, the people retiring. Uh, there's additional, uh, vacation time that's being added for these positions. I don't know exactly what the differential is.
number of the employees have been here for a number of years. So they're probably at that level anyways, a little bit of a differential in the life insurance and then getting paid out. The sick pay depends on if you meet those conditions. So I can tell you, I'm not getting the lifetime benefit.
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:11:57–04:11:57 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
So I understand that as well. That's what they do in the military. My husband had to do 20 years to get the TRICARE for life. So anyway, thank you. I'm good.
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 04:12:16–04:12:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 04:12:28–04:12:32 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 04:12:34–04:12:40 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
uh One of the observations you'll find out about at TPO on Thursday, ‸ you probably already know about it, but for everybody else, the widening project for 524 is now broken into five phases and it's a phased approach. Some of the good news that I heard. One, uh under the draft cost feasibility plan, the crystal ball that says we will have money it's fully funded for 2036 to 2050.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:13:43–04:13:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:13:55–04:14:25 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
City Hall, at fire stations, at the police station and leisure services facility. we're also going to be hosting a collection event on saturday july 19th from 9 a.m to 2 p.m at uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:14:39–04:14:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:14:46–04:14:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
that's a little change from um from from where we normally do it there. uh Also, the city has partnered with the Early Learning Coalition to install a learning trail surrounding the playground at Provost Park. uh
to bring early learning to families in a free, fun environment with interactive sidewalk activities and signs with learning prompts. um Early Learning Coalition has volunteers from
uh summer mission team that will work on July 16th to help install the signs and paint the stencils uh on the sidewalks and you you guys are welcome to participate in that. uh Chief Lamb introduced the new assistant Fire Chief Roderick
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:15:41–04:15:46 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
mr city manager um brevard house alliance is proud to announce that ‸ they have expanded their services at endeavor elementary they have a health clinic at endeavor elementary school which now will include care for adults and families of the students. In in addition to, it is a it is becoming a true neighborhood resource for parents, siblings, and community members who can receive the same high quality compassionate care on the campus. uh The expansion and serves ensures better access to primary care, chronic disease management, and wellness support for the whole family in one convenient location. For more information or to make an appointment, uh you can call
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:16:24–04:16:31 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:16:53–04:16:53 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:16:54–04:16:55 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:16:57–04:16:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:17:04–04:17:06 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
any uh photos. um So one of the things I wanted to bring up, and uh council could chime on ‸ if they want to. uh Hopefully we can have it come back as a gender item. I love giving staff homework. um So uh it was brought to my attention with the brack uh Bracco Pond. uh Some of the citizens would like to see more use out there, community use, and uh ways of having more community gatherings out there. So one of the things that I noticed when
uh how feasible it is to have something like that, a structure like that over on the, that would be the east, the southeast side of the park, uh where we utilize when we had the recent storm, ‸ we put the debris over there.
the need to add parking. If there was an event, people could rent it out, um host community uh gatherings, uh events. So um if council is okay with at least exploring that idea, ‸ having staff bring something back to the council to present. as If we are okay, if we're okay with it, we could probably do it as a plan over the next couple ‸ years to try to work, to have something like that out there.
but if we come up with a plan over the next couple ‸ years, we could probably get there. So I was hoping to get kind of uh consent from the council on that.
can do that as well. I could see what, what I have to uh ‸ staff, but I would love for it to come back to us as a whole to, you know, be presented to us. um As we all know, Bracco Pond, the, the possibilities out there are like unlimited. We can do so much out there and make it more useful
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:19:44–04:19:49 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:20:09–04:20:10 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
did I do? um so it's actually the best one. I think I've been at all of them. um even the year before I was elected. So this was absolutely the best event. There was just a lot going on with singing and dancing and shopping and lots of vendors. And
would uh affirm that assessment as well, that it was the best event. yet. um i my My term on the Save Our Indian River Lagoon is over, so ‸ fortunate the county commissioners have appointed me to the Environmentally Endangered Lands Program, and I'll be serving on their education committee. This is an article, the headline there is an article that I brought you in April. However, that ruling was appealed, and the appeal uh lost. And so we have a septic moratorium that will go into effect
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:21:28–04:21:36 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:21:55–04:22:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
what it means is that conventional septic will no longer be allowed. So if I have with my convection conventional um system if it has a breakdown, I will have to go to an advanced system. Now, the last time we discussed this, we had some people get up and talk about they had advanced sewer and um in fact, those were some of my neighbors, and I happen to ‸ know that they have what is a certified NSF 40 system. Now, that does not, um they have those systems, we're required to have those systems, when those homes were built, into the bluff on the Indian River Lagoon. That was a requirement at that time. They
uh the oxygen demand, the the uh total suspended solids, but did not address nitrogen. So those systems are going to have to be replaced as well. Just putting that on your radar screen and pointing out this map again, which in this is
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:23:37–04:23:37 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
part of the North Indian River Lagoon, which is affected by this. All of the purple are where the septic are, and you see that it's mostly in that in that area north of Dixon. um But we have some spots in probably, uh what's probably District
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:24:00–04:24:00 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:24:01–04:24:01 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: a language review questioned the wording; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:24:16–04:24:22 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
is monies available um that would help them get on to almost pay in full, getting on to the sewage. Of course, they would then they would have a sewage bill. But nonetheless, if they end up having to go to an advanced system, which eventually they will, um well, this would be a way to prevent that, to to get in front of that and have it paid for. um So anyway, that's that's the update there.
that is set for July 18th. um And I remember‸ this morning when I started going over this, that at the last meeting we had requested that the utilities advisory board be put on the agenda. And we've missed this agenda. So do I need a motion or can we just, I requested it be on the agenda and I think uh Deputy Mayor yeah supported that. um Can we get that on the agenda? Can I get a commitment on that? there are a lot of water issues our utility
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:25:33–04:25:42 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
transparency gives the public more of an opportunity i think particularly with all the issues that we face in this regard it would be a good thing to have in place this council never voted to stop that advisory board. It just stopped meeting. The meeting stopped being called. And as I understand it is a policy decision whether we have these boards or not, right? I mean it, um
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:25–04:26:28 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words only one machine reading has (possibly not said) · 04:26:46–04:26:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:26:56–04:26:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
I'm gonna ‸ I'm gonna ‸ start with the, with the story that was in the paper, which I showed all of you. And I still say we need a retraction and find out why they called us
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:27:12–04:27:20 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:27:28–04:27:29 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
get it. So anyway, but I will say the mayor and I look like bookends. And so you look at that picture, but that was in the Florida today over the, and again, thank you to Orlando health for that. That was awesome. um I'm going to show a few pictures. This is uh
Flag: the machine readings disagree here; numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:27:50–04:27:51 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Tavern in New York city. And on that balcony is where George Washington gave his first inaugural address. The building was built in 1719 and you can eat in there today. It's
And so to walk those streets to know, oh Hamilton, Alexander Hamilton ate his last meal before the duel there too. um My daughter, my granddaughter, huge Hamilton fan. We, I took her to see Hamilton on Broadway, but we also went to
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:28:54–04:28:58 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:28:59–04:29:03 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and then yes exactly and this was my pictures from the stage which I mean huge crowd. Obviously the rain kept some people away but then this was from when we went out to sit looking back at the stage that
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:29:16–04:29:19 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
had to do it because the sound board was under there in case it rained and of course I have to get two of my cute granddaughters in the picture and fireworks ‸ were absolutely fabulous. um One quick thing. Do we have any update on the Cocoa Conservation Area? Do we know when we're going to get that back a report back from the from the staff?
I know from Diamond Square that went um to the county commission meeting also community members that showed up in uh kind of a I guess the last couple ‸ days they found out about an agenda item. um but we had a pretty good showing Tracy
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:30:17–04:30:18 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
and some others. um Mr. Larry Brown representative Brown um showed up to the the commission meeting and it was good even though I think it was going to end up favorably anyway but it's good to show that the community showed up and show that they care about our CRAs. um this is the again the uh
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:30:37–04:30:39 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; a language review questioned the wording · 04:30:39–04:30:47 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:30:52–04:30:59 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: words were replaced by a machine repair · 04:31:02–04:31:02 · machine repair: words replaced where two further machine readings agreed (not checked by a person)
the community um birth control and all these different things that they ‸ do they do a whole lot that I didn't know about um well I told them I was gonna ‸ put them on a report today.
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:31:35–04:31:35 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings · 04:31:46–04:31:50 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
Flag: numbers, amounts, negation or names differ between the machine readings; the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 04:32:04–04:32:09 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording
thank you for participating um in your civic duty, expressing your concerns and your right about local government, because it's the best form of government, because it's the closest form of government to the people. So I thank you for your commitment and dedication. thank you
Flag: the recognizer flagged its own output; a language review questioned the wording · 04:32:35–04:32:45 · unresolved: the words are not shown (unclear audio); listen to the recording